1086:. The solicitation of warned/blocked users to use their IPs to revert my edits is almost amusing, if it weren't disruptive to others. However, I'm certainly not going to let a troll/group of trolls keep me from contributing to the encyclopedic content of Knowledge, nor deter me from reverting vandalism and blocking vandals. Just a bump in the road. Thanks for your diligence and for answering TonyTheTiger. That info was helpful — and I won't make the effort to add this group of edits to a checkuser request. Personally, I think a community ban is in order for the solicitation of others to vandalize. —
1305:& Co. and I have found a very interesting correlation that I am trying to figure out. I've retrieved a copy of the article in Google cache and it is the rubish I expected. I am curious about the edit log and I can't see it since the article has been deleted. I assume as an adminstrator that you have access to this information. Could you tell me if there are any editors other than 65.166.218.250 and the individual who added the advertisement tag? This tidbit of information might be a helpful tool to me in figuring out this mystery. The edit dates could be a clue too. Thanks. (
31:
355:
his in one respect. All the kid is asking for is to recover the text of one of those deleted articles. If that's even possible, and if an admin will do that for him, I think he'll go away happy and with a better impression of
Knowledge as a whole. Those two brief, rather bizarre articles he wrote were whimsical enough that I contemplated suggesting them for BJAODN, but wasn't sure whether I should, so I didn't. Regards and thanks....
502:
861:. Removing such tags, to me, is vandalism. Refusing to discuss, using nonsensical edit summaries, and then removing such tags, at the very least, shows that both sides weren't equal. I know spyke has a bit of a history (I've gotten into them with him before as well), but he's genuinely trying since his previous block. And choosing to punish a person
1022:. In summary, although the user needs to improve his collaborative skills, I do not see sufficient evidence to warrant the block you issued. I am a non-admin and my voice does not count for much, but it is possible you might have jumped to some conclusions. Of course, I do not know what information you may be able to see that I can not.
1262:
P.S. My mum has worked there (at the Wild Carrot) for years now, and she was there when I wrote it, so I think I'm authorised.......is it because what I wrote is on the site? Well if it is, I'm sorry, but the site has only just appeared and was written very quickly so soon enough it will be re-done,
884:
Some idiot moved Carly ColĂłn to
Carlito Cool, and then in an attempt to fix his mistake Big Boss 0 moved that page to Carlito (wrestler) rather than revert him. Since many double redirects and existing pages are involved I, do to my lack of admin powers, am not able to fix this mistake with the page
729:
Basically, I saw that no edits had been made since the 9th (be it on the AfD or on the article itself), and W.Marsh's arguments finally swayed me to choose deletion: the
Washington Post is usually a good source, but the article in question wasn't really an article (more a sort of "what's on guide"),
687:
The problem is that you don't seem to be notable enough to warrant mention in an encyclopedia: As far as I can tell, no major newspapers or magazines have written articles about you. (Yet...). We also don't like people editing articles about themselves (Conflict of
Interest). The article you created
354:
I was about to offer this user advice to the effect that "Dude, there are better ways to go about this," when I saw an edit summary that you've blocked him indefinitely. While I've no objection to this - I was the one who first speedied his two hoax articles a month ago - I'd like to add my voice to
66:
You didn't block 90.184.29.2 because of "none since last warning". The user got a second "last warning" on Oct 24, and clearly vandalized 9 times in a 17 minute period today, and then I put up a third "last warning". Why doesn't the second last warning count as a last warning? If I had not put up
709:
Hi; I noticed that you closed this AfD as delete, and another user and myself feel that you should reconsider changing the decision to no consensus or keep the AfD open for further comment. The AfD features four comments, two keep and two delete. Even the new editor considering the keep vote noted
314:
Policy is policy and the same standard needs to be applied to all RFC notices and not selectively applied. The RFC was not certified by 2 people 2 months after the page was posted. The rule is if not certified by 2 people within 48 hours then it gets deleted. If people want to recreate an RFC they
276:, yet the page was NOT certified by 2 people WITHIN 48 hours , the second certification came nearly 2 months after the first one and was only added after someone tagged the page for deletetion due to not meeting the 48 hour threshold of RFC. Could you explain why you removed the deletion tag? --
790:
It's very hard to assume the other editor is acting in good faith when they're using edit summaries like, "So then you don't have a soul? =( I guess that's why you'd want to hurt a poor, defenseless, little page. You may not have a soul, but these pages do!". There was no rationale for not
856:
then proceed to, in my opinion, vandalize. Rather than edit warring, spyke decided to first put up a template for 'suggested to merge, discuss'. (That is, realizing he'd gotten into an edit war, he instead left the version he didn't like up, and added a tag) Then steve deleted that tag
1152:
Hi. Could I ask a favor of you? I'm thinking about applying for admin sometime in late March, and I would appreciate some advice from someone who is already an admin. Could you flip through my contributions and tell me what I need to improve on? I would really appreciate it.
292:
people have participated in this discussion, so it's rather uncivil to delete the lot on a technicality. What could would it have brought? They'd have just recreated it, this time signing faster, asking everyone to come and comment again etc... i.e., wasting everyone's time.
1050:
I defer to your higher powers. I am confident that you are properly identifying IP vandalism with admin powers that I am unaware of. His unblock request and his user talk page would not have lead me to the conclusion you made, but I have no problem with your decision.
831:, I decided he needed (yet) another warning. 3RR blocks are always a bit peculiar in that they're rarely preventative in the short term (nearly all the cases posted are at least a few hours old, if not a day or two), but hopefully this will make him understand that he's
1249:
Wild Carrot (shop): OK, you've deleted it......I ask "why?" and it says "copyvio"......I guess this means copyright violation yah? Well, please could you tell me what was violating copyright? And maybe you could have just edited it out? Please answaer ASAP!
885:
history in tact. The page is currently located at
Carlito cool, but I'm pretty sure that the history is at Carly ColĂłn. Could you take the appropriate actions to fix this? If someone moves the page while I'm gone I apologize, but I can't fix this. Peace, --
224:
It was archived with no comment or admin action, and has now been sitting on ANI, reposted, without any comment from admins. It seems a clear policy violation to me. I am not involved in the dispute, but do think it deserves attention. Thanks.
958:
Looks like your entire userspace is currently protected -- userpage indef, archives for 3 days, and talk for some other time period I don't recall. Somebody's been a little too persistent. ;) Let me know if this causes any problems. –
808:
After a person realizes what he's doing wrong, and makes absolutely every attempt to make it right, it's (at the very least) unnecessary to still block him. And, frankly, it's rather inappropriate as well. Blocks for 3RR were meant to
98:
Sorry, my error! When I saw that it was gone from AIV I checked the users vlock log and I didn't see a block. So either I overlooked it, or it wasn't there yet. Again, I'm sorry for my error and I think you did the right thing.
1399:
That's unfair! I hereby swear upon steak and kidney pie, Macclesfield Town FC, Private Eye and Jeremy
Clarkson that I'm 100% pure Cheshireman. Please take this small holiday to reflect on what "civility" means. Thanks.
577:
I'm from wp:fr and i don't have an account here .You've created this article and it has been the subject of repeated vandalism but no has reverted the editing , can you put in your watch list .Sorry for my
English
926:
I don't know if it is because of you asking or not, but it was taken care of while I was sleeping. Thanks anyway. I could have pulled it off, but I needed the ability to perform a history merge. Cheers, --
545:
if I have made a mistake or if you need anything, I will start out slow and tackle the harder work once I get accustomed to the tools. Thank you once more, I simply cannot express in words my gratitude.
434:
I'm sure your aware of the dispute surrounding the
Pontian Greek genocide article. I'd appreciate if you could add your name either in favour or opposition to an arbitration attempt to reach a solution
794:
When Spyke realized that he was in danger of being blocked, he immediately ceased any "edit wars", and instead nominated the article for deletion/redirect, so other people could handle it for him. See
802:
Blocks, when used strictly for punitive measures, tend to work very poorly. In this case, he realized that he was technically violating the rules, so he stopped doing it, and then actively pursued
865:
they do all they can to fix their mistake simply isn't right. Especially when blocking isn't really supposed to be a "punishment" at all. Anyways, that's all I have to say. Just keep it in mind.
791:
redirecting, and trying to start arguments about whether articles have more souls than people do is proof that Steve HP wasn't actually cooperating. (which is barely different from vandalism.)
1276:
The text of the article was clearlt taken from the website of the business in question, which isn't allowed unless the owner of the website in question releases the text under a GFDL license
1083:
394:
Great! Thanks! I'm having trouble remembering the title of one of them (I think it was a spurious history of a fictional fisherman's organization), but the one he's asking for was titled
835:
to be more careful. It wasn't obvious vandalism, and even if Steve was trying to be humorous in his summaries, he wasn't acting in bad faith, so there's no reason for breaking 3RR,
730:
and the other article linked to was similar. Maybe deletion review? Anyway, if you can wait a few hours, I should be back online around lunchtime to discuss this further. Cheers.
191:
Yanman sucks! why did you delete the page about Sean
Patrick Molony??? I found this very interesting in my college course on the history of astronomers! Please repost it or else
710:
the reliable sources being used in the article; plus, the two users voting keep were expanding the article with reliable sources during the RfA. Currently, the article is
348:
711:
1280:
You could avoid the second problem by changing the text, but I'm afraid the first problem will mean the article will have to stay deleted. Thanks for understanding,
221:
403:
815:
Again, this is based on the assumption that this was in connection to the
Everybody Votes article. If it was based on anything else, then please just disregard.
1254:
1243:
702:
624:
579:
395:
676:
im not sure whats wrong with the article i have wrote also im not too sure how to use this site so im sorry if i have not got back to you straight away!!!!
202:
1383:
1366:
723:
667:
455:
Hi, you asked me to send you a mail to confirm the intellectual property of the Advanced Concepts Team page, but I do not know your mail address!!!
620:
462:
449:
198:
185:
1535:
1499:
1465:
1432:
596:
776:
I thought I might point out that your blocking of TJ Spyke was actually somewhat unnecessary. (This is assuming that it was over edits to the
650:
1073:
1044:
703:
1337:
1324:
1234:
1196:
1007:
945:
917:
869:
847:
1559:
I would like to move that user Wrestlinglover420 be banned outright from editing; he is continuing to remove information from the article
751:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --
738:
176:
163:
1431:. I need someone to do a neutrality sanity check before I categorize it and link it to other articles. Any directions will be appreciated
1563:
for no apparent reason, and spouting abuse when I fix the article. A 24-hour ban is, it seems, not enough to make him learn his lesson.
1538:
1502:
1493:
1468:
1451:
1357:
1095:
436:
418:
383:
259:
128:
107:
89:
761:
341:
319:
301:
660:
273:
1055:
1026:
532:
1567:
688:
was deleted several times, so I suggest you wait until you're famous before trying to get an article about yourself written here.
367:
1309:
819:
145:
Thanks for the tip! I'm pretty sure I didn't remove the user after he/she was blocked though; I just listed them as a vandal.
607:
It is considered a rather unwise action for you (as an outsider) to jump in like that with an irrational remark on the issue.
1257:
628:
582:
1419:
I dont know whether it is in your line of Wiki duty to do neutrality sanity check. I saw you get involved a while ago on a
998:
More sockpuppets are appearing on this article. I've reverted and blocked a few, but I think it bears close watching. —
398:. He recreated that article name at least once yesterday just to ask for the deleted text, which according to my note to
858:
1391:
1182:
347:
1534:
my new articles. I have collected evidence of that too. Can you let me know how I can deal with such editors. Thanks
1288:
974:
795:
903:
1408:
992:
839:
if he's already been blocked half a dozen times for the same thing. I split the customary 24h in two, one for each.
1560:
1218:
1166:
1125:
929:
887:
827:
To be honest, I wasn't sure whether to block him or not (RockMFR posted a 3RR report on him), but after seeing his
744:
149:
1141:
696:
1435:
1013:
486:
470:
1293:
769:
245:
206:
75:
566:
375:
If you give me the names of the articles, I can get the text and email it to him, or post it on his userpage.
537:, which closed at 111 / 1 / 2. I am humbled and rather shocked to see such kind comments and for it to reach
415:
364:
229:
330:
1133:
It's a blatant copyright violation taken from the webpage of a non-notable band. Look at the deletion log.
828:
758:
443:
280:
1263:
but I was going to leave the Wiki page the same, to prevent this type of thing happening.......talk soon!
1554:
602:
288:
The deletion tag was addede by a participant in the dispute (Karl Meier), which is a bad idea. Moreover,
644:
786:
true that he made more than 3 edits, but there are two things which should tend to discourage a block:
38:
1464:
OK good idea but how about the quality of the merged article itself from a neutrality point of view ?
1387:
1302:
1299:
1349:
Yeah, or maybe another automated editing tool. No-one else edited the actual content. No problem.
1061:
Nice. "Higher Powers". I like that... Seriously, you were quite right to question my actions, we
399:
1443:
If I was you, I'd merge it with Mirusivil Massacre. I'm not sure we need two articles for this.
1242:
1121:
572:
969:
466:
615:
You cannot know his motive for the decision or which policy he followed. See my response on
1428:
1379:
1376:. I already said once that this page is protected by lobbyists. That includes frog eaters.
1365:
1228:
1176:
1147:
1113:
984:
Just wanted to say thank you for the help you provided with the revert war going on at the
939:
897:
458:
194:
8:
1564:
1019:
719:
638:
If you notice, I haven't removed any comments from any AFDs, much less legitimate ones --
1103:
953:
879:
666:
1486:
1444:
1424:
1414:
1401:
1350:
1317:
1281:
1189:
1134:
1091:
1066:
1052:
1037:
1023:
1003:
985:
979:
910:
840:
731:
689:
653:
589:
542:
479:
448:
411:
376:
360:
334:
294:
252:
156:
138:
121:
103:
82:
71:
47:
17:
67:
another last warning today, would the Oct 24 last warning count as a last warning?
1372:
Would you believe it.. This frenchie threatens to ban me because I talk badly upon
961:
755:
1333:
By AWB do you mean AutoWikiBrowser? Hmmm, no new clues. Thank you for checking. (
1531:
1334:
1306:
1223:
1171:
1117:
1104:
989:
934:
909:
Whoah... Looks like something for our technical friends. I'll ask around at ANI.
892:
866:
816:
777:
616:
234:
59:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
716:
492:
213:
173:
146:
139:
1266:
P.P.S. Oh dear, my post-script is longer than my original messgae............
1211:
1206:
1159:
1154:
748:
680:
anyway if you could please tell me what im doing wrong and i will correct it
538:
440:
265:
1110:
Why did you delete the PlayRadioPlay page?!?!?! I didn't even make that!!!!
619:
and keep in mind that I'm asking for MER-C's explanation, not you, yandman.
1087:
999:
559:
407:
356:
242:
235:
100:
68:
60:
752:
633:
226:
214:
806:
means of dispute resolution that stayed within the bounds of the rules.
610:
426:
316:
315:
can go ahead but the one of 29 november is long overdue for a delete.--
277:
266:
1420:
1373:
640:
1273:
The business is not famous enough to be mentioned in an encyclopedia
1528:
501:
478:
Click the link that says "in Private" at the top of my talk page.
155:
Whoops, it was NishKid64 who removed it, not MetsFan76. Have fun!
813:
edit wars. But since he'd already stopped, what was the point?
1018:
I have posted an weak opposition to a block you issued on
402:(who helped me with the speedies) he originally posted as
184:
1527:
Can you look into this complaint about neutrality please
1530:
also the editor questining neutrality has a history of
588:
Thanks for the heads-up. I'll keep a closer eye on it.
714:, but I ask that you change your decision. Thanks. —
520:
272:I noticed that you removed the speedy deletion tag
81:Do you mean 70.184.29.2? I blocked him for a week.
1316:Only bots and editors adding categories with AWB.
120:No problem. Sometimes there's a bit of a log lag.
780:article. If not, then please just ignore this)
704:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Robert Strong
1301:. I am hunting for link spam created by
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1298:I notice that you did the delete for
1065:a collaborative project, after all.
25:
1485:Yeah, it looks reasonably neutral.
23:
523:Yandman/Archive7 for your Support!
500:
24:
1578:
533:
529:
522:
1561:Ultimate Spider-Man (Story Arcs)
1269:It was deleted for two reasons:
29:
560:
496:
1498:Thanks will follow your advice
1427:. I cretead a new one called
531:Thank you for your support in
331:Knowledge is not a bureaucracy
241:Maud(e) Petersham: Thanks. --
13:
1:
1568:15:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1539:13:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1503:15:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1494:14:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1469:14:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1452:13:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1436:13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1409:11:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1358:17:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1338:16:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1325:11:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1310:23:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1289:11:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1258:18:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1235:19:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1229:
1207:
1197:11:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1183:07:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1177:
1155:
1142:12:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
1096:22:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1074:22:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1056:22:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1045:22:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1027:19:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
1008:01:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
993:23:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
975:23:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
946:22:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
940:
918:10:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
904:06:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
898:
870:14:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
848:10:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
820:15:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
762:09:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
739:09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
724:08:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
697:12:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
661:12:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
645:12:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
629:07:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
597:10:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
583:00:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
1219:
1212:
1167:
1160:
930:
888:
829:long history of edit warring
567:19:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
487:14:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
444:20:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
419:16:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
384:09:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
368:09:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
342:09:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
320:04:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
302:14:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
281:13:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
260:09:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
246:09:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
230:10:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
177:20:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
172:No problem! Thanks again!
164:20:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
150:20:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
129:20:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
108:20:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
90:20:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
76:20:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
7:
1224:
1172:
935:
893:
10:
1583:
743:An editor has asked for a
349:User:Lordtortvillethegreat
1082:I see that you found the
1423:relatedd bio article om
1303:User talk:65.166.218.250
558:...fly on littlewing. ~
1014:CAT:RFU contrary review
400:User talk:68.39.174.238
1294:Work Magazine edit log
770:Your block of TJ Spyke
541:. Please feel free to
505:
404:User:Lord Tortville II
504:
42:of past discussions.
1429:Mirusuvil mass grave
798:for his explanation.
1555:A different request
1020:User:Marshalbannana
603:Speedy keep closure
548:
527:
506:
396:Fisherman's Choice
220:Could you look at
1425:Kumar Ponnambalam
1382:comment added by
1116:comment added by
986:Battle of Al Qaim
643:
552:
551:
528:
509:
461:comment added by
406:. Thanks again!
197:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:Yandman
1574:
1491:
1449:
1406:
1395:
1355:
1322:
1286:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1214:
1209:
1205:Thanks Yandman,
1194:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1162:
1157:
1139:
1129:
1084:report on WP:ANI
1071:
1042:
973:
966:
942:
937:
932:
915:
900:
895:
890:
845:
736:
694:
658:
639:
594:
564:
547:
535:
526:
524:
497:
484:
474:
381:
339:
299:
257:
210:
161:
126:
87:
33:
32:
26:
1582:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1557:
1487:
1445:
1417:
1402:
1377:
1370:
1351:
1318:
1296:
1282:
1247:
1190:
1150:
1135:
1111:
1108:
1067:
1038:
1016:
982:
962:
960:
956:
911:
882:
841:
778:Everybody Votes
772:
745:deletion review
732:
707:
690:
671:
654:
636:
605:
590:
575:
518:
517:
495:
480:
456:
453:
429:
377:
352:
335:
295:
270:
253:
239:
218:
192:
189:
157:
143:
122:
83:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1580:
1565:SaliereTheFish
1556:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1328:
1327:
1295:
1292:
1278:
1277:
1274:
1255:SuicidalSpider
1246:
1244:SuicidalSpider
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1200:
1199:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1107:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1077:
1076:
1048:
1047:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
981:
978:
955:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
921:
920:
881:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
852:Except, Steve
814:
807:
800:
799:
792:
781:
775:
771:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
706:
701:
700:
699:
679:
670:
665:
664:
663:
635:
632:
604:
601:
600:
599:
580:81.220.185.194
574:
573:Bassam al-Fara
571:
570:
569:
554:
550:
549:
519:
511:
510:
507:
494:
491:
490:
489:
452:
447:
428:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
389:
388:
387:
386:
351:
346:
345:
344:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
307:
306:
305:
304:
269:
264:
263:
262:
238:
233:
222:this from ANI?
217:
212:
188:
183:
182:
181:
180:
179:
167:
166:
142:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
113:
112:
111:
110:
93:
92:
63:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1579:
1570:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1540:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1504:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1375:
1368:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1256:
1251:
1245:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1215:
1210:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1163:
1158:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1106:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
994:
991:
987:
977:
976:
971:
967:
965:
947:
944:
943:
938:
933:
925:
924:
923:
922:
919:
916:
914:
908:
907:
906:
905:
902:
901:
896:
891:
871:
868:
864:
860:
855:
851:
850:
849:
846:
844:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
818:
812:
805:
797:
793:
789:
788:
787:
785:
779:
763:
760:
757:
754:
750:
749:Robert Strong
746:
742:
741:
740:
737:
735:
728:
727:
726:
725:
722:
721:
718:
713:
705:
698:
695:
693:
686:
685:
684:
681:
677:
674:
669:
662:
659:
657:
652:
649:
648:
647:
646:
642:
631:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
612:
598:
595:
593:
587:
586:
585:
584:
581:
568:
565:
563:
557:
556:
555:
546:
544:
540:
536:
525:
516:
515:
508:
503:
499:
498:
488:
485:
483:
477:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
460:
451:
446:
445:
442:
438:
432:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
385:
382:
380:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
350:
343:
340:
338:
332:
329:
328:
321:
318:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
303:
300:
298:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
268:
261:
258:
256:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
237:
232:
231:
228:
223:
216:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
187:
178:
175:
171:
170:
169:
168:
165:
162:
160:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
141:
130:
127:
125:
119:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
109:
105:
102:
97:
96:
95:
94:
91:
88:
86:
80:
79:
78:
77:
73:
70:
62:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1558:
1488:
1446:
1418:
1403:
1384:Beostaerling
1378:— Preceding
1371:
1367:Beostaerling
1352:
1319:
1297:
1283:
1279:
1268:
1265:
1261:
1252:
1248:
1217:
1191:
1165:
1151:
1148:The Hybrid 2
1136:
1112:— Preceding
1109:
1068:
1062:
1053:TonyTheTiger
1049:
1039:
1033:
1024:TonyTheTiger
1017:
983:
963:
957:
928:
912:
886:
883:
862:
853:
842:
836:
832:
810:
803:
801:
783:
773:
733:
715:
708:
691:
682:
678:
675:
672:
655:
637:
608:
606:
591:
576:
561:
553:
543:leave a note
530:
521:
513:
512:
481:
457:— Preceding
454:
439:. Thanks, --
433:
431:Hi Yandman,
430:
378:
353:
336:
296:
289:
271:
254:
251:No problem.
240:
219:
193:— Preceding
190:
158:
144:
123:
84:
65:
55:
43:
37:
1188:Of course!
964:Luna Santin
609:You're not
36:This is an
1335:Requestion
1307:Requestion
1118:Wabblybear
1105:Wabblybear
1032:Explained
990:Looper5920
954:Protection
880:The Hybrid
867:Bladestorm
837:especially
817:Bladestorm
673:hey dude
668:Simitchell
613:, are you?
611:User:MER-C
514:Thank You,
1421:Sri Lanka
1415:A request
1374:Foie Gras
980:Thank you
617:talk page
463:Darioizzo
450:Darioizzo
174:MetsFan76
147:MetsFan76
140:MetsFan76
1532:WP:Stalk
1392:contribs
1380:unsigned
1253:Thanks,
1126:contribs
1114:unsigned
712:userfied
471:contribs
459:unsigned
441:A.Garnet
416:contribs
365:contribs
207:contribs
199:Bob99938
195:unsigned
186:Bob99938
1536:RaveenS
1500:RaveenS
1489:yandman
1466:RaveenS
1447:yandman
1433:RaveenS
1404:yandman
1353:yandman
1320:yandman
1284:yandman
1192:yandman
1137:yandman
1088:ERcheck
1069:yandman
1040:yandman
1000:ERcheck
913:yandman
843:yandman
734:yandman
717:Deckill
692:yandman
683:-simon
656:yandman
592:yandman
482:yandman
379:yandman
337:yandman
297:yandman
255:yandman
243:Dominus
236:Dominus
159:yandman
124:yandman
101:Bubba73
85:yandman
69:Bubba73
61:Bubba73
39:archive
774:Allo.
539:WP:100
534:my RfA
493:My RFA
227:Jeffpw
215:Jeffpw
104:(talk)
72:(talk)
1036:you.
863:after
804:other
621:Arfan
562:Arjun
408:Karen
357:Karen
317:CltFn
278:CltFn
267:CltFn
16:<
1388:talk
1122:talk
1092:talk
1034:chez
1004:talk
970:talk
859:here
811:stop
796:here
651:Huh?
625:Talk
467:talk
437:here
412:Talk
361:Talk
290:many
274:here
203:talk
1230:rid
1225:Hyb
1220:The
1216:--
1178:rid
1173:Hyb
1168:The
1164:--
1063:are
941:rid
936:Hyb
931:The
899:rid
894:Hyb
889:The
854:did
833:got
782:It
747:of
641:feb
634:AFD
1394:)
1390:•
1312:)
1128:)
1124:•
1094:)
1006:)
988:--
784:is
759:ka
756:on
753:El
720:er
627:)
473:)
469:•
427:Hi
414:|
410:|
363:|
359:|
333:.
209:)
205:•
106:,
74:,
1386:(
1340:)
1213:援
1208:声
1161:援
1156:声
1120:(
1090:(
1002:(
972:)
968:(
623:(
465:(
201:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.