31:
70:
96:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
100:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ▫
118:
59:
77:
61:
93:
82:
38:
86:
8:
103:
47:
17:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
75:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
81:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
94:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Redline (drink)
14:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
25:
83:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
23:
24:
129:
92:The article will be discussed at
68:
29:
13:
1:
7:
10:
134:
119:04:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
85:or whether it should be
42:of past discussions.
18:User talk:Mikeblas
54:
53:
48:current talk page
125:
115:
112:
109:
106:
72:
71:
33:
32:
26:
133:
132:
128:
127:
126:
124:
123:
122:
113:
110:
107:
104:
78:Redline (drink)
73:
69:
66:
62:Redline (drink)
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
131:
67:
65:
60:Nomination of
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
130:
121:
120:
117:
116:
98:
95:
90:
88:
84:
80:
79:
63:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
102:
99:
91:
76:
74:
64:for deletion
55:
43:
37:
36:This is an
87:deleted
39:archive
105:Johnny
16:<
111:Nin
114:ja
108:Mr
89:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.