Knowledge

White & Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor

Source 📝

573: 474: 453: 432: 55: 129:
In 1954, White & Carter (Councils) Ltd. entered into a three-year contract to display advertisements for McGregor's garage company on litter bins. In 1957, with the contract set to expire, McGregor's sales manager, Mr Ward, renewed the contract; however, later that day, when the company learnt of
151:. There was no obligation to accept the breach, even though it was unfortunate that the claimants had 'saddled themselves with an unwanted contract causing an apparent waste of time and money'. Because it was a claim in debt and not damages, the mitigation rule had no application. 134:
Dear Sirs, we regret that our Mr. Ward signed an order today continuing the lamp post advertisements for a further period of 3 years. He was unaware that our proprietor Mr. McGregor does not wish to continue this form of advertisement. Please therefore cancel the
154:
Lord Hodson said it was not a discretionary remedy, and a 'novel equitable doctrine that a party was not to be held to his contract unless the court in a given instance thought it reasonable so to do' was not going to be introduced.
464: 147:
The House of Lords held, 3 to 2, that the claimants could recover the contract price and were not obliged to take steps to mitigate their loss because there was an automatic claim in
330: 551: 485: 348: 539: 512: 379: 187: 610: 272: 563: 288: 627: 258: 130:
this, they informed White & Carter that Ward had no authority to enter into such a contract, writing to them saying:
644: 139:
White & Carter (Councils) Ltd. refused cancellation and displayed the ads, and brought an action for the price.
372: 180: 659: 528: 649: 443: 365: 173: 654: 337: 572: 473: 452: 431: 54: 618: 468: 447: 426: 302: 49: 567: 75: 83: 71: 408: 319: 585: 114: 8: 412: 306: 489: 262: 208: 248: 234: 244: 606: 518: 218: 118: 110: 45: 292: 278: 230: 204: 158:
The dissenting judges held that the claimants had failed to mitigate their loss.
165: 638: 422: 396: 87: 79: 315: 357: 117:
case, concerning the right to terminate a contract and the duty to
332:
Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board
148: 617: 636: 195: 514:L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd 373: 181: 603:White & Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor 501:White & Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor 107:White and Carter (Councils) Ltd. v McGregor 621:White and Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor 380: 366: 188: 174: 21:White and Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor 274:Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Achievement Ltd 564:Woodar Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd 637: 289:Dunlop Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage Co Ltd 628:Incorporated Council of Law Reporting 387: 361: 259:Workers Trust v Dojap Investments Ltd 169: 13: 14: 671: 465:Arcos Ltd v EA Ronaasen & Son 571: 472: 451: 430: 413:[1853] EWHC J72 (QB) 53: 623:[1962] AC 413, HL(Sc)" 1: 596: 529:Bunge Corp v Tradax Export SA 196:Performance and breach cases 7: 161: 142: 10: 676: 444:Poussard v Spiers and Pond 645:English contract case law 560: 548: 536: 525: 509: 496: 490:[1961] EWCA Civ 7 482: 461: 440: 419: 405: 393: 345: 327: 313: 299: 285: 269: 255: 241: 227: 215: 201: 98: 93: 67: 62: 41: 33: 25: 20: 609: (6 December 1961), 591: 568:[1980] 1 WLR 277 552:Rice v Great Yarmouth BC 303:Murray v Leisureplay plc 124: 349:Remedies in English law 76:Lord Morton of Henryton 137: 84:Lord Keith of Avonholm 607:[1961] UKHL 5 519:[1973] UKHL 2 469:[1933] AC 470 409:Hochster v De La Tour 132: 111:[1961] UKHL 5 50:[1962] AC 413 46:[1961] UKHL 5 660:House of Lords cases 586:English contract law 115:English contract law 650:1961 in British law 630:. 6 December 1961. 540:The Alaskan Trader 99:Contract, remedies 581: 580: 486:The Hong Kong Fir 400:(1777) 1 H Bl 273 388:Termination cases 355: 354: 322:) Sch 2(1)(d)-(e) 245:Bolton v Mahadeva 103: 102: 667: 655:1961 in case law 631: 625: 576: 575: 515: 502: 477: 476: 456: 455: 448:(1876) 1 QBD 410 435: 434: 427:(1876) 1 QBD 183 382: 375: 368: 359: 358: 333: 275: 219:Sumpter v Hedges 190: 183: 176: 167: 166: 63:Court membership 58: 57: 18: 17: 675: 674: 670: 669: 668: 666: 665: 664: 635: 634: 616: 599: 594: 582: 577: 570: 556: 555:(2001) 3 LGLR 4 544: 532: 521: 513: 505: 500: 492: 478: 471: 457: 450: 436: 429: 415: 401: 389: 386: 356: 351: 341: 331: 323: 309: 295: 281: 273: 265: 251: 237: 231:Hoenig v Isaacs 223: 211: 205:Cutter v Powell 197: 194: 164: 145: 127: 52: 48: 37:6 December 1961 12: 11: 5: 673: 663: 662: 657: 652: 647: 633: 632: 614: 611:House of Lords 598: 595: 593: 590: 589: 588: 579: 578: 561: 558: 557: 549: 546: 545: 537: 534: 533: 526: 523: 522: 510: 507: 506: 497: 494: 493: 483: 480: 479: 462: 459: 458: 441: 438: 437: 420: 417: 416: 406: 403: 402: 394: 391: 390: 385: 384: 377: 370: 362: 353: 352: 346: 343: 342: 328: 325: 324: 314: 311: 310: 300: 297: 296: 286: 283: 282: 270: 267: 266: 256: 253: 252: 242: 239: 238: 228: 225: 224: 216: 213: 212: 202: 199: 198: 193: 192: 185: 178: 170: 163: 160: 144: 141: 126: 123: 101: 100: 96: 95: 91: 90: 69: 68:Judges sitting 65: 64: 60: 59: 43: 39: 38: 35: 31: 30: 29:House of Lords 27: 23: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 672: 661: 658: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 642: 640: 629: 624: 622: 615: 612: 608: 604: 601: 600: 587: 584: 583: 574: 569: 566: 565: 559: 554: 553: 547: 542: 541: 535: 531: 530: 524: 520: 517: 516: 508: 504: 503: 495: 491: 488: 487: 481: 475: 470: 467: 466: 460: 454: 449: 446: 445: 439: 433: 428: 425: 424: 423:Bettini v Gye 418: 414: 411: 410: 404: 399: 398: 392: 383: 378: 376: 371: 369: 364: 363: 360: 350: 344: 339: 335: 334: 326: 321: 317: 312: 308: 305: 304: 298: 294: 291: 290: 284: 280: 277: 276: 268: 264: 261: 260: 254: 250: 247: 246: 240: 236: 233: 232: 226: 221: 220: 214: 210: 207: 206: 200: 191: 186: 184: 179: 177: 172: 171: 168: 159: 156: 152: 150: 140: 136: 131: 122: 120: 116: 112: 109: 108: 97: 92: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 70: 66: 61: 56: 51: 47: 44: 40: 36: 32: 28: 24: 19: 16: 620: 602: 562: 550: 543:1 All ER 129 538: 527: 511: 499: 498: 484: 463: 442: 421: 407: 397:Boone v Eyre 395: 340:, 2 SCR 675 329: 320:SI 1999/2083 307:EWCA Civ 963 301: 287: 271: 257: 243: 229: 217: 209:EWHC KB J 13 203: 157: 153: 146: 138: 133: 128: 106: 105: 104: 15: 338:2012 SCC 51 88:Lord Hodson 80:Lord Tucker 639:Categories 597:References 316:UTCCR 1999 249:EWCA Civ 5 235:EWCA Civ 6 72:Lord Reid 42:Citations 222:1 QB 673 162:See also 143:Judgment 119:mitigate 94:Keywords 336:, 34:Decided 293:UKHL 1 279:UKPC 5 263:UKPC 7 135:order. 113:is an 605: 592:Notes 125:Facts 26:Court 613:(UK) 347:see 149:debt 641:: 626:. 121:. 86:, 82:, 78:, 74:, 619:" 381:e 374:t 367:v 318:( 189:e 182:t 175:v

Index

[1961] UKHL 5
[1962] AC 413
Closed access icon
Lord Reid
Lord Morton of Henryton
Lord Tucker
Lord Keith of Avonholm
Lord Hodson
[1961] UKHL 5
English contract law
mitigate
debt
v
t
e
Cutter v Powell
EWHC KB J 13
Sumpter v Hedges
Hoenig v Isaacs
EWCA Civ 6
Bolton v Mahadeva
EWCA Civ 5
Workers Trust v Dojap Investments Ltd
UKPC 7
Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Achievement Ltd
UKPC 5
Dunlop Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage Co Ltd
UKHL 1
Murray v Leisureplay plc
EWCA Civ 963

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.