223:. I responded yesterday, but haven't heard from him. I was going to reinstate my changes which arguably improve the article as I found it, but will refrain if you are taking any action. I've just checked and see other people have intervened and improved things to some extent, though I prefer my own version (as you'd expect!). If you do anything, you may find my changes are still relevant and worth including. I don't know if you've tried a dialogue with Kavs8 - it might be difficult. Best wishes
190:
appears to have copied and pasted from one article to another without proper attribution and that breaks wikipedia licensing requirements. However new information has now been added at
Fastnet so it's not as simple as deleting that page. I'll try and have a look at it all in the next couple of days
116:
at ANI as although I'm reasonbly sure it is not relevant I feel it would be good to get someone with more experience to look at it. I definitely think the redirect is useful so doon't want to go down the route of deleting it again - at the moment I've reverted back to a redirect. We'll see where
167:
Nope. Although last time I think we had to assime good faith I think now there's definitely something dodgy going on. I'm just heading out so don't have time to do anything now and maybe not to tomorrow evening but if noone else has done anything by then I'll probably do something.
218:
article (as it now is). I don't claim any expertise and have no opinion on the larger points you raise. The purpose of this message is to tell you that Kavs8 reverted my edits a couple of times, then sent me an
185:
As you may be aware from my talk page message I've largely retired from
Knowledge due to a fundamental disagreement over how it's run (but not with it's aims). This whole situation is now really quite messy as
149:
With respect to the latest edit I think we have to assume good faith although it has set alarm bells ringing, given that it's their only edit, so I'm also planning on keeping my eye on it.
75:
41:
26:
192:
49:
33:
142:
87:
158:
126:
29:
article and I followed this by deleting up the broken redirects to that article and unlinking the links to the broken redirects.
191:
although I'm quite busy at the moment. I suspect this may need administrator attention to fix. It may be quicker to post here
113:
232:
177:
102:
64:
93:
You can report the user if they keep doing this. Otherwise, yeah, it's just up to us to revert until they get bored.
208:
40:, which I now see was a substantial article before it was redirected, to the new (and obviously insufficient)
16:
220:
98:
133:
Ah, I see there's been some eyes on the article. That's good. Let's hope it's stable now. --
138:
83:
60:
195:, although that's quite specific and probably won't sort all of your concerns. A post at
108:
We are now at least getting some discussion with the user restoring the article (on their
8:
109:
71:
45:
37:
94:
228:
22:
204:
199:
may also find someone that's willing to sort it out quicker than waiting for me.
173:
154:
134:
122:
79:
56:
117:
the discussion goes but if it keeps up I suspect we may have to ask for a ban.
215:
196:
70:
I think I've caught everything so that we're back to where we were before
224:
200:
187:
169:
150:
118:
78:. Let me know if I can help you with anything else. Kind regards, --
32:
You've prompted me to have another look at this and it seems that
52:
redirected it and put back the links to it. Is that OK?
221:
ill-tempered message about my "unacceptable" changes
214:FYI: I recently made some changes to tidy up the
112:). They've made a legal point so I've started a
193:Knowledge:Cut and paste move repair holding pen
55:Thanks for raising this with me. --
13:
14:
244:
44:article. What I'll do is restore
1:
233:13:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
209:22:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
7:
10:
249:
178:07:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
159:08:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
143:23:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
127:11:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
103:23:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
88:22:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
65:22:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
36:redirected the article
48:back the point before
25:'speedy deleted' the
76:Swansea cork ferries
42:Swansea cork ferries
27:Swansea cork ferries
17:Swansea cork ferries
74:was redirected to
72:Swansea Cork Ferry
46:Swansea Cork Ferry
38:Swansea Cork Ferry
21:Hello Nobullman.
240:
23:User:Pastor Theo
248:
247:
243:
242:
241:
239:
238:
237:
19:
12:
11:
5:
246:
236:
235:
183:
182:
181:
180:
162:
161:
146:
145:
130:
129:
91:
90:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
245:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
189:
179:
175:
171:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
107:
106:
105:
104:
100:
96:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
67:
66:
62:
58:
53:
51:
50:User:Swans797
47:
43:
39:
35:
34:User:Swans797
30:
28:
24:
216:Fastnet Line
184:
95:Katharineamy
92:
54:
31:
20:
188:User:Kavs8
135:Malcolmxl5
80:Malcolmxl5
57:Malcolmxl5
110:talk page
225:Pol098
114:thread
201:Dpmuk
197:WP:EA
170:Dpmuk
151:Dpmuk
119:Dpmuk
229:talk
205:talk
174:talk
155:talk
139:talk
123:talk
99:talk
84:talk
61:talk
231:)
207:)
176:)
157:)
141:)
125:)
101:)
86:)
63:)
227:(
203:(
172:(
153:(
137:(
121:(
97:(
82:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.