180:, with both users continuing to respond to each other on their respective discussion pages like we are doing now. Note that when you replied to my reply, it was unnecessary to start a new section. Simply editing the section you previously created and typing your second communication below the first is sufficient. An exception being that if you were to contact me to initiate a discussion on a different topic, typically a new section should be started. You can place a : (colon) before your second communication to indent it to differentiate it from the first. Also, you are correct that the four marks is sufficient. Knowledge reads this as a code to automatically place your user information as a signature and timestamp it.
99:
Hi Yo918, thanks for taking the time to drop a note, and expressing interest in WP guidelines, instead of engaging in an edit war which new users often do. You have every right to be proud of your brother's accomplishments. Like you, I'm quite proud of a former hockey teammate whose played in the NHL
135:
section, I wasn't watching this article when all or most were added, so others on the list may very well not be notable at all, or less notable compared to other notables. At this moment, I don't have the time to audit the notability of those listed within the whole section of the article, but I may
108:
article you wikilinked in your edit was an article about a different person of the same name who is a writer/composer, not a former pro baseball player. Since the wikilinked article was about a different person, your brother's notability could not be verified by the wikilinked
151:
I have researched Greg
Morrison and his achievements that you provided. In my opinion, his achievements in the Pioneer League make him notable on Knowledge among minor leaguers, so long as his notability is referenced with reliable sources. Therefore, I have revised the
125:(as described in criteria #5), then that may be sufficient to list him as a notable resident. If you could provide some references, I'll review to see if they attest his baseball notability. In the meantime, is there any other criteria under
171:
Regarding discussions between users, you are communicating correctly. There are two ways to typically engage in a discussion between users. One is to start a new section on a user's discussion page, as you did
115:. As a former pro baseball player, did Greg ever play a game in the MLB? If so, the information you provided didn't advise that he did. What it did do is advise that he was within organization of two MLB clubs.
176:, and then both users talk to continue the discussion back and forth at this location. The other is for the user receiving the message to respond on the messenger's discussion page, just as I did
160:
article, summarizing his reasons for notability per the content about him on the MHBJ article, and provided the same supporting references. In my opinion, this now meets the criteria under
23:
66:
69:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
156:(MHBJ) article, providing references to support the content about him there. I then re-added him as a notable resident on the
91:
192:
145:
102:
I am going to provide three reasons why I deleted the entry, none of which are intended to be personal or to offend.
123:
published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject
173:
117:
Third, not knowing if he played a game in the MLB, a verifiable reference wasn't included per criteria #5 at
54:
44:
27:
59:
30:. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
153:
39:
34:
177:
132:
165:
161:
126:
118:
112:
86:
8:
70:
188:
141:
82:
105:
49:
157:
92:
184:
137:
78:
77:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
129:
that may render him notable according to WP standards?
100:
and recently represented Canada at the
Spengler Cup.
121:. If a verifiable reference can be provided per a
168:. We'll ultimately see if others disagree.
164:, but that is only my interpretation of
73:, ask me on my talk page, or place
13:
14:
204:
131:As for the others listed in the
1:
40:The five pillars of Knowledge
193:05:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
146:06:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
87:06:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
55:How to write a great article
7:
10:
209:
154:Medicine Hat Blue Jays
111:Second, please review
136:do so in the future.
24:welcome to Knowledge!
71:Knowledge:Questions
45:How to edit a page
28:your contributions
22:Hello, Yo918, and
133:Notable residents
95:notable residents
200:
76:
208:
207:
203:
202:
201:
199:
198:
197:
97:
74:
60:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
206:
196:
195:
181:
169:
130:
116:
110:
103:
101:
96:
90:
67:sign your name
63:
62:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
26:Thank you for
16:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
205:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
175:
170:
167:
166:WP:BASEBALL/N
163:
162:WP:BASEBALL/N
159:
155:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
134:
128:
127:WP:BASEBALL/N
124:
120:
119:WP:BASEBALL/N
114:
113:WP:BASEBALL/N
107:
106:Greg Morrison
94:
89:
88:
84:
80:
72:
68:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
31:
29:
25:
20:
19:
158:Medicine Hat
122:
98:
93:Medicine Hat
64:
35:Introduction
21:
17:
15:
104:First, the
75:{{helpme}}
18:Welcome...
183:Cheers,
109:article.
65:Please
185:Hwy43
138:Hwy43
79:Hwy43
189:talk
178:here
174:here
142:talk
83:talk
50:Help
191:)
144:)
85:)
187:(
140:(
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.