70:
126:
I don't disagree, but it doesn't particularly bother me one way or the other. Talk page get filled up with a lot of forum-ish comments, and it's a waste of energy to start removing them all (most particularly comments that are more than a decade old). If you find it particularly annoying, remove it
148:
In the meantime, I've tagged the actual article for having multiple problems, and have left a corresponding message regarding the tags on the talk page. I might get back to it when I have some energy, or it may alert other editors (such as yourself) to improve it. Cheers!
135:... but I can't see anyone doing so as it doesn't enhance discussion, as you've pointed out. My main reason for wanting to retain it is that it's an indicator of the fact that the article hasn't had any serious work done on it (
158:
121:
113:
139:), and there's been no serious discussion of the contents. I just feel that it's a prompt for active editors to take a look at what looks like an abandoned article.
82:
131:", for example, would be entirely acceptable and reflects your rationale honestly. If any other editors believe it to be relevant, they can reinstate it per
127:
using an edit summary reflecting your reasoning rather than using a dishonest/misleading edit summary. An edit summary such as "Remove per
106:
78:
112:
Sorry, but the proposal on the talk page looks kind of silly. It must be deleted, because Talk page is only for discussions.--
117:
93:, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
52:
17:
89:
that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
154:
102:
8:
128:
63:
94:
90:
86:
150:
98:
74:
48:
132:
54:
50:
69:
55:
83:
Talk:Anthem of the
Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic
25:
14:
23:
24:
172:
68:
97:to make test edits. Thank you.
73:Constructive contributions to
13:
1:
7:
10:
177:
159:06:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
122:05:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
107:05:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
18:User talk:Jeromi Mikhael
81:of yours to the page
77:are appreciated, but
114:Respublika Narodnaya
91:article's history
61:
60:
168:
72:
56:
26:
176:
175:
171:
170:
169:
167:
166:
165:
66:
57:
51:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
174:
164:
163:
162:
161:
143:
142:
141:
140:
65:
62:
59:
58:
53:
49:
47:
44:
43:
40:
39:
36:
35:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
173:
160:
156:
152:
147:
146:
145:
144:
138:
134:
130:
125:
124:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
109:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:a recent edit
76:
71:
46:
45:
42:
41:
38:
37:
33:
28:
27:
19:
136:
87:edit summary
67:
31:
151:Iryna Harpy
129:WP:NOTFORUM
99:Iryna Harpy
95:the sandbox
64:April 2018
75:Knowledge
32:Archives
85:has an
133:WP:BRD
16:<
155:talk
137:ever
118:talk
103:talk
157:)
149:--
120:)
105:)
153:(
116:(
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
