User talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 6

2693:

screen actor Ronald Colman(multi LP set, date unreported). More recent unabridged recordings have been made by the British actor Simon Callow (HighBridge Co. Oct 2005). The American film actor Stacy Keach has also recently offered his interpretation in a 2 cd set (label unspecified). Other individual complete readings include those by Jack Edwards (Helios/Hyperion, 1988-1991), and by David Butler (In Audio 2005) and Alex Jennings (Naxos 2006). Audio versions of selected Sonnets by individual readers has been recorded by the actor Anthony Quayle 24 Sonnets, (1956) and by Dame Edith Evans, 20 Sonnets (EMI, early 1960s). The best known "combined cast" audio versions of all the 154 Sonnets are those made by Dame Judi Dench, Ian McKellen, Michael Williams, Peter Egan, Peter Orrand Bob Peck (Penguin Classics 1995), and by Patrick Stewart, Natasha Richardson, Ossie Davis, Al Pacino, Claire Bloom, Kathleen Turner, Alfred Molina, Eli Wallach and others (AirplayAudio Publishing 2000). Another complete version exists by a cast of various mainly North American readers, emphasized as being 'in the public domain'. (Librivox 2005/6). An impressive cast of some 40 former alumni, young and old, of London's Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts perform on an audio rendition of 47 Sonnets, entitled 'When Love Speaks'. (EMI, released 4 February 2003). The British actor Alan Rickman has recorded his version of Sonnet 130. An interesting offering for linguists is a disc entitled 'Accents for Actors--Accents of Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England which provides "A Shakespeare Sonnet read in 20 different accents of the British Isles" (Clo-lar-Chonnachta, Eire: SAC 1027). Complete audio-visual interpretations are also scarce and include a version with musical preludes by Jonathan Willby (2006). Filmed readings of selected Sonnets include a video film entitled: "Shakespeare on Screen: selected Sonnets by Shakespeare" and described as "an educational program that gives an in-depth analysis of fifteen of Shakespeare's Sonnets". The cast of readers comprises the actors Ben Kingsley, Roger Rees, Claire Bloom andJane Lapotaire with critical commentaries by A. L. Rowse, Leslie Fiedler, Stephen Spender, Gore Vidal, Arnold Wesker, Nicholas Humphrey and Roy Strong. (Kenneth S Rothwell and Annabelle Henkin Melzer, 1984). A video version of 29 of the Sonnets was made, with a commentary, in various pastoral settings: at the breakfast table, over the telephone and as a standup comedy routine (Princeton, N.J-Films for the Humanities and Sciences, 2000) In the arthouse drama film 'The Angelic Conversion', directed by Derek Jarman, Dame Judi Dench recites a number of the Sonnets (1985). Musical settings of the sonnets are rare. Igor Stravinsky set Sonnet 8, "Music to hear", in his Three Songs From William Shakespeare. Benjamin Britten also set only one sonnet by Shakespeare, Sonnet 43, as the last part of his Nocturne. Andrzej Czajkowski set seven sonnets. Maurice Johnston set Sonnet 75 "So are you to my thoughts". In 2007 the RSC ran Nothing Like the Sun, a project to set the sonnets to music. Zehnder recorded Sonnet 30 on their CD Broken Train of Thought listed in the liner notes as '30'.

504:(leaving out all the others). I know of no way to effectively participate in Knowledge with that kind of harrassment. I've stated a few times that I'm retiring and a few people don't want me to give up so "easily", but I'm not in this for some kind of victory through superior firepower. I'm really a eurocentric sentimentalist, focussing on England and France in particular (as being most relevant to me, rather than surrounding nations) and am really distressed when these bipolar jokers are so stodgy or stuffy in what they make a fuss about, really out for that toe to toe sort of stuff. (No, my testosterone isn't running low, it's just that endless internet soap operas seem pointless.) For opposing both aggravating sides (Celticist & Germanicist) of arguments between the British peoples, I am obviously persona non grata (as a declared Romanist, even though I don't edit from this perspective, only dispute either of the other two POVs taken for granted when they argue on the talk pages), but I have been reading encyclopedias since I was in kindergarten and it still remains an interest, especially a project where we are supposed to edit in concert, building together as a team. Instead, it's all dog-eat-dog. (Does Jimmy Wales rather believe in this, the Randian individualist free for all?) I don't know what to do, but please don't say it's my fault and I deserve it, that I need to look at it from their perspective, blah blah. Their perspective is like that, to blame their victims for stupidity and vulnerability, etc. Regards, 209:. It was only then that Vartan expressed his desire to leave Knowledge, and it was then, and only then, that I asked my roommate for some help, who registered a new account. He then created The Diamond Apex, and I feel no shame in finding an intelligent individual who devoted his attention to add and expand new articles. He only engaged in a single revert, and that on the Movses Khorenatsi article. I’d been planning for midterms and asked him to edit from school. It never crossed my mind to deliberately have someone edit from elsewhere or something. Note that all that The Diamond Apex claims about himself is true (including his being an Arsenal fan). Vartan left Knowledge after the incident involving Sandstein, who again blocked Meowy and refused to do the same for Elsanaturk, in spite of the fact that he did the same number of reverts and that unlike Meowy, wrote nothing on the talkpage, as isrequired. Sandstein refused to review his decision. Even Eupator seems to have taken a break from Knowledge for similar circumstances. 213:(note that Moreschi gave him a good block previously for this same thing, and while Moreschi is gone, no one is willing to do anything about it), Baki66 and Elsanaturk. I have tasted arbitration, having seen AA1, AA2 and Ehud Lesar’s case, which all had very questionable decisions, the first being unfair, the second didn't even bother considering any of the evidence at all and had no pretension of adhering to the rules and the third one….I will even not bother saying what I feel about it. It seems that only Grandmaster seems to have unlimited time and energy for all this. If the arbitration committee wants to help (because obviously it cannot give us what we ask), then it can modify AA2, by placing articles on restrictions, rather than editors, and requiring those who reverted to actually engage in the discussion. 588:"Khem" (Cham or Ham) which means "burnt" or "black." Being an ethnic term it about people isn’t it…How ironic the page is about PEOPLE a person and his descendants. To my knowledge khemet or the hieroglyphics symbol KMT can mean 3 things land of the black or land of the blacks. or black land. It never just meant black, so I guess there is a reason why you are engaged in an edit war right now. Trying to change the meaning of Khemet, Is that going to get you another award for your work on aryan races, Its pathetic take off your eurocentric blanket. You can’t cover up or change anything. It would be best if you stated things as they were. Its quite sad really. I’m done talking to you, you can have whatever opinion of me you like it doesn’t matter. 451: 1499:

articles about skin color, race, middle eastern history, and so forth are based on the Carleton Coon mentality. Just think about it, where did you get the notion that "ruddy" meant white? From a 16th century commentary on the Bible or on a Carleton Coon type pseudoscientific article from 1954. Paul it's too late, a couple of years ago this was brought to our attention and I watched over a span of months while good references in a few articles were overtaken by the very racism you pretend to rail against. It's like going to a Tea Party, where they display nazi symbols comparing Obama to hitler, but knowing only 20 years ago many those same people were holding up nazi symbols because they were neo-nazis themselves. --

573:

the word "Kemet" refers to the color of the soil of the land. ( I don’t see anywhere that I disputed that so why is the lie I told) and how does that make me an afrocentric? the word "Kemet" is actually an ethnic term being a derivative of the word "Khem" (Cham or Ham) which means "burnt" or "black." Ham, who was one of the three sons of Noah. The article is NOT about Egyptology it’s about Ham. Get your facts straight and spare me the BS, your really do have a fixation for race topic. So I guess you are a racist then. I acutally respected what you had to say when you entered the dispute about hannibal, I didn't think you would end up being this type of person. Do not waste my time with anymore foolishness

1829:

writing, and was personally responsible for insuring the publication of her first article on the authorship question. Your suggestion that the idea of his tolerance for the debate(which is hardly just mine) is "nuts" is wrong, and substitutes a personal insult for the truth. Please see Hope and Holston for further details. Whether or not Emerson can be classified as an anti-Stratfordian is not the point, according to Knowledge guidelines. What matters is what he said and did on the subject, which deserves to be included in the article. Please cease your personal attacks and abuse. If you persist, I will file a complaint against you.--

217:

made otherwise harmless and useful edits? I would have loved to have taken credit for writing articles such as “Nahapet”. The Diamond Apex was and is not me and nearly all his edits were done independently and it's unfortunate you've so brazenly appended my name to someone who is not me. Grandmaster and Atabek regularly bring in dozens of editors on Knowledge and whatever happens to them? All I did was ask a roommate if he was interested in editing as well. I’ll stop here. Those who wonder why I opposed mediation should note what I said about Grandmaster behavior, and compare it with a past mediation already on another article,

1410:

not lead then, to speculate that Jesus race would be less likely to be black because he has white hair at 33. Again, this is possible at any race. Maybe claims have been made, but incoherent, insubstantial, and as far as I have ever known, unsupported claims do not get includeded into Knowledge articles. Even if it is, the comment "hair color is not indicative of race" should and will be added to any comments relating or disassociating him from any race due to his having white hair. But all of this would require a citation of some sort. Knowledge policy. --

647:

the bible HAM (which) means black and his children were the people who moved into Africa. Then the people who originally lived there and occupied the vast lands where descendants of Ham. So since you decided to bring up skin color, Black Africans were the first to occupy Africa weren’t they ,and they do have dark or darker skin complexions don’t they. ..This is not an Afro-centric view it is what the bible say. . You said "There is no dispute that KMT means 'black'. No-one apart from Afro centrists believes that has anything to do with

59:. But an editor informed us that there indeed was a relationship after Grandmaster came with it in an e-mail from that same editor. That was few days prior to Eupator’s reply, who naturally made the obvious assumptions. The fact is that only Grandmaster and John found that so obvious; for me the issue was rather the article on Khorenatsi itself. While I had suspicions on why Grandmaster was interested (I'm not blind), my opposition to Grandmaster changes had nothing to do with any of the reasons given by Grandmaster in his reply to Dab. 321:", where the academics are accused of "scientific fraud" !!! ("Descubrimiento de un gran fraude científico, al comprobarse que las traducciones actuales del egipcio, hitita, púnico, eblaíta, sumerio-babilonio, son enteramente falsas"), and claim the "Desciframiento de textos y glifos del Lejano Oriente, Polinesia; el Nuevo Mundo, desde el euskera"..... "Traducción de cien tablillas de la civilización de Harappa y Mohenjo Daro en el valle del Indo (Pakistán)" and "Las semillas uskomediterráneas en la América precolombina." 467:, by tracking my edit history and extinguishing anything/everything I have done in articles, all the while claiming some other motive. In this case, Ghmyrtle is against any affiliation of Bretons or Brittany, to any other collective (e.g. England or France) than the language family-based notion of people-hood (e.g. Cornwall, Wales or the Gaelic language speakers), which is a trend among "Celtic" types as was the vogue under Wagner and remains some eccentric philia for Anglo-Saxonists like 1990: 1312: 1380:

about flowers, made me think a flower had been named after the mythical beast, so I spent time searching for references to that flower, only to conclude, as I described, that there probably wasn't one, so I would not have been patronised, therefore, had the distinction been pointed out. In its original context, the quotation may very well have been devoid of ambiguity, but in the context in which it has been inserted, it acquires a new shade of sense, an unfortunate suggestion accrues.

1611:. I thought it was far too long and unsourced (well, almost unsourced, the statement "He named the city Roma after himself" has a source - which says the city wasn't named after himself - now that's bizarre). But what we seem to have here is someone copying and pasting a translation of Plutarch into the article, and I don't think that's appropriate. The article shouldn't just be regurgitating Plutarch or even completely retelling the legend, should it? 2350: 2889: 2551: 1537: 524:

discus page and insult me. By calling me a sock. That is why I brougth our entire conversation from our pages, To the articles page The image you brought back does not contain the wording of the original. which had the "warning"about authenticity. You brougth back the one that she changed. What I have been suggesting from the start was the we take time to find an acurate image which wasn't surrounded with a bunch of "MAYBE'S".

193:, when both Elsanaturk and Meowy had the same number of reverts and that Meowy was the only one discussing all this on the talk page. Elsanaturk jumped out of nowhere to remove the tag. Elsanaturk got away with it, while Meowy was again blocked. Then there is Baku87 who, just like Elsanaturk, has done the same, or Baki66 (Dacy69 was indefinitely blocked by Moreschi for constantly doing the same thing, just like both users). 1655: 147:? And when I deliberately posted broken links to see if the administrators would even bother reading it, they didn’t even do so (surprise? surprise?) Grandmaster’s references to Gazifikator edit warring, never fails to amaze me. How can he even talk about revert warring after several suspicious accounts inundated Knowledge and targeted precisely the Armenian terrorism and Armenian genocide denial articles? 446: 1059:

also the case (whatever Grove says) that there is not a scrap of evidence linking Fanelli presonally with Alkan. Any link can only be an opinion of the Grove writer, and should be cited, if at all, as such, making it clear that no 'hard' source exists for it. I'm afraid that, here as elsewhere, just because it's in Grove doesn't make it 'encyclopaedic'. Best regards - --

170:, created recently by Jayvdb. Not only is the material copyrighted, but is also an unreliable source, as the think tank’s main role is the denial of the Armenian genocide and Armenian terrorism. He failed to adhere WP:BLP and added the same unreliable source. Armenian terrorism appears to be his only interest. A few other examples also include 629:

niw.t (a political designate. It is a circle with a cross which represents a city intersection. A literal translation of KM.t is "Black City" or "Black Nation" since the determinative is not a reference to earth or soil". The statement is not referenced, so may be OR. This should be corrected in accordance to the sources you both adduce.

712:

Inscriptions" for counter-reasoning and bibliography addition? Otherwise,can one use again material which was deleted? In any case,could you tell everybody what to do? I have deleted all about Usko-Mediterranean languages,which was also deleted in the Deletion Process and main subject of controversy. Thank you--

328:" in which they teach how to translate (I quote): "Cómo se traducen los textos ibérico-tartésicos. Cómo se traducen los textos etruscos. Egiptología: traducción de los textos jeroglíficos y demóticos. Cómo se traducen los textos sumerios-babilonios, hititas, púnicos: fenicio, cartaginés, ugarítico, eblaíta." 92:. Most of the article is about its authorship', and there is nothing about the actual content of the book. Eleven out of the thirteen references come from the same author in a space as little as two pages of a book. He might just as well have copied the entire text word for word from the original author. 2660:

I am having a great deal of communications from academic colleagues about the loss of this section in Knowledge. They have been using it to aide teaching and further understanding of the works to students whose first language is not always English or to help other students articulate, hear the rises

1360:

you will see that I did not add any such material. I merely moved it from one part of the article to another to improve the logic and flow. The sentence is a quotation which refers to a list of symbols of virginity, most of which are flowers, but also happens to mention that the unicorn was also used

1341:

referring to symbols of virginity documented by Liana DeGirolami Cheney, including a string of flowers and plants, and culminating in the unicorn. This unfortunate phrasing, within an article concerning flowers, set me off to discover if there was a plant called the unicorn; I conclude there is none,

687:

As a reference I would state that many of Arnaiz seems to be publications are self-published. The book on Iberia Prehistory is on a colloquium that he organized; the Complutense's books obviously have nothing to do with the Humanities section, but with the Medicine section (where Arnaiz works; that's

651:

Well KMT does not mean black KM does. Again get your facts straight or learn about a subject before you spew rubbish I do not care about your theories of skin color, race or Afro-centricity... This is the last time I'm going to tell you this.I don't have time for your foolishness. It would be best if

646:

You come up with this nonsense and randomly accused me of being an afro-centric and brought up issues of race when no one was talking about that. It’s really pathetic; you just continue to show the type of person you are. The article is about nothing other than Ham a biblical figure and according to

538:

Well if you agree with it then no problem, your opinion is yours. But why removed the caption under the bust which let readers no it may not be authentic, because truth is we don't no whether it is or not. So why remove that and try to pass this one of as it is. When all the so-called cources seem to

475:

article for quite some time under the history heading, but only became tagged when I altered it, on the tail of disagreements with those others in the edit history attacking my contributions. Unfortunately, a few editors who have likeminded political perspectives (Anglophobia) and edit and revert en

212:

I can go on and on, but I know no one can do anything about all those suspicious accounts that come out of the blue and show similar interest, always corresponding with AdilBaguirov’s (banned in AA1) off-wiki activities. Nor can anyone do anything about the way users are pushed in edit wars by Baku87

51:

And on the contrary, for the Armenian editors involved in this, NK has nothing to do with this. Sisak is related to Syunik (Zangezur), not NK. Unless we’re speaking about the House of Syunik, Syunik is part of Armenia and it was only recently that Azerbaijan began an irredentist campaign (see the map

2637:

I have been asked to contact you and hope for some guidance on a section that was included in Shakespeare’s Sonnets in Knowledge a short while ago. Many people have said the section added greatly to the entry and we would like to see it returned in the correct and acceptable way, I am writing to ask

1773:

page? He inserted a list of prominent anti-stratfordians, living and dead, into the article along with quotations. I contend that it is promotion that adds nothing to the article beyond what a simple list of names would do. He of course, disagrees, in his usual passive/aggressive way. I reverted the

1729: 1478:

This is why we (some of the more responsible black contributors) use our screen names very sparingly to edit race/religion articles. You and others are so so obsessed with blocking modern evidence that dispels those antiquated semi-racist views that you will try to shoot the messenger to prevent the

1404:

The whole passage is irrelevant to any common-sense view because it is a passage about a supernatural being who is appearing in the clouds! However since commentators have raised this point then it is worth mentioning the claims that have been made. In any case Jesus died at the age of 33. The white

1379:

I beg your pardon for misidentifying you as the contributor who added that quotation; I did look at the article history, but apparently incorrectly. Anyway, your point that it would patronise the reader overlooks my experience where the way the word unicorn ended a list of flowers, within an article

1107:

I've now made these corrections, with the help of an additonal source. It's interesting that the Grove piece draws a lot of its information from Calvocoressi's article (which incidentally doesn't mention Alkan). Moreover note that Calvocoressi's article is dated 1st April. And Antheil was also known

1087:

Further research; Grove is definitely wrong. Fanelli studied at the Conservatoire from 1876. CV Alkan did not teach at the Conservatoire after 1848, indeed he was at war with the conservatoire after this date (seearticle). Fanelli may therefore have studied under Alkan's brother, Napoleon Alkan, who

870:

Please note that you may be blocked for edit warring if you continue to revert contrary to consensus. Your edits have been construed as POV by several editors. You are not allowed to make more that three reversions to your preferred version within a 24 hour period. See WP:3RR. Paul B (talk) 23:54, 4

825:

I never noticed the guy had written "supposing that everyone with a different nationalistic outlook to your own is a mere 'tendentious chauvinist' is in itself a prime example of chauvinism." Cheeky. I'm not from the Middle East and I don't have a dog in the fight here. Giving the common alternative

741:

Virginal6 was told that the Usko-Mediterranean theory had no place for a separate article, and was suggested that its place was in the Arnaiz-Villena article. He agreed with the inclusion of the paragraph on "Iberian Inscriptions", which dealt with the Iberian-Guanche matter, so his argument now has

683:

I would like to take a look at the text, and especially to watch for the edits of the Arnaiz's fans (which are suspected very, very, very close to Arnaiz). I am sure they will try to discredit the experts references. As a matter of fact I am afraid that their (or his) only reason to edit here is to

572:

You must be out of your mind, you call me an afro centric about the Hannibal bust when no one had even mentioned anything about race, then you pull this crap about me lying the ancient Egyptians referred to their land as "Kemet" which means "Land of the Blacks." Western historians, however, say that

216:

I doubt there is any use in appealing my block, is there? I know what I did, and I’m not trying to hide anything. I’ve had an enjoyable and fruitful three and a half years of editing experience so why would I throw that all away by hiding behind a sockpuppet who didn’t even engage in revert wars and

126:

Where was Grandmaster, when Atabek was misquoting, misusing sources on Khachen and Smbat (God sent Moreschi who finally indefinitely topic-banned Atabek for his disruptions there). Grandmaster openly supported Atabek. Did Grandmaster think then about those articles? Here is the relation with Siunik,

2641:

Mr Willby has many citations and appreciation of his work in bringing the sonnets to greater light and understanding for worldly figures as HRH Prince Charles, The Prince of Wales as President of the Royal Shakespeare Company, President Bill Clinton and many more as well as Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

2567:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

1409:

Focusing on that you believe that claims have been made about his hair color in relation to his race. Firstly, I have never seen, heard, no learned of in any institution of how white hair can be of any clue to anyone's race. White hair comes from every race. Even though Jesus was 33, again, it does

1058:

Sorry, didn't mean to be aggressive. As I'm active in the Alkan Society in London (edit the website and the Bulletin), I am I auppose unresaonably irritated by the various fantasies that people attach to Alkan. It is the case that there is no evidence that he took any pupils after the 1860s. It is

628:

was edited in January by an anon who added to an original statement that the etymology of the word Egypt was a reference to the black earth of the Nile Delta (i.e. that Egypt means "black earth"). The edit is: "A more likely theorized reference is to the people. The determinative used is called the

553:

I am suprise that you would result to something so low as name calling; I'm an Afrocentric are you serious? what makes me an Afrocentric. if you look at the edits on that page before I came on you will see that I did not add that statment it was there already I just moved it up and let it flow with

350:

Yes, the main problem is how to phrase the section in a NPOV, especially when staying absolutely neutral may do the readers to believe that it is a "serious" alternative or, at least, a minority theory. I will try to add some references, but maybe I'm not the best person to do it (I thought before

313:

In any case, the question is that his theory (his and by Jorge Alonso García) do not deal only with Iberian, Basque and Guanche; but that his theory is that of the usko-mediterranean languages including Sumerian, Hurrian, Minoic, Hittite, Eblait, and so on. Also his theory implies that every expert

142:

It was really questionable on Jayvdb's part to question Nishkid actions, when Nishkid not only supported the inclusion of an Azeri genocide and readded the sexual harassment charges on Vahakn Dadrian’s article (shortening it to meet WP:BLP), but actually requested a checkusers for The Diamond Apex.

1828:

Emerson made frequent statements throughout his life to the effect that the anti-Stratfordians had a case. More importantly, he supported a position you seem incapable of understanding; that doubters like Delia Bacon should be treated with respect. He supported the publication and dissemination of

1793:

It turns out that "Egyptian" was a common 19th C. description for dark and impenetrable. IOW Emerson couldn't understand why the Shakespeare societies thought he was a jovial actor manager. Or at least that's how I understand it now. And thanks for the help on the authorship page. It needs lots of

1483:

us when we successfully change articles away from the acccepted Eurocentric view. In fact, you should assume that any black contributor to any race/religion article is expecting that reaction. So we use our screen names when it is an air tight contribution. But we don't do sock anything. There's a

331:

As you can see, it is such a BS that maybe is only pollution in the Knowledge, but if it has to be quoted it should be well explained, explaining which are their claims and the many many many languages that they "translate". In the talk page of the deleted Iberian-Guanche inscriptions I added also

114:

The 'conflict' on the dating for the average Armenian has little to do with a territorial dispute. Khorenatsi is not related (at least was not) with Armenia-Azerbaijan before both Grandmaster and John dragged it to its fore. The author is unanimously considered the father of Armenian history. They

98:

There is, however, no need to reject the name Kalankatuaci; by assuming, as Professor W. B. Henning first suggested to me, that this refers to the name of Movses monastery in Kalankatuk' while Dasxuaranci refers to his native village, we can take Movses Kalankatuaci to be one and the same person”

3003:

No ,I can see he is just after me. When a sentence is cancelled by a superior court,nobody can reproduce it. But it is a shock to me you support such a libelagainst Arnaiz-Villena. If you are upset by the paper we wrote about Palestinians I am very sorry and I have not made any further comment.

2692:

Complete audio recordings of all the 154 Sonnets by individual readers are quite scarce. Probably the best-known purely audio interpretation of a near-complete collection is that by the legendary British actor, Sir John Gielgud (Caedmon 1963). Another memorable version is that by the English-born

1553:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

62:

Regarding John’s 0RR proposal: am I the only one honestly noticing these things? Someone out there has to be blind to not see all those suspicious accounts springing up and concentrating all their energies on Armenian terrorism, Grandmaster’s latest concern. Does John care about the edits done on

735:

It looks like somebody mixed references with arguments. As long as I know all the data I added is what the bibliography says, and there is no wrong data. All what is attributed to the Usko-Mediterranean theory has been written by its authors. All what is said in the criticism is wrote by reputed

587:

Didn’t realize you were focusing on just those words I thought you were talking about the whole revision. Which I did move up and yes I added that statement. Like I said before this is not about Egyptology this about the Ham. And the terms Kemet" is an ethnic term being a derivative of the word

2221:

Check any dictionnary, encyclopedia, they will tell you: aryan derives from the sanskrit word arya, someone has provided ref. There are similar words like ariya and (above all) airya in persian but they do not occur more than 10 times in the whole ancient persian litterature. the story of self

1513:

Paul, you keep generally stating that my comments are stupid, but you're not specific as to what it is. Yes, Ruddy and Fair are both misrepresented as meaning lightskinned. How though do you draw a parallel that the basis for people believing in a black jesus being in part due to the content we

523:

Thats just it Paul the original caption under the bust that stated clearly that" it may not be authenthic" was removed by the editor, who changed to wording under the bust to "support her claim". this I had been talking to about this dispute on our user pages but full the need to come on on the

1498:

Lies about what? You're acting like a clown. There's nothing racist about pointing out accurately that Fair is not "white", adam was not "white", ruddy is not "white", Jesus was not "white".. in other words standing up against the racist notion that everything in history was white. The bias in

2507:

for mentioning your name in a threesome on EdJohnson's page, without asking your opinion. It was an act of rather bossy arrogance for me to assume thoughtlessly that you might be tilted one way or another, instead of exemplifying, as one sees in most edits, a maverick independence of rigorous

204:

The reason why VartanM got disgusted, is visible in the section devoted to Parishan, who was edit warring just as much him. Parishan didn't even receive any warnings, see the context under which Vartan made the reverts, which concerned (see the context under which Vartan made the reverts) his

2670:

I believe this entry to be valid for this reason and also as in Elizabethan times, literacy was limited and the oral/aural tradition was far stronger than it is today: the only way for the majority of people to accede to the Sonnets would have been by the spoken word. Even today many people,

87:

here] on the early history of NK but should to as surprise that Khorenatsi is referred to in the article because he is, after all, “the father of Armenian history.” But Sisak is not the issue here so what does his dating have to do with it? Khorenatsi is used for another purpose as is Movses

196:

We've reported them multiple times, which Grandmaster replied by filing a long list of irrelevant differences, clustering and making admins lose sight of the issue at hand. And what about Parishan, who was investigated during the AA1, and was not warned once but twice but never placed under

1809:

Well, yes, but your first thought was essentially correct: Emerson believed that "The Bard must have had a Higher Purpose in mind than mere public entertainment," which is why he couldn't understand their verdict. In any case, Roger's idea that Emerson was an authorship questioner is nuts.

711:

Paul,I (and others) had a strong argument about this page,which was finally deleted by Dumu Eduba,Trigaranus and Kwami.Now,they put most of their arguments for deleting the page,expanded,in a page dedicated to a short Biography(Arnaiz-Villena). Could you restore the page "Iberian-Guanche

1774:

edit and started a discussion, and he said he would appeal. He then reverted and said I would have to appeal. I know nothing about how to go about this and in looking up the procedure it is very unfamiliar and confusing. Could you walk me through the process? I'd appreciate it very much.

309:

I see you have taken the burden to quote the linguistics theories of Arnaiz-Villena. I don't know whether it is worth the pain, as the more is said about it, the more ridiculous is seen Arnaiz. But as his supporters mixes the charitable silence with censorship I suppose it must be done.

143:

What a difference with John, who also suspiciously knosw the moves to increase tension. Now the other arbitrators can know how legitimate we were in voicing our opposition to him. Does it not come to a surprise to anyone that this arbitration request was filed after I submitted this

1479:

cited message from being published on here. Also, it is brought to my attention that the order of the outline of an article impacts the way it is viewed. The first in the order is usually taken to be the most factual. We already know in advance that other contributors will try to

706: 79:

to justify Adil additions etc., or when adding unreliable sites and on and on? Or his note on Carrière talkpage? It's unbelievable, but just few months after he was elected (and with all the controversy about the elections) he is already try having Armenian editors restricted.

1014:. The two of us had some disagreements on citing sources. I've spent quite some time researching sources, and I think I have a reasonably cited restructuring of the article. It's generally along the lines you first felt was appropriate, but very sourced. What do you think?-- 691:

Hope I will keep editing in more serious questions and not to be bothered by this usko-mediterranean lunacy, but as a person that has been accused by Arnaiz's fans of been the sockpuppet of three different wikipedians, and to be "virtual", maybe it is a very optimistic wish.

2205:

Thanks for not vandalising this wiki page, else I will request an admin to resolve this issue. Aryan derivating from the sanskrit arya is shared by most (independant) scholars. Persian ref is more a propaganda. Arya wiki page contains many mistakes. I will do some changes.

484:) on articles and talk pages, make it manifestly impossible for me to edit without disruption, although I am honestly glad that the Irish lebensraum activists have not been stalking me. It's only the Welsh! I pay the price for opposing their manifesto on such pages on 2019:

generally lacks citations. The suggestion in the article about a coup is completely unbacked up by anything. He isn't alleged to have attempted a coup. It is bizarre. My guess is that it was just propaganda by his opponents. Whatever it is, it needs justifying or

1092:

The writer of the Grove article is evidenly not aware of this. The article does not claim that F's music was influenced by Alkan. In short - nothing connects Fanelli with C-V Alkam I will correct both articles accordingly presently. Now I have to go to work.

31:

Hi Paul. I feel that it is better that I explain what has been going on lately in this e-mail, rather than on my talk page. Grab a cup of coffee and prepare yourself for the following (if it helps, place it in a Knowledge template to view it more clearly)

1039:? Or in other words, what kind of relation do you see between that necklace and the word "Aryan" (or even between that picture and Wilson's old statement about Swastica that was cited in its caption)? And what is your source for that presumptive relation? 2272:, "Μῆδοι δὲ τὴν αὐτὴν ταύτην ἐσταλμένοι ἐστρατεύοντο: Μηδικὴ γὰρ αὕτη ἡ σκευή ἐστι καὶ οὐ Περσική. οἱ δὲ Μῆδοι ἄρχοντα μὲν παρείχοντο Τιγράνην ἄνδρα Ἀχαιμενίδην, ἐκαλέοντο δὲ πάλαι πρὸς πάντων Ἄριοι, ἀπικομένης δὲ Μηδείης τῆς Κολχίδος ἐξ Ἀθηνέων ἐς τοὺς 2909: 1361:

as a symbol. I hardly think anyone will imagine that the unicorn is a flower. Since it forms part of a quotation it cannot be rewritten. I really think a parenthetical addition such as you propose would be unnecessary and patronising to the reader.

379:

and tell me what you think. It has been difficult, but IMHO the text is reasonable. The idea is to use this text (changed as necessary) instead of what is now. I do not remember the code for references though., but there do are notes. Regards.

131:, princes of Khachen (present day NK) Atabek continued his disruptions and had Moreschi not been there, he would have continued doing it (note that Atabek has been topic banned on three different occasions). Read the block quote by Hewsen on the 261:

Are you stupid it's not my source. The paragraph was there before I even edited it once. I found the source using google and took off all the crap except for the police spy because that's a fact. how stupid do you have to be to not understand

3007:

However,if you are interested in this topic some Jewish authors (at least 2 of them,the most senior ones,friend of mine) have published online today that Palestinians and Jews are genetically very similar (type Nature,Jewish genetics,today).

158:, where he devoted one third of the article on a famous genocide scholar with charge of sexual harassment when the living person never even became notable for this. Failing to adhere to both WP:BLP and WP:COATRACK. He also recently created 2682:

Copy of revised entry for Knowledge, Shakespeare’s Sonnets, please advise.. (Mr Barlow, please do not worry that this is not shown as the correct way of showing links, people, for Knowledge, I will do that, this i just for content SS)

2709: 2625: 2367:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

233:

The sender has not been given any information about your e-mail account, and you are not required to reply to this e-mail. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see

826:

name in the first line might seem a trivial thing but it's a matter of principle for me. If we can't add the most basic facts for fear of "offending" users with a dislike of, say, Arabs then Knowledge is doomed. Cheers. --

356:

First I should think about how the section should be (their claims and the scientific review), but it'd be better if there is a consensus. The problem is that even to simply quote their claims seems as mocking of them.

39:

contradicts what John claimed in the arbcom, and he wasn’t just merely interested in poetry but was rather asking a question on whether there is another source beside Khorenatsi? How interesting. Part of the answer lies

102:. Note that this same author who is cited eleven out of thirteen times in John’s article, is neatly dismissed by Grandmaster on the Khorenatsi page. To have a better understanding as to why some question the author of 44:, where Grandmaster requested a citation on whether Agathangelos’ work was written in Armenian. So now who spread the conflict? This was never in doubt. D. M. Lang writes it was discovered a century ago and that the 878:

I have provided sources & citations to back up my edits. Your posts are bias stating un-finished facts in reverse order, leading to false assumptions to serve own personal political agenda. I edit, you erase.

1197:

Hello, Paul. As a keen student of Victoriana I was wondering if you'd be interested in developing a page I've set up? One of my little pet subjects is Dennis Potter, and I've just set up a page related to his play

115:

obviously place him before other Armenian historians. This again has nothing to do with Armenia-Azerbaijan. Eupator and I have worked on the article and on details wholly unrelated with the dating, see for example

230:-- This e-mail was sent by user "MarshallBagramyan" on the English Knowledge to user "Paul Barlow". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents. 688:

no secret) and on the books by the FEGEL (Fundación de Estudios Genéticos y Lingüísticos) it is not only a Foundation created with the explicit aim of disseminate the ideas of Arnaiz, but he is its president.

106:’s birthplace and identity rests on the fact that he claims to be a native of the region (a region now in Azerbaijan). John created the article as a result of providing a smokescreen on the author's article 1210:. There's just the bare bones of a plot outline at the moment and a few production details, but these are very scant and veering into original research. Any input you may have would be most valuable. Yours, 2178:

You might like to know, there is a request about an article about the investiture of early medieval kings, in the Illustrated Exhibitor Magazine dated 1852, that some people would like to see on wikimedia.

1961:

Since you seem to edit virtually all of the articles that he was “editing”, you will most likely see if he returns to this pattern of editing before I would. If he persists, perhaps you might report him to

729: 95:

We see again here that for Grandmaster, Charles Dowsett, an author he liked to quote is dismissed as a source, (the official translator of the book) who was a notable expert and explained quite eloquently:

2508:

equanimity before the empirical facts. I did so for the usual Baconian-Elizabethan reason, numerological balancing of trinities, in making a fair proposal. But, since I am not a Trinitarian . . Regards

667:

It follows from your edits and seems to be the only plausible explanation for your obsession with removing the Hannibal bust. Otherwise it seems wholly unmotivated and bizarre. 12:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

2053:

OK. I was just composing and saw the red wavy lines and absent-mindedly right clicked on them while I was thinking. Thanks for the heads-up. I don't want to get into any more trouble than I have.

3017:

I have some friend Jews (from Middle East);you told I had to live with our Palestinian paper. I live,but I do not have an agenda in favour (Israel has the means of knowing it after so much time.

1342:

and that Cheney was referring to the mythical beast. Perhaps a parenthetic note could be appended to indicate that Cheney was referring to the animal, to avoid misleading ambiguity. Thank you.

317:

You can see the web of their Publishing House for their view of what is the usko-mediterranean theory (I don't recomend so you to buy any of their courses, though ;-). Especially the page "

2755: 2704: 83:

So once again, who is spreading conflict? It’s true that for uninvolved users like you Paul, it’s difficult to grasp the whole issue when everything is out of context. You provided a link

2671:

including the elderly and the blind can only experience this great body of verse through recordings. The purpose of this entry is to serve as a guide to some of the main source material.

959:

odd, i meant desperate. I pasted the thing and just glossed over the error! I'm also sure it's not the only portrayal; if you have the time to include some others, that would be great :)

2284:, so the word existed in the western world as an ethnonym prior to India being conquered or discovered. This does not show how much they used it themselves but the term and word existed. 1669:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 2545: 1234:, Darwin was intent on "trying out" his theories with several eminent naturalists and geologists before publishing them — this may explain the odd resequencing of events Potter employs. 1680:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1123: 2429:

please find my complete and comprehensive solution for the so called Aryan problem it is one of the longest research papers published in the history of india in a peerreview journal

1681: 247:

Please pay attention before you undo my edit. I took off the unsourced stuff after I found the source. You put back the crap. I left the police spy in there because it was a fact.--

2170: 2664:

I cannot think of any other way of doing this entry other than by giving the reader a guide to the principal audio and audio-visual interpretations that are available to them.

166:. As the site admits, it was taken from the Review of Armenian Studies, which is a publication of the Turkish center for Eurasian Strategic Studies, see its Knowledge article 1455:

Kudos for your excellent handling of the Washington baptism which was much better than what I thought about doing. I always thought it was pretty apocraphal. My interest is

144: 3014:

I must tell you I heve never visited a Mislim country since I was student in Spain (Morocco). except Bali and Java,which are mostly for Hinduism (Bali).I have many reasons.

2324:¨Provide inline, clear citations. Medes were called medes, persians, persians (...) by greeks... If it was a self designator why others never called them 'airya', 'ariya'. 2226:(the real descendants of the ancient persians) never user used it. Thanks. The word started being used in the western world only after the conquest and discovery of India. 1557:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2571:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

603:

Paul: If possible, it might be best to put the whole verbatim of Rosalie in the footnote, not just the author/book/page ref. That way, all users can see the what he says.

182:

Deniz Gokturk], waking from his slumber and suddenly charging ahead on Armenian terrorism articles? Check those Armenian names he edited and you'll have a clear picture.

1643: 1226:

Thanks for the reply. As I say, any input would be totally appreciated. You're quite right that the play has a rather unusual shape. It does seem, though, that despite

2620: 2717:

Jonathan who wrote the section lives in Midi Pyrénées so it's a pity you couldn't have met up over a "petit noir" to discuss your proposal of shortening the section.

2826:. So does one of my colleagues. That does not mean that the theory that Sickert was Jack the Ripper is legitimate revisionist art history "taught in universities". 2195: 2160: 1484:

lot of techniques used that aren't even addressed that are designed to prop up Eurocentric beliefs despite the evidence. We are handling them all, successfully. --

1714: 680:

I have just added a section. If this theory looks too silly, of course is not my fault (I have even deleted some ideas as that that god Amon means "good mother").

1434:. Do you have a source for that addition? It is controversial to use his writings as sources on Hindu subjects so it would be very helpful to have the source. 937:

Paul, I just clarified (reordered) your correction to the Riverside Shakespeare Company Wiki page, concerning the actors and the roles they played in Midsummer.

1545: 2067:

Also Paul I've been clicking on preview before posting. That cuts down on my re-edits because of typos, but it doesn't eliminate them cos I'm always rewriting.

119:

where, before the redirect, when Grandmaster was not even involved (it was just afterward) and a conflict on another article, Grandmaster found ground for some

2799: 2788: 1531: 1129:

The more I look at this the less sense it makes as an article. Anything before Clovis is 'pre-Siberian'? I'm not sure what to do about it though, suggestions?

1351: 1954:

hoping he might read what it offers and become a useful contributor. Then I reviewed all of his edits over the past two days and noticed several other less

1598: 2987: 1332: 1852: 476:

masse with others (all Celticists; most Scots are mixed temper, but make the extra effort to temper English objection to Irish and Welsh attacks, like

1389: 1370: 2743: 2696: 2496: 2269: 748: 693: 381: 358: 336: 3061:, regarding the linguistic terms/sources I provided and explained as best as I could. Its not my responsibility if someone doesnt understand it. In 1254:

Hi, Paul - sorry about the late reply, I've been offline for a couple of days. Thank you so much for the Historical Background section: great work!

2003: 1637: 1325: 638: 389: 366: 756: 218: 206: 2534: 1838: 1819: 997: 983: 1886: 1138: 859: 615: 344: 2333: 2311: 2293: 2164: 2095: 291: 277: 263: 248: 2811: 1566: 513: 454: 189:, or when those meatpuppeting have gotten other editors blocked, who, in contrast to the meatpuppeter, were really engaged in discussion. See 2661:

and falls, pauses and enunciation, etc. of English at time in the language’s history when it was in a far different form than it is today.

2612: 2453:- Part two is a detailed century by century model (This is the most important part) with methods to reconstruct the languages of the indus 2254: 2235: 415: 1907: 1877:

How exactly do I do that? It takes me an inordinate amount of time figuring out the Knowledge process, which seems to me extremely complex.

2877: 88:

Kaghankatvatsi. The conflict spread further, thanks to Grandmaster and John, when the latter created the article on the book of the author

974:

He was the most purely preraphaelite; that probably sours him to contemporary audiences. I'll look into a few of the dramas and add them.

701: 459:

I apologize for not thanking you sooner. I believe the nature of Breton identity, betwixt English and French origins, lays better on the

2141:) When I checked the copyright status, it stated that it has expired and can be used but I also noted that you have uploaded the pic. 2148: 1554:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

171: 2418: 1869: 3108: 2029: 1983: 1443: 1122: 946: 811:

to AN3, so hopefully she gets blocked before any other warring happens. This is not the only article she has been edit warring on.

304: 2604: 2584: 2474: 1855:

for you to review before I re-edit the page after your undo. Please discuss it if you don't believe the changes should be made.--

1523: 1508: 1493: 1276: 1246: 1219: 968: 290:

Since you like being an ass I'll put biography's name which calls him a political agent. Same shit nevertheless, but still fact.--

2413: 1783: 1620: 1570: 843: 776: 420: 332:

references to reliable sources reviewing their hypothesis (of course rejecting them as absurd and crazy). Also should be quoted.

2768: 2967: 2872: 2600: 2580: 2081: 1803: 661: 597: 582: 567: 548: 533: 57: 3011:

I do not know why then somebody got that upset and now Nature publishes the same thing (with a weaker methodology to my view)

2477: 2180: 2144:

Please let me know your thoughts. The pic used will not be exact but will be influencial in what will be designed through it.

1864: 1187: 185:

What are we to say about those accounts who jump out of nowhere to meatpuppet for others, as was the case for Chippolona like

2795: 1108:

as a joker. I get the feeling that a lot of the Fanelli farrago was stitched up, maybe by Pierne who envied Debussy and co.--

1023: 767:

Supporting refs - all giving only "black land" (and no dodgy variants!) added. Hopefully things'll settle down now. Regards.

103: 89: 2782: 2488: 2129: 1468: 1419: 1178:

is making many edits trying to assert King Tut's "Blackness" and trying to reason with her on the talk page does no good.--

198: 299: 285: 271: 256: 2608: 2156: 1586: 1459:

which has the painting (and signature Gano Chapel) and the college won't even vouchsafe for baptism story. Thanks again.

1117: 1102: 1082: 1068: 900: 892: 2863:

Beat me to the reversion by a nanosecond. Sixty six cites and a long history of said topic, and notability is an issue?

2517: 2121: 795: 163: 2568:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

2559: 2215: 1899: 1892: 1515: 1500: 1485: 1381: 1343: 927: 671: 2850: 1302: 351:

about creating the section, but thought it could be understood as a personal attack against Iberomesornix and friends.

72: 68: 64: 36: 3089: 2076: 2062: 2048: 1756: 1666: 1648: 1048: 3074: 1161: 835: 3099:

Your recent edits on my edits on articles discussed recently, are pleasing for the moment. Thank you for the input.

2751: 2720:

I know he spent absolutely ages paring it down to the bare minimum in order not to waste valuable Knowledge space.

2010: 1431: 815: 375:

Hello again. As you suggested I have made an essay on the Usko-etc. I have not put it yet in the page. Take a look

2841:

Minister fa the Yartz skit, followed on by a reminder that Humphreys is a keen collector of Walter Sickert's work?

1609: 555: 167: 3035: 2971: 1996: 1989: 1770: 1644: 162:

which was initially a WP:COPYVIO and violated both WP:BLP and WP:COATRACK. He copied it word by word from a blog

2822:

To my shame I used to include discussion of the Jack the Ripper conspiracy theory to get students interested in

1262:... I know what you mean about the Flake. I found myself unable to stay in a Holiday Inn afterwards, I must say. 76: 2858: 2807: 2373: 2039:

Paul, send me your e-mail again. I don't have access to my home computer, which has your e-mail address on it.

1424: 1358: 450: 151: 2802:. I switched the two places it was used with the new one, and put it up for deletion. Just letting ya know.-- 932: 41: 1627: 2787: 116: 53: 2572: 1558: 186: 2959: 2900: 2878: 2369: 2364: 952: 625: 110:(see the lead on what was required to stop the edit war on his ethnicity). Who is spreading the conflict? 2963: 2592: 2563:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1764: 1705:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1662: 1549:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 915:

since the edit history seems to indicate that you introduced the relevant material into the article?

558:. judging from you edits you seem to have a fixation with race so I guess I can race you a racist then 518: 2767:

Hi Paul - long time no hear (though I'm in touch with Colin every so often). Drop me a line sometime (

1037: 1034: 606:

TruHeir: sounds like you've some knowledge in hieroglyphics, it'd be good if you put in your refs too.

3094: 2983: 2803: 2391: 1891: 1846: 1603: 1290: 762: 707:

Antonio Arnaiz-Villena page and deleted ""Iberian-Guanche Inscriptions" page(Iberomesornix:Talk page)

376: 63:

those articles when he was pushing Adil Baguirov’s (banned in AA 1) POV? Out of nowhere we see this

2726:

Any guidance please as to what you think could be chopped without losing useful reader-information?

48:– it’s common knowledge. The only editors who helped spread the conflict were Grandmaster and John. 2778: 2492: 2406: 2016: 1788: 1473: 1272: 1242: 1215: 318: 3104: 1366: 1183: 1157: 896: 132: 128: 1318: 1311: 2723:

Half the trouble seems to be that other people have 'hitched a ride' on his original wording !

1977: 1951: 1934: 1903: 1519: 1504: 1489: 1464: 1456: 1425: 1385: 1347: 1192: 1148:

Would you be interested in writing an article on wikipedia for me? www.myspace.com/wisdommoney

677: 2471:

now that it has been published in a journal, is there any place where my ideas can be added.

1769:

Paul, could you help me appeal a dispute I'm having with Stephen Moorer (smatprt) over on the

556:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ham_(son_of_Noah)&diff=285536671&oldid=284703587

2460: 2343: 2091: 1944: 1397: 1206: 1053: 1019: 855: 242: 159: 107: 35:

First and foremost, hang on a second here Paul. What you are saying is that Jayvdb’s comment

17: 1691:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2979: 2940: 2747: 2739: 2700: 2588: 2484: 2445: 2442: 2152: 2137:

Great work! I wanted to check with you if I could use the pic of King Josiah in this link (

1710: 1670: 1633: 1616: 1134: 1005: 888: 791: 772: 752: 697: 634: 611: 385: 362: 340: 2438: 2435: 8: 2975: 2951: 2928: 2846: 2774: 2657:

Shakespeare’s Sonnets section titled “Principal Audio and Audio-Visual Interpretations”.

2530: 2513: 2397: 2377: 2307: 2289: 2117: 2072: 2058: 2044: 1927: 1882: 1834: 1815: 1799: 1779: 1405:

hair of old age has nothing to do with this. Your argument is both OR and makes no sense.

1338: 1298: 1268: 1238: 1211: 1167: 993: 979: 964: 953: 923: 725: 717: 509: 439: 429: 3100: 3085: 2710:

Shakespeare’s Sonnets section titled “Principal Audio and Audio-Visual Interpretations"

2626:

Shakespeare’s Sonnets section titled “Principal Audio and Audio-Visual Interpretations"

2355: 2200: 1967: 1911: 1574: 1415: 1179: 942: 831: 812: 1958:

edits and templated him accordingly for some of them. I left him at a Level 3 warning.

1661:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

56:

and its accompanying edit war. Jayvdb claimed that the relation with Sisak was untrue

3031: 2936: 2838: 2502: 2329: 2250: 2231: 2211: 2191: 2100: 2086:

Thanks for recognising the picture Paul, any ideas `about other objects in the room?

1972: 1860: 1752: 1695:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1594: 1460: 1448: 1439: 1028: 657: 593: 578: 563: 544: 529: 411: 325: 295: 281: 276:

Also what part of YOU ARE PUTING CRAP BACK BY UNDOING MY EDIT don't you understand.--

267: 252: 2917: 2276:τούτους μετέβαλον καὶ οὗτοι τὸ οὔνομα. αὐτοὶ περὶ σφέων ὧδε λέγουσι Μῆδοι. " in the 912: 2616: 2244:"The most authoritive dictionary is the OED (Oxford English Dictionary)..." --: --> 2087: 2025: 1719: 1362: 1200: 1175: 1153: 1113: 1098: 1078: 1064: 1044: 1015: 906: 851: 781: 481: 468: 3040: 2916:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

2896: 2882: 2834: 2816: 2762: 2577:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1744: 1706: 1629: 1612: 1563:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1281: 1130: 808: 787: 768: 630: 607: 175: 100: 2607:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 1580: 3080:), when I saw your discussions in your contribs regarding the IE tree etc etc. 3054: 2842: 2823: 2526: 2509: 2303: 2285: 2277: 2113: 2068: 2054: 2040: 2034: 1930:

since the edit was so subtle and not blatant. Nonetheless I templated him with

1878: 1830: 1811: 1795: 1775: 1294: 989: 975: 960: 919: 864: 820: 721: 713: 505: 493: 489: 434: 1874:"It might be better to raise the matter at the Reliable Sources noticeboard;" 406:

I am disgusted like you about the last time wording against classical scholars

324:

But you can also see the other advertising pages of their web as that on the "

3081: 3049: 2946:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2868: 1963: 1702: 1692: 1685: 1674: 1411: 1010:

Paul, if you remember you were an original contributor to the article on the

938: 827: 800: 501: 485: 477: 464: 460: 179: 2245:

this is your POV. Most of books tell this: aryan derives from sanskrit arya.

1940:

since he failed to provide a source supporting the changes. I also placed a

314:

in any of this languages or in Indo-European, Semitic or Afrasian is wrong.

3062: 3058: 3027: 2992: 2385: 2381: 2325: 2299: 2246: 2227: 2207: 2187: 1921: 1917: 1856: 1748: 1590: 1435: 1011: 653: 589: 574: 559: 540: 525: 422: 407: 2380:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

26: 2021: 1168: 1143: 1109: 1094: 1074: 1060: 1040: 67:(Adil Baguirov’s additions) and reverting Hajji Piruz’s additions here p 2349: 400:

Dumu ,talk to ma at the phone and we can agree in many things I believe.

84: 2888: 676:

As you asked me to add some data on the linguistics researches made by

471:. The nationality analysis, which I attempted to "retouch" was on the 786:

I wonder now whether any other "editors" wade in and say 'No'...? ;o)

154:(Chippolona and Chippolino are the same user, as evidenced by his own 2564: 2265: 1728: 1550: 1449: 1073:

I see now you've done exacly that in the Fanelli article. Thanks - --

137:

In the male line, (1) the princes (who later became kings) of Siunik.

2550: 1536: 2864: 2597:

the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

2466: 1654: 497: 472: 3078:

also type in "Indo-European" in google every search has that tree

3041: 2109: 1682:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Inaccuracies in The Da Vinci Code

197:

restrictions (while every other has been under restrictions; see

190: 150:

One out of many, Chippolona, failed to respect WP:BLP, as seen

3000:

I thought Dumu Eduba was a linguist who was against our work.

2525:

Quoi! un beau coup de veine! Alors, bon voyage et bon appétit!

2372:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 2360: 2281: 2223: 801: 2006:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1328:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2546:

File source problem with File:JWW TheLadyOfShallot 1888.jpg

1966:

to get him blocked, perhaps even a block requiring that he

445: 180:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Deniz_Gokturk

3020:

Please,dont follow Dumu Eduba or tell me WHY you want to,

2461:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1324506

2138: 684:

advertising Arnaiz and Alonso books and courses by mail.

235: 155: 2446:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/25865304/SUJAY-NPAP-Part-Two

2443:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/25880426/Sujay-NPAP-Part-One

2171:

Article in the Illustrated Exhibitor Magazine dated 1852

3069:

is referring to, exclusion of Greek, and subgroup with

3026:

I am really sorry to distress you. Best regards Antonio

2638:

your help in helping me see its return in due course .

1794:

work. I don't know how it ever got a B quality rating.

807:

Watch out for 3RR; you're on it. However, I did report

2923:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2439:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27105677/Sujay-Npap-Part-Two

2436:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27103044/Sujay-NPAP-Part-One

1289:

Try this but its heavy and sometimes slows down my pc

432:, so please expand that article section. Thank you! 85:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Nagorno-Karabagh#Early_history

2450:- Part one is just a high level overview with proof 2384:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2222:

designator among persians is more a propaganda; the

1906:

and his less than useful edit summaries. I reverted

1585:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2689:Principal Audio and Audio-Visual Interpretations 2376:to work towards wording and content that gains a 3073:. I added additional sources of the family tree 2970:can result in deletion without discussion, and 911:Hi. Was wondering if you could have a look at 1995:Hello, Paul Barlow. You have new messages at 1743:You invisibly and with due diligence improved 1532:File source problem with File:Rays a Laugh.jpg 1317:Hello, Paul Barlow. You have new messages at 3023:Why do not you call me and I can talk more.? 848:I responded to your comment on my talk page. 1174:You might want to keep an eye on this page. 178:. What can we say about other editors like [ 139:Now, again, who is spreading the conflict? 2359:according to the reverts you have made on 1337:Sir, you added information to the article 652:you stayed off my page with your nonsense. 2911:. on the other hand this is DYK material. 2353:You currently appear to be engaged in an 463:article, although it has been removed by 2388:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 1204:: his free adaptation of Edmund Gosse's 2935:notice, but please explain why in your 2139:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Josiah.gif 1898:You and I both seem to have run across 1701:This is an automatic notification by a 742:no sense (is internally contradictory). 236:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Email 46:Armenian version precedes the Greek one 14: 2667:Perhaps Mr Barlow knows a better way? 2112:talk? Its a repetition of past events. 1569:. If the image is copyrighted under a 3047:I restored to a more stable version ( 326:usko-mediterranean translators school 104:The History of the Country of Albania 90:The History of the Country of Albania 71:AdilBaguirov additions, or reverting 1514:provided... how is that nonsense? -- 539:say the same thing which is "MAYBE". 428:Paul, you are a dedicated editor at 2833:What about showing them a video of 1583:after 02:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 224:Please take this message to heart. 23: 2918:deleted for any of several reasons 2903:because of the following concern: 2887: 2560:File:JWW TheLadyOfShallot 1888.jpg 2549: 1988: 1916:“Significant content change w/out 1653: 1535: 1310: 24: 3119: 2419:My theory on Indo-Aryan migration 1870:Editor opining on piece he edited 1667:Inaccuracies in The Da Vinci Code 1649:Inaccuracies in The Da Vinci Code 1333:Unicorn in "Language of flowers"? 2729:Have a great séjour in Brittany 2467:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1541822 2348: 1914:with the following description: 1727: 1124:Pre-Siberian American Aborigines 736:experts and it is what they say. 449: 444: 77:redirecting Khachkar destruction 2108:Could you give your opinion to 1771:Shakespeare authorship question 1293:.Its a pdf of sorts from scrbd. 844:Celtic article sexual practices 319:La metodología uskomediterránea 2609:Media copyright questions page 1926:I didn’t think it was exactly 1851:I have added a new section to 1587:Media copyright questions page 1291:The-Odrysian-Kingdom-of-Thrace 1247:10:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 1220:09:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 1188:06:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 1162:21:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC) 1139:06:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 174:and obviously his creation of 13: 1: 2798:of the painting you uploaded 2414:13:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2374:discuss controversial changes 2334:12:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2312:12:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2294:12:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2255:12:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2236:12:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2216:12:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 2196:16:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 2165:14:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2122:17:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 1638:16:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1621:16:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 1599:02:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 1524:23:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 1509:20:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 1494:18:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 1469:17:58, 14 November 2009 (UTC) 1444:09:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 1420:01:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 1118:13:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1103:05:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1083:05:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1069:05:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1049:08:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 720:) 20:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)-- 3053:origin), favored by you and 2581:criteria for speedy deletion 2130:Using the pic of King Josiah 2096:16:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2077:01:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2063:00:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2049:18:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 2030:06:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 1984:06:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1887:18:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1865:20:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 1820:15:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1804:14:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1757:07:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 1715:01:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1567:criteria for speedy deletion 1390:07:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1371:07:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1352:07:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 882:I will be there. Sincerely, 127:Paul. On the article on the 7: 2974:allows discussion to reach 2794:Hi Paul. I just uploaded a 1784:18:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 1665:. The nominated article is 1303:11:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1277:11:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 1024:03:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 998:02:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 984:01:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 969:01:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 10: 3124: 2783:20:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 2756:12:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC) 2705:08:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC) 2621:01:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 2535:18:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1579:the image will be deleted 1432:this diff is your addition 1036:was unitelligable for you 1033:Which part of my argument 672:Usko-Mediterranean section 3109:18:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 3090:18:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 3071:Armenian and Indo-Iranian 3036:19:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC) 2960:proposed deletion process 2518:18:54, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 2497:12:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 1839:12:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1733: 1726: 1688:with four tildes (~~~~). 1626:Found the original edit: 947:18:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 928:01:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 860:15:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 836:10:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC) 816:18:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 796:13:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 777:16:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 757:22:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 730:20:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 702:11:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 626:Black (hieroglyphic 'km') 416:19:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC) 75:Hajji Piruz additions or 3065:, I also clarified what 2988:16:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC) 2873:19:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 2851:17:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 2812:08:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC) 2630:Limoux, France, 27/3/10 2017:Georges Ernest Boulanger 2011:Georges Ernest Boulanger 1997:SpikeToronto's talk page 988:Better late than never! 901:00:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 662:18:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 639:16:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 616:16:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 598:14:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 583:01:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 568:18:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 549:14:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 534:14:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 514:10:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 455:19:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 390:18:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 367:11:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 345:11:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 300:11:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 286:11:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 272:11:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 257:10:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 123:(see his reply to Dab). 2968:speedy deletion process 2941:the article's talk page 1952:his anonymous talk page 1608:Ahem, that would be me 133:House of Hasan-Jalalyan 129:House of Hasan-Jalalyan 2892: 2859:Antisemitism in Europe 2828: 2554: 1993: 1737:The Invisible Barnstar 1658: 1540: 1457:William Jewell College 1426:Monier Monier-Williams 1357:If you check the diff 1315: 876:contrary to consensus? 678:Antonio Arnaiz-Villena 305:"Iberian inscriptions" 2972:articles for deletion 2901:proposed for deletion 2891: 2820: 2773:Best wishes - Jason 2557:Thanks for uploading 2553: 1992: 1853:The Davinci Code Talk 1693:articles for deletion 1675:What Knowledge is not 1657: 1546:File:Rays a Laugh.jpg 1543:Thanks for uploading 1539: 1314: 990:Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση 976:Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση 961:Ελληνικά όρος ή φράση 933:Riverside Shakespeare 554:the rest of the page 207:fringe theory pushing 108:Movses Kaghankatvatsi 18:User talk:Paul Barlow 2804:Brianann MacAmhlaidh 2796:higher quality image 2789:File:Gordondeath.jpg 2426:How are you doing?? 2082:What?.... "The Puck" 1684:. Please be sure to 1671:Knowledge:Notability 913:Talk:Japhetic#Jasher 885:Simon ...un Breton 1747:which I neglected. 1339:Language of flowers 954:Desperate Romantics 624:Incidentally, page 430:History of Brittany 2964:deletion processes 2893: 2648:Steffan Scurfield 2587:. If the image is 2555: 2382:dispute resolution 2175:Dear Paul Barlow, 2004:remove this notice 1994: 1912:Friedrich Olbricht 1765:Help with dispute? 1686:sign your comments 1659: 1575:Knowledge:Fair use 1565:, as described on 1541: 1326:remove this notice 1319:JohnCD's talk page 1316: 519:hannibal roman pic 121:territorial claims 3095:Your recent edits 2879:Proposed deletion 2839:Sir Les Patterson 2759: 2742:comment added by 2487:comment added by 2370:three-revert rule 2365:three-revert rule 2155:comment added by 1968:create an account 1904:User:201.9.217.31 1893:User:201.9.217.31 1847:The Davinici Code 1762: 1761: 1604:Romulus and Remus 1088:was professor of 891:comment added by 763:That darned Kemet 69:here to reinserts 3115: 2957: 2956: 2950: 2934: 2933: 2927: 2758: 2736: 2678:Jonathan Willby 2645:Yours sincerely 2634:Dear Mr Barlow, 2579:per Knowledge's 2499: 2411: 2403: 2400: 2363:. Note that the 2352: 2298:I was adressing 2280:to describe the 2167: 2007: 1980: 1975: 1949: 1943: 1939: 1933: 1789:Egyptian verdict 1731: 1724: 1723: 1571:non-free license 1474:Sock accusations 1329: 1201:Where Adam Stood 1176:User:Deeceevoice 903: 482:User:Jack forbes 469:User:TharkunColl 453: 448: 423:Brittany#History 27:Moses of Chorene 3123: 3122: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3097: 3045: 3001: 2995: 2980:Marcus Qwertyus 2954: 2948: 2947: 2931: 2925: 2924: 2897:Hilarius Gilges 2886: 2883:Hilarius Gilges 2861: 2835:Barry Humphries 2819: 2792: 2775:Jason Whittaker 2765: 2737: 2712: 2628: 2601:speedy deletion 2548: 2505: 2482: 2421: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2386:page protection 2346: 2203: 2181:Please see here 2173: 2150: 2132: 2103: 2084: 2037: 2015:The article on 2013: 2008: 2001: 1978: 1973: 1947: 1941: 1937: 1931: 1896: 1872: 1849: 1791: 1767: 1745:Monier-Williams 1722: 1652: 1606: 1534: 1476: 1453: 1429: 1400: 1335: 1330: 1323: 1284: 1222:(AKA. Richard) 1195: 1172: 1146: 1127: 1056: 1031: 1008: 957: 935: 909: 886: 871:July 2009 (UTC) 867: 846: 823: 809:User:Jackiestud 805: 784: 765: 709: 674: 521: 426: 421:Please edit at 307: 245: 176:Mourad Topalian 160:Mourad Topalian 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3121: 3096: 3093: 3055:User:Dbachmann 3044: 3039: 2999: 2994: 2991: 2978:for deletion. 2958:will stop the 2914: 2913: 2885: 2876: 2860: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2824:Walter Sickert 2818: 2815: 2791: 2786: 2764: 2761: 2711: 2708: 2686: 2681: 2674: 2651: 2633: 2627: 2624: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2504: 2501: 2489:122.248.161.91 2432: 2420: 2417: 2345: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2296: 2278:5th century BC 2268:uses the word 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2239: 2238: 2202: 2199: 2172: 2169: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2102: 2099: 2083: 2080: 2036: 2033: 2012: 2009: 2000: 1987: 1922:edit summaries 1895: 1890: 1871: 1868: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1823: 1822: 1790: 1787: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1732: 1721: 1718: 1651: 1647:nomination of 1642: 1641: 1640: 1605: 1602: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1475: 1472: 1452: 1447: 1428: 1423: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1374: 1373: 1334: 1331: 1322: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1283: 1280: 1269:Absurdtrousers 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1239:Absurdtrousers 1236: 1235: 1212:Absurdtrousers 1207:Father and Son 1194: 1193:Collaboration? 1191: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1145: 1142: 1126: 1121: 1055: 1052: 1030: 1027: 1007: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 956: 951: 934: 931: 908: 905: 866: 863: 845: 842: 840: 822: 819: 804: 799: 783: 780: 764: 761: 760: 759: 744: 743: 738: 737: 708: 705: 673: 670: 669: 668: 644: 643: 642: 641: 619: 618: 604: 520: 517: 494:English people 490:British Empire 425: 419: 404: 403: 402: 401: 395: 394: 393: 392: 370: 369: 353: 352: 306: 303: 244: 241: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3120: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3101:WillBildUnion 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050:Indo-European 3043: 3038: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3024: 3021: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3005: 2998: 2990: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2953: 2944: 2942: 2938: 2930: 2921: 2919: 2912: 2910: 2908:Not notable? 2906: 2905: 2904: 2902: 2898: 2890: 2884: 2880: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2827: 2825: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2790: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2769: 2760: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2733: 2732:Kind regards 2730: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2687: 2684: 2679: 2676: 2675:Kind regards 2672: 2668: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2655: 2654:Dear Steffan 2652: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2611:. Thank you. 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2566: 2562: 2561: 2552: 2543: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2500: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2447: 2444: 2440: 2437: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2404: 2395: 2393: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2351: 2344:February 2010 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2184: 2183:Many thanks! 2182: 2176: 2168: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2157:110.20.30.166 2154: 2149: 2147:Thanks Alwyn 2145: 2142: 2140: 2135: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2098: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2079: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2005: 1998: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1982: 1981: 1976: 1969: 1965: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1946: 1936: 1935:uw-unsourced2 1929: 1925: 1923: 1919: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1900:the odd edits 1894: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1694: 1689: 1687: 1683: 1678: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1656: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1589:. Thank you. 1588: 1584: 1582: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1538: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1451: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1427: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1398:Race of Jesus 1391: 1387: 1383: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1340: 1327: 1320: 1313: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1203: 1202: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180:KatelynJohann 1177: 1170: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1091: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1054:Fanelli/Alkan 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 970: 966: 962: 955: 950: 948: 944: 940: 930: 929: 925: 921: 916: 914: 904: 902: 898: 894: 893:98.210.153.32 890: 883: 880: 877: 873: 872: 862: 861: 857: 853: 849: 841: 838: 837: 833: 829: 818: 817: 814: 810: 803: 798: 797: 793: 789: 779: 778: 774: 770: 758: 754: 750: 746: 745: 740: 739: 734: 733: 732: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 704: 703: 699: 695: 689: 685: 681: 679: 666: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 650: 640: 636: 632: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 617: 613: 609: 605: 602: 601: 600: 599: 595: 591: 585: 584: 580: 576: 570: 569: 565: 561: 557: 551: 550: 546: 542: 536: 535: 531: 527: 516: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502:Breton people 499: 495: 491: 487: 486:British Isles 483: 479: 478:User:Billreid 474: 470: 466: 465:User:Ghmyrtle 462: 461:Breton people 457: 456: 452: 447: 442: 441: 437: 436: 431: 424: 418: 417: 413: 409: 399: 398: 397: 396: 391: 387: 383: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 355: 354: 349: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 333: 329: 327: 322: 320: 315: 311: 302: 301: 297: 293: 288: 287: 283: 279: 274: 273: 269: 265: 259: 258: 254: 250: 243:Pay attention 240: 237: 231: 228: 225: 222: 220: 214: 210: 208: 202: 200: 194: 192: 188: 183: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 148: 146: 140: 138: 134: 130: 124: 122: 118: 112: 111: 109: 105: 101: 93: 91: 86: 81: 78: 74: 70: 66: 60: 58: 55: 49: 47: 43: 38: 33: 19: 3098: 3077: 3070: 3067:Armeno-Aryan 3066: 3063:Graeco-Aryan 3059:Talk:Mitanni 3048: 3046: 3025: 3022: 3019: 3016: 3013: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2996: 2966:exist. The 2962:, but other 2945: 2937:edit summary 2922: 2915: 2907: 2895:The article 2894: 2862: 2821: 2793: 2772: 2766: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2714:Hello Paul, 2713: 2695: 2691: 2688: 2685: 2680: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2659: 2656: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2629: 2596: 2576: 2570: 2558: 2556: 2541: 2506: 2480: 2473: 2470: 2464: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2408: 2394:from editing 2389: 2354: 2347: 2273: 2204: 2185: 2177: 2174: 2146: 2143: 2136: 2133: 2085: 2066: 2052: 2038: 2014: 1971: 1970:. Thanks! — 1960: 1955: 1945:Welcome-anon 1915: 1897: 1876: 1873: 1850: 1792: 1768: 1736: 1699:Please note: 1698: 1697: 1690: 1679: 1660: 1607: 1578: 1562: 1556: 1544: 1542: 1527: 1516:68.41.101.63 1512: 1501:68.41.101.63 1497: 1486:68.41.101.63 1480: 1477: 1461:Americasroof 1454: 1430: 1408: 1403: 1401: 1382:174.16.37.93 1344:174.16.37.93 1336: 1267: 1259: 1255: 1237: 1231: 1227: 1205: 1199: 1196: 1173: 1147: 1128: 1106: 1089: 1086: 1072: 1057: 1032: 1012:roman salute 1009: 1006:Roman salute 958: 936: 917: 910: 884: 881: 875: 874: 869: 868: 850: 847: 839: 824: 806: 785: 766: 710: 690: 686: 682: 675: 648: 645: 586: 571: 552: 537: 522: 458: 438: 433: 427: 405: 334: 330: 323: 316: 312: 308: 289: 275: 260: 246: 232: 229: 226: 223: 215: 211: 203: 195: 184: 149: 141: 136: 125: 120: 113: 97: 94: 82: 61: 50: 45: 34: 30: 2997:Dear Paul, 2738:—Preceding 2589:copyrighted 2483:—Preceding 2390:you may be 2151:—Preceding 2134:G day Paul 2088:Victuallers 2020:removing.-- 1950:message on 1918:explanation 1260:Double Dare 1169:Tutankhamun 1016:Work permit 887:—Preceding 852:Drifter bob 747:Regards. -- 500:as well as 335:Regards. -- 2952:dated prod 2929:dated prod 2744:Jwssbarlow 2697:Jwssbarlow 2603:criterion 2399:Literature 2270:Hdt. 1.1.0 2201:ARYAN wiki 1920:. Pls use 1707:Erwin85Bot 1630:Dougweller 1613:Dougweller 1230:predating 1131:Dougweller 788:Catiline63 769:Catiline63 749:Dumu Eduba 694:Dumu Eduba 631:Catiline63 608:Catiline63 382:Dumu Eduba 359:Dumu Eduba 337:Dumu Eduba 2976:consensus 2899:has been 2843:Nishidani 2735:Stephen 2573:this link 2565:copyright 2527:Nishidani 2510:Nishidani 2503:Apologies 2465:Part Two 2459:Part one 2441:Mirror: 2423:Hi Paul. 2378:consensus 2304:Megistias 2286:Megistias 2266:Herodotus 2114:Megistias 2069:Tom Reedy 2055:Tom Reedy 2041:Tom Reedy 1956:bone fide 1928:vandalism 1908:his edits 1879:Tom Reedy 1831:BenJonson 1812:Tom Reedy 1796:Tom Reedy 1776:Tom Reedy 1559:this link 1551:copyright 1450:John Gano 1402:You said 1295:Megistias 1029:Your edit 920:TimNelson 722:Virginal6 714:Virginal6 506:Catterick 227:Regards. 156:admission 3082:Forsts23 2837:doing a 2752:contribs 2740:unsigned 2593:non-free 2485:unsigned 2456:journal 2356:edit war 2153:unsigned 2002:You can 1720:A reward 1663:deletion 1581:48 hours 1412:Panehesy 1324:You can 1228:Omphalos 1090:solfege. 939:Weimar03 918:Thanks, 907:Japhetic 889:unsigned 828:Folantin 813:MuZemike 782:Hannibal 498:Brittany 473:Brittany 440:Petuaria 3042:Mitanni 3028:Arnaiz1 2817:Sickert 2763:Hey hey 2481:Sujay 2392:blocked 2326:Rajkris 2300:Rajkris 2247:Rajkris 2228:Rajkris 2208:Rajkris 2206:Thanks. 2188:Mootros 2186:Yours, 2110:Orpheus 2101:Orpheus 1979:Toronto 1857:Krezyle 1749:Alatari 1591:Salavat 1577:) then 1436:Alatari 1282:Orpheus 1152:About? 654:TruHeir 590:TruHeir 575:TruHeir 560:TruHeir 541:TruHeir 526:TruHeir 435:Lutetia 408:Arnaiz1 292:Fire 55 278:Fire 55 264:Fire 55 262:this.-- 249:Fire 55 3057:. See 2939:or on 2613:R12056 2274:Ἀρίους 2035:Wilmot 2022:Toddy1 1964:WP:AIV 1363:Paul B 1232:Origin 1154:Paul B 1110:Smerus 1095:Smerus 1075:Smerus 1061:Smerus 1041:Alefbe 865:Dieudo 821:Thanks 145:report 2409:T@1k? 2361:Aryan 2282:Medes 2224:Parsi 1974:Spike 1673:and " 1573:(per 802:Ochre 649:skin. 238:: --> 16:< 3105:talk 3086:talk 3032:talk 2993:WHY? 2984:talk 2869:talk 2847:talk 2808:talk 2800:here 2779:talk 2748:talk 2701:talk 2617:talk 2599:per 2591:and 2531:talk 2514:talk 2493:talk 2402:geek 2330:talk 2308:talk 2290:talk 2251:talk 2232:talk 2212:talk 2192:talk 2161:talk 2118:talk 2092:talk 2073:talk 2059:talk 2045:talk 2026:talk 1883:talk 1861:talk 1835:talk 1816:talk 1800:talk 1780:talk 1753:talk 1711:talk 1677:"). 1634:talk 1617:talk 1595:talk 1520:talk 1505:talk 1490:talk 1481:sock 1465:talk 1440:talk 1416:talk 1386:talk 1367:talk 1348:talk 1299:talk 1273:talk 1243:talk 1216:talk 1184:talk 1158:talk 1135:talk 1114:talk 1099:talk 1079:talk 1065:talk 1045:talk 1020:talk 994:talk 980:talk 965:talk 943:talk 924:talk 897:talk 856:talk 832:talk 792:talk 773:talk 753:talk 726:talk 718:talk 698:talk 658:talk 635:talk 612:talk 594:talk 579:talk 564:talk 545:talk 530:talk 510:talk 496:and 480:and 412:talk 386:talk 377:here 363:talk 341:talk 296:talk 282:talk 268:talk 253:talk 234:< 219:here 199:here 191:here 187:here 172:this 168:here 164:site 152:here 117:here 73:here 65:edit 54:here 42:here 37:here 2881:of 2865:JNW 2770:). 2396:. 1910:at 1902:of 1703:bot 1645:AfD 1144:??? 201:). 3107:) 3088:) 3034:) 2986:) 2955:}} 2949:{{ 2943:. 2932:}} 2926:{{ 2920:. 2871:) 2849:) 2810:) 2781:) 2754:) 2750:• 2703:) 2619:) 2605:F7 2595:, 2585:F4 2583:, 2575:. 2533:) 2516:) 2495:) 2405:| 2332:) 2310:) 2302::) 2292:) 2253:) 2234:) 2214:) 2194:) 2163:) 2120:) 2094:) 2075:) 2061:) 2047:) 2028:) 1948:}} 1942:{{ 1938:}} 1932:{{ 1924:.” 1885:) 1863:) 1837:) 1818:) 1802:) 1782:) 1755:) 1713:) 1636:) 1619:) 1597:) 1561:. 1522:) 1507:) 1492:) 1467:) 1442:) 1418:) 1388:) 1369:) 1350:) 1301:) 1275:) 1258:, 1256:Ah 1245:) 1218:) 1186:) 1160:) 1137:) 1116:) 1101:) 1093:-- 1081:) 1067:) 1047:) 1022:) 996:) 982:) 967:) 949:. 945:) 926:) 899:) 858:) 834:) 794:) 775:) 755:) 728:) 700:) 692:-- 660:) 637:) 614:) 596:) 581:) 566:) 547:) 532:) 512:) 492:, 488:, 443:| 414:) 388:) 380:-- 365:) 357:-- 343:) 298:) 284:) 270:) 255:) 239:. 221:. 135:, 3103:( 3084:( 3076:( 3030:( 2982:( 2867:( 2845:( 2806:( 2777:( 2746:( 2699:( 2615:( 2529:( 2512:( 2491:( 2476:, 2328:( 2306:( 2288:( 2249:( 2230:( 2210:( 2190:( 2159:( 2116:( 2090:( 2071:( 2057:( 2043:( 2024:( 1999:. 1881:( 1859:( 1833:( 1814:( 1798:( 1778:( 1751:( 1709:( 1632:( 1615:( 1593:( 1518:( 1503:( 1488:( 1463:( 1438:( 1414:( 1384:( 1365:( 1346:( 1321:. 1297:( 1271:( 1241:( 1214:( 1182:( 1156:( 1133:( 1112:( 1097:( 1077:( 1063:( 1043:( 1018:( 992:( 978:( 963:( 941:( 922:( 895:( 854:( 830:( 790:( 771:( 751:( 724:( 716:( 696:( 656:( 633:( 610:( 592:( 577:( 562:( 543:( 528:( 508:( 410:( 384:( 361:( 339:( 294:( 280:( 266:( 251:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index