31:
283:
64:
Please note that my block of FDO is not an ArbCom block, which requires a majority of arbitrators to vote and imposes certain conditions to be unblocked. It is a block under normal behavioral policies and guidelines, particularly CANVASS, which relies on off-wiki evidence that can only be accessed by
211:
It's not at that point yet. We need to show proof that the community has attempted to resolve the issue but failed to do so. This is based on my personal observations with ArbCom requests over the past few years. Barkeep might be able to speak for himself and a couple of other arbitrators, but there
121:
There have been pages created recently on the darts theme, that supposedly don't pass your "threshold", yet nothing has happened to those..., clearly this is some sort of vendetta against me, as when I started doing some before my ban, I got flagged up within minutes..., so you're clearly all
117:
Hi, I want to know why you think it was right to reject my request for my ban to be removed..., because based on your reasoning, you clearly are a hypocrite, along with every other person who has been against me recently...
125:
And to make it worse, there are plenty of errors too, which I can't alter, because one of you guys will just come racing in and revert it, without any care about what I've just done to help this site.
236:
I'm going to write up a GS request this evening if I could bear on your indulgence to wait until then. I want to make sure this is done properly with all of the appropriate evidence accounted for. --
65:
checkusers (only blocks that use CU data are technically CU blocks). My suggestion is to have the close of the ANI thread just read "FleurDeOdile has been blocked by
Barkeep49".
350:
if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!
147:
I don't have a vendetta against you because I've never interacted in the same article space as you. The reasons for the "reject" were quite simple:
343:
181:
106:
269:
255:
231:
362:
260:
Oh, I wasn't planning an ArbCom case request. I just was interpreting what I was reading and passing on that interpretation.
342:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see
141:
291:
205:
346:(even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my
132:
on me, and while that might be true, what you have effectively replaced me with is something worse...., BCWYWF....
74:
322:
38:
153:
2. You didn't even wait more than a week to appeal it. The community advises, much as they do with a
193:
329:
357:
347:
137:
8:
316:
295:
rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
277:
70:
265:
201:
304:
300:
249:
225:
175:
112:
100:
47:
17:
351:
187:
133:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
129:
82:
66:
261:
197:
238:
214:
164:
154:
89:
282:
212:
are thirteen of them and they are all independently-minded agents. --
59:
150:
1. You didn't address the reason for the topic ban, and
299:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
289:Hi WaltCip. After reviewing your request, I have
122:nit-pickers, who don't care about anything.
335:If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
344:Knowledge:Administrators' guide/Rollback
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
25:
358:
23:
310:Rollback should be used to revert
281:
24:
373:
328:Rollback should never be used to
29:
162:That is, quite simply, all. --
13:
1:
7:
10:
378:
363:17:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
270:17:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
256:17:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
232:17:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
206:17:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
192:My strong feeling is that
182:12:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
142:09:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
107:17:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
75:17:29, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
359:Penny for your thoughts?
196:to go the ArbCom route.
128:You may have thrown up
286:
285:
157:, waiting six months.
42:of past discussions.
287:
87:Will do, thanks.--
338:Use common sense.
253:
229:
179:
104:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
18:User talk:WaltCip
369:
360:
323:good faith edits
294:
278:Rollback granted
247:
242:
223:
218:
173:
168:
98:
93:
86:
33:
32:
26:
377:
376:
372:
371:
370:
368:
367:
366:
290:
280:
240:
216:
190:
166:
115:
91:
80:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
375:
340:
339:
336:
333:
326:
308:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
234:
194:this is a hint
189:
186:
185:
184:
160:
159:
158:
155:standard offer
151:
114:
113:Topic ban talk
111:
110:
109:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
374:
365:
364:
361:
355:
354:
349:
345:
337:
334:
331:
327:
324:
320:
318:
313:
309:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
293:
284:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
254:
251:
244:
243:
235:
233:
230:
227:
220:
219:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
183:
180:
177:
170:
169:
161:
156:
152:
149:
148:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
123:
119:
108:
105:
102:
95:
94:
84:
79:
78:
77:
76:
72:
68:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
352:
341:
315:
311:
288:
246:
237:
222:
213:
191:
188:GS vs ArbCom
172:
163:
127:
124:
120:
116:
97:
88:
63:
55:
43:
37:
353:HJ Mitchell
241:WaltClipper
217:WaltClipper
167:WaltClipper
92:WaltClipper
36:This is an
321:, and not
134:JRRobinson
348:talk page
317:vandalism
314:cases of
83:Barkeep49
67:Barkeep49
330:edit war
262:Valereee
198:Valereee
305:RedWarn
301:Twinkle
292:enabled
130:WP:YANI
39:archive
312:clear
16:<
319:only
266:talk
250:talk
226:talk
202:talk
176:talk
138:talk
101:talk
71:talk
303:or
60:FDO
356:|
268:)
239:⛵
215:⛵
204:)
165:⛵
140:)
90:⛵
73:)
332:.
325:.
307:.
264:(
252:)
248:(
245:-
228:)
224:(
221:-
200:(
178:)
174:(
171:-
136:(
103:)
99:(
96:-
85::
81:@
69:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.