Knowledge

:Article Feedback Tool/Version 5/Feedback evaluation - Knowledge

Source 📝

218:, refers to the process of evaluating and categorizing items by hand (and with human eyes), as opposed to using a computer or other machine to do the work. Hand-coding is often used when human judgement is necessary in order to perform a proper evaluation. In the case of feedback received via AFTv5, a computer algorithm is insufficient for determining the usefulness, so volunteer Wikipedians will need to perform the evaluation manually. Therefore, the Feedback Evaluation System (described below) has been constructed to make the process of manually categorizing AFTv5 feedback quick and easy. 160: 306: 362: 35: 282: 385: 172: 406:
This question is a judgement call that Wikipedians will be the most qualified individuals to answer. Here, volunteers should use their best judgement, but think broadly of the possible usefulness of feedback to any editors. It is only the most entirely useless feedback that should be categorized as
380:
When the FES interface first loads, the next available feedback item will automatically be loaded into the Feedback form. The revision of the article at which the feedback was submitted will be loaded into the article pane. When the user completes the form and saves the evaluation, the feedback
585:
to get an introduction to the FES system and make sure that his/her questions are answered. A volunteer will then be provided with a link to FES that will load around 30 minutes worth of work into FES. Once a volunteer has evaluated the provided feedback items, he/she may request another set of
419:, Wikipedians tend to have a keen eye for the likely intentions of others. Volunteers should take the feedback in the context of the article and try to express the likely intentions of the user who left the feedback. Many of the possible intentions can be selected, or none if none apply. 198:. This page summarizes the technical details and usage instructions of the Feedback Evaluation System (FES), a web interface that volunteer Wikipedians will use to evaluate the quality of feedback received via different versions of the 352:
Any feedback item can be selected (whether completed or available) to be loaded into the feedback form by clicking on it. The feedback item can then be updated by changing the values in the feedback form and clicking "save" again.
289:
The horizontal bars in the two feedback items lists represent an individual feedback items that have been randomly selected for evaluation. The information included for each feedback items includes:
395: 381:
item will automatically be moved from the available list to the completed list with an updated set of icons and the next available feedback item will be loaded into the form.
133: 258:
These two lists surround the Feedback form and represent the feedback items that a volunteer has been asked to evaluate. When the interface first loads, the
376:
Evaluation form: a header containing information about the feedback item (id & page title), the feedback itself, and two questions about the feedback.
202:
feedback form. This result of this evaluation will help make the decision about which feedback form will be included in the final AFTv5 deployment.
556: 93: 123: 118: 191: 181: 88: 21: 113: 205: 108: 138: 266:
on the top should be empty. As a volunteer evaluates feedback using the interface, the feedback items will move from the
598: 253: 103: 17: 432:
The following users have volunteered to use FES to help evaluate the usefulness of feedback generated by AFT5:
98: 299:
This is the page that will be loaded into the feedback form's article pane when the feedback item is selected.
148: 128: 407:"no" (not useful). Additionally, feedback items where the evaluation is unclear can be marked as "unsure". 373:
Article pane: a scroll-able pane containing the content of the article at the time that feedback was posted
392:
The two questions in the form include helpful tooltips which can be access by moving the mouse over the
81: 226:
FES is designed to quickly organize the information necessary for evaluating feedback into a coherent
221: 194:(AFTv5), the feedback produced by each of the proposed interface widgets will need to be judged for 356: 227: 410: 313:
For items that have already been evaluated, icons which summarize the evaluation are included:
143: 516: 215: 8: 561: 491: 451: 526: 481: 62: 54: 42: 34: 401: 582: 511: 441: 369:
The feedback form is the main mechanism of FES. The form consists of two components:
536: 501: 476: 578: 546: 506: 496: 436: 285:
Information provided in the lists for all feedback items (id, title, username).
199: 180:
A process and tool for evaluating the usefulness of feedback generated by the
592: 466: 456: 416: 566: 541: 521: 577:
Each volunteer who adds their username above will be contacted by either
572: 531: 486: 446: 551: 388:
Help tooltip for "What is the intent" is extended in the feedback form.
305: 394: 281: 159: 461: 427: 471: 422: 296:
Title: the title of the page for which the feedback was submitted
384: 361: 214:
be asked to do any computer programming. "Hand-coding", in
48:
AFT5 was removed from all Wikimedia wikis on March 3, 2014.
237:: A list of feedback items that have been evaluated (coded) 243:: A web form that will capture the volunteers evaluation. 163:
The Feedback Evaluation System with components labelled.
41:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
317:which categories did the feedback item belong to? 309:Information provided for completed feedback items 590: 249:: A list of feedback items that need evaluation. 230:. The system breaks down to three major parts: 278:is empty, the assigned set has been completed. 210:Although it may sound like it, volunteers will 415:Although it is a necessity in Knowledge to 383: 360: 304: 293:Id: the internal id of the feedback item 280: 158: 14: 591: 190:As part of the first phase of testing 262:on the bottom should be full and the 166: 74: 29: 27: 206:What do you mean by "hand-coding"? 28: 610: 393: 170: 33: 18:Knowledge:Article Feedback Tool 222:The Feedback Evaluation System 13: 1: 134:Feedback Response Guidelines 7: 10: 615: 52: 340:was the feedback useful? 228:graphical user interface 192:Article Feedback Tool v5 182:Article Feedback Tool v5 178:This page in a nutshell: 599:Inactive project pages 389: 366: 310: 286: 164: 387: 364: 308: 284: 162: 139:Monitors' Noticeboard 254:Feedback items lists 216:qualitative research 99:Walkthrough Tutorial 129:Feedback Guidelines 586:items to work on. 411:What's the intent? 390: 367: 311: 287: 165: 417:assume good faith 365:The Feedback Form 188: 187: 157: 156: 73: 72: 606: 517:Martijn Hoekstra 397: 174: 173: 167: 119:Oversighter Help 82:Article Feedback 75: 65: 49: 37: 30: 614: 613: 609: 608: 607: 605: 604: 603: 589: 588: 575: 430: 425: 413: 404: 402:Is this useful? 359: 256: 224: 208: 171: 153: 84: 69: 68: 61: 57: 47: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 612: 602: 601: 574: 571: 570: 569: 564: 562:MathewTownsend 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 492:GorillaWarfare 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 464: 459: 454: 452:Fabrice Florin 449: 444: 439: 429: 426: 424: 421: 412: 409: 403: 400: 378: 377: 374: 358: 355: 350: 349: 348: 347: 344: 338: 337: 336: 335:irrelevant (?) 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 320:suggestion (s) 303: 302: 301: 300: 294: 276:available list 272:completed list 268:available list 264:completed list 260:available list 255: 252: 251: 250: 247:Available list 244: 238: 235:Completed list 223: 220: 207: 204: 186: 185: 184:is summarized. 175: 155: 154: 152: 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 126: 124:AFT5 Talk page 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 85: 80: 78: 71: 70: 67: 66: 58: 53: 50: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 611: 600: 597: 596: 594: 587: 584: 580: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 527:Sven Manguard 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 482:Thehelpfulone 480: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 434: 433: 420: 418: 408: 399: 396: 386: 382: 375: 372: 371: 370: 363: 357:Feedback form 354: 345: 342: 341: 339: 334: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 318: 316: 315: 314: 307: 298: 297: 295: 292: 291: 290: 283: 279: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 248: 245: 242: 241:Feedback form 239: 236: 233: 232: 231: 229: 219: 217: 213: 203: 201: 197: 193: 183: 179: 176: 169: 168: 161: 150: 147: 145: 144:AFT5 Research 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130: 127: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 89:AFT5 Overview 87: 86: 83: 79: 77: 76: 64: 60: 59: 56: 51: 46: 44: 39: 36: 32: 31: 23: 19: 583:Okeyes (WMF) 576: 512:salimfadhley 442:Okeyes (WMF) 431: 423:Volunteering 414: 405: 391: 379: 368: 351: 323:question (q) 312: 288: 275: 274:. Once the 271: 267: 263: 259: 257: 246: 240: 234: 225: 211: 209: 195: 189: 177: 114:Monitor Help 40: 537:Josh Parris 502:kgorman-ucb 109:Editor Help 104:Reader Help 477:Tom Morris 329:praise (p) 196:usefulness 94:Video Tour 45:reference. 43:historical 579:EpochFail 573:Procedure 557:Tomtomn00 547:Whiteguru 507:Ajraddatz 497:PimRijkee 437:EpochFail 343:"yes" (✓) 332:abuse (!) 326:issue (i) 22:Version 5 593:Category 467:Dcoetzee 457:Looie496 346:"no" (✗) 149:AFT5 Hub 55:Shortcut 20:‎ | 567:protonk 542:Osarius 522:Sceptre 428:Sign-up 270:to the 532:VQuakr 487:Narson 447:DarTar 398:icon. 63:WP:AFT 552:Frood 200:AFTv5 16:< 462:Utar 581:or 472:FT2 212:not 595::

Index

Knowledge:Article Feedback Tool
Version 5

historical
Shortcut
WP:AFT
Article Feedback
AFT5 Overview
Video Tour
Walkthrough Tutorial
Reader Help
Editor Help
Monitor Help
Oversighter Help
AFT5 Talk page
Feedback Guidelines
Feedback Response Guidelines
Monitors' Noticeboard
AFT5 Research
AFT5 Hub

Article Feedback Tool v5
Article Feedback Tool v5
AFTv5
qualitative research
graphical user interface



Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.