Knowledge

User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy

Source 📝

285: 431: 255: 339: 219: 582:. However, it is being continually harassed by sockpuppets of the user YilevBot, and you recently rolled back the article to remove their additions of copyvio images. Their (checkuser confirmed) sockpuppets recently readded images that are most likely copyvio, but I don't have any defininitive proof of them being copyvio and would like to know if I need proof to revert the edits, as well as what would constitute reasonable proof if necessary. 302:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 503:. I'm an admin over on Commons and someone nominated an image from an open access journal for deletion, not realizing it was correctly freely licensed, and that's how I discovered that there's a trove of freely licensed plant photos available. I've been uploading images from other articles in that journal whenever I have time. 557:
Looking at your edits, it appeared to me that you were attempting to funnel traffic to websites you own, such as theyneedthebible.blogspot.com, through the inappropriate use of external links, and you were using your Commons uploads as part of that attempt. If you disagree with this assessment, you
585:
Also in general, many of the sockpuppet's low quality and misinformed contributions get through on that page. I think they harm the article greatly, but I do not want to contribute to an edit war reverting them. What do you think is reasonable for me to do as a new user to deal with this issue?
455:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
294: 458:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has
279: 589:
Thank you very much for your service to Knowledge. After looking through your user contributions, I find it very reassuring that people like you are here to help maintain Knowledge, and keep it in line with its purpose.
368:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 542:
As a linguistics researcher, involved in language development for over 85 different micro-languages, I take that quite personally. Can you go into some detail regarding what was consider spam?
436: 421: 262: 150: 595: 451: 539:
Hello Squirrel Conspiracy, Yesterday, you blocked my Wikimedia Commons account without any specifics or rationale. Perhaps there's a reason there, but all that's written is "Spamming".
230: 419: 384: 138: 353: 326: 162: 222: 211: 470: 194:
Hello! Yes, I did. I'm also not around here that much any more, as other hobbies (mainly TTRPGs) take up most of my time. Good to see you're doing alright!
411: 209: 244: 573: 567: 599: 203: 149:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
526: 512: 131: 125: 121: 114: 440: 314: 17: 331: 551: 407: 274: 226: 298:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 153:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 146: 140: 188: 403: 103: 99: 95: 88: 84: 80: 76: 69: 65: 61: 57: 50: 46: 42: 38: 591: 109: 303: 493: 559: 517:
Niiiice. Finding a good source opens up so many possibilities sometimes. Anyway thanks again and congrats.
504: 377: 195: 158: 31: 389: 265:
were found precious. That's what you are, always. (sorry, missed it last year due to the name change) --
481: 299: 444: 547: 154: 270: 365: 183: 376:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8: 543: 240: 534: 249: 347: 280:
Orphaned non-free image File:XCOM Enemy Unknown, illustration of the strategy UI.jpeg
266: 522: 489: 396: 361: 178: 322: 466: 373: 236: 369: 167: 578:
Hiya, I am new to wikipedia and I am interested in improving an article,
518: 500: 485: 475: 380:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
357:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
318: 254: 462: 452:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gallery of distinctive unit insignias
338: 579: 393:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 383:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
351:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
295:
File:XCOM Enemy Unknown, illustration of the strategy UI.jpeg
558:
can request an unblock on your Commons user talk page.
435:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
364:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
439:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
172:
Wow you changed your name! Greetings from Colombia.
313:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 229:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 574:Requesting advice on sockpuppet abuse problems 315:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 309:Note that any non-free images not used in any 232:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 253: 14: 437:Gallery of distinctive unit insignias 422:Gallery of distinctive unit insignias 348:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 441:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 332:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 24: 283: 25: 610: 480:Bravo on completing whatever set 449:The article will be discussed at 429: 337: 217: 147:Architecture of the Song dynasty 141:Architecture of the Song dynasty 387:and submit your choices on the 275:08:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC) 245:17:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 139:Good article reassessment for 13: 1: 527:20:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 513:19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 494:19:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC) 412:00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 366:Knowledge arbitration process 327:19:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC) 304:our policy for non-free media 204:21:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC) 189:06:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) 163:13:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 7: 471:16:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC) 210:Nomination for deletion of 10: 615: 600:15:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 568:00:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 552:18:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) 482:Weberbauerella raimondiana 404:MediaWiki message delivery 284: 563: 508: 443:or whether it should be 401:to your user talk page. 199: 560:The Squirrel Conspiracy 505:The Squirrel Conspiracy 196:The Squirrel Conspiracy 18:User talk:Sven Manguard 289: 258: 227:nominated for deletion 223:Template:Miller Center 212:Template:Miller Center 362:Arbitration Committee 345:Hello! Voting in the 292:Thanks for uploading 287: 257: 155:~~ AirshipJungleman29 378:arbitration policy 290: 261:Eleven years ago, 259: 414: 300:claim of fair use 176: 151:reassessment page 134: 16:(Redirected from 606: 433: 432: 402: 400: 341: 286: 221: 220: 174: 27: 21: 614: 613: 609: 608: 607: 605: 604: 603: 576: 537: 535:Block Rationale 484:was a part of. 478: 460: 434: 430: 426: 417: 416: 394: 342: 334: 317:. Thank you. -- 282: 252: 250:Always precious 218: 215: 170: 144: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 612: 575: 572: 571: 570: 544:Andrew J Olson 536: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 477: 474: 428: 427: 425: 420:Nomination of 418: 385:the candidates 354:eligible users 343: 336: 335: 333: 330: 281: 278: 251: 248: 214: 208: 207: 206: 169: 166: 143: 137: 136: 112: 29: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 611: 602: 601: 597: 593: 587: 583: 581: 569: 565: 561: 556: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 540: 528: 524: 520: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 473: 472: 468: 464: 457: 454: 453: 446: 442: 438: 423: 415: 413: 409: 405: 398: 392: 391: 386: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 358: 356: 355: 350: 349: 340: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 307: 305: 301: 297: 296: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 256: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 228: 224: 213: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 186: 182: 181: 177: 165: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 142: 135: 133: 130: 127: 123: 119: 116: 111: 108: 105: 101: 97: 93: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 19: 588: 584: 577: 541: 538: 479: 461: 450: 448: 424:for deletion 388: 382: 359: 352: 346: 344: 310: 308: 293: 291: 267:Gerda Arendt 260: 231: 216: 184: 179: 173: 171: 145: 132:2021 to 2022 128: 117: 115:2015 to 2019 106: 91: 72: 53: 34: 28:Archives — 26: 390:voting page 374:topic bans 459:finished. 370:site bans 237:Jonesey95 225:has been 175:→ Call me 168:Hey there 580:Bali Aga 476:Congrats 311:articles 499:Thanks 445:deleted 397:NoACEMM 519:jengod 501:Jengod 486:jengod 185:Nation 126:Q3, Q4 122:Q1, Q2 120:2020: 104:Q3, Q4 94:2014: 75:2013: 56:2012: 37:2011: 592:似た牌愛魔 319:B-bot 110:2015+ 596:talk 564:talk 548:talk 523:talk 509:talk 490:talk 467:talk 463:Fram 408:talk 360:The 323:talk 271:talk 241:talk 235:. – 200:talk 180:Razr 159:talk 113:SQ: 32:2010 30:SM: 306:). 263:you 102:, 598:) 566:) 550:) 525:) 511:) 492:) 469:) 447:. 410:) 399:}} 395:{{ 372:, 325:) 273:) 243:) 202:) 161:) 124:, 100:Q2 98:, 96:Q1 89:Q4 87:, 85:Q3 83:, 81:Q2 79:, 77:Q1 70:Q4 68:, 66:Q3 64:, 62:Q2 60:, 58:Q1 51:Q4 49:, 47:Q3 45:, 43:Q2 41:, 39:Q1 594:( 562:( 546:( 521:( 507:( 488:( 465:( 406:( 321:( 288:⚠ 269:( 239:( 198:( 157:( 129:· 118:· 107:· 92:· 73:· 54:· 35:· 20:)

Index

User talk:Sven Manguard
2010
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3, Q4
2015+
2015 to 2019
Q1, Q2
Q3, Q4
2021 to 2022
Architecture of the Song dynasty
Architecture of the Song dynasty
reassessment page
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
13:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Razr
Nation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.