39:
that needs your approval. The article is being considered for deletion in accordance with
Knowledge's deletion policy. I believe this article has some good sources, but an Wikipedian decided to submit it for deletion after I notice there are similar article was approval without deletion. This article
52:
with bad independent sources and anyone could wrote this without reliable source that speak for the article. The article meet
Knowledge guidelines but doesn't bring show any notable content to be an article. So I wrote my article but and even clean up the article for more reliability. Please can you
68:
41:
36:
44:
has no reliable independent source with minor roles, I feel there should be up for deletion, but it still meets
Knowledge guidelines. Another article
45:
49:
26:
48:
used the same database I use for my article, that meet
Knowledge guidelines without deletion. I also notice this article
58:
17:
54:
64:
8:
32:
53:fix my article and removed the deletion remark.
14:
23:
24:
80:
27:Remove the Deletion indication
13:
1:
35:I have written an article on
7:
10:
85:
69:18:05, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
18:User talk:Phil Bridger
37:Prince Richardson
76:
71:
55:Iranmichealswiki
84:
83:
79:
78:
77:
75:
74:
73:
62:
46:Brittney Wilson
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
82:
67:comment added
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
81:
72:
70:
66:
60:
56:
51:
50:Young Cartoon
47:
43:
38:
34:
19:
63:— Preceding
33:Phil Bridger
30:
42:Paul Bates
65:undated
16:<
59:talk
61:)
31:Hi
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.