65:
On the other hand, given the thorough discussion and consideration of sources, I felt confident proceeding with the deletion based on the consensus at the AfD. That said, best practice would have been to notify you. The AfD policy states "While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion. One should not notify bot accounts, people who have made only insignificant 'minor' edits, or people who have never edited the article." There is no consensus to upgrade this recommendation to a requirement because it would yield too many useless notifications on highly watched or very old articles. To ensure that you are notified of any deletion proposals on articles you have worked on or approved, the best method is using the watchlist. Any deletion proposal is made via an edit to the article's page and will show up in the watchlist, typically with an edit summary saying "nominated for deletion".
211:"Notable" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even web content that editors personally believe are "important" or "famous" are only accepted as notable if they can be shown to have attracted notice. No web content is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of content it is. If the individual web content has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable simply because other web content of its type are commonly notable or merely because it exists (see "If it's not notable", below).
277:. I am sorry but your article does not meet these criteria. I did not submit your article for speedy deletion but it can be deleted if it does not meet the notability requirements. If you do not agree, a link is provided within the notice for speedy deletion so that you can dispute it and if, after you review the criteria for notability, you feel your subject is notable then I invite you to state your objection by clicking on that link and providing your reasons. Best Regards Snowysusan 21:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
587:
473:
99:
thought the article met the necessary
Knowledge criteria. At the end of the day, of course, one person's view does not and should not carry the day but given the work that reviewers often put into the process, sometimes several days of our time, to help a contributor bring a submission into line with the criteria I can't imagine that we wouldn't have something meaningful to contribute to the discussion if we were notified that it was taking place.
839:
198:
users but
Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a web directory. At the help page you will read that if, as you have indicated, there has been no significant media or other independent coverage related to the cite then the cite is not "notable" as defined by Knowledge and cannot be the subject of a Knowledge article.
64:
Thank you for your kind note regarding the deletion of the Harry
Stickel article. When I saw that the article had been created through the AfC process and formally approved I was a bit taken aback myself, since you had obviously considered whether it met the inclusion criteria and felt that it did.
723:
Examples 1 to 4 set the precedent to why
Geoduck Aquaculture should be allowed on Knowledge along with the article on Geoduck. Alternatively, in the same manner as Examples 5 to 8, a small section on aquaculture can be added to the existng article on Geoduck that links to the much larger article on
379:
Dear
Stephen, I hereby affirm that: or or are the creator and /or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of Teodoras Daukantas jpg files .Knowledge Permissions staff member Stephen Philbrick will attempt to upload images of one Teodoras Daukantas. In the meantime , I thank you for accepting the
251:
if you compare the article on J. E. Cosgriff
Memorial Catholic School with the article i entered on The Madeleine Choir School, you would see the same type of information. Yet the Cosgriff article is posted saying that it is incomplete and my article is denied. what kind of references can i give you
38:
I am not sure if you have had sight of my last comment re the article I was trying to submit? I updated the references I added to the article based on your feedback but have not heard anything back as yet. Are you able to look into this for me? I cannot seem to find the article itself. Really new to
719:
When preparing the outline for
Geoduck Aquaculture, I patterned the contents after the articles on the aquaculture examples above to avoid any similarities with the article specific to the animal. If all the above articles (animal versus its aquaculture) are allowed to co-exist on Knowledge, then I
290:
One of my partners has
Alzheimer's, and the other is also retired. I'll try to contact Dave to see if he can provide the material you need, but he is partially blind and may not be able to help. I don't have an Email address or phone for him, but I can keep trying. Would edits (off line, of course)
272:
I know it can be upsetting when you have worked hard on an article and submitted it in good faith, yet the article is not accepted. You are right, the article and J.E. Cosgriff should probably be nominated for deletion as well because it is not properly sourced. If there are no independent, third
808:
decline needs to be reverted - the article (at the time!) was MUCH longer and was simply not shown due to a closing-tag-missing-for-a-ref, something which isn't exactly tricky to fix! It's subsequently been improved by another new user also. I'm not saying it's 100% ready to go, I'll leave that to
98:
I was just wondering if there was any process by which an editor who has reviewed an article in good faith could be notified at an earlier stage in the process? I think it might be useful when discussing a proposed deletion to have the input of the person who accepted the article as to why he/she
92:
I received notice through my watchlist today that an article I reviewed and accepted through AFC was deleted today. When I looked back through the process I see that it was nominated for deletion, then the proposed deletion was discussed and finally it was deleted. My first notice of any of this
205:
In the dictionary, notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." Knowledge bases its decision about whether web content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web
197:
help page. You will note that your article, unfortunately, could have been declined for more than one reason - I chose to refer to the lack of independent references which also means the subject is not "notable" as that term is defined by
Knowledge. I have no doubt the webcite is helpful to its
43:
Hi Nicola. As you can see, I did some work on your article and I have created it in the main space. You may continue to work on it and edit it to add more substantial inforamtion about Marvin Rees, but remember it cannot be promotional or supportive of his campaign - it must remain neutral and
31:
Hi there, I submitted a biographical article on Marvin Rees but it was declined due to a lack of references. I have now edited my article with references and hope I have done this correctly. Thank you for your feedback. If you could have another look and let me know if this is ok that would be
164:
Thank you for your message regarding my recent submission for
Northwest Car Owners Club (NWCOC). You declined it on the fact that there were not enough references in the article. There is a reference to the main website which backs up what the article is about. What other references would you
127:
Thank you for your message regarding my recent submission for Northwest Car Owners Club (NWCOC). You declined it on the fact that there were not enough references in the article. There is a reference to the main website which backs up what the article is about. What other references would you
365:
Dear SnowySuzan, I appreciate the constructive feedback with the Knowledge User Talk Page .I would like tothank you for reviewing an article for Teodoras Daukantas. I would like to think that I could apply to have the artice submitted for a Featured Artice Review. In my own defense I have
913:) where I found the Millard County reference (unlinked). Because I had the material to fill that need, I was attempting to do so. I was wanting to carefully illustrate the likeness between the "Great Stone Face" and Joseph Smith. Did you make the link or did it happen automatically?
876:
I have read your comments concerning the new article 'The Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction.' The PDF on the internet site you mention was written by myself and I am the contributing editor of this article. The article submitted as slightly different from the one in the PDF.
286:
Susan, Since the Olympic Organ Builders closed over 40 years ago - somewhat before the internet age - I'm having difficulty finding original sources for reference. Since I was the most active partner in this company, i consider myself a reliable source - if somewhat biased.
886:
Is your objection based on your opinion that the article does not explain the theory at a more elementary level? The concept does require a basic knowledge of physics (i.e., the conservation of angular momentum). Please explain your reason for not accepting this article.
745:
Thank you SnowySusan for the very prompt response. I did consider amending the current article on geoduck but realized it could get bloated by the contents of the aquaculture article, and since there were precedents, I decided to create a separate one. Thanks again.
762:
273:
party sources about a subject it will not meet Knowledge's requirements for "notability." There are no agreed upon guidelines for the notability of schools, so we have to use the general rules for notability. If you wish to review them they can be found at
448:
Hi Snowysusan, Thankyou for your review and feedback of the article I wrote. Unfortunately, as this is Malouf's first book, there is very little, if any information on the internet to reference to him. What would you suggest I do to bolster the article?
624:
I would like to know specifically why this article was declined at this time. If the reason is that the article on Geoduck (the clam) already exists, then it would not be sufficient because the contents of these two articles are different.
549:
Hi, I was just wondering if you could elaborate on your reasons for declining my Long Sutton and Pitney railway station articles for creation submission. I believe I have referenced everything that needs to be referenced.
215:
I hope, after reviewing this guide, you will understand why I was unable to accept your article. However, if you feel I was wrong and your article meets the criteria for notability of a website, you may wish to access
904:
797:
165:
suggest? There has been no books on the subject, as of yet no media coverage, although that will be coming in the next show season. I am now at a loss as to what other reference apart from the website can be used.
128:
suggest? There has been no books on the subject, as of yet no media coverage, although that will be coming in the next show season. I am now at a loss as to what other reference apart from the website can be used.
798:
790:
829:
928:
616:
246:
767:
Hi susan, I am not able to understand, what should i do and how should i do it. if you could help me and tell me how to go about it step by step i ll be grateful to you.
93:
was today, after the article had been deleted. I realize I could ask for a review of that decision but it was clearly made after careful consideration by the community.
509:
805:
757:
739:
505:
491:
261:
206:
content, its authors, or its owners. Notability requires only that these necessary sources exist, not that the sources have already been named in the article.
539:
944:
We would like to know which part of the article is looking like advertisement. We just put factual description for the organization. Please help. Thanks.
933:
450:
964:
600:
862:
458:
952:
749:
731:
173:
136:
116:
880:
There are three images which greatly enhance understandng the article but I have been waiting for approval of the article before uploading them.
392:
341:
416:
Dear Reviewr! Could you pls re-upload the article about the MEDIS study without the sentences you thing that are problematic... Many thanks, D
253:
44:
factual, supported by independent references. However, you can include more references to articles about Rees and/or his candidacy for Mayor.
628:
When researching the possibility of writing an article on Geoduck Aquaculture on Knowledge, I looked at these existing articles as examples:
297:
This matter of references is partially a chicken-and-egg problem. Without an original article (this one) there can be no cross-references!
185:
443:
233:
148:
705:(the article on the animal has a small section on aquaculture linked to a separate and larger article on the aquaculture of catfish)
608:
519:
74:
899:
716:(the article on the animal has a small section on aquaculture linked to a separate and larger article on the aquaculture of corals)
694:(the article on the animal has a small section on aquaculture linked to a separate and larger article on the aquaculture of salmon)
436:
883:
I have read the article you referenced about what is appropriate for Knowledge and I believe this article meets the criteria.
570:
683:(the article on the animal has a small section on aquaculture linked to a separate and larger article on scallop aquaculture)
512:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
380:
first drafts of the article in question. I will make every concerted effort to properly format the article in its entirety.
786:
515:
323:
353:
720:
see no reason why the article on Geoduck Aquaculture cannot co-exist (and is in fact linked) with the article on Geoduck.
849:
816:
404:
294:
I have found references to another database of pipe organs but have not been able to track down the database itself.
122:
960:
763:
query : 3 September 2012 by Snowysusan, with the edit summary: Your submission at Knowledge:Articles for creation
319:
181:
144:
411:
400:
349:
59:
868:
577:
566:
496:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
432:
916:
In my opinion, your handling of the subject matter remains unresolved in the eyes of the "unimaginative".
544:
919:
Would it appropriate for me to include the Miller Canyon petroglyphs in the Millard County article?
782:
497:
454:
281:
938:
856:
823:
924:
604:
333:
I appreciate the ability to converse and receive constructive feedback for the "talkpage".I
948:
895:
778:
774:
554:
420:
388:
337:
307:
228:
169:
132:
113:
70:
50:
17:
384:
If you can offer me any advice on this process, your feedback would be most appreciated.
8:
956:
753:
735:
315:
177:
140:
396:
345:
194:
26:
844:
811:
562:
535:
526:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
428:
360:
257:
920:
891:
110:
66:
463:
56:
Snowysusan, you are an absolute STAR!!! Thank you so very much. Regards, Nicola
311:
274:
939:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/AASTOCKS.com_Ltd
501:
217:
905:
Great Stone Face Millard County Utah (Mormon Prophet Joseph Smith likeness)
799:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Hahn Democratic Strategist
558:
531:
527:
424:
221:
586:
472:
376:
Wikipedian account # Zckjsrbn , george vytautas daukantas. Post Script :
224:
from another experienced reviewer who may well take a different view.
369:
Knowledge Permissions staff member Stephen Philbrick; Knowledge -
909:
When I looked up "Great Stone Face" on wikipedia I was taken to (
702:
656:
691:
713:
680:
301:
646:
636:
910:
809:
yourself, but a fair review is in order methinks! Cheers,
49:
Have a great day! Snowysusan 11:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
666:
617:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Geoduck aquaculture
599:
could you help make a article for the Gravity Plus Suit
728:
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this issue.
500:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
670:
227:
Best Regards, Snowysusan 16:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
160:Thank you for writing the following message to me:
104:
Any information you can provide would be appreciated.
485:
raj ashwini kumar rai 18:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
247:i don't understand why my article is being deleted
698:
676:
662:
652:
687:
642:
632:
492:Disambiguation link notification for September 3
373:Permissions subject: @ Knowledge Permissions
709:
241:could you please elaborate on why this request
724:Geoduck Aquaculture, which should be allowed.
703:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aquaculture_of_catfish
657:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aquaculture_of_tilapia
692:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aquaculture_of_salmon
934:Question about the page of AASTOCKS.com Ltd.
714:http://en.wikipedia.org/Aquaculture_of_coral
681:http://en.wikipedia.org/Scallop_aquaculture
302:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:JimLudden
647:http://en.wikipedia.org/Shrimp_aquaculture
637:http://en.wikipedia.org/Oyster_aquaculture
370:
911:http://en.wikipedia.org/Great_Stone_Face
667:http://en.wikipedia.org/Seaweed_farming
14:
252:when i am using school produced copy?
195:guidelines for notability of websites
836:
671:http://en.wikipedia.org/Algaculture
218:the Dispute Resolution Notice Board
23:
444:Article on Gregory Nicholas Malouf
234:Recent article for creation review
24:
977:
837:
585:
471:
201:The guideline reads (in part):
699:http://en.wikipedia.org/Catfish
677:http://en.wikipedia.org/Scallop
663:http://en.wikipedia.org/Seaweed
653:http://en.wikipedia.org/Tilapia
220:to discuss the issue or seek a
688:http://en.wikipedia.org/Salmon
643:http://en.wikipedia.org/Shrimp
633:http://en.wikipedia.org/Oyster
13:
1:
965:10:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
929:23:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
900:19:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
863:08:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
830:16:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
791:04:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
758:07:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
740:01:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
710:http://en.wikipedia.org/Coral
609:01:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
571:16:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
540:14:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
459:02:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
437:09:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
32:greatly appreciated. THanks!
7:
405:18:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
354:18:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
324:15:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
262:17:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
186:10:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
149:10:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
117:18:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
75:18:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
10:
982:
366:submitted photo images :
584:
498:Five Star Island, Bermuda
470:
371:https://en.wikipedia.org
123:Thanks for your feedback
835:Thanks for the update!
890:Thank you, Jstheorist
412:Delete the MEDIS study
300:Sincerely, Jim Ludden
275:Knowledge - Notability
60:Harry Stickel Deletion
39:Knowledge! Thank you.
27:Article on Marvin Rees
869:Review of new article
593:The Original Barnstar
479:The Original Barnstar
528:opt-out instructions
18:User talk:Snowysusan
578:A barnstar for you!
545:Declined submission
510:fix with Dab solver
464:A barnstar for you!
222:Third Party Opinion
518:• Join us at the
193:Please review the
968:
951:comment added by
873:Dear Snowysusan,
794:
777:comment added by
614:
613:
574:
557:comment added by
523:
489:
488:
440:
423:comment added by
408:
391:comment added by
357:
340:comment added by
330:Dear SnowySusan;
327:
310:comment added by
189:
172:comment added by
152:
135:comment added by
973:
967:
945:
859:
854:
847:
842:
841:
840:
826:
821:
814:
793:
771:
589:
582:
581:
573:
551:
513:
506:check to confirm
475:
468:
467:
439:
417:
407:
385:
356:
334:
326:
304:
243:
242:
188:
166:
151:
129:
35:Hi Snowysusan,
981:
980:
976:
975:
974:
972:
971:
970:
946:
936:
907:
871:
857:
850:
845:
838:
824:
817:
812:
802:
779:Vikassharma2512
772:
765:
619:
580:
552:
547:
520:DPL WikiProject
494:
466:
446:
418:
414:
386:
363:
335:
305:
291:from him help?
284:
282:More References
249:
238:Hi Snowysusan,
236:
229:Snowysusan Talk
167:
130:
125:
87:Good Afternoon,
81:In response to:
62:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
979:
935:
932:
906:
903:
870:
867:
866:
865:
801:
796:
764:
761:
744:
727:
618:
615:
612:
611:
596:
595:
590:
579:
576:
546:
543:
493:
490:
487:
486:
482:
481:
476:
465:
462:
445:
442:
413:
410:
383:
362:
359:
283:
280:
279:
278:
269:
268:
248:
245:
235:
232:
213:
212:
208:
207:
191:
190:
124:
121:
120:
119:
106:
105:
101:
100:
95:
94:
89:
88:
84:
83:
61:
58:
54:
53:
46:
45:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
978:
969:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
942:
940:
931:
930:
926:
922:
917:
914:
912:
902:
901:
897:
893:
888:
884:
881:
878:
874:
864:
861:
860:
855:
853:
848:
834:
833:
832:
831:
828:
827:
822:
820:
815:
807:
800:
795:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
768:
760:
759:
755:
751:
747:
742:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
715:
711:
706:
704:
700:
695:
693:
689:
684:
682:
678:
673:
672:
668:
664:
659:
658:
654:
649:
648:
644:
639:
638:
634:
629:
626:
622:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
594:
591:
588:
583:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
524:
521:
517:
511:
507:
503:
502:Wilson Island
499:
484:
483:
480:
477:
474:
469:
461:
460:
456:
452:
451:Gregdjacobson
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
381:
377:
374:
372:
367:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
331:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
303:
298:
295:
292:
288:
276:
271:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
244:
239:
231:
230:
225:
223:
219:
210:
209:
204:
203:
202:
199:
196:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
163:
162:
161:
158:
157:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
118:
115:
112:
108:
107:
103:
102:
97:
96:
91:
90:
86:
85:
82:
79:
78:
77:
76:
72:
68:
57:
52:
48:
47:
42:
41:
40:
36:
33:
19:
947:— Preceding
943:
937:
918:
915:
908:
889:
885:
882:
879:
875:
872:
851:
843:
818:
810:
803:
773:— Preceding
769:
766:
748:
743:
730:
726:
722:
718:
707:
696:
685:
674:
660:
650:
640:
630:
627:
623:
620:
592:
553:— Preceding
548:
525:
495:
478:
447:
419:— Preceding
415:
387:— Preceding
382:
378:
375:
368:
364:
336:— Preceding
332:
329:
306:— Preceding
299:
296:
293:
289:
285:
267:My response:
250:
240:
237:
226:
214:
200:
192:
168:— Preceding
159:
155:
154:
131:— Preceding
126:
80:
63:
55:
37:
34:
30:
921:Sid.L.Young
601:GravitySuit
109:Thank you.
892:Jstheorist
804:Hi Susan.
530:. Thanks,
111:Snowysusan
67:Eluchil404
953:Aamichael
750:Nadine al
732:Nadine al
514:Read the
361:new topic
312:JimLudden
174:Macca1411
137:Macca1411
961:contribs
949:unsigned
787:contribs
775:unsigned
645:versus
567:contribs
555:unsigned
433:contribs
421:unsigned
401:contribs
393:Zckjsrbn
389:unsigned
350:contribs
342:Zckjsrbn
338:unsigned
320:contribs
308:unsigned
182:contribs
170:unsigned
156:Response
145:contribs
133:unsigned
770:Vikas
712:versus
701:versus
690:versus
679:versus
669:versus
665:versus
655:versus
635:versus
559:Mikeo34
532:DPL bot
425:Dbpanag
254:Ydaltak
858:stoned
825:stoned
16:<
957:talk
925:talk
896:talk
806:This
783:talk
754:talk
736:talk
621:Hi!
605:talk
563:talk
536:talk
455:talk
429:talk
397:talk
346:talk
316:talk
258:talk
178:talk
141:talk
114:Talk
71:talk
51:Talk
852:the
846:Nik
819:the
813:Nik
708:8.
697:7.
686:6.
675:5.
661:4.
651:3.
641:2.
631:1.
516:FAQ
963:)
959:•
941:.
927:)
898:)
789:)
785:•
756:)
738:)
607:)
569:)
565:•
538:)
508:|
457:)
435:)
431:•
403:)
399:•
352:)
348:•
322:)
318:•
260:)
184:)
180:•
147:)
143:•
73:)
955:(
923:(
894:(
781:(
752:(
734:(
603:(
561:(
534:(
522:.
504:(
453:(
427:(
395:(
344:(
314:(
256:(
176:(
139:(
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.