User talk:Yunshui/Archive 6

3865:

talk only the 'notability rules' and that is the reason I posted other factors related to the article too. I am still not sure the place to discuss those points. Only on the article discussion page and not on an AFD page? Coming back to the lengthy posts, yes, I did a fairly good research on the matter. That was done for few months actually. I know people may consider this as something negative but I do not think so. I think the efforts people put to create or maintain an article get equal importance to the efforts put to investigate, research and finding facts which are against the article too. I believe that then only we will have quality articles in Knowledge. If we keep on adding new articles entirely based on 'Notability Rules' and nothing else, and completely ignore the research and facts against them, I do not think that will be a good practice. But again, that is just my opinion and I know it may be an inappropriate place to discuss it here.

3856:

clear on the last three AFD discussions too, as the 'Keep' decision was not explained well in those three. You very clearly mentioned it in this case and thanks for that. I fear the conclusion you reached after the AFD discussion was not completely correct, based on the same reason above. The debate didn't reflect the 'notable vs not notable', rather it was based on other factors. Personally I feel this is one of the biggest flaw of the system, but then that is strictly my personal view. We all know how easy to get published in the local newspaper and how these small reports help us to get us more publicity in not just printed media but other media too, especially when the media people are not experts on fields as in this case. And just based on the 'Notability Rules', all those can get a Knowledge entry is something beyond my thinking of the system. But then, that is just me.

568:. They enable other editors to understand the reasoning behind your edits, and make it less likely that your work will be casually reverted. (Not coincidentally, they also would have made my job a lot easier in reviewing this situation!) You also need to accept that unsourced or poorly-sourced material can and probably will be challenged, and act less defensively when it is. I appreciate that you're trying to make the encyclopedia better, but you need to make more constructive arguments for the retention of your material, rather than simply claiming to be in the right. It might also be wise, if such issues arise in the future, to start a discussion on the article's talkpage, rather than the other user's; that way more editors can get involved and the conversation is slightly more transparent. 3550:

my current sporadic internet access I can't easily commit to the lengthy, major edits that are needed (I'm spending most of my time at the moment dealing with admin backlogs). That said, if you want a neutral perspective, I'd say (I'm afraid) that there still seems to be a bit of work needed to balance the article - at present, there appears to be a definite slant towards the anti-government position, with sections like the "State sponsorship" (even the header there is POV, implying that the government financially backed the rioters) having substantial allegations balanced only by a couple of lines pointing out that Modi claimed innocence and was exonerated. Having looked at some of the earlier versions, though, you have made

2870:

Corporation's website where it is made perfectly clear that: "The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)". TREDIC Corporation is not undetakng illicit marketing of a person or business, it is an establised international real estate development & investment busienss with 5 international offices. We strongly suggest you undertake further research and rescind your blocking of our entry, with immediate effect and issue a full apology.

3452: 3998:

count as the number of votes can go in any direction. But my thinking was, facts, proofs and other supporting materials get importance as well. I was wrong. As I mentioned in the discussion, anyone with a few local newspaper articles about them get a Knowledge entry and the article will remain there forever. As we all agree, this seems to be a flaw in the system, at the same time I understand that Knowledge has limitations as well. I wish there would be some 'trusted members' locally to verify the claims, facts and supporting documents. But then, that will be a major policy change.

3983:

through to the end. I can certainly say I've seen some admins close some heavily contested AfD's not out of argument merits but simply out of !Votes regardless. Yunshui best described my overall argument over the course of the 4 AfD nominations -- in that this one particular article does not necessarily add a lot of value individually, but rather the policies that allow this article to be included are the same policies that make Knowledge one of the most powerful resources. It is in that reason I argue to protect articles like this and not so much the indiscriminate subject matter.

2164:, however Musicfreak7676 has been reverting all my edits to when it showed that Hope and Liam were married. Can you explain to me how Hope is considered married to Liam? They married in Italy I understand that, but once they came over to America the marriage was invalid because the wedding papers were not signed. Hope ripped up the wedding papers and did not sign the papers, therefore Hope and Liam are not married. Regardless of European Law, if they are not recognized as a married couple in the state of California, how can they be considered married on this website? 940:. After a few days to check it doesn't make anything explode or die, we'll be sticking up a big notice and sending out an additional newsletter inviting people to test it out and give us feedback :). This will be followed by two office hours sessions - one on Tuesday the 14th of August at 19:00 UTC for all us Europeans, and one on Wednesday the 15th at 23:00 UTC for the East Coasters out there :). As always, these will be held in #wikimedia-office; drop me a note if you want to know how to easily get on IRC, or if you aren't able to attend but would like the logs. 3088:. I added about 25K words of prose (phew...). I'm not one of the better ones when it comes at copy-editing perhaps if you can lend about 5 or 10 minutes for the article and improve where possible. I don't know that if you are still interested in content work or not but I just need your help buddy here. Since you'd worked with the article about my city, I was hoping that you might also be interested in what had happened in my city 10 years ago (I live close to the spot where the massacre had taken place). Cheers mate! 2599: 31: 2698:. I agree with you, it's unfortunate that articles on topics like this generally end up deleted. Sadly our notability requirements, in their current form, tend to allow more weight to be given to popular culture phenomena and far less to minor historical figures and incidents. (It's even more difficult when you start looking at historical information from other cultures (Japan, in my case); if sources aren't available online and in English you're pretty much out of luck.) 1372: 2495: 420:

airdate. Do you have any sources that give you info like I do? Do you even read the magazine CBS Soaps in Depth? It says right in there on page 13, that Davidson's last air date as Ashley is Friday August 3. Not to mention, the countless number of previews that have also mentioned that August 3 is the last day Davidson is on Y&R. So please do not discredit me when my information is absolutely correct. Colton hockey11 (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)"

3870:

exceptional skill to be get an entry in Knowledge or any similar platform. I have nothing personal against the girl or the people who are actually behind her, but I have proof (which I already explained in the discussion) for every statement I make. I still believe we need to discuss it further and yes, beyond the 'Notability Rules' limit, and I promise this is for making Knowledge a better place and not for any personal attack or wasting people's time.

1005: 1767: 1469: 1666: 3583: 2463: 443:, which is pretty unambiguous. I don't have time at present to research the sources you're warring over, but I'd strongly recommend that both you and Musicfreak step back from the article for a short while, at least until I or another uninvolved editor have had a chance to take a look. If no-one else gets there first, I guarantee it'll be my first priority tomorrow. In the meantime, you may want to consider 185:@Ryulong. Yes, possibly. But one can hope that he'll realise that Knowledge isn't willing to tolerate these sort of edits, and either start doing something constructive or give up and go away. I admit, your scenario seems more likely... I will up his block to an indef per your request, with the proviso that I'm willing to consider a proper unblock request if one is forthcoming. 678:. So I'm going off of their consensus of the group. Also it says VICTOR leaves town, not ERIC BRADEN. Victor leaving town could be him going to another country on Newman business. Hence why scoops aren't reliable nor creditable as such. Soaps In Depth confirmed EB is in contract until the end of the year and is not due to go into negotiations until the end of the year. 555:, and should not be used for the purposes of verification. Soapzone's message board falls into this category, and Musicfreak7676 was right to challenge it. SoapCentral looks more promising as a source; it appears (after an admittedly cursory check) to have some level of editorial oversight, and may be usable for non-contentious material. 2773:"Material featured on this site is subject to copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The copyright protected material may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a misleading context." 757:

not air until tomorrow afternoon in the U.S.A., and just to clarify, I would like to be shown where it says this cannot be updated until aired in the U.S.A. Once again, as soon as I updated Nikki's page to reflect the marriage to Jack, who do you think was right up my rear to undo it less than one minute after the fact.

2794:, this looks like a bad call on my part. I've restored the deleted article, and removed the copyvio segment (the licence quoted by Offender9000 above is not compatible with Knowledge's CC-BY-SA licensing (the last sentence specifically prohibits derivation), so we cannot use the text). Sorry for the inconvenience. 3904:. The article exists (among over four million others), it's sourced, it has been deemed worthy of inclusion. Further attempts to delete it could and probably would be seen as disruptive, and there are a vast number of articles out there that could use your talent for research. However, if you're determined... 3948:

Thank you. No, I am not going further on this. And no more deletion review too. You explained it very well, much appreciated. And the link you sent (do nothing) make sense. As long as we rely on the 'Notability Rules' to a great extend, there is no use in further discussion on this. I will sure spend

3869:

Another point I would like to mention in this discussion. Yes, based on the 'Notability Rules', it can be be kept and nothing wrong in that. But based on my research, findings and facts, this is purely an un-ethical way of self promotion and boosting and projecting a normal girl who does not have any

3612:

Hey, I noticed you forgot to sign your name when you declined the request for Confirmed permission. I went ahead and signed it for you. If you feel that there is an administrative need to retain the signature, or that my unsign template was unnecessary, please don't hesitate to revert and tell me! :P

3226:

Hello mr Yunshi, the orga .in is a seo trick , just to get their website up the google search ranking they have put this , any one can create a domain under .in command it can be (india.ind.in or briney.spears.in ) and same as been done above, so the whole thing is kind of real but i see it as a haux

2091:

I thought I had done the needed change, had added the references and was feeling it was reasonable fort a first ever entry. It it seems to be now available on line. So I have no idea what this message is all about and need help in explaining. Are my changes OK or not? Please explain more. I do ntom

756:

Ok, this guy is getting absolutely ridiculous. Y&R airs an episode ahead in Canada, where does it say under any circumstances on Knowledge that I cannot update a page a day ahead? Just curious, because Nikki Newman and Jack Abbott married on the episode of Y&R today in Canada, however it does

653:

Yunshui, after you said it was perfectly fine having Eric Braeden in the Comings and Goings section with an Exit Date as TBA, based on SoapCentral. Musicfreak once again went around your authority and undid my post stating that it wasn't a reliable source. Every little thing I do, this guy makes sure

610:

Thank you very much for looking into this Yunshui. And yes I have an early subscription to SiD, so I get my information from there, and I also have sources that contact me whenever an immediate change is in the near future. I will do my very best to use edit summaries from now on, and look for actual

3549:

Hey TSU. I'm sorry I haven't done more with the article. Truth be told, I'm not sure I'm the right person for the job - the amount of background reading I'd have to do just to get to the same basic level of knowledge that you and Vaibhav have on the subject is more than a little daunting, and due to

1176:

I'd be glad to, but I'm on holiday at present and have only very limited internet access (this response is pretty much the only thing I'm likely to have time to post today). If Guðsþegn's cool with waiting a couple of weeks to kick off, then all's good; otherwise, he might be better off with someone

3982:

I would like to commend the two of you for resolving the AfD in such a way that shows the best merits of editors co-existing. This easily could have turned into a heightened situation, and has done so in the past even. Everyone presented their arguments and Yunshui, took the time and care to see it

3888:

Your research was considerable, and I commend you for it. However, what you say is correct; it is quite possible for a subject to get coverage in comparatively minor news outlets and thus warrant an article. Let me reiterate again: for Knowledge purposes it matters not one whit whether the coverage

3855:

Regarding the first point, I am not very familiar with the Knowledge deletion process and I never knew that AFD discussions should be related to and based on 'Notability Rules' of Knowledge and nothing else. I guess it is the same with many others participated in the discussions. This point was not

3829:

in the past, and no major changes have been made to either the article or the policies, then renominating it is almost certainly going to be a waste of everybody's time, especially since you didn't advance any policy-based reason for deletion. However, you did make the nomination in good faith, and

2127:

have written about him. So far, the only sources mentions which are not by Schofield himself are simply used to verify background information (such as the laws regarding homosexuality and the work of people who have been influenced by Schofield). At present, there are not enough independent sources

3864:

Now, regarding the long text I posted. Yes, some others also mentioned that. And I know it is a pain to go through the entire content that I posted. I wanted to explain my points with maximum details and proof. I didn't want to talk based on guesswork. As I mentioned above, I never knew we should

3787:

While I respect the decision completely, I still didn't get few things. 'Notability rules' are the sole justification for a Knowledge entry? So anyone who get their details published in few newspapers will get an entry in Knowledge? This question is not to mock the system or to make fun of anyone,

3400:

Thanks for your reply. I think the RFC was unnecessary, as there was already a discussion ongoing at Wikiproject Film, but I hope that it can result in something positive. The best result, in my opinion, would be a rewrite of the plot, which is nearly incoherent. My concern, though, is that the

2546:

To be honest, I'd suggest not deleting it at all - we have individual articles on just about every sura of the Qu'ran, and deleting one of them apparently at random would open a seriously huge can of worms. Whilst Knowledge isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, we are an encyclopedia,

738:

had deemed acceptable. I, myself, am a fan of Soap Central, however, per the guidelines and consensus reached at the WikiProject, Soap Central is not deem able on cast lists. Several editors prior to me who've held much more history within the WikiProject have also reminded me that said website is

715:

Incidentally, I'd also just like to briefly dispel the idea that Musicfreak7676 edited "around my authority": I have no more authority here than anyone else, and I can't dictate whether something is "allowed" in a particular section or not. I'm just trying to offer a neutral third party opinion to

799:

Yes, I know it is a US soap, but I do not see anything that says it cannot be updated based on the fact that the episode had aired. I should see no reason now as to not editing Davidson's Comings and Goings section for her exit on August 3 (for US viewers) considering today in Canada was her last

3997:

Yes, it was nice discussing with Yunshui as he very well explained the system and the rules behind AFD. That also in a nice manner. I never knew (and many others too I guess) 'Notability Rules' are the sole thing which leads to decision making in an AFD. Yes, I knew that the votes alone will not

3374:

I've left a message on his talkpage asking him politely to give it a rest until the RfC concludes. For the record, I too think the section he's adding has no place in the article (fascinating though it is; I'll have to re-watch the film tonight with that information in mind), but don't intend to

3352:

I understand your reasoning for declining protection. My intention was to maintain the integrity of the article while we attempted to reason with Inedible, which has consistently failed so far. Would you mind keeping an eye on things, in case he returns? He has already been warned for his 3RR

1215:

Dear Yunshui! I need help from you with the behavior of another wikipedia editor. Santurman is steering into an edit conflict without improving the article itself, just claiming his version to be "written in stone". He even deleted the "multi issues with this article, refimprove etc.. tags"! See

419:

Hi, I am sorry for the confusion but I did not just attack Musicfreak. Every little thing I say he takes as an attack, the message I just sent to him that he just deleted was this "Oh Musicfreak, would you give it a rest already. I don't understand why you continue to edit Eileen Davidson's last

962:

This article is currently a good article nominee.Please review this.I'm pretty sure it gonna be failed once again.Because there is lots of issues like dead links, unappropriated references,POV etc.Though i've notified nominating user that not to nominate that without solving issues.Please check

780:

based on US airdates. If it were a Canadian soap, it'd be OK to update. I only undid it because I checked "My Watchlist" and it showed me changes had been done. It had nothing to do with you. If somebody else made the edit, I would've undone it for the same reason. You're making this a personal

170:

I was going to comment on your page Ryulong but since you moved it here - my apologies for reverting your talkpage when he added that, I had just finished commenting and was away from the comp for a few mins when it appeared and just hit undo when I got back. I was off to drop him a warning but

1305:

First, you'll note that all the project titles have now changed to the Page Curation prefix, rather than having the New Pages Feed prefix. This is because the overarching project name has changed to Page Curation; the feed is still known as New Pages Feed, and the Curation Toolbar is still the

207:

pages because of their political beliefs that Hong Kong should revert to British rule or become its own sovereign nation, and believes that means anything because of it, is going to be a nuisance on this project for some time to come. I find it weird he prefers the crown colony flag over an

2869:

What are your grounds for deleting a perfectly viable wikipedia entry (TREDIC Corporation) and wasting my companies extremely valuable time? Please take the time to thoroughly investigate prior to deleting valid entires next time, this includes visitng the privacy policy settings of TREDIC

3670:

moved the page to Retina Displays, then you deleted G8 (at which time the main page, and not the talk page, had been moved back to Retina Display. I'm pretty sure this is what happened but I may have it wrong (without being able to see where the deleted content is it's difficult. Thanks,

2196:

to your claim. I mean to say that if they are not officially married, we can have a way of adding it but there must be a reliable source out there which says that they are not officially married. Sources such as press releases or books or official website would be great. Once you've got a

820:

which you should take a look at. Knowledge isn't a crystal ball, which in short means it doesn't tell the future. Nikki and Jack's marriage has not aired in the US yet, where the series is set and is centered. You can't update until hatafter the marriage airs on the east coast of US.

529:, and that's where these edits seem to be problematic. Although I have no doubt that Colton hockey11 is telling the truth about the information he has access to, it's impossible for me to verify it, since the magazine mentioned isn't apparently available until next week. Whilst 591:, but it might be sensible to leave Eileen Davidson's departure date as TBA until a reliable and verifiable source can be produced. I hope this huge wall o' text is in some way helpful, and I'm open to discussing the matter further with you both if you'd like. Regards, 887:

From what I've been told by other editors who have years more experience than I have, the edits cannot be made since the soap is not a Canadian soap. It goes based on the country it origins. That's what has been told to me by several editors, who got their claims from

781:

vendetta when I've never made it personal until you personally attacked me on my wall. I've kept everything Wiki-related. This is how it's been getting done for years, and now you think you can just come in and do as you please, and that is not how Knowledge works.

3911:. If you can demonstrate using sources that her awards are minor or that her parents did her web designs for her (or that people have made those arguments elsewhere), then nothing is stopping you from editing the article to include that information. Be mindful of 3768:

What a mess. After wading through all the arguments (on the AfD, the three previous AfDs, and the talkpage), I finally closed it as Keep. Again. I'm half-inclined to issue a warning to the nominator for disruptive editing... Thanks for drawing my attention to it.

1044: 711:

reliable. Musicfreak7676 is a highly experienced editor in this area and so I don't doubt for a moment that I've simply missed the appropriate discussion of SoapCentral; if you could link it for me that would be handy, just to clarify it for Colton

1793:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1495:

673:

have said it isn't a third-party, valid source. It's a "Scoop" anyway, it isn't a news breaking that anyone else has reported. And I did not see this posting until after I had done the edit. SC has been deemed by the community as not fitting

520:

Cast lists in soaps change all the time, and so it's important to try to reflect the most up-to-date information. Colton hockey11 is to be commended for trying to keep the article current. However, any information added to Knowledge must be

842:

Musicfreak7676, would you be able to link to a discussion or policy that shows that information on US soap plots can only be sourced to their US showing? I'm not aware of such a consensus, and it seems contrary to the usual requirements of

634:

issue with Colton's exits if (s)he had just sourced it from the magazine and/or website in the correct format. Erasing a TBA with sources for a date with no sources isn't acceptable. I don't see how I didn't keep it directed on the topic.

2243:

TSU has a point - what you need is a source showing the correct surname, not a claim surmised from in-universe events. Taking a position on her surname based soley on whether or not events on the show mean that she is legally married is

815:

Because Colton you aren't sourcing anything. You just add a date and think that's okay. You need to correctly source it, whether it's a magazine or a book or a website. And updating Nikki's marriage before the US episode airs violates

3788:

but I find it very strange. And second, " I'm half-inclined to issue a warning to the nominator for disruptive editing" - you meant my nomination? If so, would you please explain it? I mean what disruptive editing that I have done? --

847:. If the show has aired in Canada prior to its US release, then the plotline has been made publicly available, and therefore the Canadian release seems as though it should be perfectly adequate as a source for plot points. It's not a 1347:

I hope you're having a nice vacation, but your enrollee seems to be inactive. I would remove e from the status page and let them know that if they become reactive they will need to re-enroll. At your discretion, but my suggestion.

114:

indef him already. He's a nationalistic editor who's only here to push his own personal propaganda. Why he chose to take out his beliefs on the Amazing Race season pages is beyond me. Also, the fact he assumes I'm Japanese is

541:

does), they should, in theory at least, be somehow available to the general public. I would therefore suggest holding off on adding this information until the magazine is published and can be correctly cited in the article -

423:

I do not understand how that is an attack, I am just giving him information that he does not know. He then goes to delete my comment to make it look like I am leaving him a personal attack, which is not what I am doing.

577:

before reverting and reporting to AIV. The lack of edit summaries and aggressive messages on your talk page might admittedly make that difficult, but try to see past such things to the other editor's actual motivation.

263:

Hi Yunshui, could you please take a look at this IP user's contributions and block log. I'm thinking about using mass rollback (given that there are so many and the history) but I just wanted to get an admin's opinion.

1797:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1499:

3821:

of coverage, not its content. I actually agree that there are some flaws in the current policy (it gives far too much weight to modern popular culture, for example), but an AFD discussion is not the place to change

485:, since that's the page where the two of you have had the most interaction. The main bone of contention here appears to be the "Comings and Goings" section, where Colton hockey11 has been adding Eric Braeden per 2679:

plenty more on Google News archives and web search. With over twenty references it's a shame this Berkley pilot, veteran, aircraft manufacturer, and businessman was considered not notable and had to be deleted.

3174:

That was quick. I'm trying to steer clear of any POV issues and just focus on grammar and readability at the moment, although I've found myself neutralising the more hyperbolic language from time to time.

236: 2337:

I see you removed the tag for help. Great...no prob. New editor will or won't ask. Question: I noticed that you put a ""t"" in the link. Is that the way to do an easy no link instead of using <wiki:

3897:

of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources is sufficient to warrant an article. As I said above, it's arguably a flaw in the rules, but that's the way it currently stands.

3830:

you'd waited a decent length of time to tag it again, so warning you for disruption would be overly harsh (which is why I didn't). I apologise if you felt at all threatened by the above comment.

309:

Thanks for that, Acroterion got in first. I had checked a few and found some to be okay, but I was just about to do it when I noticed that it had already been done. I was a little too slow :).

233: 1492: 3825:

As far as the disruptive editing comment goes, that was somewhat glib on my part (I was rather frustrated after wading through all your walls of text...) If an article has been taken to AFD

2991:, and your resume does not belong here. If what you have done in life is notable, someone will eventually write an article about you - this person should not be you, for the reasons set out 3375:

weigh in on the RfC for fear of making my talkpage message appear somewhat hypocritical. I'm more interested in preventing the edit warring than in whether or not the section gets included.

1530:

which you semi-protected on 3 August 2012. Hope you are enjoying/enjoyed your holiday (I'm going to leave a message on RFPP that I believe you're on holidays - sorry if I'm wrong. Regards,

2115:

Hi Bailey Chipping, and sorry for the late reply; I've been away. The main problem I can see with the article is that almost all of the references are to Schofield's own work. Knowledge's

2736:, but the article has been built up over 200 edits and contains much material of value. I suggest the deletion of the copyvio paragraph is sufficient, not deletion of the whole article.- 3750: 3503: 134:

Yeah, good call, actually. After that post on your talkpage I've slapped a 48hr block on him; should have just done so earlier and saved you having to endure that little tirade. Sorry.

2297:

Hi Kudpung. Is there a specific section you're suspicious of? I've copy-pasted a few bits and bobs into Google and found only Wikimirrors, but I'm not sure which part(s) to focus on.

3445: 3526: 2961:

Yunsui! You have deleted my webpage User: RcSihag/R.C.Sihag. Kindly restore it. I will soon get the information on tripod deleted. I wish to keep this information on wikimwdia.

2672: 3441: 1210: 1324:

It's still a beta version - bugs are expected - and we've got a lot more work to do. But if you see something going wrong, or a feature missing, drop me a note or post on the

361:

Just having a look at the history, it seems they do some good ones to start with the move onto doing it every article they see. Hopefully they'll lose interest after a month.

3030: 654:

he is there right away to undo it. Which I don't understand considering you said that Eric Braeden leaving Y&R was allowed in the Comings and Goings section. Thank you.

3817:(the other main inclusion policy), it can have an entry. That the coverage is prompted by spurious awards or insignificant achievements is irrelevent; what counts is the 285: 3510: 2972: 1710: 248: 3874:

Finally, kindly let me know how to proceed from here, how to nominate for a deletion review or what is the next step to follow up in this to continue the discussion. --

3543: 2764:

You might also like to note that the alleged material does not belong to or come from the www.crime.co.nz website anyway. It was taken from the official website of the

4002:

Anyway, this is my first long interaction with many of the Knowledge members and I am looking forward to start contributing and actively participating in Knowledge. --

1951: 1863: 1605: 1581: 1112: 1088: 1232: 3860:

Regarding the second point above, no, it is alright and it didn't sound like threatening. I was new to the terms and I was curious. Thanks for explaining that too.

3290: 1959: 1931: 1855: 1613: 1597: 1228: 1104: 171:

Yunshui got there first. I have to say though, he cannot actually be from HK can he? I dont know anyone from there who uses 'Hongkongese' or wording to that effect.

3527: 3298: 3252:; that would be an appropriate speedy deletion template. The reason I declined it was because it isn't a hoax, but I'd have no problem deleting it as non-notable. 1939: 1847: 1589: 1458: 1096: 3424: 3123:

I'm having a crack at it now; afterwards I'll take a look at the lead. May not get finished today; if I suddenly stop editing, feel free to carry on without me!

2391: 2058: 1923: 1756: 1509: 1476: 1460: 1251: 1196: 1163: 387:

I will be keeping an eye on that address once the block expires - hopefully the person behind it will have found something better to do with their time by then.

3659: 3652: 3647: 3282: 2924:. Copyright has nothing to do with it, the arguments for deletion were based on the corporation's failure to meet the notability requirements for inclusion at 1915: 1831: 1774: 1758: 1673: 1659: 1573: 1080: 3227:

as their is no subject or article to write about anything. do i have to go it in long AFD for this ? or again putting this to speedy deletion would be fine ?

3536: 3196: 3111: 3091: 2231: 2208: 2031: 1425: 1281: 2282:

for possible copyvios and/or close paraphrasing. I seem to have stumbled on something but I'm not sure if they are mirroring WP content or not. Thanks.

1790: 1523: 3851:

Thank you for explaining it. I am not sure whether this is the right place to discuss it, if not, please let me know where to and I will continue there.

3690: 3080:

was about to be announced so was intending to start work on my subpage for it. In the meantime, I saw that someone did create it and it was looking like

1839: 1807: 208:

independent one, though. And Only in death, it is weird that he's decided to use "Hongkongese", considering they tend not to use that phrase themselves.—

2238: 2215: 1257: 904: 833: 793: 690: 647: 3533:

The issues brought here are addressed perhaps can you leave few comments there if it is warranted and fix the POV in the lines of the article. Thanks.

3118: 2921: 1288: 2006: 1654: 626:

Yunshui, I never made any of my comments towards said user personal in anyway. I always keep things directed to the topics at hand when I leave the

3160: 1751: 1048: 1018: 2445: 2397: 1202: 1190: 936:

The curation toolbar, our Wikimedia-supported twinkle replacement. We're going to be deploying it, along with a pile of bugfixes, to wikipedia on

3012: 2878: 2145: 604: 482: 460: 242: 3567: 3416: 3391: 3203: 3136: 2584: 2564: 2477: 2265: 2052: 2038: 1450: 1432: 864: 729: 512: 508: 2109: 1442: 1404: 1385: 180: 3641: 2807: 3306: 1823: 1565: 1072: 382: 356: 3782: 3265: 3098: 2432:- confusing if they aren't actively looking for help. That's why I untranscluded (is that even a word?) it. Thanks for lending them a hand. 3733: 3709: 3340: 3188: 3169: 2616: 943:

I hope to see a lot of you there; it's going to be a big day for everyone involved, I think :). I'll have more notes after the deployment!

699:

Hello chaps, sorry to have missed most of this conversation. Regarding SoapCentral as a source, I did only have a short look at it, and if

588: 400: 330: 304: 3072:

Hi Yunshui! I see that you've been busy of lat doing all those admin stuff and you are doing great. Do you remember our collaboration for

2858: 2839: 2711: 2689: 1549: 3966: 3943: 3883: 3843: 3797: 3154: 2945: 2758: 2648:

I have full access to Highbeam, and having run a number of different searches, can find no mention of the subject in the archives there.

2509: 2324: 2310: 2074: 221: 198: 165: 147: 3762: 3622: 2824:. We only have 2 people working on this article and we are struggling finding reliable sources. Your input would be much appreciated! -- 1993: 1897: 1647: 1146: 3368: 3220: 4011: 3953:

Regarding the edits, yes, as the deletion discussion is closed, I will try to make few edits in the article, not in an attacking way.

3059: 2783: 2161: 1779: 1481: 3440:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 952: 2995:. If your only purpose on Knowledge is self-promotion, as appears to be the case, then you will find little success here; consider 2983:

The decision to delete the page was not made (primarily) on copyright grounds, but on the grounds of unencyclopedic promotion (see

2815: 335:

I think that may be someone to watch in a month, because right after their 1 week block expired they started the same thing again.

3991: 1337: 3271: 2742: 2661: 2453: 2123:

sources - whilst Schofield can be used, with caution, as source for information about himself, it's more important to cover what

1514: 3040: 2540: 3327: 2415:

tags work as well, of course, but have the disadvantage that they don't provide a link to the template content. A useful trick!

2084: 1980: 1884: 1731: 1634: 1133: 923: 881: 809: 766: 663: 620: 475: 433: 2357: 2248:. Personally, I would use whichever surname is currently listed in the show's credits. If you haven't raised the issue yet at 1412: 1393: 1026: 2968: 2669:

Just got my access. Dissapointing the search only goes back 25 years, the Dole Air race got national coverage and newsreels.

2429: 2180: 703:

deems it unreliable then their opinion definitely trumps my own. That said, the only discussion of it I could find there was

3696:

Well spotted, I missed that (the talkpage had been blanked, so I assumed it was empty). Fixed now, thanks for the heads up.

3741: 3065: 2184: 1904: 1812: 1554: 1401:

Once I have added reliable citations (under way: e.g. newspapers), how do I resubmit the article for moderation? Thanks :)

1061: 291:

Blocked. I see you already mass rollbacked them; I approve and would have done so myself if you hadn't gotten there first.

2128:

to meet the notability requirements, and as such the article is liable to be proposed for deletion. He seems as though he

914:

issue, because the show has aired. I can understand if it was a week in advance, but it is not, as Yunshui has clarified.

3598: 2976: 1224: 1056: 2414:. This tells the software to display a link to the template page, rather than transcluding the template. <nowiki: --> 1357: 971: 3573: 3085: 3018: 2291: 254: 1270:

for the content you want to add up. I tried to find but I didn't get source to things you added thus few facts may be

1169: 3236: 498: 494: 440: 2821: 2723: 2637: 2632: 2485: 981:

You need to check for deleted edits. A few of the ones you suggested had no edits, had some but they were deleted.

910:

Please show me any article on Knowledge that states something cannot be edited when aired in Canada? This is not a

128: 3081: 1220:

and it's edit history. Many article statements are clearly disprooven by quick search and multiple ext. sources.

501:

that he has personal knowledge of these facts due to (I'm guessing from context) an early release subscription to

3725: 3682: 3347: 2612: 2547:

and coverage like this is appropriate. If you're determined to get the page deleted for some reason, I'd suggest

2018: 1735: 1541: 990: 372: 346: 320: 275: 152:

I've clarified myself above. He is not here to edit constructively and in 2 days he's just going to be angrier.—

3401:

summary be written objectively, and not in an in-universe style. We will see what develops. Thanks again. ---

2911: 2886: 2085: 928: 3076:

GA? You had helped a lot there and I'm in need of few touch ups again. I came across the news that verdict of

2402:

Just to expand on Catfish's reply: to stop a template from displaying the template contents, format it with a

3939: 3839: 3778: 3705: 3637: 3563: 3387: 3261: 3184: 3150: 3132: 3055: 3008: 2996: 2941: 2854: 2803: 2749: 2707: 2657: 2560: 2441: 2332: 2306: 2261: 2141: 2070: 1362: 1186: 860: 725: 600: 456: 396: 300: 194: 143: 2605: 2598: 1274:. If the facts are true, there should be some source that you are using to add the content, thus please see 3907:

The first and most preferable course, if you have concerns about the article, would be to try and fix them

3316: 1969: 1873: 1623: 1325: 1294: 1122: 97: 3926:

was incorrect, but that I made an error in assessing the arguments put forth) then you can open a case at

704: 3167: 2897: 2365: 1723: 1677: 1655: 1241: 995: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2525:

Hi, I thought A1 wasn't the best criteria, but I couldn't find anything better. What would you suggest?

3019: 2394: 1727: 1254: 1199: 1166: 38: 2005:

In April you warned user Thirtyonecookies about vandalism. Since then he has vandalized the entry for

3927: 3753:

which has its 4th AFD with just the process stretched can you have a look into this and close please

3322: 2505: 2473: 2176: 2105: 2097: 1975: 1879: 1783: 1629: 1505: 1485: 1128: 919: 877: 805: 762: 659: 616: 471: 429: 2043:

I have no interest or patience in devoting myself to Knowledge. If anyone cares they can report it.

3410: 3362: 3046:

Shows what Google translate knows. Never trust a translation robot... Anybody there speak Kannada?

2729: 2577: 2533: 2520: 1342: 1275: 902: 831: 791: 749: 688: 645: 2992: 2384: 933:

Hey all. Some quick but important updates on what we've been up to and what's coming up next :).

716:

help the two of you resolve the issue. You can both take or leave my suggestions as you see fit.

176: 3618: 3605:

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

3108:

can you write it so that it summarizes the article? Three or four paragraphs would do great :)

3077: 3066: 2779: 2273: 1333: 1034: 986: 948: 565: 414: 3451: 1418:

It is simple to re-submit the article. Once you are done with the fixes you want to do, place

3729: 3686: 2192:

Hi Colton and thanks for your contributions! Instead of changing the text, why not provide a

1545: 969: 911: 848: 817: 777: 552: 587:

As far as the page in question is concerned, I can't see any immediate reason not to accept

3758: 3378:

Thanks for accepting the RPP decision, and please let me know if the disruption continues.

3336: 3232: 2964: 2874: 2569:

Alright then, if that's the case I won't bother. It just seems so short and insignificant.

2501: 2469: 2172: 2168: 2101: 2093: 1989: 1893: 1643: 1501: 1318: 1142: 915: 873: 801: 758: 655: 612: 467: 425: 2765: 8: 3721: 3678: 3663: 3648: 3403: 3355: 3165: 2769: 2572: 2528: 2370:

You can put "tl|" before the content in the template. In a help me template, you replace

1739: 1537: 1052: 1022: 957: 894: 823: 783: 741: 680: 637: 368: 342: 316: 271: 3714:

No worries, I saw it on my watchlist then had a look at them and did a 'what the heck'.

1040: 3742: 2882: 2832: 2685: 2151: 1803: 1747: 1159: 675: 172: 105: 3141:

Stepping back now to let Vaibhav have a crack at it; I'll take another look tomorrow.

2061:

for that last edit now, but I will keep an eye out and indef him if he does it again.

4007: 3962: 3935: 3879: 3835: 3809:

the sole (or at least primary) justification for an entry. If a subject has received

3793: 3774: 3701: 3633: 3614: 3559: 3383: 3257: 3180: 3146: 3128: 3051: 3004: 2937: 2907: 2850: 2799: 2775: 2754: 2738: 2703: 2653: 2628: 2556: 2437: 2349: 2320: 2302: 2287: 2257: 2137: 2066: 2048: 2014: 1706: 1527: 1446: 1408: 1389: 1329: 1182: 982: 944: 856: 721: 596: 530: 490: 452: 392: 377: 351: 325: 296: 280: 215: 190: 159: 139: 122: 47: 17: 2920:

As SmartSE has helpfully explained (cheers SmartSE!), the grounds are made clear at

2748:

You might like to look at the (now deleted) comments made on the article talk page (

2315:

Thanks for looking and confirming. I also concluded that they were mirrors. Cheers,

1693: 1047:, which i uploaded few weeks back to use in way i had already told to you. Good day 3444:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 3219: 3026: 2956: 2592: 2422: 2374: 2000: 1353: 964: 611:

articles, rather then using my source/SiD, when it is not available to the public.

204: 3901: 3754: 3582: 3332: 3307:

Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing

3246: 3228: 2988: 1985: 1889: 1692:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

1639: 1138: 889: 735: 700: 670: 564:

Colton hockey11; I'd advise a couple of things. Firstly, you need to start using

543: 466:

Thank you for your professionalism Yunshui. Hope this issue gets rectified soon.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3989: 3912: 3716: 3673: 3105: 3104:

Hey, one more request. The lead is in the state as it was when created, so per

3034: 2864: 2676: 2249: 1532: 1516: 1195:

Fine, I'll be taking. We'll give you someone in September. Enjoy your Holiday!

627: 579: 503: 363: 337: 311: 266: 2733: 439:

No, that last was somewhat blunt, but not a personal attack. I warned you for

3916: 3814: 3803: 3667: 2984: 2929: 2925: 2827: 2695: 2681: 2548: 2225: 2116: 2025: 1960:

Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension

1799: 1743: 1716:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1247: 582:, and try to respond to the actual edits, rather than the person behind them. 574: 4003: 3958: 3931: 3875: 3831: 3810: 3789: 3770: 3697: 3629: 3555: 3437: 3379: 3253: 3176: 3142: 3124: 3047: 3031:

Knowledge:Pages needing translation into English#Bettadasanapura, Bangalore

3000: 2933: 2903: 2846: 2795: 2699: 2649: 2624: 2552: 2433: 2341: 2316: 2298: 2283: 2253: 2245: 2221: 2198: 2193: 2133: 2062: 2044: 2010: 1614:

Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship

1271: 1267: 1178: 1153: 852: 717: 592: 534: 526: 448: 444: 388: 292: 209: 186: 153: 135: 116: 1422:

at the top of your submission and it will be up for review again. Cheers!

1371: 507:. Musicfreak7676 has persistently reverted these edits, pointing out that 2732:. I agree the first paragraph of the History section is far too close to 2202: 1924:

New influence graph visualizations; NPOV and history; 'low-hanging fruit'

1349: 976: 844: 522: 2494: 872:

That is precisely what I thought. Thank you for clearing it up Yunshui.

3900:

As far as "next steps" are concerned, it would probably be sensible to

2157: 1685: 1493:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bicycle Shaped Object (2nd nomination)

1105:

Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity

1004: 533:

are totally acceptable (so long as they meet the other requirements at

486: 3984: 3073: 2279: 1266:

I see that the stuff removed by Santurman was unsourced. Please find

3283:

World's largest photo competition kicks off; WMF legal fees proposal

1313:

On the subject of the Curation Toolbar (nice segue, Oliver!) - it's

800:

episode, as a heartfelt goodbye was given as she left for New York.

3802:

Under the current form of Knowledge's policies, basically yes, the

3436:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in 1832:

Core content competition in full swing; Wikinews fork taken offline

1574:

Bangla-language survey suggests the challenges for small Wikipedias

776:

is a US soap, not a Canadian. So updating the information violates

2462: 2410:

prefacing the template title within the curly brackets like this:

2057:

Thanks to Nicmart for the heads-up. It's rather too late to block

707:

from four years ago, which seemed to tentatively conclude that it

2675:

There is an article nontheless, found it in about two minutes...

489:

and giving Eileen Davidson's departure date as August 3rd (using

3490:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August 3922:

If you believe that I closed the AfD incorrectly (not that the

2671: 2623:

Not directly at you, but a query on a recent speedy you made.

2418:

The problem with leaving the template as it was is that adding

1217: 203:

Yunshui, I doubt that someone who tries to change the flags on

2132:

be notable, so suitable sources presumably exist somewhere...

3949:

the energy and efforts on other parts of Knowledge instead.

2845:

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll take a look at it tomorrow.

2619:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1848:

Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.

1177:

more readily available. I'll be back properly in September.

1384:

Thanks for your feedback on page:Starters with Mocktales.

3504:

Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard

2092:

grasp how these talk pages work either. Bailey Chipping--

3528:

Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Naroda_Patiya_massacre

2694:

Good find, but sadly too sparse for the requirements of

1856:

Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension

3496:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate 1772:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1734:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1474:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1211:

Help from u to deal with the behavior ofan other editor

3484:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums 1699:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

3811:

significant coverage in reliable, independent sources

1791:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Miss Liberty America

546:

if the article is slightly inaccurate for a few days.

3353:

violation, so he can't claim ignorance. Thanks! ---

1778:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

1480:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

481:

Okay, I'm going to restrict myself here to edits on

2024:If they continue vandalism, you can report them at 1952:

From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who

509:

fansites/forums are not considered reliable sources

3478:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey 2922:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/TREDIC Corporation 630:messages on people's talk pages. I would have had 2820:Dear Yunshui, you are invited to join us to edit 2160:'s wiki page to show that she is not married to 734:Exactly Yunshui. I wouldn't have reverted it if 3159:I am done with it. Its really a POV nightmare. 2902:I am replying to this user on their talk page. 2278:Hi Yunshui. Could you do me a favour and check 1039:Remember sir, i beg if you can tell me role of 483:List of The Young and the Restless cast members 1598:"Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit 1113:Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts 1306:Curation Toolbar. Hopefully this will be the 3428:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) 2220:If the problem still persists, you can seek 2734:http://www.crime.co.nz/c-files.aspx?ID=9878 493:as a source). Colton hockey11 further adds 2728:Please reconsider your speedy deletion of 2604:Hello, Yunshui. You have new messages at 2252:(I haven't checked), it might be an idea. 3628:Whoops. Thanks for cleaning up after me. 2768:. There is no breach of copyright as the 2205:the content added and keep them. Thanks! 2119:require that information be available in 851:issue, since the show has already aired. 3930:; follow the instructions on that page. 3450: 3084:. Eventually, I stared work and made it 2770:the Board has a disclaimer which states: 1932:Just how bad is the code review backlog? 3466:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. 3025:It's not Gujarati ;) It's likely to be 2009:. How is it possible to ban this user? 1705:notice, but please explain why in your 14: 1582:You really can request for arbitration 1328:and I'll be happy to help :). Thanks! 1043:which is mentioned at left bottom of 559:, when available, looks to be be fine. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3658:Hi Yunshui, could you please restore 2430:Category:Wikipedians looking for help 237:2002:1814:17F3:1234:226:8FF:FEE2:BADD 2551:, but I wouldn't be too optimistic. 2428:to a page automatically lists it in 2156:Hi there Yunshui. I've been editing 1089:No pending or open arbitration cases 892:and have been doing such for years. 25: 3749:hello again Mr Yunshui this is the 3455:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow 1840:American judges on citing Knowledge 1780:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 1482:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 1321:and it should appear on the right. 1158:Hey Yunshui! Would you mind taking 23: 2597: 1916:Tough journey for new travel guide 1694:deleted for any of several reasons 1680:because of the following concern: 1664: 24: 4023: 3511:Read the entire first edition of 1789:The article will be discussed at 1491:The article will be discussed at 3581: 3432:Welcome to the first edition of 3299:Knowledge's Seven Days of Terror 3291:Time for a MediaWiki Foundation? 2822:Night in paintings (Eastern art) 2816:Night in paintings (Eastern art) 2670: 2493: 2461: 2100:) 17:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC) -- 1864:Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea 1765: 1467: 1370: 1003: 551:Fansites and forum postings are 513:removed sources from the article 29: 2454:A bowl of strawberries for you! 1824:Wikimedians are rightfully wary 575:assume a little more good faith 3523:19:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 2086:Michael Schofield (campaigner) 1317:. Just open up any article in 1073:The Athena Project: being bold 739:not admissible on cast lists. 535:the reliable sources guideline 13: 1: 4012:06:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 3992:22:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3967:13:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3944:13:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3884:12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3844:07:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3798:07:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3783:06:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3763:14:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3734:12:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3710:12:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3691:12:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3642:06:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3623:23:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3568:07:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 3544:23:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3417:13:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3392:13:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3369:13:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3341:12:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3266:07:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3237:07:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3204:08:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3189:13:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3170:13:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3155:13:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3137:13:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3119:13:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3099:13:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3060:10:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3041:10:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 3013:08:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 2977:08:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC) 2946:22:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 2912:16:39, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 2859:22:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 2840:09:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 2808:22:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 2784:00:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 2750:Talk:New Zealand Parole Board 2712:22:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 2228:regarding the topic. Cheers! 511:and that Colton hockey11 has 3067:The darker side of Ahmedabad 589:the addition of Eric Braeden 573:Musicfreak7676, you need to 7: 2759:23:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2752:) by its principal author.- 2743:23:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2690:20:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2662:09:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2633:19:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2613:19:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2585:13:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2565:12:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2541:12:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2510:12:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2478:12:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2446:20:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2398:16:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2358:14:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2325:11:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2311:11:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2292:07:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 2266:11:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2239:15:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC) 2216:15:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC) 2185:15:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 2146:11:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2110:17:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 2075:11:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2053:18:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 2039:04:18, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 2019:01:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC) 1994:07:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 1898:10:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 1808:09:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 1752:23:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC) 1738:allows discussion to reach 1719:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1702:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1648:12:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC) 1550:07:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC) 1510:01:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 1451:13:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC) 1433:06:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 1413:04:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 1394:04:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 1358:02:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 1338:00:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 1264:An old stalker of this page 380:(etc) template appreciated. 354:(etc) template appreciated. 328:(etc) template appreciated. 283:(etc) template appreciated. 173:Only in death does duty end 10: 4028: 3813:, then unless it violates 3574:You forgot to sign at PERM 3317:Read this Signpost in full 3020:Bettadasanapura, Bangalore 1970:Read this Signpost in full 1874:Read this Signpost in full 1730:exist. In particular, the 1624:Read this Signpost in full 1289:06:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 1258:22:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1233:22:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1203:20:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1191:12:10, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1170:23:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 1147:11:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC) 1123:Read this Signpost in full 1097:Casliber's words take root 1057:05:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 1027:05:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 991:01:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 972:20:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 953:20:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 924:00:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 905:17:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 882:17:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 865:07:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 834:23:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 810:23:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 794:23:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 767:23:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 730:22:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 691:19:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 664:19:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 648:16:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 621:15:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 605:07:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 476:18:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 461:17:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 434:16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 401:12:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 383:12:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 357:12:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 331:12:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 305:12:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 286:12:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 222:09:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 199:09:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 181:09:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 166:09:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 148:09:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 129:09:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 3554:improvements; good work! 3502:: It's time to close the 3488:DR Noticeboard comparison 3472:: The most recent DR data 1724:proposed deletion process 1369: 1315:now deployed on Knowledge 1011:The Barnstar of Diplomacy 1002: 3599:whacked with a wet trout 2766:New Zealand Parole Board 2730:New Zealand Parole Board 2724:New Zealand Parole Board 2638:Livingston Gilson Irving 2486:A cup of coffee for you! 1782:or whether it should be 1566:Small Wikipedias' burden 1515:Unprotection request at 1484:or whether it should be 1420:{{subst:AFC submission}} 1302:A couple of new things. 3919:if you take this route. 3348:Donnie Darko protection 2997:one of the alternatives 1711:the article's talk page 1522:Hi Yunshui, there is a 1017:A barn star for you :) 701:WikiProject Soap Operas 553:not considered reliable 3456: 3242:You could tag it with 3078:Naroda Patiya massacre 2602: 1669: 929:Page Triage newsletter 441:"Listen here, asshole" 3506:. Agree or disagree? 3454: 2601: 2333:User Rjains talk page 2201:, we can use them to 2117:notability guidelines 1736:articles for deletion 1678:proposed for deletion 1668: 1477:Bicycle Shaped Object 1461:Bicycle Shaped Object 1378:The Original Barnstar 525:through reference to 447:as a possible route. 42:of past discussions. 3660:Talk:Retina Displays 3653:Talk:Retina Displays 2989:is not a CV database 1950:WikiProject report: 1862:WikiProject report: 1775:Miss Liberty America 1759:Miss Liberty America 1674:Miss Liberty America 1660:Miss Liberty America 1604:WikiProject report: 1580:Arbitration report: 1526:for unprotection of 1295:New Pages newsletter 1111:WikiProject report: 1087:Arbitration report: 3664:Talk:Retina Display 3649:Talk:Retina Display 3289:Technology report: 3275:: 03 September 2012 2606:Mdann52's talk page 1958:Discussion report: 1930:Technology report: 1854:Technology report: 1612:Discussion report: 1596:Technology report: 1363:A barnstar for you! 1103:Technology report: 1081:FDC portal launched 996:A barnstar for you! 966:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 544:the world won't end 3909:within the article 3743:Sreelakshmi Suresh 3457: 3438:dispute resolution 3297:Featured content: 3162:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 2617:remove this notice 2603: 1938:Featured content: 1846:Featured content: 1728:deletion processes 1670: 1606:Dispute Resolution 1588:Featured content: 1319:the New Pages Feed 1095:Featured content: 537:, which I believe 445:dispute resolution 3610: 3609: 3606: 3494:Discussion update 3482:Activity analysis 3459:In this issue: 2967:comment added by 2898:talk page stalker 2891: 2877:comment added by 2838: 2583: 2539: 2515: 2514: 2483: 2482: 2366:talk page stalker 2356: 2246:original research 2188: 2171:comment added by 1940:Knowledge rivals 1922:Recent research: 1656:Proposed deletion 1590:On the road again 1528:User talk:Makecat 1399: 1398: 1276:WP:Citing sources 1265: 1242:talk page stalker 1032: 1031: 899: 828: 788: 746: 685: 642: 381: 355: 329: 284: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Yunshui 4019: 3987: 3957:Thanks again. -- 3804:notability rules 3604: 3585: 3578: 3577: 3539: 3521:The Olive Branch 3513:The Olive Branch 3434:The Olive Branch 3426:The Olive Branch 3406: 3405:The Old Jacobite 3358: 3357:The Old Jacobite 3281:News and notes: 3251: 3245: 3199: 3163: 3114: 3094: 2979: 2901: 2890: 2871: 2837: 2835: 2830: 2825: 2757: 2741: 2677:Highbeam article 2674: 2620: 2582: 2580: 2575: 2570: 2538: 2536: 2531: 2526: 2521:CSD you declined 2497: 2490: 2489: 2465: 2458: 2457: 2427: 2421: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2389: 2383: 2379: 2373: 2369: 2348: 2339:</nowiki: --> 2234: 2211: 2187: 2165: 2059:Thirtyonecookies 2034: 1914:News and notes: 1908:: 27 August 2012 1830:News and notes: 1816:: 20 August 2012 1769: 1768: 1721: 1720: 1704: 1703: 1667: 1572:News and notes: 1558:: 13 August 2012 1471: 1470: 1428: 1374: 1367: 1366: 1343:Inactive Student 1326:project talkpage 1284: 1263: 1245: 1079:News and notes: 1065:: 06 August 2012 1007: 1000: 999: 967: 963:once.Thank You - 898: 895: 827: 824: 787: 784: 772:Because Colton, 745: 742: 684: 681: 641: 638: 527:reliable sources 376: 350: 324: 279: 259: 258: 239: 218: 212: 205:The Amazing Race 162: 156: 125: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4027: 4026: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4018: 4017: 4016: 3985: 3928:Deletion review 3747: 3662:and move it to 3656: 3576: 3537: 3531: 3517: 3430: 3413: 3404: 3365: 3356: 3350: 3345: 3311: 3277: 3249: 3243: 3224: 3197: 3193:Thanks guys :) 3161: 3112: 3092: 3070: 3023: 2969:117.198.128.101 2962: 2959: 2895: 2872: 2867: 2833: 2828: 2826: 2818: 2753: 2737: 2726: 2640: 2621: 2610: 2595: 2578: 2574:Adam Mugliston 2573: 2571: 2534: 2530:Adam Mugliston 2529: 2527: 2523: 2488: 2456: 2425: 2419: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2387: 2381: 2377: 2371: 2363: 2335: 2317:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2284:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2276: 2274:Opinion needed 2232: 2209: 2173:Colton hockey11 2166: 2154: 2102:Bailey Chipping 2094:Bailey Chipping 2089: 2032: 2007:Sycamore School 2003: 1998: 1964: 1910: 1902: 1868: 1818: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1732:speedy deletion 1718: 1717: 1701: 1700: 1665: 1663: 1652: 1618: 1560: 1520: 1502:Dennis Bratland 1472: 1468: 1465: 1426: 1365: 1345: 1310:namechange ;p. 1297: 1282: 1239: 1213: 1156: 1151: 1117: 1067: 1037: 998: 979: 965: 960: 931: 916:Colton hockey11 896: 874:Colton hockey11 825: 802:Colton hockey11 785: 759:Colton hockey11 743: 682: 656:Colton hockey11 639: 613:Colton hockey11 531:offline sources 468:Colton hockey11 426:Colton hockey11 417: 261: 240: 235: 234: 216: 210: 160: 154: 123: 117: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4025: 4015: 4014: 4000: 3999: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3955: 3954: 3951: 3950: 3920: 3905: 3898: 3872: 3871: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3861: 3858: 3857: 3853: 3852: 3823: 3746: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3655: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3608: 3607: 3586: 3575: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3538:TheSpecialUser 3530: 3525: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3497: 3491: 3485: 3479: 3476:Survey results 3473: 3467: 3429: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3411: 3395: 3394: 3376: 3363: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3343: 3330: 3325: 3320: 3312: 3310: 3309: 3302: 3301: 3294: 3293: 3286: 3285: 3278: 3276: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3223: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3198:TheSpecialUser 3113:TheSpecialUser 3093:TheSpecialUser 3069: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3022: 3017: 3016: 3015: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2915: 2914: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2762: 2761: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2639: 2636: 2611:Message added 2609: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2498: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2466: 2455: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2416: 2385:help me-helped 2353: 2345: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2233:TheSpecialUser 2218: 2210:TheSpecialUser 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2088: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2033:TheSpecialUser 2002: 1999: 1997: 1996: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1965: 1963: 1962: 1955: 1954: 1947: 1946: 1942:The New Yorker 1935: 1934: 1927: 1926: 1919: 1918: 1911: 1909: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1887: 1882: 1877: 1869: 1867: 1866: 1859: 1858: 1851: 1850: 1843: 1842: 1835: 1834: 1827: 1826: 1819: 1817: 1811: 1764: 1762: 1757:Nomination of 1755: 1742:for deletion. 1722:will stop the 1690: 1689: 1662: 1653: 1651: 1650: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1619: 1617: 1616: 1609: 1608: 1601: 1600: 1593: 1592: 1585: 1584: 1577: 1576: 1569: 1568: 1561: 1559: 1553: 1519: 1513: 1466: 1464: 1459:Nomination of 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1436: 1435: 1427:TheSpecialUser 1397: 1396: 1381: 1380: 1375: 1364: 1361: 1344: 1341: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1283:TheSpecialUser 1261: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1118: 1116: 1115: 1108: 1107: 1100: 1099: 1092: 1091: 1084: 1083: 1076: 1075: 1068: 1066: 1060: 1036: 1035:Good morning ! 1033: 1030: 1029: 1014: 1013: 1008: 997: 994: 978: 975: 959: 956: 930: 927: 912:WP:CRYSTALBALL 908: 907: 897:Musicfreak7676 870: 869: 868: 867: 849:WP:CRYSTALBALL 837: 836: 826:Musicfreak7676 818:WP:CRYSTALBALL 797: 796: 786:Musicfreak7676 778:WP:CRYSTALBALL 754: 753: 752: 751: 744:Musicfreak7676 732: 713: 694: 693: 683:Musicfreak7676 651: 650: 640:Musicfreak7676 608: 607: 584: 583: 570: 569: 566:edit summaries 561: 560: 557:Soaps in Depth 548: 547: 517: 516: 504:Soaps in Depth 464: 463: 416: 415:Musicfreak7676 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 260: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 183: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4024: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3990: 3988: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3942: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3903: 3899: 3896: 3892: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3868: 3863: 3859: 3854: 3850: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3842: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3781: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3744: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3708: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3675: 3669: 3668:User:Jimthing 3665: 3661: 3654: 3650: 3643: 3640: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3603: 3602: 3600: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3587: 3584: 3580: 3579: 3569: 3566: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3529: 3524: 3522: 3516: 3514: 3505: 3501: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3480: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3468: 3465: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3453: 3449: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3427: 3418: 3415: 3414: 3408: 3407: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3367: 3366: 3360: 3359: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3326: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3313: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3274: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3248: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3222: 3205: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3187: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3164: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3153: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3135: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3107: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3068: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3039: 3037: 3032: 3029:instead. See 3028: 3021: 3014: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2987:). Knowledge 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2954: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2899: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2860: 2857: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2836: 2831: 2823: 2809: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2731: 2713: 2710: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2678: 2673: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2618: 2614: 2607: 2600: 2586: 2581: 2576: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2518: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2468:i love them! 2467: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2447: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2424: 2417: 2412:{{t|help me}} 2401: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2386: 2376: 2367: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2163: 2159: 2147: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2087: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1944:: Mark Arsten 1943: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1907: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1886: 1883: 1881: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1865: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1838:In the news: 1837: 1836: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1792: 1787: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1760: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1714: 1712: 1708: 1697: 1695: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1661: 1657: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1562: 1557: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1525: 1518: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1462: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1322: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1309: 1303: 1300: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1262: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1249: 1246:Please go to 1243: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225:94.139.26.139 1221: 1219: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1160:User:Guðsþegn 1148: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1001: 993: 992: 988: 984: 974: 973: 970: 968: 955: 954: 950: 946: 941: 939: 934: 926: 925: 921: 917: 913: 906: 903: 901: 900: 891: 886: 885: 884: 883: 879: 875: 866: 863: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 841: 840: 839: 838: 835: 832: 830: 829: 819: 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 795: 792: 790: 789: 779: 775: 771: 770: 769: 768: 764: 760: 750: 748: 747: 737: 733: 731: 728: 727: 723: 719: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 692: 689: 687: 686: 677: 672: 668: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 649: 646: 644: 643: 633: 629: 625: 624: 623: 622: 618: 614: 606: 603: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 581: 576: 572: 571: 567: 563: 562: 558: 554: 550: 549: 545: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 519: 518: 514: 510: 506: 505: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 462: 459: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 421: 402: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 379: 374: 370: 366: 365: 360: 359: 358: 353: 348: 344: 340: 339: 334: 333: 332: 327: 322: 318: 314: 313: 308: 307: 306: 303: 302: 298: 294: 290: 289: 288: 287: 282: 277: 273: 269: 268: 256: 253: 250: 247: 244: 238: 223: 219: 213: 206: 202: 201: 200: 197: 196: 192: 188: 184: 182: 178: 174: 169: 168: 167: 163: 157: 151: 150: 149: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 130: 126: 120: 113: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3981: 3934: 3923: 3908: 3894: 3893:or not; the 3890: 3848: 3834: 3826: 3818: 3806: 3773: 3748: 3715: 3700: 3672: 3657: 3632: 3615:Michaelzeng7 3611: 3597:You've been 3596: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3558: 3551: 3535: 3534: 3532: 3520: 3518: 3512: 3499: 3493: 3487: 3481: 3475: 3469: 3463: 3458: 3442:active in DR 3433: 3431: 3425: 3409: 3402: 3382: 3361: 3354: 3351: 3315: 3273:The Signpost 3272: 3256: 3225: 3195: 3194: 3179: 3145: 3127: 3110: 3109: 3090: 3089: 3071: 3050: 3035: 3024: 3003: 2963:— Preceding 2960: 2952: 2936: 2873:— Preceding 2868: 2849: 2819: 2798: 2791: 2776:Offender9000 2772: 2763: 2727: 2702: 2666: 2652: 2645: 2622: 2555: 2524: 2516: 2500:i am a boy! 2436: 2350: 2344:Buster Seven 2342: 2340:? Thanks.``` 2336: 2301: 2280:this article 2277: 2256: 2230: 2229: 2207: 2206: 2167:— Preceding 2162:Liam Spencer 2155: 2136: 2129: 2125:other people 2124: 2120: 2090: 2065: 2030: 2029: 2004: 1968: 1941: 1906:The Signpost 1905: 1872: 1814:The Signpost 1813: 1796: 1788: 1773: 1771: 1761:for deletion 1726:, but other 1715: 1707:edit summary 1698: 1691: 1684: 1672:The article 1671: 1622: 1556:The Signpost 1555: 1531: 1521: 1498: 1490: 1475: 1473: 1463:for deletion 1424: 1423: 1419: 1403: 1400: 1377: 1346: 1330:Okeyes (WMF) 1323: 1314: 1312: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1280: 1279: 1222: 1214: 1181: 1157: 1121: 1063:The Signpost 1062: 1038: 1010: 983:Secretlondon 980: 961: 945:Okeyes (WMF) 942: 937: 935: 932: 909: 893: 871: 855: 822: 798: 782: 773: 755: 740: 720: 708: 679: 652: 636: 631: 609: 595: 556: 538: 502: 465: 451: 422: 418: 391: 362: 336: 310: 295: 265: 262: 251: 245: 189: 138: 111: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3827:three times 3328:Unsubscribe 3323:Single-page 2121:independent 1981:Unsubscribe 1976:Single-page 1885:Unsubscribe 1880:Single-page 1635:Unsubscribe 1630:Single-page 1299:Hey all :) 1223:Thank you! 1134:Unsubscribe 1129:Single-page 958:Uttarakhand 676:WP:RELIABLE 487:this source 115:hilarious.— 36:This is an 3902:do nothing 3755:Shrikanthv 3464:Background 3333:EdwardsBot 3229:Shrikanthv 2615:. You can 2158:Hope Logan 2152:Hope Logan 1986:EdwardsBot 1890:EdwardsBot 1686:Notability 1640:EdwardsBot 1278:. Cheers! 1162:? Thanks, 1139:EdwardsBot 523:verifiable 106:BoodyBooty 98:Archive 10 3895:existence 3891:justified 3819:existence 3745:4th AFD!! 3717:Callanecc 3674:Callanecc 3446:this page 3074:Ahmedabad 2999:instead. 2829:RexRowan 2792:Mea culpa 2199:reference 1740:consensus 1676:has been 1533:Callanecc 1049:Alcides86 1045:this page 1019:Alcides86 712:hockey11. 580:Stay cool 364:Callanecc 338:Callanecc 312:Callanecc 267:Callanecc 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 3849:Comment: 3726:contribs 3683:contribs 3500:Proposal 3470:Research 3221:.orga.in 2965:unsigned 2957:RC Sihag 2887:contribs 2879:Jajamaha 2875:unsigned 2682:FlugKerl 2593:Talkback 2392:Electric 2181:contribs 2169:unsigned 2001:A Vandal 1800:Ariconte 1744:Ariconte 1542:contribs 1441:Thanks! 1252:Electric 1250:. Best, 1197:Electric 1164:Electric 938:9 August 890:WP:SOAPS 736:WP:SOAPS 705:this one 671:WP:SOAPS 669:Because 378:talkback 373:contribs 352:talkback 347:contribs 326:talkback 321:contribs 281:talkback 276:contribs 249:contribs 110:Oh just 4004:LVerina 3959:LVerina 3932:Yunshui 3924:outcome 3913:WP:NPOV 3876:LVerina 3832:Yunshui 3790:LVerina 3771:Yunshui 3751:article 3698:Yunshui 3630:Yunshui 3556:Yunshui 3515:--: --> 3412:The '45 3380:Yunshui 3364:The '45 3305:Op-ed: 3254:Yunshui 3177:Yunshui 3143:Yunshui 3125:Yunshui 3106:WP:LEAD 3048:Yunshui 3027:Kannada 3001:Yunshui 2934:Yunshui 2904:SmartSE 2847:Yunshui 2796:Yunshui 2755:gadfium 2739:gadfium 2700:Yunshui 2667:Comment 2650:Yunshui 2646:Comment 2625:Mdann52 2553:Yunshui 2434:Yunshui 2423:help me 2395:Catfish 2375:help me 2299:Yunshui 2254:Yunshui 2250:WP:SOAP 2134:Yunshui 2063:Yunshui 2045:Nicmart 2011:Nicmart 1822:Op-ed: 1784:deleted 1564:Op-ed: 1524:request 1517:WP:RFPP 1486:deleted 1443:Ditz246 1405:Ditz246 1386:Ditz246 1255:Catfish 1248:WP: DRN 1200:Catfish 1179:Yunshui 1167:Catfish 1071:Op-ed: 853:Yunshui 774:Y&R 718:Yunshui 628:WP:WARN 593:Yunshui 449:Yunshui 389:Yunshui 293:Yunshui 211:Ryulong 187:Yunshui 155:Ryulong 136:Yunshui 118:Ryulong 39:archive 3917:WP:BLP 3815:WP:NOT 3651:& 3591:Whack! 3247:db-web 2985:WP:G11 2930:WP:ORG 2926:WP:GNG 2865:Tredic 2696:WP:GNG 2226:WP:RFC 2203:verify 2130:should 2026:WP:AIV 1709:or on 1350:Dan653 1218:Santur 3822:that. 2834:Talk 2579:Talk 2535:Talk 2502:hgafe 2470:hgafe 2380:with 2222:WP:DR 2194:WP:RS 1272:WP:OR 1268:WP:RS 255:WHOIS 112:block 16:< 4008:talk 3986:Mkdw 3963:talk 3915:and 3880:talk 3794:talk 3759:talk 3730:logs 3722:talk 3687:logs 3679:talk 3619:talk 3552:vast 3337:talk 3233:talk 3086:this 3082:this 3033:. — 2993:here 2973:talk 2908:talk 2883:talk 2780:talk 2686:talk 2629:talk 2506:talk 2474:talk 2352:Talk 2321:talk 2288:talk 2177:talk 2106:talk 2098:talk 2049:talk 2015:talk 1990:talk 1894:talk 1804:talk 1748:talk 1644:talk 1546:logs 1538:talk 1506:talk 1447:talk 1409:talk 1390:talk 1354:talk 1334:talk 1308:last 1229:talk 1154:CVUA 1143:talk 1053:talk 1041:this 1023:talk 987:talk 949:talk 920:talk 878:talk 845:WP:V 806:talk 763:talk 660:talk 632:zero 617:talk 499:here 497:and 495:here 491:this 472:talk 430:talk 369:talk 343:talk 317:talk 272:talk 243:talk 177:talk 3889:is 3807:are 3036:fox 2928:or 2549:AfD 2408:tl| 2406:or 2338:--> 2224:or 1658:of 1235:-- 977:UAA 709:was 539:SiD 4010:) 3965:) 3882:) 3796:) 3761:) 3732:) 3728:• 3724:• 3689:) 3685:• 3681:• 3666:. 3621:) 3519:-- 3448:. 3339:) 3250:}} 3244:{{ 3235:) 2975:) 2932:. 2910:) 2889:) 2885:• 2782:) 2688:) 2631:) 2508:) 2476:) 2426:}} 2420:{{ 2404:t| 2390:. 2388:}} 2382:{{ 2378:}} 2372:{{ 2323:) 2290:) 2183:) 2179:• 2108:) 2051:) 2028:. 2017:) 1992:) 1896:) 1806:) 1786:. 1750:) 1713:. 1696:. 1646:) 1548:) 1544:• 1540:• 1508:) 1500:-- 1488:. 1449:) 1411:) 1392:) 1356:) 1336:) 1231:) 1172:. 1145:) 1055:) 1025:) 989:) 951:) 922:) 880:) 808:) 765:) 662:) 619:) 474:) 432:) 375:) 371:• 349:) 345:• 323:) 319:• 278:) 274:• 220:) 217:竜龙 179:) 164:) 161:竜龙 127:) 124:竜龙 94:→ 64:← 4006:( 3961:( 3940:水 3938:‍ 3936:雲 3878:( 3840:水 3838:‍ 3836:雲 3792:( 3779:水 3777:‍ 3775:雲 3757:( 3720:( 3706:水 3704:‍ 3702:雲 3677:( 3638:水 3636:‍ 3634:雲 3617:( 3601:. 3564:水 3562:‍ 3560:雲 3388:水 3386:‍ 3384:雲 3335:( 3262:水 3260:‍ 3258:雲 3231:( 3185:水 3183:‍ 3181:雲 3151:水 3149:‍ 3147:雲 3133:水 3131:‍ 3129:雲 3056:水 3054:‍ 3052:雲 3038:j 3009:水 3007:‍ 3005:雲 2971:( 2942:水 2940:‍ 2938:雲 2906:( 2900:) 2896:( 2881:( 2855:水 2853:‍ 2851:雲 2804:水 2802:‍ 2800:雲 2778:( 2708:水 2706:‍ 2704:雲 2684:( 2658:水 2656:‍ 2654:雲 2627:( 2608:. 2561:水 2559:‍ 2557:雲 2504:( 2472:( 2442:水 2440:‍ 2438:雲 2368:) 2364:( 2319:( 2307:水 2305:‍ 2303:雲 2286:( 2262:水 2260:‍ 2258:雲 2175:( 2142:水 2140:‍ 2138:雲 2104:( 2096:( 2071:水 2069:‍ 2067:雲 2047:( 2013:( 1988:( 1892:( 1802:( 1746:( 1642:( 1536:( 1504:( 1445:( 1407:( 1388:( 1352:( 1332:( 1260:. 1244:) 1240:( 1227:( 1187:水 1185:‍ 1183:雲 1141:( 1051:( 1021:( 985:( 947:( 918:( 876:( 861:水 859:‍ 857:雲 804:( 761:( 726:水 724:‍ 722:雲 658:( 615:( 601:水 599:‍ 597:雲 515:. 470:( 457:水 455:‍ 453:雲 428:( 397:水 395:‍ 393:雲 367:( 341:( 315:( 301:水 299:‍ 297:雲 270:( 257:) 252:· 246:· 241:( 214:( 195:水 193:‍ 191:雲 175:( 158:( 144:水 142:‍ 140:雲 121:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index