User talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 11

961:

was provocative bear-poking.") is utterly and completely incorrect. I was not behaving or thinking in a sanctimonious manner and I wasn't implying Tenebrae was homophobic/un-PC/or anything remotely in the same vicinity of either. And no, I wasn't trying to provoke or engage in poke the bear behavior. My post on his talkpage was only about informing him of something I thought he wasn't aware of and that a better and appropriate revert reason/edit summary would have been that there was no reference to support the content added. As I already stated at that particular AN/I thread, I was about to unaccept that pending revision myself. I was glad it was taken care of by someone (it happened to be Tenebrae) but did not agree with the reasons why. When one operates as a reviewer (as I assume he was and as I was about to do), they need to be more precise in their reasons why a revert/unaccept is made. My comments on Tenebrae's talkpage were only meant to be informative and helpful, nothing less and nothing more. I don't go around trolling and poking. Further, as I also stated at the same AN/I thread, I didn't even remember that Tenebrae and I had tangled months ago when I posted on his talkpage. That explanation alone should assure you and anyone else who cares that my actions were completely above board and honorable. --

2370: 2397: 2406: 2388: 2379: 4172:

and leading individual within those events? Taber Gregory achieving that level of recognition is certainly note worthy, it's so note worthy that after he used that TRC-Canada recognition to achieve his USA Citizenship on basis of being a victim of the genocide-Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops, the mandate of TRC-Canada was edited to preclude all other victims of Canada Scoops who were not kept within Canada but who were instead placed in USA and west Europe from being recognized by this TRC-Canada. So would you pleas stop editing him out of Notable Residents of Wilton, Connecticut already. This is like a senseless tug of war.

4341:

in other ways. I disliked it that someone (not you)would assume that seeing the name "Wm Shaxpere" on a marriage licence would automatically mean it to be the playwright William Shakespeare. I didn't like it that someone felt so certain that the "Whately" name on the marriage license was "Hathaway" but just misspelled badly. So, we are supposed to assume that this marriage license was definitely the one filed by William Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway? To me, especially in matters of history, we have to be more certain. The purpose of my contribution was to provide more information to further enlighten the reader.

2712: 1632:

concept of a "pure" Nordic or a Nordic "ideal", which I will leave to anyone's imagination. Does this study define its terms? Of course a lot of this kind of discussion was in reaction to the Nazis, of which Hans F. K. Günther was one. The more I think about this term the more I agree with others (perhaps including Paul B) that this is a pretty useless and antiquated term. I started out just thinking it meant "people from the north" but it has been misused over the years, not unlike the term "Negro".

4119:

of truth and reconciliation commissions, Canada Scoops, human trafficking, etc., by which to understand the vernacular used? Because not being fluent in the vernacular of those events would be a really legitimate reason that the Knowledge editors are making these deletions. Even the Knowledge Editor who told me that the TRC victim file number I gave within a citation could not be true and had to be false. (I even offered to send him a copy of it but was then told that wasn't enough).

2318:, that was the only one where the existing Knowledge image seemed better than the official collection one! I replaced in the hope that editors might find the extra meta-data useful - did it interest you? I see that you've clicked through to the image on Commons though and done some categorisation. That's much appreciated! I wondered whether their might be other images from the collection or items that you would find useful for your editing? Let me know if I can help at all! Cheers, 1458:(it identifies his mother as Annie Lennox and makes other absurd statements). It claimed that Dickens had "dyslexia" (!) and the grave marker has a caption ("meal man") that is unknown on any grave at all. The story as presented was just about plausible enough to appear in the press for a few years on and off and then circulate on the internet. But it has NEVER EVER appeared in any academic literature on Dickens. BTW, Find A Grave has other grave sites of people who never existed. 3517: 2219:

the earlier part of the battle, before the shooting starts. However, since at least Hardy's book longbow "Nestroque" has been interpreted as a shooting signal for the archers. We could put it back in - it is a common interpretation - but would somehow need to refer to it as a modern idea and would need to source that. Or we could take the lazy route and leave it out. Happy to work with you on wording on the article talk page if you want to go back to including it

3568: 2867: 1232:). We have to put such material in context, otherwise it's misleading. That's why I said it was 'undue weight'. It could be reintroduced if we can add other points of view to balance it. I'd suggest that you could add it to the article on the sonnet. We may be able to create a whole new page on the dedication, but I'm far too busy to do that now. The whole sonnets page really needs a complete overhaul. 4219: 844: 734: 1100:

Harris lose 116 pages of Book of Mormon manuscript, chastising him for "fearing man more than God." The revelation was given in the voice of God, and Smith, as a speaker, was absent from the revelation. Subsequent revelations would take on a similar authoritative style, often opening with words like "Hearken O ye people which profess my name, saith the Lord your God."

1886:, which was dramatised within the soap opera. Her "fictional" production was then broadcast separately as an independent radio version of the play, with the actors credited as both the "real" actors and also the fictional "actors" - the characters they play in the soap opera. The performance was unique because the actors were playing their characters playing the roles. 295:

its inflated view of itself. or to put it another way, they dressed similar to the peeky blinders. or further, as I submitted, all cities in the UK had gangs who dressed in a similar fashion. Finally. my added comment was not from some academic work but an addition from family history handed down directly from grandparents who actually knew some of these people.

1009:. Tatlock has moved on to that article now. I don't intend to waste any more of my time on him so I don't really want to waste yours but could you add a third opinion please (even if it's just a short one), because once he reverts again I am going to raise the issue at ANI. He is clearly a SPA and I believe it's time for his account to be deactivated. 1841:

war! Instead, use the Talk page to explain if you think that more needs to be said than that the one episode of the series included a broadcast of an adaptation of the play, and give a reference that verifies if any other episodes discuss the play, and in what way it was discussed in each such episode. If a substantial part of another episode of

3587:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1251:

and neutral enough to include? One in the paragraph about "onlie begetter" and the other down in the section about Mr. W.H.? See what you think. Otherwise I will definitely edit the other Sonnets as you suggest as I am trying to touch them all up systematically and include details from this work where appropriate. Thank you for your input.

70:"Kręciła mnie taka moc w nim - reportaż" . Gazeta Wyborcza (paywall now). Archived from the original on 2007. "I'm beginning to understand why this country is listed as one of the most anti-Semitic countries in the world (Polish: "Zaczynam rozumieć, dlaczego ten kraj jest notowany jako jeden z najbardziej antysemickich krajów na świecie!"" 1138:

However, I'm not defending that paricular passage. Frankly, I don't even know what is meant by "The revelation was given in the voice of God, and Smith, as a speaker, was absent from the revelation." I'm guessing it means he heard the voice of God inside his own head, but it's far from clear. Knowledge is full of

4192:

goes into detail on this very requirement. Don't you think I know by now what, in your opinion, Taber Gregory's 'claim to fame' is? You have repeated it over and over and over on multiple pages. I don't know what connection you have to Taber Gregory, but you have provided no independent sources about

4171:

Taber Gregory is the 1st and only victim of Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops to be recognized by the recently concluded Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada. Knowledge deems Canada Scoops/Sixties Scoops noteworthy, and Truth & Reconciliation Commission - Canada note worthy, but not a unique

4118:

Until I made reference to Pearl S Buck involvement in the Canada Scoops, these inputs, including adding Taber Gregory as a Notable Resident on Wilton, CT page stood and withstood Knowledge edits-reviews. So, I have to ask do you or any of those who have edited Pearl S Buck page have any understanding

2838:

look like a Jewish funeral. It is so ugly that blind men gouge their eyes out out of fear they might see it. It sucks so hard scientists are studying it to better understand black holes. It is so bad that when God saw it He had to forgive the devil because he never did anything comparable. If you

2767:

the image attempts to compile all the characteristics attributed to the god Hubal in a single image to make it easier for the viewer to visualize or get a rough idea of the image. this at the moment is the only existing image of Hubal so I honestly do not see how it DOESNT bring value to the article.

2707:

After some research, I believe now more than before, that The phrase Cow-Toe, represents an evolution in linguistics, as it is not a malapropism as it means essentially the same thing as kowtow nor is it a Homonym Heteronym Heterographm, nor a Homophone or Homograph. As you can see by the chart which

1224:

I accept that the book is legitimate scholarship, but your edit presented a point of view as if it were fact. I think if that pov is going to be included, it has to be in the context of other viewpoints that have been expressed by scholars. Most don't think that the "only begetter" passage would have

1160:

I should add that you don't help youself by edit warring, making wild accusations and sockpuppeting. This is the first time you have even tried to discuss content, despite months of attempting to alter the content of the article, which, by the way, is not "mine". I wrote very little of it. Also, this

127:

The Polish message appears because of a "ref" tag that someone added above, in a discussion about Simon Mol, who caused controversies in Poland, hence the language. I've removed the tag. As for the issue itself, I think it's important that there should be consistent formatting across articles. If the

4340:

Dear Mr. Barlow, By leaving my contribution in (with regard to there were other people with the surname of Shakespeare), this would have informed Wikepedia readers that there were other people during Shakespeare's time who had the surname "Shakespeare," and I went on to show how the name was spelled

3947:

Please note that I am not the one accusing the other of "ridiculous" melodrama. If you want to make a point then please do it directly. It is encyclopedic to give clear indications of usage and words like "usually" or "frequently" are appropriately used. However and as noted I did appreciate your

3358:

has been removed from the Friedrich article. From the 1960s on, Graubner's "fog spaces", one of them even entitled "Erster Nebelraum - Hommage à Caspar David Friedrich" (1968), and his picture-size coloured cushions or "color-space bodies" were clearly inspired by Friedrich's "Wanderer above the Sea

1457:

There never was a grave of Ebenezer Scroggie. Read any academic book on Dickens and you will find no mention whatever of this story. It was a hoax created in the 1990s that circulated in the press in the early 2000s. If you read the original article from which the story derives it is an obvious hoax

1208:

Hello. You reverted some edits on the basis they gave "undue weight". I'm trying to update some sonnets articles with information from a book my father wrote. He's a fairly accomplished Shakespeare scholar. I don't mind either way whether the information is included. I wonder though whether deleting

1099:

You made the argument to kwm1975 that Knowledge is not for Nation of Islam dogma with regard to the Knowledge page of its founder, Wallace Fard Muhammad. The Knowledge page of Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormons, states: "Smith's first recorded revelation was a rebuke from God for having let Martin

294:

your bad mannered comment "who the hell is Michael Lacy" is uncalled for. The edit was to replace the inaccuracy in the Peeky Blinder wikipedia. for the comment they dressed similar to the manchesters gangs, I would point out Birmingham was, and still is, more important than Manchester regardless of

3713:

I don't know that you mean by spelling your name incorrectly. I spelled it that same way it is spelled in the article and by you. I deleted the material about accepting an article for "deposit" because, frankly, it is not clear what is supposed to be significant about that fact. It implies academic

2218:

The simple answer is I didn't write it and hadn't noticed it (so thank you for drawing attention to it). If you look at the Nestroque passage in Waurin or Lefevre, it says nothing about the archers shooting - the next thing the army does is advance, which implies that Erpingham's action belongs to

1868:

in the article, though a citation to the BBC website was, this was to a different page within it. If you had troubled to read the first reverter's edit summary you would have seen that he claimed that the edit was not supported by the existing citation (even though the information is all within the

1840:

involves Lynda Snell organising a Christmas production of the play; and (3) even if you can find a reference that states that more than one episode of "The Archers" was involved, those episodes would be merely pop culture references to the play, and therefore, arguably "trivia". Please do not edit

1250:

Hi, Paul. Thanks for taking the time to respond. I don't have the wikipedia knowledge required to make a decent page on the dedication myself, but I would like to contribute to such a page. I have constructed the two sentences below from your own statements about the content. Perhaps they are short

1111:

Unquestionably anyone who challenges your approach, and the approach of your colleagues, will face a high barrier in any effort to replace your article with a new Knowledge page containing Wallace Fard Muhammad's "dogma" given the nature of his teaching. But for the record - you are simply wrong on

960:

Your assessment of my motivation at AN/I ("For the record I think Winkelvi's comment on your talk page was utterly stupid and they should be ashamed of themselves for sanctimoniously insinuating that you were homophobic, un-PC or whatever for removing something so obviously false and silly. Yes, it

4187:

WV NYC, this is becoming ridiculous. Multiple editors have tried to explain to you the nature of Knowledge policies. You just ignore them. There is next-to-no evidence in what you say that you have read the guidelines, though you do rightly say that they require "secondary sources reporting on the

1881:

is the longest running soap opera in the world. Of course that does not in itself make it culturally important, but it has had a long history of self-reflexive commentary on acting and dramatic convention, and its target demographic is people who are literature-history literate. What happened this

982:

How is the edit summary "he's not married" somehow a denial of gay marriage, which is the only possible reading of your talk page comment? The edit simply removed factually incorrect information, which was no more than a bit of vandalism. He's not married - to a woman, a man or a trans-dimensional

3966:

The joke was about beetles, not the Beatles. The rest of your message makes no discernible sense to me, or rather it comes across as disingenuous. We both know why you want to say 'usually'. It's as ideologically driven as your obsession with the hyphenated spelling. Invoking COMMONNAME is just a

1631:

The article makes it fairly clear that any single definition of "Nordic race" is a snapshot in time of the development from circa 1855 to today. There apparently has never been one consistent definition. It seems to vary between meaning generally the people who originate in Northern Europe to the

1107:

Your article on Wallace Fard Muhammad, which is now his Knowledge page, presents the history of Mr. Wallace Dodd Ford as if that history is unquestionably the history of Wallace Fard Muhammad. This view, while appropriate to serve as the opinion of whoever shares the view, cannot be presented as

231:

I understand you are a veteran editor here, but I must assert that there IS a relationship between the Hittite Hubal and the Arabic, it is explicit in the source, and perhaps I should have stated the Arabic connection more clearly "a Hellenic double of the ARAB God Hobal" (Guirand, 1972, p.109) I

1137:

You know perfectly well that the article on Smith makes it very clear that the "relevations" described are from his point of view. You will have had to have read half the article before coming upon that passage, by which time the context of his claims to revelation have been discussed in detail.

4031:

I've already answered that question. We don't say in the article on Mount Olympus that there is no archaeological evidence that Greek gods lived on the top of it. The topic is mythology. In any case, I rather doubt that any excavations have ever been undertaken designed to prove or disprove the

1103:

The reason that this Knowledge page, and the Knowledge pages of every religious founder, contains the dogma of the group that they founded is due to the fact that the teachings and beliefs of the founder form the basis of their life's work. The Nation of Islam teaches that White people are the

3302:

page, simply because they were of the opinion that these are minor artists not worth mentioning in the featured Friedrich article, although the work of these important 20th-century artists is clearly inspired by Friedrich, as several independent sources say. To my mind, linking is an important

534:

nonsensical. There's nothing snide in that. It said "In popular culture, generates a high level of controversy". In popular culture what generates a high level of controversy? Hitler? Portrayals of Hitler? And, no, I don't really think Hitler is "controversial", nor are most portrayals of him.

4114:

Taber Gregory on the Wilton, CT Notable Residents page, Why did you delete that? The information provided is correct and it has been properly cited, i.e., If Knowledge doesn't think 'Notable' The 1st and currently The Only victim of Canada Scoops - a genocide - to be recognized by Truth &

2333:

Yes, it's not that I worked on the image, though of course everyone hates to see their work lost. But I think I can overcome that twinge of pain. It was just that the image you added was rather "weird" to look at, as it had some very odd visual 'artefacts', especially at the right (streaks of

1644:

article has this as the first sentence: "The word "Negro" is used in the English-speaking world to refer to a person of black ancestry or appearance." It does not seem terribly prolix and perhaps the idea of "white ancestry or appearance" should be interjected into the lead of the Nordic race

1041:

There's no harm in giving the English translation, though I don't think it's necessary. Obviously it would be great to have a photograph of A-V, which is something that every biographical article should have where possible. It would be better to have a single image of him rather than a group

167:

Hello Paul Barlow. I haven't heard back from you. I'd appreciate it very much if you would point me in the direction of that Wiki policy page on this. I have not been able to find it (and I have looked). I've seen where people discuss the issue, but that's all I could find. Thanks again.

3688:

There is no reason for you to delete any of this material from the original submitted draft. You have removed all references to Scientific Works including those accepted for deposit with the UK IET. This is unacceptable interference and has nothing to do with protococls and/or layouts.

3904:" Of course the article title goes against p and g as I am sure you are able to clearly see. The term is most often presented as "anti-Semitism" and my edit presented a clearly encyclopedic presentation of the reality of the situation. Please also note that an central issue of being 1142:

that could be improved. But that's a matter for discussion at the Joseph Smith article. In any case, you misunderstood what I said. Of course the view of the NOI should be expounded in the article - in the sense that its opinion of WFM should be explained, but the article should not

192:

about formatting and I've tagged one page for ref formatting, but do you think I should just wait until they get finished before I do anything else? There are a lot more of them than me. (It looks like they're applying for GA rating after they finish, not that that's gonna happen.)

983:

being from the Delta Quadrant. The fact that it was uncited is less important (most infoboxes contain uncited material). The fact that it is simply untrue is the crucial point. I cannot for the life of me see how your edit to his talk page helped to illuminate anything whatever.

432:

Sincere thanks for the revert back to the original that's been there for years now. From time to time, it becomes evident that 'certain' folks 'incline towards the dogmatic' when it comes to external/objective evidence on his life/aliases, etc prior to founding NOI ... Smh ...

4167:

I'm going through Knowledge's criteria for 'Notable' and except that he does not have multiple secondary sources reporting on the event that makes him 'significant' 'notable' 'worthy of notice' note worthy', Taber Gregory certainly does fit Knowledge's criteria of 'Notable.'

1912:

Of course much of what I am saying here constitutes OR, but that's unimportant, because that's not what was added to the article. What I objected to was the deeply obtuse and frankly ignorant assertion that merely listing a production is fine, but that indicating what made it

4122:

This is why major corporations have Knowledge departments, and why people like me are offered Knowledge services for a few thousand to several thousand per month I can hire a Knowledge expert to place and keep my information up...Knowledge is seeing to be quite the racket.

1104:

devil. As a result, Whites (and some Blacks) often argue that their teachings should not be repeated. But how can you have a Knowledge page of a religious founder, like Joseph Smith for example, void of the founder's teaching simply because it makes some uncomfortable?

1576:

Don't be daft. There is nothing "surreptitious" about an edit summary. It's an explanation. What do you expect? A personal email after every edit? Your tiresome claim to be victimised is deeply unhelpful. And no, Nordics are not a "living and breathing people". It's a

3303:

feature of Knowledge, binding the project together into an interconnected whole, as connections to related subjects of other articles are always useful, and these were just two additional links based on reliable sources. What is your opinion concerning this matter?

488:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on 4142:

notable to have their own Knowledge page, which Gregory is not. Frankly, beyond your website I can find almost no mention of him, except the report of a divorce (assuming that's the same Taber Gregory). Again you can raise this at the discussion page, or at

1603:

OK. There are no racial differences in your world? Or how do you describe those differences if they exist? Very few redheads or blue eyes among native populations in East Asia or Africa. Very few people with curly hair in Asia, etc. How do you explain

4270: 4258: 869: 759: 3932:

No one has censored anything, don't be so ridiculously melodramatic. It is is true that it is 'also' spelled other ways, and that description avoids the point-scoring aspect of your edit which merely betrays your typical battleground attitude.

2771:

And I would like to understand the term 'value' is objective, as is the term 'silly' if these are your reasons, I sincerely doubt if you should be editing any article as you clearly tend to remove images on the basis of your personal opinions.

1156:

divergent from the scholarly view that we have the problem of how to integrate it. There is also very little evidence left by WFM himself, and information about his movements has been reconstructed. Even his opinions are not clearly or fully

805:

I've gone over your changes three times now and I'm still not sure that you did it properly. Given the editing climate on the subject, this refactoring could be taken the wrong way. Please use clear and detailed edit summaries in the future.

1225:

been considered "outrageous", and there are disputes about who it is intended to refer to. Also Sonnet 125 does not "describe the coronation of James VI", that's just an interpretation of the reference to bearing a "canopy", one of several

4162: 1072:

about Knowledge over the last 5 years or so. What Paul said means is that it would be good to have a photo which is of Arnaiz that the user in question has copyright over that can be added to Commons to be used in the article. He does

821:

Edit summaries would have made zero difference. I simply put it in chronological order and added user names. There is in fact almost no "editing climate" on the page. There have been a tiny number of contributions in over 5 years.

2613:

Dear Mr. Barlow, the list is not "ridiculous." More than 50 ITT Tech campuses have default rates that exceed their graduation rates. If you look at the USA story. Readers use Knowledge to learn more about prosepective colleges.

3371:, Volume 65, April 1991, pp. 49-53. According to Werner Hofmann, both Graubner and Friedrich created an aesthetics of monotony as a counterpart to the aesthetics of variety that was predominant before the nineteenth century. See 2413:

Just thought I'd let you know in case it was up your street? Either way you might find these new images useful. Also, feel free to get in touch if there's anything else connected to Yorkshire's museums I might help with! Thanks,

1869:

BBC website). Hence the fact that I added a separate cite to the relevant page within it. As for trivia, again you misunderstand. The term "trivia" typically refers to passing, trivial mentions within popular culture (e.g.

4193:

him whatever. You are becoming disruptive. You also claim that the "mandate of TRC-Canada was edited to preclude all other victims of Canada Scoops who were not kept within Canada" but again provide no evidence of this

3684:

2.I am an Author, with more than 10 published titles in more than 20 languages. I am an Engineer, Registered with Institute of Engineering and technology, I am a Scientist - Engineering is the application of Science.

1699:

I am not going to close the AfD. Just advising you that could be closed by an admin anytime within the next few days with your vote counted as a Keep, since you have not elected to revert the other user's changes. -

1147:

that view. Also, from an academic pov, it's an extreme minority view. There are always going to be differences between articles, because sources differ. In the case of Smith, there is very little dispute about the

1182: 1787: 708: 1987:. Fearofreprisal is cautioned that if they disrupt and breach restrictions, they may be subject to increasingly severe sanctions. They may appeal this ban to the Committee in no less than twelve months time. 144:

Dear Paul Barlow. Thanks for your reply. I had no idea. Would you please direct me to the Wiki policy article on that subject? I couldn't find it on my own, and I would like to read about it. Thanks again.

1124: 4075:

You are definitely really helpful, albeit I would rather you just said 'sure give me the copy you want copied and pasted onto the page, and it will be done and sealed off from future edits/deletions ' ;-)

3383:

from your perspective, as you seem to have much knowledge about nineteenth-century painting, as your excellent article on Victorian painting shows. I think this should be a featured article on Knowledge.

594: 3692:

You have abridged the list of Publications and references, without explanation. You have categorised the content as fringe science, when you have no right to do so. New science is not fringe science.

1779: 1585:. There is no such "people" as "Nodrics", any more than "red heads" are a people. There are just individuals who happen to come from northern Europe, or have blue eyes, just as, it so happens, I do. 1882:

year was that the standard narrative (involving the character "Lynda Snell" creating an amateur production of some play at Christmas) was extended over many weeks, culminating in her production of

1273:

Some critics think the "only begetter" passage would have been considered "outrageous", because it could be read as a reference to the Bible. (ref:Larsen, Kenneth J. Essays on Shakesprea's Sonnets)

1120: 4254: 1770: 3338:(Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2000), p. 100. For a discussion of the influence of 19th-century German Romantic landscape painting on Schult, see also the article by art historian and Romantic expert 31:

Hello Paul Barlow. I see that you changed the format of the Andrew R. Heinze article... adding the white space in the center. Was the way I had it formatted a violation of some kind? Thanks.

1932: 1546:

Did you think I had no reason or mind or brain? Can you please respond to my points before you attack me surreptitiously? The ENTIRE point is that the Nordic race is not the same thing as the

865: 317:

Birmingham is not "more important" than Manchester. What a silly thing to say. What relevance does this pointless my-town's-better-than-your-town assertion have in any case? And who the hell

4181: 2315: 1907:, which has always drawn on dramatic conventions derived from Coward himself, including the tradition of characters who are themselves actors being exaggeratedly theatrical in "real" life. 2708:

is missing malapropism this word Cow-Tow is a new type of word. One that means the same, sounds the same, is spelled different, and has a different root. Perhaps a Hetrohomosyngraphanym.

3334:, exh. cat., Kunsthalle Bremen 1988, p. 316, and Hilmar Frank, "Raum/Zeit-Schichtungen: Bemerkungen zu einem Chronotopos", in Tatjana Böhme, Klaus Mehner and Tatjana Böhme-Mehner, eds., 698: 208:

I noticed this with one or two sonnets. I guess the best thing would be to just let it pass for a little while. Many of the sonnet articles are in poor shape - like the parent article.

1034:

1st- I am going to leave title in Spanish and also translating it into English. Please, change it if you do not find appropriate 2nd- I am also uploading The Royal House photography.

2360:

and I thought that the ones of the Harrogate Sarcophagus might lend themselves to your photo editing talents? They're quite good as you can see, but some have quite messy backgrounds.

2334:

unreadable shapes); and the base of the sculpture seemed to floating in a void, which gave it a distinctly eerie look. Yes the image was in one sense more useful. It had more visual

755: 615: 607: 26: 4070: 2567: 642: 602:

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at

1864:

You seem to have a strange idea of what "edit warring" is. Reverting once is not edit warring. Please do not make inappropriate accusations, Secondly, the citation I added was

1809: 40: 2827: 2011: 1981: 575:

Wikigood, the fact is your addition had multiple problems. This was spelled out by Diannaa, Paul B and Nick-D. I would suggest you reflect and consider on their points made.

393:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

4115:

Reconciliation Commission - Canada and on that basis USCIS, then who is? I see other names on that list of Notables who are far less, if they are even at all, significant.

4095:

Thank you very much for the links. I will follow them and see what happens. So far though when I have done as the editors requested, it ends up same result, i.e., deleted.

424: 3523:

Hi paul, sorry for being a wikikit blundering into the Tag-team edit-warring on Rape jihad counter to WP:BRD of Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (section)

2433:

Where did Joshua Jonathan provide quotes saying that Bryant thinks Indo-Aryan Migrations are more likely than OIT? Bryant says nothing of the sort, let alone repeatedly.

390: 4382:

With your permission, one more bit of vandalism and I'm requesting semi-production of your userpage. I have many many gadgets enabled, so that is five clicks at most.--

4147:. This is the second time you have made comments suggesting that people are paid to edit articles and that you will hire someone for that purpose. This is not helpful. 3346:, exh. cat., Kunsthalle Kiel, 10 March-14 April 1974. On German TV, the artist has described himself as "a Romantic of the consumption age" and "a great moralist". See 1849:, I would agree that it can be mentioned somewhere in the article, as long as the reference shows clearly that this was the case. All the best, and happy New Year! -- 4085: 501: 128:

TOCLEFT format was the norm, then I'd reveret to it. I think it's completely inappropriate to create unusual formats for articles because of a personal preference.

48:

Hello Paul Barlow. There is something written in Polish and English - right under my message to you. But it doesn't appear to be from you (since it makes no sense).

2977: 2967: 2901: 1933: 1717: 1305: 1128: 603: 595: 306: 1203: 457: 419: 2634: 2442: 2357: 2168: 1983:

It is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban affecting the Historicity of Jesus, broadly construed, and enforcement of the ban should be discussed at

910: 647: 464: 177: 116: 92: 2080: 1218: 336: 3017: 2941: 2493: 1765: 1345: 1170: 3698:

You have changed the entry to 'supposed ancient prophesies'. None of these editorial changes have anything to do with unsubstantiated claims about science.

3560: 3466: 3219: 3174: 2697: 2674: 2482: 2208: 950: 687: 524: 506: 384: 2120: 1570: 376: 3506: 3259: 3214: 3073: 1550:

Nordic race. Nordics are living and breathing people. The article is about an ideology (one that died out long ago). That ideology had a name. A name is a

1094: 154: 137: 3113: 2883:, and it has come to my knowledge that you may have prior history with this user. As such, your input may assist with the case. That case can be found at 2563:. But here it neither looks good (in my opinion, at least) nor relates to the images meaningfully, so I would like to remove the overhead of the template. 2299: 4327: 4287: 3611: 1538: 3771: 3727: 3656: 3429: 3407: 3393: 2258: 1679: 4419: 3707: 3616: 2951:

Saw an article today showing that his comedy estate as been purchased by Comedy Dynamics and the company is planning on releasing his entire catalog.

2786: 1010: 330: 4104: 4062: 2848: 2629: 1667: 1467: 1260: 1241: 4090: 3756: 3675: 2679: 1654: 1613: 1594: 570: 3803:

While it's likely that Mary would have racked up enough victims to be a serial killer had she not been caught, I think you made the right decision.

3364: 2347: 2245: 1709: 1694: 1485: 1086: 552: 217: 4132: 3980: 3959: 3942: 3927: 3887: 3714:

approval without offering any evidence of such. I think you need to read wikipedia policies before continuing to edit. I will raise this matter at

2907: 2813: 2559:, usually when the intent is to compare several images, or connect them with a common description; or even for purely aesthetic purpose such as in 1926: 1836:. Please note that (1) the ref that you added was already in the article; (2) the ref does not support the statement that more than one episode of 4371: 2600: 2586: 992: 4206: 4156: 1662: 584: 283: 3445: 2748:

versions were finished in 1863, whereas we say the big Manchester one was finished in 1865, when it was exhibited. Can you shed light? Cheers,

1018: 258: 4344: 4109: 831: 4282: 3283:. Incidentally, as you seem to be an expert on art, may I ask you an additional question? My recent edits reminded me of an old discussion on 2954: 2512: 4173: 4124: 4096: 4077: 4050: 4014: 1355:

I notice that you have carried out several amendments to this article and would like to thank you for your efforts which are much appreciated

2685: 107:

of my messages. So obviously this weird message is not from you. Is the message apparent to you too? Is it some bazaar Wiki malfunction?

4352: 4243: 2884: 2608: 2532: 1006: 2798: 2163: 1423: 815: 4144: 3449: 3132: 2543: 1077:

mean you should to commit a copyright infringement as you did with the Spanish monarchy photo or to endlessly link to photos on the web.

223: 2423: 2327: 397: 1984: 1940:

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1685:

OK, just checking. It still reads "Keep" by the way. I assume you have not reverted the change because you want to keep the article? -

619: 202: 3831: 2075: 1891:

Ironically the mere fact that there was a radio production of the play might be said to be "trivia" (so what? there was production of

4307: 3661: 3636: 3535: 3486: 3239: 3194: 3093: 2997: 2921: 2654: 2462: 2188: 2100: 2039:

If they don't/won't, do the edit. If they undo the edit, discuss (on the article talk), get consensus, and do it again. If they undo

1745: 1325: 930: 722: 667: 356: 3812: 3047: 1364: 4359: 1858: 3599: 3339: 3150: 2775:

Further attempts to remove the image will result in complaints of bias, unprofessional conduct will be forwarded under your name.

1198: 976: 3312: 800: 310: 3318:

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. Concerning the links removed from the Friedrich article, German art historians such as

3068: 2228: 1450: 1051: 2139: 998: 3739:

I do not feel that your edit adequately represents the facts and therefore request that the entry is removed in its entirety.

2971: 2728: 905: 4332: 4303: 4300:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3868: 3791: 3632: 3629:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3482: 3479:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3235: 3232:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3190: 3187:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3089: 3086:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2993: 2990:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2917: 2914:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2757: 2650: 2647:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2458: 2455:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2452: 2184: 2181:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2096: 2093:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2052: 1741: 1738:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1321: 1318:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 926: 923:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 795: 663: 660:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 561:

Paul's right. That sentence was nonsensical. I agree with him about Hitler also. And of course one revert isn't an edit war.

352: 349:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3555: 2617:

You may be an intelligent person, but I'm not sure you are qualified to edit this (in terms of judging what's important).

2437: 2369: 2338:

in it, but of course that's not the principal purpose it served in the article. Thanks for the information on other images.

2155:, I was being sincere with my Edit summary... "Wanna paraphrase this? There's valid point in there somewhere..." Regards, -- 188:

Apparently some class has taken on some of Shakespeare's sonnets as a class project. I've left a note on what is apparently

4400: 2686:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_participants_in_the_creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy

2020: 1973: 1956: 1818: 1419: 2896: 1393: 4212: 3748: 3699: 3667: 3461: 3043: 2396: 2284: 2057: 489: 3916:" "Anti-Semitism" is the presentation of the word that is most widely presented and there is no justification for your 2533:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Starburst_(confectionary)&curid=996943&diff=645499170&oldid=645370941

2405: 4394: 4041: 3874:

I dispute that this is anything other than a pointy edit trying to insinuate that the spelling of the article violates

3296: 2963: 2821: 481: 302: 4439: 3695:

Your claim of 'alternative science' is likewise unacceptable; science is science. Who is to say what new science is?

3583:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2387: 1532: 1511: 1378: 3169: 2794: 2517: 2153: 2144: 1524: 1442: 540: 2762: 2487: 2305: 653: 535:

Controversy implies differing viewpoints, but the mainstream view of Hitler is fairly settled and uncontroversial.

515:. Odd, also, that you don't seem to think that Hitler is controversial. WP Civility does count in edit summaries. 3330:"the Romantic of the consumption age" or "Caspar David Friedrich of the consumption age." See Siegfried Salzmann, 2016: 2003: 1814: 1801: 530:

What edit warring? One deletion isn't "warring". I wrote "The first sentence is nonsensical": The first sentence

183: 3736:

The name is spelled incorrectly on your edit: 1st Line, 2nd paragraph reads 'Cotterall' instead of 'Cotterell'.

103:

Hello Paul Barlow. After I hit "saved" the Polish message appeared again at the bottom of this section... under

3808: 3270: 2378: 1374:

There is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.

999: 474: 3588: 1895:

on BBC radio a few days ago. It's not worth listing all productions of every classic play on Knowledge). What

1670:

I just wanted to check if you were agreeable to having another editor change your vote from Delete to Keep. -

4292:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3621:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3471:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3277:. I am not sure if this was a good idea, because there is another important person named Werner Hofmann. See 3224:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3179:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3078:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2982:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2906:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2639:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2447:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2173:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2085:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1722:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1398: 1350: 1310:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

972: 915:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

652:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

512: 453: 341:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1554:. In this case, because of a twist in history, the term does not refer to the people, only to the ideology. 868:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

758:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

4022: 3817: 3398:

Thanks for your opinion. A well-sourced reference to Graubner has now been added to the Friedrich article.

3225: 3128: 2955:

http://thelaughbutton.com/news/comedy-dynamics-rerelease-entire-bill-hicks-catalog-acquiring-comedy-estate/

1959:) is warned to not engage in personal attacks or cast aspersions of bias and intent against other editors. 1825: 955: 692: 254: 4006:

Why do you keep supporting false information in the first paragraph regarding the Greek island of Patmos?

1058:

Paul, we have followed your advice but Akerbeltz keeps removing information. Could you please have a look?

3380: 3284: 485: 470: 403: 3858: 2549:

That pesky plural 's' in my question was entirely unnecessary, sorry. There are plenty of good uses for

1209:

it all outright is the best option when perhaps a much briefer version of the edit could go in. Thanks.

3861:. Do you dispute that "anti-Semitism" and "anti-semitism" represent the usual spellings of the term? 3413: 3143: 3052: 888:

1902-19840, known as '''Dorfy''', was a noted dialect author and journalist<ref name="Dorfhex"/: -->

266:

It wasn't unthinking. I thought. It seemed a rather fringy speculaton that was distracting in context.

173: 150: 112: 88: 36: 3822:

In particular, citing some of your posts as evidence that Human Chlorophyll is not fit to edit there.

3372: 3323: 270:

is a very generalist source for such a sweeping claim which I have not seen in any other sources. The

3804: 3511: 2518: 2505: 2277: 1176: 857: 497: 4430:

I emailed you but it came back with a note that you weren't available. Do you have another address?

2125: 3118: 3022: 2448: 2059: 2048: 1967: 1950: 1415: 1186: 415: 3123:

If I left a comment on Talk between other editors' comments, it was entirely inadvertent. My bad.

1108:

conclusive fact in light of the FBI file's clear explanation of the origin of the Ford/Fard link.

778:(1531-97), a corrupt Justice of the Peace who had a long-running feud with the owner of the [[Swan 4415: 4367: 4202: 4152: 4037: 3976: 3938: 3883: 3767: 3752: 3723: 3703: 3671: 3531: 3180: 3124: 3039: 2817: 2733: 2724: 2693: 2684:

List of participants in the creation–evolution controversy, has been nominated for deletion, see

2553: 2343: 2295: 2213: 1590: 1507: 1237: 1166: 1047: 988: 827: 772:

his 1931 book ''Shakespeare versus Shallow'' argues that Shallow is a parody of William Gardiner

606:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at 548: 326: 279: 213: 133: 83:

When I hit "edit" the "something" disappears, so I copied it in my message here. Very creepy.

711:

to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --

4389: 4278: 3836: 3551: 3439: 3425: 3403: 3389: 3308: 3299: 3264: 1430: 1023: 289: 2741: 473:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 4058: 3827: 3579: 2844: 2790: 2625: 2007: 1922: 1805: 1528: 1463: 1446: 1256: 1214: 1014: 837: 169: 146: 108: 84: 32: 17: 1291: 1226: 893: 783: 232:

would appreciate it if you actually read the citation before editing the work unthinkingly,

4230:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

4010: 3948:

prejudice against the Beatles comment which I think also carries to topics such as that of

3893: 3875: 3787: 3777: 3147: 3137: 3027:

Nice work, but I suspect "By descreated a wide range of puppets" contains a typo or two...

2959: 2854: 2782: 2644: 2640: 2497: 2434: 2269: 2241: 2224: 2159: 2145: 2135: 1977: 1826: 1705: 1690: 1675: 1650: 1609: 1566: 1520: 1438: 1407: 1194: 1139: 1116: 901: 791: 727: 717: 566: 493: 441: 389:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

298: 242: 189: 3898:

Knowledge prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in

3678:

I do not agree with your assessment of the content of your Maurice Cotterell entry edit.

8: 4435: 4163:

What Makes A Person Knowledge-Notable, Taber Gregory (Canada Scoops Victim Placed in USA)

3622: 3165: 2946: 2596: 2582: 2539: 2419: 2323: 2044: 1999: 1963: 1946: 1797: 1481: 1411: 1389: 1082: 520: 411: 198: 2570: 2035:

If they post somewhere else, just say 'Please discuss on <article talk page link: -->

1476:

This is a long-term-abuse IP editor. Just looks like another one of their hobby-horses.

1152:

of his life. The dispute is about interpretation. In the case of WFM the NOI view is so

4407: 3956: 3924: 3865: 3718:, which is a discussion board for requesting intervention by Knowledge administrators. 3626: 3527: 3053: 3030: 2720: 2702: 2689: 2086: 1854: 1502:

Your grasp of biology is poor. Cunts have no noses. Go play somewhere else meshugenah.

1369: 1360: 969: 3354:

A further problem is that not only the reference to Schult, but also the reference to

2560: 1557:

I won't bother getting into an edit war with you. Sigh ... you just have so much more

612:

Please add your evidence by November 6, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes.

4384: 4348: 4323: 4314: