31:
116:
in the Court of Appeal held that Newman
Industries only had to compensate for the ordinary, not the extraordinary loss of profits. He distinguished losses from "particularly lucrative dyeing contracts" as a different type of loss which would only be recoverable if the defendant had sufficient
117:
knowledge of them to make it reasonable to attribute to him acceptance of liability for such losses. The vendor of the boilers would have regarded the profits on these contracts as a different and higher form of risk than the general risk of loss of profits by the laundry.
105:. It issued for the ordinary profit that it had forgone through not having the boiler on time. The question was whether it could also claim the extraordinary profit it would have made, had it been able to take advantage of the lucrative Ministry of Supply contract.
100:
Newman
Industries Ltd was meant to deliver a boiler for Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd. The delivery was five months late. As a result of not having enough laundry capacity, Victoria Laundry lost a lucrative contract from the
157:
149:
192:
113:
59:
30:
187:
197:
202:
135:
85:
8:
127:
102:
89:
71:
181:
165:
141:
81:
Victoria
Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd
24:
Victoria
Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd
150:
Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd
158:
South
Australia Asset Management Co v York Montague
179:
29:
193:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
180:
13:
14:
214:
16:1949 English case in contract law
1:
7:
120:
108:
10:
219:
70:
65:
58:
53:
45:
37:
28:
23:
173:
95:
188:English remedy case law
136:Koufos v Czarnikow Ltd
92:of damage principle.
86:English contract law
198:1949 in British law
128:Hadley v Baxendale
103:Ministry of Supply
131:(1854) 9 Exch 341
77:
76:
210:
203:1949 in case law
33:
21:
20:
218:
217:
213:
212:
211:
209:
208:
207:
178:
177:
176:
123:
111:
98:
84:2 KB 528 is an
41:Court of Appeal
17:
12:
11:
5:
216:
206:
205:
200:
195:
190:
175:
172:
171:
170:
162:
154:
146:
132:
122:
119:
110:
107:
97:
94:
75:
74:
68:
67:
63:
62:
56:
55:
51:
50:
47:
43:
42:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
215:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
185:
183:
168:
167:
166:The Achilleas
163:
160:
159:
155:
152:
151:
147:
144:
143:
138:
137:
133:
130:
129:
125:
124:
118:
115:
106:
104:
93:
91:
87:
83:
82:
73:
69:
64:
61:
57:
54:Case opinions
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
22:
19:
164:
161:3 All ER 365
156:
148:
142:The Heron II
140:
134:
126:
112:
99:
88:case on the
80:
79:
78:
18:
182:Categories
114:Asquith LJ
90:remoteness
72:Remoteness
60:Asquith LJ
153:1 QB 791
145:1 AC 350
121:See also
109:Judgment
66:Keywords
49:2 KB 528
46:Citation
169:UKHL 48
174:Notes
96:Facts
38:Court
139:or
184::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
