User talk:Kevin/Archive 7

6210:

in which case you're just wasting my time, because if even half the list can be sourced there is every reason in the world to include it, because that's how wikipedia works. Other stuff can be sourced later, you just need to prove there is enough mention of the subject matter itself to make it notable, which sources on the team would do. Sorry, I am pretty sure there are ways disputes like these are resolved, and I don't think your "kill all the information" is the standard policy for this. It's also a waste of my time because I have to look for sources you may later claim we have to dump (because they are either for that person, or indirectly mention them). I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but there is no way your approach can be the method by which this sort of issue is resolved. And how can wikipedia be violating privacy if we're merely noting information that is readily available elsewhere (notable or not; though obviously notable sources can be found too)

10422:

first focus purely on protecting children here, then one needs to scrutinize innapropriate behavior right here, someone having declared themselves as being sexually attracted to children does not by itself make that person a threat (I know that this is a huge taboo like subject, but research does point to about 1% or so of the population having such sexual feelings to some degree, obviously they are not all dangerous pedophiles. The Devils's Advocate also made that point on AN/I or on Jimbo's talk page). Obviously, it doesn't make much sense for someone with criminal intentions to mark themselves in a way that would lead to greater scrutiny. Another thing is that when it comes to grooming children, there are people involved with this who are not themselves pedophiles, they make and sell child porn pictures for money alone. So, my point is then that we're going about dealing with this problem in the wrong way.

10165:. My defenses were never replied to, and my appeals were declined for non-policy (don't talk back to an admin, failed to accept BWilkins' offer to accept the divulging of your previous account) as well as counter-policy (must give up your previous account to ArbCom) reasons. If you look over my situation, you'll perhaps think "oh there must be something he's not telling me here" why would ArbCom reject this, but really they never gave any responsive answer to me, no evidence, no nothing, just this laughable without explanation "carefully considered, declined to unblock." For the first appeal I was told though it would be denied because Timotheus Canens had not responded to its query. By the time of the second, he was an arb and chose not to recuse. Forgive me, it's cartoon-like. 4686:

dBase. Ed Esber convinced IBM Corporation to take microprocessors seriously, which led to the introduction of the IBM PC using an Intel Microprocessor. Esber later went on to pioneer the marketing of the first software that made buying a personal computer for business viable, VisiCalc. Esber later was the CEO of Ashton Tate, one of the three leading Personal Computer Software companies of the 1980s (along with Lotus and Microsoft). Then, Esber ran the Creative Labs, the U.S. subsidiary of Creative Technology. He is or has sat on the boards of over 30 companies, public, private and educational. Ed Esber is now an Angel Investor investing in exciting new companies in Silicon Valley.

9538:(in reply to TDA:) If Kevin knew the content of the basis for the block from private communication with Cla68, I'd say that demonstrated that Cla didn't understand that continued outing wasn't acceptable and that Kevin shouldn't have unblocked someone who didn't understand that. If he knew it from some other method, he was making a decision based on possibly-faulty information from a third party. If he didn't know it at all, then he was taking an administrator action in a situation where he wasn't able to adequately review the evidence. There's pretty much no explanation for this unblock in which Kevin made an informed decision based on familiarity with the evidence of the case. 4032:

responsibility for checking your assumptions. For example a quick check on IMDB as I have done above, to see if this is a well-known porn star and there is every reason to expect reliable sources to be added within the 7-day period (as Iamcuriousblue pointed out above). Based on your statements here, I believe that you will continue deleting any weakly sourced pornography articles on principle shortly after they are PRODded rather than, say, raising an AfD. Such behaviour is not based on consensus but on what you feel is obvious. Is that a fair summary of your position? (I will probably not be able to reply for 24 hours, so you have plenty of time to consider the issue.)

10217:

we have no monopoly on appeals." By "esteemed" I can't tell if you're being ironic, but I can say that SilkTork informed me in the sixth or so day of my appeal that it would be declined if Timotheus failed to respond to ArbCom's query about it. Which makes makes me tend to unesteem SilkTork. But, Kevin, by my thinking, one in a position of authority can't just go by those he esteems, he has has to examine the facts and the rules, and there I can again assure you that those don't support my block, and that anyone who says I've socked or been dishonest in any way... well the strongest I can respond to that out-person is it's just not so. This is Colton Cosmic.

1718:

they would also end up blocked and this would end up in an unbelievably messy ArbCom case that would put a grinding halt to efforts to deal with unsourced BLPs. Your actions have already served a useful purpose, which is to stir up a major conversation that is indeed different from some of the debates that have happened before, and which still has a good chance of coming up with a solution whereby we begin to steadily work through the unreferenced BLP category in full. I understand and sympathize with your frustration and your motivation, but I think continuing to delete articles would be counterproductive to your end goal. Let the discussion at

325:

drama in the end. The BLP policy on deletion does say that if the article isn't policy compliant then it should be improved and rectified and only deleted if that is not possible. There is a sub project over at the Football Wikiproject that is attempting to reference relevant BLPs, of which there are still around 5000 at the moment - it is slow going as there are only a couple of people working on it but thousands of articles have already either been referenced or deleted, so it is possible for improvement to happen to these articles. Would a project with a focus of doing what the football project does on a wider scale be useful maybe?

10817: 4231:

article. That was when I thought to myself that a journalist who doesn't believe that freedom of information applies to himself isn't worth bothering about. As far as I'm concerned he can sink or swing by his own principles, I've wasted my time trying to establish that the man was notable (which he is, and the original proposer simply couldn't be bothered to make any effort to check out the subject). That doesn't mean that deletion shouldn't proceed without checking the updated status of the article and the notability of the subject, whatever the comments.

7434:

are usually well-sourced). I'm one who has come around to thinking the BLP unsourced and undersourced issues are very important, and have been tagging and prodding some now. The fact that the category of BLP unsourced has shrunk from 52000 to 38000 overall (despite many many more being added), and that many editors like me are now involved, is HUGE. I agree that changes to address Athlete notability and the IMDB/other reliability issues are v. important, though. My view is that 38000 is huge, too, but i believe it is being addressed, instead of growing.

7438:

BLPs, to try to redirect the effort to address all BLPs which are imperfectly sourced. It's a matter of tactics. I like the strong effect of focus on articles that are a) completely unsourced b) BLP issue present and c) older than 3 years (or whatever age). Labelling those clearly and nominating them for deletion is important and good to do, perhaps the most important thing to do. Tackle the worst, first. And try to stop new unsourced BLPs upfront, by the BLPprod. Quibbling about whether IMDB is reliable or not is important but secondary, relatively.

10176:. You do have to entertain the proposition that block evasion can possibly be justifiable. Consider the article of a young actress said without attribution (and maybe with) to have contracted herpes. The blocked editor is still supposed to take it out. WP:BLP trumps WP:EVADE. Justifiable block evasion. I'm not that noble in my situation don't get me wrong, but I say that in the absence of any evidence or explanation to support my block (and this there has never been) it is justifiable block evasion. Thanks. This is Colton Cosmic. 5525:

drastic action is needed to deal with the rump but I don't believe that now is the right time. For instance, we've just had a bot pick up 3,600 articles (not all of them BLPs) for the Children's Literature Project. I'm almost half-way through the BLPs and a PRODing, referencing and tidying up as I go. It'll take another month or so to get to the end of the backlog. We're also watching the New articles. I genguinely think you should leave this be for a few more months before bringing it back for discussion.--

11635: 9813: 11248: 10034: 31: 1495:

Do we have 100 editors who care enough about preserving information but also about verifiability to do this, or are a handful of admins instead going to act by fiat and alienate editors? What about all the people who contributed the content that is being binned without any attention being paid to whether it can be retained and improved, and all the readers who will never get a voice in these discussions? Knowledge's reputation is in the gutter due to this kind of zealous deletionism.

5770:? From your other work, I'm guessing your intentions were good, but it looks to me like you restored a hatchet job, e.g. "a position he was released from quickly, though the continued to claim he was still employed there" (not even very literate, that) or especially "Sadly, he has never been able to hold a job for very long, being terminated from almost 20 positions in as many years. Fortunately, his ex wife, Heidi, the more talented of the two, has gone on to better things." - 4849:, I didn't know that Chris Agee was being deleted, but then most of us don't know about most of the deletion processes going on in quiet. I quite agree with you about Chris Agee. I know of him mainly because of his role as a bridge between English language poetry and the poetry of Bosnia, and his anthology Scar on the Stone, with translations from the likes of Ted Hughes. All meaningless. You're fighting a lost cause, Knowledge relishes devouring its children. 1411:(where it's already been copied). I think this gets at the problem you are (thankfully) trying to address but will probably elicit less objections, allow more people to help out, and ultimately still get the job done. If we can't get consensus for something along these lines then we've got a problem, but I think it's a good route that could gain consensus without too much difficulty. Regardless, thanks for kicking the BLP can a bit further down the road. -- 11376: 10158:

the size of my ego by daring to undo my block." And I think this is proved by the reblock as "don't unblock without ArbCom permission." In other words it's now demonstrably about hierarchy and not any supposed heinousness that's only viewable via oversight. Anyhow, since you've demonstrated guts by your handling of the response, and now I note unchastened because you're pushing even now for Cla68's block to be lifted, maybe you'll have a look at my case.

11137: 11009: 7196:(ec)What we need to do is fix the attitude that unsourced BLPs are fine. Regardless of the "do no harm" argument, which in my opinion should be enough to get rid of every unsourced BLP, we are supposed to be making an encyclopedia. Scholarly sources and all that. If this was a business we would all have been fired long ago. Like NW says, in the big picture we have achieved absolutely nothing. We need a paradigm change, not incremental shifts. 11604:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 11560:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 11350:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 1360: 9590: 8174: 1320: 8634: 4314:

admittedly I was using it as an educational tool for contributing to Knowledge. I must say it was a real eye-opener to realise the effort involved in creating and maintaining articles on the site. However, I understand and accept the reasons for its deletion. It has certainly reinforced my belief that my role as a Knowledge contributor is best served as a corrector of facts, spelling and grammar as it has been in the past.--

11585: 11541: 11331: 7993:

copy/pasting the text "long unsourced article" for your nominations, when many of the nominated articles in fact are not long at all. The reaction I have as a reviewer to seeing this is to suspect that if you have been careless in describing the article you may also have been careless in performing good faith searches to establish its notability, which makes me disinclined to contribute to the argument. Thanks. -

7959:

reason to the fact that the wikia is not an established journal and that articals may be published there without even a conventional intake review. Such articals are therefore can not be taken seriously enough to merit the time and effort necessary for peer review by anyone, much less a professional in the field. Some articals do, however, attract discussion, questions and comments that might lend to peer review.

7615:

I put a lot of work into this page and I think that everything is on point now--I revised it as much as I could after I got your warning. I'm sure you're busy with other pages, but please take a look and tell me what you think I need to do otherwise, cause I'm kind of at a loss and I'm new to making these pages. I'm sorry that I removed the notice, but I thought that I had cleared all of the citations up.

8236: 8515: 11705: 8210: 8902: 6789: 6320:

life. It is not readily apparent how the listing of a person's name as having been on a state team harms their life, or is at all in line with BLP, regardless of your claims to the contrary that every name in a list needs to be fully sourced to exist. The material is not "biographical" in any sense, no more than a list of school captains on a school entry is "biographical".

10426:

include alleged terrorists, or people seen to be sympathetic to certain groups that many disapprove of, and then some time later you'll end up banning the advocates these people who themselves don't believe in their causes. Also, we can't then argue that other Knowledge's can't do the same w.r.t. issues they feel strongly about but with which we strongly disagree about.

573:

Wikiproject there are people doing it, including many that I have personally referenced, or gone through the established procedure for deletion myself. If prod hasn't worked on an article I haven't found references for, then I've taken it to AfD and not a single one has survived AfD where references were not found - in my experience the current deletion system works.

5679:

clearly is on a crusade to change what has been posted in various fora on the internet. My comment on a site that has nothing to do with Knowledge dealt with a fact relating to the Yates case. The subject claims he wasn't subpoenaed on his PR page. This is untrue. This is what I was referring to. Finally, please explain what you mean by a "crusade." Thank you.

7007:

been absolutely necessary - it has shown an interesting result though. I firmly agree that this thing should be got on the road asap, and the next few weeks will allow the creases to be ironed out. To do this effectively we need the Twinkle feature setting up, but all the programmers seem to either have gone on holiday, or are now afraid to spend much time on it.--

1555:

we have an unambiguous policy requiring sourcing, reinforced by a special policy particularly requiring sourcing for that kind of article. Yes, people keep on creating unreferenced biographies, and that is a problem. Find them, educate them. Fix the articles. And let the process of housekeeping carry on for the ones that are not compliant with core policy, because

10358:. Thing is, we keep nasty things like child porn out of here by focussing on building the encyclopedia using the policies we have. With that focus, we can leave it to law enforcement to act against pedophiles if that's necessary. We don't have to ban people simply because they may be criminals, we should leave that to the police, prosecutor, judge and jury. 6596:

DashBot and Article Alerts automated updates, we've got the tool to detect when they've been tagged - and the time to respond. And I admit we've slowed down - but referencing 1600 Aussie ones down to around 300, with a couple of hundred tagged since Jan isn't too bad. We either need a prompt like yours or something else to get going again. Cheers,

7056:

coordinate their efforts and they have my every sympathy, because the programmers of anything on Knowledge work in the basement and rarely get any recognition at all for their work. I also agree (as one of the (janitors) that it's a bit like a police chase up the motorway to keep track of all the page moves, and the archiving up the side roads.--

11395:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 11596:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 7267:"Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research. The only way you can show that your edit does not come under this category is to cite a reliable published source that contains that same material" (WP:NOR). 4201:

to be bothered to check out a monstrous list like that to see what might be worth helping improve. It's a sort of moral blackmail. If you want to scrap what people don't manage to get to look at, go on. It all helps persuade people who have trouble abandoning Knowledge that we might just as well go and cultivate the garden. Cheers.

11552:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 11342:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 4372:

copyright. It was there for public use and for anyone who wanted some information about me. I intended to add more information as time allowed. I would appreciate any help in restoring my page. The page was not copied from www.nme.com. It was the other way round and nme.com signs that the text was taken from Knowledge

6526:? I do think that there needs to be one category programmed into place, and think there is consensus for that (although perhaps not on exact wording for the category), to appear in the articles that have the new unsourced BLP tag applied to them. I just don't know how/where to put it into place, myself. Thanks! -- 5237:

fall and your contributions to the discussion are invaluable. However, In an attempt to keep the policy discussion on an even track, some users have decided to start the ball rolling for clarity by creating a special workshop pages. The first of these is for the technical development of a template at

10325:

children. If your argument is that cultural mores are evolving and therefore should not exist, even to the point of accepting child abuse, then I strongly disagree with your assertion. It would be nice if Knowledge didn't feel the need to go out of its way to demonstrate a reprobate moral conscience. --

10339:

And a rational debate a few centuries ago would likely see the atheist banned. So I'm not sure what your point is. We are all living today, by the laws and social conventions of today. Where pedophilia is universally reviled. And before you leap in with a semantic argument, by pedophile I mean anyone

10212:

I don't fault you for that. You looked, which is more than most bother to do. I think you read the block log incorrectly, what SilkTork did there was to stuff my talkpage under an "extended" label that must be clicked on to see the entirety. He didn't block me though. I was only blocked by "Timotheus

10157:

Hi Kevin. I watched the events unfold since you unblocked Cla68. I think that generally any admin should be able to unblock an oversight admin block to the extent he can tell what happened and ascertain policy-violating edits are unlikely to reoccur. Otherwise it's just an ego thing. "Do not diminish

9772:

Game playing would be if I made a statement that knew would win favour, rather than one which expresses my true feelings, which is what I have done. I've made clear my reasons for doing what I did, noted that I understand where Arbcom is coming from, that I disagree with their position, but that I am

9457:

I believe the point of the blocking admin's statement was that the decision on unblocking was supposed to be made by the oversight team, not J. Random Administrator. Kevin isn't an oversighter or an arbitrator so hasn't been party to the discussions that have being going on behind the scenes. I don't

9209:

AGK would obviously need to give permission for me to quote his email, but I think I can safely paraphrase without breaking any rules. Bit of background, Hersfold left the note above, and also presumably emailed me, but as my email account was out of date I never received it. When I saw the note here

7958:

A visitor to the academia wikia found an artical that was at one time published here and then deleted as original research. The visitor wanted to know whether it or any articals had passed peer review bringing to my attention the fact thata no articals had been formally peer reviewed. I attribute the

7791:

I would like to re-create this deleted article using the same content except I will have additional reliable/outside citations/references (total of 10). I am new in using Wiki but will either read the tutorial or ask someone who has submitted articles here to do it for me. Please let me know the best

6671:

Similarly St Patrick's College was a sentinal institution in education for it's failure to enforce it's values and care for it's students in the 1970s. Your removal of information which is clearly accurate and adequately referenced from a number of sources is highly disrespectful to the many students

6595:

It's good to see that your latest attack on uBLPs is using the appropriate tool this time round. We've had 2 months of referencing and I reckon that most truly notable articles have been done - at least in the Australian pool (if we lose a few soapie "stars" I won't lose any sleep) - and between the

6447:

My protection was due to edit warring. That it was over a copyright issue is not relevant. I left a note on your talk page about how to assert permission for the meterial as one way to resolve the dispute, one that does not involve determining whether or not something has been adequately rewritten. I

6356:

Aside from the sources that reference them, and the local newspaper articles they make at least once a year after the tournament? From hardcopy files I obtained from the ACTDU, who I'm sure could e-mail the information if need be. Heck, I'm going to ask them to put the information on their website,

6319:

Just so long as they comply with actual rules you mean? Because BLP does not say anything like "a persons name on a list with no other information whatever" constitutes a privacy violation. It talks about personal information, sensationalism and conjecture and so on, which could harm their personal

5836:

I have said that I would desist from further deletions in line with Scott, against my better judgement I must say. Given that, what exactly is your motion supposed to achieve? While it is difficult to imagine a process less likely to get a result than the RfC, the arbcom clarification might just beat

5737:

Well, that is laughable in my opinion. I have repeatedly stated that my motive is to ensure objectivity and accuracy -- to wit, the truth. That's how I interpret, nay, meant the phrase "...teh internets will soon be awash in documented proof...." And if you understand internet humor you understand

5708:

Okay, you must mean by crusade then that you have evidence that I have engaged in numerous efforts against the subject. Where is your evidence besides one comment on a non-Knowledge site? Also, you are placing yourself in the position of an arbiter or decision-maker. In my field -- law -- you need

5678:

Obviously I have serious issues with your attempt to muzzle my suggestions. I have simply made those vis-a-vis content without editing, unlike Joshua Woroniecki. You're going to have to do a much better job justifying your attempt at censorship of my comments whilst allowing an interested party who

5338:

It is becoming clear that my view of the way Knowledge should be is inconsistent with the view of the masses. Actually, it has been clear for some time. It makes me wonder who is the more out of touch, the community who describe what is being made here an encyclopedia, or myself, who felt that direct

5236:

Hi Kevin/Archive 7! If there is any consensus at at all, it is that the entire discussion has become a tangled confusion, and as a result both proponents and opponents of the issues under discussion are abandoning ship. None of us want this. It is still not clear which way consensus will

3913:

I deleted it because it is both negative in tone and unsourced. Like it or not, being a porn star is viewed negatively by much of western society, and the article was not reliable sourced. Do you have a reliable source for the article? I would be much happier restoring it if I know it will be sourced

3042:

It will take some time to read through all of the proposals that have been raised here. So long as a process is accepted that results in these articles being deleted or sourced within a short period of time then there is no need for me to continue. As for the list of what I deleted, every article was

396:

Will you not consider consulting the community for their thoughts at least? I know you don't think anything positive will come of it, but there will be discussion, either initiated by you or by somebody else and I feel it would be better if you could explain your reasoning and process from the outset

149:

How is the entire article a copyright violation? A very modest amount of content was similar to the website indicated above for which there may have possibly been a copyright infringement, how does that justify having to rewrite the entire entry? If the citation(s) itself requires more information,

8532:

Hello Kevin. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey

8123:

The user who nominated this for deletion did not notify any of the wikiprojects tagged on the talk page (the rock, BLP, or progressive rock wikiprojects would all cover this musician). Unfortunately the deleted page prevents me from checking whether even the original author was notified. I have over

7614:

Okay, well I don't really know what else to say, man. I added in his two clothing companies and tried to use reliable sources, but there aren't that many. So sorry..? that you don't think it's "relevant", but I think that a page for him is if people want to know more about individual competitors.

7441:

Not sure what should be next big priority for Knowledge, but honestly i think the effort to address truly unsourced BLPs by identifying and then fixing or deleting them, is working. Hope you both don't mind my commenting here. I don't want to argue, i just wanted to say that i think there has been

4479:

Thank you Kevin for your response. Yes, if you would be willing to undelete it and reenlist it into debate, I would be grateful. I can make some additional changes to it as well. She is an international beauty queen which gives her celebrity status, so I feel she qualifies for notability, but I'll

4031:

I note you have not pointed out a Knowledge consensus that supports your viewpoint which is apparently not based on prejudices but on a "fairly obvious to anyone" rationale. As the deleting admin deciding to skip the normal 7-days and not allowing the article any chance of improvement, you must take

3935:

shows a solid acting portfolio. I recommend de-PRODding and moving the discussion to AfD to give a chance of improvement. Your comment presuming that being labelled a "porn star" is automatically defamatory is an unnecessary assumption based on your own prejudices rather than consensus - celebrities

2992:

going to have a formal process for cleaning out the unreferenced BLP category. It will likely have relative consensus and will be able to proceed quickly. Given that, it is best to stop admin deletions now, regardless of what the Arbs said about them. The best solution is one that: A) Deals with the

2612:

In light of the ArbCom case, i have asked them to enjoin you from such deletions until the matter is resolved. I have unblocked, asking you at this point to strongly consider delaying any further deletions until the community consensus over such deletions can be better determined, and policy changes

2479:

As you can see, nearly all of the articles you mass deleted were easily sourceable. The above took me 20 minutes to search in total, which is roughly the same amount of time it took you to delete them. See how deleting articles like these without even the most cursory checks for sources can harm the

1745:

I don't disagree with you, but I'd rather lose while I'm at least trying to do something. I proposed a similar deletion scheme a few months back, which in common with all the other discussions failed to reach a consensus. If the community at large is unable to deal responsibly with a problem because

1622:

Nope. My BLP Task Force suggestions can be found over on meta for those who care about such things. However I advocate remembering what an admin is. Adminship is granted to perform various janitorial functions within limits set by the community. If you want to change policy you do so in your role as

1554:

There is nothing stopping you patrolling the categories for PROD and/or unreferenced BLPs, or even building a taskforce to fix them. It would probably be more beneficial than the perennial race to be first to A7 tag every bit of vanity at newpages. What Rdm2376 is doing is precisely right: with BLPs

1494:

If more people spent time adding sources instead of just deleting articles, we could start to clear the backlog. How many people participating in these debates have sourced and expanded any of these unsourced BLPs? If we pledged to do one a day, just 100 of us could clear half the backlog in a year.

324:

I don't know for certain that it will achieve a positive result but I do believe that proceeding with deleting these article will generate discussion on one of the noticeboards at some point, so addressing it and letting the community have input before taking the action would hopefully generate less

10216:

supposed privacy-preserving offer to examine my previous account in exchange for his forbearance not to immediately cut me off from my talkpage. I was confused myself though, so I asked an arb whether ArbCom's declining of my block appeal transformed it into an "ArbCom block," to which he said "no,

9761:

If you want to be an admin, stand up and say so, and agree to follow the responsibilities of adminship, including the one that says you may not overturn the actions of a fellow administrator without consulting them first. You know what you need to say. If you don't agree, say so and resign. This

9227:

There are a couple of reasons. Underlying my reasons is the principle that blocks are preventative, and not punitive. Regardless of what Cla posted, his promise not to repost the material, combined with my observation of his character over the years, led me to believe that the material would not be

8677:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

8318:

Hi Kevin, I'd like to recreate the article page OurStage following guidelines for asserting its importance and/or significance, which was the reason it was deleted 2 years ago. Would like to create it under Special:Mypage/OurStage to ensure proper compliance with Knowledge guidelines. Please let me

7483:

I've though of that. What does it achieve though? We need a large scale change of attitude towards BLPs, and small scale efforts on largely unwatched articles just doesn't achieve that. Deletions had a larger impact, but I stopped way too soon. What I really wanted to do with the deletions was give

6922:

Actually, substantial work has been done on the backlog. However, the numbers don't go down quickly because unsourced BLPs are being newly-identified every day. We don't actually know how many are out there; there may be tens of thousands more that haven't been identified yet. That those working on

6667:

Kevin I have real problem with you removing the section on St Patrick's College particularly as you are an administrator. It is not possible to move forward if we sanitise the past. Have a look at the Wiki entry for the Bristol Royal Infirmary for example. While that hospital does considerable good

6246:

That's ridiculous, no wikipedia page requires every single name or place or fact to have a source next to it, and you're wasting my time with no basis given. What on earth do you intend to do when sources are invariably added? Seriously now, I'd like an answer to that question. Assuming you have

6209:

In the first place, I don't see how it can possibly be a privacy violation (noting s/he was on a team? It's not like there is any other information about them). In the second place, the fact that the person has contacted you doubtless concedes the veracity of the information (they don't deny it),

5241:

in case policy is decided for it . The taskforce pages are designed keep irrelevant stuff off the policy discussion and talk page, and help a few of us to move this whole debate towards a decision of some kind or another. The pages will be linked in a way that watchers will still find their

4371:

Kevin - I am Melvyn Grant. I admit to not fully understanding how Knowledge works, or the terms you use, but I'm trying. Although someone else started my page, I edited and added to it, in my own words, and all the information was correct and not copied from another place and in no violation of any

4200:

Well, you got rid of Richard C. Longworth despite sourcing and substantive additions - tell me he's not a notable journalist. Fortunately I'm not that bothered to see a journalist who copyrights his own CV go. Now you've got people like the Vice-President of Burundi on that list. But who's going

3973:

Okay, as you claim to be following policy rather than your own prejudices, then please point to the current consensus that supports speedly deletion (which consequently allows no other editor time to improve the article) specifically for actors appearing in pornography rather than letting PRODs run

3263:

This seems to be a hotspot for those interested in the current BLP controversy, so I figured i'd post here. Kevin, if you don't want the notice here, feel free to blank it. Anyway, to correct the misconception that nobody is interested in sourcing these articles, I have created a list for people to

2909:

I wanted to start an unsourced BLP drive to actually source these articles, but now that ArbCom has ruled that all 50,000 unsourced BLPs can be mass deleted this seems a bit moot, as it is much quicker to hit the delete button than find sources - any effort at sourcing would be quickly overtaken by

2599:

has roundly rejected the idea of speedy deletions for such articles (7 to 20 at present). Your attention has previously been drawn to this discussion as evidence of the lack of any consensus -- indeed a consensus against -- your current actions, which amount to speedy deletion without the formality

1717:

here Kevin. There is not consensus for you to continue on this course, and if you persist there will be some admin who blocks you, which would rather short circuit your project. I don't think there are going to be enough admins to take up the gauntlet and delete 50,000+ BLPs, and even if there were

1523:

problem on Knowledge, but just because you don't feel like doing a Google search doesn't mean that you may delete easily-sourceable articles at will. Please, cease until one of the more transparent proposals gains consensus. If they've gone for 6 months without being noticed or edited by anybody, a

1435:

This is an abuse of your admin tools. You're not making any efforts at sourcing. Cleaning up this backlog is hard work that involves a lot of effort in finding sources and making edits, not just clicking the delete button. This kind of unilateral action is the sort of thing that chases editors away

10421:

I started an RFC about this policy, the issue being that someone can have identified themselves only off-Wiki as a pedophile, which in practice is still grounds for being blocked here. I did not weigh in with my opinion yet there. There are a number of reasons why I think this is a bad idea. If we

7433:

Kevin, i think your efforts have not at all been wasted. I didn't realize it was you that started the mass-deletion of articles back in January; when i heard about the brouhaha i wasn't much concerned because i didn't think it had much relevance (as i work mostly on historic sites articles which

7055:

Please don't get me wrong Kevin. What I was saying was exactly how you reacted - because of all the stop-start bullshit, brought on mainly by a relative latecomer who wants to change all the policy at the last minute, the Twinkle tweakers were at a loss to know what to do. I have at times tried to

1828:

deleting them on sight with with no process has a strong consensus against it. That makes such deletions, after warnings, disruption. Some Prod-based process may gain consensus, but even that is far from a SNOW at this point. You have successfully gotten a significant community discussion started,

918:

Please do keep in mind that some of the articles on that list are in fact referenced (sometimes sloppily) - just mis-tagged. From looking through some of them (and I reffed some too) it appears that from a quarter to half+ of them initially had no sources and got tagged, then someone added sources

339:

I strongly doubt it. My eventual aim is for all biographies to have at least a source for the main claim to notability. in the past I have tried PROD, but often it is removed without improvement; and tagging as unsourced, which is even less successful. There is a project around somewhere which has

10425:

Then when it comes to Knowledge itself, when we allow arguments like "editors X' opnion on matter Y outed on website Z is not consistent with our social norms", then sooner or later the domain of Y and Z tend to increase in size. So, while today Y is mainly about pedophiles, tomorrow it will also

10168:

Anyhow, should you undertake to help me out somehow, all I can say is I'll play it straight with you. Not knowing what else to do, I did resort to clearly-disclosed block evasion. In other words, IP edits that I sign my ID to. Other than the fact they're evades, I've conformed to policy, I think.

9825:

This is for standing up for what you believe is right and having the guts to say so to the people that are jerking the chains. It is the mark of a good admin one, one that thinks with logic. Note it doesn't always work out well for people historically that do that but they get respect nonetheless

9552:

that that's what he intended to do, in the same note where he declined Newyorkbrad's recommendation for how to be unblocked. That seems a very clear indication to me that he was going to continue his behavior, with his only concession being that he wouldn't directly say or link to the name of the

9458:

think anyone will be reblocking, but it's also fairly obvious that Kevin has trodden rather heavily on the toes of the Arbcom and the oversighters - not the kind of thing they appreciate. Herfold's message in the section above is unlikely to be an enquiry about what Kevin had for breakfast today.

9087:

Good afternoon, good sir. I've seen you around the Wiki and I think you'd make an excellent sysop. Have you considered running for RfA? In all seriousness, Hersfold's comments indicate that you've "lost the trust of the community" and that an RfA would be needed to get your tools back. If you

7962:

Another wikia artical that was deleted from the wikipedia now has an online proof of concept which indicates the concept is valid whether original research or not. In an accredited school this article might indeed be accepted as a master's thesis so my question is: where might articals written by

7763:

RE: A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

7006:

a mess.). This may also include some who breeze in at the last minute, with an attitude to boot, and appear to be attempting to take the credit for the work - or at least the policy. I think Maureen's efforts however are certainly in GF, but possibly her most recent call for a poll might not have

6975:

Well, had we set some kind of goal we might well call it progress, but as we did not, I'm not sure we can call it anything. And while liberal semi-protection is great, it relies on someone already having been fucked over by their Knowledge bio, and someone noticing it. It is a bandaid solution at

6716:

was confirmed by you when closing the discussion. Yet the AfD tag was then removed (this remains the most recent edit), and the article continues to exist, 5 months and 15 days after you closed the discussion. I was wondering if I have missed something here, or should the article be deleted after

6132:

I will look into this, and see what other sources are available. I will have time to consider a rewrite on the weekend. In the meantime, recommend removing just the name involved. I can't see your link btw, I don't have a login, can you please let me know the name so it isn't included in the new

5317:

Maybe, but I doubt it, as the LP task force is pretty independent from enwiki. I'm just more concerned with the sticky prod or Jimmy's call for temporary Flagged Revisions (though I did see your rather cynical post on WR) falling apart because of the deletions. In any case, I would think that the

4685:

Edward M. Esber, Jr. was a personal computer pioneer who laid the foundation for a revolutionary industry. Esber is credited with being the marketing guru behind two of the personal computer industry’s best selling application programs at the dawn of the personal computer revolution; VisiCalc and

4443:

I'm a bit confused and am curious if I could get some insight on the Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald page. When it was first put up for deletion it was incomplete but I was able to get various resources that were relevant (newspapers, news, magazines, etc.) I had included the standard beauty queen title

3992:

In my opinion, being labelled as a porn star could be harmful to an individual if they are in fact not a porn star. This should be fairly obvious to anyone. When there is the potential for harm, and no sources, deletion is a reasonable course of action. Of course, if a source is then provided the

3844:

Hi, could you please userfy a copy of this article you have recently deleted? If the only remaining issue is to add sufficient reviews of his works (in particular for the film he has directed), then this seems easy to rectify. I was expecting the AfD would appear to be "inconclusive" rather than

3564:

You're knocking out articles about Vice-Presidents, Prime Ministers, etc., foreigners of course. Why can't they be left till someone gets around to dealing with them in good time, as long as there's nothing contentious about the entry? Or why can't you do something positive yourself rather than

601:

The list the project I'm talking about reached 8000 at one point, it is now down to around 5000 (even with new articles being created all the time) with 3-4 editors involved. 60000 is not insurmountable with enough editors participating. Break it down into Biographies by country or profession and

354:

I wasn't aware of the other project but I can confirm the Football project is making progress and referencing a large number of articles to at least have a source for the main claim to notability - it would be a shame if the articles that are being working on are deleted before we get a chance to

9235:

Also, I find the concept of preventing a user from access to their talk page, whilst having strident discussions on that talk page regarding the fate of the user to be abhorrent. It goes against the principles of natural justice. Now I know that Cla posted a couple of times, and that the initial

7437:

SV, i think your concern is overstated. No one is advocating for no sources or for unreliable sources. I think the BLPprod is useful for being so clear to offending contributors and to all editors concerned. It would be diluting the effort to address the truly, obiously inappropriate unsourced

5524:

Dear Kevin, the RfC may have got bogged down, but the work of dealing with unreferenced BLPs continues at a steady pace now that a large number of people are focused on it, which is evidenced by the way in which the number is dropping. There may come a time when that process is stalled and more

4230:

Semi-facetious. I think the explanation was there. When I updated the article from various sources including his website I never thought to check that he would copyright his own biographical details. Then the stuff from his own site plus some more (which wasn't copyright) was removed from the

1498:

Please stop any out-of-process deletions and instead propose a new speedy deletion criteria if you really feel that prod and AfD aren't enough to deal with problematic articles. What you're doing is the nuclear option: can we discuss other ways of dealing with the problem of unsourced BLPs being

7992:

I know it gets boring filling out AfD after AfD when there are so many articles deserving of deletion, but out of respect to people who are taking their time to review and comment on your AfDs could you please take care to describe the nominated article correctly? You appear today to have been

7160:

How about fixing WP:PROF and WP:ATH? Right now they allow people with no secondary source coverage pass notability. WP:PROF is based on the notability of their work instead of the person, and WP:ATH is based on the level of sport they played at. Both allow for people failing the GNG through.

6778:

Kevin, I am wondering why you decided to delete the page on Marloes Horst. The page is far from done and I and others will add when time is available. We are trying to write up a page on her similar as is done for e.g., Doutzen Kroes. This page is not marked for deletion. What is the difference

5738:

the connotation of the term "teh internets." It's only my opinion and I mean this with all due respect and in the most civil way possible but it appears to me that you should think a tad less highly of yourself and your ability to discern intent based on a mere one post on a non-Knowledge site.

5257:

I too am abandoning the RFC ship. With large and important issues it is an especially poor way of making decisions. The community has had ample opportunity to come up with a means of dealing with the issues I brought to a head, and they have failed. This is not so much a failure of those at the

572:

You could be doing it if you wanted to. In the amount of time that even this brief discussion took place a number of articles could have been improved. Just because it is a big job doesn't make the easy way the right way. You say nobody is doing it, but I have mentioned to you that at least one

2910:

the deletions. Without knowing who is doing mass deletion there's no way to record which unsourced BLPs have been deleted, unless I trawl the whole deletion log. Can we record the list of titles somewhere so those of us who wish to find sources and retain some of this content can work on them?

1698:

I'm not going to join a pointless debate that we have had 10 times before. The community, for want of a better word, is unable to reach consensus on anything important, making more direct action appropriate. I see enough support from well respected editors to continue what I am doing, which is

257:

Hi, I'm a bit concerned that you are deleting BLPs based on a criteria of "Unwatched and unsourced biography that has not been edited for at least 6 months". Has this process been discussed anywhere? I agree that these pages are an issue, but I'm also not sure that bypassing the usual deletion

10324:

Yes. Because clearly there's no difference between being an atheist and hosting a child pornography website. Being an atheist impacts only your own soul (or, I suppose, the atheist would argue, nothing whatsoever), whereas child pornography necessarily requires the exploitation and abuse of

4313:

I`ve just discovered that my article regarding Mao Dongdong has been deleted. I know it was about a young child whose only claim to fame was a notorious ancestor (Mao Zedong) but I was just a bit disappointed. It was my first and, thus far, only contribution as an article. It was minor and

3939:

I note that this was another occasion where you deleted an article within 24 hours of the PROD being raised. I hope you are having second thoughts about doing this for articles that are not the no-brainer-vandalism-type. If you persist with these types of early deletion (the alerts show up in

3848:

If I am to sufficiently improve the article, it would be helpful if you could explain why interviews with him in QX Magazine, another by RAD Video and a review of one of his performances in QX Magazine, are not currently sufficient to address ARTIST #3 considering that these organizations are

2950:

I'd go further, and say that in view of the multiple efforts to get something organised, there's no excuse for pre-empting that; and Arbcom's ruling may be ambiguous, but I hope they would not smile on any very precipitate resumption of mass deletion. At least a week or two for the RFC etc to

2337:

Please stop! If these articles need improvement, then flag them. But to mass delete the work of many people, trashing their efforts, without even reading the articles, without any consensus or consideration of the actual article text, because you are the self-appointed angel of death, seems

9516:

DA has covered it, so I won;t repeat that. In addition, the concept of sticking an editor in the corner with a gag, whilst holding discussion about his fate seems to me to be entirely unfair. There would have to be extreme circumstances to do such a thing, i.e. that the revealing of private

8275:

I set this request for the page to be bring back, I wanted to update some info about it, (some recent mayor jurys I have done as the Biennale and premis FAD), besides my webpage edgargonzalez.com for which I am very well known in spain specially has been setting as a mayor influence in the

1281: 5975:

Some months ago Scott and I tried very hard to get something done the usual way, but as I'm sure you are aware getting consensus for any change whatsoever is impossible here, and we failed. My biggest failing this time around was stopping too soon. Pressure seems to be a great motivator.

1945:. If a dispute centers around a page's inclusion (e.g., due to questionable notability or if the subject has requested deletion) then this is addressed via deletion discussions rather than by summary deletion. Summary deletion in part or whole is relevant when the page contains unsourced 1632:

Well, I would prefer not to continue with this threat hanging over me, but I am unwilling to continue to sit idly by. As noted above I am being selective so I do not consider that I am blindly mass deleting articles in any case. Of course you are free to take whatever action you see fit.

6167:

Ok, I just read your comment on the talk page. I'm sorry, but I need more to go on here. 1) I don't know you're an admin, and 2) You have to tell me so it doesn't get included in a rewrite, which you admit you lack time to do. I think just removing the person's name is the sensible

9141:

I might wait for an official response from the Arbitration Committee, not just a passing comment from a couple of arbs before I make any decision. I may even have a discussion with them, although they do not seem amenable to that at the moment. Thanks so much for your advice though.

8124:

4000 pages on my watchlist, so somethings go unnoticed (especially since the Progressive Rock project doesn't have article alerts set up). Can this article please be undeleted and redirected to the band if it is indeed not notable; there is no reason to delete the history. Cheers,

6484:. The second user certifying corroborated he was the ip on the list "Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute". And back then it was consulted that it isn't a requirement to have an account to be part of the process to resolve any dispute besides other users participated actively 1043:. As any article thus undeleted is still a problem and undeletion without it being immediately fixed is a BLP policy violation. DS surely has the best of intentions but may be hit by a bus tonite. In which case those articles will never get sourced and we're back to square one. ++ 7484:

the community a kick in the ass, and create an environment where unsourced BLPs are just not acceptable, the same way we do not accept copyright violations. In this, I have utterly failed, and pretty much everything I'm doing here is an expression of frustration at that failure.

2930:

Second that, and if you're unwilling to log it somewhere, then don't mass delete. Random admins deleting articles at random is not the way to solve the problem of unsourced BLPs, particularly when there are community discussions that will likely lead to a more organized process.

4163:

Perhaps you would like to un-delete so I can add these sources and reformat the article, particularly as you chose to delete within 24 hours of the PROD being added rather than waiting until 2010-02-23 as would be the normal procedure to allow folks time to improve the article?

2613:

if any are made. I will not, however, re-block even if you should engage in further deletions, but I reserve the right to undelete and source in place any such articles. I do still consider your contiued deletions disruptive and harmful to the project. I know that you disagree.

3168:

Oh, I agree. To me, I'd call it gaming if you put in sources that aren't reliable just to keep articles alive. Of course, now that means removing those sources, which will cause a fight at each one of them and continue the arguments at the next stage. Not my interest. --

6906:

And while 1000s of words have been spent on what could have been achieved with so much less, absolutely nothing has been done on the backlog, the clearing of which has slowed to a trickle. I can't believe I fell for the whole RFC thing as being a "less chaotic" way forward.

6096:

Some of it is very well sourced, as you will notice, and I'm pretty sure that's just grounds for removing the one person, not the whole thing, which there is a good basis for building consensus on having notability, in line with the many sources that reference the team and

9339:

It was a fairly bad idea to unblock Cla68 and ignoring the private evidence and concerns regarding outing, and for making it so that nobody, not even an oversighter who has access to the evidence, can reblock under penalty of desysopping, as that would be wheel warring.

7323:

The above is just a selection, and doesn't include all the other policies and guidelines that say the same or similar. I thought the battle for decent sources had been won years ago on WP, so I've been pretty depressed to find myself having to argue for it from scratch.

2328:: you're starting to sound like a troll. You didn't need CSD backing for mass deletion, so why would you bring it up for mass incubation? Because incubation can be undone by anyone, not just admins is one reason that springs to mind. In which case, be honest and say so. 880:

I don't want to get overly pushy, but I am personally concerned on my own, and sufficiently by a lack of uniform support on ANI, and I'd like to make sure you don't just start up again when RL happenings cease. I believe that would be abusive of the community consensus

7338:

SV, whilst I agree entirely with your list, I cannot recall having read a suggestion anywhere that BLPs without reliable sources are OK. The whole concept seems silly - just who are those people? There was some discussion over the semantic differences between

309:

I'm not sure how many qualify. At a guess I would say that at least 20000 meet the criteria I am using, but I don't have solid numbers at this stage. Do you think discussion with a wider audience will actually achieve a positive result? My experience says otherwise.

11087:

for deletion. Now I know the article is very confusing and conflicting but I remember hearing a lot about this event so I did some extensive research to try to clarify the confusion. Given the new details I hope you can reconsider your view on this article. Thanks,

6565:

Hi, I cant seem to find any proper sourced links on him, even though he is active on other portals like facebook and all. All his publications seem to be in URdu language in pakistan, and none in english. please advise. thanks --Sonisona 08:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

426:

The comment you replied to was posted well before the arbcom case was raised. If you consult the community and don't get the result you want it shouldn't be a license to just do it anyway without further consultation as (in theory) the community shapes the project.

9156:

All I can say is its a good thing that we have more than enough Admins to perform all the necessary admin tasks these days (Sarcasm intended) because desysopping Kevin for making a call is a prime example of the general douchebaggery that goes on in WP these days.

6024:

Talk page consensus relates to list of winners (gone), not to list of state teamers, which are actually quite well sourced in various media, and which there is some sympathy for. Don't delete it again thanks, as there is no such consensus, and it is not a privacy

1518:

I've got to agree with Fences on this one. We're discussing several proposals on how to work this out. Your deletions had their intended effect. Continuing them while we're discussing a transparent method of clearing out the backlog is plain disruptive. BLPs are a

6954:

that Betacommand is doing for me; it has kept a tally of unsourced BLPs once every day since February 20th. Yes, it is slowing down, but still progressing. At any rate, there will be a formal review in two more months where sterner measures may (unfortunately) be

11225:. This will be an opportunity for new editors to come and learn either basic or more advanced editing from very experienced wikipedians, so if you know anyone who would like to get some practice, please let them know - and beginners will be very welcome. Cheers, 9490:

I wasn't aware the Beebs had the authority to force all the lesser admins to abide by his decrees. Oh wait, he doesn't. Kevin obviously knew the basis of the block and, given Cla68's pledge, lifted it on the basis that such a decision was within reason under the

6286:

Bring it on. I'm going to re-add the list under wiki rules once I've added more sources later this week, not the made up guidelines you've invented above. And if you try to block the list on the basis that every word isn't sourced, we'll see just how your ANI

2498:

I'll be happy to userify any of these for you, and you can source them and move them back. Any that aren't sourced 12 hours after you get them, I'll delete again. Let me know if that's of interest. (and don't ask for more at once than you can handle easily...)

3526:

I am deleting articles that have been listed as unsourced for over 6 months, and have had no substantive edits for 6 months either. I am happy for any admin to restore these articles, so long as some kind of source is added such that the article complies with

199:

4179:

OK, but not till tomorrow. Admin actions and iPhones don't go well together. While enlightened people like us know that being a porn star is not a negative thing, many others hold more conservative views, hence my being extra careful with this unsourced bio.

10494:

THIS is "Pointy"? Now, if someone tried to run a gazillion "Knowledge controversy" DYKs on the front page over a prolonged period of time, which may or may not be related to private commercial interests to the extent that THAT would be pointy. You've got it

5723:"Crusade" is how I describe statements such as "...teh internets will soon be awash in documented proof...". It isn't based on anything else. Also, if you read my comments carefully, you will see that I am expressing an opinion regarding your participation. 4669:

page to make it less like a personal advertisement. Ed Esber himself (he refers to "I" and "me" in the history logs) reverted it several times to his promotional ad copy. Now you have reverted it to said promotional ad copy...are you working for Ed Esber?

2274:

I think a lot of people would find a time limit necessary or at least agreeable, also I think that's how the incubator, for the most part, works now. I would say setting a limit of a couple of months is reasonable, though the exact time is not so important.

10543:

The subject of the DYK hook is not a public figure and does not use that name on the English Knowledge. If even Volunteer Marek can see the problems with it, you should be able to as well, and frankly I would expect you to given that you hold a sysop bit.

9548:(in reply to Kevin:) Kevin, you made an unblock when the person you unblocked had clearly stated that rather than acknowledging that he wouldn't continue pursuing the issue of another editor's identity, he was going to take it to public noticeboards. He 7115:

I don't quite know who or what you are addressing there, Kevin. If it's my comment, well I'm sorry you missed the fact that I was wholeheartedly agreeing with you on every point, and sympathising with the fact that the programmers had been pissed about.

6111:

As I do not have the time to go through each entry, and have a valid complaint to deal with, I will be removing the table again. I very strongly suggest that you not replace any unsourced entries. Feel free to replace a condensed, fully sourced version.

5318:

deletions would have much more of an impact if they are done once the backlog clearing process stalls. At least then the average uninvolved reader would see that these actions are being done ought of necessity, not because you are an evil abusive admin.

7001:

is a fair word to use in these circumstances. As far as I can see, it comes mainly from newcomers to the topic, who, like any any latecomer at this stage, find it impossible to figure out what has gone before (let's face it, the two Phases of the RfC

5009: 1460:

cause people to leave Knowledge: unilateral deletions or libelous information that just lost someone their job. The Knowledge community encompasses a few hundred hard-core people, and really we're the only ones who care about the method of deletion.

3268:. If you can commit to sourcing at least 500 of the problematic BLPs over the coming weeks and months, please sign up. By doing so, you may also receive notices about BLP reform-related proposals, task forces, etc. if people choose to use the list. 8723:

to Knowledge editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Knowledge editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

2975:

But I'm sure Kevin would agree that having a handful of admins delete articles somewhat at random is not the best way to clean up the unsourced BLP problem—it's not a question of being "right" so much as being effective. Right now there has been a

3285:

I've no objection to the notice, or to the sourcing. The more people sourcing, the less I'll have to delete out of process (only joking, sort of) in the long run. Please, just make the sourcing better than the ones listed just above this section.

8766:

Hi there, many thanks for the revert this morning, however I would have thought that the Daily Mail, Esquire magazine and BBC Radio 4 fit into the parameter of good sources, would you not agree? If you are OK with them I shall put the para back.

6631:

Kevin, George Louie is not an advocate for disabled people. He is not a lawyer. I looked him up on calbar.org and confirmed he is not an attorney or lawyer, even though many people believe he is based upon the number of lawsuits he has filed.

4804:. Furthermore, his work has been noted by several literary festivals and he is a member of editorial boards of several magazines. All of it is easily verifiable using reliable sources, mentioned above. Could you please userfy the deleted content 2119:

You're debating semantics at this point, as the articles which are currently being deleted have not been sourced for over 2+ years. No one is saying these articles cannot be re-written from reliable sources at a later date, but good riddance.

1684:

I see you have continued with your deletions. I have blocked you for 3 hours. There are a number of ongoing debates that appear to have a chance of makeing some changes in this area. When your block expires I urge you to join them but wikipedia

11163:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

11035:

7936: 6385: 4160:) with most of his work being between 1992-4. So he passes PORNBIO and is "historically" interesting enough to be worth an article. In this case the PROD was on a faulty premise, as this was not a "negative biography" it just needed sources. 8486:

Hi kevin. No, my comment was not aimed at you. I drafted my comment in response to the post before yours. Unfortunately the landscape there keeps changing too quickly for me to respond in time or even to correct any mistakes. I endorse your

2582:

I have blocked you for 12 hours for continuing to delete non-contentious biography articles out-of-process, and without any supporting consensus. You have been asked by several respected editors to stop these non-policy supported deletions.

10295:

Obviously, this was the correct decision. It is a shame that on Knowledge, what is obviously correct to any normal human being is a hotly debated topic and a motion to ban the person who pointed out the situation gets about 50/50 support.

9254:

I later emailed Hersfold to find out what the missing email contained, but he said that his questions had been answered. Since then I've heard nothing. I guess I expected that my email was a discussion opener, not the entirety of my case.

3649:

And BTW, he's in the Children's Literature Project and we are getting around to fixing, sorting or (presumably) deleting our unreferenced BLPs. May I suggest that you refrain from adding any more BLPs from this project to this or future

1776:

These deletions are completely within policy. Unsourced material from BLPs may be removed. If the entire BLP is unsourced and unwatched, the entire BLP may be removed, and in fact should be. It is you, Geni, who is acting outside policy.

8581:

Kevin I would appreciate if you could also have a look at the Talk section of my biography also. There are some seriously defamatory and malicious comments being inserted by one unsigned editor. Not sure how you prevent that. Thanks MH

8800:

Understood. I'm not that bothered, but the main jist of it IS from the article in Esquire, which is properly sourced and certainly seems very extensively researched and not what I would call "a gossip rag"! Last appeal to replace...?

8684:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

2595:. So far as I can tell you are making no attempt to source these, so it is your first resort. You are deleting articles that have no faintly contentious content, so you are again not supported by the bLP policy. And the discussion at 4799:

All in all, Agee has an entry in specialized printed encyclopedias, his books were published by several poetry publishers and his books/anthologies were reviewed in an Irish national newspaper and in a specialized literary journal -

9101:

He should probably wait for the shitstorm to subside before taking such a gesture, presuming it does not get resolved in the end. At this point a lot of people would oppose just because there is some public bitchfest going on right

3730:

I was hoping you could provide me with direction whether my complaint about a Kevin R. D. Shepherd link could be considered inappropriate or whether there is justification for the link to remain. My explanations are provided on the

11534: 10867:, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of 5085: 1499:

created, like semi-protecting them or feeding articles from non-confirmed editors through AFC? An admin going on a rampage like this in any other area would rightly be desysopped faster than you could say 'I deleted the mainpage'.

11578: 9568:

I had no private communication with Cla68, or any other user. As I've just told arbcom, my faith in Cla68's promise not to repost the name of to link to the post was not dependent on what that name was, or where the link went to.

7319:"Summary deletion in part or whole is relevant when the page contains unsourced negative material or is written non-neutrally, and when this cannot readily be rewritten or restored to a version of an acceptable standard" (WP:BLP). 2250:

hardly. "the problem" is long-term unreferenced BLPs as live articles, accessible by search engines. In the incubator, articles are not in mainspace, and are noindexed. So the move is not a moving of the problem, it's a solution.

11324: 5709:

awfully good authority and good evidence to do what you are attempting. Please cite your authority and your evidence or direct me to the appropriate rule within Knowledge where you have such authority to make this determination.

5855:

I appreciate that you have said you would desist. But others have made summary deletions since the original mass deletions. I'd prefer any further discussion to take place on the ArbCom page, just for the sake of consolidation.

4465:. Having read the links you added, I am not convinced that any show notability. Most are reprints of the same article, which is a very brief passing mention. That said, I can undelete and relist the deletion debate if you like. 789:

I'm actually quite encouraged by the discussion there. You've been here long enough to know that the "community" could not find consensus on what day of the week it is, let alone the legitimacy of something important like this.

4355:

Unfortunately this article was copied from a page on www.nme.com, and was a copyright violation. As such I am unable to restore it, but you are welcome to rewrite it in your own words (although you will need an account first).

887:

WP:BOLD and IAR cover what you've done; ignoring that there's a dispute over it and some significant objections now would be disruptive, going forwards. BRD applies - You were bold, it's been pushed back against, it's time to

753:

than it is to simply ask people to tick the right box. Smears with sources are bad. Accurate articles without sources are not. What's the point of doing something just for the sake of doing something? I just don't get it.

9373:

Kevin, could you please clear something up for me? The blocking admin posted in his edit summary "please do not unblock without consulting the oversight team". Did you have any contact with the oversighters before unblocking?

7461:

So Kevin, I had an idea that I wanted to kick around. Instead of mass deletions next time, Twinkle batch semi-protect until flagged revisions are turned on? Definitely more useless, but much harder to argue against. Thoughts?

10717:

I've recently learned a bit about the field of Core Energetics, and I'm excited to finally find a topic where I have some knowledge to give back to Knowledge after all these years. So I'd like to resurrect and clean up this

5487:

I see from your recent contribution history that you are big on removing unsourced content... but have you actually referenced ANY BLPs in the past 6 weeks? There are two ways to solve this problem. About 20 or so of us in

2338:

inappropriate to me, in the extreme. It is a legitimate issue of what should be done with these articles, but to take it on yourself to be judge, jury and executioner, seems counter to the idea of a "community" effort. --

7963:

authors who are not affiliated with any school, which are deemed original research here be professionally reviewed online, even for a fee? Submission to a conventional publisher seems the only avenue for any valid review.

5459:

If you resume your deletions, I am certain that there will not be a second amnesty for your actions. Arbcom forgave it once, but many arbs have explicitly stated that resuming the mass deletions would not be a good idea.

1496: 10161:

I was no-warn no-discussion blocked by Timotheus Canens for sockpuppetry last May. It's simply not true. I cleanstarted once because of harassment, never went back. I've always been straight-up about it, even from edit

4444:

holder template and all and was surprised when it was deleted with all the sources and information that was added. I look forward to your insight into either why it was deleted or hopefully, how to have it reinstated.

3958:

You would do well to assume a lot less about my prejudices as you perceive them. If you do not understand how being mislabelled as a porn star could hsave a negative impact on a person, then you need to open your eyes.

7175:

As great a place to start as any, and better than most. One would have to hash out a coherent and detailed proposal that rebuts all major arguments, and I have never seen such a proposal. Would you care to write one?

9317: 8533:

takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

2960:

There was nothing ambiguous about the ArbCom motion. That people are probing the cracks and corners of it looking for wiggle room does not introduce ambiguity into a very simple "the deletions were right" finding.

11167:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

11039:

8738:

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through

11500:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 11445:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 6473: 3301: 8666:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 277:(i.e. be sourced) then I would use that process. As it is, these articles have been tagged in excess of 6 months and have zero sources, and I feel that deletion is in keeping with the spirit of the BLP policy. 7097: 449:

Hi Kevin. Just thought I'd inquire about these... "Unwatched and unsourced biography that has not been edited for at least 6 months"... Has there been a change to the deletion policy that I'm not aware of?

9972:'s administrator privileges are reinstated, effective immediately. He is strongly admonished for reversing the block and warned to abide by all applicable policies governing the conduct of administrators. 9442:

That's not really an explanation for 'An ArbCom-appointed functionary told us explicitly not to do what I just did'. It's an explanation for why Kevin might've thought talking to the OSers was a good idea.

8690: 5641: 3845:"delete" and a simple tagging for improvement would address any need for more reviews to meet ARTIST, considering the repeated arguments of "fails PORNBIO" when PORNBIO does not apply to film directors. 1479:

On the contrary, if we took a stance to support only sourced BLP articles on Knowledge, it might cause readers to start taking us seriously for a change. Our image is in the toilet, and for good reason.

4956:

by all means, i was wondering why that was deleted, (i don't see the offense there, but i agree labeling could be annoying) it is a verifiable reference, could you leave the ref part as an external link?

4288:

Hmm. I don't get why, but I guess it's not worth fighting about. If someone uses the "Plaxico" terminology on AN/I again, i'll just be insistent that they don't in case someone does not know the context.

8279:

I read that one of the reasons is because there is another architect (older and cuban) named the same as me, actualy Iknow him and we worked at the same office on different times Zaha Hadid Architects.

5870:

Seems a little ironic to ask me to keep this discussion centralised, when the BLP issue has been split over several pages, to the point that none of the remaining bits have many interested parties left.

4082:. I'm perfectly fine with that, though I don't think there is too much harm allowing people to try to save these for another week. But if you're interested in checking out some of the articles I tagged, 1245: 1112: 7400:(in fairness to Gigs he supports "reliable," but with the others removing it he thought there was a consensus against it), until finally several people posted in support of "reliable" on talk. Maurreen 258:

processes is the right way to handle them. Surely if the articles are in a state of disrepair then applying a Prod to them and allowing time for objection or improvement before deletion is reasonable.

178:

Each of the websites listed as references have had entire sentences copied verbatim to the text, to various paragraphs in the article. Unfortunately this precludes me from restoring any of the article.

9909:, that he's uncomfortable with any kind of admonishment at all, and he wants to do some research and think things through. IDK, I'm wondering the same thing - but that thought also crossed my mind. — 3392: 6801: 6149:

Add-on- I also don't think removing it all is the best outcome, just because you're too busy to check sources... the fair outcome seems to be to remove the one name, and allow the process to continue.

3396: 11608:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 11589: 11564:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 11545: 11354:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 11335: 6357:

so not only will the veracity not be in doubt, but any claim of privacy breach will be moot. Whoever complained can whine to the ACTDU. I wish them luck in their obviously frivolous complaints.

5582: 2665:

I must admit I got a good chuckle out of that too. There are thousands, THOUSANDS of unsourced BLP articles and they are being created at a rate that actual editors who give a damn cannot keep up.

2099:

There is a world of difference between the possibility of something being fixed and somebody actually fixing it. That's what you are missing - anybody could fix this, but nobody ever has. For years.

1599:

Very well. Since you will not respond to polite requests I will block you indefinitely if you do not stop carrying out large scale out of process deletions without first gaining community consensus.©

8267: 6807: 4141:

The original article was pretty much a stub, unfortunately it was not flagged up on enough project alert lists for someone to add a few sources. As there is no doubt that the GEVA was won in 1992 (

1408: 10340:

who sexually molests children, traffics or watches kiddy porn, talks about their desire for pubescent kids, or invites minors into their house and gives them porn. None of them have a place here.

1854:

I agree with DES - the actions created a debate, which may lead to something, but further such actions would at this time be pre-empting that debate. (Which is why blocking was and is warranted.)

9006:. Kevin failed to obtain agreement for the unblocking from either the oversighters or the Arbitration Committee prior to doing so. Accordingly, Kevin is temporarily desysopped in accordance with 355:

even check them out - most of the articles are stubs but there are actually some articles that are a decent start, they just need the referencing. Please consider stopping the deletion for now.

9993: 9791:

Okay, I agree that this issue has been beaten to much, and I agree with you completely that the functionaries and ArbCom did exactly the opposite of what they should have done. Happy editing,

10310:

A few centuries ago, it would have been "obviously correct" to ban someone for being an atheist. So, the only way to really tell if something is correct is to have a rational debate about it.

10198:

Well I've had a look. I see your latest block is by one of our esteemed Arbitrators, which rules out me taking any part. I was willing to give up my sysop bit for Cla68, but I won't for you.

1334:

Hell yes! Fantastic work!! The reaction was to be expected—typical cluelessness and irresponsibility—but you pushed on anyway to do the right thing. Good for you! You've made us damn proud!

7024:

Twinkle is not being set up because despite weeks of discussion, there are still editors trying hard to prevent forward motion. Don't blame Twinkle programmers for the bullshit going on at

7132:

I think Kevin's frustration just might have to do something with the fact that after two and a half months of debate, nothing has gotten done. Yes, I see what has been declared policy. In

6839:

I agree, i've been doing my best to try and nudge it along. With a little bit of luck, we should have it finalized within a week. Those few cries for a third RFC are falling on deaf ears.

8711: 2981: 9210:

I sent an email saying "You called?". AGK then sent an email saying thanks for getting in touch, and asking why I had unblocked, while knowing that there were oversighted edits involved.

11617: 11573: 11363: 11126: 9773:

willing to abide by their request. The needless strife was caused by implementing harsh and extremely public solutions for problems that could have been resolved quietly and privately.

6936:

Try drawing a graph - there is an exponential decline in the backlog reduction. I'm not knocking the efforts of those working on it, but they are too few, and the backlog is too great.

4679:

Edward M. Esber, Jr. is the former CEO of Ashton-Tate, prior to its sale to Borland. Esber was involved in founding VisiCalc and presently works as an angel investor in Silicon Valley.

3383: 1984:

is exactly the opposite of "appropriate". Consensus should be fundamental on anything important. If there isn't, the only appropriate course of action is avoiding to push it roguely. --

8467:

Though I understand that there are elements of the article that do "sound like an advertisement," I'm unsure if it needs to be completely re-written or just pared down and simplified.

5258:

various discussions, rather a lack of a reasonable decision making process. Once I have dealt with a couple of things I am working on, I intend to pick up where I left off in January.

11307: 11262: 7401: 7397: 7393: 7389: 7385: 7381: 7378: 7374: 7370: 4913: 4828: 1217:

I was discussing your noble actions with my wife over a continental breakfast and we both agreed that this is a thoroughly, jolly good, and positive action. Keep up the good work and

10581:

The article is in compliance with WP:BLP, which you are probably well aware of. It was the original proposed hook which ran afoul of WP:BLP. I fixed that. You could have, but didn't.

10085:

Treating editors was most recent ;) - long-term goals and achievements should be kept in mind, I have "Every editor is a human being" on my user for more than a year now, to stay, --

9075: 5088:

in which I mention your name and disagree with your interpretation of policy. I'm not gauntlet–throwing, just trying to let you know in case you would like to respond. Best regards,

10472: 9546:

adequately review the basis for the block or the prognosis for an unblock without access, either directly or through a consultation with an OSer, to what went on to cause the block.

3322: 9553:

person. Outing policy covers more, far more, than that - an important point that Cla68 does not yet seem to grasp or abide by, and you don't seem to have taken into consideration.

9127:

That's good advice, actually. Kevin, if you're thinking of pursuing an RfA (though you do have other options), it would be best to wait at least a couple of months until doing so.

8442:

I notice that the page on the Maltese singer/songwriter had been removed from here. would you kindly enlighten me why this was done, and how it can be restored. Thank you so much.

5818:

has asked me to "ask those involved in these discussions to comment on whether they think a motion such as you have proposed is needed, especially those you have mentioned in it,"

2645:

Thanks. I think I'm fully aware of your opinions on the matter. As I state at the top of this page, I am perfectly happy for articles to be restored, so long as sources are added.

11160: 7309:"Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living persons or organizations, and do not move it to the talk page" (WP:V). 6797: 6496:

finally that RfC did have an outcome which was mediation (which is in progress) and archived properly, so I don't think it was necessary to delete it, could you review it? Thanks

8423:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 4083: 852:

I don't. Perhaps tomorrow morning a rough consensus will emerge, but there's certainly enough dissent at the moment that "This exceeds community agreement on WP:BOLD" is true.

5441:) 05:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC) -- I could list a number of argument. But that fact that they are out of process is enough. I don't need to justify asking someone to follow rules. 2628:

BLPs are subject to summary deletion only when there's no claim of notability, an objection that can usually be countered by a single editor, resulting in an AfD. Source away!

1148: 9660: 8306: 2294:

The current guideline for the incubator is a month for articles to be fixed. With mass incubation, that would have to be raised appropriately. (Also, failing to see how it's

11651: 11205: 10169:

There was one where I was mistaken about jargon, and my aggravation was apparent in another, but overall I've tried to live up to the project's spirit. Here's some examples

412:

If you were following this more closely you would already know that that was attempted with mixed success. You may want to refer to the Arbcom case regarding this matter.

10774:

I have put a block template on both the user page and talk page of Meco. (User contribution indicates that he has been blocked, which is unfortunate for the article about

10127:

I am not comfortable unprotecting this article. Last time the vandalism returned instantly, and there is nor reason to think the same will not happen again. You could add

5666: 884:

As I said, a real consensus could emerge on ANI, etc. That's fine. But I really would strongly urge you not to proceed until some consensus emerges (there or elsewhere).

8461:

I have been working to revise this article so that it will better conform to Knowledge's standards, and was wondering what more I need to do in order to remove the flag.

6133:

version? Also, I don't think a fully sourced version is required, no page requires that, just one with most of it sourced, and the potential for more to be sourced later

3414: 11368: 8680: 8081:

Yes, the sourcing now looks much better. In light of the other delete opinion, this might have to go the distance though. Presumably it will be kept in the end anyway.

4894:(i've seen worse AfD's) apparently, no one thinks much of that Irish anthology - find some more reviews or an anthology or award and it will be a keep. (oh and flag it 2460: 2167:

If Rdm2376 has deleted unsourced BLPs that had uncontentious material then he wasn't following BLP. BLP only empowered him to delete articles that were in its enterity

1953:

when this cannot readily be rewritten or restored to a version of an acceptable standard. The deleting administrator should be prepared to explain the action to others

11656: 10998: 10048: 8993: 8596: 7977: 6368: 3634:

I've seen your note on the content and references I added earlier. He's important, so I'll make him a priority to get sorted out. Please remove him from your list.--

1699:

exactly what I will do in 3 hours, unless one of those debates miraculously gets somewhere. If you cannot accept my actions, then I urge you to do something about it.

11720: 3465:

Well... I did hear rumblings in the distance, but did not quite see pitchforks and torches. I'll be sure to invite you in for a look-see after I do some work on it.

1202: 11177: 10792: 8620: 5897:

I agree that the proliferation was unhelpful. I acknowledge that I did start the prod workshop on a page other than the RFC. It seemed like a good idea at the time.

5296:

I'll be a few days yet in any case. I have another 7000 unwatched articles to check for references. Would my continuing have a negative impact on the LP task force?

4895: 3865: 587:

The list I'm working from has over 60,000 articles on it. Your method just does not scale up to that. Would you find it less disruptive if I listed them all at AfD?

8786:

piece supports nothing of that paragraph, and the BBC Radio piece even less. The rest are gossip rags. Much better sourcing will be needed to replace the material.

3894:

You speedy deleted this page without so much as an AFD. It is not an "attack page", but simply biographical info about an award-winning porn performer who appeared

10672:

I don't know. There's some interesting stuff there on Google. I do think that if one obsesses over off-wiki nutters then some of the nuttery does tend to rub off.

10187: 8039: 7312:"Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be 6185:. If it turns out that the name is included in a reliable source, and is seen to be sufficiently important for inclusion, then we can deal with that later. I will 3044: 2154:

material. WP:BLP does not say that you should remove all unsourced material from BLPs, only the contentious unsourced material (or contentious and poorly sourced).

219: 9946: 8756: 984:

Not to mention about Korean sources, you deleted it without checking, so I request you to undelete the article or at least userfy it into my usage page. Thanks.--

11032: 10228: 7872: 7738: 4462: 11261:, with care and attention, patience and diligence, and for treating editors as living persons, following the spirit of policy rather than letter, - you are an 10934: 10921: 10803: 10047:, with care and attention, patience and diligence, and for treating editors as living persons, following the spirit of policy rather than letter, - you are an 8706: 8659: 8624: 8601: 8549:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

8187: 8075: 5927:

Well, it's been 8 weeks now and in my opinion, we have achieved precisely nothing in terms of changing policy. No doubt many are very pleased with the result.

5242:

way to them. This move is not intended to influence any policy whatsoever; It is to keep the discussion pages focussed on the separate issues. Cheers. --

3013: 2691:

and source, without feeling the need to discuss the undeletion here first, since the results of that discusssion ar already clear. 03:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

11234: 9007: 8283:

In my humble opinion, being named the same as someone disqualifies you from appearing on wikipedia, I am a semi-public figure on Spain where i Live and Work.

8115: 10941: 10872: 4698: 3884: 11111:

I don't find it to be either of those things. I do however disagree that it should remain as a separate article. I've commented at the deletion discussion.

2467: 9985: 9183:

Would you be willing to disclose the contents of the e-mail you received from AGK and the e-mail you sent? Obviously, redact information where necessary.--

8294: 7802: 7776: 5805: 5070: 5056: 3198: 11529: 7100:

seems pretty clear to me. Those who tried to put up further roadblocks have been shouted down; we should be good to go now (at least for a few months). --

1166:!! I never give out barnstars, but you totally earn this one for taking the initiative in dealing with a very serious BLP problem indeed. Truly, you have 1011:

Just... slow down. I've undeleted a batch already - put sources in half, and added the others to my personal watchlist (so I can do them in the morning).

11182: 8447: 8327: 1584:

I have no intention of stopping. That's what we have been doing, and it achieves nothing. I won;t sit idly by while we let the problem grow even larger.

11474: 11419: 5123: 3434:

Thanks. I was kinda hoping the original discussion might have had more than three editors disussing.... but what with the furor elsewhere.... Regards,

1532: 11200: 11049: 9966: 8468: 7932: 4729: 3342:

I'm not sure I see the point in those categories, to be honest. You don't have to be a "deletionist" to believe that certain pages should be deleted. –

3089: 2977: 2945: 1723: 1472: 11078: 9953: 9511: 9452: 9437: 9136: 8351:

If I recall during the EB mediation years back you were but are no longer right? The results section is reserved for administrators as far as I know.

4115:

Thanks for that - it's a better tool than the one I had been using. You're probably right though, it might be easier all round to leave them prodded.

3233:

Just don't be taking BLP policy to all unsourced articles. I'm not sure we'd have much left around here. ;) Three missed unsourced BLPs so far. --

861: 831: 784: 6709: 6680: 5493: 5133: 4946: 4821: 3728: 2881:

Don't worry. Won't start it :) But really, well done. A historic change in the way BLPs are handled Mr.Anderson (aka, Neo of Matrix) :) Best of luck

2535: 1513: 1489: 900: 875: 799: 11695: 9122: 8891: 8139: 4753: 4694: 4109: 3837: 1034: 1020: 602:

people interested in either could work on chunks of the list. I am aware your question about AfD is rhetorical in nature, but if you have followed

295:

I think this should be discussed with a broader audience before you proceed. How many articles meet this deletion criteria out of interest please?

11593: 11549: 11339: 10618: 10214: 10174: 9526: 9068: 1407:

A proposal I made on ANI is being discussed there and you might want to weigh in if you're so inclined, though the conversation might well end up

10592: 10572: 10524: 10506: 10170: 7798: 7772: 6433:

I'm going to enjoy bringing back those sources as soon as I have time. You may want to look into copyright law, because you don't understand it.

6419:

Go and shout at the talk page. In any case, you are edit warring, something you have been blocked for several times. You know better, don't you?

6389: 5739: 5710: 5680: 5066: 5052: 4888: 4858: 4481: 4448: 3907: 8930: 8885: 8272:

Hello kevin, I noticed that the page that was written about me has been deleted. I was notified by a newspaper reporter who was looking for it.

3664:

Don't worry about the list - none will be deleted by me at least without checking. There's quite a few that have had references added recently.

1824:

material from BLPs may be removed. Deletion of non-contentious BLPs for lack of souring is not current policy, and judging by the discussion on

11068: 10121: 6633: 6386:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Australian_Capital_Territory_Debating_Union.2C_User:JJJ999.2C_121.45.216.232_.26_121.45.196.175

4130: 3477: 3460: 3446: 3429: 1726:

should really be an essay) can be a good thing (and the cause here is certainly just), but strategically I do no think it wise at this time. --

1086: 1069: 991: 526: 158: 112: 11732: 9853: 7894: 7880: 7155: 6892: 6878: 6861: 6477: 2787:

The community that thinks "a lot of unsourced articles are perfectly useful", to use Apoc2400's extremely absurd choice of words, apparently.

1722:

continue for awhile, and if nothing really comes of that then other possibilities would have to be considered. Turning oneself into a martyr (

919:

but didn't bother removing the tag. So IF you're gonna do this (and I'm necessarily agreeing with this course of action), at least be careful.

11105: 8107: 8090: 7764:

21:50, 22 October 2009 Kevin (talk | contribs) deleted "Amapola Cabase" ‎ (Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Amapola Cabase (2nd nomination))

7065: 6668:

work it is also a sentinal hospital for failings in clinical governance with the deaths of many children. It is fully included in the entry.

6372: 4131: 4073: 3295: 2768: 2400: 2212: 2184: 246: 10649: 10440:

The person in question did say on Knowledge that he ran a child pornography FTP server in the 1990s. It's not really outing to say that. --

9166: 8935: 8031: 8017: 7493: 5633: 5554: 5382: 5348: 5333: 5305: 5291: 5209: 4539:) as their talk page is fully protected. As you were the last person to edit their talk page, would you be able to notify them of the PROD? 4124: 3923: 3371: 3353: 3028: 2782: 2750: 2734: 2289: 1755: 1740: 1006: 10172: 10100: 9578: 9562: 9467: 9274: 7549:

process; I have contested the deletion, as some sources have now been added. If you still feel the article should be deleted, feel free to

7226: 7191: 7170: 7050: 6985: 6970: 6945: 6931: 6883:

Thanks. I agree that some people have not accepted the principle established by the RFC, and that that position is at best a losing cause.

6847: 5694:

Your comment there makes clear your feelings and intentions toward the subject. I think you understand perfectly what I mean by a crusade.

5482: 5468: 4562:

obviously edits through that protection without telling me, I never noticed it was protected before. I wouldn't worry, Curps is long gone.

4408: 4365: 3898:. This is uncalled for and I would like you to reverse it. The merits of the case for deletion can be reasonably discussed through an AFD. 3785: 3385: 3079: 2640: 1232: 10354:

The mere act of having a rational debate would itself have been seen as heresy. It was precisely a more rational attitude that led to the

10207: 10094: 10017: 8397: 8383: 8372: 7806: 7734: 7425: 7356: 5110: 4298: 4281: 3936:

reveal far, far worse on "Big Brother". In future please let such PRODs run for the full 7 days, then there can be no post-delete dispute.

3242: 3228: 3214: 3192: 3178: 3163: 2955: 2725:

You might want to note for the sake of accuracy that between Coffee's unblock and the 12 hour block that I continued my rampage unabated.

2674: 2488: 2352:

Perhaps you are late arriving? ARBCOM have already dealt with my deletions, and now I'm waiting to see if the RFC comes to any consensus.

2302: 2129: 2094: 1892: 10981:. Perhaps it's time to unprotect it and see what happens. I have trouble seeing his page as an ongoing target for excessive vandalism. 10381: 10367: 10349: 10232: 10146: 9505: 9431: 9197: 9116: 8041: 7644: 7366: 7125: 6767: 4840: 4605: 4173: 3883: 3751: 3007: 2619: 2511: 2480:

encyclopedia? Looking in Google's cache, none of these articles contained contentious material. I request that all of these be restored.

2236:

Mostly because there are articles that have been there for months without being fixed, so all it would do is move the problem elsewhere.

1572: 1549: 972: 763: 744: 707: 686: 654: 567: 513: 500: 486: 473: 132:

Where's the "please"? I cannot restore this, as the entire article was a copyright violation. It would need to be completely re-written.

9367: 8451: 8432: 5162: 5145: 5027:

I wouldn't do anything, as it doesn't look like an attempt to skew the debate. It's most likely a mistake, not logging in or something.

3279: 2924: 2876: 2862: 2654: 2108: 1919: 1849: 1425: 11214:, with the aim of improving the scope and quality of articles on South Australian topics. We meet at UniSA's City West campus, and our 10875:. There's lots of news this month for the Knowledge Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... 10787: 10695: 10681: 10553: 10538: 10435: 10416: 10246:

For taking the correct action in a situation where others either didn't have the nerve to, didn't feel the need to, or didn't want to.

9795: 9782: 9412: 9398: 9151: 8842: 8828: 8810: 8795: 8550: 7866: 7758: 6412: 4981: 4925: 4907: 4730: 4723: 4414:

Hi Kevin, no harm done. In fact you've given me a much needed prod to get and understand a bit more on how it all works. Many thanks.

3941: 3716: 3591: 3337: 3316: 2894: 2705: 964: 943: 188: 141: 10290: 8158: 7662: 7242:

I want to reiterate what Kevin said. I've been bowled over the last few days to find there are people still arguing that BLPs without

6834: 6620: 6428: 5985: 5970: 5936: 5906: 5880: 5865: 5846: 5747: 5732: 5718: 5703: 5519: 5505: 5450: 5428: 5414: 4650: 4634: 4504: 2361: 1295:

You've helped clean one of the dirtiest parts of the wiki. Well done. Way to step up and take initiative. Beats talk talk any day. ++

436: 421: 104:

If the page cannot be restored as is, please indicate the nature of the desired changes and their respective section of the article.

11149: 11021: 10667: 10449: 10334: 10319: 10191: 9417:

Hmmm, maybe because Cla68 stated that he had no intention of repeating the sort of actions that prompted the block. Just a thought.--

8566: 8437: 8339: 8262: 7081: 7037: 6656: 6554: 6522:

Thanks for following up about my bumbling edits within the two BLP unsourced related templates. Could you please see and comment at

6296: 6219: 6177: 6158: 6142: 6069: 5999: 5362: 5267: 4995: 4873: 4240: 4225: 3673: 3609: 2572: 2546: 2332: 2320: 2269: 2255: 2245: 1858: 94:(Deletion log); 02:46 . . Rdm2376 (talk | contribs) deleted "Richard Mammone" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: in part from 11120: 10305: 10261: 9329: 6523: 6457: 6442: 6343: 6329: 6314: 6273: 6256: 6241: 6198: 6121: 6106: 6091: 6049: 5793: 5367:

Oh, how I wish I could just tell you that the entire premise behind that question was wrong. But I can't, so I won't bother trying.

5036: 2805: 2796: 2347: 1835: 1708: 1693: 1679: 1651: 1642: 1627: 1617: 1603: 615: 596: 582: 378: 364: 349: 334: 319: 304: 286: 11479: 9925: 9892: 9835: 8357: 5534: 5223: 4589: 4571: 4518: 3659: 1228: 1055: 934:

Which list are you referring to? I'm being as careful as I can, hence my choosing not to use a bot or some semi-automated process.

11407: 10967: 9940: 9743: 9722: 9708: 7205: 2970: 2436: 11258: 11222: 10746: 10044: 9859: 9630: 9616: 8909: 8861:

Just a heads up: When you semi-protected the page a short while back, no icon was put up on the page to reflect it's protection.

8407: 8363:

I did resign the tools some time ago, however my opinion stands. Your "I didn't know that" routine is particularly unconvincing.

7698: 7532: 4189: 4055: 4041: 4006: 3987: 3968: 3953: 3877: 3689: 3358:

True Julian. One doesn't have to be a deletionist to think like that. But for those who believe they are, the category exists :)

2985: 1815: 1665: 11690: 11676: 9672: 9236:

block and talk page revocation were likely justified. However once things had cooled down, the necessity for the block was gone.

7937:

RFC: Should Knowledge:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Knowledge:Notability (events) and Knowledge:Notability (people)?

3144: 1789: 1397: 11424: 9299: 8694: 8597: 7851: 5599: 5115: 4489: 4456: 4388:

Hi Melvyn, thanks for explaining that. I can't believe I missed NME's disclaimer, very sorry about that. The article is back -

1806: 981:

who is a very notable politician (served as Finance Minister of South Korea) to have been featured on NYT times many occasions.

10993: 10372:

Your argument to let pedophiles freely interact with children here might be more effective if you made it at the policy page.

8870: 8750: 6692: 6535: 6305:

Just so long as you understand that biographical material must be sourced. If you are creating a list, that means every name.

5272:

Kevin, could I ask you to hold off on this for ten days or so? I really do think we are quite close to at least accomplishing

4778: 4736:

Hello Kevin. I disagree with the result of this deletion discussion and I would like to recreate the article, as I think that

8500: 7072:

Fuck this. My patience has expired. You've managed to water this down until there is nothing left, and you're still arguing.

5778: 5194: 4808:? I'll also notify the editors who participated in the discussion. If you disagree with my intention, I'll take the issue to 3722: 3056: 2383: 1450: 10764: 9692:

A good carpenter measures 3 times before cutting. In other words, make sure it's not something you'll regret later. IJS —

7829: 6745: 5276:(though I agree with you that it is about the minimum that could have been done without calling it "nothing accomplished"). 4714:

You forgot to mention the bit about "subsequent ruin" that I removed. Are any of the facts in the longer version incorrect?

4474: 2142:

JBsupreme, you left out the relevant part of Jimbo's quote "This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of

11525: 11470: 10948: 9203: 9158: 9003: 8583: 7973: 7417:. The whole point of having policies is that we don't have to reinvent the wheel like this every time we discuss an issue. 6364: 5079: 4210: 3504: 1537:

That's a fallacious argument. Even one day more could be the difference between nothing bad and something bad happening. ++

1402: 532:

You deleted this article, for example. I just did a quick search and found that it can be easily sourced with articles in

11319: 11277: 9358:

Anyone can re-block should Cla68 repost the offending material. If he doesn't then he equally doesn't need to be blocked.

8538: 7723: 4078:

Hey there Kevin. I noticed that you had speedily deleted a couple of articles that I had prodded with what is essentially

3993:

article can be undeleted. This has absolutely nothing to do with any prejudice on my part, and is firmly supported by the

3858: 3624: 3574: 1268: 1074:

Point stands. Please do not undelete any that you do not immediately fix or userify, or they are subject to redeletion. ++

955:

is clearly referenced although all the references aren't collected in a section called "references". Just pointing it out.

866:

Fortunately I'm not overly concerned with the ANI discussion. I've stopped for now because I'm off to some RL happenings.

11597: 11553: 11343: 11215: 10488: 9958: 9663:

which involves you has been proposed and is being voted on by the Arbitration Committee. For the Arbitration Committee --

9228:

reposted. I had no need to see the actual material to make a judgement on whether or not he would be likely to repost it.

8776: 8616: 8302: 7604: 7477: 4429: 4421: 4381: 4373: 4348: 4340: 3762: 3258: 1820:

I fully support Geni's block and will reimpose it if there are further deletions after it expires. ] says that Unsourced

1375: 1224: 982: 458: 8746:

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

7306:, especially in articles about themselves ... so long as ... the article is not based primarily on such sources" (WP:V). 6512: 4552: 3558: 3540: 2980:

made to WP:PROD to make it verboten to remove prods on unsourced BLPs unless sources are added, and support for this is

2816: 2719: 231: 213: 11712: 11512:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

11457:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

10833: 10387:"we keep nasty things like child porn out of here by focussing on building the encyclopedia using the policies we have" 10241: 10183: 9686: 8591: 8335: 8244: 8227: 8002: 6183: 5688: 5074: 5060: 3736: 3003: 2941: 2285: 1736: 1421: 1344: 11391:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 9542:

is what Beeblebrox's "do not unblock without consulting" restriction was supposed to account for - no non-oversighter

7839: 7332: 3831: 3770: 3512: 1135: 170: 124: 10224: 10152: 10113: 9311: 8505: 8313: 7981: 7517: 7109: 6481: 5830: 5251: 5124:

http://www.squareenixmusic.com/musicnews2.php?subaction=showfull&id=1267549876&archive=&start_from=&u

4966: 4619: 4046:

I don't see that anything useful can come from continuing this discussion. We do not agree, and probably never will.

949: 749:

Really? What's the good of "doing something" just for the sake of "doing something"? Surely it's more important to

668: 639: 552: 10063: 9279:

Thanks. I'm not ignoring your email either, just figured that the answer had been worked out by the time I woke up.

8476: 6819: 2052: 729: 11144: 11128: 9348: 7562: 7451: 7016: 6688: 6641: 6605: 6230:

do not allow unsourced material about living people, especially when they tell us that it is causing them a problem

5141: 4509:

You'll need to act fast - there are now 3 arguments to delete, and any passing admin may choose to close it again.

4323: 4262: 2634: 2396: 2000: 1971: 1189: 9088:

need a nom, I'll be happy to jump in that drama pot and stir it vigorously until you have your tools back.--v/r -

8735:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

7270:"To demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must be able to cite reliable sources that are 3701: 1593: 928: 11521: 11466: 10709: 9500: 9426: 9352: 9306: 9192: 9111: 8481: 8416: 8346: 7753: 6916: 6517: 5759: 4706: 4702: 4435: 3836: 3265: 406: 267: 11210:

Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, a group of Adelaide Wikipedians has been meeting on a monthly basis

9383: 7140:

sourced, and we are now not letting a dozen articles/day through. That is quite meaningless in the big picture.

6662: 3600:

Foreigners? Do you have any idea where I'm from? Do you have nothing better to do than accuse others of racism?

2412: 2230: 1307: 10986: 10972: 10783: 10658:

says everything you need to know, and is certainly a lot more useful than the maunderings of off-wiki nutters.

9766: 8134: 7834: 7780: 7667: 6582: 5646:

Perhaps for the 2009-2010 section on the Johnny Weir page: Johnny Weir at 2010 Independent Spirit Awards.jpg

4091: 3643: 2904: 2843: 2606: 2596: 1883:

The block of this fellow contributor was inappropriate and consensus to do so was severely lacking. How sad.

1456:

Fences, I think you need to take a step back from the wiki bureaucracy for a minute and think about what would

896: 891:

Nothing disasterous will happen if you wait 2 days (or whatever) to see what happens with the ANI discussion.

857: 780: 775:

Please stop and wait until the legitimacy of this approach are discussed in the usual *cough* *gak* place....

11396: 7921: 7585: 5594: 5021: 3944:

but may take 24 hours or more to do so) I shall have to assume your deletes demonstrate a deliberate pattern.

3688:

I found some articles - reviews mostly - with her name as part of her band. I think it should be merged into

11188: 11064: 10079: 7811: 7639: 6397: 4879:

Congratulations. The deletion of this article was the triumph of an alliance of philistinism and arrogance.

4805: 3812: 2298:

a problem for them to be in the incubator indefinitely, other than making the incubator too hard to manage.)

1556: 1393: 1126:

For encouraging change in the plague that is unsourced BLP articles on Knowledge, I award you this barnstar!

1065: 1016: 166: 120: 9264: 8008:

Unsourced for a long time is what I meant. Perhaps a reword is in order though, to make that point clearer.

7365:

Then you can't have been watching closely, Kudpung, because this was what the dispute was mainly about. The

6403:

Dude. the material has been REWRITTEN. It's not the same fricking material! Please unprotect and restore.

4094:

and various other categories, one at a time. I thought that you might want to give that a try. Best wishes,

2428: 11622: 11096: 10847: 10611: 8866: 8643: 8253:? I think it's time to give it a shot, and I'll be sure to monitor the article for any problems. Thanks. -- 7948: 6034: 5662: 4758: 4195: 4151: 2919: 2424: 1508: 1445: 150:

I will be happy to provide it. Otherwise, I ask the article be restored as soon as possible. Thank you.

6712:

on 30 September 2009, and eventually, after being relisted twice, consensus was reached. The consensus of

4148:) and this actor (also performing as Cody Feelgoode and Paul Alexander) is credited with over 70 titles ( 3494:

Listen dude, I don't care about any of these guide lines and rules. Why are you changing my stuff back??

11601: 11557: 11517: 11462: 11387: 11347: 10905:

Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

10769: 10561:- Prioryman, cut out the personal attacks. I'm pretty sure I have a much better grasp of WP:BLP than you. 9803: 9288: 9095: 9021: 8957: 7719: 7292: 7253:"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Knowledge should not have an article on it ( 5238: 4526: 3692:, and redirected, instead of an outright deletion, as students may actually look for information on her. 3521: 2993:

problem quickly; B) Has the most support from editors (which helps with the get-it-done-quick factor). --

2471: 8388:

If you think your argument is improved by complaining about the location of a comment, then have at it.

1025:

Perhaps I should post my working list and give you all 30 minutes head start. Whatever works, you know?

340:

also achieved little. My hope is that this will actually achieve something in furtherance of this goal.

10778:

since Meco contributed to the section about the conflict of interest parliamentary hearing in 2012.) --

10390: 9831: 9654: 9492: 9418: 9184: 9103: 9064: 8686: 7909:

That comment in the BLP unsourced stats subsection didn't get signed. Just a friendly FYI. Cheers! --

7876: 7499: 6825:

This looks like a last ditch attempt to stop this from going ahead. Feels a lot like square one again.

6060:. It's very well sourced in places, and with time more sources could easily be found. Consensus fail. 5104: 4942: 4846: 4817: 3067: 2420: 1219: 38: 9589: 4143: 2388:

I looked through your recent mass deletions, and I found quite a few that are very easily sourceable:

977:

After seeing the ANI complaint against your mass deletion of BLP articles, I noticed that you deleted

11211: 11153: 11059:

Hi. Thanks for the notice. I will go to the discussion page and add my two cents. Thanks again.

11025: 10893:

Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

10779: 10588: 10568: 10502: 10163: 8969: 8104: 8072: 6699: 4809: 4608:, the troublesome accounts have been blocked. Perhaps it's time to drop it down to semi-protection? 3817: 3474: 3443: 3411: 2508: 1803: 1786: 1546: 1304: 1083: 1052: 892: 853: 776: 194: 72: 67: 59: 8491:

view. I should know better than to get involved in those circular debates. Sorry for the confusion!

7673: 10957:'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this 10899:

OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

10467: 9981: 9668: 9162: 8987: 8975: 8761: 8650: 8587: 8027: 7998: 7470: 7184: 7148: 5626: 5612: 5547: 5375: 5326: 5284: 5187: 4102: 3903: 3508: 2531: 1389: 1061: 1012: 444: 7792:

way I could get this started or if I can just "edit" the deleted article and add new references.

6056:

You're not an admin, and if a complaint is made it then becomes a matter for that admin to remove

2556: 2548: 478:

I too would suggest that this be discussed with more of the community before you proceed. Thanks,

11716: 11594:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

11550:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

11340:

provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year

11084: 11016: 11000: 10887:

Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

9558: 8963: 8926: 8862: 8702: 8298: 8164: 8117: 7739:

Knowledge:VPR#Proposal to turn on revision deletion immediately (despite some lingering concerns)

7388:("rm requirment there is no consensus for"). Maurreen removed it a fourth time and changed it to 6951: 6467: 5821:

Regardless of whether you think the motion is needed, I want to give you opportunity to comment.

5767: 5760: 5673: 5168: 5042: 4768: 4425: 4377: 4344: 3766: 3732: 2911: 1500: 1437: 1264: 242: 87: 10213:

Canens" who called me sockpuppet, and by UltraexactZZ who faulted me for not accepting Bwilkins'

6756: 5153:

Given that the title includes the word "rumour", I think we will need to wait for a better one.

4916:; would you care to give it a second look? (work in 3 anthologies, and bio in harvard magazine) 3582:

Sorry, to clarify the muddled wording - "who think they'd be better involved in other activity"

1647:

I've blocked you for 10 minutes. Please pursue policy changes through more acceptable channels.©

1259:

For doing the right thing, knowing it would be unpopular with the legions of the irresponsible.

11686: 11672: 11315: 11293: 11273: 11239: 11196: 11060: 10827: 10131: 10090: 10059: 8981: 8671: 8560: 8331: 7715: 7599: 7369:

posted by Maurreen asked only for a source, and when that was changed to reliable source, Geni

7133: 5231: 4951: 4801: 4576:

Okie dokie - just wanted to dot my i's and cross my t's on the PROD nom. Thanks for checking!--

4294: 4258: 3746: 3351: 2999: 2937: 2812: 2748: 2717: 2281: 1732: 1470: 1417: 1382:

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

985: 631:

which was not even unsourced. A source was listed and the {{BLPunsourced}} tag was incorrect.

7650: 7246:

are okay, as though the last several years of content policy development had never happened.

6810:

on the table to conclude the process. I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. --

5576: 3707:

Sounds OK. I would have redirected myself if I knew which band was the best redirect target.

2474: 1978:"The community, for want of a better word, is unable to reach consensus on anything important" 10958: 10604: 10431: 10363: 10315: 10117: 9827: 9325: 9060: 8472: 8258: 7728: 7590: 5799: 4938: 4813: 4597: 3075: 2208: 2180: 1102: 558:

Obviously sourcing is preferable to deletion. But nobody is doing it, leaving this solution.

252: 8912:

at your earliest convenience; I will be sending you an email shortly with more information.

7098:

Knowledge talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#What else needs to be done?

6560: 6476:

however I think it was a little bit too precipitated because it was discussed a week before

4747: 2260:

I might agree if there were some time limit, but not a a place to dump the problem forever.

11508:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 11453:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 11303: 11285: 11173: 10742: 10583: 10563: 10497: 10355: 10254: 10220: 10179: 9345: 8854: 8612: 8323: 8290: 8097: 8065: 7969: 7918: 7768: 7249:

The policies say—and this has all been in these policies in one form or another for years:

6782: 6684: 6676: 6626: 6570: 6360: 5650: 5137: 5129: 4788: 4690: 4417: 4336: 4328: 4308: 3546: 3500: 3467: 3436: 3404: 3238: 3210: 3174: 3140: 2699: 2630: 1714: 1336: 525: 154: 108: 10911:

WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

8063:. If you feel your concerns have been addressed, might you consider a withdrawal? Thank, 7885:

I think the Great Jimbo is quite capable of fucking himself over without my dubious help.

4087: 3066:

is always useful. If you're looking for deletions made by a specific admin, you could use

8: 11613: 11569: 11513: 11458: 11359: 11230: 10917:

Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

10816: 10691: 10663: 10549: 10520: 10484: 9977: 9664: 9463: 9448: 9408: 9379: 9132: 8999: 8838: 8806: 8772: 8428: 8023: 7994: 7847: 7538: 7463: 7456: 7177: 7141: 7105: 6590: 6505: 5619: 5540: 5489: 5368: 5319: 5277: 5180: 5089: 4937:. Thanks for your assistance, Kevin and Pohick2. No need for angry or ironic comments. -- 4773: 4095: 3899: 3712: 3681: 3669: 3456: 3425: 3291: 3224: 3188: 3159: 3151: 3052: 2872: 2778: 2730: 2670: 2650: 2527: 2432: 2357: 2316: 2265: 2241: 2223: 2125: 2104: 2048: 1888: 1845: 1751: 1719: 1704: 1675: 1638: 1613: 1589: 1485: 1430: 1131: 1030: 1002: 939: 871: 827: 795: 759: 740: 725: 715: 682: 650: 592: 563: 496: 469: 417: 374: 345: 315: 282: 227: 209: 184: 137: 10775: 9965:

Based on his commitment not to reverse any block designated as an oversight-based block

9298:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

6958:

On a not-quite-related note, you may be interested in what I was discussing with Lar on

6923:

the backlog have managed to keep it slowly but steadily decreasing should be applauded.

3400: 2444: 1670:

An acceptable channel would be one that produces a result, and I haven't found one yet.

1656:

Very petty and very punitive. Congrats on deteriorating the situation even more, Geni.

1244: 1111: 237:

You really should stop. This is inappropriate behavior. Just add references yourself. --

9621:

In my naivety it hadn't occurred that some policies are merely traps for the unwary ;)

9554: 9533: 8740: 8698: 8223: 8132: 7944: 7658: 7621: 7581: 7558: 7220: 7211: 7044: 6964: 6925: 6888: 6872: 6870:

a handful of editors who are making a last-ditch effort to filibuster. They will fail.

6857: 6841: 6815: 6647:

I was using advocate in a non-legal sense. There may be a better word to describe him.

6601: 6578: 6393: 5966: 5902: 5861: 5826: 5743: 5714: 5684: 5590: 5501: 5462: 5446: 5438: 5410: 5312: 5176: 5051:

page. Are you a volunteer? Wondering if you could state it on the talk page. Thanks! --

4645: 4614: 4485: 4452: 3629: 3273: 3119: 3104: 3063: 2858: 2764: 2617: 2604: 2568: 2482: 2090: 2037: 1996: 1967: 1833: 1825: 1526: 1260: 238: 6082:

so that you understand why adding unsourced material on living people is a bad thing.

2624:"Reserve the right to . . . source" an article? Hardly a controversy! Uncontroversial 1840:

After all this time, I see actions as more useful that words. I'm sorry you disagree.

11682: 11668: 11489: 11480: 11434: 11425: 11311: 11289: 11269: 11192: 11116: 10938: 10823: 10760: 10677: 10534: 10377: 10345: 10203: 10142: 10086: 10075: 10055: 9936: 9849: 9778: 9718: 9682: 9626: 9574: 9522: 9394: 9363: 9293: 9284: 9260: 9147: 8881: 8824: 8791: 8576: 8555: 8456: 8393: 8378: 8368: 8352: 8154: 8086: 8013: 7987: 7890: 7862: 7825: 7703: 7596: 7546: 7528: 7489: 7447: 7352: 7285: 7215: 7201: 7121: 7077: 7061: 7033: 7012: 6981: 6941: 6912: 6830: 6763: 6705: 6652: 6637: 6616: 6550: 6531: 6453: 6424: 6339: 6310: 6269: 6237: 6194: 6117: 6087: 6045: 5995: 5981: 5932: 5876: 5842: 5789: 5728: 5699: 5515: 5510:

So I don't measure up to your standard? I'm sure that doesn't surprise either of us.

5478: 5424: 5358: 5344: 5301: 5263: 5247: 5219: 5205: 5158: 5032: 4991: 4977: 4962: 4921: 4903: 4884: 4869: 4854: 4836: 4719: 4630: 4567: 4514: 4500: 4470: 4404: 4361: 4319: 4290: 4277: 4254: 4236: 4221: 4206: 4185: 4155: 4120: 4051: 4002: 3964: 3932: 3919: 3873: 3827: 3791: 3781: 3756: 3741: 3697: 3620: 3605: 3587: 3570: 3554: 3536: 3366: 3344: 3332: 3311: 3154:

which has surname and initial only. I don't see that as a suitable source for a bio.

3129: 3109: 3023: 2994: 2932: 2889: 2838: 2808: 2741: 2710: 2464: 2448: 2276: 2074:

to source, I agree with removal. If something hasn't simply been sourced, one should

1727: 1463: 1412: 960: 924: 540: 534: 162: 116: 9024:) is to be reversed until Cla68's appeal is addressed by the Arbitration Committee. 6247:

any authority, you've overstepped it. I'll be complaining about this in due course.

4793: 3399:. The asertions of notability and the hints toward proper sourcing being available 464:

See above. To answer your question, no there has been no change that I am aware of.

11728: 11579:

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

11509: 11493: 11454: 11438: 11103: 10841: 10427: 10359: 10311: 10025: 9321: 9092: 8496: 8464:

I have re-linked several references and deleted links that have suffered from rot.

8286:

I hope you reconsider the deletion, thanks a lot. edgargonzalez (the mexican one)

8254: 8146: 8052: 7676: 7414: 7025: 6720: 6438: 6408: 6325: 6292: 6252: 6215: 6173: 6154: 6138: 6102: 6065: 6030: 5775: 5658: 5017: 5003: 4658: 4532: 3727:

Dear Kevin, since you were involved in a former discussion on Kevin R. D. Shepherd

3489: 3402:

with a truely diligent search were indicative that this one could have been fixed.

3114: 3099: 3071: 2821: 2542: 2343: 2204: 2176: 2171:

unsourced or poorly sourced material. Otherwise he should have invoked some of the

2075: 1906: 1794:

Geni, your block is outside of policy. Your reblock is even more egregiously so. ++

603: 99: 95: 11535:

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

11325:

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

9031:: Carcharoth, Coren, Courcelles, Hersfold, David Fuchs, SilkTork, Timotheus Canens 8662:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under 7674:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Boba_Phat_(2nd_nomination)

6866:

You may or may not be (personally I don't think you are) but there most certainly

6541:

Just revert all my edits, and then go do whatever you like. I'm just going to use

4783: 11415: 11298: 11169: 11045: 10738: 10476: 10247: 10015: 9342: 9334: 9178: 9015: 8951: 8749:

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at

8720: 8716: 8663: 7953: 7911: 7418: 7325: 7243: 5815: 5530: 5169: 4587: 4550: 4248: 4079: 3655: 3639: 3234: 3206: 3202: 3170: 3136: 3124: 2577: 2523: 2392: 1359: 952: 674: 606:(specifically point 9) on each article nominated then I have no problem with it. 47: 17: 11634: 11247: 10722: 10033: 9812: 4763: 4461:

Primarily it was deleted because nobody made an argument to keep the article at

2308: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

11708: 11697: 11609: 11565: 11505: 11497: 11450: 11442: 11355: 11296:) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC) Two years ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my 11226: 10752: 10687: 10659: 10655: 10545: 10516: 10480: 9918: 9906: 9885: 9792: 9763: 9753: 9736: 9701: 9459: 9444: 9404: 9375: 9128: 8834: 8816: 8802: 8768: 8667: 8424: 7843: 7749: 7742: 7567: 7166: 7101: 6542: 6499: 6485: 5961:

Did you try changing relevant policy first? That is, before the mass deletion?

5496:

down to about 25-30% of what it was back in Jan. Focusing on sourcing can work.

4393: 3975: 3808: 2966: 2792: 2666: 2552: 2456: 2416: 2121: 2044: 1884: 1661: 1481: 1127: 823: 819: 769: 755: 721: 700: 661: 632: 611: 578: 545: 506: 479: 451: 432: 413: 402: 360: 330: 300: 263: 10881:

10070:

Thanks Gerda! It's been a while though, might be something to look back into.

9870: 9865: 9759:

Kevin, it is really not okay for you to continue playing games with Knowledge.

7817: 7609: 7302:"Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information 7264:"The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth" (WP:V). 3047:. It looks like most have been restored, some with particularly poor sources. 2404: 1746:

they cannot form a consensus, then actions such as mine are all that is left.

11605: 11561: 11501: 11446: 11351: 10990: 10982: 10954: 10857: 10634: 10512: 10401: 10275: 9601: 9303: 8913: 8219: 8126: 8056: 7940: 7654: 7634: 7628: 7577: 7554: 7550: 7512: 7506: 7296: 7258: 6959: 6884: 6853: 6811: 6752: 6597: 6574: 6261: 6229: 6079: 6019: 5962: 5898: 5857: 5822: 5586: 5497: 5442: 5434: 5406: 4754:

The book of Irish American poetry: from the eighteenth century to the present

4640: 4609: 4598: 4169: 4037: 3994: 3983: 3949: 3854: 3528: 2854: 2830:

or something like that on Knowledge where users can sign up? You're my hero!

2760: 2614: 2601: 2584: 2564: 2504: 2440: 2172: 2147: 2079: 1985: 1956: 1936: 1912: 1830: 1799: 1782: 1567: 1561: 1542: 1300: 1079: 1048: 696: 274: 201: 10686:

Yes, quite. <looks meaningfully at Kevin's off-wiki forum membership: -->

10623: 9871:

ya got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em, and know when to run

8203:

Check and update the 'Tasks' box regually to help develop climbing articles.

7442:

some misunderstandings, and the effort overall is working, IMHO. Thanks. --

2558: 11392: 10391:

editors who identify themselves as pedophiles will be blocked indefinitely.

10109: 10102: 9269: 8855: 8443: 7904: 7821: 7595:

Your prod was removed, so I followed up with a nomination at AFD. Thanks!

7443: 7348: 7117: 7057: 7008: 6962:

about resurrecting Liberal Semi and putting it into the protection policy.

6527: 6493: 6489: 5991: 5605: 5354: 5243: 5048: 4973: 4958: 4917: 4899: 4880: 4850: 4559: 4389: 4315: 4232: 4202: 3708: 3693: 3665: 3616: 3583: 3566: 3452: 3421: 3359: 3325: 3304: 3287: 3220: 3184: 3155: 3094: 3048: 3016: 2882: 2868: 2831: 2774: 2726: 2646: 2408: 2353: 2312: 2261: 2237: 2100: 1841: 1747: 1700: 1671: 1634: 1609: 1585: 1026: 998: 956: 935: 920: 867: 791: 736: 678: 646: 628: 588: 559: 492: 465: 370: 341: 311: 278: 223: 205: 180: 133: 10933:

only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the

10511:

Yes, it's pointy. Trying to run a DYK that is blatantly noncompliant with

9905:

He may be thinking that given the past accolades/"commended" notation for

7284:"This policy ... from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing 660:

What is your preference for the forum for a wider discussion of all this?

11724: 11089: 10978: 10964: 10837: 10445: 10330: 10301: 10112:. I would like to request that the article be unprotected. Thank you. 9089: 9082: 8753: 8642:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

8492: 8420: 8409: 8250: 8060: 7926: 7573: 7539: 7254: 6434: 6404: 6381: 6321: 6288: 6248: 6211: 6169: 6150: 6134: 6098: 6061: 6026: 5771: 5654: 5013: 3682: 2339: 1900: 1174: 978: 8729: 6189:

divulge the contents of private correspondance under any circumstances.

6078:

Actually I am an admin, not that that makes any difference. Go and read

4625:

Thanks. I've dropped it back to semi, no point giving them a free pass.

2988:. Given the events of the last couple of days and the ArbCom motion, we 1039:

I suggest that DS not undelete any that they are not prepared to source

11411: 11112: 11041: 10756: 10673: 10530: 10373: 10341: 10199: 10138: 10108:

Hello. Three years ago, on 25 January 2010, you protected the article

10071: 9969: 9932: 9845: 9774: 9714: 9678: 9622: 9570: 9518: 9390: 9359: 9280: 9256: 9143: 9011: 8946: 8940: 8936: 8877: 8820: 8787: 8389: 8364: 8150: 8082: 8009: 7886: 7858: 7524: 7504:

You have a note at OTRS, 2010022110023583. Good work on that one, sir.

7485: 7373:(because we shouldn't be "forcing newbies to deal with our RS policy") 7197: 7073: 7029: 6977: 6937: 6908: 6826: 6759: 6648: 6612: 6546: 6449: 6420: 6335: 6306: 6265: 6233: 6190: 6113: 6083: 6041: 5977: 5928: 5872: 5838: 5785: 5724: 5695: 5526: 5511: 5474: 5420: 5340: 5297: 5259: 5215: 5201: 5154: 5028: 4987: 4934: 4865: 4832: 4737: 4715: 4626: 4577: 4563: 4540: 4536: 4510: 4496: 4466: 4400: 4357: 4273: 4253:

That's fine, but where did my edit go? I can't find it in my contribs.

4217: 4181: 4116: 4047: 3998: 3960: 3928: 3915: 3869: 3823: 3797: 3777: 3651: 3635: 3601: 3550: 3532: 2952: 2329: 2299: 2252: 2227: 1855: 1812: 10728:

I've read the history of the page, but I'm unclear why you removed it.

8049:

Long unsourced article on a subject with no reliable secondary sources

6717:

all? If so, would you mind doing the honours, as I am not an admin :P

6228:

We'll do it your way then. I am going to remove the table, because we

5539:

Plad explains the points I try to make quite a bit better than I can.

4972:

ok, check out the selective editing of "offensive words", is that ok?

4480:

check my sources as well. Thank you so much for monitoring Knowledge.

2019:

There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of

9913: 9880: 9731: 9696: 9302:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

8186:

I just thought that I'd drop you a quick note to inform you abou the

7711: 7704: 7218:. If you have an idea on how to do this, you might wish to weigh in. 7162: 5642:

I have a picture of Johnny Weir at the 2010 Independent Spirit Awards

4269: 3802: 2962: 2788: 2021:

random speculative "I heard it somewhere" pseudo information is to be

1690: 1657: 1648: 1624: 1600: 645:

I see you are correct. I guess it's a good thing I didn't use a bot.

607: 574: 428: 398: 356: 326: 296: 273:

If the PROD process required that articles would pass all aspects of

259: 8173: 6773: 3776:

Yes. I changed back after some RL issues with outing were resolved.

3549:. Any that receive attention before I get there will be left alone. 222:. Any that receive attention before I get there will be left alone. 10627: 10394: 10268: 10008: 9677:

Thanks, but they are not going to like what I'm writing there now.

9594: 8896:

Hello, Kevin. Please contact the Arbitration Committee by email at

8249:

Hi Kevin, would you have any objections if I tried unprotection of

7377:("restore 'source' with no specification about level of sourcing") 7042:

Twinkle BLPPROD is now live. It can be found on the "Prod" button.

6672:

who were victims of sexual abuse while in the care of the school.

4666: 4659: 4165: 4033: 3979: 3945: 3850: 3565:

divert people who think they'd be better kept from other activity?

3135:

I've found a source for Hurukawa and only Koizumi is an issue. --

2500: 2452: 1829:

please don't continue with unilateral deletions against consensus.

1795: 1778: 1538: 1319: 1296: 1075: 1044: 772:- though the problem and good faith nature here are not in dispute. 6380:

Just to let you know that I have opened a ANI about this page and

6334:

Let's try this another way: where are you getting the names from?

5175:

Hey there Kevin. I undid your protection of the Vivaldi page, per

2311:

all of the older ones? Why do I think that might case more drama?

2038:

http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html

1280: 948:

In trying to ref some of these BLPs I was working off of this one

768:

I think the feedback on ANI indicates that this was a step beyond

11496:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

11441:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

11161:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lefevre Peninsula Primary School

10004: 8268:

Undelete Request for Edgar Gonzalez (architect) (Mexican) request

7649:

Is there an icon that I could insert this as my special project?

6448:

left it in an attempt to be helpful, not to tell you what to do.

2759:

I do wonder, what attention do you pay to community consensus? --

1168: 8235: 7820:-- an editor recently deleted it. You may wish to comment. TIA, 5811:

It is intended to get the most acceptance by the most people.

5065:

Just noticed your edit summary for removing deletion. Thanks! --

4216:

So you were being facetious with your final argument to delete?

3615:

I wasn't accusing you of racism, simply of promoting ignorance.

2199:

Also, the message subject was "Zero information is preferred to

2023:

tagged with a "needs a cite" tag. Wrong. It should be removed,

10479:. Please don't do that, especially given that you're an admin. 10441: 10326: 10297: 9931:

Yeah, maybe. We shall have to wait and see. Liked the tunes :)

9316:

Please note my comment on the pending request for arbitration,

8193:

Should you happen to stop by and decide to contribute, please:

2222:

Any particular reason you chose mass deletion rather than mass

1147: 11584: 11540: 11330: 10601:

Who is this Prioryman and why is he so frenetically whinging?

9713:

I take your point, but there's some nails that need pounding.

8197:

Pick a new selected article and picture every two weeks or so.

7672:

An AFD you participated in 6 months ago, is being done again.

6788: 10732:

What needs to be cleaned up, and what's the process for this?

8514: 8377:

Your opinion is in the wrong section if you aren't an admin.

8022:

Oh... long-unsourced! Sorry, that makes much more sense. -

7733:

You are receiving this note because of your participation in

6800:. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few 6755:

might be the best venue. Someone else restored the article -

4392:. Before someone else points it out you should probably read 2043:

We need take a firmer stance when it comes to BLP articles.

10723:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Meco/sandbox

8876:

Yeah, I find people tend to find out when they try to edit.

8712:

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

7281:"Do not base articles entirely on primary sources" (WP:NOR). 6852:

I'm not at all trying to stop it. I've said so a few times.

2587:

specifically refers to deleting unsourced or poorly sourced

7545:

Hi there. You proposed this article for deletion using the

6950:

I've been keeping a graph, yes. You might be interested in

5419:

Your plea would carry more weight with an actual argument.

3062:(To people who are looking for lists of deleted BLP pages) 369:

If I honestly though that there was a better way, I would.

6232:. If you replace any unsourced entries, I will block you. 5784:

Thanks, I picked up the wrong revison. Think it's OK now.

5766:

Kevin, would you take a look at what you did in reverting

4495:

OK. The article has been undeleted, and the AfD relisted.

4333:

KEVIN - WOULD YOU PLEASE REPLACE MY PAGE . MELVYN GRANT!

1201: 397:

rather than people upset about the deletions starting it.

11721:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

11218:

will have a guest speaker from the National Trust of SA.

7413:"Reliable source" has an accepted description on WP; see 6611:

Another prompt is exactly what I was thinking is needed.

5091: 5047:

Hi Kevin, just wondering why you made the changes to the

997:

I'm happy to undelete, so long as the sources are added.

11033:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Death of Abigail Taylor

7935:. I was wondering if you might share your opinion here: 7136:, nothing has been done. Sure 10,000 articles have been 5990:

For the person exercising the pressure, it would seem.

4812:

for further consideration. Thank you, have a good day.--

2984:

at an RfC. An alternative process is being discussed at

2951:

potentially go somewhere is a minimum to be reasonable.

2025:

aggressively, unless it can be sourced. — Jimmy Wales

11142:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

11014:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

9876:

I hope this comes across the way I intend it to. :-) —

8782:

If I was OK with them I would not have removed it. The

8544:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

8149:, I am no longer an admin and cannot undelete for you. 4774:

Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment

4463:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald

3219:

110,000 articles in there? That's almost unbelievable.

11406:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

11257:

Thank you for taking care of the correct sourcing for

10515:, as you yourself have pointed out, is very bad form. 10043:

Thank you for taking care of the correct sourcing for

7314:

removed immediately and without waiting for discussion

5214:

Or notice that he has unfortunately died, apparently.

4682:

Ed Esber's self-written peacocking that you restored:

3152:

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/MPDiscsAlpha.html

3014:

Knowledge:Arbitration_Committee_Ruling_(BLP_Deletions)

2804:

Hi - I responded to Ikip's statement at BLP_deletions

11206:

Invitation to Adelaide Knowledge Users Group meetings

10003:

Your administrator permissions have been restored by

9008:

Level II procedures for removing administrative tools

7931:

I noticed that you participated in a previous RFC at

5581:

I have filed a clarification on the arbitration case

4665:

Ed Esber, is that you? I rewrote the opening to the

11148:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

11020:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

10929:

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be

10559:

If even Volunteer Marek can see the problems with it

4748:

International Who’s Who in Poetry 2005, 13th Edition

3199:

Category:Articles lacking sources from December 2009

2005:

WP:JIMBOSAID notwithstanding, I find this relevant:

1689:

720:

Keep at it. Your deletions are long overdue. :-) --

11369:

Orphaned non-free image File:The Tracker poster.jpg

8728:Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): 8059:have now expanded and properly sourced the article 3849:independent of him or his publishing house. Cheers 818:(edit conflict) I see pretty strong support at the 11719:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 7933:Knowledge talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions 5473:Really. I rather doubt any action would be taken. 4535:for deletion and am unable to notify the creator ( 3183:I think I'll just PROD them and see what happens. 1557:if the article creator doesn't care, why should we 627:Please stop what you are doing. You just deleted 102:)" website was featured in the references section. 11488:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 11433:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 10793:Books and Bytes: The Knowledge Library Newsletter 10755:moved it, you might ask him what the reason was. 5405:Please do not make any out-of-process deletions. 2867:You could do that pretty much anywhere but here. 2706:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#BLP_deletions 98:) The information was sourced and a link to the " 8998:has unilaterally reversed a block placed by two 8047:In addresing your concern that the article was " 6472:Hello Kevin I just noticed you deleted a RfC in 4396:, which contains help on writing about yourself. 100:http://business.rutgers.edu/default.aspx?id=1663 96:http://business.rutgers.edu/default.aspx?id=1663 11284:A year ago, you were the 423rd recipient of my 11221:This coming Sunday, 6 July, we will be holding 8664:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion 4864:A ranting matyr. Just what I've always wanted. 544:. It should not have been deleted, in my view. 11402:Note that any non-free images not used in any 9762:dispute is causing a lot of needless strife. 7871:You mean that wasn't intentional? Pity :-) -- 7626:There's a supportive message for you at OTRS. 7028:, or wherever it has been moved to this week. 6524:Knowledge talk:Sticky Prod workshop#Categories 6474:Knowledge talk:Requests for comment/MarshalN20 3974:for the conventional 7-days. You may find the 3302:Category:Unsourced BLP Deletionist Wikipedians 9947:Motion to return Kevin's administrator rights 9049:: AGK, Risker, Roger Davies, Worm That Turned 7842:edit seems to have edited Jimmy's comment. -- 7347:, but that, as far as I remember, was all.-- 3085:Restored with no sources, or poorly sourced: 2807:; hope you'll agree it's an accurate account 10137:to the talk page with your suggested edits. 8721:donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts 7743: 7291:"Be very firm about the use of high quality 7278:the information as it is presented (WP:NOR). 5604:I should have either stubbified or speedied 5105: 4673:My version is pretty balanced. Ed's isn't. 4086:is a useful list. I found these articles by 3386:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/James Hyland 11600:and the userright will be restored per the 11556:and the userright will be restored per the 11346:and the userright will be restored per the 11183:Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians 8042:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Janette Luu 7735:WT:Revision deletion#Community consultation 2526:as the article is coming along nicely now. 11633: 9214:I sent this reply to AGK, CCd to arbcom-l 8689:. If the page is deleted, you can contact 8200:Update the 'Did You Know?' box every week. 5433:What would be your argument for doing so? 5353:Why is everyone else out of step with me? 4769:The New North - culturenorthernireland.org 4750:- original entry available at Google Books 4731:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chris Agee 3942:Knowledge:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion 3735:. Thank you for any advice you can offer. 3300:Thought this might help in the between... 2739:I've done so, thanks for the suggestion. – 1060:Very few buses pass through my apartment. 10977:A few years back, you protected the page 10624:https://www.google.com/search?q=Prioryman 10529:Is there some part of it that is untrue? 3397:Knowledge:Article Incubator//James Hyland 3393:User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/James Hyland 2144:negative information about living persons 1436:from Knowledge. You are not Judge Dredd. 1317: 1278: 1242: 1199: 1109: 9517:information was a certaintly to recurr. 8892:Please contact the Arbitration Committee 7857:Ta. Maybe random trolling isn't for me. 5618:, a mistake. Live and learn, I suppose. 5339:action could actually provoke a change. 5008:What should we do with the last vote at 3761:Is your former usenamn User:Rdm2376 ? -- 3742: 2203:information", not on all information. -- 1623:an editor not in your role as an admin.© 677:? Less cynically, I have no preference. 11592:in June 2011, consensus was reached to 11548:in June 2011, consensus was reached to 11338:in June 2011, consensus was reached to 11079:Some insights on Abigail Taylor's death 10635: 10402: 10276: 9727:Fair enough. I even understand. :-) — 9602: 8910:Special:Emailuser/Arbitration Committee 8644:the guide to writing your first article 7816:There's a discussion of retaining this 7523:Has no-one else picked up that ticket? 3995:policy on biographies of living persons 3868:. I'll look at your question in a bit. 3747: 2986:Knowledge:Deletion of unreferenced BLPs 2545:, Minister in the government of Åland. 2395:- former Canadian Member of Parliament 14: 11083:Hi there, I noticed you nominated the 7651:Faith#Advantages_associated_with_faith 7274:to the topic of the article, and that 4912:i've improved the article a little at 4779:Aspects 2009 Irish Literature Festival 4759:A father left bereft - The Irish Times 3737: 3545:The next batch of articles are here - 1949:material or is written non-neutrally, 1145: 218:The next batch of articles are here - 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 10751:I've never seen this article before, 10475:is getting very close to the line of 9300:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 8730:http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM 4074:Speedying my prods, and a useful tool 3800:. Enough is enough already. Cheers 3362:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 3328:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 3307:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 3019:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 2885:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 2834:▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ 10863:Welcome to the inaugural edition of 10477:disrupting Knowledge to make a point 9002:relating to the repeated posting of 8168: 5200:No problem. Didn't see that thread. 5179:. I hope that's all right with you. 2150:to support the removal of unsourced 2010: 25: 11150:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 11022:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 10389:You mean like the policy that says 9959:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case 9501: 9427: 9193: 9112: 8697:the page or email a copy to you. 8687:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 8649:You may want to consider using the 5608:. Instead, I merely tagged it with 1352:A more appropriate response IMHO: 973:Request for userfying or undeletion 491:I'm sure you are not the only one. 23: 11598:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard 11554:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard 11374: 11344:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard 9493: 9419: 9185: 9104: 8693:to request that the administrator 8632: 8513: 6796:! You participated earlier in the 2076:look if it's possible to source it 822:thread. Esp. among older users. -- 24: 11743: 11514:review the candidates' statements 11459:review the candidates' statements 11159:The article will be discussed at 11031:The article will be discussed at 9389:Yes I saw that, and no I didn't. 8438:Undelete Request for Tony Grimaud 8145:I think you'll have more luck at 7210:There is currently a proposal at 6545:, which I believe already works. 4740:meets our criteria for authors. 4146:. Adam Gay Video Directory. 1993. 2017:I can NOT emphasize this enough. 1935:Deletions within policy? Please. 11703: 11583: 11539: 11329: 11246: 11145:Lefevre Peninsula Primary School 11135: 11129:Lefevre Peninsula Primary School 11007: 10815: 10032: 9811: 9588: 9043:: Kirill Lokshin, NuclearWarfare 8900: 8509: 8234: 8208: 8172: 6787: 3201:is quite a bit but I've already 1358: 1318: 1279: 1243: 1200: 1146: 1110: 29: 11098: 11091: 10812:Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 9976:For the Arbitration Committee, 9860:For your listening pleasure ... 9059:For the Arbitration Committee, 8561: 8556: 8319:know that this is acceptable. 7910: 7714:? It's been over two months. 7214:to tighten the requirements of 6264:is the usual complaints venue. 5012:where an IP signed for a user? 3323:Category:Unsourced_BLP_Rescuers 3266:User:The Wordsmith/BLP sourcing 3150:Not quite. Most are sourced to 2849:IF there any any I can start a 2826:Is there any way I can start a 2403:- Cabinet of the Åland Islands 2146:.". The quote is being used in 1913: 1608:So you advocate doing nothing? 11520:. For the Election committee, 11490:Arbitration Committee election 11481:ArbCom elections are now open! 11465:. For the Election committee, 11435:Arbitration Committee election 11426:ArbCom elections are now open! 9555:A fluffernutter is a sandwich! 8554: 8433:08:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC) 7982:04:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 7645:Dear Kevin, 'Special project'? 7572:Thanks for improving the page 6739: 6727: 5600:Thanks for catching my mistake 5116:Square Enix Music Team layoffs 4789:Franco-Irish Literary Festival 4144:"Gay Erotic Video Awards 1992" 4092:Category:All unreferenced BLPs 3497:Better get with the program. 3391:Please either userfy to me at 2597:WT:CSD#Add new criteria to CSD 1253:What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar 1225:Hands of gorse, heart of steel 1120:What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar 951:. For example, the article on 13: 1: 11642:biographies of living persons 11530:13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 11475:13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 11397:our policy for non-free media 11254:biographies of living persons 11189:Knowledge:Missing Wikipedians 11121:05:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC) 11106:20:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 11069:04:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 11050:00:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 10994:15:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 10040:biographies of living persons 10009: 8833:Life's too short!!!! Cheers! 8741:WikiProject Resource Exchange 8681:the page's talk page directly 8625:19:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 8095:Thank you, and best regards, 8032:22:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 8018:10:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 8003:06:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 7750: 6731: 4996:00:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 4982:23:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4967:23:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4947:11:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 4926:02:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 4908:23:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4889:22:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4874:22:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4859:20:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4841:22:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4822:12:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 4724:08:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 4707:06:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 4651:22:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4635:22:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4620:22:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4590:20:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4572:20:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4553:15:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4475:09:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4457:21:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 4430:14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC) 4409:21:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4382:13:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4366:03:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4349:13:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4324:11:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4299:17:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4282:00:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4263:00:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4241:08:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4226:00:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4211:00:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 4190:11:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4174:11:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4125:08:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4110:07:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4056:22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4042:21:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4007:21:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3988:21:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3969:20:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3954:11:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3924:07:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3908:07:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3891:Kevin – what the hell, dude? 3878:06:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3859:06:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3832:03:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 3813:06:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 3786:22:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 3771:22:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 3752:15:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 3723:Sai Baba of Shirdi link issue 2384:Please restore these articles 2086: 2080: 1992: 1986: 1963: 1957: 11408:criteria for speedy deletion 10968:15:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 10949:The Knowledge Library Survey 10942:20:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 10909:Announcing WikiProject Open: 10903:News from the library world: 8886:04:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 8871:00:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC) 8653:to help you create articles. 8477:17:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 8108:00:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 8091:23:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC) 8076:22:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC) 6735: 6506: 6500: 5084:Just so you know, I've made 5080:BLP contentiousness proposal 4152:Internet Adult Film Database 3733:Sai Baba of Shirdi talk page 3717:07:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 3702:06:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC) 3674:00:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 3660:00:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 3644:00:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 3559:21:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 3541:04:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 3478:07:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3461:05:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3447:04:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC) 3430:05:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 3415:05:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 3372:07:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 3354:19:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3338:16:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3317:15:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3296:04:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3280:04:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3243:05:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3229:05:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3215:05:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3193:05:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3179:05:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3164:05:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3145:05:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3080:21:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 3057:21:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 3029:19:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 3012:For a historic context : --> 3008:19:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2971:19:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2956:19:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2946:18:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2925:17:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2895:05:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 2877:21:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2863:21:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2844:16:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2817:13:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2797:03:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2783:03:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2769:02:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2751:02:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2735:02:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2720:02:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2675:03:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2655:03:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2641:03:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2620:03:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2607:01:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2573:01:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2536:20:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2512:21:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2489:19:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 2425:Donald Cole (anthropologist) 2362:01:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 2348:01:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 2333:09:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2321:03:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2303:02:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2290:02:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2270:01:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2256:01:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2246:01:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2231:01:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2213:14:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2185:01:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2130:00:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2109:00:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2095:00:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2053:00:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 2001:00:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1972:00:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1920:00:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1907: 1893:00:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1859:00:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1850:00:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1836:00:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1816:00:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1807:00:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1790:23:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1756:01:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1741:00:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1709:00:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1694:00:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1680:23:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1666:23:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1652:23:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1643:22:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1628:22:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1618:22:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1604:22:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1594:20:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1573:19:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1550:18:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1533:18:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1514:18:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1490:17:20, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1473:14:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1451:11:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1426:08:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1403:Alternative with same effect 1398:20:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC) 1345:02:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1308:18:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1269:08:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1233:12:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1190:08:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1136:07:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1087:00:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1070:23:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1056:19:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1035:06:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1021:06:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1007:05:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 992:05:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 965:06:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 944:06:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 929:06:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 901:06:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 876:06:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 862:06:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 832:05:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 800:05:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 785:05:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 764:05:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 745:05:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 735:Thanks. Gotta do something. 730:05:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 708:05:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 695:To the dramaboard, then.... 687:05:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 669:05:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 655:05:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 640:04:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 616:05:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 597:05:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 583:05:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 568:04:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 553:04:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 514:04:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 501:04:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 487:04:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 474:04:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 459:04:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 437:22:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 422:18:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 407:04:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 379:04:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 365:04:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 350:04:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 335:04:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 320:04:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 305:04:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 287:04:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 268:04:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 247:16:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 232:21:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 214:04:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 189:00:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 171:21:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 142:20:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 125:14:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 7: 11681:six years now - miss you -- 11516:and submit your choices on 11461:and submit your choices on 11388:File:The Tracker poster.jpg 11187:You have been mentioned at 10891:New subscription donations: 10788:10:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 9819:The Brilliant Idea Barnstar 9506: 9432: 9403:Er. Could you explain why? 9198: 9117: 8843:01:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 8829:00:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 8811:00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 8796:22:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 8777:10:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 8691:one of these administrators 8452:12:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 8159:20:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 8140:00:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 7371:reverted back to any source 6723: 5806:proposed a motion to ArbCom 4914:User:Vejvančický/Chris Agee 4829:User:Vejvančický/Chris Agee 4150:Please use a more specific 3259:shameless canvassing of TPS 3197:If you're also interested, 2472:John Manley (archaeologist) 2435:- notable Iraqi politician 2091: 1997: 1982:"making more direct action" 1968: 10: 11748: 11696:Nomination for merging of 11691:07:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC) 11677:07:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC) 11522:MediaWiki message delivery 11467:MediaWiki message delivery 11320:09:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 11278:09:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 11178:16:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 10953:As a subscriber to one of 10885:Knowledge Loves Libraries: 10871:, please add your name to 10696:22:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10682:22:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10668:19:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10650:12:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10619:09:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10593:00:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10573:00:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10554:00:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10539:00:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 10525:23:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 10507:23:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 10489:23:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC) 10242:Give him ALL the barnstars 10233:20:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC) 10208:21:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 10192:16:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 10147:21:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 10122:21:51, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 10095:10:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 10080:10:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 10064:09:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC) 10018:17:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 9986:17:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC) 9941:23:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC) 9926:22:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC) 9893:04:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC) 8592:07:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 8501:04:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 8415:An editor has asked for a 8398:06:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 8384:06:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 8373:06:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 8358:05:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 8245:Stana Katic semiprotection 8228:21:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 7737:, which is referred to in 7699:08:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 7663:21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 7653:, what would be my script? 7640:14:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC) 7605:02:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 7586:19:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 7563:22:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC) 7533:23:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 7518:21:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 7386:Geni reverted it once more 6657:01:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 6642:00:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 6621:23:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 6606:12:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 6555:22:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC) 6536:02:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC) 6513:03:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 6458:22:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 6443:22:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 6429:21:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 6413:21:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 6398:07:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 6373:06:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6344:04:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6330:02:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6315:01:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6297:01:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6274:01:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6257:01:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6242:01:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6220:01:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6199:01:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6178:01:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6159:01:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6143:01:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6122:01:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6107:01:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6092:00:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6070:00:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6050:00:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6035:00:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 6000:13:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 5986:11:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 5971:08:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 5937:07:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 5907:01:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC) 5881:23:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC) 5866:17:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC) 5847:08:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 5831:06:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 5794:04:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5779:03:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5748:02:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5733:02:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5719:02:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5704:01:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5689:01:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 5667:20:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 5634:12:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 4134:Speedy Delete, too Speedy? 3321:And for the sake of NPOV, 3068:Special:Log/delete/Rdm2376 2058:Note that your quote says 2034: 1524:few more days won't hurt. 1220:illegitimi non carborundum 11646: 11641: 11632: 11618:00:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC) 11420:17:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC) 11375: 10915:New ways to get involved: 10765:22:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 10747:06:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC) 10450:22:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 10436:12:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 10417:10:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 10382:23:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10368:22:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10350:21:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10335:18:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10320:18:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10306:12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10291:10:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10262:03:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 10153:Consider another unblock? 9854:04:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 9836:02:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC) 9810: 9796:21:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 9783:21:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 9767:12:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 9744:22:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9723:22:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9709:22:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9687:22:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9673:21:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9631:21:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9617:13:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9579:21:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9563:21:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9527:21:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9512:21:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9468:21:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9453:21:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9438:20:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9413:20:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9399:20:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9384:19:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9368:20:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9353:19:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 9330:13:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9312:Arbitration and adminship 9307:07:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9289:03:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9265:00:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9204:00:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC) 9167:23:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 9152:21:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 9137:21:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 9123:21:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 9096:17:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 9069:06:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 8931:16:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC) 8901: 8757:17:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC) 8707:19:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 8658:A tag has been placed on 8567:00:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 8506:Dispute resolution survey 8340:19:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 8314:Recreate OurStage article 8263:01:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 7895:06:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 7881:03:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 7867:02:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 7852:01:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 7830:16:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 7494:01:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7478:00:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7452:16:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7426:22:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7357:12:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7333:03:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7227:01:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7206:01:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7192:01:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7171:00:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7156:00:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 7126:17:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 7110:12:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 7082:10:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 7066:09:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 7051:19:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 7038:07:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 7017:07:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6986:05:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6971:05:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6946:05:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6932:05:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6917:05:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6893:05:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6879:05:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6862:05:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6848:05:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6835:05:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 6820:06:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 6768:06:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC) 6746:16:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC) 6693:03:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 6561:Danish Taimoor - deletion 5595:08:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5555:17:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5535:07:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5520:06:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5506:06:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5483:04:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5469:03:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5451:05:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5429:04:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5415:03:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5383:17:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5363:10:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5349:03:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5334:03:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5306:03:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5292:02:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5268:23:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 5252:23:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 5224:04:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5210:04:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5195:04:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5163:03:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5146:03:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5111:21:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 5075:15:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 5061:14:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 5037:03:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 5022:03:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 4810:Knowledge:Deletion review 4519:02:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 4505:23:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 4490:21:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 4088:checking the intersection 3625:10:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3610:20:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3592:10:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3575:20:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3513:04:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 2853:? What fookin' drama!-- 2687:No, reserve the right to 2600:of passing as CSD first. 2035: 1897:Don't worry I unblocked. 1324: 1285: 1249: 1206: 1152: 1116: 11733:10:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 11574:00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 11364:00:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC) 11235:05:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 11152:or whether it should be 11024:or whether it should be 10922:Read the full newsletter 10626:may explain a little. — 10101:Request unprotection of 8307:15:34, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 7949:19:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 7922:04:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 7807:02:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 7759:Deleted "Amapola Cabase" 7754:14:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 7724:07:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 7710:Is it time to unprotect 5097: 5093: 4158:for available templates. 3822:My IRC nick is kevin_g. 2173:speedy deletion criteria 1376:whacked with a wet trout 11717:Template:Archive bottom 11201:08:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC) 11085:Death of Abigail Taylor 11017:Death of Abigail Taylor 11001:Death of Abigail Taylor 10710:resurrecting an article 8674:for more information. 8482:sorry for the confusion 8347:Are you still an admin? 6518:prod BLP template fixes 5768:Dennis James (musician) 5761:Dennis James (musician) 4896:Article Rescue Squadron 4436:Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald 3866:User:Ash/Dominik Trojan 11647:... you were recipient 11380: 10973:Rajon Rondo protection 9974: 9866:take the money and run 8672:Knowledge:FAQ/Business 8668:the guidelines on spam 8655: 8637: 8518: 8276:architectural scene. 8118:John O'Hara (musician) 7835:Unintended alteration? 7668:Boba Phat at AFD again 4802:World Literature Today 4764:World Literature Today 4447:Thanks for you time! 4272:deleted the revision. 3045:User:Rdm2376/Unwatched 2905:Deleted unsourced BLPs 2773:"There's a community? 1943:normally a last resort 1811:Nonsense. Good block. 220:User:Rdm2376/Unwatched 11713:nominated for merging 11494:Arbitration Committee 11439:Arbitration Committee 11385:Thanks for uploading 11378: 11223:our first Edit-a-thon 10955:The Knowledge Library 10873:the subscriber's list 9963: 9587:? What are you, crazy 8640: 8636: 8523:Dispute Resolution – 8517: 8116:Undelete request for 7812:Delete Ayers mugshot? 3796:... for the sprot on 2459:- Swedish cartoonist 42:of past discussions. 11623:Precious anniversary 11602:re-sysopping process 11590:community discussion 11558:re-sysopping process 11546:community discussion 11348:re-sysopping process 11336:community discussion 10780:Ship owner symposium 10356:Age of Enlightenment 9495:The Devil's Advocate 9421:The Devil's Advocate 9187:The Devil's Advocate 9106:The Devil's Advocate 9004:personal information 8660:State Fund Insurance 8602:State Fund Insurance 8408:Deletion review for 8188:Rock Climbing Portal 7402:removed it once more 6806:There are now a few 6802:points of contention 6798:sticky prod workshop 6663:St Patrick's College 5120:Here's your source: 4794:Irish Writers Online 4784:Dublin Book Festival 4558:That's interesting, 4196:Richard C. Longworth 3864:I've userfied it at 3547:User:Kevin/Unwatched 3203:found one hidden BLP 2068:unless it is sourced 1715:tilting at windmills 1289:The Cleanup Barnstar 893:Georgewilliamherbert 854:Georgewilliamherbert 777:Georgewilliamherbert 11629: 11628:Three years ago ... 11498:arbitration process 11443:arbitration process 10963:Thanks and cheers, 10770:Block tags for Meco 9804:A barnstar for you! 8906:lists.wikimedia.org 8190:is up and running. 6719:Thanks in advance, 6040:See the talk page. 4527:Protected talk page 3885:Anja Juliette Laval 3451:There was a furor? 2433:Naseer al-Chaderchi 2201:misleading or false 1955:(emphasis mine). -- 1390:Contains Mild Peril 1215:BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO!! 11627: 11510:arbitration policy 11455:arbitration policy 11381: 11263:awesome Wikipedian 10049:awesome Wikipedian 9655:Arbitration motion 9585:assumed good faith 8638: 8519: 7610:Evan Starkman page 7576:, I appreciate it. 7500:Michael Woroniecki 7392:, left undefined, 6743: 6480:and months before 4159: 4154:template. See the 3805: 3120:Orlando A. Naranjo 3105:Masanori Matsuyama 3064:Special:Log/delete 2443:- Swedish actress 2326:Listen to yourself 2070:. If something is 1328:Home-Made Barnstar 1041:that very instant 11665: 11664: 11393:claim of fair use 11061:Joseph A. Spadaro 10858:Knowledge Library 10617: 10223:comment added by 10182:comment added by 9924: 9891: 9841: 9840: 9742: 9707: 9537: 9055:: Salvio giuliano 9010:. The unblock of 8929: 8815:You could ask at 8719:, who generously 8615:comment added by 8574: 8573: 8569: 8343: 8326:comment added by 8310: 8293:comment added by 8242: 8241: 8051:", editors using 7972:comment added by 7915: 7785: 7771:comment added by 7716:Everard Proudfoot 7638: 7516: 7424: 7390:"relevant" source 7331: 6721: 6706:Gracie and Zarkov 6700:Gracie and Zarkov 6696: 6679:comment added by 6587: 6573:comment added by 6363:comment added by 5670: 5653:comment added by 5316: 5149: 5132:comment added by 5086:a proposal at BLP 4710: 4693:comment added by 4649: 4618: 4604:As a result of a 4420:comment added by 4339:comment added by 4149: 3978:project helpful. 3818:IRC cloak request 3811: 3801: 3522:Note re deletions 3503:comment added by 3264:sign, located at 3130:Kiichiro Hurukawa 3110:Atsushi Takahashi 3070:(as an example). 3006: 2944: 2639: 2632: 2555:, also minister. 2465:Bounleut Saycocie 2449:Robert C. Kolodny 2288: 2033: 2032: 1941:Page deletion is 1918: 1739: 1571: 1424: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1350: 1349: 1313: 1312: 1274: 1273: 1238: 1237: 1209:The Pug Barnstar 1195: 1194: 1141: 1140: 706: 667: 638: 551: 541:Technology Review 535:The Village Voice 512: 485: 457: 195:Note re deletions 174: 157:comment added by 128: 111:comment added by 92:"Richard Mammone" 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 11739: 11707: 11706: 11637: 11630: 11626: 11587: 11543: 11383: 11377: 11333: 11301: 11250: 11139: 11138: 11100: 11093: 11011: 11010: 10935:Suggestions page 10819: 10776:Jonas Gahr Støre 10647: 10646: 10642: 10638: 10632: 10616: 10614: 10609: 10602: 10591: 10586: 10571: 10566: 10505: 10500: 10468:POINTy behaviour 10414: 10413: 10409: 10405: 10399: 10288: 10287: 10283: 10279: 10273: 10235: 10194: 10136: 10130: 10036: 10013: 9956: 9923: 9921: 9910: 9890: 9888: 9877: 9828:Hell In A Bucket 9815: 9808: 9807: 9741: 9739: 9728: 9706: 9704: 9693: 9614: 9613: 9609: 9605: 9599: 9592: 9531: 9508: 9503: 9497: 9491:circumstances.-- 9434: 9429: 9423: 9200: 9195: 9189: 9119: 9114: 9108: 8997: 8925: 8907: 8905: 8904: 8903: 8762:Marc Sinden page 8635: 8627: 8565: 8563: 8558: 8548: 8510: 8381: 8355: 8342: 8320: 8309: 8287: 8238: 8216: 8212: 8211: 8176: 8169: 8129: 8100: 8068: 7984: 7920: 7913: 7873:Seth Finkelstein 7784: 7765: 7751: 7747: 7695: 7692: 7689: 7686: 7683: 7680: 7632: 7510: 7473: 7423: 7421: 7404:even after that. 7330: 7328: 7304:about themselves 7286:reliable sources 7276:directly support 7272:directly related 7244:reliable sources 7225: 7187: 7151: 7049: 6969: 6930: 6877: 6846: 6794:Kevin/Archive 7' 6791: 6741: 6737: 6733: 6729: 6725: 6695: 6673: 6586: 6567: 6511: 6508: 6502: 6375: 5669: 5647: 5629: 5617: 5611: 5550: 5467: 5378: 5329: 5310: 5287: 5190: 5148: 5126: 5107: 5100: 5099: 5095: 5014:Kevin Rutherford 4709: 4687: 4643: 4612: 4585: 4548: 4533:Gabriele Cattani 4432: 4351: 4147: 4105: 3807: 3749: 3744: 3739: 3515: 3470: 3439: 3407: 3363: 3347: 3329: 3308: 3278: 3115:Hitoshi Shiozawa 3100:Tetsuyasu Mitani 3090:Hidemasa Koizumi 3020: 2997: 2935: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2886: 2835: 2744: 2713: 2633: 2629: 2543:Harriet Lindeman 2487: 2307:So I can go and 2279: 2092: 2088: 2082: 2040: 2011: 1998: 1994: 1988: 1969: 1965: 1959: 1915: 1909: 1898: 1730: 1713:I think you are 1565: 1531: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1466: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1415: 1381: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1341: 1322: 1315: 1314: 1283: 1276: 1275: 1247: 1240: 1239: 1204: 1197: 1196: 1187: 1184: 1182: 1156:The BLP Barnstar 1150: 1143: 1142: 1114: 1107: 1106: 705: 703: 666: 664: 637: 635: 550: 548: 511: 509: 484: 482: 456: 454: 445:Recent deletions 173: 151: 127: 105: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 11747: 11746: 11742: 11741: 11740: 11738: 11737: 11736: 11704: 11701: 11661:a prize of QAI! 11625: 11581: 11537: 11518:the voting page 11484: 11463:the voting page 11429: 11410:. Thank you. -- 11372: 11371: 11327: 11299: 11282: 11281: 11251: 11242: 11216:23 July meeting 11208: 11185: 11140: 11136: 11133: 11081: 11012: 11008: 11005: 10989: 10975: 10951: 10946: 10924: 10869:Books and Bytes 10865:Books and Bytes 10862: 10852: 10810: 10809: 10808: 10804:Books and Bytes 10795: 10772: 10712: 10644: 10640: 10636: 10628: 10612: 10605: 10603: 10587: 10582: 10567: 10562: 10501: 10496: 10470: 10411: 10407: 10403: 10395: 10285: 10281: 10277: 10269: 10244: 10218: 10177: 10155: 10134: 10128: 10106: 10068: 10067: 10037: 10028: 9978:Alexandr Dmitri 9952: 9949: 9919: 9911: 9886: 9878: 9862: 9806: 9756: 9737: 9729: 9702: 9694: 9665:Alexandr Dmitri 9657: 9611: 9607: 9603: 9595: 9510: 9436: 9337: 9314: 9296: 9272: 9202: 9181: 9121: 9085: 8949: 8944: 8899: 8897: 8894: 8859: 8764: 8717:Credo Reference 8714: 8656: 8633: 8610: 8605: 8598:Speedy deletion 8579: 8541:to participate. 8528: 8508: 8484: 8459: 8440: 8417:deletion review 8413: 8379: 8353: 8349: 8321: 8316: 8288: 8270: 8247: 8231: 8209: 8207: 8167: 8165:Climbing Portal 8137: 8127: 8121: 8098: 8066: 8045: 7990: 7967: 7956: 7929: 7907: 7837: 7814: 7766: 7761: 7731: 7708: 7693: 7690: 7687: 7684: 7681: 7678: 7670: 7647: 7624: 7612: 7602: 7593: 7570: 7543: 7502: 7471: 7459: 7419: 7375:as did Maurreen 7326: 7219: 7185: 7149: 7134:the big picture 7043: 6963: 6924: 6871: 6840: 6785: 6776: 6702: 6674: 6665: 6629: 6593: 6568: 6563: 6520: 6497: 6470: 6468:The RfC deleted 6358: 6022: 5802: 5764: 5676: 5674:Woroniecki Page 5648: 5644: 5627: 5615: 5613:unreferencedBLP 5609: 5602: 5579: 5548: 5461: 5376: 5327: 5285: 5239:WT:BLP PROD TPL 5234: 5188: 5177:this ANI thread 5173: 5170:Antonio Vivaldi 5127: 5118: 5082: 5045: 5043:Changes to page 5006: 4954: 4933:I've recreated 4734: 4688: 4663: 4602: 4583: 4546: 4529: 4438: 4415: 4334: 4331: 4311: 4251: 4198: 4142: 4136: 4103: 4076: 3896:under that name 3889: 3887:speedy deletion 3842: 3820: 3794: 3759: 3725: 3686: 3632: 3524: 3498: 3492: 3468: 3437: 3405: 3395:or incubate at 3389: 3384:A request inre 3369: 3361: 3345: 3335: 3327: 3314: 3306: 3272: 3261: 3125:Thierry Pauwels 3043:on the list at 3026: 3018: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2907: 2892: 2884: 2851:Kevin Hate club 2841: 2833: 2824: 2742: 2711: 2702: 2637: 2580: 2524:Talk:Tolu Ajayi 2522:Please restore 2481: 2411:- Chilean poet 2393:Stephen Langdon 2386: 2085: 1991: 1962: 1903: 1525: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1464: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1405: 1343: 1337: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1105: 975: 953:John Poindexter 718: 701: 662: 633: 546: 530: 507: 480: 452: 447: 255: 197: 152: 106: 90: 88:Restore Article 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Kevin 12: 11: 5: 11745: 11709:Template:Afc b 11700: 11698:Template:Afc b 11694: 11663: 11662: 11660: 11648: 11644: 11643: 11639: 11638: 11624: 11621: 11580: 11577: 11536: 11533: 11487: 11483: 11478: 11432: 11428: 11423: 11370: 11367: 11326: 11323: 11256: 11245: 11244: 11243: 11241: 11240:Precious again 11238: 11207: 11204: 11184: 11181: 11134: 11132: 11127:Nomination of 11125: 11124: 11123: 11080: 11077: 11076: 11075: 11074: 11073: 11072: 11071: 11006: 11004: 10999:Nomination of 10997: 10985: 10974: 10971: 10950: 10947: 10926: 10920: 10879:New positions: 10854: 10800: 10799: 10798: 10797: 10796: 10794: 10791: 10771: 10768: 10753:User:Jimfbleak 10737: 10733: 10729: 10725: 10719: 10711: 10708: 10707: 10706: 10705: 10704: 10703: 10702: 10701: 10700: 10699: 10698: 10599: 10598: 10597: 10596: 10595: 10579: 10578: 10577: 10576: 10575: 10469: 10466: 10465: 10464: 10463: 10462: 10461: 10460: 10459: 10458: 10457: 10456: 10455: 10454: 10453: 10452: 10423: 10384: 10337: 10293: 10267:Yes. Bravo. — 10243: 10240: 10239: 10238: 10237: 10236: 10154: 10151: 10150: 10149: 10105: 10099: 10098: 10097: 10042: 10031: 10030: 10029: 10027: 10024: 10023: 10022: 10021: 10020: 9998: 9997: 9988: 9948: 9945: 9944: 9943: 9903: 9902: 9897: 9874: 9873: 9868: 9861: 9858: 9857: 9856: 9839: 9838: 9822: 9821: 9816: 9805: 9802: 9801: 9800: 9799: 9798: 9786: 9785: 9755: 9752: 9751: 9750: 9749: 9748: 9747: 9746: 9656: 9653: 9652: 9651: 9650: 9649: 9648: 9647: 9646: 9645: 9644: 9643: 9642: 9641: 9640: 9639: 9638: 9637: 9636: 9635: 9634: 9633: 9499: 9479: 9478: 9477: 9476: 9475: 9474: 9473: 9472: 9471: 9470: 9425: 9371: 9370: 9336: 9333: 9313: 9310: 9295: 9292: 9271: 9268: 9252: 9251: 9250: 9249: 9248: 9247: 9244: 9241: 9239: 9237: 9233: 9231: 9229: 9225: 9223: 9212: 9211: 9191: 9180: 9177: 9176: 9175: 9174: 9173: 9172: 9171: 9170: 9169: 9159:108.28.162.125 9110: 9084: 9081: 9080: 9079: 9057: 9056: 9050: 9044: 9038: 9032: 8943: 8939:'s unblock of 8934: 8921: 8918: 8893: 8890: 8889: 8888: 8858: 8853: 8852: 8851: 8850: 8849: 8848: 8847: 8846: 8845: 8763: 8760: 8733: 8732: 8713: 8710: 8651:Article Wizard 8639: 8630: 8604: 8600:nomination of 8595: 8584:220.245.205.26 8578: 8575: 8572: 8571: 8546: 8543: 8530: 8521: 8507: 8504: 8483: 8480: 8458: 8455: 8439: 8436: 8412: 8406: 8405: 8404: 8403: 8402: 8401: 8400: 8348: 8345: 8315: 8312: 8269: 8266: 8246: 8243: 8240: 8239: 8232: 8205: 8204: 8201: 8198: 8179: 8177: 8166: 8163: 8162: 8161: 8135: 8120: 8114: 8113: 8112: 8111: 8110: 8044: 8038: 8037: 8036: 8035: 8034: 8024:DustFormsWords 7995:DustFormsWords 7989: 7986: 7974:96.252.213.127 7955: 7952: 7928: 7925: 7906: 7903: 7902: 7901: 7900: 7899: 7898: 7897: 7836: 7833: 7813: 7810: 7760: 7757: 7730: 7727: 7707: 7702: 7669: 7666: 7646: 7643: 7623: 7620: 7611: 7608: 7600: 7592: 7589: 7569: 7566: 7551:take it to AFD 7542: 7537: 7536: 7535: 7501: 7498: 7497: 7496: 7458: 7455: 7431: 7430: 7429: 7428: 7408: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7360: 7359: 7321: 7320: 7317: 7310: 7307: 7300: 7289: 7282: 7279: 7268: 7265: 7262: 7240: 7239: 7238: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7194: 7095: 7094: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7088: 7087: 7086: 7085: 7084: 6995: 6994: 6993: 6992: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6988: 6956: 6904: 6903: 6902: 6901: 6900: 6899: 6898: 6897: 6896: 6895: 6805: 6784: 6781: 6779:between them? 6775: 6772: 6771: 6770: 6718: 6701: 6698: 6664: 6661: 6660: 6659: 6628: 6625: 6624: 6623: 6592: 6589: 6562: 6559: 6558: 6557: 6519: 6516: 6486:User:Keysanger 6469: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6460: 6416: 6415: 6379: 6377: 6376: 6365:121.45.210.165 6353: 6352: 6351: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6300: 6299: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6276: 6223: 6222: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6162: 6161: 6146: 6145: 6130: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6073: 6072: 6053: 6052: 6021: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6015: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6002: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5940: 5939: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5913: 5912: 5911: 5910: 5909: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5883: 5850: 5849: 5814:ArbCom member 5801: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5763: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5754: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5675: 5672: 5643: 5640: 5638: 5601: 5598: 5578: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5457: 5456: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5365: 5233: 5232:BLP discussion 5230: 5229: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5172: 5167: 5166: 5165: 5117: 5114: 5081: 5078: 5044: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5005: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4986:Works for me. 4953: 4952:Rochelle Owens 4950: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4877: 4876: 4844: 4843: 4797: 4796: 4791: 4786: 4781: 4776: 4771: 4766: 4761: 4756: 4751: 4743:The evidence: 4733: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4662: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4653: 4601: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4528: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4437: 4434: 4412: 4411: 4397: 4369: 4368: 4330: 4327: 4310: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4250: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4135: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4075: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 3937: 3900:Iamcuriousblue 3888: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3841: 3838:Dominik Trojan 3835: 3819: 3816: 3793: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3758: 3755: 3724: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3685: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3631: 3628: 3613: 3612: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3563: 3523: 3520: 3518: 3505:72.204.207.173 3491: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3388: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3367: 3333: 3319: 3312: 3260: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3133: 3132: 3127: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3083: 3082: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3024: 2906: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2890: 2839: 2828:Kevin Fan Club 2823: 2820: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2771: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2708:. Thank you. – 2701: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2643: 2635: 2591:articles as a 2579: 2576: 2561: 2560: 2553:Runar Karlsson 2550: 2539: 2538: 2528:Colonel Warden 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2477: 2476: 2469: 2462: 2457:Cecilia Torudd 2454: 2446: 2438: 2430: 2422: 2417:Martyn Jacques 2414: 2406: 2398: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2083: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2020: 2015: 2008: 1989: 1960: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1901: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1818: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1668: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1552: 1476: 1475: 1432: 1429: 1404: 1401: 1385: 1384: 1363: 1348: 1347: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1325: 1323: 1311: 1310: 1292: 1291: 1286: 1284: 1272: 1271: 1256: 1255: 1250: 1248: 1236: 1235: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1193: 1192: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1151: 1139: 1138: 1123: 1122: 1117: 1115: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 974: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 889: 885: 882: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 773: 717: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 690: 689: 658: 657: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 529: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 446: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 290: 289: 254: 251: 250: 249: 196: 193: 192: 191: 148: 147: 145: 144: 103: 93: 89: 86: 83: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 11744: 11735: 11734: 11730: 11726: 11723:. Thank you. 11722: 11718: 11714: 11710: 11699: 11693: 11692: 11688: 11684: 11679: 11678: 11674: 11670: 11658: 11654: 11653: 11645: 11640: 11636: 11631: 11620: 11619: 11615: 11611: 11607: 11603: 11599: 11595: 11591: 11586: 11576: 11575: 11571: 11567: 11563: 11559: 11555: 11551: 11547: 11542: 11532: 11531: 11527: 11523: 11519: 11515: 11511: 11507: 11503: 11499: 11495: 11491: 11482: 11477: 11476: 11472: 11468: 11464: 11460: 11456: 11452: 11448: 11444: 11440: 11436: 11427: 11422: 11421: 11417: 11413: 11409: 11405: 11400: 11398: 11394: 11390: 11389: 11382: 11366: 11365: 11361: 11357: 11353: 11349: 11345: 11341: 11337: 11332: 11322: 11321: 11317: 11313: 11309: 11306: 11305: 11302: 11295: 11291: 11287: 11280: 11279: 11275: 11271: 11266: 11264: 11260: 11255: 11249: 11237: 11236: 11232: 11228: 11224: 11219: 11217: 11213: 11203: 11202: 11198: 11194: 11190: 11180: 11179: 11175: 11171: 11165: 11162: 11157: 11155: 11151: 11147: 11146: 11130: 11122: 11118: 11114: 11110: 11109: 11108: 11107: 11104: 11102: 11101: 11095: 11094: 11086: 11070: 11066: 11062: 11058: 11057: 11056: 11055: 11054: 11053: 11052: 11051: 11047: 11043: 11037: 11034: 11029: 11027: 11023: 11019: 11018: 11002: 10996: 10995: 10992: 10988: 10984: 10980: 10970: 10969: 10966: 10962: 10961: 10960:brief survey. 10956: 10945: 10944: 10943: 10940: 10936: 10932: 10925: 10923: 10918: 10916: 10912: 10910: 10906: 10904: 10900: 10898: 10894: 10892: 10888: 10886: 10882: 10880: 10876: 10874: 10870: 10866: 10861: 10859: 10851: 10849: 10846: 10843: 10839: 10835: 10832: 10829: 10825: 10820: 10818: 10813: 10807: 10806: 10805: 10790: 10789: 10785: 10781: 10777: 10767: 10766: 10762: 10758: 10754: 10749: 10748: 10744: 10740: 10734: 10730: 10726: 10724: 10720: 10715: 10697: 10693: 10689: 10685: 10684: 10683: 10679: 10675: 10671: 10670: 10669: 10665: 10661: 10657: 10653: 10652: 10651: 10648: 10643: 10633: 10631: 10625: 10622: 10621: 10620: 10615: 10610: 10608: 10600: 10594: 10590: 10585: 10580: 10574: 10570: 10565: 10560: 10557: 10556: 10555: 10551: 10547: 10542: 10541: 10540: 10536: 10532: 10528: 10527: 10526: 10522: 10518: 10514: 10510: 10509: 10508: 10504: 10499: 10493: 10492: 10491: 10490: 10486: 10482: 10478: 10474: 10451: 10447: 10443: 10439: 10438: 10437: 10433: 10429: 10424: 10420: 10419: 10418: 10415: 10410: 10400: 10398: 10392: 10388: 10385: 10383: 10379: 10375: 10371: 10370: 10369: 10365: 10361: 10357: 10353: 10352: 10351: 10347: 10343: 10338: 10336: 10332: 10328: 10323: 10322: 10321: 10317: 10313: 10309: 10308: 10307: 10303: 10299: 10294: 10292: 10289: 10284: 10274: 10272: 10266: 10265: 10264: 10263: 10260: 10259: 10258: 10253: 10252: 10251: 10234: 10230: 10226: 10222: 10215: 10211: 10210: 10209: 10205: 10201: 10197: 10196: 10195: 10193: 10189: 10185: 10181: 10175: 10173: 10171: 10166: 10164: 10159: 10148: 10144: 10140: 10133: 10132:editprotected 10126: 10125: 10124: 10123: 10119: 10115: 10111: 10104: 10096: 10092: 10088: 10084: 10083: 10082: 10081: 10077: 10073: 10066: 10065: 10061: 10057: 10052: 10050: 10046: 10041: 10035: 10019: 10016: 10014: 10012: 10006: 10002: 10001: 10000: 9999: 9996: 9995: 9991: 9990: 9989: 9987: 9983: 9979: 9973: 9971: 9967: 9962: 9960: 9955: 9942: 9938: 9934: 9930: 9929: 9928: 9927: 9922: 9916: 9915: 9908: 9900: 9899: 9898: 9895: 9894: 9889: 9883: 9882: 9872: 9869: 9867: 9864: 9863: 9855: 9851: 9847: 9843: 9842: 9837: 9833: 9829: 9824: 9823: 9820: 9817: 9814: 9809: 9797: 9794: 9790: 9789: 9788: 9787: 9784: 9780: 9776: 9771: 9770: 9769: 9768: 9765: 9760: 9745: 9740: 9734: 9733: 9726: 9725: 9724: 9720: 9716: 9712: 9711: 9710: 9705: 9699: 9698: 9691: 9690: 9689: 9688: 9684: 9680: 9675: 9674: 9670: 9666: 9662: 9632: 9628: 9624: 9620: 9619: 9618: 9615: 9610: 9600: 9598: 9591: 9586: 9583:You mean you 9582: 9581: 9580: 9576: 9572: 9567: 9566: 9565: 9564: 9560: 9556: 9551: 9545: 9541: 9535: 9534:edit conflict 9530: 9529: 9528: 9524: 9520: 9515: 9514: 9513: 9509: 9504: 9498: 9496: 9489: 9488: 9487: 9486: 9485: 9484: 9483: 9482: 9481: 9480: 9469: 9465: 9461: 9456: 9455: 9454: 9450: 9446: 9441: 9440: 9439: 9435: 9430: 9424: 9422: 9416: 9415: 9414: 9410: 9406: 9402: 9401: 9400: 9396: 9392: 9388: 9387: 9386: 9385: 9381: 9377: 9369: 9365: 9361: 9357: 9356: 9355: 9354: 9351: 9350: 9347: 9344: 9332: 9331: 9327: 9323: 9320:. Thank you, 9319: 9309: 9308: 9305: 9301: 9291: 9290: 9286: 9282: 9277: 9276: 9267: 9266: 9262: 9258: 9246:Kevin Godfrey 9245: 9242: 9240: 9238: 9234: 9232: 9230: 9226: 9224: 9221: 9220: 9219: 9218: 9217: 9216: 9215: 9208: 9207: 9206: 9205: 9201: 9196: 9190: 9188: 9168: 9164: 9160: 9155: 9154: 9153: 9149: 9145: 9140: 9139: 9138: 9134: 9130: 9126: 9125: 9124: 9120: 9115: 9109: 9107: 9100: 9099: 9098: 9097: 9094: 9091: 9078: 9077: 9073: 9072: 9071: 9070: 9066: 9062: 9054: 9051: 9048: 9045: 9042: 9039: 9037:: Newyorkbrad 9036: 9033: 9030: 9027: 9026: 9025: 9023: 9020: 9017: 9013: 9009: 9005: 9001: 8995: 8992: 8989: 8986: 8983: 8980: 8977: 8974: 8971: 8968: 8965: 8962: 8959: 8956: 8953: 8948: 8942: 8938: 8933: 8932: 8928: 8924: 8923: 8922: 8919: 8916: 8911: 8887: 8883: 8879: 8875: 8874: 8873: 8872: 8869: 8868: 8864: 8857: 8844: 8840: 8836: 8832: 8831: 8830: 8826: 8822: 8818: 8814: 8813: 8812: 8808: 8804: 8799: 8798: 8797: 8793: 8789: 8785: 8781: 8780: 8779: 8778: 8774: 8770: 8759: 8758: 8755: 8751: 8747: 8744: 8742: 8736: 8731: 8727: 8726: 8725: 8722: 8718: 8709: 8708: 8704: 8700: 8699:ArglebargleIV 8696: 8692: 8688: 8683: 8682: 8675: 8673: 8669: 8665: 8661: 8654: 8652: 8647: 8645: 8631: 8628: 8626: 8622: 8618: 8617:75.136.44.142 8614: 8609: 8603: 8599: 8594: 8593: 8589: 8585: 8570: 8568: 8564: 8559: 8552: 8551:research page 8545: 8542: 8540: 8537:Please click 8534: 8529: 8527: 8526: 8525:Survey Invite 8516: 8512: 8511: 8503: 8502: 8498: 8494: 8490: 8479: 8478: 8474: 8470: 8465: 8462: 8454: 8453: 8449: 8445: 8435: 8434: 8430: 8426: 8422: 8418: 8411: 8399: 8395: 8391: 8387: 8386: 8385: 8382: 8376: 8375: 8374: 8370: 8366: 8362: 8361: 8360: 8359: 8356: 8344: 8341: 8337: 8333: 8329: 8325: 8311: 8308: 8304: 8300: 8296: 8295:Edgargonzalez 8292: 8284: 8281: 8277: 8273: 8265: 8264: 8260: 8256: 8252: 8237: 8233: 8230: 8229: 8225: 8221: 8217: 8215: 8202: 8199: 8196: 8195: 8194: 8191: 8189: 8184: 8183: 8178: 8175: 8171: 8170: 8160: 8156: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8143: 8142: 8141: 8138: 8133: 8131: 8130: 8119: 8109: 8106: 8105: 8102: 8101: 8094: 8093: 8092: 8088: 8084: 8080: 8079: 8078: 8077: 8074: 8073: 8070: 8069: 8062: 8058: 8054: 8050: 8043: 8033: 8029: 8025: 8021: 8020: 8019: 8015: 8011: 8007: 8006: 8005: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7985: 7983: 7979: 7975: 7971: 7964: 7960: 7951: 7950: 7946: 7942: 7938: 7934: 7924: 7923: 7919: 7917: 7896: 7892: 7888: 7884: 7883: 7882: 7878: 7874: 7870: 7869: 7868: 7864: 7860: 7856: 7855: 7854: 7853: 7849: 7845: 7841: 7832: 7831: 7827: 7823: 7819: 7809: 7808: 7804: 7800: 7796: 7793: 7789: 7786: 7782: 7778: 7774: 7770: 7756: 7755: 7752: 7748: 7746: 7740: 7736: 7729:Courtesy note 7726: 7725: 7721: 7717: 7713: 7706: 7701: 7700: 7697: 7696: 7675: 7665: 7664: 7660: 7656: 7652: 7642: 7641: 7636: 7631: 7630: 7619: 7616: 7607: 7606: 7603: 7598: 7591:Evan Starkman 7588: 7587: 7583: 7579: 7575: 7565: 7564: 7560: 7556: 7552: 7548: 7541: 7534: 7530: 7526: 7522: 7521: 7520: 7519: 7514: 7509: 7508: 7495: 7491: 7487: 7482: 7481: 7480: 7479: 7476: 7474: 7467: 7466: 7454: 7453: 7449: 7445: 7439: 7435: 7427: 7422: 7416: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7409: 7403: 7399: 7395: 7391: 7387: 7383: 7380: 7376: 7372: 7368: 7367:first version 7364: 7363: 7362: 7361: 7358: 7354: 7350: 7346: 7342: 7337: 7336: 7335: 7334: 7329: 7318: 7315: 7311: 7308: 7305: 7301: 7298: 7294: 7290: 7287: 7283: 7280: 7277: 7273: 7269: 7266: 7263: 7260: 7256: 7252: 7251: 7250: 7247: 7245: 7228: 7224: 7223: 7222:The Wordsmith 7217: 7213: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7193: 7190: 7188: 7181: 7180: 7174: 7173: 7172: 7168: 7164: 7159: 7158: 7157: 7154: 7152: 7145: 7144: 7139: 7135: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7127: 7123: 7119: 7114: 7113: 7112: 7111: 7107: 7103: 7099: 7083: 7079: 7075: 7071: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7067: 7063: 7059: 7054: 7053: 7052: 7048: 7047: 7046:The Wordsmith 7041: 7040: 7039: 7035: 7031: 7027: 7023: 7022: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7018: 7014: 7010: 7005: 7000: 6999:Filibustering 6987: 6983: 6979: 6974: 6973: 6972: 6968: 6967: 6966:The Wordsmith 6961: 6960:his talk page 6957: 6953: 6949: 6948: 6947: 6943: 6939: 6935: 6934: 6933: 6929: 6928: 6927:The Wordsmith 6921: 6920: 6919: 6918: 6914: 6910: 6894: 6890: 6886: 6882: 6881: 6880: 6876: 6875: 6874:The Wordsmith 6869: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6859: 6855: 6851: 6850: 6849: 6845: 6844: 6843:The Wordsmith 6838: 6837: 6836: 6832: 6828: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6817: 6813: 6809: 6803: 6799: 6795: 6790: 6780: 6774:Marloes Horst 6769: 6765: 6761: 6757: 6754: 6750: 6749: 6748: 6747: 6744: 6715: 6711: 6710:placed on AfD 6707: 6697: 6694: 6690: 6686: 6682: 6678: 6669: 6658: 6654: 6650: 6646: 6645: 6644: 6643: 6639: 6635: 6622: 6618: 6614: 6610: 6609: 6608: 6607: 6603: 6599: 6588: 6584: 6580: 6576: 6572: 6556: 6552: 6548: 6544: 6540: 6539: 6538: 6537: 6533: 6529: 6525: 6515: 6514: 6510: 6509: 6503: 6495: 6491: 6487: 6483: 6479: 6475: 6459: 6455: 6451: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6440: 6436: 6432: 6431: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6418: 6417: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6387: 6383: 6374: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6355: 6354: 6345: 6341: 6337: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6327: 6323: 6318: 6317: 6316: 6312: 6308: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6275: 6271: 6267: 6263: 6260: 6259: 6258: 6254: 6250: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6208: 6207: 6200: 6196: 6192: 6188: 6184: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6175: 6171: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6163: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6148: 6147: 6144: 6140: 6136: 6131: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6110: 6109: 6108: 6104: 6100: 6095: 6094: 6093: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6076: 6075: 6074: 6071: 6067: 6063: 6059: 6058:that one name 6055: 6054: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6039: 6038: 6037: 6036: 6032: 6028: 6001: 5997: 5993: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5983: 5979: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5968: 5964: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5957: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5953: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5938: 5934: 5930: 5926: 5925: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5921: 5920: 5919: 5918: 5917: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5890: 5889: 5882: 5878: 5874: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5848: 5844: 5840: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5828: 5824: 5819: 5817: 5812: 5809: 5807: 5800:ArbCom Motion 5795: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5777: 5773: 5769: 5762: 5749: 5745: 5741: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5730: 5726: 5722: 5721: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5692: 5691: 5690: 5686: 5682: 5671: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5639: 5636: 5635: 5632: 5630: 5623: 5622: 5614: 5607: 5597: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5556: 5553: 5551: 5544: 5543: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5503: 5499: 5495: 5492:have got our 5491: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5466: 5465: 5464:The Wordsmith 5458: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5436: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5412: 5408: 5404: 5403: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5384: 5381: 5379: 5372: 5371: 5366: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5351: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5332: 5330: 5323: 5322: 5314: 5313:edit conflict 5309: 5308: 5307: 5303: 5299: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5290: 5288: 5281: 5280: 5275: 5271: 5270: 5269: 5265: 5261: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5249: 5245: 5240: 5225: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5207: 5203: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5193: 5191: 5184: 5183: 5178: 5171: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5135: 5131: 5125: 5121: 5113: 5112: 5108: 5102: 5101: 5087: 5077: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5063: 5062: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5038: 5034: 5030: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4979: 4975: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4968: 4964: 4960: 4949: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4905: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4803: 4795: 4792: 4790: 4787: 4785: 4782: 4780: 4777: 4775: 4772: 4770: 4767: 4765: 4762: 4760: 4757: 4755: 4752: 4749: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4741: 4739: 4732: 4725: 4721: 4717: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4708: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4683: 4680: 4677: 4674: 4671: 4668: 4661: 4652: 4647: 4642: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4616: 4611: 4607: 4600: 4599:Susan Roesgen 4591: 4588: 4586: 4582: 4581: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4551: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4538: 4534: 4520: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4502: 4498: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4477: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4464: 4459: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4445: 4441: 4440:Hello Kevin, 4433: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4422:83.105.36.239 4419: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4399:Sorry again, 4398: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4374:83.105.36.239 4367: 4363: 4359: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4350: 4346: 4342: 4341:83.105.36.239 4338: 4326: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4223: 4219: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4161: 4157: 4156:documentation 4153: 4145: 4139: 4133: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4108: 4106: 4099: 4098: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4020: 4019: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3892: 3886: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3846: 3839: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3815: 3814: 3810: 3804: 3799: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3763:78.70.221.227 3754: 3753: 3750: 3745: 3740: 3734: 3729: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3684: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3627: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3598: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3561: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3543: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3519: 3516: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3495: 3479: 3476: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3445: 3444: 3441: 3440: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3413: 3412: 3409: 3408: 3401: 3398: 3394: 3387: 3373: 3370: 3365: 3364: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3348: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3336: 3331: 3330: 3324: 3320: 3318: 3315: 3310: 3309: 3303: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3275:The Wordsmith 3269: 3267: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3030: 3027: 3022: 3021: 3015: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2996: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2923: 2915: 2896: 2893: 2888: 2887: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2842: 2837: 2836: 2829: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2714: 2707: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2642: 2638: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2616: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2559: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2513: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2486: 2485: 2484:The Wordsmith 2475: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2453: 2451:- sexologist 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2441:Fillie Lyckow 2439: 2437: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2426: 2423: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2093: 2089: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2063: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2039: 2028: 2026: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2009: 2006: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1970: 1966: 1954: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1938: 1921: 1916: 1910: 1904: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528:The Wordsmith 1522: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1504: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1441: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1410: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1380: 1379: 1377: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1364: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1346: 1342: 1340: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1321: 1316: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261:Bali ultimate 1258: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1198: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1172: 1170: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1103:Barnstar time 1088: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 993: 990: 988: 983: 980: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 947: 946: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 930: 926: 922: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 883: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 801: 797: 793: 788: 787: 786: 782: 778: 774: 771: 767: 766: 765: 761: 757: 752: 748: 747: 746: 742: 738: 734: 733: 732: 731: 727: 723: 709: 704: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 688: 684: 680: 676: 673: 672: 671: 670: 665: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 642: 641: 636: 630: 617: 613: 609: 605: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 584: 580: 576: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 554: 549: 543: 542: 537: 536: 528: 515: 510: 504: 503: 502: 498: 494: 490: 489: 488: 483: 477: 476: 475: 471: 467: 463: 462: 461: 460: 455: 438: 434: 430: 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 411: 410: 409: 408: 404: 400: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 338: 337: 336: 332: 328: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 293: 292: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 265: 261: 253:BLP Deletions 248: 244: 240: 239:The Cunctator 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 221: 216: 215: 211: 207: 203: 190: 186: 182: 177: 176: 175: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 143: 139: 135: 131: 130: 129: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 101: 97: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 11702: 11683:Gerda Arendt 11680: 11669:Gerda Arendt 11666: 11650: 11588:Following a 11582: 11544:Following a 11538: 11485: 11430: 11403: 11401: 11386: 11384: 11373: 11334:Following a 11328: 11312:Gerda Arendt 11297: 11290:Gerda Arendt 11283: 11270:Gerda Arendt 11267: 11253: 11252: 11220: 11209: 11193:Ottawahitech 11186: 11166: 11158: 11143: 11141: 11131:for deletion 11097: 11090: 11082: 11038: 11030: 11015: 11013: 11003:for deletion 10976: 10959: 10952: 10939:The Interior 10930: 10928: 10927: 10919: 10914: 10913: 10908: 10907: 10902: 10901: 10896: 10895: 10890: 10889: 10884: 10883: 10878: 10877: 10868: 10864: 10855: 10853: 10844: 10830: 10824:The Interior 10821: 10814: 10811: 10802: 10801: 10773: 10750: 10735: 10731: 10727: 10721: 10716: 10713: 10639: 10629: 10606: 10558: 10471: 10406: 10396: 10386: 10280: 10270: 10256: 10255: 10249: 10248: 10245: 10219:— Preceding 10184:107.1.120.50 10178:— Preceding 10167: 10160: 10156: 10110:Fidel Castro 10107: 10103:Fidel Castro 10087:Gerda Arendt 10069: 10056:Gerda Arendt 10053: 10039: 10038: 10010: 9994:Discuss this 9992: 9975: 9964: 9951:Resolved by 9950: 9912: 9904: 9896: 9879: 9875: 9818: 9758: 9757: 9730: 9695: 9676: 9658: 9606: 9596: 9584: 9549: 9547: 9543: 9539: 9494: 9420: 9372: 9341: 9338: 9315: 9297: 9278: 9273: 9253: 9213: 9186: 9182: 9105: 9086: 9076:Discuss this 9074: 9058: 9052: 9046: 9040: 9034: 9028: 9018: 9000:oversighters 8990: 8984: 8978: 8972: 8966: 8960: 8954: 8945: 8915: 8914: 8895: 8865: 8860: 8856:Sam Holbrook 8783: 8765: 8748: 8745: 8737: 8734: 8715: 8679: 8676: 8657: 8648: 8641: 8629: 8611:— Preceding 8607: 8606: 8580: 8547: 8536: 8535: 8531: 8524: 8522: 8520: 8488: 8485: 8466: 8463: 8460: 8441: 8414: 8350: 8328:Purplejoy420 8322:— Preceding 8317: 8289:— Preceding 8285: 8282: 8278: 8274: 8271: 8248: 8218: 8213: 8206: 8192: 8185: 8181: 8180: 8125: 8122: 8103: 8096: 8071: 8064: 8048: 8046: 7991: 7965: 7961: 7957: 7930: 7908: 7838: 7822:Pete Tillman 7815: 7797: 7794: 7790: 7787: 7762: 7744: 7732: 7709: 7677: 7671: 7648: 7627: 7625: 7617: 7613: 7597:Plastikspork 7594: 7571: 7544: 7505: 7503: 7468: 7464: 7460: 7440: 7436: 7432: 7394:as did Rd232 7344: 7340: 7322: 7313: 7303: 7275: 7271: 7248: 7241: 7221: 7182: 7178: 7146: 7142: 7137: 7096: 7045: 7003: 6998: 6996: 6965: 6926: 6905: 6873: 6867: 6842: 6793: 6786: 6783:Sticky prods 6777: 6713: 6704:The article 6703: 6670: 6666: 6630: 6627:George Louie 6594: 6564: 6521: 6498: 6494:User:Arafael 6490:User:Dentren 6471: 6378: 6186: 6057: 6023: 5820: 5813: 5810: 5804:Kevin, I've 5803: 5765: 5677: 5645: 5637: 5624: 5620: 5606:Michael Peck 5603: 5580: 5545: 5541: 5490:WP:Australia 5463: 5373: 5369: 5324: 5320: 5282: 5278: 5273: 5235: 5185: 5181: 5174: 5122: 5119: 5090: 5083: 5064: 5049:Herbal Magic 5046: 5007: 4955: 4932: 4878: 4845: 4827:Userfied at 4798: 4742: 4735: 4684: 4681: 4678: 4675: 4672: 4664: 4603: 4579: 4578: 4542: 4541: 4531:I've PRODed 4530: 4478: 4460: 4446: 4442: 4439: 4413: 4390:Melvyn Grant 4370: 4332: 4329:Melvyn Grant 4312: 4309:Mao Dongdong 4291:Doc Quintana 4255:Doc Quintana 4252: 4199: 4162: 4140: 4137: 4100: 4096: 4077: 3895: 3893: 3890: 3847: 3843: 3821: 3795: 3760: 3726: 3687: 3633: 3614: 3562: 3544: 3525: 3517: 3496: 3493: 3473: 3466: 3442: 3435: 3410: 3403: 3390: 3360: 3346:Juliancolton 3343: 3326: 3305: 3274: 3270: 3262: 3134: 3095:Watari Kakei 3084: 3041: 3017: 2995:Bigtimepeace 2989: 2933:Bigtimepeace 2908: 2883: 2850: 2832: 2827: 2825: 2809:Little grape 2803: 2743:Juliancolton 2740: 2712:Juliancolton 2709: 2703: 2700:Notification 2688: 2625: 2592: 2588: 2581: 2562: 2483: 2478: 2409:Pedro Lastra 2387: 2325: 2295: 2277:Bigtimepeace 2221: 2200: 2168: 2151: 2143: 2071: 2067: 2061: 2059: 2042: 2018: 2007: 2004: 1981: 1977: 1975: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1940: 1934: 1821: 1728:Bigtimepeace 1686: 1583: 1560: 1527: 1520: 1465:Juliancolton 1462: 1457: 1434: 1413:Bigtimepeace 1406: 1388: 1374:You've been 1373: 1372: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1351: 1338: 1327: 1288: 1252: 1218: 1214: 1176: 1167: 1163: 1155: 1119: 1040: 986: 976: 917: 751:get it right 750: 719: 659: 629:Ion Atanasiu 626: 539: 533: 531: 527:Edgar Matias 505:And so....? 448: 395: 256: 217: 198: 146: 91: 78: 43: 37: 11212:since April 10979:Rajon Rondo 10428:Count Iblis 10360:Count Iblis 10312:Count Iblis 10225:65.96.6.135 10114:24.22.75.14 9322:Newyorkbrad 8970:protections 8752:. Cheers! 8678:also visit 8608:Wikipidiots 8469:AJamesPrice 8421:Jarrett Lee 8410:Jarrett Lee 8255:Bongwarrior 8251:Stana Katic 8061:Janette Luu 7968:—Preceding 7767:—Preceding 7618:Thank you. 7574:Kamel Riahi 7540:Sabrina Man 7457:Random idea 7316:" (WP:BLP). 7288:" (WP:NOR). 6675:—Preceding 6591:Good to see 6569:—Preceding 6359:—Preceding 6182:For 1, see 5649:—Preceding 5128:—Preceding 4939:Vejvančický 4935:the article 4814:Vejvančický 4689:—Preceding 4416:—Preceding 4335:—Preceding 4132:Randy Mixer 3683:Lynda Stipe 3499:—Preceding 3072:Killiondude 2982:very strong 2704:Please see 2593:last resort 2589:contentious 2427:- academic 2419:- musician 2401:Kersten Alm 2205:Enric Naval 2177:Enric Naval 2169:contentious 2152:contentious 2064:be sourced. 1976:Oh, and if 1822:contentious 1431:Please stop 979:Lee Hun Jai 716:Lovely work 153:—Preceding 107:—Preceding 36:This is an 11506:topic bans 11451:topic bans 11286:PumpkinSky 11170:Epeefleche 10897:New ideas: 10856:Greetings 10739:Harvest316 10714:Hi Kevin. 10613:.Wolfowitz 10584:Volunteer 10564:Volunteer 10498:Volunteer 9047:Not voting 8982:page moves 8941:User:Cla68 8937:User:Kevin 8784:Daily Mail 7788:Hi Kevin, 7622:Woroniecki 7547:WP:BLPPROD 7420:SlimVirgin 7327:SlimVirgin 7216:WP:ATHLETE 6681:Mark358689 5816:Carcharoth 5134:Raizen1984 5094:RANSPORTER 4738:Chris Agee 4537:User:Curps 3798:Beth Stern 3630:Clive King 3235:Ricky81682 3207:Ricky81682 3171:Ricky81682 3137:Ricky81682 2224:incubation 2072:impossible 2060:unless it 1908:have a cup 1173:, sir! - 11711:has been 11610:MadmanBot 11566:MadmanBot 11502:site bans 11447:site bans 11356:MadmanBot 11288:Prize, -- 11227:Bahudhara 10688:Prioryman 10660:Prioryman 10656:user page 10546:Prioryman 10517:Prioryman 10481:Prioryman 9793:Jehochman 9764:Jehochman 9460:Prioryman 9445:Ironholds 9405:Ironholds 9376:Prioryman 9294:AN Notice 9129:Prioryman 9061:T. Canens 8976:deletions 8927:non-admin 8867:Strikeout 8863:Automatic 8835:Manxwoman 8803:Manxwoman 8769:Manxwoman 8577:Biography 8457:Modelinia 8425:bender235 8214:Thank you 8182:Hi Kevin! 8147:WP:REFUND 7988:Your AfDs 7844:MZMcBride 7712:Ike Davis 7705:Ike Davis 7382:and again 7379:and again 7138:minimally 7102:MZMcBride 7026:WP:STICKY 6955:required. 6808:proposals 6501:Erebedhel 6025:invasion. 5274:something 4695:Raindog17 4606:sock hunt 4580:Jezebel's 4543:Jezebel's 4270:User:Xeno 3914:shortly. 3792:Thanks... 3757:User name 2667:JBsupreme 2309:WP:CSD#G6 2122:JBsupreme 2045:JBsupreme 1885:JBsupreme 1724:WP:MARTYR 1482:JBsupreme 1128:JBsupreme 824:MZMcBride 756:Guettarda 722:MZMcBride 702:Paul Erik 663:Paul Erik 634:Paul Erik 604:WP:BEFORE 547:Paul Erik 508:Paul Erik 481:Paul Erik 453:Paul Erik 414:JBsupreme 79:Archive 7 73:Archive 6 68:Archive 5 60:Archive 1 11657:Precious 11404:articles 10860:members! 10848:contribs 10834:contribs 10736:Regards, 10495:flipped. 10221:unsigned 10180:unsigned 10026:Precious 9844:Thanks! 9304:Crazynas 9243:Regards, 9222:Anthony, 9053:Inactive 9022:contribs 8958:contribs 8898:arbcom-l 8613:unsigned 8336:contribs 8324:unsigned 8303:contribs 8291:unsigned 8220:Cj005257 8128:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ 8099:Schmidt, 8067:Schmidt, 8053:WP:AFTER 7970:unsigned 7966:Thanks 7941:Location 7939:Thanks! 7916:e decker 7799:Iampears 7795:Thanks, 7781:contribs 7773:Iampears 7769:unsigned 7655:Rocalisi 7578:Rocalisi 7555:Robofish 7398:did Gigs 7345:relevant 7341:reliable 6885:Maurreen 6854:Maurreen 6812:Maurreen 6751:I think 6689:contribs 6677:unsigned 6598:The-Pope 6583:contribs 6575:Sonisona 6571:unsigned 6390:Codf1977 6361:unsigned 5963:Maurreen 5899:Maurreen 5858:Maurreen 5823:Maurreen 5740:Jibbytot 5711:Jibbytot 5681:Jibbytot 5663:contribs 5651:unsigned 5587:Maurreen 5498:The-Pope 5443:Maurreen 5435:Maurreen 5407:Maurreen 5142:contribs 5130:unsigned 5067:Luna sky 5053:Luna sky 5010:this RFA 5004:Question 4703:contribs 4691:unsigned 4667:Ed Esber 4660:Ed Esber 4641:Gamaliel 4639:Thanks! 4610:Gamaliel 4482:dericksc 4449:dericksc 4418:unsigned 4337:unsigned 4268:I think 4090:between 3840:deletion 3650:lists?-- 3501:unsigned 3490:No title 3469:Schmidt, 3438:Schmidt, 3406:Schmidt, 3271:Thanks, 3004:contribs 2942:contribs 2855:Milowent 2822:Fan Club 2761:Apoc2400 2689:undelete 2565:Apoc2400 2286:contribs 2036:Source: 1947:negative 1737:contribs 1422:contribs 1171:de latón 1162:Oh godz 888:discuss. 881:process. 675:WP:RFARB 167:contribs 155:unsigned 121:contribs 109:unsigned 11300:Pumpkin 11154:deleted 11026:deleted 10005:User:X! 9907:WP:BOLD 9550:told us 9335:Comment 9179:E-mails 9041:Recused 9029:Support 8817:WP:BLPN 8444:Phatwon 8380:Wikifan 8354:Wikifan 7954:sources 7444:doncram 7384:. Then 7349:Kudpung 7293:sources 7118:Kudpung 7058:Kudpung 7009:Kudpung 6634:Jamesw9 6543:WP:PROD 6528:doncram 6168:option. 6097:members 5992:Opbeith 5355:Opbeith 5244:Kudpung 4974:Pohick2 4959:Pohick2 4918:Pohick2 4900:Pohick2 4881:Opbeith 4851:Opbeith 4560:Twinkle 4394:WP:AUTO 4316:Yameogo 4249:Plaxico 4233:Opbeith 4203:Opbeith 4080:CSD G10 3976:WP:PORN 3694:Bearian 3617:Opbeith 3584:Opbeith 3567:Opbeith 2921:Windows 2626:sourced 2578:Blocked 1980:, then 1720:WT:PROD 1510:Windows 1447:Windows 1169:cojones 987:Caspian 770:WP:BOLD 159:Emcee44 113:Emcee44 39:archive 11725:Gonnym 11606:WP:RFA 11562:WP:RFA 11492:. The 11437:. The 11352:WP:RFA 10965:Ocaasi 10931:opt-in 10838:Ocaasi 10607:Kiefer 10513:WP:BLP 9961:that: 9954:motion 9754:Enough 9661:motion 9507:cntrb. 9433:cntrb. 9199:cntrb. 9118:cntrb. 9102:now.-- 9035:Oppose 8988:rights 8964:blocks 8754:Ocaasi 8695:userfy 8557:Steven 8493:McOoee 8489:delete 8057:WP:ATD 7568:Thanks 7297:WP:BLP 7259:WP:NOR 7212:WT:BIO 6976:best. 6753:WP:DRV 6714:delete 6435:JJJ999 6405:JJJ999 6384:here 6382:JJJ999 6322:JJJ999 6289:JJJ999 6262:WP:ANI 6249:JJJ999 6212:JJJ999 6170:JJJ999 6151:JJJ999 6135:JJJ999 6099:JJJ999 6080:WP:BLP 6062:JJJ999 6027:JJJ999 5772:Jmabel 5655:Tomdog 5577:ArbCom 4676:Mine: 3529:WP:BLP 3420:Done. 2978:change 2913:Fences 2585:WP:BLP 2340:Mdukas 2296:really 2148:WP:BLP 2066:, not 1937:WP:BLP 1902:Coffee 1826:WT:CSD 1687:cannot 1502:Fences 1458:really 1439:Fences 1368:Whack! 697:WP:ANI 275:WP:BLP 202:WP:BLP 11715:with 11412:B-bot 11308:Prize 11113:Kevin 11042:Kevin 10757:Kevin 10718:page: 10674:Kevin 10589:Marek 10569:Marek 10531:Kevin 10503:Marek 10374:Kevin 10342:Kevin 10257:Vesey 10200:Kevin 10139:Kevin 10072:Kevin 9970:Kevin 9933:Kevin 9846:Kevin 9775:Kevin 9715:Kevin 9679:Kevin 9623:Kevin 9571:Kevin 9519:Kevin 9391:Kevin 9360:Kevin 9281:Kevin 9257:Kevin 9144:Kevin 9012:Cla68 8947:Kevin 8878:Kevin 8821:Kevin 8788:Kevin 8743:). 8562:Zhang 8390:Kevin 8365:Kevin 8151:Kevin 8083:Kevin 8040:inre 8010:Kevin 7887:Kevin 7859:Kevin 7694:Focus 7635:Help! 7525:Kevin 7513:Help! 7486:Kevin 7396:, as 7198:Kevin 7074:Kevin 7030:Kevin 6997:BLP: 6978:Kevin 6938:Kevin 6909:Kevin 6827:Kevin 6760:Kevin 6649:Kevin 6613:Kevin 6547:Kevin 6450:Kevin 6421:Kevin 6336:Kevin 6307:Kevin 6287:goes. 6266:Kevin 6234:Kevin 6191:Kevin 6114:Kevin 6084:Kevin 6042:Kevin 6020:ACTDU 5978:Kevin 5929:Kevin 5873:Kevin 5839:Kevin 5786:Kevin 5725:Kevin 5696:Kevin 5527:Plad2 5512:Kevin 5475:Kevin 5421:Kevin 5341:Kevin 5298:Kevin 5260:Kevin 5216:Kevin 5202:Kevin 5155:Kevin 5029:Kevin 4988:Kevin 4866:Kevin 4833:Kevin 4716:Kevin 4627:Kevin 4584:Ponyo 4564:Kevin 4547:Ponyo 4511:Kevin 4497:Kevin 4467:Kevin 4401:Kevin 4358:Kevin 4274:Kevin 4218:Kevin 4182:Kevin 4117:Kevin 4048:Kevin 3999:Kevin 3961:Kevin 3929:Laval 3916:Kevin 3870:Kevin 3824:Kevin 3778:Kevin 3709:Kevin 3690:Oh OK 3666:Kevin 3652:Plad2 3636:Plad2 3602:Kevin 3551:Kevin 3533:Kevin 3453:Kevin 3422:Kevin 3288:Kevin 3221:Kevin 3205:. -- 3185:Kevin 3156:Kevin 3049:Kevin 2953:Rd232 2917:& 2869:Kevin 2775:Kevin 2727:Kevin 2647:Kevin 2636:matic 2354:Kevin 2330:Rd232 2313:Kevin 2300:Rd232 2262:Kevin 2253:Rd232 2238:Kevin 2228:Rd232 2101:Kevin 1856:Rd232 1842:Kevin 1813:Rd232 1748:Kevin 1701:Kevin 1672:Kevin 1635:Kevin 1610:Kevin 1586:Kevin 1568:Help! 1506:& 1443:& 1027:Kevin 999:Kevin 957:radek 936:Kevin 921:radek 868:Kevin 792:Kevin 737:Kevin 679:Kevin 647:Kevin 589:Kevin 560:Kevin 493:Kevin 466:Kevin 371:Kevin 342:Kevin 312:Kevin 279:Kevin 224:Kevin 206:Kevin 181:Kevin 134:Kevin 16:< 11729:talk 11687:talk 11673:talk 11649:no. 11614:talk 11570:talk 11526:talk 11471:talk 11416:talk 11360:talk 11316:talk 11310:, -- 11294:talk 11274:talk 11259:BLPs 11231:talk 11197:talk 11174:talk 11117:talk 11065:talk 11046:talk 10991:hups 10937:. -- 10842:talk 10828:talk 10784:talk 10761:talk 10743:talk 10692:talk 10678:talk 10664:talk 10550:talk 10535:talk 10521:talk 10485:talk 10473:This 10446:talk 10432:talk 10378:talk 10364:talk 10346:talk 10331:talk 10316:talk 10302:talk 10250:Ryan 10229:talk 10204:talk 10188:talk 10143:talk 10118:talk 10091:talk 10076:talk 10060:talk 10045:BLPs 9982:talk 9937:talk 9914:Ched 9901:rfar 9881:Ched 9850:talk 9832:talk 9779:talk 9732:Ched 9719:talk 9697:Ched 9683:talk 9669:talk 9627:talk 9575:talk 9559:talk 9540:That 9523:talk 9502:tlk. 9464:talk 9449:talk 9428:tlk. 9409:talk 9395:talk 9380:talk 9364:talk 9349:7754 9346:chen 9326:talk 9318:here 9285:talk 9270:rfar 9261:talk 9194:tlk. 9163:talk 9148:talk 9133:talk 9113:tlk. 9065:talk 9016:talk 8952:talk 8920:fold 8917:Hers 8882:talk 8839:talk 8825:talk 8807:talk 8792:talk 8773:talk 8703:talk 8670:and 8621:talk 8588:talk 8539:HERE 8497:talk 8473:talk 8448:talk 8429:talk 8394:talk 8369:talk 8332:talk 8299:talk 8259:talk 8224:talk 8155:talk 8087:talk 8055:and 8028:talk 8014:talk 7999:talk 7978:talk 7945:talk 7905:psst 7891:talk 7877:talk 7863:talk 7848:talk 7840:This 7826:talk 7818:here 7803:talk 7777:talk 7745:xeno 7720:talk 7659:talk 7582:talk 7559:talk 7529:talk 7490:talk 7472:Talk 7448:talk 7415:here 7353:talk 7343:and 7257:and 7255:WP:V 7202:talk 7186:Talk 7167:talk 7163:Gigs 7150:Talk 7122:talk 7106:talk 7078:talk 7062:talk 7034:talk 7013:talk 7004:were 6982:talk 6952:this 6942:talk 6913:talk 6889:talk 6858:talk 6831:talk 6816:talk 6764:talk 6708:was 6685:talk 6653:talk 6638:talk 6617:talk 6602:talk 6579:talk 6551:talk 6532:talk 6507:Talk 6492:and 6482:here 6478:here 6454:talk 6439:talk 6425:talk 6409:talk 6394:talk 6369:talk 6340:talk 6326:talk 6311:talk 6293:talk 6270:talk 6253:talk 6238:talk 6216:talk 6195:talk 6174:talk 6155:talk 6139:talk 6118:talk 6103:talk 6088:talk 6066:talk 6046:talk 6031:talk 5996:talk 5982:talk 5967:talk 5933:talk 5903:talk 5877:talk 5862:talk 5843:talk 5837:it. 5827:talk 5790:talk 5776:Talk 5744:talk 5729:talk 5715:talk 5700:talk 5685:talk 5659:talk 5628:Talk 5591:talk 5583:here 5549:Talk 5531:talk 5516:talk 5502:talk 5494:list 5479:talk 5447:talk 5439:talk 5425:talk 5411:talk 5377:Talk 5359:talk 5345:talk 5328:Talk 5302:talk 5286:Talk 5264:talk 5248:talk 5220:talk 5206:talk 5189:Talk 5159:talk 5138:talk 5106:TALK 5071:talk 5057:talk 5033:talk 5018:talk 4992:talk 4978:talk 4963:talk 4943:talk 4922:talk 4904:talk 4885:talk 4870:talk 4855:talk 4847:talk 4837:talk 4818:talk 4806:here 4720:talk 4699:talk 4646:talk 4631:talk 4615:talk 4568:talk 4515:talk 4501:talk 4486:talk 4471:talk 4453:talk 4426:talk 4405:talk 4378:talk 4362:talk 4345:talk 4320:talk 4295:talk 4278:talk 4259:talk 4237:talk 4222:talk 4207:talk 4186:talk 4170:talk 4138:Hi, 4121:talk 4104:Talk 4084:here 4052:talk 4038:talk 4003:talk 3984:talk 3965:talk 3950:talk 3933:IMDb 3920:talk 3904:talk 3874:talk 3855:talk 3828:talk 3809:talk 3803:Tvoz 3782:talk 3767:talk 3748:Talk 3743:User 3738:Wiki 3713:talk 3698:talk 3670:talk 3656:talk 3640:talk 3621:talk 3606:talk 3588:talk 3571:talk 3555:talk 3537:talk 3509:talk 3457:talk 3426:talk 3292:talk 3239:talk 3225:talk 3211:talk 3189:talk 3175:talk 3160:talk 3141:talk 3076:talk 3053:talk 3000:talk 2967:talk 2963:Tarc 2938:talk 2873:talk 2859:talk 2813:talk 2793:talk 2789:Tarc 2779:talk 2765:talk 2731:talk 2671:talk 2651:talk 2569:talk 2532:talk 2358:talk 2344:talk 2317:talk 2282:talk 2266:talk 2242:talk 2209:talk 2181:talk 2175:. -- 2126:talk 2105:talk 2081:Cycl 2078:. -- 2049:talk 1987:Cycl 1958:Cycl 1889:talk 1846:talk 1752:talk 1733:talk 1705:talk 1691:Geni 1676:talk 1662:talk 1658:Tarc 1649:Geni 1639:talk 1625:Geni 1614:talk 1601:Geni 1590:talk 1521:huge 1486:talk 1418:talk 1409:here 1394:talk 1339:Lara 1265:talk 1229:talk 1223:... 1132:talk 1066:talk 1031:talk 1017:talk 1003:talk 989:blue 961:talk 940:talk 925:talk 897:talk 872:talk 858:talk 828:talk 820:AN/I 796:talk 781:talk 760:talk 741:talk 726:talk 683:talk 651:talk 612:talk 608:Camw 593:talk 579:talk 575:Camw 564:talk 538:and 497:talk 470:talk 433:talk 429:Camw 418:talk 403:talk 399:Camw 375:talk 361:talk 357:Camw 346:talk 331:talk 327:Camw 316:talk 301:talk 297:Camw 283:talk 264:talk 260:Camw 243:talk 228:talk 210:talk 185:talk 163:talk 138:talk 117:talk 11655:of 11652:423 11486:Hi, 11431:Hi, 11399:). 11304:Sky 11191:. X 11099:Jay 11092:Jay 10836:), 10822:by 10654:My 10630:Hex 10397:Hex 10271:Hex 10011:AGK 9957:at 9597:Hex 9544:can 9275:fyi 9083:RfA 8994:RfA 8908:or 8419:of 7927:RFC 7741:. – 7629:Guy 7507:Guy 6868:are 6792:Hi 6187:not 5808:. 4166:Ash 4034:Ash 3980:Ash 3946:Ash 3931:at 3851:Ash 3002:| 2990:are 2940:| 2615:DES 2602:DES 2501:Lar 2284:| 2087:pia 2062:can 1993:pia 1964:pia 1951:and 1917:// 1914:ark 1911:// 1905:// 1831:DES 1796:Lar 1779:Lar 1735:| 1562:Guy 1559:?. 1539:Lar 1420:| 1297:Lar 1164:YES 1076:Lar 1045:Lar 11731:) 11689:) 11675:) 11667:-- 11616:) 11572:) 11528:) 11504:, 11473:) 11449:, 11418:) 11362:) 11318:) 11276:) 11268:-- 11265:! 11233:) 11199:) 11176:) 11156:. 11119:) 11067:) 11048:) 11028:. 10983:Ma 10786:) 10763:) 10745:) 10694:) 10680:) 10666:) 10645:❞) 10641:?! 10637:(❝ 10552:) 10537:) 10523:) 10487:) 10448:) 10434:) 10412:❞) 10408:?! 10404:(❝ 10393:— 10380:) 10366:) 10348:) 10333:) 10318:) 10304:) 10296:-- 10286:❞) 10282:?! 10278:(❝ 10231:) 10206:) 10190:) 10162:#1 10145:) 10135:}} 10129:{{ 10120:) 10093:) 10078:) 10062:) 10054:-- 10051:! 10007:. 9984:) 9968:, 9939:) 9920:? 9917:: 9887:? 9884:: 9852:) 9834:) 9781:) 9738:? 9735:: 9721:) 9703:? 9700:: 9685:) 9671:) 9659:A 9629:) 9612:❞) 9608:?! 9604:(❝ 9593:— 9577:) 9561:) 9525:) 9466:) 9451:) 9411:) 9397:) 9382:) 9366:) 9343:Rs 9340:-- 9328:) 9287:) 9263:) 9165:) 9150:) 9135:) 9067:) 8884:) 8841:) 8827:) 8819:. 8809:) 8794:) 8775:) 8705:) 8623:) 8590:) 8553:. 8499:) 8475:) 8450:) 8431:) 8396:) 8371:) 8338:) 8334:• 8305:) 8301:• 8261:) 8226:) 8157:) 8089:) 8030:) 8016:) 8001:) 7980:) 7947:) 7893:) 7879:) 7865:) 7850:) 7828:) 7805:) 7783:) 7779:• 7722:) 7661:) 7601:―Œ 7584:) 7561:) 7553:. 7531:) 7492:) 7465:NW 7450:) 7355:) 7299:). 7261:). 7204:) 7179:NW 7169:) 7143:NW 7124:) 7116:-- 7108:) 7080:) 7064:) 7036:) 7015:) 6984:) 6944:) 6915:) 6891:) 6860:) 6833:) 6818:) 6766:) 6758:. 6691:) 6687:• 6655:) 6640:) 6619:) 6604:) 6585:) 6581:• 6553:) 6534:) 6504:- 6488:, 6456:) 6441:) 6427:) 6411:) 6396:) 6388:. 6371:) 6342:) 6328:) 6313:) 6295:) 6272:) 6255:) 6240:) 6218:) 6197:) 6176:) 6157:) 6141:) 6120:) 6105:) 6090:) 6068:) 6048:) 6033:) 5998:) 5984:) 5969:) 5935:) 5905:) 5879:) 5864:) 5845:) 5829:) 5792:) 5774:| 5746:) 5731:) 5717:) 5702:) 5687:) 5665:) 5661:• 5621:NW 5616:}} 5610:{{ 5593:) 5585:. 5542:NW 5533:) 5518:) 5504:) 5481:) 5449:) 5427:) 5413:) 5370:NW 5361:) 5347:) 5321:NW 5304:) 5279:NW 5266:) 5250:) 5222:) 5208:) 5182:NW 5161:) 5144:) 5140:• 5109:) 5098:AN 5073:) 5059:) 5035:) 5020:) 4994:) 4980:) 4965:) 4945:) 4924:) 4906:) 4898:) 4887:) 4872:) 4857:) 4839:) 4831:. 4820:) 4722:) 4705:) 4701:• 4633:) 4570:) 4517:) 4503:) 4488:) 4473:) 4455:) 4428:) 4407:) 4384:. 4380:) 4364:) 4347:) 4322:) 4297:) 4280:) 4261:) 4239:) 4224:) 4209:) 4188:) 4172:) 4123:) 4097:NW 4054:) 4040:) 4005:) 3997:. 3986:) 3967:) 3952:) 3922:) 3906:) 3876:) 3857:) 3830:) 3784:) 3769:) 3715:) 3700:) 3672:) 3658:) 3642:) 3623:) 3608:) 3590:) 3573:) 3557:) 3539:) 3531:. 3511:) 3459:) 3428:) 3368:―Œ 3350:| 3334:―Œ 3313:―Œ 3294:) 3241:) 3227:) 3213:) 3191:) 3177:) 3162:) 3143:) 3078:) 3055:) 3025:―Œ 2998:| 2969:) 2936:| 2931:-- 2891:―Œ 2875:) 2861:) 2840:―Œ 2815:) 2795:) 2781:) 2767:) 2747:| 2733:) 2716:| 2673:) 2653:) 2571:) 2563:-- 2534:) 2503:: 2499:++ 2360:) 2346:) 2319:) 2280:| 2275:-- 2268:) 2244:) 2226:? 2211:) 2183:) 2128:) 2107:) 2051:) 2029:” 2014:“ 1939:: 1899:— 1891:) 1848:) 1798:: 1781:: 1777:++ 1754:) 1731:| 1707:) 1678:) 1664:) 1641:) 1616:) 1592:) 1541:: 1488:) 1469:| 1416:| 1396:) 1299:: 1267:) 1231:) 1181:is 1134:) 1078:: 1068:) 1062:DS 1047:: 1033:) 1019:) 1013:DS 1005:) 963:) 942:) 927:) 899:) 874:) 860:) 830:) 798:) 783:) 762:) 743:) 728:) 699:. 685:) 653:) 614:) 595:) 581:) 566:) 499:) 472:) 435:) 420:) 405:) 377:) 363:) 348:) 333:) 318:) 303:) 285:) 266:) 245:) 230:) 212:) 204:. 187:) 169:) 165:• 140:) 123:) 119:• 64:← 11727:( 11685:( 11671:( 11659:, 11612:( 11568:( 11524:( 11469:( 11414:( 11379:⚠ 11358:( 11314:( 11292:( 11272:( 11229:( 11195:( 11172:( 11115:( 11063:( 11044:( 10987:c 10850:) 10845:· 10840:( 10831:· 10826:( 10782:( 10759:( 10741:( 10690:( 10676:( 10662:( 10548:( 10533:( 10519:( 10483:( 10444:( 10442:B 10430:( 10376:( 10362:( 10344:( 10329:( 10327:B 10314:( 10300:( 10298:B 10227:( 10202:( 10186:( 10141:( 10116:( 10089:( 10074:( 10058:( 9980:( 9935:( 9848:( 9830:( 9777:( 9717:( 9681:( 9667:( 9625:( 9573:( 9557:( 9536:) 9532:( 9521:( 9462:( 9447:( 9407:( 9393:( 9378:( 9362:( 9324:( 9283:( 9259:( 9161:( 9146:( 9131:( 9093:P 9090:T 9063:( 9019:· 9014:( 8996:) 8991:· 8985:· 8979:· 8973:· 8967:· 8961:· 8955:· 8950:( 8880:( 8837:( 8823:( 8805:( 8790:( 8771:( 8701:( 8646:. 8619:( 8586:( 8495:( 8487:' 8471:( 8446:( 8427:( 8392:( 8367:( 8330:( 8297:( 8257:( 8222:( 8153:( 8136:¢ 8085:( 8026:( 8012:( 7997:( 7976:( 7943:( 7914:⚛ 7912:j 7889:( 7875:( 7861:( 7846:( 7824:( 7801:( 7775:( 7718:( 7691:m 7688:a 7685:e 7682:r 7679:D 7657:( 7637:) 7633:( 7580:( 7557:( 7527:( 7515:) 7511:( 7488:( 7475:) 7469:( 7446:( 7351:( 7295:( 7200:( 7189:) 7183:( 7165:( 7153:) 7147:( 7120:( 7104:( 7076:( 7060:( 7032:( 7011:( 6980:( 6940:( 6911:( 6887:( 6856:( 6829:( 6814:( 6804:. 6762:( 6742:- 6740:y 6738:- 6736:e 6734:- 6732:k 6730:- 6728:i 6726:- 6724:m 6722:- 6683:( 6651:( 6636:( 6615:( 6600:( 6577:( 6549:( 6530:( 6452:( 6437:( 6423:( 6407:( 6392:( 6367:( 6338:( 6324:( 6309:( 6291:( 6268:( 6251:( 6236:( 6214:( 6193:( 6172:( 6153:( 6137:( 6116:( 6101:( 6086:( 6064:( 6044:( 6029:( 5994:( 5980:( 5965:( 5931:( 5901:( 5875:( 5860:( 5841:( 5825:( 5788:( 5742:( 5727:( 5713:( 5698:( 5683:( 5657:( 5631:) 5625:( 5589:( 5552:) 5546:( 5529:( 5514:( 5500:( 5477:( 5445:( 5437:( 5423:( 5409:( 5380:) 5374:( 5357:( 5343:( 5331:) 5325:( 5315:) 5311:( 5300:( 5289:) 5283:( 5262:( 5246:( 5218:( 5204:( 5192:) 5186:( 5157:( 5136:( 5103:( 5096:M 5092:T 5069:( 5055:( 5031:( 5016:( 4990:( 4976:( 4961:( 4941:( 4920:( 4902:( 4883:( 4868:( 4853:( 4835:( 4816:( 4718:( 4697:( 4648:) 4644:( 4629:( 4617:) 4613:( 4566:( 4513:( 4499:( 4484:( 4469:( 4451:( 4424:( 4403:( 4376:( 4360:( 4343:( 4318:( 4293:( 4276:( 4257:( 4235:( 4220:( 4205:( 4184:( 4168:( 4119:( 4107:) 4101:( 4050:( 4036:( 4001:( 3982:( 3963:( 3948:( 3918:( 3902:( 3872:( 3853:( 3826:( 3806:/ 3780:( 3765:( 3711:( 3696:( 3668:( 3654:( 3638:( 3619:( 3604:( 3586:( 3569:( 3553:( 3535:( 3507:( 3455:( 3424:( 3290:( 3237:( 3223:( 3209:( 3187:( 3173:( 3158:( 3139:( 3074:( 3051:( 2965:( 2871:( 2857:( 2811:( 2791:( 2777:( 2763:( 2729:( 2669:( 2649:( 2567:( 2530:( 2509:c 2507:/ 2505:t 2356:( 2342:( 2315:( 2264:( 2240:( 2207:( 2179:( 2124:( 2103:( 2084:o 2047:( 1990:o 1961:o 1887:( 1844:( 1804:c 1802:/ 1800:t 1787:c 1785:/ 1783:t 1750:( 1703:( 1674:( 1660:( 1637:( 1612:( 1588:( 1570:) 1566:( 1547:c 1545:/ 1543:t 1484:( 1461:– 1392:( 1378:. 1305:c 1303:/ 1301:t 1263:( 1227:( 1185:n 1183:o 1179:l 1177:A 1130:( 1084:c 1082:/ 1080:t 1064:( 1053:c 1051:/ 1049:t 1029:( 1015:( 1001:( 959:( 938:( 923:( 895:( 870:( 856:( 826:( 794:( 779:( 758:( 739:( 724:( 681:( 649:( 610:( 591:( 577:( 562:( 495:( 468:( 431:( 416:( 401:( 373:( 359:( 344:( 329:( 314:( 299:( 281:( 262:( 241:( 226:( 208:( 183:( 161:( 136:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index