Knowledge

User talk:Nandt1

Source 📝

785:
Rose snuck out with him...and he isn't even aware that they've spent time together before that point. However, the new version fails to address the fact that Jack and Rose spend time together before she sneaks out to visit him later that night. The current text makes it seem that they first spend time together during and after that dinner Cal invited Jack to. The fact that they bond before that point is a significant aspect (later referenced at the end of the film when we see that Rose lived the type of life she discussed she would live with Jack) that should be included, as was mentioned on the talk page before. That is why the "Jack and Rose develop a tentative friendship" line was included where it was. As the hidden note in that section shows, all aspects of that section were carefully considered. So will you add this material back?
816:
concluded that that's why you'd changed it). As for "at Rose's insistence," you are obviously correct that she doesn't insist that Cal invite him to dinner. It's apparent that the editor who wrote that was trying to convey that it is because Rose expresses disapproval with Cal paying Jack so little for saving her life...that he invites Jack to dinner. As for restoring what you removed, I can't. The article is semi-protected. I'm an IP, which is the main reason I came to you about this. The other reason is curiosity.
588: 856: 1247: 78: 1065: 739: 487: 128:—to ask whether the neutrality tag should remain on the article. There are a number of issues in dispute; if you could comment even on just one of them, or your overall impression of the article's balance, that would be very helpful. I'm leaving this note because you've edited the article or talk page, but if you have no interest in commenting, please feel free to ignore the request. Cheers, 191: 284:
incorrect understanding of Knowledge policy. Indeed, Knowledge fully allows for strengthening articles in one language version with material translated from another. Please see, for example, the article "Knowledge: Copying within Knowledge". Please do not continue deleting material in Knowledge articles based on a misunderstanding of Knowledge policy. Thank you.
984:
WikiProjects but no editors have come to join the discussion. Now I am reaching out to you and the other two editors who responded to your message to see if someone can come back and review this information. If you'd like to help you can see the information about this July's events in the final paragraph of the
801:
introduced some new misinterpretation, please feel free to fix it in whatever wording you feel is most accurate. But unless you have the film in front of you (which I do not), and I am mistaken about dinner (not) being "at Rose's insistence", I'd be grateful if that phrase did not go back in. Best of luck!
784:
is more accurate. But now I see that you must have been referring to the placement of where it mentioned Cal's wariness of Jack, a mention that was less accurate because, after Rose explains to him "the circumstances" of how Jack saved her life, he is mainly indifferent to Jack until he disovers that
510:
working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions
449:
appears to be the same person as determined by their actions. I had reported them and both the IP address and account has been blocked for 1 week. If you suspect that same edits are happening again from the same IP address and account or some other IP address or account, then feel free to contact me
1028:
I returned to this subject after reading the comment in the Daily Mail from which I quote. The article is far tidier than when I first edited it. As her time in EU office draws to an end it we may perhaps moved to a more balanced assessment, neither wholly good nor wholly bad. Zero to hero and now
697:
Thanks so much for the recognition. I enjoyed learning more about Bunin -- entirely new to me -- after seeing the NYT review of his play ("In Paris") currently (August 2012) playing in New York with Mikhail Baryshnikov in the lead. I'll hope to have a chance to read some of his work at some point
283:
Response: You have several times deleted material from the article on Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy -- material which has been translated from an article on the Dreyfus Affair in the French version of Knowledge -- claiming that Knowledge does not permit copying from one article to another. This is an
531:
article's Talk page? It did seem to me that explaining in the article's text that treatment of the major controversy concerning Casement had been deleted from Knowledge might help attract attention to the task of replacing it. But as I said, you may very well be expressing institutional policy.
424:
I did my main LHiS pilgrimages about 25 years ago and various pictures from then can be found scattered around wikipedia. I think the one of the much maligned grave marker was mine - might still be. I just learned how to create a link to the middle of an article, so will try one here - something
335:
Well, if you are worried about quotation, I suppose I can go back and either put it into quotation marks or do a paraphrase of this stuff. As to the sources, one does have to work a little at finding material on the World Bank website -- sorry to hear you are finding it a slow site, I haven't had
241:
Hello, I have already left you a message at your own Talk Page. Please edit responsibly and coherently and abide by Knowledge's rules and conventions. If you are not comfortable writing in the English language, perhaps you should consider contributing to one of the other versions of Knowledge.
815:
LOL, I figured that I was a tad off about the "wary" part being your concern, since both versions do include it. But I couldn't think of any other reason you'd changed the text, and the previous "wary" part makes it seem as though Cal is already aware of Jack and Rose bonding (which is why I'd
983:
This information is now addressed in the article, though not without flaws, as it relies heavily on an opinion piece. To address this a few weeks ago I suggested a few additional sources that could be used to expand this information in the article. I tried reaching out on a couple of related
530:
Thank you for your feedback here. I certainly wouldn't want to enter into a dispute on these points -- you may very well be expressing institutional policies here. This said, I can't help wondering, as a purely pragmatic question, what percentage of WP readers ever actually visit a typical
800:
Hello. Actually my real concern, having seen the film quite recently, is that I do not recall that it is "at Rose's insistence" that Cam invites Jack to dinner -- so I wanted to take that out. The other changes in wording were incidental to that change. If you feel that, inadvertently, I
81:
Nandt, I presented user Brek a WikiCookie last month to encourage his/her useful contributions to WP. (Turns out the cookie has gotten stale.) Please don't think you are getting the same stale cookie. Instead, this one, fresh and hot out of the oven, is for your pushes on the
1259:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1007:
Arturo, Thanks for your efforts on this piece. I am afraid I am not really in a position to undertake this work at present, but I shall try to keep an eye on the article to see if editing by others at least meets the "smell test" of credibility.
635:
I've done my best to help my Russian friend with these articles (he writes them in Runglish), but I'm steeped in 19th century novels, so my grammar is old-fashioned and clunky at best. If you ever want to try your hand at a raw article check out
16: 1202:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 989: 977: 1119:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, 1271:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1287: 450:
and i will then forward the report accordingly. And also if you find this kind of problem on any other articles too. Thank you for your help in defending and improving Knowledge :).
668:. The gentleman who wrote these articles is the same who wrote the FA and GA versions on ru.wiki. I haven't been able to keep up with him. Thanks again for the help with Bunin. 33: 298: 821: 790: 976:
article on your watchlist but if not I wanted to let you know that there has been information added to the article and a few comments on the talk page based on the
446: 502:. While Knowledge welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying 442: 1305: 1029:
somewhere in between. I hope you'll recognise that my sources are not notably pro-Russian, though I removed a writer who is likely to be anti-Russian.
330: 718:
P.S. Sorry to read on your own page that you have been experiencing health issues, and my sincere best wishes to you for progress on this front.
218: 1236: 318:
currently seems to lead only to a menu of different documents (the World Bank site is very slow at the moment, which makes it hard to navigate).
359: 345: 1231: 963: 258: 336:
that particular problem. When I have more time, I guess I can try to go back and add more specific citations for the different material.
928: 304: 1001: 794: 839: 825: 810: 474: 62: 48: 772: 276: 1017: 890:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 688: 426: 1053: 958: 1181: 762: 727: 707: 125: 1175: 985: 922: 1301: 1227: 817: 786: 459: 1080: 268: 227: 205: 1214:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
941: 1116: 917: 781: 945: 181: 1038: 1297: 1223: 653: 520: 1127: 432: 259:
do not use sources that present material originating from Knowledge to support that same material in Knowledge
136: 235: 310:
Would you be able to give me any pointers on exactly which source the last paragraph of that section, added
1280: 1139: 1084: 540: 491: 350:
For continuation of this exchange please see the Talk Page for the article on Robert Zoellick. Thank you.
315: 311: 1156: 1292: 1219: 1143: 973: 886:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
404: 24:
I have placed the article on hold for a week, to give you an opportunity to address my concerns. Thanks,
626: 559: 95: 573: 162: 418: 293: 251: 1122: 110: 1023: 911: 869: 849: 455: 176: 272: 231: 1091:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
1135: 1096: 1072: 997: 937: 516: 480: 326: 1268: 1034: 507: 115: 1279:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1210:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1059: 264: 223: 158: 91: 58: 44: 29: 8: 1215: 1131: 1088: 906: 864: 773: 755: 681: 641: 619: 451: 400: 201: 698:
down the road. No promises on your other Russian authors, but I'll keep them in mind!
437:
Hello Nandt1, now you do not need to worry about those blanking vandalism edits on page
1162:
This is an unwarranted allegation, as I discuss in greater detail at the Talk page for
883: 665: 637: 545: 121: 17: 1255: 1237: 1191: 1182: 993: 949: 932: 564:
At last, a Wikipedian who admits his or her mistake! Welcome, brother (or sister)!
555: 512: 364: 322: 213: 1264: 1211: 1195: 1030: 661: 645: 578: 409:
A pleasure to learn from you. You are clearly far better-informed on LHS than me!
373:
middle name thing. I looked it up in my Morrison and he goes with "Henry" too.
649: 154: 129: 87: 70: 54: 40: 25: 53:
Congratulations and thank you for your kind words. Good luck with the article.
1276: 1207: 1199: 953: 896: 743: 669: 657: 607: 503: 499: 438: 396: 370: 197: 141: 83: 71: 1272: 1203: 1163: 1076: 830:
It is fixed. Hope you'll consider registering in future. Again, good luck.
587: 550:
It never occurred to me to check who originated the thread. My mistake. --
1147: 876: 551: 1167: 1130:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
1045: 1009: 831: 802: 719: 699: 565: 532: 466: 410: 351: 337: 285: 243: 168: 147: 102: 1283:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
855: 1104:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
603: 20:
looks good, I recommend doing a final check over and nominating for GA
1246: 1044:
As you'll see, I've provided an alternative source to Ms. Applebaum.
887: 879: 495: 77: 511:
of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
1198:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1126:. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's 927:
Based on your past editing activity, you may want to comment at
307:
because it made much too close use of the source's own wording.
1286:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
498:. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, 780:
Hi, Nandt1. I was going to state that I don't understand how
190: 1142:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 1121:
breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a
219:
This account seems to be used essentially for what is used.
904:
Hello Nandt1! Wishing you a very Happy Merry Christmas :)
196:
For your good work recently on To The Manor Born. Cheers!
1267:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
969: 303:
Hi Nandt1, I've removed some of the material you added
1134:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
972:'s representative on Knowledge. Perhaps you have the 929:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Theatre#Award enumeration
146:
I had a quick look at some recent edits of yours at
299:
Robert Zoellick - some concerns about use of source
101:Thank you, S., for the cookie and the recognition! 1110:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 1190:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1115:In particular, editors should be aware of the 899:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 652:. For more "light" work like Bunin, check out 388:, W.W. Norton Company, New York, 1963, c. 1935 386:Louis Sullivan: Prophet of Modern Architecture 427:Talk:Home Building Association Bank#Untitled 314:comes from? The source URL you added for it 1075:according to the reverts you have made on 1071:You currently appear to be engaged in an 585: 506:. If you post your comments there, other 76: 369:for hanging in there in regards to the 968:Hi Nandt1. My name is Arturo and I am 882:! This greeting (and season) promotes 964:Following up on Deepwater Horizon oil 1256:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 736: 465:Thank you for your backing on this! 13: 1097:Knowledge's policy on edit warring 1095:Please be particularly aware that 1063: 992:are the sources I shared. Thanks. 854: 14: 1318: 1216:review the candidates' statements 150:and I think they were well done. 1245: 737: 586: 485: 189: 120:Hi Nandt, I've posted an RfC at 1222:. For the Election committee, 1192:Arbitration Committee election 1183:ArbCom elections are now open! 1083:with others, to avoid editing 1018:22:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 1002:21:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 378: 1: 1306:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1269:Knowledge arbitration process 1253:Hello, Nandt1. Voting in the 1232:16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 923:Awards lists in play articles 918:12:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC) 895:Spread the cheer by adding {{ 541:04:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 521:01:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 294:21:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC) 277:07:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC) 252:14:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 236:09:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 1176:17:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 1157:17:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 475:17:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 460:14:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 419:19:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 405:19:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 111:18:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 96:17:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 63:05:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC) 49:22:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 34:17:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 7: 1290:and submit your choices on 1218:and submit your choices on 974:Deepwater Horizon oil spill 840:11:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 826:02:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 811:02:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 795:02:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 360:14:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 346:15:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 331:15:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 206:10:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC) 10: 1323: 1298:MediaWiki message delivery 1288:the candidates' statements 1224:MediaWiki message delivery 1054:20:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC) 763:22:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 728:20:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 708:20:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 689:17:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 627:17:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 137:20:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 1039:21:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 596:The Copyeditor's Barnstar 592: 574:14:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 560:14:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 490:Hello, and thank you for 177:00:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 163:00:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC) 1171: 1089:try to reach a consensus 1079:. Users are expected to 1049: 1013: 959:18:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 835: 806: 723: 703: 569: 536: 470: 414: 355: 341: 289: 247: 182:Some bubble tea for you! 172: 106: 1136:appropriate noticeboard 1068: 859: 433:Article Kenneth Fisher 425:that you might enjoy, 98: 1265:Arbitration Committee 1238:ArbCom Elections 2016 1196:Arbitration Committee 1067: 858: 526:Hello, Pat Gallacher, 80: 602:For your cleanup of 447:User:Andrewjames1977 441:. The edits made by 1200:arbitration process 986:Spill response fund 774:Titanic (1997 film) 642:Dmitry Merezhkovsky 167:Thank you so much! 39:Your turn. Thanks, 1281:arbitration policy 1240:: Voting now open! 1212:arbitration policy 1140:dispute resolution 1069: 978:message you posted 860: 666:Mirra Lokhvitskaya 638:Konstantin Balmont 492:your contributions 443:User:94.192.166.75 122:Talk:Roger Scruton 99: 18:Robert Latham Owen 1155: 1117:three-revert rule 957: 875:is wishing you a 632: 631: 267:comment added by 226:comment added by 211: 210: 135: 1314: 1249: 1154: 1152: 1066: 1024:Catherine Ashton 935: 914: 909: 872: 867: 850:Merry Christmas! 760: 754: 748: 742: 741: 740: 686: 680: 674: 662:Aleksey Pisemsky 646:Nikolai Uspensky 624: 618: 612: 590: 583: 582: 489: 488: 389: 384:Morrison, Hugh, 382: 279: 238: 193: 186: 185: 153: 134: 132: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1293:the voting page 1250: 1242: 1220:the voting page 1186: 1148: 1144:page protection 1064: 1062: 1026: 966: 925: 912: 907: 902: 888:Merry Christmas 870: 865: 852: 778: 756: 750: 744: 738: 682: 676: 670: 650:Zinaida Gippius 620: 614: 608: 581: 548: 486: 483: 435: 393: 392: 383: 379: 367: 301: 262: 221: 216: 184: 151: 144: 130: 118: 75: 22: 12: 11: 5: 1320: 1251: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1235: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1092: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1020: 965: 962: 924: 921: 908:TheGeneralUser 891: 866:TheGeneralUser 862: 853: 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 818:31.193.138.223 787:31.193.138.223 777: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 731: 730: 713: 712: 711: 710: 692: 691: 658:Nikolai Leskov 630: 629: 599: 598: 593: 591: 580: 577: 547: 544: 528: 527: 500:Roger Casement 482: 481:Roger Casement 479: 478: 477: 452:TheGeneralUser 439:Kenneth Fisher 434: 431: 430: 429: 391: 390: 376: 375: 371:Louis Sullivan 366: 363: 300: 297: 281: 280: 215: 212: 209: 208: 194: 183: 180: 143: 140: 117: 114: 74: 69: 68: 67: 66: 65: 21: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1319: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1248: 1239: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1184: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164:Aneurin Bevan 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1151: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1118: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077:Aneurin Bevan 1074: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 981: 979: 975: 971: 961: 960: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 934: 930: 920: 919: 916: 915: 910: 901: 900: 898: 892: 889: 885: 881: 878: 874: 873: 868: 857: 841: 837: 833: 829: 828: 827: 823: 819: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 799: 798: 797: 796: 792: 788: 783: 775: 764: 761: 759: 753: 749: 747: 735: 734: 733: 732: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716: 715: 714: 709: 705: 701: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 687: 685: 679: 675: 673: 667: 663: 659: 655: 654:A. K. Tolstoy 651: 647: 643: 639: 634: 633: 628: 625: 623: 617: 613: 611: 605: 601: 600: 597: 594: 589: 584: 576: 575: 571: 567: 562: 561: 557: 553: 543: 542: 538: 534: 525: 524: 523: 522: 518: 514: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 448: 444: 440: 428: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 407: 406: 402: 398: 387: 381: 377: 374: 372: 362: 361: 357: 353: 348: 347: 343: 339: 333: 332: 328: 324: 319: 317: 313: 308: 306: 296: 295: 291: 287: 278: 274: 270: 269:24.15.121.116 266: 260: 256: 255: 254: 253: 249: 245: 239: 237: 233: 229: 228:24.15.121.116 225: 220: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 188: 187: 179: 178: 174: 170: 165: 164: 160: 156: 149: 139: 138: 133: 127: 123: 116:Roger Scruton 113: 112: 108: 104: 97: 93: 89: 85: 79: 73: 64: 60: 56: 52: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 36: 35: 31: 27: 19: 1291: 1285: 1262: 1254: 1252: 1187: 1149: 1120: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1094: 1085:disruptively 1070: 1060:January 2015 1027: 994:Arturo at BP 988:section and 982: 967: 933:TonyTheTiger 926: 905: 903: 894: 893: 863: 861: 782:this wording 779: 776:plot section 757: 751: 745: 683: 677: 671: 621: 615: 609: 595: 563: 549: 529: 513:PatGallacher 484: 436: 408: 394: 385: 380: 368: 349: 334: 323:Demiurge1000 320: 309: 302: 282: 263:— Preceding 240: 222:— Preceding 217: 166: 145: 119: 100: 86:. Thanks. -- 23: 1081:collaborate 1031:Sceptic1954 897:subst:Xmas2 148:Che Guevara 1277:topic bans 1208:topic bans 980:in July. 950:WP:CHICAGO 604:Ivan Bunin 546:Mea culpa! 395:Einar aka 155:Coppertwig 131:SlimVirgin 55:Racepacket 41:Racepacket 26:Racepacket 1273:site bans 1204:site bans 1132:consensus 1128:talk page 1087:, and to 880:Christmas 504:talk page 496:Knowledge 397:Carptrash 365:Thank you 321:Thanks -- 214:warning 1 198:bodnotbod 1138:or seek 1099:states: 1073:edit war 884:WikiLove 579:Barnstar 265:unsigned 224:unsigned 1150:Snowded 1146:. ---- 954:WP:FOUR 552:Drmargi 508:editors 88:S. Rich 84:WP:POLE 72:WP:POLE 1194:. The 1168:Nandt1 1046:Nandt1 1010:Nandt1 913:(talk) 871:(talk) 832:Nandt1 803:Nandt1 720:Nandt1 700:Nandt1 566:Nandt1 533:Nandt1 467:Nandt1 411:Nandt1 352:Nandt1 338:Nandt1 286:Nandt1 244:Nandt1 169:Nandt1 142:Thanks 103:Nandt1 1123:block 877:Merry 752:Never 678:Never 664:, or 648:, or 616:Never 124:—see 1302:talk 1263:The 1228:talk 1172:talk 1050:talk 1035:talk 1014:talk 998:talk 990:here 836:talk 822:talk 807:talk 791:talk 724:talk 704:talk 570:talk 556:talk 537:talk 517:talk 471:talk 456:talk 445:and 415:talk 401:talk 356:talk 342:talk 327:talk 316:here 312:here 305:here 290:talk 273:talk 248:talk 232:talk 202:talk 173:talk 159:talk 126:here 107:talk 92:talk 59:talk 45:talk 30:talk 1188:Hi, 946:BIO 931:.-- 758:Cry 684:Cry 622:Cry 494:to 261:" 1304:) 1296:. 1275:, 1230:) 1206:, 1174:) 1166:. 1052:) 1037:) 1016:) 1000:) 970:BP 956:) 838:) 824:) 809:) 793:) 726:) 706:) 660:, 656:, 644:, 640:, 606:. 572:) 558:) 539:) 519:) 473:) 458:) 417:) 403:) 358:) 344:) 329:) 292:) 275:) 250:) 234:) 204:) 175:) 161:) 109:) 94:) 61:) 47:) 32:) 1300:( 1226:( 1170:( 1106:. 1048:( 1033:( 1012:( 996:( 952:/ 948:/ 944:/ 942:C 940:/ 938:T 936:( 834:( 820:( 805:( 789:( 746:I 722:( 702:( 672:I 610:I 568:( 554:( 535:( 515:( 469:( 454:( 413:( 399:( 354:( 340:( 325:( 288:( 271:( 257:" 246:( 230:( 200:( 171:( 157:( 152:☺ 105:( 90:( 57:( 43:( 28:(

Index

Robert Latham Owen
Racepacket
talk
17:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Racepacket
talk
22:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Racepacket
talk
05:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:POLE

WP:POLE
S. Rich
talk
17:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Nandt1
talk
18:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Roger Scruton
here
SlimVirgin
20:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Che Guevara
Coppertwig
talk
00:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Nandt1
talk
00:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.