Knowledge

User talk:Johnuniq

Source 📝

730:
continuing a campaign. Is there any documentation or discussion supporting a continuation? Do you have any idea how many more of these articles need to be "fixed"? A dozen? A hundred? By discussion, I don't mean bickering with extreme indignation at a user or an article talk page. Has there been a calm wikiproject discussion on this issue? If not, and if you intend continuing, please start a discussion and let me know where it is. If wanted, link to here or AN, but do not mention other editors at a wikiproject. What is needed is a calm examination of the issue, not the background. Changing any further articles without such a discussion would be disruptive.
1767:, there have been more instances of new profiles and IPs doing the same changes - warned a couple of times, referred to the talk page, they're still at it. At this point I'm just getting a bit tired of yelling at a wall and reverting things non-stop - they've even started deleting the default instructions not to edit the roster, possibly to make their changes logical? No clue. As a side question, in the talk page we had a Team Manager for that football club reach out about updating the logo - tried to give some info as did other users, but I'm not sure if we misled him about how to go about the whole thing, if you want to chime in on that too. -- 607:. Both my perspective and his behavior seem like they are not changing and for many reasons, escalating it to WP:AN is not the right idea and the user does not seem interested in discussing one-one one, so I will not be posting to his talk again as I have no interest in harassing someone who refuses to talk. (I also didn't ping him because I don't see value in that, but I respect if you want to notify him of the conversation.) What do you recommend I do here? I still think and it seems like you validated that changing styles unilaterally is disruptive, so is there something that I'm missing here? What should I be doing differently? ― 918:. I agree with a comment at the Teahouse that it can be hard to get a wikiproject going and there is not much point persisting if only one person is involved. Small wikiprojects get created when people are enthusiastic but after a year or so, not much happens and people move on. If I need to ask for assistance with some topic, I prefer asking at a major top-level wikiproject with some activity rather than at a small project which in principle would be more pertinent. I don't know anything about WikiWork. By the way, there is no need to ping someone at their own talk page. 2137: 1499: 1089: 599:, escalating an issue that many other users explicitly said I was wrong to escalate to that venue and that they objected to my framing in many respects. There were additional complaints about my tone, skirting editing restrictions, etc. I appreciate that the issue at large just got out of control. Unfortunately, the issue in general has continued. As you noted at the time, "changing the style of anything in an article without good reason is very disruptive" and as soon as that conversation was closed at AN, 1510: 1467: 1184: 2201: 2179: 2148: 2126: 1541: 1477: 130: 2115: 1456: 93: 39: 104: 2271: 1583: 2043: 1124: 1554: 177: 2331: 200: 2168: 2190: 1530: 1424:
proxies which means anyone can get access to them and there is no way to anticipate whether they are proxies or to test them. My preference would be for the WMF to take ownership of the issue and for admins here to not have to do anything. On the one hand, a blocked IP might be prevented from useful contributions, but on the other, regular editors get dispirited when they see inadequate responses to blatant abuse.
2225: 2160: 1522: 85: 992:. Both have concrete references and an armed consensus so that neo-fascism is mentioned in their infobox. But a user who arbitrarily removes referenced content, because he simply doesn't like it, has removed neo-fascism by arguing that the references don't mention it, which is completely false. So I wanted to ask you to please revert the edits of this disruptive user. Thank you. 648:) that the way you addressed me regarding the page I just went back and made edits to was inappropriate at the time and again, I only make changes under good reasons, and in this case it was to reflect a consistent style across the board as he already had multiple country albums release prior to that with the tracklisting template. 2758:(added by me) is 5.5 hours after all other comments. Please do not reply here. Instead, comment in that section and quote a few words from the discussion that shows there is a consensus. Also, briefly outline what the consensus is. That is, what change, if any, is proposed? It should be on article talk so others can see it. 2487:). I've reverted about 40 of them over the past 40 minutes, but it's an exhausting ritual (maybe 1% to 5% of his tags are merited) and I'm tired of it. Not sure of the best course of action, but definitely needs eyes and a block if it continues. Plus need more of the tagging reverted/rolled back. Any help appreciated. 214: 1939:
My semi-protection of three days is the first time protection has been applied to this article. Standard procedure is that responses to problems have to escalate. Let me know if it happens again and I'll act then. It would be best to start a new section at article talk with a diff of a recent edit to
1808:
Thank you, I will monitor, there were sadly some unfortunate edits yet again due to a bad result in a game last evening. Should I proactively list any issues/accounts in a reply here every once in a while, or would that be annoying/not the proper way to report anybody continuing to abuse the article?
1158:
I assume it does nothing. A day or two ago I took a look at what other admins were doing after seeing some blocks for 31 hours(!). A couple I saw had disabled talk and email. I wondered if that was some script they were using or whether they knew something I didn't. I think probably not but it's easy
1040:
to VanderWaal's article. In case you don't remember, Larson is a YouTuber who is apparently obsessed with VanderWaal and has been stalking her for some years, claiming to be her "boyfriend". There is no evidence, other than his own social media posts, that she has ever met or communicated with him.
1830:
Please explain any reverts that are needed on article talk. If repeating yourself, just link to an earlier explanation. You might give a diff of a problematic edit which I can see, but just one or two (it's best to focus on a single issue). You can ping me from there if needed. If I don't respond in
390:
The user is now unable to comment further at their talk so there is nothing further to do. However, for the future, please do not repeatedly comment at a blocked users talk unless invited. Very few people think they deserve to be blocked and it is expected that they will vent a bit. I know you were
1313:
I'll handle it but not until there is a good explanation on article talk. After that, please revert with a link to the section with the explanation. If it changes again, you can contact me. On talk, please include what the sources say that leads to the conclusion regarding the birth date. Often it
729:
and that does not appear to have been added recently. I take your point that a good argument can be made for a consistent style between articles on a single artist. However, that argument has to be made somewhere central such as a relevant wikiproject. A positive consensus has to be shown before
643:
We've gone round and round and round in one-on-one discussions and you made the decision to withdraw your complaint due to the overwhelming majority of the responses from admins being unfavorable toward your argument, so I'm at an impasse as far as being able to engage with you (not that this is
1868:
Okay, will keep it in mind. And fair enough, will stop calling it malicious. Hopefully it will not be held against me, as the latest set of changes are literally people deleting players that performed badly in the last match and replacing the staff with a note in Bulgarian saying "RESIGN RESIGN
1423:
I was doing it for the normal short period, but then I saw very experienced admins blocking for a year. I also saw a couple of IPs which had been blocked for 48 hours or similar a few days prior to being reused. I saw an admin recently blocking for two years. Apparently the IPs are residential
715:
As noted at WP:AN, Koavf has an interesting history and you might correctly assume that the discussion there did not support Koavf's position. However, the comments that I noticed were focusing on the extreme TLDR and background rather than the issue. I did see one comment along the lines of
910:. It looks like the system relies on categories and they can take a long time to update after changes occur. A category might update immediately or it might take several days or longer. If there were a specific problem (at , x should be y) I might be able to investigate. I found WikiWork at 367:
The user is now baselessly accusing me of being a sock of some user they have a grudge against. This is sufficient evidence to demonstrate they are uninterested in actually getting unblocked. I think revoking their talk page rights is in order.
1789:
I semi-protected the article but some of the contributors will soon be able to edit it anyway. If problems continue, I'll try to have word with them. You will see that I have replied at article talk regarding the logo (and at the user's talk).
965:‪2605:8D80:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 is the range that this user has blocked. Even though the block expires in about 2 months, it's still problematic. (Either it's the Rogers cellular network, the DuckDuckGo web browser, or something else that I missed.) 1845:
I just saw your edit summary: "Reverting another set of malicious changes". Please don't say that sort of thing in an edit summary because it won't help anything and it will count against you if the matter is ever at an admin noticeboard (see
2285: 942:
also have the same effect. I have no clue whether, I, the only person, can remain continue the activity of that project, instead of require some users to do. I wish I could update the project by changing it, although it will be drastic.
818: 1290:
they still are not stopping. I initially requested protection for the page but I thought I would ask an admin beforehand, as it is stressing me out that they keep changing this as it is a BLP. I am sorry for disturbing your day.
720:
but that is just wrong due to the amazing disruption that has occurred when people dedicate themselves to "fixing" various style issues—dates, spelling, colors, spacing, wiki syntax, and probably many more. The documentation at
596: 1148: 411:
The Tupac page can now be edited by everyone; it wasn't like that before. Previously, only administrators and users with permission could edit it. This rule needs to be reinstated, or it will be edited every day
960: 2082: 2315: 2698: 1662:, for example). I was hoping to get some advice about what the best thing to do moving forward on this topic is, I do want to make changes to these articles, but I also really do not want to edit war. 1899:. However upon a little investigation, different IPs have been repeatedly trying to make essentially the same (unsourced, opinionated) edit to the introduction since December 2023, eight months ago ( 907: 2687:. A user keeps removing its content (even though those content has reliable sources) and keeps adding thier preferred version. The same user did same thing on bnwiki and we reverted their edits. 2298: 391:
trying to help but it plainly was not doing any good. It's best to leave them alone and comment only if they ask for something specific and it appears that a reply might achieve something useful.
1854:
is vandalism but just about anything else is a good-faith although possibly mistaken edit). We can't know if someone is malicious. Just say something like "reverting mistaken edits, see talk".
2694: 1314:
seems best just to omit the birth date if the sourcing is dubious or based on inferences. At any rate, full details are needed on talk for now and for the future when the issue arises again.
1918:
It's just occurred to me that maybe I should have put this on the article's talk page and pinged you. If that would be the case, feel free to move this discussion there from your talk page.
2368: 2516:
Thanks. By the by, this rapid-fire 80-edits-per day MO is often standard behavior of someone trying to rapidly achieve EC status, so might take a look at his edits again once he hits 500.
2070: 1369:
but I don't think anyone has properly investigated the range required or the side effects. If you have a suggestion, post it at ANI although only very useful comments should be added per
2690:
I reverted their edit twice here on enwiki & asked the user to stop but the user still doing it. I did not reverted their latest edit as I don't want to get involved in edit wars.
2534:
I will note that this is not an attempt to pad for EC status(if you wish to believe me on that), in fact looking into what EC provides I don't see much reason to shoot for it, except
553: 2480:
is adding rapid-fire (75+ per day) bogus tags (like the utterly spurious "underlinked") to articles, apparently via scripts he has added to his account. I warned him on his usertalk
1366: 2078: 2472: 974: 752:
Any thoughts on how the broader NOTHERE issues in relation to that multiple IP address user might be resolved? I’m not sure that attempting to get further blocks like this one
567: 2645:
Thank you. Right before your block he was EDIT-WARRING over my reverts from today. Clearly this editor is not here to build an encyclopedia. Has the air of a possible LTA.
2281: 835: 1597: 1009: 993: 1144: 576: 559: 1903:
here). I'm not super familiar with the protection process but potentially some sort of longer-term semi-protection may be called for? Thanks again for your assistance.
584: 2235: 1593: 1483: 161: 146: 141: 136: 2591:. You're skating on pretty thin ice now that you are continuing to do what you were warned by multiple highly experienced editors plus an administrator not to do. 2358: 2322: 824: 1736: 431:
where I don't think I have ever been involved. The above has been posted in a number of places and the article is now fully protected to prevent an edit war.
2302: 120: 2254: 1831:
24 hours or so, remind me here because I might have missed a ping. It doesn't matter, but FYI, a ping on a user talk page is not needed and doesn't work.
2621: 2496: 2017:, the purpose of a short description is to disambiguate searches and adding "songwriter" to "singer" might not be needed. However, the IP should be at 1286:
despite it not being 100% certain if it is the same person. They kept changing it in May and after I reverted it yesterday and I have told them about
267:
that hasn’t been answered in two weeks. I won’t cast judgement on its validity but I think the user has a right to know whether they’ll be unblocked.
1470: 166: 2408: 2100: 2047: 1488: 558:
Hi. There is a vandal, whose name is Maeve Kessler, trying to revert constructive edits, including mine. can you block him for a while? thank you.
304: 155: 2385: 1647: 1624: 580: 563: 342:
I saw that but did nothing because I think there should be a bit more time to see if anyone else has an opinion. I'll look again a little later.
229: 2212: 2207: 2182: 252: 1441: 2390: 1629: 234: 151: 115: 2151: 2129: 1760: 1168: 360: 1513: 1152: 73: 1689:
I reverted the edit in question. It was, frankly, a pretty silly moment of bad decision making for which I take full responsibility (and
1577:. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked. 2380: 1619: 1231: 670:
examples of arbitrary style changes occur, please let me know." That is the only reason I wrote here, since I was solicited to do so. ―
224: 663: 322: 2678: 1940:
the article (a diff which would have probably been reverted). Add an explanation of why it was unsatisfactory, possibly mentioning
1544: 1245: 1236:
For the past month or so, my watchlist has been a blizzard of revdels. Why do you think so much of this is going on at this time?
2702: 1196:
I wanted to give you this barnstar for your devotion to dealing with IP addresses used by that sick, fierce LTA, in real time! —
1014:
An issue like this should be discussed on the article talk page. Editors should have been able to see the messages that I left.
1267: 590: 2341: 2105: 1446: 1396: 1355: 888: 784: 110: 78: 2693:
I think it would be better to restore the last good version until there is a consensus. Could you please help here? Thanks.
891:
to WikiWork Factor? The mismatched number of polyhedron articles in a table is already an old problem after it was created.
2404: 1643: 248: 1407:
Why are you blocking what seem to be very dynamic IPs for a year? Blocking for a day would make them hop just the same --
1323: 739: 1023: 2351: 744: 637: 604: 1722: 1702: 515:
Please look at User:BittersweetParadox's edit history. They make numerous rapid edits to add wikilinks to words like
1117: 970: 900: 1927: 1748: 1671: 770: 2721: 1991: 1912: 863: 850: 532: 482: 276: 2668: 2654: 2640: 2525: 2511: 841:
I saw your report which is why I protected. I had to add it to the log and so was slow updating the request page.
2400: 2066: 1975: 1961: 1878: 1863: 1840: 1818: 1799: 1639: 1263: 1079: 871: 700: 657: 510: 468: 244: 2600: 2547: 2464: 2450: 1433: 1411: 997: 952: 927: 504: 400: 298: 2781: 2767: 2258: 2094: 1296: 1225: 755:
is really going to work (although i don't think it would necessarily do any harm, given recent edits like this
2420: 2030: 1400: 1382: 1073: 547: 440: 351: 337: 2481: 1037: 932:
By the way, my apologies for pinging. It was my habit, and I learned my lesson. After all, it looks like the
258: 2565: 1001: 810: 796: 600: 210: 2741: 1900: 1890: 1567: 1207: 1101: 985: 966: 915: 2248:
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
187: 186:
Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript.
1776: 1574: 1300: 1253: 691: 628: 446: 377: 44: 1994:? I have asked them to do so and left edit summaries explaining, but.... Perhaps semiprotection? -- 756: 2612:
Update: That's still all he's doing. I've reverted most of the new ones now, as they were unwarranted.
1653: 1259: 1054: 2003: 1308: 1292: 1132: 1036:
This Daniel Larson nonsense is back. New user:Fhfhdvevdgxgdbegobirhwv is edit warring to add this:
2755: 2709: 2292: 2018: 2010: 1764: 1698: 1667: 911: 653: 452: 2553: 2431: 2073:. A couple of editors (not Kcmastrpc) are requiring evidence that it would be contentious to edit 2059: 908:
Template talk:Articles by Quality and Importance#Unknown-importance articles not included in total
487: 2419:
Many thanks for your quick response on this. I forgot to also request hiding of these revisions:
936: 819:
Your semi-protection of Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election
695: 645: 632: 421: 264: 2538:
Content Translation, but I'm not currently comfortable adding major content to pages like that.
2363:
is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the
2727: 2712:. Let me know if it continues but first try to engage with them in discussion on article talk. 2650: 2617: 2596: 2521: 2492: 1717: 1241: 1174: 884:
but it does not give responses from many users. Do you know where can I request to include the
722: 456: 2367:. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. 1282:. For the past few months various IPs (from the same range) have been changing the age, using 2684: 1971: 1923: 1908: 1874: 1814: 1772: 989: 906:
I know very little about article assessment and won't be much help. A relevant mention is at
310: 1509: 1466: 491:
is not a problem. I would delete it if it was misleading or something bad but the people at
2659:
There is probably an essay describing the high correlation between confidence and socking.
2460: 2427: 2364: 2200: 2178: 2147: 2125: 1540: 1476: 1287: 1113: 1061: 948: 896: 464: 373: 272: 129: 2502:
I left a message at their talk and will probably notice any further comments added there.
1359: 1105: 1038:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Grace_VanderWaal&diff=prev&oldid=1236817726
309:
Even though one person was already blocked for edit-warring on this, two others continue:
8: 2777: 2737: 2055: 2014: 1694: 1679: 1663: 1202: 1029: 710: 649: 359: 2628: 1658:
Hi, I just wanted to say I really appreciated your feedback. (I had never even heard of
1999: 1985: 1754: 1563: 1392: 1351: 1050: 881: 528: 417: 333: 318: 103: 2646: 2613: 2592: 2531: 2517: 2488: 1990:
Can anything be done to get this IP to go to the Talk page instead of Edit warring
1237: 191: 2136: 1498: 2543: 2325:
is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
1967: 1934: 1919: 1904: 1870: 1825: 1810: 1784: 1768: 1030: 806: 766: 2456: 2423: 1711: 1690: 1418: 1408: 1278:
Hey, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to please ask for some advice regarding
1109: 944: 892: 885: 687: 624: 476: 460: 385: 369: 284: 268: 2243: 1739:. Mass editing without clear consensus in advance can often lead to disruption. 2773: 2749: 2733: 2588: 2051: 1896: 1847: 1659: 1370: 1283: 1197: 1183: 979: 855:
Sounds good. We were fighting for our lives there. LMAO. Thanks for your help!
753: 58: 2759: 2713: 2660: 2632: 2557: 2503: 2442: 2262: 2239: 2086: 2036: 2022: 1995: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1855: 1832: 1805: 1791: 1740: 1425: 1388: 1374: 1347: 1343: 1315: 1217: 1160: 1065: 1046: 1042: 1015: 919: 877: 842: 788: 731: 539: 524: 520: 496: 492: 432: 413: 406: 392: 343: 329: 314: 290: 38: 2422:, an apparent good faith error on the part of another editor. Thanks again. 2079:
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Shitposts in biographies
1137:
Just curious, since you've done it twice recently - does disabling email on
601:
the same user changed styles on an article where we discussed this years ago
2484: 2414: 2346: 1941: 1339: 1335: 1279: 481:
I wouldn't worry about it. The word "diminishment" appears in the article (
428: 2437:
I made a mess of that. I still don't know how those bad revision got into
2114: 1869:
RESIGN". Either way - thank you for the explanation and the assistance! --
1455: 1088: 961:
Johnuniq blocked the entire Rogers cellular network from editing Knowledge
495:
accept just about anything for redirects and this is a long way off that.
92: 2584: 2539: 1334:
Hi, Johnuniq. About that LTA user from South Korea who was disruptive at
802: 778: 762: 749:
Hi, Many thanks for your recent assistance at WP:RPPI, much appreciated.
644:
anything new). It was brought to my attention through that discourse (by
328:
There is an edit request there now that, I think, resolves the issue? --
62: 1159:
to tick everything to disable it so that's what I've been doing lately.
64: 2478: 1952:. Include a ping to me. If I don't respond in a day or two, post here. 671: 608: 2556:
is good. In brief: improving articles is productive; tagging is not.
2438: 2270: 2050:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1582: 1273: 857: 829: 1707:
Yet you're still removing content. This counts as a partial revert.
2074: 1573:
Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via
1346:, I have a quick question: is an IP range block necessary? Thanks, 519:
and make other mischievous edits, such as the edit on July 16th to
516: 60: 2732:
Consensus has been reached. Is it possible to remove protection?
1763:, I'm reaching out. As you can see in the Ludogorets page history 2354:
reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
2330: 2189: 2167: 1731:
For the record, this relates to edits at number articles such as
1684:
6 minutes after this note saying you don't want to edit war, you
1608: 1553: 1529: 1123: 726: 199: 176: 605:
posted to his talk and he archived the thread without responding
1895:
Hello. Thank you for applying the three day semi-protection to
1737:
WT:WikiProject Numbers#Help remove WP:CRUFT on number articles!
1329: 2224: 451:
Hi. Excuse me, can you help me to delete the redirect article
65: 2473:
Rapid-fire bogus tagbombing by user with less than 400 edits
2310: 2159: 1566:
may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may
1521: 84: 1258:
It's one person, mostly. Everyone needs a hobby, I guess.
554:
Vandal calling my actions on Nguyễn Phú Trọng 'vandal ism'
1104:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your 23:
I'll reply to messages here, unless requested otherwise.
1045:
to this new editor. Would you please take a look? --
313:. Can you please return it to the status quo ante? -- 1732: 289:
After a fair bit of thought, I declined the request.
1602: 32: 2067:Talk:JD Vance#Remove the nonsense about the couch 801:Much obliged. I'll keep an eye on the situation. 787:for three months. Let me know what pops up next. 2048:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2288:World War II and the history of Jews in Poland 2077:to add mention of fucking a couch. I asked at 523:. They have been warned many, many times. -- 1735:, with a correspondingly large discussion at 305:Continued edit warring during open discussion 1598:conflict of interest volunteer response team 2483:(his last tagging before my warning was on 2101:Administrators' newsletter – September 2024 2772:Ok. Thought it was to be requested here. 2627:Blocked for 48 hours with explanation at 1442:Administrators' newsletter – August 2024 823:Figured I should point out I had made a 1232:Why is there so much disruption lately? 2455:Yes looks good now, thanks very much. 455:? It seems it is already has the name 74:Administrators' newsletter – July 2024 2679:Continuous removal of sourced content 2263:subject-specific notability guideline 1966:Thanks for the response, understood. 984:Hello, you have blocked the pages of 785:Special:Contributions/151.71.102.0/24 666:where Johnuniq explicitly wrote, "If 577:2601:646:8003:6B20:F0F5:240E:3682:771 560:2601:646:8003:6B20:F0F5:240E:3682:771 1596:the following administrators to the 1083: 761:Any assistance gratefully received. 2441:but I think I've got them all now. 2291:(the topic and interaction bans on 2108:from the past month (August 2024). 2106:News and updates for administrators 2046:There is currently a discussion at 1447:News and updates for administrators 591:Request for mentoring and direction 459:. I really messed up. Many thanks. 79:News and updates for administrators 13: 2587:, you certainly do not seem to be 2158: 1520: 573:Nevermind, he already got blocked. 83: 14: 2795: 1449:from the past month (July 2024). 595:As you likely recall, I recently 81:from the past month (June 2024). 2329: 2269: 2223: 2199: 2188: 2177: 2166: 2146: 2135: 2124: 2113: 2041: 1850:which boils down to saying that 1581: 1552: 1539: 1528: 1508: 1497: 1475: 1465: 1454: 1182: 1122: 1106:successful request for adminship 1087: 483:Gyroelongated pentagonal pyramid 198: 175: 128: 102: 91: 37: 2683:Hi John, please take a look on 2314:German history topic ban") was 2141:Interface administrator changes 2065:For posterity, this relates to 1503:Interface administrator changes 745:RPPI for Across the River (etc) 213:is re-opening on 15 July 2024. 2782:04:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 2768:03:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 2742:03:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 2722:02:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 2703:22:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2669:05:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2655:05:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2641:05:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2622:05:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2601:05:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2566:00:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 2548:13:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2526:08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2512:07:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2497:06:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 2360:New Pages Patrol backlog drive 2344:, an alternative for informal 2295:, respectively) were repealed. 2021:and I will watch for a while. 1143:Or are they just misclicks? – 1100:Hi Johnuniq! On behalf of the 538:I have warned and will watch. 1: 2756:Talk:Peter Brimelow#Protected 2589:here to build an encyclopedia 2554:Knowledge:Teahouse#On tagging 2465:10:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2451:10:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2432:10:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 2409:18:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 2240:criterion for speedy deletion 1141:blocked IPs even do anything? 19: 2754:I do not understand because 2370:Sign up here to participate! 1096:Happy adminship anniversary! 1080:Happy Adminship Anniversary! 986:Freedom and Direct Democracy 872:WP:3TOPE and WikiWork Factor 511:Rapid-fire disruptive editor 7: 2342:good article review circles 2340:Editors can now enter into 2318:for a period of six months. 2257:is open to discuss whether 2095:05:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 2081:and another BLPN report is 2060:14:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 2031:01:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2004:22:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1976:04:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 1962:23:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1928:12:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1913:12:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1879:07:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1864:05:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1841:05:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1819:04:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1800:02:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1777:17:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1575:Special:GlobalVanishRequest 1434:09:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1412:08:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 263:There’s an unblock request 10: 2800: 2401:MediaWiki message delivery 1759:Hey, per the instructions 1749:23:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 1723:17:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 1703:15:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 1672:14:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 1648:16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 1640:MediaWiki message delivery 1592:The Arbitration Committee 1401:04:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1383:04:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1360:04:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1324:03:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1301:03:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 1268:23:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 1246:23:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 1226:09:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 1208:09:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC) 1169:03:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 1153:03:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 1108:. Enjoy this special day! 259:Unanswered unblock request 245:MediaWiki message delivery 188:Documentation is available 2229:Guideline and policy news 1891:Leonard Maltin protection 1181: 1118:10:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 1074:23:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 1055:18:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 1041:I have tried to explain 1024:00:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 1002:14:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 975:17:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 953:13:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 928:02:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 901:11:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 864:05:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 851:05:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 836:05:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 811:05:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 797:05:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 771:05:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 740:04:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 701:17:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 658:16:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 638:16:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 585:11:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 568:11:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 548:02:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 533:02:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 505:01:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 469:13:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 441:02:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 422:14:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 401:01:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 378:16:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 352:02:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 338:20:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC) 2763: 2717: 2710:User talk:Yasarhossain07 2664: 2636: 2561: 2507: 2446: 2350:arrangements, to have a 2286:remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of 2090: 2026: 2019:Talk:Morissette (singer) 2011:User talk:190.167.27.164 1957: 1859: 1836: 1795: 1744: 1429: 1378: 1319: 1221: 1164: 1069: 1019: 923: 912:User:WP 1.0 bot/WikiWork 846: 827:so you can mark it off. 792: 735: 543: 500: 488:Diminishment icosahedron 453:Diminishment icosahedron 447:Diminishment icosahedron 436: 396: 347: 323:04:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 299:09:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 294: 277:08:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 253:07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 2381:Discuss this newsletter 2261:should be adopted as a 1654:Thanks for the feedback 1620:Discuss this newsletter 1064:who handled the issue. 967:Over1BillionPagesOnWiki 880:. I have asked this in 646:User:Just Step Sideways 225:Discuss this newsletter 2163: 1525: 1133:Email disabled on IPs? 725:specifically mentions 723:Template:Track listing 457:Diminished icosahedron 88: 2685:Chittagonian language 2629:User talk:Akaibu#Tags 2321:The arbitration case 2162: 2119:Administrator changes 1524: 1460:Administrator changes 1260:ScottishFinnishRadish 990:Our Homeland Movement 97:Administrator changes 87: 2708:I left a warning at 2323:Historical Elections 2259:Notability (species) 1309:DaniloDaysOfOurLives 1293:DaniloDaysOfOurLives 1190:The Admin's Barnstar 1110:The Herald (Benison) 311:Richard D'Oyly Carte 147:Georgewilliamherbert 121:Pickersgill-Cunliffe 2728:Peter Brimelow page 2293:My very best wishes 2255:request for comment 2172:Oversighter changes 1365:That was mentioned 1175:A barnstar for you! 485:) and the redirect 2164: 2009:See my comment at 1693:to the face) for. 1609:Extraordinary Writ 1526: 1102:Birthday Committee 1010:Democrático Slovak 994:Democrático Slovak 211:Community Wishlist 89: 2411: 2304:German war effort 2238:, there is a new 2213:GeneralNotability 2194:CheckUser changes 1721: 1650: 1570:when appropriate. 1534:CheckUser changes 1254:talk page stalker 1213: 1212: 1145:2804:F1...0F:3702 1130: 1129: 255: 71: 70: 45:Index of archives 31: 30: 2791: 2753: 2398: 2333: 2313: 2273: 2227: 2203: 2192: 2181: 2170: 2150: 2139: 2128: 2117: 2045: 2044: 1938: 1829: 1788: 1708: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1637: 1611: 1605: 1585: 1556: 1543: 1532: 1512: 1501: 1479: 1469: 1458: 1422: 1312: 1257: 1205: 1200: 1186: 1179: 1178: 1126: 1091: 1084: 1031:Grace VanderWaal 1013: 941: 935: 889:asssesment table 860: 832: 825:RPP for the page 782: 714: 699: 682: 680: 636: 619: 617: 490: 480: 389: 288: 242: 202: 190:on MediaWiki. ( 179: 132: 106: 95: 66: 41: 33: 16: 15: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2747: 2730: 2681: 2475: 2417: 2412: 2396: 2395: 2309: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2156: 2103: 2042: 2039: 1992:at this article 1988: 1986:Edit warring IP 1932: 1893: 1823: 1782: 1757: 1755:Ludogorets page 1677: 1656: 1651: 1635: 1634: 1607: 1601: 1568:locally unblock 1550: 1549: 1518: 1493: 1471:Isabelle Belato 1444: 1416: 1332: 1306: 1276: 1251: 1234: 1203: 1198: 1177: 1140: 1135: 1098: 1082: 1062:Isabelle Belato 1034: 1007: 982: 963: 939: 933: 874: 858: 830: 821: 776: 747: 708: 685: 678: 673: 622: 615: 610: 597:posted to WP:AN 593: 556: 513: 486: 474: 449: 427:This refers to 409: 383: 365: 307: 282: 261: 256: 240: 239: 171: 167:The Night Watch 125: 76: 67: 61: 48: 27: 12: 11: 5: 2797: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2729: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2680: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2552:The advice at 2474: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2416: 2413: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2365:new pages feed 2355: 2327: 2326: 2319: 2296: 2267: 2266: 2251: 2219: 2218: 2216: 2215: 2210: 2204: 2186: 2185: 2157: 2155: 2154: 2133: 2132: 2111: 2110: 2102: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2033: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1897:Leonard Maltin 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1843: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1695:Allan Nonymous 1680:Allan Nonymous 1664:Allan Nonymous 1655: 1652: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1579: 1578: 1571: 1558:Technical news 1548: 1547: 1519: 1517: 1516: 1495: 1494: 1492: 1491: 1486: 1480: 1473: 1452: 1451: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1284:Genes Reunited 1275: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1211: 1210: 1193: 1192: 1187: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1120: 1099: 1094: 1092: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1026: 981: 978: 962: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 937:category class 873: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 820: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 746: 743: 711:CloversMallRat 706: 705: 704: 703: 650:CloversMallRat 592: 589: 588: 587: 574: 555: 552: 551: 550: 512: 509: 508: 507: 448: 445: 444: 443: 408: 405: 404: 403: 364: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 306: 303: 302: 301: 260: 257: 241: 238: 237: 232: 227: 221: 220: 219: 218: 217: 196: 195: 181:Technical news 173: 172: 170: 169: 164: 159: 149: 144: 139: 133: 126: 124: 123: 118: 113: 107: 75: 72: 69: 68: 63: 59: 57: 54: 53: 50: 49: 42: 36: 29: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2796: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2751: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2695:আফতাবুজ্জামান 2691: 2688: 2686: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2479: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2372: 2371: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2356: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2343: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335:Miscellaneous 2332: 2324: 2320: 2317: 2312: 2311:Cinderella157 2307: 2305: 2300: 2297: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2234:Following an 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2191: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2161: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2138: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2109: 2107: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1936: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1827: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1786: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1687: 1681: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1610: 1604: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1584: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1564:Global blocks 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1490: 1489:Modussiccandi 1487: 1485: 1482: 1481: 1478: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1450: 1448: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1397:contributions 1394: 1390: 1389:Lord Sjones23 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1356:contributions 1353: 1349: 1348:Lord Sjones23 1345: 1341: 1337: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1289: 1288:WP:BLPPRIMARY 1285: 1281: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1255: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1180: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1125: 1121: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1097: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1039: 1032: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 977: 976: 972: 968: 954: 950: 946: 938: 931: 930: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 890: 887: 883: 879: 865: 862: 861: 859:TrueCRaysball 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839: 838: 837: 834: 833: 831:TrueCRaysball 826: 812: 808: 804: 800: 799: 798: 794: 790: 786: 780: 775: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 759: 757: 754: 750: 742: 741: 737: 733: 728: 724: 719: 712: 702: 697: 693: 689: 684: 677: 669: 665: 661: 660: 659: 655: 651: 647: 642: 641: 640: 639: 634: 630: 626: 621: 614: 606: 602: 598: 586: 582: 578: 575: 572: 571: 570: 569: 565: 561: 549: 545: 541: 537: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521:Lingua franca 518: 506: 502: 498: 494: 489: 484: 478: 473: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 419: 415: 402: 398: 394: 387: 382: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 362: 353: 349: 345: 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 300: 296: 292: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 266: 254: 250: 246: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 222: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204:Miscellaneous 201: 193: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 168: 165: 163: 160: 157: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 134: 131: 127: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 105: 101: 100: 99: 98: 94: 86: 82: 80: 56: 55: 52: 51: 47: 46: 40: 35: 34: 26: 25: 24: 18: 17: 2731: 2692: 2689: 2682: 2647:Softlavender 2614:Softlavender 2611: 2593:Softlavender 2535: 2532:Softlavender 2518:Softlavender 2489:Softlavender 2485:Aelbert Cuyp 2476: 2418: 2369: 2359: 2347:quid pro quo 2345: 2334: 2328: 2303: 2287: 2280:Following a 2274: 2268: 2247: 2228: 2222: 2193: 2187: 2171: 2165: 2140: 2134: 2118: 2112: 2104: 2040: 2015:WP:SHORTDESC 1989: 1894: 1851: 1758: 1710: 1709: 1657: 1586: 1580: 1557: 1551: 1533: 1527: 1502: 1496: 1459: 1453: 1445: 1333: 1280:Charlie Suff 1277: 1238:Softlavender 1235: 1189: 1136: 1095: 1035: 983: 964: 875: 856: 828: 822: 760: 751: 748: 717: 707: 675: 667: 612: 594: 557: 514: 450: 429:Tupac Shakur 410: 366: 308: 262: 203: 197: 180: 174: 116:HouseBlaster 96: 90: 77: 43: 22: 21: 20: 2275:Arbitration 1968:StewdioMACK 1935:StewdioMACK 1920:StewdioMACK 1905:StewdioMACK 1871:Yupyuphello 1826:Yupyuphello 1811:Yupyuphello 1785:Yupyuphello 1769:Yupyuphello 1587:Arbitration 1484:Ian.thomson 980:Neo-fascism 882:WP:TEAHOUSE 662:Please see 2477:This user 2457:Wikishovel 2424:Wikishovel 2208:Courcelles 2071:ANI report 2037:ANI Notice 1712:Polyamorph 1419:Guerillero 1409:Guerillero 1139:anon. only 1060:Thanks to 945:Dedhert.Jr 893:Dedhert.Jr 783:I blocked 477:Dedhert.Jr 461:Dedhert.Jr 407:Tupac Page 386:Dronebogus 370:Dronebogus 361:user:Smefs 285:Dronebogus 269:Dronebogus 2774:Cundebuff 2750:Cundebuff 2734:Cundebuff 2439:Talk:Yawn 2415:Talk:Yawn 2386:Subscribe 2316:suspended 2299:Remedy 3C 2183:Wugapodes 2052:Kcmastrpc 1691:WP:TROUTs 1625:Subscribe 1594:appointed 1545:Barkeep49 1199:AP 499D25 914:with its 718:who cares 664:this post 230:Subscribe 215:Read more 2760:Johnuniq 2714:Johnuniq 2661:Johnuniq 2633:Johnuniq 2558:Johnuniq 2504:Johnuniq 2443:Johnuniq 2399:Sent by 2246:, which 2087:Johnuniq 2075:JD Vance 2069:and the 2023:Johnuniq 1996:Ssilvers 1954:Johnuniq 1856:Johnuniq 1833:Johnuniq 1806:Johnuniq 1792:Johnuniq 1741:Johnuniq 1638:Sent by 1426:Johnuniq 1387:Got it. 1375:Johnuniq 1316:Johnuniq 1218:Johnuniq 1216:Thanks! 1161:Johnuniq 1066:Johnuniq 1047:Ssilvers 1016:Johnuniq 920:Johnuniq 886:WP:3TOPE 878:Johnuniq 843:Johnuniq 789:Johnuniq 732:Johnuniq 672:Justin ( 609:Justin ( 540:Johnuniq 525:Ssilvers 517:baseball 497:Johnuniq 433:Johnuniq 414:Pier1999 393:Johnuniq 344:Johnuniq 330:Ssilvers 315:Ssilvers 291:Johnuniq 243:Sent by 156:deceased 152:Hyacinth 142:De728631 2391:Archive 2301:of the 1848:WP:VAND 1660:WP:FAIT 1630:Archive 1371:WP:DENY 727:MOS:VAR 235:Archive 162:ProveIt 137:Brianga 2585:Akaibu 2540:Akaibu 2282:motion 2152:Pppery 2130:Pppery 2013:. Per 1950:WP:BLP 1946:WP:DUE 1367:at ANI 1344:WP:ANI 1274:Advice 1204:(talk) 1043:WP:BLP 803:Axad12 779:Axad12 763:Axad12 493:WP:RFD 2536:maybe 1942:WP:RS 1603:Bilby 1340:WP:AN 1336:WP:BN 876:Hi, @ 363:again 192:T6086 2778:talk 2764:talk 2738:talk 2718:talk 2699:talk 2665:talk 2651:talk 2637:talk 2618:talk 2597:talk 2562:talk 2544:talk 2522:talk 2508:talk 2493:talk 2461:talk 2447:talk 2428:talk 2405:talk 2306:case 2091:talk 2083:here 2056:talk 2027:talk 2000:talk 1972:talk 1958:talk 1948:and 1944:and 1924:talk 1909:talk 1901:diff 1875:talk 1860:talk 1852:poop 1837:talk 1815:talk 1796:talk 1773:talk 1765:here 1761:here 1745:talk 1718:talk 1699:talk 1668:talk 1644:talk 1514:Izno 1430:talk 1393:talk 1379:talk 1352:talk 1342:and 1320:talk 1297:talk 1264:talk 1242:talk 1222:talk 1165:talk 1149:talk 1114:talk 1070:talk 1051:talk 1020:talk 998:talk 988:and 971:talk 949:talk 924:talk 897:talk 847:talk 807:talk 793:talk 767:talk 736:talk 654:talk 603:. I 581:talk 564:talk 544:talk 529:talk 501:talk 465:talk 437:talk 418:talk 397:talk 374:talk 348:talk 334:talk 319:talk 295:talk 273:talk 265:here 249:talk 209:The 111:Elli 2352:GAN 2236:RfC 1330:LTA 916:FAQ 668:new 2780:) 2766:) 2740:) 2720:) 2701:) 2667:) 2653:) 2639:) 2631:. 2620:) 2599:) 2564:) 2546:) 2524:) 2510:) 2495:) 2463:) 2449:) 2430:) 2407:) 2357:A 2308:(" 2284:, 2253:A 2244:C4 2242:: 2093:) 2085:. 2058:) 2029:) 2002:) 1974:) 1960:) 1926:) 1911:) 1877:) 1862:) 1839:) 1817:) 1809:-- 1798:) 1775:) 1747:) 1701:) 1670:) 1646:) 1606:, 1600:: 1432:) 1399:) 1395:- 1381:) 1373:. 1358:) 1354:- 1338:, 1322:) 1299:) 1266:) 1244:) 1224:) 1167:) 1151:) 1116:) 1072:) 1053:) 1022:) 1000:) 973:) 951:) 940:}} 934:{{ 926:) 899:) 849:) 809:) 795:) 769:) 758:. 738:) 674:ko 656:) 611:ko 583:) 566:) 546:) 531:) 503:) 467:) 439:) 420:) 399:) 376:) 350:) 336:) 321:) 297:) 275:) 251:) 2776:( 2762:( 2752:: 2748:@ 2736:( 2716:( 2697:( 2663:( 2649:( 2635:( 2616:( 2595:( 2560:( 2542:( 2530:@ 2520:( 2506:( 2491:( 2459:( 2445:( 2426:( 2403:( 2265:. 2250:. 2089:( 2054:( 2025:( 1998:( 1970:( 1956:( 1937:: 1933:@ 1922:( 1907:( 1873:( 1858:( 1835:( 1828:: 1824:@ 1813:( 1804:@ 1794:( 1787:: 1783:@ 1771:( 1743:( 1733:1 1720:) 1716:( 1697:( 1682:: 1678:@ 1666:( 1642:( 1428:( 1421:: 1417:@ 1391:( 1377:( 1350:( 1318:( 1311:: 1307:@ 1295:( 1262:( 1256:) 1252:( 1240:( 1220:( 1163:( 1147:( 1112:( 1068:( 1049:( 1018:( 1012:: 1008:@ 996:( 969:( 947:( 922:( 895:( 845:( 805:( 791:( 781:: 777:@ 765:( 734:( 713:: 709:@ 698:☯ 696:M 694:☺ 692:C 690:☮ 688:T 686:❤ 683:) 681:f 679:v 676:a 652:( 635:☯ 633:M 631:☺ 629:C 627:☮ 625:T 623:❤ 620:) 618:f 616:v 613:a 579:( 562:( 542:( 527:( 499:( 479:: 475:@ 463:( 435:( 416:( 395:( 388:: 384:@ 372:( 346:( 332:( 317:( 293:( 287:: 283:@ 271:( 247:( 194:) 158:) 154:(

Index


Index of archives
News and updates for administrators


added
Elli
HouseBlaster
Pickersgill-Cunliffe
removed
Brianga
De728631
Georgewilliamherbert
Hyacinth
deceased
ProveIt
The Night Watch

Documentation is available
T6086

Community Wishlist
Read more
Discuss this newsletter
Subscribe
Archive
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
here

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.