483:, the members of which will likely have views more in line with your own (members of the other WikiProjects are a toss-up, I think). I also hope that you don't harbor any ill feelings towards me; I know this is the second of two recent disputes we've had. Know that if consensus sides with you, I will not pursue the matter any further. Finally, I hope you didn't take my comment about arrogance as a personal attack (it was not meant to be construed as such, but rather an side-argument for the use of infoboxes, albeit not a great one...I now realize that it may have been a little out of place).
997:'bel canto'. The existing article has a stab at explaining the term - it's quite a good article - but doesn't get down to the nitty gritty. Yes one could make subsidiary articles about these musical terms (some probably already there) but it is their collective import, not only in what is written down in notes, but in their effect together on vocal technique, that comes to bear on bel canto, AND on what is supposed to be represented by de Lucia. I agree, get some of it out of the de Lucia article - would
95:
980:
there is an article on bel canto yet (or can belto, either...)! But something of this kind is needed because de L is in that special place between both traditions and active in both, and one can't just say it without explaining oneself. If you can bear it, and if I'm not making horrible demands on you (you seem to be somewhere at the heart of wikipedia opera!), could you please look at it and perhaps come back to me with a comment? Thanks,
1143:
then I shall start to come up with other possible article titles in due course. This task carries a responsibility of not encouraging young novice wikipedian singers to go and sing in peculiar ways which may strain their voices, and will require some caution and diffidence. They will probably all interlink, so it should be possible to track them, but I bet several of them are out there already. best wishes
179:
editors to do more work. lol Your editors actually bothered to fill in some of the holes I filled in (albight without good citations etc.) I still think that many of the articles are lacking in information though and could use more work. (especially when it comes to the background history of the lesser known operas and many of the opera synopses are too general or have scene divisions that are incorrect).
1153:
page to remove the redirect and create the proper article. I wouldn't worry about harming any young singer's technique - if someone is trying to learn to sing from an encyclopedia they are already lost in the wilderness, and a couple informative articles won't hurt them any more or less. Also, Knowledge is not censored, and probably has far more hazardous articles, such as the
305:, which is useful, especially the (rather melancholy) note by Vivien Liff. I wish this long list were instead a list with the disc titles added, as they don't appear in the books! (and I didn't buy the records in the 70s, only the books!) Do you think there is any chance of having them added in a short form? good wishes,
561:
Commons?)... Article status doesn't bother me much, so long as it gets into internet search etc. But if it would help YOU for me to inline ref one or two of these articles, let me know. In general the sources I list ARE my sources. Thanks for the tip about RoS, just at present I have other financial priorities! cheers
979:
Thanks very much for your latest - since you wrote it/them I have added to
Fernando a dissertation on the technique of bel canto as it is often applied rightly or wrongly to his singing. I believe it is not nonsense, but it may not suit the article or your project, and I haven't so much as checked if
178:
Thanks for your patience. My Verdi stint was really my first attempt at adding to the wiki world and I have since learned much more about good editing. I will say though that my mistakes ultimately ended up improving many of the articles, especially in the lesser known Verdi Operas, by inspiring your
827:
I noticed that The opera corpus list is not complete. I just added few more list for Rameau and now, I noticed that there are few operas by
Rossini not in there too. It is hard to check one by one because some of the opera titles in The Corpus opera and in the navigation box (taken from the article)
1051:
Well, why not? I'll need to actually devise my own points system first, though. I hadn't registered that
Moreschi had improved (from our point of view) the opera version of the "standard" assessment system, but it certainly looks better now. I'll see what I can come up with over the weekend (but
533:
I've done as much as I can on this, transferring material from the German Wiki. I'm no musicologist, so you might like to look over the translation as some of it might not quite make sense. Hopefully you won't have to do too much to it! The German article is totally unreferenced, and so the
English
1152:
The way it's done is to plug the redirect into the box and hit "go". Then, it will redirect you to the unwanted title, but, under the tag "", it will say in small letters "(Redirected from
Desired title)" and "Desired title" will be linked. Click on this and you will find yourself able to edit the
1142:
Okay, thanks! I see that coup de glotte is in the
Concise Oxford Dict of Opera, interestingly, but without much comment. If there is really to be an exploration of vocal technique in a little series of articles (and my theory in this is definitely old fashioned and rusty, but I could make a start)
231:
Re your question, I would think you are correct. But I must confess that although I thought I had a pretty good grasp on US copyright law, my understanding has frequently conflicted with
Knowledge policy (or practice). So the images I've been searching and adding to opera-related articles lately
171:
I'm not sure how to revert the changes... I'm afraid that I am fairly new to wikipedia and haven't figured it all out yet. All of my Verdi changes were rightly reverted back to the original form or another member has taken it upon himself/herself to go back delete any copywrited information or add
580:
Oh, he's definitely a countertenor of some sort. Grove has a fairly lengthy biography of him. Apparently, sources from the time call him both a treble, a tenor, and a countertenor, so he was probably blending head voice in with chest quite a lot. Just what the "countertenor" voice consisted of at
1052:
I'm busy this p.m. and all
Saturday). Are the Wagner people OK with me doing the two sorts of assessment as an experiment? To what extent is this just between you and me? Should we tell the Opera Project that I'm doing this, or wait until I've done it?! Reply by email if you think it best. --
780:
Hi, I got your note. I hadn't intended to write articles on the
Nicolai operas I added just yet. I do intend to write articles on some others first, like Penderecki's 'Ubu Rex' and some of the Glass operas. I guess I have assumed that the opera corpus was intended to be more complete in its
1021:
is already very serviceable but could be tweaked to embrace the real operatic messa di voce, and the technique as part of a true vocal portamento, properly. Then the bel canto article can have some proper rusti-gutsi in it! Now I'm off to bed to dream about it and try to remember some possible
560:
Thanks for your latest messages, etc. I have got some nice pictures of Erb but they are in a book published 1948, and there has been a 1970s or 80s reissue, though both in German only. Can I use such pictures (from the 1948 copy) under fair use? Please advise me, can I use them here (ie not on
959:
Thankyou very much for both your replies! I tried to respond earlier but the system seized up on me. I have looked at the project page and read your comments and I think I understand - the main thing being that if I find a lower case title and feel that there should be a redirect
629:
up for deletion while we're at it: none of us (AFAIK) are maintaining it, and new opera articles are being created at an unprecedented rate compared with when I joined the
Project. It'd be interesting to compare the # of operas there with the blue links in the Corpus.
424:, who was clearly a movie star and pop singer, not "just" an opera singer. (I am not particularly fond of infoboxes; I simply don't think that Opera project participants should be removing them, considering that Biography project participants think they are vital.) --
784:
Its fine if you remove the Nicolai operas. Thank you for your courtesy in asking. And, yes, I would like to join the opera project. And also thanks for reminding me about the tildes for signature. I am still relatively new to this. Thanks
870:
To avoid similar problem like what happened to Sullivan’s, I think it is best if you could tell me which operas/ composers need to have the navigation boxes. I didn’t know about Sullivan-Gilbert special project until I was told. Cheers -
646:
Therese Tietjens is my latest victim. Please subject her to your usual error-erasing rubadub and I will try to do the same and make the article less colourful in the red spectrum. Any hints on the above query about pics? best wishes,
172:
citations. I appologize for any problems I may have caused. I am more familiar with the wiki rules now and I am more careful with the changes/ additions I make. If you have any other questions feal free to ask. 15:42, 12 June 2007
668:
colour coding and is listed by consensus on the Project page. In any case there really is no reason why these boxes have to conform to someone else's design - WP looks better if tere is some aesthetic variety. Have a nice day! --
353:
about this. I put a level 2 warning about attacking editors on his talk page. If he continues I will escalate from there, up to and including a block. If you want help with which warnings to put on people's Talk Pages, go to
1001:
agree, try to squeeze some of it (the terminology and a little more vocal theory) into bel canto, but with possible extension into short subsidiaries? If agreeable I'll have a bash at this tomorrow (bedtime now!) best wishes
368:
just to let you know, I have reverted the edit yet again, have put a final warning on his talk page, and have requested Semi-Protection. I'll let you know how it turns out. (This message will be posted on my Talk Page as
837:
I have checked Donizetti, Rameau, Bizet, Rossini, Monteverdi, Vivaldi , Gluck , Meyerbeer , Offenbach , Grétry , Auber , Massenet – all are correct except Vivaldi. I just added “Farnace” in The opera corpus. -
1077:
Thanks for your perfected list of terms, very useful and I will play with the contents! To begin with there ought to be an article with the above name, but at present it redirects (inappropriately, I think) to
920:
does not link, simply because the F and R are in capital letters? Anyone searching wikipedia will type in the titles with capitals. Myself, I think it is silly to give these things l.c. titles because they are
915:
so that he doesn't always come up in red. 2., capitalization of opera titles. I assume this has been done through general discussion somewhere that I haven't found. But surely it is mad that, for instance,
608:
I've retranslated the German page and blended it with what was already there. Again, would you mind taking a look over my work - my English sometimes gets a bit Germanised when I'm translating... Cheers!
496:
You know, I would appreciate it if you would come to me first regarding those messages before making a public spectacle of me. As I wrote earlier, I think it falls under the "friendly notice" section of
1082:' which is a similar action but a different kind of thing. Do you have any idea how to DETACH a redirect so that I can either start a different article or else invent a redirect? I now have a copy of
548:
Bless you for this attention! I haven't quite finished with Karl yet, have something to say more about his Evangelist and his Lieder stage and recs but nearly there. One of my heroes!! best,
1094:
in singing , and he has a 'chapter' about it. Perhaps I should just create a new article 'Coup de glotte (singing)' and put a little redirect sentence at the head of the other article?
896:
I will but please read the latest discussion in Project opera talk page. That is what I was trying to avoid actually. Edit warring (bottom or top or whether it is neccessary or not) -
886:
Sure, I will. I think it is easier if you could list down composers that you think we could put the nav boxes. I will do it one by one whenever I have the time. How about Berlioz? -
448:
766:
to one of the opera lists. It was never performed, and most of the music and libretto are lost, so I'm not sure you want to list it, but I leave it to you. Best regards, --
301:(which I submit to your wisdom re categories etc) and also a short and inadequate beginning of one for Elena Gerhardt. I have just noticed that you originated the article on
938:
385:
Some people put it back because they thought we being “double standard” – simply because famous operatic singers have info boxes in their articles. I just removed from
947:
is (IMO) silly! However I'm sure that has all be argued about ad infinitum elsewhere. My point is, these must surely be added as redirects for searching purposes?
273:
Yes, by all means restore the banner if you think it's appropriate. It would also be a good idea to remove the infobox as these are not used for opera. Thanks. --
1181:
1147:
1137:
1026:
1006:
984:
972:
565:
727:
Done. Lots of prizes, which I didn't really know how to format, so I've had a shot, but if that's no good and you still need help with translation, just shout.
417:
1017:
on the discussion there, which I propose to join into and get another definition included (because perhaps there is more than one usage), and the article on
634:
193:
I will gladly hold off on this but please keep me in touch with what you are doing. I was driven by an attempt to sort out the English/UK music pages (see
781:
content. If not, that's ok but I am not always sure which to include. By the way, great project. I am glad to participate. 13:06, 26 June 2007 Canticle
618:
320:
61:. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than
1066:
993:, because all these points about the use of the breath etc resolve together in what the earlier 19th century teachers taught, i.e. the technique which
964:
it using capitals, its okay to add one, without altering the main article title in any way? Please let me know if NOT. I am thinking of attempting the
1166:
1113:
194:
749:
518:
509:
309:
355:
712:
692:
373:
362:
341:
595:
287:
277:
267:
1122:
401:
490:
968:
article which your project page is appealing for - have you anyone else working on that just now (don't want to barge in!)? best wishes,
900:
875:
863:
842:
832:
822:
813:
619:
412:
The Opera Wikiproject may not like infoboxes, but webpages about operatic singers do not exclusively "belong" to this project. These are
828:
are different. That is why I changed the whole list rather than adding what's not in there. I will check Rossini's list later tonight -
428:
514:
Could you please respond to me? I'm trying to remain calm, but it's hard when I am implicitly (or explicitly) accused of bad faith. --
480:
251:
651:
1056:
314:
205:
1098:
1157:(pardon me, my nationalism is showing). Anyway, thanks to Kleinzach for his kind hosting, just wanted to keep the thread together.
673:
890:
613:
538:
407:
47:
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than
41:
1177:, and it leads to all sorts of other ideas. Thankyou very much to you both for all the above. Tomorrow is another day! Cheers
731:
552:
505:, I would be happy to remove one of the two notices left on talk pages that would more likely attract pro-infobox editors. --
951:
1129:
You are too kind. I wish I knew how you did that! The times I have wanted to unplug a redirect.... I was just fiddling with
292:
246:
183:
803:
989:
Eurgh .. getting a bit late tonight! Having looked at the bel canto article I think the gist of this material belongs in
770:
433:
188:
1041:
789:
221:
1104:
I stuck my nose in and removed the redirect for you, go for it! It's an interesting vocal technique/sometime ornament.
1062:
Thanks for the reminder. It wasn't lost in cyberspace - I just didn't get round to replying, but have done so now. --
585:
201:. As I think you will agree, all the categories relating to 'classical' music seem to be in poor shape. Best regards
502:
881:
534:
one is too - I've tagged the article, but I don't think I would be able to find the references! Next task? IGF,
158:
656:
153:
148:
136:
131:
123:
1133:
article, which wants enriching, but haven't enough resources to hand. I'll get on with the coup de glotte.
1046:
581:
this time is open to debate. But yep, he's an alto; certainly his written range agrees with that. Cheers,
742:
665:
58:
601:
102:
934:
818:
I will do the navigation boxes for other composers too (from time to time based on Opera Corpus). -
232:
are pulled from Wikimedia Commons since it is by definition a repository of freely licensed images.
1118:
Thanks Makemi. I don't know if you have seen Steven's articles - some great singer biographies. --
794:
664:
This is to explain that I have reverted your change to this box. The reason is that it follows the
639:
526:
466:
1178:
1144:
1134:
1095:
1023:
1003:
981:
969:
948:
720:
648:
562:
549:
306:
257:
226:
680:
You have to be kiddy me! That named color does not show up in IE6. I'll add a rule to convert
1072:
166:
762:
755:
657:
451:
regarding whether infoboxes should be used for opera singers. Please weigh in if you'd like.
302:
917:
912:
775:
498:
458:
210:
438:
I should let you know that I posted the following message at a few relevant WikiProjects:
8:
1130:
1032:
350:
111:
17:
1063:
1053:
631:
625:
Yes, it serves no useful purpose, so let's get rid of it. And maybe we should put the
602:
573:
965:
701:
462:
1161:
1108:
930:
926:
852:
746:
728:
640:
610:
543:
535:
527:
515:
506:
487:
330:
217:
I fixed the problem by splitting off the films into their own article. Cheers, --
198:
809:
Ok done. I also added 6 more opera list in Massenet opera list in Opera corpus. -
906:
856:
721:
298:
738:
110:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1174:
1154:
1119:
1091:
1038:
709:
689:
670:
626:
370:
359:
338:
274:
180:
173:
479:
I hope you don't view this as canvassing or votestacking, as I also posted at
1090:
on my desk so I could do a short piece on this, as he is the arch teacher of
1083:
1018:
786:
767:
592:
582:
234:
218:
1079:
943:
454:
284:
264:
211:
1158:
1105:
1013:
Message received, thanks: and p.s., I see there is some discussion about
897:
887:
872:
860:
839:
829:
819:
810:
800:
760:
I expanded the Ford article that you started. BTW, I see that you added
425:
421:
398:
202:
741:- shall I keep working my way along the "Can You Translate" line on the
1014:
574:
72:
386:
1022:
reference sources for this. Thanks for everything today! G'night,
394:
390:
263:
an opera singer. Should the opera banner be restored? Cheers,
486:
Cheers, and thank you for your civility in our disputes. --
283:
Oh, why are infoboxes not used for opera singers? Cheers,
420:, which calls for infoboxes. I restored the infobox for
297:
Hello, Kleinzach.. Have just entered a new article for
708:
y will not display with the exception of lightgray. —
418:
Knowledge:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment
745:? Do let me know if some pages have higher priority.
380:
another note, 70.69.51.111 has been blocked for a day
195:Knowledge:WikiProject_Music_of_the_United_Kingdom
911:Two points, 1. I have created a little stub for
356:Knowledge:Template messages/User talk namespace
447:There is currently a discussion taking place
620:Knowledge:WikiProject Opera/Opera Work List
337:and left another warning on his Talk Page.
481:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Classical music
197:) and basically adapting rules used in
70:. The original talk page is located at
14:
108:Do not edit the contents of this page.
319:Hi. I don't know if you noticed, but
440:
89:
25:
1037:Shouldn't Groves be footnoted then?
23:
252:Garðar Thór Cortes an opera singer
24:
1195:
315:Lauritz Melchior and 70.69.51.111
929:' by Thomas Hardy would be, not
503:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Opera
93:
80:ki/User_talk:Kleinzach/Archive_7
397:. See how it goes from here. -
408:Infoboxes and operatic singers
349:- I just saw your message on
13:
1:
704:notes all the colors with gr
293:Record of Singing and others
7:
434:Infoboxes for opera singers
189:Opera singer categorization
10:
1200:
1182:03:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1173:Okay, there's a start on
1167:01:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1148:00:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
1138:23:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1123:23:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1114:16:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1099:15:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1057:12:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1042:10:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
1027:01:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
1007:01:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
985:00:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
973:14:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
952:13:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
939:Hamlet, prince of Denmark
935:Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
901:01:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
891:01:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
876:04:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
864:15:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
843:14:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
833:09:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
823:07:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
814:05:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
804:04:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
790:07:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
771:18:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
750:17:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
732:14:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
713:02:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
693:02:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
674:02:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
652:00:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
635:00:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
614:21:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
596:12:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
586:08:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
566:13:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
553:00:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
539:20:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
519:09:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
510:07:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
491:07:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
429:13:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
402:09:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
374:08:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
363:21:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
342:21:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
310:15:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
288:13:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
278:13:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
268:13:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
247:06:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
222:14:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
206:16:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
184:10:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
1067:17:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
702:Named Colors in HTML/CSS
995:later came to be called
882:Wolf-Ferrari and others
416:typically included in
925:of works, just like '
763:The Sapphire Necklace
658:Template:Opera genres
303:The Record of Singing
106:of past discussions.
1088:Compendious Treatise
1047:Assessments, ranking
918:La Fille du Regiment
913:James Henry Mapleson
499:Knowledge:Canvassing
1131:Maude Valerie White
859:for Tchaikovsky. -
799:Sure, I'll do it -
591:Yes. Done. Cheers,
18:User talk:Kleinzach
1179:Dr Steven Plunkett
1145:Dr Steven Plunkett
1135:Dr Steven Plunkett
1096:Dr Steven Plunkett
1024:Dr Steven Plunkett
1004:Dr Steven Plunkett
982:Dr Steven Plunkett
970:Dr Steven Plunkett
949:Dr Steven Plunkett
649:Dr Steven Plunkett
603:Max von Schillings
563:Dr Steven Plunkett
550:Dr Steven Plunkett
501:. Like I wrote on
307:Dr Steven Plunkett
258:Garðar Thór Cortes
57:you are viewing a
966:Fernando de Lucia
477:
476:
470:
323:added an infobox
321:User:70.69.51.111
164:
163:
118:
117:
112:current talk page
88:
87:
1191:
1164:
1111:
931:Jude the obscure
927:Jude the Obscure
853:Vakula the Smith
795:Navigation boxes
641:Therese Tietjens
528:Pasquale Anfossi
452:
441:
331:Lauritz Melchior
243:
240:
237:
145:
120:
119:
97:
96:
90:
84:
81:
78:
75:
69:
68:
65:
56:
54:
51:
40:
39:
36:
26:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1162:
1109:
1075:
1049:
1035:
909:
884:
857:The Enchantress
797:
778:
758:
725:
722:Aribert Reimann
661:
644:
623:
606:
578:
546:
531:
453:(Notes left at
436:
410:
333:. I deleted it
317:
299:Frederic Austin
295:
254:
241:
238:
235:
229:
227:Photo copyright
215:
191:
169:
141:
94:
79:
76:
74:https://en.wiki
73:
71:
66:
63:
62:
52:
49:
48:
37:
34:
33:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1197:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1175:Coup de glotte
1171:
1170:
1169:
1155:Bill of rights
1127:
1126:
1125:
1092:coup de glotte
1074:
1073:Coup de glotte
1071:
1070:
1069:
1048:
1045:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1011:
1010:
1009:
977:
976:
975:
908:
905:
904:
903:
883:
880:
879:
878:
868:
867:
866:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
796:
793:
777:
774:
757:
754:
753:
752:
724:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
696:
695:
687:
683:
682:LightSlateGray
660:
655:
643:
638:
627:List of operas
622:
617:
605:
600:
599:
598:
577:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
545:
542:
530:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
475:
474:
471:
445:
435:
432:
409:
406:
405:
404:
382:
381:
377:
376:
316:
313:
294:
291:
281:
280:
256:Hi! Actually,
253:
250:
228:
225:
214:
209:
190:
187:
174:User:Nrswanson
168:
167:Verdi Articles
165:
162:
161:
156:
151:
146:
139:
134:
129:
126:
116:
115:
98:
86:
85:
46:
42:user talk page
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1196:
1183:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:Manuel Garcia
1081:
1068:
1065:
1064:GuillaumeTell
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1054:GuillaumeTell
1044:
1043:
1040:
1028:
1025:
1020:
1019:messa di voce
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
987:
986:
983:
978:
974:
971:
967:
963:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
950:
946:
945:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
919:
914:
902:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
889:
877:
874:
869:
865:
862:
858:
854:
850:
844:
841:
836:
835:
834:
831:
826:
825:
824:
821:
817:
816:
815:
812:
808:
807:
806:
805:
802:
792:
791:
788:
782:
773:
772:
769:
765:
764:
756:Ford/Sullivan
751:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
730:
723:
714:
711:
707:
703:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
691:
685:
681:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
672:
667:
666:Opera Project
659:
654:
653:
650:
642:
637:
636:
633:
632:GuillaumeTell
628:
621:
616:
615:
612:
604:
597:
594:
590:
589:
588:
587:
584:
576:
567:
564:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
541:
540:
537:
529:
520:
517:
513:
512:
511:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
493:
492:
489:
484:
482:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
450:
446:
443:
442:
439:
431:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:
379:
378:
375:
372:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
357:
352:
348:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
322:
312:
311:
308:
304:
300:
290:
289:
286:
279:
276:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
259:
249:
248:
245:
244:
224:
223:
220:
213:
208:
207:
204:
200:
196:
186:
185:
182:
176:
175:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
144:
140:
138:
135:
133:
130:
127:
125:
122:
121:
113:
109:
105:
104:
99:
92:
91:
82:
60:
45:
43:
30:
28:
27:
19:
1087:
1080:Glottal stop
1076:
1050:
1036:
998:
994:
990:
961:
944:Il trovatore
942:
922:
910:
885:
798:
783:
779:
776:Opera Corpus
761:
759:
743:project page
739:Johann André
726:
705:
663:
662:
645:
624:
607:
579:
547:
532:
485:
478:
467:WT:MUSICIANS
437:
413:
411:
351:my Talk Page
346:
345:
334:
325:
324:
318:
296:
282:
260:
255:
233:
230:
216:
212:The New Moon
192:
177:
170:
142:
107:
101:
77:pedia.org/wi
31:
1033:Les Horaces
851:Just added
747:Cricketgirl
737:I also did
729:Cricketgirl
611:Cricketgirl
536:Cricketgirl
516:Cielomobile
507:Cielomobile
488:Cielomobile
422:Grace Moore
414:biographies
100:This is an
59:mirror site
1015:portamento
575:John Abell
371:Jru Gordon
360:Jru Gordon
339:Jru Gordon
159:Archive 10
32:This is a
1120:Kleinzach
1039:Nrswanson
710:Dispenser
690:Dispenser
671:Kleinzach
387:Pavarotti
275:Kleinzach
199:WP:MUSCAT
181:Nrswanson
154:Archive 9
149:Archive 8
143:Archive 7
137:Archive 6
132:Archive 5
124:Archive 1
941:. Hence
787:Canticle
768:Ssilvers
593:Moreschi
583:Moreschi
544:Karl Erb
459:WT:WPBIO
219:Ssilvers
907:Various
686:#778899
395:Domingo
285:Jacklee
265:Jacklee
103:archive
1163:(talk)
1110:(talk)
937:, not
923:Titles
855:, and
785:again.
465:, and
426:orlady
391:Caruso
203:Smerus
991:there
933:, or
463:WT:CM
455:WP:VP
369:well)
335:again
326:again
67:pedia
53:pedia
38:pedia
16:<
688:. —
449:here
393:and
347:EDIT
242:BigD
236:Nick
64:Wiki
50:Wiki
35:Wiki
1159:Mak
1106:Mak
1086:'s
999:you
898:Jay
888:Jay
873:Jay
861:Jay
840:Jay
830:Jay
820:Jay
811:Jay
801:Jay
684:to
399:Jay
329:to
962:to
630:--
473:”
469:.)
461:,
457:,
444:“
389:,
358:.
261:is
239:In
128:←
1078:'
706:a
114:.
83:.
55:,
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.