31:
86:. The article was kept untouched by several months. To my surprise, it was recently eliminated and redirected to the director’s page with no discussion. I undid the redirection, but saw the article was proposed to deletion. Reason:
154:
in one. I guess that “outstanding” may be a synonym for “notable” in such cases and that articles like this shouldn’t be deleted without previous cared analyses: important information may be lost.
146:
Although unreleased, although having no reliable secondary sources, Drifts is unquestionably an outstanding film for its uniqueness and characteristics: autobiography, comedy,
121:
79:
125:
105:. A film that has not yet been premiered or distributed may not be commented. Besides, none of the films so listed has ever been deleted or even contested.
165:
article, which I created on 10 September 2010, is the latest example. The article structure was unreasonably modified, loosing clarity and useful content.
190:
113:
101:. I argued that the article couldn’t have but primary sources (the producer’s ones) as it is an upcoming film, like many others listed at
175:
136:
83:
129:
132:(Drifts) and published it once more with some improvements. As a result, the article was fast deleted and I blocked for three days.
162:
117:
71:
67:
I apologize for the inconvenience, but have no other way than appealing for administrators’ help recover a deleted article.
161:, supported by two or three user friend. It has no other explanation. It contributes in nothing to improve articles quality.
38:
59:
186:
8:
95:
128:. As the semantic root “drift” seemed to be the problem, I replaced the article name to
47:
17:
181:
I'm just wondering -- why do you think this issue requires a budget of 30 people? --
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
172:
158:
140:
109:
102:
182:
98:
87:
151:
147:
91:
75:
116:
or similar, and at the same time put at the disambiguation page of
139:, which was proposed to fast deletion as well by the same user,
135:
In the meantime, a new article about the trilogy was published:
157:
This sequence of interventions is clearly a personal attack by
82:. It is the second film from an autobiographic trilogy,
124:. I created a new page for the same article entitled
112:proposed that the article should be renamed to
120:this reference «Drifs, unreleased film by
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
70:I published a film article entitled
25:
23:
24:
202:
168:NOTE: sent to 30 administrators.
29:
13:
1:
108:At last, in discussion, user
7:
171:Thanks for your attention,
10:
207:
191:21:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
176:22:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
122:Ricardo Costa (filmmaker)
126:Drifts (Portuguese film)
74:(Derivas), a film by
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Mikeblas
60:Articles deletion
54:
53:
48:current talk page
198:
33:
32:
26:
206:
205:
201:
200:
199:
197:
196:
195:
64:Dear Mikeblas,
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
204:
194:
193:
173:User:Tertulius
159:User:reddogsix
141:User:reddogsix
110:User:reddogsix
103:upcoming films
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
203:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
169:
166:
164:
160:
155:
153:
149:
144:
142:
138:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:Drifts (film)
111:
106:
104:
100:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:Ricardo Costa
77:
73:
68:
65:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
170:
167:
156:
145:
134:
107:
69:
66:
63:
55:
43:
37:
152:metafiction
148:docufiction
88:independent
36:This is an
92:verifiable
76:Portuguese
99:resources
96:secondary
78:director
183:Mikeblas
137:Faraways
84:Faraways
130:Derivas
39:archive
163:Mists
118:Dritf
72:Drits
16:<
187:talk
143:.
189:)
150:,
94:,
90:,
185:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.