1069:) you made the rather impolite comment "What does a US court case have to do with opinions of people who think Taiwan was integral to ROC?" I suppose that any college student could reply that "Some people may also think that the world is flat, but that does not make it so." More to the point, the judges in the case mentioned analyzed the international legal record, and conferred with the US State Dept., and came to the conclusion that Taiwan is not a part of ROC national territory. Hence, as qualified legal professionals, their opinion should carry some weight. Again, please provide some solid references for your alternative viewpoint.
970:. I'd like to draw your attention, in case you're new to the topic, to the fact that the entire field of climate change on Knowledge is under general sanctions imposed by the Arbitration Committee. Please don't use the talk pages, edit summaries or article space for inappropriate comments, in particular attacks on other people or "us and them" style discussions. Stick to the content and discussion of how best to represent the topic, please. Take up interpersonal issues on user talk pages, and so on. If there is a glaring instance of inappropriate behaviour, please take it immediately to
643:.) are not members of a Country Club, or a Gentlemen's Club, be it in London or in New York, and we ought not to "just take HIS word for it", what it ultimately boils down to, without question. In the spirit of democracy, a fair amount of doubt and scepticism ought to be allowed. The word "claim" do not upon (on) its own usually infer a meaning of uttering or writing an untruth, or a lie, although its use is often liable to attract the accusation thereof; the word "purport", however, does, at least in the modern usage, and certainly the word "pretend", for quite some time indeed.
414:
111:
1556:
647:
progeny are not of note (notable) in their own right (whereas they would had been if
Derbyshire were, due to reasons best explained at a different forum, at a different juncture), especially given their relative minority (young age), and they definitely have not yet made a name for themselves, not even trades or occupations of any sort to speak of. It might had been different if the either of them had authored or published any works of literature, such as what
1863:
1788:
1639:
849:
316:
985:
going to individual user's talk pages but there were so many users engaged in such behavior. I did consider taking J. Johnson dispute resolution but my initial request for a third party intervention was ignored and I decided I could probably just to ignore him. I have been pondering whether this something that should be brought to the group that deals with
Systemic Bias but I'm not sure this fits there either.
209:
States of
America". In all other cases, we are using the city name and a location that serves to clearly disambiguate the city from other cities that may have the same name. "Taiwan" clearly disambiguates "Taipei". Further, it avoids any POV complaints from fringe beliefs that Taipei is part of the PRC. Whether you believe Taipei is part of the ROC or the PRC, no one disputes that Taipei is in Taiwan.
708:
to not use a loaded word like "claim". It sounds like you are from the UK. If that is the case perhaps this is a difference in dialect. Words may have a different connotation in the UK than in the US as I'm sure you're aware. A more neutral phrasing ("According to John
Derbyshire, ...", "John Derbyshire writes...", "John Derbyshire says...", "John Derbyshire has stated...", etc.) would be better.
1713:
1093:
necessarily a reality matter. Knowledge deals in reality and when there are questions it deals in significant views of what the reality is. Legal decisions are certainly a significant view of reality, but they do not alone define reality. There are other viewpoints including the significant views of people who live in Taiwan and support or control the
Kuomintang government.
1601:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like
1605:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current
1765:
which has been in the article for awhile (about Taipei for over 1.5 years). I think I understand your deletion of the added
Nanjing entry, but the text should've been restored. I've gone and re-added the deleted text, because I think it can/could be useful to the reader unacquainted with the issues.
1233:
I've shifted the above posts to this page instead of the talk. I still very much disagree that the IP was attempting to contribute, because of the combination of content and writing style. I also disagree that removing such a post is uncivil. Still, per your post I'll leave it there in good faith and
1064:
article, in particular in relation to your assertion that Taiwan is a part of ROC territory. Could you please verify what international legal documents and/or scholarly articles you are referencing in your assertion? In the
Revision History of Government_in_exile, in regard to the US court case of
651:
had supposedly done during her minority. This might be the 21st. Century, but I do not see how they could be included into an encyclopaedic, or encyclopedic article, without having been first mentioned or published in
Derbyshire's notice of death or obituary. If something was not fit (good enough) to
1260:
Decent response to the whole thing too (as in, one mostly agree with...), which is really well within WP:LAME territory. One nit though—my own entirely unscientific observation is that the pro-independence media tend to use "China", whereas the pro-(re)unification media tend to use "the mainland" or
1092:
As for the court case - there is the question of whether a US court has jurisdiction over Taiwan. Even if a US court were to rule that it does, would that invalidate ROC and PRC courts that say it doesn't? And even all the courts around the world agreed, that would still be only a legal matter, not
946:
Hi I saw you changed the Taiwan disambiguation page! Thanks for contributing. The argument you gave, that "sovereignty is POV" regards the article in the list is mistaken. While any actaul claim (by the encyclopedia itself) as to the sovereignty of Taiwan might be disputed, the fact is that PRC does
878:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
707:
As for his wife and children. I don't care much whether their names are included in the article or not. They were originally included as he has frequently referenced them by name in his writings. If you do include them, or any other information that comes directly from
Derbyshire, it is good form
272:
Rather than argue point by point, I think we can go straight to the solution. "Taipei, ROC (Taiwan)" or "Taipei, Taiwan (ROC)" would be acceptable, though the latter is preferable because "Taipei, Taiwan" is far more common usage and clarifies the information most people use to identify Taipei. The
208:
Aside from injecting "Republic of China", the only other state name being used is "United States", presumably because some people believe "America" might be confusing because the
Americas are sometimes called simply "America". And even then, "United States" is not the full name of the state "United
1299:
when I went in there to post a reply. I thought perhaps this user was making unintentionally disruptive edits but in good faith, but judging by the edit history the user seems to be intentionall disruptive. I'm not sure of their political persuation but their tactics seem to be stealthy at best and
659:
At the risk of offending yourself, John Derbyshire, after all, ultimately cannot be said in good faith to be (or, he is not really) a man of much note, or, much notability, perhaps even in his adopted land; other than being an emigrant originally from the Southern shires and provinces, he certainly
611:
Now having a bout of influenza, or cold, amongst other things, personally, I am not really too "worked up" with the removal of the COI-tag, which is perhaps to be expected, eventually; but, and this is a matter perhaps too delicate, if not inflammatory, but probably not libellous, for the article's
1108:
It is also the policy of Knowledge to provide references for statements and assertions made on its webpages. Knowledge is involved with verifiable facts, and not speculation. In regard to what the people of Taiwan and China believe, much of it is also falls in the realm of myth, fable, parable,
635:
It seems that his wife's name was, or is, not "Changhe", after all, being more of the name of a Chinese-made car. I shall be intrigued to know as to whether Derbyshire's marriage certificate, presumably Chinese, was deposited (in contrast to "registration", a distinction they are at pains to make)
1609:
which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every
1201:
that the IP was unaware of the meaning of "colony", but that can be corrected easily enough. I agree that he clearly has a strong POV, but we all have POVs and it is quite common for new editors to have to learn to suppress them. There is also a guideline that says to be gentle with new editors.
1200:
Knowledge demands civility. When someone makes an attempt to contribute we supposed to be civil even if we completely disagree with that person. As for your accusation that he's just making an attack - one of the guidelines of Knowledge is that we assume good faith. I agree with your assessment
1019:
If you're repeatedly finding people expressing disagreement with your proposals and even dismissing them out of hand, that in itself isn't a sign of hostility. It's a sign that you have failed to build consensus. There are appropriate ways to tackle this. It's up to you to read about the editing
984:
Thank you for the information. I am new to the topic. What do you mean by "under general sanctions". How do such sanctions that apply to the numerous personal attacks that were directed toward me? Is there a page where problematic behavior related to the topic can be directed? You mentioned
560:
I'm a bit late to this party (been travelling for work recently) but I noticed your comment on the Taiwan talk page that there's no rule about signing posts. If you're interested, the following line is in our signature guideline: "Any posts made to the user talk pages, article talk pages and any
646:
The names of the son and of the daughter (or even that of the wife) ought not (do not really) belong to the article. John Derbyshire is not e.g. a gentleman (with a "coat-of-arms"), a knight, a baronet or a member of the peerage back in England, or in Scotland or Ireland, and the members of his
541:
Nah, you've lost me there completely. I didn't take the dispute anywhere. Midcent did, and didn't even advise me. I only ever responded, AFTER he had posted his unsigned bullshit in about five different places across Knowledge, and after I had noticed it, sometimes by pure chance. If you cannot
81:
I would like to seek your view as to whether we should eliminate from the lists of diplomatic missions by sending/receiving countries all references to representative offices of sending states that do not have formal diplomatic missions with the host states. This would affect a large number of
248:
ROC (Taiwan) is also to be used "When identifying nationality (eg. "Lee Teng-hui is a citizen of the Republic of China (Taiwan).")" - Adding "Germany," "Honduras," etc. unavoidably invokes nationality, even if your intention is just to show geographical location. Sister city relationships are
620:
tongue, means, besides a surname, amongst other things, "love", "loves", "loved" or " love", &c., regardless of the tense, absent in Chinese; and I don't think that her wife's real and legal name, if she is still supposedly a Chinese subject, or a citizen of China, and somehow not yet a
204:
It says "Guatemala", not "Republic of Guatemala". It says "Mexico", not "United States of Mexico". It says "Honduras", not "Republic of Honduras". It says "Colombia", not "Republic of Colombia". It says "Spain", not "Kingdom of Spain". It says "Brazil", not "Federative Republic of Brazil"
1800:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1304:
was a wholesale deletion of about half the article but was marked "a minor edit". That user's post on my talk page said it was due to "unicode control characters". It would probably be a good idea to keep an eye on this uer's edits on Taiwan-related articles if you come across them.
252:
By having it as "Taipei, Taiwan" without mentioning the ROC and while having other countries mention their states, it inadvertently introduces the POV that Taiwan is not a part of China. (Especially with the ] link) - But it just seems strange when pairing it with the obviously ROC
1204:
It does us little harm to allow the text to remain on the talk page for a few days to give the IP a chance to read the comments and maybe even respond to them. After that closing the discussion should be easy as it appears that the three of us agree on the outcome of the
26:
Before you teach me, why don't you wait until there are significant agreement first then move? Not only no one have agree with your proposal or even settled the problem yet you move first? Like I said, if you would like to make a new template, you're welcome to do so.
256:
In summary, as long as country flags are shown and as long as other non-disputed countries are named "Republic of China" is unavoidable here - If you don't want the ROC to be mentioned, then other country labels should be deleted and the flags should be removed.
1275:
I'm not as in touch with happenings in Taiwan as I was even just 5 years ago, so things may have changed. I know I used to find it surprising to hear so many pro-independence folk use "mainland". I'm glad to hear they're not doing it as much anymore.
616:"? I don't see how a person who writes for the "Virginia Dare" magazine would have many Chinese, Chinese-speaking or ethnic-Chinese followers. I, as an amateur linguist, who probably can read a bit of Chinese, know that the word "Ai" in Chinese, in the
1651:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
143:
has to be included because every other entry on the list has its country/state identified. If ROC is to be removed, every other country must be removed too. Our China guidelines say that PRC and ROC must be used when referring to political divisions.
525:
BTW - the language I use in those situations that so offends you is language I hear many times daily where I live and work. Different places, different cultures. Whose culture should decide what's acceptable here is an interesting question
1084:
It's not an assertion that Taiwan is part of ROC territory. The assertion is that there are people who do believe Taiwan is part of ROC territory. One particularly significant example of this is the government of Taiwan. Another is
1320:
Looking back through his contribution history, every edit I checked was eventually reverted, and it was done by almost as many different people as there were articles he edited (i.e. it wasn't just one or two editors reverting him
1109:
etc. Hence, my insertion of a "Citation Needed" is certainly reasonable, because the readers are entitled to know about FACTS and not just propaganda. Again, please provide some solid references for your alternative viewpoint.
1152:
713:
When discussing territorial claims or even claims of possession ("China claims Taiwan", "he claimed his inheritance") the word is pretty neutral. But when used for simple statements of truth or fiction the word is loaded.
1324:
I'm not quite ready to call it vandalism since it looks more like POV pushing and he did at least make an effort to talk with you. I put a comment on his page encouraging him to read up on some of policies such as NPOV.
518:
You will see that enough other editors realised where the real fault existed. My firmness and frankness led to that editor clearly showing his true colours and doing even more stupid things, and ultimately being blocked.
1382:
136:
You said: "rv "Taipei, Taiwan" is enough to identify city. "Taipei, Taiwan, ROC" could imply misinformation (use of ROC implies political jurisdictions; while Taipei is in Taiwan, it is not in "Taiwan Province""
1512:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
76:
1752:
Whenever you are editing/correcting/vandalfighting/etc. in an article that has to do with _anything_ that nationalistic POV warriors might edit, please be very careful in your 'fixes'. After one editor
1010:
Please check the "General sanctions" notice at the top of the talk page. In general, any hostile behaviour towards editors may breach the sanctions, which are intended to foster a collegial environment.
621:
naturalised, or naturalized, American citizen, really is "Lynnette Rose". Is "Changhe", or "Chang-he", or "Chang He", the given name of her wife? That was not in fact you, however, I sincerely hope. --
1890:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1812:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1663:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1186:
There's nothing in original post here that is remotely constructive. The IP doesn't know what a colony is, and is simply making an ill-informed attack on countries with large immigrant communities.
751:
imply "something that he does not have, but ought to have", nor "something that he did not do, but ought to had done". A strange analogy in many ways indeed, and probably an ill-placed one as well.
639:
Anyhow, if it is "uncredited", then naturally it is unverifiable. We and Derbyshire (perhaps the "Mr." title can now be safely dispensed with, lest it appear any more pompous; this is after all not
734:
All I wrote, and intended to say, was that John Derbyshire is not of such note (or with such a notability), and probably never will, as to warrant the inclusion of the names of his children,
522:
I see my strategy of moving beyond false niceness as being in the same vein as basketballers deliberately breaking the rules for their team's benefit. It works that way at Knowledge too.
86:. You have received this notice because you have regularly contributed to either kind of article, or have had dealings with editors concerning the conduct of this dispute. Thank you.
1906:
1828:
1679:
992:
page as you suggested. That page seems to be for reporting a breach of a ruling that has already been made. I don't know of any rulings that have been made that have been breached.
235:
1766:
The continual abrasion of POV warriors causes problems for Knowledge, and the reaction of using too strong cleaning agents is one of the ways damage is caused. Please take care.
1876:
1208:
In addition to the guidelines, it makes sense to give this person a response and a chance to read the response because doing so will make him less likely to start edit-warring.
395:
1728:
599:
83:
1353:. If you're prepared to leave the page alone for a few days, I'm prepared to not bother report you. Since you've already been blocked for 3RR, you ought to know about it
273:
latter is definitely preferred if using the spelled out "Republic of China" instead of "ROC" because the longer name will tend to obfuscate the identifying information.
1120:
330:
1428:
95:
1704:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1747:
228:
acceptable shorthand for Republic of China, so "Taiwan" and "Republic of China" is not analogous to United States and United States of America - I will repeat:
369:
919:
479:
Okay, I read the links. I can see why you wanted to keep that in, that portion is a mess. I'm trying to sort it out and see if it can be written better.
1606:
925:
625:
1697:
1393:
1377:
407:
1610:
country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --
1598:
1238:. Your message was for me, and I think having it there would be slightly detrimental to any attempt to appear gentle. Does this make sense? Regards,
50:? An editor has suggested changing the nationality from "American-born Taiwanese" to "Taiwanese-American"; your input would be appreciated. Thanks,
1932:
1846:
831:
1628:
1590:
936:
821:
1742:
1541:
1070:
28:
355:
Hi. In the average wage per country page, Taiwan is not listed because it is not an OECD member and this list ranks only OECD member nations.
1775:
1617:
838:
1623:
1451:
1020:
history of the article, and its talk page, to bring yourself up to speed. You may often find a reason why you're not persuading anyone. --
1300:
underhanded at worst - the initial edit by an anon (whose edit pattern seems to indicate they may be the same person as Quickbest5t6) on
458:
It's not removed. It's in the 2nd paragraph. There's actually no reason for it to show up twice. To state and restate the same thing.
1853:
1780:
1086:
1350:
967:
856:
795:, is he? Has the names been changed to "protect" their identities and privacy? Well, we don't know either! Were there notices in the
1334:
1140:
420:
413:
1217:
827:
807:
782:
764:
723:
1024:
1001:
773:
Asking that Derbyshire's statements about his family not be written as though he is presumed to be lying is considered a fanpov?
297:
266:
1159:
1491:
1424:
1602:
1584:
1102:
440:
551:
1928:
1842:
1693:
1537:
1116:
1229:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
591:
465:
303:
1576:
1706:
1524:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1041:. Of course, I have always had the greatest respect to you as an editor, even when I disagree with you over content. --
486:
345:
1314:
690:
I don't know how much notability is required for Knowledge. Surely as the author of "Prime Obsession" (winner of the
427:
388:
124:
978:
684:
1383:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Readin_reported_by_User:William_M._Connolley_.28Result:_.29
1261:"mainland China", so it's not really all "mainland". Thanks for being open to compromise and not losing your cool.
613:
604:
1474:
956:
448:
1924:
1838:
1689:
1533:
1413:
509:
403:
164:
68:
1124:
569:. A guideline it may be, but its use of the word 'must', emphasised in the guideline itself, seems unambiguous.
1594:
1409:
1389:
1373:
1358:
1247:
1195:
660:
has not yet made a name for himself back in his native land, and probably never will, unlike even the likes of
473:
1362:
1270:
1050:
656:
back in the year nineteen-hundred and eleven, then probably it is not fit (good enough) for inclusion today.
494:
1463:
1301:
47:
36:
1285:
282:
218:
1899:
1821:
1672:
914:
903:
535:
63:
41:
1234:
to be gentle and unbitey. It was in line with being gentle and unbitey that I shifted the above here from
100:
1911:
1833:
1684:
1611:
1546:
1529:
1078:
907:
238:
says that when identifying the state of the Republic of China one should use "Republic of China" (Taiwan)
1459:
1146:
585:
1486:
924:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
1405:
1385:
1369:
1354:
1290:
961:
676:(or so it is claimed by the magazine's adversaries); whose interview was "politely" relegated under "
444:
326:
636:
with the British Government, a facility available to the Queen's subjects who are British persons.
1572:
1310:
1046:
669:
630:
399:
329:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
82:
articles which relate to Taiwan, Palestine, Kosovo and other states. Please provide your views
1252:
1243:
1191:
941:
933:
911:
835:
804:
761:
681:
622:
469:
131:
21:
1296:
1021:
975:
929:
899:
664:
in North America, simply in or by virtue of his late brother's fame; and not even according to
648:
500:
490:
378:
1440:
394:. The two navboxes are now merged again few days ago. Would you want to share your opinion at
1887:
1809:
1660:
1455:
293:
262:
245:
analogous to "Taiwan," so the ROC flag should be deleted if you don't want to mention the ROC
160:
236:
Knowledge:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Republic_of_China.2C_Taiwan.2C_and_variations_thereof
1898:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1820:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1671:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1520:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1112:
665:
482:
461:
434:
117:
110:
8:
1568:
1525:
1306:
1164:
1055:
1042:
891:
453:
1423:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
826:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
1482:
1266:
1239:
1187:
566:
542:
comprehend what actually goes on here, your attempt to educate me has no credibility.
1870:
1796:
1647:
1629:
1501:
1492:
1074:
1066:
1032:
860:
140:
91:
32:
1918:
1883:
1805:
1771:
1656:
1521:
1505:
875:
695:
691:
617:
579:
547:
531:
289:
258:
156:
1757:, apparently moving the text from 'Taipei' to 'Nanjing', and then your trying to
1468:
1436:
886:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
883:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
866:
843:
800:
792:
757:
699:
600:
341:
1895:
1817:
1668:
1517:
1509:
1445:
1399:
887:
796:
661:
350:
1891:
1813:
1733:
1720:
1664:
1513:
1478:
1346:
1262:
1038:
895:
871:
653:
304:
1257:
That's one brilliant turn of phrase. I hope you don't mind if I nick it. :P
947:
make a sovereign claim regardless. Please don't change it back, Thanks. --—
1477:. Please feel free to correct me if I misrepresented your actions. Thanks.
989:
971:
155:
Taiwan Province. I.E. I meant Taipei, Island of Taiwan, Republic of China.
87:
1767:
1555:
1340:
1326:
1277:
1235:
1209:
1132:
1094:
993:
830:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
774:
715:
543:
527:
502:
274:
210:
52:
1902:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1824:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1675:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
77:
Proposed Removal of all non de jure diplomatic Missions in List Articles
16:
1880:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1432:
1418:
788:
337:
102:
1862:
1787:
1638:
572:
322:
308:
230:
Taiwan alone is not an acceptable shorthand for the Republic of China
898:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
738:
of course questioning the notability of strictly his person as such.
514:
Continued harassment by other user after repeated requests to stop.
336:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
315:
743:
As to the Taiwan analogy, well, all I would say is that the word "
1508:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
439:
The Military Service Act was actually in place long before 1949.
1915:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
191:
Flag of the United States Los Angeles, California, United States
1905:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
1827:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1678:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
874:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
188:
Flag of the Republic of China Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
1712:
1719:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1061:
747:" has MANY DIFFERENT SENSES of the word indeed; it does not
430:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
127:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
508:
I think you're quite wrong, and the evidence now exists at
374:
I have found just now that you were the editor who created
331:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Denialism (2nd nomination)
1874:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1427:
regarding a hostile editing environment. The thread is "
928:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge's policy on
1886:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1808:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1659:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
865:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
680:", as a mere American of incidental British birth. --
670:
Her Majesty's College of Saint Mary Magdalen in Oxford
1179:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1153:
Template talk:Countries and territories of East Asia
1131:Please take this to the talk page for the article.
906:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
1607:
Knowledge:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon
1473:This is just a note to say that I mentioned you at
321:An article that you have been involved in editing,
1067:http://www.taiwanbasic.com/state/usg/shengvsro.htm
926:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
698:) and formerly a popular long-time contributor to
147:And the "Taiwan" in there literally refers to the
1599:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge
1500:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
890:to work toward making a version that represents
361:
1748:Clean the graffiti butleave the monuments whole
1591:Knowledge:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge
881:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
1593:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland
756:What you are proposing are all simply called "
370:Template:Taiwan topics and Template:ROC topics
194:Flag of Colombia Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
1060:Hi, I noticed your recent actions/changes in
920:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
672:, engaged and retained by (in the employ of)
366:I'm attempting to get a unified wiki login.
1727:redirect, you might want to participate in
1454:one's efforts were actually useful. Thanks
1062:http://en.wikipedia.org/Government_in_exile
859:shows that you are currently engaged in an
803:announcing their births? Probably not. --
1723:. Since you had some involvement with the
48:User talk:Rjanag#Leehom Wang's Nationality
1475:Talk:Republic of China#Article recreation
1351:Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change
968:Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change
857:Category:Vietnamese expatriates in Taiwan
787:Well, we don't know, do we? He is hardly
419:Hello, Readin. You have new messages at
185:Flag of Honduras San Pedro Sula, Honduras
116:Hello, Readin. You have new messages at
828:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
822:Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
702:, Derbyshire at least somewhat notable.
46:If you have time, could you comment on
1429:User:J._Johnson_-_hostile_environment.
1087:Pro-independence former president Chen
966:Hi, I noticed your recent comments on
668:Dons and other learned men drawn from
396:Template talk:Republic of China topics
384:in 2008, effectively spliting it from
1603:Knowledge:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)
1425:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
1871:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
1797:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1731:if you have not already done so. -
1648:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1173:The following discussion is closed.
176:Flag of Nicaragua Managua, Nicaragua
13:
1854:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
1781:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
1711:
1404:Don't move other peoples comments
847:
412:
182:Flag of Mexico Guadalajara, Mexico
179:Flag of Mexico Mexico City, Mexico
109:
14:
1947:
1526:review the candidates' statements
512:. Read all of the section titled
232:- The acceptable shorthand is ROC
1861:
1786:
1637:
1554:
1225:The discussion above is closed.
314:
288:"Taipei, Taiwan (ROC)" works :)
200:Flag of Brazil Sao Paulo, Brazil
1909:and submit your choices on the
1831:and submit your choices on the
870:—especially if you violate the
855:Your recent editing history at
510:Knowledge:Wikiquette assistance
421:Jeffrey Fitzpatrick's talk page
1595:Knowledge:The 10,000 Challenge
1532:. For the Election committee,
1502:Arbitration Committee election
1493:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
1933:00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
1888:Knowledge arbitration process
1810:Knowledge arbitration process
1794:Hello, Readin. Voting in the
1776:04:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
1698:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1661:Knowledge arbitration process
1645:Hello, Readin. Voting in the
1585:Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
1542:13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1335:14:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1315:09:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
1302:Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall
1248:20:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
1218:04:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
1196:16:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
1151:Would you mind joining in at
96:07:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
69:02:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
1847:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1743:04:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
1624:02:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
1414:09:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1394:13:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
1378:13:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
1368:Oh well, it was your choice
1363:12:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
1286:19:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
1271:16:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
760:". Not (really) allowed. --
612:talk page, but who is this "
346:06:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
224:On Knowledge "Taiwan" alone
7:
1682:and submit your choices on
1528:and submit your choices on
1295:Hi, I noticed your post on
1160:23:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
298:17:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
283:17:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
267:17:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
219:15:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
197:Flag of Spain Madrid, Spain
165:14:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
37:21:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
10:
1952:
1925:MediaWiki message delivery
1839:MediaWiki message delivery
1690:MediaWiki message delivery
1680:the candidates' statements
1534:MediaWiki message delivery
1487:01:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
1464:14:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
1141:19:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
1125:23:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
449:09:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
249:political, not geographic.
1553:
1441:03:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
1103:16:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
1079:04:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
1051:09:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
1025:21:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
1002:21:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
979:21:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
957:21:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
592:00:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
408:14:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
173:Guatemala City, Guatemala
1923:to your user talk page.
1761:, the net effect was to
1707:Redirects for discussion
1705:President Lee listed at
1330:
1281:
1227:Please do not modify it.
1176:Please do not modify it.
1136:
1098:
997:
937:13:26, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
915:13:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
839:19:31, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
808:20:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
783:19:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
778:
765:19:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
724:18:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
719:
685:18:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
652:be included by a Mister
626:02:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
552:03:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
536:22:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
495:02:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
474:21:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
389:Republic of China topics
278:
214:
1729:the redirect discussion
1577:14:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
1037:for your kind words at
561:other discussion pages
1716:
1613:Ser Amantio di Nicolao
1297:User talk:Quickbest5t6
1065:Sheng v. Rogers ( See
852:
692:Association of America
417:
325:, has been listed for
118:Paradoxian's talk page
114:
1884:Arbitration Committee
1868:Hello! Voting in the
1806:Arbitration Committee
1715:
1657:Arbitration Committee
1630:ArbCom Elections 2016
1562:The Editor's Barnstar
1506:Arbitration Committee
851:
416:
113:
1406:William M. Connolley
1386:William M. Connolley
1370:William M. Connolley
1355:William M. Connolley
867:blocked from editing
678:Democracy in America
42:Your input requested
1547:A barnstar for you!
1510:arbitration process
932:. Thank you. --
894:among editors. See
169:The list contains:
1900:arbitration policy
1822:arbitration policy
1717:
1673:arbitration policy
1632:: Voting now open!
1619:Lo dicono a Signa.
1522:arbitration policy
1147:East Asia template
904:dispute resolution
853:
428:remove this notice
418:
351:Taiwan Wage Figure
125:remove this notice
115:
1939:
1938:
1739:
1582:
1581:
1431:". Thank you. --
1291:User:Quickbest5t6
1115:comment added by
962:General sanctions
872:three-revert rule
834:". Thank you. --
485:comment added by
464:comment added by
141:Republic of China
67:
1943:
1922:
1865:
1858:
1857:
1790:
1737:
1641:
1614:
1558:
1551:
1550:
1456:NewsAndEventsGuy
1178:
1127:
988:I looked at the
954:
850:
631:John Derbyshire.
590:
589:
575:
497:
476:
431:
393:
387:
383:
377:
318:
149:island of Taiwan
128:
60:
56:
1951:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1916:
1856:
1851:
1850:
1791:
1783:
1750:
1736:
1710:
1702:
1701:
1685:the voting page
1642:
1634:
1622:
1612:
1587:
1549:
1530:the voting page
1496:
1471:
1448:
1421:
1402:
1343:
1293:
1255:
1253:Annexationists?
1231:
1230:
1183:
1174:
1167:
1155:? Thanks much.
1149:
1110:
1058:
1035:
964:
952:
949:
944:
942:Taiwan Province
922:
908:page protection
848:
846:
832:John Derbyshire
824:
801:Washington Post
793:Charles Dickens
700:National Review
649:Queen Elizabeth
633:
609:
605:User:Ai changhe
601:John Derbyshire
577:
573:
570:
565:be signed", at
506:
480:
459:
456:
441:218.250.159.216
437:
432:
425:
391:
385:
381:
375:
372:
364:
353:
319:
312:
134:
132:Political stuff
129:
122:
107:
79:
66:
54:
44:
24:
22:Moving Articles
19:
17:About Taiwanese
12:
11:
5:
1949:
1937:
1936:
1907:the candidates
1877:eligible users
1866:
1855:
1852:
1829:the candidates
1792:
1785:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1755:changed things
1749:
1746:
1734:
1709:
1703:
1643:
1636:
1635:
1633:
1627:
1616:
1586:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1569:Daniel kenneth
1565:
1564:
1559:
1548:
1545:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1470:
1467:
1447:
1444:
1420:
1417:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1380:
1345:You've broken
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1322:
1307:PalaceGuard008
1292:
1289:
1254:
1251:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1206:
1202:
1182:
1181:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1117:118.166.251.23
1106:
1105:
1090:
1057:
1054:
1043:PalaceGuard008
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1005:
1004:
986:
963:
960:
950:
943:
940:
921:
918:
845:
842:
823:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
797:New York Times
768:
767:
754:
752:
741:
739:
727:
726:
710:
709:
704:
703:
662:Peter Hitchens
632:
629:
608:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
583:
555:
554:
505:
499:
455:
452:
436:
433:
424:
411:
371:
368:
363:
360:
352:
349:
313:
311:
307:nomination of
302:
301:
300:
270:
269:
254:
250:
246:
239:
233:
202:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
133:
130:
121:
108:
106:
99:
78:
75:
73:
62:
43:
40:
23:
20:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1948:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1920:
1914:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1879:
1878:
1873:
1872:
1867:
1864:
1860:
1859:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1830:
1825:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1802:
1799:
1798:
1789:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1745:
1744:
1741:
1740:
1730:
1726:
1725:President Lee
1722:
1721:President Lee
1714:
1708:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1640:
1631:
1626:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1615:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1552:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1466:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1450:It is always
1443:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1258:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1228:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1171:
1170:
1162:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:Talk:Bopomofo
1026:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
981:
980:
977:
973:
969:
959:
958:
955:
939:
938:
935:
931:
927:
917:
916:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
884:
882:
877:
873:
869:
868:
862:
858:
841:
840:
837:
833:
829:
809:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
785:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
769:
766:
763:
759:
755:
753:
750:
746:
742:
740:
737:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
725:
721:
717:
712:
711:
706:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
679:
675:
674:The Economist
671:
667:
663:
657:
655:
654:Hugh Chisholm
650:
644:
642:
641:The Economist
637:
628:
627:
624:
619:
615:
606:
602:
593:
587:
581:
576:
568:
564:
559:
558:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
540:
539:
538:
537:
533:
529:
523:
520:
516:
515:
511:
504:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
477:
475:
471:
467:
466:159.53.46.140
463:
451:
450:
446:
442:
429:
422:
415:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
390:
380:
379:Taiwan topics
367:
359:
356:
348:
347:
343:
339:
334:
333:. Thank you.
332:
328:
324:
317:
310:
306:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
268:
264:
260:
255:
251:
247:
244:
241:The ROC flag
240:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
206:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
171:
170:
167:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
142:
138:
126:
119:
112:
104:
98:
97:
93:
89:
85:
74:
71:
70:
65:
59:
58:
49:
39:
38:
34:
30:
1910:
1904:
1881:
1875:
1869:
1832:
1826:
1803:
1795:
1793:
1751:
1732:
1724:
1718:
1683:
1677:
1654:
1646:
1644:
1618:
1588:
1561:
1497:
1472:
1452:nice to hear
1449:
1422:
1403:
1344:
1321:everywhere).
1294:
1274:
1259:
1256:
1232:
1226:
1213:
1175:
1172:
1156:
1150:
1111:— Preceding
1107:
1059:
1036:
965:
948:
945:
930:edit warring
923:
885:
880:
864:
854:
825:
748:
744:
735:
677:
673:
658:
645:
640:
638:
634:
610:
562:
524:
521:
517:
513:
507:
487:96.40.134.13
481:— Preceding
478:
460:— Preceding
457:
438:
435:Conscription
373:
365:
357:
354:
335:
320:
271:
242:
229:
225:
207:
203:
168:
152:
148:
146:
139:
135:
101:Talkback re
80:
72:
51:
45:
25:
1912:voting page
1834:voting page
1763:delete text
1236:Talk:Colony
1205:discussion.
1165:Colony talk
1056:Taiwan, ROC
900:noticeboard
749:necessarily
696:Euler Prize
567:WP:SIGNHERE
503:Talk:Taiwan
454:Martial Law
290:WhisperToMe
259:WhisperToMe
157:WhisperToMe
1896:topic bans
1818:topic bans
1759:fix things
1669:topic bans
1518:topic bans
789:Mark Twain
614:Ai changhe
103:Cape No. 7
1892:site bans
1814:site bans
1665:site bans
1514:site bans
1033:Thank you
892:consensus
888:talk page
603:and the "
358:Lneal001
323:Denialism
309:Denialism
105:subtitles
1589:Hi. The
1479:wctaiwan
1263:wctaiwan
1113:unsigned
902:or seek
879:warring—
861:edit war
618:Mandarin
483:unsigned
462:unsigned
426:You can
327:deletion
123:You can
64:contribs
1919:NoACEMM
1738:HAMPION
1469:Mention
1071:Hmortar
876:reverts
844:Uw-3rr.
799:or the
736:without
400:Jeffrey
88:Kransky
29:Lennlin
1768:Shenme
1504:. The
1446:Thanks
1400:WP:TPG
1347:WP:3RR
1327:Readin
1278:Readin
1210:Readin
1133:Readin
1095:Readin
994:Readin
910:. --
775:Readin
758:Fanpov
716:Readin
666:Oxford
544:HiLo48
528:HiLo48
275:Readin
243:is not
226:is not
211:Readin
1433:Elvey
990:WP:AE
972:WP:AE
953:obbie
934:KC9TV
912:KC9TV
836:KC9TV
805:KC9TV
762:KC9TV
745:claim
682:KC9TV
623:KC9TV
586:edits
338:Unomi
1929:talk
1882:The
1843:talk
1804:The
1772:talk
1694:talk
1655:The
1597:and
1573:talk
1538:talk
1483:talk
1460:talk
1437:talk
1410:talk
1390:talk
1374:talk
1359:talk
1331:talk
1311:Talk
1282:talk
1267:talk
1244:talk
1214:talk
1192:talk
1157:GotR
1137:talk
1121:talk
1099:talk
1075:talk
1047:Talk
998:talk
974:. --
779:talk
720:talk
580:talk
574:NULL
563:must
548:talk
532:talk
491:talk
470:talk
445:talk
404:talk
342:talk
294:talk
279:talk
263:talk
253:flag
215:talk
161:talk
92:talk
84:here
57:anaɢ
33:talk
1498:Hi,
1349:on
1341:3RR
1240:CMD
1188:CMD
896:BRD
791:or
694:'s
607:" .
501:Re
362:SUL
305:AfD
153:not
1931:)
1921:}}
1917:{{
1894:,
1845:)
1837:.
1816:,
1774:)
1696:)
1688:.
1667:,
1575:)
1540:)
1516:,
1485:)
1462:)
1439:)
1419:JJ
1412:)
1392:)
1376:)
1361:)
1333:)
1313:)
1305:--
1284:)
1269:)
1246:)
1216:)
1194:)
1139:)
1123:)
1101:)
1077:)
1049:)
1022:TS
1000:)
976:TS
863:.
781:)
722:)
571:–
550:)
534:)
493:)
472:)
447:)
406:)
398:?
392:}}
386:{{
382:}}
376:{{
344:)
296:)
281:)
265:)
217:)
163:)
151:,
94:)
35:)
27:--
1927:(
1841:(
1770:(
1735:C
1692:(
1571:(
1536:(
1481:(
1458:(
1435:(
1408:(
1388:(
1372:(
1357:(
1329:(
1309:(
1280:(
1265:(
1242:(
1212:(
1190:(
1135:(
1119:(
1097:(
1089:.
1073:(
1045:(
996:(
951:r
777:(
718:(
588:›
584:‹
582:›
578:‹
546:(
530:(
489:(
468:(
443:(
423:.
402:(
340:(
292:(
277:(
261:(
213:(
159:(
120:.
90:(
61:/
55:ʨ
53:r
31:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
