Knowledge

User talk:Kateshortforbob/Archives2009/May

Source 📝

85:
those three books has cooled a bit - but thanks for the offer! They were books mentioned a couple of years ago by the editors who had got the page into a basic shape, but they hadn't been referred to in a very specific way. Macphysto seems to have come up with lots of marvellous stuff and I'm in no position to wonder if he ought to look at those books or not! Anyway, I hope you enjoy doing the GA. I can't say the whole GA/FA processes fill me with much enthusiasm - I was rather put off by following the Samuel Johnson FA, which managed to be protracted and extremely unpleasant - but I'll be watching to see what questions etc get thrown up by it all. All the best
31: 108: 84:
Actually the GA nomination was made by another editor MacPhysto, who seems to know his way about an academic library and who has recently been putting good work into filling the gaps that I had left - I don't know anything about literary criticism, but it seems he does, happily - so my yearning for
170:
Oh dear, that was poorly written on my part; this is why I shouldn't edit late at night... Yes, it is my review on which I was looking for feedback, if you have the time? There seems to be work ongoing on the article, but I think most of the points I had to make on the GA review criteria are there
188:
Hello Kate. The GA nominator has announced that he will be disappearing from WP in a day or two and has asked if a decision could be made one way or another asap. I've gone through your list marking everything either "done", "assumed okay" or, in four cases, asking if this has now been addressed
157:
whether you wanted me to participate in the GA review itself? I had thought from your request on my talkpage that you were looking for feedback on your assessment – a review of the review rather than a review of the article in other words – and was intending on holding off until you had finished
129: 99: 218: 182: 143: 230: 203: 78: 164: 238: 115:
tag. In places we need to discuss more, and in a couple of places the ball in is in yr court. This system seems to be working!
104:
As you'll see Macphysto and I have been continuing the discussions on from each of yr comments. Where possible I've added a
189:(these were ref issues which weren't my dept, sorry!) Please check that I haven't been presumptuous. Thank you! 154: 38: 198: 177: 124: 94: 73: 47: 17: 59: 234: 190: 172: 116: 86: 65: 8: 214: 139: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
224: 210: 159: 135: 209:Thank you for your contribution to the GA process. 153:Ciao, Kate. I am wondering from your comment 229:Thanks for answering my question. Bye -- 14: 134:I agree. Thank you for your insights. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 158:before offering my comments. Mahalo, 25: 23: 24: 249: 106: 29: 64:Your name inspires confidence 13: 1: 7: 10: 254: 144:14:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 130:10:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 100:22:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 79:19:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 18:User talk:Kateshortforbob 239:16:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 219:07:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 204:10:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 183:22:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 165:16:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 42:of past discussions. 54: 53: 48:current talk page 245: 201: 194: 180: 175: 162: 127: 120: 114: 110: 109: 97: 90: 76: 69: 60:Philip Larkin GA 33: 32: 26: 253: 252: 248: 247: 246: 244: 243: 242: 227: 199: 192: 178: 173: 160: 125: 118: 107: 105: 95: 88: 74: 67: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 251: 226: 223: 222: 221: 186: 185: 151: 150: 149: 148: 147: 146: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 250: 241: 240: 236: 232: 220: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 202: 196: 195: 184: 181: 176: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 156: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 128: 122: 121: 113: 103: 102: 101: 98: 92: 91: 83: 82: 81: 80: 77: 71: 70: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 228: 191: 187: 152: 117: 111: 87: 66: 63: 55: 43: 37: 36:This is an 231:Spongefrog 211:Macphysto 174:Kateshort 161:Skomorokh 136:Macphysto 200:instinct 126:instinct 96:instinct 75:instinct 171:now. -- 39:archive 225:Thanks 193:almost 179:forbob 119:almost 89:almost 68:almost 16:< 235:talk 215:talk 155:here 140:talk 112:Done 237:) 217:) 142:) 233:( 213:( 197:- 138:( 123:- 93:- 72:- 50:.

Index

User talk:Kateshortforbob
archive
current talk page
almost
instinct
19:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
almost
instinct
22:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
almost
instinct
10:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Macphysto
talk
14:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
here
Skomorokh
16:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Kateshort
forbob
22:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
almost
instinct
10:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Macphysto
talk
07:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Spongefrog
talk
16:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.