User talk:Leszek Jańczuk/Archive 1

1223:

catalogues, official institutions (Institute for New Testament Textual Research). It has I Category of Aland. It is not very important in which century was written manuscript. More important is from which manuscripts was rewritten. Many manuscripts with Alexandrian text-type were corrected by peoples who preffered Byzantince text-type (f.e. P66 Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Regius). Many mansucripts were destroyed (f.e. Codex Coislinianus). Why so many Alexandrian manuscripts are in a fragmentary and very poor condition? (f.e. Minuscule 33, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Freerianus). Only Codex Vaticanus is in good condition, because it was not used very often.

2356:

of what he says is quite misleading. We cannot say that at Wiki, and we cannot simply cite sources against Ehrman without letting him speak too. However, I think it is important for Wiki that some documentation of Ehrman's views is provided in a context where editors who understand and can source objections are available. I think James, you and I might be able to do that. We must, of course, be fair to Ehrman. I don't think we'll find that hard. His critics are persuasive enough without us needing to bias things. The only problem, atm, is that there don't appear to be any Wiki editors providing sourced criticisms.

1237:

represents a text on the boundary of what might reasonably be considered a manuscript of the Byzantine tradition in John" (Introduction, p. V). This edition based on minuscule 35 from 11th century. Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Ephraemi, Codex Basilensis, and other uncials which represent early Byzantine text are cited only in crittical apparatus. Supportes of Byzantine text-type and supportes of Textus Receptus in one point are agreed, they do not like ancient readings. They always think, every early manuscript is corrupted, only late manuscript is good.

1245:

Codex Sinaiticus 14 000 corrections. Why so much lieses? The Western text-type has nothing common with Textus Receptus (only Byzantine grammar, and some readings, not numerous which were used by Robert Estienne). The Alexandrian text in 85% agrees with Textus Receptus, and always you can find some "traditional" readings in every ancient manuscript. Peoples who read this type of books will never know true. They think, Textus Receptus was always in using, they think Orthodox church uses this text. Who corrected Codex Sinaiticus?

2388:, but that should not stop you! ;) It might be best that we wait until say February next year. Then we could work closely together day by day. You can read some sources, I can read others, maybe some others will offer to read and write or just to write. I think we should aim to get NT textual criticism to be a Featured Article, that will take time. I also think we should work on the Lists so that they can be featured also. Generally, I think information is more important than recognition, so I help 1266:

transcription errors in the editing, or printers typos. Hence it is not an independent witness, but simply a repetition of a text that is already noted in the article. Oh, and for information, I have no love at all for the Textus Receptus; and altogether prefer the standard critical text. But I try to keep my personal preferences out of my Wikpeida edits so far as possible. I do much appreciate your very assiduous edits on the various text types - keep up the good work!!

2585: 32: 2180: 1998: 317: 698: 1327: 515: 2467: 2664: 1233:

Byzantine text-type (a lot of individual readings, a lot of additions). Dean Burgon and Edward Miller were last scholars which supported Byzantine text-type, but they lived in 19th century, and they did not have our knowledge. According to Burgon Textus Receptus must be corrected. Two of his books about reconstruction of Byzantine text-type were published posthoumosly.

1116:, for example. However, someone may complain that this topic is not "notable" enough. It might make things easier for people if most of an article grew at the List page first. You and I know how important Uncials are, especially in text criticism; but it helps others to see this if there is a lot of reliably sourced information provided when the article is created. 1811: 1545: 2126:

The sources will tell you, but whoever added it, "hand" has standard categories and is paleographically significant. The concept is "do this in your best handwriting" = "book hand" at one end, "documentary hands" in between and personal correspondance at the lowest end. They are classified on a scale

1848:

I know you weren't doing work expressly for a barnstar - nobody does. But you do very good work, and I believe in recognizing you for it. Especially because you're an academic, and I've seen a number of academics turn away from the project because of one dispute or another. I believe in supporting

1445:

if i get no feedback from other editors may i change the article. the specific points of my proposed changes are backed up with sources and the general points which cant be given a specific source and need a good understanding instead (such as the Human rights acts status as UK constitution) are back

1288:

One of the most interesting additions of the Alexandrian text-type we can find in Gospel of Matthew 27:49: "The other took a spear and pierced His side, and immediately water and blood came out" (see: John 19:34). We can find this textual variant in codices: Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Regius, and several

1716:

Perhaps the second variant (2) above never occurred, the scribe of P110 or its exemplar made a stylistic adjustment from υμων εξερχομενοι εξω to εξερχομενων υμων in a single editorial decision. That seems less likely to me, since υμων is very natural following τους λογους (consider των ποδων υμων at

1297:

Alexandrian text. My impression is that many textual critics are nevertheless inclined to deny this - but I suspect this is from a predisposition to favour the Alexandrian text, and hence an unwillingness to admit into it an obviously inauthentic reading. One point I have only recently come across

1265:

Apologies Leszek, I should have made it clearer. The reason that 2427 should not be included is not only that it is a 19th century forgery, but also that it is a copy at one remove of Vaticanus (via Cardinal Mai's edition). It has many minor variants from Vaticanus, or course, but these are simply

924:

which was a cultural safehouse at that time as most of the Georgian lowlands were subjected to the Mongol and Turkish invasions. It was kept there at the Kala church of St. Cyricus where it was seen by Bartholomeé in the 1850s. Several decades later, the codex was rediscovered by the Georgian bishop

2355:

I don't like politics, but it is inevitable in the areas that people know are most directly relevant to important decisions. With textual criticism of the NT, Bart Ehrman has won an audience among thoughtful people interested, but not believers, in Christianity. You and I (and James) know that some

1240:

Of course Byzantine text-type it is not Textus Receptus. Ortodox Church never used and never will use Textus Receptus. Textus Receptus has about 40 readings (or more) from Codex Bezae (Robert Estienne used Codex Bazae). It has some Ceasarean readings in Gospels (from Minuscule 1). It was influenced

1222:

Yes, Minuscule 2427 is 19th century forgery, but it represents the Alexandrian text-type in the best quality (without Byzantine readings). Every manuscript with the Alexandrian text which was written after 4th century has allien readings (usually Byzantine). Minuscule 2427 is classified in official

911:

Hello, Leszek. Thanks for your message. I looked into some other sources concerning the codex. The manuscript appears to have traveled all across Georgia, but it has never come anywhere near the Caspian. There is an obvious mistake in that book. The codex was preserved at the Korideti church of the

850:

is most definitely an orphan. It looks like there are a whole bunch of other orphans on those lists, too. I have to turn my attention to my day job right now, but I hope to look through and tag a whole bunch of those articles later in the day. I'd also like to discuss what we can do about all of

577:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that

196:

First of all, I want to commend you on your work related to the New Testament Uncials. I've gone through your new articles and did some general clean up. I'll describe some of what I've done so in the future you may be able to write even better articles from the get go! First of all, the first line

78:

2113:

uses the term. I'll research this further and see if there is definition. My best guess as of right now is that "hand" refers to the script or handwriting, like Uncial, Half-Uncial, Insular... but maybe not. Also, the color idea is good. I'll play around and see if I can come up with a system. If

1251:

I know you love Holy Scripture. You prefer Textus Receptus because it was used by protestant in 16th century. It belongs to protestant tradition. But I think a protestant must stay with distance to every tradition, even protestant tradition. Be sure I am protestant. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 14:02, 3

1086:

It is in my mind to create an "Order of Origen" barnstar to award to you, for outstanding contribution to articles related to the textual history of the Bible. Jerome "stood on the shoulders" of Origen. May many articles stand on your shoulders, and the diligent work you have provided already. :)

2379:

Thank you for the barnstar, my friend. :) Actually, I would appreciate it if you would keep on asking me to do this. Your work is very good and easy to copyedit. Copyediting for you is a natural way for me to say "thank you" for all your work that benefits readers ... and to stay in touch with a

2351:

For our next project, I think we should consider expanding treatment of versions and editions of versions. James might be just the man to help us. Also, there has been talk about an article devoted to textual criticism in the area of the New Testament specifically. We should cover the history of

1244:

I red book of D.A. Waite, Defending the King James Bible. I know your point of vieuw. 99% of manuscript represent "traditional text". 85% of papyri represent traditional text. Old-Latin manuscripts represented "traditional text". Ireneus, Origen and other church fathers used traditional text. In

1236:

One year ago Deutsche Bibelgesselschaft edited The Gospel According to John in the Byzantine Tradition. They used only one uncial codex in main text, Codex Koridethi, other uncials are cited only in crittical apparatus. Yes, only one uncial, but in Introduction you can read: "Manuscript 038 (Θ)

1497:

On a couple of occasions, I have found that big (more than 1 megabyte) articles have been crashing my RSS feed. Since they were just nonsense text dumps, I deleted them. But I found it an amusing thought that I was having to change Knowledge for the convenience of my computer! But your case is

1232:

The Alexandrian text uses grammar from Greek-koine (f.e. οι δε ειπαν), Byzantine text uses grammar from Byzantine-Greek (f.e. οι δε ειπον). This text has not much additions, manuscripts represented this tradition are in great agreement. Unfortunately we cannot say that about manuscript of the

1779:

gets that many hits. We are serving 1,000 interested readers a month--that is more people than most church pastors serve. ;) Knowledge allows us to give people, not just Christians, access to documents that belong to everyone. I'm sure you feel the significance of this. God bless,

2348:. But please, the remaining uncials would ideally be your work. You have given Wiki that series. It is kind of you to give me the chance to be your partner in this contribution, but I'm a little (or a lot) busy right now. Also, I do not work as efficiently as you do. 2127:

and scholars debate shades of grey between them. They influence paleographic dating according to various theories of script development. "Hand" provides an additional "dimension" by which to describe features of writing, so adding precision to dating. There is

213:). Other than these style issues, I have no more constructive criticism. I'm glad you've taken the time to put together these articles, and I hope your hard work continues! If you need any help, or have questions, I'd be glad to do whatever I can. Good luck!- 1289:

other witnesses of Alexandrian text-type. Of course it is not authentical. Probably it was added in a result of figthing with Docetism. Every from four textes of the NT is corrupt, but in different way. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 02:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

1498:

different! Unless you get complaints from others, please feel free to use whatever characters you want. If they crash my browser, I will live with it. The main thing is that I have identified the source of the crash and can work round it if necessary.

338:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

2392:

to be featured, but don't seek for my work to be featured. But, in the case of NT Textual Criticism, it is such an interesting topic even for non-Christians, that it might be fun to go through all the Knowledge processes that end up with a Featured

2267:

I think the easiest way to describe hands is to think of fonts we use on computers, but the analogy is far from perfect. Hands tell us something about the context in which a manuscript was produced, and the purpose for which it was intended.

335:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. 867:

Yeah, each wiki has its own ways of doing things. I imagine it can be confusing for those people who contribute to multiple languages. I appreciate your willingness to learn our way here. Now let's just get this mess cleaned up. ;-) --

962:

Please help clarify the article Herzog August Bibliotech for me. I assume it is a library but the wording is not clear. You say "its" and then "his", as tho he is living (which may be the case) but it is quite ambiguous as it stands right

2263:

Alphabets are more abstract than people think, scripts are different forms of alphabets, hands are different forms of scripts. Hands are actually what we see, scripts are generalisations of hands and alphabets generalisations of scripts.

1119:

I would recommend you start sections on Classification, History and Text criticism at the List page first. Later we could move most text to a new main article on Uncials. The List could remain as a simple list, saving space at the main

1360:

Knowledge is good with experts like you. Translation is quick but researching to write good articles is beyond my time now. What a great collection of articles on your page; they will keep me busy for a while. Keep on the great work.

233:, and attempted to merge any content. As for the Munster link, I have changed it so it links directly to the page on lectionaries. Reworking the intro may be a good idea, and I may do it myself if I get a little more free time. - 1380:

I saw your note to Garzo. I can't speak to his time frame, but I'll be tied up for a few days. I'll be happy to help clean up the articles, but it will be Wednesday night at the earliest before I'll be able to help. Best.

1503:

Edit counts. Bigger than 40! In my case the difference is bigger than 5000! It does not correspond even remotely to the count of my deleted edits. It may be due to "database lag". Just don't worry about it. Stick to

281:

Ah yes! I understand you exactly. I also am writing a book at the moment. I also am writing slowly. And I also find writing at Knowledge helps me feel I am actually "doing something useful", when other writing is

2238:

Ah yes, Scotland! Many men in Scotland are called Alastair, I found it very confusing when I was there. I found Scottish English hard to understand sometimes too! Very occasionally they might have been speaking

2131:

overlap with the selection of characters and theories about that too. Hand is actually a less subjective descriptor than assessments of "free" or "strict" transcription of the text-type of the exemplar. Cheers

1208:, Leszek. I'm okay, but I'm afraid this war is not going to end soon. I hope we won't have to resort to guerrilla resistance although many people, including myself, are quite ready for that. Best wishes, -- 1158:

You are teaching me many things about Uncials that I didn't know, but are very helpful. Enjoy your holiday and I look forward to learning, reading and helping however I can with your work here on Uncials.

579: 80: 2340:

Hi Leszek, the article on the Schoyen collection is very helpful, thank you. It is extra good because it has led us to discover James. You said just the right thing to him. I hope he joins us more often.

1701:

I can see that P110 also omits υμων after τους λογους. Perhaps this is because that would give υμων εξερχομενων υμων, which is a little awkward. Perhaps also there was an error in transmission like this:

1454:

Looks right to me. Western in caps since it desinates an area. Non-interpolations is only a political stance...it doesn't "name" anything. My pleasure is to assist. Any friend of Alastairs is a friend of

768:

It is better doing this in English. People get confused with capital letters when they try to use German. (As you can see for yourself.) It is silly to use German words with English captial letter style.

1302:

consulted the copy of Matthew's Gospel that had been discovered in the supposed tomb of Barnabas on Cyprus in 478 to find whether it had this reading (it did not). See the point in the article on the

287:

I understand the vital importance of your work on the history of the New Testament. When my own writing is slow, I will think to pray for you and your work, which is so much more important than my own.

2558: 1293:

Indeed it is a most interesting variant - as it raises the question of whether a reading that is supported by Vaticanus, Sinaiticus and other ancient witnesses ought therefore to be considered as

1624: 2396:

Will you be very busy in the cold of February, or would that be a good time to do most of our work? You could watch the article "flower" as the flowers come out in the European Springtime. :)

1396:

PS -- I just looked at your interests and articles. Looks like we have some parallel interests, so I'll be glad to help in other articles. You might want to contact Alastair Haines as well.

1181:

Yes, redirects are very useful when two sigla refer to portions of the same codex. :) It is still useful to have some clear indication visible on the page, though. I'm really loving your work.

1155:

Ah yes! I see, very beautiful. It reminds me of the one place in Australia with mountains high enough to provide snow and ski-ing in Winter. That place is beautiful in all seasons of the year.

1052: 2293:

Many thanks for your welcome message. I don't think he stole it. But the story of its burning is difficult to believe; it's more complete than Vaticanus. Do experts agree which is oldest? --

791:

Hello -- I think you are misunderstanding the criteria for orphans, as you have recently removed orphan tags from dozens of orphans that are still orphans. Please review the criteria at

1849:

and encouraging good work when I see it. Also because the work you do on manuscripts is so valuable; there aren't enough editors working on medieval and ancient history, in my opinion.

2246:

Thank you for the reference regarding book hands. One type of "hand" is "book hand", which the scholars mentioned believe to have four sub-types, and these themselves to be divided.

2073: 1248:

I prefer Alexandrian text-type, because this text use original grammar, and not much corruptions in this text (f.e. itacismus), but I see some errors, and some lacks in this text.

2434:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. 827: 2274:

I think you and Andrew might be able to produce a quality short article on the topic without needing much time. I will be somewhat busy for the next six weeks myself, though. :(

810:

Leszek, let me know which articles are tagged as orphans and I will help you cite them in other articles that can use the information you provide. This is an easy issue to fix.

362:

Your proposals sounds reasonable. Splitting the table between named/lettered manuscripts and the ones that just have numbers is a good idea because of the empty column problem.-

2512: 2450: 2431: 2419: 2477:! We're a group of editors working to improve Knowledge's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add 653:

You need to be more clear if you want me to "not change any more" and if you want other to understand you in general expand your vocabulary from pronouns to nouns. --

2405: 1789: 1754: 1732: 1692: 1168: 1135: 1096: 492:

I'd be grateful if references in your article contributions to the manuscripts and other items in the college library collections could include a direct link to the

303: 70: 1193: 1113: 1064: 2141: 1602: 1579:

I do New Page Patrol and I keep coming across the Papyrus articles you are creating. Your work is remarkable and deserves praise. Thank you for your input!

2413: 2352:

this: Jerome did some textual criticism, I believe a particular manuscript was delivered to Martin Luther's trial, then there are the more recent big names.

1027: 819: 595: 1588: 901: 352: 2060: 1962:, and will write some manuscript articles too. It will be very enjoyable to do this together. A nice thing is that the articles do not have to be big! :) 1405: 64: 1529: 680: 239: 2207:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2025:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 209:

purposes. Finally, short and one sentence paragraphs should be avoided, so I combined some of your single sentence paragraphs into larger paragraphs (

1825:

Actually, I'm not sure I'm qualified to give out the other award. So this one will have to do instead. I'm not going to let the fact that somebody

1334: 988:

The good news is we don't need to do all this work before Christmas! Also, as we work, other people may join us, which would be very nice indeed. :)

877: 860: 839: 205:). I have changed your "Further reading" section to "References" because these books contain all the information in the article, and can be used for 2307:

Regarding Ehrman, maybe it's just for argument sake. Comma J. being in the margin of some older mss someone may argue that it dates further back? --

2109:

I'm glad you are using the template and like it! I'm not sure about the "hand" parameter. I think another user added it, but it looks like at least

1983: 1568: 1474:

I take an RSS feed of new pages using Opera 8 beta. It has been crashing quite a lot recently and I have traced the cause to your Papyrus articles!

893: 1315: 2381: 1362: 1342: 951: 672: 654: 2638:. I thought it was wrong to assert that anything copied by hand must contain errors, which is what the earlier wording suggested. Thanks again. 1917: 1887: 1123:

The main thing is providing more reliably sourced information for readers. There are many good ways of doing this. Please, just keep writing! :)

1000: 201:). Next, the end section have a general order, normally "See also" then "Notes" then "References" then "Further reading" then "External links" ( 1464: 506: 219: 1439: 781: 2520: 2096: 937:

who translated the text into German and published in Leipzig in 1913. Later, it was brought back to Tbilisi. Hope this helps. Best regards,

1864: 1837: 1045: 883: 2283: 2225: 2043: 1720:

In any case, surely someone has noted that P110 omits υμων after τους λογους (whether or not it has simply moved it and changed its case).

202: 2570: 2120: 38:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use

2692:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 1655: 1184:

By the way, in the mountains, did you sleep in a tent at night, or are there permanent shelters or professional accomodation available?

275: 481: 2624: 2508: 2371: 1275: 851:

the still-orphaned articles you've removed the tags from recently. Shall we split the list and each replace tags on half? Thanks --

626: 2165: 1509: 94: 2110: 1505: 1226:

Knowledge, it is not place for a private opinions. The articles must represent official point of vieuw of experts in every field.

225:

Regarding to lectionaries list: because it is inappropriate to have multiple articles on the same topic, I have boldly redirected

1673: 972: 309: 2652: 1929: 1899: 1513: 725: 114: 2546: 2527:

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

941: 2330: 2316: 2302: 1390: 1651: 1212: 368: 1491: 1370: 804: 186: 1535: 1745:

Thanks for your kind comment. You are very welcome. It is the least I can do to encourage your generous gifts to readers.

792: 662: 610: 487: 2438: 1431: 889: 671:

Do not bother to write messages for me to read if you cannot take the trouble to write in complete or clear sentences.--

606: 2427: 1449: 1283: 230: 609:

and that is from a disambiguation page. Dab pages don't count as links for oprhan purposes. You may which to read the

2532: 2153: 198: 191: 2495: 1205: 2601: 2481: 2385: 2114:

not, perhaps I can pass it off to the graphics lab. Anyway, thanks for your comment, and keep up the good work. -

1934: 1416:

i have followed you advice and posted on the talk page before making my proposed changes you can find these here

614: 328: 310: 2494:

Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's

2359:

Anyway, the NT text criticism article has many, many other things it needs to say before we even get to Ehrman.

1717:

the end of the verse). I think it most likely the first error was "mindless", then the second perfectly natural.

2539: 2423: 1620:

I will certainly spend the time, which will not be so very much, smoothing the style of your new contribution.

1525: 1487: 926: 226: 1617:

Yes, Ecoleetage is obviously correct, you are really an exceptional contributor at Wiki Leszek! Thank you! :)

1074: 733: 136: 1321: 2499: 1776: 1077:. It is such an outstandingly helpful internal reference here at Wiki ... and now it is comprehensive! Wow! 131: 43: 1424:

i have also told jakew (the guy who was constantly changing my posts) about my proposal on his talk page

1348: 757:). Explain your article has more information. Nothing will be lost if the other article is deleted. It is 379:

Thank you for your kind words, despite what you say, you are much more liguistically accomplished than me.

2688:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

2474: 2170: 2104: 1988: 1411: 977: 2584: 17: 2208: 2026: 529:, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another 493: 1475: 947:

You are welcome. I will try to add some more info to the article when I get a chance. Best regrads, --

210: 2590: 2446: 2401: 2367: 2279: 2137: 2087:

For the creation of numerous articles related to the Bible, which are backed by reliable references.

1979: 1959: 1785: 1750: 1728: 1688: 1669: 1559:

In appreciation of your extraordinary editorial contributions to Knowledge. Keep up the great work!

1338: 1189: 1164: 1131: 1109:

Yes, I think you are right, an article on Uncials would be very good. There are many ways to do that.

1092: 1060: 996: 815: 777: 746:

What you have done is good. English translations of names is good. Long names are better translated.

738: 477: 299: 271: 141: 1478:

seems to have fixed it. Don't feel obliged to do anything just for me! But if others complain ... —

2576: 2455: 2147: 1801: 1341:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 985:

I agree, there are many libraries that need articles. Also, New Testament versions need more work.

569: 348: 1659: 1598: 1435: 713: 600: 117:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 26: 1913: 1883: 1217: 548:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

163:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 121: 110: 49:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

2422:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 2179: 1997: 1772: 934: 542: 2566: 2233: 2195: 2092: 2013: 1925: 1895: 622: 538: 148: 260:

Sharing your knowledge with information and references is the most important thing, though.

2674: 2635: 2442: 2397: 2363: 2288: 2275: 2133: 2056: 1975: 1781: 1746: 1724: 1684: 1665: 1584: 1564: 1427: 1311: 1271: 1185: 1160: 1127: 1088: 1056: 992: 957: 906: 811: 773: 721: 473: 332: 295: 267: 152: 2561:, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! 2362:

Expanding work on versions and textual criticism seem like good projects to work on next.

8: 2701: 2649: 2426:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

2221: 2039: 1401: 1386: 897: 563: 522: 508: 344: 324: 245: 164: 156: 2321:

I see. Because Vaticanus text is generally better I assumed Sinaiticus older. Thanks. --

933:

where it was presented to the German pastor Gustav Beermann. The latter then send it to

251: 2685: 2619: 2118: 1861: 1834: 1594: 1521: 1483: 1366: 1303: 1299: 1199: 676: 658: 583: 373: 366: 237: 217: 126: 1955:

mine. You sourced excellent information, and presented it clearly. My work was small.

712:

Thank you so much for taking care of all of the orphaned articles and listing them on

2629: 2437:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

2335: 2161: 1460: 1023: 968: 873: 856: 835: 800: 567:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 168: 68:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 39: 1644: 1241:

by Vulgate. Why do you prefer text in which so much corruptions? So much additions.

2562: 2088: 1921: 1891: 750: 688: 525:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 2697: 2670: 2240: 2052: 1869: 1580: 1560: 1375: 1307: 1298:

is that this particular reading was the subject of early controversy - such that

1267: 786: 758: 717: 553: 357: 340: 99: 54: 1810: 1544: 526: 2644: 2639: 2326: 2312: 2298: 2217: 2035: 1469: 1397: 1382: 1355: 645: 618: 2613: 2594: 2115: 1775:

you might find helpful. More than 1,000 hits per month is a busy page (imo).

1640: 1632: 1517: 1479: 588: 363: 266:

Best regards to you, and for your work serving Polish students of the Bible.

234: 214: 1679:

Here is a rather useful web-page, though I expect you know about it already—

1229:

By the way, you distroyed an article by deleting end marks of the table |}.

920:) from the 9th century until the 14th when it was taken to the mountains of 534: 257:

I hope Andrew's advice is helpful, we have our own ways of doing things. :)

2678: 2157: 1612: 1456: 1019: 964: 869: 852: 831: 796: 631: 470:

A small diagram using the proportions 1.25 to 1 (5:4 = 125:100) might help.

176: 84: 1680: 2202: 2186: 2020: 2004: 1905: 1875: 206: 2657: 263:

People like Andrew and me can "smooth" your work to English Wiki style.

46:

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

31: 2345: 1512:

which can be quickly accessed via the "Interiot" link at the bottom of

1209: 948: 938: 847: 2538:

Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the

2689: 2681: 2322: 2308: 2294: 2072: 1909: 1879: 913: 530: 541:

to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from

316: 1918:

Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on November 19

1888:

Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on November 17

1419: 1326: 514: 467:

So, I think the text is correct, but it is very hard to understand.

2466: 1636:

seems to me to be the most sensible starting point for such work.

697: 921: 638: 1944:

This article was long overdue! Vielen, vielen herzlichen Dank!

1908:, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the 1878:, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the 930: 917: 892:, because that's a good place to go to ask questions. Thanks, 1845:

Glad you like it here. We try to keep it nice and homey. :-)

1256: 2271:

Interpreting hands is very much at the heart of paleography.

1969:

Christos anesti ek nekrwn, thanatw thanatos, zoe charisamenos

160: 2663: 826:

Please note that I've opened a discussion about this at the

772:

Your article is the right one for the future. Good work! :)

573:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

74:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

2190: 2008: 1650:

You may also be interested in what I did for Wikisource in

2384:'s page. Now is not the best time for me to start work on 2380:

friend. :) I left a thank you and the {{Welcome}} tag at

1936: 1126:

P.S. Will you be travelling for work, study or pleasure?

1051:

I've started a brief outline of a new list of sources at

2557:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask

982:

Thank you for the new articles. I have copyedited both.

333:

http://scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/codex/clark_history.html

1627:. Several people have requested this at various pages. 42:

for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the

716:. I know it took you a long time and I appreciate it. 447:

Reciprocal is swapping height and width = 90° rotation

410:

Reciprocal is swapping height and width = 90° rotation

327:. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2634:

Hello, and thank you for your feedback on my edit to

1890:, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, 1643:

has also produced a fine apparatus in English in the

416:

Reciprocal of page 1 to 1.1 = 100 to 110 = 100/110 =

1623:

You are not the only one to think about providing a

795:

before removing any more such tags. Thanks you. --

422:

Reciprocal of text 1 to 0.91 = 100 to 91 = 100/91 =

382:

And you like Bach and Handel. So do I. Of course! :D

1333:An article that you have been involved in editing, 453:Reciprocal of page 2 to 3 = 100 to 150 = 100/150 = 171:, or ask your question on this page and then place 331:, and it appears to include a substantial copy of 1958:Your work is inspiring me. Soon I will return to 1420:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Circumcision_and_law 1112:A very direct way is to start a new article, say 991:Thanks again for your outstanding work, brother. 578:if the article does get deleted, you can contact 459:Reciprocal of text 3 to 2 = 100 to 67 = 100/67 = 79:if the article does get deleted, you can contact 1920:, where you can improve it if you see fit. -- 2704:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1860:. The barnstar only says it in another way. -- 1633:A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament 1343:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cat Rock Hollow 430:It is easier to imagine with different numbers. 1018:I'm willing to help. Where's the mop bucket?-- 582:to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~ 527:section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2545:Want to know how good our articles are? Our 2414:License tagging for File:Codex Mosquensis.JPG 1965:I will have a look at your current work too. 564:the page that has been nominated for deletion 197:of an article should be a complete sentence ( 2490:A few features that you might find helpful: 1711:τους λογους εξερχομενων υμων εξω της οικιας 1708:τους λογους εξερχομενοι υμων εξω της οικιας 1705:τους λογους υμων εξερχομενοι εξω της οικιας 1257:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TomHennell 1073:Congratulations on your outstanding work at 1916:. You can see the hook for the article at 1886:. You can see the hook for the article at 147:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 83:to request that a copy be emailed to you. 2553:film article in Knowledge. Check it out! 2199:was updated with a fact from the article 2070: 2051:Great article, Leszek! Congratulations! 2017:was updated with a fact from the article 1808: 1542: 1446:up by a my recent study of a law degree. 793:Knowledge:WikiProject_Orphanage#Criteria 488:References to Trinity College, Cambridge 2511:. The newsletter for October has been 503:--Lang rabbie 10:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 175:before the question. Again, welcome! 14: 2684:! This greeting (and season) promotes 2531:Want to jump right into editing? The 2519:; it will be delivered as a link, but 1625:List of New Testament textual variants 695: 2696:Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ 2441:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 2498:; it is highly recommended that you 1053:List of New Testament Church Fathers 1046:List of New Testament Church Fathers 2439:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 890:Knowledge:Village pump (assistance) 605:It is still an orphan. It has only 537:out to another project. Please see 23: 2662: 2465: 1325: 513: 323:This is an automated message from 315: 231:List of New Testament lectionaries 30: 24: 2714: 2256:formal hand or informal hand, and 2154:Knowledge:Request for Arbitration 1819:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 1553:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 1322:AfD nomination of Cat Rock Hollow 2583: 2178: 2071: 1996: 1809: 1543: 696: 2535:show things you should include. 2386:New Testament textual criticism 615:Knowledge:Wikiproject Orphanage 393:I think the article means this. 386:Aber du sprichst nicht Deutsch? 329:Kenneth Willis Clark Collection 311:Kenneth Willis Clark Collection 254:for helping English Knowledge. 2589:Hey, Leszek Jańczuk. You have 2253:book hand or documentary hand, 2156:----(3.2...Request to Amend)-- 1194:07:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 227:List of Lectionary Manuscripts 13: 1: 2653:00:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 2625:01:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 2571:05:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC) 2451:19:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 2406:14:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 2226:07:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2166:02:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2142:16:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 2121:01:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 2097:13:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2061:13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2044:12:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1984:03:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1930:06:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1900:14:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1865:22:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1838:17:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1790:00:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1755:00:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1733:00:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1693:21:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1674:20:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1603:23:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1589:02:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1569:02:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1075:List of New Testament uncials 888:Hi, I moved your question to 765:). It is better for readers. 734:eu:Txantiloi:Geografia izarra 413:1.1↑ to 1→ becomes 1↑ to 1.1→ 404:Text 0.91 to 1 = 91 to 100 = 398:Page 1.1 to 1 = 110 to 100 = 122:The five pillars of Knowledge 2372:02:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 2331:23:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2317:23:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2303:23:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 2284:01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) 1777:List of New Testament papyri 1723:Am I hopelessly unclear? :) 1536:In praise of a job well done 1530:02:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1492:11:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 1465:00:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 1406:19:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1391:19:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1371:16:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 743:Machts nichts, mein Freund. 137:How to write a great article 113:to Knowledge! Thank you for 7: 2604:at any time by removing or 1645:Comprehensive New Testament 1316:23:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1276:00:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1213:05:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 1169:02:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 1136:22:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 1097:03:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 1065:10:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 543:foreign-language Wikipedias 435:Page 3 to 2 = 150 to 100 = 109:Hello, Leszek Jańczuk, and 10: 2719: 2344:Thanks also for expanding 1450:Western non-interpolations 1440:23:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 1284:the spear in Matthew 27:49 884:Moved "duplicate" question 828:Administrators Noticeboard 494:Trinity College, Cambridge 441:Text 2 to 3 = 67 to 100 = 353:21:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 341:the maintainer's talk page 304:00:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 276:07:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC) 240:16:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 220:23:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 187:23:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 95:23:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 2549:has rated the quality of 2420:File:Codex Mosquensis.JPG 2249:Some "hand" options are: 2081:The Christianity Barnstar 2077: 1960:List of theology journals 1815: 1549: 1351:of receiving this notice? 1028:02:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 1001:02:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 973:00:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 952:18:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 942:12:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 902:23:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 878:14:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 861:14:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 840:13:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 820:13:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 805:12:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 782:20:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 749:The way to fix things is 726:04:33, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 702: 627:21:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 521:A tag has been placed on 450:3↑ to 2→ becomes 2↑ to 3→ 192:Good work, a few pointers 2542:to see how you can help. 1829:just gave it to you put 1771:There is another useful 916:(that’s definitely near 681:15:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 663:15:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 596:23:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 482:00:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 369:17:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 18:User talk:Leszek Jańczuk 2517:currently in production 2515:. December's issue is 2209:Did you know? talk page 2027:Did you know? talk page 1974:Good work, brother! :) 1514:your contributions page 714:List of lakes in Norway 496:article and not to the 2667: 2540:Announcements template 2482:User WikiProject Films 2470: 1914:Knowledge:Did you know 1884:Knowledge:Did you know 1337:, has been listed for 1330: 706:The Geography Barnstar 518: 320: 35: 2666: 2559:another fellow member 2547:assessment department 2521:several other formats 2469: 2418:Thanks for uploading 1833:off, no sir... :-) -- 1329: 1114:New Testament uncials 539:Knowledge:Translation 517: 500:disambiguation page. 319: 34: 2636:Biblical manuscripts 2496:main discussion page 2424:image copyright tags 2702:User:Flaming/MC2008 2677:) is wishing you a 2487:to your user page. 2171:DYK for Uncial 0212 2105:Manuscript template 1989:DYK for Papyrus 110 1940:— ausgezeichnet! :) 1904:Hi. I've nominated 1874:Hi. I've nominated 1641:Timothy Erik Clontz 1412:uk circumsision law 1252:October 2008 (UTC) 978:More great work! :) 935:Caspar René Gregory 755:Technical deletions 637:Some New Testament 607:one main space link 580:one of these admins 523:Porphiryj Uspienski 509:Porphiryj Uspienski 507:Speedy deletion of 165:Knowledge:Questions 81:one of these admins 2668: 2602:remove this notice 2509:monthly newsletter 2507:The project has a 2471: 1862:User:AlbertHerring 1835:User:AlbertHerring 1331: 1304:Gospel of Barnabas 1300:Severus of Antioch 1055:. Cheers friends. 519: 321: 132:How to edit a page 115:your contributions 36: 2608:ing the template. 2475:WikiProject Films 2215: 2214: 2102: 2101: 2033: 2032: 1843: 1842: 1574: 1573: 1430:comment added by 1352: 739:Münster Institute 731: 730: 155:your messages on 2710: 2647: 2642: 2622: 2616: 2609: 2607: 2588: 2587: 2577:Re:Calvin Levels 2533:style guidelines 2486: 2480: 2473:Hey, welcome to 2456:WP:FILMS Welcome 2182: 2175: 2174: 2148:A Friend in Need 2075: 2068: 2067: 2000: 1993: 1992: 1813: 1806: 1805: 1802:Another barnstar 1547: 1540: 1539: 1442: 1346: 1255:Retrieved from " 1204:Thanks for your 700: 693: 692: 593: 586: 559: 558: 552: 533:project, or was 184: 181: 174: 157:discussion pages 92: 89: 60: 59: 53: 2718: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2690:Merry Christmas 2660: 2658:Merry Christmas 2645: 2640: 2632: 2620: 2614: 2611: 2610: 2605: 2599: 2582: 2579: 2574: 2484: 2478: 2464: 2458: 2443:ImageTaggingBot 2416: 2398:Alastair Haines 2364:Alastair Haines 2338: 2291: 2276:Alastair Haines 2241:Scottish Gaelic 2236: 2173: 2150: 2134:Alastair Haines 2107: 1991: 1976:Alastair Haines 1942: 1872: 1804: 1782:Alastair Haines 1747:Alastair Haines 1725:Alastair Haines 1685:Alastair Haines 1666:Alastair Haines 1615: 1538: 1472: 1452: 1425: 1414: 1398:SkyWriter (Tim) 1383:SkyWriter (Tim) 1378: 1358: 1347:Do you want to 1335:Cat Rock Hollow 1324: 1286: 1220: 1202: 1186:Alastair Haines 1161:Alastair Haines 1128:Alastair Haines 1089:Alastair Haines 1057:Alastair Haines 1048: 993:Alastair Haines 980: 960: 929:and brought to 909: 886: 812:Alastair Haines 789: 774:Alastair Haines 741: 691: 634: 603: 601:re: Chris Britt 589: 584: 556: 550: 549: 545:into English. 512: 498:Trinity College 490: 474:Alastair Haines 376: 360: 314: 296:Alastair Haines 293:Christos anesti 268:Alastair Haines 248: 194: 182: 177: 172: 142:Manual of Style 102: 90: 85: 57: 51: 50: 29: 27:Speedy deletion 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2716: 2693: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2631: 2628: 2598: 2581: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2555: 2554: 2543: 2536: 2525: 2524: 2523:are available. 2504: 2503: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2454: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2394: 2337: 2334: 2290: 2287: 2261: 2260: 2259:glossing hand. 2257: 2254: 2235: 2232: 2230: 2213: 2212: 2183: 2172: 2169: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2084: 2083: 2078: 2076: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2031: 2030: 2001: 1990: 1987: 1941: 1933: 1871: 1868: 1841: 1840: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1814: 1803: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1696: 1695: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1595:Richard Cavell 1593:Hear, hear! - 1572: 1571: 1556: 1555: 1550: 1548: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1508:(as above) or 1500: 1499: 1471: 1468: 1451: 1448: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1377: 1374: 1357: 1354: 1345:. Thank you. 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1219: 1218:Minuscule 2427 1216: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1156: 1145: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1110: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1068: 1067: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 979: 976: 963:now...Thanks-- 959: 956: 955: 954: 908: 905: 885: 882: 881: 880: 864: 863: 843: 842: 823: 822: 788: 785: 740: 737: 729: 728: 709: 708: 703: 701: 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 666: 665: 650: 649: 646:Late Antiquity 633: 630: 602: 599: 511: 505: 489: 486: 485: 484: 471: 468: 464: 463: 457: 451: 448: 445: 439: 432: 431: 427: 426: 420: 414: 411: 408: 402: 395: 394: 390: 389: 383: 380: 375: 372: 359: 356: 345:CorenSearchBot 325:CorenSearchBot 313: 308: 307: 306: 289: 288: 284: 283: 247: 244: 243: 242: 193: 190: 145: 144: 139: 134: 129: 124: 101: 98: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2715: 2705: 2703: 2699: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2665: 2655: 2654: 2651: 2648: 2643: 2637: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2617: 2603: 2597:'s talk page. 2596: 2592: 2586: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2488: 2483: 2476: 2468: 2463: 2453: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382:User:Textcrit 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2360: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2347: 2342: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2234:Welcome back! 2231: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2210: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2198: 2197: 2196:Did you know? 2192: 2188: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2117: 2112: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2082: 2079: 2074: 2069: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2016: 2015: 2014:Did you know? 2010: 2006: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1956: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1939: 1938: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1867: 1866: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1850: 1846: 1839: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652:1 Corinthians 1648: 1646: 1642: 1637: 1635: 1634: 1628: 1626: 1621: 1618: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1447: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432:82.24.163.100 1429: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1353: 1350: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1328: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1296: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1258: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1215: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1179: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 989: 986: 983: 975: 974: 970: 966: 953: 950: 946: 945: 944: 943: 940: 936: 932: 928: 923: 919: 915: 904: 903: 899: 895: 891: 879: 875: 871: 866: 865: 862: 858: 854: 849: 845: 844: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 824: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 784: 783: 779: 775: 770: 766: 764: 760: 756: 753:deletion (G6 752: 747: 744: 736: 735: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 710: 707: 704: 699: 694: 682: 678: 674: 670: 669: 668: 667: 664: 660: 656: 652: 651: 647: 643: 640: 636: 635: 629: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 598: 597: 594: 592: 587: 581: 576: 572: 571: 570:the talk page 566: 565: 555: 546: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 516: 510: 504: 501: 499: 495: 483: 479: 475: 472: 469: 466: 465: 462: 458: 456: 452: 449: 446: 444: 440: 438: 437:width is 150% 434: 433: 429: 428: 425: 421: 419: 415: 412: 409: 407: 403: 401: 400:width is 110% 397: 396: 392: 391: 387: 384: 381: 378: 377: 371: 370: 367: 365: 355: 354: 350: 346: 342: 336: 334: 330: 326: 318: 312: 305: 301: 297: 294: 291: 290: 286: 285: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 264: 261: 258: 255: 253: 241: 238: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 189: 188: 185: 180: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 119: 118: 116: 112: 107: 106: 97: 96: 93: 88: 82: 77: 73: 72: 71:the talk page 67: 66: 56: 47: 45: 41: 33: 19: 2695: 2669: 2633: 2621:¡Talk to me! 2612: 2591:new messages 2556: 2550: 2526: 2516: 2500:watchlist it 2489: 2472: 2461: 2436: 2417: 2389: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2343: 2339: 2320: 2306: 2292: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2248: 2245: 2237: 2229: 2216: 2201: 2200: 2194: 2151: 2128: 2108: 2080: 2034: 2019: 2018: 2012: 1973: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1957: 1952: 1948: 1947:The DYK was 1946: 1943: 1935: 1903: 1873: 1857: 1853: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1830: 1826: 1818: 1681:Laparola.net 1664: 1649: 1638: 1631: 1629: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1552: 1473: 1453: 1444: 1423: 1418: 1415: 1379: 1359: 1332: 1294: 1287: 1254: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1203: 1144: 990: 987: 984: 981: 961: 958:Help Clarify 910: 907:Re:Koridethi 887: 790: 771: 767: 762: 754: 748: 745: 742: 732: 705: 641: 604: 590: 574: 568: 561: 547: 520: 502: 497: 491: 460: 454: 443:width is 67% 442: 436: 423: 417: 406:width is 91% 405: 399: 385: 361: 337: 322: 292: 265: 262: 259: 256: 249: 207:verification 195: 178: 169:my talk page 167:, ask me on 146: 108: 104: 103: 86: 75: 69: 62: 48: 44:welcome page 37: 2563:Nehrams2020 2430:, click on 2203:Uncial 0212 2187:25 November 2089:Redtigerxyz 2021:Papyrus 110 2005:21 November 1922:Redtigerxyz 1912:as part of 1906:Uncial 0212 1892:Redtigerxyz 1882:as part of 1876:Papyrus 110 1426:—Preceding 644:written in 562:the top of 535:transwikied 246:More thanks 159:using four 63:the top of 40:the sandbox 2671:Ecoleetage 2346:Kurt Aland 2289:Sinaiticus 2053:Ecoleetage 1630:Metzger's 1581:Ecoleetage 1561:Ecoleetage 1308:TomHennell 1268:TomHennell 1200:Re:Georgia 848:Codex 2427 718:Kingturtle 374:Sinaiticus 252:Dr Janczuk 250:Thank you 173:{{helpme}} 149:Wikipedian 2682:Christmas 2630:Thank you 2513:published 2432:this link 2428:this list 2218:BorgQueen 2111:this book 2036:BorgQueen 1910:Main Page 1880:Main Page 1639:However, 1476:This edit 1206:attention 914:Theotokos 894:Darkspots 763:Duplicate 751:WP:Speedy 619:JLaTondre 531:Wikimedia 151:! Please 2686:WikiLove 2600:You can 2462:Welcome! 2393:Article. 2116:Andrew c 1858:dziękuję 1852:In sum, 1526:contribs 1518:RHaworth 1510:this one 1506:this one 1488:contribs 1480:RHaworth 1428:unsigned 1363:Lavivier 1339:deletion 1120:article. 759:WP:Merge 689:barnstar 673:Carlaude 655:Carlaude 611:criteria 364:Andrew c 235:Andrew c 215:Andrew c 127:Tutorial 105:Welcome! 65:the page 2336:Uncials 2158:Buster7 1870:DYK NOM 1773:website 1457:Buster7 1455:mine.-- 1376:English 1349:opt out 1020:Buster7 965:Buster7 922:Svaneti 870:Avocado 853:Avocado 832:Avocado 797:Avocado 787:Orphans 639:uncials 591:kendall 358:Uncials 111:welcome 100:Welcome 2650:(talk) 2390:others 1951:work, 1660:3 John 1656:2 John 1470:Wierd! 1356:Thanks 931:Tiflis 927:Kyrion 918:Batumi 575:speedy 554:hangon 211:source 203:source 199:source 183:figura 161:tildes 91:figura 76:speedy 55:hangon 2698:subst 2679:Merry 2641:Loves 2606:tnull 2551:every 2152:See: 1854:merci 1210:Kober 949:Kober 939:Kober 846:Yes, 282:slow. 16:< 2675:talk 2646:Macs 2615:§hep 2595:Shep 2567:talk 2447:talk 2402:talk 2368:talk 2327:talk 2323:Witr 2313:talk 2309:Witr 2299:talk 2295:Witr 2280:talk 2222:talk 2191:2008 2162:talk 2138:talk 2129:some 2093:talk 2057:talk 2040:talk 2009:2008 1980:talk 1949:your 1926:talk 1896:talk 1856:and 1827:else 1786:talk 1751:talk 1729:talk 1689:talk 1670:talk 1658:and 1613:Amen 1599:talk 1585:talk 1565:talk 1522:Talk 1516:. — 1484:Talk 1461:talk 1436:talk 1402:talk 1387:talk 1367:talk 1312:talk 1272:talk 1190:talk 1165:talk 1132:talk 1093:talk 1061:talk 1024:talk 997:talk 969:talk 898:talk 874:talk 857:talk 836:talk 830:. -- 816:talk 801:talk 778:talk 761:(M1 722:talk 677:talk 659:talk 642:were 632:Huh? 623:talk 617:. -- 478:talk 461:150% 424:110% 349:talk 300:talk 272:talk 153:sign 2618:• 2593:at 2185:On 2003:On 1953:not 1937:ZNW 1306:. 1295:the 613:at 560:to 455:67% 418:91% 229:to 61:to 2569:) 2485:}} 2479:{{ 2449:) 2404:) 2370:) 2329:) 2315:) 2301:) 2282:) 2243:. 2224:) 2211:. 2193:, 2189:, 2164:) 2140:) 2095:) 2059:) 2042:) 2029:. 2011:, 2007:, 1982:) 1971:! 1928:) 1898:) 1831:me 1788:) 1753:) 1731:) 1691:) 1683:. 1672:) 1662:. 1654:, 1647:. 1601:) 1587:) 1567:) 1528:) 1524:| 1490:) 1486:| 1463:) 1438:) 1404:) 1389:) 1369:) 1361:-- 1314:) 1274:) 1259:" 1192:) 1167:) 1134:) 1095:) 1063:) 1026:) 999:) 971:) 900:) 876:) 859:) 838:) 818:) 803:) 780:) 724:) 679:) 661:) 625:) 557:}} 551:{{ 480:) 388::( 351:) 343:. 302:) 274:) 58:}} 52:{{ 2700:: 2673:( 2565:( 2502:. 2445:( 2400:( 2366:( 2325:( 2311:( 2297:( 2278:( 2220:( 2160:( 2136:( 2091:( 2055:( 2038:( 1978:( 1924:( 1894:( 1784:( 1749:( 1727:( 1687:( 1668:( 1597:( 1583:( 1563:( 1520:( 1482:( 1459:( 1434:( 1400:( 1385:( 1365:( 1310:( 1270:( 1188:( 1163:( 1130:( 1091:( 1059:( 1022:( 995:( 967:( 896:( 872:( 855:( 834:( 814:( 799:( 776:( 720:( 675:( 657:( 648:. 621:( 585:a 476:( 347:( 298:( 270:( 179:B 87:B

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index