User talk:Ramdrake/Archive 3

338:

fringe status of the hereditarian hypothesis, which he categorically couldn't accept). Now, this POV-pusher also happened to be very civil in his ways and demeanor, which confused more than one admin (until some admins decided to follow the talk page over weeks and months and sorted things out). Even when Jagz was finally indef-blocked, he still was so polite that Elonka fell for it and argued against a strong consensus to have him unblocked. However, he managed to get himself reblocked in a matter of a couple of weeks. A second issue was with an article merge and the user Zero g, who had been pushing a POV that the theory of dysgenics (as advanced by Richard Lynn) was a notable one. The theory was already discussed in part in the article about Lynn, but an article was created regarding a book he had published in 1996 on the subject, which had been the subject of a half-dozen reviews, and then litterally fell into oblivion. A proposal was done to merge the book article's contents into Lynn's article, and was endorsed by 5 editors, with only one dissenting voice, Zero g's. Several days after the merge was done, Zero g started to single-handedly revert the book article to its pre-merge state. This again ended up at ANI, where Elonka insisted that an RfA be held on the subject (claiming some improprieties in the merge process). The RfA's result was that the merge was endorsed by many more editors, with again Zero g being the lone dissenting voice.

2313:"It is statistically implausible that variants of numerous genes relating to intelligence would be distributed among racial groups in a manner that systematically conferred cognitive advantage on one group or disadvantage on another. Furthermore, there is no evidence to support the claim that current racial differences in mean IQ scores are caused by racially distinctive patterns of genetic variation. There is evidence that IQ scores are influenced by environmental factors that are pervasively and systematically patterned along racial lines in the U.S. Nonetheless, mean IQ differences among racial groups have been decreasing over the past few decades, perhaps in response to improved educational opportunities for some minority individuals. Taken together, the evidence suggests that differences in IQ scores are the result of social inequality rather than its cause." 308:

discuss things and come up with a general consensus of how much space the material should get and which sources were appropriate. Sometimes this took getting other outside editors through an RfC or a post on RS/N, but in the end a majority of editors agreed how to handle it and the editor(s) trying to insert more material were politely told that consensus was against them. There were a few cases where those editors continued to edit against the consensus and ended up blocked or under sanctions. Do you think that's an approach that would work for the types of disputes you're experiencing? Or is it difficult even getting a consensus on these issues at all? Because honestly, if you have editors who're continuing to fight a clear consensus, I'd consider that to be disruptive and think they should be put under some kind of restrictions.

2319:"Hereditarian claims are based on the alleged heritability of IQ. Heritability assess the way a trait varies in a population, and purports to measure how much of that variation is explained by genetic differences within the population. The remaining variation is attributed to all other factors (the environment and non-genetic aspects of biology). If children in a classroom score between 90 and 130 on an IQ test, a hereditarian might claim that 65 percent of the 40 point difference in IQ is due to genetic differences between the students, and 35 percent is due to other factors. Strong proponents of hereditarian theories tend to believe that genetic differences explain as much as 85 percent of the variation in adult IQ in a population, but other scholars believe that genes explain much less than 50 percent of the variation in IQ." 236:

If I'm understanding correctly, its about the difference between "no edit warring" and "no reverts" - while keeping people from edit warring is more about keeping the editing environment sane, saying "no reverts" may put a barrier in the way of keeping the content sane. I think part of the problem may be that for administrator's trying to help resolve some of these long standing disputes, its hard to tell who the good guys are sometimes - with everyone reverting, claiming that their pov is the right one and being a bit snippy with each other, you'd need to have a good knowledge of the subject to sort it all out. Like you said, the problem is most of the editors and administrators trying to help out aren't going to be experts and I'm not sure there's an easy way to fix that.

2333:"Today, scientists are faced with this situation in genomics, where existing biological models or paradigms of 'racial' and 'ethnic' categorizations cannot accommodate the uniqueness of the individual and universality of humankind that is evident in new knowledge emerging from human genome sequence variation research and molecular anthropological research. The paradigms of human identity based on 'races' as biological constructs are being questioned in light of the preponderance of data on human genome sequence variation10, 11, 12, 13 and reflect the need for a new explanatory framework and vision of humankind with different fundamental assumptions about biological groups that can accommodate new knowledge from a new generation of research." 2306:"Because humans have high within-group genetic variation, genes are unlikely to explain average differences in IQ test scores of different racial groups. We do not know the extent to which genes underlie a person’s ability to perform complex mental tasks, but there is no reason to think that people whose relatively recent ancestors all came from one continent would have different variants of any relevant genes than do people whose ancestors came from another continent. If potential “cognition genes” are similar to other genes, then most variants will be found within all groups of people at similar frequencies." 396:

even though calling them "trolling" might be disputable, I believe that many of them (especially on the R&I talk page) would definitely qualify as "baiting", however. So, he was warned several times for his behavior, although he didn't receive increasing blocks for it. He kept removing warnings from his talk page regularly, so that kept the history less apparent. But please review Jagz' talk page history and you will find multiple warnings there. It may have been your perception that Jagz was blocked pretty much out of the blue, but a closer look at his history will reveal multiple warnings.--

1497:

being called "gay" versus any other kind of insult the other kids throw at him? If he'd been called "fat", would you be counting the number of episodes he's been called that? No, because it's trivial. Spelling out all those details overdetails the synopsis, and the average reader, who may well read the article without being a Sout Park fan, gets losgt in all the detail. The level of detail you want to bring may be appropriate for a fan site, but it's just way too much detail for an ecnyclopaedia, which is there to give just an overview of a subject.--

2361:

accurate and precise. But the arguments I got were generally irrelevant. At least two editors claimed that heritability was a measure of genetic contribution to intelligence (Occam and Arya), whereas no one has ever disputed that heritability is a measure of variation. Then Occam went into a long irrelevant discussion about regression towards the mean, while Arya went on about comparison's of within to between group variation. None of these expansive discussions were at all relevant to whether the sentence was accurate or precise.

572:

cut peoples' heads off. I was merely stating facts regarding the method, and reason why these Islamic insurgents do this. If you are a Muslim, that's your problem. If you don't believe in a flat earth, that's cool, but some people do. And they have every right to do so. Don't delete things just because you don't believe in them. That's called vandalism, and will not be tolerated. If you disagree with any edits that other people make, then use the talk page for that article to discuss it with everyone.

2364:

regression towards the mean and within to between group differences. They seemed to be incapable of sticking to the subject at hand, which was whether the sources actually say that within "race" heritability is "substantial", and whether most of the measurements have been done with homogeneous populations. Indeed Arya didn't even accept that environmental influences can affect heritability estimates, which displays a deep and fundamental lack on understanding of what heritability actually estimates.

31: 2377:

sacrificial lambs. When it does come to dispute resolution the community seems more keen to sanction those editors who are trying to push a neutral point of view, probably because the larger community is too lazy or cowardly to actually go out and do some research of their own. I've never seen a dispute resolution process where any "uninvolved" admin has actually taken the time to read the relevant sources, find out what the dispute is about, and engage constructively.

3254:. You have not yet commented on it, and I am preparing to give the outline to David.Kane (per current agreement in mediation) to enter a draft of the article in mainspace. There will be a review/revision period after the draft is entered in which any issues can be addressed, so if you have no immediate comment, or can't get to the mediation page to make a comment, you can participate in the review and we can address any concerns you still have there. 1838:

based on what you have read in the past what you do. However, it needs to have hard evidence for our purposes. Your beliefs and your way of seeing the article stating "a small number" don't really matter to the public coming to these pages for information. Let's keep looking so that we can create an informational page. I'm sure you know what you know, but it doesn't have bearing on our search for encyclopedic verification.

3261: 1682: 3095: 2959:, that the deadline for any final comments in this introductory stage of mediation is due within the next 24 hours. At the end of this timeframe, the Mediators will seek page protection for 48 hours to review the entire case and prepare a schedule of issues to discuss to proceed forward. Thank You for your cooperation and acting in good faith to pursue a conclusion to this dispute. Cheers! -- 1368: 2370:

into false dichotomies, as in "you're either with us or against us", and simply refuse to even acknowledge that the people they see as their "ideological enemies" can ever have anything worthwhile to contribute. And so they just became refusenicks towards my proposed minor change (I wasn't even trying to change the meaning, only make it more accurate) simply because it was

2203: 2199: 451:

access." Then, if Jagz didn't heed that warning, a short-term block might have been in order, or a "this is your last warning" message, and then escalate from there to an indefinite if necessary. But just jumping straight to an indefinite block without warning, was not appropriate. I would have spoken up about that kind of situation for

342:

energies and time went to waste to get exactly to the same point. While I have no doubt that Elonka had the best interests of everyone at heart, it seems clear to me that she argued without a full proper appreciation of the situation. However, I'm sure that other admins in the same situation might have done the same thing.--

1339:(and the term has appeared in boldface in the lead for a long time, so it isn't the case that this is just an "unnoted redirect"), and hence it is completely unclear why you should claim that the history of ethnography of Europe should be off topic. This wouldn't be a big deal normally, but in the context of the 3288:

article is being edited into mainspace, based on discussion in mediation. It should be completed sometime on 4/1/2010. I am posting this notice to mediation participants in the hopes that those who have not contributed recently to the mediation will come back to review and comment on the draft, and

2981:

2. What is 'intelligence'? IQ may well predict societal success in Western cultures, but is it a validated measure of cognitive abilities? Probably not. As it is possible to improve an IQ score with training, it's not a stable measure of 'intelligence'. Can intelligence researchers continue to use IQ

2903:

central point of this article, and all of my comments have been written with that in mind. I have not considered the topic to be "race and intelligence as a field of study". Perhaps this has been one of the primary sources of unnecessary confusion. If so, you're right to point it out, and you're also

2818:

I have welcomed the assitance of the two more expierenced mediators for the RI case. I hope all is well with the situation and I am sorry if it appeared as me misguiding you about my expierence - please accept my apology if you think of it that way. I am sure with the help of the others, this process

1733:

I hope you don't mind my asking, I really appreciate the help. Ask me if you are unsure of the research but otherwise i trust your judgement especially here, a topic bridging the life sciences and the human sciences, and the challenge of writing about technical research for a general audience. Best,

914:

Many words that are considered neologisms may have a very small number of search results on the web. If the word was actually a word, it would have been in dictionaries; encyclopedias; scholarly works; and it would have had at least 1,000 results on a web search engine. In addition, the "Afro-Polish"

775:

would suggest that you are wring in calling this uncivil, and recently you have been bandying about accusations. Also, tag teaming isn't on your 0RR - so I see no problem with Ramdrake's action. Making changes as smaller edits would have been much more helpful, especially when moving sections as that

665:

Hi, it's a really offensive site. I have come across it several times before in google searches and did not know what to make of it, these people like to behave as if they know what they are they are talking about and at first I was just confused. A couple of months ago I came across Robert Lindsay's

373:

issue indefinite blocks on longterm editors in that kind of manner. Heck, even with anon vandals, we tend to at least give them a warning before blocking. If MastCell would have placed a few warnings on Jagz's talkpage and made it clear that a block was in Jagz's future if he didn't straighten out,

2985:

3. What does 'heritable' mean? Hereditarians in the race and intelligence debate argue that heredity = genetic inheritance, but accents are highly heritable and there's probably also a degree of heritability in whether you to go university or not, but the genetic contribution to this heritability is

2540:

but socks and IPs constantly and relentlessly insert the same old sock edits into the same old articles. Becker-Weidman is neither notable nor a suitable source. Neither in fact is DDP particularly notable either. After the sock army was banned this article was rewritten from what sources there were

1837:

Well, we need to be able to cite sources. If the article I found had said "... a small number of chefs feel this way ~ as opposed to ...", that would be at least a little better. I would be delighted to see an article that said something a bit more expanded. I don't blame you for believing firmly

1755:

Listen, some of us have come up with suggested language to replace the existing lead paragraph at the "controversy" article that we feel presents the issue more honestly/accurately and opens up the article for development in a new, more informative and comprehensive direction. If you have a moment,

1462:

OR. If the only thing the episode contributes to the continuity of the story is the factoid that Buttters gets called "gay", then we're in sorry shape. Why doesn't this contribute anything in any other way? About there being Goth students in the school? About the lack of proper teaching abilities of

395:

Elonka, if you take a look at Jagz' history and that of his talk page, you will see that he was incessantly revert-warring and was indeed warned several times for it. I am unsure as to why he didn't get more blocks for his revert-warring, but that's how it happened. If you look at his contributions,

341:

That's why to me, an admin injecting themselves in such a contrversy without trying to understand the content part of the dispute (or even at least the history of the dispute) can lead to erratic results. In both of the cases I witnessed, there was considerable wiki-drama generated, and considerable

307:

I've been wandering around looking at some of the disputes that keep cropping up, particularly in the medical science areas and I came up with some more questions. In my past experience with disputes where editors kept trying to give undue weight to material, it seems like other editors were able to

235:

I noticed you made a suggestion about how to handle problematic editors (the sort that try to push junk into articles) and while I'm not sure that the Knowledge community is ready to approve something like Subject Matter Experts, I think I may be getting a better idea of what you're concerned with.

2857:

I already posted it on the page itself, but I wanted to inform you that you should respond to others' statements next to your own statement. This centralization of viewpoints allows the mediators to see where each person stands rather than having to dig through a long debate to find what people are

2376:

Coming back here has only served to reinforce my feelings of the beginning of the year. There's no support for hard working established editors, when it comes to controversial articles we're just hung out to dry and the larger so called "community" buries their heads in the sand and offers us up as

2369:

I don't know if this response was supposed to be some sort of filibuster, or really was borne of ignorance, but either way it hardly seems worth my while to contribute. There's no real support for editors who want to improve articles like this, and people like Occam and Arya seem to split the world

2360:

The thing is Ramdrake that the rewards don't justify the effort. I made a huge effort to change a single sentence. That sentence was badly written, confusing and didn't come close to saying the same thing as the sources. I'd have thought it was in everyone's interests to change it to something more

1948:

Hi. The IP editor has a long history of POV edits that seem to be pushing a racist agenda. The editor's latest project is adding Racism and Black supremacy categories to BLPs because of rap lyrics. I don't know what the right forum is, but I agree that we should bring the IP editor to the attention

1255:

The whole section conflates the results for "ethnic origin" and "ethnic and cultural identity". The questions asked are different. In particular, the "ethnic and cultural identity" question goes to great lengths to emphasize that the identity can be different from that of one's ancestors. Including

1152:

I so disappointed with the direction the page has taken, it's like some Charest radicals have taken it over, and are attempting to rewrite history, any talk of nationalism has been relegated to a mere footnote. SADNESS. I have no time to jump back into the debate, unfortunately, or fortunately, the

973:

That has been my standing there has been a consensus for inclusion of the gallery the consensus would have to be for removal not inclusion but i get harrassed for doing the right thing(see my talk page) like im a bad faith editor in this article and to top it off im down on previous record as being

120:

There is a limit to the abuse of the consensus policy: a single user cannot fight common sense, verifiable facts, reliable sources, and generally more knowledgeable users (on a given subject at least) anyway he pleases, don't you think? This is very tiring for all of us, and not to the advantage of

2366:

When observations about substantive problems with a very tiny part of the article can be derailed like this, then there is a fundamental problem here. I would have thought that it was in everyone's interests, whatever one's point of view, that the sentence in question was clearly written, accurate

571:

I see that your edits are not always appreciated. An edit such as I made to the beheading article is perfectly acceptable, considering that the info is obvious to the millions upon millions of people who have seen the beheading videos. I never once said that it is the common practice of Muslims to

2624:

Actually, that one should have been a 24 - I default to 31h on 3RR reports and did it on this one even though it wasn't necessary, as the report was somewhat stale. Yes, the reason behind 31h is to push the block past the user's next window of editing assuming that they edit at the same times of

1721:

I am asking you to do this over the next week or two. You could spend a whole weekend working on it. My hope is that if you just spend a little time on this every day or every few days until you feel good about it, you can spread the work over a couple of weeks and it will not be too difficult.

1347:

attempts at sabotaging this article, I can only assume for political reasons beyond my horizon, I strongly urge you to remove your warning template in the interest of further unproductive escalation of this non-dispute (I would like to call it a dispute, but the article's "detractors" have so far

337:

In my experience (editing the Race & Intelligence article and others related to it), I've encountered a few POV-pushers, but most lately and prominently people like Jagz, who wouldn't even be satisfied with an RfC on the question, and kept putting the same question to FTN and NPOVN (about the

2993:

5. The fact that the bulk of the hereditarians are funded by the Pioneer Fund is a central issue for writing the article. They are a small but vocal minority, and the background of the Pioneer Fund in eugenics and segregation is widely seen to at least partly discredit research that is funded by

2573:

I don't see any reason, grounded in generally policy or practice here, that would preclude adding these references. In addition, the "objections" don't seem to have any basis in policy or practice either, and it appears that the way things work here is that actions should be guided by policy and

1821:

Ramdrake, may I request that when asked for sources that you may or may not have readily available, but that you have quoted ~ you reveal straight away whether you have it or need help finding it. We are all in this together. Let's not waste each other's time, yeah? Thanks for working with me.

1496:

But you've got to realize that not every single detail has some kind of hidden meaning? What is, for example, the difference between the children playing Call of Duty: World at War (say, Endwar) versus any other type of violent military computer-based game? What is the difference between Butters

1269:

in French as a group she called "French New World" ancestry. Naturally, this depended entirely on the language of the interview, and was just a device to handle the fact that "Canadian" is meaningless, and you have to make sense of the data somehow. Soulscanner read into this that she was saying

751:

The best way to proceed here, is to ensure that the essay reflects consensus. This doesn't mean "Okay, we have a consensus, and now anyone else who wants to change the essay needs to get permission first." Instead, it means trying to edit the essay so that everyone's view is presented. If you

2907:

I guess this has to be clarified before anything else is discussed. But, even if we decide to write about the mainstream scientific view on race in general and any connection with any differences intelligence in particular, in my view there will remain a need for an article which deals with the

1928:

Thanks so much for your input on this article! It still needs lots of work, and attention from someone more expert than myself, so if you end up with any free time and have a masochistic side, feel free to contribute further. When I put a note on Guesttarda's page asking for advice I knew other

1391:

Thanks for the offer. If those articles are an area of interest for you - feel free, but as I reviewed the previous seasons it does appear that the articles tend to shape up into decent articles over time. I just may have begun too aggressive attempt to clean up too soon to actually accomplish

2363:

My complaint about the sentence is still relevant and still outstanding, but what's the point when substantive issues become bogged down with irrelevant issues regarding the beliefs of editors. I am wholly uninterested in what Arya and Occam believe, but was bombarded with their beliefs about

1064:

Ramdrake, if I ask really really nicely, would you be willing to remove Jagz's talkpage from your watchlist? Or at least, refrain from posting there for awhile? You do have a point about what Jagz was doing, but it's probably best if administrators handle things for now. Lots of admins are

450:

have done, was to post to Jagz's page with a message such as, "Jagz, I am concerned about your recent edits, I'm not seeing you move on from the dispute. Please, I encourage you to get involved in other constructive pursuits on Knowledge, otherwise it might be necessary to block your account

2421:

Well, that's the closest I could come to it. Considering the article, it very definitely was in very bad taste and I interpreted it as some sort of deliberate provocation, therefore I called it "vandalism" for lack of a better word. I would certainly understand if you disagreed. However, the

2604:

I don't see why the book is "rejected." What is the policy and practice basis for that? It is a legitimate book published by a legitimate publisher that describes this treatment approach. The attack on me is unfounded and reminds me of what happens at times when I go through security at

2989:

4. Science isn't done by petition or survey. The 1980s survey of opinions in the field is so out of date that it holds no contemporary value anyway. The list of signatories to 'Mainstream science on Intelligence' is a tiny snap-shot of opinion post-Bell Curve, selected by one of the main

1284:

is an ethnic term on the basis of this survey looks ridiculous when the data for "Canadian" are presented alongside. He will oppose this as an irrelevant comparison, but the fact that they are covered together by the survey report is justification that the comparison is not original

365:

Hiya, just a point of clarification about why I got involved with the Jagz situation at all. It wasn't that he was polite (it was clear that he was being repeatedly uncivil), it was that he was blocked, indefinitely, without warning, and blocked as though he was a common troll and

2637:

Ssh, you'll give it away! :) Actually, it's most useful on blatant vandalism coming from educational institutions and shared IP addresses such as internet cafes, as it stops the user just coming back the next morning and starting again - which is why it's on the drop-down list at

1413:" by putting the two facts together. As for Butters being referred to as gay - it's part of what this episode contributes as far as continuity goes. Please don't mutilate articles just for the sake of following rules - eventually, WP is there for the reader and not for the editor. 2769:

that lists you as a party. Please indicate your acceptance of the mediation process on my talk page and on the case page so we can move quickly towards discussion and resolution of the dispute. The proceedings cannot start unless ALL parties agree to accept the mediation process.

2316:"Many claims of contemporary hereditarians have been critiqued and debunked in books such as Measured Lies, 48 Inequality by Design, 41 Whitewashing Race, 49 and Intelligence and How to Get It. 50 These books describe mistakes of fact, method and logic made by the hereditarians." 1782:? Its a blog entry, but links to a reviewed paper." The blog is indeed interesting and the article looks valuable. Perhaps it can be insered into the article on race or racism. I have to focus on my own rwork right now and pass this on to you for your consideration. 170:

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader,

1089:... for bringing the discussion to a close on Elonka's page. I have to admit that I did not seriously entertain the possibility that any other administrator would have been willing to act as Jagz's mentor. Perhaps Elonka will think twice next time before writing 2692: 2469:

in asking you this question. The reports of the number of floors in Place Ville-Marie vary from 43 to 46. Do you, with your Montreal expertise, know the actual number of floors in this structure, or could you possibly visit this building to find out? Thanks,

2977:

1. What is 'race'? There's consensus among biologists and geneticists that the traditional folk concept of race doesn't match biological reality, so can intelligence researchers legitimately continue to lump human populations into these categories? Probably

2529:. One of the main purposes of the sockpuppets was to promote DDP as an evidence based therapy and the works of Becker-Weidman. This was inserted into well over 20 articles and maintained there by the socks. Attachment therapists real world "enemies" are 1481:

have I suggested the "sin of synth" by expressing this opinion. There's nothing wrong in putting these two together and letting the reader do their own "2+2" as far as the meaning of this goes. It's a valid point, why are you being stubborn for nothing?

1238:

Hi Ramdrake, thanks for taking the time to clean up the census section. I'm not going to have time to work on it immediately, but I will in the coming days. I think with both of us paying attention we should be able to make it less ridiculously biased.

1404:

The definition of fancruft is loose and can't be applied here, as both "trivia" facts are closely related to the article. Similar happenings at the beginning and the end of the episode is an indication of writing style - notice that I'm not committing

810:, where you're trying to force through your own changes, and reverting other people and insisting that their edits are not allowed unless they get permission first. You seem to be very confused on the concept of how consensus is defined. Please read 166:

Hi, Ramdrake I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Knowledge. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

3014:

8. There seems to be a bias in the presentation of the article: the hereditarian view is presented first then the opposing view afterwards, which makes it seem as though the hereditarian opinion is the consensus and the opposing view is the minority

1705:

I have just written the section on physical anthropology and the evolution of culture. It is hard for me to keep things focused on "culture" rather than talking about "anthropology," especially while there are serious debates among anthropologists.

2367:

and precise. But instead of accepting the challenge and cooperating with me on trying to re-write it, all I got was a barrage of irrelevant posts that added nothing to the discussion. Indeed my salient points were never addressed during these posts.

1243: 2045:. While I agree that the previous editor shouldn't have moved the page without discussion, you appear to have spelled the new article name incorrectly. Also, you might like to contribute to the discussion on the article name on the talk page. 2195:

I looked through my refs (a list I compiled quite a while ago, and it turns out most of them have been incorporated in the article since. However, a friend of mine also came up with this short list, which would support the point quite well:

1573:

on January 18, 2009. There is currently a discussion going on in the article's talk page. The user who made the move is now considering moving it back. We just need a few others to support this revert. Feel free to drop by and visit. ;-)

1976:

Hey, Ramdrake - No problem with changes. I didn't check the source, only that there was no edit summary to indicate why the change had been made. I think those methods may have been more common a few years ago, but the reversion is fine.

2379:

I used to get a lot of pleasure from editing here, but now there is little pleasure for far too much effort. I can't help bu feel there is no "community" here any more, onyl a collection of individuals looking after themselves.

378:

feel if you got into a dispute somewhere, a few editors started calling you a troll, and then suddenly an administrator blocked you indefinitely, without a single warning to your talkpage? You might have been a bit testy too.

1657: 954:? I see no reason why examples cannot be given in relevent places in the article and no consensus has been gained against these additions as only one editor reverted them and no one other than me has used the talk page. 182:

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You,

1279:

The report I've linked to above studies "Canadian", "Québécois", "Acadian" and "Newfoundlander" ethnic/cultural identities together, calling them regionally-based. I think any argument made by Soulscanner that somehow

1858:

You removed the section with no consensus nor close to it. In the talk page, there are as many people who want such a section as against it. The section will be added due to lack of any semblance of an agreement.

436:

In other words, there was no other warning of, "Stop this or you're going to be blocked." Instead, MastCell jumped from a topic ban and "You've done good work" to "I am blocking you indefinitely for trolling and

1294:

The bigger picture in all this, though, is that Soulscanner is attempting an impermissible synthesis of facts to argue that "Québécois" is an ethnic term. His overall argument cannot be attributed to any source.

3290: 974:

in favor of removal of the gallery and having no images but we have one editor who is into art and wants to replace one demon(phtoto gallery) with another a cartoon/art gallery(which would lead to sterotype)--

2524:

This article, the article on attachment therapy and all the attachment related articles were owned and run for over a year by a sockpuppet army called the "DPeterson entity", found by arbcom to be this chap

3251: 2211: 413:

On June 3, MastCell posted to Jagz's talkpage, announcing the 6-month topic ban and related ANI thread. MastCell also said, ""You've done good work elsewhere on Knowledge, and hopefully that will resume."

2488:

Place Ville-Marie has a total of 47 floors, the last three being devoted to the Altitude 737 restaurant complex. The last floor actually rotates upon itself on top of the building itself. Hope it helps.--

2574:

practice...so if there are not objections grounded in policy and practice, it would seem adding the references would be a good thing as adding them is consistent with the verifiable policy and practice.

1886:

You need not credit me. :) Nearly everything on my page I stole from someplace else. Remember, this is wikipedia, which is dripping with free content. Plagiarism R Us! And now you've got me humming that

1274:

was an ethnic term in French but not in English. Elsewhere on the internet it's probably possible to find sources correlating a response of "Canadian" ethnic origin with both British and French ancestry.

422:

On June 13, 03:35, Jehochman posted a question about whether Jagz was really retired or not, and gave him a caution about his message to Cailil's talkpage, saying basically to save comments for the RfA

2227:

Sorry for the delay: I'm at the hospital most days of every week lately (ESRD and associated issues - not pleasant), so I have rather little time to myself and can't answer as swiftly as I'd like.--

1908:

At one time I was thinking of displaying a washing machine which wouldn't run its final cycle, hence "entering the no-spin-dry zone", but I thought to be at once too complicated and too obscure. :)

2080:

Hi - I don't doubt that your percentages are correct, but I wonder if listing them is OR since the source doesn't list them? I think those numbers used to be there, so no big deal, just wondering?

1709:

Also, I have just had my head in journal articles and what I have produced is not well-written. Long quotes that should be paraphrased, areas that need more expanation, the organization sucks.

685:

saw fit to interview him. At least they didn't pretend he was an expert though. Still he's not the first artist to write racist nonsense and get a lot of attention for it, and we all know where

681:

article came as a shock, this Malloy bloke seems to be getting a lot of attention for talking a lot of hot air on the internet about a subject he knows nothing about. I don't understand why the

510: 496: 1026:

Thanks for the input, I've added a summary of the warnings recently given to this editor, could you comment on the talkpage on if you think these were unclear or not strongly-worded enough?

2793: 2674: 859: 1511:

The mention of Twilight in the episode is not a sufficiently reliable source? I don't see how this can be the case. I also don't see how "Clammato" isn't obviously a parody of "Clamato".

3106:

be changed from one featuring Canada's Governor General to one featuring Canada's Prime Minister. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at

1319:, this is getting surreal. We generally have "history" sections in articles on any topic whatsoever, discussing the historical development of the topic. Of course, if we had an article 2287: 1348:

failed to build any sort of verifiable case. Just as your placing an "off topic" template without any explanation why the section should be off topic isn't particularly helpful). --

669:

It's a bunch of racists trying to convince the world that science supports their beliefs. Then I forgot about it, it was only when I actually looked at the PDF version of Malloy's

2766: 419:

On June 6, I posted to Jagz's page about communication, and how I urged him to wipe the slate clean and move forward, but let me know if he had any concerns and I'd take a look.

818:

you to create an essay that incorporates everyone's point of view. That's what consensus is, not some kind of majority rules atmosphere. So please, stop with the reverts. --

550:

be fair and describe the reasons that flat earthers have given to support their minority viewpoint. We cannot simply suppress their arguments. Please join the discussion at

2974:

Hi, I've not had the time to contribute to the R&I mediation, so I'm just going to scribble my general thoughts about the article here to check we're on the same page.

898: 522: 2134: 1045:

The original research needs to come out. I will revert back one time, but I will not edit war over this. In the two paragraphs I deleted there was nothing worth saving.--

880: 1971: 1795: 1516: 2708: 1158: 2837:

I appreciate your willingness to continue the process. Long disputes always leave deep rifts, but I am sure that a panel of 3 Mediator Musketeers can resolve it :)

2899:

This might well be one of the most sensible comments I've seen on that page thus far. I have always assumed that the "environmentalism vs. hereditarian debate" is

2169: 1069:

see something that we miss, you are welcome to bring it to an admin's talkpage (such as myself or MastCell) so that we can address it. Would that work for you? --

2294: 3310:) on his talk page. Whatever your opinion of the draft itself, I think he deserves thanks for putting a lot of time and effort into making the revisions. -- 2164: 1811: 2190: 1986: 1246: 518: 1422: 3107: 2236: 1950: 1265:

is an ethnic term in a way "Canadian" isn't, when really he was basing things on a footnote somewhere saying that the author would aggregate the response

2606: 2575: 1450: 1436: 1428: 922: 527: 1730:

It is part of a much larger article but i am asking you to look only at this section (I feel better about the others, this is the one that need help!!)

1540: 791: 2680: 1768: 1915: 586: 1747: 1506: 1491: 1472: 1392:

anything. However, if the IP's start to attempt to use the talk page to pretend some type of consensus exists for fancruft, I will let you know! --

563: 3034: 2542: 514: 2069: 1520: 3000:

6. There is no evidence for any specific genetic difference that can explain a difference in cognitive ability between any two human populations.

2614: 2583: 2648: 2598: 2140: 1615: 351: 316: 290: 124:

Also, on a related "case", I personally feel we (common sense people who know at least some about Quebec) have failed to support the actions of

2666: 2449: 2431: 2144: 1627: 410:

Actually, I did look at his talkpage history, quite closely. And yes, I looked for deleted messages. But the history of the block was this:

262: 3177: 2568: 2554: 2497: 3019: 2879:

However, re-reading Varoon Arya's comment, I'm thinking fo something else we should probably discuss and agree on: is the article about the

2752: 2126: 2108: 1757: 1012: 244: 3319: 3121: 2269: 989:

Ramdrake, I'm not going to bother templating you, but I would point out that it appears you're now at 4 reverts in a 24-hour period at the

1847: 1317: 853: 465: 405: 1035: 630: 506: 2846: 1458:. Please supply a third-party reference that says this in relation to South Park episodes. Until you do, according to ur policies, this 766: 717: 2517: 2089: 1966: 1938: 536: 3099: 1586: 389: 226: 3279: 3088: 3010: 1752:

Heya, Ramdrake. :) Happy New Year! I hope 2009 is going along swimmingly for you so far -- and, if so, that the trend continues.

1228: 1214: 1188: 425:

Five hours later, 08:28, MastCell blocked Jagz indefinitely, accusing him of trolling, vandalism, and longterm tendentious editing.

3131: 2982:

as a catch-all comparator when it is known that it favours modern abstract thinking found in industrialised society? Probably not.

1715:

I am not asking you to do any research (and if i wrote anything that doesn't make sense to you ask me and i will try to clarify).

1357: 934: 211: 2945: 905:

The fact that this search engine only gave 127 results (many of which are blogs) further supports that this term is a neologism.

156: 3219: 2545:. FT2 followed up the new socks and IPs for a while. Now it's MastCell. You can see where I have reported them on his talkpage. 2054: 3274: 3239: 1380: 3168:

Hope all's well Jean. If you're sick, then turn off your watch page for a while. You've already made great contributions.

2512: 2482: 2241: 963: 3060: 1162: 3103: 3083: 2923: 2075: 1902: 1532: 1512: 1018: 983: 752:

disagree with something that I've added, then add more information yourself! The strongest essay will be one that reflects

479: 2631: 1398: 192: 3152: 2968: 2389: 2009: 1961: 1912: 1899: 1154: 1054: 197: 2990:

hereditarian proponents and somewhat akin to the 'Scientific dissent from Darwinism' or 'Scholars for 9/11 Truth' lists.

1831: 3212: 3162: 2909: 2828: 2518: 2207: 1304: 1193: 1167: 930: 785: 624: 93:

which is nothing short of vandalism from where I stand. What should we do about it? Should we start by filling a solid

2870: 2782: 1205:

is exclusionary so long as "or" is included. Are you sure you object to "specifically" in the form "or specifically"?

539:, I wasn't talking about preponderance. I was talking about the suppression of a minority viewpoint on false grounds. 491: 2530: 1921: 1610: 667: 2997:

Treating Rushton or Lynn as normal researchers obscures the reality that they head a highly controversial institute.

2415: 2027: 1868: 132:

page problem this past March, especially his patient work on demonstrating "the fundamentally territorial nature of

3307: 1790: 1742: 1561: 729: 677:

and my suspicions were aroused. I then spent some time trying to find Robert Lindsey's blog about the website. The

2808: 2246:

I brought this up on the talkpage, Ramdrake. Since you're feeling revert happy, perhaps you'd care to explain why

1605: 1142: 1124: 1102: 655: 2422:

Babelfish translation of the German caption only mentions "fur coats" not cats, and even less so domestic cats.--

1943: 1669: 1410: 1079: 3141: 3136: 3008: 3003:

7. Evidence looking at African-Americans shows no sign that those with more European ancestry have higher IQs.

2940: 2928: 2747: 2726: 2684: 2563: 2549: 2374:

who had made the suggestion, I don't think they even bothered to respond to the actual substance of my problem.

1309: 828: 745: 605: 482:

which had made several inappropriate edits a few hours ago, so that's why I automatically called it vandalism.

202:

I think diffs would be helpful. I can't find this type of involvement by Elonka in the article you mention. --

2731: 2533:. This latter article was created by the socks as an attack article. The whole lot were indef. banned back in 1779: 800: 1000: 998: 996: 994: 698: 2834:

Haha, I actually have alot of expierence with policy debates (to say the least). I actually go to them alot!

2324: 1646: 1362: 1290:

The census itself includes a question about ethnic origin, with only 150,000 or so responses of "Québécois."

140:. Unfortunately, he has been away from Knowledge for a while and I do not know when he will come back. (His 3040: 3029: 1623: 1076: 1009: 825: 763: 742: 462: 386: 84: 76: 64: 59: 3188:

Hello active member of WikiProject Cats! There is currently going to be a discussion about whether or not

1689: 3245: 2625:

day. In this case, I don't think it matters much though, as the edit-warring party hasn't edited since.

1487: 1446: 1418: 886: 777: 616: 367: 1441:

You're (deliberately?) ignoring my points again, which only proves me right on these particular issues.

416:

There was some other (non-admin) chatter around them, including a barnstar awarded to Jagz from Plusdown

3235: 894: 887: 369:

But he was a longterm editor with an FA to his name. Even if he really was pushing a POV, we still do

176: 102: 38: 89:

I find Soulscanner has gone way over board, especially his most irrational (cynical even) behavior at

3065: 2457: 1922: 1702:

i have been avoiding edit wars and cranks by rewriting the formerly attrocious article on "Culture."

1393: 3183: 2950: 2605:

airports...just because I look like someone doesn't mean I am them or subscribe to their ideology!

2277: 2050: 1726: 1566: 1536: 959: 610: 2688: 478:

Thanks for the heads up on the vandalism notice. The IP editor that I reverted is the same one as

3196: 3021: 1955: 1619: 551: 1456:

Similar happenings at the beginning and the end of the episode is an indication of writing style

3207: 3159: 2813: 2610: 2579: 2465:

I see on your user page that you live in Montreal. I am going to assume that you have heard of

2403: 2032: 2024: 1991: 1816: 1787: 1739: 1483: 1442: 1432: 1414: 1336: 1324: 1310: 1233: 1139: 1121: 968: 926: 802:

You're simply removing information that I'm adding, and you're using a false edit summary. At

673:

comment piece that I noticed that it stated that this article had originally been published on

161: 90: 1463:

their professor? The fact that Butters gets called "gay" for the nth time is in fact trivia.--

136:(in French). In June, I found excellent sources by accident which I pointed out to him on his 3285: 3231: 2956: 2919: 2852: 2760: 2740: 2619: 2334: 2265: 2171: 1933: 1800:

There may be growing pc consensus, but a quick check of biology shows that it's simply spin.

1764: 2887:

that it ouccurs betweeen psychometricians and behavioral geneticists mainly, or is it about

2344: 1996:

Hello! You might be inrerested in tha fact that some users are trying to re-add pictures to

1427:

I've been trying to scrub the articles of OR, speculation, trivia too, all help is welcome!

3301: 2662: 2643: 2626: 2594: 2493: 2445: 2427: 2411: 2232: 2186: 2160: 2104: 2065: 1665: 1528: 1502: 1468: 1147: 1050: 1040: 1031: 979: 945: 918: 876: 849: 840: 487: 401: 347: 286: 137: 101:

process right away, patiently walking our way up the ladder until the naming conflict over

3289:

help discuss any revisions that need to be made. You may make any reviews or comments at

2995: 1718:

But i am asking you to go over it and edit it - revise for clarity, reorganize, whatever.

8: 3224: 2508: 2478: 2046: 1881: 1637:

Hey Ramdrake, good to see you back. Please see my talk page for a response to your post.

1582: 1376: 1353: 1176: 955: 915:

article on the Polish Knowledge was deleted because they agreed it is not a valid term.

811: 188: 152: 3311: 3266: 3193: 3117: 3004: 2349: 2215: 2178: 2122: 2085: 2038: 2005: 1982: 1909: 1896: 1864: 1332: 1328: 1320: 803: 582: 529: 502: 47: 17: 3252:

Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-11-12/Race_and_Intelligence#Proposed_outline

1525:

Just to point out Ramdrake, if something is trivial then it is trivia by definition.

3202: 3155: 3079: 2787: 2466: 2020: 1853: 1843: 1827: 1783: 1735: 1601: 1135: 1117: 1098: 1020: 653: 559: 473: 310: 238: 98: 3045:

Clearly that user is not listening and is ignoring our warnings. I've reported him.

2223: 3146: 2964: 2913: 2866: 2842: 2824: 2804: 2778: 2704: 2385: 2259: 2148: 1930: 1760: 1642: 1591: 1386: 1300: 1224: 1210: 1184: 1084: 1073: 1006: 822: 760: 739: 713: 694: 635: 601: 459: 383: 258: 172: 2955:

This is a notice to inform all parties in the MedCabal case involving the article

2891:, in which case my comment just above stands: we need to involve all other fields 1153:

endless useless attempts at compromise only served to create non-truths, sigh...--

3297: 3173: 3053: 2441: 2407: 2394: 2255: 2182: 2156: 2042: 1699:

I would like to ask a favor of you. it is a big favor but it means a lot to me.

1661: 1570: 1406: 1059: 1046: 1027: 975: 708:

the clever "race". One might almost conclude that they are biased in some way!!!

483: 1929:

editors would see it; you're one of the people I was hoping might drop in : )

1065:

watching his page now, so action from you is probably not required. And if you

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2933: 2504: 2474: 2251: 2219: 1803: 1578: 1372: 1349: 1195: 1169: 723: 591: 222: 207: 184: 148: 113:, however it would really really help to have the guidance and assistance of a 110: 106: 3133: 3112: 2937: 2744: 2723: 2658: 2639: 2590: 2560: 2546: 2526: 2489: 2423: 2228: 2118: 2100: 2081: 2061: 2014: 2001: 1978: 1860: 1686: 1498: 1464: 1113: 872: 845: 807: 772: 578: 397: 343: 282: 94: 2792:

The mediation case has now opened. Please post your Opening Statement here:

2589:

I replied on that article's talk page. Please keep the conversation there.--

2096: 1873: 1759:

and let us know your questions, comments/critique, and vote. Thanks much.

704:

PS, it's funny how they always manage to "discover" that "white" people are

640:

Thanks for fixing my links at the deletion of Tag Teams, much appreciated.--

3126: 3075: 2247: 1997: 1839: 1823: 1773: 1694: 1674: 1651: 1597: 1094: 990: 951: 660: 641: 555: 3018:

9. An interesting tangent: smarter British kids become anti-racist adults.

1712:

I am too close to this and need a break but it still needs a lot of work.

666:

blog about gene expression and it confirmed my suspicions about this site.

277:

For the record, Shell, that's exactly my concern. It's a matter of trying

3189: 3071: 2960: 2862: 2838: 2820: 2800: 2774: 2713: 2700: 2381: 2301: 1892: 1638: 1632: 1477:

This is the justification behind me adding this to the article - nowhere

1296: 1251:

Here is what I remember from the last time I looked at things in detail:

1220: 1206: 1180: 1129: 1107: 1070: 1003: 819: 757: 736: 709: 690: 597: 456: 380: 254: 125: 1656:

As a courtesy, I need to let you know that I've brought your name up at

615:

Those articles are much more interesting than the ones you linked to :D

3169: 3046: 2719: 2145:

WP:AN3#User:Captain Occam reported by Wapondaponda (talk) (Result: 24h)

2117:

Thanks. Makes sense. You sure know those rules (and how to find them)!

1888: 543: 2440:

OK, I'll ask the editor if they're sure that is what the image shows.

141: 2794:

Knowledge talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-11-12/Race and Intelligence

2691:

for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the

218: 203: 129: 2657:

Thanks for the explanation. And your secret's safe with me... ;-) --

2286:

National Human Genome Center observations about "race" and genetics

374:

I probably would not have spoken up. But think about it, how would

97:

on his behaviour? Or should we ignore it and just initiate the long

2354: 2293:

American Association of Physical Anthropologists statement on the "

2155:. It does not have to take the article back to a previous version. 799:

Ramdrake, this edit, though not labeled as a revert, obviously was.

1261:

The section goes into detail, on rather flimsy grounds, about how

446:

It was a bad block, and that was why I complained. What MastCell

2143:. Please note that a warning to you is included in the result of 1134:

Thanks, that was odd. I think I fixed it, can you double-check?

2908:

environmental vs. hereditarian debate in some depth, similar to

1878:

Thanks - the whole thing is bizarre. 16:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

950:

Can you please explain why you reverted my edits on the article

179:. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected! 497:

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: citequote reverted

3094: 864:

The claim in the section that the rise in IQ is "worldwide" -

2675:

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

2019:

Glad you are alive, hope you are well. Let's catch up soon.

860:

See the discussion page at the IQ article - re your revisions

771:

Funny - that sounds a bit like an accusation of tag teaming.

1681: 121:

Knowledge and its goal which is the diffusion of knowledge.

3108:

Talk:Canada – United States relations#Proposed image change

2335:

Changing the paradigm from 'race' to human genome variation

1596:

Thank you Ramdrake, for defending my talkpage, from Mr IP.

3293:, and we will discuss any revisions that need to be made. 2695:. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. 1367: 1327:, "History of European ethnography" would be a section at 2395: 2153:"any action which reverses the actions of other editors" 1679:

I think you posted your suggestion under the wrong case

1331:. As far as I can see, it is completely undisputed that 871:

And it is, indeed occuring in most parts of the world.--

735:

things, but just doing wholescale reverts is uncivil. --

542:

Although less than 200 people alive today believe in a

2743:. I can't think of anybody off hand. I'll ask around. 2765:Hello! My name is Reubzz and I have opened up this 2718:Yeah he never stops. Did you note his sock edit on 253:was the entire problem with the whole Jagz affair. 2258:issues cannot be addressed immediately. Thanks, -- 1972:PETA - treatment of animals in some rural shelters 3074:hasn't edited WP for about 5 days now. Very odd. 2895:with psychometricians and behavioral geneticists. 2135:You've been mentioned in the result of a 3RR case 756:our points of view, not just one or the other. -- 728:Ramdrake, please do not revert good faith edits. 281:to throw the baby out with the bath water. :) -- 838:. I did, however, remove bits that I felt were 3102:, it has been proposed that the lead image at 144:is dated May 27, 2008.) C'est à suivre... :-) 1256:the original questions would be useful here. 2889:"race and intelligence as a field of study" 1371:Wishing you the very best for the season. 507:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 105:is truly over? I am confident I can remain 2739:Wow. Looks like a complete minefield over 1411:let the reader draw their own conclusions 3070:Do you have any idea what is happening? 1778:KC passed this on to me: "have you seen 1366: 117:, whether you or anyone you recommend. 14: 2881:"environmental vs hereditarian debate" 2300:American Anthropological Association " 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3296:I'd also ask you to leave a note for 3100:Talk:Canada – United States relations 3258: 3007:has presented the evidence for this. 2099:. It's just a routine calculation.-- 501:I have reverted your removal of the 115:Experienced & Established Editor 25: 2139:Hello Ramdrake. I saw your comment 2060:Thanks for the heads up. Will do.-- 175:. Survey questions can be found at 23: 3250:there 's a draft of an outline at 2819:can proceed on its path smoothly. 2679:As you participated in the recent 2519:Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy 24: 3330: 2531:Advocates for Children in Therapy 3280:Race and intelligence, new draft 3259: 3199:. Your opinion would be valued. 3104:Canada – United States relations 3093: 3089:Canada – United States relations 2693:SecurePoll feedback and workshop 2345:Council for Responsible Genetics 1680: 1577:Bonne année 2009 en passant! -- 1242:Here are some sources: a report 29: 2883:, in which case VA is actually 2698:For the Arbitration Committee, 2288:Template:Race and Genetics NHGC 1748:The Egyptian "race" controversy 1245:, the original questionnaire: 1112:I just made three proposals at 3229:What business of yours is it? 2910:Creation–evolution controversy 2177:Can you provide an update for 1796:"Race" as a "Social Construct" 1660:as a possible sock puppeteer. 1013:21:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 984:20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 964:15:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 935:21:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 881:12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 13: 1: 3257:sorry for the bulk message. 3142:22:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 3122:16:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 3098:In response to discussion at 3084:13:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 3061:21:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 3035:19:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 2969:02:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 2946:20:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 2924:19:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2871:01:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 2847:01:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC) 2829:01:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC) 2809:20:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 2783:14:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 2753:21:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC) 2732:19:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC) 2709:08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 2242:Snyderman and Rothman (study) 1848:00:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1832:00:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1812:00:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 1791:00:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 1521:04:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 1507:13:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1492:13:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1473:13:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1451:12:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1437:12:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1423:09:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 1399:15:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 1381:01:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1358:18:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 1305:15:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 1229:15:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 1215:13:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 1189:12:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 1143:16:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 854:19:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 844:, as the edit summary said.-- 829:18:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 792:06:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 767:03:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 746:23:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 3240:03:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 3220:22:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 3178:21:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 3163:14:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 2667:21:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC) 2649:21:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC) 2632:21:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC) 2615:01:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC) 2599:20:56, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 2584:20:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 2569:19:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 2555:19:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 2541:though. The best summary is 2513:01:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2498:23:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 2483:22:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 2450:20:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 2432:20:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 2416:20:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 2390:06:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 2325:RACE, GENES AND INTELLIGENCE 2270:16:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 2237:00:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 2191:00:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 2165:14:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 2127:19:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 2109:16:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 2090:16:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 2076:PETA - percentage euthanasia 2070:21:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 2055:21:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 1769:18:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 1743:03:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 1690:23:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 1670:19:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 1647:22:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1628:22:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1606:20:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 1587:22:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 1163:07:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 1125:01:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1103:21:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 1080:19:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1055:18:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 776:really messes up the diffs. 7: 2683:election, or in one of two 2350:Genetics for the human race 2170:Update on Worldwide tag at 2028:10:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 1541:05:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 1036:18:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 806:, you seem to be violating 718:16:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 699:16:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 656:21:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 631:16:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 606:17:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 587:01:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 564:14:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 546:, our article on the topic 523:22:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 492:16:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 466:17:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 406:17:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 390:17:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 198:Your comments in RfC/Elonka 10: 3335: 3320:18:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 3275:11:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 2687:that relate to the use of 2295:Biological Aspects of Race 1967:02:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 1939:14:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1916:00:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1903:22:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1869:17:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 899:African minority in Poland 893:Please stop violating the 352:12:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 317:09:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 291:15:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 263:15:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 245:10:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 227:19:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 212:18:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 193:07:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 157:03:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 2904:deserving of my thanks. 2010:16:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 1923:Genetically modified food 1616:Why is this inapropriate? 1611:Why is this inapropriate? 1335:should be a redirect to 596:Thanks, I didn't notice. 455:editor, not just Jagz. -- 103:Quebec's National Holiday 1987:13:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 1618:Where do I bring it up? 1567:National Order of Quebec 1562:National Order of Quebec 1116:- feel free to comment, 528:NPOV and POV pushing by 2037:Hi. You recently moved 1944:IP editor 68.33.205.149 1479:within the article text 552:Knowledge talk:tag team 3192:should be merged into 2986:probably very limited. 2929:For your entertainment 2897: 2340:You might like to try 1409:here in any way, but " 1383: 1345:completely unmotivated 1337:European ethnic groups 1325:European ethnic groups 1311:European ethnic groups 1219:Okay, take your time. 91:National Patriotes Day 3286:race and intelligence 3151:please weigh in here: 2957:Race and Intelligence 2877: 2172:Race and intelligence 1370: 814:. I am happy to work 177:geraldckane/medsurvey 42:of past discussions. 3041:Stormfront (website) 2875:You recently wrote: 2767:mediation cabal case 2685:requests for comment 2642:(as is "55 hours"). 2282:Well there's these: 2141:here in the 3RR case 897:rule on the article 85:Soulscanner... again 3284:A new draft of the 2473:-Stuck in Edmonton 2302:Statement on "Race" 2095:It's not OR as per 1949:of more editors. — 1756:please drop by here 1395:The Red Pen of Doom 895:WP:Avoid neologisms 888:WP:Avoid neologisms 812:Knowledge:Consensus 731:You are welcome to 530:Knowledge:tag teams 3291:the mediation page 3194:Cat skin disorders 3005:Richard E. Nisbett 2681:Audit Subcommittee 2039:Africans in Europe 1620:Proxima Centauri 2 1384: 1363:Season's Greetings 1333:European ethnology 1329:European ethnology 1321:European ethnology 1175:Please comment at 836:false edit summary 804:Knowledge:Tag team 671:Medical Hypotheses 99:dispute resolution 18:User talk:Ramdrake 3246:R&I mediation 3242: 3139: 3066:R&I mediation 2943: 2922: 2750: 2729: 2566: 2552: 2539: 2467:Place Ville-Marie 2458:Place Ville-Marie 2268: 1874:Franco Crackpotto 1725:here is the link: 1531:comment added by 1484:NotAnotherAliGFan 1443:NotAnotherAliGFan 1415:NotAnotherAliGFan 1356: 1194:Lead sentence of 1168:Proposed move of 1021:Talk:Chiropractic 921:comment added by 790: 629: 509:. Please see the 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3326: 3317: 3314: 3272: 3269: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3232:Mortetviolachaud 3230: 3217: 3215: 3210: 3205: 3184:WikiProject Cats 3137: 3097: 3058: 3051: 3032: 3028: 3024: 2951:Mediation Notice 2941: 2918: 2916: 2748: 2727: 2564: 2550: 2537: 2278:Thoughts on Race 2264: 2262: 1965: 1936: 1809: 1806: 1684: 1543: 1396: 1352: 1002:Please stop. -- 937: 834:I'm not using a 788: 784: 782: 651: 646: 627: 623: 621: 611:Meat & Socks 315: 313: 243: 241: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3315: 3312: 3282: 3270: 3267: 3260: 3248: 3227: 3213: 3208: 3203: 3201: 3186: 3149: 3129: 3091: 3068: 3054: 3047: 3043: 3030: 3026: 3022: 2953: 2931: 2914: 2855: 2816: 2790: 2763: 2716: 2677: 2622: 2522: 2460: 2406:was vandalism? 2400: 2355:Is race "real"? 2280: 2260: 2244: 2179:this discussion 2175: 2137: 2078: 2043:Afro Eureopeans 2035: 2017: 1994: 1974: 1953: 1946: 1934: 1926: 1884: 1876: 1856: 1840:Sarah Katherine 1824:Sarah Katherine 1819: 1807: 1804: 1798: 1776: 1750: 1697: 1677: 1654: 1635: 1613: 1594: 1571:Order of Quebec 1564: 1526: 1394: 1389: 1365: 1314: 1236: 1199: 1173: 1150: 1132: 1110: 1087: 1062: 1043: 1024: 971: 948: 916: 891: 862: 786: 778: 726: 675:Gene Expression 663: 647: 642: 638: 625: 617: 613: 594: 533: 499: 476: 311: 309: 239: 237: 200: 164: 87: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3332: 3281: 3278: 3247: 3244: 3226: 3223: 3185: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3148: 3145: 3128: 3125: 3090: 3087: 3067: 3064: 3042: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3016: 3012: 3001: 2998: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2952: 2949: 2930: 2927: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2835: 2815: 2814:Mediator issue 2812: 2789: 2786: 2762: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2715: 2712: 2699: 2697: 2696: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2652: 2651: 2621: 2618: 2602: 2601: 2521: 2516: 2501: 2500: 2459: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2435: 2434: 2399: 2393: 2378: 2375: 2368: 2365: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2338: 2337: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2321: 2320: 2317: 2314: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2298: 2291: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2243: 2240: 2174: 2168: 2151:, a revert is 2136: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2112: 2111: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2047:Cordless Larry 2034: 2033:Afro Europeans 2031: 2016: 2013: 1993: 1990: 1973: 1970: 1945: 1942: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1883: 1880: 1875: 1872: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1818: 1817:Citing Sources 1815: 1797: 1794: 1775: 1772: 1749: 1746: 1696: 1693: 1676: 1673: 1653: 1650: 1634: 1631: 1612: 1609: 1593: 1590: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1533:71.234.228.127 1513:71.192.116.155 1388: 1385: 1364: 1361: 1323:separate from 1313: 1308: 1292: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1276: 1275: 1258: 1257: 1235: 1234:Census section 1232: 1201:I don't think 1198: 1192: 1177:Talk:Québécois 1172: 1166: 1149: 1146: 1131: 1128: 1109: 1106: 1091:n'importe quoi 1086: 1083: 1061: 1058: 1042: 1039: 1023: 1017: 1016: 1015: 970: 967: 956:Usergreatpower 947: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 907: 906: 890: 885: 884: 883: 867: 861: 858: 857: 856: 797: 796: 795: 794: 725: 722: 721: 720: 662: 659: 637: 634: 612: 609: 593: 590: 576: 575: 574: 573: 532: 526: 498: 495: 480:67.150.254.160 475: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 441: 440: 439: 438: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 339: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 230: 229: 199: 196: 163: 162:Survey request 160: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3331: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3309: 3306: 3303: 3299: 3294: 3292: 3287: 3277: 3276: 3273: 3255: 3253: 3243: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3222: 3221: 3218: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3198: 3195: 3191: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3144: 3143: 3140: 3135: 3132: 3124: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3114: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3096: 3086: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3063: 3062: 3059: 3057: 3052: 3050: 3036: 3033: 3025: 3020: 3017: 3013: 3011: 3009: 3006: 3002: 2999: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2948: 2947: 2944: 2939: 2935: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2911: 2905: 2902: 2896: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2876: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2859: 2853:R/I mediation 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2797: 2795: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2768: 2761:MedCabal Case 2754: 2751: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2725: 2721: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2641: 2640:Special:Block 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2620:31 hour block 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2571: 2570: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2556: 2553: 2548: 2544: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2527:User:AWeidman 2520: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2402:Are you sure 2397: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2373: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2173: 2167: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1969: 1968: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1952: 1951:Malik Shabazz 1941: 1940: 1937: 1932: 1924: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1910:Baseball Bugs 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1901: 1898: 1897:Baseball Bugs 1894: 1890: 1879: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1801: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1753: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1700: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1683: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1572: 1569:was moved to 1568: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1369: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1289: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1249: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1171: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1155:4.234.159.119 1145: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1093:. A bientot, 1092: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1022: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1001: 999: 997: 995: 992: 988: 987: 986: 985: 981: 977: 966: 965: 961: 957: 953: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 904: 903: 902: 900: 896: 889: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 865: 855: 851: 847: 843: 842: 841:non sequiturs 837: 833: 832: 831: 830: 827: 824: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 793: 789: 783: 781: 774: 770: 769: 768: 765: 762: 759: 755: 750: 749: 748: 747: 744: 741: 738: 734: 730: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 658: 657: 654: 652: 650: 645: 633: 632: 628: 622: 620: 608: 607: 603: 599: 589: 588: 584: 580: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 540: 538: 531: 525: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 494: 493: 489: 485: 481: 467: 464: 461: 458: 454: 449: 445: 444: 443: 442: 435: 434: 433: 432: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 411: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 385: 382: 377: 372: 368: 353: 349: 345: 340: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 318: 314: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 246: 242: 234: 233: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 209: 205: 195: 194: 190: 186: 180: 178: 174: 168: 159: 158: 154: 150: 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 118: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3304: 3295: 3283: 3256: 3249: 3228: 3200: 3187: 3156:Slrubenstein 3150: 3130: 3111: 3092: 3069: 3055: 3048: 3044: 2954: 2932: 2906: 2900: 2898: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2878: 2874: 2860: 2856: 2817: 2798: 2791: 2772: 2764: 2717: 2678: 2644: 2627: 2623: 2607:Abdul Faisel 2603: 2576:Abdul Faisel 2572: 2558: 2534: 2523: 2502: 2472: 2464: 2461: 2401: 2371: 2359: 2339: 2281: 2273: 2245: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2176: 2152: 2138: 2079: 2036: 2021:Slrubenstein 2018: 1998:White people 1995: 1992:White people 1975: 1958: 1947: 1927: 1885: 1877: 1857: 1820: 1802: 1799: 1784:Slrubenstein 1777: 1754: 1751: 1736:Slrubenstein 1732: 1729: 1724: 1720: 1717: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1678: 1655: 1636: 1614: 1595: 1576: 1565: 1478: 1459: 1455: 1429:Alastairward 1390: 1344: 1340: 1315: 1293: 1281: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1250: 1241: 1237: 1218: 1203:specifically 1202: 1200: 1174: 1151: 1148:Disappointed 1136:Slrubenstein 1133: 1118:Slrubenstein 1111: 1090: 1088: 1066: 1063: 1044: 1041:Richard Lynn 1025: 991:White people 972: 969:White people 952:White people 949: 946:White people 923:GeorgeHarper 892: 866: 863: 839: 835: 815: 798: 779: 753: 732: 727: 705: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 664: 648: 643: 639: 618: 614: 595: 577: 547: 541: 534: 500: 477: 452: 447: 375: 370: 364: 278: 250: 201: 181: 169: 165: 146: 133: 123: 119: 114: 88: 70: 43: 37: 3225:My Username 3190:feline acne 3072:User:Reubzz 2861:Cheers! -- 2442:Tim Vickers 2408:Tim Vickers 1893:Lobachevsky 1891:song about 1882:Plagiarism? 1761:deeceevoice 1527:—Preceding 1028:Tim Vickers 1019:Comment at 917:—Preceding 579:Shawn Crapo 437:vandalism." 249:Agree, and 173:geraldckane 126:User:Joeldl 36:This is an 3298:David.Kane 2720:Emily Rosa 2689:SecurePoll 2645:Black Kite 2628:Black Kite 2462:Hi there, 2183:David.Kane 2157:EdJohnston 2000:. Thsnks! 1889:Tom Lehrer 1662:arimareiji 1047:Anthon.Eff 976:Wikiscribe 901:. Thanks. 544:flat earth 535:Regarding 484:Kman543210 217:Thanks! -- 2858:saying. 2788:Statement 2722:as well? 2505:117Avenue 2475:117Avenue 2181:? Thanks 2149:WP:REVERT 1854:Dysgenics 1579:Mathieugp 1373:Guettarda 1285:research. 1282:Québécois 1196:Québécois 1170:Québécois 515:Epistaxis 511:talk page 503:citequote 474:Vandalism 185:BCproject 149:Mathieugp 142:last edit 138:talk page 134:Québécois 130:Quebecois 128:over the 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3308:contribs 3147:R&IQ 3134:Fainites 3113:M.Nelson 3015:dissent. 2938:Fainites 2893:on a par 2799:Cheers! 2773:Cheers! 2745:Fainites 2724:Fainites 2659:Ramdrake 2591:Ramdrake 2561:Fainites 2547:Fainites 2490:Ramdrake 2424:Ramdrake 2256:WP:SYNTH 2229:Ramdrake 2119:Bob98133 2101:Ramdrake 2082:Bob98133 2062:Ramdrake 2002:The Ogre 1979:Bob98133 1962:contribs 1861:Verwoerd 1529:unsigned 1499:Ramdrake 1465:Ramdrake 1407:WP:SYNTH 1387:Fancruft 1272:Canadien 1267:Canadien 1263:Canadien 993:article. 931:contribs 919:unsigned 873:Ramdrake 846:Ramdrake 683:NY Times 679:NY Times 556:Uncle Ed 398:Ramdrake 344:Ramdrake 283:Ramdrake 3313:Ludwigs 3268:Ludwigs 3204:Bramble 3076:Mathsci 3031:Windows 2915:Aryaman 2559:Cheers. 2503:Thanks 2261:Aryaman 2252:WP:NPOV 1935:Tropics 1913:carrots 1900:carrots 1598:GoodDay 1095:Mathsci 1060:Request 644:Crohnie 505:tag on 366:vandal. 111:WP:CALM 107:WP:COOL 39:archive 3138:scribs 3023:Fences 2961:Reubzz 2942:scribs 2920:(talk) 2863:Reubzz 2839:Reubzz 2821:Reubzz 2801:Reubzz 2775:Reubzz 2749:scribs 2728:scribs 2701:Risker 2565:scribs 2551:scribs 2266:(talk) 2147:. Per 1805:Ryoung 1592:Thanks 1341:severe 1297:Joeldl 1221:Joeldl 1207:Joeldl 1181:Joeldl 1114:WP:NOR 1085:Thanks 808:WP:OWN 780:Verbal 773:WP:BRD 733:change 724:Revert 706:really 636:Thanks 619:Verbal 592:Thanks 448:should 109:& 95:WP:WQA 3170:T34CH 3027:& 2994:them. 2885:right 2741:there 2248:WP:OR 2015:Hello 689:led. 312:Shell 240:Shell 16:< 3302:talk 3236:talk 3209:claw 3197:here 3174:talk 3160:Talk 3127:See? 3118:talk 3080:talk 2978:not. 2965:talk 2934:Here 2912:. -- 2867:talk 2843:talk 2825:talk 2805:talk 2779:talk 2705:talk 2663:talk 2611:talk 2595:talk 2580:talk 2543:here 2538:2007 2535:2008 2509:talk 2494:talk 2479:talk 2446:talk 2428:talk 2412:talk 2404:this 2386:talk 2382:Alun 2254:and 2233:talk 2187:talk 2161:talk 2123:talk 2105:talk 2097:this 2086:talk 2066:talk 2051:talk 2025:Talk 2006:talk 1983:talk 1956:talk 1931:Doc 1895:... 1865:talk 1844:talk 1828:talk 1788:Talk 1780:this 1774:race 1765:talk 1740:Talk 1695:help 1675:RFAr 1666:talk 1658:AN/I 1652:AN/I 1643:talk 1639:Alun 1624:talk 1602:talk 1583:talk 1537:talk 1517:talk 1503:talk 1488:talk 1469:talk 1447:talk 1433:talk 1419:talk 1377:talk 1354:(𒁳) 1343:and 1301:talk 1225:talk 1211:talk 1185:talk 1159:talk 1140:Talk 1122:Talk 1099:talk 1051:talk 1032:talk 980:talk 960:talk 927:talk 877:talk 850:talk 816:with 787:chat 754:both 714:talk 710:Alun 695:talk 691:Alun 687:that 661:GNXP 626:chat 602:talk 598:Alun 583:talk 560:talk 554:. -- 548:must 537:this 519:talk 488:talk 402:talk 348:talk 287:talk 259:talk 255:Alun 251:that 223:talk 219:Ronz 208:talk 204:Ronz 189:talk 153:talk 3158:| 3110:. - 3056:UDI 2901:the 2714:DDP 2398:fur 2396:Cat 2041:to 2023:| 1808:122 1786:| 1738:| 1687:NE2 1633:hey 1350:dab 1316:Re 1138:| 1130:RfC 1120:| 1108:nor 649:Gal 453:any 376:you 371:not 279:not 147:-- 3265:-- 3238:) 3176:) 3154:! 3120:) 3082:) 3049:A8 2967:) 2869:) 2845:) 2827:) 2807:) 2796:. 2781:) 2707:) 2665:) 2613:) 2597:) 2582:) 2511:) 2496:) 2481:) 2448:) 2430:) 2414:) 2388:) 2372:me 2250:, 2235:) 2189:) 2163:) 2125:) 2107:) 2088:) 2068:) 2053:) 2008:) 1985:) 1867:) 1846:) 1830:) 1767:) 1685:-- 1668:) 1645:) 1626:) 1604:) 1585:) 1539:) 1519:) 1505:) 1490:) 1471:) 1460:is 1449:) 1435:) 1421:) 1379:) 1303:) 1248:. 1227:) 1213:) 1187:) 1179:. 1161:) 1101:) 1077:ka 1074:on 1071:El 1067:do 1053:) 1034:) 1010:ka 1007:on 1004:El 982:) 962:) 933:) 929:• 879:) 852:) 826:ka 823:on 820:El 764:ka 761:on 758:El 743:ka 740:on 737:El 716:) 697:) 604:) 585:) 562:) 521:) 513:. 490:) 463:ka 460:on 457:El 404:) 387:ka 384:on 381:El 379:-- 350:) 289:) 261:) 225:) 210:) 191:) 155:) 3316:2 3305:· 3300:( 3271:2 3234:( 3214:x 3172:( 3116:( 3078:( 2963:( 2936:. 2865:( 2841:( 2823:( 2803:( 2777:( 2703:( 2661:( 2609:( 2593:( 2578:( 2507:( 2492:( 2477:( 2444:( 2426:( 2410:( 2384:( 2297:" 2290:. 2231:( 2185:( 2159:( 2121:( 2103:( 2084:( 2064:( 2049:( 2004:( 1981:( 1964:) 1959:· 1954:( 1863:( 1842:( 1826:( 1763:( 1664:( 1641:( 1622:( 1600:( 1581:( 1535:( 1515:( 1501:( 1486:( 1467:( 1445:( 1431:( 1417:( 1375:( 1299:( 1223:( 1209:( 1183:( 1157:( 1097:( 1049:( 1030:( 978:( 958:( 925:( 875:( 848:( 712:( 693:( 600:( 581:( 558:( 517:( 486:( 400:( 346:( 285:( 257:( 221:( 206:( 187:( 151:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index