59:
124:
1328:
1275:
2418:
1973:
1831:
1422:
1312:
384:
2487:
1632:
1203:
1011:
586:
2615:
2568:
2536:
2393:
2355:
2316:
2184:
1789:
1692:
1534:
535:
333:
2444:
2349:
1979:
1638:
2492:
1985:
1586:
1477:
1389:
1318:
598:
302:
276:
253:
2110:
code--it did the trick and is better than going full width and pushing down the discussions. Thanks as well for the fonts in your sandbox--I still have to take the time and learn how to incorporate one into my skin. I think there is a basic skin concept that is eluding me, such as where my skin's css
2080:
pointless, but what it actually does is refresh the article's categories. Your User: page was still listed in a category that it wasn't actually in anymore - but to force everything to update - I 'bumped' the article. Bumping essentially is adding a blank line to the top of an article, which actually
1952:
Hello, I am not sure I am doing this right; please bear with me. I am not sure what a "pipe" is, but if it's the link divided by |, then my reasoning was this: I was merging "Course evaluations" with "Course evaluation," and when I corrected the links to "Course evaluations," I used the | to preserve
2506:
NP for being bold - sorry I didn't research first - I should have - my only defense is that I got that habit on that particular page because of its high profile since it is linked prominently on the main page - but I should have at least looked who did the change first. Sorry also about the footer -
2214:
Oh, the basic concept is fine, but the table design is simple (and ugly?). That's what i meant you could replace (only if ya want). Or it could be moved/merged to the project page, or anything! (I also just meant, that the table is all my work, just unsigned, so noone will argue with you if you hack
1855:
Hi there! That was a reasonable compromise... but let me explain why I put that line there in big honkin' bold letters. Novice users frequently make a proposal and then say, hey let's vote on it. I (and some others) try to put a stop to that unfortunate tendency. A big !! sign on the template seemed
898:
On GUS, I'm winding down a bit on my involvement with it. The flames are cooling down to embers in most places, and an infrastructure for userspace boxes is off the ground. I'm not iterested in nit-picking "shoulds" because wiki is what it is. Jimbo's the Big Cheese and he's letting me play with his
495:
There is practically no limit to the amount of potential contention surrounding what is included or excluded. I'd like to think I've built a reputation for impartial adds, moves, and drops from Cent. This reputation allows me to do a lot of dog work that otherwise might just not get done. I'm hardly
2371:
I was just following your lead on reformatting portal browse, but since there were some objections, we should just leave it the way it was originally, for the time being. We should drop the matter of upgrading that page for now. Quiddity thought we should wait, and I happen to agree. (Quiddity's
2271:
per your suggestion. This breaks the colour scheme on that template and I feel we need a unified "two-level" scheme if we are going to go down that road. Once again, I don't want to change all the templates multiple times, so this needs to be discussed / decided now. If we really create a guideline
760:
of color. I smell a wave of anti-color sentiment masked as concern for the color-blind. I think this POV is foolish; people who truly cannot abide colors can use a skin that, through CSS, controls all colors to white and black, maybe gray. I also know that my personal strength as a designer lies in
267:
I suppose because the footer is two lines high, the "absolute bottom" position hits the "relative bottom" of the header box. I really wanted to keep it located in the background bar. I added the "extra" text area for when someone used the "Start a new discussion" button. Unless there's some way to
487:
Cent is not really my pet project; an editor named
Radiant started it, invested a lot of effort, burned out, and left. I've uncovered more than one place where this editor seems to have overdriven his own opinions, trying to see acceptable outcomes where there were none. I mention this because I'd
1440:
Hey! Is there a scale of any kind to indicate how psychology articles should be assessed? It looks like you've been doing most of the assessing so far. I've been reluctant to do it, but I've gotten involved in a discussion on one article about how it should be rated. I would use the scale for the
529:
instead of running a competing proposal. I don't think you agree and I'm not going to force the issue. Between the current system (reverse chronological) and alphabetical, I don't have much preference. I alphabetized
Conclusions because that's a more or less stable directory; the Cent template is
2260:
using the same colours as the "Guidelines, help and resources" section of the CP. I then changed help related project templates and pages to the same colour scheme (from a mixture of schemes - some very poorly designed). I also changed a number of collaborations and fix-up/to do templates to the
768:
Let's do this: You fiddle with Cent; adjust the colors and assume a one-column layout. Prototype it casually; don't worry about function, let alone content. If you want to take it all the way, that's fine; but I'm willing to take it over at some point and get the functions working and update the
2286:
which uses the same style as the principles template above to make the sub-headings slightly smaller. This provides a better differentiation between the top & sub headings and is something to consider in a debate about two-level headings. I admire what you are doing and look forward to your
579:
work here isn't the way many of the written procedures would have you believe. I've seen more than one "old timer" make comments to that effect, but I couldn't tell you where at the moment. Anyway, thanks for clearing things up, and I apologize for editing the template "out of process". (I even
984:, and built it out. (It's honestly still just a proposed guideline; Urthogie added the "style guideline" template back in April without discussion, but I didnt have the heart to remove it, as it's not a bad page, and might help influence things until it can be properly improved.) There are a
574:
opposed to wikiwars. At least it quieted things down a bit. As far as policymaking goes, the "it's descriptive, not prescriptive" mantra rings true for me. I'm more inclined to call it a distributed, rather than a centralized process. One thing I've learner from GUS is that the way things
2332:
The tip of the day is starting to run low. Just another month left on the buffer. I kept the thing stocked up since April, so I would really appreciate if someone would pick up where I left off. You are my first choice, 'cuz I know you'll keep the quality level high. --Go for it! aka
945:
If some broader page pulls together a cluster of templates, then that certainly takes the pressure off any one of them to stray off focus. If something important still falls through the cracks, it alway could be added to the page through another template. I think the concept has promise.
100:
2121:
You're welcome. I don't use css but you would create one at username/monobook.css if you use the main skin. You also can just use subpages like I do for my header, or just put a div at the top of a page like here. You can see some of the page resources I have at
2261:
schemes of their respective CP sections. I like the tweaks you have made to the CP but was wondering what else you had planned (I am happy to tweak the aforementioned templates, but don't want to then change them again). On a related note, Quiddity has changed
2301:
and the talk page as much as possible. I went with 60 degree hue increments for the most part with shades like at the the talk page. Different layouts forced picking a border so I always went with the darker choice. I've been trying the two-level palettes at
1163:
Establishing some kind of standard look for project/process boxes. We can take a page here from article taxoboxes, which are starting to fall into a loose standard -- but I don't see any need to copy these and it might be well if "ours" were distinct.
632:
I like the palettes more than you know. This recent whinging about the tints chosen to head Cent points up the need for standard color schemes -- to be used right across the board, everywhere, in article mainspace, project space, and templates. This
2200:
be interested in adding a two-level header option. If you happen to find that color blindness test page, I could adjust what I've been using, if needed, and then throw it into to mix. Then we can see what happens with something like that too.
663:
that goes light on function and strong on specifying exactly which colors may be used for which roles in what places. Border thickness, margins, paddings, widths of infoboxes, notice boxes, and tags all need to be defined. One or two standard
1901:
Please keep an eye out, and if you agree it might help to make the point a bit clearer again. Thanks. Regarding consensus polling, I think it might be useful for major policy shifts, but other than that I don't really see the point on-wiki.
1616:. While it is clear some areas do lack citations, I do not agree that the page as a whole lacks references. Would you object to the removal of this template and instead include the indication of which sections or facts need reference work?
2081:
dissapears once saved - thus causing no interferance with the article's appearance :) Normally, categories update themselves properly and a bump isn't needed - however sometimes articles get stuck and need a little encouragement.
2382:
That's fine with me. I've just tried to do minor adjustments here and there where no one objected. Since
Quiddity was the one who opened his mouth on starting another project (what was he thinking! ;-), I'll just follow
2157:
2460:
I restored the prior introduction pages - I didn't see anywhere this was discussed prior to the change - I think it looks good to have the header tied into the tutorial better, but lets get concensus first on
1343:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
1288:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
822:
Notability has simply become too large of a topic to be handled on cent. It has its own directory template and interested parties are thrashing out dozens of issues in their own ways, on at least 40 pages.
2478:
2462:
641:
be grouped but from one to the next there is no consistency. It looks as though someone cobbled together a shelf, one volume at a time, from a dozen different reference works: that is, looks like hell.
655:, you see a primitive, limited effort to standardize presentation. It has caught on some but the creator didn't really seem to know how to go about it. I fooled around with this some, trying to improve
2552:
I have restored your page. When I had deleted it, it was actually listed on the "Speedy
Deletions" page, which is a bit strange if you did not post the template. It must have been a technical error.
414:. This will help us stay all on the same page -- no pun intended. You're also going to want to come up with a more plausible rationale for pushing your pet project than alphabetic sorting. Or sort the
1210:
four or five other "projects" I've been dabbling with. For the most part, I'll make my comments on the respective talk pages, in a feeble attempt to try to keep things straight. Some quick comments.
1247:
P/P boxes: Those types of things seem to have the best success when they're "project-related." I think people would be interested in help in the form of templates, but probably not "requirements."
889:
layouts for different settings. The content gets entered into a "text-only" template and then layout templates format it as needed. I'm willing to work with you on Cent as a stand-along activity,
1661:
1650:
743:
important as a tool for distinguishing one thing from another and more from less important. The current tint, #acf, keys all the
Centralized discussion pages. Under the whinging, I also altered
230:
969:
I totally agree with John's comments that we need an organised color scheme. (Possibly, a standardised color scheme for the
Knowledge/Official/Meta pages & templates, and a set of color
1365:
Sorry about that. I will be sure to do that when I add the template in the future. Thanks for all of your work in creating the template and adding the right ratings to the articles! —
350:
932:
see a somewhat similar discussion-omnibus template that is much more wide open. When the idea works it's way through my mental digestive tract, I'll show you what I think.
2310:. Something like that might be a good way to coordinate groups of pages for color palettes and layouts. I'm open to suggestions too. I'm just "putzing" for the fun of it.
2008:
1743:
556:, too. Within these bounds, hey, it's your wiki too. I'd really rather have you involved in process, making decisions. Then you, too, can sweat your own neutrality.
39:
321:
I tried "margins" and "padding" to no avail. Since they're on different "layers," the footer just moved around and everything else just stayed put. Thanks anyway.
747:
500:. I make dozens of judgement calls and sometimes I'll make the wrong call. I'll be content if my error is corrected and it's not labeled as self-will run riot.
488:
not like to go down the same road. I did adopt this stray neighborhood cat; I saw that it could do a lot of good -- or harm, if not managed with some firmness.
1463:
I just took a look myself! I didn't get very far at "customizing" it, so we just have to play it by ear. If you have some ideas, go ahead and adjust the draft.
2018:
1753:
1996:
1711:
1403:
Sorry again about the class/quality thing! I get these WikiProject templates mixed up sometimes. Fortunately, I only made that mistake on a few articles. —
1383:
get around to adding a "draft importance" subpage table that's specific to psychology, but I'll probably try out some details on a different project first.
1098:
1075:
826:
Many proposals compete in an effort to regulate the creation, format, storage, and display of UBX. This is a failure of the centralized discussion process.
773:
27:
2372:
hands are full with the sidebar project, so I think we should wait until that project is completed). Nice work on the color coordination, by the way. --
2098:
1698:
2115:
925:
discussions. What that actually is, has not been clearly defined and right at the moment I'm still trying to figure out if a clear definition is wise.
1727:
1049:
2599:
Thanks for updating the Rambot FAQ / Rambot Talk Page. I'm sure you did all of that for your own reasons, but it just looks nicer anyway. Later! --
1721:
1240:
1032:
950:
915:
466:
435:
2635:
2239:
2230:
2205:
2139:
2130:
1939:
1926:
1894:
1816:
1260:
1256:: I'm interested in "tweaking" high level page colors for borders, headers, and backgrounds, so they use more-or-less the same set of HSV palettes.
624:
479:
2061:
2036:
1513:
728:. When I took up the Cent mop, the three-column layout was already established; I retained that through the last few minor facelifts. I might well
2586:
2513:
2027:
It's baaaaaack.... :D I tried looking at the code and I can't figure out why it's showing up for CSD? Maybe because something is transcluded?---
1540:
1507:
1483:
1458:
1445:
1428:
1407:
1395:
1649:
1089:
1369:
2256:
Hi. I noticed that you have been working on colour standardisation. Following the redesign of the
Community Portal, I initiated a redesign of
2104:
411:
1620:
135:
of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2376:
1217:
1190:
1172:
I think I can develop the technical ur-template, you can lend an eye to color selection, and we can work together on the layout appearance.
882:
790:
You came in with your edit just as I finished about 16 straight hours of work on Cent, only to have to deal with the whinging on the tint.
613:
442:
2337:
783:, we can substitute the new version in a few prominent places. If it's accepted there, then we move it directly to the regular template.
1451:
339:
309:
282:
259:
241:
2542:
2498:
2088:
1500:
1644:
1085:
Creating some sort of alternative to Cent, something much more wide open, with less focus, less overhead, broader scope. I'm thinking
2650:
2526:
Thanks, I'm used to being reverted. The footer thing is just a game I play. I realize most people won't see the note until I move it.
2471:
1017:
995:
988:
at the bottom of its talkpage. (I'm just a design novice, who's been poking at that page recently, as it is so obviously a problem)
921:
Cent can't be for everything; perhaps it shouldn't even try to include the most pressing issues of the day. It should be limited to
2450:
2399:
1592:
2361:
2291:
1733:
1360:
1554:
1550:
Yes, i would like some help displaying them in columns...also, i'd like to know how you managed to make your page look so nice?
857:
2322:
1880:
1764:
Now, are you ever going to be pleased with just one userpage design? ;) I think it's a neat idea though; now what shall I add?
1183:
900:
637:
be an encyclopedia but if so, it's one where each volume is bound and illustrated in a different style. Articles and processes
2190:
2164:
1837:
1795:
1777:
197:
192:
2646:
Good point about the namespace. I've fixed that problem, so we can get on with the discussion about merging the pages. --
2574:
698:
You've got an idea with Cent: the vertical, one-column layout. This is how most similar project directory boxes work, e.g,
187:
182:
177:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
131:
2014:
Thanks, whatever it was must have been deleted already. I touched it and two other pages to get them out of the category.
2621:
2556:
1991:
1957:
390:
361:
2603:
939:
846:
563:
452:
425:
353:
to be self referential, I didn't put it on the main template to avoid confisuion for casual editors coming across it. —
2153:
1158:
There must be another dozen floating around the project worthy of general interest. I don't really know where to begin.
604:
519:. I will -- generally -- keep on Cent the most viable of a number of competing proposal pages and drop all the rest.
410:. This is quite all right and I encourage you to help keep it current. But please don't forget to log your changes at
58:
1334:
HSV color test: (original "AliceBlue" HSV - H:208 S:6 V:100) (adjusted to "wikified" HSV - H:210 S:4 V:100 - #F5FAFF)
2307:
911:
shouldn't be maginalized simply because it's messy. Maybe
Quiddity's new page could find room for such "hub" pages.
798:
like the way the "Germans" are, ever so politely, marching us along. The most frightening words in any language are
2094:
It didn't always work when I tried just saving without making any changes, even after purging my browser cache. --
820:
Now, I'm leaning toward pulling all UBX discussions right out of Cent, just as I did
Notability. I wrote recently
1107:
Creating some sort of Grand
Central Station for these omnibus templates. Besides Cent, I have 4 on my user page:
1580:
easier too! Let me know if you have any other questions, or need more help with the userbox columns boilerplate.
985:
224:
211:
2265:
2223:
2005:
1740:
899:
toys. If he wants some separation of "neutrality" and "viwepoints" that works for me. There's a category for
881:
like Quiddity's idea about grouping similar "advanced user" templated info on a common page he mentioned at
496:
perfect; I have my own biases. I don't want to do anything on Cent that might suggest I'm pushing my biases
2455:
1146:
794:
I agree with you on this point: The war is bad and almost any solution is probably better than none. But I
1001:
Hey! I was just trying to add a comment there when I got a "you've got mail" banner on my page! And no, I
959:
668:
of icon need to be established and all other sizes ruthlessly forced to conform -- to say nothing of icon
1597:
1441:
Biography WikiProject as a guide, but it would be better if we had one for the Psychology WikiProject. --
1226:
617:
206:
21:
828:
Now, I'm thinking that the failure itself just disqualifies UBX-related issues from Cent. Cent is for
2071:
1931:
Okay. Will do. Also, the expectation that "It is only really appropriate when a group of individuals
832:
discussion, not for dispatches from the battlefield. The biggest possible mistake is to link Cent to
441:
I really dislike reverting other editors, even once. I've also spent several hours recently, sorting
76:
2306:. If there's interest, I would add the suggestion to the WP colours page. Also, Quiddity suggested
2002:
1737:
1124:
712:
526:
1565:
2366:
2280:
2123:
1569:
1545:
612:
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I like the template. In fact, I like it so much, I
84:
1635:
It didn't see the references section the first time around, so I just took the tag off. Sorry.
2647:
2373:
2334:
2327:
2303:
1576:) and then "transcluding" them with various subpages. That makes testing and changing things a
1573:
92:
1059:
1953:
the appearance of the page. I apologize if this is not the correct way; I am new to merging.
1606:
462:
pet project, you pick. I'll either revert the original sort or make everything alphabetical.
1736:
but it's too large for me to be able to pick out the item. Perhaps you can find it. Cheers.
1568:
you can try out. I fiddle with my pages by "borrowing" layout designs from other users (see
2251:
1964:
1842:
522:
So, for my preference, drop GUS altogether. If you think this kind of approach is correct,
8:
2147:
1759:
1708:
1617:
1613:
1180:
1029:
936:
843:
560:
449:
422:
2508:
2466:
1176:
I don't know how much time we can devote to all of these but there's no time on a wiki.
1903:
1857:
1810:
1771:
1340:
1285:
570:
Thanks for the history, very interesting. Personally, I'm opposed to GUS too. I'm just
359:
136:
108:
17:
1454:. I should have paid more attention to the talk page of the Psychology WikiProject! --
2641:
2298:
2273:
2032:
1846:
1135:
960:
722:
123:
2547:
2095:
2085:
1167:
2156:
as much as you like or replace it completely. I just hacked it together (based on
1375:
Cool. Don't worry about the ones you already added. I'm going to update them with
1222:
Kite: I'm not at all sure what that would be. I don't even know what "Kite" means.
2288:
1353:
1349:
1298:
1294:
1253:
1233:
981:
649:
507:
and contrary to the nature of a wiki to have more than one competing proposal on
2594:
2235:
Cool. If it holds up for a while, I'll add a two-level palette to the options.
1976:
Sorry for assuming you made the original caps changes and the renaming pipes.
1947:
1679:
1665:
1345:
1290:
1177:
1113:
1026:
933:
885:. I'd like to see your comments there too. :-) Templates like these often have
840:
702:
557:
446:
419:
344:
234:
2632:
2628:
2618:
2571:
2539:
2495:
2447:
2408:
2396:
2358:
2352:
I won't say "yes," but I won't say "no" either. I'll pitch in where I can.
2319:
2257:
2236:
2227:
2202:
2187:
2161:
2136:
2127:
2112:
2058:
2015:
1988:
1954:
1936:
1891:
1834:
1805:
1792:
1766:
1750:
1718:
1695:
1683:
1669:
1641:
1589:
1537:
1480:
1425:
1412:
Well, if you just did more wikiwork, you probably could keep things straight!
1392:
1376:
1321:
1257:
1237:
1046:
1014:
992:
947:
912:
861:
621:
601:
476:
463:
432:
404:
387:
354:
336:
306:
279:
256:
238:
68:
2507:
I use the little + sign and didn't realize I had edited below the footer. --
1626:
Hi Michael, either my browser didn't load the full page or I just spaced it!
756:
I definitely am not wedded to any particular color combination, only to the
2600:
2219:
2028:
395:
1887:
2583:
2553:
1551:
1504:
1455:
1442:
1404:
1366:
1336:
1281:
973:
for the other regions (so that inappropriate choices can be over-ruled))
1250:
Cent on CBB: It's still a possibility, the conversation continues there.
592:
p.s. Being the graphic designer you are, I'm glad you like the palettes.
292:
Hmm, if it can't be hacked with padding, then I'm stumped too. Ah well.
2631:
so I decided to give that group of FAQ pages a similar look and feel.
856:
what I say!. Plus... On palettes, check out this Color project topic,
552:
than in any outcome. I'm sure you'll appreciate that I like things to
1967:
are those verticle lines that let you change how a link is displayed!
739:
ask that you retain the colored background headers. I think color is
1503:
as a basis. Let me know what you think, or make some edits to it. --
445:. This is up to you. But please don't break this thread over pages.
1206:
At this point, I'm going to opt for the "putzing" aproach on these
1025:
Something should be done and we might just be the people to do it.
688:. In other words, some responsibility must be taken to establish a
1982:
In most cases, links are best displayed in their "unpiped" form.
1327:
1274:
2417:
1972:
1830:
1421:
1311:
383:
1356:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
1301:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
2486:
2226:
template back to your test, and noone has complained yet :) --
1631:
1202:
1010:
585:
2479:
Template talk:Please leave this line alone#Tabs like Tutorial
2343:
Dho! The "real world" has me cutting back on my wikitime too.
1045:
I'm sure we can do something, even if its just suggestions.
2614:
2567:
2535:
2392:
2354:
2315:
2183:
1788:
1691:
1533:
534:
332:
38:
2443:
2348:
1978:
1686:, thanks for the invite, but I think I'll pass on this one.
1637:
1068:
different-though-related initiatives we may both support:
2160:), and the example hues have no specific importance. :) --
1886:
I get it. :-) Just out of curiosity, what do you think of
1935:
that affects them all," often isn't met around here. :-)
779:. When you and I and anyone else who drops in think it's
2491:
2053:
in the place of the offending template. The code itself
1984:
1585:
1476:
1388:
1317:
597:
301:
275:
252:
1080:
I'd like to see what you do there before I get into it.
493:...its usefulness is in inverse proportion to its size.
1803:
A nice featured picture from the Commons, perhaps. :)
1664:. If you want to join, Click on the blue link. Signed
907:
of pages, so I agree Cent has a dilemma. However, the
868:
got a clue on how to try out different palettes with
1499:
I did some work on it using the importance scale at
1268:
2272:for help / project pages it could be documented on
1717:Thanks again, but I've never even seen an episode.
1732:Something on that page is causing it to appear in
2001:It's back in the speedy deletion category again.
268:push up the relative bottom, I'm stumped for now.
1856:like a good idea for that. Just my $ .2. Yours,
1514:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment
2308:Portal talk:Browse#Reference pages wikiproject?
824:I also wrote, trying to summarize the UBX war,
659:on the original, but what's really needed is a
580:missed the note in red at the top of the page!)
431:If you have a problem with sorting, revert it.
991:Anyway, that's it, just a plea for input :) --
1707:because MatchPat has already left Knowledge.
1225:GCS: Again, I'm interested in the context of
458:So, since you seem to be the expert guarding
412:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Template log
1236:. This seems to be the general GCS concept.
1216:Cent: I'll try things out in the context of
443:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Conclusions
1452:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment
769:content. Let's do this on a workpage, say,
2463:Template talk:Please leave this line alone
1997:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/ Non-ISO Languages
1728:User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/ Non-ISO Languages
1501:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Assessment
2297:Hi Gareth Aus, I've been trying to go by
1072:Reworking Cent into a one-column layout.
816:You will have to come with us, thank you.
2057:look any different. I commented it out.
2174:seem to have some momentum. Of course,
1734:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
1703:Rfrisbie, the WikiProject really needs
812:Sorry, but your papers are not in order
212:
14:
2222:. The contrast is fine, I changed the
1933:desire to collectively solve a problem
1194:
1189:All interesting stuff, not to mention
2135:I think I have it now--thanks again.
2105:Help controlling ubx position | Stuff
1572:), fiddling with color palettes (see
765:may have a better eye for palette.
400:Hello, I see you've recently edited
231:Template:Main Page discussion footer
28:User talk:Rfrisbie/Archive/Archive 6
511:topic. It's definitely contrary to
34:
2049:There's going to be a speedy note
1339:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
1326:
1284:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
1273:
503:My personal opinion is that it is
37:
35:
2667:
986:list of things that might be done
517:keep all players on the same page
2613:
2566:
2534:
2490:
2485:
2442:
2416:
2391:
2353:
2347:
2314:
2182:
1983:
1977:
1971:
1829:
1787:
1690:
1636:
1630:
1584:
1532:
1475:
1420:
1387:
1316:
1310:
1201:
1009:
804:Please forgive the inconvenience
761:form and outline, not in color.
596:
584:
533:
382:
331:
300:
274:
251:
122:
57:
2627:Oh, by the way. It's listed at
2084:Hope that explains things :) --
1361:WikiProject Psychology template
732:a standard one-column layout.
2587:22:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2575:22:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2557:19:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2543:03:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2514:03:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2499:00:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2472:00:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2451:19:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2400:18:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2377:18:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2362:18:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2338:18:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2323:11:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2292:10:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
2240:18:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2231:18:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2206:14:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2191:11:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2165:04:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
2140:14:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2131:13:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2116:12:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
2099:02:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
2089:02:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
2062:19:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2037:17:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2019:02:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
2009:01:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
1992:21:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1958:21:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1940:17:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1927:17:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1895:16:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1881:16:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1612:box to the top of the page on
1429:17:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
1408:17:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
864:on such matters. That's how I
672:, which currently ranges from
620:. I hope you'll add your 2¢.
475:Nevermind. I took care of it.
13:
1:
2178:can change whatever I do too.
1838:04:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1817:03:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1796:00:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1778:00:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1754:14:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1744:12:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1722:00:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1712:11:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
1699:14:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1645:22:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1621:21:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1593:20:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1555:19:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1396:17:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1370:17:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1261:20:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
1241:02:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
1184:14:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
1050:03:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1033:03:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1018:03:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
996:03:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
951:03:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
940:03:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
916:03:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
901:Knowledge userbox discussions
847:01:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
625:15:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
605:05:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
564:05:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
480:04:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
467:04:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
453:04:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
436:04:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
426:04:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
391:03:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
362:03:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
351:Template talk:User GUS UBX to
2609:Welcome...colors...pretty!!!
2218:And I did find that page :)
2152:You're welcome to alter the
1749:I think I fixed it. Thanks!
1662:WikiProject Little Einsteins
1651:WikiProject Little Einsteins
1512:Looks good! See comments on
808:This will only take a moment
540:I'm much more interested in
371:win the prize for being the
7:
2651:21:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
2636:03:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2622:03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2604:03:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
2481:. Sorry for being so bold!
2109:Thanks for the <div: -->
1566:userbox columns boilerplate
1541:23:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1508:22:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1484:19:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1459:19:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1446:19:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
800:Step this way, please, Sir.
515:. The driving spirit is to
340:19:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
310:19:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
283:19:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
260:18:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
242:18:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
233:, as used at the bottom of
10:
2672:
2276:. Finally, I have tweaked
1227:Knowledge:Community Portal
893:as part of a themed group.
802:Next thing you know, it's
566:
229:You may like to check out
2407:*hides under a blanket* -
1660:This is an Invitation to
1379:. Also, this weekend, I
1218:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
1191:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
980:if you both took over at
883:Add Template:Cent to CBB?
692:for the entire project.
2220:colorfilter.wickline.org
966:If I might interject...
49:
2154:Colour generation guide
2124:User:Rfrisbie/Resources
1602:You recently added the
1570:User:Rfrisbie/Resources
1232:I just stumbled across
1005:know what color it was!
877:As far as Cent goes, I
860:. I typically defer to
48:
2304:User:Rfrisbie/Palettes
1574:User:Rfrisbie/Palettes
1331:
1278:
550:moving process forward
513:Centralized Discussion
225:T:MP discussion footer
42:
1330:
1277:
645:If you check out old
349:I fixed the links on
41:
2562:Thanks, you're fast!
2456:Introduction changes
2266:Knowledge principles
2224:Knowledge principles
2076:Hello there! Yes it
1783:No....and...hmmm....
661:design working group
2477:Okay, go for it at
2434:where you wikilive!
2003:CambridgeBayWeather
1888:"consensus polling"
1738:CambridgeBayWeather
1709:User talk:Iswatch19
1614:South Bend, Indiana
1598:South Bend, Indiana
1450:Nevermind--I found
1147:villagepumppagesbox
695:Well, that's one.
213:New quote & pic
1332:
1279:
1099:Template talk:Kite
1076:Template:Cent/work
786:Re UBX, GUS, etc:
491:Early on, I noted
377:"Push the footer"!
65:
43:
18:User talk:RichardF
2648:The Transhumanist
2374:The Transhumanist
2335:The Transhumanist
2299:Knowledge:Colours
2274:Knowledge:Colours
2072:Re:Pointless edit
1675:
1674:
1195:Knowledge:Colours
961:Knowledge:Colours
872:wikiness to them.
616:adding it to the
217:
143:
142:
137:current talk page
63:
26:(Redirected from
2663:
2617:
2582:You're welcome.
2570:
2538:
2511:
2494:
2489:
2469:
2446:
2420:
2395:
2357:
2351:
2318:
2285:
2279:
2270:
2264:
2186:
1987:
1981:
1975:
1923:
1921:
1919:
1917:
1915:
1877:
1875:
1873:
1871:
1869:
1851:
1845:
1833:
1813:
1808:
1791:
1774:
1769:
1694:
1657:
1656:
1640:
1634:
1611:
1605:
1588:
1536:
1479:
1424:
1391:
1320:
1314:
1205:
1168:Knowledge:Probox
1151:
1145:
1140:
1134:
1129:
1123:
1118:
1112:
1094:
1088:
1013:
778:
772:
752:
746:
727:
721:
717:
711:
707:
701:
654:
648:
618:Community Portal
600:
588:
537:
409:
403:
386:
357:
335:
304:
278:
255:
216:
214:
205:
126:
119:
118:
114:
106:
98:
90:
82:
74:
61:
31:
2671:
2670:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2662:
2661:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2644:
2597:
2550:
2509:
2467:
2458:
2369:
2367:Top level pages
2330:
2283:
2277:
2268:
2262:
2254:
2170:Thanks, but it
2150:
2107:
2074:
1999:
1950:
1913:
1911:
1909:
1907:
1905:
1867:
1865:
1863:
1861:
1859:
1853:
1849:
1843:
1811:
1806:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1730:
1655:
1609:
1603:
1600:
1548:
1546:Userbox display
1363:
1358:
1306:Thanks Michael!
1303:
1271:
1234:Knowledge:Watch
1149:
1143:
1138:
1132:
1127:
1125:notabilityguide
1121:
1116:
1110:
1092:
1086:
1062:
964:
776:
770:
750:
744:
725:
719:
715:
713:notabilityguide
709:
705:
699:
652:
646:
538:
416:entire template
407:
401:
398:
375:editor to play
355:
347:
247:Thanks, I will.
227:
219:
218:
210:
202:
116:
112:
109:
104:
101:
96:
93:
88:
85:
80:
77:
72:
69:
66:
62:
55:
54:
44:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2669:
2655:
2654:
2643:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2611:
2610:
2596:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2564:
2563:
2549:
2546:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2483:
2482:
2457:
2454:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2389:
2388:
2368:
2365:
2345:
2344:
2329:
2328:Tip of the day
2326:
2312:
2311:
2281:Writing guides
2253:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2209:
2208:
2196:By the way, I
2180:
2179:
2149:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2111:file resides.
2106:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2073:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2022:
2021:
1998:
1995:
1969:
1968:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1898:
1897:
1852:
1841:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1785:
1784:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1688:
1687:
1673:
1672:
1654:
1648:
1628:
1627:
1599:
1596:
1582:
1581:
1562:
1561:
1547:
1544:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1448:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1385:
1384:
1362:
1359:
1335:
1325:
1308:
1307:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1251:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1223:
1220:
1199:
1198:
1174:
1173:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1141:
1130:
1119:
1104:
1103:
1082:
1081:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1007:
1006:
963:
958:
956:
954:
953:
919:
918:
895:
894:
874:
873:
839:What say you?
792:I overreacted.
630:
629:
628:
627:
594:
593:
582:
581:
532:
527:Userbox policy
485:
484:
483:
482:
470:
469:
439:
438:
397:
394:
380:
379:
346:
343:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
272:
271:
270:
269:
249:
248:
235:Talk:Main Page
226:
223:
221:
204:
203:
201:
200:
195:
190:
185:
180:
175:
170:
165:
160:
155:
150:
144:
141:
140:
127:
117:
110:
102:
94:
86:
78:
70:
67:
56:
47:
46:
45:
36:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2668:
2653:
2652:
2649:
2637:
2634:
2630:
2629:Knowledge:FAQ
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2620:
2616:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2588:
2585:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2573:
2569:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2555:
2545:
2544:
2541:
2537:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2515:
2512:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2497:
2493:
2488:
2480:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2470:
2464:
2453:
2452:
2449:
2445:
2433:
2432:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2419:
2410:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2398:
2394:
2387:lead on that.
2386:
2381:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2375:
2364:
2363:
2360:
2356:
2350:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2336:
2325:
2324:
2321:
2317:
2309:
2305:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2290:
2282:
2275:
2267:
2259:
2258:Help:Contents
2241:
2238:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2207:
2204:
2199:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2189:
2185:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2141:
2138:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2129:
2125:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2114:
2100:
2097:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2087:
2082:
2079:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2020:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2007:
2004:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1986:
1980:
1974:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1956:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1925:
1924:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1879:
1878:
1848:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1832:
1821:Cool! Thanks!
1820:
1819:
1818:
1815:
1814:
1809:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1770:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1742:
1739:
1735:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1633:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1619:
1615:
1608:
1595:
1594:
1591:
1587:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1543:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1515:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1368:
1357:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1338:
1329:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1313:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1276:
1262:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1209:
1204:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1171:
1169:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1148:
1142:
1137:
1131:
1126:
1120:
1115:
1109:
1108:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1077:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1064:Okay, that's
1051:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
989:
987:
983:
979:
974:
972:
967:
962:
957:
952:
949:
944:
943:
942:
941:
938:
935:
931:
926:
924:
917:
914:
910:
906:
902:
897:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
845:
842:
837:
835:
831:
827:
823:
818:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
784:
782:
775:
766:
764:
759:
754:
749:
742:
738:
733:
731:
724:
714:
704:
696:
693:
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:naked moderne
675:
671:
667:
662:
658:
651:
643:
640:
636:
626:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
603:
599:
591:
590:
589:
587:
578:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
536:
531:
528:
525:
520:
518:
514:
510:
506:
501:
499:
494:
489:
481:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
468:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
448:
444:
437:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
424:
421:
418:. Thank you.
417:
413:
406:
393:
392:
389:
385:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
358:
352:
342:
341:
338:
334:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
308:
303:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
222:
215:
208:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
146:
145:
138:
134:
133:
128:
125:
121:
120:
115:
107:
99:
91:
83:
75:
60:
53:
52:
40:
29:
23:
19:
2645:
2612:
2598:
2565:
2551:
2533:
2484:
2459:
2441:
2430:
2429:
2415:
2390:
2384:
2370:
2346:
2331:
2313:
2287:thoughts --
2255:
2252:Help colours
2197:
2181:
2175:
2171:
2151:
2108:
2083:
2077:
2075:
2054:
2050:
2000:
1970:
1951:
1932:
1904:
1858:
1854:
1828:
1804:
1786:
1765:
1763:
1731:
1704:
1702:
1689:
1629:
1607:Unreferenced
1601:
1583:
1577:
1549:
1531:
1474:
1419:
1386:
1380:
1364:
1354:subst:smile3
1350:subst:smile2
1333:
1315:Backatcha!
1309:
1299:subst:smile3
1295:subst:smile2
1280:
1207:
1200:
1175:
1165:
1096:
1073:
1065:
1063:
1008:
1002:
990:
977:
976:It would be
975:
971:restrictions
970:
968:
965:
955:
929:
928:I certainly
927:
922:
920:
908:
904:
890:
886:
878:
869:
865:
858:WikiPalettes
853:
838:
833:
829:
825:
821:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
785:
780:
767:
762:
757:
755:
748:divstyleblue
740:
736:
734:
729:
697:
694:
689:
685:
682:photorealist
681:
677:
674:neoprimitive
673:
669:
665:
660:
657:functionally
656:
644:
638:
634:
631:
595:
583:
576:
571:
553:
549:
545:
541:
539:
523:
521:
516:
512:
508:
504:
502:
497:
492:
490:
486:
459:
440:
415:
399:
381:
376:
372:
368:
367:Thanks. You
348:
330:
299:
273:
250:
228:
220:
172:
130:
50:
2176:anyone else
2148:Color table
2096:Sagaciousuk
2086:Sagaciousuk
1965:piped links
1760:Re: Collage
1346:subst:smile
1291:subst:smile
1060:Lotta stuff
923:centralized
903:that shows
830:Centralized
753:to match.
129:This is an
2289:Gareth Aus
2158:this table
1963:Hi. Yes,
1653:Invitation
1560:Hi Somody,
978:marvellous
852:Whoo-Wee,
834:everything
546:neutrality
2642:Namespace
2465:. thx --
2215:it up :)
2051:displayed
1680:Iswatch19
1666:Iswatch19
1564:Here's a
1229:tie-ins.
774:Cent/work
741:extremely
686:liquid 3D
554:look good
173:Archive 6
2633:Rfrisbie
2619:Rfrisbie
2572:Rfrisbie
2548:Restored
2540:Rfrisbie
2496:Rfrisbie
2448:Rfrisbie
2409:Quiddity
2397:Rfrisbie
2359:Rfrisbie
2320:Rfrisbie
2237:Rfrisbie
2228:Quiddity
2203:Rfrisbie
2188:Rfrisbie
2162:Quiddity
2128:Rfrisbie
2059:Rfrisbie
2016:Rfrisbie
1989:Rfrisbie
1955:Jlittlet
1937:Rfrisbie
1892:Rfrisbie
1847:proposed
1835:Rfrisbie
1793:Rfrisbie
1751:Rfrisbie
1719:Rfrisbie
1696:Rfrisbie
1684:MatchPat
1670:MatchPat
1642:Rfrisbie
1590:Rfrisbie
1538:Rfrisbie
1481:Rfrisbie
1426:Rfrisbie
1393:Rfrisbie
1352:}} or {{
1341:WikiLove
1322:Rfrisbie
1297:}} or {{
1286:WikiLove
1258:Rfrisbie
1254:WP:COLOR
1238:Rfrisbie
1136:MiniAWFP
1047:Rfrisbie
1015:Rfrisbie
993:Quiddity
982:WP:COLOR
948:Rfrisbie
913:Rfrisbie
887:multiple
862:Quiddity
723:MiniAWFP
680:through
622:Rfrisbie
614:proposed
602:Rfrisbie
542:civility
477:Rfrisbie
464:Rfrisbie
433:Rfrisbie
388:Rfrisbie
356:xaosflux
337:Rfrisbie
307:Quiddity
280:Rfrisbie
257:Rfrisbie
239:Quiddity
207:Archives
89:esources
81:serboxes
20: |
2584:Michael
2554:Michael
2029:Deville
1618:Michael
1337:Michael
1282:Michael
866:finally
730:endorse
132:archive
97:alettes
22:Archive
2595:Rambot
2510:Trödel
2468:Trödel
2137:--Eric
2113:--Eric
2006:(Talk)
1948:Pipes?
1741:(Talk)
1552:somody
1505:Cswrye
1456:Cswrye
1443:Cswrye
1405:Cswrye
1377:WP:AWB
1367:Cswrye
1348:}}, {{
1293:}}, {{
854:that's
814:, and
788:Sorry.
650:divbox
577:really
548:, and
530:not.
345:Gus to
73:amples
2198:would
2078:seems
2055:won't
1906:: -->
1860:: -->
1807:Sango
1768:Sango
1381:might
1269:Smile
1178:John
1114:style
1027:John
1003:don't
934:John
909:issue
841:John
796:don't
703:style
670:style
666:sizes
558:John
505:wrong
447:John
420:John
373:first
237:;) --
16:<
2431:know
2172:does
2033:Talk
1922:<
1876:<
1682:and
1668:and
1193:and
1181:Reid
1166:See
1097:See
1090:Kite
1074:See
1066:four
1030:Reid
937:Reid
905:lots
879:also
870:some
844:Reid
690:look
676:and
572:more
561:Reid
524:edit
498:here
460:your
450:Reid
423:Reid
405:cent
396:Cent
369:also
105:ssay
64:Talk
2428:We
2385:his
1812:123
1773:123
1705:you
1678:Hi
1578:lot
1208:and
930:can
891:and
836:.
763:You
758:use
684:to
639:may
635:may
509:any
113:alk
2601:RM
2284:}}
2278:{{
2269:}}
2263:{{
2126:.
2035:)
1890:?
1850:}}
1844:{{
1610:}}
1604:{{
1344:{{
1289:{{
1150:}}
1144:{{
1139:}}
1133:{{
1128:}}
1122:{{
1117:}}
1111:{{
1095:.
1093:}}
1087:{{
810:,
806:,
781:go
777:}}
771:{{
751:}}
745:{{
737:do
735:I
726:}}
720:{{
718:,
716:}}
710:{{
708:,
706:}}
700:{{
653:}}
647:{{
544:,
408:}}
402:{{
305:--
209:•
198:11
193:10
139:.
2031:(
1920:t
1918:n
1916:a
1914:i
1912:d
1910:a
1908:R
1874:t
1872:n
1870:a
1868:i
1866:d
1864:a
1862:R
1516:.
1197:!
1170:.
1101:.
1078:.
188:9
183:8
178:7
168:5
163:4
158:3
153:2
148:1
111:T
103:E
95:P
87:R
79:U
71:S
51:↑
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
