Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Evidence

2786: 3262: 43: 198: 2546:... and there is no policy or guideline that would expect or require them to participate, and considering that Arbcom had stopped reasonable critical ANI discussion by the Knowledge community in its tracks by accepting this case so it would be incredibly stupid for Rama to keep on making casual remarks without putting on an Arbcom level nitpicker resistant wikilawyer hat first, this is clearly evidence of ... literally nothing. 2339:

credited of the work at ORNL. The story is then enriched by 11 PR docs emitted in a PR context (75th anniversary, YMCA, outreach) 14,18,19,06,11,22,21,20,24,23,25 where Phelps is only one of the many... and the focus is not Te297. Therefore we don't have 30 solid references, but a fake reference list, in the style. Page numbers (or time for a video) are never given: characteristic behavior.

1014:(in April) was speedy closed after 9 hours. It had two keep !votes and one userfy vote, plus my request for undeletion of the first article so it could be compared to the recreated article before !voting. The second AfD was started by the same editor as the first AfD and closed by the same admin, who salted the article. 2618:(Yet to find the evidence) The allegations published on this page of "Rama's comment is either filled with their own racism and misogyny or their excuses are simply false" appears to have been accepted as fact, but I am unable to find any evidence in Rama's contributions. Correction, the allegations have been 1529:. At that time, any such "damage" would already have been done, so bringing this up at the appropriate venue would not have made a difference in this regard. In fact, by acting in this way, they hurt their cause because acting unilaterally is the opposite of allowing Knowledge to "correct its mistakes". 3089:

That Rama has a strongly held belief is not relevant. That they used their tools to act on those beliefs, that they refused to reverse or reconsider their actions when it became apparent that it was controversial, and that they repeatedly cast aspersions against Wikipedians (ongoing), however, is. It

2869:

It seems to me quite impossible for Rama to prove their good faith: they acted in some way which may or may not have been correct, but was given no opportunity to consider the circumstances or reverse their actions. This is critical as the scope is strictly limited to the actions of the accused: they

2799:

The overall effect (deletion of women and people of colour, attempts to stall initiatives that promote diversity, inhibiting prominent women contributors) seems targeted. If the Knowledge community was as impartial as claimed, this kind of behaviour would not occur often enough to be noticed. In this

2338:

Asserting there were is simply shameful. These 25 references were listed and commented at , refer to the corresponding . The Navy documents (7,8) don't ever mention Phelps. The ORNL documents about Te237 discovery (10,13,15,16) don't ever mention Phelps, and she is not on the photo of the team of 50

1353:

Troutman opted to delete Phelps whilst !voting for the deprecation of the SNG. DGG asked for heightened restriction of PORNBIO whilst opting for deletion of Phelps and later, even restored it. Two/three others opted for deleting Phelps and keeping the SNG. In short, there's not much of a co-relation.

769:

I thought it was a unfortunate incident that needed a little nudge and would solve itself when the editors involved would be informed that they were making Knowledge look like a haven for Gamergate-style bullying and misogny; instead, I seem to have upset a hornet nest of people very much undisturbed

758:

I think an administrator should clearly separate their administrative and editorial actions, which is obviously easier when one is indifferent to the subject ... In this particular instance, I do not feel personally passionate about the subject, I merely acted in what I perceived to be an opportunity

2039:

Citing the subject's employer's PR - a non-independent source - is not a solid reference. Furthermore, Rama asserted that sources (from the US navy) that did not even mention the subject established notability. This is clearly dismissed in the AfD discussion, as well as being rather basic in regards

1375:

Rama is cherry-picking favorable opinions and presenting them in a light of being a trademarked truth whilst (again) failing to recognize the (lack of) consensus notwithstanding some blatant mistruths. He's once again blaming the overall circumstances to be targeted and intentionally misogynistic.

2603:

there are patterns of selective enforcement. Knowledge does suffer from systemic bias and even if that boils down to the known fact that in the sample space of reliable sources, they suffer from selective bias, that still means that enforcement of notability criteria is problematic. There has been

1850:

Inevitably, a desysopping here would be described off-wiki as "next, English Knowledge's highest authority removed an administrator as punishment for seeking to rescue this article." There can be little doubt that such an addition to the narrative would, unhelpfully, further compound the notoriety

1464:

despite knowing well that established processes exist to address mistakes made in deletion-related discussions. It's clear that a) Rama had no interest in actually arguing in favor of overturning the deletion (by admitting that they would not have done anything if they couldn't have done what they

1165:

proposed a motion that sought to make his previous conduct difficult to scrutinize. As much as I agree with the probable motivations to prevent a slug-fest, where every user who has been the subject of borderline controversial treatment from Rama chooses to pile on, I guess that we won't have any

2696:

Phelps' biography counted 28 references when I found it deleted for lack of notability — not only unusual, but unprecedented in my 16-year experience. It highlights a combination of factors loaded with political significance: the subject of the biography is an African-American woman; its author,

1078:

Administrators are (supposed to be) vehicles by which Community consensus, be it via discussion or agreed policy or guideline, is enacted and not its interpretors. I have been able to review the ANI discussion as an observer only, and have come to the conclusion that Rama does not understand the

2810:

The events I have described are exceptional or atypical of natural Knowledge patterns. In destroying valuable content, driving excellent editors away and harming the public image of Knowledge, they are contrary to its interests. Thus, it cannot have been unreasonable to suspect an exceptional

2775:

The artificial nature of the events unfolding on the English-speaking Knowledge is also apparent when contrasted with other Wikimedia projects: on 4 May 2019, Clarice Phelps was featured on the front page of Wikidata (see screenshot), and there were biographies about her on three Wikipedias,

1800:

with Rama's interpretation, but given the evidence that was available to Rama at the time of Rama's attempt to restore the article, it was not beyond admin discretion to interpret that there had been a sufficiently significant change of circumstances that a change of course was justifiable.

2397:), and not having specifically informed Rama of it (which isn't in the instructions, but probably should have been done anyway). The former isn't at all uncommon—I end up tagging the AFDs in probably around half of submitted DRVs, though usually I'm able to do so in a more timely manner. — 1291:

David Eppstein is not a RS for asserting such details and his off-hand research is statistically meaningless for the above purpose, unless we can assert that the chosen sample is of near-similar quality or have near-similar referencing, as a control. (The Arxiv research chooses to exploit

2016:). Each source present at the time of the AfD was analyzed in terms of Knowledge guidelines. Specifically ORNL (Oak Ridge) is dismissed as non-independent PR by the subject's employer on their website. The US navy (recruitment PR) is dismissed since it doesn't mention Phelps at all - " 1882:

The existence of 2 AFDs and a DRV should have made it obvious to Rama that restoring this article would not be uncontroversial. As pointed out by Black Kite and SoWhy above (and whose evidence sections I fully endorse), Rama restored the Clarice Phelps article without consulting the

803:

I think the phrase we reach for here is "when you're in a hole, stop digging". If Rama had immediately, when called out on their behaviour, admitted they were wrong, this wouldn't even have got to ArbCom. But equally, this clearly isn't conduct conducive to being an administrator.

3620:

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.

3041: 1920:.) This was not the case here, there was no risk of harm to any individual person or to the project that required skipping the usual processes. The existence of new evidence that may or may not prove that a subject is notable is not a reason to claim that there is an emergency. 2533:). These types of repeated narrative which encourage the policing of any Wikipedian's off-wiki social media accounts actively damage Knowledge. Arbcom could usefully rule on whether promoting the policing of real life social media accounts is "evidence" or "conspiracy theory". 1951: 1813: 2713:

Knowledge has biographies on scientists with significant academic achievements, but who are little known to the general public. Such biographies on white male scientists do not come under the sort of scrutiny that Phelps' biography endured, even when they have far fewer

1605: 1981: 675: 3629:

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.

1547: 1824:

This is a hasty request created literally 2 hours after the undeletion action by a requester that has done nothing to engage participants apart from issuing notices nor had the procedural based discussion at ANI precisely focused on this undeletion been

817:

Rama should not have access to admin tools if this is how they're going to use them. Having said that, removing their tools would not be any big deal anyway, as they have hardly used them to the benefit of the encyclopedia in the last 8+ years anyway.

2643:). Arguments that procedures must be followed blindly are flawed: Knowledge is not a test of unquestioning loyalty where doing evil would be preferred to interpreting rules. Of course we have process, but above all we do what is just and reasonable ( 2027: 3350:

which you should withdraw; I merely told them—twice—the likely unintended consequence of their actions as I would any inexperienced editor. It is a shame, but maybe unsurprising in the circumstances, that while complaining of a supposed lack of

1784:

Therefore, when Rama restore the article on 29 April, what he would have understood was that nothing had happened to Knowledge's coverage of Clarice Phelps since 4 April. Noting that most of the independent media coverage about Phelps occurred

3390: 2654:

To decide that my action was unjustifiable, one must prove that I could not have reasonably suspected something unusual and contrary to the interests of Knowledge was happening. I will prove that there was in fact good reason to suspect so.

1468: 3066: 2559:

Rama did not say they were reliable sources, or critical proof of notability, only that given nearly 30 references from what appear to be real institutions the deletion was unusual and was bad optics. Those are reasonable observations to

1568:, indicating that they believed that no further references were required to establish the subject's notability and they thus did not act because of new information but because they believed the old information was judged incorrectly ( 1869: 1552:

It has been brought up by others (although not by Rama itself) that new information that emerged after the 4 April deletion might have prompted Rama to restore the article because notability were to be assessed differently (see

1275:

Many over the Arb-Case (GAB, Lectonar, Fram, SoWhy, BKite, Nick, Alan et al) supported some sanction but did not participate in the 2 AfDs. Carrite asked for the article to be kept over the 1st AfD but asked for your desysop.

1166:

similar problem. We are talking about a sysop who did not hold the mop, for all practical purposes, since his last massive breach of trust and this AfD saga. (From 2011 to this day, Rama has taken around 30 logged actions).

2873: 1879:

administrative actions should not be reversed without good cause, careful thought, and (if likely to be objected to), where the administrator is presently available, a brief discussion with the administrator whose action is

1793:), a reasonable admin could have deduced that there had been a significant change of circumstances between 4 April and 29 April, and therefore the prior deletion consensus should no longer be treated as a binding precedent. 3051:. They could have reversed this situation at any point, even when it was submitted at Arbcom. To suggest they had no opportunity to rectify the situation and re-instill confidence in their abilities as an admin is untrue. 2726:

Within the span on a single week, four other articles authored by Jesswade88 were nominated for deletion. This resulted in overwhelming support for keeping three of the articles, their DRs closing with explicit mention to

2060: 1827:. An arbitration case may well be justified in this case to look at Rama's past sysop actions in general, but the filing of this case actually inflamed last week's events and prevented an amicable resolution via ANI. 3395:

A number of assertions above deal with the possibility that the Arbcom case request was launched prematurely. Although the request was launched just over two hours after Rama restored the page to mainspace, Rama had

3073:

I understand that this disregards the previous Deletion Requests, but doing otherwise would amount to a dismissive and defiant "Knowledge is not for Social Justice" attitude, which would be irresponsible and deeply

3313:. Your "evidence", such as it is, does not and may be removed. It could, therefore, also be seen "as an example of unacceptable behaviour"; as you yourself point out, "making accusations is not a zero sum game"... 1068:

Unilaterally making obviously incorrect decisions in a collaborative project and defying consensus with very little rationale except for his own judgment that has been brought into question time and time again is

2550: 1520: 693: 1834: 3060: 1808: 839:

a reasonable admin could have deduced that there had been a significant change of circumstances between 4 April and 29 April, and therefore the prior deletion consensus should no longer be treated as a binding

1519:), the article had been deleted twice by 4 April with the deletion reason clearly logged and visible for any admin viewing the page. The deletion was already covered in news sources well before 29 April (see 1095:

Rama's statement at the RFC pointed fingers at others and claimed that some user was not competent et al and precisely none supported his views. His rebut to the original statement was not supported, either.

1292:

h-index/net-cite-count, in a quasi-similar regard). It might be very plausible that we create more low-quality female bios, which may not be surprising in light of the massive propagation of the 18% figure.

3600: 1595: 1317:

Post-fact explanation that (probably) seeks to assert that he was right and the community was (again) wrong as to the Phelps issue, by citing arguments from entirely unrelated AfDs with grossly dissimilar

2528:

It has also been implied that in some peculiar way, suffered from bias because they follow people on twitter, and Rama mentioned it was an embarrassment for Knowledge recognizing the "real world" impact

2870:

pressed a button, and almost instantly after found themselves in front of the ArbCom. And as per the link above, the users demanding arbitration actually believe Rama acted in good faith, if foolishly.

1532: 1008:

was endorsed, but had !votes like "sad endorse" or "reluctant endorse", and comments that while a delete close was within discretion, a no-consensus or keep close would also have been within discretion.

1169:

Back over the T-Ban ANI, he had the fundamental inability to understand that his actions were blatant transgressions of community consensus and pointed to some imaginary support, which led Xeno to ask

3099: 2595:"suspiciously selective enforcement of notability criteria", well Rama has hardly been the first to believe there are systemic selective enforcement norms, compare with the concerns raised this week 1139: 796:

In this case, English Knowledge seems not just to reflect outside racism and misogyny, but to actively enforce one of its own ... Arbitrators should therefore rule in my favour on Good Faith grounds

2658:

The deletion of Phelps' biography turned out not to be an isolated event, but the first in a string of incidents involving the same group of editors: this Arbitration; several Deletion Requests —

3355:

being shown to Rama here, you show as much to me. I would have thought it was clear (as it was to me at the time) that—far from being a threat—this was useful and perhaps even beneficial advice;

2811:

dysfunction. Arbitrators should therefore rule in my favour on Good Faith grounds — and the community should work together to encourage more diversity in its articles and among its contributors.

1995: 1614:

set of community decision and administrative action. However, when Rama restored the Clarice Phelps article on 29 April, only the following deletion log entries would have been visible to Rama:

714:

page since 2009, and hadn't deleted one (apart from G6 maintenance and obvious R3 errors) since 2012. This suggests that they may not be up-to-date with community norms regarding their position

1249:

The deletion of Phelps' biography turned out not to be an isolated event, but the first in a string of incidents involving the same group of editors: this Arbitration; several Deletion Requests

3222:

from around 30 minutes later. They probably had the article watchlisted from the previous incarnation, as I did, but even if not I don't think I'd describe them as part of a "foreign army"! -

2847: 869: 2945: 3015:. Of the two that I can relate to politics, both are easily proven. The other two I can't make fit into any definition of politics. I did note Fae's comment (veiled threat) elsewhere that 2245: 782:

I am clearly and obviously at fault for bypassing the restoration rules, while simultaneously being obviously right because of WP:IAR, and many of my detractors arguably fall under WP:LW

780:

Rama still believes they're right, even after this, and that they can invoke IAR even against consensus (and here's another attack against those who think the article should be deleted)

3379: 2608:, and despite perceptions statistical bias might be marginal, but this has yet to be published by WiR or friends. In the meantime, Rama's observation of current patterns is just that. 3268:

I have removed this evidence submission, which dealt with content issues outside the scope of this case. This is an action by an arbitrator that should not be reversed except on

1839: 1268:

People who supported deletion of Phelps over the two AfD/DRV, have objected in some of the four AFDs. (Icewhiz, Nateurium et al) I, for one, had opposed restoring Phelps but had

1106: 2599:

where AfDs have been created because of paying special attention to a member of the WiR project (based on reading the statement by the creator of those deletions), consequently

2268: 2005: 1664: 1011: 573: 103: 1697:

created page Clarice Phelps (recreated page that was deleted. I really want this to stay up, so please advise where I need to improve instead of just nominating for deletion.)

1239: 928: 3200: 2619: 1434: 798: 3036: 2723:

disruptions. Likewise, it is easy to find stubs about pornographic actresses. The overall effect of confining women to stereotypical gender roles needs not be underlined.

1859: 944: 419: 3104: 2281:. Remark: evaluating the quality of such a lip service would have been outside the remit of this ArbCom case. But the lack of even that lip service is inside this remit. 1991:"An article with nearly 30 references by solid institutions (US Navy, Oak Ridge) being deleted in such a way is a very unusual occurrence (I have never seen this before)" 1515:

With all due respect to the subject of the article, there was no need for immediate restoration of the article, bypassing the established processes. As Amakuru outlined (

3083:

The overall effect (deletion of women and people of colour, attempts to stall initiatives that promote diversity, inhibiting prominent women contributors) seems targeted

2479:

There are lots of assertions made here so weak as to be laughable, if it were not worrying that they appear to be cherry picking to make allegations that seriously fail

2300:

A Knowledge admin is supposed to act on behalf of the community that granted them their status. User:Rama has stated in many places that Rama's actions were dictated by

993: 3254: 2952:

in the light of the language of the unsupported dismissive allegations of "politics and social justice", "shooting yourself", "discrimination", "commander-in-chief" ...

1928: 950: 1056:

An admin should not edit-war over their viewpoint with others and certainly should not do re-add speedy deletion tags after multiple admins have declined to delete it.

456: 288: 98: 3177: 3004:... but unlike you I don't behave like commander-in-chief of Knowledge and so accept that others will have different views and that a consensus will form accordingly 858: 822: 1781:

above) because these occurred at a different title, "Clarice E. Phelps", and none of the AfD and DRVs above had been updated to refer to the events of 26-27 April.

1295:

The Arxiv piece does not say anything to this effect of greater scrutiny. (There's a difference between studying the differential (male-female) rates of bios being

3405: 1444: 808: 3568: 3566: 2631:

Knowledge has a considerable corpus of rules, with a hierarchy of norms, including rules about bypassing the usual procedures in exceptional or clear-cut cases (

2453:), or to unlinked mentions such as "refbombed" or "source bombing". Most examples hover around the 20-ref mark, but ten minutes' searching of closed AFDs found 221: 51:

Any further edits made to this page may be reverted by an arbitrator or arbitration clerk without discussion. If you need to edit or modify this page, please go

2756:

and were seen as disruptive enough to be reported on the Administrators' noticeboard. These events give a new perspective on the deletion of Phelps’ biography.

1437:). Of those uses, 27 were deletions or restorations, almost all of them maintenance-related. In the same time (actually, since 2009), they only participated in 1430: 3293: 2937:

As an aside, the evidence removed by the clerk, coupled with the excerpt I have given indicate coordination. I was under the impression this was frowned upon.

2424: 92: 81: 52: 1420: 1410: 1392: 1005: 2506:

show that Rama was not very active. That's all they show, it is not proof of saving the world. Rama's motivations need more proof than bad faith speculation.

2401: 2369: 1338:

Likewise, it is easy to find stubs about pornographic actresses. The overall effect of confining women to stereotypical gender roles needs not be underlined.

1028: 450: 2769: 2556: 1986: 787: 773: 761: 3341: 3287: 3205:

Off-wiki, at the same time (3 May), the Twitter account whose tweet had made me aware of the incident in the first place went private « due to harassment »

2382: 1287:

Such biographies on white male scientists do not come under the sort of scrutiny that Phelps' biography endured, even when they have far fewer references.

2671: 1523:). At the time of Rama's actions, there was no emergency situation that required them or anyone else to unilaterally restore the article in question to 2698: 1369:

The last time I checked, the sister projects (and even other language versions) were editorially independent. Why shall you compare apples and oranges?

2837: 2820: 2510: 2311: 1215:

Phelps' biography counted 28 references when I found it deleted for lack of notability — not only unusual, but unprecedented in my 16-year experience.

1203: 3385: 3236: 1561: 1537: 1477: 1450: 414: 87: 3333: 2751: 2749: 2747: 1465:

did) and b) believes that their own opinion is sufficient grounds to restore an article where deletion has been previously been decided and upheld.

2492: 2454: 2234:

The admin line comes from by removing the moved/created/uploaded lines. The figures for 2011-2019 seem so low that I have perhaps missed something

446: 242: 234: 2826: 2679: 1017: 2983:

discrimination: Who did I say was being discriminated against? Nobody. The allegation is from Jarvis, in the undark article, and from Rama (e.g.

2700: 2573:

Rama stated "you are also letting far-Right talking point slip", which in the light of the language of the unsupported dismissive allegations of

2295: 1379:

In short, it's the 2010 saga and IDHT behaviour. He did not understand consensus, do not understand consensus and will not understand consensus.

988: 2537: 2394: 962: 2458: 2014:" many of the sources don't mention the subject, mention the subject in passing, aren't reliable, aren't independent, or a combination thereof" 2001: 1728: 1526:

avoid making Knowledge look indifferent, incapable of correcting its mistakes, or even militant in its invisibilisation of women and minorities

1365:

The artificial nature of the events unfolding on the English-speaking Knowledge is also apparent when contrasted with other Wikimedia projects.

1208: 559: 555: 2856:

personally. I know he acted in good faith, but this cannot be proven in what seems to me quite an unjust set-up, as I will try to show below.

2612: 1510: 1357:

There's no hidden agenda of the community and the final outcome certainly proves that your inference from a weird comparison is awfully wrong.

1043:

The multiple statements over the User-RFC point to the fact that Rama massively used admin tools to further his own view in deletion-disputes.

748: 3530:

09:25: Rama responds at WP:ANI in their first post since 08:51 again confirming that restoration to mainspace was and remains their intention

3404:

in that time confirmed that they intended to leave the article in mainspace. All times are UTC on 29 April 2019. All unsourced points appear

2914: 2754: 2717: 2715: 2651:). All contributors, administrators included, can bypass usual rules in cases of exceptional dysfunctions harming the interest of Knowledge. 1971: 1490:

a hornet nest of people very much undisturbed that Knowledge would be shown to the general population as insensitive to women and minorities,

388: 70: 3231: 670: 3624: 2687: 725:

Rama undeleted the article despite the fact it had been through two AfDs and a DRV, and the community consensus at all three was to delete.

2732: 2497: 238: 3428: 2469: 2390: 2379: 1577: 958: 408: 253: 231: 1190:

So, to conclude, I do see a pattern of tool-misuse and mis-interpretation of community consensus, in the sparse occasions of mop-usage.

1126:

Rama chose to respond by accusing the OP of harassing and stalking him whilst proclaiming of a grand CABAL conspiracy to brand him as a

3615: 3483:

08:51: Rama responds at length in their first edit since 07:42 confirming that restoration to mainspace was and remains their intention

1957: 1914:(i.e., reasonable possibility of actual, imminent, serious harm to the project or a person if not acted upon with administrative tools) 528: 489: 441: 379: 298: 226: 2525: 3367: 3321: 2663: 2290: 1433:, Rama has only used admin tools 29 times between 2011 and 2019 (a drop coinciding with the last time he was admonished in 2010 (cf. 404: 3298: 2928: 936: 2940: 2897: 2543: 2375: 2358: 1115:

He continued with his actions amidst the RFC showing a blatant disregard for community expectations and subsequently got T-banned,

698: 515: 384: 65: 29: 2437:

Deletion of articles with many low-quality references is neither unprecedented nor even unusual, as asserted in Rama's evidence.

3269: 3114:

the editors involved would be informed that they were making Knowledge look like a haven for Gamergate-style bullying and misogny

2785: 2706:) project to improve coverage of women scientists on Knowledge. Besides details, we should consider the overall effect using the 2462: 661:'s statement on the request page, but it is the most distilled form of the timeline, and I think it should be presented clearly. 394: 374: 257: 2731:, while the fourth is still under discussion. Others have characterised these nominations as "really really unhealthy pattern" 1171:

If it is not the community who is asking you to moderate your approach, why has no one stepped forward to endorse your approach?

966: 1154: 864: 399: 312: 293: 1073:

Lankiveil noted a particularly egregious edit-sum and one even suggested a desysop, given his contempt for the particular RFC.

362: 2753:

that had also been used to erase Phelps' biography. These nominations were mared with divisive arguments proved to be untrue,

2364: 433: 324: 3187: 1888: 1441:

and closed none as far as I can tell. As such it is safe to assume that Rama is no longer up to date on how deletion works.

3215: 3182: 2807:) and ask how she perceived these events; in particular, whether she felt treated with respect, fairness and impartiality. 1600: 842:

Except there was no change to the circumstances of the article; it had been deleted twice, discussed and confirmed at DRV,

357: 2592: 2564: 2417: 2413: 1942: 1933: 2442: 2055: 1415: 1034: 283: 212: 25: 2503: 1978:. Note Rama states they are familiar with "requests" - plural - indicating awareness of more than one deletion process. 3211:, but clearly Rama was first alerted to the situation off-wiki and not from seeing the Undark piece discussed on-wiki. 2800:

case, English Knowledge seems not just to reflect outside racism and misogyny, but to actively enforce one of its own.

2626: 1899: 1721: 1657: 1627: 854:. The minor issue of it being re-created under a different name (and almost immediately sent to draft) was irrelevant. 3605: 533: 3427:

07:42: Rama removes AFD and notability tags from the article, but does not otherwise modify it from its pre-AFD state

2474: 2430: 1917: 1408: 1390: 1201: 2596: 1269: 3017:

anyone making a flawed summary would be quickly picked up on it anyway, we have plenty of boomerang spotters around

1755: 1691: 747:

Rama then attacked other editors who had argued for the article's deletion, insinuating that they were "Far-Right"

2891: 2882: 2864: 1329: 3584: 1952:

2. Rama willfully restored the article against community consensus, and was aware of multiple "deletion requests"

999: 349: 189: 2842: 2267:

article. But once the World saved, Admin Rama has not paid even a slight lip service to the concerns listed at

2250: 335: 278: 21: 2570: 1982:

3. Rama has asserted the article was backed up nearly 30 references by solid institutions (US Navy, Oak Ridge)

759:

to protect Knowledge from bad press in a case that I though would not prove as divisive as it turned out to be

3374: 3328: 2803:

To confirm that the effect is as I characterise, I respectfully suggest that Arbiters reach out to Dr. Wade (

1790: 1148:

Months after that, he was back in the same sphere, writing weird insensitive comments over FfDs and all that.

974: 878: 270: 1495:

the article on Phelps now appears to be part of a more general pattern of harassment against User:Jesswade88

2389:

This is mitigated somewhat by the submitter of the deletion review not having tagged the AFD per step 5 of

2316: 1470: 1398: 1380: 1191: 1022:

There is no explicit consensus about whether the protection against recreation ('salting') was appropriate.

508: 320: 218: 2691: 2034:

_Rama_does_not_understand_Wikipedia_notability_and/or_did_not_read_the-Evidence_presented_by_Icewhiz": -->

2029:

_Rama_does_not_understand_Wikipedia_notability_and/or_did_not_read_the-Evidence_presented_by_Icewhiz": -->

1524: 1740: 1676: 1642: 1343: 330: 248: 2991:- from above statement) that Knowledge/ns are being discriminatory. It's, again, demonstrably supported. 2522: 3548: 3525: 3143:

I also note that two Arbs switched stance from decline to accept as a direct result of Rama's responses

1724: 1660: 1630: 684:, Rama did not continue insisting on their correctness and use their tools to restore it to mainspace. 369: 167: 3013:... it is understandable why someone would accurately describe the phrases as far-right talking points 2589:, it is understandable why someone would accurately describe the phrases as far-right talking points. 2409: 1500:

many of my detractors arguably fall under WP:LW for invoking petty considerations to hinder diversity

3042:

Rama was notified that they had stepped into an acrimonious dispute, contrary to the above assertion

1923: 3596: 3591: 3360: 3314: 2922: 2910: 2900: 2450: 1770: 1758: 1706: 1694: 3439: 566: 542: 2343:

must remain the basis of everything here, and an admin is not supposed to go against this policy.

2340: 1814:

The hasty filing of this arbitration case has curtailed the possibility of an amicable resolution

580: 501: 156: 56: 2605: 3400:

in that time that an Arbcom request was very likely unless they reverted their actions. Rama's

3356: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3112:

I thought it was a unfortunate incident that needed a little nudge and would solve itself when

3077: 3024: 2984: 2966: 2962: 2704: 2276: 2021: 1766: 1718: 1702: 1654: 1624: 1347: 914: 905: 899: 893: 887: 689: 666: 2065:

During the Request phase of this case, I have published the following result of some homework

1864: 933:

From restoration to ANI in 45 minutes; from restoration to Arbcom in two hours eight minutes.

770:

that Knowledge would be shown as insensitive to women and minorities to the general population

2994:

commander-in-chief: I'm not the only person to assert this either. Alanscottwalker refers to

2516: 1963: 1893: 1856: 1831: 1805: 954: 208: 162: 17: 3485: 3473: 3463: 3452: 3419: 3207:

I'm not sure of the significance of this "foreign army" concept, introduced in evidence by

3173: 3095: 3056: 3032: 2765: 2743: 2480: 1752: 1688: 855: 819: 805: 681: 648: 131: 1777:

Rama was unlikely to have known about the 26-27 April recreation and speedy-deletion (see

8: 3347: 3197:

The Undark blog exists and was discussed on-wiki. This does not prove anything about Rama

2667: 2273: 2260: 2017: 1140:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive638#Fair-use_images_of_the_Holocaust

970: 772:

is another personal attack on those who believed that Phelps' article should be deleted.

120: 1606:

Rama may not have known about events of 26-27 April upon article restoration on 29 April

2998:

above, and an arbitrator received flak from two participants here for using the phrase

983: 923: 615: 178: 151: 3048: 2697:

Jesswade88, is a woman and a scientist; and it is part of an on-going (and celebrated

2647:), and do not let entanglement for the sake of rules steer us away from their spirit ( 3559:

warns that if Rama doesn’t revert themselves that "escalation" (ie: Arbcom) is likely

3250: 2906:

by 08:24, there is a discussion on the admin's noticeboard of which Rama is notified

2702: 2446: 2438: 2431: 2009: 1962:"Evidently notable, deletion of the article is a major embarassement for Knowledge : 1713: 1649: 1619: 685: 662: 593: 1892:

Evidently notable, deletion of the article is a major embarassement for Knowledge :

1584:. They did especially not add any new sources (neither then nor until now). Regards 710:

Rama has very few admin actions in the last 9 years. They hadn't actually restored

3227: 3219: 3047:

Before it was brought to AN/I and later ARBCOM, it was raised on Rama's talk page:

2707: 1947:"there is a suspiciously selective enforcement of notability criteria on this case" 1853: 1845: 1828: 1802: 1328:

Your evaluation is what's proved to be untrue. As to the diff provided over there,

832: 3461:

08:19 Serial_Number_54123 agrees with Sitush and warns of the likelihood of Arbcom

2675: 2349:

shouting out of loud when caught red handed, leads to a good resume of this hoax.

2032:

Rama does not understand Knowledge notability and/or did not read the AfDs and DRV

3281: 3169: 3091: 3052: 3028: 2804: 2761: 2720: 2354: 2307: 2286: 2241: 1747: 1683: 1590: 1548:

Rama did not act because new information became available after the last deletion

1062:

Rama appears to have returned to acting on his extremist views on replaceability.

126: 2488: 2008:

on the version Rama restored. The overall number of citations is explained as a

1870:

Rama reversed an administrative action without following the applicable policies

851: 676:

Rama has not restored Clarice Phelps to mainspace since the case request started

3611:

before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person

3541:

recommends that Rama re-delete the article to avoid Arbcom, and use DRV instead

3090:

is demonstrative of a temperament fundamentally unsuited to holding the tools.

2833: 2816: 2728: 2640: 2264: 2041: 1884: 1874: 1732: 1668: 1634: 732: 635: 115: 1435:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Statement by Hydronium Hydroxide

473: 3352: 2690:), all created by Dr. Wade; and a section on the Administrators' noticeboard 2644: 2632: 1610:

Much of the debate here hinges on the fact that Rama unilaterally reversed a

1346:

PORNBIO as a SNG and massive influx of deletion nominations have been since

1162: 979: 919: 173: 145: 1438: 1272:

Netoholic's tagging of suspected notability over one of those four articles.

1235: 707:

No, it wasn't wheel-warring. No already-reversed admin action was reversed.

477: 3301: 3246: 2739: 2735: 2683: 2648: 2636: 2466: 2421: 2398: 1762: 1736: 1698: 1672: 1638: 1503: 943:

The deletion was already covered in news sources well before 29 April (see

658: 622: 3261: 2519:

exists and was discussed on-wiki. This does not prove anything about Rama.

2445:) is a frequently-cited essay at AFD, whether by direct link, to its fork 1397:

P.S:-I thank the clerks for reverting his attempts to distort statistics.

42: 3223: 3199:

but Rama's own evidence, presented after that of Fæ and in the bit later

3151:

I found Rama's statements on the matter concerning rather than reassuring

2874:

The timeline to the arbcom shows Rama was not engaged assuming good faith

2866:

and following. Rama is apparently meant to serve as an example of sorts.

2049: 2045: 1279:

Where are you seeing such distinct co-relation? The cabal does NOT exist.

884: 2961:

politics and social justice: Rama has cited both political significance

2551:

Rama asserted the article had nearly 30 references by solid institutions

1469:

When criticized for their actions, Rama engaged in personal attacks and

1324:

These nominations were mared with divisive arguments proved to be untrue

1002:(in February), was 6 keeps and 1 redirect, but it was not speedy closed. 585: 3208: 3019:. "Flawed" doesn't cover Fae's presented evidence, it's much closer to 2378:

after the events precipitating this case, and was closed on 8 May 2019.

2350: 2303: 2282: 2237: 1585: 1426: 572:

4 April: Deleted again by TonyBallioni per CSD G4 and salted following

3192: 2734:

producing an undesirable effect for Knowledge through technicalities (

2484: 2335:] has been written by Rama, here and not by some op-ed somewhere else. 2323: 1908:

section, an emergency use of admin tools should not be claimed unless

1819: 1332:

in the regard). There is not any one objective truth in these spheres.

680:

Worth noting, once the case request started and Fram draftified it to

3067:

Rama, in their own words, engaged in (politically motivated) activism

2931: 2860: 2853: 2829: 2812: 2659: 2327: 2256: 2071: 1253:

More wrong assertions without providing any data-set. Netoholic, the

1107:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive596#Rama_-_again

911: 197: 3166:

Arbitrators should therefore rule in my favour on Good Faith grounds

1458:

if I had not been an administrator, I would not have done anything.

3274: 3002:. All similar in vein in intended meaning. In full what I said was 1976:" I understand that this disregards the previous Deletion Requests" 1261:

support from the editorial community, as to deleting those. He was

1079:

admin remit with regard to his actions relating to Fair Use images.

651:

without leaving a redirect, after the opening of this case request.

475: 140: 3434: 3391:

Rama received sufficient notice to avoid this case being requested

1533:

Rama acted without previously sufficiently assessing the situation

2965:

and to Knowledge's irresponsible defiance against social justice(

2530: 1431:

Knowledge talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Statement by Pldx1

3478:

08:31: Serial_Number_54123 indicates that Arbcom should be used

2934:, who did not participate in any of the previous discussions. 2061:

Admin Rama was rather waiting for an occasion to save the World

2006:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps (2nd nomination)

1665:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps (2nd nomination)

611:

deleted the Clarice E. Phelps article as it had been tagged as

478: 3468:

08:23: Sitush raises the issue at WP:ANI, and asks what to do.

3346:

Repeatedly stating that I "threatened" Rama with Arbcom is an

1462:

a state of affairs enforced unilaterally by one on the other;

479: 2760:

Statistical material not germane to the case scope removed.

2465:, just five days prior to the Phelps article's restoration. — 2391:

Knowledge:Deletion review#Steps to list a new deletion review

1996:

4. AfD discussions clearly addressed the references discussed

3359:

rather suggests it should have been heeded, does it not...?

3195:

says under "Rama was a soldier of a foreign army, not" that

3242: 3168:. The emperor has failed to notice that they lack clothes. 2255:

One can argue that it was so urgent to save the World that

1265:

involved in either of the two AfDs or the DRV about Phelps.

741:

When challenged on this, Rama did not reverse their action.

3423: 1964:

https://undark.org/2019/04/25/wikipedia-diversity-problem/

1894:

https://undark.org/2019/04/25/wikipedia-diversity-problem/

1478:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Statement by Rama

1451:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Statement by Rama

3498: 3006:. I again have no idea how this relates to far-right-ism. 2848:

This arbitration case was not brought forth in good faith

1912:

reasonable belief of a present and very serious emergency

1887:

by going straight to DRV with the evidence they cited in

1313:

Some stuff about arguments from AndrewDavidson and Gerard

547: 3492: 2969:) to justify their actions. It's demonstrably supported. 2408:

I've been informed the DRV was prominently mentioned at

2269:

WP:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps (2nd nomination)

3504: 2028: 1778: 973:. Rama linked to the Apr. 25 article in the undeletion 3555: 3520: 3510: 1968:- the linked piece discusses the Knowledge deletion. 1883:

protecting/deleting admin, or following the spirit of

1257:

advocate over two of the four linked AfDs did not get

1181:

simultaneously being obviously right because of WP:IAR

785:

for invoking petty considerations to hinder diversity.

607: 3446: 2950:

Briefly, I think it wise to dismiss Fae's claim that

2719:

I can give a couple of examples — privately to avoid

2374:

A second deletion review for the article was held at

941:

I respectfully disagree with SoWhy's statement that "

2887:at 08:13, Rama was notified he had stepped on toes 2746:, in particular, have discredited certain arguments 1570:

made me think that the deletion process was mistaken

1485:

composed of people willing to use spurious arguments

1219:

I take the liberty of rephrasing the last phrase as

3579: 3537: 3414: 2863:that they had stepped into an acrimonious dispute: 2483:. Here is some non-evidence which is "evidence". -- 1938:"you are also letting far-Right talking point slip" 1240:

Fram has already provided numerous counter-examples

643: 630: 3157:My concerns regarding Rama's responses are growing 2918:at 08:51, Rama responds (negatively but politely) 2330:... or even that Fae's words are endorsed by Rama. 1183:et al. He continues to see the same conspiracy:-- 1159:Do we see any similarity with the issue at hand? 598: 1554: 2978:inadvertently make a situation worse for oneself 1929:1.Rama casted aspersions in an article talk page 994:There was no strong consensus against recreation 2033: 1175:Over here, we are witness to the same stuff -- 949:". After April 12, more was published on April 870:Rama promptly responded and gave justifications 554:11 Feburary: Deleted by TonyBallioni following 2002:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps 1729:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Clarice Phelps 1542:without a complete assessment of the situation 1445:Rama used admin tools to win a content dispute 1330:discussions have continued over Eppstein's t/p 977:, and cited the press in ADMINACCT responses. 3564:09:41-09:42: Rama posts and follows-up at ANI 2927:at 09:46, the case is brought to the arbcom 1029:Evidence presented by Winged Blades of Godric 625:and the conditions for that seemed to be met. 509: 2980:. No idea how this relates to far-right-ism. 1421:Rama is out of touch with how deletion works 829:I am distinctly confused by the evidence of 735:, Rama edited through protection to do this. 3502:(who also recommends keeping the article), 2972:shooting yourself: Not what I said. I said 2420:) so was or should have been aware of it. — 1761:created page Clarice Phelps (created page) 850:be treated as binding - that's why we have 49:The Evidence phase for this case is closed. 3120:Other diffs containing aspersion casting: 2825:I disagree that the evidence removed here 2416:). Rama edited that page multiple times ( 1460:They also said that they acted to rectify 947:) ... there was no emergency situation ... 516: 502: 3386:Evidence presented by Hydronium Hydroxide 2511:Rama was a soldier of a foreign army, not 2024:- US navy, doesn't mention the subject." 1840:On-wiki events have off-wiki consequences 846:salted. Prior deletion consensus should 2921:at 08:56, Rama is threatened (again) by 2859:There was no attempt at warning/telling 2544:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 1 2376:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 1 1633:protected Clarice Phelps (indefinite) ( 1187:, the opposers are right-wingers et al. 1020:was also endorsed and the closer wrote " 3514:affirm Rama's actions as Arbcom-worthy. 2346:Following the chain ref21(05:31) -: --> 1918:WP:TOOLMISUSE#Exceptional_circumstances 14: 3606:Evidence presented by {your user name} 2958:Unsupported dismissive allegation of: 2538:Rama did not participate at second DRV 2259:couldn't take the time to comply with 1851:that this matter has already incurred. 767:feel passionately about the subject. 2989:The overall effect ... seems targeted 2613:Rama is a racist and a misogynist (?) 1578:to remove the AFD and notability tags 1576:Rama did at the restored article was 1572:). This coincides with the fact that 1564:that the article before deletion had 3294:"Anti-evidence" presented by SN54129 2963:(loaded with political significance) 2884:discussion on the undeletion starts 2523:Rama's statement, mentioning twitter 2279:US navy, doesn't mention the subject 1906:There was no need to act immediately 1511:There was no need to act immediately 1425:Based on data helpfully compiled by 289:Clarification and Amendment requests 37: 3546:09:34 Rama also contests the speedy 3438:adds a G4 speedy tag to the article 3105:Rama has repeatedly cast aspersions 2843:Evidence presented by CyrilleDunant 2498:Rama was out to save the world, not 1779:#Evidence presented by TonyBallioni 1035:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Rama 592:27 April: Draft moved to mainspace 35: 2976:, a common English phrase meaning 2878:at 07:38, the page was undeleted. 2791:Front page of Wikidata, 4 May 2019 2326:is acting as the lawyer chosen by 1796:The wider Knowledge community may 1582:Notability is ridiculously obvious 763:. However, it is clear that Rama 634:undeleted the original article at 529:Evidence presented by TonyBallioni 36: 3639: 3201:remove by a clerk as out of scope 2946:Rebuking some of Fae's "evidence" 703:A couple of points to begin with 3260: 3218:following restoration came from 3021:targeted premeditated dishonesty 2941:Evidence presented by Mr rnddude 2784: 1177:That was not community consensus 699:Evidence presented by Black Kite 196: 41: 3237:"Evidence" presented by GerardM 3027:from Fae's preferred rhetoric. 2461:), deleted for notability with 1822:'s eloquent statement on this: 1789:the 4 April deletion (see e.g. 1185:there is a motivated opposition 2370:No participation at second DRV 900:posts reasons on his talk page 865:Evidence presented by Levivich 13: 1: 3243:(Evidence submission removed) 2974:shooting yourself in the foot 2828:is not relevant to the case. 2575:"politics and social justice" 2365:Evidence presented by Cryptic 1924:Evidence presented by Icewhiz 1727:deleted page Clarice Phelps ( 1663:deleted page Clarice Phelps ( 1555:#Evidence presented by Deryck 1516: 1226:-AfD experience, in the last 3524:contests the speedy deletion 3472:08:24: Sitush notifies Rama 3183:Evidence presented by Sitush 2526:WiR official twitter account 1601:Evidence presented by Deryck 1476:The following is taken from 1449:The following is taken from 1000:The first AfD, after 9 hours 657:I blatantly stole this from 420:Conflict of interest reports 7: 3625:{Write your assertion here} 3616:{Write your assertion here} 3311:Evidence must include links 2565:Rama casted aspersions, not 2348:laziness+inventivity -: --> 2056:Evidence presented by Pldx1 1844:I would like to re-iterate 1456:Rama has explicitly stated 1416:Evidence presented by SoWhy 731:As the deleted article was 249:Search archived proceedings 10: 3644: 2776:including Simple English. 2627:Evidence presented by Rama 2381:Rama made no edits to it ( 1865:Evidence presented by Iffy 574:second deletion discussion 558:. Deletion discussion was 294:Arbitrator motion requests 2606:recent analysis discussed 2475:Evidence presented by Fae 2410:Draft talk:Clarice Phelps 2296:Soldier of a foreign army 1900:This was not an emergency 915:posts this Arbcom request 888:posts on Rama's talk page 556:first deletion discussion 3601:12:11, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3594:is not a great defence. 3490:08:53 to 09:25: Editors 3450:protests the restoration 3380:14:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3334:10:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3288:11:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3255:10:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 3232:01:49, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 2923:User:Serial_Number_54129 2911:User:Serial_Number_54129 2901:User:Serial_Number_54129 2359:13:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC) 2322:I am not convinced that 1787:after and in response to 3178:23:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 3100:23:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 3085:- From Rama's evidence. 3061:23:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 3037:23:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2838:17:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2821:13:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2770:16:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2493:11:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2470:13:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2425:13:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2402:03:41, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 2312:17:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 2291:17:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 2246:17:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 2004:, and more importantly 1860:16:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 1835:16:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 1809:10:50, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 1596:11:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 1538:As they said themselves 1411:18:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 1393:17:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC) 1204:06:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 989:17:03, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 929:02:42, 3 May 2019 (UTC) 859:17:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 823:23:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 809:23:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 718:The problems are this; 694:20:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 671:20:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 586:Hodgdon's secret garden 581:Draft:Clarice E. Phelps 3216:initial bunch of edits 3117:- From main case page. 2913:pushes for the arbcom 2899:Rama is threatened by 2620:removed from this page 2263:before undeleting the 1791:this DuckDuckGo search 1580:with the edit summary 1301:nominated for deletion 879:Rama restores the page 3583:opens the Arbcom case 3398:plenty of indications 3272:the full committee. 3049:User_talk:Rama#Phelps 2622:without clerk action. 2347:ref06 (Phelps) -: --> 1943:09:34, 29 April 2019 1502:(they probably meant 647:moved the article to 490:Track related changes 350:Arbitration Committee 190:Knowledge Arbitration 18:Knowledge:Arbitration 2744:User:Andrew Davidson 2587:"commander-in-chief" 1972:09:25, 29 April 2019 1934:12:14, 29 April 2019 1746:2018-08-31T21:49:34 1712:2019-02-11T07:23:27 1682:2019-04-03T19:18:44 1648:2019-04-04T15:37:18 1635:Repeatedly recreated 1618:2019-04-04T15:37:52 1066:Modernist writes :- 906:posts reasons at ANI 682:Draft:Clarice Phelps 649:Draft:Clarice Phelps 299:Enforcement requests 227:Guide to arbitration 137:Drafting arbitrators 3435:Serial_Number_54123 3078:09:25 29 April 2019 3000:diversity terrorist 2852:Disclaimer: I know 2668:Leslie Kolodziejski 2579:"shooting yourself" 2414:§At Deletion Review 894:opens an ANI thread 3597:HydroniumHydroxide 3508:(implicitly), and 2232:With the comment: 1904:To add to SoWhy's 1889:their log summary: 1735:)) (view/restore) 1671:)) (view/restore) 1637:) (hist | change) 1521:WaPo from 12 April 1471:casting aspersions 1344:already deprecated 1342:The community has 945:WaPo from 12 April 321:Contentious topics 219:Arbitration policy 3592:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 3422:and its talk page 3418:restores article 3402:posts and actions 2772: 2230: 2229: 1987:06:03, 2 May 2019 937:There was urgency 856:Black Kite (talk) 820:Black Kite (talk) 806:Black Kite (talk) 756:Rama then posted 594:Clarice E. Phelps 526: 525: 493: 461: 331:General sanctions 279:All open requests 209:About arbitration 182: 171: 160: 149: 135: 124: 107: 99:Proposed decision 96: 85: 74: 63: 62: 3635: 3599: 3582: 3558: 3540: 3523: 3513: 3507: 3501: 3495: 3449: 3437: 3417: 3377: 3372: 3365: 3345: 3331: 3326: 3319: 3305: 3286: 3284: 3279: 3264: 3245: 3244: 2996:content dictator 2893:talk of Arbcom. 2788: 2759: 2708:Disparate impact 2583:"discrimination" 2418:most recent edit 2341:WP:Verifiability 2068: 2067: 2035: 2030: 1852: 1846:User:Newyorkbrad 1826: 1593: 1588: 1566:solid references 1463: 1459: 1406: 1401: 1388: 1383: 1305:actually deleted 1199: 1194: 1060:Xeno writes :-- 987: 986: 927: 926: 836: 646: 633: 620: 614: 610: 601: 588: 550: 541:31 August: Page 518: 511: 504: 492: 487: 480: 459: 415:Clerk procedures 407: 365: 336:Editor sanctions 313:Active sanctions 271:Open proceedings 241: 200: 186: 185: 176: 165: 163:Worm That Turned 154: 143: 129: 118: 101: 90: 79: 68: 45: 38: 3643: 3642: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3627: 3618: 3608: 3595: 3578: 3554: 3536: 3519: 3509: 3503: 3497: 3491: 3445: 3433: 3413: 3393: 3388: 3375: 3368: 3361: 3339: 3329: 3322: 3315: 3307: 3299: 3296: 3282: 3275: 3273: 3241: 3239: 3190: 3185: 3107: 3069: 3044: 2948: 2943: 2876: 2850: 2845: 2805:User:Jesswade88 2797: 2796: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2629: 2615: 2567: 2553: 2540: 2517:The Undark blog 2513: 2500: 2477: 2435: 2372: 2367: 2319: 2298: 2271:. For example: 2253: 2063: 2058: 2037: 1998: 1984: 1954: 1931: 1926: 1902: 1872: 1867: 1849: 1842: 1823: 1816: 1750: 1716: 1686: 1652: 1622: 1608: 1603: 1591: 1586: 1562:explicitly said 1550: 1535: 1513: 1474: 1461: 1457: 1447: 1423: 1418: 1402: 1399: 1384: 1381: 1303:as compared to 1299:as compared to 1211: 1209:A rebut to Rama 1195: 1192: 1157: 1054:SoWhy writes:-- 1031: 996: 982: 978: 939: 922: 918: 872: 867: 830: 701: 678: 642: 629: 618: 612: 606: 597: 584: 583:was created by 546: 536: 531: 522: 488: 482: 481: 476: 466: 465: 464: 453: 436: 426: 425: 424: 411: 403: 391: 366: 361: 352: 342: 341: 340: 315: 305: 304: 303: 273: 263: 260: 245: 237: 215: 184: 50: 34: 33: 32: 12: 11: 5: 3641: 3626: 3623: 3617: 3614: 3607: 3604: 3588: 3587: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3561: 3550: 3543: 3532: 3527: 3516: 3487: 3480: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3455: 3454: 3441: 3430: 3425: 3420:Clarice Phelps 3392: 3389: 3387: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3306: 3297: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3238: 3235: 3189: 3188:Rebuttal of Fæ 3186: 3184: 3181: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3154: 3145: 3144: 3141: 3118: 3106: 3103: 3087: 3086: 3080: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3043: 3040: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2992: 2981: 2970: 2947: 2944: 2942: 2939: 2875: 2872: 2849: 2846: 2844: 2841: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2783: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2628: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2614: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2590: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2539: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2520: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2499: 2496: 2476: 2473: 2459:AfD discussion 2455:Burleigh Smith 2434: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2344: 2336: 2333:The following 2331: 2318: 2315: 2297: 2294: 2265:Clarice Phelps 2252: 2249: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2215: 2212: 2209: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2188: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2098: 2095: 2092: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2074: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2054: 2036: 2026: 1997: 1994: 1983: 1980: 1956:As evident in 1953: 1950: 1930: 1927: 1925: 1922: 1901: 1898: 1871: 1868: 1866: 1863: 1841: 1838: 1815: 1812: 1775: 1774: 1748: 1744: 1714: 1710: 1684: 1680: 1650: 1646: 1620: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1549: 1546: 1534: 1531: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1473: 1467: 1446: 1443: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318:circumstances. 1310: 1309: 1308: 1293: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1273: 1266: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1210: 1207: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1121: 1120: 1110: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1071: 1064: 1058: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1038: 1037: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1018:The second DRV 1015: 1012:The second AfD 1009: 1003: 995: 992: 938: 935: 871: 868: 866: 863: 862: 861: 826: 825: 801: 800: 789: 775: 751: 742: 736: 726: 716: 715: 708: 700: 697: 677: 674: 655: 654: 653: 652: 639: 636:Clarice Phelps 626: 603: 590: 577: 570: 569:by Jesswade88. 563: 552: 535: 532: 530: 527: 524: 523: 521: 520: 513: 506: 498: 495: 494: 484: 483: 474: 472: 471: 468: 467: 463: 462: 454: 449: 444: 438: 437: 432: 431: 428: 427: 423: 422: 417: 412: 402: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 360: 354: 353: 348: 347: 344: 343: 339: 338: 333: 328: 317: 316: 311: 310: 307: 306: 302: 301: 296: 291: 286: 281: 275: 274: 269: 268: 265: 264: 262: 261: 256: 251: 246: 236: 229: 224: 216: 211: 205: 202: 201: 193: 192: 66:Main case page 64: 61: 60: 55:and create an 48: 46: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3640: 3631: 3622: 3613: 3612: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3593: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3575: 3574: 3569: 3567: 3565: 3562: 3560: 3557: 3551: 3549: 3547: 3544: 3542: 3539: 3533: 3531: 3528: 3526: 3522: 3517: 3515: 3512: 3506: 3500: 3494: 3488: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3462: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3453: 3451: 3448: 3442: 3440: 3436: 3431: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3421: 3416: 3412:07:38-07:39: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3381: 3378: 3373: 3371: 3366: 3364: 3358: 3354: 3349: 3343: 3342:CyrilleDunant 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3332: 3327: 3325: 3320: 3318: 3312: 3303: 3289: 3285: 3280: 3278: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3212: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3158: 3155: 3152: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3116: 3115: 3110:Key example: 3109: 3108: 3102: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3084: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3045: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2953: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2919: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2907: 2904: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2879: 2871: 2867: 2865: 2862: 2857: 2855: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2808: 2806: 2801: 2787: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2757: 2755: 2752: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2724: 2722: 2718: 2716: 2711: 2709: 2705: 2703: 2701: 2699: 2694: 2692: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2676:Ana Achúcarro 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2652: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2621: 2617: 2616: 2607: 2602: 2601:by definition 2598: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2569: 2568: 2558: 2555: 2554: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2532: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2514: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2481:WP:ASPERSIONS 2472: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2463:48 references 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2433: 2426: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2386: 2384: 2380: 2377: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2345: 2342: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2192: 2189: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2170: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2155: 2152: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2084: 2081: 2078: 2075: 2073: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2031:5. 3+4 -: --> 2025: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1979: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1967: 1965: 1959: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1921: 1919: 1915: 1913: 1907: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1881: 1876: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1855: 1847: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1821: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1792: 1788: 1782: 1780: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1613: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1556: 1545: 1543: 1540:, they acted 1539: 1530: 1528: 1527: 1522: 1518: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1479: 1472: 1466: 1454: 1452: 1442: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1413: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1405: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1377: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1229: 1225: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1198: 1188: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1080: 1076:LVU wrote :- 1075: 1072: 1070: 1069:unacceptable. 1065: 1063: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1023: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1006:The first DRV 1004: 1001: 998: 997: 991: 990: 985: 981: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 946: 934: 931: 930: 925: 921: 916: 913: 908: 907: 902: 901: 896: 895: 892:08:23 Sitush 890: 889: 886: 881: 880: 875: 874:On 29 April: 860: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837:. He states 834: 828: 827: 824: 821: 816: 813: 812: 811: 810: 807: 799: 797: 793: 790: 788: 786: 783: 779: 776: 774: 771: 766: 762: 760: 755: 752: 749: 746: 743: 740: 737: 734: 730: 727: 724: 721: 720: 719: 713: 709: 706: 705: 704: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 650: 645: 640: 637: 632: 627: 624: 617: 609: 604: 600: 595: 591: 587: 582: 578: 575: 571: 568: 567:Created again 564: 561: 557: 553: 549: 544: 540: 539: 538: 537: 519: 514: 512: 507: 505: 500: 499: 497: 496: 491: 486: 485: 470: 469: 458: 455: 452: 448: 445: 443: 440: 439: 435: 430: 429: 421: 418: 416: 413: 410: 406: 401: 398: 396: 393: 390: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 364: 359: 356: 355: 351: 346: 345: 337: 334: 332: 329: 326: 322: 319: 318: 314: 309: 308: 300: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 284:Case requests 282: 280: 277: 276: 272: 267: 266: 259: 255: 252: 250: 247: 244: 240: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 217: 214: 210: 207: 206: 204: 203: 199: 195: 194: 191: 188: 187: 183: 180: 175: 169: 164: 158: 153: 152:KrakatoaKatie 147: 142: 138: 133: 128: 122: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 94: 89: 83: 78: 72: 67: 58: 54: 47: 44: 40: 39: 31: 27: 23: 19: 3628: 3619: 3610: 3609: 3589: 3576: 3563: 3552: 3545: 3534: 3529: 3489: 3482: 3477: 3467: 3460: 3443: 3401: 3397: 3394: 3370:SerialNumber 3369: 3362: 3324:SerialNumber 3323: 3316: 3310: 3309:Please note 3308: 3276: 3265: 3240: 3213: 3204: 3196: 3191: 3165: 3164: 3156: 3150: 3113: 3111: 3088: 3082: 3072: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3011: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2988: 2977: 2973: 2951: 2949: 2936: 2926: 2920: 2917: 2908: 2905: 2895: 2889: 2886: 2880: 2877: 2868: 2858: 2851: 2824: 2809: 2802: 2798: 2774: 2758: 2740:User:GerardM 2725: 2712: 2695: 2684:Sarah Tuttle 2657: 2653: 2630: 2600: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2478: 2436: 2388: 2387: 2383:full history 2373: 2299: 2272: 2261:WP:ADMINACCT 2254: 2233: 2231: 2064: 2038: 2013: 1999: 1990: 1985: 1975: 1970: 1961: 1958:deletion log 1955: 1946: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1911: 1909: 1905: 1903: 1891: 1878: 1873: 1848:'s warning: 1843: 1817: 1797: 1795: 1786: 1783: 1776: 1715:TonyBallioni 1651:TonyBallioni 1621:TonyBallioni 1611: 1609: 1581: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1559: 1551: 1541: 1536: 1525: 1514: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1475: 1455: 1448: 1424: 1403: 1396: 1385: 1378: 1374: 1364: 1337: 1323: 1312: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1286: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1248: 1233: 1227: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1214: 1196: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1174: 1170: 1168: 1161: 1158: 1127: 1116: 1077: 1067: 1061: 1055: 1021: 942: 940: 932: 909: 903: 897: 891: 882: 876: 873: 847: 843: 838: 814: 802: 795: 794:Good grief. 791: 784: 781: 777: 768: 764: 757: 753: 744: 738: 728: 722: 717: 711: 702: 686:TonyBallioni 679: 663:TonyBallioni 656: 136: 111: 110: 108: 76: 57:edit request 3220:Victuallers 3203:, included 2714:references. 2504:Public logs 2395:AFD history 1910:there is a 1880:challenged. 1767:Visual edit 1703:Visual edit 1128:rouge admin 1117:unanimously 904:09:25 Rama 898:08:51 Rama 833:Deryck Chan 254:Ban appeals 232:Noticeboard 112:Case clerks 3590:In short, 3499:Mr_rnddude 3406:at the ANI 3353:good faith 3170:Mr rnddude 3159:- SilkTork 3092:Mr rnddude 3074:suspicious 3053:Mr rnddude 3029:Mr rnddude 2896:at 08:19, 2890:at 08:05, 2881:at 07:50, 2762:GoldenRing 2721:WP:POINTly 2710:criteria. 2447:WP:BOMBARD 2439:WP:REFBOMB 2432:WP:REFBOMB 2236:. Did I ? 2010:WP:REFBOMB 1877:says that 1749:Jesswade88 1685:Jesswade88 840:precedent. 641:29 April: 628:29 April: 605:27 April: 579:26 April: 562:on 18 Feb. 548:Jesswade88 460:(pre-2016) 447:Statistics 380:Procedures 127:GoldenRing 3493:Ymblanter 3357:this diff 3348:aspersion 3270:appeal to 2932:User:Iffy 2909:at 08:31 2861:User:Rama 2854:User:Rama 2660:Nia Imara 2451:permalink 2443:permalink 2328:User:Rama 2257:User:Rama 2072:User:Rama 1825:completed 1733:XFDcloser 1669:XFDcloser 1517:#Timeline 1348:predicted 1297:existent 1236:this tool 975:log entry 852:WP:CSD#G4 792:Problem 7 778:Problem 6 754:Problem 5 745:Problem 4 739:Problem 3 729:Problem 2 723:Problem 1 616:db-repost 596:by admin 565:3 April: 385:Elections 116:DeltaQuad 3505:Lectonar 2251:ADMINACT 1818:I quote 1798:disagree 1756:contribs 1739:: PHP7 ( 1722:contribs 1692:contribs 1658:contribs 1641:: PHP7 ( 1628:contribs 1557:below). 1270:reverted 1234:. (Vide 1163:BU Rob13 560:endorsed 534:Timeline 174:SilkTork 88:Workshop 77:Evidence 28:‎ | 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 3577:09:46: 3556:Amakaru 3553:09:36: 3535:09:32: 3518:09:03: 3511:Icewhiz 3444:08:13: 3432:07:56: 3302:GerardM 3247:GerardM 2729:WP:SNOW 2641:WP:SNOW 2467:Cryptic 2422:Cryptic 2399:Cryptic 2324:User:Fæ 2042:WP:NPOV 1960:citing 1885:WP:SALT 1875:WP:RAAA 1820:User:Fæ 1675:: PHP7( 1155:Remarks 969:), and 815:Summary 659:Amakuru 623:Tataral 608:Amakuru 543:created 457:Reports 395:History 375:Members 370:Contact 358:Discuss 222:(CU/OS) 3447:Sitush 3224:Sitush 3025:borrow 2682:) and 2645:WP:IAR 2633:WP:IAR 2597:at ANI 2317:Re Fae 2048:, and 1916:(from 1854:Deryck 1829:Deryck 1803:Deryck 1612:recent 1439:4 AFDs 1222:in my 910:09:46 885:Sitush 883:08:13 877:07:38 848:always 733:salted 400:Clerks 258:Report 172:& 161:& 150:& 125:& 3376:54129 3330:54129 3266:Note: 3209:Pldx1 3153:- PMC 2736:WP:WL 2649:WP:WL 2637:WP:WL 2604:some 2560:make. 2351:Pldx1 2304:Pldx1 2283:Pldx1 2238:Pldx1 2179:admin 2126:edits 2121:2019 1771:thank 1759:block 1741:thank 1725:block 1707:thank 1695:block 1677:thank 1661:block 1643:thank 1631:block 1560:Rama 1504:WP:WL 1427:Pldx1 1230:years 980:Leviv 920:Leviv 434:Audit 16:< 3580:Iffy 3538:Fram 3415:Rama 3251:talk 3228:talk 3214:The 3174:talk 3136:and 3096:talk 3057:talk 3033:talk 2987:and 2985:here 2834:talk 2830:Rama 2817:talk 2813:Rama 2766:talk 2742:and 2593:diff 2571:diff 2557:diff 2531:diff 2489:talk 2355:talk 2308:talk 2287:talk 2277:ref8 2274:ref7 2242:talk 2174:343 2165:1497 2162:1716 2156:2281 2153:2118 2147:1745 2144:3719 2141:4164 2138:6767 2135:3822 2132:7173 2129:1402 2118:2018 2115:2017 2112:2016 2109:2015 2106:2014 2103:2013 2100:2012 2097:2011 2094:2010 2091:2009 2088:2008 2085:2007 2082:2006 2079:2005 2076:2004 2050:WP:N 2046:WP:V 2022:ref8 2018:ref7 2000:See 1753:talk 1719:talk 1689:talk 1655:talk 1625:talk 1255:sole 912:Iffy 765:does 690:talk 667:talk 644:Fram 631:Rama 451:Talk 442:Talk 409:Talk 389:Talk 243:Talk 213:Talk 179:Talk 168:Talk 157:Talk 146:Talk 132:Talk 121:Talk 104:Talk 93:Talk 82:Talk 71:Talk 53:here 30:Rama 26:Case 3277:AGK 3023:to 2930:by 2738:). 2674:), 2666:), 2385:). 2302:]. 2196:120 2193:194 2190:353 2187:149 2184:361 2171:613 2168:369 2159:171 2150:476 1763:Tag 1737:Tag 1699:Tag 1673:Tag 1639:Tag 1592:Why 1574:all 1429:at 1404:WBG 1386:WBG 1263:not 1259:any 1238:.) 1197:WBG 984:ich 961:), 924:ich 844:and 712:any 621:by 599:DGG 545:by 325:Log 141:AGK 3521:Fæ 3496:, 3408:: 3363:—— 3317:—— 3253:) 3230:) 3193:Fæ 3176:) 3132:, 3128:, 3124:, 3098:) 3076:- 3059:) 3035:) 2954:. 2903:. 2836:) 2819:) 2768:) 2693:. 2688:DR 2680:DR 2672:DR 2664:DR 2639:, 2635:, 2585:, 2581:, 2577:, 2491:) 2485:Fæ 2357:) 2310:) 2289:) 2244:) 2226:4 2199:73 2052:. 2044:, 2020:, 1989:- 1974:- 1945:- 1936:- 1857:C. 1832:C. 1806:C. 1765:: 1701:: 1587:So 1544:. 1480:: 1453:: 1307:.) 1228:10 1179:, 971:29 963:26 955:25 953:, 951:24 917:. 692:) 669:) 619:}} 613:{{ 139:: 114:: 97:— 86:— 75:— 3344:: 3340:@ 3304:: 3300:@ 3283:■ 3249:( 3226:( 3172:( 3140:. 3138:5 3134:4 3130:3 3126:2 3122:1 3094:( 3055:( 3031:( 2967:1 2832:( 2815:( 2764:( 2686:( 2678:( 2670:( 2662:( 2529:( 2487:( 2457:( 2449:( 2441:( 2412:( 2393:( 2353:( 2306:( 2285:( 2240:( 2223:6 2220:0 2217:4 2214:7 2211:1 2208:2 2205:3 2202:2 2012:( 1966:" 1773:) 1769:( 1743:) 1731:( 1709:) 1705:( 1679:) 1667:( 1645:) 1506:) 1400:∯ 1382:∯ 1350:. 1242:. 1224:4 1193:∯ 1130:. 1119:. 1024:" 967:2 965:( 959:2 957:( 835:: 831:@ 750:. 688:( 665:( 638:. 602:. 589:. 576:. 551:. 517:e 510:t 503:v 405:+ 363:+ 327:) 323:( 239:+ 181:) 177:( 170:) 166:( 159:) 155:( 148:) 144:( 134:) 130:( 123:) 119:( 106:) 102:( 95:) 91:( 84:) 80:( 73:) 69:( 59:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Evidence - Knowledge

Index