User talk:Spinningspark/Archive 12

1590:, (I wasn't aware of the first three RfAs, otherwise I would have argued this there too), is that there ARE notable, secondary major media sources previewing and reviewing these events. WP:SPORTSEVENT seems to allow for events that have secondary coverage beyond results, names, places, etc. All these events do, even though it is treated like a foregone conclusion that they do not. I've cited them in the ongoing RfA, but it hasn't been responded to yet. These notable pieces of prose are already in the article (not put there by me; I've never edited an MMA article) so I assume that those who support deletion don't find the prose notable ENOUGH. And they have a point! The problem is 1)other sporting events, across the board, are allowed to stand and are not subject to AfDs if they contain some secondary sources (As WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS states, "these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes. Trouble arises when legitimate comparisons, either by analogy with existing or non-existing article kinds, are disregarded without thought or consideration of the Knowledge:Five pillars.)" and 2)WP:EVENT allows articles with secondary sources that provide unique prose beyond just the whats whens and wheres. It doesn't claim that such prose/news needs to be earth-shattering (and to be sure, it's not earth-shattering) but that's how the deletion supporters are interpreting it. And that's fine, but that's not how it's done with almost any other sporting event in Knowledge. Further complicating the debate is that SPAs and meat puppets who are nominally on my "side" in this debate have descended on the AfDs (these have been noted by the Admins when closing with a delete)and my "side" is being decidedly less civil. This debate is being fleshed out both on the UFC 145 AfD where I linked to above, and on the talk page of WP:MMANOT 2935:

fix to templates, I saw that the refs were all a little bit sparse and flaky and I completed them into one style, using templates. Usually after a few years and many little fixes you have 10 different citation styles in one article, then it is time to clean that up and work it up. IMO templates are even a bit easier to read, as you immediately know what is what, and they also are bot accessible for the same reason! I cannot follow the argument that they are clutter, they are more cleartext than the many dots, commas and apostrophes you need for a good formatting. If you read the refs now they are better.(have isbn and page number and a title etc. where possible) In particular in articles with many journal cites templates pay off. I read the wiki article about filter synthesis and it is rather sparse. IMO the way from S21 to the continued fraction for Zin should be included, thats for conoisseurs. It doesn't need to be the complete "Theorie der linearen Wechselstromschaltungen" by Cauer. (you should read that, it is really worth it. The guy was a mathematician, and it is gourmet reading.) Besides, the first filte synthesis program I wrote ran on a Zuse Z23. This were times. Later I made an extended version on an Electrologica X8, followed by one on a PDP11. The most tricky part was the polynomial solver, because the polynomials may be high order and numerically ill-conditioned. Today it is all canned programs, and my impression is that the engineers don't know what they are doing, just relying on the canned std. solutions. Do you know who still needs such skills, I can't find work, I will soon sit at the corner rattling with coins in a tin can.

3763:

energy could more usefully be put into improving the article. However, because of its clear politically controversial nature, and because it was a major element of the debate, I felt it important to indicate that I had considered the issue of the name "British Isles" and made an exception for this. It should be clear from my closing statement why WP:BISLES would make no difference to the result - it represents an issue I had already considered. And it is certainly not because I share "a common attitude of mainly British people", as should have been obvious from my closing remarks. The bottom line on this as far as the deletion debate is concerned is that a problematic name can be changed; that is, arguments against it are arguments for a name change, not arguments for deletion.

2277:

who removed the advert tag appeared to be fans of the service or otherwise troublesome users of that service. I am not well versed in the ways of Knowledge, but it appears an edit war has been brewing with the user Weatherfug and myself. I have asked him politely to engage me in the talk section, but he refuses. Instead he levels allegations of 'loudmouthing' on my part, without further elaboration. How should I best handle this situation? I'd rather not go back and forth with the undo button. Ideally I would prefer that someone who is not a user of the service, or someone who does not hold negative views of the WOT community rewrite the article. My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place to bring this up.

1594:, where they are moving towards lumping all the UFC events into what would be a garguantuan "2012 in UFC" article, which I am opposed to for the reasons I cited above. I am working on a draft for that talk page as well. If events within UFC have secondary prosaic coverage, then it does not seem to run against the wording of WP:EVENT and it is consistent with most other uncontroversial sporting events on Knowledge. These UFC articles can be and should improved with that secondary coverage, but the other side of the debate seems to have been "Nope! Not good enough! Delete them all and create an omnibus article!" Thanks for reading all this, I hope it wasn't too incoherent, and please advise. 3748:

disrespectful to other editors who have spent their time outlining their views, whatever they may be, only for a closing admin to not be as transparent in their motives or reasoning. The fact that you had no knowledge of WP:BISLES means you have zero knowledge of the background. The fact that you say it would have made no difference anyway is a common attitude of mainly British people (and unlikely to be shared by Irish people), so perhaps your British background is a factor. But hey, cos you didn't outline your reasoning, all we can do is guess. A bit of a fuckup if you ask me. At least have the courage of your convictions whatever they may be. --

4609: 1702:- just a point about Rosemary's Sister - originally I included a reference to a website that incorrectly credited another artist (Fairport Convention) with the song. The reference I include for the song is a track list - I can include other references - the main issue with any of this material is refers to the period 1980-2000 and finding anything online is not easy. This is further complicated by the fact that, unlike (e.g.) Ralph McTell, there is no official biography to point to (I note that the reference list on his page almost reads as a summary of the paper-based book). Thank you for the constructive comments. 4943:

it. At the same time, I have seen no evidence that you now understand the reasons for your ban and that you would in future comply with Knowledge's quality requirements such as notability, verifiability, reliability, and original research. However, I am open to persuasion. Some quality work on articles where you are not banned would be particulary convincing. During the ANI discussion which banned you, you declined to take up offers of mentorship. You might want to reconsider that, your refusal almost certainly convinced some administrators who were otherwise disinclined to ban you.

1116:

saga on the talk page, but as I understand it, non-notable family members are upset that they are not also mentioned in the article. So the suspicion is that someone has retaliated by removing reference to all family members. If that is the reason behind this unexplained deletion, or no justification at all is forthcoming, then I see no reason why the material should not be put back in. Nobody has a right to be mentioned in the encyclopedia - it is an editorial decision. If you choose to reinstate the deleted material, be sure to say so on the talk page and why you are doing it.

1617:. But I don't think you really want to go down that path; you cannot go to DRV just because you do not like the outcome of the AfD. A better approach in that case is to take into account the consensus of the AfDs in future editing. I don't think anyone is arguing for all UFC event articles to be deleted/merged as a matter of principle. As far as I can see even those in favour of deletion accept that an individual event can be notable - but each individual article needs to justify that it is notable beyond its immediate impact, as described in WP:EVENT, on a case-by-case basis. 3893:

constructive use would be made of it, but sadly I can't see that happening. It is quite ironic that I am being criticised for not giving a full enough statement at a venue where discussions are habitually closed with just the bare result and my alleged inadequate closing statement is actually already far longer than any other recent close. I will say this though: my decision was absolutely not based on a headcount; I can say that with complete confidence since I did not carry out any kind of count prior to making the assessment. It was entirely based on arguments and policy.

4324:. I think 2-dabs have their uses, but if the consensus is against them let's just do away with them. This compromise is cumbersome, complicated and confusing. Trying to rescue them by encouraging people to turn them into 3-dabs will at best just encourage inappropriate dabs, but most likely achieve nothing. Karl, I don't know why you are bringing this here. You asked me above to comment on the proposal page, and I did so. If no one there likes my opinion, they are free to ignore it, but I see no good reason to amend it. 1067:(subscribers only, but subscription is open and you can gain access to the archives in a few clicks. You really should subscribe if you're in the UK!) has Rich Farmbrough and a few others sharing their experience and technical insight as to why subdividing UK in geo-location doesn't work. Charles Matthews also raised the point that certain "local" events, most notably the London and Cambridge regular meetups, are actually UK-wide events because there are people who travel a few hundred miles to attend them. 2189: 6212: 31: 3163: 4295:

the Sexual harassment beavis & butthead episode for example); my position was similar; however the other editors vehemently disagreed - they felt 2-DABs were useless, and simply slowed down users. We weren't making much progress. Then David Levy came up with an orthogonal solution, which is to somehow tag the fact that a 2-DAB exists (or should be created) and needs help. I proposed a modification, which is to create the 2-DAB, link it from the top (while maintaining the

486: 5333: 799: 752: 4269: 4970:; just because of that I tested it to convince myself. I lost my desire to make major edits in Knowledge and returned to Wikibooks where I continued developing detailed stories about the mystic negative resistance phenomenon. They gradually come to the fore in Google approaching the same Knowledge articles; so, I feel easy in my mind that there is a place in the web where people can learn the truth about circuits... 1254: 1465: 1777:

make the distinction (probably POV insertion by the same zealots who are forever trying to impose it here) but the only source cited is the pocket Oxford English Dictionary. In fact, the online OED does not make a distinction between the two meanings. It actually gives the plural as "antennae" for all cases and describes "antennas" as rare. I might just go over to Wiktionary and stir up a debate there.

701:; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive. 2489: 2026:. Since both links go to the same site, I have removed them both from the page. They cannot possibly be allowed on Knowledge unless they are cleaned up and I for one am not prepared to go back to periodically test them. In any case, it appears to allow illegal downloads which was one of the objections to previous sources, which is what I was looking at when I got disconnected. 191:]) but have a lot of additional informations especially written in respect of new information. May be I am an expert of capacitors but not of the English language, that is the reason to ask for help in grammar, wordings and so on. Please have a look at my talk page and decide what now will be the best way to make a good English article out of my draft. Thanks for helping. -- 2826:. But meanwhile i'am in plan to develop one more. So kindly visit page also. This article doesn't seems encyclopedic. I made some changes but,i'm foiled. Will you please help me By telling what requirements it needs and what contents it should not be. please let me know which part of the section will not require reference part.Reply on my talk page if possible.well wishes 3782:

article content. The "name" dispute always gets emotional, its a tactic used many times before, and then naturally the superior numbers of British editors forms a "consensus". Funny that you also see it as a name dispute.... Anyway, no point in rehashing this here. Thanks for responding in any case. Difficult topic, not the end of the world, etc, etc. --

1635:

neutrally worded, the request must be highly focused on a well defined question - ideally one that can be answered in black and white terms such as support or oppose with no grey areas in between. I strongly suggest, however, that you do not use this process if the question you seek comment on is already being debated, this can only confuse matters further.

4413:, I've done significant (man-weeks, actually) work on the time-related pages. I don't know how it's possible that such pages can get deleted without my even knowing about it, but I need my work to be restored. James apparently logged in and did some work after my posting on his talk page, but did not respond, nor restore my pages. Can you help? 1276:, and published a popular textbook on science for medical students. He developed an interest in chemistry as a child, and through self-study was advanced enough to deliver lectures to his fellow pupils at school. He later applied this knowledge to medicine and became a great authority on urinary deposits. He was the first to describe 916:. While that page does have a section on guidelines, it is almost entirely concerned with the formatting of messages. It says nothing about what is acceptable content which is the thing really at issue. Further, what is being proposed here is guidelines for all site-wide notices, or at least watchlist notices, not just geonotices. 3361: 2690: 4099:

rationale was referring to the R3 rule which refers to "implausible typos or misnomers" (focusing on the implausible part since I couldn't see a typo). Anyway, sorry for the confusion (and for the frustrated tone of my previous message), and thanks for restoring my faith in the editor community! Cheers,

5728:

I would like also to join indirectly the discussion by noting that a NIC (e.g., a negative inductor) and a gyrator (e.g., a simulated inductor) are different things although gyrators are frequently made by NICs. Both they are virtual elements (circuits) emulating the corresponding electronic elements

5193:

Don't worry about it, DYK rules are pretty arcane and take some getting used to. They even used to have unwritten rules - then someone wrote them down, but they still called them unwritten rules. They are called additional rules, or something like that now. Image policy is even more difficult, and

5093:

About the suggestions... Thank you but I don't see much point in the first two. As far as I can see, their purpose is to ascertain if I am able to make edits according to Knowledge's requirements. I have shown (and you know very well) that I can make such edits; it is only necessary to browse through

4218:

Just so I'm clear, you are essentially saying that an admin having a firm conversation with an ordinary user in one forum where their actions have been criticized and challenged by said user is perfectly free to take negative administrative actions with regard to that user's editing in another forum?

3781:

In my opinion, the biggest argument was that it was a content fork of an existing article. And if you check, the people bringing up the "British Isles" name suitability are the ones trying to keep the article. They were (and still are) trying to turn this into a name dispute and not focusing on the

2276:

Originally I voiced some concerns about the lack of balance in the talk page. After a month or so of inaction, I did a bit more research and uncovered the advert tag. I thought it was appropriate to tag the article as having a promotional bias. The article has been tagged this way historically. Those

2079:

Sorry, Vithurgod, but I got caught up in other things, and although I noticed when you added the links (now removed), I then forgot to go back and look at them. I do keep the Reddy article on my watchlist, so you don't have to let me know when you put something on the Talk page. However, IF I fail to

2046:

To answer your original question, I suggest that you post on the talk page the table exactly as you intend to add it to the article. It is not clear from your post there exactly what you want to add. I would leave it for at least a week before you assume there are no objections, or else contact the

1663:

Thank you. Yes, I was mistaken about the no-consensus thing, I thought the arbitration summary was saying he was going to break from the usual guideline and deleting it in spite of it being no-consensus. To your point, "You cannot believe both that deletions were "improper" and "done in good faith

1407:

for external links. Have you read them? By consensus, the default position on Knowledge is not to include links unless there is a good reason. The accepted good reasons can be found in the guideline and I would be happy to explain the guidelines further if you wish. It is not my function to check

973:

About a quarter, I'd imagine, and independently of where you actually are. This is because the geo-location tool, rightly and ethically, uses only public data to determine your location. In the UK, that means it'll return wherever your ISP or network manager is based, rather than where you are, which

5737:

the input voltage; thus the NIC injects energy into the circuit while the gyrator absorbs energy from it. So, the gyrator behaves as an ordinary (but with swapped voltage and current) electrical component that produces a voltage "drop" (a contrary voltage) across its terminals while the NIC produces

5177:

I just wanted to say thank you for your patience. In retrospect, I realised that I should really have re-read the DYK rules before proposing the George Simon article; when I did re-read them it was patently obvious that the first hook I proposed wasn't suitable. Also, thank you for your tips about

5098:

to convince yourself. I have created large parts of many WP articles; I have even created entirely a few articles and they have been staying untouched during this year. Concerning the third suggestion, I can't imagine how they implement the mentorship. I suspect this is a quite clumsy procedure that

4993:

Only, I can't forget Knowledge; I miss Knowledge and can't imagine to live out of Knowledge. During this year I have been watching what happens there. I could help in many situations but I was not able to do it because of the ban. All I want is to have the freedom to make episodic small edits and to

4965:

Thank you for understanding. I am not sure if you will beleive me but I have really realized what the problems with my Knowledge contribution are. Of course, after the ban I felt resentment since, you should admit, extremely strong restrictions were applied to me. I couldn't believe that I hadn't to

4942:

I certainly don't want your topic ban to go on forever when you are still around and want to make useful edits. But I would take some convincing to support this. During the time you have been banned you have made numerous edits testing your ban, and have had several warnings and a block to enforce

4427:

I'm sorry, but it was following several paragraphs of admin-speak that one would have to be an admin, familiar with the nuances of Knowledge admin-ing, to understand fully. I don't think it was a mis-characterization. If it demonstrates some animosity, I don't think I'm out of line there, either. He

4304:

hatnote). However, the compromise would not have been accepted if we deleted the hatnote at the same time. Thus, even though I understand you disagree with some aspects of this, I wonder if you might consider going along with this proposal, at least for a while, to see how well it works in practice;

3747:

Not at all, but why did you make a point of your nationality? Either it's relevant or it's not, and raising it makes it seem like it is part of your decision. If there was doubt, you should have avoided closing. If you're not happy to explain your reasoning, you should have avoided closing. It's

3419:

while I was teaching a remedial algebra course, and it seemed like a delightful example of that terminology as well as a real-life, simple use of the square-root function. I was distressed that students were able to recite the definitions of the "varies directly", etc., phrases, but had never seen a

2428:

and noted Finetooth's comments, all of which you've addressed. I'm sorry that you waited so long for a copy-edit; I hope it's okay for you. I've replied to your comments on the article's talk page and have addressed the issues you've raised - thank you. :-) It's an interesting article and I wish you

1348:

I have no idea. There are millions of pages on Knowledge, it would take many lifetimes before I got round to them all if it was all just down to me. All editors are volunteers and edit those areas that interest them - there is no structured assignment of tasks. Quality is bound to be very patchy.

1115:

No, I have not received an explanation. Nor did I delete the material. I reverted the IP who deleted the material without explanation. The IP promptly deleted it again. I was waiting to see what was said on the talk page - which is what is supposed to happen next. I have not followed all of the

1098:

delted a section which you probably reverted and then deleted it again? In principle, although I do not disagree with this action really (as the section seemed to be rather controversial and probably riled up some relatives/family members of the subject of the article who felt indignant about it-see

1039:

I accept its not going to be perfect. The thing we want is best fit, not too many either wrongly included or wrongly excluded. That can only be acheived with at least some partial data. Notifying the whole of the UK because some pub in Cambridge has been missed is just ludicrous. The pub already

987:

Do we actually know this? We can't write a guideline based on what we imagine. I have been with three different ISPs at this address and also use GPRS. They have all geolocated me to within 10 miles with a whois query. I know that is only anectode, but I struggle to believe the exclusion could be

842:

Dear sir, how do you do. I am a new editor and am assisting with the above article. According to my article watchlist, you made a change and deleted or hid from view some recent revision on this article. Im sorry to bother but possibly this revision might have been made by me and I would be grateful

5116:

In conclusion, there are no problems with my Knowledge contribution. Really, a year ago, trying to explain some circuits in the best way, I went too far in a WP article and fell into a trap... but I was (more than) severely punished. One year is more than enough; it's time to lift the ban. I repeat

4294:

Hi SS. Re: the discussion on hatnotes, I can understand your points, but I'd ask you just to consider that there was a very long, protracted discussion, and neither side seemed willing to budge. You had previously stated in the discussion that you agreed to move trivial hatnotes to a DAB page (like

3827:

Welcome, Spinningspark, to the topic area of the British Isles. I assume at this point you can see why this is such a contentious topic area? The section right below is a prime example. This is my first foray into the area as well and it is quite inhospitable. I can see why so many people have been

2599:

I don't know if anyone will truly appreciate Knowledge to the full extent of its potential. I use it as a personal reference for any number of researches and value its content as utmost importance for truth and accuracy. I just wanted to find a link to show my appreciation for it. I hope this is it

1717:

I am not following you. If you cannot find references then the material does not belong in an encyclopeida article. If you are saying that you can only find book references, then cite the book. Books still count as reliable sources regardless of whether they can be accessed online. Book sources

1573:

There have been a spate recently of deletions of "UFC" MMA events. To give you the conclusion before I get to the details, I think these deletions were improper, though done in good faith and with reasonable rationale by the admins who closed them. In once case, the article was deleted though the

1044:

geolocates me to better than 10 miles. You have not responded to my point that US geonotices regularly use sub-national coordinates, seemingly without major problems. You said there has been extensive discussion, perhaps you would care to link to some of it. Actually, do it on VPP where everyone

908:

I did not in any sense delete the entry because "I received a message that was irrelevant to me". It was entirely because the message was inappropriate. Whether or not I am interested in going to the Wakefield show is beside the point. It is worth noting though, that the intended target seems to

5447:

The point is, that next time it may well not be the same person and has to be treated as a new user. My reading is that this is probably from something like a school, college or library with a spread of four IP addresses CIDR/30. Unless there is evidence that it is always the same person (always

4342:

I came here b/c I wanted to give you some background to the compromise off-page, in case you hadn't read the (very long) discussion which preceded it. Consensus was split on 2-DABs; several editors thought they are fine - the eventualist approach - others wanted them killed quickly - so that's the

4133:

should be kept or deleted. I would be grateful if you'd provide an extended closing rationale now—before the DRV is closed—so participants can focus on the merits of your closing statement rather than the lack of it. I've also skimmed through the "endorse" statements, some of which indicate that a

3892:

I'm sure you have already read my response above. I cannot see that providing a fuller closing statement will achieve anything other than providing a scaffolding around which to structure yet another pointless wall-of-text debate. I would happily put in the work if I could be convinced that some

3374:

CD is correct that I-V converters are used for current meters, but it is highly unlikely that any modern multimeter would use the simple passive circuit he describes. I think he is probably conflating this with the current shunts used on the old moving-coil meters. The moving-coil meter is still

2954:

need to get an account if you want to continue talk page converstations with a dynamic IP. I did not really want to get into an argument with you over citation styles, just to let you know that it could be controversial so it did not come as a surprise to you, but if you were to do something like

2934:

Well the constantan fact tag was 3 mo old and the name of this constantan proprietary brand was not present to me as an ee. a direct search for the name gave no immediate hit, I should have searched together with "constantan" as you did to avoid 100 leading false drops in the search. Regarding the

607:

I quite agree. When I first reverted the addition of the link, I urged them to have a discussion on the village pump or a content Rfc linked from Centralized discussion, but I was ignored and as it appeared clear the discussion was proceeding on Template talk:Welcome I thought the least I could do

5265:

I believe it is ok for you to move it yourself once it has been reviewed and approved. There is still no guarantee that the request will be honoured. It probably will, but there are many other factors that restrict selection for a particular day (for example, not too many articles from the same

4478:

I'm not in the habit of keeping local copies of article sources more than just temporarily (if I edit them offline), trusting WP as a safe repository. So, no, I do not have the source for that article or the other articles and templates that are still deleted, and will need admin help to get them

4382:

Thank you for reverting your deletion of the citation. The consensus on Knowledge is that every article needs to be referenced in its own right. Several attempts have been made to modify this in the past and have always failed - the vast majority of editors do not agree. You are welcome to try

4098:

Thanks. I was getting a little disappointed that two administrators had deleted perfectly useful redirects without addressing the contesting of the db tag. After your deletion summary, I tried to see whether there was a misspelling but forgot to look in the namespace :) so I assumed your deletion

1776:

No it isn't, as a gbooks search will quickly demonstrate, although a lot of people seem to believe it is. You will find numerous examples (nearly 100,000 hits) of "antennae" in an IEEE Xplore search, which, if anywhere, you would think they would be policing correct terminology. Wiktionary does

1010:

I guess GPRS locates better because they have the phone's signal tower data. Do your ISPs give you fixed IPs? If so they're likely to be more accurate. One notorious example is the Cambridge meetup - it's held in a pub whose IP geolocates to somewhere in Cumbria! I'm not saying sub-UK geolocation

627:

Dear Sir, Please assist me in convincing other editors on the Page Ranina Reddy 's Discography. Everytime there is an edit war Happening and other Editors are just telling, some reason or the other.. Discography is a Table of Songs sung by the Indian Singer and it must find a place in Knowledge..

5024:

I think phrases like "stories about the mystic negative resistance" are going to set alarm bells ringing for several editors who have come across you in the past. If you don't understand why, then you are not ready to come back. You were banned by the community, to undo that it will have to be

4772:

Oh, ok. For some reason the site served entirely the wrong video the first time I looked - it was some 30 minute documentary. Still not convinced it is worthwile when ads are not even discused in the article. Why don't you open a thread on the talk page to see what other editors think? It is

4471:

I don't think it should be up to me to do anything. I've said my peace, and I've the support of multiple users, including you. I just want the articles back the way they were, and to be a part of the discussion, should anyone feel a need to delete them (note that one of the Time in... series was

1640:

If RfC is not appropriate, you can seek wider editor input to the current debate by advertising it at venues which might be interested such as related Wikiprojects, the Village Pump, and affected policy talk pages. In this case as well though, the notice must be scrupulously neutral in wording.

935:

Unfortunately it is technically impossible to subdivide the UK when creating geonotices. There has been extensive discussions about several notices competing for the UK geonotice space because of this technical limitation, and there is an informal guideline that there should be no more than 2 UK

5796:

I saw the newspaper ref and read it. It was also in the previously deleted article. The only thing new was the You Tube video. How can you possibly think that adding a video of the band suddenly makes acceptable an article that has been deleted three times previously? It has been a different

3762:

My reason fo closing "keep" was that that was my assessment of the consensus. I do not have any fear of publishing a detailed breakdown of my assessment, I just do not think it would be productive. It will be endlessly disputed point by point for absolutely no benefit to the encyclopedia when

3489:

Please explain to me why the Endtown page was deleted. When it was listed there was very little discussion (very few participants)-- mostly TenPoundHammer. When it was re-listed, there was even less discussion, fewer than a half dozen posters. There were several requesting keep and there was no

3378:

This might just be me, but I like to see example circuits that don't do everythign with op-amps. It depresses me that virtually every electronic circuit article amounts to an opamp application sheet. To understand how circuits work one needs to get down to the component level. If you can get

2919:

Deleted unsourced addition, just because it was unsourced. Thanks for providing source, which I have now completed, please check. So you are an old filterist? Me too. Have done a lot of filter design synthesis from the transfer function. (by chain fraction development from Zin from S11, for the

1664:

with a reasonable rationale" I meant, "I think he is misinterpreting guidelines and policies, but I do not believe he is doing so in bad faith, as said guidelines are ambigious and has been subject to very heavy debate." But, we are making progress on the WP:MMANO talk page. Thanks again!

1634:

description of the point you want decided - note that your "brief" post above is anything but brief. You can post your arguments after this, but it is important that the initial statement is brief as that's what will be seen by editors before they come to the page. As well as being carefully

3345:

I wouldn't object to reverting it all the way back, and not just because of the unencyclopedic drawings. The application examples are largely bogus and the explanations are full of OR and unnecessarily involved. There are a few ideas from CD that could be retained, but they effectively need

2132:

Maybe not grammar, but do you have a problem with that edit? The only thing that "threshold circuit" adds to the article is the assertion that the term is a synonym for Schmitt trigger. I don't see much evidence that that is the case: all the books I looked in use the term to mean something

3850:

I note that you have not explained the rationale for your closure. After such a long an complex debate, that lack of explanation is very disappointing. I was going to open a DRV, but thought that I should first ask you to reconsider your lack of explanation, in the hope that I might better

1612:

did not result in a delete as you claim. It was a "no consensus" which under our rules means it defaults to the status quo, ie "keep". You cannot believe both that deletions were "improper" and "done in good faith with a reasonable rationale". If you believe that the deletions really were

4189:

I just noticed your posts on JamesBWatson's talk page concerning these and I can see that you felt it was inappropriate for him to revisit them. Given that I was the original CSD nominator and had just addressed you quite firmly at DRV over a close, I'd be interested in your comments on the

4168:

Thanks for taking the time. And I'm sorry you had to endure some unfair barbs. Since you took so much time and care in reviewing the arguments and the article, if this DRV closes with a keep I'd appreciate your additional input into the article itself, as I (like RA I think) agree it needs

4079:

Did you not read my deletion reason? They were deleted because "Template" was misspelled and you have consequently created these in mainspace. You will notice that none of your redlinks goes to a deleted page. I initially declined the first one because I did not initially realise this.

4448:

it. In any case, there is no restriction on you recreating the article since its deletion reason was "creation of a blocked or banned user" and as far as I know you are not blocked or banned. If you still have the data, recreation is your easiest option and you don't need to involve an

5645:

negative resistance. Negative impedance converter is only one implementation of the absolute negative resistance phenomenon; it is an electronic circuit, not an electrical property. Each of the two pages should consist of two parts - the first about the property and the second about the

5238:

Hello again! I wondered if there was any chance you might be able to move the nomination to a special holding area for Sept 10th (if you think it's appropriate) - I was just about to do it but couldn't figure out if there were unwritten/additional rules against my doing that! All best,

3796:

No, no, no. I do not see it as a name dispute. Nowhere have I given that indication. I just felt it important to explicitly state I had considered that point. My closing statement explicitly makes the point that the AfD result is not to be taken as approval of the use of that name.

2023: 3415:. (I can't believe I mis-entered Ohm's law!) Do you know of any other real-life, interesting, not-too-complicated examples of people expressing mathematical relationships using the vocabulary of "varies directly", "varies inversely", "varies jointly", etc.? I first took up editing 3011:

Hi - Unfortunately for returning to my talkpage and repeating a imo unduly attacking allegation that I had previously objected to - I would request that you do not post on my talkpage in future unless this dispute is resolved satisfactorily or I remove this request - thanks -

4065:, then you deleted it regardless, under the same premises. And what's with deleting a page whose deletion was contested, without addressing the objections? What's more, you deleted the talk page that contained valid discussion (well, attempts at such) about the deletion, at 2021:

First of all, I have removed the links to sources you placed on the talk page. The second one has a link to a reported attack site (on the big green "play button"). I only found out when my security software automatically disconnected me from the site. You can view the

2164:

I'm still thinking about if I can handle the copyedit job. English is not my native language but i have a degree in the US Embassy in my country on English Language (both American and British) and English culture. I know i usually write awfully bad on the talk pages...

122:

The first source quoted (published jointly in Turkey’s JTW/ and France’s Revue Analyse Financière) clearly mentions “ commodities” (1st and 2nd paragraphs) and energy-related infrastructure assets such as “power generation” and “power grids” (9th and 11th paragraphs).

608:

was try to notify anyone who'd expressed an opinion elsewhere. I may add the link to the pump myself shortly, if nothing else is done. Its frustrating; this isn't my project and I'm not involved, but I seem to be doing a lot of the work for their desired changes.

4520:

I work for FindTheBest. FindTheBest was blacklisted from Knowledge a few years ago for adding a page while the company was still very young. Now that the site has grown to 10M visitors a month, I am attempting to get FindTheBest removed from the blacklist.

4423:

You need to give James time to respond (he does not seem to be online at the moment), but I would suggest that using the term "administrivia" to an administrator could be taken as an insult and is not going to put him in the best frame of mind for helping you.

2364:

Was almost tempted to do that, but I don't think assessing ones own student's articles is actually against guidelines, even if done incompetently. I wouldn't object to someone else speedying it, but probably best to let the process run now it has been opened.

4979:

I intend to stay in Wikibooks where, I think, my place is. After I defend my university life's work (dedicated to understanding, teaching and inventing circuits by heuristic tools) about the end of the year, I will put effort in finishing my web life's work -

3368: 3350: 5076:) in Wikibooks. I am going to develop an exciting detailed story about the truth behind the "most mystic" circuit - the negative impedance converter (NIC) in its two versions (VNIC and INIC)... but I need a lot of inspiration to develop it in the best way... 3323:'s whiteboard drawings. On the one hand, this presents the same problems as the other articles this user has edited, namely the editing difficulties of the illustrations and the lack of references in the text. On the other hand, the version of the page from 2202: 126:

The second source quoted (Euromoney magazine published in London) mentions specifically “commodity-rich” sovereign institutions (paragraph 14) active in the field of “oil and other commodities”, and, more generally, “energy” and “energy infrastructure”.

1838:

does not say anything on methods other than refer to WP:ARCHIVE. The previous archive was done that way. In my opinion it is advantageous to keep the history associated with the text to which it relates, but I am not going to fight with you over it.

715:

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where

1523:, but are a matter of editorial judgement. Since this article went all through the FA process without an infobox - and that is a long and arduous process. I think you will find a lot of editors agree with me on the disadvantages of infoboxes. 4428:

damaged my work and left a mess, intentionally. When/if I delete/redirect/rename an article, I make sure that anything that references it is fixed. Had he done that, he would have realized how many articles were being affected, and stopped it.

5472:

Thankyou for responding to my posting. No we are viewing the Robert -Watson Watt I am trying to find my Grandfathers name as I see others in squadrons etc. I just have a difficult time trying to get to what I want due to my vision, Thankyou

3662:- many of the issues raised were similar, and since it appears like you're taking your time and weighing all of the arguments carefully, whatever logic you end up using to close could likely be applied to the category as well. Thanks. -- 1629:

process, which has the advantage of attracting a wider circle of editors, you should place the template on that same page to avoid splitting the discussion over multiple venues. The template should be followed by a neutral and

4449:

administrator to do that. But be aware, the accuracy and referencing of the material will then be your responsibility so only put it back if you know it is right. If you want to take the issue up in a formal process there is

4305:

this is a compromise, but of the other solutions, such as leaving a trivial hatnote on top of the article until a 3-DAB was created, or removing the hatnote and replacing with a 2-DAB, neither one was accepted by consensus.--

3918:

It is also a bit disingenuous to say that your closure is "already far longer than any other recent close", because that length has not been used to explain the assessment you made. Instead it simply sets out a refusal to do

3914:

I think that it is misleading to say, as you did, that "discussions are habitually closed with just the bare result"; that is the case with non-contentious discussions, but the more complex ones usually eplain the closer's

948:

What would have happened if the lower limit of latitude had been set north of London? Do we know what percentage of the intended target would be excluded? The answer is of interest for the purpose of writing a guideline.

1402:

It would help if you said what article you were talking about. You seem to be referring to external links you inserted in, and I removed from, a bunch of articles over a year ago. At the time, I posted on your talkpage

5560:

The procedure is just to remove the merge templates from both articles. It would be helpful if you also noted you had done so in the discussion on the talk page. By the way, I don't agree with Chetvorno's comment that

4134:"no consensus" closure is more accurate. Please take this into consideration in your extended closing rationale and explain why a "keep" closure is a better assessment of the consensus than "no consensus". Thank you, 1040:

knows the info anyway so doesn't need a watchlist notice. As for whether my current ISP is dynamic, I just tried resetting my modem and it reconnected to an IP address that is not even in the same CIDR /2 range! It

2893:, however. Visually similar sigs, and a very close linguistic match, too: Same number of letters in each segment, both start with the "sp" sound, "i" and "a" sound swapped in one name relative to the other. Cheers, 2842:

oh yes, my intention was to remove those kharaghpur station pic's gallery. Article is about Indian railways. As far as media article concern i will try to develop in good way. Thanks for your kind response and help

1140:

I would like to add a youtube link on "The Questor Tapes" page. How do I do that without it being removed by a bot program? Other pages, such as 'Overland_train', have youtube links so it is an acceptable site.

4299:

hatnote), and then put the 2-DAB in a category so that interested editors can find them, and perhaps turn them into 3-DABS (meaning they can live), or perhaps they wont (meaning they may be deleted, restoring the

1829:

I don't really have any strong feelings on this one way or the other, but it certainly can't be described as "against convention", unless there is a specific Wikiproject Electronics guideline I am not aware of.

6012:. As you can see by this message, he outright confesses that he is the original IP. As this is a blatant evasion of his block, could you block his new IP (would we need to get the range blocked?)? Many thanks – 4111: 4655:. Great work! It's on hold, pending a few issues I'd like to see addressed. I apologize in advance for this being my first GA review, and for any problems that arise as a result of my inexperience. Best, -- 4684: 1332:

Thank you for the reply. But I have this question. Why was the non-active youtube link on the subject line page not removed earlier since it falls within your definition of non-acceptable external links?

2708:

intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse

4895:

As you were involved in a previous discussion regarding this issue, I am informing you of a new discussion proposing that the Teahouse be linked from the Welcome template(s). The discussion can be found

4149: 1373:

I think you should review the other external links on that page. Several are to commercial sites. At least I am an educational site. And who are you to judge my activities as not credible? Randy hurst

3380: 130:

Bottom line: The article in question states the (rather mainstream) perspective of a leading European think-tank, backed by refs to mainstream financial (Euromoney, RAF) and poli. sci. (JTW) journals.

2787:

Helped a lot. will conquer all the difficulties after integrating one. Will it be consider vandalism,if i forgot to mention what changes I've made in edit summary of the article? well wishes

3729:

I certainly would have looked at WP:BISLES if anyone had raised it in the debate, but it probably would not have changed the outcome. Would you have preferred me to attempt to hide my Britishness?

251:, and crop off all the additional space to the right of the speakers behind him on the right. I think this is a better photo of him recently hopefully for the infobox. Please let me know! Thanks. -- 4365:

Where? I was not edit warring, your warning is noted but was completely unwarranted. This is the second time, without cause you have accused me of misconduct. Please desist from doing it again.

3715:

and the discussions there before you closed. It is also poor judgement to not give your reasons or rationale for the close, and to then bring up your Britishness. How do you think that looks? --

3121:

There are numerous books which describe this well known circuit - do a search on gbooks and you will find quite a few with preview. Can you give me a clue where you think the article is in error?

286:

I made an edit to the page in the headline. This edit should not be undone since it does not involve capitalization. It is a link the the military rank, similiar to the links above and below it.

1919:

Dear Spinning Spark User Bbb23 has agreed to enter details in Singer Ranina Reddy s Knowledge Page. You can see the Talk Page. Hence I am adding the Details of the Table... Thanks for the Help.

300: 6180:

in the see also section so a user who can remember only one word of a phrase still has somewhere to go. If all such entries were included on the page it would be excessively long. An entry for

4262: 4676: 3659: 3869:

XfD closures are not supposed to be a headcount; they are supposed to be an assessment of policy-based arguments. Please can you explain why you did not accept this policy-based argument? --

2868: 2157:

Hello!. I'd like to thank you for scanning my copyedits and pointing out all the mistakes I've made on them. To be specific, it was hard for me to (or try to) make a copyedit of the article

6133:

disambiguation page. Don't you think it's likely that a person interested in one of those medical tests is likely to search for the term impedance? It's a far more familiar word than

4143: 1063:

Ah, I see. The reason I moved the discussion here is that I don't see the technical details as crucial to the proposed guideline. Anyway, the thread "Cambridge meetup 21 May" on the

878:

My dear sir, thank you for clarifying that. I hope that if I make a mistake the experienced editors will please let me know, and guide me and I hope to gain from that. Best regards,

5608: 2425: 5068:

About the confusing "mystic negative resistance"... Actually, it is no longer a mystic phenomenon since I have already revealed in details the mystery of negative resistance (both

2661:

The reason you are unable to upload photos to Knowledge is that you have not registered an account and it has not been confirmed. But in any case, you need to provide evidence of

1099:

history)no note/rationale was given for this. I wonder if you received some explanation? Ive asked for reasons, on the user talk page and just wanted to let you know. Best wishes,

4314: 4289: 2920:

lossless filter, plus preshift of PZ pattern for loss compensation in the pass band) Besides, on an old PDP11, in Fortran. This was a time when EEs still had to know mathematics.

3995:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 4919:

A year ago, a topic ban was imposed on me (I hope you remember the circumstances around me). Would you help me to start the procedure for lifting the ban? Thank you in advance.

4533:

I am not too familiar with all of the Knowledge rules, but it seems like there must be a way to get FTB's page restored. Feel free to contact me at evanthomas1(at)gmail(dot)com

3239:, wildly inaccurate as usual. They must be using some funny clocks to measure that at 10 minutes. If only it were a reliable source you could write yourself into the article. 5069: 1248:. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below: 6092: 2773:

Hi, can you take a quick loot at article. Please tell me the requirements it needs,Despite being citations. So that i could fix the problems and make it Good article. Cheers

3605:'Alexandre Rodrigues da Silva (born 2 September 1989), commonly known as Alexandre Pato, is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays as a striker for Barcelona and ...' 3506:

Deletion debates are not votes. The closing admin decides on the strength of the arguments, with policy based arguments being given far more weight. I gave my reasoning in

3073:

In this instance - I have already objected to a comment you made and then repeated - if you consider administration needed in this case imo you are not the person to do it -

3436:

P.S. Would you also care to comment on my latest, super-elementary explanation of how Barlow got an inverse square-root law? I don't trust my meager knowledge of batteries.

3106:? I was trying to read up on the topic and the article really confused me. The article seems to be erroneous and the cited article didn't help me either. What do you think? 3658:

Thanks for taking on this close, and I appreciate it is a long and complex discussion. Not to add to your burden, but would you consider closing this one at the same time:

6111: 2391:

Hi, Spinningspark, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested on the above article. Please feel free to correct or revert me if I'm doing something I shouldn't be. Cheers,

3148:...it seems to me this is completely bogus. There is no deliberately introduced component. There is parasitic contact resistance that the double bridge engineers around. 843:

to know what exactly did you change/remove? As that would be helpful for me to learn and avoid any such errata in future. Thank you for your cooperation, yours sinceley,

329: 5944: 5852: 4012: 3266:

Trying to find someone with expertise in the use of ceramic components to produce a better filter is proving impossible. Can you help or do you know someone that might?

2542: 1086: 186: 3634:

on 4th June. The recent editing seems dubious and is certainly not explained. There is no reason to bring problems with this article to me, you can edit it yourself.

3542:

I'd like to help, but I can't see well enough to wade through the material in the article or the FLC debate. Also, my knowledge of table options is limited. I see that

909:

have been the North of England, if it had been accurately limited to that rather than almost as far south as Dieppe, I would never have received it in the first place.

4066: 3619: 3587: 2650: 2292: 102: 5178:

describing derivative images on Commons: I've struggled a bit with Image use policy and reckon I'm going to find your tips very helpful in the future too. All best,

1823: 1472:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See 154: 4123: 4112: 3979: 2940: 2296: 1245: 1108: 5755: 5663: 2531:

Hi Spinningspark, I just wanted to say thank you for the advice on how to improve the Akasha article and make it read less like marketing. I really appreciate it.

5025:

taken back to the community. To convince them, and for me to support you, there needs to be some evidence. I recommend that you do some or all of the following:

4599: 1801: 206:

I don't have the time right now. If you would like, I can put it on my list, but I can't promise to get round to it any time soon. You can request a copyedit at

3855: 3828:

banned from this area if you have to deal with the users you are currently having to deal with. Anyways, I wish you luck and the will to withstand the onslaught.

1494: 4637: 4396: 643:

I will answer you fully on your own talk page, but basically you should be discussing this with the editors on the talk page first before seeking outside help.

6082: 6062: 5939: 5872: 4152:. I hope you didn't take offense (or laugh too hard) re my comment that a British or Irish admin should have left that discussion for someone else to close. -- 2762: 2271: 5720: 5682: 5138: 5051: 5011: 4956: 3943: 3906: 2146: 614: 602: 185:

Hi SpinningSpark, maybe you remember helping me for better English with “Dielectric absorption”. Now I wrote a new article "film capacitor" and put it under "

5512: 4163: 3647: 3283: 2678: 2470: 2456: 2438: 2419: 2378: 2340: 887: 852: 6201: 3695:

Ok, thanks. Perhaps once you close, you could ask another uninvolved editor to close the category discussion, which needs to be closed as well... Cheers. --

3287: 2972: 1904: 1878: 1861:

By convention means how it is done and does not mean "this is how it we tell you how it is done". The archiving bots use cut and past, and bot operation is

1852: 275: 5625: 5448:

hitting the same articles, same style of writing etc), it would be a bit like me blocking you because other people in the same town have been vandalising.

3210: 3087: 3068: 1156:

Links to YouTube are very rarely acceptable, which is why we have a bot removing them. The fact that some have got into articles is beside the point, see

5073: 4374: 3252: 3144:"Resistance R should be as low as possible (much lower than the measured value) and for that reason is usually made as a short thick rod of solid copper." 2905: 2815: 1751: 1570:

Thank you for responding to my help desk request. So hard to keep this brief! But I don't want to just send you looking at reams of talk pages and AfD.

1536: 1074: 1058: 1026: 1001: 859:

You are not at fault, it is the edit of another user which has been hidden. I would be happy to give you a full explanation if you contact me by e-mail.

556: 5461: 4906: 4352: 4337: 3704: 3690: 2400: 1891:

Archiving bots have to cope with fast moving pages where archiving the whole page is not practical. But as I say, I am not going to fight you about it.

1684: 1654: 1433: 1095: 834: 4628: 3839: 3531: 3476: 3306: 2852: 2835: 2074: 2060: 2039: 1995: 1971: 1951: 1129: 974:

is often hundreds of miles away from your actual location unless you edit from a major company or educational institution and therefore have fixed IPs.

872: 656: 529: 6053:

I've just blocked him for 48 hours - making demands like that while edit warring is not acceptable (not as bad as his earlier threat, but not good) --

5612: 5582: 4383:

again, I might even support you, depending on what your proposal says, but it is highly unlikely to succeed. In the meantime you simply cannot do it.

3810: 3791: 3776: 3757: 3742: 3258: 2509: 1795: 1362: 1189: 434: 420: 402: 360: 6048: 5821: 5309: 5279: 5225: 5207: 4250: 4223: 4213: 3400: 4861: 4786: 4763: 4502: 4483: 4466: 4103: 4093: 2684: 1382: 1241: 166:

Now its fixed... again. I a sorry but I am doing many things at the same time. I beg for a little patience and minor edits problem will be fixed. --

3724: 2729:

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

1731: 1322: 545: 233: 3420:

single example of their use and could not see how they would apply to anything real. If you know of further examples, they might be good to add to

3279: 3199: 3173: 3134: 3111: 2066: 2007: 1987: 1963: 1920: 1560: 629: 537: 499: 4178: 3974: 5589: 5546: 5441: 1762: 1442: 1334: 1209: 1142: 5248: 4232: 4069:. I don't want to undelete these pages (again!) without hearing your rationale first, so would you mind please explaining your actions? Thanks, 2089: 5788: 2600:

or will get to the editors or other responsible authors. I personally hope to become more of a contributor in the months & years to come.

1412:. I have checked my posts around the time in question and can find no example of accusing you of not being credible. Please either provide a 2006:@@ Spinning Spark... I have provided References for the songs and the user BBb23 hasnt responded !!! Can we arrive at an conscensus ?. Thanks 1342: 740: 4936: 4194: 4135: 2125: 175: 4417: 3339: 784: 5956: 5889: 5499:? If so, you have not given his name. He may not necessarily have an article on Knowledge - it depends on whether he meets the criteria. 5432:

Well, let's wait for the next round of senseless nonsense, since there was a long run of it with no blcoking, then we'll go after the SOB.

5385: 4619: 3952: 2065:@@spinning Spark... Ok. I will add the Table that I wanted to add. No one there is responding.. And I shall provide my explanations there 1810:

for archiving purposes. This is completely against convention and it should be undone. Archiving is done with the cut and paste method. --

1711: 295: 6027: 5422: 4073: 2796: 2782: 988:

as high as 25%. I note that geonotices in the US regularly use corners that are smaller than the whole UK, so it seems to work for them.

5797:

nominator and a different admin every time, so at least six people besides me thought it should be deleted. I think you need to go read

3169: 3107: 5535:

has not received any support and it may be time to close it - but I forget the correct protocol, so could you help please? Incidentally

4360: 3671: 3591: 3490:

consensus by any definitin of the word. It is my understanding that an article would not be deleted without clear consensus. Thank you.

2617: 686: 5597: 5554: 5028:

Do some substantial work on an article for which you are not banned and that shows understanding of all the policies I mentioned above,

3951: 3926:

you weighed the debate as you did, I can only regard it as a perverse closure. I will therefore open a reqiuest for deletion review. --

2550: 2384: 2238:, which is mostly Latino (although I'm Italian myself), so I've grown up with the derogatory understanding of that word. Thanks again. 1195: 5937:) whom I reported due to his vandalism on various articles including my talk page. However, it seems he is now editing from a new IP ( 4119: 3886: 3623: 2883: 2554: 2351:

Given your comments at the GAR, I don't think this needs to sit in the GAR queue. This seems like it should be speedy-delisted as GA.

1284:. Bird was innovative in the medical use of electricity, designing much of his own equipment. He was instrumental in rescuing medical 823: 667:

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

5164: 5118: 4890: 3483: 1565: 1408:

all the links in all our millions of articles; at issue are the links you inserted, and they stand or fall on their own merits - see

507: 260: 6146: 2929: 2358: 2218: 1603: 5488: 5095: 4731:

It had no encyclopaedic value. Besides which, the wrong advertisement had been linked, so it was not even about the Rubik's cube.

4569: 3988: 2944: 2247: 1770: 1487: 1088: 836: 4819: 4744: 4556: 1986:@ Spinning Spark.. I have Self Reverted the Edit... I will wait for Conscensus . Will provide the Links that BBbb23 wants. Thanks 1622:

I think the idea of an umbrella RfC to establish the principles here is a very good idea. In effect this is already happening at

1150: 5768:

I haven't add youtub referenace only, you didn't see I have added Sri Lankn paper aticles also which are write about this band?

5760: 4680: 4530:

Amatrulic told me I need to find a trusted editor to make an appeal to have the FindTheBest page restored. Can you help me out?

3507: 3433: 2105: 1758: 1542: 662: 4885: 4129:

I am an uninvolved user who has not participated in the AfD or the previous DRV and who has not formed an opinion about whether

3045: 3026: 1394: 981: 5427: 3001: 2654: 2315:

on Knowledge and is not permitted under policy. We simply do not offer opinions in the encyclopedia. On the other hand, if a

1807: 637: 4591: 3367:

Genuine applications are needed. A very common use is with photo-detectors. There are numerous book sources with circuits -

2015: 1928: 583: 5950: 5883: 5848: 5747: 5712: 5655: 5404:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

5130: 5003: 4928: 4897: 4696: 4404: 4184: 4007: 3938: 3881: 2117: 1694: 1613:

improper, that is, done against policy or the closing admin improperly ignored consensus then the correct procedure would be

1327: 6126: 5974: 5907: 5187: 4436:

I stand by it. He could see it in the history anyway. For integrity, I try not to edit something out after it's been posted.

2521: 2461:

Yes, I will do that - I'm not as active as I was, but I'm usually active daily, so I should catch any problems. :-) Cheers,

200: 5480: 4842: 4273: 4190:

propitiatory of your assessing my nominations in a negative light immediately after I had taken your close to task in DRV.

4159: 3615: 3583: 3312: 3160:

I'll make a sandbox a come back here when it's ready for review. BTW, what tool do you use for drawing svg files like your

2921: 2871:, as well. No additional blocks are being sought, but a broader consensus on the indentation issue would be welcome. Best, 2646: 2288: 1754: 1519:

Because it adds nothing to the article that is not already in the prose. Infoboxes are not a requirement of the MOS - see

1513: 5856: 3922:

Anyway, thank you for your response. I'm sorry to say that I find it completely inadequate, and without an explanation of

3177: 3115: 2266: 704:

If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to

110:

I just came across comments left by Ahora earlier today re: the article on Infrastructure- you seemed to agree with him.

5835:

There was no vandalism on Richard's page. It was a simple message - It was not abusive nor did it constitute harassment.

5155:

Thanks for the link, I must have missed that when reading about Knowledge. All along I never knew what a minor edit was.

4017: 3499: 2936: 2578: 2493: 1874: 1819: 1205: 745: 459: 287: 5630:

I second your proposal about splitting the negative resistance page but also sympathize the Chetvorno's considerations.

5339: 4661: 3573:

The development seemed appropriate in my account sandbox area; unpublished and a place to develop format and materials.

1212:. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director 116:

I don’t see anything misleading, biased or “weasely” (??) in the section of the article on Infrastructure you refer to.

6275: 6270: 6265: 6253: 6248: 5620: 3375:

measuring current, not voltage, and the shunt merely brings the current within range, it does not perform a conversion.

3230: 2628: 2385: 1459: 901: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 6067:

Many thanks. It appears I made a bit of a faux pas in posting this originally on the wrong talk page. Thanks again! –

2890: 1623: 1591: 674:

Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in

6240: 5801:. Even if you get this past speedy deietion, if it does not meet the criteria, it will still fail a deletion debate. 5751: 5716: 5659: 5134: 5007: 4932: 4552: 3845: 3349:

You could keep in something about a simple resistor amounting to a current-to-voltage converter. This is sourcable (

3224: 2995: 2257:

Why not just cite that book, if that is where it came from? Let the publisher worry about if it too lengthy a quote.

2121: 1292:

and bringing it into the mainstream. He was quick to adopt new instruments of all kinds; he invented the single-cell

471: 59: 4967: 3555: 5798: 5637:. So, to be consistent, we should split it into two pages having titles about the two varieties of this property - 3863: 3862:(RA) near the end of the discussion, in which he demonstrated quite clearly that this article is a content fork of 1680: 1390: 161: 2174: 1935: 1161: 5862: 4153: 3859: 2161:. It was the first time i made a copyedit in my whole life and I felt i didn't changed anything on the article. 1548: 729: 6009: 6100:

I very much appreciate your time and the insights and links you contributed to the Frances Hugle discussions.

5998: 5931: 5518: 3356:

If you want a general theoretical description without referring to specific circuits such as op amps, then the

2768: 2594: 2546: 1237: 779: 720: 6058: 5992: 5962: 5925: 5895: 5784: 5150: 4911: 4130: 3992: 3981: 3653: 3602:

I reported a mistake with a page which you promptly fixed but there is a small mistake with the fis I quote;

3421: 2179: 2099: 1223: 789: 281: 4794:

Too much work. I see no harm in it. There are thousands of links to youtube. It illustrates the subject.

1172:

material but it is almost certainly copyright violations so you definitely cannot link to that either. See

4722: 3313: 2710: 1482: 4370: 3324: 1269: 682: 476: 210:

but they also have a long backlog. Alternatively, you can move the article to mainspace and tag it with

3911:

Yes, I read your response above, and wanted to give you a chance to reconsider your lack of explanation.

3518:

not have declared due to being newbies not understanding the system) and that was only after relisting.

2742: 6219: 6033:

Ah, it seems he has even advertised his ban evasion on your talk page, mere minutes before I posted. –

5405: 5391: 5323: 4806:

But not too much work to harangue me? The talk page is the way forward if you really care about this.

2889:

No worries if you'd prefer not to, of course. But thought it might amuse you to know that you may have

2864: 1737: 705: 38: 2443:

Will you continue to watch the article through the FL process in case any copyediting issues come up?

5877: 5743: 5708: 5651: 5418: 5126: 4999: 4924: 4003: 3934: 3877: 3560: 2858: 2714: 2113: 1135: 812: 712:. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. 5099:

will lose my time. Would you explain me how they implement this procedure? Would you engage with it?

4984:. At the age of 58, I have not so much time and I want to leave something behind me in this world... 4685:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive690#Wtshymanski failing to work collaboratively

2622: 1782:

Thanks for the praise on Golding Bird. Do you have an FA in the pipeline yet? I'd be glad to help.

1699: 6054: 5484: 5369: 4585: 4438:(time passes...) I did a strikeout with an explanatory note that will hopefully clarify my meaning. 3155:

The diagram doesn't show the key point namely that the resistance is a four-terminal configuration.

2925: 2639:

Im having trouble with having my upload remain and also linking the photos to match the page??SOS

2466: 2434: 2396: 1610: 1592:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts/MMA_notability

1575: 1064: 6228: 6195: 6142: 5968: 5901: 5815: 5676: 5616: 5576: 5537: 5525: 5506: 5455: 5273: 5201: 5117:

it again: I don't want to make large edits in WP articles; I will stay in Wikibooks where I have

5045: 4950: 4855: 4813: 4780: 4738: 4608: 4496: 4460: 4390: 4331: 4244: 4207: 4087: 3900: 3804: 3770: 3736: 3684: 3641: 3597: 3576:

I don't want to publish my details without a copyright, so I will withdraw all related content.

3525: 3470: 3406: 3394: 3300: 3246: 3193: 3128: 3062: 2966: 2809: 2756: 2672: 2450: 2413: 2372: 2334: 2226: 2140: 2054: 2033: 1945: 1898: 1870: 1846: 1815: 1789: 1725: 1648: 1574:

admin acknowledged no consensus had been reached, though he provided his rationale for doing so:

1530: 1477: 1427: 1356: 1183: 1123: 1052: 995: 956: 923: 866: 650: 596: 523: 414: 354: 291: 271: 256: 239: 227: 47: 17: 4701: 2959:

get a very lively argument. No idea about work, I seem to over 5,000 miles from your location.

1609:

I have just started looking at this, but your post seems very confused. The first AfD you link

6181: 6117: 6107: 4879:, I have listed the article as a Good Article. Great work, congratulations, and well done! -- 4652: 4624: 4512: 4410: 4366: 4237:

No, you seemed to be doing just fine in your fight with the strawman and did not need my help.

3834: 3082: 3040: 3021: 2900: 2878: 2235: 1938:

to wait 24 hours to give other editors a chance to comment. Consensus is not just one person.

1473: 180: 171: 119:++ I’m not sure Ahora has effectively taken the time to (fully) read the sources in question: 5332: 5805: 5531: 5344: 4870: 4548: 3219: 3095: 2990: 2911: 2848: 2831: 2802:

No, it's not vandalism, but you will irritate other editors if you don't use edit summaries.

2792: 2778: 2722: 2705: 2574: 2517: 2497: 2492:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of

2346: 2243: 1556: 1509: 1504:

hi, I think having infobox is much better a single picture. why did you remove that infobox?

1368: 1071: 1023: 978: 940: 622: 570: 144: 4752: 4126:

that you would provide an extended closing statement if requested by the closer of the DRV.

3631: 1962:@Spinning Spark... Ok Sir. I will wait.. I have provided references as he wanted... Thanks. 6075: 6041: 6020: 5844: 5772: 5739: 5704: 5647: 5476: 5467: 5437: 5414: 5169: 5122: 4995: 4920: 4901: 4883: 4710: 4659: 4540: 4348: 4310: 4285: 4174: 4059: 4049: 4039: 4029: 4018: 3996: 3958:

Hi I have created the Electrical engineering wikiproject, I think you might be interested.

3927: 3870: 3700: 3667: 3611: 3579: 3440: 3320: 3140:

Sure. I think I figured out how it works now. The two errors in the article (I think) are:

2642: 2538: 2284: 2109: 1914: 1676: 1668: 1599: 1386: 1378: 1157: 893: 609: 578: 551: 150: 3660:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_May_21#Category:Politics_of_the_British_Isles

1244:. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at 725:

Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage

498:

Hello Sir... Can You unblock me ?. My twenty four hours block period is over... Thanks :)

317:

is the proper name. The move operation won't let me and suggests that I contact an admin.

8: 5980: 5913: 5121:. But it is a question of honour for me to have a right to join episodically Knowledge... 4692: 4666: 4577: 4321: 3551: 3495: 3429: 3006: 2978: 2689: 2613: 2605: 2589: 2462: 2430: 2392: 2070: 2011: 1991: 1967: 1924: 1718:

are far and away preferable to random internet sites as far as reliability is concerned.

1318: 1104: 913: 894: 883: 848: 675: 633: 541: 503: 113:

The WPC is one of Europe’s leading think-tanks dedicated to pension investment research.

6152:

Disambiguation pages are intended to help the reader distinguish between pages with the

5565:-parameters are limited to two-port networks. It even says they can be extended at the 4981: 4280:

hatnotes and what to do about them, your input is requested on a finalizing a proposal.

6190: 6138: 5810: 5671: 5593: 5571: 5550: 5501: 5496: 5450: 5401: 5373: 5268: 5196: 5040: 4945: 4850: 4808: 4775: 4733: 4525: 4491: 4455: 4385: 4326: 4239: 4202: 4082: 3895: 3799: 3787: 3765: 3753: 3731: 3720: 3679: 3636: 3520: 3465: 3389: 3295: 3241: 3188: 3123: 3057: 2961: 2804: 2751: 2698: 2667: 2445: 2408: 2367: 2329: 2262: 2135: 2049: 2028: 1940: 1893: 1866: 1841: 1811: 1784: 1766: 1720: 1643: 1525: 1422: 1351: 1338: 1231: 1178: 1146: 1118: 1047: 990: 951: 918: 861: 819: 777: 759: 645: 591: 574: 518: 452: 430: 409: 398: 349: 325: 267: 252: 222: 214: 4754:

As for encyclopaedic value, it shows the subject in use during its most popular era.

3677:

No, something this controversial should not all be done with the input of one person.

6174: 6160:

explicitly excludes partial title matches from dab pages. I replaced the entry with

6103: 5780: 5633:

The title of the page is about an electrical property (an attribute, a phenomenon) -

5305: 5244: 5221: 5183: 5160: 5031:

Copy an article for which you are banned into your userspace and work on it as above,

3967: 3829: 3561: 3335: 3074: 3032: 3013: 2896: 2874: 2526: 2505: 2304: 2252: 1831: 1455: 1448: 1297: 1217: 550:

I never got a barnstar from anyone I'd blocked (or who thought I blocked them.) Huh.

467: 167: 3510:

and don't really have anything to add. There was actually only one declaration for

1253: 912:

Getting back to the question at hand, that of guidelines, thank you for the link to

6164: 5566: 4838: 4799: 4759: 4718: 4544: 4445: 4139: 3712: 3460: 3330:

I'm not sure how much to cull from the article, so a second opinion would be good.

3214: 2985: 2844: 2827: 2788: 2774: 2634: 2570: 2513: 2482: 2239: 2213: 2170: 1552: 1505: 1489: 1068: 1020: 975: 937: 140: 4672: 4576:

be the bear minimum? :-) Thanks for all the good work you do at EA. Best regards,

4200:

I had not noticed there was an intersection, and even if I had, it is irrelevant.

3411:

Hi, Spinningspark. Many thanks for the corrections and knowledgable commentary on

1700:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Huw_%26_Tony_Williams

6070: 6036: 6015: 5433: 5388:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 5379: 4880: 4656: 4563: 4344: 4306: 4281: 4170: 3696: 3663: 3482: 3448: 2823: 2308: 2085: 1761:

were not entirely without merit. Congratulations on Golding Bird incidentally. --

1707: 1672: 1595: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1499: 1409: 1273: 589:

Template talk pages are stupid places to hold discussions. Nobody watches them.

196: 6227:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2583: 2080:

respond within a day or so, feel free to alert me on my own Talk page. Thanks.--

1576:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UFC_140_(2nd_nomination)

1045:

else can see it, my talk page is not a suitable venue for thrashing out policy.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5542: 4688: 3547: 3491: 3456: 3425: 3055:

in my role as an administrator, your talk page is the place it is going to go.

2609: 2601: 2501: 2324: 2158: 1835: 1469: 1413: 1314: 1285: 1265: 1100: 879: 844: 671:

Your account activation code has been emailed to your Knowledge email address.

564: 336: 207: 4476:). I don't think it's too much to ask for someone to fix something they broke. 4025:

Hi there. I didn't understand your edits on the templates marked for deletion

2188: 6157: 4876: 4646: 4450: 3783: 3749: 3716: 3416: 3412: 3103: 3096: 2735: 2561: 2258: 1626: 1614: 1520: 1227: 815: 774: 769: 446: 426: 407:

You are right, it has always been capitalised. I should have checked first.

394: 374: 370: 344: 321: 189:". This article is not only a translation from the German Knowledge article ( 5395: 3379:

Amazon "see-inside" where you are, there is a simple example on page 206 of

245: 6134: 5776: 5301: 5240: 5217: 5179: 5156: 4634: 4229: 4220: 4191: 3959: 3463:...there must be any number. Your explanation is completely wrong-headed. 3452: 3444: 3331: 2316: 2312: 1444: 1404: 1306: 1293: 1281: 1260: 1213: 1201: 1173: 516:

You are not blocked, otherwise you would not be able to post to this page.

463: 248: 6188:, but since the term is being used attributively, that is quite unlikely. 4833:

though it was a 30 min. documentary. Can I revert your good faith edit?

3269:

Just been made redundant and was pinning hopes on getting help with this.

2424:

Hi again; I've now finished copy-editing the article - I read through the

485: 5602: 4834: 4795: 4755: 4714: 4100: 4070: 3546:

is involved in the discussion; I would trust his judgment and expertise.

3205: 3162: 2662: 2206: 2166: 2152: 1301: 737: 736:

Thanks for helping make Knowledge better. Enjoy your research! Cheers,

709: 4124:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 June 17#Politics in the British Isles

4113:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2012 June 17#Politics in the British Isles

2512:

to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.

6005: 5827: 5365: 5360: 5351: 3543: 3537: 2913: 2081: 1703: 1094:

Dear Spinningspark Hello. From this article's history, it seems that a

192: 4848:

No, I removed it because I did not think it appropriate. I still do.

4623:, a collaborative effort focused on improving Knowledge's coverage of 4453:, but contacting James is your first port of call before you do that. 4343:

reason for the resultant proposal. Anway, thanks for your comments. --

2867:

for our indentation essay, I wonder whether you might care to comment

798: 6130: 6118: 4526:

http://en.wikipedia.org/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#FindTheBest.com

3327:, the last version of the page before C.D. edited it, is very short. 3272:

I have a customer and access to a factory but at present no product.

2567: 2205:

and bringing a subject matter expert into the discussion. Good work!

2203:

Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Nullspeeds in General Relativity

751: 266:

Thank you!! What a nice job and I appreciate your indulgence! :) --

1578:. In this one, the closing admin actually suggested this be an RfC 451:(Cross posting to everyone who commented in the JSTOR discussion on 5729:

by dynamic voltage sources. But the NIC (a negative inductor here)

4573: 3183: 2665:

of your subject before you write any more about them on Knowledge.

1289: 1277: 1168:

so this is definitely not acceptable. That user has uploaded some

6004:). One of the edits I reverted of the original IP was on the page 3353:) but only requires one or two sentences to explain its drawbacks. 2311:

it into a conclusion that is not explicit in the source is called

220:

which will attract the attention of someone from GOCE eventually.

5609:

Template:Did you know nominations/Write-only memory (engineering)

340: 6184:

could only be justified if it were commonly referred to as just

4263:

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Finalizing_the_new_proposal

2406:

Never been known to hesitate to do that. Thanks for reviewing.

698: 3851:

understabd why you have made such a perverse closure decision.

3570:

Yes, I am the author of QESdunn and the related relationships.

3357: 2303:

Yes, you are edit warring, please stop it. Taking data from a

1588:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UFC_146

1584:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UFC_143

1580:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UFC_142

5808:. Finding a reference to support that would be a good start. 5194:

is largely patrolled by bots who are difficult to argue with.

1464: 1304:, and published the first description of such an instrument. ( 4433:

You might want to consider removing it before he comes back.

5356:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2697:

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at

5588:

Thanks. Yes, the number of ports is of course arbitrary. --

4479:

back, unless you can tell me how to see a deleted article.

2822:

Hi, studiousness is going in accordance,what I've told for

2278: 1416:

of the post or withdraw the accusation. In any case, such

5986: 5919: 4276:. Since you participated in the earlier discussion about 4228:

Should I take your silence as agreement with my comment?

2234:

Thanks for the clarification. I'm a lifelong resident of

301:

I'd like to move Rubik's cube group to Rubik's Cube group

4994:

join discussions in this area where I have what to say.

3031:

Is there some part of the above post that is unclear? -

2508:

for any test edits you would like to make, and read the

1246:

Knowledge:Today's featured article/requests/instructions

385:

as does the OED on my Mac. WP:MOS says don't capitalize

1750:

the accepted plural when not discussing the Arthropoda.

694:

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.

6093:

Thank you for your contributions to Frances Hugle Talk

5034:

Find acceptable mentor(s) and agree to work with them.

4524:

I appealed to this page, but was denied by ~Amatulić:

3608:

Pato does not play for Barcelona, he plays for Milan

3186:, although I created the symbols (coils etc) myself. 5384:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

4444:

If he won't undelete the article you can ask him to

2955:

that to an article I was pushing for FA status, you

5669:It's moot anyway, there is no support for a split. 4627:. If you'd like to join, add also your name to the 3711:Perhaps you should have familiarized yourself with 1753:. Though I found cause to winge about one of them, 732:

to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

5804:I noted after deletion that the band is listed at 4274:Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Finalizing_the_new_proposal 1280:, a condition which leads to a particular kind of 103:Infrastructure/ citing mainstream European sources 4683:". While similar behavior before has resulted in 2629:User talk:Lstclaire#Clarification on Parker story 2500:, did not appear to be constructive and has been 5691:Then the page can be divided into three parts - 4600:Invitation to WikiProject Electrical engineering 2319:secondary source has done such a synthesis then 2201:For your diligence and objectivity in reviewing 1802:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electronics page move 1242:Knowledge talk:Today's featured article/requests 369:Thanks. The name of the Rubik's Cube article is 4489:So what action is it you want from me exactly? 3514:(although I appreciate that other contributers 2047:editors directly who have previously objected. 1586:. My point is, as I wrote in the ongoing RfA 5733:while the gyrator (a simulated inductor here) 2717:pages some time during the last few months. 2272:myWOT page appears written by fans or PR staff 1210:Knowledge:Today's featured article/May 2, 2012 1208:on May 2, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at 681:If you did not receive a code but were on the 6010:a rather antagonistic message on my talk page 5495:Is your grandfather is a different person to 3424:, which is a pretty weak article right now. — 1300:with it. In 1840 he designed a flexible tube 1164:go to a YouTube user page, not a video about 577:. There is a bit of a dearth of input there. 5626:About splitting the negative resistance page 5386:Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Nock 5216::) This made me chuckle... Again, thank you 2863:Hi, Spark. Since you took part in an RfC at 5300:Thank you Spinningspark :) have done it... 1204:know that the article will be appearing as 569:For commenting and offering suggestions on 4751:It is the right ad. Look again, please: 4272:You are invited to join the discussion at 3259:High Q filters using dielectric resonators 2749:Ask me why I didn't complete this survey. 1200:This is a note to let the main editors of 6008:. He has now reverted my revert and left 5378:episodes, founded a company which became 5348:was updated with a fact from the article 4219:Do I understand your position correctly? 3102:Hi Wondering if you could take a look at 2685:Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey 2279:http://en.wikipedia.org/WOT_Services,_Ltd 1865:per guidelines, policy or convention. -- 5523:Hi Spinning, The proposed merge between 1089:Sikandar Hayat Khan (Punjabi politician) 837:Sikandar Hayat Khan (Punjabi politician) 719:HighBeam would love to hear feedback at 536:Thanks for discussing about Discography 4681:Switched-mode power supply applications 3567:Thank you for the thoughtful response. 1759:Power dividers and directional couplers 1476:for things which need to be addressed. 14: 6225:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2566:hi dude you have a message in my talk 1808:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Electronics 1468:. The article is close to meeting the 1420:arguments carry no weight whatsoever. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5838:Take it easy pal, you don't have it. 5541:seems more suitable for merging with 6206: 5327: 2534:Have a good day. Cheers - Jonathan 1834:describes it as a valid method, and 728:When the 1-year period is up, check 373:. Instead, there is a redirect from 247:which already is on the article for 25: 5364:, the maker of the seven-barrelled 4706:Why is a TV commercial irrelevant? 4055:. First you declined the db tag on 3051:If I need to say something to you, 2608:) 18:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)haleiwahi 1742:Hi Spinning, Even here in Blighty, 697:To activate your account: 1) Go to 460:Knowledge:Requests for JSTOR access 244:I'm hoping you can take this photo 23: 4620:WikiProject Electrical engineering 4472:already proposed for deletion and 3953:WikiProject Electrical Engineering 2688: 2429:well with your FL Review. Cheers, 2386:List of chronometers on HMS Beagle 1296:and made important discoveries in 1196:Main page appearance: Golding Bird 1176:for guidelines on external links. 902:Knowledge:Village pump (proposals) 750: 387:unless the title is a proper noun. 335:That would not be consistent with 24: 6289: 5870:You very recently blocked an IP ( 5646:implementation of this property. 4891:Add teahouse to welcome template? 3854:I was particularly struck by the 1934:That would not be advisable. He 1582:, and here is still another one: 6210: 5331: 4875:After review of your changes at 4651:I've left a Good Article Review 4607: 4361:Edit Warring? - I don't think so 4267: 3864:Ireland-United Kingdom relations 3161: 2487: 2187: 1463: 1252: 936:geonotices running at any time. 797: 484: 29: 5761:Knowledge page Whirlwind (band) 3630:I have reverted the article to 3360:is the circuit element needed ( 3319:This article is plastered with 2725:to be taken to the survey site. 1549:Knowledge:Ownership of articles 1543:Knowledge:Ownership of articles 663:Your HighBeam account is ready! 5703:(idea and implementation) NR. 5699:(idea and implementation) and 5621:18:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 5598:23:50, 28 September 2012 (UTC) 5583:05:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 5555:22:45, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 5513:01:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 5489:01:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC) 5462:06:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 5442:23:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 5428:Revert User talk:207.225.51.18 3856:evidence and reasoning offered 3293:Sorry, unlikely I could help. 2496:, such as the one you made to 2104:Would you have a look at this 13: 1: 5423:00:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 5310:17:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 5280:17:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 5249:14:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 5226:23:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 5208:18:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 5188:18:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 4405:Help? restoring time articles 4185:Tobias Conradi G5 nominations 4131:Politics in the British Isles 3993:Politics in the British Isles 3982:Politics in the British Isles 3422:Proportionality (mathematics) 2623:Clarification on Parker story 1695:AfC - Huw & Tony Williams 1328:The Questor Tapes (TV series) 1162:tried to put into the article 699:http://www.highbeam.com/prof1 6202:08:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 6147:00:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 6112:11:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 6083:14:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 6063:14:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 6049:14:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 6028:14:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 5857:14:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC) 5822:11:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 5789:11:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 4617:You are invited to join the 3314:Current-to-voltage converter 2983:Thanks, I do appreciate it. 2745:on 01:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 1625:. If you choose to use the 1240:), or start a discussion at 1015:works; I'm just saying it's 770:Knowledge Birthday Committee 7: 5756:13:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 5721:13:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 5683:12:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 5664:12:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC) 5165:16:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 5139:10:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 5052:20:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) 5012:09:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC) 4957:17:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 4937:16:53, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 4907:23:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC) 4773:quite a well-watched page. 4675:, now Wtshymanski tries an 2701:would like your feedback! 1270:Royal College of Physicians 943:11:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 929:13:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 765:happy adminship anniversary 746:Happy Adminship Anniversary 10: 6294: 6097:Thank you, SpinningSpark 5832:The block was not valid. 5735:subtracts its voltage from 4886:21:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 3987:An editor has asked for a 3860:User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid 2741:This message was sent via 2627:<Conversation moved to 1434:11:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 1395:06:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 1363:02:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 1343:01:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 1323:23:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 1264:(1814–1854) was a British 1190:15:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 1151:14:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC) 1130:15:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC) 1109:12:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC) 1075:17:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 1059:15:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 1027:14:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC) 1002:21:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 982:20:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 962:12:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC) 888:12:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 873:08:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 853:08:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 824:00:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 785:10:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC) 741:21:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 657:08:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 638:04:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 615:00:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 603:00:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 584:23:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 557:23:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 546:15:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 530:08:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 508:08:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 276:12:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 261:06:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 234:08:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 201:00:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 176:21:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 155:17:35, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 5799:WP:Notability (musicians) 4867:The editors have spoken. 4862:06:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 4843:00:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC) 4829:deleted the link because 4825:Nobody's haranguing you. 4820:23:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 4787:19:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 4764:18:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 4745:16:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC) 4697:03:15, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 4662:17:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 4638:11:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 4557:20:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 4503:23:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 4484:21:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 4467:17:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 4418:17:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 4397:17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4375:16:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4353:03:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC) 4338:22:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4315:21:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4290:06:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 4251:07:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 4233:04:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 4224:16:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4214:15:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4195:15:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4179:20:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4164:20:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4144:18:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 4104:14:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC) 4094:15:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 4074:11:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC) 4013:01:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3975:08:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 3944:01:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3907:00:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3887:00:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3840:00:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 3811:12:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 3792:11:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 3777:11:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 3758:10:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 3743:23:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 3725:19:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 3705:13:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 3691:13:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 3672:12:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 3648:15:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 3624:15:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 3592:04:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 3556:21:18, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 3532:09:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 3500:03:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC) 2195:The Barnstar of Diligence 2186: 813:Talk:meridian (geography) 796: 483: 472:20:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 435:15:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 421:08:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 403:01:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC) 377:. Also, the article uses 361:22:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 330:21:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC) 320:That'd be you. Thanks, -- 296:21:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 187:User:Elcap/Film capacitor 5400:and it will be added to 5096:my 7493 WP contributions 4592:21:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 4067:Tempate talk:archive url 3477:17:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 3434:17:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 3401:09:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 3340:03:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 3307:17:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 3288:16:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 3253:17:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 3231:15:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 3200:00:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 3178:00:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 3135:16:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 3116:15:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC) 3088:10:32, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 3069:10:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 3046:10:27, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 3027:10:11, 2 June 2012 (UTC) 3002:22:53, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2973:11:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2945:10:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2930:02:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2906:17:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2884:01:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2853:16:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2836:16:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2816:19:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 2797:19:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 2783:16:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 2763:07:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC) 2704:We have created a brief 2679:20:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2655:19:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2618:18:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2579:09:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2555:04:00, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 2522:00:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 2471:22:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2457:16:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2439:02:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 2420:21:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 2401:21:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 2379:21:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 2359:20:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 2341:11:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 2297:08:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 2267:14:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC) 2090:23:19, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2075:16:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2061:09:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2040:09:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 2016:07:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC) 1462:has been placed on hold 1206:today's featured article 811:Thanks for your help at 462:. Feel free to sign up. 381:article capitalizes the 162:Whitespace problem fixed 5863:About an IP you blocked 5538:nodal admittance matrix 5526:nodal admittance matrix 5406:Did you know? talk page 2743:Global message delivery 2504:or removed. Please use 2248:18:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC) 2219:20:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 2175:00:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC) 2147:17:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 2126:16:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 1996:15:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1972:10:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1952:10:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1929:04:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1905:00:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 1879:23:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1853:22:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1824:21:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1806:You did a page move of 1796:16:39, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1771:16:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1732:22:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1712:22:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1685:23:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1655:21:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1604:19:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1561:13:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1537:13:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1514:13:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1495:13:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 721:WP:HighBeam/Experiences 305:I'd like to rename the 18:User talk:Spinningspark 6182:impedance phlebography 5519:Closing proposed merge 4966:write even the letter 4671:I saw your comment on 4625:electrical engineering 4411:User Talk:JamesBWatson 3346:completely rewriting: 2769:Good article standards 2694: 2595:appreciating wikipedia 2236:Union City, New Jersey 2024:Norton Safe Web report 1474:Talk:Nominal impedance 1312: 1065:wikimediauk-l archives 971: 755: 628:Please assist. Thanks 6223:of past discussions. 5806:List of Peel sessions 5532:admittance parameters 5266:geographic region). 5151:Regarding minor edits 4916:Hello SpinningSpark, 4912:Lifting the topic ban 3654:British isles article 3211:See bottom of article 2692: 2498:List of battery types 2100:Grammar correction?!? 1470:good article criteria 1250: 906: 805:The Teamwork Barnstar 754: 571:Template talk:Welcome 492:The Original Barnstar 282:Military organization 107:Dear Spinningspark, 42:of past discussions. 4633:Thanks for reading! 4517:Hello Spinningspark 4019:template:archive url 3980:Deletion review for 3321:User:Circuit dreamer 2590:User talk: Corretore 2543:Jonathan M MacDonald 2106:"grammar correction" 1268:and a Fellow of the 689:and we'll try again. 393:is a proper noun. -- 6055:Boing! said Zebedee 5731:adds its voltage to 5635:negative resistance 5174:Hi Spinningspark! 3441:Newton's second law 2845:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 2828:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 2789:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 2775:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 2584:Lessac Technologies 2180:A barnstar for you! 1458:you nominated as a 914:Knowledge:Geonotice 790:A barnstar for you! 706:WP:HighBeam/Support 685:, add your name to 676:Special:Preferences 477:A barnstar for you! 458:I have now created 389:I guess I'm saying 5765:Hi Spinningspark, 5497:Robert Watson-Watt 5324:DYK for Henry Nock 5119:9435 contributions 3508:my closing remarks 2891:a long-lost cousin 2695: 2323:conclusion may be 1738:Sensory appendages 1226:) or his delegate 900:Carried over from 756: 311:Rubik's Cube group 307:Rubik's cube group 6281: 6280: 6235: 6234: 6229:current talk page 5847:comment added by 5792: 5775:comment added by 5479:comment added by 5412: 5411: 5399: 4905: 4727: 4713:comment added by 4644: 4643: 4615:Hi fellow editor, 4560: 4543:comment added by 4373: 4367:Wee Curry Monster 4011: 3942: 3885: 3614:comment added by 3582:comment added by 3562:User talk:Qesdunn 2859:Indentation again 2738:, Teahouse host 2645:comment added by 2558: 2541:comment added by 2494:your recent edits 2313:original research 2287:comment added by 2224: 2223: 1757:'s copy edits to 1688: 1671:comment added by 1566:Help Desk Request 1456:Nominal impedance 1449:Nominal impedance 1398: 1381:comment added by 1298:electrometallurgy 1272:. He lectured at 1166:The Questor Tapes 1160:. The links you 1136:The Questor Tapes 1096:User:74.82.68.144 829: 828: 767:on behalf of the 730:applications page 613: 582: 555: 513: 512: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6285: 6262: 6237: 6236: 6214: 6213: 6207: 6198: 6193: 6179: 6173: 6169: 6163: 6078: 6073: 6044: 6039: 6023: 6018: 6003: 6002: 5957:deleted contribs 5936: 5935: 5890:deleted contribs 5859: 5841:Amanbir Singh. 5818: 5813: 5791: 5769: 5738:"real" voltage. 5679: 5674: 5579: 5574: 5567:two-port network 5509: 5504: 5491: 5458: 5453: 5389: 5340:8 September 2012 5335: 5328: 5276: 5271: 5204: 5199: 5048: 5043: 4953: 4948: 4904: 4858: 4853: 4816: 4811: 4783: 4778: 4741: 4736: 4726: 4707: 4673:BC548 notability 4611: 4604: 4603: 4588: 4582: 4568:In reference to 4559: 4537: 4499: 4494: 4482: 4463: 4458: 4416: 4409:As you noted on 4393: 4388: 4369: 4334: 4329: 4271: 4270: 4247: 4242: 4210: 4205: 4156: 4090: 4085: 4064: 4058: 4054: 4048: 4044: 4038: 4034: 4028: 4002: 3999: 3971: 3965: 3962: 3933: 3930: 3903: 3898: 3876: 3873: 3837: 3832: 3807: 3802: 3773: 3768: 3739: 3734: 3687: 3682: 3644: 3639: 3626: 3594: 3528: 3523: 3473: 3468: 3397: 3392: 3303: 3298: 3249: 3244: 3229: 3227: 3222: 3217: 3196: 3191: 3165: 3131: 3126: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3065: 3060: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3000: 2998: 2993: 2988: 2969: 2964: 2904: 2882: 2812: 2807: 2759: 2754: 2732:Happy editing, 2675: 2670: 2657: 2557: 2535: 2491: 2490: 2453: 2448: 2416: 2411: 2375: 2370: 2356: 2354:Ten Pound Hammer 2337: 2332: 2299: 2211: 2191: 2184: 2183: 2143: 2138: 2057: 2052: 2036: 2031: 1948: 1943: 1901: 1896: 1849: 1844: 1792: 1787: 1728: 1723: 1687: 1665: 1651: 1646: 1533: 1528: 1480: 1467: 1430: 1425: 1397: 1375: 1359: 1354: 1256: 1186: 1181: 1126: 1121: 1055: 1050: 998: 993: 959: 954: 926: 921: 869: 864: 801: 794: 793: 653: 648: 612: 599: 594: 581: 573:, regarding the 554: 526: 521: 488: 481: 480: 417: 412: 357: 352: 230: 225: 219: 213: 158: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6293: 6292: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6258: 6211: 6196: 6191: 6177: 6171: 6167: 6161: 6123: 6095: 6076: 6071: 6042: 6037: 6021: 6016: 5942: 5940:117.220.145.234 5938: 5875: 5873:117.199.111.175 5871: 5865: 5849:117.220.145.234 5842: 5830: 5816: 5811: 5770: 5763: 5740:Circuit dreamer 5705:Circuit dreamer 5677: 5672: 5648:Circuit dreamer 5628: 5605: 5577: 5572: 5521: 5507: 5502: 5474: 5470: 5456: 5451: 5430: 5415:Graeme Bartlett 5380:Wilkinson Sword 5326: 5274: 5269: 5202: 5197: 5172: 5153: 5123:Circuit dreamer 5046: 5041: 4996:Circuit dreamer 4951: 4946: 4921:Circuit dreamer 4914: 4902:KillerChihuahua 4893: 4873: 4856: 4851: 4814: 4809: 4781: 4776: 4739: 4734: 4708: 4704: 4669: 4649: 4602: 4586: 4578: 4566: 4538: 4515: 4497: 4492: 4480: 4461: 4456: 4451:Deletion Review 4414: 4407: 4391: 4386: 4363: 4332: 4327: 4268: 4265: 4245: 4240: 4208: 4203: 4187: 4154: 4150:Thanks for this 4116: 4088: 4083: 4062: 4056: 4052: 4046: 4042: 4036: 4032: 4026: 4023: 3997: 3989:deletion review 3985: 3972: 3969: 3963: 3960: 3956: 3928: 3901: 3896: 3871: 3848: 3835: 3830: 3805: 3800: 3771: 3766: 3737: 3732: 3685: 3680: 3656: 3642: 3637: 3609: 3600: 3598:fixed pato page 3577: 3565: 3540: 3526: 3521: 3487: 3471: 3466: 3461:Hopkinson's law 3409: 3407:Proportionality 3395: 3390: 3317: 3301: 3296: 3263:Spinningspark, 3261: 3247: 3242: 3225: 3220: 3215: 3213: 3208: 3194: 3189: 3129: 3124: 3100: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3063: 3058: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3009: 2996: 2991: 2986: 2984: 2981: 2967: 2962: 2917: 2894: 2872: 2861: 2824:Indian Railways 2810: 2805: 2771: 2757: 2752: 2687: 2673: 2668: 2640: 2637: 2625: 2597: 2586: 2564: 2536: 2529: 2488: 2485: 2451: 2446: 2414: 2409: 2389: 2373: 2368: 2352: 2349: 2335: 2330: 2282: 2274: 2255: 2232: 2207: 2182: 2155: 2141: 2136: 2110:Circuit dreamer 2102: 2055: 2050: 2034: 2029: 1946: 1941: 1917: 1899: 1894: 1847: 1842: 1804: 1790: 1785: 1740: 1726: 1721: 1697: 1666: 1649: 1644: 1568: 1547:hi please read 1545: 1531: 1526: 1502: 1492: 1485: 1478: 1452: 1428: 1423: 1376: 1371: 1357: 1352: 1330: 1257: 1198: 1184: 1179: 1138: 1124: 1119: 1092: 1053: 1048: 996: 991: 957: 952: 924: 919: 898: 867: 862: 840: 792: 787: 782: 781:about my edits? 775:Armbrust, B.Ed. 748: 665: 651: 646: 625: 610:KillerChihuahua 597: 592: 579:KillerChihuahua 567: 552:KillerChihuahua 524: 519: 479: 449: 415: 410: 355: 350: 303: 284: 242: 240:Can you assist? 228: 223: 217: 211: 183: 164: 148: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6291: 6279: 6278: 6273: 6268: 6263: 6256: 6251: 6246: 6243: 6233: 6232: 6215: 6205: 6204: 6122: 6116: 6094: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 5864: 5861: 5829: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5802: 5762: 5759: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5723: 5686: 5685: 5627: 5624: 5604: 5601: 5586: 5585: 5543:nodal analysis 5520: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5481:204.237.59.138 5469: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5429: 5426: 5410: 5409: 5370:Patrick Harper 5336: 5325: 5322: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5289: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5228: 5211: 5210: 5171: 5168: 5152: 5149: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5141: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5032: 5029: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4960: 4959: 4913: 4910: 4892: 4889: 4872: 4869: 4865: 4864: 4823: 4822: 4792: 4791: 4790: 4789: 4767: 4766: 4748: 4747: 4703: 4700: 4668: 4665: 4648: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4632: 4616: 4612: 4601: 4598: 4596: 4580:TransporterMan 4565: 4562: 4514: 4513:Need your help 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4431: 4430: 4429: 4406: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4362: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4264: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4186: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4166: 4115: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4022: 4016: 3984: 3978: 3968: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3847: 3846:Please explain 3844: 3843: 3842: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3616:195.158.86.126 3599: 3596: 3584:174.28.174.180 3564: 3559: 3539: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3486: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3449:Avogadro's law 3408: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3376: 3372: 3365: 3354: 3316: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3260: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3207: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3168: 3159: 3157: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3145: 3138: 3137: 3099: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3008: 3005: 2980: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2922:70.137.140.123 2916: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2860: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2839: 2838: 2819: 2818: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2647:209.125.23.146 2636: 2633: 2624: 2621: 2596: 2593: 2585: 2582: 2563: 2560: 2528: 2525: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2463:Baffle gab1978 2431:Baffle gab1978 2393:Baffle gab1978 2388: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2305:primary source 2289:124.41.232.101 2273: 2270: 2254: 2251: 2231: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2198: 2197: 2192: 2181: 2178: 2159:WFN Strategies 2154: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2043: 2042: 2005: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1955: 1954: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1856: 1855: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1779: 1778: 1755:204.228.188.31 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1658: 1657: 1637: 1636: 1619: 1618: 1567: 1564: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1501: 1498: 1490: 1483: 1451: 1447:nomination of 1441: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1405:our guidelines 1370: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1329: 1326: 1286:electrotherapy 1274:Guy's Hospital 1266:medical doctor 1251: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1091: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1005: 1004: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 897: 892: 876: 875: 839: 833: 831: 827: 826: 808: 807: 802: 791: 788: 780: 749: 747: 744: 734: 733: 726: 723: 717: 713: 702: 695: 692: 691: 690: 679: 664: 661: 660: 659: 624: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 566: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 533: 532: 511: 510: 495: 494: 489: 478: 475: 448: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 364: 363: 302: 299: 283: 280: 279: 278: 241: 238: 237: 236: 182: 181:Film capacitor 179: 163: 160: 153:comment added 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6290: 6277: 6274: 6272: 6269: 6267: 6264: 6261: 6257: 6255: 6252: 6250: 6247: 6244: 6242: 6239: 6238: 6230: 6226: 6222: 6221: 6216: 6209: 6208: 6203: 6200: 6199: 6194: 6187: 6183: 6176: 6166: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6144: 6140: 6139:SchreiberBike 6136: 6132: 6128: 6125:Hello, I saw 6120: 6115: 6114:Cheryl Hugle 6113: 6109: 6105: 6101: 6098: 6084: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6074: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6060: 6056: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6047: 6046: 6045: 6040: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6019: 6011: 6007: 6000: 5997: 5994: 5991: 5988: 5985: 5982: 5979: 5976: 5973: 5970: 5967: 5964: 5961: 5958: 5955: 5952: 5949: 5946: 5941: 5933: 5930: 5927: 5924: 5921: 5918: 5915: 5912: 5909: 5906: 5903: 5900: 5897: 5894: 5891: 5888: 5885: 5882: 5879: 5874: 5868: 5860: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5846: 5839: 5836: 5833: 5823: 5820: 5819: 5814: 5807: 5803: 5800: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5790: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5774: 5766: 5758: 5757: 5753: 5749: 5745: 5741: 5736: 5732: 5722: 5718: 5714: 5710: 5706: 5702: 5698: 5694: 5690: 5689: 5688: 5687: 5684: 5681: 5680: 5675: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5665: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5649: 5644: 5640: 5636: 5631: 5623: 5622: 5618: 5614: 5610: 5600: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5584: 5581: 5580: 5575: 5568: 5564: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5544: 5540: 5539: 5534: 5533: 5528: 5527: 5514: 5511: 5510: 5505: 5498: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5490: 5486: 5482: 5478: 5463: 5460: 5459: 5454: 5446: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5425: 5424: 5420: 5416: 5407: 5403: 5397: 5393: 5387: 5383: 5381: 5377: 5376: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5362: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5347: 5346: 5345:Did you know? 5341: 5337: 5334: 5330: 5329: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5299: 5298: 5297: 5296: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5281: 5278: 5277: 5272: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5250: 5246: 5242: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5227: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5209: 5206: 5205: 5200: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5185: 5181: 5175: 5167: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5124: 5120: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5097: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5086: 5085: 5075: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5053: 5050: 5049: 5044: 5038: 5033: 5030: 5027: 5026: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4989: 4983: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4969: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4958: 4955: 4954: 4949: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4922: 4917: 4909: 4908: 4903: 4899: 4888: 4887: 4884: 4882: 4878: 4877:Wilhelm Cauer 4871:Wilheim Cauer 4868: 4863: 4860: 4859: 4854: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4821: 4818: 4817: 4812: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4801: 4797: 4788: 4785: 4784: 4779: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4750: 4749: 4746: 4743: 4742: 4737: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4699: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4686: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4664: 4663: 4660: 4658: 4654: 4640: 4639: 4636: 4630: 4626: 4622: 4621: 4613: 4610: 4606: 4605: 4597: 4594: 4593: 4589: 4583: 4581: 4575: 4571: 4561: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4534: 4531: 4528: 4527: 4522: 4518: 4504: 4501: 4500: 4495: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4475: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4465: 4464: 4459: 4452: 4447: 4443: 4439: 4435: 4434: 4432: 4426: 4425: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4412: 4398: 4395: 4394: 4389: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4336: 4335: 4330: 4323: 4322:camel designs 4320:I don't like 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4303: 4298: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4252: 4249: 4248: 4243: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4231: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4222: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4212: 4211: 4206: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4193: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4167: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4151: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4132: 4127: 4125: 4121: 4114: 4105: 4102: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4092: 4091: 4086: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4072: 4068: 4061: 4051: 4041: 4031: 4020: 4015: 4014: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3994: 3990: 3983: 3977: 3976: 3973: 3966: 3954: 3945: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3905: 3904: 3899: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3867: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3852: 3841: 3838: 3833: 3826: 3825: 3812: 3809: 3808: 3803: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3769: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3741: 3740: 3735: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3689: 3688: 3683: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3649: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3633: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3606: 3603: 3595: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3574: 3571: 3568: 3563: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3533: 3530: 3529: 3524: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3485: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3469: 3462: 3458: 3457:Charles's law 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3418: 3414: 3402: 3399: 3398: 3393: 3387: 3382: 3377: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3352: 3348: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3328: 3326: 3325:July 24, 2006 3322: 3315: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3299: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3276: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3254: 3251: 3250: 3245: 3238: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3228: 3223: 3218: 3212: 3201: 3198: 3197: 3192: 3185: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3166: 3164: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3149: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3127: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3104:Kelvin bridge 3098: 3097:Kelvin bridge 3089: 3086: 3078: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3067: 3066: 3061: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3036: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3017: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2994: 2989: 2974: 2971: 2970: 2965: 2958: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2937:70.137.135.97 2932: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2915: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2880: 2876: 2870: 2866: 2865:the talk page 2854: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2808: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2764: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2744: 2739: 2737: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2726: 2724: 2718: 2716: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2700: 2693:Teahouse logo 2691: 2680: 2677: 2676: 2671: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2632: 2630: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2592: 2591: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2532: 2524: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2455: 2454: 2449: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2412: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2387: 2380: 2377: 2376: 2371: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2355: 2347:Structuration 2342: 2339: 2338: 2333: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2280: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2230: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2212: 2210: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2185: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2162: 2160: 2148: 2145: 2144: 2139: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2053: 2045: 2044: 2041: 2038: 2037: 2032: 2025: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1906: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867:Alan Liefting 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1845: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1812:Alan Liefting 1809: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1788: 1781: 1780: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1724: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1652: 1647: 1639: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1616: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1571: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1529: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1488: 1486: 1481: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1457: 1450: 1446: 1440: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1369:Arc flas link 1364: 1361: 1360: 1355: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1255: 1249: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1158:WP:OTHERSTUFF 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1122: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1090: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 994: 986: 985: 984: 983: 980: 977: 961: 960: 955: 947: 946: 945: 944: 942: 939: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 928: 927: 922: 915: 910: 905: 903: 896: 891: 889: 885: 881: 874: 871: 870: 865: 858: 857: 856: 854: 850: 846: 838: 832: 825: 821: 817: 814: 810: 809: 806: 803: 800: 795: 786: 783: 778: 776: 772: 771: 766: 762: 761: 760:Spinningspark 753: 743: 742: 739: 731: 727: 724: 722: 718: 714: 711: 707: 703: 700: 696: 693: 688: 684: 683:approved list 680: 677: 673: 672: 670: 669: 668: 658: 655: 654: 649: 642: 641: 640: 639: 635: 631: 623:Please Assist 616: 611: 606: 605: 604: 601: 600: 595: 588: 587: 586: 585: 580: 576: 572: 558: 553: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 531: 528: 527: 522: 515: 514: 509: 505: 501: 497: 496: 493: 490: 487: 482: 474: 473: 469: 465: 461: 456: 454: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423: 422: 419: 418: 413: 406: 405: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 365: 362: 359: 358: 353: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 318: 316: 312: 308: 298: 297: 293: 289: 288:174.22.11.218 277: 273: 269: 268:Leahtwosaints 265: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 253:Leahtwosaints 250: 246: 235: 232: 231: 226: 216: 209: 205: 204: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 188: 178: 177: 173: 169: 159: 156: 152: 146: 142: 137: 134: 131: 128: 124: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6259: 6224: 6218: 6189: 6185: 6153: 6135:phlebography 6124: 6104:Cheryl Hugle 6102: 6099: 6096: 6069: 6068: 6035: 6034: 6014: 6013: 5995: 5989: 5983: 5977: 5971: 5965: 5959: 5953: 5947: 5928: 5922: 5916: 5910: 5904: 5898: 5892: 5886: 5880: 5869: 5866: 5843:— Preceding 5840: 5837: 5834: 5831: 5809: 5771:— Preceding 5767: 5764: 5734: 5730: 5727: 5701:differential 5700: 5696: 5692: 5670: 5643:differential 5642: 5638: 5634: 5632: 5629: 5606: 5587: 5570: 5562: 5545:. Thanks, -- 5536: 5530: 5524: 5522: 5500: 5475:— Preceding 5471: 5468:Watson-Wyatt 5449: 5431: 5413: 5374: 5359: 5357: 5350: 5349: 5343: 5267: 5195: 5176: 5173: 5170:Thank you... 5154: 5074:differential 5039: 4982:Circuit Idea 4944: 4918: 4915: 4894: 4874: 4866: 4849: 4830: 4826: 4824: 4807: 4793: 4774: 4732: 4709:— Preceding 4705: 4702:Rubik's Cube 4670: 4650: 4618: 4614: 4595: 4579: 4567: 4539:— Preceding 4535: 4532: 4529: 4523: 4519: 4516: 4490: 4477: 4473: 4454: 4437: 4408: 4384: 4364: 4325: 4301: 4296: 4293: 4277: 4266: 4238: 4201: 4188: 4128: 4117: 4081: 4024: 3986: 3957: 3923: 3894: 3868: 3853: 3849: 3798: 3764: 3730: 3678: 3657: 3635: 3632:this version 3610:— Preceding 3607: 3604: 3601: 3578:— Preceding 3575: 3572: 3569: 3566: 3541: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3488: 3464: 3417:Barlow's law 3413:Barlow's law 3410: 3388: 3329: 3318: 3294: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3240: 3236: 3209: 3187: 3167: 3158: 3150: 3147: 3139: 3122: 3101: 3056: 3052: 3030: 3010: 2982: 2960: 2956: 2951: 2933: 2918: 2897:OhioStandard 2875:OhioStandard 2862: 2803: 2786: 2772: 2750: 2740: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2720: 2719: 2703: 2696: 2666: 2641:— Preceding 2638: 2626: 2598: 2587: 2565: 2537:— Preceding 2533: 2530: 2510:welcome page 2486: 2444: 2407: 2390: 2366: 2353: 2350: 2328: 2320: 2309:synthesising 2283:— Preceding 2275: 2256: 2233: 2228: 2214: 2208: 2194: 2163: 2156: 2134: 2103: 2048: 2027: 2004: 1939: 1918: 1915:Ranina Reddy 1892: 1862: 1840: 1805: 1783: 1747: 1743: 1741: 1719: 1698: 1667:— Preceding 1642: 1631: 1572: 1569: 1546: 1524: 1503: 1460:good article 1454:The article 1453: 1438: 1421: 1417: 1377:— Preceding 1372: 1350: 1331: 1313: 1305: 1294:Daniell cell 1282:kidney stone 1261:Golding Bird 1259: 1258: 1234: 1220: 1202:Golding Bird 1199: 1177: 1169: 1165: 1139: 1117: 1093: 1046: 1041: 1016: 1012: 989: 972: 950: 917: 911: 907: 899: 895:WP:Geonotice 877: 860: 841: 830: 804: 768: 764: 758: 735: 687:this section 666: 644: 626: 590: 568: 517: 491: 457: 450: 408: 391:Rubik's Cube 390: 386: 382: 379:Rubik's Cube 378: 375:Rubik's cube 371:Rubik's Cube 348: 345:Rubik's cube 319: 315:Rubik's Cube 314: 310: 306: 304: 285: 249:Tim Reynolds 243: 221: 184: 168:Magioladitis 165: 138: 135: 132: 129: 125: 121: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 78: 43: 37: 6217:This is an 5613:Staszek Lem 5396:quick check 4667:Wtshymanski 4629:member list 4572:would this 4545:Evanthomas1 4060:archive url 4050:web archive 4040:url archive 4030:archive url 3453:Boyle's law 3445:Hooke's law 3007:my talkpage 2699:WP:Teahouse 2514:Orphan Wiki 2506:the sandbox 2426:Peer Review 2240:Nightscream 2133:different. 1302:stethoscope 1087:Re article 716:appropriate 710:User:Ocaasi 309:article to 149:—Preceding 141:B.Andersohn 133:Cordially, 36:This is an 6276:Archive 15 6271:Archive 14 6266:Archive 13 6260:Archive 12 6254:Archive 11 6249:Archive 10 6137:. Thanks, 6006:Transistor 5993:block user 5963:filter log 5926:block user 5896:filter log 5867:Hi there, 5434:Viva-Verdi 5392:here's how 5366:volley gun 5361:Henry Nock 5352:Henry Nock 4881:j⚛e decker 4657:j⚛e decker 4000:HairedGirl 3931:HairedGirl 3915:reasoning. 3874:HairedGirl 3544:User:RexxS 3502:Jlbickley 3426:Ben Kovitz 3369:here's one 3053:especially 2914:constantan 2663:notability 2215:talk to me 2108:? Thanks, 1832:WP:ARCHIVE 1673:Mreleganza 1632:very brief 1596:Mreleganza 1418:ad hominem 1383:Randolph02 1111:AsadUK200 1017:unreliable 890:AsadUK200 855:AsadUK200 95:Archive 15 90:Archive 14 85:Archive 13 79:Archive 12 73:Archive 11 68:Archive 10 6241:Archive 5 6186:impedance 6131:Impedance 6127:your edit 6119:Impedance 5999:block log 5932:block log 5569:article. 5358:... that 4689:Electron9 4536:Thanks! 4169:work...-- 3713:WP:BISLES 3548:Finetooth 3512:weak keep 3492:Jlbickley 3381:this book 3280:Straygrey 2979:Thank you 2711:Questions 2610:Haleiwahi 2602:Haleiwahi 2588:Moved to 2527:Thank you 2253:Chebyshev 2227:The word 2067:Vithurgod 2008:Vithurgod 1988:Vithurgod 1964:Vithurgod 1936:asked you 1921:Vithurgod 1315:UcuchaBot 1101:AsadUK200 880:AsadUK200 845:AsadUK200 708:, or ask 630:Vithurgod 538:Vithurgod 500:Vithurgod 425:Thanks.-- 347:article. 215:copy edit 60:Archive 5 6192:Spinning 6175:lookfrom 5951:contribs 5884:contribs 5845:unsigned 5812:Spinning 5785:contribs 5773:unsigned 5748:contribs 5713:contribs 5697:absolute 5673:Spinning 5656:contribs 5639:absolute 5590:catslash 5573:Spinning 5547:catslash 5503:Spinning 5477:unsigned 5452:Spinning 5402:DYKSTATS 5368:used by 5270:Spinning 5198:Spinning 5131:contribs 5042:Spinning 5004:contribs 4947:Spinning 4929:contribs 4852:Spinning 4810:Spinning 4777:Spinning 4735:Spinning 4723:contribs 4711:unsigned 4553:contribs 4541:unsigned 4493:Spinning 4457:Spinning 4387:Spinning 4328:Spinning 4241:Spinning 4204:Spinning 4084:Spinning 4008:contribs 3939:contribs 3897:Spinning 3882:contribs 3801:Spinning 3784:HighKing 3767:Spinning 3750:HighKing 3733:Spinning 3717:HighKing 3681:Spinning 3638:Spinning 3612:unsigned 3580:unsigned 3522:Spinning 3467:Spinning 3391:Spinning 3297:Spinning 3243:Spinning 3190:Spinning 3184:Inkscape 3125:Spinning 3059:Spinning 2963:Spinning 2806:Spinning 2753:Spinning 2669:Spinning 2643:unsigned 2635:Untitled 2551:contribs 2539:unsigned 2502:reverted 2483:May 2012 2447:Spinning 2410:Spinning 2369:Spinning 2331:Spinning 2317:reliable 2285:unsigned 2259:Hgrosser 2137:Spinning 2118:contribs 2051:Spinning 2030:Spinning 1942:Spinning 1895:Spinning 1875:contribs 1843:Spinning 1820:contribs 1786:Spinning 1763:catslash 1744:antennas 1722:Spinning 1681:contribs 1669:unsigned 1645:Spinning 1527:Spinning 1424:Spinning 1410:WP:OTHER 1391:contribs 1379:unsigned 1353:Spinning 1335:Kenixkil 1290:quackery 1278:oxaluria 1238:contribs 1228:Dabomb87 1224:contribs 1180:Spinning 1143:Kenixkil 1120:Spinning 1049:Spinning 992:Spinning 953:Spinning 920:Spinning 863:Spinning 816:HTML2011 757:Wishing 647:Spinning 593:Spinning 575:Teahouse 520:Spinning 427:Olsonist 411:Spinning 395:Olsonist 351:Spinning 322:Olsonist 313:because 224:Spinning 6220:archive 6165:intitle 6156:name. 6129:of the 6072:Richard 6038:Richard 6017:Richard 5777:Rapa123 5302:Lorelei 5241:Lorelei 5218:Lorelei 5180:Lorelei 5157:JZNIOSH 4635:SchreyP 4570:fiachna 4564:fiachna 4302:trivial 4297:trivial 4278:trivial 4230:Spartaz 4221:Spartaz 4192:Spartaz 3484:Endtown 3332:Hellbus 3275:Thanks 3237:The Sun 1836:WP:TALK 1748:believe 1500:infobox 1307:more... 1214:Raul654 1170:Questor 763:a very 464:Raul654 343:or the 341:MOS:CAP 337:WP:CAPS 208:WP:GOCE 151:undated 39:archive 6158:WP:PTM 5693:common 5375:Sharpe 4835:Fuddle 4796:Fuddle 4756:Fuddle 4715:Fuddle 4474:failed 4446:USERFY 4136:Cunard 4101:Waldir 4071:Waldir 4021:et al. 4004:(talk) 3935:(talk) 3878:(talk) 3831:Silver 3362:source 3358:nullor 3351:source 3278:Chris 3221:Centri 3080:really 3038:really 3019:really 2992:Centri 2952:really 2721:Click 2715:Guests 2706:survey 2229:cabrón 2209:Pol430 2167:Hahc21 1863:always 1627:WP:RfC 1615:WP:DRV 1521:WP:IBX 1072:yck C. 1024:yck C. 979:yck C. 941:yck C. 738:Ocaasi 565:Thanks 453:WT:FAC 6197:Spark 5969:WHOIS 5902:WHOIS 5817:Spark 5752:email 5717:email 5678:Spark 5660:email 5607:FYI: 5578:Spark 5508:Spark 5457:Spark 5275:Spark 5203:Spark 5135:email 5047:Spark 5008:email 4952:Spark 4933:email 4857:Spark 4815:Spark 4782:Spark 4740:Spark 4679:for " 4647:Cauer 4498:Spark 4462:Spark 4392:Spark 4345:KarlB 4333:Spark 4307:KarlB 4282:KarlB 4246:Spark 4209:Spark 4171:KarlB 4120:wrote 4089:Spark 3998:Brown 3929:Brown 3902:Spark 3872:Brown 3858:] by 3836:seren 3806:Spark 3772:Spark 3738:Spark 3697:KarlB 3686:Spark 3664:KarlB 3643:Spark 3527:Spark 3516:might 3472:Spark 3396:Spark 3302:Spark 3248:Spark 3195:Spark 3130:Spark 3064:Spark 2968:Spark 2957:would 2811:Spark 2758:Spark 2674:Spark 2631:: --> 2562:refer 2452:Spark 2415:Spark 2374:Spark 2336:Spark 2325:cited 2321:their 2142:Spark 2122:email 2082:Bbb23 2056:Spark 2035:Spark 1947:Spark 1900:Spark 1848:Spark 1791:Spark 1746:is I 1727:Spark 1704:N1geD 1650:Spark 1532:Spark 1443:Your 1429:Spark 1358:Spark 1288:from 1185:Spark 1174:WP:EL 1125:Spark 1054:Spark 1042:still 1013:never 997:Spark 958:Spark 925:Spark 868:Spark 652:Spark 598:Spark 525:Spark 447:JSTOR 416:Spark 356:Spark 229:Spark 193:Elcap 16:< 6170:and 6154:same 6143:talk 6121:edit 6108:talk 6059:talk 5987:http 5981:RBLs 5975:RDNS 5945:talk 5920:http 5914:RBLs 5908:RDNS 5878:talk 5853:talk 5781:talk 5744:talk 5709:talk 5652:talk 5641:and 5617:talk 5594:talk 5551:talk 5529:and 5485:talk 5438:talk 5419:talk 5306:talk 5245:talk 5222:talk 5184:talk 5161:talk 5127:talk 5072:and 5070:true 5000:talk 4925:talk 4898:here 4839:talk 4800:talk 4760:talk 4719:talk 4693:talk 4653:here 4587:TALK 4574:this 4549:talk 4371:talk 4349:talk 4311:talk 4286:talk 4175:talk 4160:talk 4140:talk 4118:You 4045:and 3961:Shri 3788:talk 3754:talk 3721:talk 3701:talk 3668:talk 3620:talk 3588:talk 3552:talk 3496:talk 3430:talk 3336:talk 3284:talk 3174:talk 3170:Woz2 3112:talk 3108:Woz2 2950:You 2941:talk 2926:talk 2901:talk 2879:talk 2869:here 2849:talk 2832:talk 2793:talk 2779:talk 2736:J-Mo 2723:here 2651:talk 2614:talk 2606:talk 2575:talk 2547:talk 2518:talk 2467:talk 2435:talk 2397:talk 2307:and 2293:talk 2263:talk 2244:talk 2171:talk 2114:talk 2086:talk 2071:talk 2012:talk 1992:talk 1968:talk 1925:talk 1871:talk 1816:talk 1767:talk 1708:talk 1677:talk 1600:talk 1557:talk 1510:talk 1414:diff 1387:talk 1339:talk 1319:talk 1232:talk 1218:talk 1147:talk 1105:talk 884:talk 849:talk 820:talk 634:talk 542:talk 504:talk 468:talk 431:talk 399:talk 326:talk 292:talk 272:talk 257:talk 197:talk 172:talk 145:talk 136:BJA 5603:WOM 5372:in 5338:On 4831:you 4827:You 4677:AfD 4122:at 4006:• ( 3991:of 3964:Ram 3937:• ( 3924:why 3919:so. 3880:• ( 3216:Egg 3206:Lol 3084:can 3076:You 3042:can 3034:You 3023:can 3015:You 2987:Egg 2912:Re 2713:or 2357:• 2281:. 2153:Hi! 1479:GoP 1069:Der 1021:Der 976:Der 938:Der 835:Re 455:) 147:) 6245:← 6178:}} 6172:{{ 6168:}} 6162:{{ 6145:) 6110:) 6077:BB 6061:) 6043:BB 6022:BB 5855:) 5828:Oi 5787:) 5783:• 5754:) 5750:, 5746:, 5719:) 5715:, 5711:, 5695:, 5662:) 5658:, 5654:, 5619:) 5611:. 5596:) 5553:) 5487:) 5440:) 5421:) 5394:, 5342:, 5308:) 5247:) 5224:) 5186:) 5163:) 5137:) 5133:, 5129:, 5010:) 5006:, 5002:, 4935:) 4931:, 4927:, 4900:. 4841:) 4802:) 4762:) 4725:) 4721:• 4695:) 4687:. 4590:) 4555:) 4551:• 4481:—— 4415:—— 4351:) 4313:) 4288:) 4177:) 4162:) 4155:RA 4142:) 4063:}} 4057:{{ 4053:}} 4047:{{ 4043:}} 4037:{{ 4035:, 4033:}} 4027:{{ 3970:me 3866:. 3790:) 3756:) 3723:) 3703:) 3670:) 3622:) 3590:) 3554:) 3538:FL 3498:) 3459:, 3455:, 3451:, 3447:, 3443:, 3432:) 3364:). 3338:) 3286:) 3176:) 3114:) 2943:) 2928:) 2895:-- 2873:-- 2851:) 2834:) 2795:) 2781:) 2653:) 2616:) 2577:) 2571:al 2553:) 2549:• 2520:) 2469:) 2437:) 2399:) 2327:. 2295:) 2265:) 2246:) 2173:) 2165:-- 2128:. 2124:) 2120:, 2116:, 2088:) 2073:) 2014:) 1994:) 1970:) 1927:) 1877:) 1873:- 1822:) 1818:- 1769:) 1710:) 1683:) 1679:• 1602:) 1559:) 1553:al 1512:) 1506:al 1445:GA 1393:) 1389:• 1341:) 1321:) 1310:) 1149:) 1107:) 1019:. 904:: 886:) 851:) 822:) 773:! 678:). 636:) 544:) 506:) 470:) 433:) 401:) 339:, 328:) 294:) 274:) 259:) 218:}} 212:{{ 199:) 174:) 139:-- 64:← 6231:. 6141:( 6106:( 6057:( 6001:) 5996:· 5990:· 5984:· 5978:· 5972:· 5966:· 5960:· 5954:· 5948:· 5943:( 5934:) 5929:· 5923:· 5917:· 5911:· 5905:· 5899:· 5893:· 5887:· 5881:· 5876:( 5851:( 5779:( 5742:( 5707:( 5650:( 5615:( 5592:( 5563:y 5549:( 5483:( 5436:( 5417:( 5408:. 5398:) 5390:( 5382:? 5304:( 5243:( 5220:( 5182:( 5159:( 5125:( 4998:( 4968:a 4923:( 4837:( 4798:( 4758:( 4717:( 4691:( 4631:. 4584:( 4547:( 4347:( 4309:( 4284:( 4173:( 4158:( 4138:( 4010:) 3941:) 3884:) 3786:( 3752:( 3719:( 3699:( 3666:( 3618:( 3586:( 3550:( 3494:( 3428:( 3383:. 3371:. 3334:( 3282:( 3226:c 3172:( 3110:( 2997:c 2939:( 2924:( 2903:) 2899:( 2881:) 2877:( 2847:( 2830:( 2791:( 2777:( 2649:( 2612:( 2604:( 2573:( 2569:. 2545:( 2516:( 2465:( 2433:( 2395:( 2291:( 2261:( 2242:( 2169:( 2112:( 2084:( 2069:( 2010:( 1990:( 1966:( 1923:( 1869:( 1814:( 1765:( 1706:( 1675:( 1598:( 1555:( 1551:. 1508:( 1491:N 1484:T 1385:( 1337:( 1317:( 1235:· 1230:( 1221:· 1216:( 1145:( 1103:( 882:( 847:( 818:( 632:( 540:( 502:( 466:( 429:( 397:( 383:C 324:( 290:( 270:( 255:( 195:( 170:( 157:. 143:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index