User talk:Johnsoniensis

5208: 26: 5161: 120: 930:- it would be much more helpful to do the full assess - as it is you have left ?? in the importance.... Also I rarely ever see any of my talk page editing added or amended. (most eds are not the slightest interested in maintaining project tags) . The 'List' project tag in effect becomes redundant if you have put 'list' as the class in the other projects. I could go on at length, but... If indeed you are interested in project tagging, or in assessing - good luck to you - there is no support for the activity (not that I have ever seen). 3686: 5154: 5147: 96: 6039:. Secondly, it was the author himself, Daniel Couto Vale, who originally added the rating. (Although Austronesier is credited with 72% of the authorship, this is only because he helped Daniel by copying and pasting the material for him. The real author is Daniel.) And he gave it this rating on the very first day, 13 November 2022, before even starting work on his edits. Thirdly, the material which Daniel himself has added is highly questionable, and he uses terms which are not found in any grammar book, such as 1748: 5760: 675: 5571:, which I think is just as good if not rather better; certainly I have done my best to satisfy all the Knowledge criteria. And yet recently it was graded as "Start" class. It is clearly nothing like the example of a Start-class article on the grading-criteria page, so why Anaclasis should be given a B but Metron only a Start grade is a mystery. It is a bit of an imposition, I know, but if you could cast an eye on the Metron article and check if it has been correctly graded I would be most grateful. 72: 1674: 1502: 6440:. I noticed you rated it as C-Class. Is there something that is preventing it from being B-Class? The person who gave it a C-Class for Companies said that "The article is suitably referenced with in-line citations, however, I note that you have included a list of both in-line citations and a separate list of bulleted references. Numerous references within the bulleted list could be cited as relevant secondary sources within the inline citations of the article." (see 6346: 6813: 4755: 53: 5632: 3737: 3373: 3325: 6713: 5241: 6180: 5169: 4867: 3945: 3443: 1380: 3599: 1114: 3041: 2162: 1313:, to which I contributed. You decided it is a stub. I was surprised, but then I am a newby on Knowledge, and my English is not native. My understanding of the assessment process is surely still very limited. The article has 11 sections and 52 citations from 28 sources. Admittedly it lacks images. Perhaps, I should not have touched the Projects header of the talk page. With many thanks and sorry for bothering you. Best regards 108: 5234: 5091: 3848:

on the WP Women page of articles threatened with deletion. It allows editors interested in reducing the gender gap to take any remedial action which appears necessary. In future, it would help if you left it in place, even though I can understand your logic that if there is a more specific banner, the general banner is superfluous. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Happy editing!--

2933: 2925: 2896: 2866: 2854: 2814: 2806: 2768: 2738: 2730: 2667: 2641: 2616: 2600: 2578: 2562: 2536: 2514: 2477: 2443: 2398: 2359: 2315: 4714: 4365: 1783: 1635: 3781:

that you're then rating the articles for those other projects purely on the basis of my one original rating? I'm just trying to understand the rationale, and more generally how the rating does or should work, because I've asked a few people and received a few different answers, some of which are contradictory, and so far I'm none the wiser, really. Thanks, --

4992:

Highs and got them all up to GA or not far off, which was really worth doing. There's less of that kind of thing these days as WPs are no longer as active as they were, but priorities are still pretty important for the average project where 90% or more are low-priority articles, and it doesn't take that much time to add if you're already assessing. The

6051:"I will have begun to act" is not usually considered a tense at all). No reference is given for such terms. So I'm very puzzled. This article in my opinion doesn't meet the criteria for grade B. It's not suitably referenced and doesn't have reliable sources for things which are likely to be challenged. Can you explain why you have given it a B? 3148:== Mega Bog and Claire Cronin == Hello, Thank you for your message. The reason for calling them American is the categories "from Los Angeles" and "from Athens, Georgia". I know that such categories often include people who have gone there to live and are really from some unidentified place. I have no objection if "American" is deleted.-- 4957:

including WP Scotland and (90% of the time anyway....) WP Lists. Of course the real problem is that Anthroponymy really needs to adopt the SI class which would better describe its lists, but that's another matter. Anyway, please can you remember to change the assessment of lists by other projects to something other than NA - it's

4565:, there is no need to add "listas=" and "living=no" to Non-Bio WPs. It's my understanding that those WPs should inherit Listas & Living from the WP Bio wikiproject as long as WP Bio is listed first. Since I use Rater to update assessment, it's fairly easy to delete those extras but I thought to let you know as well. 4998: 4412:

is beyond "Start" ("An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources"). The article is developed, with five or six reviews quoted, an article about it, and a section on recent developments. If you have no objections, I will raise the rating to

3780:

Hi! :) I noticed that you've rated at least a couple of my recently-created articles. I usually rate my articles for just the one project that I feel qualified to do so, while also adding blank banners (as in, without parameters) for other projects that I think are appropriate. Am I right in thinking

3132:

I avoided placing these articles in "American x" categories or mentioning nationality in the lede of either because I wasn't able to find sources to support those claims. While they're certainly both likely to be American, it's not something we can necessarily assume – unless, I suppose, we interpret

2495:

My contributions to assessment are restricted to the range stub to B. Getting GA seems to be quite difficult so I would not be involved in that. Also I am now doing less editing than formerly but probably doing several hours a day was too much. If those articles are still unassessed tomorrow I expect

6604:

I suspect that banner was added by mistake because Unitarian churches are not Christian churches. They are non-creedal churches, as explained in the main article for "First Unitarian Church of Rochester". A member of a Unitarian church is as likely to be a pagan or a Buddhist as a Christian and is

5066:

Many thanks. I appreciate it. I thought so as well, but as I did much of the recent editing, as with ratings I thought it would be great to have another editor's input. Thanks for addressing it. Also, from the talk page, it looked as though there had previously been some kerfluffle about the article

5010:

to regain its approval after lapsing during a long Wikibreak. It's great for ripping through Low Start/Stubs, and for doing the edits quickly for manual reviews of the more complicated ones - but it still takes a lot of time and my Wiki time is limited and sporadic. My main targets at the moment are

4991:

You have to remember the original intention of assessment which was to assign a priority for WikiProjects to work on; I prefer to think of "importance" as "priority", some projects do formally see it that way. We had a good thing going in WP Wine years ago where we collectively attacked the Tops and

5444:

Thank you for your message. On a second look the article easily meets B class criteria but for German articles a B rating cannot be given without completing the form; so as not to spend too much time on one article I opt out of this. In fact the article looks as if on more thorough consideration GA

3847:

Hi there, Johnsoniensis, and thank for your interest in talk pages. I've noticed that you have recently deleted WP Women from a number of women's biographies, despite the fact that the tag had been specifically added by other editors. One of the reasons they did so was because it provides a listing

3092:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

544:

If I come across a list which does not have a banner for WP Lists already I usually add one. In the case of lists of people I would add a WPBIO banner as well on the basis that it relates to the organization of biography articles. ("The Biography WikiProject concerns the creation, development, and

1867:

I'm not trying to get into an edit war with you. Apparently, what adding the workgroup to the template does is add it to the Women's project. I've never seen this before; I've never seen any discussion about it. Can't imagine that is what is intended. Guessing the Music project template is either

4996:

can be useful in cases where you've no real feel for an article's importance. It's not to be taken too literally - overview articles are always under-read relative to their importance whereas pop culture is relatively...popular - and the numbers vary a bit by subject, but the rule of thumb works

577:

No, no policy. I was just seeing if you had a compelling enough reason to motivate me to go through and add it to all the People from...lists. Your reason is sound enough for your edit, but not compelling enough for me as I doubt anyone for the project would take notice, if that makes any sense.

475:

I would rather that you didn't assess the article at all, rather than assess it as a C-class, when it is plainly to developed, too well written and too well supported with references to fit in that category. Once assessed, an article tends to stay that with that assessment. Would you mind taking

2063:

Thanks for adding some context to the fete article. The link you've added as a reference doesn't appear to work, though. You're also using what's described as a 2007 source to support a statement about Ralph being the director from 2003 to 2012, which doesn't add up. Did you copy the wrong link

513:

Hello, recently you added a BioProj assessment to the List of people from Evanston. I edit a lot of these lists and am an active member of the BioProject. I don't disagree with you that this is a Biography related list, but I never saw it that way and was simply inquiring about your reasoning.

4956:

yesterday. You've obviously copied and pasted the WP Anthroponymy template for WPs Scotland and Lists, but that means you've copied Anthroponymy's non-standard use of NA importance for Lists. Almost every other project treats lists as a type of article and thus assign an importance to lists -

4976:

Hello, Thank you for your message, I am not a member of WP Anthroponymy but usually assess two articles there each day. It would make some sense if that project did without importance assessment (like WP Visual arts and WP Netherlands). There are so many unassessed articles everywhere that

1508:

Hi, I came across this statement : ..."In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the family owned many castles and large residences. It's said that they owned up to 99 castles but never 100 as this would have required their personal contribution to fund the imperial army."... on the wiki page :

6269:

but as you can see in the "A" section, there are a bunch of dab pages getting indexed as unassessed recently. If you go to the talk pages of these dab pages, the source code says dab as the class but the talk page banner is blank instead of displaying it as a Disambiguation page. Thoughts?

1069:"(conformity with WM Commons)" is the worst possible reason to move an article title, and not supported by the relevant policy. Where there is a difference, as often, Commons can be pretty much guaranteed to be wrong. Nor did you edit the article to reflect the move. Please move it back. 1332:

Hi Joansoniessis. I see that you added a "s&a-work-group" tag to the "Tom Lane (computer scientist)" page. I've looked around to try to figure out what that tag is but to no avail... could you please let me know what it is about otherwise I am tempted to remove it. Kind regards

4997:

surprisingly well that Lows have under 10 views/day and mids have under 100 views/day. Even if it's not a rule to be followed slavishly, it can't be a bad thing to prioritise the articles that our users actually want to read. The Massviews tool can give you the same data in bulk, eg

1774: 1327: 2420:

That is fair enough; it is good that properly researched articles are added. I wrote some articles a long time ago byt do not do so anymore since my last few stub article were assessed as substandard. However assessment and making small additions are still

1503:

Researching the statement: ...." In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the family owned many castles and large residences. It's said that they owned up to 99 castles but never 100 as this would have required their personal contribution to fund the imperial

4252:

Hello. Thank you but my article Jeanne d'Albret was suppressed by a contributor and redirected with no possibility of discussion even though the name Joan of Albret appears on Wikidata, on WIR (Joan of Albret) and on frWP. What can I say? Thanks all the

6589: 6670:

My mother, Sandy Hendrickson, was a personal friend of Jimmy Creech. She was the first AIDS caseworker in North Carolina working for the NCDHHS. I have a photo of him and Sandy at my sister's wedding, which he officiated, and we could add to his page.

2780: 5001:

which might be useful for choosing which articles to assess in the first place, you might as well do your bit for the most-read articles. Massviews does take a little while to assemble the data so don't be concerned if you get a blank page to start

3637:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

1205: 3727: 1539:

I am a direct descendent of the Pálffy-Daun of Erdöd family, and hence am very curious where this claim of 99 castles came from. I am not doubting it, but I never heard of it before. It would be fun to be able to see the source of this statement.

2435:

Dear Johnsoniensis, with complete sensitivity, best regards, and respect to you, I would like to say that it if feels great to finally hear from you (written comments), and I am kind of feeling like I have just received (heard) a compliment from

1099: 1626: 4580:

Hello, These extra subfields are included by the process of copying from WPBIO and revising those copies for other WPs which is a quick way to create them. I did not know about the importance of deleting them which would take slightly longer.

4518:

in March and someone created the same article in another name in June and rather than merge the newer article or point that it already existed, you redirected the article I had created to theirs. I sincerely feel cheated of an article count.

2009:

used to be pronounced (and sometimes spelt) Trerammet. I can remember a few older folk and farmers when I was a little boy down the lane in Treknow who still used it, but you'd be hard pressed to find anyone now using the old pronunciation.

4331:

I used to do some work in the way of creating new articles but am not doing so now. Now most of what I do is assessment with occasional changes to existing articles and very occasionally to WPs in other languages. Perhaps you could look at

4451:

Thank you so much for rating CRE as diffusion of innovation. It needs to be designated as a subpage, do you know how? I looked at the wiki instructions and thought I did what it said but it came up red. Can you help? I would be grateful!

3743: 3728: 3081:. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 4355: 452:

The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial

4640:

FYI: in the text of the image of Howard Carter that you inserted into the Latin wiki, you changed Latin "Fasciculus" to non-Latin "File" (which works but isn't the locally favored term), and your caption uses the ungrammatical

4213:

by adding banners to the the respective talk pages. In doing so, you appear to have copied the same parameters from the Biography WikiProject banner to the Criminal Biography WikiProject banner. This is not correct because the

4672:

Hello, Thank you for your corrections. I have forgotten much of the Latin I used to know and rarely go to Vicipaedia. The 1924 portrait came from the Russian WP and the caption needed to be better Latin than my hasty version.

5586:

Hello; I think at least a B rating is amply justified for both articles. Possibly the lower rating is due to hasty assessment when the assessor only considers grades of start or lower so as not to spend too much time on each

3827:

as a part of my university unit. I can see that you are an expert in Burma culture, can you please help me improve my article by giving any feedback, advice or assessment? Thank you very much! And hope you have a lovely day.

471:

The article is short because there is not a great deal of information available. All the apparent major events of de' Becchi's life are covered, except his date of birth and education, which are unknown to his biographers.

6841:

Please dont tag all {surname} pages as Stub. A vast majority of them are lists with brief intro and they must be tagges as List. At the same time, there indeed are several surname pages which are "true" articles, such as

3179:

The article cites "Augustin Jeanneau 1974" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste

5687: 1991:

which may well follow the same pattern but no pronunciation has been recorded there (it is obviously needed as a French pronunciation may well be wrong in Plymouth). For Prideaux I think there are two pronunciations.--

5542:

you are right about "Tag:New topic", it adds signature automatically. You should avoid to use "Tag:New topic" when creating a talk page. Otherwise, someone has to do cleanup work every time you create a new talk page

5072: 3753: 1213: 4088:, has no relevance to it whatsoever. The trouble is the correct address is Queensbury Place, but there is no image of it on Knowledge. The image is misnamed and should be correctly re-titled as Cromwell Place.-- 4400: 5912:– don't worry about the warning; it's just boilerplate) and a new feature, "Rater", will appear in the menus near the History tab (exactly where depends on your skin, but try looking for one called "Tools"). 5879:

There seems not to be a rule about this but this aspect of academics is in the majority of cases dealt with by adding the science and academia work group of WPBIO. Adding Higher education as well seems to me

5408:? I suggest you do so. The article contains all known biographical facts about Mignon, and mentions most of his works. It's not even that short, if you assess purely by length, as most assessors seem to do. 4316:

edits you can perform? Like I've seen someone who's like yourself but they could review drafts submitted for verification, what can you do sir? I'm just curious and wanna know if I can do more (review) too.

3804:

that you helped in 2013! I am doing this as part of my university course. Currently, I am working on the format, citation as well as enhancing my writing style! Any suggestions would be lovely. Thank you.--

224: 3867:

Just a question. When it concerns Scandinavian history what is "high" vs "low importance" when you rate articles? I was really surprised to see some quite notable topics being rated "low importance" by

1959:

Yes, I have consulted BBC Pronouncing Dict. However it is not conclusive for Bottreaux at Boscastle or Molland, but only for "Baron Botreaux", so I suppose that means that Butr'y may still be right.--

25: 6209:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4896:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3972:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3470:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1407:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4704: 1239: 1798: 6105:

I saw that you rated the article B-class. Can you fill in the checklist and such? Also it was primarily edited by COI users so it is not clear if the sourcing and such will meet such critieria.

5677: 5622: 3315: 4993: 1342: 5646: 4405:

I see from your "Contributions" that you are doing the important work of making Talk Pages and ratings. Thanks, especially since this does not usually get noticed unless somebody complains.

3389: 3341: 1810: 939:

Even weirder - saints - is a stand alone project - and by extension should have only the tag for that project at project pages - so a bit mystified as to why biography creeps in there... ?

6035:

I am surprised that you think the article Latin tenses (semantics) article is worth giving a B grade to. First of all, the material in the tables is simply copied from from another article,

4541:

Hello, I am sorry you feel you have lost the article you made. The present article still contains the kind of information that was in your version and your citations are now included there.

3770: 3363: 3029: 1277: 5637: 5623: 4377: 1790: 786:

Hi Johnsoniensis. Thought I would drop by and say thank-you for the rivers assessments you have done over the last year. I think we were both trying to reach the same goal of reducing the

1248: 4185: 1705:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. 1304: 6860:

Hello, In fact I have rated most of them as list; the ones I have tagged as stub are those with fewer than three names listed. In view of your comment I will adopt list for those also.

4369: 6225: 4912: 4395: 4060:

the article seems to be somewhere between a C and a D from the length. As the article also has a lot of references I would really like to know why you think this article is a Stub. --

3988: 3486: 2992:. I don't think it even belongs in the dormant "religious texts". In reality, the only project likely to take the slightest interest in these illuminated ms is of course visual arts. 1570: 1423: 372: 3133:"American" broadly to mean "living and working in the U.S." rather than "born there". Or perhaps you've found some sources I'd missed? Interested to hear your thoughts either way. – 6720: 4726: 1650: 730: 6620: 1592:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 1370: 71: 6677:

Jimmy might still be alive, I'm trying to find any information about his and Sandy's important work for AIDS patients during the height of the pandemic in the 80's and early 90's

6194: 4881: 3958: 3456: 2005:

Budeaux is Bude-oh. Prideaux is Priddicks for the one near Fowey, I've heard both Priddicks and Priddoh for the Padstow one. Sources will be hard to find - probably 19th century.

1393: 5682: 757:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 241:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 6463:

Hello, Thank you for your message. The C rating was made on the assumption that the earlier rating was still o.k. I see now that a B rating is justified and probably also GA.

5905: 2743: 5068: 5038: 3379: 3364: 759: 1848:, which I guess is last in alpha sort: thank you!! Every time someone edits her article I'm afraid that she died, and I still didn't polish it, - perhaps I just should. -- 5102:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

5037:. Thanks - I've been working to fill it out. I don't think the template at the of the page is necessary at this point, but thought I would ask you for your view. Thanks. 1576: 1245: 5315:

On the Rolta page to the right, Preetha Pulusani is listed as key management. MS. Pulusani resigned effective March 17, 2021. Her name needs to be removed. Thank you.

5011:

the big country projects like France and Germany where there's thousands of articles that have been tagged but unassessed since 2007/8, but it will take a while to do.

3416:

Hi. You seem to have been left off an original ping list for this one. Your involvement in place articles could suggest you might interested in this topic. Thanks. See:

1718: 1664: 1348: 1234: 6352:

Dear Johnsoniensis: thank you for assessing a lot of my church articles this year. I guess, of course, thanks for bearing with me. Attached is a little excerpt of the

5663: 689: 4425: 3232: 6445: 6002: 5988: 5958: 5744: 5459:

Thank you very much. I know very little of the assessment process, so I am just grateful for all that you do to help us improve the quality of Knowledge as a whole.

5320: 4738: 4135: 4033: 1334: 3121: 2214:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

2138:

It should be working now; it goes to a Wikidata entry which includes links to other Wikipedias (in this case French & Dutch) and other sources of information.--

214: 206:

Global contributions as of 05-12-2016: Johnsoniensis 103008 edits found in 35 projects; Felix Folio Secundus 127996 edits found in 56 projects; grand total 230,004

4522:

I've said my mind. I did not want to hold it in. Thanks for listening to me. You don't have to undo anything Sir and it's nice to meet someone of your experience.

4241: 3406: 1165:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

5482: 491:

Having has a second look it is apparent that the article is of a higher standard and the content is thoroughly referenced. Sorry for being too careless earlier.--

3358: 2177: 2155: 1891:... we try to maintain the 'place' subproject, and where possible discouragement of the 'cities' project tag, and apart from a few glitches, it works that way - 1589: 1577: 1180: 1173: 1105: 5841:

on biographical articles, you may want to be more explicit than just adding the surname, and add the first name too, i.e. "Becker, Anna" in this case. Thanks. -

5429:

Thank you so much for your assessment of the article. Do you have any specific pointers about what can be done to make it better? I would welcome any feedback.

2473:. I am sure Sam will also be very happy to see the articles being reviewed )) Also, I would still stay in touch even if the GA nomination is turned down by you 2341:, and I invite you to have another look at it. Actually, I want to know that is the article, now, satisfying the B class criteria on the quality scale? Thanks, 6682: 4977:

considering importance as well should have a lower priority. It seems very few editors want to do assessment so many good articles are not identified as such.

4057: 3116: 2675:)) Thank you for your time and kindness )) Soft and warm bear hugs to you )) I have added one more article today )) I respectfully invite you to kindly review 4291:

Hello, Thank you for your message; I began contributing in 2008 under another username. I do not know about another category of user to which I might belong.

4037: 1525:

Could you possibly help me find the right track and the right way of communication so that I could find out who wrote this page with this specific statement?

506: 3142: 2959:. You didn't answer? Because of the pandemic, people are having tough times! I really do hope that everything is good in your life! Soft and warm bear hugs, 1642: 2918:

Hello ))))))) How are you doing my dear? I hope everything is great in your life, and in the life of everyone in your life! Thank you so much for reviewing

1488:: why? I'm seeing you online on wikipedia, why not, aren't you english man? it's just want to edit to true english grammar. Alright! so thank you, bye bye. 4015: 3512: 1019: 5310: 4084:

Greetings Johnsoniensis. I thought I would let you know that the misleading image of Cromwell Place, London, you inserted in good faith into the piece on

2153: 1825:

Hi I just noticed that you have assessed this article as stub class... How? Were you using an automated process? Looks more like a B or at least C to me!

1449: 1061: 948:

Oh well happy christmas, and in all AGF and all the rest your answer feels quite unconvincing to say the least, trust you have a good new year as well.

6598: 4318: 4277: 2187:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 1151: 5076: 5061: 4210: 1468: 2964: 2946: 2909: 2879: 2827: 2793: 2751: 2684: 2654: 2625: 2587: 2549: 2523: 2486: 2452: 2411: 2385: 2367: 2346: 2328: 2298: 2276: 2268: 2253: 5042: 3165: 4774:

This article seems like it wasn’t fully baked before posting - no sources, no cats. I don’t see how this is going anywhere productive at this point.

4489:

came along and took care of it, so I am much relieved and deeply genuinely grateful to them. So awesome that people just show up and help isn't it?

3294: 2058: 5778: 4089: 4061: 545:

organization of Knowledge's articles about persons.") I know I am not a member of those projects so if this was against policy I would stop this.--

268: 223: 6760: 4506: 1595:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

1322: 6252: 4939: 3550: 2230: 1160: 1056: 869: 828:

It is an abbreviated way of saying two WikiProject banners have been added to the page; "difference between revisions" will show what they are.--

572: 538: 4345: 4326: 4300: 2883: 2845: 2527: 2505: 2456: 2430: 2073: 6763:

is that the WikiProject isn't concerned with individual authors or works, only with "literary concepts and other general pages on literature".

5784:

Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Knowledge’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.

5491: 5483:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Category_talk:Russian_individuals_subject_to_European_Union_sanctions&diff=next&oldid=1145652228

5324: 5046: 2968: 2950: 2913: 2831: 2797: 2688: 2658: 2629: 2591: 2553: 2490: 2415: 2389: 2371: 2350: 2332: 2302: 2280: 2092: 1551:

This statement seems to have been added on 15 August 2019 by an unregistered editor, so unfortunately there's no way to contact them by email.

895:. You say it's deprecated in the top left of sections, can you point me to the discussions where that was decided so I can have a look? Cheers 4498: 4476: 3935: 3433: 2989: 2019: 2000: 1982: 1968: 6549:. The individual WikiProject should be within the shell for project independent quality assessment, even if it's only a single project. see 6407: 3566: 1179:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2960: 2942: 2905: 2875: 2823: 2789: 2747: 2680: 2650: 2621: 2583: 2545: 2519: 2482: 2448: 2407: 2381: 2363: 2342: 2324: 2294: 2272: 2249: 1738: 1272: 842:

Thanks! Yes, I'd worked out that it was an abbreviated way of saying that it was 2 x something - just not what the "something" was. Cheers,

602: 554: 500: 6265:

Hi Johnsoniensis, I've noticed you do a lot of rating so I had a question you might be able to help with. I've been working my way through

5861: 3309: 3226: 6674:

Any additional information about his work or colleagues would be very helpful, I would like to add more information to his page if I can.

5067:(I myself only first edited the article a few days ago, within the past week, but found the story it reflected to be very interesting). -- 851: 837: 6605:

even more likely to be an agnostic or atheist. They would be offended at having their church labeled more narrowly as "just" Christian.

4535: 4409: 4049: 2147: 507: 6630:

where Unitarian Universalist is listed as a subcategory. Perhaps something needs to be changed there. I have made the change requested.

5709:

Hello, please add Dr. Ahmed Ezzat, born on April 22, 1991. He is a well-known doctor and has news in major newspapers such as Sky News.

4556: 4079: 4043: 2810:

I hope that you and everyone around you are in good health. Thank you for answering the above request ))))) I have written one more BLP

1299: 5405: 4440: 4112: 4097: 4069: 2461:

You have always accepted my invitations, and I am grateful for that )) If it's not too much to ask, I sincerely invite you to review –

1899: 5668: 1882: 612: 6627: 6597:

I notice that you added a "WP Christianity" banner to the talk page of the "First Unitarian Church of Rochester (building)" article (

5512:

Thank you for your message. When such a page is created the signature gets added automatically. I see the point of the other advice.

5351:, which burned down and were demolished for redevelopment years ago. I wonder if including it in that project is a bit of a stretch. 3097:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1621: 1365: 1156: 1093: 6743: 6172: 4859: 3700: 1471:, my English not good so that my article have a Template on head, hope you edit it to true english grammar and delete the template. 3898: 1913:. I may try to upgrade it this summer. Is there anything that stands out as definitely needing to be addressed? Might also work on 2183:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

804: 119: 6819: 4958: 4953: 1834: 1278: 822: 630: 5962: 4574: 1877: 6388: 4818: 3030: 1138: 6304: 6097: 6030: 5889: 5334: 4838: 3001: 2053: 6126: 6020: 6006: 5992: 5978: 5699: 5360: 1310: 912: 645: 151: 6167: 6147: 5942: 5936: 5134: 4853: 4285: 1522:

Sadly, after 20 minutes of surfing wiki, I still have no clue why there are no email addresses of writers here to be found.

6248: 6060: 5823: 5521: 5468: 5454: 5020: 4986: 4935: 4696: 4682: 4629: 4550: 4150: 4011: 3857: 3508: 3211: 2041: 1930: 1445: 6701: 6583: 6525: 5827: 5774:

is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.

5227: 5052:

Hello, The article is well sourced and as far as I can see unbiased though the subject matter is quite unfamiliar to me.--

4743: 2984: 2734:

I hope that you and all people around you are in good health ))))) After some break, I started one more article yesterday

1458: 1078: 6869: 6141: 5998: 5984: 5954: 5850: 5740: 5651: 5552: 5389: 5375: 5316: 5305: 4730: 4601:

Hi there, thank you for your work adding WikiProject rating tags to articles. I just wanted to make sure you're aware of

4029: 3758: 3394: 3346: 2264: 2241: 1940:

Hi, do you have the BBC Pronouncing Dictinary? The Boscastle article gave the pronunciation of Bottreaux as But'ry until

1914: 1144: 1037: 764: 688:, and for gnomish work in article assessment for projects, style improvements, redirects, moves, precision, - you are an 661: 6547: 6486: 6472: 5438: 4085: 2888:

Hello ))))) I hope and wish that you and everyone around you are in the best of health. Thank you so much for reviewing

485: 6089: 6075: 5748: 5614: 5596: 5278: 4722: 4706: 4590: 4373: 4357: 4160:

Thank you for your amendments to my article titled Peter Somogyi. I do acept all yor changes. Kind eregards Somogyi26

3722: 1857: 1776: 1628: 799: 787: 388:

Thank you for your reply - I think it might be helpful if you were to express your opinion on the article's Talk page.

6657: 6639: 3880: 3837: 3666: 3428: 6540: 5343:

to WikiProject Historic Sites. I'm thinking that the only "historic site" it was ever associated with was the former

5289: 4562: 4262: 3915:

as C-class. What can I do to improve the article's quality? I would like to make it B-class and then nominate it for

3747:

has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

3126: 2104: 810: 6828: 6797: 3842: 3587: 3171: 3024: 2755: 2257: 2111: 1535: 776: 6457: 6373: 3930: 3813: 1766: 413: 399: 5873: 5832: 5536: 4970: 3790: 3713:

hello Johnsoniensis, Why are you interested in St Cummin of Mayo. posted by philip cummings born liverpool 1940.--

1904: 742: 724: 704: 6244: 6148: 6120: 5819: 4931: 4822: 4614: 4486: 4175: 4124: 4026: 4007: 3909: 3535: 3504: 3078: 2645:

Thank you so much for your time )) I have written one more article )) I respectfully invite you to kindly assess

1953: 1441: 1120: 1101: 440: 6510: 6419: 5506: 5422: 4179: 3676: 3383:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

3335:

has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

2031: 435: 6732: 6441: 6320: 5640:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

5202: 4461: 4225:

To save me amending all your edits, please note that the correct criminal biography banner parameters include:

2377: 813:

you placed the comment: "wp x 2". May I bother you to explain what "wp x 2" means? Thanks in advance. Cheers,

560: 17: 6803: 6782: 5900:

It looks like you're doing a lot of work on rating articles for WikiProjects. You might find the user script

1987:

Reading it in a book one could make the pronunciation up for oneself. This reminded me to look at the article

877: 52: 6854: 5838: 5119: 3331: 3316: 3089: 3066: 3034: 2858:

I hope and wish that you and all the people in your life and in good health. Thank you so much for reviewing

2761:

Hello my dear ))))) I hope that you everything is good in your life ))))) Thank you so so much for reviewing

2080: 1252: 1220: 6424: 5921: 4666: 4267: 3556: 2785: 1862: 1820: 1497: 1480: 621:

Hello, Naki here! Please could you let me know which URL citations exactly are bad/bare? Thanks in advance.

6335: 6218: 6155: 5837:

Hi there, thanks for all the good work you do on Knowledge. I wanted to flag when adding listas such as at

5216: 5179: 4905: 4247: 3981: 3696: 3562: 3479: 3050: 1888: 1690: 1416: 1338: 1256: 1155:

of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see

1013: 1000: 987: 974: 961: 943: 934: 95: 6737: 6686: 6568: 6444:) Evidently that person does not understand how Harvard references work. I believe the article passes the 6319:

to the banner shell, please consider removing any other ratings from individual banners at the same time (

6289: 5704: 5580: 3818: 3099: 2132: 1941: 1163:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge.

6756: 6230: 5909: 5659: 4917: 4810: 4766: 4744: 3993: 3875: 3491: 1830: 1726: 1605:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1546: 1428: 1123:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

1033: 5644:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

5207: 3751:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3411: 3387:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3339:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

1973:

Thanks - the awful thing is I used to know how it was pronounced locally but time has dulled my recall.

747: 6357: 5864:. Why remove him from higher education? Is that project not for professors at colleges/universities? -- 4814: 4146: 3766: 3138: 3094: 3074: 1873: 1196:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

906: 6692:

Thank you for your message; I only rated the article and do not have any other relevant information.--

5417: 5189:

if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand

5160: 5028: 4729:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

4380:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

4111:. I have endeavored for three years to prevent this article from slipping into disrepair, especially 3592: 882: 865: 781: 644:

and the project tag. Most of the other works by Schütz, and hundreds of works by Bach would be in the

635: 6369: 5423: 3267: 1806: 1519:, where he would have found this claim/statement. what historic book it might come from, etc., etc.. 1318: 351: 316: 6310: 4947: 4605:

as it may make your life easier as some of your edits looked like they were done manually. Thanks. -

6501:

Hello Could you revise the rating of this article? I think it's definitely not "Start". Thank you.

6281: 6098: 5869: 5727: 5641: 5107: 3894: 3748: 3384: 3336: 3254: 3199: 3057: 2245: 2044:) to them as well. If you don't happen to remember, then someone else will add it later. Thanks, 1493: 1476: 341: 246: 6626:

Hello, Thank you for your message. I am aware of the distinction but was misled by the listing at

6494: 4596: 4129: 2218:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2083:. Not sure what that amounts to, I'll see if I can track down an archived copy of the original. -- 1839: 383: 6437: 5563:

You have very kindly given a grading of B (which is perhaps more than it deserves) to my article

4734: 3786: 3692: 2788:

it now. I respectfully invite you to please fill the missing parameter. Soft and warm bear hugs,

2608:. After quite some time, I have written one more article )) I humbly invite you to kindly review 2036:

If you find that you are often assessing articles for medicine-related people, please try to add

891:

over from the left. My understanding was that images should be staggered from left to right, per

86: 6546:? Near as I can tell, you're removing this as you add individual WikiProjects, as you did here 6295:

Hello, Thank you for your message. I am sorry but do not know why this practice was introduced.

6158:: "The article is substantial..." – but this is nowhere near that. I have re-assessed as Start. 5476: 4687:

No problem; it's OK now, and thanks for the new image, as such improvements are always welcome!

3889:

article as start class, would you be able to elaborate on what is wrong with it so I can fix it

3708: 6728: 6415: 5917: 5655: 5198: 5115: 5103: 4834: 4561:

Today while looking at Assessment, class B articles for WP Catholicism, I see from this update

4322: 4281: 4237: 4202: 3629:. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2189: 2108: 2088: 2069: 2049: 1853: 1826: 738: 720: 700: 685: 657: 430: 356: 6836: 6399: 6340: 6011:

That WP applies here: "one of the main proponents of macabre and mystery literature in Spain"

5855: 3795: 3073:, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 3006: 1284:

You rated this article as B-class?! You're saying I wrote a B-class article from scratch?!! –

6206: 6114: 5846: 5548: 5532: 5502: 5464: 5434: 5016: 4966: 4893: 4718: 4692: 4662: 4610: 4531: 4171: 4142: 3969: 3926: 3762: 3467: 3134: 3020: 2437: 1910: 1869: 1516: 1510: 1404: 1361: 1260: 1193:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 1062: 896: 6707: 6590:

Request to remove "WP Christianity" from Talk:First_Unitarian_Church_of_Rochester_(building)

5558: 5140: 3903: 3569:. If you noticed any flaws that prevented it from getting to B, please let me know. Cheers, 2235: 2098: 6564: 6506: 6361: 6217:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5950: 5712: 4904:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4494: 4457: 4163: 4120: 4056:

to which I contributed a lo and I'd like to know how you came to this rating. Checking the

3980:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3809: 3478:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3402: 2403: 2226: 2215: 2015: 1978: 1949: 1918: 1802: 1617: 1606: 1415:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1314: 1126: 795: 712: 684:

Thank you, Oxonian bookworm, for quality articles on Cornish villages and churches such as

641: 327: 78: 5839:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Anna_Becker&diff=prev&oldid=1167429587

4155: 4102: 1935: 1845: 8: 6850: 6271: 6163: 5865: 5792: 5385: 5356: 5340: 4826: 4391: 4333: 4138: 4093: 4065: 3890: 3660: 3643: 3615: 3417: 3237:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2184: 1489: 1472: 1029: 1025: 649: 441: 346: 242: 44: 5798:

If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider

5084: 4635: 3526:

hllo johnsoniensis, what is your connection or interest in St Cuimin of May. thanks. --

2123:

Something is wrong with your interlanguage link but I don't know how those things work.

859: 666: 107: 6861: 6789: 6693: 6631: 6575: 6517: 6495: 6482: 6464: 6453: 6431: 6380: 6296: 6133: 6067: 6012: 5970: 5928: 5881: 5799: 5602: 5588: 5564: 5513: 5446: 5367: 5330:

A reliable source is needed to justify the change; I do not have time to research this.

5126: 5053: 4978: 4845: 4674: 4621: 4582: 4542: 4468: 4432: 4337: 4309: 4292: 4258: 4108: 3782: 3714: 3634: 3542: 3527: 3424: 3301: 3241: 3218: 3157: 3149: 2901: 2837: 2671:

I hope that you and everyone around is in good health. Thank you so much for reviewing

2609: 2497: 2422: 2139: 1992: 1960: 1926: 1714: 1694: 1485: 1464: 873: 829: 595: 564: 546: 531: 492: 481: 447:

I notice that you have just tagged the article as C-class for a number of categories.

409: 395: 253: 238: 6665: 6531: 5895: 5753: 4446: 4378:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Spiritual counsellor (south Asia)

3775: 2116: 6724: 6411: 6188: 6085: 6056: 5913: 5901: 5732: 5717: 5610: 5576: 5413: 5194: 5111: 5095: 4875: 4830: 4793: 4570: 4233: 3952: 3853: 3833: 3824: 3450: 3290: 3207: 3012: 2997: 2571: 2320: 2084: 2065: 2045: 1849: 1762: 1387: 1230: 1089: 1074: 1052: 734: 716: 696: 653: 424: 264: 5688:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish artists, architects and craftspeople

5397: 4780: 4514:

This is a petty expression of my mind. I feel unhappy that I created the article on

3862: 3685: 3521: 2604:

I hope that you are doing well and are in good health )) Thanks a lot for assessing

418: 82: 6653: 6616: 6400: 6237: 6202: 5842: 5777:

We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the

5544: 5528: 5498: 5460: 5430: 5012: 4962: 4924: 4889: 4688: 4658: 4606: 4527: 4000: 3965: 3921: 3886: 3498: 3463: 3353: 3111: 3016: 2871: 2376:

Hello! I hope you are in good health. I, respectfully, invite you to kindly review

2173: 1689:

Hello Johnsoniensis, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this

1599: 1515:

I have no idea "how" wiki works, and was trying to email the creator of this page,

1435: 1400: 1357: 1328:

Knowledge page Talk:Tom Lane (computer scientist) has been changed by Johnsoniensis

1187: 892: 847: 818: 772: 753: 2819: 1353: 917: 6843: 6678: 6553: 6502: 5568: 5185: 4602: 4490: 4453: 4116: 3872: 3805: 3398: 2222: 2128: 2011: 1974: 1945: 1896: 1892: 1747: 1613: 1585: 791: 563:

where the article is relevant to a particular work group, in this case Royalty.--

4779:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

3093:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3070: 3069:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

674: 6847: 6773: 6749: 6550: 6330: 6214: 6159: 6106: 5381: 5352: 5344: 5034: 4901: 4797: 4381: 4198: 4167: 4053: 3977: 3650: 3605: 3475: 3104: 1561: 1412: 1268: 626: 6260: 5759: 5722: 5153: 5146: 3691:

A cup of tea for Johnsoniensis. Thank you for rating pages on women artists!.

6823: 6478: 6449: 6410:

is reserved for articles that have undergone two separate impartial reviews.

6210: 5788: 5771: 5497:. And I recommend to use "yes" instead of "y", which is not self-explaining-- 4897: 4421: 4272:

Hi, out of curiosity, you have over 400k total edits but yet you are only an

4254: 4115:. It is gratifying to know that someone noticed. Cheers and have a good day. 3973: 3471: 3420: 2541: 2470: 2466: 2290: 2169: 1922: 1844:

As my watchlist showed me, you looked at classical women who sing from AA to

1710: 1657: 1408: 1291: 1197: 949: 940: 931: 868:

and I can find no mention of that spelling there so presume it is a mistake.

580: 516: 477: 405: 391: 131: 58: 6599:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:First_Unitarian_Church_of_Rochester_(building)

4727:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Non-load bearing wall

3565:

as C-class. Since I have that page up for GAN, I'd hope it meets all of the

2168:

Hello, Johnsoniensis. It has been over six months since you last edited the

6353: 6081: 6052: 6036: 5606: 5572: 5409: 5348: 5007: 4566: 4074: 3916: 3849: 3829: 3671: 3598: 3286: 3282: 3247: 3203: 2993: 1815: 1758: 1673: 1226: 1085: 1070: 1048: 1044: 614: 260: 209: 126: 40: 36: 4803:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2248:

also. Suggestions for improvements would be highly appreciated )) Thanks,

1517:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Pálffy_ab_Erdöd&oldid=910976523

1511:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Pálffy_ab_Erdöd&oldid=910976523

6649: 6612: 6448:

criteria (and maybe GA). If not, let me know—and I will fix the problem.

5398: 5099: 4206: 3801: 3350: 3108: 3049:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2938: 843: 814: 768: 6345: 6221:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5678:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish geologists and explorers

5098:. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to 4908:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3984:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3482:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3418:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England/Parishes_RfC

2469:– two of the articles started by me and worked upon for improvements by 1528:

any help guiding me into the right direction would be much appreciated,

1419:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

6360:

in the Chinese language. Merry Christmas and happy new year! Cheers, --

6198:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5695: 5300: 5273: 5233: 4885:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4194: 3962:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3912: 3869: 3460:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2773: 2612:

as well. Thank you for your kindness )) Soft and warm bear hugs to you

2462: 2124: 2006: 1988: 1397:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

304: 6812: 6712: 5168: 3084:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

6764: 6326: 6266: 6179: 5190: 4866: 4762: 4748: 4401:

Thanks and a question re: Biographical Dictionary of Republican China

3944: 3575: 3442: 2676: 1698: 1552: 1379: 1264: 927: 622: 32: 5487:

And please use full WP names, e.g. WikiProject Biography instead of

5240: 4193:

I notice you recently added the following biographic articles about

1249:

Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

5265: 5250: 4417: 3122: 1702: 1286: 1113: 888: 404:

Sorry, the section to look at is "Custom carried by Slave Holders"

5481:

We don't add own signatures when we add WPs, e.g. I reverted this

2570:)) I have added one more article )) I invite you to please review 6394: 5222: 4961:

as I've just had a big push to clear all the unassesseds! Cheers

2836:

Thank you for your good wishes: I hope things go well with you.--

2117: 6315:

Hi there. Thanks for your work assessing articles. When you add

6234:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5728:

https://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/news/2022/06/23/1479362.html

4921:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3997:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3495:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2079:

Oh, I see what's happened now, you copied an old reference from

1893:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australian_places

1432:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1024:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6761:

Knowledge:WikiProject Literature#Scope and Related WikiProjects

6224:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

6192:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

5683:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Cornish philanthropists

5601:

Thank you so much for the regrading! And for your regrading of

4911:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4879:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

4717:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

4368:

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

3987:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3485:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3300:

The link to Loes seems adquate. The others have been changed.--

3273: 3173: 1422:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

1172:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

259:

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,

62: 5605:

too. I thought that other reviewer was being a bit too hasty.

5090: 4713: 4657:

genitive, third declension). These will soon have been fixed.

4364: 3956:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3454:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2763:

International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations

2744:

International Institute for the Study of Nomadic Civilizations

2269:

User talk:Mcampany/Archives/2020/July#Natalya Romanovna Guseva

1782: 1634: 6066:

In view of your explanations I have cancelled the B rating.--

5808:

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

5737: 2646: 1789:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

1754: 1641:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

3823:

Hello there, I'm currently working on expanding the article

3260: 2271:. Every detail in the article is properly sourced. Thanks, 5791:

before making your decision, and feel free to post on the

3744:

Category:Recipients of the Order of Philip the Magnanimous

3729:

Category:Recipients of the Order of Philip the Magnanimous

3103:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 1133:

coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in

1125:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

790:

to zero, which has now been done, at last. Thanks again...

5814: 5404:

You do a lot of ratings, but have you ever actually read

4431:

Hello, I agree this is much better than a Start article.

4186:

Biography and Criminal Biography parameters are different

3541:

Re: saint of Kilcummin in Mayo, Ireland; from anon. IP.--

1183:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 6379:

Thank you: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you.

5713:

https://www.skynewsarabia.com/program/influencer/1596612

4467:

Hello, I am sorry I do not know about linking subpages.

3621:— is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 1868:

miscoded or has been boldly changed. I'll look into it.

1391:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

1221:

Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors

1203:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

6205: