User talk:MSGJ/2015

3796:

is quote "Anti-Immigrationism". Whether Immigrationism is even a word is a different topic, but it does highlight that whoever had added it must have some bias, or even put it by accident through misinterpretation. Neither sources cited (I looked through the history to find the NY times one) use the term 'Anti-Immigrationism', on top of the Guardian article is part of the opinion section rather than news. After further research, not once in the UKIP 2015 manifesto does it claim to be so. What's more, a quick Google search 'anti-immigrationism ukip' clearly shows defence for UKIP in accusations of being 'Anti-immigration' by Daily Mail and Telegraph both anti-UKIP publications. Additionally I believe confusion my arise through the stance of 'Mass Uncontrolled Immigration' which is argued to be different than immigration itself. Thus I would kindly request this removed from the article as it is poorly sourced and misinterpreted.

6980:

for the reason the article owner wishes. However looking at the article 1/3 of the current citations are self attributions or to sources that are social media outlets controlled by the article owner. The article itself reads largely like marketing and contains no citations until the pre-launch section. The boston.com citation doesn't even reference Zude. Additionally it doesn't meet Audience, the remaining citations are media of limited interest and circulation (trade). Citation 5 (eweek)refers to Social Mix, an article that was already deleted as not notable, even then it was in a list and a passing mention, Also it conveniently misrepresents itself, Zude wasn't called the "Coolest Technology". The article has a certain Truthiness that really doesn't stand to even cursory scrutiny.

6860:

why would i wait till 2 days from the end of the week block to make an unblock request? and why would i care about what you're saying here right now, trying to restore my dignity, instead of getting back trolling somewhere? unlike you, i've respected the famous "assume good faith", as you can read on the other page, but according to your today's behaviour maybe i'd be wrong to continue believing that... and also, i've replied to Samir, i've written on his talk page inviting him to join back the discussion too, he didn't do that, instead i've clarified his doubts about my supposed double identity answering his demurs about our similar writing styles, you're free to read by yourself if you've got time. oh, i've almost forgot about this: can i insert a similar link too?

7084:. As he did just after his last block had ended. I will not take part in any edit war, do not worry. I would just like you to explain to me what to do in that case. Shall I report him here? Elsewhere? Am I allowed to undo his reverts once/twice or not at all? Can I make a "compromise" and let him remove the Brithsh and American English IPAs leaving on the article just the Italian one (this solution is the most used in all Wiki articles about Italian words used in English)? Let me know how to act correctly, please, I do not want to suffer the second block (actually I do not understand why I was blocked if I did not break the 3RR and came here expressly to signal him who did, but I do not care any more by now). Please answer by tomorrow morgning, thanks. 6867:

the "assume good faith", i'd bet you won't make. but let's go to the core of the problem: it was no longer the first block which i complained about at the beginning and which i and most users and admins considered a bad solution to the problem, it was your misuse (now i'm actually starting to think it was an abuse), your extending the block because i made 3 identical unblock requests since i didn't receive an answer in almost 6 hours. maybe you were really in a hurry, maybe you really were already stressed, we're both humans, but your today's reactions make me think differently. i woke up a morning and i found my full range blocked and nobody answering my unblock requests: did i have to shut up, or even to avoid making any request?

902: 5646:, applies to article text and other creative content. Some tables and templates may qualify as creative content. In your example, if you are copying a template to the linked sandbox of the same template in order to make suggested changes to the same template, attribution is not necessary IMO, because if the changes to the template are adopted the changes will be shown in the template's edit history together with all edits that came before. (Am I understanding your question correctly?) The problem arises when someone copy-pastes, or cut-and-pastes, text or other creative content from one page to another, thus breaking the chain of attribution present in the edit history of the original page. 4425:

linked to your main account. What we need here, just to clear up any misunderstanding, is why you were unable to edit from your main account, yet able to create an alternative account and edit from that. Why you didn't link the accounts. Why you voted in a RfA without revealing that you were using an alternative account. And why you later returned to your alternative account to make two edits. I think all these matters can be explained, and I am assuming good faith here, but if you hadn't abandoned the APerson account, then you were running the Thizzlehatter account simultaneously, and secretly, and you edited project space to vote in a RfA, which is

3320:. I was denied last time because of my old block, but block on new users who don't know 3RR rule deeply are quite common, that time I thought that "My version is right so I will not get blocked". But over the time with experience on Knowledge now I know policies very well. I usually revert vandalism also warn/welcome the user/IP. Rollbacker right will boost my confidence to continue my work. There is no question of abusing tool. (admin on that page suggested me to wait for 3 months since last block, currently its two months since last block, but you can see my edits in last two months.) -- 6002:, I think that's not a very good faith accusation, and it says why you were one of the ones pinged ("other admins on EWN for "second opinions"). Establish consensus? Please do see talk and edit history. I reasoned several times per WP:PAG on talk, another editor there agreed with several of my points, my edits pertaining to that dispute also adjusted to discussion, and a couple of tother editors that did not comment on talk also reverted some of Gothicfilm's edits. Gothicfilm reverted or partially reverted constructive edits from 3 different editors now, myself included, moreover, 3944:- has nothing to do with template editing and what would likely have occurred absent Beeblebrox's SPI and subsequent events is a block for a few days; recent past history hadn't reached the point where revoking TE was under consideration. Especially considering that Alakzi is currently doing productive template-related work from his talk page, IMO the best way to unwind this whole situation is to let him go back to productive work elsewhere after the block is over. If nothing else, all the drama certainly means there will be plenty of eyes on the matter. 1785: 7271:, and I am. In fact, I already have learned a lot from PCD. Since encountering PCD on WP my edits have vastly improved, as they often used to be overdone and sometimes a little off. For each successive edit I've tried to do on the Under the Skin page, I've made it cleaner and more relevant, and in each one I have tried to modify to make more in line with PCD's critiques of my edits. We disagree on our interpretation of the policy on interpreting plots, but I've almost totally stopped trying to put in the kind of content PCD objects to. 6570:

adding blatant and defamatory falsehoods to the article, which Roscelese was removing. As such, I think it would appropriate to unblock Roscelese with a note that she was properly removing a BLP violation, rather than engaging in a forbidden form of edit-warring. (Frankly, people who remove egregious BLP violations like that one deserve a pat on the back and a barnstar, rather than a block, in my view). I am minded to unblock her on these grounds, since removing BLP violations is a specific exception to

2481: 6871:

according to "assume good fate"... well, i'm happy you're scrolling recent changes hoping to see my edits, looking for a 151.20.x user, maybe someone's already editing wikipedia. actually i had no urgency to edit anything, i still don't have any, i just tried correcting an error on an article about italian switzerland and realised i couldn't, and since i thought that block was useless and exceeding i made the requests. now, no wikipedia tonight, just friends, i'll come back whenever i'll like to.

115: 6068:

posted to ANI about the multiple edits. So obviously there was no further "disruption" to project on my part necessitating the block for protection of the project, so... was it punitive? Further, I'd like to know why you would not permit me to participate in either the ANI or the AN:EW that I was currently a part of? They have since been closed and I never had an opportunity to contribute. Lastly, I would like you to show me exactly what diffs you relied on to initiate the block. Thank you. -

961: 31: 5869:"Users who engage in edit wars risk being blocked or even banned. An editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring regardless of whether their edits were justifiable...The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so." 4393:

format, but felt that as some of the subsequent discussion was critical of me, it might be inappropriate for me to do so. So I am pleased that you did move some of that content - however, probably inadvertently, you also moved some legitimate question and answer material which is pertinent to the RfA, including the comment that APerson was advised by ArbCom to make. The following section is legitimate, appropriate, and essential to a full understanding of the context:

2612:

and all those who were involved before should be re-notified. Nothing new has been presented, not even 1 reference, so why re-introduce same misleading edits just because 4 of those editors continue to smear same thing while more editors disagree? We are not online 24x7 and there is more life than just wikipedia, if it is said once 'no' after establishing some policy supporting basis, that would still mean 'no', even if opposing editor bludgeons the talk page.

7163: 7372: 2854: 1505: 4001: 2984: 2253: 1881: 1212: 778: 6218:

profanity and other obnoxious comments. I however, patiently waited until the block was done, and now I just want some answers. You blocked me from editing and I would like you to explain why. I'm not sure what "appropriate place" you're referring to, but I will not "move on". Though that would clearly suit you, it does not me. You are the blocking admin... WHY is it now so difficult for you to clarify exactly

4700: 5150:. I know about the 3RR rule, and I don't have any vested interest in either side of the dispute, but I'd really like to understand it. If no one can come up with a source that gives an estimate of the number of speakers of a language, is a source needed to support saying just that? That seems somehow illogical to me. I'd really like to understand this. I'd appreciate any insight you can provide. 7582:

open to a new consensus, per policy, requires actively seeking an acceptable compromise solution with the other editor? And the fact that I find no compromise acceptable means I'm not really open to a new consensus? Really?? Since arguments should be policy-based, I can simply declare that my proposed edit is per policy X, and there is no need to seek consensus about that? I don't think so.

4918: 1191: 634:

significant changes. Therefore I don't see your reverting as beneficial Edokter. Surely there are more important things you could be worrying about? And the charge of "circumventing process" is a little rich considering your actions earlier this month for which you were roundly criticised. I suggest you both find something better to do - this bickering is unbecoming. — Martin

7598:

Invariably, their response is to leave the article, temporarily or permanently, so they don't have to deal with it, just letting the editor do whatever they want. That's why I was left to deal with it alone, resulting in a 3RR+1 violation. I am not able to walk away like that, and I will have no choice but to leave the project if that is in fact the only solution.

587:" That is the reason they are strongly discouraged. He should have requested a move instead, but I think he knows it would fail, so he creates the redirect instead so he can 'force' the use of his preferred name anyway. I find that sneaky and underhanded. That is why I will keep reverting, until Sardanaphalus will see the light and follow the proper procedures. 5389:

cause. Please, let me know. It's definitely quite frustrating that a member of a world famous boyband who has worked with and for countless other artists and organizations as an individual, not just a member of the band and who has more followers on social media platforms than some countries have people is considered not notable enough for a wikipedia page.

3776:(SWP) (Trotskyist), which are all far-left organisations (although the foremost organisation would like to call themselves an "anti-fascist" organisation instead; but which is basically a subset of the far-left), all of which have an avowed, sworn objective of disrupting specifically UKIP and their political activities and objectives. I don't e.g. think that 3940:

Floq's ANI post was a good-faith effort at sharing concerns with the community, but such a high-visibility accusation that subsequently proves entirely inaccurate is so destabilizing to the overall situation that the only fair thing to do in my view is restore the prior status quo and work from there. The issue from which all of this escalated - the RM for

4509:

that I was violating the letter of the socking policy when I voted on the RfA for I JethroBT - as it was called the "socking" policy, I assumed that policy bullet point applied to socks only. (You can see in that account's editing history that I was browsing WP:CENT before I voted on the RfA for I JethroBT, so that was my reason for casting that vote.)

2631:. I understand your frustration but maintaining an article is inevitably a continuous process and you are never going to be able to rely on a previous consensus to stop other editing changing the article. Having said this, there is little purpose in discussing this here as I will only be able to act on a consensus on the article's talk page. — Martin 6828:. He made a big fuss on three different IPs about getting unblocked quickly so he could edit something. I extended the block for misuse of the unblock template, so he created an account, made a fuss on ANI, and has yet to do what original edit he was so excited about making. I don't see any activity from that IP range other than the now-protected 4429:. I don't think these things are serious, just odd (I suspect - as you assert above - the RfA voting was because you didn't know it was inappropriate, rather than a deliberate attempt to deceive), and what some of us in the community like of our admins is that they are able to clearly and coolly explain odd situations. So the crux here is not your 7182:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6010:. I don't see commentary on his obvious wrongdoing here, which is still continuing as I linked. "No violation", not even a warning, is frankly absurd and gives the wrong message. And I don't know what MSGJ was trying to convey by striking their "reminder" to Gothicfilm in the report, but I don't see it as beneficial. 4610:

would be the typical bickering that occurs in a RfA rather than a comment made by the candidate on which others based their oppose vote. Is there precedent for moving statements made by candidates? Is there precedent for candidates removing or moving (rather than striking) comments they have made themselves?

7698:

The Working Definition of Antisemitism gives as one example of antisemitism “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis”. The definition was created in 2004 by the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), now known as the Fundamental Rights Agency

7584:

Now, I don't fault anyone for a lack of editing competence. We're all newborn babies when we start editing, and it takes years to learn and comprehend all this stuff. I avoid areas including BLP and copyright because I know I lack competence there, and I sometimes violate something in those areas and

6866:

about the fuss i made: let's suppose you receive a fine at home. the name is yours, but the identity was mistaken. you go to the police to complain about the mistake, and they fine you again because you annoyed them. obviously, you'll make absolutely no fuss at all, right? if i'd still been following

5671:

The bare minimum needed is a link to the page which you did, though a link to the history is better as it contains all of the revisions. Dirtlawyer points out a handy template just for that. I was not paying attention when I left that message to you, I think you met the minimum requirements with your

4609:

Worm, with your 'crat hat on, if this RfA came to a 'crat chat, how would you respond if someone felt that support votes after the text was removed might be based on incomplete and therefore inaccurate information? Though there is a link to the talkpage, the assumption would be that the content moved

3939:

and wanted to follow up, since I'd intended to do so once the block was up anyway. Having followed the progress of this situation, it appears that the justification for revocation of the TE right - no longer holding the necessary trust for it - is inextricably caught up in the sockpuppet accusations.

3171:

Special:UnconnectedPages had to be reworked (thanks Amir!) because of huge performance issues. Because of this it loses some functionality (being able to specify where the list starts and limiting the list to pages that have local interwiki links). We're working on bringing functionality back without

1674:

Well, in theory, it would prevent Wtshymanski deleting discussions from his talk page where an IP editor has contributed. One would have to be petty minded to raise an ANI (or whatever the enforcement protocol is) based on a tidy up of his talk page. I delete stale discussion from mine from time to

1409:

I did read all recent comments on the talk page, as well as the DRV. I saw no reason that this move would hinder any suggestions currently being considered. Indeed one of the original opponents of the merge was now supportive of the move. If I've got this wrong, we can always revert. Regards — Martin

7653:

Sorry for the delay - three weeks goes very fast! And that was one long rambling post. If you're having problems on article let me know and I'll try and take a look. Please don't feel that you are on your own. I suggest that if you have reverted once then it's time to stop and attempt discussion. If

7594:

tolerated. Most of us are adults and we should be required to behave like adults, not like petulant six-year-olds (actually, most of us have seen better behavior in six-year-olds than much of what is currently tolerated at Knowledge). Few of these people behave this way in real life; they do it here

7320:

Although it was created in 2008, it's only had 50 or so edits in that time, including bots, so no big deal, obviously attracted little traffic. The original creation by you had no in-line citations or wikilinks, and gave no facts such as staff or patient numbers or financials to establish notability

6859:

abour being the original troll: i feel offended, and i've already written in the admins' discussion page, to be likened to the cause of my problems! but you start from me being a liar and guilty, to respect the famous "assume good faith", don't you? let's try reasoning together: if i was that troll,

5605:

may also be added to the article talk page, which often provides a much more public and obvious attribution and recognition of the contributions of previous editors for the copy-pasted text. The template probably should be used more often, especially where the copy-paste forms a significant portion

5500:

Zucchero: first, we both undid each others revision twice, not 3 times, and I'm not going beyond before an administrator intervenes; second, his edit on the talk page is totally useless both because the problem on the article page was solved before and because in the article his "source" has already

5388:

As per your suggestion I had resubmitted the Liam Payne draft, and unfortunately it was once again denied. At this point I am at a bit of a loss as to what would qualify him as notable. I have continued to improve upon the sources and yet to no avail. I'm not sure how to proceed or if this is a lost

5249:

My disgust for others now apparently has to extend to you as well. I issued the full statement only in the last post. Did it ever occur to you that there is no really reasonable way to determine whether something has or has not received support when no one has even directly responded to it yet? I am

4627:

Given that there are a number of oppose votes referring to the discussion, I would say that it's not a strong argument. For comparison, if an oppose vote raised copyright violations and subsequent support votes came in without addressing the copyvio, I would still count them. I personally work under

4392:

Hi MSGJ. I've stopped following the APerson RfA, but it's been pointed out to me that you moved part of the text in the RfA to the talkpage. I understand you doing this, indeed, I had thought of doing so myself when the content of the subsequent discussion was going away from the question and answer

3795:

Hi MSGJ, It seems likely that you are an administrator of the UKIP article, and viewing the history, there seems to be a lot of biased information constantly added and deleted. One thing I did notice however, was the fact that under 'Ideology' on the right-hand side column it claims that UKIP policy

2611:

You should revert back to the 31 March again, and tell them to get the consensus from those editors who always disagreed with these edits because the sources are very non-expertized and we cannot give undue weight to a small mention that is not even defining anything. And there should be another RFC

671:

If I spend time working on a template, I will quite often change the code spacing to my preferred format, bypass redirects, etc. It's analogous to an editor who, when rewriting an article, decides to change the style of the references. None of these activities would be deemed acceptable if they were

7581:

Time after time after time, as outlined in my report, the user demonstrated cluelessness about editing process. All one has to do is read with an open mind. My claims are easy to verify; it's all there in the record. A consensus is void because he wasn't involved in the discussion? Seriously? Being

6979:

I would like to nominate Zude for deletion but that article is locked and I can't add the subst:afd1 tag. Let the debate happen and a decision be made. At best we get a stronger, relevant article, at worst an irrelevant marketing article gets removed. I would argue that zude has relevance, but not

6940:

The ZUDE page has been incorporated on Knowledge for at least 7 years without any trouble. Now it is under attack because it demonstrates relevant information about Zude the Scott Dresden and Jeff Brown, dissident shareholders, would like to see removed. I cannot currently edit the page to remove

6067:

you placed on my account. You'll note that I didn't appeal the block, but there is reason for that. I wanted to ask why you felt it was necessary to block at that point? I had already stated that I had "disengaged" from the dispute and was making no further edits to the page in question. I had even

5667:

that all the text of Knowledge is licensed under than any Knowledge practice. Technically all the content of Knowledge still belongs to the contributors, we just use it through an open license that requires attributions. Any publication that publishes the content must give attribution. The software

4584:

Precedent is a difficult one on RfA, as we're doing our best to improve the process at the moment. I did consider moving the text to the talk page when I stepped in to stop the conversation, but decided against it as I didn't think it was necessary. At the same time, I'm certainly not opposed to it

4508:

Last year, at the end of August, I was entering a period of school during which my grades were particularly important, so I had my Knowledge access taken away. I still wanted to keep up with Knowledge in a minor way, so I created Thizzlehatter so I could do a bit of maintenance work. I wasn't aware

3880:

MSGJ, I've been a registered Knowledge editor since 2009, and I have over 81,000 editors with several hundred edits to template space, including the creation of several dozen templates. I would like the TE permission to be able to perform maintenance tasks on the protected sports-related templates

7597:

There are a few very experienced editors who tend to frequent the same kind of articles as I do, and who I respect and try to learn from and emulate. They are among the survivors, and I want to learn how they have survived. I've made an attempt to observe how they respond to editors like this one.

7274:

You also let me know about PCD's WP experience, and I do respect that. In my first warring report I said that, "personally I think most of his reverts and excisions that I've seen are good, and that he does protect many sites from illegitimate and unproductive additions. My first edit of Under the

3611:

compliant but there is resistance from editors who simply don't understand the need. There has to be a balance between writing code so it's fully compliant, and writing code so that it's nearly fully compliant and the end users are still happy, as I've discovered during the past 40 years that I've

3533:

People with privileges are edit warring against concensus and causing more problems than they purport to solve. Request a return of the article to before this edit war began and a protect to stop edits by non-admins until consensus in the current discussion is reached. People are well-aware of the

475:

Thanks for these reports – although, as the attempted "ping" was only a few days ago, six months seems quite extensive (or has datestamping previously gone awry..?). Edokter has again taken it upon himself to decide not only that a discussion has ended but that it should be marked as such, but, as

361:

have the same protection as the templates that they point to, Edokter wouldn't be able to use "redirect is unprotected; use protected template" as a reason for bypassing the redirect. As things stand, either or both of the redirects could be repurposed or vandalised, compromising those pages where

7589:

fault someone for consistently responding to constructive criticism/correction with knee-jerk anger and aggressiveness, making disputed edits without consensus, causing ongoing disruption. I fault someone for viewing WP:CONSENSUS as nothing but a weapon some editors use to prevent them from doing

7337:

You are an admin, and you can restore any revision you wish, although I recommend that if you do so you clean up the spam since it is likely that the active GF editor who nominated for SD last time will do so again in if it's in its present form. Alternatively you could restore and take it to AFD

6569:

violation: the other editor was repeatedly inserting contentious and potentially defamatory claims about a living person into her biography, using only an extremely poor-quality partisan source which exists principally to promulgate political smears. Actually, I'll go further: Johnpacklambert was

4750: 2918:

Hello, I wanna thank you for removing the reference. However, it is the wrong one. The reference that I asked for is immediately after this sentence : and a growing number of Antiochians are using it as an ethnic designation due to the Levant's Hellenistic and Byzantine past. Thanx and sorry if I

633:

This whole issue is of incredible triviality and not worth the energy you two are expending. Replacing template calls en masse with redirects would be disruptive. I really don't see this happening here, as they are being used either when the template wasn't called before, or as part of other more

6402:

Administrators are accountable for their actions involving administrator tools, and unexplained administrator actions can demoralize other editors who lack such tools. Subject only to the bounds of civility, avoiding personal attacks, and reasonable good faith, editors are free to question or to

5018:

Hi Gnangarra, I'll delete the template via G7 now, as consensus is clear. I'm wary of closing the discussion as it was my nomination but it should be procedurally closed shortly. I can't see any "dragging through the mud" - the discussion seems civil and constructive to me - so I'm not sure that

6983:

If that's not acceptable then I'd say that the article creator needs to remain hands off and allow the community of editors to improve the article under the guidelines. If the article createor is unwilling to do that then I again suggest that the article is marketing and/or notable only to the

6870:

about Mafia: i'm not going to edit that page since i've got no interest at all, if i'd had any i could have created another account the same day of the block in order to edit it 4 days later since now it's being protected. obviously, i can't guarantee for the troll, but on your opinion it's me,

5620:

Thanks Guys. I treat draft articles much like template sandboxes, as they are working areas not facing the reader. Are you telling me that I shouldn't copy a template to its sandbox without attribution? Is it not obvious that a draft article would contain edits from its mainspace article? Do we

4630:

There is precedent for moving discussion to the talk page, it's been happening more regularly in the past few RfAs. I'm not sure whether the candidate's responses have been included. There's certainly precedent for people (including candidates) removing their comments rather than striking, it's

4424:

Like DexDor I would also like a much fuller account of the creation and use of the alternative account. The reason I've asked is it looks odd, and - unless you had fully abandoned the old account - you did go against the socking policy by voting in a RfA with an alternative account that was not

7800:

Have you read? If you have not, please do it before continuing the reading. As you can see, there is one more user and also a user since 2005 who agree to add the pronunciation of the Italian word "Mafia". Is this enough for you? I would like to hear your answer to be sure, I have learnt to be

7566:

The community currently bends over backwards to avoid driving off chronic disrupters in the name of editor retention, with no regard for the more mild-mannered editors being driven off (or never starting in the first place) by those disrupters and the toxic environment they create. Unless this

6217:

Angry? Aggressive? Not in the least. What is obvious is that these questions are making you very uncomfortable, but that's not my problem. But nothing in my comments indicates that I'm "angry". If you want anger, just look at the other editors you blocked, and the ongoing onslaught of insults,

5036:

the problem is not in how it turned out but how OTRS was handled in that it would have been no issue to make an adjustment to the email if I had been given the opportunity to discuss rather than the way the OTRS agent reacted, as for the discussion yes it is a problem and needs her name to be

7567:

changes, Knowledge is doomed in my opinion. The active editor count will continue to decline until this star burns out. Or, there will be no one left but the disrupters, the ones who have a stomach for a fight, perhaps even thrive on fights. Either outcome will be very sad, and so avoidable.

4562:

You're asking me to restore more than half of what was moved ... Bear in mind that what is "legitimate, appropriate, and essential" is a subjective opinion and may not be shared by others. I still think that restoring that quantity of discussion would give undue weight to this issue, and the

813:, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with 4992:

that says do no harm well its doing harm, we also allow for courtesy deletion in such cases. While the current discussion exists I'm unable to resolve the licensing wording even though the people involved want to make the text available are/were willing to discuss and reword the permission

295:. This is only Knowledge after all, and there is no need to stress yourself out over something so trivial. You can always propose a change later once you've gotten some more experience in (if you still feel it is necessary). That's all the advice I can give at this time, good luck! — 3483:

I can't see him not implementing one of Alakzi's changes. In any case, Pigsonthewing is close enough to the issue to be classed as involved. As implemented, the changes are going to cause more problems than they resolve because editors won't have a clue what's going on. For example,

1636:"Wtshymanski (talk · contribs · logs) is banned from reverting any edit made by an editor using an IP address. This includes not only a direct reversion of an edit (using the "undo" button) but also indirectly reverting by copy-pasting text from a previous version of an article" 7275:

Skin was ill advised, and my first points on the talk page were overbearing, and I’m sure this did not help the situation ... Popcornduff is a much, much more dedicated, prolific, and decorated editor than me, but the two of us are enmeshed in a long term power struggle."

6803:

hi MSGJ, there's a note about your original 151.x range ip block expiring in an hour but extended by another admin (ohnoitsjamie) on his own initiative because there's no rule on wikipedia about blocking users who made more than 1 unblock request after not being answered.

5250:

I regret to say coming more and more to the opinion that those who seek to preemptively judge everything may well be worse than Kumioko himself, and, if this sort of conduct is becoming more the rule around here, he may be closer to being right than I would like to admit.

3959:

Hello. The removal was not connected to the sockpuppet accusations but how this editor conducted him/herself. I have made my requirements for restoration clear but he/she may take this for review if they choose. Sorry I am unable to reply more fully at present. — Martin

3349:

Hi, I just saw an IP continually replacing a warning notice on Wtshymanski's talk page and reading the "editing restrictions" notice, it is unclear to me if this trumps Wtshymanski's right to remove anything he likes from his talkpage. I looked for further detail at

4628:

the assumption that voters read at least the "leading" votes on each side (i.e. the ones that people say "per User X") and make their decision based on that. In this case, some of those votes refer to the discussion and it's reasonable to assume voters looked at it.

7112:

has done after the end of his 2 weeks block was restarting the edit war which he had been blocked twice for, reverting the last edits and removing again the IPAs. What shall we do now? What can I do? And can you do anything about that? I hope you may answer soon.

5901:

of disruptive actions, and I'm just not seeing that here. I've just looked again - he/she makes relatively few reverts and is willing to discuss. Far from being an edit warrior, they seem to be conducting themself rather well. I suggest you drop this now. — Martin

6917:

I was just coming here to ask the same questin . You seem to be under the impression that an edit that removes some longstanding content is not a revert. Well, for your education, since you did ask for examples and precedence, I was blocked for doing just that:

4987:

Can you please delete the template now, can you also delete the TFD as the person mention has no baring on the discussion and shouldnt have her name dragged thru the mud like its being when she has no direct involvement in the discussion, we have a policy called

3354:

but couldn't see Wtshymanski's name anywhere. It seems to me that this is open to misinterpretation and allows for Wtshymanski to be endlessly trolled by IPs without being able to do anything about it. Would you be able to clarify this for me please? Cheers.

3668:

Had you wanted no-one to edit the template, you should have fully-, not partially-, protected it. Your reason for partially protecting it was "edit warring". Not only was I not involved in that edit war, but I had not edited the template since December 2010‎.

7632:

Almost three weeks is a lot of reflection. I'm in a very similar situation now and I am leaving the article lest some disruptive user take me to ANEW on a 3RR+1 violation, which would no doubt result in the second block of my career. It's a Wonderful Life.

4478:

My email is enabled if you wish to give me a private explanation, but I don't want you to reveal personal or embarrassing details to myself or anyone else. If there are issues you'd rather not discuss in public, you may want to consider speaking to ArbCom.

2660:

While I only ever added 1 entry to it, it was part of my fixing up the links from the Sydney siege entry that hadn't been cleaned up from 6 months ago, and it was annoying to have it sneakily reverted (3 times) and then protected in the incorrect state.

3565:

I must admit, I'm a bit pissed off as I've effectively been the primary maintainer of this template for some time, and I can't edit it anymore as I don't have templateeditor permission, but I'd rather see it fully protected until this is all resolved.

4762: 796:

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes

86:

is a whole site guideline. (I see you have reverted, as is your prerogative.) I do not regard it as a "huge change" and I did not see it as modifying other editors' posts because I only adjusted the heading and not the content of their post. — Martin

7563:

There is nothing ambiguous or subjective about a situation like this one. It is not a matter of perspective. One editor is committed to an orderly process, the other is clearly not. Full stop. That should be the main criterion, and it currently is

5570:

Hello. When copying content from one page to another without moving the edit history along with it, it is required of the license of our content that attribution be given to the source. This can be done in an edit summary. I have added it for you

3695:

I apologise for the threat, and it probably would have been an overreaction. However I was shocked at your abuse of editing privileges. I should not have to fully protect because I trust template editors to act with decorum and at least to follow

451:, I expect it didn't notify me because it appears that you modified an existing post. I also didn't get a notification for being mentioned in the post to which I am now replying: in this case, the notification failed because you didn't sign it. -- 7590:

their righteous work in an article. I fault someone for consistently bobbing and weaving in a discussion, repeatedly missing points and twisting others' words. This kind of behavior is unacceptable and should not be tolerated, but it routinely

7398:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5104:

was 90.222.127.214's first interaction with me, and they've continued making personal attacks at me, only genuinely engaging the content being disputed and "willing to compromise" after being the report for edit warring had been filed.

4746: 1091:

my email is from gmx.com, I will check to see if it bounced back. also, it may have been a problem with me initiating the email from a machine behind a firewall. I will attempt to resend the email from a different computer shortly.

6808:

i've started that disussion on admins' page because my ip range, very common in northern italy, is the same you blocked and the other admin extended, so please read our conclusions about cancelling the block extension, thank you in

709:

am the one ultimately having to deal with the technical ramifications; it only takes one act of vandalism of a redirect that has slipped under the radar to do some real damage, and the tech guys are left searching for the source.

4461:(and everyone else who inquired about this), I can't get much more specific before I get into personal information that I'd rather not post on a public page; however, if you email me, I'll happily respond with the full story. 1654:

It's a good point, but let's keep it simple for now, and leave the restriction as written. His talk page is on my watchlist and I can act accordingly. Perhaps you can also watchlist it and revert if necessary. Cheers — Martin

7654:

that doesn't work and you've reverted twice, then it's time to seek assistance from other editors. Just be careful not to leave yourself open to accusations of edit warring, because in the perspective of an admin patrolling

5812: 5019:

blanking is needed or appropriate. But I don't oppose if it is genuinely causing some distress. Sorry you don't like the way this turned out - I was sincerely trying to find the best solution for Knowledge. Regards — Martin

3391:

Hi, I've removed the notice from his/her talk page. If the "trolling" continues we can think about semi-protecting his talk page or perhaps allowing an exception to the editing restriction on their user talk page. — Martin

2784:

Hello! I've noticed that the article says that the "Arameans were" a people. We are very much still existent and fighting for our recognition against our politicized Assyrian identity. Would it be possible to change this?

1803:

is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you may have tried to use VisualEditor before. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work well for you. The team has a list

1170:

Well I can't explain it, but I still have had nothing from you. This suggests that the problem is my end, but I've had no other reports of mail going missing. Perhaps I could ask someone else to send me an email? — Martin

792:

because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

494:

That didn't notify me either. There must be something wrong with the way that you attempt to notify people. And did it not occur to you that since I've said (several times) that I can't work out what the heck you want at

7801:

careful with trigger (block) happy admins. If you have no objection about that matter, I will write in the talk page that a consensus has been reached, then one of the two users shall add the pronunciation. Is this ok?

5037:

removed, hopefully then I can rebuild the situation and get the permission adjusted, I'll be in need of sanitising my talk page as well. (sorry for not signing the first post, my preference should have prevented that)

5948:. This is beyond baffling. Moreover, he has since made another rv, again ignoring talk points, restoring close paraphrase, extraneous quote (which was also removed by another editor), and previously-removed overlink, 4668:

I'm not so sure that this is something than should be dismissed as trivial, though if Worm feels it's not having a significant impact on the RfA then I'm OK with that. Thanks to both of you for talking this through.

578:

create a redirect and then changing all current invocation to point to the redirect. For one, that leaves it open to vandalism (which could be fixed by protection), but my main concern is increase in maintenance. As

5919:

You're saying 10 reverts across three days, 6 in one day - while discussion is open and most against talk points per WP policies and guidelines - is not disruptive edit warring? And another editor on the report and

7402:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

5363:

MSGJ, the request is to remove the ethnicity claims in the "Early life and career" heading. His Turkish nationality is not being debated; rather, the "debate" is about whether he is an Arab/Kurd/Turk, ethnically.

1552:, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the 817:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 7713:

Comparing Israeli policy to that of the Nazis, calling Israel a Nazi state, or saying Jews should know better and not behave like Nazis are all forms of the racist attack that uses Jewish identity as grounds for

6590:, which I just noticed, I went ahead and unblocked since it sounded like you were OK with this if another admin looked at the situation in more detail. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks again. 4322:

Worked on new datatype for identifiers to be able to split them from the other statements in the user interface, link them without the need for the authority control gadget and be able to link them in JSON/RDF

5664: 5057:

Thanks for those changes - I was busy working out what to do while you were making the edit, unfortunately. I've added some thoughts on the talk page, so if you need to discuss further we can do it there.

4102: 2307: 290:

or get Edokter de-sysoped. I don't find either likely in this scenario. I remained concerned as well about the interactions. More so concerned with how you are handling it than he. If I may, I'd recommend

6199:

I understand that you're angry, but being aggressive with me is not going to resolve anything. You are welcome to review of my actions at an appropriate place, but I recommend you move on. Regards — Martin

7555:

There has been no sanction here, and, based on the non-result of my similar ANI complaint in August, I'm not optimistic about action in this matter. This is what I meant when I said ANI is a waste of time.

3780:

can possibly claim in good faith that he has no links either with Labour, with HNH or with "anti-far-right", "anti-fascist" causes and activities (as he would see it), given his wider editing history. --

5304:

Hello Here is a Video Interwiev on YouTube. He says he is turkish! Please correct the article. He is not kurdish. Or leave the ethnicity away. Now everyone knows which ethnicity he has! The Video-Link:

3181:

Enabled arbitrary access on arwiki, cawiki, eswiki, huwiki, kowiki, rowiki, ukwiki, viwiki, and usage tracking on dewiki, ruwiki, cswiki and all s3 wikis. (ruwiki and cswiki get arbitrary access on June

1074:

and the threads linked back from there. This often comes up at VPT, and some people are under the misapprehension that the recipient's email address is the problem - it's not, it's that of the sender. --

5528: 2270: 6403:

criticize administrator actions. Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Knowledge-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed.

5760:

has been deleted. I tried to figure out the problem myself but coudlnt quite understand. I figured you mustve had a reason for creating that page so I wanted to let you know it had to be deleted.

3758:

is that it has obviously been hijacked not only by pro-UKIP Internet activists, but also very recently by activists, volunteers and supporters (at least one or two, but nevertheless very active) of "

2944:. On the property talk page it is desired to remove obsolete or redundant information from the template, but the proposal discussion page should stay in the state it was at the point of creation. -- 4036: 5698:, while I was concentrating on their disrespect of (two) other users' talk pages, which I personally find particularly heinous behavior. In my opinion, they need to know that that behavior will 3896:

Hi there. I would not oppose it, but am limited to a mobile device currently so cannot carry out all the usual checks. So please post on the relevant permissions request page. Regards, — Martin

3291: 216:

Thanks for your reply. I also remain concerned, although the Incidents thread is now archived and, for the past few days, Edokter has been less evident here. Having said that, I've just noticed

7134:

You know, perhaps you may also answer when I ask you a question about the edit-warrior I report instead of answering only to tell me I am blocked after reporting him, that would be kind MSGJ.

2381: 7553:

is interesting. What would you suggest I do in this situation? What does "don't let yourself get riled up" mean, exactly? I was careful to stop short of 3RR this time; is that what you mean?

1071: 199:

Not at all. I just wasn't sure how to respond and didn't have much time to look into the circumstances then. I remain concerned by the interactions between yourself and Edokter. — Martin

6668:

diff I'd say it was intentional but I can't say why now at this stage. When converting these banners the aim was generally to replicate the banner's previous behaviour. Regards — Martin

3012:

Past: Office hour on IRC. We talked about cool things that happened around Wikidata over the past 3 months got an update on upcoming developments and Freebase and more. You can read the

7711:

of the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism, signed by members of Parliament from around the world also adopts the Working Definition and encourages its widespread use.

7686: 7331:

As far as I can see it's gone downhill since, becoming increasingly spammy (including first-person additions, presumably from the hospital group), and I can't see any clean revision.

4848:

Not sure if I've done that correctly. The "Wilson" ref comes after "The restraining order has since been lifted, allowing release of more videos." and that is still undefined. — Martin

2959:

Okay, noted. From my experience with this template, a lot of the fields (description, datatype, example, etc.) are automatically filled if the relevant properties are defined. — Martin

7334:

The article was nominated for a speedy by an editor in good standing, and, as an uninvolved admin, I concurred. I didn't consider AFD because in my opinion it met the criteria for SD.

3718: 6291:

Firstly, Martin was wrong for blocking people when no actual breach had occurred, we know that, although never in a month of Sundays is he going to admit it, especially to you or I.

1308:, but apparently, I am still unable to send email without it either (a) being filed as spam, or (b) disappearing into the ether. I will look into getting a different email provider. 1125:

I tried again, it may be in your spam folder. my email is currently broken, and I am working on setting up a new email address. thank you in advance for reading it (if you get it).

6044:

is still slow-reverting against consensus on the same article, and emptily honking the arbitration horn in edit summaries, without actually trying to resolve the dispute anywhere. --

2894: 1516: 3001: 6902:

article falls under ARBPIA and is therefore under a 1RR restriction. The same goes for the other article I reported there and the two from a couple of week ago I warned him about.

6143:

Well, in this in case it certainly appears punitive. You yourself confirmed I had disengaged, therefore there was no further disruption to protect the project from with your block.

5271:

Just before full protection expires, I'm going to switch it over to a semi as, judging from the talk page, we'll have a free-for-all if the article is unprotected. Any thoughts? --

7469:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

5199: 2865: 3850: 1391: 7174: 2892:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1498: 362:

they are used. If they were to be given full protection, any repurposing would probably be reverted as undiscussed, and the risk of vandalism would be pretty much eliminated. --

185:

Did you feel unable or unwilling to advise or indicate that there'd be no response..? If I've offended you in some way, please indicate how and accept my apologies. Sincerely,

4098:, has an improved automatic matching algorithm, got speed improvements and new catalogs were added like the National Gallery of Victoria, World Heritage Sites and CulturaItalia 6895: 6095:

This was not your first block for edit warring, so it does not follow that a warning (rather than a block) would have a positive effect on your long term conduct as an editor.

2847: 2613: 3472:

Alakzi and others involved in the current dispute are requested not to edit the template, but to raise a request and allow another template editor or admin to gauge consensus

1371:

You joined the discussion, so I nowiki-ed the {{edit template-protected}} and replied. Does your lack of further response mean you're now OK with the proposed edit? Regards,

445:

for some common complaints). It would help if you stated which edit you are referring to, since I have been mentioned several times on that talk page. Assuming that you mean

67:

are you an ArbCom clerk? If not, you shouldn't be modifying other editor's posts without their permission. Even if you are, you shouldn't mark such huge changes as minor.

7155: 3480:

I don't see any actual consensus for the changes yet, so this doesn't seem right, especially given the support for Alakzi that Pigsonthewing has given on Alakzi's talk page.

2857: 4018: 7325:

notable) and the "references" at the bottom were two links to the hospital (clearly not RS) and one link now dead and therefore uncheckable. The text was promotional too —

4112: 2833:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2822: 574:

My main problem with the redirect is that they are created to circumvent proces. If Sardanaphalus wanted 'Start div col' to be the primary name, he should request a move,

5819:, evidenced by multiple diffs and the linked talk discussion, is "no violation"? Especially when two other editors at the article had also fixed his inappropriate edits? 5431:

Thank you I really appreciate your help. I guess I should keep adding to the sources just in case, considering he gets an article written about him at least once a week.

6861: 6805: 4925: 4820: 3724: 2599:

The local agreement of those who just wants to smear the subject as "pseudoscience" by hopping to unreliable sources are qualifiers of disruptive editing. There was an

1305: 7813: 7229: 6903: 4936: 2236: 7124: 7095: 5503:

In the first case, he keeps making a disruptive edit, while in the second case he keeps adding pointless information which has already been provided in the article.

5369: 2796: 2770: 1553: 5985:

I have no idea why I was pinged here, but at a glance it seems Lapadite would do better to try and establish a consensus than to try and get other editors blocked.

1822:

You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with

7145: 7051: 5516: 656:" part that I find extremely disturbing. But what's more, it's Sardanaphalus' unwillingness to discuss it. What other choice do I have to force him into dialogue? 352: 338:, who is an admin, can't edit it further. The only way that I know of a page could be protected to prevent an administrator from editing is with superprotect. — 228: 3444:

Easily done. I would just be bold and add the exception, it will immediately solve the problem and I can't believe any reasonable argument stands up against it.

3241: 2842: 2453: 2157: 6876: 6810: 5463: 3344: 3159:

The concept of “claims” no longer exists in Wikibase, as all places in the software work with statements. We are making this more and more explicit in the code.

2198: 287: 5880: 2214: 5589:

I must be blind. I see you did link to the article in your summary. Well, at least I added the revision number. Just ignore me, I have not yet had my coffee.

3168:

More work on getting the Wikibase Quality extensions ready for deployment. They'll improve constraint checking and provide checks against 3rd party databases.

1539: 7809: 7464: 5226:

The message looks fine to me, but I'm really not the right person to ask about files, copyright, etc. as my knowledge is extremely limited. Regards — Martin

4879:

you introduced two refs (Scott and Wilson), but didn't provide the full refs, leaving us with two redlinks in the refs' section. Please fix this. Thanks. --

4716: 5876: 5872: 4367: 3744: 3475: 602:

The problem with the above, as elsewhere, is that it starts from a incorrect assumption – and one that, as elsewhere, suggests a key assumption is missing.

7294:, pinging dozens of editors to the page. This strikes me as excessive and disruptive, but I'm not sure how to respond to it. Maybe it's harmless. Or is it 5834:

The diffs you provided were spread over 3 days (17-19 October). If you can show me more than 3 reverts within 24 hours I will look again. Regards — Martin

4928: 3728: 2806: 864:) is that you omit the various categories and interwikis that may be present on the /doc page. It would be better just to translude a bare text version of 2627:

I was not aware of that discussion, but while I have no opinion on the matter myself I will point out that (1) it was not unanimous by any means, and (2)

1948: 6092:

Just because you have temporarily (or permanently) disengaged from an edit war on a particular page does not mean that the block is necessarily punitive.

6041: 5147: 3364: 2942: 6929: 1156:

I got your email, and replied to it directly, so if you still didn't get it, then something is blocking emails between gmx.com and your email provider.

6619: 6109:

I attempted to treat both sides of the edit war equally. It would not be fair or defensible to block one side and not the other. So it was all or none.

3478: 2617: 1364: 5316: 5108:). Before that, all that was said by them were hostile edit summaries aimed at me and dismissing the policies I cited, which were valid and relevant ( 4089: 3409:

Ok, I would have thought it imperative that they at least are entitled to remove anything they like from their talk page, I'm not sure how that could

2877: 2331: 672:

made en masse or without significant other changes, but are perfectly fine on a case-by-case basis. Why does this bother you so much anyway? — Martin

178: 6806:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&type=revision&diff=689164654&oldid=689162959

5945: 5520: 5487: 5106: 2655: 1570: 7206: 6006:

began the reverting in the first place and continued the reverting multiple times despite talk discussion, without establishing consensus; ignoring

2240: 7361: 6631: 4385: 3814:

All discussion related to this article should take place on the article's talk page. I can take no action based on comments here. Regards — Martin

3379: 2938:

Hey. Thanks for helping creating new properties on Wikidata. I think it would be good not to remove information from the proposal discussion as in

1544: 5694:, I knew the user was blocked when I sent that notice (as I explained in it), but the block was enacted on the rationale of their edit warring on 1915: 7456: 6942: 6919: 6486: 5450: 5432: 5395: 4876: 2325: 6167:

I was blocked... what about that don't you get? It was MY ANI. What about that don't you get. The AN:EW named ME. What about that don't you get?

4115:

seeks to investigate all pairs of humans (in various subsets) that appear to have the same birth dates and death dates. De-duplication underway!

2218: 1808:, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a 1565: 308:

What does superprotect have to do with it? Redirects can be semi- template- or fully-protected just like any other page, by filing a request at

6847: 6522:. He hasn't learned a thing in spite of your 24 hour block for the same edit war, and the new template warnings from others. Thanks in advance, 4729: 1684: 770: 6779:

Thanks. Very sorry that I look like such an unscrupulous editor to you. I am trying to get better, you know, not to perceive angry mastodons.

5951:. That's not disruptive? That's what happens when someone disruptively editing warring is essentially told 'you're not doing anything wrong'. 5123:). I hope the next admin who will review their block will be aware of this and not believe what 90.222.127.214 last wrote at their talk page. 5101: 4585:

being there and would probably recommend it staying there due to the nature of the discussion. One thing I will say is that if anyone besides

3130: 1622: 7395: 7307: 6825: 6658: 3978: 3272: 2869: 1451:, which was done with no TfD, and which is contrary to the merge decision currently subject to an ongoing DR, and which was never completed. 1432: 1395: 6337:, I'll remove any that I choose to ;) Especially inflammatory comments intended to increase drama rather than decrease it. Regards — Martin 5921: 5531:

which is apparently a report of the same dispute. Perhaps you know something about this? Both sides of the dispute are hopping IPs. Thanks,

4426: 4379: 3253: 836:

This documentation page got left behind when the template was moved in 2010. I've moved it back to the right place. If I may make a comment

99: 7415: 5124: 4735: 4646: 4622: 4604: 1590: 4556: 4372: 3246: 3013: 2458: 2162: 705:

prohibits this. But it all seems to fall on deaf ears. It is extremenly frustrating to try and explain this to non-technical editors, but

65: 7771: 7450: 5540: 3607:

in 2012 as the result of MOS:ACCESS issues raised at a featured list discussion, I've been working towards making our episode lists more

3300:

Feel free to enact the change. I'm not sure if it needs doing before or after anomiebot is modified, so I'll leave that to you two : ) -

810: 529: 511: 489: 392: 7080:

Hello again, I am here for precaution: tomorrow at 11:55 Kurzon's block will end and I bet my head that he will restart the edit war on

6788: 6466: 6440: 6303: 5883:

that "Hasn't violated 3RR yet". Here, you didn't even "warn", it was just "no violation". So I'm baffled by your passive decision here.

4419: 4139: 4118:

You can now use the new special page Special:PagesWithBadges to see which articles on that project have a badge like "featured article".

2181: 1639:

As written this does not exclude edits made on his user-page/talk-page. I feel this should be excluded to avoid potential harassment. -

1380: 1116: 830: 374: 346: 324: 6884: 6818: 4724: 3972: 3453: 3439: 3422: 3404: 1690: 758: 693:. He's not bypassing redirects; he is intentionally pointing to them. He replaces instances calling a protected template with calls to 611: 271: 76: 6836:

can easily be extended as necessary to prevent further disruption from anons, and a named account can easily be blocked if necessary.

5615: 5572: 597: 303: 160:..? The most recent post leaves me wondering how best to proceed. (If there's someone or somewhere else I should ask, please advise.) 7384: 7252: 6480: 6328: 5495: 4970: 4940: 4870: 4774: 3732: 3004:. As a result Wikidata data can be used on the project as long as it happens through a template and it has a non-Wikimedia reference. 1667: 463: 7784: 7537: 5259: 3712: 3560: 3543: 1719: 1608: 1488: 1471: 1317: 1101: 256: 211: 7627: 7074: 6753: 6596: 6379: 6274: 6254: 6237: 6192: 6132: 5785: 4910: 4860: 4843: 4799: 4386: 3630: 3584: 3528: 2465: 2169: 1134: 1042:

I haven't received anything from. (And I've just checked by sending a message to myself and it works.) Try again perhaps? — Martin

967: 960: 742: 7477: 7194: 5655: 4523: 4491: 4473: 3922: 3908: 3045: 2939: 789: 6019: 5994: 5980: 5914: 5892: 5846: 5557: 5244: 5238: 4693: 4449: 2290:

conference in The Hague (10-12 April) features several presentations and tutorials about Wikidata for/with cultural institutions.

7015: 6950: 6774: 6680: 6349: 5044: 4334: 4164: 3826: 3201: 2416: 2117: 1290: 1086: 948: 7670: 7648: 7341:

I don't wheel, so I won't delete again if you do restore, although I obviously reserve the right to tag as I think appropriate

6993: 6968: 6935: 6613: 5855:

he reverted or partially reverted edits more than twice in one day. It's not a 3RR report, regardless (I clarified that), it's

5633: 5425: 5352: 5085: 4681: 4663: 4579: 3510: 2838: 2643: 1770: 1745: 1696: 1358: 1183: 1165: 1151: 1054: 886: 785: 771: 221: 6941:

the deletion notice or make any changes since the page is frozen to all until the 16th. All help here is greatly appreciated.

5474:

Please stop the edit war in the above mentioned page. It's been started by the same user that forced you to protect the page "

5184: 4589:

were to move the text, it should be wholesale. APerson, on the other hand, could put his quoted statement where he feels fit.

2971: 2600: 2589: 724: 684: 666: 7699:

of the European Union. It has received widespread international use, for example in its adopted by the US Government for the

6798: 6708: 3986: 2193: 1440: 1422: 6164:

Attempting to "treat both sides equally" is admirable in other pursuits, but silly here. Not all sides are equally culpable.

5678: 5595: 5584: 5298: 2908: 1348:

Although it's somewhat moot now, since DeltaQuad has kindly restored and moved the page to the case page structure. Cheers.

217: 7817: 7225: 6974: 6696: 6212: 5800: 5097: 4932: 4169: 3994: 3790: 3593:

Thanks for that. I fully understand the issues, but I'm trying to look at all of them, not just our requirements regarding

3280: 2977: 2928: 2882: 2701: 2297:

to link its information to any and all Wikipedias. No longer English only, but every Knowledge will be exposed in this way.

2246: 2232: 1874: 974: 5743: 5729: 3890: 380: 7723: 7120: 7091: 6686: 6639: 6580: 5757: 5365: 5220: 3685: 3317: 3259: 2899: 2792: 2766: 2753: 2737: 2585: 2523: 1535: 1467: 425: 136: 7105: 5409:

I'm not sure how that can be denied on notability, with a list of sources as long as my arm. I've listed the article at

3808: 2294: 1004:

Sorry about editing this template; it was transcluded on another page and I thought I was editing a local copy there. --

477: 194: 172: 7601: 7568: 7141: 7047: 6665: 6064: 5565: 5512: 5479: 4888: 3653: 3188:

Small breaking DOM change: Wikibase no longer adds its own h1 tag but uses MediaWiki's default .firstHeading element. (

3140:

Made a small API breaking change to wbeditentity and wbgetclaims modules. Details can be seen in the commit message of

2861: 2800: 2774: 2603:

that opposed any edits involving the "pseudoscience" term anywhere on the article. We had many other recent discussions

2319: 1512: 1428: 730: 701:-created redirects, and all that only because he prefers another name. I tried explaining this in the RfD, and why the 7178:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4159: 3370:

Ah, I missed it. But does this prevent Wtshymanski from overseeing his own talk page and remove IP posts from there?

2423: 2124: 1868: 1750:

Fair point. It's just that most editors would ignore reversion of vandalism, but I'm sure others will be watching. –

1017: 433:

No, I didn't. I've been back through the last six months of notifications, and there are none where you mentioned me.

157: 7233: 6646:, and all of them show "(Rated C-class ..." except for Knowledge Version 1.0 Editorial Team. Was that intentional? -- 4544:

I don't wish to restore it myself because I am involved, and it also may look like something of an edit war. Regards

4413:

Would you like to explain what you mean by "limited access to my main account" and why you didn't link the accounts?

3477:

Alakzi has modified the sandbox, but made no request and yet Pigsonthewing has just implemented the edits regardless.

3465: 2834: 2705: 2685: 1365: 127:

I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service

7743: 5373: 5324: 5115: 2225:

Yeah second this, you suck. The original reading was at least understandable in addition to being funny, you mong.

1838: 1403: 150: 7550: 6824:

It's clear to me that Centocinquantuno is the same user that was originally targeted with the range block, and I'm

6422: 6053: 5132: 5121: 5118: 5112: 5109: 4567:

with his bureaucrat hat on, as he probably has a better idea of RfA processes and usual precedent. Cheers — Martin

4092:

visualizes items without statements, items with statements, and deleted/redirected items by batches of 100,000 QIDs

3953: 3227: 2670: 2514: 2210: 1556:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 59: 7731: 7128: 7099: 6699:? It would make it much easier to count (or find) revisions later, as an added bonus. I'm curious what you think. 5949: 5458: 5440: 5403: 3870: 3041: 2953: 2621: 2345:

Screenshots of the current state of new constraint reports and checks against 3rd party databases have been posted

1935: 1855: 1342: 7284: 7149: 7055: 6558: 6542: 5009: 3936: 3842: 2719: 2560: 2537: 2085:

Students working on improved constraint reports and checking against 3rd party databases are making good progress

999: 990: 447: 72: 7766: 7356: 6911: 6735: 5172:

I don't know and I don't intend to get into that content dispute. But exceeding 3RR is not acceptable. — Martin

5159: 4341: 3516:

I've reverted. But please make an effort to see the issues here and work towards a compromise. Regards — Martin

3316:

Hi, Can you give me rollbacker right? Last time I requested on "Permission for Rollbacker right" page month ago

2430: 2394:

from Monday on (the old * directory will be kept around and receive new json dumps for backwards compatibility).

2131: 1648: 7460: 6515: 6313: 5691: 5067: 3427:

Probably should make that exception. I don't think anyone even considered this in the ANI discussion. — Martin

3351: 2681: 901: 646: 7183: 4376: 4181:

Duplicity can show you how many (and which) articles on a Knowledge are not connected to an item on Wikidata (

4022: 3764:" (HNH) (which receives funding from the trade unions which are officially affiliated with and which fund the 3250: 1844: 7263:

You responded to the edit warring report I submitted yesterday, and you asked if I was willing to learn from

6907: 6448: 5828: 5328: 5190: 3875: 3749: 3689: 3339: 2675: 2666: 2471: 2175: 927: 7736: 6083: 5668:

automatically maintains this through the revision history, but cannot automatically track copy/paste moves.

3481: 1108:

Actually, no emails have been going through lately, I believe they are actively working on the situation. —

6925: 6537: 5711: 5091: 5031: 3773: 3208: 2888: 2821:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2184:

page? I have provided several examples using the sandbox on the talk page to show that the changes are ok.

1865: 1508: 1385: 994: 7609: 7576: 6626: 6494: 5280: 5100:'s talk page, since I believe they will remove it like they had all my other messages to their talk page. 1834: 1805: 580: 520:

surprised, though, if you're saying that not even the numbered points there indicate what I'm addressing.

7036:

3 weeks ago, I thought I could inform you directly: he has just violated again the 3RR in the same page (

5358: 4563:

questions section does not work well when it turns into a threaded discussion. Can we get the opinion of

3863: 3832: 2689: 1699:). Please have a look and check that you are happy. If not: amend or delete as you feel appropriate. – 868: 854: 278: 105: 7704: 2555: 2055: 1851: 1262: 6880: 6814: 5774: 5771: 4640: 4598: 3949: 3449: 3418: 3375: 3360: 3149:

Fixed an issue where you'd sometimes select the wrong value when entering a statement unintentionally (

2924: 2830: 2814: 2808: 1903: 1323: 1036: 814: 68: 38: 7795: 4347: 4043: 2436: 2400:

Fixed bug that sometimes caused dates and other types of values to be cut short when quickly saving. (

2137: 7388: 7280: 6115:

The diffs are all in the history of the Skyfall talk page. I see no benefit to reproducing them here.

6035: 3215: 2933: 2913: 1230: 144: 7516: 7445: 6391: 4651:

Perhaps enough time has been spent on this trivial issue now. Shall we get back to work ;) — Martin

4210: 4182: 2306:

Office hour on IRC covering overall status/development, Freebase and admin inactivity criteria RfC.

2067: 5529:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Two IPs reported by User:151.20.75.83 (Result: )

5464: 5378: 3624: 3578: 3504: 2779: 2761: 2662: 2594: 2203:

It was my only joy in life and you have ripped it from my grasp. I hope you burn in eternal fire.

2189: 1680: 1644: 1618: 1561: 1220:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

915: 6523: 6106:

is supposed to be a "bright-line rule", some might argue that it would be remiss not to block you.

4353: 3306: 3126: 2442: 2143: 2041: 1329: 7727: 6921: 6718:

I have to ask: Do pings work in "Knowledge:" namespace? i.e. is it of any use if I used pings in

5137: 4894:

Yes, see above. You asked me to perform an edit but were not specific enough! If you can tell me

4503:, I emailed ArbCom and it was suggested that I should just post the explanation that I gave them: 4049: 3681: 3539: 2581: 2566: 2380:

Went through all the feedback we got for improving watchlist integration on Knowledge and co and

1862: 1586: 1531: 1463: 754: 607: 525: 485: 421: 388: 252: 190: 168: 4064: 3071:

now have entries for all their paintings on Wikidata thanks to wiki project Sum of all Paintings

1789: 7605: 7572: 7291: 6844: 6784: 6731: 5683: 5483: 4952: 4884: 4839: 4770: 4059: 3786: 2518: 2510: 844: 132: 5852: 2099: 2063: 585:

Redirects for templates can cause confusion and make updating template calls more complicated.

357: 7313: 7303: 7211: 6436: 6324: 6299: 6174:

suit you to go over the details, would it? Well, just the same, I would like to go over them.

5651: 5611: 5255: 5052: 4982: 4632: 4590: 4564: 4325:

Worked more on making the edit summaries in the watchlist on Knowledge and co more meaningful

4154: 4134: 4126: 4029: 3945: 3918: 3886: 3769: 3755: 3601: 3445: 3414: 3371: 3356: 3292:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_May_6#Category:Wikipedia_protected_edit_requests

2920: 2693: 1826:. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their 1823: 1817: 1222: 496: 437:

of talk page mentions can fail easily, the rules under which a notification is triggered are

406: 5717:

Okay, no problem! There is also another message about that above my block message. — Martin

5320: 4144: 4078: 3185:

Finishing work on improved handling “invalid” values and statements with deleted properties.

2462: 2166: 7825: 7805: 7658:

you are then just as culpable as the other party. Don't know if that helps at all — Martin

7522: 7276: 7221: 7137: 7116: 7087: 7043: 6532: 6015: 5976: 5888: 5824: 5536: 5508: 5312: 5216: 4997: 4711:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

3740: 3221: 3024: 2788: 2606: 2228: 2206: 1953: 1925: 1909: 413: 286:, if you want them protected, you'll need to get the community to approve the foundation's 238: 7700: 5859:

edit warring. 3RR doesn't need to be violated (and I would presume you'd know editors can

3052: 3037: 2301: 1695:

Not related to the above but I have taken the liberty of adding a note of clarrification (

8: 7776:

Warmest Wishes for Health, Wealth and Wisdom through the Holidays and the Coming Year!

7680: 7558: 7533: 7410: 7351: 7021: 6989: 6770: 6654: 6552: 6397: 5264: 5041: 5005: 4008:

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

3804: 3768:, but HNH are otherwise not directly affiliated with or controlled by the Labour Party), 3331: 3163: 2991:

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

2549: 2397:

Reduced size of entities pages by removing no longer needed data (to make the UI faster).

2374: 2344: 2260:

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

2185: 1888:

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

1676: 1640: 1614: 1557: 1549: 1258: 1082: 986: 923: 738: 507: 459: 442: 370: 320: 5445:

Sorry to bother you again. Just wondering, do we wait now and see what other say in the

4804:

I see the problem. This content was inadvertently deleted and just needs to be restored:

1833:

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at

7643: 7511: 7493: 6946: 6713: 6704: 6509: 6490: 6170:

Of course you don't. Because if you made a illegitimate block, then it certainly would

6049: 5673: 5590: 5579: 5468: 5454: 5436: 5399: 5063: 4816: 4678: 4619: 4553: 4488: 4446: 4189:

Magnus wrote a user script to let you edit Listeria-powered lists on Knowledge directly

3672: 3535: 3386: 3311: 3189: 3150: 2572: 2401: 2338: 2280: 1778: 1761: 1710: 1582: 1522: 1454: 1313: 1161: 1130: 1097: 1032: 892: 826: 750: 702: 603: 521: 481: 417: 384: 351:

That's not what Sardanaphalus is asking for. They are suggesting that if the redirects

283: 248: 186: 164: 7240:

Seems to be done? But use the talk page for these requests in future please. — Martin

1837:. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on 7781: 6838: 6780: 6727: 6453: 6409: 6366: 6334: 6261: 6224: 6179: 6070: 5806: 5751: 5155: 4948: 4880: 4835: 4782: 4766: 4704: 4519: 4469: 4199: 3930: 3782: 3765: 3613: 3567: 3493: 2949: 2494: 1111: 717: 659: 590: 341: 298: 264: 128: 83: 82:

No I am not, although there is no prohibition to other editors making such edits and

4306: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4254: 4250: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4214: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2048: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1942: 7299: 7295: 7266: 7258: 6474: 5962: 5929: 5925: 5781: 5756:

I am on the #wikipedia-en IRC channel right now. I just want to let you know that

5647: 5607: 5379: 5337: 5251: 5143: 4947:

IP185, thanks for doing that. MSGJ, I had forgotten I had contacted you before. --

4740: 3982: 3914: 3882: 3276: 2873: 2604: 1628: 1436: 1399: 1355: 1339: 954: 861: 7037: 4176: 4127:

Meta, MediaWiki, Wikispecies and Wikibooks will get (more) access to Wikidata soon

2091:

Worked on making dispatching changes from Wikidata to Knowledge and co more robust

914:

Hi MSGJ. I greatly appreciate your kindness. Very complex and delicate editing at

7202: 7000: 6832:

article or the recent unblocks. I don't care much either way; the protection on

6526: 6499: 6112:

I didn't see any request by you to participate in the discussion on ANI or AN/EW.

6011: 5972: 5937: 5884: 5820: 5695: 5643: 5602: 5532: 5212: 5128: 3736: 3489: 3485: 3268: 2498: 2387: 1072:

Knowledge:Village pump (technical)/Archive 129#Is "Email this user" on the blink?

1011: 4054: 1812:. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 1725:

I think it's unnecessary because I don't think they can be much doubt over what

1067: 788:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7762: 7665: 7622: 7526: 7487:

It means "Floreat" and is a standard thing when one has no idea of birth date.

7438: 7420: 7404: 7345: 7247: 7069: 7010: 6985: 6963: 6956:

I have removed the proposed deletion notice as you have contested it. — Martin

6763: 6748: 6719: 6695:, for editathons and other tags. What would you think about adding hashtags to 6675: 6647: 6638:

is recognised by the taskforces, but not by the main template. See for example

6608: 6587: 6574:, unless you object in which case I would be happy to discuss further. Thanks. 6548: 6445: 6431: 6344: 6319: 6294: 6249: 6207: 6127: 6058: 5990: 5966: 5941: 5933: 5909: 5860: 5841: 5795: 5766: 5724: 5684: 5628: 5552: 5420: 5347: 5293: 5233: 5179: 5080: 5038: 5026: 5001: 4965: 4905: 4855: 4794: 4758: 4658: 4574: 3967: 3941: 3903: 3821: 3800: 3707: 3638: 3555: 3523: 3434: 3399: 3321: 3265: 2966: 2732: 2649: 2638: 2541: 2480: 1827: 1740: 1662: 1603: 1483: 1417: 1376: 1285: 1251: 1178: 1146: 1075: 1049: 982: 943: 919: 881: 818: 734: 679: 641: 500: 470: 452: 434: 400: 363: 329: 313: 309: 292: 206: 94: 47: 17: 7595:

because they know they can get away with it here. It's past time that changed.

4757:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

4121: 114: 7708: 7655: 7634: 7506: 7488: 7379: 7363: 7314: 7212: 6759: 6723: 6700: 6592: 6576: 6571: 6566: 6562: 6505: 6309: 6103: 6045: 6007: 5856: 5739: 5707: 5446: 5410: 5286:

Sounds good. The issue is definitely not resolved on the talk page. — Martin

5059: 4989: 4671: 4612: 4546: 4496: 4481: 4454: 4439: 4319:

Made quantities not show URIs when editing a value but instead show the label

4074: 3760: 3697: 2826: 2818: 2654:

Thank you for removing the Sydney entry in List of Islamic Terrorist attacks

2628: 2531: 1751: 1700: 1309: 1157: 1126: 1093: 1061: 1028: 1022: 837: 822: 7327:

for a unique experience of continuity and the feel of real private practice.

2064:

SpecialPage to easily get to the Wikidata item for a given Knowledge article

7777: 7545: 7179: 6899: 6547:

Hello Martin. I wanted to ask you to review a block you recently placed on

6099: 5864: 5816: 5167: 5151: 4586: 4515: 4465: 4075:

Please vote for Wikidata to win the people's choice award of Land der Ideen

3777: 3534:

issues, the question is how to resolve the issues without creating others.

3285: 2945: 2748: 2714: 1784: 1240: 6898:

EW report as "no violation". Could you please explain your reasoning? The

6177:

You do have more to add, starting with the diffs I requested. Regards. -

6161:

to initiate the block. Just saying there were "five or six" is not enough.

5734:

I had missed that one, maybe it will be enough to get the message across.

4188: 4095: 3030: 1897: 7557:

What mental adjustment is required for me to continue at Knowledge? That

7109: 7029: 7022: 6889: 5784:

for reasons explained in the deletion log. I suggest you discuss this at

5265: 4500: 4458: 4415: 4359:

Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.

3838: 2904: 2076:

Deployed new code to Wikidata \o/ (and fixed a few issues that popped up)

1930: 1350: 1334: 4200:

New tool by Magnus to create a Commons creator page from a Wikidata item

4106: 3176: 2105:

Improved support for right-to-left languages, e.g. in the sitelinks view

1800: 7482: 7470: 7198: 5958: 5924:

stated he has done this before. Commenting on talk page does not equal

5272: 4131:

Wikidata now has an official SPARQL endpoint so you can query the data

3856: 3608: 3594: 1931:

New tool by Magnus that lets you add reference URLs with a single click

1633:

You should close a loophole regarding User:Wtshymanski's restriction.

1006: 3233:

Add labels, in your own language, for the new properties listed above.

3068: 3064: 2391: 2334:

is focusing on interwiki links and Wikidata this month. Help them out?

805:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

7758: 7661: 7618: 7433: 7243: 7065: 7006: 6959: 6744: 6671: 6664:

Can't say I remember much about that edit five years ago ;) Based on

6604: 6361: 6340: 6245: 6203: 6123: 5999: 5986: 5954: 5905: 5837: 5791: 5761: 5720: 5624: 5548: 5416: 5343: 5289: 5229: 5175: 5076: 5022: 4961: 4901: 4851: 4790: 4654: 4570: 4084: 3963: 3899: 3817: 3703: 3551: 3519: 3430: 3395: 3302: 2962: 2728: 2634: 1809: 1736: 1658: 1599: 1479: 1413: 1372: 1281: 1174: 1142: 1045: 939: 877: 675: 637: 202: 90: 7615:

I have read it, and reflecting on an appropriate response. — Martin

5494:

Renato Vallanzasca: his edit is uncorrect, you can watch the result

4122:

New tool by Magnus to suggest links to Wikidata items while you type

5735: 5703: 4000: 3725:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive273#Missing evaluation

3175:

Bene* created a SPARQL abstraction layer for PHP called Asparagus:

2983: 2252: 2068:

another one to get to the Knowledge article for a given Wikidata ID

1880: 7425:

Just in case you don't/didn't get the ping - I have addressed you

6852:

i'm answering each one of your objections against me, don't worry:

6040:

Further to the strong warning you gave them a couple of days ago,

5505:

I'll not edit anything till you or another administrator decide.

5211:

I have no objections to you asking other contributors for a view.

5073:

I've reverted for now and I'll check back later. Regards — Martin

4720: 2817:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 2493:

Thank you for working in some of the contentious areas, including

1994:

Maltese Islands National Inventory of Cultural Property identifier

1916:

Editathon in the pre-program of the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin

7502: 6407:

So, can we please just get on with this and get it over with? -

3649:

threat you have left on my talk page, I have reverted my edit at

2743: 2709: 2079:

Made good progress on RDF export (needed for example for queries)

5306: 3027:

is a nice example of an infobox completely filled from Wikidata.

2006:

Smithsonian American Art Museum: person/institution thesaurus id

1949:

Effort to define a biomedical relationship ontology for Wikidata

7426: 7038:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Mafia&action=history

6519: 5932:. He only edited per his pov, ignoring concerns of things like 5146:

had been blocked for edit-warring, so I read the discussion at

4109:

will include a Wikidata component this year for the first time.

3061:

links to external ontologies and datasets; among them Wikidata.

3058: 3141: 2829:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

7703:, and in its adoption by the British Police as part of their 7290:

Capuchinpilates has now posted a sort of call to arms on the

7081: 7033: 6833: 6829: 5475: 2823:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Electronic cigarette

2326:

A first version of the Primary Sources Tool has been released

2149:

Add multi-lingual labels for the new properties listed above.

1066:

Is your email address from either yahoo or gmail? If so, see

1926:

The next steps for the header redesign and bugfixes are live

977:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

7218:

personal life last paragraph the should be they thank you

2725:

Sorry about that. Hopefully I fixed it yesterday? — Martin

6565:. It seems evident to me that she was reverting a glaring 4193: 2047:

Newest gadgets: Image search can find photos for the new "

1970:

Word Health Organisation International Nonproprietary Name

332:, he or she suggesting that the page be protected so that 6259:

Why is that? Why do you refuse to explain your block? -

4316:

Release of the query service and unit support (see above)

4196:

has been released in beta and is using data from Wikidata

3156:

Switched the whole code base to make use of DataModel 3.0

2866:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2287: 1517:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1476:

Will comment at the deletion review shortly ... — Martin

6242:

I have nothing to add to my previous comments. — Martin

5545:

Sorry, haven't had time to look at this today. — Martin

4631:

generally considered poor form, but not against policy.

3719:

A user's ban from template space is being reviewed at AN

3162:

The autoloading mechanism of the extension changed, see

2390:-Beta dumps in place. All new Wikidata dumps will be in 1575:

With the new changes, the template displays an error if

7561:

isn't really as important as its policy status implies?

7377:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1499:

Nomination for deletion of Template:Designation/infobox

1217:

Hello, MSGJ. Please check your email; you've got mail!

7193:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

5208:

I'd like an opinion on whether it could be reworded.

2848:

Nomination for deletion of Template:Category interwiki

1027:

I don't actively check mine, but I sent you an email.

334: 7156:

Orphaned non-free image File:Southland Intertitle.jpg

6692: 6150:

my first block for edit warring, as a matter of fact.

4717:

Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy

2684:? Answered requests are not currently being added to 2002:

International Standard Industrial Classification code

7789: 7600:

Thank you for reading, if in fact you have done so.

7383:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

5897:

In the absence of a 3RR violation I'd want to see a

5875:

an IP that, according to diffs, didn't violate 3RR;

4177:

Prototype database to store all Knowledge references

2407:

Fixed issues with setting focus after clicking edit.

2082:

Did more performance groundwork for arbitrary access

973:

Message added 14:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC). You can

5971:Pinging other admins on EWN for "second opinions". 3492:

doesn't and editors are given no indication why. --

2328:. It'll help with migrating Freebase data and more. 733:of adding redirects rather than bypassing them. -- 163:Hoping your New Year was/is sufficiently peaceful, 6355:Per WP:TPO, do not remove my comments. - Cassianto 5148:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 3211:which have been flagged using Wikidata - The Game. 2864:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 2608:where about 6 editors opposed any of these edits. 2426:which have been flagged using Wikidata - The Game. 2392:https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidatawiki/entities/ 2127:which have been flagged using Wikidata - The Game. 1852:Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter 1515:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 6693:tool to search for revisions that contain hashtag 6601:No problem, thanks for letting me know. — Martin 5863:to avoid block) in order to report edit warring; 5578:Thanks for your help on the Causal loop article. 3754:I think that the problem with the article on the 7040:). I hope he will be blocked for the 4th time. 6120:I don't have much more to add. Regards — Martin 4107:International Society for Computational Biology 2108:Created a unit test framework for special pages 224:. (Is his rationale sufficient? If so, perhaps 7189:Note that any non-free images not used in any 3977:"This" editor does happen to have a username. 790:section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion 714:is why I am making such a big deal out of it. 261:If you prefer that name, then request a move. 7396:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Excela Health 4993:requirements. 01:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 4787:can you help with the above please? — Martin 3845:. Since you've had some involvement with the 2688:, instead ] is displayed in the section. See 2565:Your template edit has broken the infobox on 405:) Did you receive a ping a few days ago from 5205:as an alternative to the F11 user warning. 4898:to fix this, I will do it. Regards — Martin 4145:How US Presidents Died According to Wikidata 3837:An editor has asked for a discussion on the 2199:Can't believe you changed Bhutanese passport 2010:bureau du patrimoine de Seine-Saint-Denis ID 1596:I have reverted. Sorry about that. — Martin 1445:Please revert your deletion of the original 654:or as part of other more significant changes 7742: 6479:Hey thank you for your support of the page 4463:Sorry about the additional bother involved. 3849:template, you might want to participate in 3548:It's in hand. Bear with me please — Martin 3048:to help the mapping of Freebase properties. 2283:takes place in Monastir, Tunisia, 3-5 April 2271:Reforming administrator inactivity criteria 1945:are working again thanks to Bene* and Lucie 1792:and sharing your ideas with the developers. 1613:I've made the changes. Please take a look. 6620:Edit at Template:WP1.0 from five years ago 5621:really need to worry about this? — Martin 5096:I'd like to share with you what I left at 4165:Properties with units waiting for creation 3142:https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/217885/ 1956:- displaying history from Wikidata on maps 1731:edit made by an editor using an IP address 1366:Template talk:Editnotice#Background colour 480:your most recent comments there. Regards, 7108:, as I told you yesterday, the 1st thing 6875:for me, this ends here. have a good day! 6481:List of rapid transit systems in Pakistan 4927:I've copied over the full citations from 3729:enacted the original ban in February 2015 2337:Lots of new databases have been added to 2098:, to be deployed April 7 and 8. See also 7321:(although a group of hospitals probably 5786:MediaWiki talk:Antispoof-conflict-bottom 4387:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/APerson 4356:or proofread pages in your own language! 3230:or proofread pages in your own language! 2445:or proofread pages in your own language! 2377:. <3 to everyone who is a part of it. 2375:Wikidata development started 3 years ago 2146:or proofread pages in your own language! 1783: 1545:British Bangladeshi article reassessment 968:Talk:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism 749:Where in the RfD is this explanation..? 476:I'm interested to know what you make of 177:PS In case you haven't already seen it, 7701:State Department Report on antisemitism 5498:, as you can see the IPA is corrupted. 4433:of the alternative account, it is your 4096:Mix n Match is now available for mobile 3881:with which I work on a regular basis. 2320:short tour of Wikidata's tool ecosystem 2180:Please can you make the changes on the 966:Hello, MSGJ. You have new messages at 14: 7685:My comment is being removed from this 6063:Hello. I wanted to discuss the recent 5871:And I see in EWN that you've recently 2056:Dictionary of National Biography (DNB) 1938:(which is going read-only on Tuesday!) 786:Template:Human anatomical features/doc 772:Template:Human anatomical features/doc 381:this suggestion here (first paragraph) 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7455:A file that you uploaded or altered, 6826:not the only editor who suspects that 5811:MSGJ, do you mind explaining how you 4160:properties with units already created 3345:Wtshymanski and "editing restrctions" 3177:https://github.com/Benestar/asparagus 3121:National Library of Ireland authority 3000:German language Knowledge closed its 2094:Removed backwards compatibility from 7828:comment added 09:06, 4 December 2015 7028:Hello, since it was you who blocked 2702:Category:Implemented requested edits 2386:Put the infrastructure for creating 2332:Italian Knowledge's quality festival 1571:Problem with template 'Football box' 1221: 25: 7772:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! 7451:File:DERM.gif listed for discussion 7385:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 6642:where all the project banners have 6640:Talk:International Court of Justice 5758:MediaWiki:Antispoof-conflict-bottom 5413:to get input from others. — Martin 4834:Just flet that in where it was. -- 4819:, the defendants plan to plead the 4065:A simple way to write Wikidata bots 4055:Wikimania 2015 report by Multichill 936:Thank you, happy to help! — Martin 918:is very helpful. Thank you Martin. 815:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 244:should, therefore, be protected..?) 23: 7161: 6741:I got your ping on ANEW. — Martin 6089:I'll make the following comments: 4050:Un-deleting 500,000 Wikidata items 3999: 3998: 2982: 2981: 2251: 2250: 1879: 1878: 1782: 1691:Editing restriction of Wtshymanski 1429:Template:Infobox medical condition 1210: 959: 800:{{substituted}}</noinclude: --> 776: 24: 7838: 7394:The article will be discussed at 6098:I counted five or six reverts on 3733:A block review from February 2015 3597:. Ever since we did some work to 2708:gets (or used to get) updated. - 2706:Category:Answered requested edits 2686:Category:Answered requested edits 2088:Looked into improving suggestions 151:undoing those pre-emptive changes 7794:Hello, MSGJ, please have a look 7744: 7370: 4916: 4698: 4514:Hope this clears everything up. 3853:if you have not already done so. 2852: 2479: 1503: 1189: 908:Anatomy template editor barnstar 900: 840:, the disadvantage of replacing 113: 29: 7689:, could you please restore it: 6984:author creator and be deleted. 5501:been inserted by another user. 5245:Concerns regarding edit warring 4694:Reference errors on 4 September 3843:Template:English variant notice 2365:Great Aragonese Encyclopedia ID 2295:Library world will use Wikidata 1139:Still nothing, sorry! — Martin 7461:Knowledge:Files for discussion 7062:Blocked both of you. — Martin 6936:Please do not delete ZUDE page 6483:. I'm really thankful to you. 5195:A while back I note I created 5086:08:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC) 5068:08:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC) 5045:12:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 5032:07:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 4971:10:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC) 4941:17:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 4911:16:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 4889:16:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 4682:16:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4664:15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4647:13:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4623:13:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4605:11:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4580:11:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4557:10:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 4524:14:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC) 4492:22:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 4474:21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 4450:09:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 4420:05:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 4380:16:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC) 4340:Help develop the next summary 3913:Thanks and understood, MSGJ. 3352:Knowledge:Editing restrictions 3214:Help develop the next summary 3105:second surname in Spanish name 3097:Encyclopaedia Metallum band id 3081:takeoff and landing capability 2700:parameter adds the request to 2692:. Also, the documentation for 2682:Template:Request edit/answered 2429:Help develop the next summary 2130:Help develop the next summary 2022:category of people buried here 2014:format as a regular expression 1974:Danish National Filmography ID 581:WP:REDIRECT#Template redirects 13: 1: 7785:22:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 7767:01:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC) 7732:06:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 7705:Hate Crimes Operations Guide 7628:11:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 7610:18:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC) 7577:21:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 7416:14:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC) 7357:16:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC) 7308:06:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 7285:21:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 7253:20:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 7234:14:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC) 7207:18:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC) 7184:our policy for non-free media 7175:File:Southland Intertitle.jpg 7150:15:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 7129:13:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 7100:13:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 7016:15:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 6994:13:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC) 6969:14:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 6951:14:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 6799:Ramblings from northern Italy 6467:17:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6441:17:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6423:10:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6380:14:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6350:14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6329:13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6304:13:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 6275:17:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 6255:17:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 6238:15:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 6213:10:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 6193:07:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 6133:23:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC) 6084:20:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 5879:that didn't violate 3RR; and 5702:be reported if it continues. 5663:This has more to do with the 5307:http://youtube.de/FPWBOU0z0aM 4861:09:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 4844:07:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 4800:06:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 4775:00:26, 5 September 2015 (UTC) 4103:Knowledge editing competition 4037:Mobilizing Open Cultural Data 3935:Hi MSGJ, I just noticed your 3735:is also relevant. Thank you, 3002:RfC on usage of Wikidata data 2919:wasn't clear in my request.-- 2680:Hi, could you take a look at 2018:category of associated people 1489:09:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 1472:23:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1448:{{Infobox medical condition}} 1441:21:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1423:21:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1404:21:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1381:13:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1359:13:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC) 1343:14:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC) 1318:17:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC) 689:Because he's doing the exact 7716:This needs to be called out. 7671:13:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 7649:08:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC) 7538:23:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 7517:22:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 7478:18:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC) 7446:23:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC) 7195:criteria for speedy deletion 7075:12:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 7056:11:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 6975:Zude Nomination for deletion 6930:23:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 6912:16:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 6885:20:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 6848:14:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 6819:11:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 6789:07:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 6775:17:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 6754:14:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 6736:11:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC) 6709:07:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 6691:Hey, I've been working on a 6681:22:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 6659:19:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 6614:22:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 6597:00:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC) 6581:23:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 6538:17:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC) 6495:15:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC) 6428:Why don't you shut up then? 6054:23:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 6020:02:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 5995:00:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 5981:00:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 5915:21:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5893:20:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5847:07:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5829:00:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5801:15:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5775:15:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 5744:12:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 5730:12:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 5712:12:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC) 5679:18:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC) 5656:14:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 5634:14:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 5616:14:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 5596:14:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 5585:14:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC) 5558:16:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC) 5541:17:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC) 5459:23:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC) 5441:02:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC) 5426:19:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 5404:14:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 5102:This derogatory edit summary 4151:Wikidata now supports units 4113:Matched birth and death days 4044:Wikidata tutorial at SWAT4LS 3995:Wikidata weekly summary #175 2978:Wikidata weekly summary #163 2889:Category:Documentation pages 2883:Category:Documentation pages 2742:Yes, thank you very much. - 2247:Wikidata weekly summary #152 1978:Masaryk University person ID 1875:Wikidata weekly summary #151 1816:You can share your thoughts 1509:Template:Designation/infobox 1291:12:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 1263:12:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 1226:at any time by removing the 1184:08:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 1166:16:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC) 1152:17:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC) 1135:16:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC) 1117:15:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 1102:14:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 1087:13:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 1055:12:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 1037:02:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 1018:21:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC) 995:14:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 949:14:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 928:09:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC) 887:09:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC) 831:02:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC) 759:18:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 743:19:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 725:12:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 685:11:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 667:10:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 647:09:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 612:18:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 598:00:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 530:18:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 512:20:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 499:, I'm simply ignoring it? -- 490:19:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 464:09:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 393:00:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 383:but, it seems, to no avail. 375:20:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 347:20:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 325:15:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 304:15:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 272:12:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 257:09:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 212:09:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 195:09:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC) 137:03:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 7: 6999:Please see the response on 6687:Hashtags in edit summaries? 6624:Hi, I just found that with 5930:listening to others' points 5815:that egregious, disruptive 5521:15:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5488:15:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5374:15:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5353:14:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5329:14:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5299:14:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5281:14:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 5260:15:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 5239:13:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 5221:13:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 5185:21:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 5160:17:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 5133:16:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC) 4090:Stalagmites and stalactites 3987:08:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 3973:13:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 3954:20:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 3923:13:25, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 3909:13:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 3891:16:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC) 3871:07:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 3772:(UAF) (Trotskyist) and the 3260:Double redirects after move 3146:Worked more on unit support 2858:Template:Category interwiki 1835:mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015 1427:Where would we restore the 1278:Received, thanks! — Martin 874:on the /doc page. — Martin 173:14:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 100:13:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC) 77:18:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC) 10: 7843: 6758:Yes. We often use them at 6697:Gadget-defaultsummaries.js 6634:, you have set it so that 6586:Based on your comments at 6518:) returned to vandalizing 6504:Just to let you know that 6451:. Get over it already. - 5672:link in the edit summary. 5566:On copy/paste duplications 5492:I'll explain immediately: 4023:Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2015 3827:19:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC) 3264:Could you please retarget 2831:Draft:Electronic cigarette 2815:Draft:Electronic cigarette 2809:Draft:Electronic cigarette 2556:22:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC) 2524:17:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC) 2241:17:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC) 2219:09:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 2194:12:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 2182:Template_talk:Football_box 2170:20:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC) 2049:commemorative plaque image 1986:Commemorative plaque image 1910:IRC office hour on Tuesday 1869:19:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1846:Unsubscribe from this list 1771:14:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1746:14:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1720:14:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1685:11:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1668:09:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1649:00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1623:14:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 1609:23:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1591:23:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 64:In reference to this edit, 7162: 5606:of an article. Cheers. 5392:Thank you for your help. 4219:elevation above sea level 4085:We passed 70M statements. 3809:20:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 3791:14:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC) 3745:19:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC) 3713:22:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3690:22:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3654:Infobox television season 3631:21:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3585:21:18, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3561:21:12, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3544:21:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3529:20:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3511:20:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC) 3466:Infobox television season 3340:18:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC) 3307:20:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 3281:13:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 3254:11:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 3033:was created on 2015-06-17 2972:10:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 2954:09:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 2900:Categories for discussion 2478: 2466:15:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC) 2026:BioStor author identifier 1566:17:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC) 1540:17:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC) 899: 784:A tag has been placed on 441:sensitive to errors (see 121:The Barnstar of Diligence 112: 7585:need to be corrected. I 7501:No it doesn't. It means 7387:or whether it should be 5465:Talk:Zucchero Fornaciari 5340:is that way ;) — Martin 4763:report it to my operator 3454:14:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3440:14:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3423:13:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3413:be subject for concern. 3405:13:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3380:13:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3365:13:48, 9 July 2015 (UTC) 3172:the performance penalty. 2929:08:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC) 2909:21:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC) 2878:13:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC) 2843:22:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 2801:21:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC) 2775:23:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC) 2754:00:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC) 2738:08:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC) 2720:09:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC) 2671:13:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC) 2644:07:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC) 2622:07:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC) 1856:Translate the user guide 1306:initial problem resolved 916:template:Infobox anatomy 428:) 00:21, 14 January 2015 181:also adds some context. 60:Are you an ArbCom clerk? 6543:Request to review block 5780:It has been deleted by 4958:Thank you IP. — Martin 4263:electrical conductivity 4071:Other Noteworthy Stuff 3774:Socialist Workers Party 3065:National Gallery of Art 3025:en:South Pole Telescope 3021:Other Noteworthy Stuff 2590:11:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC) 2567:Johann Baptist Wendling 2561:Johann Baptist Wendling 2315:Other Noteworthy Stuff 2096:mw.wikibase.getEntity() 2030:chief operating officer 1990:Wikimedia database name 1936:An update from Freebase 1922:Other Noteworthy Stuff 1000:Template:Grading scheme 7749: 7745:File:Xmas Ornament.jpg 7167: 5944:. And now you've even 4709:automatically detected 4511: 4377:Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) 4060:DSS Wikidata Editathon 4004: 3847:English variant notice 3251:Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) 3131:Cross Items Interwikis 2987: 2862:nominated for deletion 2825:and please be sure to 2495:protected edit request 2256: 1982:EMLO person identifier 1884: 1839:the survey's talk page 1793: 1727:banned from reverting 1513:nominated for deletion 1215: 981:Re: the edit request – 964: 807:contest the nomination 781: 353:Template:Start div col 7748: 7459:, has been listed at 7172:Thanks for uploading 7165: 5946:strike the "reminder" 5642:The template notice, 5200:Un-confirmpermission1 5191:Opinion on a template 5092:90.222.127.214 ‎block 4725:broken reference name 4506: 4039:, Helsinki, 2 October 4003: 3937:post on Alakzi's talk 3876:TE permission request 3770:Unite Against Fascism 3756:UK Independence Party 3750:UK Independence Party 3059:nature.com/ontologies 2986: 2694:Template:Request edit 2676:Request edit template 2255: 2176:Football box template 1883: 1818:by clicking this link 1806:top-priority problems 1787: 1214: 963: 780: 497:Template talk:Div col 407:Template talk:Div col 69:A Quest For Knowledge 42:of past discussions. 7292:Ex Machina talk page 7032:for edit-warring on 6398:Admin Accountability 5665:CC BY-SA 3.0 License 4368:Read the full report 4019:Wikidata edit-a-thon 3646:wholly inappropriate 3242:Read the full report 3069:J. Paul Getty Museum 3053:manual for MixnMatch 3042:Primary Sources Tool 3040:have been added the 2895:the category's entry 2629:consensus can change 2487:The Admin's Barnstar 2454:Read the full report 2382:posted our assesment 2308:You can read the log 2158:Read the full report 1788:Thank you for using 1386:Infobox disease move 811:the page's talk page 358:Template:End div col 156:What do you make of 7525:, fourth bullet. -- 6904:No More Mr Nice Guy 6222:you blocked me? - 6157:the specific edits 5881:"warned" another IP 5788:. Regards — Martin 5338:article's talk page 4223:orbital inclination 4079:voting instructions 4014:Events/Blogs/Press 3833:Request for comment 3164:phabricator:T100813 3079:Newest properties: 3009:Events/Blogs/Press 2663:Mister Sneeze A Lot 2472:A barnstar for you! 2355:Newest properties: 2277:Events/Blogs/Press 1964:Newest properties: 1894:Events/Blogs/Press 1550:British Bangladeshi 703:redirect guidelines 106:A barnstar for you! 7750: 7738:Season's Greetings 7709:London Declaration 7168: 6922:Here come the Suns 6894:Hello, you closed 6314:remove my comments 5469:Renato Vallanzasca 4817:self-incrimination 4030:Office hour on IRC 4005: 3470:Per your comment, 3190:phabricator:T93534 3151:phabricator:T98471 3113:BerlPap identifier 2988: 2827:sign your comments 2807:MfD nomination of 2540:for the proposal. 2402:phabricator:T92831 2302:, SEO and Wikidata 2257: 1904:Moving to Wikidata 1885: 1863:Whatamidoing (WMF) 1794: 1390:Were you aware of 1324:Kind of a talkback 1223:remove this notice 1216: 975:remove this notice 965: 869:Anatomy navbox doc 855:Anatomy navbox doc 799:<noinclude: --> 782: 293:just letting it go 7829: 7822: 7808:comment added by 7754:To You and Yours! 7669: 7626: 7463:. Please see the 7444: 7251: 7236: 7224:comment added by 7180:claim of fair use 7152: 7140:comment added by 7131: 7119:comment added by 7102: 7090:comment added by 7073: 7058: 7046:comment added by 7014: 6967: 6752: 6679: 6612: 6463: 6419: 6376: 6348: 6271: 6253: 6234: 6211: 6189: 6131: 6080: 6042:User:82.41.251.96 6036:User:82.41.251.96 5913: 5845: 5799: 5728: 5632: 5556: 5523: 5511:comment added by 5424: 5351: 5332: 5315:comment added by 5297: 5237: 5183: 5084: 5030: 5014: 5000:comment added by 4969: 4909: 4871:Problem with refs 4859: 4798: 4744: 4733: 4662: 4578: 4541: 4540: 4464: 4105:organized by the 3971: 3907: 3861: 3825: 3711: 3559: 3527: 3438: 3403: 3390: 3335: 3093:Discogs artist ID 3089:Discogs master ID 2970: 2934:property creation 2914:Antiochian Greeks 2902:page. Thank you. 2803: 2791:comment added by 2751: 2736: 2717: 2642: 2529: 2528: 2522: 2243: 2231:comment added by 2221: 2209:comment added by 2054:New task forces: 1744: 1666: 1607: 1554:reassessment page 1487: 1421: 1328:I replied to you 1289: 1182: 1150: 1053: 947: 933: 932: 885: 731:here's an example 683: 645: 516:No, it didn't. I 430: 416:comment added by 279:talk page stalker 210: 145:Advice, please..? 142: 141: 98: 84:Knowledge:Be bold 54: 53: 48:current talk page 7834: 7823: 7821: 7802: 7746: 7659: 7646: 7641: 7616: 7529: 7514: 7509: 7496: 7491: 7475: 7443: 7441: 7430: 7413: 7374: 7373: 7354: 7298:? I'm not sure. 7270: 7241: 7219: 7170: 7164: 7135: 7114: 7085: 7063: 7041: 7004: 6957: 6877:Centocinquantuno 6842: 6811:Centocinquantuno 6766: 6742: 6669: 6650: 6645: 6637: 6629: 6602: 6561:) for violating 6535: 6529: 6461: 6438: 6434: 6417: 6374: 6338: 6326: 6322: 6301: 6297: 6269: 6243: 6232: 6201: 6187: 6121: 6078: 5970: 5903: 5853:the edit history 5835: 5789: 5770: 5718: 5690:With respect to 5622: 5546: 5527:Hello MSGJ. See 5506: 5414: 5380:Draft:Liam Payne 5341: 5331: 5309: 5287: 5277: 5227: 5204: 5198: 5173: 5171: 5144:User:Kwamikagami 5074: 5020: 5013: 4994: 4959: 4924: 4920: 4919: 4899: 4849: 4788: 4786: 4738: 4727: 4702: 4701: 4674: 4652: 4615: 4568: 4565:Worm That Turned 4549: 4484: 4462: 4442: 4401:Extended content 4397: 4396: 4346:Contribute to a 4183:example for frwp 3961: 3946:Opabinia regalis 3897: 3866: 3859: 3854: 3815: 3723:Hello MSGJ. See 3701: 3688: 3679: 3675: 3658: 3652: 3620: 3617: 3606: 3600: 3574: 3571: 3549: 3517: 3500: 3497: 3446:The Rambling Man 3428: 3415:The Rambling Man 3393: 3384: 3372:The Rambling Man 3357:The Rambling Man 3336: 3333: 3328: 3325: 3220:Contribute to a 3109:CulturaItalia ID 3085:Discogs label ID 3044:. There is also 2960: 2921:Attar-Aram syria 2856: 2855: 2786: 2780:Arameans Article 2762:Subject/headline 2749: 2726: 2715: 2699: 2632: 2595:Ayurveda editing 2588: 2579: 2575: 2552: 2546: 2538:draft is updated 2508: 2505: 2502: 2483: 2476: 2475: 2435:Contribute to a 2226: 2204: 2136:Contribute to a 2097: 1768: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1734: 1733:means. — Martin 1717: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1656: 1597: 1581:has no value. -- 1538: 1529: 1525: 1507: 1506: 1477: 1470: 1461: 1457: 1450: 1449: 1411: 1357: 1353: 1341: 1337: 1279: 1254: 1247: 1245: 1239: 1235: 1229: 1225: 1213: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1172: 1140: 1115: 1078: 1065: 1043: 1014: 1009: 978: 937: 904: 897: 896: 875: 873: 867: 862:Template:Cranium 859: 853: 849: 843: 801: 779: 723: 720: 673: 665: 662: 635: 596: 593: 503: 474: 455: 450: 429: 410: 404: 366: 360: 345: 337: 316: 302: 282: 270: 267: 243: 237: 233: 227: 200: 117: 110: 109: 88: 33: 32: 26: 7842: 7841: 7837: 7836: 7835: 7833: 7832: 7831: 7803: 7792: 7774: 7741: 7683: 7644: 7635: 7548: 7527: 7512: 7507: 7494: 7489: 7485: 7471: 7453: 7439: 7431: 7423: 7411: 7375: 7371: 7368: 7352: 7318: 7277:Capuchinpilates 7264: 7261: 7216: 7197:. Thank you. -- 7159: 7158: 7026: 7001:User talk:NeilN 6977: 6938: 6892: 6840: 6801: 6764: 6716: 6689: 6648: 6643: 6635: 6625: 6622: 6545: 6533: 6527: 6502: 6477: 6459: 6432: 6430: 6415: 6394: 6372: 6357:- BAH-HA!! Now 6320: 6318: 6295: 6293: 6267: 6230: 6185: 6076: 6061: 6038: 5952: 5851:One can see in 5809: 5764: 5754: 5696:Natalie Portman 5688: 5644:Template:Copied 5603:Template:Copied 5568: 5472: 5383: 5361: 5310: 5275: 5269: 5247: 5202: 5196: 5193: 5165: 5140: 5138:Recent decision 5094: 5055: 4995: 4985: 4917: 4915: 4873: 4821:Fifth Amendment 4780: 4699: 4696: 4672: 4613: 4547: 4542: 4482: 4440: 4402: 4390: 4383: 4382: 4364: 4333:Hack on one of 4303:Fusion enthalpy 4299:NIAID ChemDB ID 4010: 3997: 3933: 3878: 3869: 3864: 3857: 3835: 3752: 3721: 3677: 3671: 3670: 3656: 3650: 3643:In view of the 3641: 3627: 3618: 3615: 3612:been coding. -- 3604: 3598: 3581: 3572: 3569: 3507: 3498: 3495: 3490:NCIS (season 2) 3486:NCIS (season 1) 3468: 3347: 3334:Call me maybe!! 3332: 3326: 3323: 3314: 3297:CFD closed : ) 3288: 3262: 3257: 3256: 3238: 3200:Hack on one of 3036:More data from 2993: 2980: 2936: 2916: 2885: 2853: 2850: 2812: 2782: 2764: 2697: 2678: 2652: 2597: 2577: 2571: 2570: 2563: 2550: 2542: 2534: 2503: 2500: 2474: 2469: 2468: 2450: 2415:Hack on one of 2318:Magnus wrote a 2262: 2249: 2201: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2154: 2116:Hack on one of 2095: 1898:Sex and artists 1890: 1877: 1872: 1859: 1781: 1762: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1711: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1693: 1631: 1573: 1547: 1527: 1521: 1520: 1504: 1501: 1459: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1388: 1369: 1351: 1349: 1335: 1333: 1326: 1252: 1248: 1243: 1237: 1233: 1231:You've got mail 1227: 1219: 1211: 1190: 1188: 1109: 1076: 1059: 1025: 1012: 1007: 1002: 979: 972: 957: 895: 871: 865: 860:(as you did on 857: 851: 847: 841: 798: 777: 775: 718: 715: 660: 657: 591: 588: 501: 468: 453: 446: 411: 398: 364: 356: 339: 333: 314: 296: 276: 265: 262: 241: 235: 231: 225: 147: 108: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7840: 7810:151.20.112.193 7799: 7791: 7788: 7773: 7770: 7757: 7740: 7735: 7720: 7719: 7718: 7717: 7682: 7679: 7678: 7677: 7676: 7675: 7674: 7673: 7599: 7596: 7583: 7565: 7562: 7556: 7554: 7547: 7544: 7543: 7542: 7541: 7540: 7484: 7481: 7452: 7449: 7422: 7419: 7369: 7367: 7362:Nomination of 7360: 7317: 7312: 7311: 7310: 7260: 7257: 7256: 7255: 7226:107.25.106.233 7215: 7210: 7157: 7154: 7106:As you can see 7078: 7077: 7025: 7020: 7019: 7018: 6976: 6973: 6972: 6971: 6937: 6934: 6933: 6932: 6891: 6888: 6873: 6872: 6868: 6864: 6856: 6855: 6854: 6853: 6800: 6797: 6796: 6795: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6791: 6715: 6712: 6688: 6685: 6684: 6683: 6632:Template:WP1.0 6621: 6618: 6617: 6616: 6599: 6544: 6541: 6501: 6498: 6476: 6473: 6472: 6471: 6470: 6469: 6458: 6455: 6414: 6411: 6393: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6371: 6368: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6266: 6263: 6229: 6226: 6196: 6195: 6184: 6181: 6175: 6168: 6165: 6162: 6151: 6144: 6136: 6135: 6118: 6117: 6116: 6113: 6110: 6107: 6096: 6093: 6075: 6072: 6060: 6057: 6037: 6034: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6028: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 5808: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5753: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5747: 5746: 5687: 5685:User:Yossimgim 5682: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5658: 5637: 5636: 5618: 5567: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5504: 5502: 5499: 5493: 5471: 5462: 5429: 5428: 5382: 5377: 5360: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5302: 5301: 5268: 5263: 5246: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5192: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5139: 5136: 5098:90.222.127.214 5093: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5054: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 4984: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4956: 4933:185.108.128.12 4872: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4829: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4759:false positive 4755: 4754: 4695: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4649: 4629: 4582: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4512: 4504: 4422: 4404: 4403: 4400: 4395: 4389: 4384: 4365: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4357: 4350: 4344: 4338: 4330:Monthly Tasks 4328: 4327: 4326: 4323: 4320: 4317: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4255:watershed area 4206:Did you know? 4204: 4203: 4202: 4197: 4191: 4186: 4179: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4167: 4162: 4157: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4142: 4137: 4129: 4124: 4119: 4116: 4110: 4099: 4093: 4087: 4082: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4062: 4057: 4052: 4047: 4040: 4033: 4032:, 23 September 4026: 4011: 4006: 3996: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3877: 3874: 3862: 3851:the discussion 3834: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3751: 3748: 3720: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3640: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3625: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3579: 3505: 3467: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3382: 3346: 3343: 3313: 3310: 3295: 3294: 3287: 3284: 3261: 3258: 3239: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3231: 3224: 3218: 3212: 3205: 3197:Monthly Tasks 3195: 3194: 3193: 3186: 3183: 3179: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3160: 3157: 3154: 3147: 3144: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3123: 3076:Did you know? 3074: 3073: 3072: 3062: 3055: 3049: 3034: 3028: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2994: 2989: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2935: 2932: 2915: 2912: 2884: 2881: 2849: 2846: 2811: 2805: 2781: 2778: 2763: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2677: 2674: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2596: 2593: 2562: 2559: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2490: 2489: 2484: 2473: 2470: 2451: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2439: 2433: 2427: 2420: 2412:Monthly Tasks 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2398: 2395: 2384: 2378: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2352:Did you know? 2350: 2349: 2348: 2342: 2335: 2329: 2323: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2304: 2298: 2291: 2288:GLAM-WIKI 2015 2284: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2263: 2258: 2248: 2245: 2233:82.181.117.103 2224: 2200: 2197: 2186:TheBigJagielka 2177: 2174: 2155: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2140: 2134: 2128: 2121: 2113:Monthly Tasks 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2092: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2071: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2045: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2034:DVN identifier 1961:Did you know? 1959: 1958: 1957: 1951: 1946: 1939: 1933: 1928: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1912: 1906: 1900: 1891: 1886: 1876: 1873: 1843: 1828:privacy policy 1780: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1677:DieSwartzPunkt 1671: 1670: 1641:Knowledgekid87 1630: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1615:TheBigJagielka 1611: 1572: 1569: 1558:Cordless Larry 1546: 1543: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1443: 1387: 1384: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1218: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1105: 1104: 1024: 1021: 1001: 998: 971: 958: 956: 953: 952: 951: 931: 930: 911: 910: 905: 894: 891: 890: 889: 774: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 746: 745: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 478:my response to 395: 245: 149:Thank you for 146: 143: 140: 139: 124: 123: 118: 107: 104: 103: 102: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 18:User talk:MSGJ 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7839: 7830: 7827: 7819: 7815: 7811: 7807: 7797: 7787: 7786: 7783: 7779: 7769: 7768: 7764: 7760: 7756: 7755: 7747: 7739: 7734: 7733: 7729: 7725: 7724:184.164.147.2 7715: 7710: 7706: 7702: 7697: 7694: 7693: 7692: 7691: 7690: 7688: 7672: 7667: 7663: 7657: 7652: 7651: 7650: 7647: 7642: 7640: 7639: 7631: 7630: 7629: 7624: 7620: 7614: 7613: 7612: 7611: 7607: 7603: 7593: 7588: 7579: 7578: 7574: 7570: 7560: 7552: 7539: 7535: 7531: 7524: 7523:WP:APPROXDATE 7520: 7519: 7518: 7515: 7510: 7504: 7500: 7499: 7498: 7497: 7492: 7480: 7479: 7476: 7474: 7468: 7467: 7462: 7458: 7457:File:DERM.gif 7448: 7447: 7442: 7436: 7435: 7428: 7418: 7417: 7414: 7408: 7407: 7400: 7397: 7392: 7390: 7386: 7382: 7381: 7380:Excela Health 7365: 7364:Excela Health 7359: 7358: 7355: 7349: 7348: 7342: 7339: 7335: 7332: 7329: 7328: 7324: 7316: 7315:Excela Health 7309: 7305: 7301: 7297: 7293: 7289: 7288: 7287: 7286: 7282: 7278: 7272: 7268: 7254: 7249: 7245: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7235: 7231: 7227: 7223: 7214: 7213:Charlie Sheen 7209: 7208: 7204: 7200: 7196: 7192: 7187: 7185: 7181: 7177: 7176: 7169: 7153: 7151: 7147: 7143: 7139: 7132: 7130: 7126: 7122: 7121:151.20.31.205 7118: 7111: 7107: 7103: 7101: 7097: 7093: 7092:151.20.68.142 7089: 7083: 7076: 7071: 7067: 7061: 7060: 7059: 7057: 7053: 7049: 7045: 7039: 7035: 7031: 7024: 7017: 7012: 7008: 7002: 6998: 6997: 6996: 6995: 6991: 6987: 6981: 6970: 6965: 6961: 6955: 6954: 6953: 6952: 6948: 6944: 6931: 6927: 6923: 6920: 6916: 6915: 6914: 6913: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6897: 6887: 6886: 6882: 6878: 6869: 6865: 6863: 6858: 6857: 6851: 6850: 6849: 6846: 6845: 6843: 6835: 6831: 6827: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6820: 6816: 6812: 6807: 6790: 6786: 6782: 6781:Fleet Command 6778: 6777: 6776: 6772: 6768: 6761: 6757: 6756: 6755: 6750: 6746: 6740: 6739: 6738: 6737: 6733: 6729: 6728:Fleet Command 6725: 6721: 6711: 6710: 6706: 6702: 6698: 6694: 6682: 6677: 6673: 6667: 6663: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6656: 6652: 6641: 6633: 6628: 6615: 6610: 6606: 6600: 6598: 6595: 6594: 6589: 6585: 6584: 6583: 6582: 6579: 6578: 6573: 6568: 6564: 6560: 6557: 6554: 6550: 6540: 6539: 6536: 6531: 6530: 6524: 6521: 6517: 6514: 6511: 6507: 6497: 6496: 6492: 6488: 6484: 6482: 6468: 6465: 6464: 6460: 6456: 6450: 6447: 6444: 6443: 6442: 6439: 6437: 6435: 6427: 6426: 6425: 6424: 6421: 6420: 6416: 6412: 6405: 6404: 6399: 6392:A reminder... 6381: 6378: 6377: 6373: 6369: 6363: 6360: 6356: 6353: 6352: 6351: 6346: 6342: 6336: 6332: 6331: 6330: 6327: 6325: 6323: 6315: 6311: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6302: 6300: 6298: 6290: 6289: 6276: 6273: 6272: 6268: 6264: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6251: 6247: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6236: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6221: 6216: 6215: 6214: 6209: 6205: 6198: 6197: 6194: 6191: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6176: 6173: 6169: 6166: 6163: 6160: 6159:you relied on 6156: 6152: 6149: 6145: 6142: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6134: 6129: 6125: 6119: 6114: 6111: 6108: 6105: 6101: 6097: 6094: 6091: 6090: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6082: 6081: 6077: 6073: 6066: 6056: 6055: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6021: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6005: 6001: 5998: 5997: 5996: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5978: 5974: 5968: 5964: 5960: 5956: 5950: 5947: 5943: 5939: 5935: 5931: 5927: 5926:collaboration 5923: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5911: 5907: 5900: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5890: 5886: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5870: 5866: 5862: 5861:circumvent it 5858: 5854: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5843: 5839: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5826: 5822: 5818: 5814: 5802: 5797: 5793: 5787: 5783: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5773: 5769: 5768: 5763: 5759: 5745: 5741: 5737: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5726: 5722: 5716: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5709: 5705: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5686: 5681: 5680: 5677: 5676: 5669: 5666: 5657: 5653: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5640: 5639: 5638: 5635: 5630: 5626: 5619: 5617: 5613: 5609: 5604: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5594: 5593: 5587: 5586: 5583: 5582: 5576: 5574: 5559: 5554: 5550: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5522: 5518: 5514: 5510: 5497: 5490: 5489: 5485: 5481: 5477: 5470: 5466: 5461: 5460: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5443: 5442: 5438: 5434: 5427: 5422: 5418: 5412: 5408: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5393: 5390: 5386: 5381: 5376: 5375: 5371: 5367: 5366:86.171.92.242 5354: 5349: 5345: 5339: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5318: 5314: 5308: 5300: 5295: 5291: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5279: 5278: 5267: 5262: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5240: 5235: 5231: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5209: 5206: 5201: 5186: 5181: 5177: 5169: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5135: 5134: 5130: 5126: 5122: 5119: 5116: 5113: 5110: 5107: 5103: 5099: 5087: 5082: 5078: 5072: 5071: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5061: 5053:Jeremy Corbyn 5046: 5043: 5040: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5028: 5024: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4999: 4991: 4983:That template 4972: 4967: 4963: 4957: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4923: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4907: 4903: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4862: 4857: 4853: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4809: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4796: 4792: 4784: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4752: 4748: 4742: 4737: 4731: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4710: 4706: 4683: 4680: 4679: 4676: 4675: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4660: 4656: 4650: 4648: 4644: 4643: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4621: 4620: 4617: 4616: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4602: 4601: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4588: 4583: 4581: 4576: 4572: 4566: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4555: 4554: 4551: 4550: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4510: 4505: 4502: 4498: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4489: 4486: 4485: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4471: 4467: 4460: 4456: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4448: 4447: 4444: 4443: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4427:inappropriate 4423: 4421: 4418: 4417: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4399: 4398: 4394: 4388: 4381: 4378: 4374: 4370: 4369: 4358: 4355: 4351: 4349: 4348:Showcase item 4345: 4343: 4339: 4336: 4332: 4331: 4329: 4324: 4321: 4318: 4315: 4314: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4291:LIPID MAPS ID 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4268: 4267:heat capacity 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4207: 4205: 4201: 4198: 4195: 4192: 4190: 4187: 4184: 4180: 4178: 4175: 4171: 4168: 4166: 4163: 4161: 4158: 4156: 4153: 4152: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4141: 4138: 4136: 4133: 4132: 4130: 4128: 4125: 4123: 4120: 4117: 4114: 4111: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4088: 4086: 4083: 4080: 4076: 4073: 4072: 4070: 4066: 4063: 4061: 4058: 4056: 4053: 4051: 4048: 4045: 4041: 4038: 4034: 4031: 4027: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4013: 4012: 4009: 4002: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3969: 3965: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3938: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3905: 3901: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3873: 3872: 3867: 3860: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3828: 3823: 3819: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3797: 3793: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3762: 3761:Hope Not Hate 3757: 3747: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3714: 3709: 3705: 3699: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3678:Pigsonthewing 3674: 3666: 3664: 3663: 3655: 3648: 3647: 3632: 3628: 3622: 3621: 3610: 3603: 3596: 3592: 3586: 3582: 3576: 3575: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3557: 3553: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536:Geraldo Perez 3532: 3531: 3530: 3525: 3521: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3508: 3502: 3501: 3491: 3488:looks OK but 3487: 3482: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3436: 3432: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3401: 3397: 3388: 3387:edit conflict 3383: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3353: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3330: 3329: 3319: 3309: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3298: 3293: 3290: 3289: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3267: 3255: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243: 3232: 3229: 3225: 3223: 3222:Showcase item 3219: 3217: 3213: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3196: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3161: 3158: 3155: 3152: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3139: 3138: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3075: 3070: 3066: 3063: 3060: 3056: 3054: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3023: 3022: 3020: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3008: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2996: 2995: 2992: 2985: 2973: 2968: 2964: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2940: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2911: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2891: 2890: 2880: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2810: 2804: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2793:99.51.149.131 2790: 2777: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2767:206.188.61.25 2755: 2752: 2747: 2746: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2734: 2730: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2713: 2712: 2707: 2703: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2658: 2656: 2645: 2640: 2636: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2609: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2592: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2578:Pigsonthewing 2574: 2568: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2547: 2545: 2539: 2525: 2520: 2516: 2515:Contributions 2512: 2507: 2506: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2477: 2467: 2464: 2463:John F. Lewis 2460: 2456: 2455: 2444: 2440: 2438: 2437:Showcase item 2434: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2421: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2411: 2406: 2403: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2372: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357:choreographer 2354: 2353: 2351: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2314: 2309: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2267: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2254: 2244: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2196: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2171: 2168: 2167:John F. Lewis 2164: 2160: 2159: 2148: 2145: 2141: 2139: 2138:Showcase item 2135: 2133: 2129: 2126: 2122: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2112: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2084: 2081: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2050: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1960: 1955: 1954:Eventzoom.net 1952: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1911: 1907: 1905: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1893: 1892: 1889: 1882: 1871: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1847: 1842: 1840: 1836: 1831: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1819: 1813: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1796:Hello, MSGJ, 1791: 1786: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1760: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1732: 1730: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1709: 1698: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1664: 1660: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1637: 1634: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583:Brayan Jaimes 1580: 1579: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528:Pigsonthewing 1524: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1490: 1485: 1481: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1460:Pigsonthewing 1456: 1444: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1419: 1415: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1367: 1360: 1356: 1354: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1338: 1331: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1292: 1287: 1283: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1242: 1232: 1224: 1196: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1118: 1113: 1107: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1010: 997: 996: 992: 988: 984: 976: 969: 962: 950: 945: 941: 935: 934: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 912: 909: 906: 903: 898: 888: 883: 879: 870: 863: 856: 846: 845:documentation 839: 835: 834: 833: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 803: 794: 791: 787: 773: 760: 756: 752: 751:Sardanaphalus 748: 747: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 727: 726: 721: 713: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 687: 686: 681: 677: 670: 669: 668: 663: 655: 651: 650: 649: 648: 643: 639: 613: 609: 605: 604:Sardanaphalus 601: 600: 599: 594: 586: 582: 577: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 531: 527: 523: 522:Sardanaphalus 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 498: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 482:Sardanaphalus 479: 472: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 449: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418:Sardanaphalus 415: 408: 402: 396: 394: 390: 386: 385:Sardanaphalus 382: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 359: 354: 350: 349: 348: 343: 336: 331: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 311: 307: 306: 305: 300: 294: 289: 285: 284:Sardanaphalus 280: 275: 274: 273: 268: 260: 259: 258: 254: 250: 249:Sardanaphalus 246: 240: 230: 229:Start div col 223: 219: 215: 214: 213: 208: 204: 198: 197: 196: 192: 188: 187:Sardanaphalus 184: 183: 182: 180: 175: 174: 170: 166: 165:Sardanaphalus 161: 159: 154: 152: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 122: 119: 116: 111: 101: 96: 92: 85: 81: 80: 79: 78: 74: 70: 66: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 7804:— Preceding 7793: 7775: 7753: 7752: 7751: 7737: 7721: 7712: 7695: 7684: 7637: 7636: 7602:72.198.26.61 7591: 7586: 7580: 7569:72.198.26.61 7559:WP:CONSENSUS 7549: 7521:Either way, 7486: 7472: 7465: 7454: 7432: 7424: 7405: 7401: 7393: 7378: 7376: 7366:for deletion 7346: 7343: 7340: 7336: 7333: 7330: 7326: 7322: 7319: 7273: 7262: 7220:— Preceding 7217: 7190: 7188: 7173: 7171: 7160: 7142:151.20.71.40 7136:— Preceding 7133: 7115:— Preceding 7104: 7086:— Preceding 7079: 7048:151.20.70.92 7042:— Preceding 7027: 6982: 6978: 6939: 6900:Temple Mount 6893: 6874: 6837: 6802: 6717: 6690: 6623: 6591: 6575: 6555: 6546: 6525: 6512: 6503: 6485: 6478: 6454: 6452: 6429: 6410: 6408: 6406: 6401: 6395: 6367: 6365: 6358: 6354: 6317: 6292: 6262: 6260: 6225: 6223: 6219: 6180: 6178: 6171: 6158: 6154: 6147: 6100:Talk:Skyfall 6071: 6069: 6062: 6039: 6003: 5898: 5868: 5817:edit warring 5810: 5765: 5755: 5699: 5689: 5674: 5670: 5662: 5591: 5588: 5580: 5577: 5569: 5513:151.20.81.64 5507:— Preceding 5491: 5480:87.6.116.237 5473: 5444: 5430: 5394: 5391: 5387: 5384: 5362: 5311:— Preceding 5303: 5273: 5270: 5248: 5210: 5207: 5194: 5141: 5095: 5056: 4996:— Preceding 4986: 4949:BullRangifer 4921: 4895: 4881:BullRangifer 4874: 4836:BullRangifer 4783:BullRangifer 4767:ReferenceBot 4756: 4751:Ask for help 4708: 4705:ReferenceBot 4697: 4677: 4670: 4641: 4634: 4633: 4618: 4611: 4599: 4592: 4591: 4552: 4545: 4543: 4507: 4487: 4480: 4445: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4414: 4391: 4366: 4313:Development 4283:aspect ratio 4155:announcement 4135:announcement 4007: 3934: 3879: 3846: 3836: 3798: 3794: 3783:Urquhartnite 3778:User:Snowded 3766:Labour Party 3759: 3753: 3722: 3686:Andy's edits 3682:Talk to Andy 3673:Andy Mabbett 3667: 3662:under duress 3661: 3660: 3645: 3644: 3642: 3614: 3602:Episode list 3568: 3494: 3471: 3469: 3410: 3348: 3322: 3315: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3263: 3240: 3137:Development 3127:WikiProjects 3117:Mapillary id 2997:Discussions 2990: 2937: 2917: 2903: 2893: 2887: 2886: 2851: 2813: 2787:— Preceding 2783: 2765: 2744: 2710: 2704:but in fact 2679: 2659: 2653: 2610: 2598: 2586:Andy's edits 2582:Talk to Andy 2573:Andy Mabbett 2564: 2543: 2535: 2499: 2486: 2452: 2371:Development 2269:Closed RfC: 2266:Discussions 2259: 2227:— Preceding 2223: 2205:— Preceding 2202: 2179: 2156: 2073:Development 2042:WikiProjects 1887: 1860: 1849: 1845: 1832: 1815: 1814: 1801:Editing team 1798: 1795: 1790:VisualEditor 1764: 1728: 1726: 1713: 1694: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1548: 1536:Andy's edits 1532:Talk to Andy 1523:Andy Mabbett 1502: 1468:Andy's edits 1464:Talk to Andy 1455:Andy Mabbett 1389: 1370: 1327: 1249: 1194: 1112:Technical 13 1026: 1005: 1003: 980: 907: 809:by visiting 806: 804: 795: 783: 711: 706: 698: 694: 690: 653: 632: 584: 575: 517: 438: 435:Notification 412:— Preceding 342:Technical 13 299:Technical 13 288:superprotect 176: 162: 155: 148: 129:BlastMan 456 120: 63: 55: 43: 37: 7824:—Preceding 7722:Thank you, 7681:Help needed 7412:talk to me? 7353:talk to me? 7338:yourself. 7300:Popcornduff 7267:Popcornduff 7110:User:Kurzon 7030:User:Kurzon 7023:User:Kurzon 5963:Cyphoidbomb 5782:MusikAnimal 5692:this revert 5648:Dirtlawyer1 5608:Dirtlawyer1 5359:Aziz Sancar 5266:Aziz Sancar 5252:John Carter 5142:I saw that 4703:Hello, I'm 4435:explanation 4373:Unsubscribe 4295:KNApSAcK ID 4101:The annual 3915:Dirtlawyer1 3883:Dirtlawyer1 3839:deprecation 3700:. — Martin 3659:. I did so 3271:redirects? 3247:Unsubscribe 3209:these items 2459:Unsubscribe 2424:these items 2361:senat.fr ID 2339:Mix n Match 2163:Unsubscribe 2125:these items 2062:There is a 2051:" property 1966:ABoK number 1861:Thank you, 1824:these terms 1068:phab:T66795 695:unprotected 239:End div col 36:This is an 7759:FWiW Bzuk 7714:attacking. 7466:discussion 6714:About ping 6528:Poeticbent 6335:WP:OWNTALK 5877:another IP 5857:disruptive 5601:TPS: And 5533:EdJohnston 5213:Sfan00 IMG 4931:. Cheers. 4765:. Thanks, 4761:, you can 4736:cite error 4279:luminosity 4211:properties 4194:Musicpedia 4046:, December 4042:Upcoming: 4035:Upcoming: 4028:Upcoming: 4025:in Estonia 3737:EdJohnston 3609:MOS:ACCESS 3595:MOS:ACCESS 3312:User right 2281:WikiArabia 2211:86.7.1.169 1914:Upcoming: 1908:Upcoming: 1779:Invitation 1578:attendance 1332:. Cheers. 893:Thank you! 652:It's the " 7406:Jimfbleak 7347:Jimfbleak 7296:WP:CANVAS 7003:— Martin 6986:Tomtasget 6627:this edit 6549:Roscelese 6433:Cassianto 6362:hilarious 6321:Cassianto 6312:, do not 6296:Cassianto 5967:Heimstern 5813:concluded 5807:EWN close 5752:Antispoof 5002:Gnangarra 4929:this edit 4877:this edit 4815:To avoid 4723:caused a 4721:your edit 4707:. I have 4354:translate 4275:depositor 4247:M x sin i 3931:Follow-up 3801:HughTubex 3228:translate 3207:Help fix 3051:Nice new 3031:Q20150617 2860:has been 2544:QuackGuru 2443:translate 2422:Help fix 2144:translate 2123:Help fix 1998:ISO 639-5 1810:paper cut 1511:has been 1246:template. 983:Roscelese 920:Was a bee 735:WOSlinker 583:states: " 471:Redrose64 448:this edit 401:Redrose64 330:Redrose64 247:Regards, 7818:contribs 7806:unsigned 7638:Mandruss 7344:Cheers, 7259:Learning 7222:unsigned 7191:articles 7138:unsigned 7117:unsigned 7088:unsigned 7044:unsigned 6943:Srepetti 6841:itsJamie 6809:advance. 6644:|class=c 6593:MastCell 6577:MastCell 6559:contribs 6516:contribs 6506:Marmiras 6487:Mohsin17 6046:McGeddon 6012:Lapadite 5973:Lapadite 5938:WP:UNDUE 5885:Lapadite 5821:Lapadite 5675:HighInBC 5592:HighInBC 5581:HighInBC 5509:unsigned 5451:Beecee14 5433:Beecee14 5396:Beecee14 5325:contribs 5317:Ergün.Y. 5313:unsigned 5060:Ghmyrtle 5010:contribs 4998:unsigned 4673:SilkTork 4614:SilkTork 4548:SilkTork 4497:SilkTork 4483:SilkTork 4455:SilkTork 4441:SilkTork 4243:wingspan 4231:duration 4140:examples 3799:Cheers, 3318:see here 3101:investor 3067:and the 3057:The new 3038:Freebase 2819:deletion 2789:unsigned 2614:నిజానికి 2300:Freebase 2229:unsigned 2207:unsigned 1902:VIAF is 1629:Loophole 1431:of old? 1310:Frietjes 1158:Frietjes 1127:Frietjes 1094:Frietjes 1062:Frietjes 1029:Frietjes 991:contribs 955:Talkback 838:LT910001 823:Tom (LT) 729:Martin, 691:opposite 426:contribs 414:unsigned 7826:undated 7778:Lingzhi 7696:Comment 7503:floruit 7389:deleted 6720:WP:ANEW 6701:Stephen 6636:|class= 6588:WP:ANEW 6500:Deja vu 6155:show me 6153:Again, 5965:, and 5942:WP:CLOP 5934:WP:NPOV 5899:pattern 5873:blocked 5385:Hello, 5168:Corinne 5152:Corinne 4715:On the 4587:APerson 4516:APerson 4466:APerson 4437:of it. 4287:HSDB ID 4271:HMDB ID 4259:density 4209:Newest 4170:example 3942:WP:ROPE 3125:Newest 2946:Pasleim 2898:on the 2040:Newest 1675:time. 716:-- ] {{ 658:-- ] {{ 589:-- ] {{ 443:WT:Echo 379:I made 335:Edokter 310:WP:RFPP 263:-- ] {{ 39:archive 7782:(talk) 7707:. The 7656:WP:AN3 7530:rose64 7513:Faddle 7508:Fiddle 7495:Faddle 7490:Fiddle 7421:Notice 6767:rose64 6760:WP:VPT 6724:WP:ANI 6651:rose64 6572:WP:3RR 6567:WP:BLP 6563:WP:3RR 6520:Warsaw 6475:Thanks 6359:that's 6310:WP:TPO 6104:WP:3RR 6059:Block? 6008:WP:BRD 5867:says: 5447:WP:DRV 5411:WP:DRV 4990:WP:BLP 4734:and a 4719:page, 4501:DexDor 4459:DexDor 4416:DexDor 4235:height 4215:length 4017:Past: 3979:Alakzi 3727:. You 3698:WP:BRD 3639:Duress 3619:Legend 3616:Aussie 3573:Legend 3570:Aussie 3499:Legend 3496:Aussie 3273:Alakzi 3046:a page 2905:DexDor 2870:Alakzi 2835:--TMCk 2750:(talk) 2716:(talk) 2650:Thanks 2501:Occult 2388:Turtle 1866:(talk) 1433:Alakzi 1396:Alakzi 1352:Begoon 1336:Begoon 1255:rose64 1079:rose64 504:rose64 456:rose64 367:rose64 317:rose64 7790:Mafia 7473:Kelly 7199:B-bot 7082:Mafia 7034:Mafia 6834:Mafia 6830:Mafia 6462:child 6418:child 6375:child 6364:! - 6270:child 6233:child 6188:child 6102:. As 6079:child 6065:block 5959:Bbb23 5865:WP:EW 5478:". -- 5476:Mafia 5125:Dan56 5042:garra 4520:talk! 4470:talk! 4352:Help 4342:here! 4335:these 4251:speed 4239:width 3858:Godsy 3324:Human 3266:these 3226:Help 3216:here! 3202:these 2696:says 2532:Draft 2441:Help 2431:here! 2417:these 2142:Help 2132:here! 2118:these 1943:tours 1767:: --> 1763:< 1716:: --> 1712:< 1394:DRV? 1023:email 850:with 16:< 7814:talk 7796:here 7763:talk 7728:talk 7666:talk 7662:MSGJ 7623:talk 7619:MSGJ 7606:talk 7573:talk 7564:not. 7551:This 7546:2602 7534:talk 7434:Ched 7427:here 7304:talk 7281:talk 7248:talk 7244:MSGJ 7230:talk 7203:talk 7146:talk 7125:talk 7096:talk 7070:talk 7066:MSGJ 7052:talk 7011:talk 7007:MSGJ 6990:talk 6964:talk 6960:MSGJ 6947:talk 6926:talk 6908:talk 6896:this 6881:talk 6862:here 6839:OhNo 6815:talk 6785:talk 6771:talk 6762:. -- 6749:talk 6745:MSGJ 6732:talk 6705:talk 6676:talk 6672:MSGJ 6666:this 6655:talk 6609:talk 6605:MSGJ 6553:talk 6534:talk 6510:talk 6491:talk 6457:WOLF 6449:lost 6413:WOLF 6396:Per 6370:WOLF 6345:talk 6341:MSGJ 6333:Per 6308:Per 6265:WOLF 6250:talk 6246:MSGJ 6228:WOLF 6208:talk 6204:MSGJ 6183:WOLF 6128:talk 6124:MSGJ 6074:WOLF 6050:talk 6016:talk 6000:Huon 5991:talk 5987:Huon 5977:talk 5955:Huon 5922:here 5910:talk 5906:MSGJ 5889:talk 5842:talk 5838:MSGJ 5825:talk 5796:talk 5792:MSGJ 5767:Soap 5740:talk 5725:talk 5721:MSGJ 5708:talk 5700:also 5652:talk 5629:talk 5625:MSGJ 5612:talk 5573:here 5553:talk 5549:MSGJ 5537:talk 5517:talk 5496:here 5484:talk 5467:and 5455:talk 5437:talk 5421:talk 5417:MSGJ 5400:talk 5370:talk 5348:talk 5344:MSGJ 5336:The 5321:talk 5294:talk 5290:MSGJ 5274:Neil 5256:talk 5234:talk 5230:MSGJ 5217:talk 5180:talk 5176:MSGJ 5156:talk 5129:talk 5081:talk 5077:MSGJ 5064:talk 5039:Gnan 5027:talk 5023:MSGJ 5006:talk 4966:talk 4962:MSGJ 4953:talk 4937:talk 4922:Done 4906:talk 4902:MSGJ 4885:talk 4856:talk 4852:MSGJ 4840:talk 4795:talk 4791:MSGJ 4771:talk 4741:help 4730:help 4659:talk 4655:MSGJ 4642:talk 4635:Worm 4600:talk 4593:Worm 4575:talk 4571:MSGJ 4499:and 4457:and 4307:mass 4227:area 3983:talk 3968:talk 3964:MSGJ 3950:talk 3919:talk 3904:talk 3900:MSGJ 3887:talk 3865:CONT 3822:talk 3818:MSGJ 3805:talk 3787:talk 3741:talk 3708:talk 3704:MSGJ 3556:talk 3552:MSGJ 3540:talk 3524:talk 3520:MSGJ 3450:talk 3435:talk 3431:MSGJ 3419:talk 3411:ever 3400:talk 3396:MSGJ 3376:talk 3361:talk 3327:3015 3303:jc37 3286:Note 3277:talk 2967:talk 2963:MSGJ 2950:talk 2925:talk 2874:talk 2839:talk 2797:talk 2771:talk 2733:talk 2729:MSGJ 2690:here 2667:talk 2639:talk 2635:MSGJ 2618:talk 2551:talk 2536:The 2511:Talk 2504:Zone 2293:The 2286:The 2237:talk 2215:talk 2190:talk 2100:here 2066:and 1941:The 1799:The 1765:Talk 1757:Rail 1754:Live 1741:talk 1737:MSGJ 1714:Talk 1706:Rail 1703:Live 1697:diff 1681:talk 1663:talk 1659:MSGJ 1645:talk 1619:talk 1604:talk 1600:MSGJ 1587:talk 1562:talk 1484:talk 1480:MSGJ 1437:talk 1418:talk 1414:MSGJ 1400:talk 1392:this 1377:talk 1373:Bazj 1330:here 1314:talk 1286:talk 1282:MSGJ 1259:talk 1195:Done 1179:talk 1175:MSGJ 1162:talk 1147:talk 1143:MSGJ 1131:talk 1110:{{U| 1098:talk 1083:talk 1050:talk 1046:MSGJ 1033:talk 1008:Pres 987:talk 944:talk 940:MSGJ 924:talk 882:talk 878:MSGJ 827:talk 819:here 802:). 755:talk 739:talk 719:talk 712:That 699:self 680:talk 676:MSGJ 661:talk 642:talk 638:MSGJ 608:talk 592:talk 526:talk 508:talk 486:talk 460:talk 439:very 422:talk 409:..? 397:PS ( 389:talk 371:talk 355:and 340:{{U| 321:talk 312:. -- 297:{{U| 266:talk 253:talk 234:and 222:this 220:and 218:this 207:talk 203:MSGJ 191:talk 179:this 169:talk 158:this 133:talk 95:talk 91:MSGJ 73:talk 7687:AFD 7528:Red 7186:). 6890:EWN 6765:Red 6722:or 6649:Red 6630:to 6446:You 6220:why 6172:not 6146:It 5736:LjL 5704:LjL 4896:how 4875:In 4747:Fix 4745:. ( 4431:use 4021:at 3841:of 3680:); 3269:two 3182:23) 3014:log 2941:or 2601:RFC 2580:); 2519:Log 1854:• 1850:• 1830:. 1804:of 1729:any 1530:); 1462:); 1253:Red 1241:ygm 1236:or 1114:}} 1077:Red 821:. 576:not 502:Red 454:Red 365:Red 344:}} 315:Red 301:}} 7820:) 7816:• 7798:. 7780:♦ 7765:) 7730:) 7664:· 7621:· 7608:) 7592:is 7587:do 7575:) 7536:) 7505:. 7483:fl 7440:? 7437:: 7429:— 7409:- 7391:. 7350:- 7323:is 7306:) 7283:) 7246:· 7232:) 7205:) 7148:) 7127:) 7098:) 7068:· 7054:) 7009:· 6992:) 6962:· 6949:) 6928:) 6910:) 6883:) 6817:) 6787:) 6773:) 6747:· 6734:) 6726:? 6707:) 6674:· 6657:) 6607:· 6493:) 6400:; 6343:· 6316:. 6248:· 6206:· 6148:is 6126:· 6052:) 6018:) 6004:he 5993:) 5979:) 5961:, 5957:, 5940:, 5936:, 5928:, 5908:· 5891:) 5840:· 5827:) 5794:· 5742:) 5723:· 5710:) 5654:) 5627:· 5614:) 5575:. 5551:· 5539:) 5519:) 5486:) 5457:) 5449:. 5439:) 5419:· 5402:) 5372:) 5346:· 5327:) 5323:• 5292:· 5258:) 5232:· 5219:) 5203:}} 5197:{{ 5178:· 5158:) 5131:) 5120:, 5117:, 5114:, 5111:, 5079:· 5066:) 5025:· 5012:) 5008:• 4964:· 4939:) 4904:· 4887:) 4854:· 4842:) 4793:· 4773:) 4749:| 4657:· 4645:) 4603:) 4573:· 4522:) 4472:) 4375:· 4371:· 4305:, 4301:, 4297:, 4293:, 4289:, 4285:, 4281:, 4277:, 4273:, 4269:, 4265:, 4261:, 4257:, 4253:, 4249:, 4245:, 4241:, 4237:, 4233:, 4229:, 4225:, 4221:, 4217:, 4213:: 3985:) 3966:· 3952:) 3921:) 3902:· 3889:) 3820:· 3807:) 3789:) 3743:) 3731:. 3706:· 3684:; 3665:. 3657:}} 3651:{{ 3629:) 3605:}} 3599:{{ 3583:) 3566:-- 3554:· 3542:) 3522:· 3509:) 3452:) 3433:· 3421:) 3398:· 3378:) 3363:) 3338:• 3279:) 3249:· 3245:· 3129:: 3119:, 3115:, 3111:, 3107:, 3103:, 3099:, 3095:, 3091:, 3087:, 3083:, 2965:· 2952:) 2927:) 2876:) 2868:. 2841:) 2799:) 2773:) 2745:NQ 2731:· 2711:NQ 2698:|A 2669:) 2657:. 2637:· 2620:) 2584:; 2569:. 2554:) 2517:• 2513:• 2497:. 2461:· 2457:· 2363:, 2359:, 2239:) 2217:) 2192:) 2165:· 2161:· 2032:, 2028:, 2024:, 2020:, 2016:, 2012:, 2008:, 2004:, 2000:, 1996:, 1992:, 1988:, 1984:, 1980:, 1976:, 1972:, 1968:, 1841:. 1739:· 1683:) 1661:· 1647:) 1621:) 1602:· 1589:) 1564:) 1534:; 1519:. 1482:· 1466:; 1439:) 1416:· 1402:) 1379:) 1316:) 1284:· 1261:) 1250:-- 1244:}} 1238:{{ 1234:}} 1228:{{ 1198:, 1177:· 1164:) 1145:· 1133:) 1100:) 1085:) 1070:, 1048:· 1035:) 993:) 989:⋅ 942:· 926:) 880:· 872:}} 866:{{ 858:}} 852:{{ 848:}} 842:{{ 829:) 757:) 741:) 722:}} 697:, 678:· 664:}} 640:· 610:) 595:}} 528:) 518:am 510:) 488:) 462:) 424:• 391:) 373:) 323:) 269:}} 255:) 242:}} 236:{{ 232:}} 226:{{ 205:· 193:) 171:) 153:. 135:) 93:· 75:) 7812:( 7761:( 7726:( 7668:) 7660:( 7645:☎ 7633:― 7625:) 7617:( 7604:( 7571:( 7532:( 7302:( 7279:( 7269:: 7265:@ 7250:) 7242:( 7228:( 7201:( 7166:⚠ 7144:( 7123:( 7094:( 7072:) 7064:( 7050:( 7013:) 7005:( 6988:( 6966:) 6958:( 6945:( 6924:( 6906:( 6879:( 6813:( 6783:( 6769:( 6751:) 6743:( 6730:( 6703:( 6678:) 6670:( 6653:( 6611:) 6603:( 6556:· 6551:( 6513:· 6508:( 6489:( 6347:) 6339:( 6252:) 6244:( 6210:) 6202:( 6130:) 6122:( 6048:( 6014:( 5989:( 5975:( 5969:: 5953:@ 5912:) 5904:( 5887:( 5844:) 5836:( 5823:( 5798:) 5790:( 5772:— 5762:— 5738:( 5727:) 5719:( 5706:( 5650:( 5631:) 5623:( 5610:( 5555:) 5547:( 5535:( 5515:( 5482:( 5453:( 5435:( 5423:) 5415:( 5398:( 5368:( 5350:) 5342:( 5319:( 5296:) 5288:( 5276:N 5254:( 5236:) 5228:( 5215:( 5182:) 5174:( 5170:: 5166:@ 5154:( 5127:( 5105:( 5083:) 5075:( 5062:( 5029:) 5021:( 5004:( 4968:) 4960:( 4955:) 4951:( 4935:( 4908:) 4900:( 4883:( 4858:) 4850:( 4838:( 4823:. 4797:) 4789:( 4785:: 4781:@ 4769:( 4753:) 4743:) 4739:( 4732:) 4728:( 4661:) 4653:( 4639:( 4597:( 4577:) 4569:( 4518:( 4468:( 4337:. 4185:) 4081:) 4077:( 3981:( 3970:) 3962:( 3948:( 3917:( 3906:) 3898:( 3885:( 3868:) 3855:— 3824:) 3816:( 3803:( 3785:( 3739:( 3710:) 3702:( 3676:( 3626:✉ 3623:( 3580:✉ 3577:( 3558:) 3550:( 3538:( 3526:) 3518:( 3506:✉ 3503:( 3474:. 3448:( 3437:) 3429:( 3417:( 3402:) 3394:( 3389:) 3385:( 3374:( 3359:( 3275:( 3204:. 3192:) 3153:) 3016:. 2969:) 2961:( 2948:( 2923:( 2872:( 2837:( 2795:( 2769:( 2735:) 2727:( 2665:( 2641:) 2633:( 2616:( 2576:( 2548:( 2521:) 2509:( 2419:. 2404:) 2347:. 2341:. 2322:. 2310:. 2235:( 2213:( 2188:( 2120:. 2102:. 2070:. 2044:: 1820:. 1743:) 1735:( 1679:( 1665:) 1657:( 1643:( 1617:( 1606:) 1598:( 1585:( 1560:( 1526:( 1486:) 1478:( 1458:( 1435:( 1420:) 1412:( 1398:( 1375:( 1312:( 1288:) 1280:( 1257:( 1181:) 1173:( 1160:( 1149:) 1141:( 1129:( 1096:( 1081:( 1064:: 1060:@ 1052:) 1044:( 1031:( 1013:N 985:( 970:. 946:) 938:( 922:( 884:) 876:( 825:( 797:( 753:( 737:( 707:I 682:) 674:( 644:) 636:( 606:( 524:( 506:( 484:( 473:: 469:@ 458:( 420:( 403:: 399:@ 387:( 369:( 319:( 281:) 277:( 251:( 209:) 201:( 189:( 167:( 131:( 97:) 89:( 71:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index