146:
ArbCom, yet he has self-proclaimed himself innocent and others guilty. Since when is a prosecutor also a judge? E. Citing himself as policy (which was his own recent edits, and he failed to notify others of changes, and then claiming "silence is consent") F. Mislabelling others as "Conflict of
Interest." CanadaJack, DerbyNZ, Brendan, etc. all have NO "Conflict of Interest". Brendan is a 15-year-old kid who runs an amateur blog. How is that COI? G. JJB intentionally tried to "stir the pot" by involving other editors from disputes 3+ years ago. Is this a way to find consensus, or cause more problems?
2950:, which I have declined. The subject is a member of a notable group, which fulfills the requirements for notability. There was significant work done to the article after you requested the speedy, which led me to realize that it had existed for only fourteen minutes when you requested the speedy. Perhaps you should give them a bit more time to become familiar with our policies and offer to help them fix it? I'm afraid you're going a little too fast, and may be requesting speedies that are not correct. This is the second one I've seen from you in the recent past. -
832:
the GRG as a reliable source should be established by, for example, an article about the GRG that was on the front page of the Wall Street
Journal in 2005, and its use as a source by the mainstream media. So, the problem is accusing the GRG of being "not reliable" is based on personal opinion, not outside sources which support the GRG as reliable. 3. "whether they are biased against non-western centenarians"...this is a negative comment that should not be made as there are no outside reliable sources that support such a negative assertion 4. GRG--a primary source?
682:"Delete There are absolutely no sources in the article's text. Under the "External links" header there's a single link, to a Gerontology Research Group web page. There's some controversy about whether GRG pages are simply not reliable, whether they are biased against non-western centenarians or whether they are primary sources, prohibited for citation by WP:NOR. Whichever way one goes, this GRG web page cannot be the sole source for an article on Knowledge. David in DC (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)"
2897:
deliberately misleading advertising (and there's something very wrong with that) implying that he is somehow affiliated with the Denver Show. His article is continuing that practice. I edited out the most egregious falsehoods several months ago when I found the article, but some of it's back in claims that are sort-of true, but worded to be misleading. If you look at the article's references, veery single one is to an advertisement
Carhart or one of his employees placed.
1325:
evidence presented about misbehavior by others (yes, that includes
Brendanology) that was overlooked, but Brendanology is a 15-year-old kid; he'll learn. Less certain is whether David in DC will learn. The first rule for judges is that if they cannot be impartial, they should recuse themselves and let a third-party, neutral person be involved. It's more than clear that David in DC has a personal vendetta and should have long ago recused himself from this discussion.
553:
693:, represent the loss of substantial information and smacks of "recentist" bias. The article was sourced to not just GRG material but to public-archive records. As the last child of a Revolutionary War veteran and as the first verified living person to attain age 111 in 1925, and as someone mentioned in both the scientific literature and the very first edition of Guinness World Records, this article should have stayed.
614:
959:
824:"Delete There are absolutely no sources in the article's text. Under the "External links" header there's a single link, to a Gerontology Research Group web page. There's some controversy about whether GRG pages are simply not reliable, whether they are biased against non-western centenarians or whether they are primary sources, prohibited for citation by NOR"
2830:. As I've never come in contact with him before and have never edited any articles relating to either Burma or prehistory at all, I was quite confused. At first I thought Soewinhan might have accidentally posted on my talk page instead of someone else's, but as I dug around I happened to come across the ANI... where I discovered mentions of Hybernator.
715:. JJBulten even stated that it would be easier to take down the list on European supercentenarians afterwards...by deleting articles on non-Europeans, they could then counter that the data was biased. But the fact is, the data is limited to the state of recordkeeping 110+ years ago. The GRG data is actually more widespread than, for example, IDL data:
883:
197:
never denies) that he wants to minimize/delete articles on supercentenarians because he believes that people living to 110 aren't notable, when the Bible cites people living to 950. Never mind the fact that even
Biblical fundamdentalists like Arthur Custance believed that people "once" lived a lot longer, but not now:
686:
analysis, the GRG decides that the case is true and puts it on the GRG website, that's NOT self-published. Moreoever, if the GRG makes a mistake, it is open to scrutiny. In the past ten years, out of more than 1,000 cases, only two mistakes regarding death reports were made by the GRG...an accuracy rate of 99.8%.
1691:
2225:
Informality, eh. I've been accused of a number of vices whilst on
Knowledge but never that one before. Have endeavoured to posh it up a little. Seriously, would be most grateful for any assistance you were able to offer, on this or any other William Burges-related article I've contributed to. I'm
812:
No one, not even me, is saying that simply being on a GRG list confers biographical notability. In fact, biographical notability is largely a function of how much attention the supercentenarian and their family want. I note that the Wiki lists even include anonymous cases (no name given, just age and
779:
3. List-only coverage may be warranted for persons 110+ who do not meet standards 1 and 2, subject to age verification by a third-party reliable source. That could be the GRG. That could be www.recordholders.org, which by the way is not a self-published source either, since Louis
Epstein lives in the
739:
Coverage on the death of Eunice
Sanborn, world's oldest person according to Guinness World Records, generated more than 800 articles in English alone. Whether the GRG exists or does not exist, the fact remains is that the media has long decided that extreme longevity is notable. David in DC's push to
731:
The fact is, I am the only person in the world that is associated with all the major supercentenarian databases. They call me "Switzerland". I real life, I come across as neutral. Only on
Knowledge does there seem to be a "problem." Often, that problem is that non-experts come on here and try to edit
181:
Yet, often kids (teenagers/fans) create articles on people who just turned 110, or even age 109. In some cases I opposed deletion because the arguments for deletion were incorrect. People would say things like "supercentenarians can't be notable" instead of "some supercentenarians may be notable, but
2924:
So, I take it no copy of the article remains anywhere? I'd be happy to reconstruct it in the sandbox for your review, if i had any confidence that it would work. When I originally wrote it, I saved it in the sandbox, and when I came back to work on it, the damn thing had disappeared. I couldn't find
2896:
The deletion seems especially odd since there's an article about the Denver
Coliseum Mineral, Fossil, Gem, and Jewelry Show, an entirely commercial venture (not that there's anything wrong with that) established two years ago by a local entrepreneur, Lowell Carhart, who has been running all sorts of
2889:
There are gem and mineral shows and clubs all over the world. When I wrote the piece I tried to place it in the context of gem & mineral shows in general (including links to other shows), and the shows relationship to local geologists, rockhounds, and rock clubs, including links to organizations
2762:
was needed, now your explanation makes sense! :) I've been noticing a tonne of pages which have already been tagged for improvement or deletion, but not marked as page patrolled - it seems if we could get people to mark them it would nearly halve the workload. Do we know why the pages aren't getting
1420:
Most of your deletion nominations are very well considered, but this article did indicatess very considerable importance, as a company operating multiple large cruise ships. That it's unref is a reason to add refs— and if one cannot find them, that's of course another matte. I think you may simply
1198:
I often notice that you put for some new articles "Knock this out of the unpatrolled log" Which I also notice sometimes about every 12 hours a bunch of articles disapear from there. So what is that about? (That has caused a huge problem recently where it just seems like we just have unpatrolled from
220:
4. We need a discussion of what is COI and what is not. In fact, I was an editor at Knowledge before I became the "Senior Consultant for Gerontology" for Guinness World Records. Nearly all persons cited as "conflicts" in fact started out on Knowledge, or edited on Knowledge long before the so-called
177:
I hold a very high standard for creating articles based on the intersection of longevity and notability. I don't create articles on 111-year-olds, in general. I cite 111-year-olds in local papers as being not yet individually notable, perhaps notable for a list. I believe that notability begins when
2693:
Cool, thanks. Question 2: when I first go to the article from special:new pages there's a "Mark page as patrolled" box in the bottom right hand corner. But it seems once I make an edit, the box disappears, so I can't mark it as patrolled after I've tagged it. Is there a way around this? Or should I
2067:
Hi BNL! I'm not sending out thankspam to everyone, but I would like to personally thank you for your support on my RfA and for the kind words. You have a clear understanding of the principles on which the BLPROD was crafted, and whether some of the patrollers are doing it well or not, it
1801:
Thanks a lot for pointing the way. While I've got your attention can I ask you about something that's just stumped me. Since I came here I seem to have lost my small font (that I was delighted to get when they made the changes a while back). Have you any idea how I can get it back? It's nice to
1048:
Now, when I look at lynxOS, a real-time OS that has an entry in WikiPedia, to figure out what makes an article a spam only meant for promotion and what does not, I noticed there is a project to provide entries for computing terms, but when I visited the Project page and discussion page, I was at a
1040:
BeRTOS · ChibiOS/RT · cocoOS · Contiki · DNIX · DSOS · eCos · Embedded Linux · ERIKA Enterprise · EROS · FreeRTOS · FunkOS · Integrity · Junos · LynxOS · MenuetOS · MQX · MERT · Nano-RK · Nucleus RTOS · OpenComRTOS · OS-9 · OSE · PikeOS · pSOS · Prex · QNX · RMX · RSX-11 · RT-11 · RTEMS · RTLinux ·
853:
I also found it "COI" for David in DC to be lauding praise on John J Bulten on the Workshop page. Considering that David in DC and John J Bulten were heavily involved in a tag-team of AFD's in November-December (that resulted in some cases in poor decisions to delete to be made), David in DC should
699:
C. Supercentenarian coverage is "one event." Aside from the purpose of the "one event" rule, to prevent coverage on non-notable persons who might have been, for example, a witness to a fire, articles about supercentenarians are sourced to material ABOUT THEM rather than trivial mention. And in most
269:
Apparently I have upset you regarding the above ArbCom. I don’t quite know what you mean by being a bit “ducky” and you feel that my comments have been “inflammatory” and unhelpful. I certainly have strong opinions on the above, as I see it as censoring the works of science in the same tradition as
185:
The other issue is that of "one event." If someone was reported just for their death, that may be "one event." But if they were reported for their 113th birthday and then a year later at 114, that's NOT "one event." Moreover, "one event" is, by example, a non-notable person interviewed about a fire
138:
Erm... where did I enter into this? I didn't have anything to do with the (now deleted) article on Robert Young; I didn't create, tag, or delete it (not that I could have deleted it, not being an admin). If you're talking more generally, outside this specific recreation, open up another section and
105:
Erm... where did I enter into this? I didn't have anything to do with the (now deleted) article on Robert Young; I didn't create, tag, or delete it (not that I could have deleted it, not being an admin). If you're talking more generally, outside this specific recreation, open up another section and
2782:
The wiki page for MANHATTAN Personal Computing Products should not be deleted. The style, content and objectivity is similar to wiki pages for Logitech International SA, Targus Corporation, KYE Systems Corporation or other similar brands. If MANHATTAN is deleted so should Logitech, Targus, KYE and
1237:
Hey there, I just wanted to let you know, so you could hopefully stop the speedy deletion of the page. I am supposed to write a Knowledge article for a University assignment so if you delete it then i would fail. I just wanted to start the page and there is going to be a lot more to add to it once
831:
Problems with David in DC's statements: 1. The GRG was given as an external link "for more information," not as a source for Tase Matsunaga. So the criticism of using the GRG as a "source" is invalid here. 2. "Some controversy about whether GRG pages are simply not reliable"...again, notability of
827:
Now, while I agree that simply listed listed on the GRG list does not establish biographical notability, it SHOULD qualify the person for being on a list, such as the 100 validated oldest persons or something to that effect. The point of the list is not really biography but statistics, to give the
703:
D. The GRG is a "data dump." It's terms like "data dump" that make David in DC part of the problem, not part of the solution. The GRG is a non-profit entity (so much for COI charges) and is governed by U.S. law regarding privacy. Moreoever, it is run by persons with academic credentials (Dr. Coles
2833:
Now you tell me, what are the odds that this is all just a coincidence? I'm not sure if this proves anything (it's certainly not conclusive evidence that Hybernator and Soewinhan are connected) so I didn't want to post it in the ANI, but... I feel like someone involved should know about it. (also
2546:
You've added "refimproveBLP" to the article. Here in Russia there is no much WhoIsWhos etc where you can find everyone catalogized. So what kind of reliable (=published?) source you mean for the article about a living person? See the Nomenclator Zoologicus for the list of genera described by YuAP
2174:
Hi, I started this article to give the history of a magazine that is no longer published; however, you have marked it as advertising. The magazine ceased publication in March 2009, subscriptions are no longer available, so I am a bit confused as to the claim of advertising. It may be, having only
2087:
hi! excuse for my English but I am Italian and I am writing in a language that is not mine. I am making a search on the Sigma-Tau that is an international firm and on his/her president, I thought about making an useful thing to the information to make public that was cost to me so so much work to
1912:
1086:
Nice idea (I too wish that pages like this could be deleted more easily), but it's far enough from policy that I don't feel comfortable doing it. I'm willing to bend the rules somewhat in one specific kind of case — if I delete an article that uses a non-free image with a rationale only for that
685:
Allegations made by David in DC A. GRG is a "self-published" source. Actually, it's not. If a family puts up a photo of grandma on a blog and says she's the world's oldest person at 120, that's self-published. If a family sends us the documents that indicate that someone is 114 and, after careful
196:
For practical purposes, consider Louisa Thiers. The "world's oldest person" in 1926, according to science, the article was unfairly deleted by JJBulten and others. Her coverage has been continuing, over 80+ years, and many of the sources for the article were NOT the GRG. Yet Bulten indicated (and
145:
A. "Voting" on his own deletion proposals B. Mass-nominating AFD's C. It was JJB who launched the so-called "Bolding War" (his words), then he cites opposition to his changes as evidence of a "Walled Garden." Walled or not, why are such attacks not called into question? D. JJB is a "party" to the
2885:
It's a major annual event that's been running in Denver for over 40 years. Not only is it not-for-profit, but it's the second-largest event of this type in the US, one of the largest in the world. People come from all over the world, not just to buy and sell (not that there's anything wrong with
1324:
Another false accusation by David in DC. I was clearly editing last night census 2010 population counts, such as for San Antonio, Texas (1,327,407) or South Bend, Indiana (101,168). David in DC's false accusations went nowhere, but he needs to seriously disengage. At the ArbCom, there was also
1705:
I have a deep respect for anyone on here who defends a Wikipedian's right to have a sense of humour. I see nothing wrong with having a good laugh sometimes. It can only be a good thing. Unfortunately, many people here wish to wipe the "sound" of laughter off the face of this corrupt community.
1044:
I noticed that there is a sub-section titled "T-Kernel" in the entry for T-Engine, but T-Kernel, the software can run on any suitable hardware, and should have its own entry. I don't want to expand that section into a full blown explanation of what T-Kernel is: after all, the main entry is for
2569:
I wonder whether you can help me. I am creating a page about the composer Alexander Rudd. It is my first article so I am adding sources and references slowly. I have entered the name of the article 'Alexander rudd', please could you advise me on how I can correct it to "Alexander Rudd"?!!
1106:
Blade, I'm sending you a real Valentine in real life, I'm simply delivering it electronically. :-) That's for being so sweet, mature and rational (in real life). It's not necessary to have a girlfriend to be recognized as a decent human being and a true gentleman that you are! And I thought
735:
Itsmejudith has since come around to be more reasonable, and others have noticed the misbehavior of JJB, but David in DC's continued negative characterizations of both the GRG and Knowledge articles on supercentenarians in general is now the biggest problem, assuming JJB's wings are clipped
808:
Words and actions often don't match up. I note that David in DC may seem to be OK with the GRG as a source on the Wikiproject:WOP board, but in several AFD's he went way beyond that, accusing the GRG of being "self-published" (not true), a "data dump" (the data is processed, not dumped),
2226:
ok on content, I think, but have never really cracked the style issues. As a possible incentive I see you're interested in Asian history and speak some Japanese. Josiah Conder, whom you may know as the father of modern Japanese architecture, was a pupil of Burges. Thanks and regards.
1458:
Right. They have already been given the necessary information about editing--but this is a much more straightforward article than the usual spam that is written in such circumstances, of which I have deleted literally thousands. COI makes it very difficult, but not impossible, to edit
2452:
thinks she's solved all her problems by taking up an unexpectedly high-brow hobby: translating Latin. The language has given her magical powers, enabling her to ward-off the frenzied attention of her adoring fans, and the British Library offers an ideal refuge from the hordes.
2423:
I saw that you informed me of the possible deletion of the said article. I don't want anything like that to happen. I will remove the template for now, giving the reason that I want time to improve. Could you give me tips on what I am missing out? Will be appreciated!Thanks!
1177:
Wouldn't it be handy if the offending words could be highlighted in some way, or maybe the consecutive words that make it qualify? Just a thought. Otherwise in a large article it must be very difficult and you could end up making the thing clumsy and verbose, unnecessarily?
1126:
Hi there. Thanks for your response at AN/I. What does "globally locked" mean? How/when/why is one globally locked, and how does one get unlocked? I wanted to ask here, so as not to veer off-topic and (further) broadcast my ignorance on such a wide forum as AN/I. Thanks,
1026:
Anyway, to cut a long story short, the initial attempt was considered a spam article that tries to promote T-Kernel and was tagged for "speedy deletion" and is gone now in less than 24 hours. Maybe my justification or rationalization for the entry was not good enough.
131:
4. While you seem more reasonable than JJB (religious fanatic and self-proclaimed paranoid psychotic) and David in DC (who tries to be a ham while "sticking it to" people to irritate them), I'm concerned about whether the Knowledge "whack a mole" tendency is all fair.
1946:
Your conduct was more exemplary than mine, I should add. It was difficult being caught between your friend and the rest of the community, and you did it without alienating anyone. I wish the situation had ended better, but your esteem has definitely risen with me. —
1045:
T-Engine, the hardware. Growing the subsection will be akin to have a Windows or MS-DOS section for Intel x86 CPU chip hardware entry in wikipedia. It doesn't make a sense much since Windows (at least some versions) run on different CPUs (DEC Alpha, MIPS CPU, etc.).
149:
I'm posting this because you seem rather more mundane and reasonable than JJB or David in DC. David in DC is NOT under the same influence as JJB, but rather he seems to be egotistical and still edits based on his personal whim rather than what outside sources say.
704:
has a Ph.D., for example). The data is not "dumped" but is instead processed. This process can take a long time, which is why the Knowledge articles are often updated before the GRG is. So, to suggest that the GRG is a data dump is just being nasty and negative.
1107:
Valentine's Day was an appropriate time to do that. Also, when my personal life starts to suffer, that's when I know it's time to get off the computer and find some real people to interact with, but that's just me. :) It's been a pleasure running into you here!
849:
So, is there anything left to argue about? A careful reading shows that I am in agreement with you and even Itsmejudith, but not David in DC's negative commentary, which may not be enough to get him banned but should at least warrant a fairminded admonishment.
2210:
Hi, just created this article. It would be really helpful if you could give some indication of the cleanup required. Although not a novice in terms of time on Knowledge, I've never really mastered the finer points of style. Many thanks and best regards.
1275:
Are you JJB's deputy? If not, why did you reply to my question to him? I never said I wanted an immediate answer to his question, just that I wished to see one. Even if the question is public, keep your nose out of matters that don't concern you. Good day.
250:(although I must say I like that song), but I'm a New Page Patroller who stumbled across this by chance; I have no stake in this. Trust me; I have no love for religious views on longevity, I'm a strong agnostic. More to follow if I can find the time.
1734:
I am quite new at posting on wikipedia, but my pages for the bands Rings of Saturn and Waking the Cadaver, both releasing albums on labels and both not on here, were deleted, when I thought i had put in some good work on them. Explanation please?
2669:
Specifically, when marking pages as patrolled is it necessary to tag less urgent problems, (like orphan, reorganise, references are bare urls...) or is it okay to only tag pages for big problems (notability, advert, copyright etc.)? For example,
2046:. It has not been my intention to promote or advertise EASL; I simply wanted to create an encyclopaedic article that people could use for reference. I’d value your feedback on the article, so that I can soon move it into the "article space".
1767:
Excuse me saying so, but adding a tag saying an article needs a clean-up and not saying how except pointing to the Talk page where the only post is my explanation of the source doesn't really help too much. Tell me what you think needs doing.
2674:
I tagged as needing a lead, but in retrospect feel that was a bit tag-happy, as it's pretty obvious anyway, and it seems quite picky to put the tag on a new article. Would it have been ok to just mark that page as patrolled without tagging?
502:
FWIW I made a request to the Oversight account. Putting the note here so as to not further muddy the edits that need to be redacted. I don't know where the other 'discussion' took place, so hopefully Daniel and Fred will be forthcoming.
1582:
Thank you for the link correction. I clearly remember taking the test in school, you know the one where you have to read, comprehend, and then follow instructions, but it wasn't in HTML! :) Also, feel free to disagree, I won't get upset.
838:
A family member applies to the GRG to have "grandma" on the GRG list. The applying family is the original source, the GRG is publishing the material. I don't put my own family members on the GRG lists. It is not a self-published source.
167:
The fact of the matter is, the GRG is cited by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Guinness World Records, the AP, APF, etc. Not only that, it's a NONPROFIT organization. So one can argue whether COI even applies to the GRG.
1033:
Now, for real-time OS, Knowledge has only these "entries" (taken from at the end of "VxWorks" entry, and I think it is very insufficient. It doesn't seem to have all the names in the "list of real-time operating systems." even.
1022:
Hi, I tried to create an entry for "T-Kernel" a free real-time OS kernel, meant for embedded devices, i.e., devices with embedded computers such as FAX machines, laser printers, digital cameras, or automobiles these days, etc..
1474:, check to see if there's a hangon tag also, which of course must also be removed, for it continues to list the article for speedy deletion. . Beginners sometimes put it in odd places--in this case, it was at the bottom.
2485:-reader that turns her world upside-down. Keeley learns a valuable lesson that appearances can be deceiving. Her journey of discovery reveals the extent in which she yearns for exactly what she is trying to escape from.
163:
Note that we have several issues. First off, many/most supercentenarians are deceased, and most of the "living" articles are just lists. Those don't fall under BLP. That leaves only a few articles under BLP to discuss.
2440:
Hey Blade, this is my first time posting so I am sorry for any obvious ignorant mistakes. I was flagged up from the following copyright infringement but do you not think the two text versions have been changed enough?
156:
1. ArbCom behavior of editors (including JJB and his multiple transgressions). I can see where some might find me over-the-top, but most of the time I am like a linebacker pointing out a false start on the other side.
1782:
Thanks - these things happen! No problem, I can work on it myself if you're busy now I know what the issue is. I'm going to come back to it anyway, but I wanted to put up the basics up without too much delay after
1565:
471:, which I tagged. "Mount everest migration is what happens annually when Hindu Sherpas move the mountain from india into China. It is a sacred ritual, and has been occurring for the last 10 million years."
2460:-reader in the country she hadn't bargained for, Keeley is given a lesson in not judging books by their covers. Her journey of discovery will reveal just how far she's come to rely on the advantages of fame.
780:
USA and sends the material to Germany, and the info. isn't about Louis but is about supercentenarians. Or perhaps the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research or the International Database on Longevity.
1841:- not the same thing as the drivel posted, but a genuine place for the term. I'm surprised it hadn't already been created as a redirect. Keep up the good work. I see your name around a lot in my patrolling.
1345:
You said you didn't delete my page, so who did??? Also, since you said that that anthem wasn't real, prove it! I can prove that the anthem of Buryatia was real!!! Get a Chinese Admin to go on that website (
321:
845:
I am arguing that listing a supercentenarian on the GRG or the OHB (my competitor, Louis Epstein) should be sufficient to qualify a supercentenarian for inclusion on a LIST, not as a standalone biography.
227:
I ask you this: my personal article, how many reliable sources did it have? Do I write the Atlanta Journal-Constitution? One could argue "local notability," but that doesn't mean the source isn't reliable.
985:
Your wish is granted - I just wanted to thank you for being so quick in adding the unreferenced tag to the article I just created on The Krazy Gang. Would you be a New Page patroller, by any chance?
2175:
just written the article, that for the moment I can't see the wood for the trees and if you could point out to me which areas are of concern so they can be corrected it would be of great help.
900:
For all your thoughtful comments at my defense,. (And for your NPP activities and common sense on deletion of nonsense, of course!) Have a great time on this site until you're chased out, too! —
657:
128:
3. Whether I warrant an article or not, this was deleted before I even had a chance to read what it said. So, I was more concerned with that than whether the article should or should not exist.
2407:
1673:
1011:
646:
Thanks!!!! That's the 2nd barnstar, and I do appreciate it. I love NPP, and I wouldn't give it up for anything (on-wiki, that is); the recognition isn't necessary, but it's sure thoughtful.
2742:
2728:
2703:
1721:
1171:
261:
949:
732:
in ways that are inappripriate. Itsmejudith tried to delete the articles on Longevity Myths and on Oldest People. Ironically, JJB and I agreed on at least one thing...that was a bad idea.
543:
529:
482:
462:
445:
429:
412:
396:
379:
279:
88:
1600:
1318:
1157:
2295:
2161:
2068:
is one of the most indispensable tasks at Knowledge. I hope that you will continue to broadcast that message, which you put across far more eloquently than I did. Regards, --
1612:
310:
2792:
1622:
I didn't realise I violated any policies so I have been quick to remove those potential violations from the Earthcore talk page. So what's next re getting unblocked ? Fisted Rainbow
1598:
1501:
1485:
1453:
2021:
2007:
2666:
I've decided to try some new page patrolling. I've done a few today but am not sure in certain cases if I'm doing it right, so wondered if you'd be willing to mentor me a little?
1681:
1606:
Hi, I left him a message and deleted the page. I hope we don't have to block them for that (IMO G11 is a bit far fetched, I stretched the policy a bit to delete these pages). --
1564:
Hi Blade, I'm attempting to delete 3 useless lists and I think I followed the instructions, but you may want to double check. Feel free to comment while you're there. Thank you.
783:
In conclusion, David in DC has gotten away with a lot, in part because he is a long-term established editor. But much of his editing reflects personal bias, not outside sources.
288:
868:
773:
193:, is that they are covered in national sources, the articles are about the person (non-trivial mention), and the age was mentioned before (i.e, 113th birthday in March 2010).
2847:
2278:
1657:
1301:
2777:
1076:
696:
Fact: I don't generally create articles on supercentenarians any more. And when I did, I waited until they were at least 113 and had coverage in sources beyond the local.
2391:
674:
1. Reliability is established by outside sources, not editorial opinion. 2. Yet, we see David in DC in particular make a lot of unsubstantiated allegations. For example:
2823:
1238:
our group starts work. Please revise the deletion because there is a lot of good information on the important author, Maurice Mierau. thanks and hopefully you can help.
1334:
2556:
2382:
are automated taggers and do generate false positives as well as finding copies of public domain material and other situations which can require some in-depth review.
363:
2934:
689:
B. The longevity articles on Knowledge are a "walled garden" that needs pruning. Nonsense. We've already had a lot of trimming. Some of the articles deleted, such as
2756:
2319:
1307:
468:
2719:
I'm not sure what to do about this article - would you leave it or nominate it for deletion? It only has an infobox and no references, but might well be notable.--
2772:
2687:
1592:
1405:
1151:
2911:
2663:
1396:
You get to know the style - or perhaps it's because I write that I'm sensitive to styles. Also, as in this case, if they've done it once they'll do it twice...
1187:
270:
the reaction to Charles Darwin and the Scopes Monkey Trial. There are important issues at stake, and I have expressed my opinion. What else am I supposed to do?
236:
125:
article. However, I think that article should start with persons from 100+ years ago, like Thomas Emley Young. So, yes, I agree there is a bit of "recentism."
2043:
1439:
1096:
246:
calling for your head here. I don't want to see you banned from Knowledge, because I think you have valuable contributions. I know it's easy to see this as
2592:
2571:
1755:
1296:
1825:
1811:
1796:
1777:
1490:
Whoops; I usually remember to do that. In fact, last night I also found a redirect that for some reason was categorized under db-nonsense. Thanks again.
1227:
1213:
2604:
2579:
2515:
2240:
928:
908:
800:
458:
425:
392:
359:
67:
2893:
Knowledge already contains a few articles on other gem and mineral shows,including the Tucson Show, the Munich Show, and the Sainte-Marie-aux-Mines Show.
2057:
2625:
786:
I note that the GRG list of validated supercentenarians exceeds 1,000 entries, while the Knowledge list only does the top 100. Is less than 10% too much?
2435:
2235:
2220:
2195:
190:
224:
5. David in DC has a tendency to misstate the truth in AFD's, often claiming "no sources" when articles had one, two, or even seven or eight sources.
2323:
1068:
2956:
2536:
932:
828:
reader some idea of how closely-conforming the maximum-attained ages for all humans are when sufficient standards of age verification are employed.
2617:
2886:
that), but for other activities including museum exhibits, lectures, and meetings of local, regional, national, and international organizations.
1956:
1871:
912:
795:
217:
3. We need a discussion of the GRG and reliability. Remember, BLP rules don't apply for dead persons, and don't apply for non-biography articles.
2926:
2903:
2784:
2548:
2503:
1637:
1136:
971:
922:
902:
842:
Thus, we have FOUR misrepresentations about the GRG by David in DC in just one AFD. This has been a repeating pattern, not an isolated incident.
690:
637:
452:
419:
386:
353:
271:
61:
1970:
1938:
1850:
628:
I know how much new page patrollers only get noticed when they mess up. Don't think it's always that way, as I like the work you do. Thank you!
142:
Yet, we have JJB then attacking Rejuvenation Research. It seems that he has no limit. Moreover, he continues to not follow Wiki protocol, from:
2417:
2039:
1576:
1432:
1017:
994:
2652:
1989:
1030:
Anyway, my point is that T-Kernel is being used in many applications along with its predecessor implementations based on ITRON specification.
599:
337:
31:
hello Blade of the Northern Lights as you nominate for speedy deletion again the person has deleted your remark try to violate rule link is
2872:
2096:
1863:
758:
In my honest opinion, I have already suggested an objective drawing of the line, with a very high standard, for extreme age and notability:
71:
2541:
2367:
2360:
1216:
Awww okay thanks! Also what does happen to the pages that don't get patrolled that are less then a month old that dispear off the backlog?
1116:
512:
2916:
2713:
2144:
2077:
1897:
1388:
1350:) and make him search for Buryatia!!! Humph! By gum, don't be such an #$ $ . P.S. Stop swearing.Brian Zhao 23:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
46:
2900:
I'd be happy to rewrite the piece if you can tell me what you found objectionable, but I think the deletion was completely unwarranted.
1052:
Probably starting a discussion in the computer project would be nice, but not sure which discussion page of which entry should be used.
2798:
2636:
2401:
2289:
2155:
1667:
1495:
1447:
1005:
943:
651:
523:
476:
439:
406:
373:
255:
82:
17:
2810:
A little bit of backstory: today I've been doing some work with removing/commenting out non-free images outside of article space, per
2396:
Yeah, I know that; every once in a while, I forget to check. It's not typical; that's the exception, as my contributions will show.
1061:
PS: I am not even sure if this "edit" is the right way to leave a message to you, but I have no other means to contact you, it seems.
1041:
RT-Thread · SINTRAN III · Symbian · Talon DSP RTOS · THEOS · ThreadX · TNKernel · TPF · TRON · µC/OS-II · VRTX · VxWorks · Windows CE
816:
It seems that others aren't getting what I'm saying. Negative comments like those made at several AFD's by David in DC (such as here:
121:
2. As discussed in the 2007 AFD, Carcharoth, Crusio, and others agreed that there was enough material on me to add a paragraph to the
1885:
712:
186:
in NYC and the fire story being covered in multiple sources. In a case like that, it's not only "one event" but a trivial mention.
1927:
2616:
I've added several references in this article so, Can we remove the warning about it needs "refimprove"? Thank you very much.--
2121:
2113:
2082:
563:
2921:
Yeah, I know this is clunky but how to reply to a message isn't all that clear and the help screens aren't all that helpful.
2877:
2397:
2285:
2151:
1995:
1663:
1491:
1443:
1001:
939:
647:
519:
472:
435:
402:
369:
251:
78:
2600:
2133:
1262:
1081:
94:
2463:
A warped retelling of Ovid's most famous myth, Venus and Adonis, and a comic study of society's obsession with the image.
109:
The only thing I noted was you reported this page creation (by Plyjacks) to David in DC, who then tagged it for deletion.
2315:
1629:
1193:
1055:
Your suggestion where to start discussion how to approach enhancing the list of entries for real-time OS is appreciated.
242:
I'll address the substance of this issue tomorrow, when I have time; for now, I just want you to be 100% clear that I am
112:
I would have felt a lot more comfortable had a neutral, third-party person noticed the article and made a judgment call.
1862:
Please read what I have written in the talk page of the article and take in mind that the article will be improved soon
1762:
1751:
1645:
1290:
740:
delete "old" articles about supercentenarians in the past smacks of recentist biase. It's easier to delete articles on
2803:
OK, I'm in kind of a weird situation here and didn't know exactly what to do, but I noticed you've been commenting in
2167:
1816:
Not to worry, I've come back here and the small font has returned. Best to pretend nothing happened. Thanks anyway!
2671:
2640:
708:
299:
And then the guy decided to revert it (it is a spam thing as I can tell) so how can I send another warning? Thanks!
2474:
plays herself as a model who is trying to escape from her hounding fans by seeking refuge translating latin in the
2415:
2205:
2478:. She finds this new hobby gives her magical powers enabling her to ward off the unwanted attention she receives.
518:
I've asked Fred Bauder at his talkpage to explain his thought process; discussion will most likely happen there.
2768:
2738:
2724:
2699:
2683:
1550:
1366:
707:
E. "The GRG is non-Western-biased." This accusation came after JJBulten and David in DC deleted articles such as
2511:
1729:
1270:
1049:
loss where to start discussing. There was NO mention of real-time OS in the project page if I am not mistaken.
2733:
On second thoughts, as there's references available from google, I think I'll just improve that one myself.--
2611:
2029:
2712:
Cheers, I think I'm starting to get the hang of it, going slowly through them. Feel free to critique any of
1162:
Don't really know how the system works yet, fully, can you remove the tag please? I think I have done enough
2104:
938:
I will; you keep it up too. I'll help this place, and by extension the whole internet, try to suck less.
2843:
2191:
2764:
2734:
2720:
2695:
2679:
2657:
2561:
2017:
2003:
1985:
122:
2495:
I thought they differed significantly enough. Apologies if not and I shall have to reword it further
2371:
2939:
1855:
1802:
have large legible type but I prefer to squeeze more on my page of display. Any advice appreciated.
1413:
571:
343:
Blade, you have email turned off. Send me one and I can reply with the info I just sent Daniel Case.
36:
2596:
2575:
2522:
2168:
1258:
768:
2. Mini-bios are warranted when the person was the oldest in the nation or among the oldest (i.e.,
761:
1. Individual articles are warranted when coverage is continuing and exceeds the local news (i.e.,
633:
561:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
2034:
Thanks for getting back to me. I’ve been through and extensively edited the article in line with
1559:
1633:
1121:
873:
2822:, a user I've never before come in contact with. Shortly after (less than an hour later), I got
135:
I note, for example, that the GRG has material published by a third-party source, such as here:
2839:
2387:
1830:
1747:
1653:
1285:
857:
I don't see anyone on "my side" arguing for or against any proposed punishment for me, do you?
663:
434:
And indeed I do. I'll be around for NPP, for the time being at least; we'll have to carry on.
77:
Oh for fuck's sake, how did that get through? I'll probably renominate it in a month or two.
174:
Rather, I have been opposing blanket deletions of articles based on policy misinterpretation.
2819:
2301:
2013:
1999:
1981:
1966:
1952:
1934:
1471:
1314:
1308:
User talk:David in DC#The_least_surprising_topic-ban_violation_in_the_history_of_the_world...
990:
595:
333:
726:
139:
I'll respond there. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
106:
I'll respond there. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
2890:
not affiliated with the Greater Denver Area Gem and Mineral Council and its member clubs.
2865:
2815:
2630:
2588:
2499:
2354:
2311:
2179:
2092:
2053:
1739:
1625:
1538:
1354:
1250:
1072:
214:
2. We need to have JJBulten dialed back from his "blacklisting" all who disagree with him.
8:
2827:
2621:
2532:
2375:
1546:
1362:
1254:
629:
819:
677:
2951:
2930:
2907:
2788:
2552:
2507:
2249:
2242:
1902:
1893:
1379:
Not only is it spam, I've just added copyvio, like the other one from the same stable.
539:
508:
275:
247:
56:
2947:
2940:
2648:
2383:
2073:
1856:
1846:
1821:
1807:
1792:
1773:
1743:
1649:
1617:
1588:
1572:
1414:
1401:
1384:
1277:
1147:
1132:
1112:
1101:
1092:
980:
967:
51:
2716:. What tools do you use when you're new page patrolling? I've started using twinkle.
2284:
Ah; the link was broken, that's why I missed it. Thanks for cleaning up after me.
1340:
723:
You can register and logon. By the way, did you notice I'm listed as a contributor?
2925:
it anywhere, and I had to start over from scratch. Is there a trick to doing this?
2852:
2489:
2274:
2264:
2141:
2112:
2100:
1962:
1948:
1930:
1867:
1707:
1310:
1223:
1209:
1184:
1168:
986:
882:
604:
591:
558:
Hello, The Blade of the Northern Lights. Please check your email; you've got mail!
346:
329:
325:
315:
306:
43:
26:
2125:
2858:
2835:
2475:
2431:
2349:
2187:
2062:
2049:
1838:
1784:
1644:
I too have received a message from this user, and have replied at some length at
1374:
762:
745:
160:
2. Wiki policy regarding "reliable sources" and "biographies of living persons".
2253:
1566:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Shenzhen Stock Exchange/List of listed companies
171:
COI "might" apply to Guinness World Records, but I'm not adding GWR citations.
37:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Need_For_Speed_Hot_Pursuit&redirect=no
2811:
2804:
2528:
2329:
2257:
2231:
2216:
2129:
2088:
pick up considering that they seem me matters of public utility. make me know.
2035:
1876:
1831:
1542:
1470:
On a related topic, when you remove a speedy tag, as you very correctly did at
1358:
1326:
860:
787:
752:
228:
1241:
671:
Let's take a closer look at the disputes regarding supercentenarian articles.
2471:
2449:
1889:
1481:
1428:
1347:
535:
504:
200:
1961:
Wow ... fastest response I've ever gotten to a barnstar. Again, impressive.
2644:
2635:
Hi Blade, This is a photo I nominated for deletion: File:Khalid-Saeed.jpg
2069:
1842:
1817:
1803:
1788:
1769:
1584:
1568:
1397:
1380:
1143:
1128:
1108:
1088:
963:
769:
581:
2269:
2137:
1975:
1219:
1205:
1179:
1163:
741:
302:
40:
2248:
Just a courtesy note that I have declined your request to speedy delete
2132:
has already been contested for this article, so we have a discussion at
1421:
have been going too fast sometimes. I've been known to do that myself
211:
1. Most of my "violations" have been pointing out other transgressions.
178:
cases are cited nationally or internationally (such as Frank Buckles).
2664:
Knowledge:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#We_need_more_New_Page_Patrollers
2467:
2445:
2427:
2379:
2183:
1690:
1232:
820:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tase_Matsunaga
678:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tase_Matsunaga
2227:
2212:
2882:
Why did you delete the piece on the Denver Gem & Mineral Show?
2344:
brings me to a site about biofuels, not a military leadership site.
1911:
718:
700:
cases, the coverage was over a period of time, often several years.
2857:
I would like you to give assistance now that I have rollback back.
2527:
Thanks for the prod and note on my talk page. Much appreciated! -
1607:
1523:
1519:
1476:
1423:
1199:
the past 24 hours due to the fact we have so many patrollers now!)
1306:
Please review and, if so moved, comment at my enforcement request
854:
have recused himself from commenting on JJB's possible topic ban.
118:
1. I did not know that Plyjacks planned to re-create the article.
467:
If you need a laugh on the way out; here's the entire content of
328:, who decided that was the place for the RFC, rather than RFC/U.
2267:, so I have turned it into a redirect to the artist's article. —
2337:
2330:
1526:. Actually, there is. Brian Zhao 16:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
613:
39:
to what I assume is an uncontroversial redirect, is that ok?--
2488:
This film is a twisted retelling of Ovid's most famous myth,
1158:
Speedy deletion nomination of Home Office Drugs Inspectorate
1087:
page, I'll delete the image — but not really in any other.
958:
813:
rank), much like a Knowledge list of editors by edit count.
32:
2547:(Popov & Hem) or named after him (both incomplete). --
2306:
1513:
2482:
2457:
2341:
727:
http://www.supercentenarians.org/project_contributors.htm
401:
I just sent myself a message; it should be working now.
2366:
I've also noticed a few other G12s you tagged recently:
1682:
For defending our right to be light hearted sometimes...
1534:
I understand. Brian Zhao 22:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
289:
How do I warn someone about reverting speedy deletions?
1888:
has come back... different user name - same nonsense.
1302:
The least surprising topic ban violation in the world
809:"unreliable," "biased", and lots of other negatives.
324:, I think you would be best taking up that case with
2826:
on my talk page from Soewinhan, asking me to review
2778:
MANHATTAN Personal Computing Products Speedy Delete?
294:
1662:Thank you; I will continue any discussion there.
2374:. Maybe this is a good time to remind you that
1246:Hi why speed deletion, this article is useful.
2040:European Association for the Study of Diabetes
751:David in DC's push to delete articles such as
35:useless page I changed your CSD on this page:
1438:Yes, and it didn't help that the creator was
189:What's different, when you have someone like
182:this one doesn't have significant coverage."
2012:Uh oh...NPP is getting filled up again... --
1646:User talk:Fisted Rainbow#Unblock request etc
801:List-Format Notability versus Bio-Notability
1037:List of entry names at the end of VxWorks:
2637:Knowledge:Files for deletion/2011 March 15
2083:Fondazione Sigma-Tau & Claudio Cavazza
1348:http://www2.lidicity.com/flags/index2.html
201:http://www.custance.org/old/seed/ch5s.html
33:http://en.wikipedia.org/Govind_Kumar_Singh
18:User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights
1926:For walking a fine line with ease during
1787:got turned back at Vancouver yesterday.
1688:
880:
611:
450:Yes, well keep up your shitty work! ;) —
2307:http://en.wikipedia.org/CheckMyARMonline
1202:So why do you put that as well? Thanks!
957:
713:List of South American supercentenarians
2584:Many thanks for reading and your help
153:So, we have several issues to discuss:
14:
2814:. Some of the pages I came across was
2694:mark it as patrolled before tagging?--
2466:I then changed to: - PLOT: Model and
2336:I'm not seeing the copyvio problem in
2042:’s article. I’ve saved the article at
1909:
2643:Can you offer any additional advice?
2120:Hi. I noticed that you proposed that
1881:Hi The Blade of the Northern Lights,
2752:Me again. I found a situation where
2134:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/NE0N
1713:
894:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
562:
266:To the Blade of the Northern Lights,
2946:You requested a speedy deletion of
2917:Denver Gem & Mineral Show reply
1518:You said there wasn't an anthem of
534:Yep, have it watchlisted. Thanks!
23:
2799:Something weird about Soewinhan...
1601:User:Keegan Lukaszuk (Prince Alex)
1142:Ah, thanks for the clarification!
748:, but that doesn't make it right.
551:
24:
2967:
2807:'s ANI, and this relates to him.
2662:Hiya, Following your comments at
2641:Knowledge:Non-free content review
2639:The discussion is happening here
2456:But when she meets Adam, the one
719:http://www.supercentenarians.org/
709:List of African supercentenarians
622:The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
295:http://en.wikipedia.org/Politemps
2398:The Blade of the Northern Lights
2286:The Blade of the Northern Lights
2152:The Blade of the Northern Lights
1910:
1689:
1664:The Blade of the Northern Lights
1492:The Blade of the Northern Lights
1444:The Blade of the Northern Lights
1180:
1164:
1002:The Blade of the Northern Lights
940:The Blade of the Northern Lights
881:
648:The Blade of the Northern Lights
612:
520:The Blade of the Northern Lights
473:The Blade of the Northern Lights
436:The Blade of the Northern Lights
403:The Blade of the Northern Lights
370:The Blade of the Northern Lights
293:Okay I put one up on this page:
252:The Blade of the Northern Lights
79:The Blade of the Northern Lights
772:of the UK, to be placed in the
208:So, when all is said and done:
1980:OMG did we clear NPP again? --
1286:
13:
1:
2878:Denver Gem & Mineral Show
2058:23:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
2022:19:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
2008:19:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1990:19:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1957:19:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1939:19:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1898:06:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
1872:20:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
1851:19:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
1826:00:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
1812:23:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
1797:23:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
1778:22:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
1756:14:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
1722:12:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
1674:17:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
1658:12:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
1638:11:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
1613:09:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
1593:00:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
1577:00:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
1502:19:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1486:17:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1454:17:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1433:15:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1406:23:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
1389:22:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
1335:22:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1319:15:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1297:11:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
1291:
1228:17:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1214:17:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1188:03:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1172:02:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1152:00:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
1137:22:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
1117:15:26, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
1097:12:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
1077:10:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
1012:00:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
995:00:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
972:22:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
950:05:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
933:16:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
913:16:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
869:00:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
796:20:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1708:
1278:
1082:List of Rural banks in Ghana
1018:Deletion of "T-Kernel Entry"
920:And that's the last edit. —
774:List of UK supercentenarians
658:22:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
638:21:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
600:20:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
567:at any time by removing the
544:18:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
530:18:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
513:17:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
483:17:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
463:17:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
446:17:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
430:17:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
413:17:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
397:17:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
380:17:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
364:17:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
338:16:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
311:19:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
280:17:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
262:05:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
237:05:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
95:Robert Young (gerontologist)
89:16:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
72:15:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
47:18:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
7:
2263:That said, the album fails
962:Happy Valentines day! From
10:
2972:
2957:23:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
2935:17:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
2912:17:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
2873:17:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
2848:17:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
2793:18:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
2773:17:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
2743:14:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
2729:14:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
2704:17:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
2688:17:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
2653:00:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
2626:09:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
2605:22:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
2580:22:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
2557:22:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
2542:about "Yu A Popov" article
2537:17:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
2516:11:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2436:03:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
2241:Speedy deletion declined:
1763:Prescribed senior official
1699:The Barnstar of Good Humor
123:Extreme longevity tracking
2481:She then meets Adam, one
2408:14:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2392:13:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
2361:23:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2324:22:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2296:21:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2279:19:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2236:19:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2221:19:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2196:15:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
2162:04:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
2145:04:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
2078:12:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
1971:04:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
1916:
1695:
1442:. Thanks for the note.
890:
618:
2444:From: - PLOT: Model and
2256:does not apply, because
2206:All Saints Church, Fleet
2150:Thanks for the notice.
1599:Re: Your AIV reporty on
417:You should have mail. —
349:that I'm not happy with.
102:Regarding this dispute:
2169:Goodliffe's Abracadabra
1884:This is the fifth time
469:Mount everest migration
322:the turn this just took
2342:http://www.caldol.net/
1837:I've redirected it to
1730:Why were these deleted
1271:ArbCom question to JJB
974:
556:
2820:User:Hybernator/test2
2765:Physics is all gnomes
2735:Physics is all gnomes
2721:Physics is all gnomes
2696:Physics is all gnomes
2680:Physics is all gnomes
2612:Web Medica Acreditada
2030:EASL article deletion
1472:Pete Moore (composer)
1341:Who deleted my page?!
961:
555:
2816:User:Hybernator/test
2347:What am I missing?--
2044:User:FabioMarra/EASL
1440:User:RoyalCruiseLine
345:No socks here, just
2828:Prehistory of Burma
2376:User:CorenSearchBot
1067:I am adding my sig
2658:NPP advice please?
2562:Hello there Blade!
2250:Transtorno bipolar
2243:Transtorno bipolar
1242:Why speed deletion
975:
835:The way I see it:
564:remove this notice
557:
221:"conflict" arose.
2948:Albert Verrecchia
2941:Albert Verrecchia
2840:Fletch the Mighty
2608:
2591:comment added by
2519:
2502:comment added by
2314:comment added by
2199:
2182:comment added by
2109:
2095:comment added by
1944:
1943:
1857:Sidi Fredj Halimi
1759:
1742:comment added by
1727:
1726:
1628:comment added by
1555:
1541:comment added by
1415:Royal Cruise Line
1371:
1357:comment added by
1267:
1253:comment added by
1194:"Unpatrolled log"
931:
918:
917:
911:
643:
642:
461:
428:
395:
362:
350:
70:
2963:
2954:
2869:
2862:
2761:
2755:
2714:my contributions
2607:
2585:
2523:Kendall Marshall
2518:
2496:
2490:Venus and Adonis
2404:
2359:
2357:
2352:
2326:
2292:
2260:has an article.
2198:
2176:
2158:
2108:
2089:
2014:Highspeedrailguy
2000:Highspeedrailguy
1982:Highspeedrailguy
1914:
1907:
1906:
1758:
1736:
1719:
1712:
1693:
1686:
1685:
1670:
1640:
1610:
1554:
1535:
1498:
1450:
1370:
1351:
1332:
1329:
1293:
1288:
1282:
1266:
1247:
1182:
1166:
1058:TIA Zephyrusjp.
1008:
946:
927:
921:
907:
901:
885:
878:
877:
866:
863:
793:
790:
755:was overturned.
654:
616:
609:
608:
588:
586:
580:
576:
570:
566:
554:
526:
479:
457:
451:
442:
424:
418:
409:
391:
385:
376:
358:
352:
344:
258:
234:
231:
191:Mississippi Winn
85:
66:
60:
2971:
2970:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2952:
2944:
2919:
2880:
2867:
2860:
2855:
2836:User talk:Okkar
2801:
2780:
2759:
2753:
2660:
2633:
2614:
2586:
2564:
2544:
2525:
2497:
2476:British Library
2421:
2402:
2355:
2350:
2348:
2334:
2309:
2304:
2290:
2246:
2208:
2177:
2172:
2156:
2118:
2090:
2085:
2065:
2032:
1978:
1905:
1879:
1860:
1839:Leather culture
1835:
1785:Srdja Trifkovic
1765:
1737:
1732:
1684:
1668:
1623:
1620:
1608:
1604:
1562:
1536:
1516:
1496:
1448:
1418:
1377:
1352:
1343:
1330:
1327:
1304:
1273:
1248:
1244:
1235:
1196:
1160:
1124:
1122:Globally locked
1104:
1084:
1020:
1006:
983:
944:
925:
905:
876:
874:Been a pleasure
864:
861:
803:
791:
788:
763:Walter Breuning
746:Walter Breuning
666:
652:
607:
589:
584:
578:
574:
572:You've got mail
568:
560:
552:
524:
477:
455:
440:
422:
407:
389:
374:
356:
318:
291:
256:
232:
229:
97:
83:
64:
54:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2969:
2943:
2938:
2918:
2915:
2879:
2876:
2854:
2851:
2805:User:Soewinhan
2800:
2797:
2783:other brands.
2779:
2776:
2757:db-unpatrolled
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2717:
2707:
2706:
2659:
2656:
2632:
2629:
2613:
2610:
2593:Johnholmes1981
2572:Johnholmes1981
2563:
2560:
2543:
2540:
2524:
2521:
2420:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2333:
2328:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2258:Porta (rapper)
2245:
2239:
2207:
2204:
2202:
2171:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2117:
2111:
2084:
2081:
2064:
2061:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
1977:
1974:
1942:
1941:
1923:
1922:
1920:Civility Award
1917:
1915:
1904:
1901:
1878:
1875:
1859:
1854:
1834:
1832:Leather people
1829:
1764:
1761:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1702:
1701:
1696:
1694:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1619:
1616:
1603:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1417:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1376:
1373:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1303:
1300:
1272:
1269:
1255:Dominiquewikki
1243:
1240:
1234:
1233:Maurice Mierau
1231:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1123:
1120:
1103:
1100:
1083:
1080:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
982:
979:
977:
955:
953:
952:
916:
915:
897:
896:
891:
889:
887:
875:
872:
802:
799:
753:Tase Matsunaga
736:sufficiently.
665:
664:Walled Garden?
662:
661:
660:
641:
640:
630:Reaper Eternal
625:
624:
619:
617:
606:
603:
559:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
320:Leaving aside
317:
314:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
267:
205:See figure 2.
96:
93:
92:
91:
53:
50:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2968:
2959:
2958:
2955:
2949:
2942:
2937:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2922:
2914:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2898:
2894:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2875:
2874:
2871:
2870:
2864:
2863:
2850:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2831:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2808:
2806:
2796:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2758:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2676:
2673:
2667:
2665:
2655:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2628:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2609:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2567:
2559:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2539:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2520:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2493:
2491:
2486:
2484:
2479:
2477:
2473:
2472:Keeley Hazell
2469:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2454:
2451:
2450:Keeley Hazell
2447:
2442:
2438:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2419:
2409:
2405:
2399:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2353:
2345:
2343:
2339:
2332:
2327:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2316:173.69.169.99
2313:
2308:
2302:one to delete
2297:
2293:
2287:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2266:
2261:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2244:
2238:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2170:
2163:
2159:
2153:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2115:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2080:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2060:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1921:
1918:
1913:
1908:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1882:
1874:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1760:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1717:
1711:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1675:
1671:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1630:211.28.221.57
1627:
1615:
1614:
1611:
1602:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1560:It's me again
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1533:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1503:
1499:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1473:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1416:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1349:
1336:
1333:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1289:
1283:
1281:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1239:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1200:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1013:
1009:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
978:
973:
969:
965:
960:
956:
951:
947:
941:
937:
936:
935:
934:
930:
924:
914:
910:
904:
899:
898:
895:
892:
888:
884:
879:
871:
870:
867:
858:
855:
851:
847:
843:
840:
836:
833:
829:
825:
822:
821:
817:
814:
810:
806:
798:
797:
794:
784:
781:
777:
775:
771:
766:
764:
759:
756:
754:
749:
747:
743:
737:
733:
729:
728:
724:
721:
720:
716:
714:
710:
705:
701:
697:
694:
692:
691:Louisa Thiers
687:
683:
680:
679:
675:
672:
669:
659:
655:
649:
645:
644:
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:
623:
620:
615:
610:
602:
601:
597:
593:
583:
573:
565:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
527:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
484:
480:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
454:
449:
448:
447:
443:
437:
433:
432:
431:
427:
421:
416:
415:
414:
410:
404:
400:
399:
398:
394:
388:
383:
382:
381:
377:
371:
367:
366:
365:
361:
355:
348:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
281:
277:
273:
268:
265:
264:
263:
259:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
225:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
202:
198:
194:
192:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
158:
154:
151:
147:
143:
140:
136:
133:
129:
126:
124:
119:
116:
115:Some facts:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
90:
86:
80:
76:
75:
74:
73:
69:
63:
58:
49:
48:
45:
42:
38:
34:
19:
2945:
2923:
2920:
2902:
2899:
2895:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2881:
2866:
2859:
2856:
2832:
2824:this message
2809:
2802:
2781:
2751:
2677:
2668:
2661:
2634:
2631:Your opinion
2615:
2587:— Preceding
2583:
2568:
2565:
2545:
2526:
2498:— Preceding
2494:
2487:
2480:
2465:
2462:
2455:
2443:
2439:
2426:
2422:
2418:KingdomQuest
2416:Deletion of
2384:VernoWhitney
2346:
2335:
2305:
2268:
2262:
2247:
2224:
2209:
2201:
2178:— Preceding
2173:
2119:
2091:— Preceding
2086:
2066:
2048:
2033:
1979:
1960:
1945:
1919:
1883:
1880:
1861:
1836:
1815:
1800:
1781:
1766:
1744:Nickiscool96
1738:— Preceding
1733:
1715:
1714:
1709:
1698:
1650:JamesBWatson
1621:
1605:
1563:
1537:— Preceding
1531:
1517:
1475:
1459:objectively.
1422:
1419:
1378:
1353:— Preceding
1344:
1305:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1249:— Preceding
1245:
1236:
1218:
1204:
1201:
1197:
1161:
1125:
1105:
1085:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1000:Yes, and...
984:
976:
954:
919:
893:
886:
859:
856:
852:
848:
844:
841:
837:
834:
830:
826:
823:
818:
815:
811:
807:
804:
785:
782:
778:
770:Elsie Steele
767:
760:
757:
750:
738:
734:
730:
725:
722:
717:
706:
702:
698:
695:
688:
684:
681:
676:
673:
670:
667:
621:
590:
501:
319:
301:
298:
292:
243:
226:
223:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
199:
195:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
159:
155:
152:
148:
144:
141:
137:
134:
130:
127:
120:
117:
114:
111:
108:
104:
101:
98:
55:
44:(let's chat)
30:
2566:Hi there,
2310:—Preceding
2124:be deleted
1996:Not exactly
1963:Daniel Case
1949:Daniel Case
1931:Daniel Case
1624:—Preceding
1530:Thank you.
1311:David in DC
987:ACEOREVIVED
805:Greetings,
742:Elsa Moberg
668:Greetings,
592:Daniel Case
330:Daniel Case
326:Fred Bauder
248:Us and Them
99:Greetings,
2834:posted on
2763:marked? --
2678:Cheers, --
2468:page three
2446:page three
2380:User:VWBot
2351:SPhilbrick
2050:FabioMarra
1069:Zephyrusjp
384:Nuttin. —
2795:Msmith43
2618:Mmayereng
2529:Blueman33
2470:favorite
2448:favorite
2340:The link
2265:WP:NALBUM
1618:EARTHCORE
1543:YOPbottle
1359:YOPbottle
1102:Real life
981:Thank you
587:template.
347:WP:OUTING
52:AfD fail!
2953:Philippe
2927:Eepstein
2904:Eepstein
2853:Rollback
2785:Msmith43
2601:contribs
2589:unsigned
2549:Prosbole
2512:contribs
2504:Keelymad
2500:unsigned
2312:unsigned
2192:contribs
2180:unsigned
2105:contribs
2093:unsigned
1928:this RFC
1903:Barnstar
1890:Acabashi
1752:contribs
1740:unsigned
1626:unsigned
1551:contribs
1539:unsigned
1524:Abkhasia
1520:Chechnya
1514:Not true
1367:contribs
1355:unsigned
1263:contribs
1251:unsigned
923:Timneu22
903:Timneu22
605:barnstar
536:Syrthiss
505:Syrthiss
453:Timneu22
420:Timneu22
387:Timneu22
354:Timneu22
316:Timneu22
282:Cam46136
272:Cam46136
62:Timneu22
27:Redirect
2812:WP:NFCC
2645:USchick
2130:WP:PROP
2126:earlier
2070:Kudpung
2063:Thanks!
2038:and the
2036:WP:NPOV
1843:Peridon
1818:Opbeith
1804:Opbeith
1789:Opbeith
1770:Opbeith
1585:USchick
1569:USchick
1398:Peridon
1381:Peridon
1375:Oloyede
1144:28bytes
1129:28bytes
1109:USchick
1089:Nyttend
964:USchick
368:Done.
2403:話して下さい
2338:CALDOL
2331:CALDOL
2291:話して下さい
2270:C.Fred
2254:CSD A9
2157:話して下さい
2138:C45207
2097:Dani23
1886:Joy510
1877:Joy510
1864:Saba50
1710:Orphan
1669:話して下さい
1497:話して下さい
1449:話して下さい
1328:Ryoung
1220:Kamkek
1206:Kamkek
1007:話して下さい
945:話して下さい
862:Ryoung
789:Ryoung
653:話して下さい
525:話して下さい
478:話して下さい
441:話して下さい
408:話して下さい
375:話して下さい
303:Kamkek
257:話して下さい
230:Ryoung
84:話して下さい
41:Yaksar
2861:Wayne
2428:Ossih
2184:B1964
1482:talk
1429:talk
1064:PPS:
744:than
16:<
2931:talk
2908:talk
2868:Slam
2844:talk
2818:and
2789:talk
2769:talk
2739:talk
2725:talk
2700:talk
2684:talk
2672:this
2649:talk
2622:talk
2597:talk
2576:talk
2553:talk
2533:talk
2508:talk
2432:talk
2388:talk
2378:and
2372:here
2370:and
2368:here
2320:talk
2275:talk
2232:talk
2228:KJP1
2217:talk
2213:KJP1
2188:talk
2142:Talk
2122:NE0N
2114:NE0N
2101:talk
2074:talk
2054:talk
2018:talk
2004:talk
1998:. --
1986:talk
1967:talk
1953:talk
1935:talk
1894:talk
1868:talk
1847:talk
1822:talk
1808:talk
1793:talk
1774:talk
1748:talk
1716:Wiki
1654:talk
1634:talk
1589:talk
1573:talk
1547:talk
1522:and
1402:talk
1385:talk
1363:talk
1315:talk
1259:talk
1224:talk
1210:talk
1181:2829
1165:2829
1148:talk
1133:talk
1113:talk
1093:talk
1073:talk
991:talk
968:talk
929:talk
909:talk
711:and
634:talk
596:talk
540:talk
509:talk
459:talk
426:talk
393:talk
360:talk
334:talk
307:talk
276:talk
68:talk
59:. —
2483:Sun
2458:Sun
2116:AfD
1976:NPP
1609:Luk
1532:Now
1477:DGG
1424:DGG
1331:122
1280:Bre
865:122
792:122
765:).
582:ygm
577:or
244:not
233:122
57:wow
2933:)
2910:)
2846:)
2838:)
2791:)
2771:)
2760:}}
2754:{{
2741:)
2727:)
2702:)
2686:)
2651:)
2624:)
2603:)
2599:•
2578:)
2555:)
2535:)
2514:)
2510:•
2492:.
2434:)
2406:)
2390:)
2322:)
2294:)
2277:)
2252:.
2234:)
2219:)
2194:)
2190:•
2160:)
2140:|
2136:.—
2128:.
2107:)
2103:•
2076:)
2056:)
2020:)
2006:)
1988:)
1969:)
1955:)
1937:)
1896:)
1870:)
1849:)
1824:)
1810:)
1795:)
1776:)
1754:)
1750:•
1672:)
1656:)
1648:.
1636:)
1591:)
1575:)
1553:)
1549:•
1500:)
1484:)
1452:)
1431:)
1404:)
1387:)
1369:)
1365:•
1317:)
1292:an
1287:nd
1265:)
1261:•
1226:)
1212:)
1185:VC
1169:VC
1150:)
1135:)
1115:)
1095:)
1075:)
1010:)
993:)
970:)
948:)
776:.
656:)
636:)
598:)
585:}}
579:{{
575:}}
569:{{
542:)
528:)
511:)
481:)
444:)
411:)
378:)
351:—
336:)
309:)
278:)
260:)
87:)
2929:(
2906:(
2842:(
2787:(
2767:(
2737:(
2723:(
2698:(
2682:(
2647:(
2620:(
2595:(
2574:(
2551:(
2531:(
2506:(
2430:(
2400:(
2386:(
2356:T
2318:(
2288:(
2273:(
2230:(
2215:(
2186:(
2154:(
2099:(
2072:(
2052:(
2016:(
2002:(
1984:(
1965:(
1951:(
1933:(
1892:(
1866:(
1845:(
1820:(
1806:(
1791:(
1772:(
1746:(
1666:(
1652:(
1632:(
1587:(
1571:(
1545:(
1494:(
1480:(
1446:(
1427:(
1400:(
1383:(
1361:(
1313:(
1276:→
1257:(
1222:(
1208:(
1146:(
1131:(
1111:(
1091:(
1071:(
1004:(
989:(
966:(
942:(
926:·
906:·
650:(
632:(
594:(
538:(
522:(
507:(
475:(
456:·
438:(
423:·
405:(
390:·
372:(
357:·
332:(
305:(
274:(
254:(
81:(
65:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.