Knowledge

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements/Fritzpoll - Knowledge

Source 📝

85:
produced by the other parties. I would like to see a clear scope explicitly defined for all cases when they are accepted. Clerks would be empowered to remove evidence that does not speak directly to the scope of the case, and the scope could be expanded if necessary. This would require consent of the entire group, but it is something that I will push for to improve efficiency and accessibility, as well as removing obfuscation. I will be engaging in “active” arbitration by asking direct questions, requesting specific diffs and making sure that relevant points in a case come to light so that the Committee can determine the facts of a case rather than relying on interpretations and slants imposed on evidence by the various sides of a dispute.
246: 73:
Arbitration should try to resolve issues to the benefit of the encyclopaedia - it is not about punishment, but should instead typically be about restoring a collegial collaborative environment so that editors can focus less on disputes and more on the production of encyclopaedic content. This will
58:
I have been involved in trying to resolve disputes of various types from shouting matches at certain project pages, increasingly heated disputes between users and other problems I occasionally encounter during my wanderings through Knowledge. I was appointed as one of three referees in the recent
84:
I think some cases in the past have lacked focus – reams of evidence were produced to speak generally to the charge that some editor is “bad” or “good” and new areas of behaviour to be examined are introduced at random points throughout the arbitration process, requiring yet more evidence to be
299: 289: 309: 303: 293: 313: 21: 78:
are not a goal of arbitration. As an arbitrator, I would not hesitate to impose sanctions, but they must improve the collaborative environment that we strive to create on Knowledge.
151: 268: 334: 17: 74:
often involve sanctioning individual editors, and administrators should in particular be scrutinised if there is evidence of impropriety, but sanctions
261: 173: 157: 254: 197: 165: 189: 103: 41: 181: 143: 135: 221: 227: 207: 215: 67:
that we produced has resulted in greater stability for the editors in that part of Knowledge.
233: 127: 8: 97: 45: 119: 111: 49: 276: 64: 60: 190: 158: 198: 166: 281: 93: 31: 328: 174: 245: 182: 52:
and have edited various other articles, guidelines and policies.
30: 18:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009
112: 326: 104: 335:Knowledge Arbitration Committee Candidates 2009 56:What have I done that is relevant to this role? 128: 262: 208: 71:What do I think the point of arbitration is? 144: 136: 269: 255: 120: 14: 327: 240: 277:Arbitration Committee Election 2009 27: 28: 346: 244: 92: 38:What have I done on Knowledge? 13: 1: 82:What would I do differently? 7: 300:Questions for the candidate 10: 351: 61:Macedonia naming dispute 48:, helped establish the 310:Discuss this candidate 22:Candidate statements 290:Candidate statement 323: 322: 50:Article Incubator 44:, contributed to 342: 271: 264: 257: 248: 241: 237: 210: 200: 192: 184: 176: 168: 160: 146: 138: 130: 122: 114: 106: 76:in of themselves 350: 349: 345: 344: 343: 341: 340: 339: 325: 324: 319: 275: 203: 40:I have written 35: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 348: 338: 337: 321: 320: 318: 317: 307: 297: 286: 285: 274: 273: 266: 259: 251: 249: 239: 238: 202: 88: 65:the resolution 34: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 347: 336: 333: 332: 330: 315: 311: 308: 305: 301: 298: 295: 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 278: 272: 267: 265: 260: 258: 253: 252: 250: 247: 243: 242: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 206: 201: 196: 193: 188: 185: 180: 177: 172: 169: 164: 161: 156: 153: 150: 147: 142: 139: 134: 131: 126: 123: 118: 115: 110: 107: 102: 99: 95: 91: 90: 89: 86: 83: 79: 77: 72: 68: 66: 62: 57: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 33: 23: 19: 280: 230: 224: 218: 212: 204: 194: 186: 178: 170: 162: 154: 148: 140: 132: 124: 116: 108: 100: 87: 81: 80: 75: 70: 69: 55: 54: 37: 36: 279:candidate: 129:target logs 282:Fritzpoll 228:deletions 191:checkuser 137:block log 94:Fritzpoll 32:Fritzpoll 329:Category 222:protects 105:contribs 20:‎ | 46:another 314:create 304:create 294:create 216:blocks 209:rights 234:moves 199:socks 113:count 42:an FA 16:< 152:rfas 121:logs 98:talk 63:and 183:lta 175:rfc 167:arb 159:rfb 331:: 145:lu 316:) 312:( 306:) 302:( 296:) 292:( 270:e 263:t 256:v 236:) 231:· 225:· 219:· 213:· 205:· 195:· 187:· 179:· 171:· 163:· 155:· 149:· 141:· 133:· 125:· 117:· 109:· 101:· 96:(

Index

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009
Candidate statements
Fritzpoll
an FA
another
Article Incubator
Macedonia naming dispute
the resolution
Fritzpoll
talk
contribs
count
logs
target logs
block log
lu
rfas
rfb
arb
rfc
lta
checkuser
socks
rights
blocks
protects
deletions
moves

v

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.