749:
31:
241:
261:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
710:
to eat, someone else might not see it the same way - and might try to make orange juice from one. I've noticed under some trees around here where deer have tried some, and the fruit always shows just one great big bite taken, and the rued mouthful within a few feet of it. I know deer aren't humans, but it isn't much of a stretch to imagin an adventurous person giving it a go. And they really
291:. When moving articles, it's preferable to do it through the move tab located on top of the screen: it takes care of histories, talk pages and leaves redirects at the old location. I have tagged Crataegus × lavallei for history merge - this simply means your watchlist will soon have a few extra entries. –
709:
Hi, Nadia. Noticing you removed osage oranges from the list of indedible fruits: I think the thrust of the article is on 'is it edible', despite that opening sentence, not 'does it appear to be edible'. Appearances are subjective, and although I happen to agree with you that osage oranges look awful
578:
to the new article title instead, which transports the history of edits under the old title, along with all of the page itself, to the new title. From there whatever additional edits that need to be done to it can follow. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if the talk page gets whisked along in the move as
435:
So how about considering the other changes that you backed out so flippantly, rather than going into a tailspin over getting
Knowledge to match other sources that have sloppy typesetting? You've reverted to a statement about hysteresis, which makes no sense in this context ... I will not touch this
326:) 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Hi,Thanks for fixing that, I didn't notice the doubling of the links. I don't know which pages you've changed, but if it's just Hawthorn/Crataegus and not choosing a different species, there shouldn't be a problem (unless Photinia could be an option).
318:. If you will, please check my work. If you would, please try to pick the correct dab for "hawthorn" for any additional article3s you create, or you can simply proceed and I will come around eventually and make my best guess, whichever is easier for you. -
134:
was ok, I added an e to the word pah‘e so that it became pahe‘e (Section non-medicinal uses). That one was fine. Then, I tried to add a common name at the top of the page (Hawaiian Rose), next to
Hawaiian Hawthorne. I forgot to remove the extra < p :
574:) were highly accurate. However, in doing so the entire history of the former two articles (newly made into redirects) were left behind along with their associated talk pages. In order for this not to happen, the articles should always be
166:
Hi, I removed it because I am not sure if it is wrong. That book that I was looking at was printed a while ago (not that long, but its definitetly not the most current). I am going to do a little more reaserch on it and see what i find
280:
That message above was actually caused by cut & paste move - the problem with them is that the article histories are left behind, and the license used in
Knowledge requires attribution. There's more info on the canned message at
419:
Checking more books, I see the subscript is not so uncommon. Probably need to mention that it's written both ways, and provide sources, especially if you have one that explains what it means as a subscript (or otherwise).
532:
in this case. Unfortunately there are no recipes there related to quince yet. I'm wondering if you are willing to reconsider the inclusion of the "len.ro" link and if there is a solution we can both be satisfied with.
313:
page for about a year. I found a few of you pages that linked to that page and I fixed the links to point (I hope) to the correct pages instead, or I de-linked the word when it was right next to a valid link to
579:
well, because I've never moved a page that already had a talk page attached to it. (but I suspect it takes a separate move)Please tell me if you know how to go about doing this, and if you need any help.Peace,
151:
Hi, I dont quite see what you are talking about. I added the hawaiian word for taro and specified which islands is is found on. Are you talking about what I added and then deleted? Let me know on my talk
665:
Copyright image. Hi, the image that you have added (with citation) to the Prunus maximowiczii taxobox appears to be copyrighted, see :-( Nadiatalent (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
401:
111:
I FIXED YOUR PAGE (I had messed it up ☹ )!!! I WAS USING BETA, SO IT MESSED EVERYTHING UP. I STOPPED USING BETA, AND NOW I CAN CHANGE THINGS WITHOUT RUINING EVERYTHING! WEEEEE!☺
628:
448:
Flippantly? Tailspin? Reliable sources with "sloppy typesetting"? I responded to the substantive part on the article talk page where you copied this discussion.
646:
as the genus. Whoever originally put that there was fulla balloney. I just put it in alphabetical order, since it was at the end. Thanks for pitching it.
335:
304:
298:
504:
482:
457:
429:
739:
723:
176:
161:
146:
274:
670:
Yes, That's my copyright. Read the description pages: it's from my own work. Nickrz (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Bruce Marlin
523:
activity take advantage of the open nature of
Knowledge to generate revenue for the owner by driving traffic to an adsense website.
519:, the link was one of many added throughout Knowledge, (almost certainly) by the website's owner. I don't like to see this type of
492:
632:
611:
413:
378:
697:
228:
655:
588:
704:
624:
642:
Hi, Nadia - Chiku is indeed just another common name for sapodilla. I found it in an old book by E. J. H. Corner, using
693:
125:
477:
540:
120:
101:
515:
In a recent edit summary you ask "what's wrong with a link to a recipe?" In this particular case, besides being a
797:
789:
784:
354:
79:
71:
66:
404:, and didn't encounter a single one with the subscript (though if I had looked further I might have found one).
92:
ARAGH! I ADD THE SECTION, ITS FINE. I REEDIT IT TO ADD MY SIGNATURE, AND IT MAKES IT ALL WEIRD. SUPER SORRY!
233:
730::Oops! Corrected. I was taking Maclura out of various lists, and hit the inedible fruits list by mistake.
756:
364:
131:
38:
637:
270:
735:
616:
607:
441:
394:
331:
254:
234:
689:
545:
285:
765:
386:
47:
17:
681:
660:
295:
181:
8:
719:
651:
584:
528:
In many articles, recipe links can be replaced with a single link to
Wikibooks Cookbook,
473:
323:
266:
250:
172:
157:
142:
116:
97:
603:
569:
563:
557:
453:
425:
409:
374:
258:
529:
106:
685:
552:
500:
225:
369:
None of the sources that I've looked at use a subscript for F1 hybrid. What's up?
731:
550:
Hello
Nadiatalent, I trust your expertise as a botanist that your synonym edits to
437:
390:
350:
327:
309:
Hi. I don't know all that much about botany, but I have been "disambiguating" the
617:
463:
292:
262:
764:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
715:
647:
580:
575:
537:
510:
495:
regarding a concern of mine. Any feedback there would be appreciated. Regards,
469:
319:
168:
153:
138:
112:
93:
87:
520:
516:
449:
421:
405:
370:
340:
209:
187:
496:
488:
191:
137:
tags that it automatically adds on. It would be nice if you could do that.
400::I was looking at both the sources that are cited in the article and the
346:
205:
200:
240:
623:
Sorry, but may you add the source for Armen
Takhtajan's information? --
217:
213:
599:
315:
221:
310:
674:
257:, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page:
190:
does not include the whisk ferns; the whisk ferns are in the
468:
Hi
Nadiatalent. I've responded to your question at my talk.
387:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/199610/F1-hybrid
568:(...and the article you may be creating as I write this,
253:. I have performed a web search with the contents of
602:. Will watch the mouse more carefully next time!
598:Thanks for catching my reference repair error on
345:Yeah, can`t figure out why those keep breaking.
385:What are you looking at? Try Britannica online
675:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bruce_Marlin
487:Hi there. I noticed your recent expansion of
186:Please be more careful with your facts. The
305:Thanks for your work on Crataegus articles
14:
762:Do not edit the contents of this page.
483:Reassortment and chromosomal crossover
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
743:
25:
23:
249:This is an automated message from
239:
24:
811:
402:books found by google book search
747:
29:
589:21:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
541:22:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
505:18:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
229:20:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
13:
1:
698:01:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
656:21:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
633:07:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
177:08:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
162:04:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
130:Hi, the first edit I made to
740:22:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
724:20:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
612:18:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
517:self-published source (blog)
389:, or any genetics textbook.
336:20:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
216:, but only a single kind of
147:23:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
121:23:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
102:23:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
7:
705:Appearance vs. Inedibleness
478:12:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
299:06:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
275:22:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
10:
816:
263:the maintainer's talk page
198:have microsporangia; only
194:. Most Lycopodiophyta do
132:Osteomeles anthyllidifolia
126:Osteomeles anthyllidifolia
458:00:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
430:18:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
414:18:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
379:18:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
355:00:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
493:that article's talk page
360:Posted from Wii HB app*
244:
760:of past discussions.
491:, and left a note on
243:
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Nadiatalent
562:and the new article
521:conflict of interest
255:Crataegus × lavallei
235:Crataegus × lavallei
365:Why the subscript?
259:Crataegus lavallei
245:
136:and < / p : -->
803:
802:
772:
771:
766:current talk page
701:
684:comment added by
553:Crataegus diffusa
530:b:Cookbook:Quince
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
807:
781:
774:
773:
751:
750:
744:
700:
678:
673:Retrieved from "
536:
290:
284:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
815:
814:
810:
809:
808:
806:
805:
804:
777:
748:
707:
679:
663:
640:
621:
618:Armen Takhtajan
548:
534:
513:
485:
466:
367:
343:
307:
288:
282:
238:
184:
128:
109:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
813:
801:
800:
795:
792:
787:
782:
770:
769:
752:
706:
703:
662:
659:
639:
638:You're correct
636:
620:
615:
547:
546:Synonymy edits
544:
512:
509:
484:
481:
465:
462:
461:
460:
446:
366:
363:
362:
361:
342:
339:
306:
303:
302:
301:
286:uw-c&pmove
267:CorenSearchBot
251:CorenSearchBot
237:
232:
183:
180:
143:my talk page ☎
127:
124:
108:
105:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
812:
799:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
780:
776:
775:
767:
763:
759:
758:
753:
746:
745:
742:
741:
737:
733:
728:
726:
725:
721:
717:
713:
702:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
676:
671:
668:
666:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
635:
634:
630:
626:
625:91.77.252.179
619:
614:
613:
609:
605:
604:Malcomsbridge
601:
596:
593:
591:
590:
586:
582:
577:
573:
572:
567:
566:
561:
560:
555:
554:
543:
542:
539:
531:
526:
524:
522:
518:
508:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
480:
479:
475:
471:
459:
455:
451:
447:
445:
443:
439:
433:
431:
427:
423:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
388:
383:
381:
380:
376:
372:
359:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
312:
300:
297:
294:
287:
279:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
242:
236:
231:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:Lycopodiaceae
207:
203:
202:
197:
193:
189:
188:Equisetopsida
179:
178:
174:
170:
164:
163:
159:
155:
149:
148:
144:
140:
133:
123:
122:
118:
114:
104:
103:
99:
95:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
778:
761:
755:
729:
727:
711:
708:
686:Bruce Marlin
672:
669:
667:
664:
661:My Copyright
643:
641:
622:
597:
594:
592:
570:
564:
559:C.. dunbarii
558:
551:
549:
527:
525:
514:
489:Reassortment
486:
467:
436:page again!!
434:
432:
399:
384:
382:
368:
344:
308:
248:
246:
226:EncycloPetey
199:
195:
192:Psilotopsida
185:
182:Recent edits
165:
150:
129:
110:
91:
60:
43:
37:
754:This is an
732:Nadiatalent
680:—Preceding
571:C. scabrida
565:C. iracunda
438:Nadiatalent
391:Nadiatalent
328:Nadiatalent
214:microphylls
206:Isoetopsida
201:Selaginella
36:This is an
714:inedible.
595:==Thanks==
293:Sadalmelik
218:sporangium
798:Archive 5
790:Archive 3
785:Archive 2
779:Archive 1
716:Hamamelis
648:Hamamelis
600:Whitebeam
581:Hamamelis
538:JonHarder
470:Hamamelis
320:Arch dude
316:Crataegus
222:strobilus
220:in their
169:Smiler121
154:Smiler121
139:Smiler121
113:Smiler121
94:Smiler121
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
694:contribs
682:unsigned
450:Dicklyon
422:Dicklyon
406:Dicklyon
371:Dicklyon
311:Hawthorn
208:do (the
204:and the
757:archive
576:"moved"
497:Emw2012
39:archive
644:Achras
511:Quince
347:Vistro
107:Fixed!
88:SORRY!
507:<
464:Reply
341:Reply
212:have
152:page.
16:<
736:talk
720:talk
690:talk
652:talk
629:talk
608:talk
585:talk
501:talk
474:talk
454:talk
442:talk
426:talk
410:talk
395:talk
375:talk
351:talk
332:talk
324:talk
271:talk
224:. --
173:talk
167:out.
158:talk
117:talk
98:talk
712:are
677:"
196:not
135:-->
794:→
738:)
722:)
696:)
692:•
654:)
631:)
610:)
587:)
556:,
503:)
476:)
456:)
428:)
412:)
377:)
353:)
334:)
289:}}
283:{{
273:)
265:.
175:)
160:)
145:)
119:)
100:)
76:→
768:.
734:(
718:(
688:(
650:(
627:(
606:(
583:(
535:✤
499:(
472:(
452:(
444:)
440:(
424:(
408:(
397:)
393:(
373:(
349:(
330:(
322:(
296:☎
269:(
171:(
156:(
141:(
115:(
96:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.