317:
great example because with it's innovative use of color it deviates from this, using these tools in non-noir ways. In Film Noir, these things would be lit brighter, with much more shadow around them instead of the standout color. Secondly, Film Noir is darkly realistic and normality is from where evil stems. This is another area where Sin City again specifically becomes Neo-Noir, especially Elijah Wood's Kevin and The Yellow
Bastard. Many of the other neo-noirs that include many of the basic elements of voice-over, criminal underworld, and male main character with criminal undertones, follow the same path. Memento is a great example. The horrific nature of the film comes from the out-of-the-ordinary, the strange, not from extreme forms of self-preservation. Film noir often tried to make the point that there is no evil, there are only mistakes that people make which drive us to evil actions.
1096:
embolism from a blood clot at a convenient time, but its doubtful). However his removal of the Bobby
Schindler thing strikes me as bizarre. I think FuelWagon's assesment as to the fact that the acrimony continued up till the end demonstrates its pertinence rather well. I'm not sure why LRod keeps saying it should be taken out because it makes Bobby look like an asshole -- First, I don't think anybody really begrudges emotional reactions from family members during the hour of a loved ones death; short of injecting yourself with rabies and biting the staff, not much is taboo. Second, sometimes people just plain look like assholes for what they do. Ordering his followers to kill people makes Charles Manson look like an asshole. It makes him look like an asshole because he did it. I don't think you should go around removing the facts because the facts (in this case,
407:"classic" recordings, but as the music is continually reinterpreted, it makes more sense to denote the songs themselves as standards. I would also argue that the list you linked to has many songs in the wrong places. (It's also strange to have "contemporary" applied to stuff from the 60s and 70s.) This just goes to show that everybody has his/her own particular jazz categorization scheme, and that we'll never come to a consensus =). However it's not a big deal to me; it's just terminology. You're right, I rarely hear anybody cover "So What," but I hear a whole lot of "All Blues," especially in vocalise. This might be a peculiarity of my local jazz radio station though. It's not humanly possible to listen to the vast amount of jazz out there. -
3522:
sub-headings until I did the hr, and told everyone I wasn't going to change them any further. Thanks for the suggestion though. I figured if anyone wanted to improve on what I started they would either add it (some did) or mention it on the talk page. Most everyone responded in one way or another. I just wanted to at least talk with you directly since you didn't leave a message before or after the change. I have learned from recent experience that the edit summaries aren't the best communication. I still hope I wasn't too offensive with my wording. For now, I think I'll just leave it be, until I have a chance to setup a non-live proposal. Thanks again for your understanding and the reply.
320:
because the visual and structural rules are laid down before hand. I love neo-noir, but it is halted in it's expansion of the genre when it adds those additional elements, and slowly they pull away from the specific greatness to the genre. Resevoir Dogs is great example for this, because it's interesting story structure halts the dark movement of Noir and stays within the simple morality play, and moving the base of creativity around. Not to denigrate the film at all, but it's greatness differs significantly from the things that made Sunset
Boulevard or The Stranger great, and to fit them both in the same genre requires a bit too much square-peg-round-hole for me. --
603:. The main problem with the definition you offer is that it defines drug abuse as the abuse of drugs. Well, ok, and we can say that this is a currently used definition, along with who uses it (what do you mean by 'strictly defined'? by whom?). Another major issue is that what is illicit, prescription, intended or indicated use, or interpretation of what is abusive varies with time and location. We should state this, and discuss how this is different in different places in the world, and has been different at different times in history. I am not on a soapbox, just trying to give the facts, rather than parrot someone's opinion as if it was unquestioned fact.
169:. Even though they have been discussed, I feel that we really need to confirm everything. For that, we should discuss each issue with its own sections, and raise a list of issues that we need to nail down before really continuing on. The English Knowledge is nearly at 500k articles. Either the MediaWiki software needs to handle stubs such that they can be found with a simple union of categories, or the sorting is done manually by Wikipedians. Personally, I think the latter is less taxing on the server load, especially when we use subst:, which I think would help the Knowledge out, performance wise. Please make your comments at
455:"Before I attempt to do a major revision on this article, I would like to get your opinion on the title. I notice that substance abuse redirects to drug addiction, so what is the current consensus for keeping drug abuse as a standalone article? It seems to me that drug abuse should redirect to substance abuse, and an attempt should be made to split substance abuse issues off of drug addiction. What do you think? If you disagree, in what direction do you want to see the drug abuse article go, and what topics do you think it should focus upon? I was thinking it could examine the scientific, poltical, and social aspects." -Viriditas
2523:
the preview window. Once I am satisfied with its appearance, I hit the Save button. Most of the time I either get an accept (well, no "accept" message, but the freshly edited and saved page comes up) or an "Edit
Conflict" window. But in both of those cases tonight, upon hitting the save button it went to another preview. The first time I got that new edit window two or three times before it was saved and I didn't notice until I looked at the new page what had happened. I noticed the second time (not soon enough) that that second preview was of the whole page, but the whole page was now just the section I edited.
1904:
a side issue under one of the androcentric topics, but I'll leave that part up to you. I do think it deserves a mention but I'm not sure that going into any detail is necessary. When I wrote the article I tried to keep it nice and simple by drawing a distinction between the different approaches to environmental ethics and outlining some of the recent attempts to do so - please feel free to expland on any of it, but it really needs to be re-written if you want to start going into greater depth and the geographical issues that the controversies are centred around rather than just the approaches.
580:, a term that is defined by its medical, political, and social application. It is currently strictly defined as, "the use of illicit drugs or the abuse of prescription or over-the-counter drugs for purposes other than those for which they are indicated or in a manner or in quantities other than directed." While there is certainly room for a more general definition, you keep trying to redefine "drug abuse" in contexts where it has already been defined, hence my problem with your POV. We probably both have problems with the current definition, but
3495:, you would not have formatting issues. Many of the users use them in that manner, and you can even check the "what links here" to see how many of them are jumbled together because they don't have headers. I only ask that you at least take the time to look and/or comment on the discussion pages, to see if anyone gave any reasoning for the changes or proposed changes. I don't mean to seem rude, and I hope you didn't take it that way. I was just trying to improve the usage of the templates for the entire community. Thanks for your time.
1224:. Technically "drug abuse" only includes items in schedules I-IV, excluding alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, etc. Since the term only focuses on drugs that are classified primarily by legal definition, it is clear that any medical definition which maintains the artificial segregation between legal recreational substances (alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, ginseng, ephedra) and CSA "drugs" (cocaine, cannabis, amphetamines, opioids, etc) is working from a non-scientific POV, and this needs to be highlighted.
1843:
1992; Racism , Flammarion, Paris 1997; Populisms , Galileo, Paris 1998; The color and blood: racist doctrines with the
Frenchwoman , Thousand and One Nights, Paris 1998...In his work the news judƩophobie , Beech, Paris, January 2002, Pierre-Andre Taguieff, who affirms not to be Jewish itself, firmly gives an opinion in favour of the Israelis in the territorial war which opposes them to the Palestinians, and seems to confuse anti-sionnisme and judƩophobie." I hope you have another source. -
31:
2379:
that it's not him that's the problem, but rather the article. Sometimes, of course, the newbie comes in screeching and stamping her foot, and then I'm worse than most, I guess, at being hostile, but I feel bad for the kid who simply misunderstands what makes
Knowledge different from Everything2, and I do try to lash the vice, not the man. Thanks for the kind words, again. (I was on a long VfD vacation, but now that I've been lured out of my cave, I'll probably stick with it a bit.)
2704:
frequently at a 5:1 rate of volume (content, not level). It is impossible to get any meaningful consensus from him that won't change in twenty minutes. Another claims that the article is too POV already and certainly will not bemoan the loss of that section. Fuelwagon has pretty much the same position on the project as do I, but I don't speak for him. Some of the other names (yours included, I'm sorry to say) that you see in the history, are once a week drive-by viewers.
1893:
only thing that did spring to mind was James
Lovlock's Gaia hypothesis - I'm not sure if this is relevant to terraforming as I am not up to speed on planetary engineering, but if it is possible to argue, in discussion of terraforming, that the planet actualy engineers or evolves itself due to factors beyond human control - then it might be good to bring in Lovelock. In my article I simplified the hypothesis in a short paragraph:
260:
has actual emigrees from the Toltec/Aztec culture in Chaco about 1100 - just before the canyon began to really empty. But almost everyone believes this was simply trade in luxury goods, as some central
American jade and feathers were the major physical evidence. Even so, it was a much tighter cultural world than we usually think about. These people were hardly isolated in their desert. A wonderful place.
3196:. BTW, I have been fixing double redirects, although I am leaving single redirects as is. "Movie" has bothered me for quite some time, and recent events have shown me that other Knowledge users find the use of "film", "cinema" and "movie" schizophrenic. Now that the Category and template are called film, I thought that making the dab changes were called for, but I can wait to hear what others think. --
1140:. You seem to be in the middle of a revert war with a user who will not even respect an inuse request. Both versions seem to me to be rather POV and I just don't want to get in the middle of it. I've been far too involved in messy articles for the last couple of days and not doing enough real contributing. Sorry, but please don't feel that I don't welcome your message.
1855:
article has any neutral basis whatsoever, in its very premise, other than in rhetoric, such as you cite. I can put that aside FTTB, given that it can be written in an npov way. But it doesnt seem like thats the way its being written, if the very basis for its use as a term is as a polemic. I would also suggest at least stubbing the
Taguieff article before citing him. -
1594:. If you can think of a better article title for what was formerly Giant Steps (song), I'll take the changes back. Even if most people will be looking for information on the album, it's no reason to have a poorly named page. There's a lot to be said on the composition itself, as I'm sure you'll agree it's an extrememly important work. -
3820:. You can't expect him to prove he's Hawaiian, so why can't you just take his word for it? Adding a category to one's own user page can hardly be construed as 'trolling'. And just the fact he's taken a picture in the UK doesn't mean he's British - that would make myself a citizen of at least a dozen different countries. Relax, man. -
2126:, with some rather POV captions as well. Since she is very insistent on having the Palestinian flag in there, I have inserted the flag of Israel as well for now, but I don't think either flag belongs, since the final status and ultimate ownership of the territories has not been decided. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the subject.
2878:
unstable for the last thirty or forty years. You accuse others of pushing a point of view, yet it is not at all clear that a concensus definition exists outside of wikipedia. For an example of how the term is handled in a medical text one could do worse than to examine the chapter in the current edition of
Goodman and Gilman.
161:
what defines its need for deletion, what criteria it should follow, what are the general steps should one take when sorting a stub, whether or not to start using subst: for all templates, whether or not use subst: for all templates created by the meta-templates, and any other matters that may come up in consideration. I thank
1624:
composition, and the composition is greatly responsible for the album's fame. The album is secondary to the composition, especially in the jazz world where the album is a vehicle for introducing compositions. Other jazz artists have used the same title for their albums, showing just how influential the composition has been. -
691:, but it's likely better that we add it in using a NPOV manner rather than leave it up to others. It's not too hard to point out all the social problems related to alcohol, tobacco, opioid (heroin, oxycontin) and stimulant (cocaine, meth) abuse, but pointing out the evils of marijuana is a little more difficultĀ ;)
3887:
People from Hawaii or living in Hawaii enjoy discussing the islands and have no problem identifying the name of the island they call home. The fact that you can't even talk about it makes me question the veracity of your claims, and further strengthens my belief that you've been trolling all along.
3394:
I have also removed some entries under the "evidence of disputed behaviour" that had been inserted by another editor that went beyond the original intent of the RFC. I have ammended the summary of the RFC to list its two specific goals: that SlimVirgin's edit contains too many errors to be reinserted
2727:
The false claim comment has zero justification in a Terri Schiavo article and is fatally POV. There is no argument he is a board certified neurologist, and that was his function at trial. His character belongs in the Hammesfahr article (where, in fact, it is), and in any event is adequately addressed
2142:
It seems as though he's just finding out what happened back then. He was suffering from amnesia, but while in the jacket, he remembers what happened with the officer being shot and some scenes from his childhood. I don't see it as him being able to change those events at all. Regardless, I think it's
2088:
Nice, I was not aware that there was such a thing in the cartographic worldĀ :) I think we could intergrate the math points into the subject of that article. I wiki'd it right now, but I'd like to see it expanded upon. Ie: where the name topological came from in reference to the map (its points are
1903:
I'm sorry that I can't offer much more help than that but if you have any specific questions on environmental ethics I would be happy to see if I am able to answer them. In terms of incorporating terraforming in the environmental ethics article - I think it certainly could make interesting reading as
1789:
As before, it should reflect the basic fact that the term is a "controversial neologism that asserts that most or all political opposition toward Israel's occupation of the Palestine territories is based on an irrational hatred toward Jews." This should be the prominent definition, as there is no use
1444:
Give me some time & I'll write something up about the score. It might take a day or two. About the changes, I think they're perfect. Thanks for doing them. It makes the page work much better the way you organized it. BTW, if you don't like the way that I quote you here just let me know &
1042:
The 3RR thing seems to have scared some sense into the anons, at last, they're online editing now. All edits, other than blanking out coments on the 3RR page and reverting and replacing The Revolution disambig again, so far have been sensible. Since no other admin seems to be paying attnetion, I will
765:
ratio of certain drugs. Opioids would have high scores for medical, therapeutic and abuse, and low scores for experimental and recreational use. Cannabis would score low for medical, a little higher for therapeutic, moderate for experimental, high for recreational, and low for abuse. Cocaine would
565:
page should focus on the sociology of how 'abuse' has been defined in different societies and times. A page on drug addiction should focus on the medical use of the term, perhaps documenting how it is used by lay people as well. Alcohol likewise needs a page on historical and geographic views of what
319:
The other important aspect of Film noir is the rigidity of the genre that allows for great movement within it's realm. The differences between two of my favorite noirs, Touch of Evil and The Big Sleep, are a great example. The story can span more settings, and larger ranges in character development
313:
As for film noir, here is the continuation of my position. The difference and the specificity of time period isn't specifically for artistic nostalgia. I think that among the reasons for the linear end of Film Noir was the influx of new technology and the infusion of new techniques, which if you've
268:
The Hohokam actually built raised mounds full of rubble like the Toltec/Aztec and Mayan -- but the buildings they put on them don't seem to have been religious in nature. However, they were always associated with the ball courts, and built close to them. These "complexes" were found as far north as
3839:
Very well, either way, you should probably not edit other people's user pages unless it is to remove a personal attack or something that is against user page policy. I am sorry if I sounded a tad harsh before and can now see it has been a huge misunderstanding between various users, myself included.
3666:
If you wish to dispute a user's claims about their location, feel free to do so on their talk page. However, there is no burden of proof associated with adding a category to a user page in any Knowledge guideline or rule that I can see. Pleasee feel free to correct me my pointing one out. Meanwhile,
2603:
I got your recent most post & replied on my talk page; By the way, what is the normal rule of thumb in conversations? Do I answer you on my own page and expect you to go back there? What do most people do? Keep the conversation on one page? Also, i had a question about "what does 'cm' stand for"
2005:
as i wanted input from the people working on that. unfortunately i've been unable to out up a project page with a more detailed outline and whatnot as it has suddenly become finals week and i have a bunch of papers to write and a lot of german to study. hopefully i'll be able to find time soon; in
1550:
Well, I met Kurt when there was a screening of Equilibrium in Atlanta. He is definitely an American but I do not have a clue about his birth date. I have not found it anywhere on the internet. If you want to know a little more about him, his background, how Equilibrium personally relates to him I
973:
Sorry, I checked your contribs to see if you were still actively working on the T. Schiavo article forking and stumbled on your comment to theCustomofLife. I think that, in all fairness to NCdave, AStanhope's comment should stand. Other users have suggested that the RFC is a personal attack on dave,
942:
Well, I'd gotten to thinking that there was a particular impression about - that is, the perception that this hasn't happened before. It has. But a hundred years ago, our ethics was different, eh? We were afraid of the right things...Anyway, I'm dreaming aloud. If you say it's out of order, it's
281:
I removed the category "Film Noir" from the Sin City page because "Film Noir" is a narrowly defined genre, not simply some dark imagery, violence, and a voiceover, but of the location and the time in which it was made, specifically after the stylization of film and the use of lighting after "Citizen
208:
I've been part of a small group working on this page. You recently put a Cleanup notice on the page. I don't find that particularily helpful, because it doesn't say what you think is WRONG with the page. I can understand it when the article is completely garbled, but I don't think this one is. Could
160:
in a set of rules that we can follow. Once we have built a set of guidelines, we can formally create a policy out of those guidelines. We need to define what a specialized topic stub is, how many articles it should cover, when is it appropriate to create it, what defines its need for its creation,
3655:
I am an Hawaiian. I was born in Hawaii as were my parents and two of my grandparents. My parents live in Hawaii in a home I personally own (long story). I am currently studying outside of Hawaii and will return upon graduation. I consider myself an American first and an Hawaiian second but there is
3547:
Oops, I misunderstood what you meant by second level, thanks for the clarification. Acutally I did, and that was a bad mistakeĀ :) Two users immediately and accidentally edited the template instead of the user talk page they were using it on, because they clicked the header edit link. So I switched
3521:
Hi, thanks for the reply. Yea, on this particular occasion I decided to do a live demo, rather than wait a week. I spoke with everyone who either liked them or disliked them and made improvements. When I seen no further consensus to keep or change, I left them be. I didn't think of the secondary
2703:
At the beginning of the month there was a host of participants from whom a consensus could be obtained, and to keep the edit wars to a manageable level an active consensus was needed. Now there are only about three or four regulars (counting me). One of them just spews non sequitirs at any comment,
2528:
I'll watch for that scenario in the future and while I can't promise it won't happen again, I do promise that I'll fix it promptly if it does. I'm not some vandal indiscriminately terrorizing wiki; my edits are in earnest, although I can appreciate what you're looking for and how it appears. Thanks
2522:
I now know the symptoms that lead to it and should be able to avoid it in the future. I don't understand the mechanism, however. I'll desribe it to you: I open a new window (browser session) to edit the section and once I've completed the edit hit the Preview button and the browser then proceeds to
1896:
James Lovelockās Gaia hypothesis; the theory that the planet earth or āGaia spiritā alters its geo-physiological structure over time in order to ensure the continuation of an equilibrium of evolving organic and inorganic matter. The planet is characterized as a unified, holistic entity with ethical
1775:
Thanks for the note. I just like to have dab notes at the top because that's where they are most likely useful (and where people tend to expect them). I don't try to speculate why, for instance, someone might enter Gary Numan's real name when looking for information about him. But it is a plausible
1147:
Just glancing through it, it seems to be a good route forward. I like that "problems with definitions" is prominent, because you're definitely having thoseĀ ;-) I absolutely support your approach. Let's review others' views and not spend our days pushing our own! If an editor's views on drug use (or
1086:
I took a look at LRod's edits and I thoroughly disagree with them. Unfortunately I didn't have time to post a talk page/revert relevant to them (I was with my mother at the hospital, priorities are obvious.) Regardless, it seems there's a consensus amongst other editors as well that LRod's removals
259:
people to the southwest in Arizona and Mexico seem to be the cultural link here. They have roads that extend to Chaco. The Hohokam have ball courts and other strong evidences of Aztec and even Mayan influence, and there are trade goods scattered both north and south. One loosely supported theory
3902:
I am sure you are a good editor and wish you well. But I think our interaction should cease here. I have no problem discussing home, all day long. I miss it very much. In your case, you have been very aggressive, hostile and trolling and demanding information that's very personal to me. I think we
2274:
In response to your reply, which reads: "Your impression is mistaken. I was in the proces of editing my comment when an edit conflict occurred due to your response. Because you composed and posted a reply while I was in the process of editing my comments, I was unable to save my comments." I will
1939:
Thanks for catching that. I do remember faffing around at the time trying to figure out which was the better name to use, and ended up going with the first version I could find him using. (Variants on James/Jim are always tricky - some people use it as a nickname, some a "proper" variant and never
1673:
Though Knowledge is a popular encyclopedia, it is still an encyclopedia, and written by the people who have the knowledge about particular subjects. They should therefore make the decisions on how best to organize the articles in their area of interest. For the average user, it's a single click to
873:
article to the talk page temporarily, due to its lack of citations and use of weasal words. There does seem to be overlap between drug abuse and substance abuse, however I am fleshing out the differences (if they can be argued to exist -- if not, eventual merge). Any help is greatly appreciated.
316:
First, the inclusion of color, no matter how small. This is not a simple difference, because the lighting and color schemes are one of the most distinct artistic signatures of Film-Noir. Several of these films are quite brightly lit and lack the distinct visual style of film noir. Sin City is a
310:
I apologize if I gave the impression of hostility to your edit, I meant nothing by it if I did. To our discussion however, I didn't include Neo-Noir because I think the term might be too vague for a category. Sin City is a perfect example of Neo-Noir, but many of the others included (upon closer
2378:
and its VfD vote. I think it's important for VfD voters to be able to be clever, to quip, and even to be a bit cruel at times, but always to be sure that their ire is directed at an article and not a person. That's why, when the newbie who writes an article shows up puzzled, I try to make clear
1892:
It seems to me you've pretty much got the ethics side of terraforming sussed. To be honest my knowledge of environmental ethics doesn't stretch much beyond what I compacted in that article and havn't got any suggestions that are applicable to terraforming beyond what you have already written. The
1744:
is what I was looking for. Sorry for dragging this on for such a long time. Though I would be in favor of changing the music guidelines to reflect the importance of individual compositions, I can't think of enough such instances to merit complicating the album-song hierarchy. The best thing to do
1842:
gaveĀ :"Former gauchist situationnist reconverted as a republican chevenementist. Director of research at CNRS Adviser of CRIF . Author of works on the Judaism and the anti-semitism, in particular of the protocols of wise of Sion, forgery and use of a forgery , 2 vol., international Berg, Paris
1727:
Indeed, we are working for the betterment of Knowledge. That said, I don't quite agree with your argument that we should name pages according to what the user is searching for. It's nowhere in the dab guidelines. An encyclopedia should have accurate article titles, and not need to anticipate the
661:
I guess there are two paths... one would be to plan it out well, prepare the changes apart from the original articles, and bring the changes in all at once in a broad sweeping motion so that there's no conflict and uproar in the middle of the process. The other path would be to do it a bit at a
2359:
Thanks for your message. We can't grow bananas in Ireland - it's obviously hotter where you are! I still have doubts about inserting the "to better care for his wife" phrase as if it's an undisputed fact - as if Knowledge is trying to confirm that that was, indeed, his motivation. It's not a
1431:
All I can say is, wow! No live instruments? Amazing. I hope you will add a version of your talk comment to the film article, as we need a section on the score. I also wanted to mention that if you didn't like any of the changes I made to your comments, or if you aren't happy with the section
1095:
My mom's fine, thanks for asking. Anyway, I think I was a bit hasty -- LRod's edit concerning the unknown cause of death, I think, is correct (to an extent, anyway). I think it's fair to say that she probably died from complications from dehydration (sure, she could have had a massive pulmonary
2877:
drift from the topic of the article and attempt to assign motives to other editors. These ad hominum attacks are not productive. Remember to assume good intentions. One thing most authorities do agree upon when discussing drug abuse is that the definition of the term has been contentious and
1996:
veriditas and thoric, i agree a better name and system is needed. after putting a few articles in each of them i stopped; the name is awkward, and doesn't really distinguish in the way it should- for instance, it isn't a category john lennon should be in, despite his use of hallucinogens; the
1854:
That was the first page I got for a search for Pierre-Andre Taguieff]], who doesnt even have an article here on Knowledge. Dont complain that others dont agree with your choice of sources, even if its only on the basis that they dont have access to them. This only adds to my objection that the
614:
does not define drug abuse as the "abuse of drugs". This is not a parroting of opinion, it is the accepted medical definition of drug abuse whether you or I agree with it or not. The problem is that you are spending too much time attempting to redefine terms to suit your own POV. Take this
2950:
page: "The policy is easily misunderstood. It doesn't assume that it's possible to write an article from a single, unbiased, objective point of view. The policy says that we should fairly represent all sides of a dispute, and not make an article state, imply, or insinuate that any one side is
406:
Well, jazz standards are basically "jazz classics". They are standard because they are classic, really. I myself, as an enthusiast and musician, have rarely heard the term "jazz classic" applied. For the sake of argument, are Gershwin songs classics or standards? In my view, there may be some
950:
There's something else. Your requirement here is stricter than the requirements that the other Wikipedias impose, the ones I started in. It makes sense, of course, that it would be this way. But what you say is dead-on. If CNN doesn't publish it, I shouldn't publish it here. It's a very
3756:
What is the point of this? Simple rules to follow here: There is nothing wrong for the user to claim to be from and/or living Hawaii and therefore you have no right to refute that claim. Just let it go and I do not really see how this affects you. If you have a beef with the user take it up
3876:
Please do not misrepresent your activities. You repeatedly have sought personal information from me, about my birthplace and so on. I find this to be highly intrusive and something I cannot imagine any reasonable person doing. You have discredited yourself by acting in this manner, you are
1623:
Yeah, the moves will require an admin. I'd like to take this opportunity to argue that the changes should stand. Many album articles already have (album) in their titles, so users searching for the album will hit a disambiguation page as it is. Secondly, the album takes its title from the
2185:
V, I saw your comment on (I think) Adam Stanhope's page, in which you hypothesize that I'm a newbie, and you are correct. Thank you for giving me the benefit of the doubt. Well, I hope that I left the "Wiki" encyclopedia improved --and I think that my interactions had a positive effect.
978:
involved. Removing AStanhope's comment only serves to hide his noose-swinging bias, which isn't quite fair to dave. If anybody takes issue with it, it does fall under the purview of a personal attack; but getting rid of it only serves to hide the fact that AStanhope made that attack.
2360:
verifiable fact like the date of her collapse. Newsweek asserts it, but Newsweek could be wrong. If we're going to do a sentence-by-sentence discussion on the talk page, that sentence will probably come up soon. Anyway, I'll sleep on it. (It's very late in Ireland.) Regards.
766:
score low to moderate for medical use, low for therapeutic and experimental, moderate for recreational use and high for abuse. Psilocybin would score low for medical use, moderate to high for therapeutic and experimental, low to moderate for recreational use and low for abuse. --
3116:" wasn't directed at your edit, although yours tidied up the section nicely. I was commenting on the engraving Michael had done for the plaque. And as I said, it was more elegant than what I would have done. Those ashes would have been in an urn on my mantle for many, many years.
1490:
Yes, but the references that EQ uses from literature, film, and history/culture are sooooo numerous I hardly think that justice can really be done in such a limited space. This is the main reason I have not interfered much with what has already been written here. Maybe I'm
3689:
3429:
You're quite right I have been bad with both the edit summaries and non use of the preview button. I will try harder in future. As an aside posting a tutorial rather than just complaining is a very positive and helpfull way of drawing "sinners" like me back into the fold.
387:
I'd just like to discuss the edits you reverted on the links to GreenFacts. The article about GreenFacts is still under debate, so I agree that I might have been hasty on my deleting of "industry lobbying group". You can see the full debate on the GreenFacts article here:
1227:
There is no contest within the scientific community that alcohol, nicotine, caffeine (and other xanthines) are all drugs, but you will get a completely different view from law enforcement. I fear that any medical definition of "drug abuse" is political bias supported by
2988:
You might find the biweekly special article interesting. Every fortnight, an otherwise good article that lacks any sources is chosen, and the Fact and Reference Check team works collaboratively to add references to the article. The current biweekly special article is
1644:
I don't see a Google test type for this situation. (In fact Google pulls up an interesting variety of results. There's a ska band called Giant Steps.) The conventions you cite don't seem to apply here either. There's no guidelines for jazz works that aren't strictly
2193:
So, in conclusion, while I was very bent (angry / frusterated) by some people, attitudes, and actions, I hope that my neighbors all don'r stress out. In other words, I am not angry. (There are worse things that happen in life.) Thank you for being a good neighbor.
3861:
I double that. I knew about his issues with the Israeli terrorism VfD (I was there), but thanks for informing me further. He seems like trouble - someone could do something about him. I congratulate you on your efforts on keeping a watch on this user though.Ā :) -
3484:
Hi, please do not take this the wrong way, I understand the reason why you reverted the changes, but every other user at least made an attempt to discuss it on one of the talk pages involved. If you used the templates by themselves w/o the header you added, ie
1522:
Another thing I want to add about Minority Report is that the film is really much different than the short story. Both EQ and MR were done by the same production company Blue Tulip. Even though EQ was filmed first it was released after MR. Just some trivia. --
2241:
is not a neutral source. Do you have any support for this statement? Perhaps I am incorrect in assuming that you understand that NIDA is not a political organization. They do not make policy, they fund and conduct research. Are you confusing them with
974:
and that does add some evidence to that effect. I think anybody commenting on it would do well to take that into account, as we have characterized the comments to support dave as well. I think that the fairest way to show the attitudes involved is to show
1018:
They seem to have stopped at the 3rd revert so I won't block them this time. I think the person must work for the station or something, posting from home and work. If they keep doing it would it be worng just to protect the page? I'll keep an eye on it,
3573:
Yea I thought the same thing about the headers, until people did actually edit the template. Like I said though, I only did this one live, because there was no better way to demo it, other than in use. Thats mainly why I wanted your feedback on it.
1212:
Herein lies the problem... is the term "drug abuse" in itself a biased POV term? If so, then we have to make that clear. If not, then we have to provide multiple definitions, and where they come from. Clearly, non-therapeutic use of alcohol is only
815:, I would like to know if you have any recommendations for reputable online references. Further, it seems that most medical dictionaries define substance abuse and drug abuse differently, so I'm not sure a redirect is the best thing at this time. --
2189:
While I would like to make more improvements, there is the time invested that it would cost me, and when you subtract some of this investment by reverts, it would be more time-efficient and energy-efficient (less stressful) for me to edit my pages.
415:
Wow, people sure do come up with rigorous definitions for something so amorphous as jazz. I would agree with Jeremy Wilson's definition, though. Also, thanks for pointing me to such an interesting website. Great history info and musical analysis. -
3656:
no question about whether the category fits. I'll wear it and I won't bother questioning your ethnicity or connections with Hawaii. Nor will I remove the category from your user page, as you did to me in a fit of what many might see as vandalism.
2719:
be arguable that the first part about vasodilation therapy and the courts opinion of it is germane to an article about Terri Schiavo, it doesn't belong in the part of the article that sets the stage for the trial. It would more properly go in the
725:
are laced with poorly written rant about non-medical uses of the agent; and really should separate the medical from non-medical somehow... Alas I don't have the time (or expertise) to help fix those up myself, so best of luck with the initiative.
3001:
For example, if you want to reference which university somebody went to, simply add {{an|which_university}} next to the fact. At the bottom of the page in a seperate "Notes" section, add {{anb|which_university}}, and then your website or book.
1361:
I cut a quote from an article I wrote. It seemed too weak to link directly to NOI as a major example of what I agree is a long history of antisemitism. Your work is usually much better, I syuspect anger is getting in the way. Happens to all of
2584:
I got your message. Thanks. The concept is a bit confusing, but I had found thatlink before you showed it too me, but I think I'll leave it alone now, as it's an unfamiliar concept -better left alone. Thank you once again, and have a nice day.
221:
Thank you for your revert of my helpless talk page. I have yet to find out how to unredirect it myself in these cases. Also I have promptly reported the vandal to Vandalism in progress. Apparently he had done this to about 15 other users. --
2604:
in your edit comments? I think I got the concept, and explain that on my talk page reply to you. I UN-indented to save space. Lastly, is my "colorful" signature OK, or does the way it pushes the last line of text down make it hard to read?--
795:
I was referring to current medical use. Benzocaine and Lidocaine have reduced the medical use of cocaine a great deal... but I'd be happy to give cocaine a higher medical use score... I was just being... umm... conservative... egads!Ā ;)
886:
I'm not sure what you mean by weasel words. Much of what you removed was merely outlining the use/abuse controversy, which is an important topic I'm sure you'll agree, and relevant to a page discussing drug abuse specifically. Once the
2441:
Veriditas, I notice that some of your edit summaries are verging quite close to personal attacks, if they have not crosed that line already. This behaviour is counterproductive and certainly not helping to resolve your dispute with
2325:. I have given a large amount of new information on the definition of matriarchy as mother dominated kinship systems, along with bibliography on the main article page and the talk page. Yet it has been reverted innumerable times by
2565:
I recopied it to another subheader, adding other links to those listed, but I can't edit the section you made, only the one I made. (My edit has an updated version of your creation, Dr. Frankenstein! Did I make a better monster?)
2001:" is not actually an organization- but some sort of categorization of these things is certainly needed. i'd like to set up a hallucinogens project for all of this to be discussed- i've briefly outlined it on the drugs project
1348:
character? He (probably he, I think) seems to have some kind of agenda. Most of these vandalisms seem to be more eccentricity than anything else. Tschus, if I'm not mistaken, is German for "cheerio" or something like that...
1058:
Sorry, I had no idea the site required registration. I must have registered before (thank you, BugMeNot) and had it auto-login. I thought maybe Minaflorida got a not found or timeout error and just assumed the link was dead.
2430:
Veriditas, I notice that your revert war with this user spans several articles. I'd like to ask you not to revert each other without discussion on the talk page. It's anti-social, and not conducive to collaborative editing.
839:
should likely redirect there. There is really no real distinction between the two other than drug abuse being specifically illegal, and some substance abuse (i.e. alcohol and tobacco) is perfectly legal. We already have a
3321:
I'm sorry about commenting on your page in re Uthar Wynn's comments. I saw his note there and simply responded. You're right to think, as I assume you do, that they belong more properly on the Schiavo talk page. Regards, ~
2709:
Dr. William Hammesfahr (who made claims about vasodilation therapy that the court found spurious, and who later falsely claimed to be a Nobel Prize nominee, being nominated by someone who was ineligible to nominate him.
2755:
By no definition was that a substantial change. In any event, I see no directive that I must seek consensus for each and every, or any save substantial, change. Put a note on the talk page if you think it's a problem.
3447:
It's customary, if you put a POV check template on the top of an article, to state on the talk page exactly what POV problems you think the article has. Often, the disputed POV will be a small part of a long article.
2343:
Greetings. Well, there isn't a way to move an image at this point. The best way to deal with the situation is to re-upload the image under the correct name, and then tag the image for speedy deletion as a duplicate.
1031:, the same user has also been repeatedly vandalising another page, I guess they'll be blocked, I didn't want to do it myself in case I looked biased since I had started one of the articles, thanks for being vigilant--
3238:
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in
2542:
3094:
I'm the webmaster for another wiki, and I pioneered the combination of templates and headers to facilitate editable sections. It's not used in the English Knowledge (yet), as far as I know. But try this out:
2906:. Read the references you yourself have provided discussing why the definition of the term has been unstable for decades. Almost every time G. makes an edit you accuse him of deliberately trying to inject
2821:
Oh, one more thing. What does the "Aloha kakou, e komo mai" on your front page mean? I'm sure you will have commentary on Duck. Sorry for the squabble. I didn't mean to get into a cat fight with my neighbor
2984:
No doubt you're familiar with what our noble (and somewhat lofty!) goal is, and I'm really glad you've decided to help to try and make it a reality. Thank you so much for helping out in our noble causeĀ :)
3632:
Thanks for reverting the spam/vandalism that was placed by 203.127.203.17 on the Xanadu House article (that I wrote most of), I didn't really ever expect to see someone place spam on that article. ā
2507:
merely reports on a commonly held view, without worrying about the "true" validity of NDs. So if there's any factual information I can add to the drug abuse page I will, but I can't offer an opinion.
523:). Specifics of problems with certain substances can have their own pages. I'm certain that all the individual drug pages have plenty of information that can be moved off to specific abuse pages.
2303:
We all try to assume good faith, but it is increasingly difficult with you. Please answer reasonable questions on the talk page, instead of claiming to have already, when you have obviously not.
1116:
me (216.78.15.201) and adding eight others that were me. I'm not going to be painted as a vandal by your inadequate research. On the odd chance that you wish to carry on, I can be reached at
246:/San Juan Basin unmentionable years ago. I love both places and visit every couple of years. There is so much to see in those parks and in surrounding areas. Come and bring your camera!
3417:
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Simple user page. After dealing with a persistent vandal for a week, it's good to know there are those who want to make Knowledge a better place. ā
2662:
2573:
512:
I'm more of an advocate of giving separate topics their own pages of proper NPOV naming (even if they are stub articles) as long as those pages are well linked into from relevant pages.
3903:
should just back off from each other, you do your thing and I mine. I am happy to provide my email address to anyone who asks for it, in a non-troll context. So good luck and good bye.
1805:
With all due respect, the definition you give is neither a neutral nor objective one, and I would challenge you to cite unbiased sources to support your claim that it is "documented." -
641:
It looks like we are in complete agreement. I think we almost need a roadmap to implement these changes. Any idea on how to take the first step and how to approach this transition? --
2998:
Two convenient templates for adding references are {{an}} and {{anb}}. By specifying a footnote name (eg. "which_university"), these templates allow us to link to notes effectively.
2006:
the meantime, i'll hold off on putting anyone else/any orgs in the categories and would love to start discussing this on user pages or something . . . (cross posted to my talk page,
2002:
152:
I sincerely believe that we really need to lay down the law in stub sorting, and really provide a guideline. I believe that we should all attempt to reach a general consensus by
3411:
895:
page making POV claims in either direction (i.e. that any use of illegal drugs is automagically clinical abuse based only on the current legal status.) I think removal of the
869:. I'd appreciate any suggestions you could offer, and I will also be making an attempt to follow the roadmap you have left on my talk page. I have removed some text from the
3467:
366:
Nice addition! I've never actually tried chile beer myself, though I have an unopened bottle in my collection. If you have some time, would you like to lend a hand on the new
3743:
Yes, I'm interested, why don't you email me using the "E-mail this user" link to the left. After all, you never answered my question as to which island you come from. --
704:
Separating the use from abuse of all these substances should also prove to cut down on disputes, or at the very least confine the disputes to the abuse related pages. --
3395:
into the article and that she has held herself above any criticism of her edit. There seemed to be a misunderstanding of the scope of the RFC. Hopefully this clarifies.
3167:
and subsequently deleted. I thought you might be interested if you are no longer watching the category page. The nomination for deletion and discussion are found at
2511:
1148:
anything else) have not yet been interesting enough to gain broad public attention... well, you and I firmly agree that they're not interesting for our encyclopaedia.
173:. I apologize for making this somewhat of a spam notice, but since the project has more members, the project can finally decide on these important issues at hand. --
1374:
BTW, do you know anything about the score? One of the things that really drew me to the film was the perfect score and mis-en-scene working in harmony together. --
2823:
2786:
2605:
2586:
2570:
2198:
2197:
PS: I don't plant to check my page much, and if anyone needs to contact me, look up my email addresses, phone numbers, postal address, and web pages. Take care, --
2177:
2162:
519:
it's own page talking about substance abuse in general, and have it reference other pages talking about specifics of chronic abuse the different substances (i.e.
3734:
I hope this is the end of this very unseemly episode. For the record, if anyone else is interested in my birthplace etc, drop me a line would be happy to chat.
784:? I'm not sure that's correct, since it was used as an analgesic for a century until it was synthesized. I guess you are referring to personal medical use? --
2930:
by reverting 5 times when the two of you were the only ones editing the article. By your own standard, how many times did you revert the article yourself? --
2591:
2537:
3243:? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. --
1350:
1312:
992:
1122:
99:
282:
Kane" and ending with "Touch of Evil" in 1954, and English, French and American movies only. It is not film noir, despite some superficial likenessess.--
3866:
3824:
3434:
3363:
3343:
3014:
2361:
2158:
1991:
1908:
1268:
298:
and note the difference between Neo-Noir and Film Noir. Thus, a difference. If the category was Neo-Noir, I think you may have some sort of argument.--
3168:
1243:
1220:
I think it may also be important to point out that the term "drug abuse" primarily segregates certain substances based on their legal placement in the
1177:
170:
166:
2264:
you made several changes to text I had already replied to. Doing this is not correct, as it gives a reader an inacurate view of the conversation. --
1291:
721:
Hi Viriditas, I agree with what's been said here about the need to improve a lot of these drug abuse/misuse articles. I do find that articles such as
3931:
3922:
3913:
3904:
3878:
3817:
3797:
3735:
3693:
3668:
3657:
3647:
3366:
3100:
2923:
2891:
2862:
2304:
604:
567:
389:
234:
Thanks for the "in use" marker -- but I'm finished with this one for the weekend. If you would like to look it over...edits and comments welcome.
97:
2512:
2014:
1956:: Webster's gives celeste as an alternate spelling for celesta, too. Possibly it was more common in the fifties? In any case, I've just edited the
2724:
part of the description of the trial, if it belonged at all. It's in the trial order link for all to read and Greer was none too gentle about it.
1649:. Again I argue that Giant Steps as a jazz standard has been more influential than the album titled by it. It's just not a pop music situation. -
3263:
2887:
1345:
3896:
3800:
3751:
2969:
526:
I'm certain that some will be opposed to separating the "good and the bad" of different substances into regular pages and abuse pages (consider
3863:
3821:
3399:
3145:
2978:
2782:
1554:
You might be able to glean something from it for his page. It's the most candid interview that he has done. No birth date though...sorry. --
1363:
1272:
1185:
1165:
727:
321:
299:
283:
2397:
you have reverted the article several times and marked your changes as "minor." This is an incorrect use of the "minor" tag, as explained at
2295:
1882:
Hi, someone under the name Viriditas sent me a message regarding some questions on Environmental Ethics. I would be happy to help if I can...
1499:
but there are tons more that he refers to elsewhere in interviews. I have a thread about it on my message board that lists a bunch of these.
3738:
3675:
3609:
Hi - There was a mediawiki bug that's recently been fixed that caused content of a page to be duplicated when editing a section. It appears
2772:
2450:
2419:
2279:
2212:
433:. I have left this message on your talk page since you have been involved in the dispute resolution process regarding his edits in the past.
2201:
2180:
135:
You made use of the original. To me, that means the history must be preserved. I will nominate the category for deletion. Thanks again.
3636:
3080:
It fetches a "live copy", and if the template is edited, the changes to the template are reflected on every page that employs the template.
2443:
2383:
3686:
I am an Hawaiian. I was born in Hawaii as were my parents and two of my grandparents. My parents live in Hawaii in a home I personally own
1925:
article while refusing to participate in any sort of consensus building on the Talk: page. Is there something that can be done about it?
1776:
and perfectly valid thing to enter, so I'd like to offer some help in case someone does. That said, I won't object if you change it back.
986:
353:... (where bjensen got the data from). Apparently, Lanai is abnormally young. Maybe we should change it to <2 Myr, just to be safe. --
3717:
3700:
2132:
612:
the use of illicit drugs...for purposes other than those for which they are indicated or in a manner or in quantities other than directed
3713:
That was a tad too harsh. I'm sorry. Let me re-phrase: the claim is that he is Hawaiian. He has re-stated that claim here. We're done. -
2435:
119:
I didn't mean to sound pushy. I was just offering to help but didn't know if I would be stepping on something you still had in process.
3193:
2165:
1028:
441:
Since you added evidence to the RFC, you would be certifying the basis for the dispute, and your vote wouldn't go under "other users."
1235:
I suggest that we work on Drug Abuse in some sort of neutral ground, and not put it in place until it is more than a stub article. --
2487:
2369:
2364:
3684:
Ignoring the absurdity of the claim that putting a cat link on your user page is somehow "trolling", you seem to feel that saying "
3594:
3568:
3542:
2469:
2110:
1500:
1176:
I've felt for a while, especially with the film opening and the proliferation of Sin City pages that the comic should be moved to
757:. It might not be that bad an idea to rate each drug's potential in each section, as it would give a clearer picture to the true
3040:
has been the biweekly special article for way too long (must've been at least a month now!), so I'll probably change that soon. -
3692:", and I see no reason to suggest that the above claim to membership in the category is incorrect. Please refrain from editing
3627:
2851:
2814:
3934:
3925:
3916:
3907:
3881:
3388:
2503:
is peer reviewed or what its reputation is.) I'll take a look at your drug abuse page, but keep in mind that the statement in
2032:
1318:
3877:
compounding it by misrepresenting the situation. If you like I will post the many requests you made for my personal details.
3346:
3185:
2783:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Terri_Schiavo#The_.22singling_out_Hammesfahr.22_POV_debate_.2F_and_Duck.27s_complaints_addressed
951:
dangerous dance for me, because I'm in the category of people who like to be fanciful. I'll try not to trip over anyone. --
430:
3144:
Thank you for your support for my adminship. More importantly, thank you for your many contributions to Knowledge. Cheers, -
1986:
3871:
3331:
3189:
3164:
2425:
1702:
Though (song) may be established, you'll recall that the debate began because "Giant Steps" does not fit the definition of
581:
3660:
3650:
2496:
but you need a subscription for many (most?) articles, and I find the site difficult to search. In my search I also found
2333:
924:
126:
which now only has the one page in it. I've not done much with nested categories yet. Does it have a purpose anymore?
1087:
were not appropriate. I think he'd have to do some serious justification for those, he's only given a glib explanation.
3829:
3212:
nor any dictionary I could find call 'substance' in this context anything else than a euphemism, or at best a synonym.
2405:
2398:
1972:
1507:
BTW, there is a problem with the Minority Report one since Equilibrium was actually filmed before it. There are other
478:
is a more correct title for the article, but then such an article (substance abuse) should also include information on
3437:
3216:
censored for the protection of minors, and I see no reason to use a euphemistic cat name. Thus my vote stands. Yours,
3132:
as an edit summary is just too hilarious (in a certain perverted kind of way) to pass by without making a commentĀ :))ā
3073:
keyword. I think that was what I really should have used. It fetches a one-time, static copy of the boilerplate text.
2760:
1207:(Substance abuse is) "a maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress"
216:
3515:
2693:
2157:
Message received; You're welcome, Viriditas; and, thank you for being thinking to protect my personal information. --
1922:
1915:
471:). It could also be a matter of renaming articles to the most accepted NPOV term, and having appropriate redirects.
2223:
2147:
675:
Knowledge is somewhat devoid of details of abuse of substances which have very low addiction potential (for example
3362:
suggests that he thought a partial revert wouldn't count as a revert, and he was adding other material. Regards.
3278:
Hi there! Sorry I never got back to you about that, it kind of got lost in the shuffle. Busy week, and all. Yours,
3240:
2174:
1229:
94:
Thanks for detecting the error, have you corrected it? I wanted the robot listed in the category:Fictional robots.
2562:, I was wondering if you could tell me whay I can't make edits (changes) to the section with six (6) links in it.
2307:
1502:
At some point I plan to create a page for it on my site. Iām not sure how well all of that stuff would work here.
1278:
and I've been biting my tongue. It feels much better to be thanking someone. fyi, lovely pic on your user page. ā
1118:
314:
ever tried to make a film-noir are almost impossible to pass up in favor of the incredibly difficult noir process.
3888:
You've also asked people to "drop you a line", yet you haven't provided an email address in your preferences. --
3852:
3768:
3456:
2152:
3474:
2768:
Fixed the ambiguity about the neurologists. I was focused too close to the second half of the sentence. Thanks.
2268:
2250:
1838:
Certainly anyone worth quoting is someone worth writing an article about. A google translation of an article on
2019:
1386:
I completely agree. It, along with the visuals, are what really drew me into the film as well. The score for
1294:
a few hours ago, and will be off until tomorrow evening (as will I, for other reasons). For Cc, the disruption
1276:
683:, so little existing content will be available. I'm kind of leery of the idea of grabbing propaganda from the
2560:
1799:
1286:
I have been keeping an eye on User:Coolcat for about a month now; he's been doing the same thing in spades on
493:
page has some POV problems. What should be done here is to leave 'drug addiction' itself under the domain of
3548:
to the hard line. I was considering the third level === this ===, but didn't get that far. Thanks again.
3353:
3018:
2569:
Can you tell me if you know what is up? I may check my WIKI page and/or my email for an answer. Thank you, --
2474:
2354:
566:'abuse' is, including prohibition, islam, methodism etc, as well as a page on the medical term 'alcoholism'.
81:
76:
71:
59:
3360:
2518:
Damn, I thought I fixed it. It was certainly unintentional and I explained how it happened to Kelly thusly:
1914:
3610:
2080:
I was looking for an easy reference to point people towards, when they went looking for that information...
1977:
968:
3342:
Hi Viriditas. Uthar vandalized your user page after you warned him about 3RR, and has now been blocked.
3064:
3036:
You're rightā it should have been one ref. I've made the change as you suggested. Actually I think that
1706:. I see you've moved things around. But yes, we should have more opinions on this subject, from others. -
338:
3757:
elsewhere. Basically: just don't do it again and happy editing to everyone and don't forget to smile =).
2497:
2284:
243:
1900:
but there is a whole article witten on the gaia hypothesis if you think it is relevant to Terraforming.
1742:
We want to maximize the incidence that people who make a link guessing the article name, guess correctly
2456:
1998:
367:
103:
38:
1411:
with the film's music editor, Richie Nieto, he mentions that almost all of the instrumentals are from
203:
3575:
3549:
3523:
3496:
3375:
1416:
1221:
1161:
1003:
123:
2958:
1369:
3834:
3327:
3160:
1827:
Last I checked, the only sources were from frontpagemag.com and the like - hardly an npov source. -
1388:
2123:
2112:
1953:
1947:
737:
Agreed. Each drug has the potential to be used for purposes spread over a spectrum ranging from
374:
3646:
Could you please not edit (dare I say vandalize) my user page again? I am quite upset about it.
3233:
2785:
Plus, I fixed my signature. Your "simple" concept has merit. Here is my new-and-improved sig: --
2493:
I couldn't find the NANDA reference, cause I can't access the journal from home. The journal is
1575:
1568:
891:
page is changed into a redirection, this will no longer be an issue. Ideally we don't want the
3479:
2480:
2220:
2025:
1432:
titles that I added, that you should go ahead and change it to something more appropriate. --
189:
3604:
2894:
than on the substance of the article. Whether or not he has also insulted you is irrelevant.
1405:
958:
Oh, and I needn't see it. I edited the thing today. Changed one word that bothered me.Ā ;) --
3337:
2991:
1839:
1497:
538:), but if alcohol is treated that way, then other substances deserve the same consideration.
468:
89:
3641:
3619:
3249:
2668:
2462:
1860:
1848:
1832:
1810:
1795:
1762:
1733:
1711:
1679:
1654:
1629:
1612:
1599:
1101:
1088:
980:
442:
434:
3151:
2338:
1982:
For voting in favour of my nomination for adminship! I very much appreciate your support!
1562:
350:
8:
3893:
3847:
3764:
3748:
3323:
3045:
3029:
2388:
2292:
1821:
1750:
1543:
1483:
1437:
1379:
879:
845:
820:
789:
646:
624:
589:
223:
177:
47:
17:
1567:
Sorry, I wasn't trying to twist what you stated. Please continue the conversation on my
1217:
if ones use of alcohol causes significant social and/or personal problems for the user.
147:
3613:
was affected by this bug. Just letting you know so you can fix it if you care to. --
3282:
3220:
3197:
2698:
2466:
2318:
2312:
2137:
2119:
1081:
546:
531:
371:
295:
269:
the current Phoenix area. An interesting mix of cultural traits - and a fun mystery.
3466:
The prior VFD that you voted at ended with no consensus, a new VFD has been opened at
1921:
I am getting sick and tired of our anonymous AOL IP editor running roughshod over the
1356:
1013:
183:
3796:
Viriditas, you will note I said anyone else, that excluded you. I won't feed trolls.
3442:
3088:
2504:
2484:
2216:
1965:
1287:
1188:
1168:
324:
302:
286:
139:
130:
113:
3816:
No offence intended, but you do seem to bear some sort of a personal grudge against
3273:
1062:
927:, you'll discover that Mark Twain really did write that article. What upset you? --
2533:
Obviously I missed that I hadn't fixed it. I'll be even more vigilant, now. Sorry.
2330:
2007:
1591:
1261:
722:
709:
3381:
3380:
I have filed a request for comment on SlimVirgin. You can visit the page by going
1877:
915:
561:
page should focus on the physiological / societal facts about drug use, while the
3614:
3461:
3359:). He may not have realized he was breaking the 3RR. One of his edit summaries
3308:
3244:
2902:
I disagree. The definition seems to be central to what you refer to as injecting
2874:
2499:, which is at least a bit more authoritative (though I don't know if the journal
2261:
2130:
1929:
1856:
1844:
1828:
1806:
1791:
1758:
1729:
1707:
1675:
1650:
1625:
1608:
1595:
1474:
1469:
1450:
1423:
1324:
1299:
1279:
1254:
1149:
1141:
1044:
1032:
1020:
900:
892:
866:
832:
812:
516:
502:
475:
417:
408:
393:
193:
3405:
1897:
worth of which the human race is of no particular significance in the long run.
1196:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3889:
3841:
3758:
3744:
3671:
in maintaining his user page as he sees fit, within the Knowledge guidelines. -
3633:
3489:
3453:
3424:
3396:
3385:
3058:
3041:
3025:
2947:
2288:
1817:
1539:
1508:
1479:
1464:
1433:
1412:
1375:
1267:"hay" thanks for the support; your timing's wonderful; I've just been having a
1075:
959:
952:
944:
935:
928:
875:
816:
785:
642:
620:
585:
498:
490:
174:
3690:
Category:People whose primary residence for the majority of the year is Hawaii
2171:
2118:
I'm having a dispute with an editor who insists on putting in the flag of the
1745:
would be to update the disambiguation guidelines to mention alternatives like
1552:
1478:
in the literary references section. What do you think? No hurry on this. --
1339:
429:
I have filed a request for comment on NCdave. You can visit the page by going
3583:
3557:
3531:
3504:
3301:
3279:
3217:
3213:
3173:
3117:
2964:
2952:
2931:
2927:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2895:
2879:
2769:
2757:
2534:
2447:
2432:
2416:
2402:
2326:
2276:
2265:
2247:
2096:
1941:
1397:
1250:
479:
270:
261:
247:
235:
2494:
1585:
1408:
1053:
3418:
3285:
3223:
3085:
3007:
2677:
2348:
2255:
2228:
2206:
1551:
highly recommend that you take a look at the interview he did for CHUD.com.
1459:
1393:
1332:
1007:
996:
501:
page (with all its references to brain chemistry, and method of action) to
354:
342:
136:
127:
110:
3179:
1260:
1242:
1002:
Couldn't disagree with you more strongly on this one. See my response on
3714:
3697:
3672:
3267:
3133:
2857:
Sorry to snap at you, please, take a look at the rearrangement I made on
2737:
Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
2380:
2375:
2144:
2043:
1754:
1579:
1535:
1401:
1236:
908:
853:
797:
767:
705:
550:
197:
162:
2890:
Again, you seem to be focusing your attention more on your dispute with
2749:
Please read this talk page discussion before making substantial changes.
2060:
1232:. (Also note that NIDA does not list alcohol as a substance of abuse).
3471:
3305:
2943:
2858:
2690:
2394:
2322:
2234:
2127:
1926:
1555:
1524:
1512:
1446:
1419:
1137:
1136:
Thanks for the compliment but I couldn't at this point get involved in
896:
888:
870:
862:
849:
836:
616:
562:
542:
535:
520:
483:
460:
400:
339:
http://users.bendnet.com/bjensen/volcano/eastpacific/hawaii-hawaii.html
242:
I actually did a little archaeological survey work there and in nearby
3107:
3069:
I was just thinking about that! Thanks for clueing in me in about the
2329:. You have been editing the page Matriarchy, your help is needed here.
2176:
diff, I reply to you on my home page's talk/discussion page. Aloha. --
1155:
382:
188:
I thought you might be interested in this recent Atlastawake addition
109:
Thanks for doing the merge. Are they ready to be redirected in yet?
3449:
3209:
3003:
2029:
2011:
1983:
1969:
904:
841:
506:
494:
210:
3688:" indicates something other than what it says. The category is not "
3295:
995:
page. I like what you've started, and added a request for detail.--
3580:
3554:
3528:
3501:
2684:
1404:
specifically asked Badelt to create a sound of "Wagnerian guitars."
1181:
676:
558:
464:
2868:
2547:
I can only add (not edit or revise) to the Catagory page you made.
1415:
recorded sound library and are not actual live instruments at all.
1131:
2910:. I just don't see where you are justified in these accusations.
2676:
I've recently made some changes and am making ongoing changes to
2401:. Thank you for your attention to this matter in the future. --
1961:
1957:
1777:
1511:
stories that are a much closer match such as The Novelty Act. --
1323:
Just wanted to thank you for undoing the vandalism so quicklyĀ :)
1203:"Drug abuse is the overuse of a drug for a nontherapeutic effect"
527:
256:
153:
2556:
1934:
1306:
361:
229:
899:
page is an important first step (it can remain a subsection of
3468:
Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Historical persecution by Muslims
3203:
3139:
828:
449:
399:
332:
3410:
2243:
2042:
Hey THANKS for reverting the vandalism on my user pageĀ : ) --
1534:
I would like to add the date of birth and nationality to the
1074:
Thanks for your note. I understand. I will self-revert. --
831:, as they have a lot of published books transcribed online.
688:
2037:
1770:
1574:
Sorry to trouble you again, but there's a little more on my
1445:
I'll change it. I'm still quite a novice at all of this. --
861:
Well, I've taken the plunge, and I've begun working on both
276:
3037:
3013:
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on
2238:
1703:
1646:
1458:
I just realized that we should probably add and expand on
341:... If you have better data, please substitute. Thanks! --
157:
3257:
2731:
Finally, at the top of the Talk page are two statements:
1063:
3021:. Thanks for joining, and taking the time to read this!
3006:
can be used for generating correctly-styled references.
2781:
V, I answered the left-handed comments made about me at:
684:
680:
3123:
2917:
2687:
article has a different sense than what I had intended.
1607:
I concede. I'll move things back after I get dinner. -
662:
time, but do expect some opposition to occur midstream.
3930:
You archive quite regularly. I admire your diligence.
3052:
2937:
920:
I knew I was going to be slapped for it, now or then.
505:. Anything addiction specific should be moved to the
351:
http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/1995/95_09_22.html
165:
for initially creating the subpage for the project at
2415:
of your edits to all articles are marked "minor." --
1538:
page, but I can't find that data. Is he American? --
1496:
Wimmer himself mentions a number of these on the DVD
993:
Talk:Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case
848:), so there is no real reason to maintain a separate
3313:
1578:
page I hope you'd be willing to respond to. Thanks.
2970:
Welcome to the Fact and Reference Check WikiProject
1128:(apparently you can add 216.76.216.83 to the list)
782:
Cocaine would score low to moderate for medical use
3169:Knowledge:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_June_18
3128:I probably should not be posting this, but seeing
3010:is a good example of a nicely referenced article.
1068:
171:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines
167:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines
3352:It wasn't your talk page: it was your user page
3300:The whole "Anti-Polonism" thing is showing up at
2922:Perhaps it would be enlightening to consider how
2092:~ender 2005-05-19 12:52:MST (same time weird...)
2074:-- Lipo't Feje'r (1880-1959) Quoted in D MacHale,
2513:Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case
1790:for the term outside of conservative rhetoric. -
1783:
987:Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case
424:
311:inspection of the List) are nothing of the sort.
3076:The problem with using a template for this is:
2072:What he says is a topological map of the truth.
2024:Hi Viriditas, please see current discussion at
1201:I'm going to have to agree with Guttlekraw ...
2557:http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Terri_Schiavo
2461:Hi, I hope we can work out a compromise with
2275:say: the history tells a differant story. --
2213:Knowledge:Neutral point of view/BCE-CE Debate
2143:too strong to call it a "glaring plot hole".
1396:with additional music by Ramin Djawadi &
392:. You're welcome to join the discussion... --
934:I'm sorry for merging the two paragraphs. --
541:If people disagree, then I'd argue that the
1992:hallucinogen people & organization cats
1043:block if they do anything else disruptive--
610:You need to read closer for comprehension:
3355:. He also used a dishonest edit summary (
3304:again. I'd appreciate your insight there.
3208:Sorry, but neither the Knowledge entry on
1319:Thanks for reverting my userpage vandalism
209:you please expand on the talk page there?
1749:. In any case, I'll ask an admin to move
1249:If you don't like a category, list it on
1029:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
852:page. I'd say good riddance to itĀ ;) --
3159:The category you created back in April,
2399:Knowledge:How to edit a page#Minor edits
2010:, and veriditas' talk page.) thanks --
1112:post by removing the IP number that was
1100:) make the person look like an asshole.
2963:Thanks for your invitation welcome! --
2873:I noticed that many of you comments on
14:
2683:Thanks for the feedback! I think the
2555:Since you are the one who created the
1728:user's intentions to such a degree. -
549:pages should likewise be combined. --
482:, which currently has its own page as
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3186:Knowledge:Naming conventions (movies)
2411:Actually, I just looked and it seems
1331:And likewise thanks from me as well!
1205:is a little strongly worded, whereas
943:out of order. I'm still learning. --
582:this is an encylopedia, not a soapbox
463:article existed to coincide with the
192:. I've put a merge tag at the top to
3192:. Please see the discussion on the
3190:Knowledge:Naming conventions (films)
3165:Category:Substance-related disorders
3163:, is on the block to be merged into
2979:Fact and Reference Check WikiProject
2065:re: your redirection to cartography.
1816:It was cited and sourced already. --
25:
1674:get to the article on the album. -
467:article (which is a redirection to
23:
3409:
3057:Thank you for supporting my RFA.
1968:articles to reflect that. Cheers.
1952:Hi. Regarding your comments on my
24:
3945:
3912:Greetings from a fellow Hawaiian
3184:I've called for a vote to rename
2370:Lashing the vice, but not the man
2089:transformed, but it is the same).
2067:Yeah, it does matter, here's why:
1923:Nation of Islam and anti-Semitism
1916:Nation of Islam and anti-Semitism
1292:three revert rule violation block
903:for now, with a reference to the
217:We Don't Need No Stinkin' Vandals
3130:(missing period (You can help!))
3065:Templates as communication tools
2861:and let me know what you think.
29:
835:should include drug abuse, and
3840:Regards and happy editing =).
3628:Thanks for reverting vandalism
2946:N.B. that it is stated on the
2479:I'm formulating a response on
2374:Thanks for the kind words re:
1275:about his recent edit summary
969:Re: let's string the... on RFC
679:and psychedelic drugs such as
204:Dissociative Identity Disorder
122:By the way, someone created a
13:
1:
3858:01:18, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
3334:ā 22:51, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
2959:Thank you for the invitation!
2559:page, as shown by this diff,
2393:Hello, I notice that over at
2173:link, which is saved in this
2095:Something kinda like they do
2076:Comic Sections (Dublin 1993)
1370:Equilibrium & Kurt Wimmer
1180:and the dab page made simply
3771:20:30, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
3624:23:57, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
3611:User_talk:Viriditas/archive3
3134:Ćzhiki (erinaceus amurensis)
2588:GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida
2571:GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida
2426:Your dispute with Guttlekraw
2199:GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida
2178:GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida
2163:GordonWattsDotCom_In_Florida
2082:~ender 2005-05-09 12:52:MST
337:I got the 2 Myr figure from
7:
3935:12:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
3926:12:03, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
3917:09:48, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
3908:12:00, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
3897:05:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
3882:14:03, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
3872:13:07, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
3830:23:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3801:21:06, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3752:13:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3739:13:02, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3718:12:56, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3701:12:54, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3676:12:32, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3667:I will continue to support
3661:12:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3651:10:32, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
3421:13:59, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
3234:lots of edits, not an admin
2483:. Thanks for your inquiry.
2170:UPDATE: Viriditas, At this
2161:12:29, 14 May 2005 (UTC) --
2102:~ender 2005-05-19 13:20:MST
827:I'd recommend checking out
244:Hovenweep National Monument
10:
3950:
3637:13:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
3605:duplicated article content
3254:June 28, 2005 04:14 (UTC)
3230:12:21, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
3148:07:00, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
3136:13:33, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
3091:11:36, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
3084:Thanks for catching this.
2728:in the trial order link.
2351:18:57, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
1999:Harvard Psilocybin Project
1407:In an interview I have on
1282:07:19, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
1193:19:08, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
1173:05:22, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
1091:01:44, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
983:22:46, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
437:11:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
226:20:18, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
104:Minamata Tokyo negotiation
3595:07:48, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
3569:07:24, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
3543:07:20, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
3516:06:53, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
3475:18:45, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
3457:10:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
3438:17:33, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
3400:18:15, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
3389:22:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
3367:23:18, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
3347:23:08, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
3292:July 4, 2005 09:42 (UTC)
3270:28 June 2005 17:25 (UTC)
3200:06:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3176:23:44, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
3120:13:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3061:00:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3032:01:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2057:03:41, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
1944:23:58, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1931:04:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1911:18:41, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1851:00:50, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1835:21:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1824:21:35, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1813:21:27, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1802:21:19, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1780:11:38, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1737:05:55, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1603:04:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1582:04:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1546:01:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1486:01:25, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1440:07:41, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1382:04:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1366:02:59, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1353:14:31, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1344:What do you make of this
1327:13:31, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1315:13:24, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1302:10:34, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
1257:02:55, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1239:16:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1222:Controlled Substances Act
1152:04:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1144:04:42, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1125:19:23, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1104:02:24, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
1078:01:06, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1023:22:01, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1010:05:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1004:User talk:Professor Ninja
999:16:39, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
947:07:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
938:06:35, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
931:06:19, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
882:08:11, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
844:page (which redirects to
823:22:04, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
792:21:42, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
607:00:01, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
592:23:56, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
570:23:35, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
553:23:23, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
515:My vote would be to make
445:12:41, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
411:01:27, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
396:19:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
379:06:17, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
329:04:55, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
307:03:53, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
291:01:58, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
213:09:36, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
180:23:22, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
124:Category:Minamata disease
90:Day the Earth Stood Still
3310:5 July 2005 03:09 (UTC)
3161:Category:Substance abuse
3152:Category Substance abuse
3048:19:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2955:14:41, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2934:14:41, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2926:could have violated the
2914:14:28, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2882:13:22, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2865:10:29, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2852:08:19, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
2815:07:43, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
2773:07:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
2761:05:22, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
2694:04:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
2663:08:20, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
2592:06:15, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
2574:04:12, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
2538:11:20, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
2529:for watching out for me.
2488:01:11, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
2470:10:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
2451:09:50, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
2436:15:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
2420:18:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2406:17:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2384:02:25, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
2365:01:22, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
2339:Moving a misspellt image
2334:05:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2308:13:56, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2296:09:34, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
2280:09:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
2269:08:54, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
2251:03:39, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
2237:you made the claim that
2224:00:02, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
2202:17:16, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2181:13:10, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
2166:12:30, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
2148:10:07, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
2133:21:45, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1863:01:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1766:02:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1715:00:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1683:09:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1658:07:05, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1633:06:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1616:04:36, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1563:Your Pablo Neruda Revert
1558:03:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1527:03:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1515:03:17, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1453:14:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1426:05:00, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1335:14:33, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1047:10:09, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1035:01:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
962:07:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
955:07:29, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
911:17:13, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
856:17:13, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
811:Before I get started on
800:17:13, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
770:16:30, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
730:11:11, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
712:06:04, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
649:23:31, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
627:00:12, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
420:06:45, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
345:11:06, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
273:07:22, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
238:06:41, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
200:02:21, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
3015:the project's talk page
2898:14:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2153:Reply from Gordon Watts
2124:Palestinian territories
2113:Palestinian territories
2033:06:56, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
2015:18:56, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1987:02:52, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1973:13:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
357:11:22, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
264:07:07, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
250:06:51, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
148:Stub sorting guidelines
3414:
2481:talk:nursing diagnosis
2321:goiing on at the page
2078:
2026:Template talk:Israelis
2020:Template talk:Israelis
1357:NOI & Antisemitism
1160:Why not put it on the
1014:3RR and The Revolution
595:I agree with you that
190:Solar variation theory
184:Solar variation theory
3413:
3274:Substance & drugs
3019:contact me personally
2992:Johann Sebastian Bach
2743:Which is what I did.
2707:Read the paragraph. "
2475:re: nursing diagnoses
2355:Terri Schiavo - reply
2347:I hope this helps, ā
2070:
1840:Pierre-Andre Taguieff
469:recreational drug use
42:of past discussions.
2886:RE your response on
2463:Francis Ford Coppola
1978:Thank you, Viriditas
1878:Environmental Ethics
1082:LRod's Schiavo edits
1027:I've reported it on
916:Original researchĀ ;)
3921:Where is the love?
3406:Reverting vandalism
1751:Giant Steps (album)
1311:Thanks for the rv!
1197:Drug Abuse Revision
846:Prohibition (drugs)
829:www.druglibrary.org
599:is synonymous with
576:is synonymous with
18:User talk:Viriditas
3415:
3266:for my comments. -
2457:Working things out
2120:State of Palestine
2008:thoric's talk page
1940:the full form...)
1340:Whodunit vandalism
1253:, don't blank it.
1209:is more balanced.
547:alcoholic beverage
532:Alcoholic beverage
296:List of films noir
100:Japanese democracy
3869:
3827:
3623:
3376:RFC on SlimVirgin
3253:
2974:Dear new member,
2505:nursing diagnosis
2285:Assume good faith
2211:Please check out
1966:Brilliant Corners
1586:Giant Steps moves
1288:Armenian Genocide
1054:Re: External link
991:I started up the
976:all the attitudes
923:If you follow my
557:I think that the
497:, and rename the
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3941:
3867:
3857:
3855:
3850:
3844:
3835:Re: Hawaii Issue
3825:
3761:
3617:
3592:
3589:
3586:
3578:
3566:
3563:
3560:
3552:
3540:
3537:
3534:
3526:
3513:
3510:
3507:
3499:
3494:
3488:
3290:
3247:
3228:
3214:Knowledge is not
3180:Films and Movies
3104:
3017:. You can also
2854:
2849:
2848:
2845:
2842:
2839:
2836:
2833:
2830:
2827:
2817:
2812:
2811:
2808:
2805:
2802:
2799:
2796:
2793:
2790:
2665:
2660:
2658:
2655:
2652:
2647:
2644:
2638:
2635:
2630:
2627:
2622:
2619:
2614:
2611:
2594:
2589:
2548:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2046:
1592:Talk:Giant Steps
1392:was composed by
1290:. fyi, he got a
1262:Nanjing Massacre
1244:Category:Racists
1191:
1178:Sin City (comic)
1171:
1110:please come back
1070:
1066:Opiod Use -: -->
1065:
723:dextromethorphan
368:WikiProject Beer
327:
305:
294:Please see page
289:
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3949:
3948:
3944:
3943:
3942:
3940:
3939:
3938:
3853:
3848:
3846:
3842:
3837:
3818:User:Coqsportif
3759:
3644:
3630:
3607:
3590:
3587:
3584:
3576:
3564:
3561:
3558:
3550:
3538:
3535:
3532:
3524:
3511:
3508:
3505:
3497:
3492:
3486:
3482:
3464:
3445:
3427:
3408:
3378:
3340:
3316:
3298:
3287:
3276:
3260:
3236:
3225:
3206:
3182:
3154:
3142:
3126:
3114:very nicely put
3110:
3098:
3067:
3055:
2977:Welcome to the
2972:
2961:
2940:
2920:
2875:Talk:Drug abuse
2871:
2846:
2843:
2840:
2837:
2834:
2831:
2828:
2825:
2824:
2820:
2809:
2806:
2803:
2800:
2797:
2794:
2791:
2788:
2787:
2780:
2701:
2673:Hi Viriditas,
2671:
2659:
2656:
2653:
2650:
2645:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2620:
2618:
2615:
2612:
2610:
2607:
2606:
2602:
2587:
2583:
2550:
2543:
2516:
2477:
2459:
2428:
2391:
2372:
2357:
2341:
2315:
2262:Talk:Drug abuse
2258:
2231:
2209:
2155:
2140:
2116:
2063:
2061:Topological map
2053:
2050:
2047:
2044:
2040:
2022:
1994:
1980:
1950:
1948:Celesta/Celeste
1937:
1919:
1880:
1786:
1773:
1588:
1565:
1475:Minority Report
1470:Phillip K. Dick
1372:
1359:
1342:
1321:
1309:
1265:
1247:
1199:
1189:
1169:
1158:
1134:
1129:
1102:Professor Ninja
1089:Professor Ninja
1084:
1072:
1056:
1016:
989:
981:Professor Ninja
971:
918:
901:substance abuse
893:substance abuse
867:substance abuse
833:Substance abuse
813:substance abuse
601:substance abuse
578:substance abuse
517:substance abuse
503:Drug dependence
476:substance abuse
452:
427:
404:
390:talk:GreenFacts
385:
364:
335:
325:
303:
287:
279:
232:
219:
206:
194:Solar variation
186:
150:
107:
92:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3947:
3900:
3899:
3836:
3833:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3780:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3722:
3721:
3720:
3706:
3705:
3704:
3703:
3679:
3678:
3643:
3640:
3629:
3626:
3606:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3481:
3480:Test templates
3478:
3463:
3460:
3444:
3441:
3426:
3423:
3407:
3404:
3403:
3402:
3377:
3374:
3372:
3370:
3369:
3339:
3336:
3324:Neuroscientist
3315:
3312:
3297:
3294:
3275:
3272:
3259:
3256:
3235:
3232:
3205:
3202:
3198:Samuel Wantman
3181:
3178:
3172:
3153:
3150:
3141:
3138:
3125:
3122:
3109:
3108:Schiavo burial
3106:
3082:
3081:
3072:
3066:
3063:
3054:
3051:
3050:
3049:
2971:
2968:
2960:
2957:
2939:
2936:
2919:
2916:
2900:
2899:
2870:
2867:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2753:
2752:
2741:
2740:
2700:
2697:
2670:
2667:
2649:
2641:
2632:
2624:
2616:
2608:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2549:
2541:
2531:
2530:
2525:
2524:
2515:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2476:
2473:
2467:Samuel Wantman
2458:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2427:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2390:
2387:
2371:
2368:
2356:
2353:
2340:
2337:
2314:
2311:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2257:
2254:
2230:
2227:
2208:
2205:
2154:
2151:
2139:
2136:
2115:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2100:
2090:
2081:
2075:
2073:
2068:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2039:
2036:
2021:
2018:
1993:
1990:
1979:
1976:
1949:
1946:
1936:
1933:
1918:
1913:
1890:
1888:
1879:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1785:
1782:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1618:
1617:
1587:
1584:
1571:page. Thanks.
1564:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1517:
1516:
1509:Philip K. Dick
1504:
1503:
1493:
1492:
1465:Fahrenheit 451
1456:
1455:
1454:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1413:Media Ventures
1371:
1368:
1358:
1355:
1351:Matthew Platts
1341:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1320:
1317:
1313:Matthew Platts
1308:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1264:
1259:
1246:
1241:
1198:
1195:
1157:
1156:Sim/Sin Cities
1154:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1108:I edited your
1106:
1105:
1083:
1080:
1071:
1061:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1037:
1036:
1015:
1012:
988:
985:
970:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
956:
917:
914:
913:
912:
860:
858:
857:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
774:
773:
772:
771:
732:
731:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
654:
653:
652:
651:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
615:discussion to
499:drug addiction
491:drug addiction
459:I believe the
451:
448:
447:
446:
426:
423:
422:
421:
403:
398:
384:
383:Reverted edits
381:
363:
360:
359:
358:
334:
331:
318:
315:
312:
278:
275:
266:
265:
252:
251:
231:
228:
224:Riffsyphon1024
218:
215:
205:
202:
185:
182:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
142:
120:
106:
96:
91:
88:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3946:
3937:
3936:
3933:
3928:
3927:
3924:
3919:
3918:
3915:
3910:
3909:
3906:
3898:
3895:
3891:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3880:
3874:
3873:
3870:
3865:
3859:
3856:
3851:
3845:
3832:
3831:
3828:
3823:
3819:
3802:
3799:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3784:
3770:
3766:
3762:
3755:
3754:
3753:
3750:
3746:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3737:
3733:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3719:
3716:
3712:
3711:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3707:
3702:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3687:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3677:
3674:
3670:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3659:
3653:
3652:
3649:
3639:
3638:
3635:
3625:
3621:
3616:
3612:
3596:
3593:
3582:
3579:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3567:
3556:
3553:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3541:
3530:
3527:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3517:
3514:
3503:
3500:
3491:
3477:
3476:
3473:
3469:
3459:
3458:
3455:
3451:
3440:
3439:
3436:
3431:
3422:
3420:
3412:
3401:
3398:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3387:
3383:
3373:
3368:
3365:
3361:
3358:
3354:
3351:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3345:
3338:Uthar blocked
3335:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3319:
3311:
3309:
3307:
3303:
3302:Shoah (movie)
3296:Shoah (movie)
3293:
3291:
3284:
3281:
3271:
3269:
3265:
3264:talk:houseing
3255:
3251:
3246:
3242:
3231:
3229:
3222:
3219:
3215:
3211:
3201:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3177:
3175:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3157:
3149:
3147:
3137:
3135:
3131:
3121:
3119:
3115:
3112:Actually my "
3105:
3102:
3096:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3079:
3078:
3077:
3074:
3070:
3062:
3060:
3047:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3031:
3027:
3022:
3020:
3016:
3011:
3009:
3005:
2999:
2996:
2994:
2993:
2986:
2982:
2980:
2975:
2967:
2966:
2956:
2954:
2949:
2945:
2935:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2915:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2888:Talk:Osmodiar
2885:
2884:
2883:
2881:
2876:
2866:
2864:
2860:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2818:
2816:
2813:
2784:
2774:
2771:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2759:
2750:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2738:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2729:
2725:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2711:
2705:
2696:
2695:
2692:
2688:
2686:
2681:
2679:
2674:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2593:
2590:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2572:
2567:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2553:
2546:
2540:
2539:
2536:
2527:
2526:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2514:
2506:
2502:
2498:
2495:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2486:
2482:
2472:
2471:
2468:
2464:
2452:
2449:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2434:
2421:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2386:
2385:
2382:
2377:
2367:
2366:
2363:
2352:
2350:
2345:
2336:
2335:
2332:
2328:
2327:User:Ashley Y
2324:
2320:
2310:
2309:
2306:
2297:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2278:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2267:
2263:
2253:
2252:
2249:
2245:
2240:
2236:
2226:
2225:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2204:
2203:
2200:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2179:
2175:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2150:
2149:
2146:
2135:
2134:
2131:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2114:
2101:
2098:
2094:
2093:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2077:
2069:
2058:
2056:
2035:
2034:
2031:
2028:. Thank you.
2027:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2009:
2004:
2000:
1989:
1988:
1985:
1975:
1974:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1945:
1943:
1932:
1930:
1928:
1924:
1917:
1912:
1910:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1889:
1886:
1885:Simon Fisher
1883:
1862:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1825:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1788:
1787:
1781:
1779:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:(composition)
1743:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1583:
1581:
1577:
1572:
1570:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1526:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1476:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1461:
1452:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1435:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1398:Geoff Zanelli
1395:
1391:
1390:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1381:
1377:
1367:
1365:
1354:
1352:
1347:
1346:User:Whodunit
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1316:
1314:
1301:
1298:the point. ā
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1252:
1245:
1240:
1238:
1233:
1231:
1225:
1223:
1218:
1216:
1210:
1208:
1204:
1194:
1192:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1174:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1162:disamiguation
1153:
1151:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1126:
1124:
1123:216.76.216.83
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1079:
1077:
1060:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1011:
1009:
1005:
1000:
998:
994:
984:
982:
977:
961:
957:
954:
949:
948:
946:
941:
940:
939:
937:
932:
930:
926:
921:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
885:
884:
883:
881:
877:
872:
868:
864:
855:
851:
847:
843:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
822:
818:
814:
799:
794:
793:
791:
787:
783:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
769:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
729:
724:
720:
719:
711:
707:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
650:
648:
644:
639:
638:
637:
636:
626:
622:
618:
613:
609:
608:
606:
602:
598:
594:
593:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
571:
569:
564:
560:
556:
555:
554:
552:
548:
544:
539:
537:
533:
529:
524:
522:
518:
513:
510:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
487:
485:
481:
480:alcohol abuse
477:
474:I agree that
472:
470:
466:
462:
457:
456:
444:
440:
439:
438:
436:
432:
419:
414:
413:
412:
410:
402:
397:
395:
391:
380:
378:
377:
373:
369:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
344:
340:
330:
328:
323:
308:
306:
301:
297:
292:
290:
285:
274:
272:
263:
258:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
237:
227:
225:
214:
212:
201:
199:
195:
191:
181:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
159:
155:
141:
138:
134:
133:
132:
129:
125:
121:
118:
117:
116:
115:
112:
105:
101:
95:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3929:
3920:
3911:
3901:
3875:
3860:
3838:
3815:
3685:
3654:
3645:
3642:My User Page
3631:
3608:
3483:
3465:
3446:
3435:62.253.64.14
3432:
3428:
3416:
3379:
3371:
3364:Ann Heneghan
3357:spelling fix
3356:
3344:Ann Heneghan
3341:
3320:
3317:
3299:
3277:
3261:
3237:
3207:
3183:
3158:
3155:
3143:
3129:
3127:
3113:
3111:
3097:
3093:
3083:
3075:
3068:
3056:
3023:
3012:
3008:Titan (moon)
3000:
2997:
2990:
2987:
2983:
2976:
2973:
2962:
2951:correct." --
2941:
2921:
2901:
2872:
2856:
2819:
2779:
2754:
2748:
2742:
2736:
2730:
2726:
2721:
2716:
2714:
2708:
2706:
2702:
2689:
2682:
2678:Deep ecology
2675:
2672:
2669:Deep Ecology
2601:
2568:
2564:
2554:
2551:
2544:
2532:
2517:
2500:
2478:
2460:
2429:
2412:
2392:
2373:
2362:Ann Heneghan
2358:
2346:
2342:
2317:there is an
2316:
2302:
2259:
2232:
2217:Slrubenstein
2210:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2169:
2159:64.12.116.14
2156:
2141:
2117:
2079:
2071:
2064:
2041:
2023:
1995:
1981:
1951:
1938:
1920:
1909:Simon Fisher
1906:
1902:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1774:
1761:
1746:
1741:
1732:
1726:
1710:
1678:
1653:
1628:
1611:
1598:
1589:
1573:
1566:
1533:
1473:
1463:
1460:Ray Bradbury
1457:
1430:
1394:Klaus Badelt
1387:
1373:
1360:
1343:
1322:
1310:
1295:
1273:User:Coolcat
1266:
1248:
1234:
1226:
1219:
1214:
1211:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1175:
1159:
1146:
1135:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1107:
1097:
1085:
1073:
1069:_Abuse": -->
1064:_Abuse": -->
1057:
1017:
1001:
990:
975:
972:
933:
922:
919:
859:
810:
781:
762:
758:
754:
751:Recreational
750:
747:Experimental
746:
742:
738:
640:
619:, please. --
611:
600:
596:
577:
573:
540:
525:
514:
511:
488:
473:
458:
454:
453:
428:
405:
386:
375:
365:
336:
309:
293:
280:
267:
233:
220:
207:
187:
151:
108:
93:
65:
43:
37:
3318:Viriditas,
3262:please see
3086:-- Uncle Ed
2722:conclusions
2552:Viriditas,
2389:Minor edits
2376:Humanifesto
2331:Robin klein
1935:James Oberg
1755:Giant Steps
1590:Please see
1536:Kurt Wimmer
1402:Kurt Wimmer
1389:Equilibrium
1325:Greg Robson
1307:Mouth ulcer
743:Therapeutic
362:Chile brews
230:Chaco Edit.
36:This is an
3932:Coqsportif
3923:Coqsportif
3914:Coqsportif
3905:Coqsportif
3890:Viriditas
3879:Coqsportif
3798:Coqsportif
3745:Viriditas
3736:Coqsportif
3696:further. -
3694:Coqsportif
3669:Coqsportif
3658:Coqsportif
3648:Coqsportif
3615:Rick Block
3245:Rick Block
3204:Substance?
3140:RfA thanks
2944:Drug abuse
2924:Guttlekraw
2892:Guttlekraw
2869:Drug abuse
2863:Guttlekraw
2859:Drug abuse
2699:Hammesfahr
2444:Guttlekraw
2395:Drug abuse
2323:Matriarchy
2313:Matriarchy
2305:Guttlekraw
2289:Viriditas
2235:drug abuse
2138:The Jacket
1907:Regards --
1818:Viriditas
1540:Viriditas
1480:Viriditas
1434:Viriditas
1376:Viriditas
1300:Davenbelle
1280:Davenbelle
1255:LevelCheck
1215:drug abuse
1150:Grace Note
1142:Grace Note
1138:drug abuse
1132:Drug abuse
897:drug abuse
889:drug abuse
876:Viriditas
871:drug abuse
863:drug abuse
850:drug abuse
837:drug abuse
817:Viriditas
786:Viriditas
643:Viriditas
621:Viriditas
617:drug abuse
605:Guttlekraw
597:Drug abuse
586:Viriditas
574:Drug abuse
568:Guttlekraw
563:drug abuse
543:alcoholism
536:Alcoholism
521:alcoholism
484:alcoholism
461:drug abuse
450:Drug abuse
401:Modal jazz
394:PatVanHove
349:Check out
333:Puāu Kukui
3843:Sasquatch
3760:Sasquatch
3634:Wackymacs
3443:POV-check
3397:FuelWagon
3386:FuelWagon
3241:this list
3210:Substance
3194:talk page
3174:Courtland
3059:Guettarda
3042:Frazzydee
3026:Frazzydee
2715:While it
2111:Flags at
2038:Thank you
2003:talk page
1954:talk page
1771:Gary Webb
1076:AStanhope
960:VKokielov
953:VKokielov
945:VKokielov
936:VKokielov
929:VKokielov
907:page). --
905:drug laws
842:drug laws
507:addiction
495:Addiction
372:Clockwork
277:Film Noir
175:AllyUnion
82:ArchiveĀ 5
77:ArchiveĀ 4
72:ArchiveĀ 3
66:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
3433:Thanks.
3258:houseing
3118:Duckecho
2965:Dotshuai
2953:Osmodiar
2932:Osmodiar
2912:Osmodiar
2896:Osmodiar
2880:Osmodiar
2770:Duckecho
2758:Duckecho
2685:Ecosophy
2535:Duckecho
2448:Osmodiar
2433:Intrigue
2417:Osmodiar
2403:Osmodiar
2319:edit war
2277:Osmodiar
2266:Osmodiar
2260:Over at
2248:Osmodiar
2233:Over at
1942:Shimgray
1753:back to
1182:Sin City
1019:thanks--
677:cannabis
559:drug use
465:drug use
271:WBardwin
262:WBardwin
248:WBardwin
236:WBardwin
3864:ulayiti
3822:ulayiti
3462:new vfd
3419:Quadell
3156:Hello,
3146:Willmcw
3124:Giggles
3004:Wikibib
2918:reverts
2822:here!--
2501:Nursing
2349:Quadell
1962:Celeste
1958:Celesta
1409:my site
1364:Cberlet
1333:Man vyi
1164:page?--
1121:. LRod
739:Medical
728:Techelf
534:--: -->
530:--: -->
528:Alcohol
355:hike395
343:hike395
257:Hohokam
154:April 2
137:Rossami
128:Rossami
111:Rossami
39:archive
3868:(talk)
3826:(talk)
3715:Harmil
3698:Harmil
3673:Harmil
3425:Thanks
3306:Jayjg
3283:adiant
3268:Beezly
3221:adiant
3101:vechat
3089:(talk)
3071:subst:
3053:My RFA
2646:lorida
2381:Geogre
2145:Mikkel
2128:Jayjg
1927:Jayjg
1580:Anonip
1491:wrong.
1251:WP:CFD
1237:Thoric
909:Thoric
854:Thoric
798:Thoric
768:Thoric
763:danger
706:Thoric
551:Thoric
509:page.
443:Mike H
435:Mike H
198:Vsmith
178:(talk)
163:jag123
140:(talk)
131:(talk)
114:(talk)
3490:test2
3450:David
3314:Sorry
3289:|<
3288:: -->
3227:|<
3226:: -->
2829:ordon
2792:ordon
2691:Muxxa
2613:ordon
2545:Help!
2465:. --
2246:? ``
2244:ONDCP
2221:Talk
1647:songs
1556:JenGe
1525:JenGe
1513:JenGe
1447:JenGe
1420:JenGe
1362:us.--
1271:with
1098:might
1067:Abuse
1045:nixie
1033:nixie
1021:nixie
1008:ghost
997:ghost
759:value
755:Abuse
689:ONDCP
16:<
3894:Talk
3749:Talk
3620:talk
3472:~~~~
3454:Talk
3382:here
3250:talk
3038:Bach
2948:NPOV
2942:Re:
2938:NPOV
2835:atts
2798:atts
2621:atts
2485:Matt
2293:Talk
2287:. --
2256:Talk
2239:NIDA
2229:NIDA
2207:NPOV
2097:here
2030:IZAK
2012:Heah
1984:El_C
1970:RodC
1964:and
1822:Talk
1757:. -
1704:song
1576:Talk
1569:Talk
1544:Talk
1484:Talk
1468:and
1451:Talk
1438:Talk
1424:Talk
1380:Talk
1269:talk
1230:NIDA
1190:Grza
1184:. --
1170:Grza
925:link
880:Talk
865:and
821:Talk
790:Talk
710:Talk
647:Talk
625:Talk
590:Talk
584:. --
545:and
489:The
431:here
418:mako
409:mako
376:Soul
370:? ā
326:Grza
304:Grza
288:Grza
255:The
211:Zora
158:2005
102:and
98:re:
3581:Who
3555:Who
3529:Who
3502:Who
3188:to
2928:3RR
2908:POV
2904:POV
2717:may
2413:all
2219:|
2122:at
2054:el
1800:add
1784:NAS
1759:mak
1730:mak
1708:mak
1676:mak
1651:mak
1626:mak
1609:mak
1596:mak
1472:'s
1462:'s
1400:.
1186:The
1166:The
1114:not
1006:.--
753:to
687:or
685:DEA
681:LSD
425:RFC
322:The
300:The
284:The
3892:|
3747:|
3493:}}
3487:{{
3470:.
3452:|
3384:.
3330:|
3326:|
3103:}}
3099:{{
3024:ā
2995:.
2981:!
2847:om
2841:ot
2810:om
2804:ot
2712:"
2680:.
2648:,
2639:__
2637:om
2629:ot
2585:--
2446:.
2291:|
2215:,
2051:er
1960:,
1857:SV
1845:SV
1829:SV
1820:|
1807:SV
1792:SV
1778:Rl
1542:|
1482:|
1449:|
1436:|
1422:|
1418:--
1378:|
1296:is
878:|
874:--
819:|
796:--
788:|
749:,
745:,
741:,
708:|
645:|
623:|
588:|
486:.
196:.
156:,
3854:ē
3849:č®²
3769:ē
3767:ā
3765:č®²
3763:ā
3622:)
3618:(
3591:?
3588:Āæ
3585:?
3577:ā
3565:?
3562:Āæ
3559:?
3551:ā
3539:?
3536:Āæ
3533:?
3525:ā
3512:?
3509:Āæ
3506:?
3498:ā
3332:C
3328:T
3286:_
3280:R
3252:)
3248:(
3224:_
3218:R
3171:.
3046:ā
3044:|
3030:ā
3028:|
2844:C
2838:D
2832:W
2826:G
2807:C
2801:D
2795:W
2789:G
2751:"
2747:"
2739:"
2735:"
2657:A
2654:S
2651:U
2642:F
2633:C
2625:D
2617:W
2609:G
2099::
2048:P
2045:M
1861:t
1859:|
1849:t
1847:|
1833:t
1831:|
1811:t
1809:|
1798:|
1796:t
1794:|
1763:o
1734:o
1712:o
1680:o
1655:o
1630:o
1613:o
1600:o
761::
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.