Knowledge

User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars/Archive 10

Source šŸ“

1081:"Meatpuppet" here. Knowledge discourages the use of the term. The issue is, apparently, "third party sources". Third party sources are difficult to obtain especially when much of the label's history existed prior to the internet and the existing sources (if a copy exists) have to be digitalized -- if someone desires to do so. The company is independent and always has been -- that means no major publicity from any of the "major players": Warner, Universal Music Group, Sony. The major players have connections, deep pockets, wide levels of distribution and piles of promotional items to garner attention -- even if their releases are of trivial interest. For example, the album "Mexican R&B" on then London (Distributed by then major Polygram) by The Stairs has had its own article for twelve+ years. Working in the music business at the time, I know for a fact that the LP didn't sell (original research) and never charted. Virtually any copies seen today are promotional cutouts. Where does this album fit the criteria for inclusion in Knowledge? Personally, I'm glad to see the article because I now know the UK version of the CD has more tracks. There's a Knowledge article on Crown Records -- known mainly from the 30s-60s because of the cheap quality of its pressings. What trusted, third-party sources utilized met the Knowledge standard for this article's inclusion? What trusted, third-party media will fulfill the standard for Knowledge for Eric Records? If the problem is with the writing, style and the format of the presentation, writing that seems to be promotional -- those things can be corrected. Eric Records history is ongoing so additions to the listings should be forthcoming. 586:. These two are reducing the size of the largest articles in Knowledge, which sounds like a noble goal, but when I asked what limit there should be on an article size, the response was 100 kB characters. The Wiki-guideline does state that readable prose should be less than 100 kB, but readable prose is the article minus citations, lists, tables, footnotes, and images, so I find the interpretation dangerous. The other editor said to get articles down in size, a yearly list could be cut down in half, in quarters, or even monthly. I cannot picture the easy usage of lists that is divided by month for multiple years. The guideline mostly states lists and tables are excluded from the guideline, so my objection to the split is that there is no justification except a misused guideline. 1063:
sound mastering nowadays, it can finally take off and provide listeners newer stereo experiences with yesterdays mono oldies. Every new Eric releases have received lots of praising in different music forums. It's worth to have a page introducing this new trends and possibilities that many people once thought to be impossible in the past. This new page has just been created for 3 days only, it needs time to grow, more and more fans will certainly come in and improve the contents in future(we just don't have such page/chance to gather together and start it up before). Attached two newspaper source articles today here as a support.
2431:
matter how big or small a role, there would also have to be a category for every other actor who appeared in each of those movies as well, which has been deemed as overcategorization. In the same vein, categorizing On the Town just by von Stade would suggest it should also be categorized as an album by the 9 or so other performers on the album as well. If a rock band contributes one song to a film soundtrack, you wouldnā€™t call that or categorize it as an album by that band, either. I hope this helps.
3918: 31: 3548: 3698: 1583: 650: 2854: 2454:
doing is essentially to construct a category that was a duplicate of the discography in the Frederica von Stade article, which, apart from any other considerations, would obviously be redundant. Mea culpa (not for the first time, and probably not for the last!). Might a reasonable rule of thumb be that an album belongs in the FVS album category if, and only if, there's a photo of her on its front cover?
876:
sourced to the artist's social media or not sourced at all, and the articles for the artists show just how poor the sourcing is for the sections about their music careers ā€“ there really are zero reliable sources for them. Nevertheless, I hold my hands up and accept I made a mistake in putting the categories up for CfD ā€“ next time I'll just redirect the articles and let someone else do the CfDs.
1697: 1931:. These have clearly been created by non-native speakers of English and need renaming, but I'm not sure of the correct name for each. For the parent category, I think the word "list" should be capitalized, as it each country's proposals for new additions to the WHS is officially called the Tentative List. But it's possible that it should be the plural "Lists". 2404:
a musician's album category page would prefer it to be generous rather than strict. (In the same way, I imagine that people interested in, say, Denzel Washington movies would like to know about articles about those in which he played a small part as well as articles about those in which he starred.) I think it would be a shame if someone enjoyed my page about
830:... you are absolutely right, redirecting the articles so the category is emptied and then tagging it for deletion does come across as though I have some agenda against these artists, which sincerely was not meant to be the case. What should I do ā€“ withdraw the CfD proposals and let someone else put them up for deletion, or leave them as they are? 1600:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3489:ā€œBing Bong Zooā€ according to Genius, is a smash hit. I know Iā€™m not allowed to cite Genius, but I want to know if thatā€™s true or itā€™s just a thing for little kids as making it ā€œa hitā€. If it is true that itā€™s a hit, you should not have deleted the page. Also, if I put Genius refs there, I question if it would be okay if I re-created the page. 1302:, the reviews are independent from the star ratings. The ratings are assigned by the editors, who only compare the album with other albums in the artist's discography, and it's possible for ratings to change over time. That's why you might see a 4-star rating for an album even if the review itself is somewhat negative. 576: 3853:) resulting in no consensus. With that being allowed to stay, I figured it needed a proper parent. If you find the link that does discourage it, I'm happy to revert what I've done and do something about the soundtrack categories, too. Thanks and have a Happy New Year! On to the next decade of editing! 2673:
I donā€™t see this as being a problem. It wasnā€™t the reason you were brought to ANI and you werenā€™t asked to start the practice of notifying category creators of C1 speedy deletions. Unless I read the wrong one, it was the person who filed the complaint who got a little bit of a slap down for taking it
803:
I can't say much, but he is a long-term vandal who edits different ways at different locations. There are some technical differences, but there is enough similarities between the technical data and the behaviour that I am pretty sure he's a globally locked LTA. Don't try to reach out to him or be his
3448:
Yes, we'll wait and see on the image. What I did was use examples of others' stub files to create mine, and I was able to make the stub work, but it was not optimal. And it's probably why I didn't see a notice of proposing the stub type first. And so I am glad you came along to fix it. But I will be
2403:
from the category of Frederica von Stade albums. I quite take your point that many other people - I'd guess more than a hundred! - contributed to that CD, and I agree that it is certainly not a von Stade album in the same sense that one of her song recital records is. But I feel that most readers of
2162:
Those discussions are mostly about whether the eponymous article should appear in the eponymous category. There is no policy that eponymous categories should not be categorised, and there are many thousands of eponymous categories which are categorised. This policy which has secretly developed has
1062:
Please keep this new Eric page. Lots of releases by this company, but never a proper English page for Wiki readers to research more about their highly praised (DES) Digital Extraction Stereo creations or high quality mono-to-Stereo new mixes. With modern powerful audio software/hardware and careful
875:
Thanks for your reply. The Cory Lee category that you commented on was actually empty before I nominated it, although I don't know if that was as a result of my redirect actions or if it was already empty. I do feel I was justified in redirecting those song and album articles... they were all either
2791:
Hi, I don't really understand why the articles in my userspace have suddenly become such an issue to you, they are not harmful, the top 40 is notable but the consensus on wiki has always been that we only have articles for the top 10 on the UK singles chart, hence why I have not moved them into the
2453:
Hi once more. Thank you for replying so promptly and patiently. I must admit that nothing that I've yet encountered on Knowledge is quite so hard to understand as categorization, so I can easily believe that I haven't been using categories sensibly. Thinking over what I wrote before, what I've been
852:
I'd leave things as is. If empty, you explained why they are empty, and if there was a still a redirect, you provided reason why it should still be deleted. I've cleared categories out as well, not because that was my goal, but simply because I boldly redirected an artist's albums that I deemed not
780:
Thank you, I will. The content he adds to articles in and of itself is not always bad, but he has always been a bad editor in terms of sourcing and notability. He never even communicated until I started redirecting some non-notable articles he created. Once he did, he showed he had no understanding
2430:
Youā€™re not being foolish and I understand your point, but categories are for the most defining aspects of the album. The example of Denzel Washington is a good one because that is exactly why actor categories donā€™t exist. If one categorized every film that he was in as a Denzel Washington film, no
1765:
Hi, itā€™s not plagiarism or copyright, itā€™s using Knowledge as your own personal webhost for all these chart lists that your are making for yourself and are not part of the encyclopedia nor planned to be. Itā€™s not allowed. You can copy them offline or to your own webhost so youā€™re work isnā€™t wasted
1742:
I just got your message about what exactly the User:page articles your talking about. Really, the charts on my user articles are not exact copies of the charts on the existing articles. Like the "references" part of the charts is left out on all of them. This is so it doesn't look like I'm copying
1671:
I've spent a lot of time over the past few days reverting edits by sockpuppets of a sockpuppeteer called Son of Zorn who loves to create lots of new TV categories (by decade, nationality and very narrow genres) and populating them with IP accounts. I saw that you've tagged some for CSD C1 deletion
2648:
and noticed that you didn't notify the category creator that the page was tagged for deletion. A few months, I was brought to ANI by a category creator who was upset that he didn't receive notification, I was basically admonished, so I always do so now and remind others to do the same. If you use
1134:
noted previously? Obviously, some of the commenters are new to this process, including me. Do you make the decision to delete or is it a general request for deletion and someone else actually makes the decision? I'm not meaning to be argumentative, it's just that some things seem obvious to me
3014:
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it.
3406:
I appreciate the advice about proposing, didn't realize that. If there's a next time, sure will. And, thanks for the big change in fixing the rodeo stub to be plural. You definitely went above the call of duty. It wasn't my best-planned project obviously. Lesson learned. I do like the image you
221:
is wrong - there is nothing in categorisation that says that a category can be or should be free of a visible category - so I think in respect - you are wrong to clear the category of having a category without a parent category regardless. But hey the late Douglas Adams couldnt get a hang of
204:
thank you for the considered explanation - weird - I think I'll accept it... but hell that needs to be flagged somewhere for otherwise ignorant category players such as self... seems tagging categories and adding project tags on talk pages is fraught with such hidden dangers... diffusion and
2649:
Twinkle, it is easy to set up Twinkle preferences to do these notifications automatically but you have to check all of the CSD categories boxes, in this case, C1, so that all page creators are notified. In my case, I had most of the boxes checked but, as I discovered, not C1. Thanks!
1038:
Sites like facebook, allmusic, discogs, 45cat, musicbrainz, rateyourmusic are not indications of significant third-party coverage. The topic needs to be discussed by independent and reliable sources. Unfortunately, those sources don't exist. By the way, I'm a big fan of Eric Records.
3011:, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Knowledge. 3639:
No. It needs actual coverage in multiple reliable sources, that means where the topic is discussed - not simply a chart placement (especially on such a minor chart). I would recommend you not create any more new pages. Even the ones you create drafts for keep getting rejected.
1016:), as there was no English equivalent. I've included multiple reference websites for them at the bottom of the page, and I've made all the citations I can think of. I am only a novice Knowledge editor so I am asking for assistance with fixing things that need to get corrected. 1001:). Saying there is no information for this record label is not true. Eric Records is an established music release company in business since 1969. They are a smaller, specialized release company that does most of their business via direct sales on their official website ( 970:
Fair enough, but I also think stopping by the closing admin's talkpage is generally good when you have issues with their action. Now this second nomination subverts the consensus established. Honestly I would prefer if you withdrew that nomination and filled a DRV. --
1369: 597:, and provide feedback. I do not care if you say split or oppose, but to me the discussion is not about the split but the misuse of the Article Size guideline, and I want your and others I respect feedback on the conversation and the proper use of the guideline. 581:
Please, I need your input. There is a conversation about splitting an article because of its size, but I donā€™t care which way you would vote on if it should be split or not. My issue is that the other editor and a companion-in-arms are misusing, mistranslating
2816:
It's suddenly only because I didn't know you were maintaining top 40 lists on Knowledge for your own personal information. As you said, consensus is not to list more than a top 10 so that means you are keeping these lists for yourself, which is not allowed per
2472:, I don't think you are alone regarding categorizing articles on Knowledge. You are correct though that a discography page does a better job on what you are trying to do over strict categorization. I would say a good rule of thumb for categorizing an album in 3356:
Just a short note to say thank you for fixing the rodeo stub files. It was obviously my first attempt to create a stub type. I know the actual type should not be plural when you see it in the article; but probably too far along now to correct. Thanks, again.
1365: 703:
part. They are placing it under the song column as a means of emphasis on the songs, rather than the issue dates. (I reverted that edit, but then they reverted me back, and I made one more revert to invite them to that article's talk page.) According to
222:
thursdays, maybe I am in the same boat - but it needs a category. To have a category like that is the first time in over 10 years editing that I find such a case, and I have no clear proof apart from your reasoning that it is an allowable situation.
1924: 1855: 232:
Based on the discussion I linked you to, these categories are to be hidden. Just because they are hidden, doesnā€™t make these categories uncategorized. The other side of this is that any other categorization just doesnā€™t make sense. Placing
3407:
added, but seeing as it is a logo and is non-free content, it might get pulled. I have done logos for rodeo organizations many times. But maybe you have done this before and know of a different use case here. Regardless, thanks a bunch!
2298: 2524:
Hey could we do some grouping when nominating track listing templates to TfD? There are quite a lot of them and the arguments are the same for the most part. Maybe nomibate all track listings only used in infoboxes at the same time?
3775:
I do know how they work. It takes time to create templates, and populate them with articles and links. WP:NORUSH There always seems to be editors who are eager to propose deletion or revert without an edit summary. I will move on.
2593:
states that cover versions shouldn't have their own article anyway. I don't think I'm going to get time to do it tonight, but unless someone beats me too it, I think I'm just going to merge the two articles back together tomorrow.
2098:
I dont think hidden categories count. Apart from any other consideration it means these categories are not available for scrutiny. Policy is very clear. All categories must be categorised. The category system is heirarchical.
3731:
You have undid my edits and left no edit summary. I feel that the Templates will be deleted because they do not have enough links yet, and so I placed them in the articles, and you undid without summary? Why was this necessary?
3089:
Hi. I'm not disputing that it is an AllMusic rating, but it's not a rating by the critic who wrote the review. Ratings are done by the editors of the site and it is not a reflection or condition of a good or bad review by Mr.
1934:
For the two sub-categories I don't know if the naming convention would be "... of (country)" or "...in (country)", but it clearly isn't "...by (country)". Any help or guidance you can give here would be appreciated. Thanks.
1672:
and I'd just like to thank you. I still haven't reverted all of their edits and I'm not sure I will uncover all of their work so it helps to have other editors keeping an eye out for these unnecessary categories. Thank you!
3192:. They are not the same. The song has had to receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Also, the article was not deleted, just redirected to the article on the film. Thanks. 2185:, where it is explicitly stated that hiding a parent is not the same as removing a parent. Adding an invalid parent is not an answer to anything. (Perhaps Rathfelder should activate the 'show hidden categories' option.) 2024:
is adding a lot of categories to categories and I'm not sure of the most appropriate guideline for this. Both you and I have reverted or changed his edits. Better probably to discuss them all together than piecemeal and
1928: 1688: 2385: 2540:
I only nominated two. I found the second one after listing the first one. I'm sure there are more but I tend to nominate them as I come across them. I'll try to start a list and bulk nom every 3 or 4 months or so.
3324:. You need to find sources that actually discuss the song like in a review or an article that talks about the development of the song. Even then, if it's not that much, it would be better off as a redirect per 3000: 3425:
I'm happy to help where I can. You may be right about the logo. I looked for one on Commons but came up empty, then I came across this one already on Knowledge and gave it a shot. I'll guess we'll find out.
1457:
and the category page itself both look correct but I noticed that Twinkle fired off some other notifications etc (in the course of its misdirection) so there must be some other actions that need correcting.
606: 1920: 1649: 548: 3046: 1732: 1957:
I don't know anything about the World Heritage Site or the Tentative Lists so wouldn't be able to help with this. Sorry, I can't be of more help. Perhaps there is an appropriate WikiProject you can ask.
922: 2955:
and has nothing to do with Artist 100, other than being "modeled after the same formula as the Artist 100 chart." So why redirect to it? I don't do many Redirects, but this one, a Redirect to the page
2645: 708:, the scope parameter identifies the headers (for columns and rows) in the table, and if that's the parameter's function, then that editor's intent of changing where the parameter goes is in question. 121:
09:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Also, to turn your user page links that appear for every edit from blinding red to the normal blue, you might consider editing it (even one character would do the trick).
2881:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2674:
to ANI without attempting to communicate with you first. I know if I created lots of categories, I wouldnā€™t want to be notified on my talk page every time one may be deleted for being empty. Thanks.
2137: 758:
Just file the Ben cases at SPI. Myself or another CU will see them. FWIW, he's an LTA who does goodhand/badhand stuff from what I can tell, and I've been told by stewards he will not be unlocked.
1064: 3747:
They are templates. Youā€™ve added them to articles in their entirety, which defeats the purpose of them being templates. Iā€™m not sure you understand how navigational boxes are supposed to work.
387:
either, but itā€™s done that way pretty consistently. Contents within eponymous categories are about the topicā€™s relationship to the person, while entries for specific defined categories such as
1500: 3850: 2389: 3258: 3231: 3657: 3579:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. 3532: 3345: 3320:
Discogs is not reliable as its content is user generated. Everything you are referencing so far only tell me that the song exists. You don't seem to have a grasp of what makes something
3299: 3251: 3209: 1467: 2323: 2297: 2182: 2163:
hidden all these categories from scrutiny and many are in great need of attention or deletion. I cannot see why anyone thinks this is a sensible approach. This discussion should be at
2128:
Let's not hide the categories then. This should be discussed in a larger forum and you should refrain from adding what many may consider inappropriate categories for the time being per
683: 175: 2994: 2408:, clicked "Frederica von Stade albums" and didn't find a reference to an article about another Bernstein disc that might have interested them. What do you think? Or am I being foolish? 1517:
on March 26, thanks. That's yet another sock of BenJ1994, Ben2719941, both of which are blocked and locked. If you see any future suspects, please let me know and I'll deal with them.
3875: 2897: 2638: 1862:
are all earthquakes lists, currently about 25 of them, and it's unclear whether or not further work on them is intended. Ty654: any time you are finished with a page, you can add a
1845: 1821: 1794: 1665: 813: 798: 3455: 3443: 3413: 3401: 2626: 1989: 1975: 1427: 1240: 1226: 1117: 885: 870: 827: 3846: 3793: 3764: 2761: 2576: 2558: 2507: 2493: 2463: 2448: 2246:
where numerous editors expressed concern, which apparently is not a deterrence. Perhaps, though, this could continue where it started or begin again in a new section there? Thanks.
2176: 2157: 1231:
Yes, that must be it - I thought something must have happened to it... I was just letting you know, because of course you weren't going to get any discussion about your nomination.
1100:
when determining whether a topic meets the notability requirements for inclusion in Knowledge. Improve the article with what you have found and I'm sure it can be saved. Good luck.
747: 717: 666: 560: 542: 516: 408: 354: 316: 274: 209: 195: 3680: 984: 961: 443:
When making one category a subcategory of another, ensure that the members of the subcategory really can be expected (with possibly a few exceptions) to belong to the parent also.
2923: 2867: 1743:
from the original articles. I also worked super hard on them and would hate to see them deleted because of infringement of copyright. But anyway, thanks for writing to me though.
1592: 1526: 1056: 635: 3109: 2367: 1644: 1624: 2707: 3905: 3870: 2263: 2091: 1835: 1808: 1783: 1351: 1319: 2838: 1577: 839: 3166:
A while ago you deleted my page ā€œLet It Grow (The Lorax song)ā€. To let you know, the song is actually notable, espicially on YouTube. Explain to me whatā€™s not notable about.
2691: 1569: 1551: 1479:
It appears you may have used twinkle from the Categories for Discussion page rather than from the category you wanted to nominate. You may want to revert the notification at
1372:? Apart from the horribly unwieldy titles, I'm puzzled by them, as they only seem to contain talk pages. Presumably the creator meant to create categories along the lines of 1879: 1206: 2589:
I already left a message on PichPich's talk page, saying that I didn't think the article should be spun out... the combined article wouldn't be too long (under 25 kB) and
2381: 2074:. If there's a way to have categories with manually entered hidden categories not show up as being uncategorized (since they really aren't), that could solve the problem. 1629: 1377: 688: 1752: 640: 3029: 3020: 2417: 1712: 1403: 1373: 696: 3470: 660:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the 577:
RfC discussion on List of 2017 articles that is really about proper use of Knowledge:Article size. Requesting your time because I think a guideline is being misused
1183:
I know you've put this template up for deletion, but I can't seem to find any deletion discussion. Am I missing something, or did it not get transcluded properly?
498: 338: 322: 3498: 1906: 1894: 1140: 1086: 589:
Basically, I think these two editors are going beyond being useful in improving Knowledge and are moving into damaging Knowledge, so I would like you to come to
617: 2291: 2243: 2237: 2194: 2112: 3512: 1737: 1389: 1072: 821: 3626: 3025:
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
2660: 2534: 1192: 689: 611: 3741: 3511:
Find some actual reliable sources then you can re-create the article (note that it wasn't deleted but redirected). I would suggest you create a draft at
2279: 2071: 1454: 170:
because he is a rock musician, categories should apply to the articles contained within it, so his albums and songs aren't rock musicians and neither is
2950: 1284: 911: 1136: 1082: 3156: 2971: 2726: 2499: 2469: 2455: 2425: 2409: 2003: 1508: 3984: 3976: 3971: 3460:
Hi, just letting you know a bot removed the image due to the reason I mentioned before. However, I used the image that another editor drew for the
1683: 1144: 1090: 1068: 226: 149: 97: 89: 84: 2304:
Hi Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. We generally do not delete user pages unless the user in question explicitly requests deletion. Please refer to
2103:. There appears to be a widespread failure to adhere to this policy in categories about musicians. That is the problem we should be working on. 3959: 3954: 3946: 3314: 3269: 3224: 3175: 2734: 2703: 2394: 2011: 1076: 72: 67: 59: 1944: 1025: 3712: 1447: 3835: 3808:
I seem to recall a conversation that discouraged categorizing this way but I don't have a link. Do you know if there's consensus for this? ā€•
3363: 2603: 3377: 1849: 1827: 1800: 1760: 1744: 3592: 3057: 2953: 218: 1826:
I have now removed a lot of the pages in question. For all the ones that are now blank, please start a deletion process on them. Thanks.
1653: 371:. A member of a band is specific and other topics within the Mick Jagger category are not members of The Rolling Stones. Iā€™m not sure if 2786: 2844: 2632: 2278:
I would like more discussion of this issue. Your point of view has not had much support. My main concern is that this approach makes
1170: 1066: 3076: 2060: 767: 2772: 245:). If you want to change how these eponymous musician categories are currently being categorized, I suggest starting a discussion at 2350:. He blanked a lot of these pages after I talked to him, but he still many more similar pages that he didn't blank as well. Thanks. 3380:
first. You can also probably ask an admin who is involved with the stub sorting project to help with renaming the template back to
2373: 938: 730:
Yes, it is clear that the editor does not understand what "scope" means in terms of table formatting. It is not used for emphasis.
620:. Just wanted to let you know I replied to your comment (forgot to ping). Hoping this discussion will get additional attention. --- 1612: 132: 944:
I apologize for not following procedures. I misread DRV as only for reviewing deletion decisions so renominated the WikiProject.
1248: 2803: 429:
includes eponymous categories which in turn contain sub-categories and articles about things that are not cities. I know that
3934: 47: 17: 142:
it was some disbelief that the categories existed - with no categories and no project tags - for what seemed a long time -
3703:
Thank you for continuing to make Knowledge the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season.
2919: 549:
WT:WPMU#Hidden Category:Knowledge categories named after rock musicians is a subcategory of content Category:Rock musicians
145:
what I dont get - since when do categories about them end up with hidden categories and no visible? it doesnt make sense
3484: 2564: 2473: 1359: 671: 368: 304: 292: 2519: 1690: 1126:
have their own article. I certainly hope this one can be saved. What were the notability criteria sufficient for the
893: 590: 219:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Category%3AJimi_Hendrix&type=revision&diff=879759054&oldid=879144262
1596:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3720: 1659: 1175: 242: 241:
implies the contents of that category are rock musicians (although even if done this way, it should go in the subcat
174:. As far as I can tell, making the parent categories of eponymous categories such as these hidden occurred following 1254: 2712: 2374: 388: 2498:
Hi once more! That sounds an eminently sensible suggestion, and I shall make it my policy forthwith. Thanks again.
1557: 1540: 3674: 3115: 2915: 1463: 1443: 1324:
Wow, Star--you teach me new things all the time. I've been using AllMusic for almost 20 years and never knew... ā€•
899: 853:
notable. I leave it up to Liz and others who patrol empty categories to tag them for speedy deletion afterwards.
3612: 3151: 1438:
I used twinkle as advised. I don't understand why it got the target so wildly wrong. I am working to repair. --
1601: 2164: 2133: 2067: 1565: 1522: 3564: 2890: 2792:
mainspace. Surely you have far more pressing interests within the main site in terms of deleting articles.
3515:
to ensure it is reviewed by an editor who understands the notability requirements before it is published.
3896: 3826: 3600: 2956: 2945: 2902: 2476:
is the primary act (the lead or co-lead) and performs on all, or nearly all, of the tracks on the album.
2228: 2051: 1342: 1275: 594: 372: 300: 288: 280: 3449:
more careful in the future. It's not as easy as creating a series template or an article template, etc.
664:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
453:
but in reality many categories fail this if you traverse more than one level of the tree. Ie this fails:
3925: 2932: 2798: 1474: 1459: 1439: 1097: 925:
without coming to me for an explanation or going to DRV? I don't just count votes and close things. --
628: 488: 477:
Perhaps that sentence in SUBCAT needs to be expanded to explicitly say "... members of the subcategory
137: 38: 1005:), but also has their product available for sale on Amazon. They have an official Facebook page here: 3803: 3622: 3494: 3310: 3265: 3220: 3171: 2282:
almost unusable, and that means that many categories which need attention are effectively invisible.
1514: 1407: 992: 679: 426: 3461: 3042: 2697: 1997: 1561: 1533: 1518: 661: 359:
Eponymous categories are general and apply to articles strongly related to the subject. Nothing in
3662:
Agreed. Focus on existing articles and start sourcing your edits. Your additions are problematic.
3900: 3830: 3563:
Hello Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
2967: 2232: 2055: 1453:
If you can spare a couple of minutes, could you just check that I have done everything I should?
1346: 1279: 502: 342: 238: 167: 3016: 3008: 3878:, Totally sensible to me. Here's looking forward to another decade of working with you, Star. ā€• 3688: 2347: 1914: 1725: 1205:
Wow, I hadnā€™t even paid attention to this after I listed it. It looks like it disappeared with
809: 763: 583: 1885:
I deleted a few too. Only afterwards did I realise that I'd used the wrong rationale! Oops! --
1560:). But I'm not doing admin things at the moment, so someone else will have to block this one. 463:
When making one category a subcategory of another, ensure that the members of the subcategory
2878: 2702:
Can you please split the article of double-A side single Scream/Childhood into two articles:
2599: 1985: 1940: 1547: 1480: 1385: 1236: 1188: 881: 835: 621: 330: 234: 2584: 705: 3789: 3781: 3737: 3708: 3634: 3618: 3538: 3506: 3490: 3376:
No problem. In the future and FYI, you should propose new stub categories and templates at
3306: 3277: 3261: 3216: 3183: 3167: 2889:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2730: 2572: 2530: 2503: 2459: 2413: 2287: 2207: 2203: 2172: 2108: 2026: 2007: 2002:
Thank you for your very kind message. I'll try to learn from your advice and encouragement.
713: 675: 556: 512: 384: 380: 376: 360: 350: 326: 312: 296: 284: 171: 2938: 1859: 8: 3669: 3381: 3161: 3038: 2590: 2567:
since they were in quite short sucession. I may look through the category myself then. --
1903: 1876: 1704: 1364:
Hi Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars... what do you make of these recently created categories,
972: 926: 522: 334: 250: 246: 162:
It's because they are eponymous categories with no other appropriate parent. While, yes,
1711:. Since you had some involvement with these redirects, you might want to participate in 337:, which says in its infobox "Do not include this category in content categories." - but 3568: 3351: 3149: 2963: 2016: 1890: 1021: 602: 3851:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 2#Category:Soundtracks by century
2380:
Can you revert the new user's edit? Because s/he added an unofficial Taiwanese chart.
467:
really can be expected (with possibly a few exceptions) to belong to the parent also.
3588: 3074: 2861: 2818: 2313: 2030: 1640: 1164: 1149: 907: 805: 775: 759: 656: 641: 3091: 1299: 997:
Please remove the request for deletion for the newly created page for Eric Records (
3465: 3450: 3420: 3408: 3371: 3358: 3325: 3051: 2941: 2909: 2874: 2595: 2100: 1981: 1952: 1936: 1708: 1543: 1397: 1381: 1232: 1200: 1184: 877: 847: 831: 430: 422: 2718: 3892: 3822: 3785: 3777: 3733: 3704: 3145:
for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page.
2568: 2526: 2283: 2224: 2199: 2190: 2168: 2123: 2104: 2047: 2021: 1831: 1804: 1748: 1718: 1620: 1338: 1271: 1127: 725: 709: 552: 508: 346: 308: 223: 206: 157: 146: 127: 116: 3933:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3617:
It still was a Top 5 hit on what chart it was on. Shouldnā€™t that get it a page?
2309: 2305: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3664: 2886: 2340: 2244:
Knowledge talk:Categorization#Help me understand something about categories....
1900: 1873: 1866: 1635:
Please see my proposal to upmerge to the parent "British" category by century:
980: 934: 105: 1537: 3305:
I added another ref to Discogs, which says the genre. Is it acceptable now?
3146: 3134: 2882: 2129: 1886: 1131: 1033: 1017: 598: 254: 2962:, which details the creation and history of the chart, seemed appropriate.-- 923:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject HBO (2nd nomination)
3725: 3584: 3547: 3125: 3117: 3084: 3069: 2741: 2331: 1636: 1597: 1539:, particularly in light of the comment he left on Hughesdarren's talk page 1156: 1123: 903: 1370:
Category:Knowledge featured topics Megadeth studio albums featured content
1096:
Another thing Knowledge discourages are meatpuppets. I don't look at what
3321: 3189: 2767: 2740:
I requested a split years ago. If there is clear consensus, feel free to
1433: 1012:
The original base of this page came from the converted German Wiki page (
916: 753: 364: 163: 3697: 2893:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2722: 1006: 1002: 3879: 3842: 3809: 3001:
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
2871:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2211: 2186: 2070:. The only reason they've been added is because they are showing up in 2034: 1616: 1325: 1293: 1258: 122: 111: 3282:
Spotify and iTunes are not valid sources for establishing notability.
1366:
Category:Knowledge featured topics Megadeth studio albums good content
3572: 2853: 2811: 2793: 2776: 3721: 3576: 2668: 2651: 1674: 1380:, but even so, is this something we would categorize on Knowledge? 781:
of Knowledge's core policies and it could not be explained to him.
391:
are just that: articles on people who are English rock guitarists.
699:
at that article, where the editor is changing the location of the
3234:
and let someone review it before it becomes a published article.
1154:
I just wanted to thank you for the correction on my articlesĀ :)--
3464:
series template for me and Atsme. I think it looks pretty good.
3230:
That's pretty much on you. Try re-creating it in draft space at
2906:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1925:
Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Bosnia and Herzegovina
2896:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
2779:. Please weigh in with your opinions to help form a consensus. 1799:
I understand now. I'm now in the process of removing them all.
593:, read the discussions in the two section above it, especially 3849:
and discovered it was nominated a little over a year ago (see
3123:
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on
1703:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirects
1696: 1410:
group, so I don't see anything to be concerned about. Thanks.
1135:
that may not be obvious to others and vice versa. Thank you!
3215:
Well can you please try and create it with reliable sources?
2775:
is an AFD that you might be interested regarding the article
2609:
I'm glad someone will do it, thanks. Keep up the great work!
2299:
User:Ty654/List of Adult R&B number-one singles in 2005
1402:
Definitely something I've never seen before. I see there's
205:
eponymous - sheesh enough to give one a sense of humour...
497:
In any case how do we resolve the inclusion of the hidden
2346:
be more appropriate per my conversation with the user at
1013: 2865:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1404:
Category:Knowledge featured topics BeyoncƩ studio albums
499:
Category:Knowledge categories named after rock musicians
339:
Category:Knowledge categories named after rock musicians
323:
Category:Knowledge categories named after rock musicians
2877:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1578:
Orphaned non-free image File:Now 49 us album cover.jpg
998: 494:
would be better than making one a subcat of the other.
484:
As for Jagger and Stones, Lennon and Beatles, perhaps
2181:
There is nothing secret about it. It was decided at
1630:
Upmerge English operas singers by century categories
690:
List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2019
2280:
Knowledge:Database reports/Uncategorized categories
2072:
Knowledge:Database reports/Uncategorized categories
1854:I commend you both for your attention to this. As 1689:Shake It Off (song) and Rather Be (song) listed at 1455:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 31
1929:Category:World Heritage Tentative List by Colombia 1611:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 3139:completely different target, so G4 does not apply 3028:If you have any questions, please let us know at 2210:, etc.? What has changed in the past two weeks? ā€• 1858:, there were over seven hundred such pages. The 921:Is there a particular reason why you renominated 525:. It doesn't bother me that it's there. Thanks. 2944:. The chart was originally a BB-Twitter chart, 2704:Scream (Michael Jackson and Janet Jackson song) 1009:. They can be reached there or on their site. 3257:I created it. Can you see if itā€™s acceptable? 1613:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1607:Note that any non-free images not used in any 1556:That's him for sure (see the previous sock at 1406:, among others. It seems to be managed by the 3141:. I request that you consider not re-tagging 2563:No worries, just thought you were looking at 1738:Response to User:Subpage plagarism from Ty654 822:Cory Lee and Alexz Johnson category deletions 3378:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals 2132:. There has been a long-standing issue with 612:Categorizing all songs by an artist by genre 591:Talk:List of 2017 albums#Request for comment 3019:and send us your Google account address to 1921:Category:World Heritage Site Tentative list 1899:I think G7 was ok in this circumstance. ā€“ 1654:Category:19th-century English opera singers 1650:Category:18th-century English opera singers 425:. But note that even the WP:SETCAT example 1209:, which itself is a malformed nomination. 363:is a ā€œMick Jaggerā€ except Jagger himself. 3845:, I came across the scheme developed for 2773:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Spurs 2646:Category:Categorys with short description 3060:? The review page quite clearly states: 2744:and split the article yourself. Thanks. 2242:This discussion had been centralized at 1766:but they canā€™t be on Knowledge. Thanks. 1536:ā€“ i have my suspicions about this user: 505:, contrary to the infobox on the former? 2937:Hi S, why did you change this redirect 2395:When is an album with X not an X album? 293:the other members of the Rolling Stones 14: 3931:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3554:Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! 2725:on article's talk page.Thank you... - 2382:2402:1980:824D:93A:2E98:8AFC:FFF4:7D77 2138:discussed off and on for over 10 years 2066:Somewhat of a discussion has begun at 521:You may want to take that question to 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2399:Hi again! I noticed that you removed 1860:remaining pages in Ty654's user space 1513:Hi. I see you reverted some edits at 1014:https://de.wikipedia.org/Eric_Records 1007:https://www.facebook.com/ericrecords/ 1003:http://www.ericrecords.com/index.html 999:https://en.wikipedia.org/Eric_Records 18:User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 3912: 2862:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 341:is included in the content category 25: 2565:Category:Album track list templates 2474:Category:Frederica von Stade albums 369:Category:The Rolling Stones members 305:Category:The Rolling Stones members 23: 3232:Draft:Let It Grow (The Lorax song) 2845:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 2633:Notification for CSD page creators 2202:, Why are you doing this again at 1695: 1581: 1483:, but everything else looks fine. 898:Please see my proposal to upmerge 24: 3998: 3188:You're confusing popularity with 1980:Okay, no problem. Thanks anyway. 1558:Commons:User_talk:Hughesdarren#Hi 644:has been nominated for discussion 243:Category:American rock guitarists 3916: 3784:) 05:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC) 3696: 3546: 2852: 2713:Childhood (Michael Jackson song) 2375:Special:Contributions/ESCGorilla 1532:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars and 1253:Can you explain the distinction 804:friend. Just revert and report. 648: 479:but not necessarily its children 389:Category:English rock guitarists 29: 3847:Category:Soundtracks by century 2900:and submit your choices on the 1509:"The Essential..." sockpuppetry 900:Category:2016 murders in Turkey 706:Help:Table#Pipe syntax tutorial 616:Thank you for participating in 2762:15:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC) 2735:06:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC) 2692:15:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 1593:File:Now 49 us album cover.jpg 595:Talk:List of 2017 albums#Redux 13: 1: 3906:01:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 3871:01:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 3836:01:00, 29 December 2019 (UTC) 3794:05:42, 25 December 2019 (UTC) 3765:05:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC) 3742:04:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC) 3713:03:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC) 3681:06:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC) 3658:22:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC) 3627:19:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC) 3593:17:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 3252:21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 3225:21:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 3210:20:51, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 3176:19:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 3157:00:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC) 3110:00:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC) 3077:21:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC) 3047:21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 2995:15:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 2972:12:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC) 2924:00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 2879:Knowledge arbitration process 2708:Scream (Michael Jackson song) 2661:18:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC) 2348:User talk:Ty654#User subpages 2165:Knowledge talk:Categorization 1602:our policy for non-free media 748:23:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 718:23:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 684:12:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC) 636:21:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 561:03:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 543:03:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 517:01:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC) 409:14:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 367:is appropriately included in 355:12:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 317:12:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC) 295:) is a Mick Jagger. Possibly 3603:}} to other user talk pages. 3599:Spread the love by adding {{ 3533:21:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 3499:20:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 3471:04:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3456:02:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3444:01:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3414:00:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3402:19:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 3364:19:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 3346:20:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3315:19:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3300:17:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 3270:06:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 2947:Billboard" Twitter Real-time 2839:00:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 2804:00:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 2787:05:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 1249:Reviewers don't rate albums? 607:02:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 275:16:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 227:07:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 210:23:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 196:17:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 150:10:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 133:09:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 7: 3876:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 3485:ā€œBing Bong Zooā€ not notable 3022:, so we can invite you in! 2717:There is a clear consensus 2639:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 2627:21:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 2604:21:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 2577:22:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2559:22:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2535:21:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 2508:10:54, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 2494:18:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 2464:12:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 2449:06:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 2418:01:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 2390:05:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 1846:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 1822:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 1795:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 1666:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 1360:Strange Megadeth categories 695:I'm getting an interesting 415:specific defined categories 373:Category:The Rolling Stones 301:Category:The Rolling Stones 289:Category:The Rolling Stones 287:, but not everything under 281:Category:The Rolling Stones 10: 4003: 3571:by wishing another user a 2916:MediaWiki message delivery 2520:Group nom of tracklistings 2292:07:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC) 2264:22:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 2238:22:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1919:Hi, I've just come across 1907:09:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC) 1895:03:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC) 1880:10:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC) 1378:FL-class Megadeth articles 1171:03:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC) 1077:06:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 1057:22:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 1026:22:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC) 912:20:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 894:Proposal to merge category 886:13:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 871:01:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC) 840:18:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC) 814:06:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 799:06:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 768:06:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC) 3545: 2368:16:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 2324:02:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 2195:13:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 2177:22:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 2158:21:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 2136:in general that has been 2113:20:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 2092:19:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 2061:19:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC) 2012:00:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 1990:23:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 1976:23:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 1945:17:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC) 1872:tag for its deletion. ā€“ 1836:14:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 1809:13:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC) 1784:10:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC) 1753:02:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC) 1733:01:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC) 1715:if you wish to do so. ā€” 1684:03:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC) 1660:Multiplying TV categories 1645:05:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC) 1582: 1570:15:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 1552:15:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 1515:The Essential Roy Orbison 1408:Knowledge:Featured topics 985:01:25, 5 April 2019 (UTC) 962:15:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC) 939:14:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC) 672:categories for discussion 427:Category:Cities in France 217:The more I look at it - 3601:subst:Seasonal Greetings 3462:Professional Bull Riders 3135:speedy deletion criteria 3056:Hi. What do you mean by 2914:to your user talk page. 2312:for specifics. Thanks, 1691:Redirects for discussion 1625:17:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC) 1527:17:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC) 1501:19:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC) 1468:19:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC) 1448:19:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC) 1428:18:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC) 1390:17:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC) 1374:GA-class Megadeth albums 1352:01:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 1320:01:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC) 1285:23:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC) 1091:20:14, 01 May 2019 (UTC) 253:, or maybe even open an 1856:this deletion log shows 1713:the redirect discussion 1241:10:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 1227:07:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC) 1193:23:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC) 1145:02:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC) 1118:23:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC) 503:Category:Rock musicians 343:Category:Rock musicians 239:Category:Rock musicians 168:Category:Rock musicians 3613:In This Place Deletion 3129:. I do not think that 3064:, and then there is a 2644:I was just looking at 1923:and its subcategories 1700: 1587: 584:Knowledge:Article size 299:should be a subcat of 3929:of past discussions. 2875:Arbitration Committee 2859:Hello! Voting in the 2406:Arias and Barcarolles 1699: 1590:Thanks for uploading 1585: 1481:User talk:Grendelkhan 1475:John Maynard Friedman 1460:John Maynard Friedman 1440:John Maynard Friedman 417:, I presume you mean 331:Category:Jimi Hendrix 235:Category:Jimi Hendrix 42:of past discussions. 2208:Category:TVT Records 2204:Category:Fats Domino 2134:eponymous categories 2027:Category:Mick Jagger 667:the category's entry 385:Category:John Lennon 381:Category:The Beatles 377:Category:Mick Jagger 361:Category:Mick Jagger 327:Category:Mick Jagger 297:Category:Mick Jagger 291:(in particular, the 285:Category:Mick Jagger 283:is a subcategory of 172:Anomphalus jaggerius 3513:Draft:Bing Bong Zoo 3382:Template:Rodeo-stub 3039:User:Martin Urbanec 1705:Shake It Off (song) 1562:Boing! said Zebedee 1534:Boing! said Zebedee 1519:Boing! said Zebedee 3015:Please sign up at 2952:and was revamped, 2933:Change of Redirect 2891:arbitration policy 1701: 1588: 1098:other stuff exists 138:hendrix and jagger 3990: 3989: 3941: 3940: 3935:current talk page 3804:Albums by century 3718: 3717: 3610: 3609: 3565:seasonal occasion 3384:. Happy editing. 3153:DESiegel Contribs 2960:Twitter Real-Time 2930: 2929: 2068:WT:Categorization 2031:Category:Magnapop 1730: 1598:claim of fair use 1300:AllMusic FAQ page 1298:According to the 1178:Red Rose Speedway 993:Eric Records Page 983: 937: 828:this CfD proposal 674:page. Thank you. 657:Category:Examples 642:Category:Examples 489:Category see also 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3994: 3968: 3943: 3942: 3920: 3919: 3913: 3904: 3887: 3869: 3865: 3862: 3859: 3856: 3834: 3817: 3763: 3759: 3756: 3753: 3750: 3700: 3693: 3692: 3677: 3672: 3667: 3656: 3652: 3649: 3646: 3643: 3638: 3604: 3550: 3543: 3542: 3531: 3527: 3524: 3521: 3518: 3510: 3442: 3438: 3435: 3432: 3429: 3424: 3400: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3387: 3375: 3344: 3340: 3337: 3334: 3331: 3298: 3294: 3291: 3288: 3285: 3281: 3250: 3246: 3243: 3240: 3237: 3208: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3187: 3133:fits any of the 3108: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3088: 3017:the contest page 2993: 2989: 2986: 2983: 2980: 2942:Emerging Artists 2913: 2856: 2849: 2848: 2837: 2833: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2815: 2801: 2796: 2784: 2782:Ten Pound Hammer 2760: 2756: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2698:Scream/Childhood 2690: 2686: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2672: 2659: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2492: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2447: 2443: 2440: 2437: 2434: 2429: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2345: 2339: 2335: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2249: 2236: 2219: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2127: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2059: 2042: 1998:Von Stade albums 1974: 1970: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1956: 1871: 1865: 1853: 1825: 1798: 1782: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1764: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1709:Rather Be (song) 1682: 1584: 1499: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1478: 1426: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1401: 1350: 1333: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1297: 1283: 1266: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1204: 1167: 1159: 1116: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1055: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1037: 979: 977: 960: 956: 953: 950: 947: 933: 931: 869: 865: 862: 859: 856: 851: 797: 793: 790: 787: 784: 779: 746: 742: 739: 736: 733: 729: 652: 651: 631: 624: 623:Another Believer 541: 537: 534: 531: 528: 493: 487: 465:and its children 407: 403: 400: 397: 394: 325:(which contains 273: 269: 266: 263: 260: 194: 190: 187: 184: 181: 161: 130: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4002: 4001: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3964: 3917: 3890: 3881: 3867: 3863: 3860: 3857: 3854: 3820: 3811: 3806: 3761: 3757: 3754: 3751: 3748: 3729: 3691: 3675: 3670: 3665: 3654: 3650: 3647: 3644: 3641: 3635:CheatCodes4ever 3632: 3619:CheatCodes4ever 3615: 3598: 3573:Merry Christmas 3541: 3529: 3525: 3522: 3519: 3516: 3507:CheatCodes4ever 3504: 3491:CheatCodes4ever 3487: 3440: 3436: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3418: 3398: 3394: 3391: 3388: 3385: 3369: 3354: 3342: 3338: 3335: 3332: 3329: 3307:CheatCodes4ever 3296: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3278:CheatCodes4ever 3275: 3262:CheatCodes4ever 3248: 3244: 3241: 3238: 3235: 3217:CheatCodes4ever 3206: 3202: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3184:CheatCodes4ever 3181: 3168:CheatCodes4ever 3164: 3154: 3121: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3096: 3093: 3082: 3062:Allmusic rating 3054: 3003: 2991: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2978: 2935: 2907: 2847: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2809: 2799: 2794: 2780: 2770: 2758: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2700: 2688: 2684: 2681: 2678: 2675: 2666: 2650: 2635: 2623: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2610: 2587: 2555: 2551: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2522: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2445: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2423: 2397: 2378: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2343: 2337: 2329: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2302: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2222: 2213: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2121: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2078: 2075: 2045: 2036: 2022:User:Rathfelder 2019: 2000: 1972: 1968: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1950: 1917: 1869: 1863: 1843: 1819: 1792: 1780: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1758: 1740: 1726: 1719: 1694: 1673: 1662: 1632: 1615:. Thank you. -- 1580: 1511: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1472: 1436: 1424: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1395: 1362: 1336: 1327: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1291: 1269: 1260: 1251: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1198: 1181: 1165: 1157: 1152: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1031: 995: 973: 958: 954: 951: 948: 945: 927: 919: 896: 867: 863: 860: 857: 854: 845: 824: 795: 791: 788: 785: 782: 773: 756: 744: 740: 737: 734: 731: 723: 693: 676:UnitedStatesian 653: 649: 646: 634: 629: 622: 618:this discussion 614: 579: 539: 535: 532: 529: 526: 501:in the content 491: 485: 480: 468: 466: 444: 405: 401: 398: 395: 392: 335:hidden category 271: 267: 264: 261: 258: 192: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176:this discussion 155: 140: 128: 117: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4000: 3988: 3987: 3982: 3979: 3974: 3969: 3962: 3957: 3952: 3949: 3939: 3938: 3921: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3805: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3770: 3769: 3728: 3719: 3716: 3715: 3701: 3690: 3689:Happy Holidays 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3614: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3583: 3581:Happy editing, 3580: 3577:Happy New Year 3560: 3557: 3556: 3551: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3353: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3303: 3302: 3255: 3254: 3213: 3212: 3163: 3160: 3152: 3120: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3053: 3050: 3009:Google Code-In 3002: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2927: 2898:the candidates 2868:eligible users 2857: 2846: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2396: 2393: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2301: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2197: 2116: 2115: 2095: 2094: 2018: 2015: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1916: 1915:WHS categories 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1787: 1786: 1739: 1736: 1693: 1687: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1647: 1631: 1628: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1510: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1180: 1174: 1151: 1148: 1128:Mexican R'n'B' 1121: 1120: 1060: 1059: 994: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 965: 964: 918: 915: 895: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 823: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 755: 752: 751: 750: 692: 687: 662:categorization 647: 645: 639: 626: 613: 610: 578: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 506: 495: 482: 478: 464: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 421:as defined in 419:set categories 321:I notice that 319: 279:I notice that 215: 214: 213: 212: 199: 198: 139: 136: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3999: 3986: 3983: 3980: 3978: 3975: 3973: 3970: 3967: 3963: 3961: 3958: 3956: 3953: 3950: 3948: 3945: 3944: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3927: 3922: 3915: 3914: 3907: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3889: 3885: 3877: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3819: 3815: 3797: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3768: 3766: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3727: 3723: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3682: 3679: 3678: 3673: 3668: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3636: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3606: 3605: 3602: 3595: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3567:. Spread the 3566: 3559: 3558: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3534: 3514: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3472: 3469: 3468: 3463: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3454: 3453: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3422: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3412: 3411: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3383: 3379: 3373: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3362: 3361: 3347: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3301: 3279: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3260: 3253: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3211: 3191: 3185: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3159: 3158: 3155: 3150: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3119: 3111: 3092: 3086: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3075: 3073: 3072: 3068:user rating. 3067: 3063: 3059: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3035: 3032: 3030: 3026: 3023: 3021: 3018: 3012: 3010: 3006: 2996: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964:Bonnielou2013 2961: 2959: 2954: 2951: 2949: 2948: 2943: 2939: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2911: 2905: 2904: 2899: 2894: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2870: 2869: 2864: 2863: 2858: 2855: 2851: 2850: 2840: 2820: 2813: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2802: 2797: 2789: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2774: 2763: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2705: 2693: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2658: 2656: 2655: 2647: 2642: 2640: 2628: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2427: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2402: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2376: 2369: 2349: 2342: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2311: 2307: 2300: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2265: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2217: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2097: 2096: 2093: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2044: 2040: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1954: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1932: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1908: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1868: 1861: 1857: 1851: 1847: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1762: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1723: 1722: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1698: 1692: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1679: 1678: 1669: 1667: 1655: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1502: 1482: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1429: 1409: 1405: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1331: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1301: 1295: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1256: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1208: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1179: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1161: 1160: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1132:Crown Records 1129: 1125: 1119: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1058: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1008: 1004: 1000: 986: 982: 978: 976: 969: 968: 967: 966: 963: 943: 942: 941: 940: 936: 932: 930: 924: 914: 913: 909: 905: 901: 887: 883: 879: 874: 873: 872: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 815: 811: 807: 802: 801: 800: 777: 772: 771: 770: 769: 765: 761: 749: 727: 722: 721: 720: 719: 715: 711: 707: 702: 698: 691: 686: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 668: 663: 659: 658: 643: 638: 637: 632: 625: 619: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 587: 585: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 524: 520: 519: 518: 514: 510: 507: 504: 500: 496: 490: 483: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 413:When you say 412: 411: 410: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 276: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 220: 211: 208: 203: 202: 201: 200: 197: 177: 173: 169: 165: 159: 154: 153: 152: 151: 148: 143: 135: 134: 131: 126: 125: 120: 115: 114: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3965: 3930: 3924: 3883: 3813: 3807: 3796: 3767: 3730: 3726:Eric Tessmer 3663: 3616: 3597: 3596: 3562: 3561: 3553: 3539:Merry Merry! 3488: 3466: 3451: 3409: 3359: 3355: 3304: 3256: 3214: 3165: 3143:Template:Rfs 3142: 3138: 3131:Template:Rfs 3130: 3126:Template:Rfs 3124: 3122: 3118:Template:Rfs 3070: 3065: 3061: 3055: 3036: 3033: 3027: 3024: 3013: 3007: 3004: 2957: 2946: 2936: 2901: 2895: 2872: 2866: 2860: 2790: 2781: 2771: 2716: 2711: 2701: 2653: 2652: 2643: 2636: 2591:WP:SONGCOVER 2588: 2523: 2405: 2400: 2398: 2379: 2303: 2215: 2038: 2020: 2001: 1933: 1918: 1842: 1741: 1717: 1716: 1702: 1676: 1675: 1670: 1663: 1608: 1606: 1591: 1589: 1512: 1437: 1363: 1329: 1262: 1252: 1182: 1177: 1163: 1155: 1153: 1124:Meat Puppets 1122: 1080: 1061: 1011: 996: 974: 928: 920: 897: 825: 806:TonyBallioni 776:TonyBallioni 760:TonyBallioni 757: 700: 694: 665: 655: 654: 615: 588: 580: 418: 414: 216: 144: 141: 123: 112: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3923:This is an 3467:dawnleelynn 3452:dawnleelynn 3421:Dawnleelynn 3410:dawnleelynn 3372:Dawnleelynn 3360:dawnleelynn 3259:Let It Grow 3162:Let It Grow 3116:Tagging of 3034:Thank you! 2903:voting page 2596:Richard3120 2401:On the Town 2183:cfd in 2012 1982:Richard3120 1953:Richard3120 1937:Richard3120 1544:Richard3120 1398:Richard3120 1382:Richard3120 1233:Richard3120 1201:Richard3120 1185:Richard3120 1137:PaulBigelow 1083:PaulBigelow 878:Richard3120 848:Richard3120 832:Richard3120 701:scope="row" 383:belongs in 375:belongs in 365:Mick Jagger 164:Mick Jagger 36:This is an 3985:ArchiveĀ 14 3977:ArchiveĀ 12 3972:ArchiveĀ 11 3966:ArchiveĀ 10 3786:Lightburst 3778:Lightburst 3734:Lightburst 3705:Lightburst 3352:Rodeo stub 3190:notability 2887:topic bans 2821:. Thanks. 2819:WP:NOTHOST 2727:Akhiljaxxn 2585:Doin' Time 2569:Trialpears 2527:Trialpears 2500:Niggle1892 2470:Niggle1892 2456:Niggle1892 2426:Niggle1892 2410:Niggle1892 2284:Rathfelder 2200:Rathfelder 2169:Rathfelder 2124:Rathfelder 2105:Rathfelder 2017:Categories 2004:Niggle1892 1720:Newslinger 726:MPFitz1968 710:MPFitz1968 553:Mitch Ames 509:Mitch Ames 347:Mitch Ames 309:Mitch Ames 224:JarrahTree 207:JarrahTree 166:can be in 158:JarrahTree 147:JarrahTree 98:ArchiveĀ 14 90:ArchiveĀ 12 85:ArchiveĀ 11 79:ArchiveĀ 10 3960:ArchiveĀ 9 3955:ArchiveĀ 8 3947:ArchiveĀ 5 3326:WP:NSONGS 3090:Buchanan. 2958:Billboard 2883:site bans 2777:The Spurs 2310:WP:CSD#U1 2306:WP:CSD#G7 2101:WP:SETCAT 1901:Athaenara 1874:Athaenara 1207:this edit 1150:Thank you 1069:Chiu.0606 431:WP:SUBCAT 423:WP:SETCAT 73:ArchiveĀ 9 68:ArchiveĀ 8 60:ArchiveĀ 5 3880:Justin ( 3810:Justin ( 3722:Guy King 3585:ā˜…Trekker 3569:WikiLove 3137:because 3066:separate 3052:Allmusic 3005:Hello, 2212:Justin ( 2035:Justin ( 2033:, etc. ā€• 1887:kingboyk 1609:articles 1326:Justin ( 1259:Justin ( 1176:TfD for 1034:GodzFire 1018:GodzFire 981:(aka DQ) 935:(aka DQ) 599:Mburrell 333:) is a 3926:archive 3322:notable 3085:Teemeah 3071:Teemeah 2910:NoACEMM 2742:be bold 2637:Hello, 2332:Fastily 1664:Hello, 1637:Hugo999 904:Hugo999 670:on the 523:WT:WPMU 251:WT:CATP 247:WT:WPMU 110:Sorry! 39:archive 3858:cheers 3752:cheers 3645:cheers 3575:and a 3520:cheers 3431:cheers 3389:cheers 3333:cheers 3287:cheers 3239:cheers 3197:cheers 3097:cheers 2982:cheers 2826:cheers 2749:cheers 2679:cheers 2614:cheers 2546:cheers 2481:cheers 2436:cheers 2355:cheers 2336:Would 2319:ASTILY 2251:cheers 2145:cheers 2130:WP:BRD 2079:cheers 1963:cheers 1771:cheers 1652:& 1488:cheers 1415:cheers 1307:cheers 1214:cheers 1105:cheers 1044:cheers 975:Amanda 949:cheers 929:Amanda 858:cheers 786:cheers 735:cheers 547:Done: 530:cheers 396:cheers 379:or if 262:cheers 183:cheers 129:(talk) 118:(talk) 106:Revert 3861:peaks 3843:Koavf 3755:peaks 3648:peaks 3523:peaks 3434:peaks 3392:peaks 3336:peaks 3290:peaks 3242:peaks 3200:peaks 3100:peaks 2985:peaks 2829:peaks 2752:peaks 2682:peaks 2617:peaks 2549:peaks 2484:peaks 2439:peaks 2358:peaks 2341:db-u5 2254:peaks 2187:Oculi 2148:peaks 2082:peaks 1966:peaks 1867:db-u1 1850:Ty654 1828:Ty654 1801:Ty654 1774:peaks 1761:Ty654 1745:Ty654 1617:B-bot 1491:peaks 1418:peaks 1310:peaks 1294:Koavf 1217:peaks 1158:Lirim 1108:peaks 1047:peaks 952:peaks 861:peaks 789:peaks 738:peaks 533:peaks 481:...". 399:peaks 265:peaks 186:peaks 16:< 3868:wars 3866:lost 3864:news 3855:Star 3790:talk 3782:talk 3762:wars 3760:lost 3758:news 3749:Star 3738:talk 3724:and 3709:talk 3655:wars 3653:lost 3651:news 3642:Star 3623:talk 3589:talk 3530:wars 3528:lost 3526:news 3517:Star 3495:talk 3441:wars 3439:lost 3437:news 3428:Star 3399:wars 3397:lost 3395:news 3386:Star 3343:wars 3341:lost 3339:news 3330:Star 3311:talk 3297:wars 3295:lost 3293:news 3284:Star 3266:talk 3249:wars 3247:lost 3245:news 3236:Star 3221:talk 3207:wars 3205:lost 3203:news 3194:Star 3172:talk 3107:wars 3105:lost 3103:news 3094:Star 3058:this 3043:talk 2992:wars 2990:lost 2988:news 2979:Star 2977:OK. 2968:talk 2920:talk 2873:The 2836:wars 2834:lost 2832:news 2823:Star 2812:03md 2759:wars 2757:lost 2755:news 2746:Star 2731:talk 2723:here 2721:and 2719:here 2689:wars 2687:lost 2685:news 2676:Star 2624:wars 2622:lost 2620:news 2611:Star 2600:talk 2573:talk 2556:wars 2554:lost 2552:news 2543:Star 2531:talk 2504:talk 2491:wars 2489:lost 2487:news 2478:Star 2460:talk 2446:wars 2444:lost 2442:news 2433:Star 2414:talk 2386:talk 2365:wars 2363:lost 2361:news 2352:Star 2288:talk 2261:wars 2259:lost 2257:news 2248:Star 2191:talk 2173:talk 2155:wars 2153:lost 2151:news 2142:Star 2109:talk 2089:wars 2087:lost 2085:news 2076:Star 2029:and 2008:talk 1986:talk 1973:wars 1971:lost 1969:news 1960:Star 1941:talk 1927:and 1891:talk 1848:and 1832:talk 1805:talk 1781:wars 1779:lost 1777:news 1768:Star 1749:talk 1727:talk 1707:and 1641:talk 1621:talk 1566:talk 1548:talk 1523:talk 1498:wars 1496:lost 1494:news 1485:Star 1464:talk 1444:talk 1425:wars 1423:lost 1421:news 1412:Star 1386:talk 1376:and 1368:and 1317:wars 1315:lost 1313:news 1304:Star 1255:here 1237:talk 1224:wars 1222:lost 1220:news 1211:Star 1189:talk 1166:Talk 1141:talk 1130:and 1115:wars 1113:lost 1111:news 1102:Star 1087:talk 1073:talk 1054:wars 1052:lost 1050:news 1041:Star 1022:talk 959:wars 957:lost 955:news 946:Star 908:talk 882:talk 868:wars 866:lost 864:news 855:Star 836:talk 826:Re: 810:talk 796:wars 794:lost 792:news 783:Star 764:talk 745:wars 743:lost 741:news 732:Star 714:talk 697:edit 680:talk 630:Talk 603:talk 557:talk 540:wars 538:lost 536:news 527:Star 513:talk 433:says 406:wars 404:lost 402:news 393:Star 351:talk 329:and 313:talk 272:wars 270:lost 268:news 259:Star 193:wars 191:lost 189:news 180:Star 124:Tony 113:Tony 3841:Hi 3676:vee 3671:van 3666:Rob 3147:DES 3031:. 2785:ā€¢ 2768:AFD 2706:or 2669:Liz 2468:Hi 1604:). 1434:cfd 1290:Hi 1257:? ā€• 917:MFD 754:SPI 303:or 255:RfC 249:or 237:in 3981:ā†’ 3951:ā† 3886:vf 3882:ko 3816:vf 3812:ko 3792:) 3740:) 3711:) 3625:) 3591:) 3497:) 3328:. 3313:) 3268:) 3223:) 3174:) 3045:) 3037:-- 2970:) 2940:, 2922:) 2912:}} 2908:{{ 2885:, 2800:md 2795:03 2733:) 2657:iz 2641:, 2602:) 2575:) 2533:) 2525:-- 2506:) 2462:) 2416:) 2388:) 2344:}} 2338:{{ 2290:) 2218:vf 2214:ko 2206:, 2193:) 2175:) 2167:. 2140:. 2111:) 2041:vf 2037:ko 2010:) 1988:) 1943:) 1904:āœ‰ 1893:) 1877:āœ‰ 1870:}} 1864:{{ 1834:) 1807:) 1751:) 1680:iz 1668:, 1643:) 1623:) 1568:) 1550:) 1542:. 1525:) 1466:) 1458:-- 1446:) 1388:) 1332:vf 1328:ko 1265:vf 1261:ko 1239:) 1191:) 1162:| 1143:) 1089:) 1075:) 1024:) 910:) 902:. 884:) 838:) 812:) 766:) 716:) 682:) 605:) 559:) 551:. 515:) 492:}} 486:{{ 353:) 345:. 315:) 307:. 257:. 178:. 94:ā†’ 64:ā† 3937:. 3903:ā˜Æ 3901:M 3899:ā˜ŗ 3897:C 3895:ā˜® 3893:T 3891:ā¤ 3888:) 3884:a 3833:ā˜Æ 3831:M 3829:ā˜ŗ 3827:C 3825:ā˜® 3823:T 3821:ā¤ 3818:) 3814:a 3788:( 3780:( 3736:( 3707:( 3637:: 3633:@ 3621:( 3587:( 3509:: 3505:@ 3493:( 3423:: 3419:@ 3374:: 3370:@ 3309:( 3280:: 3276:@ 3264:( 3219:( 3186:: 3182:@ 3170:( 3087:: 3083:@ 3041:( 2966:( 2918:( 2814:: 2810:@ 2729:( 2671:: 2667:@ 2654:L 2598:( 2571:( 2529:( 2502:( 2458:( 2428:: 2424:@ 2412:( 2384:( 2334:: 2330:@ 2316:F 2308:/ 2286:( 2235:ā˜Æ 2233:M 2231:ā˜ŗ 2229:C 2227:ā˜® 2225:T 2223:ā¤ 2220:) 2216:a 2189:( 2171:( 2126:: 2122:@ 2107:( 2058:ā˜Æ 2056:M 2054:ā˜ŗ 2052:C 2050:ā˜® 2048:T 2046:ā¤ 2043:) 2039:a 2006:( 1984:( 1955:: 1951:@ 1939:( 1889:( 1852:: 1844:@ 1830:( 1824:: 1820:@ 1803:( 1797:: 1793:@ 1763:: 1759:@ 1747:( 1677:L 1639:( 1619:( 1586:āš  1564:( 1546:( 1521:( 1477:: 1473:@ 1462:( 1442:( 1400:: 1396:@ 1384:( 1349:ā˜Æ 1347:M 1345:ā˜ŗ 1343:C 1341:ā˜® 1339:T 1337:ā¤ 1334:) 1330:a 1296:: 1292:@ 1282:ā˜Æ 1280:M 1278:ā˜ŗ 1276:C 1274:ā˜® 1272:T 1270:ā¤ 1267:) 1263:a 1235:( 1203:: 1199:@ 1187:( 1139:( 1085:( 1071:( 1036:: 1032:@ 1020:( 906:( 880:( 850:: 846:@ 834:( 808:( 778:: 774:@ 762:( 728:: 724:@ 712:( 678:( 633:) 627:( 601:( 555:( 511:( 349:( 311:( 160:: 156:@ 50:.

Index

User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 5
ArchiveĀ 8
ArchiveĀ 9
ArchiveĀ 10
ArchiveĀ 11
ArchiveĀ 12
ArchiveĀ 14
Tony
(talk)
Tony
(talk)
09:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
JarrahTree
10:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
JarrahTree
Mick Jagger
Category:Rock musicians
Anomphalus jaggerius
this discussion
17:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
JarrahTree
23:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Category%3AJimi_Hendrix&type=revision&diff=879759054&oldid=879144262
JarrahTree
07:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Jimi Hendrix
Category:Rock musicians

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘