825:... OK. If you are truly serious about making such an article, it is going to need a lot more work. I'll put it this way. Your article is probably 2% of the quality and length of what an ideal "List of Texas hurricanes" article would be. I'll go point by point. A true List of Texas hurricanes article wouldn't stop at 1885. There are plenty of available sources to extend it to the 1500s-1600s. Furthermore, it is missing a lot, a lot of storms. From 2000 to present, there have been TD 9 (00), Allison (01), Bertha (02), Fay (02), Lili (02), Claudette (03), Erika (03), Grace (03), Marty (03 EPAC), Ivan (04), Matthew (04), Emily (05), Rita (05), and John (06), and that's excluding 2 storms that required hurricane warnings and 1 that required storm warnings for the state. You only mention 8 of those. The ones you did mention were very short summaries of what they did. They give no details, such as rainfall totals, wind reports, and or actual damage. What is the point of even having this article if there is no original information that can't be found elsewhere? This is a very ambitious project, and unless you are willing to put a lot of work into it, it adds nothing to Knowledge. The writing is poor, especially with phrases like "Tropical Storm Chris got near Texas" or "The storm never made landfall in Texas although Jeanne weakened for being over the Texas area" that make no sense. In all, I don't like it. More effort should have been put into it.
966:"The system rapidly weakened as it moved through southern Texas and northeastern Mexico, and dissipated within 24 hours of making landfall over the mainland, over "The Borderline" which is the border of Mexico and Texas. The thirty-fifth and final advisory was released when Eleven was a minimal tropical storm status of 40 mph winds." You're trying waaay too hard to extend the article. The first sentence is useless, inaccurate, and poorly worded after the word "landfall". "The Borderline"? Why would you put it in quotes, and why would you include it? The term is very unofficial, and it's already implied the hurricane dissipated in northeastern Mexico. The next sentence very inaccurate. How do you know it had 35 advisories on it? For your information, the Weather Bureau issued advisories for hurricanes twice a day, and their best tracks were later extrapolated and interpolated based on more research.
982:
track, it was the only hurricane to hit Texas in the year, along with two tropical storms. The other trivia fact, "Hurricane Eleven ranks 10th on the list of most intense hurricanes to enter the Gulf Coast with the minimum pressure of 949 mbar (28.03 inHg). It is behind Betsy (1965), Dennis (2005), Ivan (2004), Frederic (1979), Allen (1980), Celia (1970), Audrey (1957), Opal (1995), Rita (2005), Carla (1961), Katrina (2005), Camille (1969) & several unnamed storms." is incorrect and important as well. Taking a quick look, it is twentieth on the list. Something in twentieth place doesn't deserve a mention.
1002:
caused by this hurricane. How do you know the image wasn't of one of the other hurricanes in the season to hit Cuba? I'm still not convinced there's a need for a separate article. The key to making a new article is determining whether there's enough information. If that is all of the information out there on the storm, there's not enough, as the season article can handle it. You still need more impact and aftermath (in fact, only the first sentence in the aftermath is actually aftermath of the storm, the rest is impact) if this is to be published. Otherwise, the storm section in the season article suffices.
31:
858:. I put strong emphasis on that last one, the raw observations for Hurdat. There's stuff there you might have missed, including rainfall and wind speeds for older storms. Be sure to add the dates for every storm section. It means little saying "The fourth tropical storm made landfall near Corpus Christi". When did it make landfall? How strong?
949:
The lede should be longer and not as repetitive. "It affected Cuba as a
Category 2 hurricane and affected Mexico and Texas as a Category 3 hurricane killing 179 people." You shouldn't repeat so much in one sentence (you used affected twice and Category X hurricane twice). Expand it to two paragraphs,
914:
or other pages regarding how to best construct a project page, and I strongly urge you to do so. If the project is redesigned to be more in keeping with wikipedia guidelines, then I think it may well get through the MfD process revised, but viable. Otherwise, I think it may well face a consensus in
909:
being deleted, on the provision that it established some other goals than simply creating pages for every street in the city. As already indicated, such material is outside the scope of wikipedia and readily eligible for deletion. I noted that you might try to implement some of the suggestions made
956:
Are the numerous pressure reports important in the storm history? Typically, the way to measure the hurricane's strength is with its maximum sustained winds. Very few people use pressure, especially when saying useless things like "At the time, Eleven was the strongest storm of the season untill the
548:
It's not bad, but I doubt there's enough information out there to justify having an article for Emmy. There's simply not a lot of info for storms in that time period. Also, when searching, you should type "Hurricane Emmy", not
Hurricane and Emmy. Keeping them together will limit the results to what
977:
format. "Many businessmen who expected more severe damage were angry with the meteorologist in charge of the Corpus
Christi station, though the National Weather Bureau assured the preparations were needed and saved lives. 90 percent of the citrus crop was destroyed in LRGV." needs a source. What is
927:
If it is to survive, the project page will have to be substantially reworked. You will have to indicate specific goals and tactics to achieve them which fall within wikipedia guidelines. Notable buildings, residents, history, and institutions (school districts, etc.) are generally the most widely
586:
Sigh. It doesn't matter of someone wants it. I know for a fact that someone wants every storm since 1950 to have an article, but some things aren't going to happen. As it is, I'd rate the Emmy article a 2, due to lack of information and poor writing. I'm sorry, but not all storms can have articles,
135:
No, I don't like the image gallery you've placed on the CR 676 page. Please crop the images so that the black background is not visible. Please remember that this is an encyclopedia, and we should aim for professionalism. It is not just a repository for things you find interesting and the photos
981:
The trivia section should be removed. Trivia is not needed for hurricane articles. The first "trivia" fact, "The hurricane became was the fifth and final storm of the 1933 season to hit Texas, a record held on for 73 years." is very vague, incorrect, and sourceless. Taking a quick look at the best
723:
The article is practically an exact copy of the storm summary in the season article. I think you should wait until the 1933 AHS is done. I have been working on that lately, and I am considering trying to get it to FA status. Any major changes, such as adding articles or formatting changes, should
706:
article, I removed your image gallery. You asked me what I thought of the gallery when you posted it, and I responded that you need to crop the photographs so that the black background in the images was not visible. You did not do so, thus I removed the images since they were not of the quality
1001:
Still some things. You still use the word "borderline", referring to Mexico/USA. That term is unofficial, and not needed. The picture, while a good find, is not available for use. They don't specify a copyright status, and, as thus, it can't be used. Also, the website doesn't say the damage was
972:
The impact section is poorly made. You should organize the impact by area, not just random collections of sentences. You need a source for "Many weak buildings were destoyed, most of them at
Harlingen, Texas." Again, you use Hidalgo County, Mercedes. Typically, one uses a
1067:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
587:
and unless you find some website that has unseen info on the storm, Emmy probably cannot have an article. All it did was cause the plane crash and, while sad, it is not enough to justify an article for a storm with very little info.
978:
LRGV? You need to explain acronyms in articles and expect the user to know what they mean. It seems like the "many businessmen" part isn't impact... more like aftermath. Try and find more aftermath to make a section for it.
611:
Hi there, I tried to archive your user talk page, but it seems that you have an error in your
Werdnabot directive that prevented me from correctly archiving your User talk page. Please review this error, or contact
928:
accepted. Revise the project page to indicate that your intention is to pursue activities such as these, and then any future voters will see that the project has changed and will be more likely to vote to keep it.
1027:
898:
780:
I really don't think we should use numbers for pre-1950. There is an ongoing hurricane reanalysis, and the numbers will likely be changed over time. Having an unofficial name is better than having to change them.
986:
Overall, the article is not needed at the moment. If you expand on it, fix the errors, and find an impact picture, it could serve a purpose, but right now, it is a near duplicate of what's in the season article.
883:
This is to inform you that the articles you have created for North Second Street through North Fifth Street in
Highland Park, New Jersey have been proposed for deletion. You can find the discussions for them at
904:
You will note that your project page now has a tag indicating that the project is being considered for deletion. I note as well that I did not put the tag there, and that I actually supported the project's
963:
What does this mean? "in
Hidalgo County, Mercedes" Hidalgo County, Mercedes is not a place. Furthermore, it's not needed. "The hurricane made landfall just to the north of Brownsville" will suffice.
1022:
635:
679:
newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the
195:. Knowledge is not your free webhost to put up what you wish, especially when it is not related to the upkeep of an article, or talking about yourself (which is what a user page is for).
945:
I don't think the article should be published as it is. It is still pretty much the same as what's in the season article, with only a few minor additions. Here's what's wrong with it.
842:
That's better. Now, it's probably around 30% of the quality and length of what the ideal article would be. It's still missing a lot. First, look through all of the archives, including
159:
I'm having 2nd thoughts about US 1 on the parkway info box, because there's no entrance to Route 1 northbound on the GSP and there's only one entrance to the GSP Northbound on US 1.
1058:
1053:
91:
I'm slightly unclear as to what your request is. The only difference I can see is the street names parameter. Are you saying that you'd like to include that in the infobox?
68:, "Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette." This is especially true after another user had already told you to stop doing this about a week ago.
661:
1064:
672:
1071:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
1039:
1098:
1031:
919:
897:
885:
347:
Thanks, I only used Ana in the page beacause (at the time) it was the only storm to be used 5 times without a hurricane. I'll add Beryl to that too. Thanks!
136:
you take of them. Captions such as "Pic of..." are not "the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia entry", to quote the tag at the top of the article. --
807:
708:
692:
666:
137:
99:
76:
932:
869:
792:
752:
598:
577:
472:
Uh, I don't think we should put pics of Alicia and
Allison (95) becasue thats not what the article is about. It's about the two main Allisons, ya know?
892:
94:
One thing you might want to try instead is to use the more major segments under "alternate_name". See the way
Central Jersey Expressway is listed on
974:
806:
I've created the shield you requested. Please cleanup the article; some of it is incorrectly copy and pasted from your
Middlesex 676 article. --
330:
306:
283:
260:
114:
Nah, I only read that once I read your post on my talk page. I'm sorry to see you go, but good luck in the future with anything you aspire to do.
703:
630:
713:
836:
529:
503:
Uh, the article is abot the similarties of Tropical Storm Allison (89) and Tropical Storm Allison (01). It's not about the other two storms.
498:
467:
436:
405:
878:
125:
606:
1013:
236:
181:
643:
636:
202:
812:
735:
960:
You can't call the hurricane "Eleven". It had no name. Therefore, you'll have to call it "the hurricane" or something like that.
741:
Still, before you publish it, can you wait until 1933 AHS is done? Right now, almost all of it is found in the season article.
697:
142:
373:
153:
104:
81:
817:
774:
560:
109:
1094:
911:
165:
325:
301:
278:
255:
231:
210:
1083:
940:
170:
STOP using edit summaries as your personal edit count, it is disruptive and can be considered a violation of
724:
wait until it's done. I'm sorry if I sound mean, but that article is a personal project of mine right now.
1078:
38:
801:
953:
You should cite the NHC's Deadliest Atlantic hurricanes, not Weatherunderground, for the casualties.
819:
718:
199:
186:
969:
In the preparations section, you should include when the Weather Bureau issued hurricane warnings.
1008:
993:
864:
831:
787:
769:
747:
730:
593:
572:
555:
342:
120:
95:
851:
130:
47:
17:
763:
Yea, for some reason, storms from about 1925 to 1965 had a lot more info than 1966 to 1990.
321:
297:
274:
251:
227:
8:
1049:
847:
688:
680:
625:
613:
196:
86:
56:
1003:
988:
929:
916:
889:
859:
826:
782:
764:
742:
725:
588:
567:
550:
514:
483:
452:
421:
390:
358:
115:
72:
855:
758:
658:
543:
178:
147:
I added US Route 1 at exit 130 on the GSP but they took it away, I can try again.
1030:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
843:
317:
312:
293:
270:
247:
223:
171:
150:
65:
441:
Very, cool! Thanks. Hold on, Let me try something with this (organization-wise)
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1090:
1044:
1036:
684:
676:
651:
620:
617:
212:
1068:
647:
504:
473:
442:
411:
380:
348:
192:
566:
Then there most likely isn't enough enough information for an Emmy article.
655:
175:
410:
I agree. Espeacially with that retirement one. That's pretty cool.
1023:
TfD nomination of Template:1914 Atlantic hurricane season buttons
644:
User:Mitchazenia#How_stupid_is_Highland_Park.27s_School_System.3F
637:
User:Mitchazenia#How_stupid_is_Highland_Park.27s_School_System.3F
1074:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
1059:
Image copyright problem with Image:Cuba1933Hurricane.jpg
1032:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
291:
Don't feel that you can;t be a part of the project. --
886:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 September 14
64:
stop marking every edit you make as minor. To quote
1093:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
1028:Template:1914 Atlantic hurricane season buttons
899:Knowledge:WikiProject Highland Park, New Jersey
704:County Route 676 (Middlesex County, New Jersey)
191:I have deleted your 2007 predictions page, per
311:I had to remove stuff above. Saw the stuff at
957:next storm became the strongest at 948 mbar".
667:Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #4
71:Also, please familiarize yourself with the
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
879:Streets in Highland Park, New Jersey
25:
1095:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
912:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Guide
607:An automated message from Werdnabot
23:
24:
1109:
162:But 22, I believe is more major.
29:
1089:This is an automated notice by
1099:05:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
1084:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1054:07:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
1014:19:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
933:19:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
920:15:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
893:17:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
870:00:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
837:23:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
698:Middlesex CR 676 image gallery
13:
1:
813:20:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
793:22:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
775:02:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
753:22:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
736:21:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
714:12:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
693:00:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
677:WikiProject Tropical cyclones
7:
1065:Image:Cuba1933Hurricane.jpg
662:17:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
631:22:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
599:21:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
578:21:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
561:20:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
530:22:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
499:21:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
468:21:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
437:20:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
406:20:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
374:20:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
331:06:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
307:21:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
289:Removed for privacy reasons
284:21:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
266:Removed for privacy reasons
261:21:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
243:Removed for privacy reasons
237:21:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
219:Removed for privacy reasons
203:03:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
182:16:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
154:00:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
143:08:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
126:02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
105:23:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
82:01:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
10:
1114:
1079:Knowledge:Image use policy
707:expected of Knowledge. --
166:Your recent edit summaries
915:favor of its deletion.
200:I did "That's hot" first!
110:Re: I'm guessing you read
820:List of Texas hurricanes
941:Re: 1933 storm article
702:When I cleaned up the
654:. Please remove it. –
96:Route 138 (New Jersey)
1063:Thanks for uploading
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Mitchazenia
1052:
1011:
996:
867:
834:
802:Re: Sussex CR 615
790:
772:
750:
733:
596:
575:
558:
123:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1105:
1048:
1042:
1007:
992:
863:
830:
786:
768:
746:
729:
719:Re: Hurricane 11
616:for assistance.
592:
571:
554:
528:
521:
511:
497:
490:
480:
466:
459:
449:
435:
428:
418:
404:
397:
387:
372:
365:
355:
211:Re your edit to
187:2007 predictions
119:
33:
32:
26:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1061:
1040:
1025:
943:
902:
881:
823:
804:
761:
721:
700:
673:September issue
669:
640:
628:
609:
546:
515:
513:
505:
484:
482:
474:
453:
451:
443:
422:
420:
412:
391:
389:
381:
359:
357:
349:
345:
343:Re:Coincidences
315:coming down. --
216:
189:
168:
133:
112:
89:
66:Help:Minor edit
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1111:
1087:
1086:
1081:
1060:
1057:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1017:
1016:
984:
983:
979:
975:City, X County
970:
967:
964:
961:
958:
954:
951:
942:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
901:
896:
880:
877:
875:
873:
872:
822:
816:
803:
800:
798:
796:
795:
760:
757:
756:
755:
720:
717:
699:
696:
668:
665:
639:
634:
624:
608:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
581:
580:
545:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
215:
209:
207:
188:
185:
167:
164:
132:
129:
111:
108:
88:
85:
58:
55:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1110:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1069:copyright tag
1066:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1043:
1038:
1034:. Thank you.
1033:
1029:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1004:Hurricanehink
1000:
999:
998:
995:
990:
989:Hurricanehink
980:
976:
971:
968:
965:
962:
959:
955:
952:
948:
947:
946:
934:
931:
930:Badbilltucker
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
918:
917:Badbilltucker
913:
908:
900:
895:
894:
891:
890:Badbilltucker
887:
876:
871:
866:
861:
860:Hurricanehink
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:
839:
838:
833:
828:
827:Hurricanehink
821:
815:
814:
811:
810:
799:
794:
789:
784:
783:Hurricanehink
779:
778:
777:
776:
771:
766:
765:Hurricanehink
754:
749:
744:
743:Hurricanehink
740:
739:
738:
737:
732:
727:
726:Hurricanehink
716:
715:
712:
711:
705:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
664:
663:
660:
657:
653:
649:
645:
638:
633:
632:
627:
622:
619:
615:
600:
595:
590:
589:Hurricanehink
585:
584:
583:
582:
579:
574:
569:
568:Hurricanehink
565:
564:
563:
562:
557:
552:
551:Hurricanehink
531:
527:
526:
522:
520:
519:
512:
510:
509:
502:
501:
500:
496:
495:
491:
489:
488:
481:
479:
478:
471:
470:
469:
465:
464:
460:
458:
457:
450:
448:
447:
440:
439:
438:
434:
433:
429:
427:
426:
419:
417:
416:
409:
408:
407:
403:
402:
398:
396:
395:
388:
386:
385:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
370:
366:
364:
363:
356:
354:
353:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
314:
310:
309:
308:
305:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
286:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
267:
264:
263:
262:
259:
257:
253:
249:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
220:
214:
208:
205:
204:
201:
198:
194:
184:
183:
180:
177:
173:
163:
160:
157:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:
141:
140:
131:Image gallery
128:
127:
122:
117:
116:Hurricanehink
107:
106:
103:
102:
97:
92:
84:
83:
80:
79:
74:
69:
67:
63:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1088:
1073:
1062:
1035:
1026:
1018:
985:
944:
906:
903:
882:
874:
824:
808:
805:
797:
762:
722:
709:
701:
681:mailing list
670:
641:
610:
547:
524:
523:
517:
516:
507:
506:
493:
492:
486:
485:
476:
475:
462:
461:
455:
454:
445:
444:
431:
430:
424:
423:
414:
413:
400:
399:
393:
392:
383:
382:
368:
367:
361:
360:
351:
350:
346:
316:
292:
288:
269:
265:
246:
242:
222:
218:
217:
206:
190:
169:
161:
158:
149:
146:
138:
134:
113:
100:
93:
90:
77:
75:feature. --
73:edit summary
70:
61:
60:
43:
37:
379:Go for it!
87:Re: Infobox
57:Minor edits
36:This is an
549:you want.
318:Rschen7754
294:Rschen7754
271:Rschen7754
248:Rschen7754
224:Rschen7754
151:Nextbarker
1091:OrphanBot
950:at least.
685:Nilfanion
614:Werdna648
759:Re: 1933
544:Re: Emmy
326:contribs
313:WP:CHILD
302:contribs
279:contribs
256:contribs
232:contribs
172:WP:POINT
910:in the
675:of the
652:WP:USER
213:WP:USRD
197:Mike H.
39:archive
854:, and
648:WP:NPA
646:, see
618:Werdna
193:WP:NOT
62:Please
1050:talk!
809:NORTH
710:NORTH
508:→Cycl
477:→Cycl
446:→Cycl
415:→Cycl
384:→Cycl
352:→Cycl
139:NORTH
101:NORTH
98:. --
78:NORTH
16:<
1037:Core
1009:talk
994:talk
865:talk
856:here
852:here
848:here
844:here
832:talk
818:Re:
788:talk
770:talk
748:talk
731:talk
689:talk
671:The
659:acor
642:Re.
594:talk
573:talk
556:talk
518:one1
487:one1
456:one1
425:one1
394:one1
362:one1
322:talk
298:talk
275:talk
252:talk
228:talk
221:. --
179:acor
174:. –
156:Dan
121:talk
1041:des
907:not
683:.--
621:bot
245:---
1097:.
1045:at
1012:)
997:)
888:.
868:)
850:,
846:,
835:)
791:)
773:)
751:)
734:)
691:)
656:Ch
650:,
629:\
597:)
576:)
559:)
328:)
324:-
304:)
300:-
281:)
277:-
268:--
258:)
254:-
234:)
230:-
176:Ch
124:)
1006:(
991:(
862:(
829:(
785:(
767:(
745:(
728:(
687:(
626:T
623:/
591:(
570:(
553:(
525:→
494:→
463:→
432:→
401:→
369:→
320:(
296:(
273:(
250:(
226:(
118:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.