505:
371:
87:
but this perspective is ommited from the wikipedia page, which just seems to offer some vague and fuzzy feelings about the word or how it was used once or twice in the media. the laundry list of parrallels is used to illustrate how, in collective, the essence of 'nazism' exists in radical feminist methods and propaganda,. to illustrate the clear parrallels with the nazis & kkk who also had the 'priviledged class' vs. the 'targeted class'.
417:
273:
524:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
481:). I advise you to read and understand the policies listed above before you delve in any edit warring. It has been noted several times by different editors within a period of a year or so. Please edit carefully or you'll be blocked for violating two of the fundamental policies of Knowledge. Thank you. --
65:
is a very specific term, and except in cases of hyperbole is usually used to refer to a very specific group of people or specific ideology. In your edits, however, you cover an extensive number of subjects under the heading of feminazism. Most of the people I know advocate one or more of the things
321:
to delete my edits because you disagree with them violates, in my view, the POV guidelines. A 'neutral' view is not simply your view, there are often many differing views on an issue, and all reasonable, documented, and sourced views should be acknoledged, and views that you happen to disagree with
86:
for me to source all the commentary would turn this topic into a novel, I'll exclude some of the titles for now, then add then later when I dig up sources. My point is that the term 'feminazi' is widely used in the father's right's & men's rights movements, probably more so than anywhere else,
57:
you haven't referenced much of what you wrote. For instance, when you say, "arranged matters so the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the target group were shown leniency - and often applauded," I honestly have no idea what that's about. Statements like that need to be
53:
your word choice often does not reflect a neutral point of view. Words and phrases like "capriciously," "perverted the justice system," "biased hate speech laws," etc. - these are all value judgments and are not very
316:
I am requesting that this matter to be escalated for review of the POV policies that you alledge. We may disagree on our POV, but the purpose of this format is to provide a balanced viewpoint, and for you
50:: Adding other perspectives can be great and can really add to a reader's understanding of an article, but that's not quite the same as POV. Let me be a bit more specific about my concerns:
213:
describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to
Knowledge. —
194:
has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
66:
you mentioned in your extensive list - does that make most people I know feminazis? If not, then those aspects of the article don't really help illustrate what the term means.
516:
497:
222:{{Medea Complex was paraphrased from the credible article inlcuded as a reference, I am aware of no direct copyright violations. Loneranger4justice 10 Oct 06
548:
202:
133:
197:
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
145:
120:
111:
99:
75:
339:
253:
239:
123:
114:
206:
191:
179:
167:
156:
58:
backed up with statistics, verifiable examples, etc., not just to negate POV but to give the reader a clear idea of what you're talking about.
36:
of POV wording and unsourced material. Please work on a more neutral point of view and provide some more citations as you edit. Thanks! -
492:
318:
288:
536:
119:
I don't know why you're so mad at women after your divorce. You were a dog to your wife and she is lucky to get away from you.--
187:
464:
47:
520:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
445:
351:
311:
256:
242:
217:
459:
411:
398:
342:
102:
430:
375:
284:
231:
174:
text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from
230:
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to
Knowledge articles. Doing so violates Knowledge's
40:
198:
525:
252:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing
Knowledge.
447:
403:
If you wish to discuss these edits or inquire why editors are disputing this content please drop me a line--
349:
163:
234:
policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the
331:
205:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at
183:
383:
335:
449:
353:
141:
An editor reverted your addition, and I have reinserted it for reasons given on the talk page.
267:
386:
from editing
Knowledge. If you continue to re-insert unsourced, original research violating
155:
544:
171:
81:
8:
72:
37:
489:
347:
71:
Anyway, I may be offline for a while and unable to reply to any comments. Thanks. -
16:
Hi, Loneranger4justice - I noticed some of the edits you've been making to pages like
235:
295:
be blocked from editing
Knowledge. You've been warned of this multiple times, but
21:
540:
478:
287:
by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to
225:
142:
296:
470:
441:
387:
325:
300:
249:
25:
482:
308:
304:
521:
474:
469:
This is an administrative note concerning the way you edit in violation of
93:
150:
452:
404:
391:
370:
433:
by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you
175:
214:
416:
378:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you
272:
62:
29:
17:
322:
should not be deleted. Please escalate this. Loneranger4justice.
135:
110:
Where you go I will find you. You are not safe anywhere.--
166:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as
61:
many of your edits seem off-topic to me. For instance,
334:
on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be
248:
Please stop. If you continue to violate
Knowledge's
374:
Please stop. If you continue to violate
Knowledge's
535:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
297:Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought
537:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
531:Note that any non-free images not used in any
498:Orphaned non-free image File:Women of klan.jpg
289:2006 Duke University lacrosse team scandal
283:. The next time you violate Knowledge's
429:The next time you violate Knowledge's
440:Please stop reinserting disputed and
24:, and I reverted some of them due to
437:be blocked from editing Knowledge.
201:, you can comment to that effect on
330:You are in danger of violating the
176:http://www.mmpi-info.com/medea.html
170:, but we regretfully cannot accept
13:
503:
415:
271:
14:
559:
369:
218:04:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
146:22:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
124:21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
115:21:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
103:21:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
526:our policy for non-free media
465:Note from the Administration
431:neutral point of view policy
376:neutral point of view policy
343:22:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
285:neutral point of view policy
257:22:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
243:21:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
178:. As a copyright violation,
32:article in particular has a
7:
493:03:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
460:18:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
134:"Who initiates Divorce" in
76:00:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
10:
564:
549:13:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
412:16:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
399:23:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
312:05:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
41:23:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
504:
188:speedy deletion criteria
82:thanks for the feed back
28:issues. Right now, the
338:from further editing.
182:appears to qualify for
517:File:Women of klan.jpg
509:
444:content to wikipedia.
420:
390:you will be blocked.--
299:. Please comply with
276:
98:You're a sick puppy.--
514:Thanks for uploading
507:
419:
275:
232:neutral point of view
164:welcome to Knowledge
510:
421:
307:in your edits. --
277:
203:Talk:Medea complex
522:claim of fair use
491:
332:three-revert rule
555:
512:
506:
488:
485:
457:
409:
396:
373:
366:
365:
361:
151:Copyright issues
22:radical feminism
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
501:
500:
483:
467:
453:
405:
392:
367:
363:
359:
357:
356:
328:
270:
238:. Thank you.
228:
184:speedy deletion
160:
153:
139:
96:
84:
12:
11:
5:
561:
499:
496:
466:
463:
428:
355:
346:
327:
324:
269:
266:
264:
261:
247:
227:
224:
159:
154:
152:
149:
138:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
95:
92:
90:
83:
80:
79:
78:
73:Tapir Terrific
69:
68:
67:
59:
55:
38:Tapir Terrific
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
551:
550:
546:
542:
539:. Thank you.
538:
534:
529:
527:
523:
519:
518:
511:
495:
494:
490:
486:
480:
476:
472:
462:
461:
458:
456:
450:
448:
446:
443:
438:
436:
432:
426:
423:This is your
418:
414:
413:
410:
408:
401:
400:
397:
395:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
362:
354:
352:
350:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
323:
320:
314:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:This is your
274:
265:
262:
259:
258:
255:
251:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
223:
220:
219:
216:
212:
208:
207:Medea complex
204:
200:
195:
193:
192:Medea complex
189:
185:
181:
180:Medea complex
177:
173:
169:
168:Medea complex
165:
158:
157:Medea complex
148:
147:
144:
137:
125:
122:
118:
117:
116:
113:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
104:
101:
91:
88:
77:
74:
70:
64:
60:
56:
54:encyclopedic.
52:
51:
49:
45:
44:
43:
42:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
532:
530:
515:
513:
502:
468:
454:
439:
434:
425:last warning
424:
422:
406:
402:
393:
379:
368:
329:
315:
292:
281:last warning
280:
278:
263:
260:
246:
229:
221:
210:
196:
161:
140:
121:Onedayoneday
112:Onedayoneday
100:Onedayoneday
97:
89:
85:
48:your message
33:
15:
250:NPOV policy
172:copyrighted
162:Hello, and
541:Sfan00 IMG
340:Operator50
268:April 2007
254:Operator50
240:Operator50
186:under the
143:Mr Stephen
63:feminazism
533:articles
484:FayssalF
479:WP:SYNTH
348:WP:NPOV
319:TedFrank
30:Feminazi
18:Feminazi
471:WP:NPOV
388:WP:NPOV
384:blocked
336:blocked
301:WP:NPOV
236:sandbox
226:wp:NPOV
136:Divorce
455:Cailil
407:Cailil
394:Cailil
358:": -->
326:wp:3RR
305:WP:NOR
291:, you
477:(see
475:WP:OR
211:after
545:talk
473:and
435:will
380:will
360:edit
303:and
293:will
215:Brim
199:GFDL
94:Sick
46:Re:
20:and
528:).
442:POV
382:be
309:THF
34:lot
26:POV
547:)
487:-
451:--
427:.
209:,
190:.
543:(
508:⚠
364:]
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.