User talk:OAbot - Knowledge

2837: 1018:. Please don't just match on title, please match on additional key parameters such as journal name, year, volume, page start number etc. I am surprised it was ever thought suitable to just match on title. Otherwise the bot is sometimes adding PMCs for papers with the same/nearly the same name by different authors, or a different version of a dated paper, or reprints 50 years later in different journals. While reprints may be the same paper is it NOT in my view acceptable to simply add the PMC for a reprint (you don't know if it's a full reprint, partial, edited etc.) - if the original paper has no full free text and the reprint does then the bot would need to have approval to add a separate cite/link for the reprint so it's clear it is a reprint. 4120:

10\.(1100|1155|1186|1371|1629|1989|1999|2147|2196|3285|3389|3390|3410|3748|3814|3847|3897|4061|4089|4103|4172|4175|4236|4239|4240|4251|4252|4253|4254|4291|4292|4329|4330|4331|5194|5306|5312|5313|5314|5315|5316|5317|5318|5319|5320|5321|5334|5402|5409|5410|5411|5412|5492|5493|5494|5495|5496|5497|5498|5499|5500|5501|5527|5528|5662|6064|6219|7167|7217|7287|7482|7490|7554|7717|7766|11131|11569|11647|11648|12688|12703|12715|12998|13105|14293|14303|15215|15412|15560|16995|17645|19080|19173|20944|21037|21468|21767|22261|22459|24105|24196|24966|26775|30845|32545|35711|35712|35713|35995|36648|37126|37532|37871|47128|47622|47959|52437|52975|53288|54081|54947|55667|55914|57009|58647|59081)

46:. CiteSeerX is very indiscriminate about where it gets copies of papers from; the accuracy of such a copy vis-a-vis the officially published version, and the provenance of the copy, cannot be verified by a bot. In this particular case, the online copy appears to be taken from a class web site unaffiliated by the authors of the original paper. The owner of the course web site is probably safe from copyright violation as course reading lists have powerful fair use exemptions to copyright, but CiteSeerX and Knowledge do not. Using it here appears to be a copyright violation and a violation of 6650:, OAbot added a PMC that points to a brief announcement of a result in PNAS, to a reference to the full publication of the same result in a different journal. That sort of edit is incorrect and bad. It's the sort of thing that leads to mangled citations as the error is then built on with more bot edits that treat the erroneous id as definitive and replace more of the citation with garbage. Do not do that. If the journals do not match, regardless of similarities in authorship and title, do not add metadata. — 1890: 2372: 2933:. That combination of parameters does not work and has not worked since the doi autolinking RFC was implemented. Bot edits like this should never cause a valid citation template to become a broken citation template. In the long term, maybe, the cite journal template maintainers can be persuaded to allow that combination of parameters to work. In the short term, the bot must be prevented from making broken citations. That could be done by making the bot recognize that 5856:

no guarantee of anything because there is no free license, so those publishers can and do make those articles closed OA again. (Less than 1 % of those DOIs carry a free license and less than 10 % carry any license at all, according to CrossRef.) So once again, please state what kind of data verification procedure you've conducted that makes you more confident of your OA status determination than a process that involves actually checking the DOIs one by one.

1643: 4789:– no this is not good advice. If the URL is redundant with the DOI it is much better to just put the DOI and add doi-access=free (readers benefit by hitting a journal metadata page with a "download PDF" button vs. a direct PDF link). If the bot is incorrectly removing those (like, anything more than a 0.01% error rate), there is something going very wrong, and a human should be regularly spot checking to make sure the bot is staying on target. – 4618: 6435: 3392:, and will leave that comment alone rather than changing it to doi-access=free. In this case the comment was stale because the problem it was intended to work around has apparently been fixed: it is no longer the case that adding doi-access to citation templates that have title=none causes the template to break. Nevertheless, OAbot fails to be well-behaved in this regard: 4891:

text copy but there are reasons to believe not everyone would be able to access it (due to captchas etc.), so the removal of the doi-access=free link is defensible because we do need to find better OA links. Therefore I'm planning to resume the removals. There are few thousand more doi-access=free parameters to remove, less than the bot added just last week.

6297:{{cite journal|last1=Dawwrueng|first1=Pattarawich|last2=Tan|first2=Ming Kai|last3=Artchawakom|first3=Taksin|last4=Waengsothorn|first4=Surachit|title=Species checklist of Orthoptera (Insecta) from Sakaerat Environmental Research Station, Thailand (Southeast Asia)|journal=Zootaxa|date=2017|volume=4306|issue=3|page=307|doi=10.11646/zootaxa.4306.3.1 4310:. So far, I haven't found any edits of this type where the bot was correct. Seems like it is going to be very rare that someone incorrectly adds this parameter such that it needs removing, even rarer that a free-to-read journal article would later not be. Can the bot be stopped from doing this, it is a little tiresome. 2782:. Unless/until the citation template is changed to re-allow this combination, I consider any additions of doi-access=free to such citations to be damage caused by the bot that must be stopped from happening. So to avoid messier ways of stopping it, please check for title=none and avoid altering these citations. — 4747:, ok. The bot was manually activated for a one-time run with this new feature, as I believe I mentioned above. Otherwise it's scheduled to run once a week. You can remove the block as I won't run it again manually while this discussion is ongoing, and I'll disable this feature in the scheduled weekly run. 6357:

works (gratis OA without a Creative Commons license). These are the works where detection is most unreliable and which often change status. However there are two factions of users battling in this user page, some asking more doi-access=free and some less, and so far nobody engaged with this proposal,

4890:

I've sampled the latest batch of doi-access=true the bot would remove. It's clear that Unpaywall has been updating large portions of their data. In about half of the cases, the edits are indisputably correct (there's no full text link to be found at least for me); in the other half, I found some full

3611:

Is that why for the last several days some 90% of my watchlist changes have been OAbot? It is forcing me to hide bot edits in my watchlist in order to find anything else, and therefore making me miss other bot edits that might be worth checking. Is there some way to throttle this down to make it less

6097:

I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm taking all this heat from you because I went out of my way to make the bot reverse some of its previous edits that people complained about. It took way longer than I had hoped for (the bot wasn't editing at all for many weeks) but all/most errors you reported back in

5816:

Which DOI prefix are you talking about? If you mean 10.4103, those DOIs belong to dozens of publishers including Springer, Elsevier, Thieme, de Gruyter, Wiley, SAGE and others, which are definitely not fully OA. So again, please be clear about what "public information" you're talking about. CrossRef

4857:

shows that only some 14k DOIs from 10k articles were touched, out of over 300k doi-access=free we have across all articles (most of which have been added by OAbot previously, at least the non-redundant ones). Many of these changes don't even affect which URL is linked. One week later the bot already

4699:

It's true that currently Unpaywall currently detects less bronze OA DOIs than before. This is probably due to changes on the publishers' side which have made PDFs harder to access even when they're nominally gratis access. I've sampled the ongoing edits and I'm pretty sure such cases are a minority,

3411:

Ah, that's for title=none, right? I was hoping the template would be fixed, but it seems we need to give up and just skip such occurrences. As for leaving parameters with comments untouched, we rely on the behaviour of a standard library to handle the template parameters, but I'll see if I can add a

1790:

For the sake of transparency, some statistics about the edits the bot will attempt to do: after having gone through most of the articles with relevant citations, we have found about 75k articles to work on (each requires a single edit) and the parameters to be touched have the following frequency so

766:

Edge case? In cs1|2, all identifier parameter names may be written uppercase or lowercase (mixed case not accepted). When deciding to add an identifier to a cs1|2 template, bots must look for all of the accepted parameter name forms or aliases before making the addition. This to me is only common

6107:

No, you're taking heat from me because your bot malfunctions and when people complain you don't respond in such a way that gives the impression that you understand the problem, care, or intend to fix it. If you are currently fixing some problem, then you'll avoid "taking heat" by explaining clearly

6001:

This bot needs to be shut down until it is fixed. It continues making heaps of incorrect edits, and the maintainer continually refuses to acknowledge the problem or act responsibly to fix it. Here are more examples I have reverted (nearly every example of OAbot edits I have checked from recent days

5958:

if it hasn't been stored by any archive service, then mark it as free? (And otherwise -that is if it is archived, but Knowledge doesn't link to the archive, add a link to it?) Nemo, do you want the bot do do that? Do you feel you need support (that you don't currently have) from the community to

5855:

The list made by you is not a source. You've still not stated how you verified that the DOIs with a 10.4103 prefix are OA. In reality, only 80 % of those DOIs are held by Medknow (the publisher now owned by LWW/WK), and there are over 30 publishers involved. Also, the supposed original OA status is

5677:

And no, I appreciate your confidence in your testing capabilities but you are not everybody. Even if you have personally tested every single DOI for thousands of journals, that doesn't tell us that everyone else will be served the same result by the publishers, which use algorithmic decision-making

5589:

I've already reported the AAS journals to Unpaywall, they'll probably be fixed in a few days (as already happened with JBC). Don't hesitate to open a support ticket with Unpaywall to report specific journals whose entire archives are bronze OA. If you know the ABS people you could also suggest that

5012:

remains linked. (A direct PDF link is also much more usable. I happen to know the persee.fr interface so I was able to locate the well-hidden PDF link and adjust my browser settings so that something would actually happen when clicking it, but many users are probably completely lost when landing on

2622:

had been fooled into adding the wrong handle by a url entry for the wrong article added by a previous (human) editor. I do not understand why it was added this time, as I have checked that all the other parts of the bibliography entry refer to Kaplansky's article -- does OAbot rely on old Knowledge

1540:

I have blocked OAbot for adding copyvio links to references, after a previous warning was ignored. Specifically, the bot is adding CiteSeerX links without checking whether the links trace back to an author or publisher (not a copyvio), or to somebody else. Additionally, I don't believe the addition

1156:

doesn't confirm it. The URL parameter points to the "publication" i.e. the entire work, but both the book and the individual chapter can be considered works by themselves (otherwise the chapter wouldn't have a DOI). If you want to make it clear that the citation is about the book, it's advisable to

6084:

Actually, let me word this strongly: You need to demonstrate that you understand your bot's problems, take clear responsibility for your bot's malfunctioning and show how you intend to fix it (manually if necessary), and provide some assurance that it won't ever happen again. The cavalier attitude

4867:

If the bot makes a big pile of errors removing doi-access=free labels, then "the bot separately added a bunch of doi-access=free so now the total number is higher" is not really an adequate response. The mistakes from the previous week should be fixed. If the bot can't fix them, the relevant edits

4817:

Or if you don't want to do a manual check, can you please auto-revert every such edit from the past few days or week? Every one of the edits of this type that came up in my watchlist was OABot making a mistake. I'm sure there were some correct ones sprinkled in, but that's not good enough for bots

3111:

Thanks for your reply. Yes, but the doi does not require the access param to be there in order to be linked if the url is removed, unless there's been a CS1 change I'm not aware of. The linkage is automatic, free or not, iirc, which makes this change not an improvement to the article, because it

2058:

The plot thickens. I see the green lock in the link you give above. On my iPad, I see the green locks in the articles linked above. On my PC, I do not see the green locks in the articles, either with Google Chrome or with IE. It's a browser thing. But it is still odd that I can see some of the

5112:

There's nothing wrong about a blank doi-access parameter, it's just an empty parameter. That article is not open access, so whatever the right parameter is, doi-access=free is not it. Luckily this kind of authwalled articles among formerly gratis OA articles are a very small portion of the cases,

5099:

noted was a broken change. OABot should not have made this edit. "doi-access=free" was a correct parameter (the content is freely available), and blank "doi-access=" is flat-out incorrect. There's no "marketing ploy" involved here: the full text is right there. Arguably "doi-access=limited" could

3319:

In general, Unpaywall is the best source there is. It's even used by Scopus and all the others nowadays. They have regular automatic and manual quality assurance on the links, all sorts of things. There are some bugs sometimes, usually produced by some new bug in one of their sources, but they're

3311:

That's what confuses me: for Unpaywall to provide a match on ArXiv, usually the DOI would need to be on the ArXiv record itself. I've not verified that this match actually came from Unpaywall, so let's not get ahead of ourselves. At the moment the Unpaywall record for this DOI doesn't have any OA

7108:. It seems that this insidious garbaging of citations has been going on for a long time and that the weak patches applied to fix specific instances of the problem have not actually fixed the problem. The bot needs to be much more careful about checking these matches than it apparently has been. — 6720:

I've checked these title matches before, and unless something dramatically changed recently these should be pretty rare errors. They've happened multiple times here because of the unusual coincidence where PMC has scans of two journals which had articles with identical author, year and title but

6153:

While we're at it, the bot's edit summaries and user page are dramatically insufficient. "Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot." is not specific enough as an edit summary. Instead the bot should say something like, "Open access bot: removed doi-access=free from a non-open-access

4703:

As for the future, I'll look at the cases mentioned above. I was already making a list to be reported to Unpaywall. Most cases I found are about things other than usual article contributions (editorials, news, obituaries etc.). When they're detected as OA again, the bot will add doi-access=free

4063:

I have similarly no idea what DataCite is and I don't know how Unpaywall works or how it determines if something is free-access or not, but these DOIs prefixes are free and using them is a reliable and cheap (processing wise) way of determining free dois. And OA articles don't cease to be OA if

3256:

that a preprint with a title beginning "Ideals" was a match for a published paper with a title beginning "Filters"? It is a match, but a bot should not be guessing that things match based on authors and similar but not identical titles, because in many cases the same authors will have different

1797:

So this unblock is 99 % about adding doi-access=free and hdl-access=free to citations where the doi and hdl have been added by others (including recent citation cleanups). The addition of pmc and arxiv parameters has never been controversial but I can do these separately in the future if anyone

1125:

Thank you for the report. That edit is determined by the presence of the DOI: the citation is about the specific chapter, not about the book, otherwise the DOI would be wrong. It's therefore correct to use the URL parameter, although I agree it's better not to have two URLs pointing to the same

5894:

Have you ever clicked of any of those DOIs? I suspect not, because reality is very different from how you picture it. Some 30 % don't go anywhere and some 10 % go to a 404 or similar. Will you check examples if I provide them, or is your 100 % certainty too strong to ever be pierced by facts?

4520:

The bot should probably be temporarily shut down and all such edits by the bot from recent days should be mass-reverted or manually checked by the bot author(s) until the bot can be more carefully coded to not be making such a high proportion of mistakes. This kind of bot should seek to have a

2739:

However, finding blame for year-old errors is not very interesting. My reason for reactivating this thread is just this: Since I found this error instance to-day, and David one in 2021, and both David and Robert some in 2020, probably, there probably were more of these errors, at at least two

7123:

The April 2020 case was unrelated and caused by an incorrect DOI. The 2019 cases were because of our own title matching on Dissemin, which is not used by the bot now. Back then were fixed by making the title matches more restrictive, in a way that should prevent all the cases above (PMC title

5362:

The edit is correct in the sense that the DOI is considered bronze OA by Unpaywall. There is a delay in detecting changes to bronze OA papers, due to the nature of bronze OA. (Legacy publishers are increasingly unreliable, as captchawalls and loginwalls get placed in front of everything, even

4942:

The bot should not be doing mass changes where a nontrivial proportion of them are incorrect. Period. It wastes huge amounts of time and attention for human editors to check every example, so people need to be able to trust that the bot is like 99.9% accurate. Otherwise it's more harmful than

4053:

Why would it? What makes you think all these DOIs aren't covered by Unpaywall? (Are these all DataCite DOIs or what?) I see several which Unpaywall correctly identifies as OA. Meanwhile, individual journals and even individual DOIs can be transferred to other publishers and stop being OA.

4684:

papers regularly switch between open and closed status, so inevitably if we add doi-access=free for bronze OA we also need to be ready to remove them. The bot is mostly reverting its own edits from 2020 (many of these papers were temporarily open for COVID-related initiatives, probably).

5073:

which has a "FREE" badge on it and includes the full text of the paper on the webpage. The linked PDF says "Sign in to access free PDF" (apparently requires a registration where you give the publisher your email). If you care about the PDF per se you could use doi-access=registration or

4301:

Yes, that's pretty standard for RNAAS. I'm seeing multiple edits by the bot every day at the moment on astronomy-related articles, removing "doi-access=free". It seems to be hitting The Astronomical Journal and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific today, for example

3421:

I think the issue with title=none has been fixed — at least I didn't see problems after this edit. So I am not complaining about that, only about not respecting these comments as a way to disable changes. (This is, at least, a standard way to get Citation bot to not change things.)

5959:

have it do that? Certainly seems wrong to have the bot deleting free tags from content that is available for free from archive services that legitimately archived it - and OA bronze seems to clearly fall into this category. Am I understanding/describing the situation correctly?

1993:

My aim is consistent citations, and I don't know why there is a green link on some, but not others, or why I have to click on hdl for the link on one, but DOI for another, and yet PMC for another-- confusing to readers ? Does this explain my confusion and need for clarification?

6132:

are going to be fixed? Is there some explanation for what went wrong in the bot's data source / code / heuristics for it to wrongly consider this broad class of papers to be closed, when it is immediately obvious to any human who visits these DOIs that the papers are accessible?

5000:, thanks for reporting. That's an interesting case, I'm pretty sure it's because persee.fr recently made its rate limits very strict so even humans often have to enter a captcha to download a PDF (let alone Unpaywall's bots). This will probably be addressed soon by Unpaywall's 4494:. Maybe someone should be checking on the bot's removals of doi-access=free a bit more carefully? These are just examples from articles on my watchlist, so I am guessing there are thousands more free articles being incorrectly categorized by the bot as not having free access. – 5826:

I've linked the list many times now. 10.4103 are Medknow DOIs. Whatever location they point to now is irrelevant, because those started as Medknow DOIs and were published under open access licenses and that doesn't retroactively change whenever a journal is sold.

4901:

Please do not remove these unless you are 100% sure edit is correct (there should ideally be a manual check involved). Also, can you please figure out how to automatically mass-revert or go manually check the many incorrect changes your bot previously put through?

6575:

So does OABot believe in anything CiteSeerX says no matter whether it looks completely implausible? The entry you linked to is so thoroughly messed up that I am not sure it is even possible to correct it (and I don't have the correct bibliographic data anyway).

4718:- I had no way to know whether the bot was not running because you'd turned it off, or because it only runs on a set schedule. I don't know enough about the specifics here to respond to your other comments so will leave that to the subject-matter experts above. 2300:

Simply because oabot doesn't know what parameters were added, currently. That part of the job is done by a library, which merges existing and new parameters. I'd need to compute the diff to know what was actually changed. Or in other words, patches welcome.

1602:

David Epstein is correct here. OABot 3 was about flagging existing identifiers as free, and adding free dois and hdls and the like. CiteSeerX has been deemed too contentious to add automatically in the past and OABot 3 does not overturn that consensus.

585:

I agree that we should not be wikilinking individual terms or phrases in a template's title-holding parameters because such links, while perhaps useful in article text are not really likely to help readers locate a copy of the source. We might modify

4852:

More broadly, I understand that the bot run was surprising, and I'm very sorry it seems to have affected astronomy-related articles more than average, but I'd like to point out that in the grand scheme of things it was a rather small matter really. A

756:

A valid question. Perhaps we could run a bot to change all "PMC=" to "pmc="? As far as I can see, the uppercase is non-standard. There are only 350 such usages currently, so I think it's best to fix the odd syntax rather than optimise for edge cases.

2753:(Of course, it would be rather nice if a bot also could check if the given title in the linked item is the article title or just a title of a reference list item; but I do not think that the present level of AI in the WP bots is sufficient for this.) 504:

I don't think we should be wikilinking terms in titles, as this example does. On the other hand, some references are themselves notable, and in those cases the title seems to be the logical place to put the link to the article about that reference.

5610:

The AME DOI leads to an interstitial before people can download a PDF. A direct link to the PDF is more helpful, one can use the archived copy as well for extra safety and to prevent the citation from going unavailable as happened with Medknow.

6732:

The years don't necessarily match, and the titles are not always an exact match. I have shown the errors in a table below, calling the paper whose citation is erroneously added to paper L, and the paper whose PMC ID is erroneously added paper

2740:

occasions; and very likely are further instances as yet undetected. Nemo, I guess that also you did eliminate these errors, when you found them. Did you have the help of any bot (apart from AObot) for this? Could someone fix a list of

2560:, OAbot edited a reference to a paper by Fredman 1976, to add an hdl from a different paper by Wiedermann 1981. Why? Has whatever caused this been fixed? Has it happened elsewhere for other papers? The same bogus hdl is also present in 5465:

As discussed above, the easiest way to handle links for DOIs where the full text status isn't super clear is to "hardcode" a suitable link target, be it open or closed, and mark its status appropriately. While the discussion about the

905: 854:

for eissn/EISSN and isbn/ISBN. Although PMC and PMID are undocumented, they function in the template as pmc and pmid do. It doesn't make sense to me to require editors to adapt to the bot rather than adapting the bot to editors.

3876:

The status of that PDF may have changed as recently as last month. Soon Unpaywall should pick up the changes and report it as non-OA again. Then I need to instruct OAbot to remove such outdated doi-access parameters. I've filed

3096:

parameter can be removed and the title will automatically be linked with the DOI. If the publisher decides to change the format of its URLs, the DOI will remain valid and will point to the article, so that prevents link rot. −

5100:

also be used if someone really thinks the PDF is essential to the content. If a nontrivial proportion of OABot's edits are like this one, then OABot should have its operation entirely halted until the problem can be fixed. –

5953:

So when Nemo's bot notices that content that was previously made available for free by the publisher, and is no longer available by the publisher, does/can the bot check if has been stored/cached by an archive service, and

2586:

data (caused by an error on that repository) which only lasted a few days but was unluckily picked up by a few edits by both bots. (OAbot edits are performed with some delay, because the queue of "suggestions" is cached.)

2941:

are incompatible, and not adding the parameter in those cases. Or it could be done by holding off on making any more bot edits until the bug in the citation templates is fixed (if it ever is). Which would be preferable?

5628:

All these DOIs are freely accessible, and they should accordingly be flagged as free. That the Medknow one is broken is irrelevant and a seperate issue than its freeness, because you can report it and then it'll get

7315: 3601:(gratis nonfree open access PDFs) from Elsevier. The next round of the bot run will probably add many to citations. The errors mentioned in the previous three sections have been fixed as soon as they were reported. 1545:, where the bot adds a citeseer link to a paper by László Székely, but the citeseer provenance of the link is to web pages of Micha Sharir and Bill Gasarch (neither of whom is an author or publisher of the paper). — 6115:

is "going our of our way" to pay attention to your bot, repeatedly explain what it's doing wrong, ask for the bot to stop, etc., even though none of us want to be doing that and it's otherwise a waste of our time.

3714:

The bot has been ported to Python3 (at last) and is now processing a backlog of changes, mostly based on suggestions cached from Unpaywall in January 2023. Afterwards I hope to resume a weekly processing schedule.

1541:

of such links was ever in the bot's remit; my recollection is that when the bot was reviewed, this issue was specifically discussed and removed from the list of approved bot tasks. As an example of a bad edit, see

5215:

is supposed to be OA and it will show up as such in future updates to the data. I've manually removed the doi-access=free removals which were in the queue for JBC. A future run will revert the previous removals.

2623:

entries to find out which link belongs to which article? Whatever the problem turns out to be, it needs to be sorted, otherwise bots will just be re-adding the wrong link again and again every time I remove it.

5865:

100% of these DOIS are free and were owned by Medknow (the 10.4103 ones). No exceptions. Zero. I'm not going to keep talking to a wall that's not interested in being convinced and who wants to ignore reality.

2816: 2285:

That's still avoiding the point, because it doesn't say what parameter was added and how the addition changes the citation. Why do you object to the less-obfuscatory and shorter summary suggested by Mathglot?

6058:

As written above, the bot had already stopped removing doi-access=true before your message. The removals which actually were incorrect are being gradually reversed. I've also added some more information on

7135:

Generally speaking, I agree it would be bad to have "weak patches applied to fix specific instances of the problem". I tend to avoid exceptions for specific papers or journals in OAbot, though sometimes I

4064:

journals are sold. If they did, that would go against the publishing terms. New articles from the same journal may no longer be OA after it's sold, but that journal would have a new DOI prefix upon sale.

5597:

The Wiley etc. DOIs are authwalled via Atypon; there's no way of knowing who's able to access the full text there. They might come back once these authentication requirements are relaxed or worked around.

3272:

Hm, good question. By looking at the diff alone I would have guessed it's a DOI match (i.e. the DOI was linked to the arxiv ID either on arxiv itself or on Unpaywall), but I'm not 100 % sure. I'd need to

3026:

Sorry for the lack of response here, but I was waiting for the template storm to settle down. What's the outcome, do we have an established consensus on how the template parameters are supposed to work?

7195:

Thank you for reporting, I'll inform the repository admins. Usually, handle resolution failures like this are temporary issues with specific repositories. You can also add a direct link to the intended

2731:

Nemo, I strongly suspect that the reason two different users of OAbot made the same blatant mistake within a couple of days rather rested with the bot than with the users; and, if the bot was employing

1894: 6566:

despite being about a 2004 paper. It looks like CiteSeerX is undergoing some frontend updates and I can't find anything any more, but there's a "report error" button which might do something useful.

5387:

The bot has now started its normal weekly scheduled run, which only adds parameters and doesn't remove any. So it may add some more false positives again, if so please report. (I couldn't find any.)

4234:

for an example with three cases. Is the bot trusting NASA ADS (bibcode), which doesn't show a free-to-read link for any of these, while the direct doi link shows an open-access paper in each case?

3464:, "Counting 1324,4231-Avoiding Permutations". They are not the same paper, as a glance at their introductions verifies. They don't even have the same authors (although their author lists overlap). — 2441:

is an edit from April 2020 where again the bot has picked the PMC for a paper with a similar title but in a different journal, different volume, year etc. Please advise why this is still happening?

495:

Hm, I thought this had been fixed but I'm not sure how. What's the recommended way to proceed? I'd remove the wikilink if anything. Alternatively, the template could avoid linkifying such titles. --

5086:

Publishers often put "FREE" badges etc. on closed articles which in the end ask for money, it's just a marketing ploy. Sure, adding a doi-access=limited is an option; OAbot will not remove these.

1827:

I am unable to find access to the free full text in any of those links, yet the source is flagged by OABot. I don't speak bot; could someone explain, and help me locate a URL to free full text?

5359:

I just want to acknowledge I've seen this and I'll look into it more later. It looks like ostensibly-bronze OA DOIs are on the rise again, partly countering the decrease we discussed previously.

5122:

There's nothing wrong with a blank doi-access parameter if the paper is paywalled. If the paper is open access and the doi-access=free parameter is blanked, that's a clear and obvious problem. –

741:

result in CS1 errors where there were none before. Whilst I've not yet seen the same problem with pmid/PMID, it seems possible. Perhaps you could make parameter names case-insensitive? Cheers,

6494:

It’s not that the DOI was wrong, per se, it’s that that journal only had one DOI — for the journal as a whole — as opposed to unique DOIs for each article. Is it still not worth including?

4506:

I must have seen over a hundred in the last few days on the articles I follow. I think three were correct and the rest I reverted. I don't think a bot should be doing things like this.

3391:

Well-behaved bots will notice that a parameter has a comment as a value, such as, oh, let's say doi-access=

2858:

Is there an idea you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? Have an idea how we can use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19? Please, let us know by adding it to the agenda.

2339:

Just so you know, pinging another user doesn't work when you modify an existing comment on a talk page. I noticed this anyway because I happen to have this talk page watchlisted for now. —

6111:

It's not "going out of your way" to fix errors that your bot caused; that's an expected part of running a bot, arguably the single most basic responsibility of any bot operator. Instead,

5239:

AME and AAS journals have also reportedly been manually marked OA now on Unpaywall's end, so the doi-access=true parameter should be re-added in the next weekly run where it was removed.

6543:. Title, names of authors, number of authors, and journal are all completely different. I assume this is an error propagated from somewhere else. Did this pass the bot's sanity checks? — 4187:, because it's labeling certain article DOIs as open access when they are not, I revert the bot's changes, but then it automatically relabels the same DOIs as OA again some time later. 2906: 1001:

that this is one of those relatively rare but very annoying cases where dozens or even hundreds of articles have been published with the same title. We already have a patch for it at

5377:

As discussed above, I've sampled the new edits adding doi-access=free and the portion of false positives is negligible. I don't see a need for any corrective measure on this side.

99:

OAbot is again adding CiteSeerX links, apparently automatically. The next one I see after this warning that is not traceable back to the author or publisher will lead to a block. —

7218:. The reference goes to a journal paper but the hdl goes to a Ph.D. dissertation. (They have the same name and author but that is not a good enough match to make this decision.) — 5615:

has been previously preserved (probably when it was still accessible). It does look like a bug though, as Unpaywall considers it bronze. Will look into it, thanks for reporting.

1959:

But I finally figured out that I can find the PDF by clicking on the hdl link (I had never heard of hdl and did not know to click there-- I don't think our readers will either)

6158:, there should be a full list of all of the things the bot routinely does, with a detailed explanation and a link showing where each separate type of action was authorized. – 2384:

Dear OAbot, Thanks for working on the page "Madhu Verma", I appreciate that. Could you please let me know, what is the next steps, before it is made online/visible to public

5474:

more. To avoid adding it unnecessarily where there is an OA link, and to avoid unlinking DOIs where a previously open PDF was already archived, it would be best to also add

1248:

No, the choice of templates should be dictated by what those templates are designed to do. Are you saying that you want to cite a book but avoid using the apposite template

7311: 2683: 1908:

In general search for "PDF" is a good quick way to find something, but here it's clearly marked with a download icon. Search for PDF also works, if you missed the icon.

280:, thanks for approving the bot. It seems to me that although the BRFA has been closed, the account has not been tagged with the bot flag. Where should we request that? − 3334: 5904:

That Medknow was shit in updating CrossRef upon transfer does not change the fact that those are Medknow DOIs, or that they are free DOIs. Brokenness changes nothing.

2025:? The reason there is a green lock on some, and not others, is that those with a green lock have been identified as open access resources. Like the Migliori doi, which 5674:. Also, if the DOI goes nowhere you can't know whether the full text is available. It's better to re-add any doi-access information after the DOI becomes stable again. 2901: 5319:

The second one is a template issue, not a bot issue. If the doi is free, it should be flagged as free. If autolinking is borked, the solution is to fix autolinking.

2855:

article into other languages; as well as, brainstorm ideas about how we could use wikipedia to slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, all skill levels welcome!

2079: 7232: 6249:

Ah sorry, that was supposed to be only for manual testing, fixing now. The last edit wasn't wrong though, the link had been taken over by malware. I'm not sure what

5396: 4433: 4215:

Specifically I am referring to the "BezdekNie2019" reference in both cases (the "Moseyko2010" reference at List of flea beetle genera is fine, that actually is OA).

901: 5305: 3962: 3749: 3386: 1499: 771: 699: 667: 629: 598: 481: 5146:" (emphasis added), and which is distinct from "registration" for the case where "a free registration with the provider is required". Please open a discussion at 4914:

By definition it's impossible to be 100 % sure of bronze OA status. The only way to be 99 % certain of persistent OA status is to add a green OA link to a stable

4259:

I'm not sure about the AANDA DOIs 10.1051/0004-6361/201629835 and 10.1051/0004-6361:20011330, they're considered open by Unpaywall. Sounds like a bug on my side.

788:, and when they appear in references in articles, they're capitalised. As dois are lowercase, editors are less likely to use DOI; those might be the edge cases. 4420: 3958:

If you are going to do that, remove the entire parameter along with its value. There is no need to leave an empty parameter around to clutter up the wikitext.

2310:

I see what the problem is. Are those the only two possibilities, then, namely either adding doi, or adding/changing doi-access? If so, the summary might say,

5591: 2951: 2847:

community for our NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Knowledge Edit-a-thon - ONLINE - this Sunday, Sept 6th, 2020. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with

2769: 66: 6713:

Thank you for reporting. The first diff seems unrelated, probably one missing digit. I was already looking into it and thanks to your kind explanations in

6183:

Nothing like "Open access bot: removed doi-access=free from a non-open-access source, see XYZ linked page for details" is on that page. Not even in part.

5164: 4256:? Otherwise you can ask the bot to skip the entire page. Please also report to Unpaywall support that the manuscript.elsevier.com is no longer accessible. 2712: 818:

more standard, and uppercase will be normalized to lowercase by bots/awb most of the time. So please use that. Uppercase is just to make it friendlier to

374: 4252:

Thanks for reporting. I agree edit wars should be avoided. Perhaps we can come up with a parameter value that would confirm doi-access is explicitly not

346:

flagged as bot. Please note, in your bot software you must assert that you are a bot on edits to have the bot flagged applied when using the writeapi. —

3031: 1235:

I'm trying to explain to you that the choice between those templates is supposed to be based on formatting (punctuation and capitalization) and whether

7197: 4833:– Could you please not ignore this? It needs to be fixed. I'd really rather not start a more dramatic process bringing in administrators or whatever. – 1037:

is different. It seems my patch to avoid such overmerging on Dissemin is not going to be merged, so I'll try and add some more post-suggestion checks.

5671: 4664:, what's the point of blocking the bot when it had not been running for 15 hours? I was on a train and bus without internet while it was not running. 2078:

Sometimes the locks do not load for some JavaScript or CSS failure in my browser, but a refresh fixes it. Just for the sake of clarity, I've uploaded

1702: 5494: 4805:

can you please do a manual check of every instance of doi-access=free removed within the past few days, and revert any that were incorrect? Thanks! –

4688:

Re-adding doi-access=free manually is generally pointless (if you find a suitable URL target with an actual PDF you can add it in the url parameter:

7167:

Suggest hdl functionality be disabled for time being for anything identified by a doi as this is unnecessary duplication as doi is a subset of hdl.

5074:

doi-access=limited, but I'd recommend using doi-access=free to reflect that the full text is freely available to anyone who looks at the web page. –

4968: 3778: 3405: 3352: 1239:

is set by default, not whether bots misunderstand them. If the bot isn't going to be fixed, I guess the exclusion template is the easiest answer.

4368:, both to DOIs resolving to Duke University Press. I confirmed they both contain a link titled "Buy this digital article" on the publisher's page. 2404: 2385: 879: 30: 3313: 2791: 2503: 2481: 675: 637: 6350:

Thanks for the report. I've reported this DOI and journal to Unpaywall (you can also do the same yourself for other cases, if you want to help).

5445: 3909: 6425: 5413: 4521:

vanishingly low error rate. Otherwise it switches from being marginally helpful to being significantly harmful and disruptive to the project. –

3517: 797: 643: 390: 6482: 3374: 1858:

Thanks for your question. I'm not sure I understand what you are having problems with, though. The way to locate the full text is normally to

7319: 7069: 6202: 4950:

the doi-access=free label unless checked by a human or part of some specific set of examples known with surety to no longer be open access. –

4933:), so I remain pretty sure that it will do so in due time for the citations where it was previously there (if the PDFs don't go away again). 3550:

even though it's paywalled. De Gruyter recently revamped their website so that may have to do with it, but in any case this should be fixed.

489: 397: 4262:

10.3847/2515-5172/abd18d is a bit unusual. Are the RNAAS always like this, with a short HTML page and no PDF? Worth reporting to Unpaywall.

2729:

of the correct one; but I suspect that you know as little Czech as I do, and guessed. Look at the reference list at the end of the article!)

2506:). It would be great if those three titles could be added to the OABot workflow, so that it can add doi-access=free where possible. Thanks, 59: 5769: 4472: 2970: 2810: 1874:

look for the full text in the HTML page itself, or for a prominent download button or icon, or for some other link to HTML or PDF or other.

1772: 1561: 1199:– they both work in the same way but give slightly different formatting. The documentation isn't great, but there are separate parameters 175:

Instead of removing the section outright, you might want to simply check that such DOI point to the biorxiv repository. E.g. if you follow

108: 5694:

This is all public information. If OABots keeps removing valid free access flags, it will need to be blocked until it no longer does so.

5220: 4975: 4922:

if you want. If instead you want to change the meaning of doi-access=free to remove bronze OA from its scope, please open a discussion at

4895: 4708: 2468: 6426: 6128:

Anyway though, thanks for trying to "reverse some of its previous edits that people complained about". I'm hoping that this "some" means

3112:

doesn't affect the rendering of the link either now, or in the future if the url is removed. That's what I meant by, "what's the point".

1033:

I'm not sure what made you think that this is the fault of a title match: in fact, in your example, authors and journal match, while the

691: 7297: 6478: 6459: 6455: 6451: 5678:

to restrict access. Or if you just meant Annual Reviews, yes that's being handled; it's a moving target but will soon get easier as the

2515: 1507: 779: 716: 707: 684: 659: 650: 606: 499: 263:

Thanks for noting it; I was about to check it this morning. It seems the bot flag is being ignored, we'll perform some more checks with

2008: 6471: 6154:

source, see XYZ linked page for details" with the link pointing at somewhere explaining the bot's decisionmaking process. On the page

4382:

Today I confirmed that registering an account with the publisher does not grant access to the sources tagged in the edit, which OAbot

2599: 2314:(or better wording). If there's more than two, it might get complicated, but maybe you can extrapolate and suggest something. Adding 926: 912: 895: 873: 864: 845: 761: 750: 6282: 4025:

Why not? It should be trivial to implement this and would benefit thousands of citations. (And up to 30042 pages across mainspace.)

3621: 3483: 3431: 3416: 3324: 3306: 3292: 3016: 2998: 2666: 2591: 2348: 2305: 2295: 2227: 2215: 2201: 1626: 1597: 1579: 728: 514: 5585:

See discussion above: these are all either correct edits or temporary errors which will be reversed in short order. In more detail:

4541:

can you please stop your bot? It's getting in edit wars with human editors to impose its incorrect changes. Or perhaps some admin (@

3865:. Otherwise people will be able to retrieve the PDF from the landing page if they use appropriate browser extensions to access e.g. 3831: 1366:

template isn't able to convey the information you intend (that the citation is about the entire book rather than the chapter only).

271: 92: 78: 5251: 5139: 5024: 4981: 3473: 3053: 2836: 2649: 2160: 2141: 2109: 2090: 2073: 1903: 5622: 5544: 5313: 3362: 3284:

may still do some when manually requested to examine a page. That is, we mostly check the titles (and authors, and date, IIRC) to

2958: 2764: 2544: 4639:

I have blocked the bot indefinitely until this issue can be looked into. Any admin is free to unblock once the problem is fixed.

4328:. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy paper at SpringerLink, free to read at various places but behind a paywall at the DOI. 3862: 3439: 6060: 5554: 2912: 1724: 712:

The bot is not approved to change titles and skipping identifiers would be a loss, so I prefer to fix those few cases manually.

257: 4615:

which is clearly open access. I've seen the bot remove the "free" tag on lots of articles on my watchlist recently. This must

4016:

Thanks but we're not going to implement our own database of open access journals/publishers, if that's what you're suggesting.

3524: 3266: 3237: 3121: 2475: 2422: 2327: 2280: 1931: 1415: 1370: 1351: 1322: 1303: 1262: 1243: 1230: 1211: 1174: 1147: 1130: 1065: 1041: 1028: 1009: 362: 210: 7161:

The hdl generated by the bot which has suddenly got active with new functionality is not recognised being 20.500.12210/63872

6243: 3106: 3075: 2779: 332: 289: 231: 170: 6072:

Please do not start removing doi-access again until there's some community consensus that the bot is functioning correctly. –

5402: 3587: 2086:

be what we're supposed to be seeing (apart from custom fonts and skins). The green/red squares I've added myself, of course.

1986:

by clicking on the DOI, which is inconsistent with the Dementia with Lewy bodies situation, where I have to click on the hdl.

239: 3894: 2191: 1880: 1727: 7330: 7185: 4845:

Sorry if I didn't have new replies for you. It wasn't my intention to ignore your concerns. I'm still working on this, see

3758: 3660: 1395:

that indicates that what is being cited is the chapter, not the whole book. In that situation, the URL found should go in

352: 6085:

you are taking toward a bot which is making mistakes on such a large scale seems frankly unacceptable for bot operators. –

4608: 1942: 1824: 6344: 5391: 5371: 3247: 2868: 2467:, while the Elsevier DOI is a mere stand-in which only carries an abstract identical to that of the actual article. I've 2451: 2428: 2270: 2237: 7117: 6705: 6659: 4929:

The bot is gradually (re)adding doi-access=free to bronze OA works from Wiley and friends where it previously wouldn't (

2961:

the bot is edit-warring to reinstate its bad version after it was reverted. To me that looks like a blockable offense. —

2677: 2577: 784:

I'd add that limiting PMC and PMID to lowercase is counter-intuitive. When editors see them in a potential source, e.g.

6686: 5478:

and other OA links at the same time. Citation bot has already been adding OA links to the url parameter for years now.

5001: 4209: 4204: 4199: 4194: 3855: 3745: 3506: 2852: 2179: 1678: 6477:

I'm afraid we don't support that way of adding comments yet. Is there a specific reason to reject the hdl identifier?

5064: 5047: 2632: 2437:, incorrect addition of PMC links was reported. It was stated there that the issue was resolved in July 2019, however 6626: 3982: 3952: 3900: 3825: 3793: 3489: 7227: 5342: 4630: 3970: 222:

Unfortunately I do not have the time to do that. If anybody wants to implement that, I will be happy to merge it. −

158: 6335:

I'm not sure if there's a more effective way to report bugs but hopefully whatever caused this won't happen again.

6310:"Species checklist of Orthoptera (Insecta) from Sakaerat Environmental Research Station, Thailand (Southeast Asia)" 5551: 4243: 2438: 2174: 1170:

Again, I'm not saying I disagree with your suggestion, I'm just explaining why OAbot ended up suggesting that URL.

6594:. Unpaywall usually uses various signals to verify that a match is correct. An incorrect DOI match is quite rare. 6489: 6208: 4558: 4377: 2660: 2393: 738: 7156: 7144: 6725: 5515: 5212: 5176:

A registration is not required. The full text of the article is available to everyone directly on the web page. –

3605: 2864: 2828: 2818: 5435: 3701: 3297:

ArXiv definitely doesn't list a doi for this one. Is unpaywall a reliable source for this sort of information? —

3041: 2458: 1862: 1119: 7302: 7179: 6230: 5914: 5876: 5837: 5798: 5741: 5704: 5648: 5566: 5531: 5329: 4590: 4571: 4337: 4283: 4141: 4074: 4035: 3997: 3923: 3912: 3812: 3647: 3564: 3224: 3048: 2985: 2615: 2128: 2039: 1918: 1613: 832: 319: 197: 132: 4528: 4515: 3906: 3178:

Wittgens, Herman J. (1980). "War Guilt Propaganda Conducted by the German Foreign Ministry During the 1920s".

1764: 1099:

is present), the bot needs to distinguish between a URL for the chapter vs one for the book. For example, in

7150: 6417: 6399: 6377:- explaining that the removed free tags were incorrect. Can the bot not do better at that with little work? 5968: 5781: 5043: 5036: 4840: 4825: 4772: 4730: 4651: 4626: 4552: 4501: 4395: 4383: 4319: 4266: 3903: 3888: 3799: 1976: 1100: 385: 7208: 6217: 6192: 6178: 6165: 6140: 6123: 6102: 6092: 6079: 6067: 6053: 5948: 5519: 5485:

shows the kind of edit I'd like to see. I could open a new bot approval request soon but I'm open to ideas.

5183: 5154: 5129: 5117: 5107: 5090: 5081: 4957: 4937: 4909: 4878: 4862: 4812: 4796: 4584: 4404: 3744:

I keep getting a "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable" message. Has the bot's address on toolforge changed?

1852: 1055: 991: 6608: 6532: 6288: 6274: 6261: 5927: 5899: 5889: 5860: 5850: 5821: 5811: 5763: 5754: 5726: 5717: 5686: 5661: 5579: 5452: 5381: 5351: 5243: 5234: 5171: 5031: 5017: 4992: 4656: 4296: 4103: 4087: 4058: 4048: 4020: 3936: 2550: 1696: 1554: 733:

Why, if a citation has the parameter PMC, and that field is not empty, is OAbot adding pmc=? Edits such as

6696:. It can be locked out of this article but does it need to be blocked to prevent more widespread damage? — 6503: 6362: 4777: 4751: 4735: 4668: 4602: 3559: 3381: 2568:. Did OAbot somehow decide to take Citation bot's pile of garbage and turn it into two piles of garbage? — 1813: 1665: 734: 7086: 7077: 5309: 5299:|title=A rapid method for the determination of naringin, prunin, and naringenin applied to the assay of ] 4224: 4154: 4010: 3966: 3897: 3592: 3581: 2704: 2362: 2257:, but the previous version already had a doi, so that's misleading. The correct summary would have been, 2095:

OK, so I shall stop worrying, then, about whether I see the green lock ... sorry for all the questions!

1673: 1503: 775: 703: 671: 633: 602: 485: 6598: 6585: 6570: 6374: 6214: 6108:

what fix you are doing, and showing what other steps you're taking to make sure it doesn't happen again.

4704:

again. I could also stop removing doi-access=free at all, if people prefer to make such edits manually.

3945: 2052: 1742: 1661: 1015: 869:

Indeed, which is why bots can and do fix the inconsistencies all the time to simplify the users' job. --

850:

The acceptability of identifier parameter names in either uppercase or lowercase is documented, e.g. in

621: 6386: 6358:

so we just keep going back and forth depending on which kind of edit is more common in any given week.

5817:

certainly is not it, so I assume you're using some unofficial source, which is ok, but please clarify.

5785: 5147: 4923: 4184: 4180: 3719: 3004: 2798: 1207:, with the former attaching a link to the book title and the latter attaching it to the chapter name. 1071: 7338: 5420: 5009: 3861:

Thanks for reporting. The first one was bronze OA (gratis but not libre) earlier, so one option is to

3677: 2221: 1687: 1585: 615: 7140:. We try to maintain fixes for specific occurrences in the form of units tests to avoid regressions. 6620: 6552: 6467: 5517: 5482: 4700:

while a majority of the removals are for now completely closed papers. I suggest to let the bot run.

4424: 3036: 1967: 922: 891: 860: 851: 793: 746: 145: 6559: 4210:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Galerucinae_genera&diff=prev&oldid=1170215689

4205:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Galerucinae_genera&diff=prev&oldid=1170154613

4200:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_flea_beetle_genera&diff=prev&oldid=1170426595

4195:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_flea_beetle_genera&diff=prev&oldid=1170117091

3003:

How long is temporary? Is the core problem ever going to be fixed? It was discussed as a problem on

2180:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=MNDO&curid=2235160&diff=951504589&oldid=913941897

7334: 7223: 7113: 6701: 6682: 6655: 5489: 5475: 5096: 5039: 4622: 4428: 4220: 3976: 3870: 3617: 3469: 3427: 3401: 3302: 3262: 3012: 2975:

Really this should be a temporary fix while the core problem (the template misbehaving) is fixed.

2966: 2947: 2806: 2787: 2673: 2573: 2344: 2291: 2211: 2187: 1760: 1650: 1593: 1550: 510: 104: 88: 55: 7279: 7274: 7269: 7215: 6983: 6914: 6836: 6764: 6674: 6670: 6666: 6647: 6511: 6211: 6043: 6039: 6035: 6031: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6011: 6007: 6003: 5601: 5441: 5428: 5424: 5409: 5271: 5227: 5160: 4930: 4846: 4689: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4454: 4361: 3668: 3535: 3495: 3445: 3393: 3253: 3092:

instead. The point is to indicate that the source can be accessed freely from the publisher. The

3089: 3059: 2848: 1706: 1683: 469: 368: 253: 120: 3126:"the doi does not require the access param to be there in order to be linked " it does. Compare 7307: 3709: 3576: 3530: 2703:

The problem, or something seemingly closely related, appeared also in September 2019. I found

2628: 2561: 2557: 2247: 2156: 2105: 2069: 2004: 1983: 1972:

I see a green link on the first citation, and clicking on that takes me to a free full-text URL

1938:

OK, I will start over, so you all will see how much I don't understand what is happening here.

1848: 1542: 1432:

treats whatever it is citing as a book when all of the 'work' parameters are omitted or empty:

948: 415:|title=The coupling of synthesis and partitioning of EBV's ] replicon is revealed in live cells 39: 7157:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Woodlark_Basin&diff=1193931371&oldid=1179325953

2490:, starting with journals that had paywalls removed. Three journals are now freely-accessible: 1669: 7258: 6714: 6368: 5053: 4760:- done, block removed as you've said you won't run the bot while the concerns are discussed. 3697: 3570: 3348: 2923: 2778:, adding doi-access=free now causes the citation template to emit an error message; see e.g. 2511: 1280: 1276: 460: 408: 122:, the bot added a CHS Press doi, thinking it was a biorxiv doi. Please update the behaviour. 83:

Yes, I posted this before discovering that page, but let's centralize the discussion there. —

6270:

I manually fixed the remaining broken link to PIA. The bot should be running correctly now.

4095:

explains. Unpaywall already has a list of fully open access journals and publishers, mostly

50:. If your bot cannot make such judgements accurately, it should not be making them at all. — 7082:

Thanks, all these cases and similar ones should be fixed now. (By ignoring title matches.)

6463: 6308:

Dawwrueng, Pattarawich; Tan, Ming Kai; Artchawakom, Taksin; Waengsothorn, Surachit (2017).

5612: 5070: 4511: 4333: 4315: 4239: 4096: 3851: 3753: 3378: 2897: 2719:, the respective bot found another article, published in a Czech mathematical journal, and 2022: 1776: 1051:

I'm recreating the link suggestions with the new code and will launch a new bot run today.

918: 887: 856: 789: 742: 24: 1568:

and I suggest that you reverse it, asking the intervention of an uninvolved admin instead.

428:"The coupling of synthesis and partitioning of EBV's ] replicon is revealed in live cells" 8: 7219: 7175: 7129: 7125: 7109: 6697: 6678: 6651: 6637: 6522: 6413: 6396: 6382: 6188: 6162: 6137: 6120: 6089: 6076: 6050: 5964: 5944: 5505: 5364: 5262: 5180: 5126: 5104: 5078: 5057: 4954: 4906: 4875: 4837: 4822: 4809: 4793: 4692:), but to avoid edit wars you can exclude the bot from individual pages, as explained in 4549: 4542: 4525: 4498: 4469: 4444: 4391: 4373: 4216: 4170: 3878: 3769: 3735: 3628: 3613: 3513: 3465: 3423: 3397: 3298: 3258: 3008: 2962: 2943: 2802: 2783: 2690: 2669: 2611: 2569: 2389: 2340: 2315: 2287: 2207: 2183: 1756: 1692: 1589: 1572: 1546: 1153: 1082: 959: 587: 506: 100: 84: 51: 7252: 4787:

if you find a suitable URL target with an actual PDF you can add it in the url parameter

2656:

Merged the two sections with a more descriptive title, hoping that people will read it.

2413:

is already visible (you can see a small green lock next to the DOI in the reference). −

973: 785: 6254: 6226: 5910: 5872: 5833: 5794: 5737: 5700: 5644: 5562: 5527: 5460: 5405: 5325: 5028: 4997: 4989: 4612: 4567: 4279: 4159: 4137: 4070: 4031: 3993: 3919: 3808: 3790: 3643: 3598: 3503: 3449: 3368: 3220: 3117: 3071: 3063: 2981: 2760: 2442: 2323: 2266: 2124: 2035: 1914: 1818: 1636: 1609: 1565: 1412: 1386: 1348: 1338: 1312: 1300: 1252: 1240: 1220: 1208: 1190: 1161: 1144: 1116: 1019: 998: 986: 828: 591: 451: 427: 358:

Yes, that was fixed. The problem was using OAuth credentials rather than a password. --

315: 249: 193: 128: 43: 7046: 6976: 6829: 2532:: you can check whether the DOIs you're working on are currently marked as gold OA by 1571:

There is no copyright infringement in that diff and the link is explicitly allowed by

1318:

and friends can use CS2 as well, by setting the mode parameter. Did I miss something?

7170:

There could be some clean up to do ! Does bot need to be disabled/blocked yet again

6499: 6375:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Paracetamol&diff=prev&oldid=1187943393

6340: 5691:"I appreciate your confidence in your testing capabilities but you are not everybody" 5607:

Why do you care about the Royal Society DOI? It's already linked to an archived copy.

5279: 4854: 4768: 4726: 4647: 3634: 3202: 3195: 3162: 3155: 3102: 2698: 2624: 2619: 2565: 2418: 2147: 2096: 2060: 2016: 1995: 1839: 1427: 1378: 1360: 1330: 1286: 1270: 1182: 285: 227: 166: 74: 47: 32: 7189: 6907: 5448:

to make the task easier, so you'll see less of those pointless URL-archiving edits.

2736:

also in 2019, that the blame could be shifted one or two steps further, as in 2020.

38:

I see that your bot is adding links to copies of articles on CiteSeerX; for example

7293: 7128:. I had plans to revisit those restrictions at some point, will keep this in mind: 7073: 7042: 7033: 6972: 6963: 6903: 6894: 6825: 6816: 6693: 6354: 6321: 6238: 5922: 5884: 5845: 5806: 5749: 5712: 5656: 5574: 5539: 5404:

seems pointless as the citations have PMID numbers. What value is the bot adding?

5337: 5275: 4598: 4579: 4458: 4291: 4149: 4082: 4043: 4005: 3931: 3835: 3820: 3782: 3693: 3655: 3574:

introduces yet another doi-access= parameter to a citation to a paywalled article.

3555: 3539: 3457: 3344: 3232: 3187: 3145: 2993: 2713:

Knowledge talk:OABOT#Old bad url — translation rather than text of English original

2521: 2507: 2136: 2047: 1926: 1621: 840: 447: 439: 327: 205: 176: 140: 7286:

doi-access=free not true, the full text available through registration or purchase

6590:

No, we don't use CiteSeerX as a source directly, there's some more information on

6353:

As discussed above, there is one possible fix: to stop adding doi-access=free for

4868:

should be manually checked or else mass-reverted until they can be done correctly.

2637:

This is already answered above: there were a few days back in the spring when the

1002: 7324: 6616: 6591: 6581: 6548: 6171: 5363:

semi-free or semi-gratis resources.) It will be eventually be removed, thanks to

4915: 4561:. I agree the automated runs needs to be shut down until things are sorted out. 4507: 4329: 4311: 4235: 3847: 3843: 3044:

the bot is making several thousands edits now, mostly doi-access=free additions.

2893: 2463: 2252: 2115: 1806: 1584:

I have asked for administrative review of both the block and my involvement; see

1535: 969: 642:

I was going to fix them manually myself as they are so rare and they all go into

114: 7137: 5634:

Concerning "there's no way of knowing who's able to access the full text there"

3134:"War Guilt Propaganda Conducted by the German Foreign Ministry During the 1920s" 1564:

the task which was approved to perform these edits, I would consider this block

1308:

Thank you! I had definitely not understood this was your aim. As far as I know,

421:

contains a wikilink so the rendered citation had a URL–wikilink conflict error:

7238: 7171: 6409: 6393: 6378: 6234: 6184: 6159: 6134: 6117: 6086: 6073: 6047: 5960: 5940: 5918: 5880: 5841: 5802: 5777: 5745: 5708: 5652: 5570: 5535: 5333: 5177: 5123: 5101: 5075: 4951: 4903: 4872: 4834: 4819: 4806: 4790: 4575: 4546: 4522: 4495: 4466: 4387: 4369: 4287: 4145: 4078: 4039: 4001: 3927: 3839: 3816: 3651: 3228: 2989: 2132: 2043: 1922: 1617: 1135:

The DOI points at the chapter, so surely the corresponding URL would belong in

1103:, the bot found a URL for the cited chapter (not the whole book) and put it in 977: 836: 695:. Just fix the bot so that neither you nor I have to fix the broken templates. 323: 201: 136: 7201: 6326: 6309: 5165:

Help_talk:Citation_Style_1#Allow_setting_doi-access_to_subscription_or_limited

4918:, but unfortunately the bot is not yet authorised to do that; you can help at 3786: 3637:

for how to only hide one specific bot, and the caveats that comes with that.

3396:. Its failure to respect this kind of comment is a bug, and should be fixed. — 3205: 3165: 1948: 1755:

Ok for runs not including the addition of citeseerx, the reason for the block

7205: 7188:: every DOI is also a handle, but not vice versa. You can resolve a DOI like 7141: 7083: 6722: 6692:

The bot has also been edit-warring to reinstate this bad edit three times at

6595: 6567: 6486: 6359: 6271: 6258: 6222: 6175: 6099: 6064: 5906: 5896: 5868: 5857: 5829: 5818: 5790: 5760: 5733: 5723: 5696: 5683: 5640: 5619: 5558: 5523: 5486: 5449: 5432: 5388: 5378: 5368: 5348: 5321: 5240: 5231: 5217: 5168: 5151: 5114: 5087: 5061: 5014: 5005: 4972: 4934: 4892: 4859: 4830: 4802: 4757: 4748: 4715: 4705: 4693: 4665: 4563: 4538: 4401: 4307: 4275: 4263: 4133: 4100: 4066: 4055: 4027: 4017: 3989: 3949: 3915: 3885: 3804: 3716: 3639: 3602: 3521: 3480: 3413: 3359: 3321: 3289: 3216: 3198: 3158: 3113: 3083: 3067: 3045: 3028: 2977: 2756: 2694: 2657: 2646: 2588: 2541: 2472: 2334: 2319: 2302: 2277: 2262: 2224: 2198: 2120: 2087: 2031: 1910: 1900: 1830: 1810: 1739: 1605: 1576: 1367: 1319: 1259: 1227: 1171: 1127: 1062: 1052: 1038: 1006: 982: 909: 883: 870: 824: 758: 713: 681: 647: 496: 443: 382: 359: 347: 311: 304: 277: 268: 217: 189: 153: 124: 3543: 1889: 6632: 6517: 6495: 6336: 5500: 5257: 4761: 4744: 4719: 4661: 4640: 4462: 4439: 4165: 3764: 3730: 3098: 2603: 2414: 2276:

Would it be enough to say "parameter added to citation for doi, hdl" etc.?

2243: 1834: 1731: 1077: 954: 663:. Do not break cs1|2 citations and leave the mess for editors to clean up. 625:. Do not break cs1|2 citations and leave the mess for editors to clean up. 281: 264: 223: 162: 70: 7037: 6898: 6820: 3881:

to clarify this is in the works. (I first need to finish the current run.)

2371: 886:, as you're one of the maintainers, have we a chance of this being fixed? 7289: 6967: 6563: 5431:, so that people working on link rot know there's no point archiving it. 5208: 4594: 4414: 3551: 3276:

We used to do title matching more, but we no longer really do it for the

2844: 2410: 6250: 6612: 6577: 6544: 6540: 6536: 6155: 4231: 2607: 2146:

Oh, yes ... that did the trick. Unwatching now-- thanks for the help,

1884: 1802: 1783:, which adds only those identifiers (and corresponding parameters like 1735: 1656: 245: 17: 7246: 2182:

probably not your problem. Probably upstream data, but no full text.

1403:. So the Phab task isn't quite right as stated: it's the presence of 248:

were NOT tagged as coming from a bot and so couldn't be filtered out.

5600:

The Medknow DOI is broken, why does Citation bot re-add it? Reported

5056:. It used to be open between 2012 and 2019 though, so you can add an 4681: 4325: 4303: 3866: 3191: 3150: 3133: 2638: 2583: 2533: 1279:) is intended as an alternative to the family of cite XXX templates ( 6611:, so I assume the band-aid fix linked to from phab isn't live yet? — 5679: 2881:

2:00pm - 4:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

2748:

articles from the relevant years, from both OAbot and Citation bot?

425: 6405: 6307: 2851:

to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to work on translating the

2715:

in 2021. In both instances, as in the two examples David provided

2222:

https://support.unpaywall.org/support/solutions/folders/44000384007

180: 5427:

which simply added doi-access=free. I agree the URL is redundant;

3453: 2708: 2645:. The problem was swiftly fixed and is not expected to come back. 1495:

parameter. For the purposes of semantics, the pairs should match.

1335:

templates, it seems unreasonable to have to change one of them to

6560:

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.263.7400

5773: 3461: 1966:

My additional confusion might be better understood by looking at

1216:

Yes. Hence, if you want the citation to be about the book, using

381:.fr instead of pmc= identifiers. The error has been corrected. -- 7310:

added incorrect doi-access=free to "Restricted access" sources.

4545:?) can temporarily shut the bot down until this is sorted out? – 4352: 2486:

Hi, I'm adding content to Knowledge using material published by

2029:

marked with a green locked. I don't know why you don't see it.

7284:

But the access is not free – as I stated in the revert action,

6392:

Another issue is that 1 of the 3 papers is still open access. –

5226:

Previous incorrect removals are being reversed by the bot now (

4273:

What's weird about those? All of three are freely accessible.

3987:

See the above link for a list of open-access DOI registrants.

3724: 16:

Please use this page to report any issue or comment concerning

6450:

journal has a free HDL access but does not have an HDL value.

6406:

User talk:OAbot#Removes doi-access=free when the dois are free

6061:

Knowledge:OABOT#Why did the bot remove a doi-access parameter?

3456:, "Counting (3+1) - Avoiding permutations", on a reference to 477:

The bot should not be creating errors for editors to cleanup.

2745: 1809:

by individual users, some of whom remain separately blocked.

908:, we'll take care of that with the bot in the near future. -- 6481:, there's a mismatch. The reason is that the DOI was wrong, 6098:

August are in the process of being fixed this week, AFAICT.

5635: 5470:

parameter is ongoing, we could already get started on using

4818:

that are editing thousands of pages in a short time frame. –

4092: 4357: 2582:

Thank you for reporting! No, this was a short-lived bug in

1347:

just because a bot doesn't handle the template correctly.

7259:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aje.13279

5933: 3597:

Unpaywall just announced they added 400k newly discovered

3502:

for an article for which only the abstract is available.

2907:

Do not add doi-access=free to cite journal with title=none

1951:

that I usually see when the OA bot adds <something: -->

1730:, and having consulted the sole other active bot operator 1061:

I've sampled a number of edits and they were all helpful.

590:

to detect wikinked terms and phrases – that's a topic for

6717:

and here I should be able to apply a workaround by today.

4099:. If there are any issues, they can be reported to them. 3007:

last May but with no movement towards getting it fixed. —

2536:, and/or you can test manually with the web interface at 1005:

and hopefully it will be fixed within a couple of weeks.

7329:(cannot find image) Thanks for citing! Have a nice day 6562:, which according to Unpaywall comes with the incorrect 5731:

That those DOI prefixes are all 100% open access DOIs.

5289:

the bot continues to break citation templates by adding

5071:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/183643

4858:

has added more links than it removed the previous week.

4350:

I think this is the right thread (the issue reported by

2865:

NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Knowledge Edit-a-thon - ONLINE

2829:

NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Knowledge Edit-a-thon - ONLINE

2819:

NYC COVID-19 Multilingual Knowledge Edit-a-thon - ONLINE

2721:

with the reasonable target present in the reference list

4457:, the bot removed a free access tag from a citation to 4400:

Thanks. I've reported the false positive to Unpaywall.

3948:). I'll accelerate the process later if all goes well. 3944:

Outdated doi-access=free are now slowly being removed (

7233:

Bot repeatedly adding doi-access=free (Giant pangolin)

5759:

No it's not public information, where did you get it?

5722:

I've stopped the bot now. What do you mean by "this"?

5397:

Why is the bot adding access dates to PubMed citations

4677: 4434:

bot incorrectly removed manually added free access tag

2751:

The remaining check probably has to be done by hand.

2246:

to better reflect what the bot is actually doing? In

184: 7253:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.13279

7192:

but we don't generally put DOIs in the hdl parameter.

2725:(David, you suggested that the article you found was 2524:, nice to see more promotion of open access works! I 2537: 1787:) and doesn't add CiteSeerX parameters nor any URL. 1738:

to add doi/hdl/arxiv/pmc parameters. Details below.

1649:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

999:

https://dissem.in/p/70990242/rheumatic-heart-disease

6042:. For completeness, this edit seems to be correct: 5301:. Please fix the bot so that it does not do that. 4179:I've literally been having edit wars with OAbot at 3335:

Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.

3288:a suggestion from Dissemin when it looks "unsafe". 1982:But if I go to the Migliori citation, I can find a 1111:. If it had done that, it might have noticed that 432:

The European Molecular Biology Organization Journal

6677:(same problem with a third unrelated reference). — 6373:This edit should have had a better edit summary - 7190:https://hdl.handle.net/10.1038/s43247-022-00387-9 7016:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 6946:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 6796:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5004:around rate limits, but in the meanwhile you can 2642: 1794:145759 doi 7758 hdl 1180 pmc 464 arxiv 426:Nanbo, Asuka; Arthur Sugden; Bill Sugden (2007). 7164:The doi still works: 10.1038/s43247-022-00387-9 7105: 3387:Should respect comments on doi-access parameters 7011:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 6941:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 6869:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 6791:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 4919: 4676:The edits to correct overbroad doi-access=free 3186:(1). Canadian Historical Association: 228–247. 3144:(1). Canadian Historical Association: 228–247. 2080:some screenshots of references with green locks 1979:which is different; there is no green OA lock. 1460:is set but I don't think that is at issue here. 1407:that triggers the problem, not the presence of 1003:https://github.com/dissemin/dissemin/issues/512 6924:Dynamical Systems with Two Degrees of Freedom 5495:Removes doi-access=free when the dois are free 5297:has a wikilink. See in the example template: 5138:open access. It's also not compliant with the 3983:User talk:Citation bot § More open access DOIs 3180:Historical Papers / Communications Historiques 3138:Historical Papers / Communications Historiques 2797:Now fixed on the template side of things? See 2684:A repeated trouble, with lingering ill effects 6874:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 5052:You sure? It looks closed here (authwalled): 4971:so we can reassess and discuss more broadly. 4871:Do you intend to do either of those things? – 4465:for which a PDF scan is directly available. – 3312:version, so this was probably a DOI match on 2915:the bot broke one of the citations by adding 2770:doi-access=free does not work with title=none 1327:If I have an article full of perfectly valid 6673:(same problem with an unrelated reference), 5939:Most free content licenses are irrevocable. 5788:is an open access publisher. They all are. 244:Hi, a lot of your recent changes such as to 7202:https://hal.science/hal-03611693v1/document 6427:List of bibliographies of works on Catullus 5230:). It may take a few more weeks to finish. 1893:icon near the top left which links the PDF 1779:this run will be launched with the command 1091:When a citation is of a chapter in a book ( 6408:. I may or may not grok the big picture. 6203:keeps flagging free links as subscriptions 3252:I'm curious: how did the bot determine in 644:Category:CS1 errors: URL–wikilink conflict 533:remove the wikilink(s) (the example above) 65:For the record, this concern is discussed 6325: 3676: 3214:It also adds the free-to-read DOI icon. 3149: 450: 7257:(after clicking 'Read the full text') → 7024: 7001: 6993: 6982: 6954: 6931: 6923: 6913: 6859: 6835: 6781: 6773: 6763: 4324:Ha, found one! The bot was right about 3884:The other two cases seem to be similar. 3177: 3131: 2665:Another bad handle from the same batch: 2614:. I had already removed this wrong link 1975:But the bot just added something to the 1356:Not because of the bot, but because the 5150:to change the meaning of the template. 4358:#bot incorrectly adds | doi-access=free 2482:Adding more journals as doi-access=free 2059:green locks on my PC, but not others. 7312:2600:4041:35E:4A00:AC48:659B:3743:6105 6558:The source of the error appears to be 6283:Bot incorrectly added |doi-access=free 1179:To cite a chapter, one can use either 1115:already contained an equivalent URL. 391:wikilinks in |title= when adding |pmc= 6994:New properties of all real functions 6251:https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14173715 6170:The details of the operations are on 5638:. Everyone is able to access those. 5252:bot incorrectly adds |doi-access=free 1871:click the link before the green lock; 542:is wikilinked or if the template has 6539:claiming it to be a free version of 6130:all errors of the same general type 4946:I'd recommend never having this bot 4593:where it removed a free access tag. 1885:https://hdl.handle.net/10871%2F36535 7247:https://doi.org/10.1111%2Faje.13279 7101: 6174:which is linked from the userpage. 3320:usually spotted and fixed quickly. 3316:which is also an exact title match. 2434: 2312:altered doi and/or doi-access param 2255:: doi added to citation with #oabot 1258:because of formatting preferences? 560:with the identifier commented out ( 417:. Note that the value assigned to 13: 7138:contribute exceptions to Unpaywall 6852:The theory of dynamic programming 6849:the Theory of Dynamic Programming 2853:COVID-19 pandemic in New York City 2835: 2492:Annual Review of Political Science 1641: 1143:is for a URL for the whole book. 978:a 2012 article with the same title 822:that may not know the convention. 14: 7349: 7047:10.1090/S0002-9947-1922-1501216-9 6977:10.1090/S0002-9947-1917-1501070-3 6830:10.1090/S0002-9947-1932-1501641-2 5592:follow standards for repositories 3759:Another incorrect doi-access=free 2707:a few hours ago; and David found 2242:Can you please fix the generated 2206:How/where does one report those? 1805:are not directly responsible for 729:OAbot adding redundant parameters 6774:Non-Separable and Planar Graphs 6433: 5594:, so their PDFs are less hidden. 4616: 4360:seems to be a different issue). 3678: 3054:doi-access at War guilt question 2744:additions of references to such 2370: 1888: 1807:edits made with the sibling tool 1801:As a reminder, the operators of 1107:, when it should have put it in 6908:10.1090/S0002-9904-1954-09848-8 5142:, which says "free to read for 5140:documented definition of "free" 3440:Adds arXiv link for wrong paper 2564:, but it was added in March by 2500:Annual Review of Cancer Biology 2409:thanks! The edit OAbot made on 1899:Does this answer the question? 1586:WP:ANI#Request for block review 1283:). If the bot cannot handle a 6665:More OAbot-mangled citations: 6627:PMC for wrong version of paper 4419:Dear OAbot I have a question. 3702:17:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 3017:22:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 2999:22:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 2971:22:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 2952:22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 2606:to the bibliography entry for 2496:Annual Review of Public Health 1949:not see the green OA lock here 1299:), it should leave it alone. 972:, the bot added a PMC link to 680:I'm fixing those, no worries. 31:CiteseerX links often violate 1: 7106:§ Wrong PMC link - April 2020 6472:06:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) 6418:05:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 6400:20:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6387:08:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6363:07:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6345:23:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6275:22:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6262:21:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6257:is supposed to be a dataset. 6244:20:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6193:09:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6179:22:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6141:20:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6124:20:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6103:08:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6093:00:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 6080:22:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 6068:22:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 5969:03:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC) 5949:09:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 5928:08:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 5900:07:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 5890:00:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 5861:22:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC) 5784:is an open access publisher. 5782:American Astronomical Society 5780:is an open access publisher. 5776:is an open access publisher. 5453:07:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 5436:06:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 5414:09:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC) 5382:07:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 5282:as free to read; it is not. 5221:22:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5184:15:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 5172:11:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 5155:11:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 5130:02:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 5118:00:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 5108:23:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5091:23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5082:22:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5065:22:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5048:16:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5032:14:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 5018:12:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 4993:09:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 4976:15:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 4958:17:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 4938:07:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 4910:18:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 4896:18:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 4478:Here are some more examples: 4405:13:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 4396:12:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 3512:Hm, good catch. This journal 3479:Thank you, will give a look. 3257:papers with similar titles. — 3049:11:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 3032:11:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC) 2902:20:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC) 2618:. At the time it seemed that 917:That's good news. Thank you. 309:should be able to help here. 187:... then it's a biorxiv doi. 93:08:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 79:08:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 60:22:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC) 7228:18:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) 7214:Another incorrect hdl link: 6621:09:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC) 6535:, the bot added a link to a 6166:22:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 6054:20:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5932:I think Headbomb is right. 5851:17:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5822:16:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5812:15:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5764:15:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5755:13:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5727:13:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5718:13:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5687:12:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5662:11:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5623:11:36, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5580:02:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5545:00:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5490:06:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC) 5392:16:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 5372:16:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 5352:16:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 5343:00:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 5314:14:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC) 5280:10.1016/0003-2697(83)90314-7 5244:22:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC) 5235:16:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC) 4984:was an incorrect removal of 4617: 4378:13:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC) 3842:article is not free through 3720:16:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC) 3132:Wittgens, Herman J. (1980). 3042:Based on the current refresh 2843:You are invited to join the 2765:18:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC) 2678:22:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 1627:00:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC) 1598:00:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC) 1580:23:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC) 1555:19:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC) 1486:; each has its own matching 413:that had this as its title: 109:18:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC) 7: 7209:10:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC) 7180:00:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC) 7145:21:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 7118:17:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 7087:21:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 7078:16:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 6726:10:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 6706:07:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 6687:23:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6660:23:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6599:21:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6586:20:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6571:18:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6553:15:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 6537:2005 conference proceedings 6504:17:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 6490:18:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC) 5423:of a user using IABot, not 4920:https://oabot.toolforge.org 4879:13:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC) 4863:08:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC) 4847:phabricator:T344114#9118322 4841:18:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC) 4826:16:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC) 4813:21:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4797:21:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4778:17:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4752:17:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4736:16:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4709:16:47, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4669:16:47, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 4657:18:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC) 4631:17:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC) 4603:12:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC) 4585:00:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC) 4553:23:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4529:18:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4516:18:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4502:16:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4473:14:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4429:13:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC) 4338:14:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4320:14:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 4297:23:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 4267:22:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC) 4244:14:54, 16 August 2023 (UTC) 4225:01:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC) 4181:List of Galerucinae genera‎ 4155:09:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 4104:14:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 4088:19:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 4059:18:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 4049:09:46, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 4021:07:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 4011:21:11, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 3971:14:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 3953:14:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC) 3937:11:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 3889:07:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 3856:03:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 3826:23:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 3794:20:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 3661:21:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC) 3448:, where it added a link to 3339:The bot however just added 3248:Odd but not incorrect match 2461:: the actual article is on 2429:Wrong PMC link - April 2020 2238:Better edit summary, please 1771:According to consensus and 1653:, who accepted the request. 1508:18:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1416:16:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1371:11:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1352:11:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1323:11:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1304:10:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1263:09:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1244:07:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1231:05:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 1212:17:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1175:17:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1148:16:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1131:16:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 1120:13:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 23:You can also check out our 10: 7354: 7251:(automatic redirection) → 7186:Actually it's the opposite 7151:Created incorrect hdl link 6630: 6515: 6431: 6404:Oh? I commented above at 6255:doi:10.1186/isrctn14173715 5786:Athabasca University Press 5498: 5255: 5148:Help talk:Citation Style 1 4924:Help talk:Citation Style 1 4613:DOI:10.1074/jbc.M602297200 4437: 4230:And false negatives. See 4185:List of flea beetle genera 4163: 3980: 3840:10.1177/014362448600700203 3762: 3754:01:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC) 3728: 3325:09:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3307:07:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3293:06:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3267:06:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3238:19:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 3122:08:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 3107:07:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 3076:05:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC) 3005:Help talk:Citation Style 1 2827:September 6, 2-4pm E.S.T: 2811:23:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC) 2799:Help talk:Citation Style 1 2792:22:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC) 2349:01:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 2328:00:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 2306:23:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2296:22:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2281:22:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2271:21:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2228:22:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2216:22:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC) 2202:21:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC) 2192:11:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC) 2161:22:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2142:19:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2110:19:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2091:19:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2074:19:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2053:18:52, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 2009:18:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 1932:18:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 1904:16:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 1853:15:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC) 1814:16:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 1781:bot.py (hdl|doi|pmc|arxiv) 1765:16:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 1743:16:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 1075: 952: 927:04:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC) 913:10:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 530:is not wholly wikilinked: 232:10:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC) 211:01:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC) 171:17:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 146:17:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 7303:Incorrect doi-access=free 7298:11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 7124:matching multiple DOIs): 6327:10.11646/zootaxa.4306.3.1 4093:https://unpaywall.org/faq 3787:10.1163/2405478X-00902002 3675: 3588:06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 3560:03:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 3525:17:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC) 3490:Incorrect doi-access=free 3343:so the summary is wrong. 2826: 2661:06:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 2650:06:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 2633:03:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 2545:14:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC) 2528:OAbot already works with 2516:14:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 2476:15:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC) 2369: 2259:marked doi-access as free 1066:20:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 1056:07:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 1042:11:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC) 1029:06:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC) 1010:07:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC) 992:03:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC) 874:11:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC) 865:10:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC) 846:10:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 798:10:22, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 780:08:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 762:07:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 751:13:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC) 717:15:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC) 708:13:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC) 685:15:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 676:15:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC) 651:17:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC) 638:14:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC) 523:I guess I would suggest: 183:and the link resolves to 7339:17:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 7320:06:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 5476:Internet Archive Scholar 5167:. Let's continue there. 3871:Internet Archive Scholar 3622:18:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 3606:05:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC) 3507:09:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC) 3484:08:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 3474:18:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC) 3432:07:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC) 3417:08:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 3406:05:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC) 3377:is much appreciated. --— 2592:06:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 2578:23:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 2457:This is a correct match 2452:16:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 2261:, or some such. Thanks. 2175:Non-free flagged as free 1456:. There is oddity when 1391:, it is the presence of 1226:is the clearest option. 896:22:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 607:19:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 515:19:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 500:19:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 490:14:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 444:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601853 386:16:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 363:18:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 353:15:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 333:15:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 290:11:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 272:09:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC) 258:05:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC) 7280:Special:Diff/1229502557 7275:Special:Diff/1228447858 7270:Special:Diff/1228253952 7216:Special:Diff/1195808135 6675:Special:Diff/1193584598 6671:Special:Diff/1193815125 6667:Special:Diff/1193818981 6648:Special:Diff/1193833171 6446:by Paolo Fedeli in the 6044:special:diff/1187552735 5934:https://doi.org/10.4103 4969:small and very slow run 4455:Special:diff/1170978048 3544:10.1515/9781614511984.1 3496:Special:Diff/1027274899 3446:Special:Diff/1025587540 3394:Special:Diff/1023568392 3382:21:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC) 3363:18:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 3353:13:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 3254:Special:Diff/1020105627 3088:I believe you refer to 2608:an article by Kaplansky 2423:07:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 2394:07:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 1734:, I request unblock of 1424:Further on this point: 902:less than 100 instances 468:URL–wikilink conflict ( 7308:Special:Diff/950835738 6444:Introduzione a Catullo 6292:Citation in question: 4463:10.4153/CJM-1962-042-6 3565:another false positive 2849:NYC Health + Hospitals 2840: 2774:In citations that use 2558:Special:Diff/950630759 2114:Sounds like a caching/ 1646: 613:Still not fixed. See 7038:10.1073/pnas.8.10.283 6899:10.1073/pnas.38.8.716 6821:10.1073/pnas.17.2.125 6715:Talk:Blumberg theorem 6541:this 1966 book review 5161:opened the discussion 5113:from what I've seen. 5054:phabricator:F41547194 3977:More open access DOIs 3692:Here's a sussy baka! 3058:What is the point of 2869:optional RSVP on-wiki 2839: 2641:API relayed a bug in 2378:The Original Barnstar 1693:change block settings 1645: 1375:It is: whether using 1154:Template:Citation#URL 6968:10.1073/pnas.3.4.314 6512:Unrelated arXiv link 4678:were requested above 4364:added two incorrect 3514:used to be bronze OA 3412:rule to skip these. 3314:this Dissemin record 2604:an unrelated article 2551:DML.cz in April 2020 1868:choose a green lock; 1267:No, I'm saying that 974:an article from 1938 689:Apparently not, see 7130:phabricator:T228702 7126:phabricator:T228666 6932:George D. Birkhoff 6721:different content. 6564:doi:10.2307/2004316 5672:usually stay broken 5613:Most of the journal 5365:phabricator:T344114 4967:I'm now starting a 3879:phabricator:T344114 3781:incorrectly labels 3710:Upgrade and new run 3593:New bronze OA links 3520:the publisher PDF. 2862:Sunday September 6 2742:all still remaining 2711:and reported it in 2612:continuous geometry 2433:Hi, in the section 2363:A barnstar for you! 1941:I am talking about 1470:has these aliases: 588:Module:Citation/CS1 526:if the content of 240:Please tag as "bot" 185:http://biorxiv.org/ 6669:(same reference), 6369:Lousy edit summary 6113:everyone else here 5069:The DOI points at 3599:bronze open access 3064:War guilt question 2841: 2562:1/3–2/3 conjecture 2459:found by Unpaywall 2250:, the bot claimed 1647: 1072:url vs chapter-url 878:I see others have 646:(or don't they?). 44:abstract data type 7242:Referenced page: 7052: 7051: 5419:You reverted the 5306:Trappist the monk 4776: 4734: 4655: 4353:Trappist the monk 3963:Trappist the monk 3863:add explicit URLs 3707: 3706: 3037:December 2020 run 2890: 2889: 2801:for discussion. — 2754: 2730: 2566:User:Citation bot 2538:https://oabot.org 2469:corrected the DOI 2399: 2398: 1977:Migliori citation 1500:Trappist the monk 997:Thanks! I see at 772:Trappist the monk 700:Trappist the monk 668:Trappist the monk 630:Trappist the monk 599:Trappist the monk 482:Trappist the monk 438:(19): 4252–4262. 342:Hi, this account 7345: 7102:§ Wrong PMC link 6860:Richard Bellman 6848: 6782:Hassler Whitney 6751: 6750: 6694:Blumberg theorem 6642: 6640: 6527: 6525: 6483:should be ok now 6437: 6436: 6331: 6329: 6304: 6301: 6300:|doi-access=free 6242: 6002:was incorrect): 5926: 5888: 5849: 5810: 5753: 5716: 5660: 5578: 5543: 5510: 5508: 5473: 5469: 5341: 5300: 5296: 5292: 5291:|doi-access=free 5267: 5265: 5134:This article is 5037:.... and another 4987: 4986:|doi-access=free 4766: 4764: 4724: 4722: 4694:User:OAbot#Scope 4645: 4643: 4620: 4619: 4583: 4449: 4447: 4367: 4366:|doi-access=free 4355: 4295: 4255: 4190:Relevant edits: 4175: 4173: 4153: 4130: 4129:|doi-access=free 4126: 4086: 4047: 4009: 3935: 3834:. Access to the 3824: 3774: 3772: 3740: 3738: 3682: 3680: 3673: 3672: 3659: 3632: 3586: 3573: 3549: 3548:|doi-access=free 3501: 3500:|doi-access=free 3341:|doi-access=free 3236: 3209: 3192:10.7202/030859ar 3169: 3153: 3151:10.7202/030859ar 3095: 3087: 2997: 2940: 2936: 2935:|doi-access=free 2932: 2928: 2922: 2918: 2917:|doi-access=free 2913:this recent edit 2824: 2823: 2777: 2752: 2724: 2702: 2449: 2408: 2374: 2367: 2366: 2338: 2153: 2140: 2102: 2066: 2051: 2020: 2001: 1930: 1892: 1879:So for instance 1845: 1838: 1786: 1782: 1775:(and previous), 1712: 1710: 1699: 1681: 1679:deleted contribs 1644: 1625: 1560:Considering you 1494: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1382: 1365: 1359: 1346: 1342: 1334: 1317: 1311: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1281:citation style 1 1277:citation style 2 1274: 1257: 1251: 1238: 1225: 1219: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1186: 1166: 1160: 1142: 1138: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1098: 1094: 1087: 1085: 1026: 1014:Another example 989: 964: 962: 844: 694: 662: 624: 618: 578: 567: 559: 552: 545: 541: 538:if the whole of 529: 473: 466: 464: 456: 454: 420: 416: 412: 404: 400: 350: 331: 308: 221: 209: 157: 144: 7353: 7352: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7327: 7305: 7235: 7153: 7002:Henry Blumberg 6984:Diff 1193758371 6915:Diff 1193584598 6846: 6837:Diff 1193815125 6765:Diff 1193833171 6644: 6638: 6636: 6629: 6607:The bot did it 6592:Knowledge:OABOT 6529: 6523: 6521: 6514: 6464:Achmad Rachmani 6440: 6439: 6434: 6430: 6371: 6299: 6296: 6285: 6221: 6205: 6172:Knowledge:OABOT 5905: 5867: 5828: 5789: 5732: 5695: 5639: 5557: 5522: 5512: 5506: 5504: 5497: 5471: 5467: 5463: 5461:URL maintenance 5399: 5320: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5269: 5263: 5261: 5254: 5159:Actually, I've 4985: 4916:open repository 4762: 4720: 4641: 4562: 4451: 4445: 4443: 4436: 4421:Cologochideilia 4417: 4365: 4351: 4274: 4253: 4177: 4171: 4169: 4162: 4160:False positives 4132: 4128: 4124: 4121: 4065: 4026: 3988: 3985: 3979: 3914: 3844:SAGE Publishing 3830:Also this edit 3803: 3776: 3770: 3768: 3761: 3742: 3736: 3734: 3727: 3712: 3679:File:Amogus.png 3671: 3669:A Gift For You! 3638: 3626: 3595: 3575: 3569: 3567: 3547: 3538:, OAbot marked 3533: 3499: 3492: 3442: 3389: 3371: 3337: 3280:, although the 3250: 3215: 3093: 3081: 3056: 3039: 2976: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2920: 2916: 2909: 2822: 2817:September 6th: 2775: 2772: 2688: 2686: 2553: 2484: 2464:Animal Genetics 2443: 2431: 2402: 2365: 2332: 2253:Open access bot 2240: 2177: 2151: 2119: 2100: 2064: 2030: 2021:Do you not see 2014: 1999: 1909: 1843: 1828: 1821: 1795: 1785:doi-access=free 1784: 1780: 1769: 1768: 1746: 1700: 1690: 1676: 1659: 1642: 1639: 1604: 1538: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1425: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1384: 1376: 1363: 1357: 1344: 1336: 1328: 1315: 1309: 1296: 1292: 1284: 1268: 1255: 1249: 1236: 1223: 1217: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1188: 1180: 1164: 1158: 1152:What I read in 1140: 1136: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1083: 1081: 1074: 1020: 987: 976:to a PMID from 970:rheumatic fever 966: 960: 958: 951: 919:BlackcurrantTea 888:BlackcurrantTea 857:BlackcurrantTea 823: 790:BlackcurrantTea 743:BlackcurrantTea 731: 690: 658: 620: 614: 576: 572: 565: 561: 557: 550: 543: 539: 527: 467: 458: 457: 418: 414: 406: 402: 401:. OAbot added 396: 393: 371: 369:Change matching 348: 310: 302: 242: 215: 188: 151: 123: 117: 36: 12: 11: 5: 7351: 7331:14.102.171.218 7326: 7323: 7304: 7301: 7278:Re-insertion: 7277: 7272: 7266: 7265: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7261: 7241: 7239:Giant pangolin 7234: 7231: 7220:David Eppstein 7212: 7211: 7193: 7152: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7133: 7110:David Eppstein 7104:from 2019 and 7098: 7097: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7057: 7056: 7055: 7054: 7053: 7050: 7049: 7040: 7031: 7027: 7026: 7023: 7019: 7018: 7013: 7008: 7004: 7003: 7000: 6996: 6995: 6992: 6988: 6987: 6980: 6979: 6970: 6961: 6957: 6956: 6953: 6949: 6948: 6943: 6938: 6934: 6933: 6930: 6926: 6925: 6922: 6918: 6917: 6911: 6910: 6901: 6892: 6888: 6887: 6884: 6881: 6877: 6876: 6871: 6866: 6862: 6861: 6858: 6854: 6853: 6850: 6844: 6840: 6839: 6833: 6832: 6823: 6814: 6810: 6809: 6806: 6803: 6799: 6798: 6793: 6788: 6784: 6783: 6780: 6776: 6775: 6772: 6768: 6767: 6761: 6760: 6757: 6754: 6741: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6736: 6735: 6734: 6718: 6698:David Eppstein 6690: 6689: 6679:David Eppstein 6652:David Eppstein 6643: 6635: 6628: 6625: 6624: 6623: 6605: 6604: 6603: 6602: 6601: 6528: 6520: 6513: 6510: 6509: 6508: 6507: 6506: 6432: 6429: 6424: 6423: 6422: 6421: 6420: 6370: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6351: 6333: 6332: 6305: 6284: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6265: 6264: 6204: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6126: 6109: 6082: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5986: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5981: 5980: 5979: 5978: 5977: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5937: 5936:it's Medknow. 5930: 5778:BioMed Central 5692: 5680:S20 conversion 5675: 5665: 5664: 5631: 5630: 5617: 5616: 5608: 5605: 5598: 5595: 5583: 5582: 5511: 5503: 5496: 5493: 5481:A semi-manual 5462: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5429:just remove it 5398: 5395: 5385: 5384: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5288: 5268: 5260: 5253: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5207:I reported to 5205: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5200: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5174: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5013:such a page.) 5008:to ensure the 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4944: 4927: 4888: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4869: 4850: 4828: 4799: 4784: 4783: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4739: 4738: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4587: 4543:David Eppstein 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4450: 4442: 4435: 4432: 4416: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4299: 4260: 4257: 4247: 4246: 4217:Monster Iestyn 4213: 4212: 4207: 4202: 4197: 4176: 4168: 4161: 4158: 4119: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4106: 4097:thanks to DOAJ 3978: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3959: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3882: 3874: 3775: 3767: 3760: 3757: 3741: 3733: 3726: 3723: 3711: 3708: 3705: 3704: 3689: 3688: 3683: 3670: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3629:David Eppstein 3614:David Eppstein 3594: 3591: 3566: 3563: 3532: 3531:False positive 3529: 3528: 3527: 3498:the bot added 3491: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3466:David Eppstein 3441: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3424:David Eppstein 3398:David Eppstein 3388: 3385: 3370: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3342: 3336: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3317: 3299:David Eppstein 3274: 3259:David Eppstein 3249: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3109: 3055: 3052: 3038: 3035: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3009:David Eppstein 2963:David Eppstein 2944:David Eppstein 2929:template with 2908: 2905: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2875: 2874: 2832: 2831: 2821: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2803:David Eppstein 2784:David Eppstein 2771: 2768: 2691:David Eppstein 2685: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2670:David Eppstein 2663: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2643:https://dml.cz 2596: 2595: 2594: 2570:David Eppstein 2552: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2530:Annual Reviews 2488:Annual Reviews 2483: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2397: 2396: 2381: 2380: 2375: 2364: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2341:David Eppstein 2316:David Eppstein 2288:David Eppstein 2239: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2208:AManWithNoPlan 2184:AManWithNoPlan 2176: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2023:the green lock 2012: 2011: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1973: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1954: 1953: 1945: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1897: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1820: 1817: 1793: 1757:David Eppstein 1753: 1721: 1717:Request reason 1714: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1590:David Eppstein 1569: 1547:David Eppstein 1537: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1496: 1489: 1472:|contribution= 1463: 1462: 1461: 1458:|encyclopedia= 1420: 1419: 1418: 1297:|contribution= 1168: 1097:|contribution= 1088: 1080: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 965: 957: 950: 949:Wrong PMC link 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 906:require fixing 900:There are now 880:mentioned this 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 768: 730: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 696: 664: 655: 654: 653: 626: 611: 610: 609: 595: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 575:pmc identifier 574: 569: 564:pmc identifier 563: 554: 536: 535: 534: 519: 518: 517: 507:David Eppstein 475: 474: 392: 389: 377:links to hal.u 370: 367: 366: 365: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 295: 294: 293: 292: 241: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 181:10.1101/063081 173: 116: 113: 112: 111: 101:David Eppstein 97: 96: 95: 85:David Eppstein 52:David Eppstein 35: 29: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7350: 7341: 7340: 7336: 7332: 7322: 7321: 7317: 7313: 7309: 7300: 7299: 7295: 7291: 7287: 7282: 7281: 7276: 7271: 7260: 7256: 7255: 7254: 7250: 7249: 7248: 7245: 7244: 7243: 7240: 7230: 7229: 7225: 7221: 7217: 7210: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7194: 7191: 7187: 7184: 7183: 7182: 7181: 7177: 7173: 7168: 7165: 7162: 7159: 7158: 7146: 7143: 7139: 7134: 7131: 7127: 7122: 7121: 7120: 7119: 7115: 7111: 7107: 7103: 7088: 7085: 7081: 7080: 7079: 7075: 7071: 7068: 7067: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7048: 7044: 7041: 7039: 7035: 7032: 7029: 7028: 7021: 7020: 7017: 7014: 7012: 7009: 7006: 7005: 6998: 6997: 6990: 6989: 6985: 6981: 6978: 6974: 6971: 6969: 6965: 6962: 6959: 6958: 6951: 6950: 6947: 6944: 6942: 6939: 6936: 6935: 6928: 6927: 6920: 6919: 6916: 6912: 6909: 6905: 6902: 6900: 6896: 6893: 6890: 6889: 6885: 6882: 6879: 6878: 6875: 6872: 6870: 6867: 6864: 6863: 6856: 6855: 6851: 6845: 6842: 6841: 6838: 6834: 6831: 6827: 6824: 6822: 6818: 6815: 6812: 6811: 6807: 6804: 6801: 6800: 6797: 6794: 6792: 6789: 6786: 6785: 6778: 6777: 6770: 6769: 6766: 6762: 6758: 6755: 6753: 6752: 6749: 6748: 6747: 6746: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6731: 6730: 6729: 6728: 6727: 6724: 6719: 6716: 6712: 6711: 6710: 6709: 6708: 6707: 6703: 6699: 6695: 6688: 6684: 6680: 6676: 6672: 6668: 6664: 6663: 6662: 6661: 6657: 6653: 6649: 6641: 6634: 6622: 6618: 6614: 6610: 6606: 6600: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6588: 6587: 6583: 6579: 6574: 6573: 6572: 6569: 6565: 6561: 6557: 6556: 6555: 6554: 6550: 6546: 6542: 6538: 6534: 6526: 6519: 6505: 6501: 6497: 6493: 6492: 6491: 6488: 6484: 6480: 6476: 6475: 6474: 6473: 6469: 6465: 6461: 6457: 6453: 6449: 6445: 6428: 6419: 6415: 6411: 6407: 6403: 6402: 6401: 6398: 6395: 6391: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6376: 6364: 6361: 6356: 6352: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6342: 6338: 6328: 6323: 6319: 6315: 6311: 6306: 6302: 6295: 6294: 6293: 6290: 6289: 6276: 6273: 6269: 6268: 6267: 6266: 6263: 6260: 6256: 6252: 6248: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6240: 6236: 6232: 6228: 6224: 6219: 6218: 6215: 6212: 6209: 6194: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6181: 6180: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6164: 6161: 6157: 6152: 6142: 6139: 6136: 6131: 6127: 6125: 6122: 6119: 6114: 6110: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6101: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6091: 6088: 6083: 6081: 6078: 6075: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6066: 6062: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6052: 6049: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6025: 6021: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6005: 6000: 5999: 5970: 5966: 5962: 5957: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5946: 5942: 5938: 5935: 5931: 5929: 5924: 5920: 5916: 5912: 5908: 5903: 5902: 5901: 5898: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5859: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5847: 5843: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5820: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5808: 5804: 5800: 5796: 5792: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5775: 5771: 5767: 5766: 5765: 5762: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5735: 5730: 5729: 5728: 5725: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5714: 5710: 5706: 5702: 5698: 5693: 5690: 5689: 5688: 5685: 5681: 5676: 5673: 5669: 5668: 5667: 5666: 5663: 5658: 5654: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5637: 5633: 5632: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5621: 5614: 5609: 5606: 5603: 5599: 5596: 5593: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5581: 5576: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5560: 5555: 5552: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5541: 5537: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5520: 5518: 5516: 5509: 5502: 5492: 5491: 5488: 5484: 5479: 5477: 5454: 5451: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5411: 5407: 5406:Graham Beards 5403: 5394: 5393: 5390: 5383: 5380: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5370: 5366: 5360: 5353: 5350: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5339: 5335: 5331: 5327: 5323: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5311: 5307: 5302: 5286: 5283: 5281: 5277: 5273: 5266: 5259: 5245: 5242: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5219: 5214: 5210: 5185: 5182: 5179: 5175: 5173: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5132: 5131: 5128: 5125: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5116: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5106: 5103: 5098: 5097:Mike Turnbull 5094: 5093: 5092: 5089: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5080: 5077: 5072: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5063: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5045: 5041: 5040:Mike Turnbull 5038: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5030: 5026: 5023: 5019: 5016: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4999: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4991: 4983: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4974: 4970: 4959: 4956: 4953: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4936: 4932: 4928: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4908: 4905: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4894: 4880: 4877: 4874: 4870: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4861: 4856: 4851: 4848: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4839: 4836: 4832: 4831:User:Nemo bis 4829: 4827: 4824: 4821: 4816: 4815: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4804: 4800: 4798: 4795: 4792: 4788: 4785: 4779: 4774: 4770: 4765: 4759: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4750: 4746: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4737: 4732: 4728: 4723: 4717: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4707: 4701: 4697: 4695: 4691: 4686: 4683: 4679: 4670: 4667: 4663: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4653: 4649: 4644: 4638: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4623:Mike Turnbull 4614: 4610: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4592: 4588: 4586: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4560: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4551: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4530: 4527: 4524: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4500: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4471: 4468: 4464: 4460: 4456: 4448: 4441: 4431: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4406: 4403: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4363: 4359: 4354: 4349: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4327: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4309: 4308:V752 Centauri 4305: 4300: 4298: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4265: 4261: 4258: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4245: 4241: 4237: 4233: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4211: 4208: 4206: 4203: 4201: 4198: 4196: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4188: 4186: 4182: 4174: 4167: 4157: 4156: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4118: 4105: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4068: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4057: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4019: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3984: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3951: 3947: 3938: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3910: 3907: 3904: 3901: 3898: 3895: 3893:Another one: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3887: 3883: 3880: 3875: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3828: 3827: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3795: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3773: 3766: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3739: 3732: 3722: 3721: 3718: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3687: 3684: 3681: 3674: 3662: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3636: 3630: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3604: 3600: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3579: 3572: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3526: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3505: 3497: 3485: 3482: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3415: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3376: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3340: 3326: 3323: 3318: 3315: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3255: 3239: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3213: 3207: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3176: 3175: 3173: 3167: 3164: 3160: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3110: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3091: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3034: 3033: 3030: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2925: 2914: 2904: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2870: 2866: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2749: 2747: 2743: 2737: 2735: 2728: 2727:a translation 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2621: 2617: 2616:back in March 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2546: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2450: 2448: 2447: 2440: 2436: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2406: 2401: 2400: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2028: 2024: 2018: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1992: 1985: 1984:full-text PDF 1981: 1980: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1836: 1832: 1826: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1799: 1792: 1788: 1778: 1774: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1752: 1750: 1749:Accept reason 1745: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1726: 1720: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1670:global blocks 1667: 1666:active blocks 1663: 1658: 1654: 1652: 1651:administrator 1628: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1429: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1409:|chapter-url= 1397:|chapter-url= 1388: 1380: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1340: 1332: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1314: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1288: 1282: 1278: 1272: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1254: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1222: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1205:|chapter-url= 1192: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1163: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1146: 1137:|chapter-url= 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1113:|chapter-url= 1109:|chapter-url= 1102: 1086: 1079: 1067: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 993: 990: 985: 984: 979: 975: 971: 963: 956: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 911: 907: 903: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 876: 875: 872: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 853: 849: 848: 847: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 821: 817: 814:Lowercase is 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 764: 763: 760: 755: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 718: 715: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 688: 687: 686: 683: 679: 678: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 656: 652: 649: 645: 641: 640: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 617: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 593: 589: 584: 570: 555: 548: 547: 537: 532: 531: 525: 524: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 503: 502: 501: 498: 494: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 478: 471: 462: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 424: 423: 422: 410: 399: 388: 387: 384: 380: 376: 375:briefly added 364: 361: 357: 356: 355: 354: 351: 345: 334: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 306: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 250:Chiswick Chap 247: 233: 229: 225: 219: 214: 213: 212: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 186: 182: 178: 174: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 150: 149: 148: 147: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 121: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 81: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 62: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 34: 28: 26: 21: 20:'s activity. 19: 7328: 7325:One barnstar 7306: 7285: 7283: 7268:Bot's edit: 7267: 7236: 7213: 7169: 7166: 7163: 7160: 7154: 7099: 7015: 7010: 6945: 6940: 6873: 6868: 6795: 6790: 6691: 6645: 6639:Task T354472 6530: 6524:Task T354471 6447: 6443: 6441: 6372: 6334: 6317: 6313: 6298: 6291: 6286: 6220: 6206: 6129: 6112: 5955: 5670:Broken DOIs 5636:yes there is 5618: 5584: 5513: 5507:Task T344114 5480: 5464: 5425:OAbot's edit 5400: 5386: 5361: 5358: 5303: 5284: 5270: 5264:Task T344114 5206: 5143: 5135: 5058:archive link 5027:'s another. 4966: 4947: 4889: 4786: 4702: 4698: 4687: 4675: 4589:Another one 4452: 4446:Task T344114 4418: 4214: 4189: 4178: 4172:Task T344114 4122: 4117:If you find 4116: 3986: 3943: 3829: 3797: 3777: 3771:Task T344114 3746:73.44.31.228 3743: 3737:Task T299580 3713: 3685: 3612:obtrusive? — 3596: 3582: 3577: 3568: 3534: 3518:IA still has 3493: 3462:10.37236/225 3443: 3390: 3372: 3338: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3251: 3183: 3179: 3141: 3137: 3057: 3040: 3025: 2924:cite journal 2910: 2891: 2880: 2863: 2857: 2842: 2773: 2750: 2741: 2738: 2733: 2726: 2720: 2716: 2699:RobertFurber 2687: 2625:RobertFurber 2620:Citation bot 2600:added a link 2529: 2525: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2485: 2462: 2445: 2444: 2432: 2377: 2311: 2258: 2251: 2244:edit summary 2241: 2178: 2148: 2097: 2083: 2061: 2026: 2017:SandyGeorgia 2013: 1996: 1968:Karel Styblo 1887:which has a 1840: 1822: 1800: 1798:prefers so. 1796: 1789: 1770: 1754: 1748: 1747: 1722: 1716: 1715: 1688:creation log 1655: 1648: 1573:WP:COPYLINKS 1539: 1446:|periodical= 1090: 1084:Task T234522 1050: 1034: 1022: 1021: 981: 967: 961:Task T228666 852:cite journal 819: 815: 732: 562:|pmc= 540:|title= 528:|title= 452:2000340 419:|title= 282:Pintoch 265:Pintoch 224:Pintoch 202:physics 163:Pintoch 137:physics 115:Biorxiv 71:Pintoch 7290:CiaPan 7198:target 7070:Dmoews 6991:Title 6921:Title 6843:Title 6771:Title 6458:, and 6456:Second 6448:Myrtia 5629:fixed. 5442:opened 5274:marks 5144:anyone 4948:remove 4595:Aithus 3633:, see 3552:Nardog 3286:reject 3273:check. 2498:, and 2084:should 2082:which 1883:links 1881:note 6 1723:After 1482:, and 1454:|work= 1399:, not 1237:|href= 983:Graham 820:people 816:by far 767:sense. 657:Still 592:WT:CS1 546:then: 7025:1922 7022:Year 6955:1917 6952:Year 6886:1954 6883:1952 6880:Year 6808:1932 6805:1931 6802:Year 6613:Kusma 6609:again 6578:Kusma 6545:Kusma 6452:First 6207:E.g. 5768:Pick 5602:there 5590:they 5550:More 5401:This 5293:when 5287:still 4855:query 4384:redid 4125:|doi= 3798:Same 3450:arXiv 3373:Your 3174:with 3094:|url= 2919:to a 2746:Czech 2717:supra 2526:think 2435:above 2149:Sandy 2098:Sandy 2062:Sandy 1997:Sandy 1947:I do 1841:Sandy 1791:far: 1657:OAbot 1493:-url= 1492:: --> 1490:param 1488:|< 1401:|url= 1343:with 1201:|url= 1195:with 1141:|url= 1105:|url= 1035:title 904:that 558:|pmc= 551:|pmc= 405:to a 206:books 141:books 18:OAbot 7335:talk 7316:talk 7294:talk 7288:. -- 7224:talk 7206:Nemo 7176:talk 7155:see 7142:Nemo 7114:talk 7084:Nemo 7074:talk 7030:DOI 6960:DOI 6891:DOI 6813:DOI 6723:Nemo 6702:talk 6683:talk 6656:talk 6617:talk 6596:Nemo 6582:talk 6568:Nemo 6549:talk 6500:talk 6487:Nemo 6468:talk 6414:talk 6383:talk 6360:Nemo 6341:talk 6318:4306 6272:Nemo 6259:Nemo 6253:is: 6189:talk 6176:Nemo 6100:Nemo 6065:Nemo 5965:talk 5956:only 5945:talk 5897:Nemo 5858:Nemo 5819:Nemo 5761:Nemo 5724:Nemo 5684:Nemo 5620:Nemo 5514:See 5487:Nemo 5450:Nemo 5433:Nemo 5421:edit 5410:talk 5389:Nemo 5379:Nemo 5369:Nemo 5349:Nemo 5310:talk 5241:Nemo 5232:Nemo 5218:Nemo 5169:Nemo 5152:Nemo 5115:Nemo 5088:Nemo 5062:Nemo 5044:talk 5025:Here 5015:Nemo 5002:work 4982:This 4973:Nemo 4935:Nemo 4893:Nemo 4860:Nemo 4749:Nemo 4706:Nemo 4666:Nemo 4627:talk 4609:here 4607:And 4599:talk 4591:here 4559:here 4512:talk 4425:talk 4402:Nemo 4392:talk 4374:talk 4334:talk 4316:talk 4306:and 4264:Nemo 4254:free 4240:talk 4221:talk 4183:and 4127:add 4101:Nemo 4056:Nemo 4018:Nemo 3967:talk 3950:Nemo 3886:Nemo 3852:talk 3832:here 3800:here 3750:talk 3717:Nemo 3698:talk 3618:talk 3603:Nemo 3556:talk 3536:Here 3522:Nemo 3516:and 3481:Nemo 3470:talk 3444:See 3428:talk 3414:Nemo 3402:talk 3360:Nemo 3349:talk 3322:Nemo 3303:talk 3290:Nemo 3282:tool 3263:talk 3203:OCLC 3196:ISSN 3163:OCLC 3156:ISSN 3118:talk 3103:talk 3090:this 3072:talk 3046:Nemo 3029:Nemo 3013:talk 2967:talk 2948:talk 2937:and 2898:talk 2807:talk 2788:talk 2761:talk 2709:this 2705:this 2674:talk 2658:Nemo 2647:Nemo 2629:talk 2589:Nemo 2574:talk 2542:Nemo 2512:talk 2504:here 2473:Nemo 2439:here 2419:talk 2390:talk 2345:talk 2324:talk 2303:Nemo 2292:talk 2278:Nemo 2267:talk 2225:Nemo 2220:See 2212:talk 2199:Nemo 2188:talk 2157:Talk 2106:Talk 2088:Nemo 2070:Talk 2005:Talk 1901:Nemo 1849:Talk 1833:and 1811:Nemo 1761:talk 1740:Nemo 1594:talk 1577:Nemo 1551:talk 1504:talk 1368:Nemo 1320:Nemo 1295:(or 1260:Nemo 1228:Nemo 1203:and 1172:Nemo 1157:use 1128:Nemo 1063:Nemo 1053:Nemo 1039:Nemo 1016:here 1007:Nemo 923:talk 910:Nemo 892:talk 884:Nemo 871:Nemo 861:talk 794:talk 786:here 776:talk 759:Nemo 747:talk 739:this 737:and 735:this 714:Nemo 704:talk 682:Nemo 672:talk 648:Nemo 634:talk 619:and 603:talk 571:add 568:) or 556:add 511:talk 497:Nemo 486:talk 470:help 395:See 383:Nemo 360:Nemo 286:talk 269:Nemo 267:. -- 254:talk 228:talk 194:talk 167:talk 159:done 129:talk 105:talk 89:talk 75:talk 69:. − 67:here 56:talk 7043:doi 7034:doi 6973:doi 6964:doi 6904:doi 6895:doi 6826:doi 6817:doi 6646:In 6531:In 6397:(t) 6322:doi 6163:(t) 6138:(t) 6121:(t) 6090:(t) 6077:(t) 6051:(t) 6046:. – 5556:. 5276:doi 5213:JBC 5181:(t) 5136:not 5127:(t) 5105:(t) 5079:(t) 4955:(t) 4907:(t) 4876:(t) 4838:(t) 4823:(t) 4810:(t) 4794:(t) 4611:to 4550:(t) 4526:(t) 4499:(t) 4470:(t) 4459:doi 4453:In 4131:. 4123:in 3869:or 3836:doi 3802:. 3783:doi 3725:503 3546:as 3540:doi 3494:In 3458:doi 3278:bot 3188:doi 3146:doi 3062:at 2911:In 2668:. — 2610:in 2602:to 2556:In 2159:) 2108:) 2072:) 2007:) 1851:) 1707:log 1588:. — 1411:. 1383:or 1187:or 1095:or 448:PMC 440:doi 379:pmc 276:Hi 177:doi 119:In 42:to 25:FAQ 7337:) 7318:) 7296:) 7226:) 7204:. 7178:) 7116:) 7076:) 6847:On 6733:S. 6704:) 6685:) 6658:) 6619:) 6584:) 6551:) 6502:) 6485:. 6470:) 6462:. 6454:, 6416:) 6385:) 6343:) 6316:. 6312:. 6303:}} 6237:· 6233:· 6229:· 6216:, 6213:, 6210:, 6191:) 6063:. 6038:, 6034:, 6030:, 6026:, 6022:, 6018:, 6014:, 6010:, 6006:, 5967:) 5947:) 5921:· 5917:· 5913:· 5883:· 5879:· 5875:· 5844:· 5840:· 5836:· 5805:· 5801:· 5797:· 5772:. 5748:· 5744:· 5740:· 5711:· 5707:· 5703:· 5655:· 5651:· 5647:· 5573:· 5569:· 5565:· 5553:, 5538:· 5534:· 5530:· 5444:a 5412:) 5367:. 5336:· 5332:· 5328:· 5312:) 5060:. 5046:) 4988:. 4771:· 4767:( 4729:· 4725:( 4696:. 4680:. 4650:· 4646:( 4629:) 4621:! 4601:) 4578:· 4574:· 4570:· 4514:) 4490:, 4486:, 4482:, 4427:) 4394:) 4376:) 4336:) 4318:) 4290:· 4286:· 4282:· 4242:) 4223:) 4148:· 4144:· 4140:· 4081:· 4077:· 4073:· 4042:· 4038:· 4034:· 4004:· 4000:· 3996:· 3969:) 3930:· 3926:· 3922:· 3911:, 3908:, 3905:, 3902:, 3899:, 3896:, 3854:) 3846:. 3819:· 3815:· 3811:· 3752:) 3700:) 3654:· 3650:· 3646:· 3620:) 3558:) 3472:) 3430:) 3404:) 3351:) 3305:) 3265:) 3231:· 3227:· 3223:· 3201:. 3194:. 3184:15 3182:. 3161:. 3154:. 3142:15 3140:. 3136:. 3120:) 3105:) 3074:) 3015:) 2992:· 2988:· 2984:· 2969:) 2950:) 2927:}} 2921:{{ 2900:) 2892:-- 2809:) 2790:) 2763:) 2723:. 2693:, 2676:) 2631:) 2576:) 2540:. 2514:) 2494:, 2471:. 2421:) 2392:) 2347:) 2326:) 2318:. 2294:) 2269:) 2214:) 2190:) 2135:· 2131:· 2127:· 2046:· 2042:· 2038:· 2027:is 1925:· 1921:· 1917:· 1763:) 1751:: 1719:: 1701:• 1695:• 1691:• 1686:• 1682:• 1677:• 1672:• 1668:• 1664:• 1620:· 1616:· 1612:· 1596:) 1553:) 1506:) 1478:, 1474:, 1452:. 1448:, 1444:, 1440:, 1436:, 1430:}} 1426:{{ 1389:}} 1385:{{ 1381:}} 1377:{{ 1364:}} 1358:{{ 1341:}} 1337:{{ 1333:}} 1329:{{ 1316:}} 1310:{{ 1289:}} 1285:{{ 1273:}} 1269:{{ 1256:}} 1250:{{ 1224:}} 1218:{{ 1193:}} 1189:{{ 1185:}} 1181:{{ 1165:}} 1159:{{ 988:87 980:. 925:) 894:) 882:. 863:) 839:· 835:· 831:· 796:) 778:) 757:-- 749:) 706:) 674:) 636:) 605:) 577:}} 553:or 513:) 488:) 465:: 463:}} 459:{{ 446:. 436:26 434:. 430:. 411:}} 407:{{ 344:is 326:· 322:· 318:· 288:) 256:) 230:) 204:/ 200:/ 196:/ 169:) 139:/ 135:/ 131:/ 107:) 91:) 77:) 58:) 27:. 7333:( 7314:( 7292:( 7222:( 7174:( 7132:. 7112:( 7072:( 7045:: 7036:: 6975:: 6966:: 6906:: 6897:: 6828:: 6819:: 6700:( 6681:( 6654:( 6615:( 6580:( 6576:— 6547:( 6498:( 6466:( 6412:( 6381:( 6339:( 6330:. 6324:: 6241:} 6239:b 6235:p 6231:c 6227:t 6225:{ 6187:( 6133:– 6116:– 5963:( 5943:( 5925:} 5923:b 5919:p 5915:c 5911:t 5909:{ 5887:} 5885:b 5881:p 5877:c 5873:t 5871:{ 5848:} 5846:b 5842:p 5838:c 5834:t 5832:{ 5809:} 5807:b 5803:p 5799:c 5795:t 5793:{ 5752:} 5750:b 5746:p 5742:c 5738:t 5736:{ 5715:} 5713:b 5709:p 5705:c 5701:t 5699:{ 5659:} 5657:b 5653:p 5649:c 5645:t 5643:{ 5604:. 5577:} 5575:b 5571:p 5567:c 5563:t 5561:{ 5542:} 5540:b 5536:p 5532:c 5528:t 5526:{ 5408:( 5340:} 5338:b 5334:p 5330:c 5326:t 5324:{ 5308:( 5304:— 5278:: 5042:( 4926:. 4902:– 4849:. 4801:@ 4775:) 4773:c 4769:t 4756:@ 4733:) 4731:c 4727:t 4714:@ 4654:) 4652:c 4648:t 4625:( 4597:( 4582:} 4580:b 4576:p 4572:c 4568:t 4566:{ 4537:@ 4510:( 4461:: 4423:( 4390:( 4372:( 4332:( 4314:( 4294:} 4292:b 4288:p 4284:c 4280:t 4278:{ 4238:( 4219:( 4152:} 4150:b 4146:p 4142:c 4138:t 4136:{ 4085:} 4083:b 4079:p 4075:c 4071:t 4069:{ 4046:} 4044:b 4040:p 4036:c 4032:t 4030:{ 4008:} 4006:b 4002:p 3998:c 3994:t 3992:{ 3965:( 3961:— 3934:} 3932:b 3928:p 3924:c 3920:t 3918:{ 3873:. 3850:( 3838:: 3823:} 3821:b 3817:p 3813:c 3809:t 3807:{ 3785:: 3748:( 3696:( 3658:} 3656:b 3652:p 3648:c 3644:t 3642:{ 3631:: 3627:@ 3616:( 3554:( 3542:: 3468:( 3460:: 3452:: 3426:( 3422:— 3400:( 3347:( 3301:( 3261:( 3235:} 3233:b 3229:p 3225:c 3221:t 3219:{ 3208:. 3190:: 3168:. 3148:: 3116:( 3101:( 3086:: 3082:@ 3070:( 3011:( 2996:} 2994:b 2990:p 2986:c 2982:t 2980:{ 2965:( 2946:( 2942:— 2896:( 2873:. 2871:) 2867:( 2805:( 2786:( 2759:( 2701:: 2689:@ 2672:( 2627:( 2572:( 2510:( 2417:( 2407:: 2403:@ 2388:( 2343:( 2337:: 2333:@ 2322:( 2290:( 2286:— 2265:( 2210:( 2186:( 2155:( 2139:} 2137:b 2133:p 2129:c 2125:t 2123:{ 2104:( 2068:( 2050:} 2048:b 2044:p 2040:c 2036:t 2034:{ 2019:: 2015:@ 2003:( 1952:. 1929:} 1927:b 1923:p 1919:c 1915:t 1913:{ 1896:. 1847:( 1837:: 1829:@ 1759:( 1711:) 1709:) 1705:( 1660:( 1624:} 1622:b 1618:p 1614:c 1610:t 1608:{ 1592:( 1549:( 1502:( 1498:— 1275:( 1167:. 921:( 890:( 859:( 843:} 841:b 837:p 833:c 829:t 827:{ 792:( 774:( 770:— 745:( 702:( 698:— 670:( 666:— 632:( 628:— 601:( 597:— 594:. 509:( 505:— 484:( 480:— 472:) 455:. 442:: 330:} 328:b 324:p 320:c 316:t 314:{ 307:: 303:@ 284:( 252:( 226:( 220:: 216:@ 208:} 192:{ 179:: 165:( 156:: 152:@ 143:} 127:{ 103:( 87:( 73:( 54:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index