User talk:Timtrent/Archive 6

2221:

is in Mill Valley, California. He is a very prolific musician. He was the director of a festival called "The Bammies" (for about twelve years). He got honoured by the Mill Valley authorities last year. He reworks band for a living. He is also a prolific songwriter - his songs have been covered by well-known artistes - he has played with (practically) every famous musician in the Music Industry .... he even wrote an award winning campaign for Levis. He is 'respected'in the Music Industry: he is friends and works with musicians like Elvis Costello blah blah! I think he would be a good one to do .... I would like to start creating a page for him, and must now try to find your notes which really helped me to create the Ritz page. It would be quite an ambitious job as he has been so prolific - if I could start it off - then I could take my time

192:

Yet you insisted on redacting my userspace, like I was a common vandal, wtihout even the courtesy to appraoch me first liek a real adult would. If the wiki-break notice is a personal attack on my paer, then I'm sorry your feelings were hurt. I've had it today with people protecting the real vandals and abusers, then going after me like I'm worse than the vandals. Well, I've had it with idoits like you. And you really are stupid for nominating the largest airlines list. THere, now THAT was a REAL personal attack. GO get me blocked if you wish, but I'm gone from WIkipedia anyway. THought I may come back as an IP, since they get more respect than regular users from the likes of morons like you! -

2826:

interest. I understand that as the piece is about my/our animation projects a COI could be apparent but I tried very hard to be completely neutral, factual and included no future projects (promoting LN) or reviews (opinion based) I have added a Request to edit tag on my talk page, which if I understand correctly, someone could pick up and reword the article meaning it had more than one author resolving the COI. I was hoping that it might be possible for you to perhaps verify someone of the information on the page and fill my request for an edit. If this isn't possible any advice on the subject would be gratefully received. Kind regards k

31: 2422:

logic and I certainly respect your reply. It's not so much the destiny of this page that concerns me, as working out some general rules on when it's appropriate to strongly assert SD and when to go AfD. I've had comments suggesting boldness on SD and others suggesting caution and preferring AfD. On the other hand, AfD, particularly for a new article, seems to cause enldess headaches and 'Wikkilawyering.' Cheers,

237:

Wales will do nothing to change Wikipeida if it interferes with his stated religion belief of "open editing" at all costs. Also unforutunately, you are part of the cost. I'm sorry you were involved in this way, but there is absolutely nothing that can be done to stop people like this, and the stalkers know it. I'll do what I can to get an admin to clean up the mess. Thanks for the alert. -

2554:

experience Warrington has been pretty responsive to input and is happy to work on improving articles. He seems to feel that every time he responded to your suggestions you issued new criticisms, and based on this perception he became frustrated. I understand there are differences over how to present some of the information, but I think those can be worked out.

636:"Need" is an interesting word. I think the various topics cover so much ground that each article is expandable into a very much more complete article, so I would say that, while the current articles may have insufficient detail, they are they type of article that a casual surfer would probably search for and expect or hope to see. 1892:

of our festival and awards templates for guidance on each.) Furthermore, the linking to titles via the year is generally frowned upon in standard text, much less in a template where the link can be easily construed to be for an article on that year's award itself. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns! Thanks,

2978:

And Comsec? Well it will not benefit much from an article here, nor will the lack of an article harm it. The links have "rel=nofollow" so sites can;t inherit (eg) page rank. Your site traffic will miss 30 visitors or so per day. But this visitors are likely to bounce anyway. And, if it merits an

2915:

Finally a nice person. HEEEEELP ME. These admins are talking to me in this Knowledge talk I'm not even understanding. I need help to understand what I need to do. They keep blocking me and sending me menacing messages - I'm not doing anything to be disruptive or purposely "breaching" guidelines.

2660:

Probably wisest not to serve it with a glass of cold milk! Ah wait... One sort can be and the other sort can't. And you have to be so careful of the source of your schmaltz! Well, no wonder there was a war. You cannot have kosher and non kosher prepared in the same article! It's like kitchens!!

2477:

Thanks for your input. Sorry you felt the page should be deleted. I would like to try to make additions to keep Reflexive Human Science going, as suggested in your message. I could for example add Velmans, Max. Reflexive Sciencee of Consciousness to refrences, but I cannot any longer find the page to

1960:

You should never use the phrase "I am sorry...., but" because that is plain aggressively rude. It means "I look as if I am sorry, but I am not sorry at all." I find that phraseology pompous and arrogant. You may wish to reconsider it. I find your draconian edit without any attempt to discuss this

1306:

Hi Fiddle Faddle, Thank you for your help. I am still not sure I understood right, but have added more links to different websites concerning the ex box boys. Will this make a difference? And if people still disagree about The Ex Box Boys deserving an article in wikipedia, is there an administrator I

2437:

The AfD process gives 5 days of grace for a new article to be enhanced. So it seems to me that it can be proposed at once if it is felt necessary. I have often done so when SD seems unavailable. I truly do not care about wikilawyering. Such people tend to have their own presence in the forefront

1676:

I wouldn't know jack about adding it to categories and the other extra stuff you mentioned, I just type and clean up a few articles. I'm fairly new and I keep things simple. I submit my portion and allow everyone else to fix my grammatical errors and the extra add-ons like categories and such. Be

1414:

I see a case in point for an article on the biography of this army major on account of the interest in this persons life that is already showing up in blogging circuits and media. The article as it stands may not sufficient. Effort and research is needed to establish all facts about his contribution

949:

Then, since you appear to have infinite patience, please explain it to the user. How hard can it possibly be to understand the talk page of the disputed article? A user who gets retaliatory in a huge flurry tends to need more than gentle explanations. I will not be taking this user under my wing.

191:

FYI, I consider ANY unwanted changes to the userspace with my name (since I can't say "my userspace") to be vandalism. Vandlism is against WIkipedia POLICY - it's not a guideline, so how did I bereka my own rules?? Idiot. I know we didn't start off on the right foot today, but I did aplogize for it.

3000:

Thanks for the messages, they were really helpful. I'm not a child, and I get that I need to play the political game, at this point. I don't have a problem with that. I'll wait and let the whole story blow over, and then suck up when I need to. I just need help understanding this suggestion you

2974:

Then I would go and edit a few entirely unrelated articles, edit them well and with enthusiasm. Why? Well, to show that you have Knowledge's interests at heart, not your own. And yes, editing Knowledge is a wholly pointless activity, a complete waste of time and effort, and those of us who do it

2931:

I think you need to understand that, while your own feathers are ruffled, you have achieved angering a dragon. And that is the whole problem. Now I have no idea what Comsec Consulting is, whether it's notable, or anything about it. All I can see is that you have reacted to a baptism of fire in a

2339:

I'm on the fence on Grade II. On the one hand, I think it does actually meet our notability and verifiability requirements, and I'm chary of deleting good-faith contributions which do meet these -- excluding the obvious problem with articles that exist to promote commercial concerns, and even those

2220:

Hi Fiddle Faddle, I've been absent from Knowledge for so long, I can't even remember who is my Knowledge 'guide'. Can't locate hs (or her?!) name on my History page. (How would I find out?!). I would like to start creating a page on Austin de Lone.I think he would be a good subject to do. His base

1891:

Good work helping us expand on Southeast Asian cinema! However, just wanted to give you a heads up that I've deleted the winners portion of the template. Festival navigational templates are designed for articles on individual years, and should not be used for linking to the award winners. (See most

734:

and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund

639:

That doesn't mean that I hold an intransigent view on the concept of consolidating where appropriate, but I would expect editors to be able to achieve that by using redirects rather than nominating for deletion. I either created or added to a number of those articles in the fond hope that "a start

2405:

I'm not really sure why you are asking me. I will form a view if the article interests me, but I don't generally respond when asked to visit a deletion discussion. Don't take that personally, I just make it a personal rule. If you feel strongly and the PROD is contested I suggest you take it to

2302:

I personally don't mind whether or not this particular AfD runs the full course, but it isn't a great test case for the automatic notabiity of grade II listing -- if you do find a suitable test case and take it to AfD, I'd be obliged if you'd notify me, as I'd be very interested in the discussion.

2267:

I'd offer if I could be sure of being here reliably. The best approach is to place {{helpme}} on your talk page with the request for guidance towards a mentor/guide there (stated simply and clearly). The main thing to remember is notability plus verifiability makes an article that will stand the

1672:

Huh, didn't know anyone notices all the new stuff that appears on Wiki. Yea, I read a lot and after the past 8 months of doing research on the past of one my units I served with in the Marines. I spent way too much time and money just to write a history book on my fav company's past. But I like

1526:

that it has marked it as patrolled. But it also seems not always to be consistent. Perhaps you would like, since you seem to know more about the patrolled status than I do, to take this up with the guy who created twinkle? I see no issue with asking, but I have less, presumably, experience than

1342:

Admins: yes there are more than you can shake a stick at. You can even contact Jimbo Wales, the founder. What you will find is that each person here has one voice with one weight. No individual's word holds sway. Being an admin is a duty that carries no extra rights at all. Thus Knowledge is

643:

It was not just Grace Timmins, of course, but a great many others who passed through and shared her vision. They linked into the West London Methodist Mission, and a whole slew of suffragettes and suffragists. And the Guilds of brave things and of play are very different beasts and warrant their

2970:

You can even suggest that it would be appropriate to delete the stridency, but, and this is important, you have not done it because you are nervous that your doing so might be interpreted as vandalism, not contrition. Or that you will leave it a few hours and then delete the strident comments if

2938:

The simplest thing to do is to let it all blow over. It will. Pretty much everyone gets it badly wrong here at some point. As soon as you accept that this place works the way it works then you'll understand. People are fiercely jealous of independence here. They should be, and that is good.

2779:

I want to make it clear is that we do not know who created the continuous week we have today. While the earliest documentation we have is from the Jews, this was at the time their Kingdom fell to the Babylonian Empire. It could be a Babalonian or Jew evolution from the original Sumerian week with

2421:

hi again. I see that it may have appeared odd for me to ask you, but I did so because I wanted some neutral input and had just spotted your name in an intervention I agreed with on a 'history' log, so that was random enough for my purposes. Equally, I hope you won't be affronted by this off-beat

1398:

are appearing in enwiki. I have to check whether I'll be able to put up some more references to Sandeep Unnikrishnan. May be need one more day to get the newspaper tomorrow. That's why the delay in reply. But I am not arguing for maintaining the article in wiki. If it does not meet the notability

1363:

Even when you are successful in making an article stick, you have no rights of any description over it. Any editor may make changes at any time. the changes have to be good, and the community decides by leaving them there or by editing them further whether they are valid. Knowledge is a really

770:

I completely agree. Deleting an article is not the Knowledge way. The article must be improved in accordance with the Knowledge guidelines and has to become more encyclopedic. The SPAM issue is not somthing that I brought up, this was the person who submited the article for deletion, I think that

2966:

I would go to the places where you have been somewhat strident and put a simple note like "My apologies. I reacted emotionally and that was over the top" and then walk firmly away from the conflict however strongly you feel righteous indignation. All you will do by not doing so is to associate

2797:

The only real advice I have for you is to remember that you are writing an encyclopaedia, and that this differs markedly from any other type of report. It can be stated that "The exact derivation of x is currently (date) unkown", but even such a note is better with a citation to show that it is

1357:

To return to your immediate problem: The band has to be notable and you have to find sources that meet the guidelines for notable bands. Youtube, myspacem, facebook, blogs etc are all useless to you. No-one cares about self published sources in an encyclopaedia. That is the challenge, it is an

236:

Unfourtunately, I know EXACTLY what that is about. Thanks for the notice on my talk page. These are the actions of a Wikistalker that has been harrassing me and others who associate with me in any way since July 2007. Under Knowledge rules, while these actions are not "officially allowed", Jimbo

2576:

It's a very pleasant pie, but that is all it is. I think the article per se could do with a third eye. I really don't feel I should edit it, at least at present. Any uninvolved editor would do a decent job with it, I think. It really ought to be taken apart and rewritten from the top to the

2569:

I'm sure you are right. I truly have no interest in personalities. I am perfectly prepared to work with Warrington provided this strangeness evaporates, though emotionally I feel I am due an apology. The accusation is somewhat bizarre and offensive and I do feel that truly needs to be cleared

3236:

Wah ni qui wah is a native american legend from the cherokee tribe. There are currently 12 tribes linked under this legend. It is also a legend that leads to the white buffalo prophecy. It is a very important legend. The reason it is so short is because it was just a starting point. i was

2952:

I have no idea if Comsec deserves an article here or not. If an article is created, by you, by others, and if I see it, then I will judge it. Well, if I am interested enough. See how it works? If I judge it then my opinion is one opinion. I may make it known firmly (and I do) and without

2825:

Hi Tim Trent, I'm new to wiki so need a little advice and I'm hoping you can help, you added a COI on the littlenobody page I made. I think I have resolved the issue of the speedy delete and believe the article to be factual and not promotional but I don't know how to resolve the Conflict of

3140:

article is engaged in the early stages of what could be an interesting food battle. The latest edits and some discussion revolve around whether information about "Belgian waffles" should be removed or "clarified" which seems to mean scrubbed. The argument is that the term is an invention of

2553:

I'm not sure how things became so heated in the baked goods section. Hopefully we can move forward with a more cooperative and collaborative approach. Sometimes comments don't come across as intended over the internet, so I think a lot of the problem may be based on misunderstandings. In my

2298:

in the past, and can assure you that the article was not created as an advertisement for the pub. Peter has created many hundreds of article on listed properties in Cheshire and elsewhere. I'm willing to put it on my watchlist to make sure it doesn't get taken over for advertising purposes.

2801:

The problem we have is to distinguish between "an interesting article" and a fully encyclopaedic article. For good or ill, WP does not require "interesting articles", only ones that are suitable for an encylopaedia. When one has an abiding interest 8in a topic a good article is harder to

337:

Thanks for sorting out the formatting of the references - yes, I like the way Knowledge entries can constantly improve. I'd mentioned Southampton to explain why I was referring to a book with Southampton (not Eling) in its title, but I certainly don't have strong views about including it.

2441:

Not at all offended by your logic. I am a team player (a paradox), but only on article creation and improvement. Also, not that this applies to you, I will track idiocy down and try to root it out. Interestingly, sometimes idiots defend idiocy to the death. Perhaps we are heading for

2344:. On the Cheshire project, we've largely gone with lists for grade II, unless there are substantive other sources available, which I think is a rational compromise. As I recall, I've only created one article on a grade II building, and that has received substantial news coverage. Cheers, 1369:

I know I've made you more unhappy rather than reassured you. This is how the place works. It does not create notability, it records it. To make the cut the band has to be notable already. My view is "borderline", others have a different view. Your job is to assert that notability.

3404:

You need the page to be notable and verifiable, verifiable. Your current edit is neither of the above. Is this Golfer well known? If so provided citations. Putting the tag {{helpme}} on your talk page and asking this question will get you someone with the skills to answer your question

2438:

of their minds and "probably want to be admins". I, by contrast, have so far refused nomination for admin and will continue to do so :) I tend to be a lone wolf, and have no interest in anything except the finished product in terms of the rather arcane discussions some folk get in to.

1271:

Hi I am new to this. I was asked by Phil Fisher (creator of the Ex box boys) to write this article for him. He has approved it, yet for some reason Knowledge does not. What can I do to keep this article on permanently? How can I fix this? Please help. I am finding this system a bit

1802:

moving an article: There is, or ought to be a tab named "move", which will work very well. An alternative is to place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask the question you would like help with. Kind folks drop by and take you by thye hand and lead you towards enlightenment :)

788:

The thing is, deleting articles about non notable items is wholly valid. It is up to the people who work within the article to assert the notability of the thing about which the article is written. No amount of rhetoric will save an article, instead the article must be rescued.

2517:

like people are discussing yet not doing. Some people didn't want to get rid of the skipped entries. That's why I made this article, also I have not put in the rafs and all peole yet. Please wait! Have a good day. Also, I couldn't think of a title, you could change the title.

2320:

I missed the "*", mea culpa. Ordinary G2, I'm sure you will agree, are unlikely to be notable. We'll let this one run its course I think. Our community usually makes wise decisions. And I will most certainty do my very best to remember you if I find a "plain old G2"

2189:

Happy New Year! I haven't been active on Knowledge (due to RSI in my thumbs!) but I do intend to create an article on Austin de Lone, the musician. When I eventually do, I shall be in touch! I do hope all is well and you are creating lots of interesting entries. Cheers!

1198:

Hi. Greetings form Surrey :). I think I did what you asked on my update to the page. Let me know if it's good. As you can probably tell I am new to all of this. It's a work in progress which will take a while editing the page as well as linking and expanding. Thanks!

2675:

I even tried to invoke King Solomon in asking for the kishka to remain whole. But in the end, we accepted a brotherhood of fraternal twins and resolved that the sibling rivalry was such that they should remain apart. Oy, what a lot of kvetching over some sausage. ;)

2389:

To me it's a speedy deletion candidate and I tagged it so, but this was reverted. I've explained my reasons fully on the talk page. I honestly can't see why anyone would think otherwise, but am prepared to consider or defer to another's judgement. Many thanks

3336:

You may well be right. The whole thing is a bit of a mess, though interesting and informative. I suspect the original author(s) got a bit carried away. It needs a lot of sourcing to be a real article. AfD can also spur folk into rescuing an article, too.

3171:

I didn't even know that there was a Waffle War. The only time I rememebr eating a waffle was at a friend's house when I was 6 years old. Either his mother was a lousy cook or I was ill, but they were fatty and I threw up at once! I've not gone near a waffle

1506:

In future when patrolling new pages could you click the little link at the bottom right of the page and mark it as patrolled? That way it removes it from Special:newpages and other patrollers don't need to trawl through pages that have already been checked.

2962:

Ok, I can already feel that you may be getting a tad upset over that suggestion, but this is politics. Really. After all, the desired outcome is "Well, s/he had an outburst but understands how it works now and is sorry." followed by being a happy editor

1287:

Knowledge is very different from (eg) a site where one may place fan descriptions or press releases. The article needs to show that the band IS notable and it needs to assert that notability. The message I left ion your talk page is one key thing to help

526:

The configiration is that it has a pair of waterwheels. Each of those wheels drives (drove) a single pair of stones. It may be beneficial, if you are correct about it being the sole remaining tide mill (of any sort), to make it even clearer. Go for it.

2741:

as your reason. Not sure what the 'Id' means, but I'll assume idealogy. In which case how is that idealogy? I have searched everywhere to try and link these two systems of the Sumerian 4 x seven-day week plus a day or two, which was much earlier than the

647:

I can see why you hope to rationalise in some way. I could not see how to achieve that, and I can see the challenge that you are facing. I would say "remember that part of the fun of WP is following strange hyperlinks, and also that disk space is very

1945:

I'm sorry you feel that way, but I've explained my reasoning above. It's always disappointing to have something that one spent time on deleted, but if you want to discuss the matter with regard to reasons besides effort expended, I'm happy to. Regards,

2251:

It's a shame I can't have you! I'm not ready to 'fly' completely solo yet - so shall try and get another one. To save me time, could you be so kind as to supply the link as to how to get another one! I have really forgotten everything - sorry!

1786:

I'm afraid that the last 2/3rds of your suggestions are currently beyond my coding ability. I'll try to look into them in the days to come. In the mean time, if you have further suggestions (or links for more help), please speak up! Thanks,

729:

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to

217:

I have absolutely no idea what this is about, who this user is, or anything else about it. I did make some technical edits some time ago to this template, but that can't be it, surely? So anyone who can shed any light on this please do so.

1542: 1854:

You had hard breaks between each of the years. To remove them, I just backspaced until each entry was touching the prior and spaced forward one (not using return/enter but the space bar). Is the template displaying as you wanted it to

3076:

I'll have a look at the article myself, too. It reads very much like an advertg so i can see why it was deleted. I think a top to toe rewrite will be needed. It;s very hard to write an encyclopaedia when used to writing PR etc.

1740:

I think you have done a good job. My interest is in article quality rather than this article per se. I have no expertise in the subject area I fear, so am unable to make content suggestions, for which I apologise. If you look at

2580:

The additional criticisms are my own opinion. I may be wrong. That's Ok, because we are a community and we can do, redo and undo anything at all. I simply feel it is heading from being an adequate article to being a rather poor

1838:

which I created earlier. I cannot make the hard line breaks in list 1 go away. I've no idea why they are there, and no desire for them. I'd love it if they could be made to vanish by magic. Mediawiki line breaks are a mystery!

1346:

Consensus: Articles stay or go by consensus. You have as much right to question my work as I do yours. We each have the right to propose articles for deletion or for recognition of excellence. The articles must of themselves be

360:

I am seriously concerned about ship source pollution and want persons who are researching such matters, like seafarers, of which I am one, to note that there is a method to help end this epidemic that's destroying our oceans.

2587:

Thank you for lending an ear. I am truly not hostile to Warrington, I simply feel I ought not to go anywhere near them for my own peace of mind at present. But do let's get rid of this bizarre accusation, please, somehow.

682: 2340:

can usually be salvaged. On the other hand, I don't think the creation of thousands of tiny hard-to-improve stubs is of merit to the project, and there are privacy issues given that Knowledge is far more googleable than

558: 3320:

It was only a split (not my own writing) from the regular gramophone records article, as I saw the notice on the top of that article, so I took action. It would be better to rewrite my split instead of deleting it.

674: 2131: 544: 2746:

seven-day week used by the Jews from 586BCE. Stating that something is uncertain is not ideology? I have seen many theories but no fact and that's why I state such. So explain why this should be deleted.

868:

A little hint. While editing refs in a section, just pop in a temporary "{{reflist}}" at the end and you can preview them locally...but don't forget to remove it again, or you'll give away your secret! --

1764:

I have a concern about "shorthand" in the article title. MOU vs Memorandum of Understanding. This can be solved with a moved from the short to the long title which will create a redirect automatically.

2573:

Amazing that we are now in "The Great Apfeltrudel War of 2009" which probably warrants an article in its own right. Do you think it woudl be encyclopaedic, and should I write it, or would that be COI?

685:. The problem with these images is that while the photograph may be GFDL, the painting itself is not. You can comment at the log page linked above if there is reason to believe it might be. Thanks. 2147:

and is generally talking when you don't know what you are talking about. I might ask you follow your own advice. On this talk where you strongly disagree with making it a redirect you have written in

1291:

It doesn't matter that the band has or has not approved it I'm afraid. What matters is whether they are suitable for inclusion in an encyclopaedia. I happen to think they are, others disagree.

1557:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 509:) say that Eling is the only working tide mill in the UK, irrespective of wheel configuration, thus agreeing with the first meaning. I'm wondering if this change in meaning was deliberate. -- 1003:, please. Instead enhance your article to assert the notability and you will save it. Follow the instructions in the template rather than wasting your time on my talk page with invective. 1028: 678: 3065: 3025:

and underneath it ask if someone would please look over the userfied article and give you pointers within the manual of style (etc) here to make sure that it can survive if re-created

585: 1587: 147:-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the 1707:. I'm struggling with a better way to do the introduction. (1) Do you have any suggestions re the intro? -also- (2) Any additional comments about fleshing out the Background? 3285:

I couldn't find it online, but that header led me to believe it had been copied from a text. That starnge, implausible title gave me reason to suspect it in the first place. --

2163: 621:. I see that you have made some changes to one of the articles, but is does seem an important subject, so I wondered why it needed all those articles? I am sure you would agree! 1917:

to the talk page, please delete any unused parameters before saving your edit, as they unduly enlarge the page size and can be cumbersome to trawl through for future editors.

357:

I want to apologize if I have given you some concern regard links to reportpollution.com. Please know I have not posted them in the context of spam under any circumstances.

3265:

Seems to me that you need to add a load of citations. So far it looks like either a hoax or original research. You also need to participate in the deletion discussion.

1568:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

1549: 1162: 710: 561:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 3064:

Userfication. Nomrally you woudl ask the deleting admin. Since the page has been restored (only for review purposes) I have dropped a copy into yourt user space at

2837: 2805:

Imagine, therefore, that you are researching sources for every sentence that you write, not to synthesise research, but simply to cite the sources. It's not easy.

3097: 1593:

In general a fair use is a fair use if the image and its use is limited to a controlled set of articles. If you feel that the use of this image in four articles:

2533:

I simply do not find it a valid article. The AfD process tales five days, so please argue your case for retention. Nomination does not always lead to deletion.

1926: 1230: 1200: 2377: 2290:

Hi there -- I was one of the FL reviewers that suggested the creation of this article, which is actually grade II*, not grade II. I've worked extensively with

1066:

I'm neither one way nor the other, actually - it just seems a bit odd to prod one for speedying and not the rest. I'd look into it more, but I'm lazy. :-) --

2431: 2399: 1243: 1158: 940:

Possibly because of a miscommunication between those involved. A more personal explanation of Knowledge's policies might generate a more positive response. —

2959:

I would say a large slice of humble pie, even if you do not feel emotionally that you need to eat it. Intellectually I'm sure you can see the value in it.

2159: 1415:

in the current event and in events before. Articles should not be made Afd so soon after their creation. Others haven't even got a chance to review it yet.

760: 695:

The UK Houses of Parliament were designed by an architect. Does that mean I violate his copyright if I upload a photograph of them? This is barking mad.

605:, it soon became obvious what a tortured series of articles told the story of Grace Timmins and her philanthropic work! I found myself travelling trhrough 550: 2253: 2222: 2191: 200: 2527: 2481: 2466: 2386: 2378: 1998: 1984: 1970: 1955: 1940: 1315: 1273: 1046:

It may be notable, and you have added good references, but it does not, in my view, deserve a separate article. That is why I have taken it to AfD.

3245: 2762:

For some reason the start of the summary was deleted. It should have read "maybe speculation should be removed" The irony will not be lost upon you

1561:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

1261: 1223: 259:

As they say, Bill, shit happens. The best thing one can do with a mess like this is to document it and leave it, well documented, in plain sight.

3188: 2685: 2670: 2655: 2633: 2619: 2597: 2355: 2330: 1878: 1864: 1500: 1187: 2953:

aggression (and I am not aggressive). I will then leave it to others to judge. But I will not use rhetoric (counter productive). Still with me?

2542: 2455: 2415: 2112: 2098: 2084: 2064: 2050: 1424: 857: 3414: 3125: 2867: 2706:

Thanks for letting me know Timtrent, I plan to work on that article and maybe get it more up to scratch. I had to leave it in a hurry you see. --

2155: 1466: 1307:

could contact? If I don´t get this published, that is two weeks of work gone with no pay, so please understand my determination. Regards, Jenny

1139: 1098: 1085: 659: 2277: 2245: 2214: 1450: 1040: 994: 798: 630: 536: 3309: 2508: 2496:

The page was deleted, but I am sure that, if you approach the admin who deleted it, a copy can be emailed to you. The key thing is that it is

1379: 1300: 1238: 1208: 926:

I have no interest in this discussion. The user seems to be disruptive and does not seem to be learning anything from other people's reaction.

704: 173: 3274: 2089:

I was wondering about a simple method of "smallening" the text for the entire column. That might move it from "not to bad" to "pleasant" :)

1680:

P.S. Oh, if you think there are some military articles that may need some extra info, I might have the references and add them. Let me know.

1012: 3346: 1536: 1244: 1018: 959: 944: 935: 3221: 2178: 1569: 1493: 1055: 782: 2858:

on your talk page with your question there. It is challenging when, even if neutral, one places stuff on WP about one's own organisation

3086: 3051: 2991: 2372: 893: 318: 268: 246: 2814: 2771: 1812: 1780: 969: 1931:

I feel very pleased now that I bothered at all. It was kind of you to delete all of that without any discussion. Thank you very much.

1640: 1624: 365: 292: 3039:

4.make those edits, and ask that an uninvolved editor then re-creates the article with you acting as advisor. (this is the COI process)

2904: 2642:", but giving each side their own sausage seemed to dissipate the dispute. When it all ended there was a lot of dancing, mostly of the 1558: 3110: 2314: 1463:

Inquiry - really confused and new, is there a way to discuss this elsewhere, be it email or sort of a pm of sorts Mr. Trent? Thanks!

1848: 1335:

I understand the problem. This is a baptism of fire for you. I think you also have a basic misunderstanding of how Knowledge works.

3361:

it isnt, and it is not "your page". It is Knowledge's page. The page is inappropriate and has been proposed for speedy deletion.

1170: 2514: 2363: 2037: 1901: 1677:

my guest to add those if you like, or give me a quick, brief set of instructions on how and I do it instead (it'll help me learn).

590: 107: 1553:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Knowledge may not meet the criteria required by 3440: 3396: 1690: 1562: 1408: 148: 2610:

war of 2008. The one article became two, and things have been mostly quiet since. But food is a very serious matter indeed. ;)

2143:, "Instead of barrack room lawyering, why not enhance the article." The definition of, "barrack room lawyering" can be found at 518: 3156:? The difference is trivial in my experience, but like I said, I consider Eggo to be a major waffle manufacturing operation... 1796: 1734: 1716: 347: 2028:

and tell me how I might make the ISBN column less obtrusive? It is meant to be an adjunct, not dominate the article itself!

689: 3165: 2777:

OK Tim, see where you are coming from. Thank you. I think the article needs to explain this though, but in a better way then.

2715: 2646:

variety. The Jewish side was particularly relieved that no blood was shed, apparently even a little blood ruins a kishke...

1327: 1281: 1070: 1024: 765: 580: 3370: 2841: 2791: 2756: 1565:; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 497:

It is the sole remaining tide mill in the UK which has a pair of independent waterwheels designed to drive a millstone each.

3257: 1193: 1166: 468:

on your talk page and ask a passing friendly giant to help. I have done my best and also failed 22:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

452: 407: 156: 2925: 1516: 983:

You therefore have no basis whatsover for this assertion. If you look on Google as the ultimate reference, God help you.

830: 3436: 3392: 2979:

article (and I agree that many articles that are here already should go, by the way) then someone will create it in time.

2833: 2563: 2148: 2140: 1573: 723: 227: 487:

It is the sole remaining tide mill in the UK, with a pair of independent waterwheels designed to drive a millstone each.

1818: 1124: 208: 905: 749:

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

3330: 3294: 2711: 1662: 1323: 878: 2205:

Hi Frances, Just having fun, sometimes here and sometimes not. Glad you are coming back to create more articles.

2169:

I am commenting because I have the right to comment. There is absolutely no reason for me to justify this to you.

367:

to discuss further as I will be glad to amplify my concerns. Perhaps then you won't consider these links as spam.

3253: 3141:

Americans. The source looks to be Antwerpian though, which confuses me. And I'm just wondering why I can't find my

2889: 2489: 2014: 1975:

If you can't even assume the pretense of good faith, I don't really think that this requires any further response.

1350:

If your article is deleted: you have the option of recreating a better article, or of asking for a deletion review.

610: 591: 429: 425: 920: 2474: 2261: 2230: 2199: 1696: 386: 134: 601:

article, and have come across the above hospital. Following back from the reference within a connected article (

3237:

planning on adding to it as I learn more. I was also hoping that others would find it and add to it as well.

3096: 3018:

2.note that when I say "your" I mean the space allocated to you, but over which you have no rights of ownership

2295: 1667: 735:

raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

719: 119: 2117:

If all else fails! I was wondering if there was a style one could apply to the column (and how to apply it!)

1980: 1951: 1922: 1897: 97: 1474: 2720: 2707: 2283: 1385: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3376:

I'm sorry, I didn't know Knowledge already had the Kyle Franke. How do I make a new one about a golfer?

3070:

With regard to comments, usually the HELPME message brings a knowledgeable person with enough time to help

726:

for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

564: 557:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 2523: 1076:

Well, I was considering the other 66. It just seemed like a lot of work if th eone I nominated stayed.

2144: 742:

at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch

1554: 1390:

No need to say sorry. :) I understand what you said in AfD discussion. But now I wonder why pages like

1234: 1204: 1145: 914:"Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption" 813: 739: 618: 38: 2932:

perfectly normal manner, and that long term editors here have reacted against that in a normal manner.

812:

I think Allied Pickfords Australia should be merged into Australia is what I meant by my comment. See

3352: 3161: 2910: 2681: 2651: 2615: 2559: 2350: 2309: 1860: 576: 554: 472: 2427: 2395: 2133: 2025: 1976: 1947: 1918: 1893: 826: 665: 352: 2949:

And there will always be articles in it that are utter crap and don;t deserve to be here. Always.

2729:

Maybe there was continuous 7 day week was used prior to 586BCE or maybe the 7 day week as used by

2638:

Good one. The conflict definitely inflicted some painful kicks to our kishkes. We never resolved "

3432: 3388: 3108: 2501: 2478:

edit it. To me this - reflexive human science - is now an important and growing differentiation.

1869:

And I thought I'd tried that! Very many thanks. It is as I hoped it would be when I stafrted.

1722: 1704: 1697: 1467:

visit us at www.ctsi-logistics.com for more information and research materials pertaining to CTSI

1266: 1120: 626: 602: 421:

Just thought you might like to have a look at the TSW and PSW userboxes - there on my user page!

343: 330: 2368:

Distinguished by the novel collocation of particulars, but it had to be done. Your servant. --

1094:

Point taken. Just letting you know I have no particular deeply-held feelings on the subject. --

718:

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the

3231: 2639: 2519: 2257: 2226: 2195: 1543:

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Bjorn-Andresen-The-Boy-Cover-by-David-Bailey-1970.jpg

1499: 1420: 778: 514: 204: 178: 3290: 2873: 2485: 2470: 1886: 1319: 1277: 1061: 977:{{Tl:Db-reason|Despite looking plausible, no trace in Google, and thus likely to be a hoax}} 598: 445: 413: 140: 2154:

Can you help me out by explaining why you are commenting on this page? I really am curious.

1610:

is outside our fair use rationale, please justify this before tagging the image for deletion

731: 3424: 3410: 3380: 3366: 3342: 3305: 3270: 3249: 3241: 3217: 3184: 3157: 3121: 3082: 2987: 2900: 2863: 2829: 2820: 2810: 2767: 2677: 2666: 2647: 2629: 2611: 2607: 2593: 2555: 2538: 2497: 2451: 2411: 2345: 2326: 2304: 2284: 2273: 2241: 2210: 2174: 2094: 2060: 2033: 1994: 1966: 1961:

onthe template talk page to be high handed. I find your pseudo-apology to be unpleasant.

1936: 1874: 1856: 1844: 1808: 1776: 1620: 1532: 1489: 1446: 1404: 1375: 1311: 1296: 1219: 1183: 1154: 1135: 1081: 1051: 1008: 990: 955: 931: 889: 863: 853: 794: 700: 655: 569: 532: 403: 374: 314: 264: 223: 196: 8: 3326: 3131: 2423: 2391: 2291: 2106: 2078: 2044: 1658: 1512: 1480:

It would help if I had any idea what you were confused about. You might like to look at

822: 382: 182: 3428: 3384: 3300:

I don't disagree. I was thinking the selfsame thing. It looks like advertorial too.

3104: 2236:

I fear I can't remember. But you could always either fly solo or as for another one.

1755: 1686: 1470: 1116: 1095: 1067: 1036: 909: 622: 339: 114: 47: 17: 3420:

Ok, I got it now. Sorry to edit the page without references. Im going to add them.

2935:

That it is "normal" does not mean that it is right. It just means "that is how it is.

3315: 3001:

put on my talk page. I don't understand how to go about this when the time is right.

2341: 1745: 1648: 1438: 1416: 1395: 804: 774: 510: 165: 559:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of King George V Playing Fields (County Antrim)

3286: 3047: 2939:

It;s an encyclopaedia, after all. It has to be neutral and as correct as possible.

2921: 2055:

Well, I feel it dominates the table, rather. But I'm happy to take your opinion.

1027:, and I think they are enough to prove that it is notable. You may want to revisit 874: 816:

talkpage for more details. But I must admit I'm not clear on the deletion process.

756: 743: 686: 606: 440: 288: 242: 2916:

I'm just not aware of them. Please help me out. How can I go about fixing this?

2878:

See my note there. COI editing is not prohibited in WP, it's just a warning sign.

3280: 2852: 2787: 2752: 2548: 1792: 1730: 1712: 1400: 1106: 1000: 986: 473: 462: 331: 108: 1229:

Many thanks for the article. I'll have a go through it and go from there. TTFN.

482:

On 19th October 2007, you made an edit to this article, changing the text from:

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3322: 2584:

I obviously caught a sensitive soul on a bad day. But Knowledge was ever thus.

2151:

that you, "have no idea what BR is (and no interest in the topic as a topic)."

1654: 1636: 1583: 1508: 1257: 941: 917: 899: 378: 2967:

Comsec with combat. Google has a good memory and all pages here are spidered.

3406: 3362: 3338: 3301: 3266: 3213: 3180: 3149: 3117: 3078: 3042:(Sorry about the bullets. I couldn't seem to make the numbers work). Thanks. 2983: 2896: 2885: 2859: 2806: 2782:

Would love a suggestion or advice as you are more familiar with the rules. --

2763: 2662: 2625: 2603: 2589: 2534: 2447: 2407: 2322: 2269: 2237: 2206: 2170: 2090: 2056: 2029: 1990: 1962: 1932: 1911: 1870: 1840: 1832: 1804: 1772: 1682: 1616: 1528: 1522:

This is a mod that Twinkle requires. Or I assume it is. In fact it usually

1485: 1481: 1442: 1371: 1292: 1215: 1179: 1131: 1077: 1047: 1032: 1004: 951: 927: 885: 849: 790: 696: 667: 651: 614: 528: 399: 395: 310: 260: 219: 3073:

I'm sorry it came over as treating you as a child. That was not my intent :)

1214:

Its a good start. I'll add something to your talk page that may be of use.

3176: 2369: 1703:

I noticed that you seem to be paying attention to the article I'm writing,

1434: 309:

I thought "email this user" was enabled. It is now :) That should work.

2956:

So, how do you solve the challenge you have got yourself in the middle of?

2895:

Indeed. But a guy suggesting that his CV is going up next is... Unusual.

3043: 2917: 2701: 2461: 1391: 870: 752: 284: 238: 2783: 2748: 2184: 1788: 1767:

I think most people would also like to see the full name of the MOU in

1726: 1708: 1111:

that article *might* end up at transgendered people who were murdered

545:

AfD nomination of List of King George V Playing Fields (County Antrim)

3103:

I've temporarily undeleted this, so people can review the article. -

2730: 2443: 1631: 1578: 1458: 1252: 1029:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Office 98 Macintosh Edition

845: 506: 144: 2975:

are weird! But it is also a relief from the pressures of the world.

1989:

I was not aware that you were pretending good faith. Interesting.

3031:

Who do I ask to look it over? The general public who encounter it?

2880: 1433:

Articles may be nominated for deletion at any time. Blogs are not

3004:

1.ask for the original article to be userfied in your user space.

2971:

no-one objects. Both of those are professional and show gravitas.

2602:

Understood. Thank you for your good efforts. You missed the great

1761:(etc) you may enhance your referencing beyond your wildest dreams. 283:

I need to contact you privately. Can we work out a way? Thanks. -

3357:

Why is my page being vandalized? Thank you - user WyattStephens

2780:

leap days. As yet no evidence can be found. And maybe never will.

1725:, but I'd welcome your advise re fixing the Background section. 3137: 2624:

I missed a Jewish Food War? Did it last the requisite 6 days?

980:

Despite not having in all probabilty looked at the reference.

3153: 2643: 2733:, unfortunately what was used before this time is uncertain. 3212:

That is more waffle than anyone should have in a lifetime.

3198: 3142: 1550:

Image:Bjorn-Andresen-The-Boy-Cover-by-David-Bailey-1970.jpg

974:

You placed this tag on the page I created around Project E

2385:

Please could you look at this and tell me what you think:

2077:

Doesn't look too bad. It's about as narrow as it can get.

424:

Also, would you mind filling in the appropriate info at

155:

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the

1653:

Please, check my answer to your deletion mark. Thanks,

683:

Image:Tony Klitz circa 1958 St Mary Le Bow, London.jpg

3175:

Will this be ironed out soon, or will we have to get

1771:

in the intro. This is WP style, but not mandatory.

1484:

though. That may answer all that you need to know.

1572:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 640:

is needed, and others will follow" and so it proves.

551:

List of King George V Playing Fields (County Antrim)

2504:. I'll drop some thoughts onto your talk page in a 711:Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice 143:dedicated to improving the overall quality of all 720:Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference 159:. We hope to be working with you in the future! 2132:fyi, definition of barrack room lawyering from 2043:Doesn't look obtrusive to me. How do you mean? 1615:I am placing this note on the image talk page. 1001:Don't jump up and down and yell at me over this 675:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images/2008 August 24 848:. If that is not liked someone will undo it. 1245:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of ships 118: 3148:Does it matter whether they are made with 3145:waffles even mentioned in the article... 1559:Knowledge:Non-free use rationale guideline 1250:Restored the article, it is back at AfD. 673:I have listed two images you uploaded at 2515:Line of Succession to the British Throne 2024:Please could a very nice person look at 771:this issue is irrelavent and unfounded. 2848:I think what you might do is to deploy 1673:contributing to wiki, so here it is... 14: 2509:People Skipped From the British Throne 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2798:unknown rather than just a statement. 1399:criteria, it should be deleted. :) -- 1025:Microsoft Office 98 Macintosh Edition 1019:Microsoft Office 98 Macintosh Edition 133:! I'd like to invite you to join the 3201:Waffle? 07:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 2104:at the beginning and </small: --> 597:Hi! I am attempting to sort out the 25: 970:Please remove this tag immediately. 679:Image:Tony Klitz Guardsmen 1977.jpg 23: 502:thus changing the meaning rather. 24: 3453: 3066:User:Shar1R/Comsec temporary page 840:, merge it yourself and then set 430:Image:TrainSpottingWorld logo.png 426:Image:PlaneSpottingWorld logo.png 2406:AfD and a consensus will form. 2364:re: I think all one can say .... 611:Chailey Heritage Marine Hospital 592:Chailey Heritage Marine Hospital 29: 3021:3.On your user talk page place 1358:encyclopaedia, not a directory. 746:, for updates on future meets. 120: 1574:media copyright questions page 799:21:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 783:16:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 553:, an article you created, for 13: 1: 1879:09:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1865:01:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1849:01:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1813:19:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1797:17:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1781:11:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1735:03:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1721:I think I fixed the intro of 1717:01:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1691:10:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 1663:01:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1641:07:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1625:10:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 1602:The subject of the photograph 1588:05:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 1537:00:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC) 1517:10:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 1451:09:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 1425:05:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 1409:18:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 1380:15:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1328:15:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1301:13:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1282:13:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1262:07:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1239:10:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1224:01:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1209:00:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1188:14:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1171:12:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 1140:00:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1125:00:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1099:20:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1086:19:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1071:19:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1056:07:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1041:03:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1013:11:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 995:10:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 960:10:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 945:10:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 936:09:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 921:09:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 766:Fish Information and Services 174:01:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3441:19:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3415:19:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3397:19:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3371:19:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3347:00:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3331:23:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3310:23:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3295:23:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3275:18:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 3258:18:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 3222:10:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC) 3189:07:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 3166:00:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 3126:10:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 3111:09:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 3087:10:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 3052:09:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2992:08:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2982:Does this brain dump help? 2926:07:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2905:06:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2890:04:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2868:22:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2842:13:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 2815:12:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 2792:11:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 2772:09:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 2757:08:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 2716:21:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 2686:17:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2671:09:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2656:01:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2634:23:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2620:23:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2598:17:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2564:17:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2543:00:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2528:00:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2490:17:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2475:17:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2456:13:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 2432:09:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 2416:22:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2400:20:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2373:15:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2356:19:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2331:18:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2315:18:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2278:19:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2262:19:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2246:18:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 2231:14:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 1570:criteria for speedy deletion 1494:08:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 1475:07:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 1194:My Entry US Army Reserve RRC 904:Appreciate if you didn't do 894:22:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 879:21:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 858:23:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 831:13:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 738:You may also wish to attend 348:13:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 319:09:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 293:08:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 7: 2381:- what's your take on this? 2215:07:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 2200:06:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC) 2179:07:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2164:02:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 2113:17:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2099:16:39, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2085:16:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2065:16:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2051:16:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2038:16:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 1999:00:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1985:00:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1971:00:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1956:00:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1941:15:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1927:04:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1902:03:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1364:tough place. Really tough. 1023:I added some references to 950:Others yes, this one, no. 761:23:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 705:21:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 690:21:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 269:02:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 247:01:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 228:01:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 10: 3458: 2513:I just want to help split 1819:Layout assistance required 1555:Knowledge:Non-free content 842:Allied Pickfords Australia 814:Allied Pickfords Australia 732:the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page 619:Guild of Poor Brave Things 586:15:47, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 537:14:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 519:13:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 458:I think you need to place 408:23:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 567:of receiving this notice? 453:16:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3197:ROFLMAO, Ok, what IS an 2134:Talk:Binomial_regression 2026:Rose Mary Crawshay Prize 2015:Rose Mary Crawshay Prize 1547:Thank you for uploading 1343:anarchy in so many ways. 660:13:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 631:14:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 3010:Who do I ask?? And how? 2946:be incomplete. Always. 2708:Jupiter Optimus Maximus 1723:Pace-Finletter MOU 1952 1705:Pace-Finletter MOU 1952 1698:Pace-Finletter MOU 1952 836:The simplest way is to 740:the next London meet-up 603:Tide Mills, East Sussex 3098:Comsec Consulting Ltd. 1668:Response from RekonDog 1629:Looks better, thanks. 1599:The author of the book 125: 2640:Who Stole the Kishka? 599:Newhaven, East Sussex 136:Berkshire WikiProject 124: 109:Berkshire WikiProject 42:of past discussions. 2721:Explanation Required 2608:Kishka (Jewish food) 2296:Cheshire Wikiproject 2285:Castle Hotel, Halton 1386:Sandeep Unnikrishnan 613:; there is also the 505:Other articles (eg. 1977:Girolamo Savonarola 1948:Girolamo Savonarola 1919:Girolamo Savonarola 1894:Girolamo Savonarola 1563:image copyright tag 432:- I tried my best! 364:Please email me at 121:File:Berks arms.gif 2111:and his otters • 2103:Put <small: --> 2083:and his otters • 2049:and his otters • 1907:Also, when adding 1146:inportant articles 1096:User:AlbertHerring 1068:User:AlbertHerring 131:Timtrent/Archive 6 126: 18:User talk:Timtrent 3444: 3427:comment added by 3400: 3383:comment added by 3353:vandalism enquiry 3261: 3244:comment added by 2911:Comsec Consulting 2832:comment added by 2354: 2342:Images of England 2313: 1396:Henry Evans Maude 1331: 1314:comment added by 1174: 1157:comment added by 844:as a redirect to 584: 568: 549:I have nominated 391: 377:comment added by 213: 199:comment added by 163: 162: 157:project talk page 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3449: 3443: 3421: 3399: 3377: 3260: 3238: 2857: 2851: 2844: 2387:John Dean Alfone 2379:John Dean Alfone 2348: 2307: 2109: 2108:Ten Pound Hammer 2081: 2080:Ten Pound Hammer 2047: 2046:Ten Pound Hammer 2021: 1916: 1910: 1837: 1831: 1825: 1760: 1754: 1750: 1744: 1596:The photographer 1435:reliable sources 1330: 1308: 1231:Usernamewastaken 1201:Usernamewastaken 1173: 1151: 884:Of course! Tks 744:Knowledge:Meetup 607:Chailey Heritage 575: 572: 562: 467: 461: 450: 448: 443: 390: 371: 353:RE:note RE: Spam 212: 193: 187: 181: 171: 168: 122: 115: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3422: 3378: 3355: 3318: 3283: 3239: 3234: 3177:the Waffle King 3158:ChildofMidnight 3134: 3101: 2913: 2876: 2855: 2849: 2827: 2823: 2723: 2704: 2678:ChildofMidnight 2648:ChildofMidnight 2612:ChildofMidnight 2556:ChildofMidnight 2551: 2511: 2464: 2383: 2366: 2346:Espresso Addict 2305:Espresso Addict 2288: 2268:test of time. 2187: 2137: 2107: 2079: 2045: 2019: 2017: 1914: 1908: 1889: 1857:Fuhghettaboutit 1835: 1829: 1828:Please look at 1823: 1821: 1758: 1752: 1748: 1742: 1701: 1670: 1651: 1605:The book itself 1545: 1504: 1461: 1388: 1309: 1269: 1267:The Ex Box Boys 1248: 1196: 1159:Andy&jord22 1152: 1148: 1109: 1064: 1021: 972: 902: 866: 807: 768: 713: 671: 595: 570: 563:Do you want to 547: 477: 474:Eling Tide Mill 465: 459: 446: 441: 439: 416: 372: 355: 335: 332:Eling Tide Mill 194: 189: 185: 179: 169: 166: 149:list of members 113: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3455: 3418: 3417: 3374: 3373: 3354: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3317: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3282: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3233: 3232:Wah ni qui wah 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3192: 3191: 3179:to intervene? 3173: 3133: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3100: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3019: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3002: 2995: 2994: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2947: 2940: 2936: 2933: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2875: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2822: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2803: 2799: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2774: 2722: 2719: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2585: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2571: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2520:What!?Why?Who? 2510: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2439: 2424:Astral Highway 2419: 2418: 2392:Astral Highway 2382: 2376: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2334: 2333: 2292:Peter I. Vardy 2287: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2249: 2248: 2218: 2217: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2136: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1784: 1783: 1765: 1762: 1700: 1695: 1669: 1666: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1503: 1501:Rachel Shanley 1498: 1497: 1496: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1428: 1427: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1366: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1337: 1336: 1304: 1303: 1289: 1268: 1265: 1247: 1242: 1227: 1226: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1089: 1088: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1015: 971: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 901: 898: 897: 896: 865: 862: 861: 860: 823:Incrediblehunk 806: 803: 802: 801: 767: 764: 712: 709: 708: 707: 670: 664: 663: 662: 649: 645: 641: 637: 594: 589: 546: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 500: 499: 490: 489: 476: 471: 470: 469: 415: 412: 411: 410: 354: 351: 334: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 252: 251: 250: 249: 231: 230: 188: 177: 161: 160: 153: 127: 112: 106: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3454: 3445: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3429:WyattStephens 3426: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3407:Fiddle Faddle 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3385:WyattStephens 3382: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3363:Fiddle Faddle 3360: 3359: 3358: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3339:Fiddle Faddle 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3302:Fiddle Faddle 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3267:Fiddle Faddle 3264: 3263: 3262: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3214:Fiddle Faddle 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181:Fiddle Faddle 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150:baking powder 3146: 3144: 3139: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3118:Fiddle Faddle 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3109: 3106: 3099: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3079:Fiddle Faddle 3075: 3072: 3069: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3032: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3024: 3020: 3017: 3011: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2984:Fiddle Faddle 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2955: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897:Fiddle Faddle 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2874:Marcus Kaiser 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860:Fiddle Faddle 2854: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2834:92.23.164.208 2831: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2807:Fiddle Faddle 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2764:Fiddle Faddle 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2745: 2740: 2739:ld be removed 2735: 2734: 2732: 2726: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2663:Fiddle Faddle 2659: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2626:Fiddle Faddle 2623: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604:Kishka (food) 2601: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590:Fiddle Faddle 2586: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2535:Fiddle Faddle 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2516: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2448:Fiddle Faddle 2445: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408:Fiddle Faddle 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2380: 2375: 2374: 2371: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2343: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323:Fiddle Faddle 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2311: 2306: 2300: 2297: 2293: 2286: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270:Fiddle Faddle 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2238:Fiddle Faddle 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2207:Fiddle Faddle 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2171:Fiddle Faddle 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2139:You wrote in 2135: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091:Fiddle Faddle 2088: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057:Fiddle Faddle 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2030:Fiddle Faddle 2027: 2022: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991:Fiddle Faddle 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1963:Fiddle Faddle 1959: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933:Fiddle Faddle 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1913: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1887:MMFF template 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871:Fiddle Faddle 1868: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841:Fiddle Faddle 1834: 1826: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805:Fiddle Faddle 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773:Fiddle Faddle 1770: 1766: 1763: 1757: 1747: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1674: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1617:Fiddle Faddle 1614: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1576:. Thank you. 1575: 1571: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529:Fiddle Faddle 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1502: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486:Fiddle Faddle 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443:Fiddle Faddle 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1397: 1393: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372:Fiddle Faddle 1368: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293:Fiddle Faddle 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1272:confusing..-- 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1246: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216:Fiddle Faddle 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180:Fiddle Faddle 1177: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132:Fiddle Faddle 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1117:Cameron Scott 1114: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078:Fiddle Faddle 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1062:Claudia Russo 1057: 1053: 1049: 1048:Fiddle Faddle 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005:Fiddle Faddle 1002: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 984: 981: 978: 975: 961: 957: 953: 952:Fiddle Faddle 948: 947: 946: 943: 939: 938: 937: 933: 929: 928:Fiddle Faddle 925: 924: 923: 922: 919: 915: 911: 907: 895: 891: 887: 886:Fiddle Faddle 883: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 859: 855: 851: 850:Fiddle Faddle 847: 843: 839: 835: 834: 833: 832: 828: 824: 820: 817: 815: 810: 800: 796: 792: 791:Fiddle Faddle 787: 786: 785: 784: 780: 776: 772: 763: 762: 758: 754: 750: 747: 745: 741: 736: 733: 727: 725: 722:. Please see 721: 716: 706: 702: 698: 697:Fiddle Faddle 694: 693: 692: 691: 688: 684: 680: 676: 669: 661: 657: 653: 652:Fiddle Faddle 650: 646: 644:own articles. 642: 638: 635: 634: 633: 632: 628: 624: 623:Peter Shearan 620: 616: 615:Guild of Play 612: 608: 604: 600: 593: 588: 587: 582: 578: 574: 566: 560: 556: 552: 538: 534: 530: 529:Fiddle Faddle 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 503: 498: 495: 494: 493: 488: 485: 484: 483: 480: 475: 464: 457: 456: 455: 454: 451: 449: 444: 436: 433: 431: 427: 422: 419: 414:PSW/TSW UBXs! 409: 405: 401: 400:Fiddle Faddle 397: 394: 393: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 368: 366: 362: 358: 350: 349: 345: 341: 340:Northernhenge 333: 320: 316: 312: 311:Fiddle Faddle 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 294: 290: 286: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 270: 266: 262: 261:Fiddle Faddle 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 248: 244: 240: 235: 234: 233: 232: 229: 225: 221: 220:Fiddle Faddle 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 184: 176: 175: 172: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137: 132: 128: 123: 117: 116: 110: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3419: 3375: 3356: 3319: 3284: 3235: 3147: 3135: 3116:Thank you. 3102: 3030: 3022: 3009: 2943: 2942:But it will 2914: 2879: 2877: 2824: 2821:Littlenobody 2776: 2743: 2738: 2736: 2728: 2727: 2725:You deleted 2724: 2705: 2552: 2512: 2492:Reshplicate 2480: 2465: 2446:after all. 2420: 2384: 2367: 2301: 2289: 2254:Frances lynn 2250: 2223:Frances lynn 2219: 2192:Frances lynn 2188: 2153: 2138: 2105:at the end? 2023: 2018: 1890: 1827: 1822: 1785: 1768: 1720: 1702: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1652: 1630: 1577: 1567: 1548: 1546: 1523: 1505: 1465: 1462: 1417:Indoresearch 1389: 1305: 1270: 1251: 1249: 1228: 1197: 1150:i suck coq 1149: 1112: 1110: 1065: 1022: 985: 982: 979: 976: 973: 913: 903: 867: 864:Refs preview 841: 837: 821: 818: 811: 808: 775:Spindoctor69 773: 769: 751: 748: 737: 728: 717: 714: 672: 609:and then to 596: 548: 511:Chris j wood 504: 501: 496: 491: 486: 481: 478: 438: 437: 434: 423: 420: 417: 369: 363: 359: 356: 336: 201:70.4.227.155 190: 164: 152: 135: 130: 104: 78: 43: 37: 3423:—Preceding 3379:—Preceding 3287:PMDrive1061 3240:—Preceding 3132:Waffle War? 2828:—Preceding 2737:And stated 2482:Reshplicate 2467:Reshplicate 1392:Matt Maupin 1316:Jenny Blaze 1310:—Preceding 1274:Jenny Blaze 1153:—Preceding 910:WP:BLANKING 687:Chick Bowen 398:a soapbox. 373:—Preceding 370:Thank you. 195:—Preceding 36:This is an 3246:Spidey6977 2744:continuous 2502:verifiable 2020:{{helpme}} 1824:{{helpme}} 1439:WP:NOTNEWS 1401:Sidharthan 1178:How nice. 987:Soarhead77 666:Images at 573:HairedGirl 183:Aircontent 141:user-group 111:invitation 98:Archive 10 3323:Newtown11 3316:about afd 2731:Babylonia 2444:Idiocracy 2303:Regards, 2149:this edit 2145:this link 2141:this edit 1756:cite book 1655:Editor br 1649:marketing 1509:Ironholds 1441:refers. 1130:love it! 1113:on wheels 846:Pickfords 805:Pickfords 507:Tide mill 379:Reportpol 145:Berkshire 139:. It's a 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 3437:contribs 3425:unsigned 3393:contribs 3381:unsigned 3254:contribs 3242:unsigned 2830:unsigned 2581:article. 2156:PDBailey 1746:cite web 1683:RekonDog 1347:notable. 1324:contribs 1312:unsigned 1167:contribs 1155:unsigned 1033:Eastmain 819:Cheers, 617:and the 581:contribs 555:deletion 479:Hi Tim. 435:Thanks, 418:Hi Tim, 387:contribs 375:unsigned 209:contribs 197:unsigned 3281:Copyvio 2577:bottom. 2549:Strudel 2498:notable 2370:Rrburke 2294:on the 1107:Well... 908:again. 838:be bold 648:cheap." 565:opt out 170:serpent 129:Hello, 39:archive 3172:since! 3138:waffle 3044:Shar1R 3023:helpme 2944:always 2918:Shar1R 2853:helpme 2802:write. 2518:Right? 1855:now?-- 1527:you. 1482:WP:COI 900:Please 871:EdJogg 753:Addbot 668:WP:PUI 577:(talk) 463:helpme 396:WP:NOT 285:BillCJ 239:BillCJ 3154:yeast 2963:here. 2784:Pnb73 2749:Pnb73 2644:polka 1789:LP-mn 1727:LP-mn 1709:LP-mn 1031:. -- 571:Brown 16:< 3433:talk 3411:talk 3389:talk 3367:talk 3343:talk 3327:talk 3306:talk 3291:talk 3271:talk 3250:talk 3218:talk 3199:Eggo 3185:talk 3162:talk 3143:Eggo 3136:The 3122:talk 3083:talk 3048:talk 2988:talk 2922:talk 2901:talk 2886:talk 2864:talk 2838:talk 2811:talk 2788:talk 2768:talk 2753:talk 2712:talk 2682:talk 2667:talk 2652:talk 2630:talk 2616:talk 2594:talk 2560:talk 2539:talk 2524:talk 2500:and 2486:talk 2471:talk 2452:talk 2428:talk 2412:talk 2396:talk 2351:talk 2327:talk 2310:talk 2274:talk 2258:talk 2242:talk 2227:talk 2211:talk 2196:talk 2175:talk 2160:talk 2095:talk 2061:talk 2034:talk 1995:talk 1981:talk 1967:talk 1952:talk 1937:talk 1923:talk 1912:Film 1898:talk 1875:talk 1861:talk 1845:talk 1833:MMFF 1809:talk 1793:talk 1777:talk 1769:bold 1751:and 1731:talk 1713:talk 1687:talk 1659:talk 1637:talk 1632:Cirt 1621:talk 1584:talk 1579:Cirt 1533:talk 1524:says 1513:talk 1490:talk 1471:talk 1447:talk 1421:talk 1405:talk 1376:talk 1320:talk 1297:talk 1288:you. 1278:talk 1258:talk 1253:Cirt 1235:talk 1220:talk 1205:talk 1184:talk 1163:talk 1136:talk 1121:talk 1115:. -- 1082:talk 1052:talk 1037:talk 1009:talk 991:talk 956:talk 942:Dark 932:talk 918:Dark 906:this 890:talk 875:talk 854:talk 827:talk 809:Hi, 795:talk 779:talk 757:talk 724:here 715:Hi, 701:talk 681:and 656:talk 627:talk 533:talk 515:talk 492:to: 428:and 404:talk 383:talk 344:talk 315:talk 289:talk 265:talk 243:talk 224:talk 205:talk 3152:or 3105:Mgm 2881:DGG 2702:Re: 2570:up. 2462:HRS 1437:. 579:• ( 167:Sea 3439:) 3435:• 3413:) 3395:) 3391:• 3369:) 3345:) 3329:) 3321:-- 3308:) 3293:) 3273:) 3256:) 3252:• 3220:) 3187:) 3164:) 3124:) 3085:) 3050:) 2990:) 2924:) 2903:) 2888:) 2866:) 2856:}} 2850:{{ 2840:) 2813:) 2790:) 2770:) 2755:) 2747:-- 2714:) 2684:) 2669:) 2654:) 2632:) 2618:) 2606:/ 2596:) 2562:) 2541:) 2526:) 2488:) 2473:) 2454:) 2430:) 2414:) 2398:) 2329:) 2276:) 2260:) 2244:) 2229:) 2213:) 2198:) 2185:NY 2177:) 2162:) 2097:) 2063:) 2036:) 1997:) 1983:) 1969:) 1954:) 1939:) 1925:) 1915:}} 1909:{{ 1900:) 1877:) 1863:) 1847:) 1836:}} 1830:{{ 1811:) 1795:) 1779:) 1759:}} 1753:{{ 1749:}} 1743:{{ 1733:) 1715:) 1689:) 1661:) 1639:) 1623:) 1586:) 1535:) 1515:) 1492:) 1473:) 1449:) 1423:) 1407:) 1394:, 1378:) 1326:) 1322:• 1299:) 1280:) 1260:) 1237:) 1222:) 1207:) 1186:) 1169:) 1165:• 1138:) 1123:) 1084:) 1054:) 1039:) 1011:) 993:) 958:) 934:) 912:. 892:) 877:) 856:) 829:) 797:) 781:) 759:) 703:) 677:, 658:) 629:) 535:) 517:) 466:}} 460:{{ 442:BG 406:) 389:) 385:• 346:) 317:) 291:) 267:) 245:) 226:) 211:) 207:• 186:}} 180:{{ 151:. 94:→ 64:← 3431:( 3409:( 3387:( 3365:( 3341:( 3325:( 3304:( 3289:( 3269:( 3248:( 3216:( 3183:( 3160:( 3120:( 3107:| 3081:( 3046:( 2986:( 2920:( 2899:( 2884:( 2862:( 2836:( 2809:( 2786:( 2766:( 2751:( 2710:( 2680:( 2665:( 2650:( 2628:( 2614:( 2592:( 2558:( 2537:( 2522:( 2484:( 2469:( 2450:( 2426:( 2410:( 2394:( 2353:) 2349:( 2325:( 2312:) 2308:( 2272:( 2256:( 2240:( 2225:( 2209:( 2194:( 2173:( 2158:( 2093:( 2059:( 2032:( 1993:( 1979:( 1965:( 1950:( 1935:( 1921:( 1896:( 1873:( 1859:( 1843:( 1807:( 1791:( 1775:( 1729:( 1711:( 1685:( 1657:( 1635:( 1619:( 1582:( 1531:( 1511:( 1488:( 1469:( 1459:? 1445:( 1419:( 1403:( 1374:( 1318:( 1295:( 1276:( 1256:( 1233:( 1218:( 1203:( 1182:( 1161:( 1134:( 1119:( 1080:( 1050:( 1035:( 1007:( 989:( 954:( 930:( 916:— 888:( 873:( 852:( 825:( 793:( 777:( 755:( 699:( 654:( 625:( 583:) 531:( 513:( 447:7 402:( 381:( 342:( 313:( 287:( 263:( 241:( 222:( 203:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index