31:
803:
501:(please see Archive 1, "Misrepresentation of sources" downwards) where you cannot find another single editor to agree with your position. Band's own talk pages are not relevant here, as the intro already reads "have been described as nu metal by professional journalists". We have already had an inconclusive RfC, but another may be useful. However, until you can point me towards a consensus for
274:
think is real) you can not remove them because they are sourced. I don't think
Evanescence, Tool, Puddle of Mudd, etc. are nu metal, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to remove them from the list. And the source for Kid Rock does actually state that he is nu metal. You can even see the book on google books. Have a nice night.
234:) by failing to provide any sources calling FNM, funk rock. Also, you don't even follow the guidelines half the time(you kept alt. metal in the box another metal sub.) Hate to break it to you, but everything but pop is a subgenre. So are we going to label Kid rock and FNM pop acts? No because it is correctly incorrect.
935:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page.
586:
We have multiple books and sources from MTV and
Rolling Stone. Your opinion that these are not reliable is just that, a point of view. And we have an established consensus. In layman's terms: Nu metal should stay in the infobox. Plain and simple. Thank God almighty that the page was protected. Also
193:
hi. according to the page "WikiProject
African diaspora aims to improve all articles related to the cultural contributions of people of African descent all over the world. " this seems to apply. if it really does not belong in the project i would appreciate that someone involved in the project would
273:
Very recently there was a death in my family and I really don't want to have an argument here, so can you please keep this civil? The bands you keep putting "dubious" next to all have sources next to them stating the bands are nu metal, even if you feel they aren't nu metal(something you don't even
288:
Again, the sources do not say what the person who added them claims they say. Opinion can run two ways. You can't add bands that you feel are nu metal to the list, and I can't remove bands that I feel aren't nu metal when the source says otherwise. But, in the case of the sources cited, nothing is
565:
besides, these users are massively different in their general attitude on wikipedia, and they have massively different styles of editing. Also, I can't see where these users would have violated 3rr if they were socks. For those reasons I fail to see a link between these accounts, and archived the
761:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk
424:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk
169:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk
139:
of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk
312:" Are you freaking kidding me? Do you not hear the irony in that statement at all? That's all you have been doing and you are putting dubious to bands that are sourced because you don't want them associated with the "useless catchphrase." And read the ref for Kid rock.
552:
As I said in the archive, this is essentially a case where two users have the same opinion in a content dispute, as J.delanoy has said. The evidence presented by you in the SPI case fails to draw any thing else against these users other than their edits on the page
829:
You're currently arguing against six sources and six editors, and you've claiming that a direct cite saying
Incubus is nu-metal, by perhaps the top music magazine ever, is not legitimate. Just accept that they're going to be listed and move on.
474:
Hi, well thank you for ask me for review the article, but the problem is my english is not as good for pass or fail any article. Of course, I can review it and comment on the talk page some changes could be done.
625:
You are not multiple editors. You are one editor. Multiple editors say that the nu metal inclusion is absolutely justified and yet again may you please take this to the article's discussion page and not mine?
209:
as you saw it was something that should be in the project. please try to make sure of things before you undo peoples changes in the future because if you dont it is a big waste of everyones time. thanks.
891:
I will certainly look at the suggestions and work on the article. Unfortunately, I've had a lot to do recently and won't be able to spend much time on it until tomorrow or
Saturday though.
334:
You're one to talk of "irony" when you scream at me to stop doing the one thing that I'm not doing - the one thing that you are doing. Why don't you stop POV pushing, and contribute? (
313:
420:
692:
mocking me. I don't see how you can justify stating that you weren't, considering that you fed back to me something that I told you, which, by the way, still holds true. (
165:
135:
931:
757:
640:
Please stop mocking me. There's no consensus to justify your actions, or the inclusion of poor sources, such as a book that was not written by a music expert, and a
726:
710:
183:
438:
158:
153:
537:
775:
413:
405:
387:
880:
If you don't trust them as a source, then it's up to you to file a complaint or whatever and to have them removed as an RS. 18:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
128:
88:
819:
750:
701:
653:
635:
615:
343:
329:
298:
283:
875:
683:
219:
484:
949:
688:
I did that, and all I got back was "you're just trying to ruin the article because you hate Kid Rock and nu metal". And, seriously, you
522:
780:
576:
73:
900:
368:
123:
919:
249:
I guess that's the reason why my talk page has a pile of warnings over neutrality-based edits. Oh, wait, no, it doesn't, that's
262:
745:
243:
203:
465:
797:
543:
845:
596:
945:
924:
771:
434:
179:
149:
392:
I've commented on the deletion of Blaze's albums. I'll begin some work on the articles now. Also, I've looked over
871:
841:
715:
492:
94:
456:
is currently a Good
Article nominee, but is on a long backlog. Would you be interested in reviewing the GAN? (
100:
886:
510:
528:
I see no consensus there... where is there a consensus of editors agreeing on how we are going to proceed?
449:
558:
354:
69:
59:
38:
64:
I posted my review of your behavior on the
Wikiquette alerts page. Feel free to add your comments.
722:
225:
188:
736:
You are aware that "someone said it was well sourced and written" and "it gets a lot of hits" are
905:
533:
518:
110:
As far as contributions, there's always new page patrol , redlink projects, new page patrol, and
915:
896:
649:
401:
383:
364:
339:
294:
941:
815:
767:
430:
175:
145:
65:
910:
No, I won't cease telling people that they're POV-pushing, but thanks for the suggestion. --
587:
for these issues please see the article's talk page and not individual editor's talk pages.
697:
611:
566:
case. If you have any new evidence to present, then let me know on my talk page. Please do
461:
258:
47:
17:
8:
867:
837:
731:
718:
679:
631:
592:
453:
325:
279:
239:
215:
199:
529:
514:
104:
513:, where you simply disagree with every other editor that contributes to this article.
911:
892:
807:
443:
397:
379:
375:
360:
119:
84:
937:
824:
811:
763:
581:
426:
171:
141:
318:
do not add dubious to sourced bands on the list and do not remove referenced bands
693:
645:
607:
457:
335:
290:
254:
509:, stop removing sourced material. If you want consensus, the closest we have is
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
862:
832:
675:
627:
588:
545:
321:
275:
235:
211:
195:
852:
573:
111:
857:
793:
786:
782:
476:
231:
115:
80:
396:
and I don't believe there is anything else to add to
Carnival of Carnage.
230:
Guidelines are just that, not rules and actually you do against a wikilaw(
606:. The consensus was to keep the genres generalized, per the guidelines. (
557:, and even those edits aren't particularly conclusive, take for instance
497:
As always, we have a problem. The consensus is indeed quite clear on the
374:
I've cleaned up the sources and the article. I've also added the genre
802:
562:
554:
673:
Now take this to the Kid Rock talk page not my talk page.
316:
doesn't say he isn't nu metal. This is getting hopeless,
194:
remove it rather than you. doesnt this seem reasonable?
810:
for eventual comments about the article. Well done! ––
378:due to its large political influence and message.
310:I can't remove bands that I feel aren't nu metal
669:a book that was not written by a music expert
448:Hi there. I noticed that you are a member of
99:(From WQA). If you don't like your username,
711:Lets Put The Past Behind Us, and Start Clean
414:WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter
320:. It's that simple, stop the POV pushing.
159:WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
129:WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
103:or create a new account, just follow the
751:WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
667:", not funny. Be serious will you? "
561:by Greg. But the content dispute on
25:
23:
740:indications of notability, right?
359:Will do. I'll get on it tomorrow.
24:
960:
801:
29:
744:, his otters and a clue-bat •
671:", pure opinion, nothing more.
79:I have added commentsw also. --
13:
1:
406:21:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
388:17:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
369:00:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
344:21:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
330:01:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
299:21:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
284:00:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
263:23:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
244:23:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
220:23:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
204:22:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
184:00:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
154:00:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
124:03:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
89:16:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
74:07:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
7:
602:There was no consensus for
10:
965:
746:15:06, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
727:05:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
702:20:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
684:20:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
654:20:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
636:20:34, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
616:20:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
597:20:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
577:20:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
538:19:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
523:19:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
499:talk page for this article
485:02:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
466:21:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
925:WP:FILMS April Newsletter
920:01:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
901:20:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
876:18:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
846:18:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
820:10:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
776:03:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
439:04:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
950:23:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
762:page. --Happy editing!
665:Please stop mocking me.
570:reopen the case again.
425:page. --Happy editing!
170:page. --Happy editing!
140:page. --Happy editing!
493:List of nu metal bands
95:Name and contributions
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Sugar Bear
887:Carnival of Carnage
796:you nominated as a
642:concert ticket site
454:Carnival of Carnage
421:February 2010 issue
355:Carnival of Carnage
450:WikiProject:Albums
166:January 2010 issue
136:January 2010 issue
60:Wikiquette alerts:
936:--Happy editing!
808:Talk:Electric Mud
572:Kindest regards,
559:this edit summary
376:political hip hop
114:. Happy editing!
54:
53:
48:current talk page
956:
932:April 2010 issue
805:
758:March 2010 issue
743:
742:Ten Pound Hammer
482:
479:
394:Behind the Paint
226:Kid rock and FNM
189:african diaspora
66:PeterbrownDancin
33:
32:
26:
964:
963:
959:
958:
957:
955:
954:
953:
927:
908:
906:RE: POV-pushing
889:
827:
790:
753:
741:
734:
713:
584:
550:
495:
480:
477:
446:
416:
357:
228:
191:
161:
131:
97:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
962:
926:
923:
907:
904:
888:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
826:
823:
789:
785:nomination of
779:
752:
749:
733:
730:
719:Greg D. Barnes
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
620:
619:
583:
580:
571:
549:
542:
541:
540:
494:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
452:. The article
445:
442:
415:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
248:
227:
224:
223:
222:
190:
187:
160:
157:
130:
127:
96:
93:
92:
91:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
961:
952:
951:
947:
943:
939:
934:
933:
922:
921:
917:
913:
903:
902:
898:
894:
879:
878:
877:
873:
869:
865:
864:
859:
855:
854:
853:Rolling Stone
850:
849:
848:
847:
843:
839:
835:
834:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
804:
799:
795:
788:
784:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
748:
747:
739:
729:
728:
724:
720:
716:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
637:
633:
629:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
599:
598:
594:
590:
579:
578:
575:
569:
564:
560:
556:
547:
539:
535:
531:
530:Blackmetalbaz
527:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
515:Blackmetalbaz
512:
508:
507:its talk page
504:
500:
486:
483:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
300:
296:
292:
289:being said. (
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
221:
217:
213:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
186:
185:
181:
177:
173:
168:
167:
156:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
137:
126:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
106:
105:multiple name
102:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
76:
75:
71:
67:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
930:
928:
912:LordNecronus
909:
893:Juggalobrink
890:
861:
851:
831:
828:
798:good article
794:Electric Mud
792:The article
791:
787:Electric Mud
756:
754:
737:
735:
714:
689:
672:
668:
664:
641:
603:
585:
567:
551:
548:Sockpuppetry
506:
503:this article
502:
498:
496:
447:
419:
417:
398:Juggalobrink
393:
380:Juggalobrink
361:Juggalobrink
358:
317:
309:
253:talk page. (
250:
247:
229:
192:
164:
162:
134:
132:
109:
98:
63:
55:
43:
37:
938:Nehrams2020
812:Jezhotwells
800:has passed
764:Nehrams2020
732:Better Days
427:Nehrams2020
172:Nehrams2020
142:Nehrams2020
36:This is an
694:Sugar Bear
646:Sugar Bear
608:Sugar Bear
458:Sugar Bear
336:Sugar Bear
291:Sugar Bear
255:Sugar Bear
863:Torchiest
833:Torchiest
546:Rockgenre
444:GA review
212:Aisha9152
196:Aisha9152
101:change it
872:contribs
842:contribs
825:nu metal
604:your POV
582:Kid Rock
574:Spitfire
563:Kid Rock
555:Kid Rock
107:policy.
946:contrib
772:contrib
435:contrib
180:contrib
150:contrib
116:Gerardw
81:Diannaa
39:archive
806:; see
112:WP:RFC
858:WP:RS
856:is a
781:Your
481:hotch
232:WP:RS
16:<
942:talk
929:The
916:talk
897:talk
868:talk
838:talk
816:talk
768:talk
755:The
723:talk
698:talk
690:were
680:talk
650:talk
632:talk
612:talk
593:talk
544:RE:
534:talk
519:talk
511:here
462:talk
431:talk
418:The
402:talk
384:talk
365:talk
340:talk
326:talk
314:Here
295:talk
280:talk
259:talk
251:your
240:talk
216:talk
200:talk
176:talk
163:The
146:talk
133:The
120:talk
85:talk
70:talk
738:not
644:. (
568:not
505:on
948:)
944:•
918:)
899:)
874:)
870:|
860:.
844:)
840:|
818:)
783:GA
774:)
770:•
725:)
717:--
700:)
682:)
676:RG
652:)
634:)
628:RG
614:)
595:)
589:RG
536:)
521:)
478:Tb
468:)
464:)
437:)
433:•
404:)
386:)
367:)
342:)
322:RG
297:)
282:)
276:RG
265:)
261:)
242:)
236:RG
218:)
202:)
182:)
178:•
152:)
148:•
122:)
87:)
72:)
940:(
914:(
895:(
866:(
836:(
814:(
766:(
721:(
704:)
696:(
678:(
663:"
656:)
648:(
630:(
618:)
610:(
591:(
532:(
517:(
460:(
429:(
400:(
382:(
363:(
346:)
338:(
328:)
324:(
308:"
301:)
293:(
278:(
257:(
238:(
214:(
198:(
174:(
144:(
118:(
83:(
68:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.