User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights/Archive 4

3535:, not only, but also because it is taking place in a blocked user's space and who is clearly not available for further comment for another month. There are comments and suggestions added as recently as 11 days ago and contributors may feel that their suggestions may not have been evaluated. Nevertheless, it's turning into another interminable discussion of the very kind that needs to be avoided, and it appears as if the contributors come mainly from those who opposed the original motion. I'm not sure how to proceed here, but naturally I want this thing to be implemented as was agreed by consensus. The data that is required in my suggestion above is IMHO perfectly adequate, taking into account the variables that can only ever be grey areas that are subject to so many different influences. Technical implementation can be worked out later, but we could start gathering the stats right now. Please see 1651:

now reached 30+ days again, and Snottywong has restarted his bot. My personal effort meanwhile has been to patrol the patrollers and to educate them as nicely as possible. This has become even more critical since I got the mop and do actual deletions at CSD and PROD. I am now looking forward to some rapid intervention to get the 'autoconfirmed only' trial implemented and would be pleased to be of assistance in preparing a draft for the proposal which as far as I understand from the closing summary, only confirms setting the duration of the trial. Any peripheral suggestions such as improvements to the Wizard, and eventually making all new articles pass through it, will be subject of course to new discussions. Please keep me up to date, and thank you again for all your hard work. --

513:

think it's essential: if people weren't doing it, we'd be overrun with spam and vandalism and nonsense. Obviously it needs to get done, and it's good that people are willing to do it. My impression is that it's exhausting and thankless, and that patrollers often feel deluged with the sheer volume of crap that gets posted. So I have empathy for that too. On the other hand, I do think that some patrollers probably tend to bias towards false positives -- their goal is to prevent crap from appearing on Knowledge, and I think they believe that if a few innocents get caught in the crossfire, that's okay. I, though, believe that the cost of false positives is higher than we've historically believed. We know now that

1212:

versus a hyphen and end up with wild inconsistencies across articles. I would like to see that as another point for "serious wikipedians." I think a huge obstacle to being a serious encyclopedia as opposed to a community experiment that has a compilation of pop culture references is that on matters where consensus is not clear chaos reigns because there is no arbiter. A real encyclopedia has an editor that for better or worse edits things according to consistent style guidelines. I think for the sake of stability and sanity and a professional appearance we need to force articles to uniformity in some cases and where consensus is impossible to obtain there has to be a foundation caveat.

1229:

to a more complete status. For all areas, including popular culture, the quality of the articles is valuable , and appropriate referencing is needed. A more rigorous approach to popular culture is also needed--the substantial published (and usually academic) work in the field is largely ignored, just as it is in many other topics of general interest. I'm not sure it's a higher priority than creating news articles--I think most of the people here work equally on both aspects; I consider them complementary. What is the highest priority is attracting new editors--most people stay only for a few years, and our survival depends upon their replacement. Therefore,

3377:

that are deleted anyway (either summarily by a patrolling admin or through CSD template by an NP editor), but also in a severe reduction in the number of articles that escape NPPers' attention and slip unnoticed into the Knowledge where they can stay for a very long time, even years, before they come to light. The huge backlog of unsourced and poorly sourced BLPs is just one example of poor patrolling. There's nothing much we can do about the flood of poorly written articles from Asia - they are problematic, but many of them survive after a cleanup.

3668:

ruffle any feathers. Perhaps Beeblebrox with his experience can chime in here. As I said before, the database isn't going to run away, and there's nothing to stop the trial going ahead while the first batch of stats is being prepared, but I just think it would be good to have something ready asap. The trial discussion is not a platform for discussing the technicalities, the devs will just have to do whatever is necessary to the site software, and we can discuss the wording of any user interface changes and messages. I know how to change those.

5484:

to be on the WW1 vets page, and the World Cup is a different matter covered in a different part of the guideline. It's all explained there in the help texts, guidelines and policies. Those men didn't die for flags, they died for causes and beliefs. Rather than give up, why not figure out how to talk to people more courteously and try to understand their point of view, and push your causes and beliefs in a more constructive way? Assume good faith, and all that. Nobody's out to get you, but on here as in life, you will pretty much reap what you sow.

5562:, haven't exactly engendered good feeling in some people, because I've been the driving force behind some of the badly-needed changes there, most notably the MOSFLAG issue; the above exchange is only one of several in many locations going back to March (it was so bad I actually had to get AWB access to remove all the flag icons without getting RSI). I think I'd make a good admin, but I want to get a little more experience under my belt. And I thought you were unfairly shot down at your RfA; I hope you'll be able to pass through soon enough. 529:. So, I do believe that patrollers need to upwards-prioritize not shooting the nuns and tourists :-) (i.e., good faith newbies). I think in order to do that, patrollers will probably need new tools and mechanisms that support different/new actions such as moving articles (i.e., to incubators) rather than deleting them, giving friendly feedback as well as warnings, etc. etc. etc. I know there are lots of people thinking about / working on this issue, which I think is good. And by the way thank you for the link to 6653: 6609: 6212: 6167: 5800:- the phrase "this piece of cruelty" is I think the tell, but sacred texts is PD anyway. From the closing sentences "She got a little power crazy. History shows that she was ruthless, but she believed that her actions would bring about needed change. She seemed to be a mix of good intentions without much rationale or sound judgment to be objective about it" just seem to be Neptune's opinion on the matter. The girl isn't illiterate, she is quite capable of stringing sentences together. -- 5709: 5024: 4059: 1714: 366:

page and you know nothing about what you have reverted. How exactly does your majoring in history apply to gender dysphoria or sexual identity issues ? Have you read TMWWBQ? No , I'm pretty sure you haven't. You saw no "venom" and I've "railed" on no one. Assuming that this is fabrication I am fairly sure . Please come on the talk page and accuse me. Well, if you aren't too "intimidated". You should know something about the article before you revert, otherwise it's pure vandalism.

432:

getting some 3rd parties involved, and that looks good. I'd suggest that brevity will aid you in that process as well. I'll try to, if not satisfy everyone, at least keep a level head; my main areas of editing involve genocide and repression, so I can handle this. If I do find myself in over my head, I will quietly slip away. But now, I have things to do IRL, so over and out. And by the way, you may not agree with what I did, but it was definitely not

5600: 3791: 6780: 6748: 4737: 1168: 2933:

soldiers came from, only whose side they were on. The soldiers' nationalities are mentioned anyway in the articles I've looked at, and no further emphasis is required. So I'd go with your interpretation of not emphasising nationality without good reason, and if anyone objects, then a "good reason" needs to be supplied. Let me know if there's any debate, as I don't have those articles on my watchlist - there seems to be quite a few!

5432:

few pointless flags are (correctly) removed from some articles and you contrive to translate that into a lack of respect for those who fought in wars? That's one of the most deeply crass and offensive accusations I've ever seen on Knowledge, and there's some pretty stiff competition. Guidelines don't seem to be your choice of reading material, but you need to start following them or this is only going to go one way.

163: 5558:. There are two issues that make me think I'll have a hard time becoming an admin; 1. I don't make a huge proportion of mistakes on NPP (I'd say maybe 1% at most of my CSD tags are wrong), but I do so much NPP that the 1% of mistakes are closer to one another than with most people, which attracts the ire of some people, and 2. my dealings in the area of longevity, which involved 4837:. All I could find about Ballowharf was an Amnesty report in French about some refugees going there and I think it said the population was about 4-500 people, so just some poor fishing village on the northern coast of SL. I know that you are trying to help her but if she cannot take on board the basic criteria for creating an article or category then you are in serious trouble. 54:"Yikes, Bermicourt has made a very valid point since policy has not been changed YET through a formal consensus process, not through discussions....{snip}.... I do support the removal of flag icons from most lists on Knowledge. I only ask that the guideline be changed via consensus so I can defend the removal of flag icons to the other editors -- just linking them to this 1777:

now accepted, as being quickly implemented. Shall we try and get this duration proposal thing drafted? Or should we consider looking at the wording of the policy, guildeline, and software interface pages first so that things can go ahead even more quickly. (This was pretty much how I helped bring the massive BLPPROD saga to a quick conclusion). --

6016:. Several GNAA members have voted, as have two neutral editors, and myself (involved, I suppose). I'm trying to get more neutral editors to comment on the proposal (a topic ban of sorts), and was wondering - seeing as you'd already commented - if you would oblige me? As far as canvassing goes, I'm only contacting neutral editors - no-one from the anti-GNNA crowd. 331:

discussion section, participate if you wish but offing these opinions of that discussion without reading it and reverting without even reading the edits adds nothing to the article at all. Everything in the article was completely sourced and from the same sources WAIDs was from. If you intend to make accusations please post them where someone neutral can decide.

4869:, and I thought I'd gotten somewhere (she did do some work on it, though not a huge amount; at the time I was willing to chalk that up to something in RL, as she had slowed down for a couple of days), but it doesn't seem to have been enough. I'll leave her a strongly-worded message on her talkpage; if that isn't enough, I think we'll need to invoke 801:

for me to decide notability when everyone has diffrent views on the matter,I'm concerned if i were to put up another page WikiDan61 or another editor doesn't like, could my account be blocked, I don't want to put up pages that may be deleted, but with so many actor stub pages that are left up, deciding who to give a page to is difficult.

5875:

still stands for chlorofluorocarbons, not Categories for Creation. A restriction to editing existing articles and their talkpages and a ban similar to Levineps' on creating/adding categories might be effective; it sounds harsh, but I'm not sure what else to do short of a block (which I can't perform anyways, not being an admin).

4905:

does not seem to be able to take on board the criteria for article/category creation, hell, I used to practise Tai Chi, I use homeopathy (not often as I'm almost never ill) and so on, but there is no way I will wade in to these areas on Knowledge and say "you're wrong, it works" as this would be OR and the current weight of

3340:

The number of those new editors who have not edited since their article was deleted; the number of those new editors of deleted articles who are still making constructive edits. The number of those new editors who have been blocked for disruptive editing/recreation of deleted articles, trolling, and vandalism.

3404:. To the matter at hand, though, I think the above is about what I was looking for. In going through your RfA, my comment to Salih is rather unfortunately true; it's that mentality we need to snap NPP out of, and this is the only feasible way to do it. Simplicity is key here, and I think the above is perfect. 1634:

exceptions to the rule. Of late, I've been watching the new user log to clean out some of the userpage spam (which is another job we'll need more people for when this is implemented), but I've been thinking about getting back to NPP again and working more at AfC. I'm looking forward to it. Thanks again.

3883: 6521:

I have observed some pretty remarkable contributions from this account. I am curious, why are you not an administrator. Pardon that you have struck me as the kind of editor who could be a good one, and that you seem qualified by a cursory review. I am working on an essay, and I believe you are of the

5539:

I do understand, and did understand that you were of the caliber shown by your last edit to that page. As an aside, I saw once where you posted that you yourself thought you needed significantly more time before putting yourself forward at RfA. I wanted to comment then, but withheld, I won't withhold

4110:

Mea culpa; I jumped a bit too fast on this one. I've had to clean up after several new users unfamiliar with our naming conventions there (see my move log; and that's just the very tip of the iceberg, a lot of it is editing the articles as well), and I forgot to check this time. I'll clean up after

3650:

I'm basically on board with your alternate proposal here; it should get things done while quelling some of the teeth-gnashing typical of these RfCs. Sorry I've been so apathetic here; RL caught up with me for a while, but I think the worst of it is over. I think we definitely want to get this on no

1759:

Hmmm... I don't see anything either. The closure mentioned something like 3-6 months, followed by 1-3 months of switching back to business as usual. If we go that route, I'd like 6 months, but 4 is also OK. The alternative is to run it until we get a consensus against doing it, which is how the PC

1258:

I have a question for you on references, recently i made comments on actors Phil Carey and Hume Cronyn that i feel were important and i even listed a book that i used as a reference, yet both comments were removed and i wasn't told why. Is a book a good enoungh reference for me to use or do i have to

743:

PokeHomsar is just a troll. He got mad because of the Ray William Johnson deal and the fact that I wouldn't except those terrible articles as references. Every opportunity he has, he make comments towards me even if I say something in the slightest. He has a grudge against me and will say anything

668:

I find your tone innapropriate. I altered it to a partial filmography highliting notable films and no more than six as the porno guide instructs. I stated the reason for the different picture in the different talk page and no one has reponded to that dialogue. The genital reference i returned as i am

548:

I hope you don't mind if I jump in on your conversation (I followed it with interest) - but I want to point out one other thing that may be a misunderstanding, but that I think is important. Your positioning of the issues is very "there's the WMF, and then there's US". I think it's really important

431:

pretend to be the arbiter of content, but I can at least offer my view up. I honestly can't understand what is so fantastically important about this book that you're drowning each other in reams of text (on all sides; this is in no way your fault alone); I see you've made an offer on the talkpage at

5874:

You have no idea how many times I've heard variations of that analogy before, and it reminds me that the confusion isn't all mine :). Her talkpage of late looks like a repository for CfD notices, and it's not getting much better; if it was articles, I'd tell her to go through AfC, but as of now CFC

5822:

wrote; that's probably what's going on here, combined with a seemingly short attention span (which I was not cursed with as a child). I've tried to turn her on to research, to no discernible avail, which even then wouldn't be such a problem if her interests weren't so arcane. This is another trait

5483:

Is this what you generally do, then? Call people 'idiot' with your first contact, 'vandal' with your second contact, then complain when they don't like it and criticise you for it? Then imply you're being victimised and give up? If you'd read the guidelines, you'd know that the flags aren't supposed

3667:

It's my turn to be lazy - I missed the reply above. We have several ways of doing this: Moving the current discussion from the blocked user's user space to Knowledge:xxxx space and adding my sandbox draft proposal onto it, or starting a new RfC with my proposal. I don't want to

3376:

I think that should do it. I see no reason at all for anything more complicated. I am fully convinced that any collateral damage, such as the loss of potential new regular contributors, is more than adequately offset by not only preventing the 80% thoroughly inappropriate articles

3339:

Statistics should be be extrapolated in table and graph form over the preceding six months to show: The number of new articles created by non autoconfirmed editors; The number of new articles created by non autoconfirmed editors that were subsequently deleted by CSD, PROD, BLPPROD, and AfD;

2912:

I just weighed in at the ANI. I tell you, I've just about reached my limit between chronic sockpuppeteers, chronic vandals and most recently, a user with a clear COI issue flying off the handle over a copyvio. Thanks for letting me know what was going on. You and Anna each deserve praise beyond a

1743:

While you're online, let me grab your attention for a bit: What's happening on this right now? I've searched everywhere but I can't see an RfC proposal launched already to fix the duration of the trial. Once the proposal for the trial duration is started, the devs can start preparing the

1617:

Hi BNL. This has now been closed with a consensus that I hoped for and anticpated. I would like to think that the 7 months of work that Snottywong and I put into researching the problems associated with NPP carried something towards the discussion, and I would like to thank you personally for having

767:

I wanted to thank you for your recent complements about the recent articles i've created, However i now feel i am being singled out by WikiDan61. Everytime i create a new article he proposes it for deletion and then orders me to stop creating pages, He keeps telling me that the people are not worthy

5979:

biography called from Hero to Traitor about Phillippe Petain) and ill be happy to dedicate myself to wikipedia when i can. Thanks for offering your help as well and seeing my potential because some people on here tend to look down on me because of my age, which isnt really fair and for a time i was

5431:

Goldblooded, did you really just tell an admin to "stop acting like a snivelling child and grow up"? I'm amazed your blatant personal attacks haven't got you blocked already. You talk about respect, and like most people who rant blindly about respect, you clearly have no concept of it whatsoever. A

5375:

Goldblooded, I suggest you moderate your personal attacks here. Blade is acting in line with current policy - if you want to get it changed, you need to challenge the policy at the policy talkpage, not indulge in personal attacks. I have noted the edit summary to your revert - I hope you avoid this

4612:

depending on the platform you are using, (Windows, Mac OS )You coud try looking in your browser 'properties', 'settings' or 'preferences' and check 'enable cookies'. You may also wish to look at your 'My preferences' on the top of the Knowledge pages, and check that everything is

3425:

tagger, because not only do I go through the steps that I helped design at WP:NPP, but my other, and main agenda, is to get some empirical experience about how bad the system really is - and I'm still doing it. I leave a lot of new pages for others to tag, and I CSD a lot

3279:

I suggest adding a proposal to the talk page of the discussion where the consensus was reached. keeping it simple on the lines of my original proposal. We can quickly draft this up in either your or my userspace and then paste it there. we could add a short notice about it on the

1791:

I was going to say, you probably have a better idea of what to do than I, but I think we should get everything set up before we figure out the fine print. We can get whatever consensus we like, but until we have what we need to implement it we're stuck where we are now. I think it'll be easier to

1551:

Yes, more. Also, a thread at ANI for the fuckheads (I'm quoting). In fact I just read your comments on their page: thank you for trying. Sometimes such efforts are successful, sometimes they're not, and I hope it wasn't a waste of your time. But the amount of wikilawyering, and the statements about

1530:

Oh no, not more. I've washed my hands of this problem; if you look at Mindbunny's talkpage you'll see I tried to talk some sense into him, but it doesn't seem to have worked. I'm somewhere between you and Mindbunny on this issue (probably somewhat closer to your view), but his reaction to this is

1228:

I came here to improve the coverage of conventional academic topics, but by the classification proposed here, I guess I'm non-serious. The strength of Knowledge is in the wide overage of popular culture topics, and we should not denigrate that area, but work instead to bring the other areas also up

1054:

Yes, each subtopic can get a page, but there is a unifying theme to it, namely: "We don't just want more text. We want more quality, we want more reliability". So that theme runs through the seven points of the "manifesto". The existing bots are a good start, but they can go a long way. But you are

1000:

Would like to see more controls over article quality standards and references rather than the creation of marginally notable new articles. This viewpoint considers the 10th anniversary of Knowledge as a turning point where improving the quality of exiting articles takes precedence over the creation

384:

By ranting at me on my talkpage, you're merely making my point for me; this is the sort of acerbic attitude I saw on the talkpage. I haven't read the whole book, no, but I did look through the reviews, which seem to be another point of contention. No, I won't fling around accusations, I don't see

346:

I have no stake in this article, and I've never really interacted with WhatamIdoing; I'm a 20 year old history major with no vested interest beyond adhering to a neutral point of view. What discussion (if you could call it that) I saw was you railing on a couple other editors, who were telling you

289:

You recently reverted text on an article that you didn't even work on claiming it "wasn't objective". How is it possible you would know that without even the slightest knowledge of the subject. I see nothing in the articles talk pages where you have discussed that with other editors and a consensus

231:

This is the height of arrogance on his part. Adults on the 110 Club aren't there to "indoctrinate" others but to serve as mentors and guides. The 110 Club was founded by teenagers. Unlike other clubs discussing supercentenarians, which have monetary gambling on who is going to die next, pictures of

6939:

A final small point that's worth noting is that flag icons take up a considerable amount of bandwidth because they're transcluded onto pages; the List of living supercentenarians article, before all the flag icons were removed, took my computer a lot longer to load than it does now. Even though we

6934:

The other issue, which is far more pointed in longevity articles but still an issue here, is that nationality isn't always important. In the case of (just for fun) the war between the Red and White armies in the USSR, it doesn't really matter whether the White Army soldier was British, Russian, or

6923:

It's an offshoot of a problem that was most evident in human and animal longevity articles. The most relevant sections are here and here. One issue with using flags is that they can be misleading. For example, read the sentence, "Hideki Matsui is a baseball player in the United States"; true, but

6410:

Ok, i get what your saying but really this isnt a sporting event or the spanish civil war so you cant use that arguement and i think in this case it should be exempt, and by the way i think i actually added him to that list. But anywho why not just put nationality: american like it was previously?

5447:

Breton theres no point of cruelly piling on , And ive been called a snivelling little child on here before. No but the thing is men died for those flags and besides if you dont really understand that sort of thing. then the WW1 vets article has them and the same with the world cup. Ive read all of

5412:

either. What I did was bring the article into compliance with MoS; you can try to get it changed, but I'll tell you before you do that a few months ago we did a lot of work to bring MOSFLAG to where it is now, and I don't think you'll be successful. And how, exactly, does removing the flags show

3602:

I'm back from my extended exile... I can try to compile some of these stats this week, perhaps as early as tomorrow. I'll let you know. It may not be possible for me to compile some of the stats requested above (for instance, number of articles created by non-autoconfirmed users which were later

2700:

Well, there you are. A Windows machine is likely to use MS Mincho when it sees kana; a Mac OS X machine will do so (but why not let it use a different font, likely to be just as good if not better?), while a Linux machine will be unnecessarily nudged into using a font that looks like intercoursing

2272:

article, but I've had some connection issues that won't be resolved until tomorrow (for some reason, I can't open more than two windows at a time); someone else is chewing up a giant chunk of bandwidth on my network, but it's a start. I added in another ref, I'd like you to take a look and see if

1915:, I tried a psychological post on her talk page (push-me pull-you if that makes any sense), it seems to have garnered a reaction, I'll mentor too if she wishes, definitely needs a different approach, I'm glad to find the WP community so big-hearted (because in places there are some real stinkers). 1776:

I think the summary was in favour of a fixed period rather than an open ended trial. Main thing is we have a clear go-ahead for the trial, and like you, I would go for six and accept 4. Most of the opposition was driven by emotion rather than pragmatic argument, and I see this trial,

1650:

Your intensive work on NPP was essential because it has proven that under normal circumstances there is an unacceptable backlog which was causing thousands of totally unverified articles to enter unnoticed into the encyclopedia. It's taken a while after your effort, but the backlog has

1211:

As a side note I think the greatest problem among people that DO know the Knowledge community is the fact we can devote megabytes of text to arguing over whether to use british or american spelling of gasoline/petrol/benzin/fossil fuel long-chain hydrocarbons for propelling a vehicle or an em dash

800:

I wanted to thank you for your help with the problem i've been having. But WikiDan61 said, rather bluntly, for me to stop creating pages and i would like to know am i still allowed to put up pages if i think the person is notable, I understand that every actor can't have a page. but it can be hard

629:

Sorry to disturb you but i was wondering why you set the page for speedy deletion? I am new to wiki and i am still learning the process so i accept i will inevitably get things wrong. the reason was under G11 promotional or advertising. PBNI is a public sector agency (government) and was unaware

5989:

Im also pretty good with Korean history (and japan for that matter paticulary the expansion of the japanese empire from 1910-1945) since i do Tae Kwon Do, which you probably already know but its basicailly a korean millitary martial art and i speak a bit of korean since we learn the commands like

4904:

Just to add to Elen's comments, you seem to be wholeheartedly interested in helping this user, so no criticism of you. I noticed that there seemed to be e-mail exchanges going on and you replied to your own tp messages after having apparently received an e-mail reply from Neptune. For me, Neptune

1849:

The matter has been taken out of my hands. The page was move-deleted from my user space by an admin without my assent. I'm not going to make a fuss about it, but the trial project now needs to be watched very carefully - I don't want your, Sotty's, and my work to have been in

565:

like templates, I think. We ran an interesting experiment over the weekend where we asked people (non-Wikimedians) to identify whether a message was left by a bot or a human, and you'd be shocked (or, at least, I was) by the number of them that though the templates were human-written. That's a

365:

Intimidate you?! Railing on other editors?! Utter nonsense! I've done no such thing and I challenge you to go to the article talk page and point out anywhere were I have"personally" railed on other editors. Where there is any "venom" . I'm sorry but you haven't read the article or the discussion

261:

It should also be pointed out that most of those on the 110 Club and longtime Knowledge editors (such as Nick Ornstein, Brendan(ology), etc) were in fact Knowledge editors first, joining the 110 Club as a place to discuss supercentenarians. I'm sending you the message but it is really directed at

5235:

and this user was following the guideline correctly. Also, if you want to continue as a Knowledge editor, you need to learn how to address people properly and courteously. However you might like to address people in person, on Knowledge we have higher standards. You would be well advised to read

4840:

I was monitoring your exchanges a month ago and Neptune seems to just create one or two line articles about fairly obscure or non-notable subjects and then ask you to expand the article. I think someone needs to explain to her that you can't just create articles about anything or everything that

3430:

admins. I'm not really interested in doing NPP myself, it's a thankless task and it's the quickest way to get rude messages on one's talk page. OK, so on the trial, let's wait until wee get some feedback at least from Beeb, Snotty, and Jayron, then hang the discussion on to the

1106:

I don't mind it, actually. I've only joined one WikiProject, WikiProject Burma (or whatever the hell it's called now, with the awful naming issues there), although I've been among those trying to revive the stillbirth that is WikiProject World's Oldest People. I like the idea, and I can see it

1032:

This is a lot to think about and probably should be split into several categories, each with its own page. Most of the points I can agree with wholeheartedly. The idea of topical encyclopedias within the larger encyclopedia strikes me as especially inspired. I'm unsure about the last two points,

512:

Hi BOTNL -- thanks for your comment on my talk page. I actually don't think that NP patrollers are terrible people, and I'm sorry if I've been coming across that way. (I've been wondering.) Essentially --probably like many of us-- I have conflicted and contradictory views on patrolling. First, I

6929:

He only plays in the US because we have better baseball, he doesn't refer to himself as an American; sticking an American flag next to his name could lead people to think that he now considers himself to be an American. Similar things can happen with war veterans; Ernest Hemingway fought in the

6338:

But anyway i was just going to say; Could you elaborate why you deleted the flags on the WW2 veterans page? Because im still not entirely sure since they have them on the WW1 version and dont forget on the FLAGS section of wikipedia it mentions birth but not allegience. They were the flags they

1207:

I like most of the points you've stated, especially #2. I think the largest obstacle to wikipedia becoming a serious and trusted information source is the perception among people that do not know the wikipedia community well that we obsess over minutae of family guy episodes but ignore serious

1010:

Would encourage the creation of far more sophisticated bots and semi-automated tools for "content protection" against vandalism and thinly veiled commercial promotion. This viewpoints encourages the creation of integrated, institutional guidelines to complement the volunteer designed protection

768:

of a page, But i've checked the actor stubs category and there are countless actors with nearly no credits and they have pages. No one eles has an issue with my articles only WikiDan61, I feel i am being unfairly targeted by him, Do you have any advice on what i should be about this situation.

330:

Oh I understand your tag team with WAID (who reverted twice ) calling you in to continue his edit warring. How its mean't to trick editors into the 3RR. "Venom"?! That is the most ridiculous accusation and clearly states you have no knowledge the discussion at all. Next time, actually read the

5978:

Yeah i specialize in modern and semi modern history (Primairily victorian times , and the first half of the 20th century and up to the Falklands war). Dont be fooled by my youth, my knowledge of history among other things is immense (I even write my own historical books, currently im writing a

3558:

Go with Kudpung's sandbox wording as being more comprehensive. I have amended slightly, as the purpose of the trial and evaluation is to decide if this should be implemented after the trial, and that needs to be made clear. Also, I added the question as to who and how the outcome is decided. I

2932:

Thanks for asking for my opinion :) I basically agree with you - in cases of wars and battles, the most significant point to be made is who was fighting on which side. Since nations themselves didn't really take sides in an official capacity as far as I know, it doesn't really matter where the

1633:

Thank you very much. Yes, your research was very helpful in affirming my support for my own idea. I hope this works out, because if it fails I'll look like a complete idiot. And when you talk about "the majority of NPPers", when it comes to the accuracy rate I'd like to think I'm one of the

3356:

Periods of six months are required in order to compensate for seasonal changes, for example the nonsense articles created by students from their school's computers during term time, possible drops in other creations during vacation periods, and major election campaigns (candidate

2683:

for what it looked like before I kicked over to this font (and before I realized why I shouldn't change my preferences late at night; forgot my te-forms for a moment there); Ms Mincho is what my Windows 2007 defaults to. I didn't realize it doesn't display properly, though; I'll see what, if

257:

P.S. The teens contacted me regarding their group, asking me to join. Unlike many who focus on just their career, I took time out to serve in a capacity that is leading to respect for supercentenarians and a skeptical sense that Carl Sagan called a "baloney detector." I see nothing wrong with

5109: 3582:

I'm finding it difficult to find solutions for providing stats. I've put several feelers out and the response ranges from 'maybe you'll have to do it yourself' to 'This request is too complex' and 'make a request at toolserver'. (which I know nothing about). There's also

4255:

Thanks for the tip. I don't recall the specific report so maybe you did this, but in general it would be helpful to point out that it's a quacker in the report so we can know to check the creation log or leave it for someone else. I'll keep an eye out for this in the future anyway. Regards,

1091:

might offer some advice. The only thing that occurs to me about naming is that it doesn't have to be called "WikiProject x" to be a WikiProject; I've seen a few that don't have that nomenclature. Incidentally, I'm suddenly wondering why we're having this conversation on TBotNL's talk page.

1552:

our corrupt admin corps--from someone with a couple of hundred edits. No wonder SlimVirgin suspected a sock. I have no experience with that suspected master, so I can't judge that, but it is true that many socks have such axes to grind. Anyway, I appreciate your note. Take it easy Blade!

6959:

Despite all this; on a minor point , i seem to be the only person actually bothering to edit any of these articles (in paticular the ww2 vets list where since your edit virtualy NOONE has added to it , and its easier to sort; paticulary if the list is relatively long , such as that one.

4237:

sock. It says on his LTA page to block on sight, which I'd interpret to mean "take it to AIV" for us non-admins; he usually doesn't edit, he just creates accounts. When someone reports as a MascotGuy sock, you have to check the user creation log; if it's a new user creating a bunch of

411:

Too late, you've already flung around accusations and worse , you are using them to revert an article you haven't read. Yes, responding is ranting I suppose. Tone down the "invective"? I have no idea what you are talking about because I've said nothing personal. You should actually read

1374:

Could you explain why you requested a speedy deletion of Nicholas Holthaus within seconds of posting. You deleted it before I could vet his films with proper accreditation and sourcing. Holthaus is widely accredited by newspapers and imbd, among others. He is an established film maker.

1064:

Is the "WikiProject" the vehicle to do this? And the name is....? Wikiproject ...? The project is in some sense "self referential" in that it applies o Knowledge , not quality control of manufacturing items, etc. So WikiProject Quality would not apply, but WikiProject WikiQuality may.

549:

to remember that a lot of the folks on the community department staff (and the tech staff, and global dev, and almost all of them) are self-identified Wikimedians. I still am a community elected administrator on the English Knowledge and Meta, and I got my start (check the history on

5359:

It is. These are the flags they fought for and could of died for (Many of their comrades did) Besides its on the WW1 version of the page anyway and its easier to sort them out and recognise them. People reading that article would know what they signify anyway. I suggest you leave it.

7003:

Thanks for posting your comments.I am Really very sorry for mistakenly putting my comments in your User Page,please don't mind.I need some help. Can you please tell me how to insert a picture in a Knowledge article? Please note that I'm a Auto-confirmed user. Hope you reply to this

2044:

Hi Blade, I haven't given up on you or Neptune, just a bit busy IRL with gardening and have a boot/yard sale this weekend. I do have some suggestions which I will post over at her talk (if she hasn't blanked the page yet) and I'll probably e-mail you too. Seems that the old adage

590:

would suggest. A better template design would be good, although that's so far beyond my technical abilities that I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot-pole. I obviously don't want to disparage your work here; you're the ones who keep the WMF running for people like me to use it.

1744:

software tweaks and drafts for rewording policy and guidline pages can begin. Because this is all basically the fruit of yours, Snotty's and my bickering about NPP for momnths, I would be more than willing to work on any aspects of getting this ready. Thoughts? --

5839:

her work, but I haven't yet gotten her to actually do work for me to review. I'm trying to figure out what my next move is to deal with this, but input from those with more life experience than I (I'm just about to turn 21, I still have much to learn) is of course welcome.

6417:

I know its just a flag but it kind of brightened up the page and it was easier to sort them since you just recognise them out of the corner of your eye instead of reading the text which can be a strain and take a lot longer, paticulary if its a long list like the ww2 list.

3897:

You made me actually laugh out loud. I think we are on the losing side of this one, but it's always nice to know I'm not the only one who doesn't wish to cave in to the "nothing can ever offend anyone even hypothetically" mentality that has become so pervasive around here.

3189:

I think this is actually a band, not a person and they might actually be notable (re a google search). On the other hand, the user name is a bit suspicious. Still, would you mind if I deleted the CSD and tagged with multiple problems and then prod'd it for notability?

3393: 1816:

I guessed you'd say that and I agree, and I have already been working on rephrasing all the instruction, policy, and guideline pages to have them ready. There are also a lot of templates and uw to be fixed as well. In the meantime, please have a look at

3300: 82: 924:

Given the comments we have seen on that Rfc, I thought that those who "take Knowledge seriously" should create a category of some sort. There are all kinds of groups within Knowledge, so how about a category "Serious Wikipedians"? I see the definition as follows:

290:

was reached . We are dealing with a POV pushing editor right now that keeps reverting text and ou aren't participating in the solution to the problem, you are adding to it. Please participate in the articles construction by adding to it rather than adding opinion.

6421:

Also with that sports case, you could just put a subheading nationality or country he plays for, a lot of players are foreign and play for other teams/countries. With due respect i still dont think it justifies its deletion, im not alone in that decision either.

990:

on domain encyclopedic topics are fully referenced, error free and of a higher quality than traditional printed encyclopedias. (Key encyclopedic topics here are defined as those which appear in two established vertical encyclopedias, e.g. two established medical

6463:. Please feel free to join the discussion if you are interested. I am not initially contacting a large number of users (in an attempt to keep the discussions contained and manageable), but feel free to invite any other users who might be helpful. Thanks. 6456: 4858: 1611: 1807:

And as an unrelated aside; I hope I haven't sunk any chance at a future RfA by starting this. Not that I was planning to go anytime soon, but it's in the back of my mind. Then again, CSD work doesn't seem to curry much favor to begin with; we really are

5467:

So you just went ahead and removed them anyway, why are they on other pages like WW1 vets and the world cup, Anyway forget it; You know what i dont even care anymore. Do your worst. Goodbye ive had enough. Im not even going to explain everything to you.

3563:. Making it clear that it has been decided to implement the trial, and it is the mechanics of how to implement it that needs discussion and agreement. So make a page which describes how the trial is to be implemented and point discussion to the talkpage. 3246:

has just blocked himself for a month. Perhaps we now have free rein to start a new, reasonable proposal or to do it through a workshop as I have suggested. Something has to move now before before the consensus is 'lost' for lack of interest.

96:, as that is a criterion that applies to every namespace. That said, I did not delete the page, however, because I'd rather let the AfC people deal with it, since it is nothing that needs to go as soon as possible... Sorry I was not of more help. Cheers. 426:

Gladly I would, except that real life calls right now, and I likely won't be around for a long while. I did take a look at the version on the talkpage, and it doesn't seem totally unreasonable. If you give me a day or two, I'll finish the book; I will

2978:

If you read the article, there's a reference where she describes herself as Ukrainian (its towards the end of the article), which is where her family come from and where she was born. She also holds US citizenship. What nationality does that make her?

5301:

states that you shouldn't attack editors. I only allow personal attacks on my talkpage if you have a valid point to make (c.f. the Earthcore fiasco in Archive 1 on my talkpage); you don't, ergo you can't attack me. Keep it up and you'll be blocked.

1850:

vain. Your RfC motion passed with flying colours and should not be required to face any further challenges, or need to wait for decisions on other matters that were not part of consensus and which it's implementation does not depend upon.

1610: 5448:

the guidelines and i follow each and everyone of them , And ive uploaded and contributing a lot to wikipedia in my short time of being here. And if you talk to me normally , not deorgratorially i am probably one of the nicest people on here. Thanks

4803:

Hand on heart, can you honestly say that Neptune is communicating with you. If you are in email contact with her, you might have a chance to explain all this. Or is she just firing orders to fix things at your talkpage, and not actually talking to

6926:

Yes but you could of added a title saying nationality instead of resdience or the team he plays for , I saw a simular thing in the England world cup squad and it stated their nationality not nessarially that they are all English or indeed play for

4909:

opinion is against all of this stuff (and I won't even mention the cosmic origins of mankind, chaos magic and ley lines for example, oops!). Basically, WP has a set of rules and if we can't abide by them then we shouldn't wiki in the first place.

471:. In my assessment, the claims that he has over 1500 performances, and has appeared both on television and in media coverage is a sufficient assertion of importance to survive criteria A7. I have replaced the A7 with a prod on notability grounds. 3169:

There still seems to be a software glitch. If you have a moment please check back in the talk page to how we covered this before. I have sent Snottywong the same message but I believe he is very busy in RL at the moment. Thanks.

3817:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

1792:

come to a consensus if people can see what it will look like, so it won't be just a shot in the dark. I agree the support rationales were more evidence-based, and I think/hope this can be put in place quickly. Just my thoughts, though.

26: 232:

supercentenarians as if they were dead, profanity, etc., the 110 Club has been attempting to temper the sometimes-misbehavior that is common to teenagers with adult mentorship. Here's an example of a non-mentored discussion by teens:

3213:

I hear you on that brother. So it's all done now, if the prod is contested and the user doesn't cleanup I'll probably retag the speedy. The user name was reported though so it's possibly they may just delete the article for that.

3420:

Salith's comments at my RfA were correct in one context: his supposition, but wrong in the implementation of PROD policy and how I went about it before, and since I got the mop. If the truth were known; I'm a terribly

80: 4889:

No criticism of you here. If someone won't talk, they won't talk, and if someone is (apparently) unable to parse the meaning of 'please run this by me first', or 'please show me here', then it makes mentoring kind of impossible.

193:

is scheduled to be closed on 11 April 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding

6942:

So just because your computer doesnt work you have to make it harder for everyone else? That isnt a valid point either, besides i go on here on my DS sometimes and ive had no trouble and that cant even lsiten to music or watch

2835:

I'll keep searching; I haven't found anything yet, but that doesn't mean it isn't there. To e-mail me, you can click the "E-mail this user" button in the toolbox on the sidebar. If you have any issues with that, let me know.

944:

on key general encyclopedic topics are fully referenced, error free and of a higher quality than traditional printed encyclopedias. (Key encyclopedic topics are defined as those with articles in two major encyclopedias such as

2451:

Should I leave Knowledge? I sometimes feel if I only post a request once it never gets answered. But I will only post a request once for now on. But how quickly can you respond to requests? I will leave if you want me too.

3603:

deleted), since that information is only available to admins, a user right with which I apparently can't be trusted. I'll dig around and see if there is any way to access that information via the toolserver database.

833:

I don't understand what you are requesting speedy deletion for,i hope is not the article i just created concerning the university in Lafia.Please revisit your request so that the new article is not affected.Thanks-yours

958:

Does not contribute to or endorse articles on trivia such as celebrity rehab visits, obscure and marginally notable living artists or musical groups trying to promote their own album that has sold less than 400 copies,

106: 3821:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3482:

the less impetus there will be to get this going. Lets enact the restriction, start collecting data as we go along, and at the same time work on analyzing the data from the prior 6 months. More delays = more bad.

1510:

Thanks, Blade. If I remember correctly, you and I weren't on the exact same wavelength in that whole Mel Gibson/Robert Mugabe free-for-all, at least not initially, but I appreciate your comment. Have you seen this,

5254:

Thank you for the comment, Bretonbanquet. Goldblooded, there has been a huge problem with gross overusage of flags in longevity lists, and I removed them because the above guideline is very clear on that issue.

5391:

Well why are you answering for him? Stop acting like a snivelling child and grow up. I asked him a question not a "personal attack" and i actually give a damn about the men who died so that we can be here today.

75: 44:"It sounds like you (David in DC) are saying let's abandon debate and all those on one side (i.e. who don't like flags) should now attack pages they don't approve. Is that really how Knowledge is meant to work?" 6068:

I remember seeing you request someone review an addition to an article about your competitor instead of reverting it yourself; that's what the GNAA people should be doing. It would have saved a lot of drama.

1627: 3851:? The user page she created seems a little bit promotional, but it's perfectly consistent with the publicly available information about the subject. It's also basically the same information as on her web site 3587:

that I stumbled on. Assuming good faith, it's natural also to assume that anyone who is/was opposed to the change will not wish to be involved. Perhaps the WMF should be asked directly, but who?

4785: 3262:

Sounds good to me. We can't really have something like this in someone's userspace if they can't respond now. I'm not sure what exactly we should call it, but just about anything will be an improvement.

1675:

Don't destroy my work : the "Agnes Obel concerts" wiki article is useful ! Instead, see, for instance, wiki articles such as : "Owl City concert tours", "Jamiroquai concerts", "Rolling Stones concerts"...

1864:

I've got my eye on it, and hopefully it doesn't devolve from what I had thought. I did some NPP yesterday, and it only confirmed the desperate need for change. I don't want this to get hijacked either.

5163:

No problem; sometimes the people who hang around that page make it seem like the consensus about it is much more immutable than it is. It sometimes helps to remind people an alternate viewpoint exists.

4432: 5860:

when I don't speak Martian. I really don't know what the next move should be. Perhaps cleaning up (I must have got half a dozen categories she's created deleted in the last 10 days) is all we can do. --

561:, and any number of the others. So we get it. Today, I was working on the guiding program some, and it's a struggle to not use templates. The trick is to make better and smarter templates that don't 7023:

Can you kindly tell me how to become a administrator? How many edits do we need to become so?? Do we have to apply for it to a administrator? Please help me as I'm a little bit confused in this topic!

5764:

is indeed the article that she created herself, I am trying to figure out where it was copied from. Compared to other edits by Neptunekh2, I think we all can agree that she didn't write that herself.

4435:, and it shouldn't be a problem. I'll add some, and I'll give you the sources I used; I want you to look through them when I'm done and see if there's anything else you can add. Sound like a deal? 4135: 4122: 2187: 658: 644: 6297: 6281: 6267: 5960: 5902: 5886: 5869: 5851: 4899: 3154: 3022: 3008: 2553: 2537: 624: 207: 6510: 4884: 3532: 3296: 2350: 2076: 2060: 2039: 2023: 2007: 1987: 1943: 1932:

Sounds good to me. I hope everything works out for everyone. I've worked with a lot of people with various AS disorders, so hopefully I can help. Any assistance from you is more than welcome.

1465: 1449: 1429: 184: 176: 154: 4720: 4704: 4690: 4370: 4354: 602: 5270: 4594: 1570:, I think SlimVirgin is onto something, and Mindbunny's followup comment confirms it for me. Anyways, I've now dropped my support at your RfA, and I hope I'm not the last. Have a good one!! 447: 421: 400: 358: 324: 5175: 3831: 6732: 5856:

The advantage you have is that you have some chance of understanding how she thinks. I like her - she's enthusiastic and has absolutely no 'side' - but to me it's like trying to deal with a

5424: 5353: 5313: 5097: 4312: 1321: 1152: 6080: 4446: 4023: 3073: 2847: 2795: 2642: 2622: 2523: 2284: 2227: 2133: 1118: 6670: 6626: 6577: 6560: 6229: 6184: 5573: 5549: 5534: 5041: 4265: 4076: 1731: 6399: 3518: 501: 6459:

a few months ago; and particularly because you had some interesting ideas on how to implement the trial. I have set up a discussion page for various aspects of implementing the trial at

4622: 3949: 3774: 3677: 3662: 3548: 3440: 3415: 3387: 3318: 3289: 3274: 1890: 1876: 1859: 1830: 1818: 1803: 1786: 1771: 1660: 1645: 6316:

article. Thank you. I'm not sure how much weight my opinion carries, but it doesn't need to be there. It's covered in the Balco Scandal section, so thanks for doing the right thing!

4857:

Well, I thought I had made some progress with getting her to post less often at the reference desk. My RL has been somewhat crazy of late, and I'm trying (through various means) to get

1581: 1561: 1546: 4958: 4781: 2734: 2718: 2695: 5936: 5789: 4337: 4220: 3780: 542: 5809: 5009: 4826:, where I listed a bunch of categories that she created that were either duplicata, improbable cross-sections or wrongly spelled, as you will see most have been subsequently deleted. 4249: 4008:

I think you've done some good work on it; I'll pop in over the next day or two and see what I can do. You should also take a look at some of the links Elen of the Roads provided in

3179: 2435: 1033:

especially the last one: existing bots could certainly be improved, and new ones created and authorized, but I wonder what sort of semi-automated tools would help to protect content.

6499:

No big deal; if we're going to point new users to it, though, maybe we should have misspellings and abused/missing punctuation. That seems to be what a lot of internet types like.

6031:

Please review deleting BalboaRV. I am trying to build an information base for a Motorhome built for only a few years in the late 60's and early 70's. I'm not promoting any company.

1760:

fiasco should have been set up all along and which I would favor. However, I suspect that approach won't curry much favor with the detractors, so I'd shoot for #2 and expect #1.

977:

Would like to see "domain encyclopedias" within Knowledge, on established academic fields of knowledge such as engineering, science, medicine, history, art, religion and literature.

4921: 4852: 566:

GOOD thing, it means our prospective new users may think that too. But regardless, my point here is.... please don't think we don't feel your pain. We do. But it's because it's

6475: 4788:

that goes against pre-established principles, and a whole bunch that divides up TV shows in Canada, to Tv shows (or sometimes tv series) in various misspelled bits of Canada. See

4552:

Can't you tell me, when I log in (write username, password), and can't edit and write articles under my username. Browser says me that I have "cookies" disabled. What must I do?

4104: 4829:

Neptune does not seem to take on board notability - here, amongst others, I am referring to her creation of articles about two villages in the middle of nowhere in Sierra Leone,

2784:

1 and 2 shouldn't be a problem, provided my connection holds out. 3 is fine as well, although I'd suggest you do that by e-mail; I've got e-mail enabled. I check it regularly.

6841: 4326:

Hi. This is just to let you know that you may have forgeotten to notify the author about the speedy deletion. I have anyways gone ahead and notified regarding the same. Cheers!

3814: 1512: 6414:

And really i go on here on my DS sometimes to check things (i know its pretty sad ) and the flags are no problem at all, and that cant even play videos or anything like that.

5385: 3732: 38:. I did type, "BNL, you are aware of the discussion at VP, but check out Bermi" but edit summary was cut off. The last part was going to be, "but check out Bermicourt's edit 6827: 6133: 5540:

commenting now. Don't shortchange yourself. Surely I am not the only Wikipedian who has seen your good work and clue. And you have shown it just again. With esteemed regards,

4993: 4227: 4203: 3138: 2988: 2418: 2233: 1304: 412:

discussions/article/book before claim bias and revert. IMO , you haven't and that is vandalism. Discussion over unless you want t argue your points on the article talk page.

6881:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

5278:

They was only about 20 of them! And dont go ruining my article - list of last living ww2 vets , the flags make it more colourful and i cant revert your edit either! Vandal!

3353:

After six months of trial, to stop the trial for a period of 30 (thirty) days for evaluation, before reinstalling the restriction as a long-term feature of en.Knowledge.

581: 6937:

Well i havent seen a list of the soldiers who fought in the revolution/rcw but even still thats a different matter unlike surviivng veterans of ww2 or the spanish civil war

5493: 5441: 5249: 2251: 347:

to stop inserting BLP violations. I read through and found I agreed with them. You're not going to intimidate me; hopefully someone more experienced than I will drop in.

137: 3162: 2891:

I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA. Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust. With much gratitude,

1596:

Yeah, that's him, the little SOB. Thank God for BSadowski1. Bumblerfan apparently didn't get the message when his school lowered the boom on his sorry @$ $ last year.

1055:

probably right that it is the most complex of the 7 items, and that was why I listed it last. But I do see the future as bot driven with much better tools against vandals.

313:. Now that I look over the talkpage, it's rather filled with venom, and I'm thinking I'll leave this snakepit alone. Be advised, however, thta you're rapidly hitting 3RR. 3231: 847: 6469: 5920: 5773: 1101: 1074: 1045: 6013: 3633: 1500: 1412: 6596: 5650: 3979: 1926: 1247: 385:

how that will be productive. All I want is to straighten the article out; if we can tone down the invective on all sides here, it should be possible. And would you

5660: 4536: 3925: 3844: 3837: 3645: 3627: 3609: 507: 34:

My apologizes, I reverted your revert (it was my first revert ever, and I was using TW for basically for the first time). So my edit summary apparently got cut off

898:

I admire you,keep the Wiki flag flying and get yourself some warmers out there since i had that the U.S especially the Northeast is cold.Have a nice time colleague.

375: 340: 299: 4191: 3597: 3498: 190: 3454: 6940:

aren't usually supposed to worry about performance, one of the exceptions is if you notice a change, and you can confirm that it's something specific causing it.

6818:

I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:

4318: 3615: 3536: 2881: 2390: 1341: 1148: 1070: 1022: 6112: 5319:

I could of sworn i saw you were banned before or had something to do with vandalism. Anyway its not nessarially the country they were born its the country they

4396: 5121: 5068: 2942: 220:

1. He makes accusations without gathering facts 2. He colludes with others, buddying up to built support 3. He makes jokes that put down others...not so funny

49: 39: 6865: 6794: 6025: 4951: 4359:

No worries. You're right, there seems to be a problem with TW. I tried tagging a page for speedy, all it did was only notify the author and not tag the page.

6706:(your approach to your wikitime becomes different when a current event is all around you and where you live). It seems someone else already took care of it. 5983:

on here and was thinking of quitting. But hopefully ill be able to put all that behind me and move on since ive befriended some experienced members on here.

2972: 2461: 1669: 1605: 1336:

should go on the front page in a week or two, then reliability will get some attention. I am yet to expand the project items but will do so in a day or two.

1221: 276: 252: 6762: 3713: 2778: 2605: 2210: 1535:, which is what made the situation worse for him in the first place. I'll drop in to support your RfA sometime tomorrow, by the way; I've been meaning to. 484: 3163: 2922: 2139: 930: 6250: 4695:

Well, I'm heading off to bed for the night. I'd watch the new talk page log, as floods of vandalistic pages of similar nature are rolling in. :P G'night!

2483: 1753: 1702: 35: 4819:

Hi all, first off, sorry Blade, I wanted to write you with some suggestions concerning Neptune but real life got really real for the whole month of June.

4789: 4425: 3718: 1026: 4002: 3864: 3086:

I've declined your A7 as I don't think it fits. It doesn't seem to be a company. I suggest prod or AfD as I can't find a CSD category that DOES fit...

3080: 1337: 1144: 1066: 1018: 6641: 6155: 4813: 2506: 6493: 5694: 6907: 6622: 5523:

Done; the exchange directly above me lit up my talkpage when I went to his RfA to change my vote, I think you'll understand why it slipped my mind.

5203: 5080: 3120: 1687: 235: 7032: 6225: 5754: 5730: 5112:, and populated the page with what is basically needed and some suggestions for the interface changes. I am not an expert in these matters. -- 4295: 4192: 2314: 1434:

Remember that without contributors, there is no encyclopedia at all. Encourage new users to learn how to write articles correctly! You can BLPPROD

1286: 6062: 3095: 3056: 2956: 2829: 2378: 701:

Anne Scheiber is a famous figure who gained notoriety in the New York area for her actions. Please reconsider the template you put on the article

689: 243:

David in DC needs to apologize, yet again, for yet another insensitive comment that was so off base, it represents a 180-degree turn from reality.

7013: 6325: 6032: 3957: 2108: 1993: 828: 757: 6688: 6445: 6431: 5517: 2333: 4673: 1279: 821: 733: 710: 619: 6666: 6615: 6608: 6200: 6002: 3426:

for other admins to actually delete, as people like Boing will confirm. That way, at least a deletion gets carried by the opinion of

3207: 1139:

Given the info that Spam was a project, I read the pages on projects based on the links you guys provided and it was straightforward to start

6971: 6823: 6715: 6348: 5980: 5559: 5157: 4496: 4320: 4283: 4009: 2176:

Working on the Chick Young article now; I'm from New England, so my knowledge of the BBC people is somewhat limited, but I'll do what I can.

1364: 788: 6549:, which is proving to be extremely difficult to find sources on. However, come back to me in a few months and I might just have to stand. 6535: 6272:

Anything that might be contentious should go to Cfd. Note that the canadian television ones are what survived after I dobbed the lot in. --

6180: 5057: 5037: 4072: 3757: 6993: 6932:

Same case scenario , put nationality or allegience. As you well know many nationalities fought in different sides in the spanish civil war.

6450: 5477: 5457: 5401: 5369: 5336: 5287: 5225: 4163: 4083: 3971: 3738: 3576: 1418:

Because we're required to have sources for BLPs, I BLPPROD them on sight; for non-BLPs, I will take that approach. Thanks for the advice.

5508:

where I have commented and beseech you to exercise leadership. You are the type of Wikipedian who can make a difference, I hope you will.

5342:

It's not about respect, it's quite simple; if you read the policy I linked above, it provides an example of how flags can be misleading.

4475: 4343:

Sorry about that; I usually tag with Twinkle, but today something got borked and I had to manually tag. Thanks for cleaning up after me.

3874: 3256: 1727: 1566:

No, it was worth is. Failures are just as much learning experiences as successes, and I can't get too hung up on it. Now that I look at

6021: 4652: 4570: 2902: 2673: 1345: 1140: 720:...you´d better wait a while before you place speedy deletion requests, as your requests seem speedyer, than the deletion by itself. See 6885: 4634:

The problem is, that I can't go to "My preferences". When I click there, it says me:"Error. It is private information(or smth like it)".

3907: 1881:

I did some more over the last 48 hours too. I've mailed you. I've probably gently warned more patrollers again than tagged articles.

911: 892: 870: 6878: 6845: 6726: 6554: 6504: 6393: 6291: 6261: 6074: 5930: 5880: 5845: 5783: 5567: 5528: 5505: 5418: 5347: 5307: 5264: 5169: 5135:. I realise that I didn't respond, and I didn't want to seem rude. Thanks for the link, and thanks for the sentiment; I appreciate it. 5091: 4878: 4714: 4684: 4588: 4440: 4348: 4306: 4243: 4214: 4116: 4047: 4017: 3943: 3768: 3745: 3656: 3512: 3409: 3312: 3268: 3148: 3067: 3002: 2841: 2789: 2728: 2689: 2636: 2616: 2547: 2517: 2344: 2278: 2221: 2181: 2127: 2070: 2033: 2001: 1937: 1870: 1797: 1765: 1639: 1575: 1540: 1459: 1423: 1315: 1112: 596: 495: 441: 394: 352: 318: 148: 120: 113: 111: 17: 6382: 6040: 3507:

is getting old real fast, and debating the color of the bikeshed, as you say above, isn't getting us anywhere. Let's get this going.

4186: 3803: 468: 461: 217:

Blade, it's going to take some time, but I hope you will eventually come around to see the problem with David in DC's editing style:

5632: 2542:

I just took a brief crack at it; I'll go through those, but I think I've established notability here, so it shouldn't be a problem.

1524: 4502: 4279: 4226: 3930:

Thanks; I've increasingly found that many people are humor-impaired, and it's nice to know my sense of humor is appreciated. I'm a

3504: 1475: 1107:

working in the way that WikiProject Spam works, but someone more experienced in these matters should probably have the final say.

6218: 6211: 5986:

So you specialise in Japanese history? Yeah i think ive heard of the Ainu people; werent they native to japan and eastern russia?

5745:. It was a bad deletion call, but the article wasn't fit to be put up at all - even worse than what she usually comes up with. -- 4999: 3958: 3392:

So you've noticed the increasing number of India and Pakistan articles in horrifically mangled English too. My favorite is still

3013:

Quite. I think a lot of the time it's safer not to say anything, particularly in a userbox where you can't provide any context.

6955:

Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually represents that country, government, or nationality

2339:

No problem; I was wondering if someone would notice. I do some work in Japanese/Ainu topics, and I figured it would look nice.

1963:) is not a personal attack but an opinion on the content, I see this type of argument posted all over the place, wow, well done. 968:

Would like to see a day when more experts are invited to contribute to Knowledge and policies which protect their contributions.

6017: 3329:

To operate the trial for a period of 6 (six) months during which the holders of registered accounts may not create pages in

2865: 1378: 5721:

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin.

4747: 1178: 62:

Makes sense if we wait until the guideline is formally changed before everyone starts to revert and revert. Agreed? Cheers,

6722: 6550: 6500: 6389: 6287: 6257: 6070: 5926: 5876: 5841: 5779: 5563: 5524: 5414: 5343: 5303: 5260: 5165: 5103: 5087: 4874: 4710: 4709:

The little 4chan kiddies probably couldn't get dates; I guess they have to vent the frustration of being rejected somewhere.

4680: 4584: 4488: 4436: 4344: 4302: 4239: 4210: 4112: 4013: 3939: 3764: 3652: 3508: 3405: 3308: 3264: 3144: 3063: 2998: 2837: 2785: 2724: 2685: 2632: 2612: 2543: 2513: 2340: 2274: 2217: 2177: 2123: 2066: 2029: 1997: 1933: 1906: 1866: 1793: 1761: 1635: 1571: 1567: 1536: 1455: 1419: 1311: 1108: 592: 491: 437: 390: 348: 314: 144: 5949: 3127: 2853: 2528:

There's a pile of references on the talkpage from when I rescued it from deletion, but I never got round to the article. --

2356: 284: 6144: 3400:; it's titles like that which make me want to have a "move with suppressed redirect" userright, as detailed at the top of 2497:

needs some work. Can you fix it? 2. Blades I hope you won't be offend but I'm wondering are you a man or a woman? Thanks!

2148:. They had a son in 1980 but they separated in 1984, although Carr has not divorced Young and they remain friends. On the 212: 6086: 4965: 4644: 4562: 4089: 2512:

Not a problem; I'm a man. As to Martyn Godfrey; I'll have some time in an hour or two, so yes, I think I can help you.

413: 367: 332: 291: 3763:

That's fine; I read it as a religion, but perhaps I was just up a bit too late last night. Thanks for letting me know.

3280:

VP (technical, because it's about implementation). What do you thinK? Perhaps discuss the ideas with Jayron too. --

2997:

is very rigid, and why I recently had to get AWB access to remove the giant amounts of flag icons from longevity lists.

1484: 6808: 6121: 4467: 4378: 2706: 2658:, but my system lacks MS Mincho and the display is distinctly cheesy -- far worse than with no font specification. -- 1445: 1408: 750: 3143:

Yeah, give me a few minutes IRL and I'll try. The tough part will be getting the message across without being harsh.

2611:

To question 2; yes, that seems like a perfect category, as the CAR seems to be Anne-Marie's country of residence now.

2273:

there's anything you can add. If you have issues with the formatting, just do what you can and I'll (try) to fix it.

2193: 1591: 572:

important that we (and Sue) feel like it's necessary to bring it up -despite that it means the work will get harder.

514: 6807:

Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady

5891: 4933: 3618:. I know nothing about using the database, but if my admin access can help in any way, please let me know. 2114:

Good. I'll be more than happy to work with you on whatever you'd like. Most of my content work here revolves around

685: 459: 5818:

myself, and remembering the way I was when I was young, if I hadn't got intervention I'd have ended up talking like

4823: 2754: 2588:

go under the category Category:Rwandan_immigrants_to_Central_Africa_Republic since the article says she was born in

6834: 4520: 4508: 2950: 2446: 1738: 28: 5327:

for. I suggest you show some respect. Besides they have them on the WW1 version. And you cant threaten me either.

1333: 4981: 4861:

implemented, so I've not been as communicative as I probably should have; however, it's not as if I haven't done

4093: 3836: 3798: 3782: 3744:

Hi Blade. I've declined the A7 speedy on this because I don't believe A7 covers made-up philosophies. The AfD is

3691: 2927: 2744: 2563: 1275: 817: 784: 236:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/59/puzzles-other-games/morbid-old-people-betting-game-thread-548102/index3.html

5908: 4984:, or people who live on the islands. You should put a note into the category to say which definition applies. -- 4233:

I saw you declined this AIV report a couple of days ago (now blocked by Favonian); this was yet another obvious

2028:

I left her a note on her talkpage; if you'd like to read it over and hit on anything I missed, that'd be great.

6118: 4938:

Is the category Category:People_from_Hudson_Bay_Quebec a good catgeory to create? Please let me know. I'll use

4412:? There is a lack of information about the town online. Also I created an article about an Inuit artist called 3855:(which even links to her user page on Knowledge). If someone is putting this on as a hoax it's very elaborate. 3347: 2404: 2397: 63: 5925:

As far as I'm concerned, that's an acknowledgment of her new restrictions; we'll see what happens from there.

5778:

Oh no, not again. I don't have much time to deal with this ATM, but I'll see what I can do about it tonight.

4961:

which is currently at categories for deleteion. Do you understand why that category is proposed for deletion.

3967:

I have erased the notability tag after adding some content. Hopefully, the article meets the guidelines now.

1143:

now that we have 3 people. Please feel free to add your names there, so we get some initial momentum. Thanks.

6721:

No problem; I myself was out for a couple of days, as my editing history will show. Totally understandable.

6659: 6652: 5666:

If you can help please, I would like to have a template on my user page (presumably a userbox) that shows my

4457: 2907: 2766: 2469: 1912: 1088: 5646:

Hi The Blade of the Northern Lights. I'm a little confused. You see, I've searched the following templates:

4516: 3307:

note there will attract a few, and only a few, people. And of course Snottywong's input would be excellent.

5687: 5641: 4401: 4150:

Why did you remove the flag ? That page is part of the WikiProject Table tennis... all the wikipages about

2861: 2854: 2407: 1618:

started a debate that has led to one of the most important milestones in the evolution of the Knowledge. --

4976:- its a vast saltwater bay, with a huge shoreline and numerous islands. So the question is - do you mean 119:

Hello The Blade of the Northern Lights. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

6891: 6770: 6277: 6246: 6173: 6166: 6151: 6129: 5956: 5898: 5865: 5805: 5750: 5381: 5005: 4989: 4939: 4895: 4809: 4607: 3984: 3134: 3018: 2984: 2753:

that his book The Great Cake Mystery is being released in 2012? The only source I found for it was this:

2702: 2680: 2533: 2431: 2414: 1668: 1487: 1087:

I have never actually joined any WikiProject, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. Someone at the

916: 262:

David in DC. Perhaps you can serve as a liasion and gently coax him to tone down his casting aspersions.

143:

Oh, I see what happened; I forgot that web-based ≠ web content. Sorry; thanks for cleaning up my mess.

6917:

This is beginning to become rather annoying. I know we've aleady made up but lets get one thing clear,

2709:

is the (non-) news story that has most delighted me during the last 24 hours. Yes, you too can vote! --

6790: 6758: 1612:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles

1483:

As an editor who was involved with the recent ELNO discussion, "Spam links becoming standard practice,"

586:

No problem; actually, that's pretty neat. The "us and them" distinction is definitely not as stark as

5674:

or something along those lines. Please respond with a template I could use, and thanks for your time.

5625: 5190:'s heritage or ancestry and list it in her article? 2. Could you also find a source saying that actor 946: 6861: 6802: 6738: 6637: 6490: 6050:

I'm a little startled to be held up as a good example of how to handle COI. I am deeply flattered. --

5240:, and maybe even restrict your abuse of other editors to occasions when you're not completely wrong. 4755: 4492: 4128: 4097: 3807: 2488: 2329: 1387: 1217: 1186: 174: 135: 104: 6236: 3346:

Take into account the general decline in submission of new articles as shown on the graph at

3343:

Repeat the statistics for the six months of the trial, and create overlapping comparison graphs.

1310:

Yeah, I got that a few minutes after I reported it. Serendipity is nice, when it works in my favor.

522: 6903: 6812: 5699: 4977: 4968:

does contain subcategories for people from the various regions in Quebec. However, if you look up

4745:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

4700: 4669: 3935: 3079: 2426:. Neptune, just make yourself a big notice that says "I will only post requests for help once." -- 1176:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

577: 2701:

ordure whoops sorry I didn't mean to say that. Yes, on this machine, your sig looks better within

1531:

neither constructive nor particularly helpful. His comment and above request strike me as rather

6857: 6546: 5761: 5670:

amount of edits, in other words, let's say I have exactly 100 edits, it could say something like

5489: 5437: 5245: 5181: 4648: 4566: 3697: 3100: 2938: 2593: 2577: 1496: 417: 371: 336: 295: 5297:

makes it very clear that you can't indicate place of birth, residence, or death with flags, and

4088:

Hello TBNL, you might not aware of it, but we don't use "Burma" on sport articles, like we have

3700:. Can you clean it up? 2. Also since you are my mentor, can you tell me how I can clean up the 1696:'s lists of gigs and icon decoration. All the problems with them have been explained before. -- 6703: 6273: 6242: 6147: 6125: 6092: 5952: 5894: 5861: 5801: 5746: 5377: 5149: 5062: 5001: 4985: 4891: 4805: 4524: 4512: 4471: 3478:

I think Kudpung's plan sounds workable and needs to be enacted ASAP. The longer we debate the

3130: 3014: 2980: 2868:

characters needs to be expanded. Can you please expand that? You can use this wiki as a guide:

2750: 2568:

Hi Blades. I'm asking you my few questions for the day: 1. Can you please find a reference for

2529: 2427: 2410: 2290: 2242:

What City in Connecticut do you live in? And have you been to the north as your name suggests?

2122:

history, but I've read a lot about Nunavut and related topics. I think we'll both enjoy this.

649:

Many thanks for your comments - will try to reconstruct the article in a more appropriate way.

6568:

Thanks for that reply, I am glad your power is restored. I'll be around, and pulling for you.

6545:

up and running, which is time-consuming enough, and 2. before I try, I want to write/overhaul

1996:

used to do that sort of thing all the time, I found it rather amusing. I guess it's go time.

1454:

Makes sense to me; always nice to find new ways to help newbies. Seems like a good solution.

7028: 7018: 7009: 6989: 6967: 6786: 6754: 6711: 6441: 6427: 6344: 6045: 5998: 5473: 5453: 5397: 5365: 5332: 5283: 5221: 5076: 4392: 4291: 4271: 3827: 3584: 3334: 3229: 3205: 3032: 2918: 2801: 2584:

He is of polish descent but those links aren't reliable sources. 2. Should the person called

1601: 1300: 696: 681: 538: 4780:

See my talkpage. She's created a bunch of categories that are all nominated for deletion -

2424: 6877:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

6633: 6591: 6483: 6321: 6307: 6108: 6057: 5581:

as a redirect for a reason; I hope we can engender some kinder feelings at RfA really soon.

5499: 5199: 5030: 5023: 4947: 4912: 4870: 4843: 4830: 4640: 4558: 4532: 4484: 4463: 4421: 4409: 4402: 4035: 3998: 3903: 3728: 3709: 3116: 3052: 2968: 2877: 2825: 2774: 2601: 2502: 2479: 2457: 2386: 2325: 2310: 2247: 2206: 2169: 2104: 2094: 2051: 2014: 1978: 1917: 1513:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Mindbunny.27s_comments_on_biographies_of_living_persons

1441: 1404: 1393:

to their talk page. This is frequently more effective than merely tagging the article with

1263: 1213: 1097: 1041: 805: 772: 715: 673: 663: 654: 640: 169: 130: 99: 6241:

G5 isn't correct. Empty them and then delete as C1 if it only has entries from Neptune --

5213:

Why did you get rid of the flags in the last surviving veterans of the spanish civil war?

4583:, who are generally more technically oriented than me, should be able to help you though. 3636:. I think I have addressed most of the points, but it might be as well to check. 8: 6998: 6899: 6872: 6573: 6531: 6474: 5545: 5513: 4696: 4665: 4580: 4362: 4329: 4261: 4143: 3330: 3299:, and we can just restart that and make whatever modifications we need to it. Hopefully 1486:

I am inviting you to comment on the proposal to rework the definition of "Official Link".

1360: 1271: 1253: 813: 795: 780: 573: 202: 6436:

But ultimately it was you who removed them so really we should discuss it here and now.

2808:

1. Would you mind fixing the reference I added on the page called about an inuit called

1440:

put a welcome notice on the author's talk page. The two are not mutually exclusive. :-)

6935:

American, it's more important to emphasize that the soldier fought for the Mensheviks.

6646: 6602: 6405: 6379: 6205: 6160: 6139: 6036: 5726: 5655: 5555: 5485: 5433: 5241: 5132: 5017: 4822:

Basically, I was going to ask you to talk to Neptune about her category creations, see

4797: 4775: 4413: 4052: 3916:

Absolutely hilarious! Made me LOL too. I don't agree with either of you though ;)

3848: 3737: 3573: 3491: 3479: 2934: 2898: 1492: 1397: 905: 886: 864: 841: 738: 729: 610: 587: 477: 70: 4174: 2474:

Can I ask you three questions a day and that's it? I can wait 48 hours for each hour.

2377:. Both articles need work on them and this section of this article needs to expanded: 2099:

I want you to help me. I want to assume good faith. Thank you for wanting to help me!

1383:

When a new editor starts an article and fails to add sourcing, you can help by adding

6542: 6460: 6196: 5578: 5294: 5232: 5138: 5117: 5053: 4635: 4618: 4553: 4182: 4065: 4058: 4043: 3921: 3753: 3673: 3641: 3623: 3593: 3544: 3450: 3436: 3383: 3285: 3252: 3175: 3091: 2994: 2648: 2628: 2585: 1886: 1855: 1826: 1782: 1749: 1720: 1713: 1697: 1656: 1623: 1350: 762: 721: 706: 558: 526: 3326:

Within the framework of the recommendations made in the closing discussion summary:

7024: 7005: 6985: 6963: 6848:. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system. 6707: 6516: 6437: 6423: 6340: 5994: 5970: 5682: 5590: 5469: 5449: 5409: 5393: 5361: 5328: 5279: 5256: 5217: 5072: 4742:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. Please check your email; you've got mail!

4388: 4287: 4234: 3860: 3823: 3237: 3215: 3191: 3184: 2914: 2813: 2758: 1707: 1683: 1597: 1557: 1520: 1296: 1173:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. Please check your email; you've got mail!

677: 534: 92:; however, I'd say that such an article could be nominated for speedy deletion per 3129:

in response to a post on my talkpage by Neptune. Can you offer her any advice? --

875:

O.k,but do it in a way it won't affect me much.I will be very greatful.Yours from

6912: 6693: 6585: 6523: 6464: 6330: 6317: 6104: 6051: 5738: 5195: 4943: 4528: 4417: 4159: 3994: 3975: 3899: 3724: 3705: 3604: 3112: 3048: 3044: 2964: 2873: 2821: 2770: 2769:

3. Can you send me a postcard from Connecticut if I gave you my address? Thanks!

2755:

http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/m/alexander-mccall-smith/great-cake-mystery.htm

2714: 2666: 2597: 2498: 2475: 2453: 2382: 2306: 2243: 2202: 2165: 2100: 1960: 1809: 1532: 1093: 1037: 650: 636: 616: 530: 93: 6811:. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on 6100: 5797: 2955:

1. Can you send me the link for the map of google earth? 2. Also can you expand

515:

the total number of active editors in the Wikimedia projects is slowly declining

6678: 6569: 6527: 5916: 5769: 5541: 5509: 5187: 5126: 4659: 4257: 4199: 3560: 3397: 2960: 2886: 2494: 2319: 2302: 2291: 1356: 1267: 809: 776: 554: 527:

many of them say they were discouraged by being reverted and deleted and warned

433: 268: 244: 199: 2869: 2153: 1017:

What do you think? And how does one go about establishing this project group?

630:

the information would be deemed advertising seeing they do not sell anything.

518: 6976: 6374: 6359: 5993:

But anyway glad to meet you and i hope we can start off on freindly terms :)

5722: 5708: 5298: 5237: 5208: 4866: 4272: 4029: 3990: 3931: 3701: 3566: 3484: 3458: 3401: 3304: 3108: 3101: 3040: 3033: 2893: 2809: 2802: 1243: 900: 881: 859: 852: 836: 725: 550: 523:

reversions and deletions of edits by new editors have been climbing over time

519:

that new editors are getting discouraged and quitting faster than ever before

472: 89: 6951:

Besides even your FLAGBIO arguement is flawed because it even said that....

3295:

Seems like a plan. The original proposal is still buried in the history of

2959:? I did ask you that a couple of days ago. 3. Can you find a reference for 2581: 226: 6564:

Just got power back from Hurricane Irene- it's nice to be back in business.

6541:

I've been thinking about it. Basically, it's two things; 1. I want to get

6366: 6313: 6312:

I noticed you removed the steroids bit out of the opening paragraph in the

6192: 5832: 5113: 5049: 4765: 4614: 4481:

You nominate articles for deletion. I am bringing this to your attention.

4178: 4151: 4039: 3917: 3749: 3669: 3637: 3619: 3589: 3559:

suggest creating a page for the proposed wording, and inviting opinions on

3540: 3446: 3432: 3394:

Who was the first lady judge of punjab and haryana high court at chandigarh

3379: 3281: 3248: 3171: 3087: 2362: 1882: 1851: 1822: 1778: 1745: 1652: 1619: 1233:

they want to work on is good: the need is to get more people started.

1196: 702: 258:

exposing pseudo-supercentenarians as frauds when evidence shows they are.

123:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 6981:

I've just started my editing work @wikipedia.It's really great, isn't it?

5975:

Thanks for your message , i really appreciate good faith posts like that.

5194:

has duel American and Korean nationality since he is Korean-born? Thanks!

2767:

http://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/by-name/a/alexandra-powers.html

83:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Swiss International Hotels Collection

6826:

and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on

6353: 6007: 5824: 5819: 5677: 4452: 4168: 4144: 3869: 3856: 3445:

Sorry, I keep saying 'Jayron' but that's not the guy's name is it?

3062:

I'll take a shot at it sometime tomorrow; real life has suddenly called.

2817: 2762: 2569: 2269: 2265: 2235: 2195: 2161: 2149: 2145: 2115: 1693: 1679: 1553: 1516: 1505: 1327: 4517:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Botswana-13-Alexander-McCall-Smith/dp/1408702606

5599: 4973: 4969: 4834: 4155: 3243: 2710: 2662: 2400: 2366: 2261: 921:

Hi, What happens after that new article Rfc ends? What is the process?

3882: 615:

Happens to all of us now and then. Have a good night, see you around!

6526:

might explain, but you are exactly the kind of editor I had in mind.

6286:

Yeah; anything I'm not really 100% sure about I'll send through CfD.

5912: 5765: 5743: 5617:

Restricting article creation to autoconfirmed and up! Brilliant!!! --

4793: 4541: 4384: 2374: 467:

Hi, I'm just dropping by to let you know I challenged your A7 CSD on

305:

Nor do I see where you've gained any consensus. I said I didn't know

6779: 6747: 6457:

proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles

6014:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Conclusion, decision

5619: 5086:

Kinda unfortunate that it needs saying, but I fully agree with it.

3614:

SW: I've left a message on your tp. The revised list of stats is

2268:

in their home country, so hopefully soon. I've worked a bit on the

6984:- Please visit my talk page:-)Hope you please post some comments! 6658:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

6614:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

6217:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

6172:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

5293:

You obviously didn't read the links Bretonbanquet provided above.

5191: 5029:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

4064:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

2957:

List_of_The_Mummy_characters#The_Scorpion_King_2:_Rise_of_a_Warrior

2379:

List_of_The_Mummy_characters#The_Scorpion_King_2:_Rise_of_a_Warrior

2264:; haven't been up north yet, but one of my goals in life is to see 1972:

As for Neptune, well, everyone seems to be rooting for her so I am

1719:

Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. You have new messages at

1292: 1237: 6012:

Hi Blade - I've proposed something for the GNAA COI issue at ANI,

2765:

being married to Canadian Gavin Potter. I only found this source:

2749:

1. Would you mind adding a source for Scottish author page called

6096: 5828: 5815: 2993:

It makes her nationality confused, is what it does. This is why

2164:

article. It seems like a short article and needs to be expanded.

876: 722:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wardwell&action=history

625:

Regarding speedy deletion of Probation Board for Northern Ireland

6930:

Spanish Civil War with Spanish forces, but was himself American.

6388:

It's just a habit of mine, but I'm not greatly attached to it.

1369: 553:) doing new page patrol and CSD work. I've been there. So has 185:

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

6256:

Wasn't 100% sure on those two; the other ones are obvious C1s.

5108:

I have started the discussion for the technical requirements

5071:. I've opened a thread on the project talk page for discussion. 3852: 3815:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Swiss supercentenarians

2589: 2573: 2157: 2152:

page needs some reference and I thought you could add this one:

6852:

Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.

6103:

Can someone help me make an article on Dlasta please? Thanks!

4515:

called Botswana 13. I found a source for the book right here:

1692:

I'm afraid you are travelling down a well worn path here with

4038:. If you have a moment, your ideas would be appreciated. -- 2705:. ¶ But let's not take this all too seriously. Light relief: 2298: 2119: 6673:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6629:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6232:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6187:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5044:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

4408:

Can you add to stub article that is a town in Africa called

4079:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1734:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

533:: I don't think I'd read it before, and I liked it too :-) 436:. If you feel the need to revert me, I won't revert again. 6099:

was based on. I have a source about the person right here:

5990:

attention , counting and names of differnt moves; ecetera.

5857: 2656:

Erm, you write <font face="MS Mincho" color="black": -->

2370: 1291:

re User:Slashbslashollocks: you do realize that it spells "

1036:

Are you thinking about doing this as a formal WikiProject?

198:

to the review page will prevent further automated actions.

4865:

to try. I did try to steer her in the right direction on

3323:

Found it. I would suggest keeping the intro, and then:

1208:

historical events and topics related to the hard sciences.

227:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:David_in_DC#A_bit_of_fun

3567: 3292:. PS/ perhaps also get Snottywong's input on it too. 1976:

pleased that she actually replied. Let's go! (hopefully)

2396:

Neptunekh, you also posted the same request at helpdesk

27:

Letting you know about discussion of flag icon issue in

6886:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration

6698:

Sorry I didn't have the time to get to reviewing it (I

3796:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2216:

Connecticut; I'm about 1 1/2 hours from New York City.

6879:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#User:La goutte de pluie

3431:

original RfC talk page an a brief note at the VP.

2816:

because it needs for references. She is possibly into

5796:

That is the text she wrote. The original source was

3164:

Knowledge talk:New pages patrol/Unpatrolled articles‎

1955:

Sorry, couldn't resist it, love your box at the top:

6191:You may need to get a Bugzilla account to comment. 3802:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

2653:

Blade, I like what you put at the top of this page.

6455:I'm contacting you because you participated in the 4792:for the whole lot. She's also spamming again, and 4790:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_9

42:". Bermicourt made a very valid point over there, 6522:adman class. I'd like to see you become an admin. 5231:Forgive me for butting in, but those flags failed 4416:. Can you add to those 2 articles please? Thanks! 3043:needs some work. Also I started an article called 6339:fought for not nessarially where they were born. 5186:1. Could you find a reliable source for Pornstar 4387:, i think the article has reliable sourcing now. 4154:players include the flag/s in the biotemplate. -- 3242:I thought you'd just like to know that admin 857:But it won't affect my edit count anyway,will it? 508:Thanks for your comment on my talk page about NPP 6584:I'll second that notion. You'd be a good 'un. -- 4730: 4278:Just a note that I undeleted this article per a 4193:Knowledge:Update/1/Deletion policy changes, 2011 3934:fan; it's kinda hard to do worse than that (see 6833:Any final comments would be appreciated on the 4679:You and Rupert Murdoch both; and his company. 4238:strangely-named accounts, it's definitely him. 1953:, who the fuck do you think you're talking too? 744:because he can't get over it. It's childish. 669:going to contrast with other trans porn stars 159:No probs. It was actually a borderline case... 2660: 2406:, you posted the same request on his talkpage 490:OK, that's fine; thanks for letting me know. 6101:http://www.sacred-texts.com/wmn/ama/ama07.htm 4664:Apparently, I'm going to start rolling... :P 3723:I only only post once in the reference desk. 3531:I'm still concerned about the content of 2723:You have just officially made my evening. ;) 2144:On the page it says Carr married journalist 5951:This is her. Have to see what happens next. 2140:There is a reference I would like you to add 1355:Thank you for your kind welcome. GoldCreek 879:,can i know where you are presently? Thanks 6091:There was a real person called Dlasta that 4786:Category:American_Actors_of_British_descent 4519:Can you please add this information in the 3719:I only only post once in the reference desk 2870:http://mummy.wikia.com/Special:WikiActivity 2154:http://www.retrosellers.com/features172.htm 1141:Knowledge:WikiProject_Wikipedia_reliability 525:. And when we ask people why they've quit, 6924:Matsui is and considers himself Japanese. 6846:Knowledge:RfA reform 2011/Sysop on request 2423:Also posted to Captain Screebo's talkpage 389:indent your comments; it's not that hard. 18:User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6335:Hey , i assume you read my reply to you. 5597: 3880: 2627:And question one seems to be resolved by 2582:http://www.nndb.com/people/735/000022669/ 2012:Ha-ha! (you actually looked didn't you?) 3843:What reason do you have to believe that 2963:saying what nationality she is? Thanks! 2361:Hi! I created 2 article about a city in 2297:Would you mind fixing the article about 1287:Better UAA call than you seem to realize 574:Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation 6702:seen it), since I'm a little busy with 4012:and see if you can make use of those. 3959:Thomas Spencer (mathematical physicist) 829:Hello The Blade of the Northern Lights, 14: 6840:Feedback on the two newer proposals - 5835:history), so I don't necessarily mind 5823:of mine, although mine is even worse ( 4096:. This is a common naming convention. 3297:User:Rd232/RfC for trial (draft phase) 2866:The_Scorpion_King_2:_Rise_of_a_Warrior 2409:. You have got to stop doing this. -- 1949:Hey, go fuck yourself you Jap-talking 5676: 4431:Sure, give me a day or two to finish 2757:2. Can you find a source for actress 2493:1. The article that I created called 2324:Just saw this and wanted to say hi!-- 2201:What State are you from? New Jersey? 1334:Template_talk:Did_you_know#Wiki-Watch 88:I have no experience whatsoever with 6451:Autoconfirmed article creation trial 4746: 4319:Author notification about speedy at 4084:Myanmar at the 2010 Asian Para Games 1177: 160: 6481:I cannot catch them all (chuckle). 5413:how little I care about WWII vets? 4966:Category:People by region in Quebec 4090:Myanmar at the 2008 Summer Olympics 3804:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 309:about the subject, not that I knew 189:This is an automated message. Your 23: 6651: 6607: 6210: 6165: 6146:. Tell me if I'm overreacting. -- 5257:Beware of calling the kettle black 5022: 4735: 4057: 4034:Hi Blade. Latest developments are 3993:article a bit. What do you think? 1712: 1166: 24: 7043: 4959:Category:Hudson bay native people 4782:Category:Hudson bay native people 4507:There is an upcoming book in the 3813:The article will be discussed at 3632:There are also some suggestions 71: 6778: 6746: 6723:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6551:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6501:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6390:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6288:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6258:The Blade of the Northern Lights 6071:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5927:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5893:Has to be the very last chance. 5877:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5842:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5780:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5707: 5598: 5564:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5525:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5415:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5376:kind of response in the future. 5344:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5304:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5261:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5166:The Blade of the Northern Lights 5088:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4875:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4711:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4681:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4585:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4579:I'm not sure; the people at the 4521:Number_1_Ladies_Detective_Agency 4509:Number_1_Ladies_Detective_Agency 4503:Number_1_Ladies_Detective_Agency 4437:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4345:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4303:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4240:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4211:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4113:The Blade of the Northern Lights 4111:myself, if you haven't already. 4014:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3940:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3881: 3789: 3765:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3696:1. A article that needs work is 3653:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3509:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3406:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3333:until their account has reached 3309:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3265:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3145:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3064:The Blade of the Northern Lights 3047:. Could you add to the article? 3039:An article about a craver named 2999:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2838:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2786:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2725:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2686:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2633:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2613:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2544:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2514:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2341:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2275:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2218:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2178:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2124:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2067:The Blade of the Northern Lights 2030:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1998:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1957:your comments are a pile of shit 1934:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1867:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1794:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1762:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1636:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1572:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1537:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1476:Reworking ELNO on Official Links 1456:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1420:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1312:The Blade of the Northern Lights 1109:The Blade of the Northern Lights 593:The Blade of the Northern Lights 492:The Blade of the Northern Lights 438:The Blade of the Northern Lights 391:The Blade of the Northern Lights 349:The Blade of the Northern Lights 315:The Blade of the Northern Lights 223:When I read comments like this: 161: 145:The Blade of the Northern Lights 29:List of living supercentenarians 5911:. Let's see how this pans out. 5620: 4982:Hudson Bay (electoral district) 4383:Thanks to the ministrations of 4130: 4099: 4094:Myanmar at the 2010 Asian Games 3799:List of Swiss supercentenarians 3783:List of Swiss supercentenarians 2820:. What is your e-mail address? 2812:? 2. I think you should at the 2305:? The article needs some work. 7033:06:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC) 7014:08:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 6994:09:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 6972:10:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 6908:22:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 6372:: it doesn't really matter. — 5688: 5683: 5616: 5607: 5104:trial: technical requirements 4916: 4913: 4847: 4844: 3348:File:Enwikipediapercgrowth.PNG 3111:article today please? Thanks! 2055: 2052: 2018: 2015: 1982: 1979: 1921: 1918: 1568:WP:Requests for comment/Noloop 1379:A template you may find useful 125:A7 does not apply to software. 64: 13: 1: 6866:21:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 6795:12:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 6763:12:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 6733:13:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 6716:05:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 6689:19:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 6667:19:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 6642:17:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 6623:17:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 6124:. Replies in both places. -- 5678: 4942:. What do you want me to do? 4824:this post on Elen's talk page 4800:(the diff is on my talkpage. 4458:Jeff Pearce (American artist) 1907:This is a good sign (Neptune) 986:Would like to see a day when 940:Would like to see a day when 6920:Lets disect your arguement. 6824:the min requirement proposal 5672:This user has made 100 edits 5626: 5131:Thanks for your comments on 4957:First you need to deal with 4751:at any time by removing the 3853:http://www.madamedesade.com/ 2862:List_of_The_Mummy_characters 2855:List_of_The_Mummy_characters 2684:anything, I'll do about it. 2357:Some Articles that need work 2049:comes into its own here ;-) 1810:the most hated people around 1182:at any time by removing the 285:Reversions without knowledge 7: 6892:Knowledge:Arbitration guide 6828:where we should put the bar 6616:Siddhartha Ghai's talk page 6597:12:58, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 6578:22:22, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 6561:21:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 6536:06:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 6511:00:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 6494:00:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 6470:00:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 6446:01:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 6432:17:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 6400:15:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 6383:14:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 6349:14:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 5577:And as an aside, I created 4940:Knowledge:Assume_good_faith 4228:User:Comin' & Goin' Guy 4198:Thanks, good work. - Dank ( 4173:Hi Blade. You will find 2703:User talk:DoubleJayTheGreat 2681:User talk:DoubleJayTheGreat 196: 10: 7048: 6785:I answered your question. 6753:I answered your question. 6326:22:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 6298:17:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 6282:17:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 6268:17:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 6251:17:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC) 6226:11:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 6219:Philippe (WMF)'s talk page 6201:23:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 6181:23:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 6156:00:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 6134:13:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 6113:04:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 5715:Thank you for your support 5407:"Sniveling child" ---: --> 4379:Nick Moore (Film Director) 3891:The Barnstar of Good Humor 1739:Autoconf only to make NP 1153:19:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1119:17:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1102:17:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1075:07:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1046:06:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 1027:20:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 912:07:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 893:07:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 871:07:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 848:07:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 822:14:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 789:14:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 758:20:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 734:20:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 711:18:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 690:01:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 659:10:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 645:10:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 620:05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC) 603:02:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 582:00:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 543:20:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC) 502:20:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 485:19:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC) 448:18:29, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 422:18:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 401:18:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 376:17:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 359:16:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 341:14:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 325:13:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 300:13:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 112:Speedy deletion declined: 6087:I want to run this by you 6081:15:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 6063:12:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 6041:02:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 6026:22:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 6003:11:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5961:20:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5937:20:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5921:20:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5907:Guessing we just got her 5903:11:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5887:00:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 5870:23:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5852:22:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5810:21:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5790:14:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5774:13:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5755:11:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC) 5731:07:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC) 5706: 5695:20:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 5633:01:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 5604: 5574:02:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 5550:00:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC) 5535:23:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 5518:23:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 5494:00:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 5478:23:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5458:23:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5442:22:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5425:22:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5402:22:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5386:21:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5370:20:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5354:20:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5337:20:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5314:20:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5288:16:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC) 5271:21:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC) 5250:20:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC) 5226:19:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC) 5204:06:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 5176:00:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 5158:23:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC) 5122:12:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 5098:01:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 5081:00:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 5058:21:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 5038:21:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 5010:20:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4994:20:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4952:18:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4934:I want to run this by you 4922:18:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4900:17:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4885:17:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4853:16:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4814:15:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4784:that doesn't make sense, 4721:03:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4705:03:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4691:03:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4674:02:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4653:05:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4623:04:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 4164:13:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 4136:03:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 4123:03:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 4105:03:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 4073:01:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 4048:00:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 4024:05:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 4003:01:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 3980:03:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC) 3950:14:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 3926:06:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 3908:04:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 3887: 3865:03:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 3832:20:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3775:13:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3758:03:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3733:03:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 3714:03:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 3678:06:13, 22 June 2011 (UTC) 3663:00:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 3646:18:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 3628:18:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 3610:16:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 3598:09:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 3577:13:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 3549:05:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC) 3519:17:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3499:17:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3455:07:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3441:07:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3416:06:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3388:05:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3319:05:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3290:04:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3275:04:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3257:04:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3232:03:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3208:03:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 3180:03:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3155:22:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3139:20:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3121:03:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3096:21:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 3074:03:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 3057:03:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 3023:20:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC) 3009:00:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 2989:00:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 2973:23:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC) 2661: 277:22:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 253:22:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 213:David in DC's misbehavior 208:15:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 177:02:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC) 155:23:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 138:21:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 107:15:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 76:14:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC) 58:discussion does no good." 6362:, you don't have to use 5651:Template:User edit count 5408:I guess you didn't read 4978:Hudson_Bay,_Saskatchewan 4595:13:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 4571:13:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 4537:19:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 4497:13:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 4476:13:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 4447:01:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 4426:23:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 4397:09:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 4371:16:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 4355:16:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 4338:16:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 4313:01:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 4296:01:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 4266:21:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 4250:18:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 4221:20:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 4204:19:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 4187:02:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 3936:Dawn of the Black Hearts 3806:or whether it should be 3396:, which I had to add to 2951:The Map for google earth 2943:21:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 2923:17:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 2903:02:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC) 2882:21:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2848:14:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2830:13:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2796:03:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC) 2779:06:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC) 2735:03:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 2719:03:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 2696:03:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 2674:03:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 2643:04:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 2623:04:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 2606:04:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 2554:16:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2538:16:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2524:00:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2507:00:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2484:18:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 2462:17:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 2447:Should I leave Knowledge 2436:15:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 2419:11:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 2403:asked you not to do that 2391:23:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2351:15:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2334:15:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2315:02:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2285:01:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2252:01:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2228:01:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2211:23:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 2188:23:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 2134:22:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 2109:22:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 2077:19:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2061:19:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 2040:05:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 2024:22:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 2008:22:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1988:22:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1944:22:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1927:21:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 1891:10:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1877:01:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1860:00:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 1831:07:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1804:05:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1787:04:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1772:04:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1754:03:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1728:03:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1703:01:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC) 1688:20:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 1661:02:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 1646:23:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 1628:05:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 1606:05:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 1582:15:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1562:03:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1547:03:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1525:02:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC) 1501:17:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC) 1466:17:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1450:17:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1430:17:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1413:17:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1248:19:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 6547:Padoh Mahn Sha Lah Phan 5762:User:Ryan Vesey/Valasca 5661:Template:User Editcount 5554:Thanks; I said that at 4796:has found a copyvio at 3845:User:Terri-Jean Bedford 3838:User:Terri-Jean Bedford 3698:Atlin,_British_Columbia 3692:Articles that need work 2928:Spanish Civil War lists 2745:A few things to mention 2631:. I'll add it in now. 2594:Central_Africa_Republic 2578:Internet_Movie_Database 2576:descent? According to 2564:A few things to work on 2260:I'm from right outside 1592:I don't believe this... 1365:00:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 1346:01:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC) 1322:02:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 1305:02:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 1280:16:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 1222:03:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 947:Encyclopædia Britannica 6656: 6612: 6215: 6170: 6093:Xena:_Warrior_Princess 5027: 4740: 4525:Alexander_McCall_Smith 4513:Alexander_McCall_Smith 4131:— Bill william compton 4100:— Bill william compton 4062: 2751:Alexander_mccall_smith 1717: 1171: 6660:Ronhjones's talk page 6655: 6611: 6214: 6169: 5026: 4739: 4061: 3651:later than July 1st. 3533:this particular draft 3503:I concur; stuff like 3480:color of the bikeshed 2908:Thanks for the update 2592:and now lives in the 2470:Three questions a day 1716: 1259:use something else. 1170: 5642:Edit number template 4831:Kobaia, Sierra Leone 4410:Kobaia,_Sierra_Leone 4403:Kobaia,_Sierra_Leone 4280:request at WP:REFUND 3335:autoconfirmed status 3107:Can you work on the 2657:話して下さい</font: --> 2047:patience is a virtue 1295:", as well, I hope. 6358:When commenting on 6174:Kudpung's talk page 5560:an arbitration case 5323:and their comrades 5031:Kudpung's talk page 4066:Kudpung's talk page 3985:Adding to a article 3539:. Thoughts please. 2065:Sounds good to me. 1721:Kudpung's talk page 1670:Agnes Obel concerts 1089:WikiProject Council 917:Serious Wikipedians 588:the Pink Floyd song 240:I have seen worse. 6947:I hope that helps. 6858:MessageDeliveryBot 6671:remove this notice 6657: 6627:remove this notice 6613: 6230:remove this notice 6216: 6185:remove this notice 6171: 5656:Template:Editcount 5042:remove this notice 5028: 4841:takes your fancy. 4798:Simeonie Amagoalik 4748:remove this notice 4741: 4554:User: John Troodon 4527:articles? Thanks! 4433:my userspace draft 4414:Simeonie_Amagoalik 4077:remove this notice 4063: 3849:Terri-Jean Bedford 3301:the talkpage there 3126:Blade, please see 2913:simple Barnstar. 2369:and a mountain in 2258:Shrank down header 1732:remove this notice 1718: 1179:remove this notice 1172: 931:serious Wikipedian 460:Challenged CSD on 6869: 6813:Jimbo's talk page 6803:RfA Reform update 6800: 6799: 6771:A cookie for you! 6768: 6767: 6739:A cookie for you! 6565: 6274:Elen of the Roads 6243:Elen of the Roads 6148:Elen of the Roads 6126:Elen of the Roads 5953:Elen of the Roads 5895:Elen of the Roads 5862:Elen of the Roads 5802:Elen of the Roads 5747:Elen of the Roads 5736: 5735: 5639: 5638: 5582: 5378:Elen of the Roads 5002:Elen of the Roads 4986:Elen of the Roads 4892:Elen of the Roads 4806:Elen of the Roads 4643:comment added by 4636:User:John Troodon 4608:talk page stalker 4561:comment added by 4487:comment added by 4466:comment added by 3913: 3912: 3704:aritcle? Thanks! 3331:article mainspace 3131:Elen of the Roads 3015:Elen of the Roads 2981:Elen of the Roads 2860:The article with 2596:country? Thanks! 2586:Anne-Marie_Goumba 2530:Elen of the Roads 2489:2 quick questions 2428:Elen of the Roads 2411:Elen of the Roads 2259: 1813: 1448: 1411: 1283: 1266:comment added by 825: 808:comment added by 792: 775:comment added by 693: 676:comment added by 559:User:Steven (WMF) 482: 7039: 6855: 6787:Besse Cooper fan 6782: 6775: 6774: 6755:Besse Cooper fan 6750: 6743: 6742: 6729: 6685: 6683: 6674: 6630: 6594: 6588: 6563: 6557: 6507: 6486: 6396: 6381: 6377: 6371: 6365: 6294: 6264: 6233: 6188: 6077: 6060: 6054: 5933: 5883: 5848: 5814:As someone with 5786: 5711: 5704: 5703: 5700:Thank you kindly 5692: 5690: 5685: 5680: 5635: 5631: 5628: 5622: 5611: 5609:The Red Barnstar 5602: 5595: 5594: 5576: 5570: 5531: 5421: 5350: 5310: 5267: 5172: 5156: 5155: 5152: 5145: 5094: 5045: 4972:, it's not like 4918: 4915: 4881: 4849: 4846: 4772: 4770: 4764: 4760: 4754: 4750: 4738: 4717: 4687: 4655: 4611: 4591: 4573: 4499: 4478: 4443: 4369: 4367: 4351: 4336: 4334: 4309: 4246: 4217: 4133: 4132: 4119: 4102: 4101: 4080: 4020: 3946: 3885: 3878: 3877: 3793: 3792: 3771: 3659: 3575: 3569: 3515: 3494: 3487: 3412: 3315: 3271: 3227: 3224: 3221: 3218: 3203: 3200: 3197: 3194: 3151: 3081:Discovery canyon 3070: 3005: 2901: 2896: 2844: 2814:Alexandra Powers 2792: 2759:Alexandra Powers 2731: 2692: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2639: 2619: 2572:saying he is of 2550: 2520: 2347: 2281: 2257: 2224: 2184: 2160:or clean up the 2130: 2073: 2057: 2054: 2036: 2020: 2017: 2004: 1984: 1981: 1940: 1923: 1920: 1873: 1806: 1800: 1768: 1735: 1700: 1642: 1578: 1543: 1462: 1444: 1426: 1407: 1402: 1396: 1392: 1388:Welcomeunsourced 1386: 1318: 1282: 1260: 1203: 1201: 1195: 1191: 1185: 1181: 1169: 1115: 908: 903: 889: 884: 867: 862: 844: 839: 824: 802: 791: 769: 756: 753: 748: 692: 670: 599: 498: 478: 475: 444: 397: 355: 321: 274: 271: 250: 247: 205: 197: 173: 166: 165: 164: 151: 134: 103: 73: 68: 7047: 7046: 7042: 7041: 7040: 7038: 7037: 7036: 7021: 7001: 6979: 6915: 6875: 6862:RfA reform 2011 6822:Have a look at 6805: 6773: 6741: 6727: 6704:Hurricane Irene 6696: 6681: 6679: 6675: 6664: 6649: 6634:Siddhartha Ghai 6631: 6620: 6605: 6592: 6586: 6555: 6519: 6505: 6484: 6479: 6453: 6408: 6394: 6375: 6373: 6369: 6363: 6356: 6333: 6310: 6292: 6262: 6239: 6234: 6223: 6208: 6193:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 6189: 6178: 6163: 6142: 6089: 6075: 6058: 6052: 6048: 6010: 5973: 5931: 5919: 5881: 5846: 5784: 5772: 5741: 5702: 5644: 5630: 5618: 5593: 5568: 5529: 5504:Please comment 5502: 5419: 5348: 5308: 5265: 5211: 5184: 5182:Finding Sources 5170: 5150: 5147: 5139: 5136: 5129: 5114:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 5106: 5092: 5065: 5050:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 5048:See 'Stats'; -- 5046: 5035: 5020: 4998:And don't spam 4936: 4879: 4778: 4773: 4768: 4762: 4758: 4756:You've got mail 4752: 4744: 4736: 4733: 4715: 4685: 4662: 4638: 4615:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4605: 4589: 4556: 4544: 4505: 4489:166.216.194.180 4482: 4461: 4455: 4441: 4406: 4381: 4363: 4360: 4349: 4330: 4327: 4324: 4307: 4276: 4244: 4231: 4215: 4196: 4179:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4177:interesting. -- 4175:this discussion 4171: 4148: 4129: 4127:Pas de soucis. 4117: 4098: 4086: 4081: 4070: 4055: 4040:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 4032: 4018: 3989:I clean up the 3987: 3962: 3944: 3918:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3872: 3841: 3794: 3790: 3787: 3769: 3742: 3721: 3694: 3670:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3657: 3638:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3620:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3590:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3564: 3541:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3513: 3492: 3485: 3447:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3433:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3410: 3380:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3313: 3282:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3269: 3249:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3240: 3225: 3222: 3219: 3216: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3187: 3172:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 3167: 3149: 3105: 3084: 3068: 3045:Atlin_Gold_Rush 3037: 3003: 2953: 2930: 2910: 2894: 2892: 2889: 2858: 2842: 2806: 2790: 2747: 2729: 2690: 2659: 2651: 2637: 2617: 2580:and this link: 2566: 2548: 2518: 2491: 2472: 2449: 2359: 2345: 2326:Kintetsubuffalo 2322: 2295: 2279: 2240: 2222: 2199: 2182: 2142: 2128: 2097: 2071: 2034: 2002: 1938: 1909: 1883:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1871: 1852:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1823:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1798: 1779:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1766: 1746:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1741: 1736: 1725: 1710: 1698: 1673: 1653:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1640: 1620:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1615: 1594: 1576: 1541: 1508: 1478: 1460: 1442:KillerChihuahua 1424: 1405:KillerChihuahua 1400: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1381: 1372: 1353: 1330: 1316: 1289: 1261: 1256: 1214:HominidMachinae 1204: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1187:You've got mail 1183: 1175: 1167: 1113: 919: 906: 901: 887: 882: 865: 860: 855: 842: 837: 831: 803: 798: 770: 765: 755: 752:I didn't do it! 751: 746: 745: 741: 718: 699: 671: 666: 627: 613: 597: 531:the WIHSD essay 521:. We know that 510: 496: 481: 473: 465: 442: 395: 353: 319: 287: 272: 269: 248: 245: 215: 203: 195: 187: 167: 162: 149: 128: 117: 97: 86: 48:That was why I 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7045: 7020: 7017: 7000: 6997: 6978: 6975: 6914: 6911: 6900:OpenInfoForAll 6896: 6895: 6889: 6874: 6871: 6850: 6849: 6838: 6831: 6804: 6801: 6798: 6797: 6783: 6772: 6769: 6766: 6765: 6751: 6740: 6737: 6736: 6735: 6695: 6692: 6665:Message added 6663: 6650: 6648: 6645: 6621:Message added 6619: 6606: 6604: 6601: 6600: 6599: 6582: 6581: 6580: 6518: 6515: 6514: 6513: 6478: 6473: 6452: 6449: 6407: 6404: 6403: 6402: 6355: 6352: 6332: 6329: 6309: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6238: 6237:Neptune's cats 6235: 6224:Message added 6222: 6209: 6207: 6204: 6179:Message added 6177: 6164: 6162: 6159: 6141: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6088: 6085: 6084: 6083: 6047: 6044: 6030: 6009: 6006: 5972: 5969: 5968: 5967: 5966: 5965: 5964: 5963: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5915: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5768: 5740: 5737: 5734: 5733: 5718: 5717: 5712: 5701: 5698: 5664: 5663: 5658: 5653: 5643: 5640: 5637: 5636: 5624: 5613: 5612: 5605: 5603: 5592: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5501: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5465: 5464: 5445: 5444: 5428: 5427: 5389: 5388: 5357: 5356: 5317: 5316: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5210: 5207: 5188:Chanel_Preston 5183: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5128: 5125: 5105: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5067:Please review 5064: 5063:Edit summaries 5061: 5036:Message added 5034: 5021: 5019: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5012: 4962: 4935: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4838: 4827: 4820: 4777: 4774: 4743: 4734: 4732: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4697:Reaper Eternal 4666:Reaper Eternal 4661: 4658: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4598: 4597: 4543: 4540: 4504: 4501: 4454: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4405: 4400: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4323: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4284:sent it to AFD 4275: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4230: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4209:Glad to help. 4195: 4190: 4170: 4167: 4147: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4139: 4138: 4085: 4082: 4071:Message added 4069: 4056: 4054: 4051: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 3986: 3983: 3961: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3911: 3910: 3894: 3893: 3888: 3886: 3871: 3868: 3840: 3835: 3788: 3786: 3781:Nomination of 3779: 3778: 3777: 3741: 3736: 3720: 3717: 3693: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3630: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3378: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3354: 3351: 3344: 3341: 3337: 3327: 3239: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3186: 3183: 3166: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3104: 3099: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3036: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 2961:Milla_Jovovich 2952: 2949: 2947: 2929: 2926: 2909: 2906: 2888: 2885: 2857: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2805: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2625: 2565: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2495:Martyn_Godfrey 2490: 2487: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2358: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2321: 2318: 2303:Looty_Pijamini 2294: 2292:Looty_Pijamini 2289: 2288: 2287: 2239: 2238:do you live in 2232: 2231: 2230: 2198: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2141: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1740: 1737: 1726:Message added 1724: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1614: 1609: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1507: 1504: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1380: 1377: 1371: 1368: 1352: 1349: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1288: 1285: 1255: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1225: 1224: 1209: 1174: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1049: 1048: 1034: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 995: 994: 993: 992: 981: 980: 979: 978: 972: 971: 970: 969: 963: 962: 961: 960: 953: 952: 951: 950: 918: 915: 897: 854: 851: 830: 827: 797: 794: 764: 761: 749: 740: 737: 724:. Regards. -- 717: 714: 698: 695: 665: 662: 626: 623: 612: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 555:User:Jamesofur 509: 506: 505: 504: 479: 464: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 404: 403: 380: 364: 362: 361: 328: 327: 286: 283: 281: 214: 211: 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 116: 110: 85: 79: 31: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7044: 7035: 7034: 7030: 7026: 7019:Administrator 7016: 7015: 7011: 7007: 6996: 6995: 6991: 6987: 6982: 6974: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6961: 6957: 6956: 6952: 6949: 6948: 6944: 6938: 6933: 6928: 6921: 6918: 6910: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6893: 6890: 6887: 6884: 6883: 6882: 6880: 6870: 6867: 6863: 6860:on behalf of 6859: 6856:Delivered by 6853: 6847: 6843: 6839: 6836: 6832: 6829: 6825: 6821: 6820: 6819: 6816: 6814: 6810: 6796: 6792: 6788: 6784: 6781: 6777: 6776: 6764: 6760: 6756: 6752: 6749: 6745: 6744: 6734: 6730: 6724: 6720: 6719: 6718: 6717: 6713: 6709: 6705: 6701: 6691: 6690: 6687: 6686: 6672: 6668: 6661: 6654: 6644: 6643: 6639: 6635: 6628: 6624: 6617: 6610: 6598: 6595: 6589: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6571: 6567: 6566: 6562: 6558: 6552: 6548: 6544: 6540: 6539: 6538: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6525: 6512: 6508: 6502: 6498: 6497: 6496: 6495: 6492: 6491: 6488: 6487: 6477: 6472: 6471: 6468: 6467: 6462: 6458: 6448: 6447: 6443: 6439: 6434: 6433: 6429: 6425: 6419: 6415: 6412: 6401: 6397: 6391: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6380: 6378: 6368: 6361: 6351: 6350: 6346: 6342: 6336: 6328: 6327: 6323: 6319: 6315: 6299: 6295: 6289: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6279: 6275: 6271: 6270: 6269: 6265: 6259: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6248: 6244: 6231: 6227: 6220: 6213: 6203: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6186: 6182: 6175: 6168: 6158: 6157: 6153: 6149: 6145: 6135: 6131: 6127: 6123: 6120: 6117: 6116: 6115: 6114: 6110: 6106: 6102: 6098: 6094: 6082: 6078: 6072: 6067: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6061: 6055: 6046:Shadowing me? 6043: 6042: 6038: 6034: 6028: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6005: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5991: 5987: 5984: 5982: 5976: 5962: 5958: 5954: 5950: 5948: 5938: 5934: 5928: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5918: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5892: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5884: 5878: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5849: 5843: 5838: 5834: 5830: 5826: 5821: 5817: 5813: 5812: 5811: 5807: 5803: 5799: 5795: 5791: 5787: 5781: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5732: 5728: 5724: 5720: 5719: 5716: 5713: 5710: 5705: 5697: 5696: 5693: 5691: 5686: 5681: 5673: 5669: 5662: 5659: 5657: 5654: 5652: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5634: 5629: 5623: 5615: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5601: 5596: 5580: 5575: 5571: 5565: 5561: 5557: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5526: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5507: 5495: 5491: 5487: 5486:Bretonbanquet 5482: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5475: 5471: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5455: 5451: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5434:Bretonbanquet 5430: 5429: 5426: 5422: 5416: 5411: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5399: 5395: 5387: 5383: 5379: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5355: 5351: 5345: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5315: 5311: 5305: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5272: 5268: 5262: 5258: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5242:Bretonbanquet 5239: 5234: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5214: 5206: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5189: 5177: 5173: 5167: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5153: 5146: 5144: 5143: 5134: 5124: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5099: 5095: 5089: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5060: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5043: 5039: 5032: 5025: 5011: 5007: 5003: 5000: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4991: 4987: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4960: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4953: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4923: 4920: 4919: 4908: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4882: 4876: 4872: 4871:WP:NOTTHERAPY 4868: 4867:Dale Campbell 4864: 4860: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4851: 4850: 4839: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4825: 4821: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4801: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4767: 4757: 4749: 4722: 4718: 4712: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4688: 4682: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4657: 4656: 4654: 4650: 4646: 4645:93.75.119.189 4642: 4637: 4631: 4629: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4613:in order. -- 4609: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4599: 4596: 4592: 4586: 4582: 4578: 4577: 4575: 4574: 4572: 4568: 4564: 4563:93.75.119.189 4560: 4555: 4549: 4548: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4514: 4510: 4500: 4498: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4479: 4477: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4459: 4448: 4444: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4404: 4399: 4398: 4394: 4390: 4386: 4372: 4368: 4366: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4352: 4346: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4335: 4333: 4322: 4314: 4310: 4304: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4274: 4273:Finish Ticket 4267: 4263: 4259: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4241: 4236: 4229: 4222: 4218: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4201: 4194: 4189: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4146: 4137: 4134: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4120: 4114: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4103: 4095: 4091: 4078: 4074: 4067: 4060: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4025: 4021: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991:Dale_Campbell 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3968: 3965: 3960: 3951: 3947: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3914: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3896: 3895: 3892: 3889: 3884: 3879: 3876: 3875: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3839: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3819: 3816: 3811: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3800: 3784: 3776: 3772: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3702:Dale_Campbell 3699: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3660: 3654: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3586: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3574: 3571: 3570: 3562: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3516: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3488: 3481: 3477: 3476: 3460: 3459:User:Jayron32 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3429: 3424: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3342: 3338: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3266: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3245: 3233: 3230: 3228: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3206: 3204: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3165: 3156: 3152: 3146: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3109:Dale_Campbell 3103: 3102:Dale_Campbell 3098: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3082: 3075: 3071: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041:Dale_Campbell 3035: 3034:Dale_Campbell 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2935:Bretonbanquet 2925: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2856: 2849: 2845: 2839: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2810:Joseph_Idlout 2804: 2803:Joseph_Idlout 2797: 2793: 2787: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2736: 2732: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2668: 2664: 2654: 2644: 2640: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2555: 2551: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2515: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2467: 2464: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2444: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2352: 2348: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2293: 2286: 2282: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2237: 2234:What City in 2229: 2225: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2197: 2189: 2185: 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2156:Also can you 2155: 2151: 2147: 2135: 2131: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2078: 2074: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2031: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2005: 1999: 1995: 1994:User:Timneu22 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1914: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1763: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1733: 1729: 1722: 1715: 1705: 1704: 1701: 1695: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1671: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1637: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1613: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1583: 1579: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493:ELNO Checking 1489: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1467: 1463: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1399: 1389: 1376: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1323: 1319: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1198: 1188: 1180: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 999: 998: 997: 996: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 976: 975: 974: 973: 967: 966: 965: 964: 957: 956: 955: 954: 948: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 933: 932: 926: 922: 914: 913: 910: 909: 904: 895: 894: 891: 890: 885: 878: 873: 872: 869: 868: 863: 850: 849: 846: 845: 840: 826: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 793: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 760: 759: 754: 736: 735: 731: 727: 723: 713: 712: 708: 704: 697:Anne Scheiber 694: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 661: 660: 656: 652: 647: 646: 642: 638: 634: 631: 622: 621: 618: 604: 600: 594: 589: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 570: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551:User:Philippe 547: 546: 545: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 503: 499: 493: 489: 488: 487: 486: 483: 476: 470: 463: 449: 445: 439: 435: 430: 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 414:98.149.114.34 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 398: 392: 388: 383: 382: 381: 378: 377: 373: 369: 368:98.149.114.34 360: 356: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 333:98.149.114.34 326: 322: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 292:98.149.114.34 282: 279: 278: 275: 266: 263: 259: 255: 254: 251: 241: 238: 237: 233: 229: 228: 224: 221: 218: 210: 209: 206: 201: 192: 191:editor review 178: 175: 172: 171: 158: 157: 156: 152: 146: 142: 141: 140: 139: 136: 133: 132: 126: 122: 115: 109: 108: 105: 102: 101: 95: 91: 84: 78: 77: 74: 69: 67: 60: 59: 55: 51: 50:replied at VP 46: 45: 41: 37: 30: 19: 7022: 7002: 6983: 6980: 6962: 6958: 6954: 6953: 6950: 6946: 6941: 6936: 6931: 6925: 6922: 6919: 6916: 6897: 6876: 6854: 6851: 6817: 6806: 6699: 6697: 6677: 6676: 6632: 6520: 6489: 6482: 6480: 6465: 6454: 6435: 6420: 6416: 6413: 6409: 6357: 6337: 6334: 6314:Jason Giambi 6311: 6308:Jason Giambi 6240: 6190: 6143: 6090: 6049: 6029: 6011: 5992: 5988: 5985: 5977: 5974: 5836: 5798:sacred texts 5742: 5714: 5675: 5671: 5667: 5665: 5645: 5608: 5556:the talkpage 5503: 5500:RFC from you 5466: 5446: 5390: 5358: 5324: 5320: 5318: 5277: 5215: 5212: 5185: 5142:Fly by Night 5141: 5140: 5130: 5107: 5066: 5047: 4937: 4911: 4906: 4862: 4842: 4802: 4779: 4663: 4639:— Preceding 4633: 4632: 4630: 4600: 4576: 4557:— Preceding 4551: 4550: 4546: 4545: 4506: 4483:— Preceding 4480: 4468:72.81.131.48 4462:— Preceding 4456: 4407: 4382: 4364: 4331: 4325: 4301:OK, thanks. 4277: 4232: 4200:push to talk 4197: 4172: 4152:table tennis 4149: 4092:, similarly 4087: 4033: 3988: 3969: 3966: 3963: 3890: 3873: 3842: 3820: 3812: 3797: 3795: 3785:for deletion 3743: 3722: 3695: 3605: 3565: 3557: 3490: 3489: 3427: 3422: 3241: 3188: 3168: 3106: 3085: 3038: 2954: 2946: 2931: 2911: 2890: 2859: 2807: 2748: 2679:You can see 2655: 2652: 2567: 2492: 2473: 2465: 2450: 2442: 2363:Sierra_leone 2360: 2323: 2296: 2241: 2200: 2194:You're from 2143: 2098: 2095:I choose you 2050: 2046: 2013: 1992:No worries; 1977: 1973: 1956: 1950: 1948: 1916: 1913:my talk page 1910: 1742: 1699:Escape Orbit 1691: 1678: 1674: 1616: 1595: 1509: 1490: 1482: 1479: 1436: 1435: 1382: 1373: 1354: 1331: 1290: 1257: 1236: 1232: 1230: 1016: 1001:of new ones. 991:references.) 988:all articles 987: 942:all articles 941: 929: 927: 923: 920: 899: 896: 880: 874: 858: 856: 835: 832: 804:— Preceding 799: 771:— Preceding 766: 742: 719: 716:Next Time... 700: 672:— Preceding 667: 664:Kimber James 648: 635: 632: 628: 614: 568: 567: 562: 511: 466: 428: 386: 379: 363: 329: 310: 306: 288: 280: 267: 264: 260: 256: 242: 239: 234: 230: 225: 222: 219: 216: 188: 168: 129: 127:Thank you. 124: 118: 98: 87: 65: 61: 57: 53: 47: 43: 33: 7025:Dipankan001 7006:Dipankan001 6999:Need Help!! 6986:Dipankan001 6964:Goldblooded 6945:videos etc. 6873:Arbitration 6708:Daniel Case 6587:Orange Mike 6438:Goldblooded 6424:Goldblooded 6341:Goldblooded 6122:my talkpage 6053:Orange Mike 6018:The Cavalry 5995:Goldblooded 5981:Discouraged 5820:James Joyce 5470:Goldblooded 5450:Goldblooded 5394:Goldblooded 5362:Goldblooded 5329:Goldblooded 5280:Goldblooded 5218:Goldblooded 5073:David in DC 4389:ElectricRay 4321:Share2there 4288:Ron Ritzman 4145:Suh Sui Cho 3824:David in DC 3357:promotion). 2915:PMDrive1061 2895:jsfouche ☽☾ 2818:Scientology 2763:Scientology 2761:being into 2570:Eli Wallach 2270:Chick Young 2236:Connecticut 2196:New England 2162:Chick Young 2150:Chick Young 2146:Chick Young 1951:sonofabitch 1598:PMDrive1061 1370:Saturdayloo 1338:History2007 1297:Daniel Case 1262:—Preceding 1145:History2007 1067:History2007 1019:History2007 907:message me! 888:message me! 866:message me! 843:message me! 678:RafikiSykes 535:Sue Gardner 6669:. You can 6625:. You can 6543:WP:ACTRIAL 6524:This essay 6461:WP:ACTRIAL 6318:Kjscotte34 6228:. You can 6183:. You can 6140:Despairing 6105:Neptunekh2 6095:character 6022:Message me 5579:WP:BEARPIT 5295:WP:FLAGBIO 5233:WP:FLAGBIO 5196:Neptunekh2 5040:. You can 4974:Echo Beach 4970:Hudson Bay 4944:Neptunekh2 4907:scientific 4835:Ballowharf 4776:Neptunekh2 4529:Neptunekh2 4418:Neptunekh2 4075:. You can 3995:Neptunekh2 3900:Beeblebrox 3748:. Cheers. 3739:Neutranity 3725:Neptunekh2 3706:Neptunekh2 3244:User:Rd232 3113:Neptunekh2 3049:Neptunekh2 2965:Neptunekh2 2874:Neptunekh2 2822:Neptunekh2 2771:Neptunekh2 2598:Neptunekh2 2499:Neptunekh2 2476:Neptunekh2 2454:Neptunekh2 2383:Neptunekh2 2367:Ballowharf 2307:Neptunekh2 2262:Bridgeport 2244:Neptunekh2 2203:Neptunekh2 2166:Neptunekh2 2101:Neptunekh2 1812:sometimes. 1730:. You can 1094:Rivertorch 1038:Rivertorch 739:PokeHomsar 651:Itewhitten 637:Itewhitten 617:Neutrality 611:No problem 265:Sincerely 81:Regarding 6837:proposal. 6570:My76Strat 6528:My76Strat 6476:Thank you 6119:Help desk 5917:hideliho! 5837:reviewing 5770:hideliho! 5542:My76Strat 5510:My76Strat 5410:WP:KETTLE 5069:this edit 4771:template. 4581:help desk 4385:user:PamD 4365:Abhishek 4332:Abhishek 4258:causa sui 4235:MascotGuy 2649:さて、話してみよう 2399:and when 2375:Pitusiray 1491:Regards, 1398:unsourced 1357:GoldCreek 1351:Thank you 1268:Vincelord 1254:Vincelord 1202:template. 810:Vincelord 796:Vincelord 777:Vincelord 763:Vincelord 434:vandalism 200:AnomieBOT 6927:England. 6809:progress 6647:Talkback 6603:Talkback 6517:Question 6485:Schmidt, 6406:Response 6376:Waterfox 6206:Talkback 6161:Talkback 6033:BalboaRV 5971:Response 5723:Qwyrxian 5627:contribs 5591:Barnstar 5192:John_Cho 5018:Talkback 4964:Second, 4863:anything 4641:unsigned 4559:unsigned 4485:unsigned 4464:unsigned 4053:Talkback 3568:SilkTork 3457:Gottit: 3238:Workshop 3185:Nova Rex 2381:Thanks! 1961:WP:SPADE 1911:Hi, see 1708:Talkback 1293:bollocks 1276:contribs 1264:unsigned 1231:whatever 902:Earlymen 883:Earlymen 861:Earlymen 838:Earlymen 818:contribs 806:unsigned 785:contribs 773:unsigned 747:Mr. C.C. 726:Gary Dee 686:contribs 674:unsigned 633:Regards 121:Timecamp 114:Timecamp 6898:Thanks, 6842:Pre-RfA 6694:Nsc atl 6331:message 6097:Velasca 5858:Martian 5829:Burmese 5816:PDD-NOS 5739:Neptune 5216:Idiot. 4917:Screebo 4914:Captain 4848:Screebo 4845:Captain 4010:the AfD 3808:deleted 3750:28bytes 3561:WP:CENT 3398:WP:DAFT 3226:rmation 3202:rmation 3088:Peridon 2995:FLAGBIO 2872:Thanks! 2373:called 2365:called 2301:artist 2120:Burmese 2056:Screebo 2053:Captain 2019:Screebo 2016:Captain 1983:Screebo 1980:Captain 1922:Screebo 1919:Captain 949:, etc.) 877:Nigeria 703:Zobango 469:JabStar 462:JabStar 311:nothing 56:ongoing 6844:& 6835:clerks 6728:話して下さい 6684:jones 6556:話して下さい 6506:話して下さい 6395:話して下さい 6360:WP:UAA 6293:話して下さい 6263:話して下さい 6076:話して下さい 5932:話して下さい 5882:話して下さい 5847:話して下さい 5785:話して下さい 5569:話して下さい 5530:話して下さい 5420:話して下さい 5349:話して下さい 5321:fought 5309:話して下さい 5299:WP:NPA 5266:話して下さい 5238:WP:NPA 5171:話して下さい 5133:WT:CSD 5127:Thanks 5093:話して下さい 4880:話して下さい 4804:you?-- 4716:話して下さい 4686:話して下さい 4660:Wheels 4590:話して下さい 4442:話して下さい 4350:話して下さい 4308:話して下さい 4245:話して下さい 4216:話して下さい 4118:話して下さい 4019:話して下さい 3970:Best, 3945:話して下さい 3932:Mayhem 3857:Pburka 3847:isn't 3770:話して下さい 3658:話して下さい 3514:話して下さい 3486:Jayron 3411:話して下さい 3402:WP:VPR 3314:話して下さい 3305:WP:VPT 3303:and a 3270:話して下さい 3150:話して下さい 3069:話して下さい 3004:話して下さい 2887:My RfA 2843:話して下さい 2791:話して下さい 2730:話して下さい 2691:話して下さい 2638:話して下さい 2618:話して下さい 2590:Rwanda 2574:Polish 2549:話して下さい 2519:話して下さい 2346:話して下さい 2320:話して下さい 2280:話して下さい 2223:話して下さい 2183:話して下さい 2158:wikify 2129:話して下さい 2072:話して下さい 2035:話して下さい 2003:話して下さい 1939:話して下さい 1872:話して下さい 1799:話して下さい 1767:話して下さい 1694:Lurulu 1680:Lurulu 1641:話して下さい 1577:話して下さい 1554:Drmies 1542:話して下さい 1533:pointy 1517:Drmies 1461:話して下さい 1446:Advice 1425:話して下さい 1409:Advice 1317:話して下さい 1114:話して下さい 598:話して下さい 557:, and 497:話して下さい 443:話して下さい 396:話して下さい 387:please 354:話して下さい 320:話して下さい 270:Ryoung 246:Ryoung 170:Salvio 150:話して下さい 131:Salvio 100:Salvio 90:WP:AFC 66:Calvin 7004:soon! 6977:Hello 6913:Flags 5909:reply 5833:Karen 5668:exact 5463:Sigh* 5209:Flags 4156:Cialo 4030:Stats 3972:Sasha 2864:with 2711:Hoary 2401:Hoary 2299:Inuit 1332:FYI: 1244:talk 1011:bots. 853:Good, 474:Monty 16:< 7029:talk 7010:talk 6990:talk 6968:talk 6904:talk 6791:talk 6759:talk 6712:talk 6638:talk 6593:Talk 6574:talk 6532:talk 6466:—SW— 6442:talk 6428:talk 6345:talk 6322:talk 6278:talk 6247:talk 6197:talk 6152:talk 6130:talk 6109:talk 6059:Talk 6037:talk 5999:talk 5957:talk 5913:Nymf 5899:talk 5866:talk 5827:and 5825:Ainu 5806:talk 5766:Nymf 5751:talk 5727:talk 5546:talk 5514:talk 5506:here 5490:talk 5474:talk 5454:talk 5438:talk 5398:talk 5382:talk 5366:talk 5333:talk 5325:died 5284:talk 5246:talk 5222:talk 5200:talk 5151:talk 5118:talk 5110:here 5077:talk 5054:talk 5006:talk 4990:talk 4948:talk 4896:talk 4859:this 4833:and 4810:talk 4794:Nymf 4701:talk 4670:talk 4649:talk 4619:talk 4567:talk 4547:Hi! 4533:talk 4493:talk 4472:talk 4422:talk 4393:talk 4292:talk 4286:. -- 4282:and 4262:talk 4183:talk 4160:talk 4044:talk 4036:here 3999:talk 3976:talk 3964:Hi, 3938:). 3922:talk 3904:talk 3861:talk 3828:talk 3754:talk 3746:here 3729:talk 3710:talk 3674:talk 3642:talk 3634:here 3624:talk 3616:here 3606:—SW— 3594:talk 3585:this 3545:talk 3537:this 3505:this 3451:talk 3437:talk 3423:slow 3384:talk 3286:talk 3253:talk 3176:talk 3135:talk 3117:talk 3092:talk 3053:talk 3019:talk 2985:talk 2969:talk 2939:talk 2919:talk 2899:Talk 2878:talk 2826:talk 2775:talk 2715:talk 2707:this 2667:しゃべり 2629:this 2602:talk 2534:talk 2503:talk 2480:talk 2458:talk 2432:talk 2415:talk 2387:talk 2371:Peru 2330:talk 2311:talk 2266:Rush 2248:talk 2207:talk 2170:talk 2118:and 2116:Ainu 2105:talk 1887:talk 1856:talk 1827:talk 1821:. -- 1819:this 1783:talk 1750:talk 1684:talk 1657:talk 1624:talk 1602:talk 1558:talk 1521:talk 1497:talk 1480:Hi, 1361:talk 1342:talk 1301:talk 1272:talk 1218:talk 1149:talk 1098:talk 1071:talk 1042:talk 1023:talk 959:etc. 814:talk 781:talk 730:talk 707:talk 682:talk 655:talk 641:talk 578:talk 563:feel 539:talk 418:talk 372:talk 337:talk 307:much 296:talk 40:here 36:here 6864:at 6815:. 6700:had 6680:Ron 6590:| 6367:nao 6354:NAO 6056:| 6008:ANI 5760:If 5679:Tom 4873:. 4766:ygm 4761:or 4731:YGM 4523:by 4511:by 4460:. 4453:AfD 4361:— 4328:— 4169:NPP 3870:HA! 3428:two 2663:ホーリ 2172:)` 1506:RfA 1437:and 1328:FYI 1238:DGG 1197:ygm 1192:or 480:845 429:not 273:122 249:122 94:G11 7031:) 7012:) 6992:) 6970:) 6906:) 6793:) 6761:) 6731:) 6714:) 6640:) 6576:) 6559:) 6534:) 6509:) 6444:) 6430:) 6398:) 6370:}} 6364:{{ 6347:) 6324:) 6296:) 6280:) 6266:) 6249:) 6199:) 6154:) 6132:) 6111:) 6079:) 6039:) 6024:) 6001:) 5959:) 5935:) 5901:) 5885:) 5868:) 5850:) 5808:) 5788:) 5753:) 5729:) 5684:US 5572:) 5548:) 5533:) 5516:) 5492:) 5476:) 5456:) 5440:) 5423:) 5400:) 5384:) 5368:) 5352:) 5335:) 5312:) 5286:) 5269:) 5259:. 5248:) 5224:) 5202:) 5174:) 5137:— 5120:) 5096:) 5079:) 5056:) 5008:) 4992:) 4980:, 4950:) 4898:) 4883:) 4812:) 4769:}} 4763:{{ 4759:}} 4753:{{ 4719:) 4703:) 4689:) 4672:) 4651:) 4621:) 4593:) 4569:) 4535:) 4495:) 4474:) 4445:) 4424:) 4395:) 4353:) 4311:) 4294:) 4264:) 4248:) 4219:) 4202:) 4185:) 4162:) 4121:) 4046:) 4022:) 4001:) 3978:) 3948:) 3924:) 3906:) 3863:) 3830:) 3810:. 3773:) 3756:) 3731:) 3712:) 3676:) 3661:) 3644:) 3626:) 3596:) 3547:) 3517:) 3493:32 3483:-- 3453:) 3439:) 3414:) 3386:) 3317:) 3288:) 3273:) 3255:) 3247:-- 3178:) 3170:-- 3153:) 3137:) 3119:) 3094:) 3072:) 3055:) 3021:) 3007:) 2987:) 2979:-- 2971:) 2941:) 2921:) 2880:) 2846:) 2828:) 2794:) 2777:) 2733:) 2717:) 2694:) 2672:) 2641:) 2621:) 2604:) 2552:) 2536:) 2522:) 2505:) 2482:) 2460:) 2434:) 2417:) 2389:) 2349:) 2332:) 2313:) 2283:) 2250:) 2226:) 2209:) 2186:) 2132:) 2107:) 2075:) 2038:) 2006:) 1974:so 1942:) 1889:) 1875:) 1858:) 1829:) 1802:) 1785:) 1770:) 1752:) 1686:) 1659:) 1644:) 1626:) 1604:) 1580:) 1560:) 1545:) 1523:) 1515:? 1499:) 1464:) 1428:) 1403:. 1401:}} 1395:{{ 1391:}} 1385:{{ 1363:) 1344:) 1320:) 1303:) 1278:) 1274:• 1246:) 1220:) 1200:}} 1194:{{ 1190:}} 1184:{{ 1151:) 1117:) 1100:) 1073:) 1044:) 1025:) 934:: 928:A 820:) 816:• 787:) 783:• 732:) 709:) 688:) 684:• 657:) 643:) 601:) 580:) 569:so 541:) 517:, 500:) 446:) 420:) 399:) 374:) 357:) 339:) 323:) 298:) 153:) 72:Ty 52:, 7027:( 7008:( 6988:( 6966:( 6902:( 6894:. 6888:; 6868:. 6830:. 6789:( 6757:( 6725:( 6710:( 6682:h 6662:. 6636:( 6618:. 6572:( 6553:( 6530:( 6503:( 6440:( 6426:( 6392:( 6343:( 6320:( 6290:( 6276:( 6260:( 6245:( 6221:. 6195:( 6176:. 6150:( 6128:( 6107:( 6073:( 6035:( 6020:( 5997:( 5955:( 5929:( 5897:( 5879:( 5864:( 5844:( 5831:/ 5804:( 5782:( 5749:( 5725:( 5689:A 5621:Σ 5566:( 5544:( 5527:( 5512:( 5488:( 5472:( 5452:( 5436:( 5417:( 5396:( 5380:( 5364:( 5346:( 5331:( 5306:( 5282:( 5263:( 5244:( 5220:( 5198:( 5168:( 5154:) 5148:( 5116:( 5090:( 5075:( 5052:( 5033:. 5004:( 4988:( 4946:( 4894:( 4877:( 4808:( 4713:( 4699:( 4683:( 4668:( 4647:( 4617:( 4610:) 4606:( 4587:( 4565:( 4542:? 4531:( 4491:( 4470:( 4439:( 4420:( 4391:( 4347:( 4305:( 4290:( 4260:( 4242:( 4213:( 4181:( 4158:( 4115:( 4068:. 4042:( 4016:( 3997:( 3974:( 3942:( 3920:( 3902:( 3859:( 3826:( 3767:( 3752:( 3727:( 3708:( 3672:( 3655:( 3640:( 3622:( 3592:( 3572:* 3543:( 3511:( 3461:. 3449:( 3435:( 3408:( 3382:( 3350:. 3311:( 3284:( 3267:( 3251:( 3223:o 3220:f 3217:N 3199:o 3196:f 3193:N 3174:( 3147:( 3133:( 3115:( 3090:( 3066:( 3051:( 3017:( 3001:( 2983:( 2967:( 2937:( 2917:( 2876:( 2840:( 2824:( 2788:( 2773:( 2727:( 2713:( 2688:( 2665:( 2635:( 2615:( 2600:( 2546:( 2532:( 2516:( 2501:( 2478:( 2456:( 2430:( 2413:( 2385:( 2343:( 2328:( 2309:( 2277:( 2246:( 2220:( 2205:( 2180:( 2168:( 2126:( 2103:( 2069:( 2032:( 2000:( 1959:( 1936:( 1885:( 1869:( 1854:( 1825:( 1796:( 1781:( 1764:( 1748:( 1723:. 1682:( 1655:( 1638:( 1622:( 1600:( 1574:( 1556:( 1539:( 1519:( 1495:( 1458:( 1422:( 1359:( 1340:( 1314:( 1299:( 1270:( 1242:( 1240:' 1216:( 1147:( 1111:( 1096:( 1069:( 1040:( 1021:( 812:( 779:( 728:( 705:( 680:( 653:( 639:( 595:( 576:( 537:( 494:( 440:( 416:( 393:( 370:( 351:( 335:( 317:( 294:( 204:⚡ 147:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index