Knowledge

User talk:Kablammo/Archive 18

Source 📝

549: 687: 299: 662:
articles). I have to say that the process of putting two AfD notifications on the talk page of a new-to-English-Knowledge editor, when their only other contribution here also has an AfD – well, it seems an entirely brutal process. So I put a note of apology on his talk page too. I hope he understands.
246:
In an environment that is a magnet for verbose, obnoxious, self-important people to pontificate at length, your understated editing, quite authority and humility are a breath of fresh air, and long may you continue. I often wonder wtf am I doing on this website; when it comes down to it is because of
213:
Hmm. There was another Joyce incident today; how come these accounts are often adding boxes on first edits. That aside, thanks a bunch for shaming me on spelling; genuinely appreciated man, I suck at English and writing and meaning and stuff, but....am great at Paddyenglish !!;) and the look helped a
62:
from setting up archive bots that remove so many old sections the ToC disappears. Adding archiving without first ensuring consensus is only acceptable if the user in good faith believed his or her actions were uncontroversial. Once it is readily apparent this is not the case, persisting is not acting
31:
Thanks so much for your copyediting help! I'm new to editing source code so there are bound to be some mistakes, but thank God for the draftspace, so I can iron out all of the kinks before tag it for review. I am still waiting on a couple of sources I want to use to add some more detail to his career
461:
And this is not to say that the subject is a walled garden to which only experts should contribute; there are scholarly journals for that. (Nor should Knowledge be a place for advocating pet theories.) Instead, we should be familiar with the subject and the varying views of real experts, and then do
198:
I thought it was exceptionally well written, and despite diligent search, was unable to discern any Paddyenglish misspellings. My copyedits are minor; feel free to revert/alter any of them. (But I must disabuse you of one notion; I am not one of "the better informed" in this area, and had virtually
665:
Just so you know, I have a very unreliable internet connection at the moment (due to a poor-quality temporary repair to my landline after it got ploughed up by a tractor). If I disappear from any ensuing discussions, it will probably because the telecommunications infrastructure here has collapsed
478:
There are two other (besides yourself and Victoria) editors there that I have high opinions of; Wtfiv (who wrote much of the page) & Xx78900 (a fellow Corkman that I share interests with). If it has to be a box, let's at least make sure it's a very small box, per your elegant rational above.
457:
Yes. Should they prevail we likely will have to fight off a proliferation of fields, and contests over whether he that he was "British", who "influenced" him and whom he influenced, and so on. Instead of actually knowing the subject and making intelligent and nuanced contributions, they will add
661:
and for posting some encouraging remarks for the originating editor. I have gone ahead and posted the two articles in the formal AfD procedures. I have notified Товболатов (who I had already been in discussion with on my talk page when he contacted me and I laid out my reservations over the
228:
Actually I think you are a very good writer, and knowledgeable. As you may have noticed, I take a very light touch on copy-editing, and will defer to the author even if I may have expressed it differently. And now I know something about this poet, thanks to
387:. I always though "Give the Anarchist a Cigarette" was one of the best song titles.ever. The point is; keep on going, despite being told to "behave"/conform with regards to infoboxes and everybody should have one, regardless of argument. 129:
Hi Kablammo, would u mind giving this a check over - no heavy lifting- only need a scan for obvious mistakes /nonsense. You are one of the better informed people I know in this areas, so asking for guidance. ps, hello long time no talk.
100:
While I would normally say auto-archiving is a trivial and uncontroversial action, and hesitate to undo archiving once done, in this case its obvious the stable state is before archival. Let's just see if
632: 81:
Capn, I think the bot edit should be reverted, and the page restored. It was only half the size where archiving is recommended. I give no special deference to bots; they should be a tool, not a weapon.
328:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 620: 344: 313: 647: 32:
section, but do you think it's sufficiently sourced and edited to go ahead and tag it for review now, and I can make those changes later, once it's a real article again? -
371: 384:
Here is something plaintive from a band that never compromised, even during the fuss over their worldwide nr 1 hit, but were far from one hit wonders
691: 631:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
658: 114: 91: 458:
trivia which contributes nothing to our understanding but will give them the satisfaction of "contributing" to an article on a great writer.
563:
Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021
462:
our best to represent the facts and expert differences, so that readers get a basic and (we hope) nuanced understanding of the subject.
521: 520:
Here is another tune, fitting, with mind-bending harmonics. Seen them loads, and their capture of post brexit England is bang on - "
41: 396: 379: 75: 675: 628: 622: 291: 718: 637:
I saw you made some significant edits to the article in 2007 and are still active, so I figured I'd give you a notification.
367: 420:. The OWN and "new faces input" claims/requests are thus a bit rich and hard to take. I'm making a tactical withdrawal. 417: 286: 513: 488: 471: 449: 429: 411: 256: 241: 208: 177: 635:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 533: 223: 193: 160: 588:
No doubt it was a combination of both of our slownesses. It was taking me a while to craft my comment (smiling).--
363: 46: 575: 643: 26: 703: 139: 615: 597: 548: 337: 349: 671: 652: 564: 639: 438: 277:
and thought you should be notified. Only come if you're interested, I'm not recruiting. Thank you.
151:; we all have our dark periods, H.D. vocalised them acquitly, and would like you to take a look.. 274: 52: 55:
are you taking about the page in the state it was in when you made your comment or in general?
667: 325: 282: 268: 37: 714: 699: 539: 467: 445: 407: 336:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 237: 204: 173: 102: 87: 59: 8: 122: 110: 71: 17: 416:
You know the Joyce article is being hit by a coordinated squad fresh off a victory at
611: 307: 356: 321: 278: 168:, on first reading it looks very good. I will go deeper this evening or overnight. 33: 710: 695: 593: 583: 571: 529: 509: 484: 425: 392: 252: 219: 189: 156: 135: 333: 503: 385: 149: 146: 680: 603: 463: 441: 403: 329: 233: 200: 169: 106: 83: 67: 607: 340:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
589: 567: 525: 505: 480: 421: 388: 317:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
248: 215: 185: 165: 152: 131: 694:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
298: 353:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 343:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
311:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
522:
nothing but a bare faced lie, is all you cunts can hold on to
123: 66:
However, I am not prepared to undo bot actions once taken.
247:
working with people I respect and know I would like IRL.
324:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
606:
is always available should you think it is necessary.
692:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 659:WT:WikiProject_Ships#Two_poor_quality_articles 546: 14: 629:Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad 623:Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad 63:in the best interests of the project. 380:I get knocked down but I get up again 308:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 690:There is currently a discussion at 292:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 23: 709:I'm very very sorry. I was wrong. 657:Thank you for getting involved in 24: 730: 199:no prior understanding of H.D.) 685: 547: 500:I take it you are talking to me? 297: 58:Generally, I want to discourage 347:and submit your choices on the 145:PPS, here is some gothic music 621:Good article reassessment for 105:self-immolates first. Cheers, 13: 1: 576:04:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC) 372:00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 326:Knowledge arbitration process 273:I'm talking about moving the 42:02:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 719:19:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC) 704:18:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC) 648:18:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 616:06:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 598:16:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 557:Best wishes for the holidays 534:03:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 514:20:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 489:17:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 472:14:41, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 450:21:05, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 430:13:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 412:13:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 397:12:50, 4 December 2022 (UTC) 287:20:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC) 257:20:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC) 53:Talk:Norway Debate#Archiving 7: 402:One of my favourites also. 10: 735: 437:Re "tactical withdrawal": 364:MediaWiki message delivery 676:19:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 553: 242:23:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 224:00:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 209:14:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 194:23:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 178:22:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 161:21:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 140:20:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 496:Who are you replying to? 361:to your user talk page. 214:lot. Onwards my friend! 115:22:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 653:2 poor quality articles 92:19:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 76:15:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 47:Archiving blanked pages 602:Received with thanks. 439:a little WBY, perhaps? 148:and my rip-off version 27:Draft:Fredrick Willius 322:Arbitration Committee 305:Hello! Voting in the 640:Trainsandotherthings 566:& fecking 2022! 103:User:No Great Shaker 60:User:No Great Shaker 338:arbitration policy 275:Twin Cities Zephyr 269:Twin Cities Zephyr 18:User talk:Kablammo 633:reassessment page 581: 580: 540:Another year gone 452: 374: 726: 689: 688: 668:ThoughtIdRetired 551: 544: 543: 436: 418:Laurence Olivier 362: 360: 301: 734: 733: 729: 728: 727: 725: 724: 723: 686: 683: 655: 626: 586: 542: 382: 377: 376: 354: 302: 294: 271: 127: 124:Hilda Doolittle 49: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 732: 722: 721: 682: 679: 654: 651: 625: 619: 585: 582: 579: 578: 560: 559: 554: 552: 541: 538: 537: 536: 518: 517: 516: 492: 491: 476: 475: 474: 459: 455: 454: 453: 381: 378: 345:the candidates 314:eligible users 303: 296: 295: 293: 290: 270: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 230: 211: 182: 181: 180: 126: 121: 120: 119: 118: 117: 95: 94: 48: 45: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 731: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 693: 678: 677: 673: 669: 663: 660: 650: 649: 645: 641: 638: 634: 630: 624: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 600: 599: 595: 591: 577: 573: 569: 565: 562: 561: 558: 555: 550: 545: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504: 501: 497: 494: 493: 490: 486: 482: 477: 473: 469: 465: 460: 456: 451: 447: 443: 440: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 375: 373: 369: 365: 358: 352: 351: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 318: 316: 315: 310: 309: 300: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 258: 254: 250: 245: 244: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 225: 221: 217: 212: 210: 206: 202: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 184:No rush man. 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 147: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 125: 116: 112: 108: 104: 99: 98: 97: 96: 93: 89: 85: 80: 79: 78: 77: 73: 69: 64: 61: 56: 54: 44: 43: 39: 35: 19: 684: 666:completely. 664: 656: 636: 627: 601: 587: 584:Your e-mails 556: 499: 495: 383: 348: 342: 319: 312: 306: 304: 272: 128: 65: 57: 50: 30: 350:voting page 279:Sammy D III 232:—Sláinte! 34:Evansknight 711:Eladkarmel 696:Eladkarmel 681:ANI notice 334:topic bans 330:site bans 464:Kablammo 442:Kablammo 404:Kablammo 234:Kablammo 201:Kablammo 170:Kablammo 107:CapnZapp 84:Kablammo 68:CapnZapp 608:Mjroots 357:NoACEMM 604:WP:ANI 502:/ 2 = 590:Bbb23 568:Ceoil 526:Ceoil 506:Ceoil 481:Ceoil 422:Ceoil 389:Ceoil 249:Ceoil 216:Ceoil 186:Ceoil 166:Ceoil 153:Ceoil 132:Ceoil 16:< 715:talk 700:talk 672:talk 644:talk 612:talk 594:talk 572:talk 530:talk 510:talk 485:talk 468:talk 446:talk 426:talk 408:talk 393:talk 368:talk 320:The 283:talk 253:talk 238:talk 229:you. 220:talk 205:talk 190:talk 174:talk 157:talk 136:talk 111:talk 88:talk 72:talk 51:Re: 38:talk 524:". 717:) 702:) 674:) 646:) 614:) 596:) 574:) 532:) 512:) 498:+ 487:) 470:) 448:) 428:) 410:) 395:) 370:) 359:}} 355:{{ 332:, 285:) 255:) 240:) 222:) 207:) 192:) 176:) 159:) 138:) 113:) 90:) 74:) 40:) 713:( 698:( 670:( 642:( 610:( 592:( 570:( 528:( 508:( 483:( 466:( 444:( 424:( 406:( 391:( 366:( 281:( 251:( 236:( 218:( 203:( 188:( 172:( 155:( 134:( 109:( 86:( 70:( 36:(

Index

User talk:Kablammo
Evansknight
talk
02:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Norway Debate#Archiving
User:No Great Shaker
CapnZapp
talk
15:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Kablammo
talk
19:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
User:No Great Shaker
CapnZapp
talk
22:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hilda Doolittle
Ceoil
talk
20:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


Ceoil
talk
21:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Ceoil
Kablammo
talk
22:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Ceoil

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.