80:(typically a parent) stood on the other side of the transparent plexiglas, calling out for them to come or holding an enticing stimulus such as a toy. This allowed so the infant would be motivated to crawl across towards them. It was assumed if the child was reluctant to crawl to their caregiver, he or she was able to perceive depth, believing that the transparent space was an actual cliff. The researchers found that 27 of the infants crawled over to their mother on the "shallow" side without any problems. A few of the infants crawled but were extremely hesitant. Some infants refused to crawl because they were confused about the perceived drop between them and their mothers. The infants knew the glass was solid by patting it, but still did not cross. In this experiment, all of the babies relied on their vision in order to navigate across the apparatus. This shows that when healthy infants are able to crawl, they can perceive depth. However, results do not indicate that avoidance of cliffs and fear of heights is innate.
152:
The first visual cliff experiment was conducted with rats who were raised in the dark and in the light. The results were that both groups of rats would walk all over the shallow and deep parts of the cliff without an issue, which surprised Gibson, Walk, and Thomas Tighe (a research assistant). A later experiment with kittens raised in the dark and then placed on the visual cliff showed that depth perception was not innate in all species as the kittens would walk on either side of the visual cliff. After six days of being in the light, the kittens would avoid the deep side of the visual cliff (Rodkey, 2015). Later researchers conducted experiments using other species.
201:
throughout the milking facility. Dairy heifers in the experimental group were exposed to a visual cliff while dairy heifers in the control group were not. The experimental group was found to have significantly higher heart rates and stop more frequently than the heifers in the control group. Depth exposure did not have any effect on cortisol levels or the ease of handling of the animals. These findings provide evidence of both depth perception and acute fear of heights in cows. This may lead to a reorganization of the way milking factories function.
143:, most of the babies crossed regardless of the mother's facial expressions. This suggests that babies look to their mother's emotional expressions for advice most often when they are uncertain about the situation. Joseph J. Campos research focuses on facial expressions between the caregiver and infant. Specifically his research shows that the infants will not crawl if the caregiver expresses a signal of distress. If the caregiver gives the infant a positive facial expression the child is more likely to crawl across the visual cliff.
20:
210:
babies to feel the solidity of the glass before they would cross over. This response was repeated over and over again in tests. Another criticism has to do with the experience of the infant. Infants who learned to crawl before 6.5 months of age had crossed the glass, but the ones that learned to crawl after 6.5 months of age avoided crossing the glass. This helps support the hypothesis that experience does influence avoidance of the glass, rather than just being innate.
175:, like rats, are nocturnal animals, sensitive to tactual cues from their vibrissae. But the cat, as a predator, must rely more on its sight. Kittens were observed to have excellent depth-discrimination. At four weeks, the earliest age that a kitten can skillfully move about, they preferred the shallow side of the cliff. When placed on the glass over the deep side, they either freeze or circle backward until they reach the shallow side of the cliff.
92:. Thus, infant studies are an important part of the visual cliff. When an infant starts to engage in crawling, to sit, or walking, they use perception and action. During this time, infants begin to develop a fear of height. The everyday exploration of infants gives them clues about things or objects to avoid when exploring. Other research that has used the visual cliff focuses on preterm infants, prelocomotor Infants, and maternal signaling.
151:
Before Gibson and Walk conducted their study with human infants, multiple experiments were conducted using rats, one-day-old chicks, newborn kids, kittens, pigs, adult chickens, dogs, lambs, and monkeys. Overall, most species would avoid the deep side of the visual cliff, some right after being born.
209:
One of the criticisms of the visual cliff study was whether the research in the study really supported the hypothesis that depth perception was innate in humans. One issue was about the glass over the deep part of the visual cliff. By covering up the deep side with glass the researchers enabled the
187:
of
Harvard University found in 1904 that aquatic turtles have somewhat worse depth-discrimination than land turtles. On the visual cliff one might expect an aquatic turtle to respond to the reflections from the glass as it might to water and prefer the deep side for this reason. They showed no such
126:
younger than crawling age on the visual cliff. This study found that the infants exhibited distress less frequently when they were placed on the shallow side of the apparatus in contrast to when they were placed on the deep side. This means that prelocomotor infants can discriminate between the two
113:
were analyzed. A significant surface effect was found, with longer crossing times and longer durations of visual attention and tactile exploration in the condition with the visual appearance of a deep cliff. Although the two groups of infants did not differ on any of the timed measurements, infants
79:
Gibson and Walk (1960) hypothesized that depth perception is inherent as opposed to a learned process. To test this, they placed 36 infants, six to fourteen months of age, on the shallow side of the visual cliff apparatus. Once the infant was placed on the opaque end of the platform, the caregiver
163:
do not depend upon visual cues like some of the other species tested. Their nocturnal habits lead them to seek food largely by smell. When moving about in the dark, they respond to tactual cues from their stiff whiskers (vibrissae) located on the snout. Hooded rats tested on the visual cliff show
43:
in human and other animal species. It consists of a sturdy surface that is flat but has the appearance of a several-foot drop part-way across. The visual cliff apparatus allowed them to conduct an experiment in which the optical and tactile stimuli associated with a simulated cliff were adjusted
135:
James F Sorce et al. tested to see how maternal emotional signaling affected the behaviors of one-year-olds on the visual cliff. To do this they placed the infants on the shallow side of the visual cliff apparatus and had their mothers on the other side of the visual cliff eliciting different
200:
to perceive a visual cliff was tested by NA Arnold et al. Twelve dairy heifers were exposed to a visual cliff in the form of a milking pit while walking through a milking facility. Over this five-day experiment the heifers’ heart rates were measured along with the number of times they stopped
188:
preference; 76% of the aquatic turtles crawled onto the shallow side. The large percentage that choose the deep side suggests either that this turtle has worse depth-discrimination than other animals, or that its natural habitat gives it less occasions to "fear" a fall.
114:
born at term demonstrated a larger number of motor strategies and avoidance behaviors by simple tally. This study indicates that infants born at term and those born preterm can perceive a visual cliff and change their responses accordingly.
164:
little preference for either side of the visual cliff apparatus as long as they could feel the glass with their vibrissae. When placed upon the glass over the deep side, they move about as if there was no cliff.
719:
Adolph, K. E., & Kretch, K. S., "Infants on the Edge: Beyond the Visual Cliff". In A. Slater, & P. Quinn (Eds.), Developmental psychology: Revisiting the classic studies (pp. 36-55). SAGE Publications.
100:
Sixteen infants born at term and sixteen born preterm were encouraged to crawl to their caregivers on a modified visual cliff. Successful trials, crossing time, duration of visual attention, duration of
136:
emotional facial expressions. When the mothers posed joy or interest most of the babies crossed the deep side but if the mothers posed fear or anger, most of the babies did not cross the apparatus.
667:
Arnold, N. A., Ng, K. T., Jongman, E. C., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2007). "Responses of dairy heifers to the visual cliff formed by a herringbone milking pit: evidence of fear of heights in cows (
729:
Nancy Rader, Mary
Bausano and John E. Richards, "On the Nature of the Visual Cliff Avoidance Response in Human Infants". Child Dev. 1980 Mar;51(1):61-8. PMID 7363749
110:
102:
23:
This mother is encouraging her child to crawl across the visual cliff. Despite a physical surface covering the cliff, the child hesitates to move forward.
106:
706:
564:
488:
302:
Lin, Yuan-Shan; Rielly, Marie; Mercer, Vicki S. (2010). "Responses to a
Modified Visual Cliff by Pre-Walking Infants Born Preterm and at Term".
357:
47:
Using a visual cliff apparatus, Gibson and Walk examined possible perceptual differences at crawling age between human infants born
437:
Campos, J. J., Langer, A., & Krowitz, A. (1970). "Cardiac
Responses on the Visual Cliff in Prelocomotor Human Infants".
501:
513:
Gibson, E. J., Walk, R. D., & Tighe, T. J. (1957). "Behavior of Light- and Dark-Reared Rats on a Visual Cliff".
762:
71:
is placed immediately beneath the
Plexiglas, and on the other it is dropped about four feet (1.2 m) below.
417:
580:"The Visual Cliff's Forgotten Menagerie: Rats, Goats, Babies, and Myth-Making in the History of Psychology"
88:
During early development, infants begin to crawl, sit, and walk. These actions impact how the infants view
219:
666:
700:
558:
482:
633:
522:
446:
345:
265:
229:
374:
Karen, Adolph (2017). "Specificity of
Learning: Why Infants Fall Over a Veritable Cliff".
8:
637:
526:
450:
269:
19:
546:
470:
399:
327:
36:
645:
277:
688:
649:
601:
538:
462:
391:
319:
281:
32:
550:
474:
403:
680:
641:
591:
530:
454:
383:
331:
311:
273:
184:
89:
40:
534:
757:
458:
361:
684:
51:
and human infants born at term without documented visual or motor impairments.
512:
315:
751:
48:
436:
387:
723:
692:
653:
605:
542:
395:
323:
285:
64:
466:
596:
579:
224:
60:
301:
197:
123:
68:
742:
418:"Baby Experiments: The Visual Cliff | Stellar Caterpillar"
172:
160:
256:
Gibson, E.J.; Walk, R.D. (April 1960). "Visual Cliff".
364: (archived 2013-02-05) The Neuron (29 March 2009).
624:
Fantz, R.L. (1961). "The origin of form perception".
584:Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
304:Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics
16:Apparatus used to test depth perception in babies
749:
255:
122:Another study measured the cardiac responses of
713:
358:Watch Out For The Visual Cliff date= 2014-02-05
139:In contrast, when the visual cliff effect was
705:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
563:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
487:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
44:while protecting the subjects from injury.
595:
63:that covers a cloth with a high-contrast
59:The visual cliff consisted of a sheet of
31:is an apparatus created by psychologists
619:
617:
615:
351:
251:
249:
247:
245:
146:
18:
117:
750:
577:
623:
612:
373:
297:
295:
242:
130:
13:
292:
95:
14:
774:
736:
673:Journal of Comparative Psychology
646:10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66
367:
278:10.1038/scientificamerican0460-64
83:
74:
660:
571:
578:Rodkey, Elissa (Spring 2015).
506:
495:
430:
410:
338:
1:
535:10.1126/science.126.3263.80-a
235:
204:
502:maternal emotional signaling
459:10.1126/science.170.3954.196
7:
685:10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.440
213:
10:
779:
178:
316:10.3109/01942630903291170
67:pattern. On one side the
54:
220:Developmental psychology
388:10.1111/1467-9280.00258
346:What Is a Visual Cliff?
191:
167:
155:
35:and Richard D. Walk at
763:Psychology experiments
24:
376:Psychological Science
348:psychology.about.com.
147:Non-human experiments
22:
230:Cognitive psychology
127:sides of the cliff.
118:Prelocomotor infants
638:1961SciAm.204e..66F
626:Scientific American
527:1957Sci...126...80W
451:1970Sci...170..196C
270:1960SciAm.202d..64G
258:Scientific American
111:avoidance behaviors
103:tactile exploration
743:Visual Cliff Video
597:10.1002/jhbs.21712
131:Maternal signaling
37:Cornell University
25:
33:Eleanor J. Gibson
770:
730:
727:
721:
717:
711:
710:
704:
696:
664:
658:
657:
621:
610:
609:
599:
575:
569:
568:
562:
554:
510:
504:
499:
493:
492:
486:
478:
434:
428:
427:
425:
424:
414:
408:
407:
371:
365:
355:
349:
344:Cherry, Kendra.
342:
336:
335:
299:
290:
289:
253:
196:The ability for
185:Robert M. Yerkes
107:motor strategies
90:depth perception
41:depth perception
778:
777:
773:
772:
771:
769:
768:
767:
748:
747:
739:
734:
733:
728:
724:
718:
714:
698:
697:
665:
661:
622:
613:
576:
572:
556:
555:
521:(3263): 80–81.
511:
507:
500:
496:
480:
479:
445:(3954): 196–7.
435:
431:
422:
420:
416:
415:
411:
372:
368:
362:Wayback Machine
356:
352:
343:
339:
300:
293:
254:
243:
238:
216:
207:
194:
181:
170:
158:
149:
133:
120:
98:
96:Preterm infants
86:
77:
57:
39:to investigate
17:
12:
11:
5:
776:
766:
765:
760:
746:
745:
738:
737:External links
735:
732:
731:
722:
712:
659:
611:
590:(2): 113–140.
570:
505:
494:
429:
409:
382:(4): 290–295.
366:
350:
337:
291:
240:
239:
237:
234:
233:
232:
227:
222:
215:
212:
206:
203:
193:
190:
180:
177:
169:
166:
157:
154:
148:
145:
132:
129:
119:
116:
97:
94:
85:
84:Infant studies
82:
76:
75:Original study
73:
56:
53:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
775:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
753:
744:
741:
740:
726:
716:
708:
702:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
663:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
620:
618:
616:
607:
603:
598:
593:
589:
585:
581:
574:
566:
560:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
509:
503:
498:
490:
484:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
433:
419:
413:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
370:
363:
359:
354:
347:
341:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
298:
296:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
252:
250:
248:
246:
241:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
217:
211:
202:
199:
189:
186:
176:
174:
165:
162:
153:
144:
142:
137:
128:
125:
124:human infants
115:
112:
108:
104:
93:
91:
81:
72:
70:
66:
62:
52:
50:
45:
42:
38:
34:
30:
21:
725:
715:
701:cite journal
679:(4): 440–6.
676:
672:
668:
662:
632:(5): 66–72.
629:
625:
587:
583:
573:
559:cite journal
518:
514:
508:
497:
483:cite journal
442:
438:
432:
421:. Retrieved
412:
379:
375:
369:
353:
340:
310:(1): 66–78.
307:
303:
264:(4): 64–71.
261:
257:
208:
195:
182:
171:
159:
150:
140:
138:
134:
121:
99:
87:
78:
65:checkerboard
58:
46:
29:visual cliff
28:
26:
752:Categories
669:Bos taurus
423:2019-11-24
236:References
225:Psychology
205:Criticisms
183:The late
61:Plexiglas
693:18085928
654:13698138
606:25728287
551:36208087
543:13442652
475:28877905
404:17845674
396:11273387
324:20170433
286:13827949
214:See also
634:Bibcode
523:Bibcode
515:Science
467:5456616
447:Bibcode
439:Science
360:at the
332:1378458
266:Bibcode
179:Turtles
49:preterm
758:Vision
691:
652:
604:
549:
541:
473:
465:
402:
394:
330:
322:
284:
141:absent
109:, and
55:Design
547:S2CID
471:S2CID
400:S2CID
328:S2CID
69:cloth
720:2012
707:link
689:PMID
671:)".
650:PMID
602:PMID
565:link
539:PMID
489:link
463:PMID
392:PMID
320:PMID
282:PMID
198:cows
192:Cows
173:Cats
168:Cats
161:Rats
156:Rats
27:The
681:doi
677:121
642:doi
630:204
592:doi
531:doi
519:126
455:doi
443:170
384:doi
312:doi
274:doi
262:202
754::
703:}}
699:{{
687:.
675:.
648:.
640:.
628:.
614:^
600:.
588:51
586:.
582:.
561:}}
557:{{
545:.
537:.
529:.
517:.
485:}}
481:{{
469:.
461:.
453:.
441:.
398:.
390:.
380:11
378:.
326:.
318:.
308:30
306:.
294:^
280:.
272:.
260:.
244:^
105:,
709:)
695:.
683::
656:.
644::
636::
608:.
594::
567:)
553:.
533::
525::
491:)
477:.
457::
449::
426:.
406:.
386::
334:.
314::
288:.
276::
268::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.png)