User talk:Jdcaust - Knowledge

1068:

looked like the editor had an agenda and that this would better left to those who edit those pages. As it is, I did not know about this general guideline and I apologize as it seems these were your actualy your edits. I do have a few questions about this, however. If you subcategorize the Indian Christians category, does that category list each of these subcategories? Further, if one were simply interested in Indian Christians in general, how would one get a list of these? After all, concerning Christianity, not everyone is always interested in dividing Roman Catholics from Protestants. Many look at them as different sects in the same religion, as many non-Muslims would not care to subcategorize Shia and Sunni if they were looking for a list of Muslims. Basically, I just want to make sure that this makes surfing wikipedia easier, rather than more difficult. Thank you for coming here and letting me know about the guideline, however. I learn something new about wikipedia all the time. --

520:

your compromise? I understand you take your compromise back, but is it fair to come back now and blame me for going ahead and considering what you wrote? It could have also ended with the edit suggested by Taz00, who said that the Tariq's issue with the sentence could be solved. Couldnt it have ended with mediation? One user refused all of that, forcing us to continue to bump heads. And this all shows the will to end it properly. I appreciate your input, but feel your decision has been made too rash. I dont see why I should be blamed for responding to editors on talk and referring to WP guidelines. I dont see why I should be blamed for taking up a compromise you suggested or that other users suggested. I dont see why I should be blamed for suggesting mediation and other ways that may formally resolve the dispute, which is based on content. Perhaps you feel that I shouldve done things better, but I dont feel like these reasons are right.

1219: 570:

realized two things. First, I had only made things worse and should have stayed out of the argument all together. I didn't realize how deep most of this went. Second, I never realized that the wording that was there had been established by a large consensus of editors. Parts of my wording had apparently been offered before and shot down. With these two things combined, I felt that I should retract my compromise, recognize that I made things worse, and apologize to all parties involved. When I mentioned stubbornness, I was referring to both sides, not just you. In this way, I feel that my comments were appropriate for the situation at hand.

718:

while you may believe what I said is untrue, I fully believe it be true. I think okedem was even-handed in all of his arguing and tried his best to keep the Israel page NPOV. In fact, the featured article reviewers seem to all agree with me as they awarded FA status to the article. Question my experience and criteria all you want, but I refuse to reword anything and I stand by my claims. Besides, who gave you the right to criticize and judge any editor's experience or Barnstar criteria? I kindly ask you to either contribute or move on. Telling me I'm wrong in recognizing another wikipedia editor serves no constructive purpose. --

707:

think you should reword and make it more accurate. I am neither Israeli not Palestinian and having seen his remarks and statements I have to say he is biased in his views. If he had contributed a lot to the Israeli page then award him for that but not for what you said as "even-handed and fair arguing throughout the discussions on the Israel discussion page" because it is not true. He is Pro-Israel and therefore has been and most likely will be biased in most all discussions in the Israel discussion page. This award in some way questions your experience and criteria when issuing awards.

787:

remove it if you think its unreliable. Let me know. The deleted fact was pretty contentious, so if unsourced, its better off being deleted anyway. One other question. I noticed in the review under "No original research" the article received a "?". Is there something questionable in the article that I can fix? In any case, I think this covers what you wanted. I've posted this on the discussion page as well. Thanks for reviewing this. I also appreciate getting the chance to make the last few changes to get this up to snuff. --

1311: 1348: 1356: 1386: 1490: 684:, taking on and solving every issue with it brought up by editors (and editing it further accordingly), and on top of that, suggesting and requesting mediation shows any stubbornness. I dont see it at all. All the issues that Tariqabjotu claimed to be concerned about were solved by the end, as other editors said. I think he became too opinionated to even see that, or the concerns he stated had not truly been the concerns he was concerned about. 1279: 1615: 1544: 751: 271: 982: 899:

on the inappropriate source and I replaced it with one from the Boston Globe. All in all, my comments stem from thinking you added a large amount of new information when in fact, I trusted wikipedia's misinterpretation of a spacing change. I hope you can understand my consternation if, in fact, that had been true. Please accept my apology for my mistake. --

524:

have been involved with the article for much longer than most of us have. It seems that you are mislead, I think you should reconsider. I always pushed for dispute resolution and named the policies, and to this day Tariqabjotu has yet to even try to prove that that sentence would contradict any policy. Discussion was limited to policies, and I was always

913:

Thanks for your message, and the changes to the page. The only thing I'm concerned about now is the passage from Bloom's book. The excerpt itself is referenced but there should be a reference for linking the passage in the book to Keyes, who isn't named personally. Who said that Bloom is referring to

786:

Alright, I fixed the three citations. I found a good source for one, an ok source for the other, and deleted one fact because I couldn't find any sources. The ok source is from the diplomat section. The only thing I could find was an article about the straw polls from his election campaign site. I'll

706:

I saw an award on "okedem" page for "The Barnstar of Diligence" with the following quote: "For your hard work on the Israel article, as well as your even-handed and fair arguing throughout the discussions on the Israel discussion page. Your contributions helped Israel earn featured article status." I

523:

Lastly, it doesnt seem like you noticed what you probably should. On the request for comment, I said that if Tariqabjotu's desired outcome will end this, then it should happen. I will not have time for this anyway, and I already know of other ways to improve the article, including the introduction. I

1090:

may be a good place to start, as it should list the most notable people in a structured format. It's generally considered that categories with hundreds of entries make surfing Knowledge more difficult, not less, and that it is better to divide large categories using appropriate criteria. Don't worry

898:

between line 87 and 119. As for the broken links, one is still broken. I thought I had checked it, but I must have clicked a different one by accident. Mesora still works, so I'm guessing they had server maintence or something similar when you checked it. Finally, as I said above, you were right

717:

Randy, are you serious? Its my decision alone who I do and do not award Barnstars to. I awarded the Barnstar based on my opinion that okedem worked hard and argued fairly. You might completely disagree with me, but that's beside the point. There's no objective standard for determining fairness, so

569:

kept going back and forth with little progress. My perspective was that I could understand where both sides were coming from and that I believed you truly did want to help out, regardless of what the other editors purported. After reading the exhaustive arguments after I put forth my compromise, I

560:

Shamir, I understand your frustration with me, even if I disgree with you. First off, I apologize its taken me this long to get back to you. I have been somewhat busy, with only enough time to make a few edits here and there. Regarding the business at hand, I don't know that I've ever agreed with

1365:

photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, at 12:30pm in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome!

519:

and not discuss content, even to a mediator? I wanted to resolve the dispute, I always stayed on topic and edited to fit the issues. Even so, I suggested mediation to resolve to correctly follow the guidelines, but he refused. You talked about "continuing" the discussion. Couldnt it have ended with

598:

Although some may see my signature as signing on to more than that, that is all I intended to mean. I feel that it should be all anyone should think I mean. I'm really not blaming you for anything. If anything, I don't think anyone is truly at fault. However, I do agree with you that you have

672:

Second, I never realized that the wording that was there had been established by a large consensus of editors. Parts of my wording had apparently been offered before and shot down. With these two things combined, I felt that I should retract my compromise, recognize that I made things worse, and

1067:

I was watching Dinesh D'Souza and noticed someone had changed Christian to Roman Catholic. Having seen similar edits before (not with categories), I admit I jumped a bit fast noticing that an anonymous editor changing these categories. Seeing as these were his only contributions, I thought it

956:

Sigh. I'm not sure what gets him so worked up over this. He did make a few constructive edits to the page after the first attempt to get rid of that material. Hopefully, this will end here. Thanks again for your help. Its always nice to have an independent editor come in and give his view.

687:

The biggest problem with editing Knowledge is editors using their personal opinion as a basis for editing. Judgment should be made in reference to cited sources and Knowledge policies. Many editors easily get this. Unfortunately, many, including most of the newbies and some who recently posted

616:

Finally, I don't think I should remove my comments from the talk page. I wrote what I wrote before I read anything at the bottom of the dispute page. Further, I don't think it really reflects poorly on you as its mostly me taking responsibility for stirring the pot and asking you to end the

390:

to be correctly represented. I took your suggestion into consideration, and on top of that, linked eighteen countries to the list of the eighteen countries that Freedom House includes in that region, and on top of that added a footnote (which I am not sure if it is even called for as per WP

1050:

Otherwise, head categories would be extremely full or articles in a way that gives no additional information. As you say, Roman Catholics are also Christians, so there is no need to add the Christian category to an article that is already categorised in (for instance) Roman Catholics.

395:

reminds us that WP is not the place for our own opinions or original research). But anyway, I did that--to express the opinion of the source citing a publication in which it holds that position, linking to a list of countries that are considered by the source to be a part of this

893:

I need to apologize as I have a little egg on my face for this. The large "addition" I thought I saw was wikipedia misinterpretting a spacing change in section on an area of controversy for Keyes. Knowledge red-marked an entire paragraph as an addition. See the edit summary

691:

Lastly, in addition to the matters you say you have done, your signature in that place does in fact directly endorse his opinion and blames me as the cause of the failure of the dispute. I am not sure if this seems to be your exact position. Thanks for getting back to me.

515:"I do believe you are a honest editor who only wants to improve the articles on Knowledge. Unfortunately, somewhere along the line, everyone involved became impassionated about the wording of a single sentence." Perhaps but does that give Tariqabjotu the right to ignore 757:

for seven days because of three instances of uncited information. You now have seven days' time to find sources for or remove uncited information before I make a decision. I also ask you to please alert me on my talkpage when you are done making the changes. Thank you.

999:. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to 512:"Since I tried and failed at mediation, I'm inclined to endorse tariqabjotu's take of things." You do know that that is not true, and that Tariqabjotu did not mention your compromise as a compromise. Trying and failing at mediation does not put the blame on me. 679:

First of all, remember that Knowledge is not a democracy, so your observation (which is exemplified by your compromise and consideration of the source) can just as so be a good one. I dont see how constantly editing a sentence in accordance with

634:

misleading as you only signed those comments on October 17th, but your edits on the page continued until October 19th. If you wanted to continue to add points and comments, you should have tabbed them out and signed them like you did the first

675:

Is any of the above mentioned my fault? If you feel your compromise (which failed on the count of one editor) should be retracted, that is not my fault. And by the way, that compromise was made even more pro-Tariq by me than with your edit.

1403:

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at

652:

page regardless of the hostility that occurred. I know that you are a fair-minded editor that is easily impassioned. There's nothing wrong with that and I hope that all of this hasn't deterred you from continuing to

1446:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 617:

disagreement, which you did. If there's something in particular that I said that you object to, please let me know and perhaps I can strike that and mention that I hadn't read the dispute resolution yet.

1206:, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. 400:. I saw that you recognized the need to refer to the source, and I am happy to see you cooperate. I see you havent edited in the last few days. If you would, I think a comment would be helpful. -- 396:

never-completely-defined region so users can see out of which countries, and including a challenge against the position of the source. As I constantly say, all of this is pretty much covered in

673:

apologize to all parties involved. When I mentioned stubbornness, I was referring to both sides, not just you. In this way, I feel that my comments were appropriate for the situation at hand.

796:

The "?" next to "No OR" was simply because of the lack of sources for those three facts - there was no way to tell whether they were OR or not. I'll go ahead and re-assess the article now.

55:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!

1480: 528:

other editors. To other editors, I was making different suggestions per each issue that arose, but too many editors here are too opinionated. I thank you for your cooperation. --

354:

Thanks a lot for the barnstar; I'll put it on my user page. Also, you should probably create a user page, even if it's just a blank page; the red link just screams "newbie". --

1396:(WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Knowledge in our regional community! RSVP at 371:

You deserve the barnstar! I know you put a lot of hardwork in. Thanks for the advice. I started the userpage. Its a little sparse now, but I'll put some more in later. --

878:

I will not change my editing style. I will not change my edit summaries. I will continue to write edit summaries, as I have done, which are wholly appropriate and correct.

1522: 688:

sections, do not. Personal opinion and conclusions are not legitimate arguments to consider, they must come from verifiable information published by a reputable source.

603:. I wish I had noticed this when this was occurring as I should have commented. If this happens again, please let me know, because I do not think that this was fair. 1157: 329:

Thank you for the editing barnstar! I appreciate your taking the time to acknowledge my efforts to improve the Israel article. It certainly has been rocky going...--

1504: 1496: 1342: 1393: 1677:

has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

1380: 852: 451:

Thanks for the comments and help. I'll be getting to the changes next week, but I've just been so busy. Hopefully I can get this thing up to snuff! --

432: 425: 1209:

Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!

1375: 1669: 349: 1632:

if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of

1561:

if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of

1475: 1298: 936:

FYI, Wikignat asked that the page be protected because you were allegedly putting Knowledge "at risk for a lawsuit". The request was declined.

693: 552: 529: 478: 415: 401: 937: 583:

I do want to respond to claims that I'm blaming you or making things look worse. I'm not sure either is true. If you read where I signed on

1690: 1140: 1659: 1588: 549: 1503:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more 1420: 365: 872:

I did not add any information, with the exception of an access date in the first reference of the 2000 US Presidential campaign section.

739: 1124: 1102: 1077: 780: 1061: 818: 791: 532: 375: 966: 1704: 923: 908: 506: 343: 243: 52: 1425: 731: 722: 661: 584: 555: 492: 464: 455: 418: 200: 115: 630:

The one thing I do object to, Shamir, is your continued editting of your comments on my talk page without signing them. This

1397: 1233:, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere: 1023: 696: 1518: 1471: 811: 773: 1018: 848: 1405: 1218: 993:

articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the

445: 110: 1629: 1558: 1458:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1337: 1202:

This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence,

931: 424: 875:

Detailing each minor change of a full stop or comma in individual edits is an unnecessary waste of my time and yours.

397: 1681:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. – 278: 205: 42: 950: 319: 946: 1655: 1584: 1514: 1467: 1033: 995: 837: 16: 1143:. I just started it. I figured userboxes would be a start. If you don't like them, feel free to alter them. 711: 551:

When it is written after that, it is undue, and only makes things look worse, which I dont think you intend. --

120: 542: 1641: 1625: 1606: 1570: 1554: 1535: 1152: 972: 488: 253: 38: 895: 887: 590:

That I certfied the basis for the dispute. I do feel that the dispute, as described, occurred in that way.

95: 34: 404: 333: 1637: 1566: 1463: 148: 1315: 1257: 1171: 1099: 1058: 1029: 339:

Hey, you've put a lot of hardwork in and I just want you and the others to know someone has noticed. --

176: 158: 153: 1371: 1330: 1314:

If you are in the STL area on the 23rd, we'd like you to come to our local St. Louis meetup. Details

1087: 1037: 826: 701: 105: 833:

Any chance of you estending your interest to the History of Israel? I could do with some sane help.

1686: 1304: 1244: 1237: 1167: 1086:

Yes, the category lists each of the sub-categories. For Indian Christians in general, the article

1186: 1163: 1015: 64: 51:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to

1148: 727:

Well, I noticed you deleted my response from your talk page completely. Very honest of you. --

293: 100: 1264: 1096: 1055: 283: 248: 1272:

Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

411: 1454:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1367: 1323: 943: 593:

That I tried and failed to resolve the dispute. My attempt at compromise was exactly that.

233: 648:

In any case, I'm sorry that its come to this. I'm glad to see you are staying around the

8: 1682: 1678: 1459: 990: 919: 883: 381: 288: 210: 1162:

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a

1361: 1195: 1011: 849:

http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/2668/Alan_Keyes_a_conservative_voice

842: 470: 238: 90: 1435: 1426: 1295: 1144: 1134: 1115:

Thanks for the information. I swear I learn new things about Knowledge every day. --

859: 827: 799: 761: 654: 482: 440: 324: 1499:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the 1455: 1439: 1416: 1319: 1230: 1092: 566: 497: 356: 939: 315: 60: 1633: 1562: 863: 1451: 1443: 915: 879: 330: 138: 1347: 1252:

Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge!

1698: 1500: 1447: 1355: 834: 681: 562: 516: 392: 215: 143: 1385: 1291: 1203: 1116: 1069: 1001: 958: 900: 788: 728: 719: 708: 658: 452: 436: 372: 340: 1640:

in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit

1569:

in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit

391:

guidelines) to clarify Tariqabjotu's apparent view, despite the fact that

1412: 748:

in response to your nomination for GA status, and I've placed the result

600: 387: 1392:

Come celebrate Knowledge Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by

1359:

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever

1674: 1489: 1045:

Usually, articles should not be in both a category and its subcategory.

745: 311: 56: 410:

Would you care to comment on the use of this sentence proposed in

386:

I am really fighting for the position held by the cited source in

1442:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1054:

I hope this is clear, but feel free to discuss with me if not. -

565:. I offered my compromise because it frustrated me that you and 1614: 1543: 649: 1278: 862:(which is still broken because of an unresolved hostname) and 750: 1318:. If you are interested, please add yourself to the list and 187: 77: 24: 435:

has been done to help this article achieve GA. Good luck.

270: 981: 548:

I had written this, which I am assuming you did not notice.

1598: 1527: 1481:

Knowledge:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

1394:

Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States

1164:

tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City

866:(which is now repaired but inaccessible yesterday). 1644:and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) 1573:and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) 1095:, to revert some of them quickly. Hope this helps, 1028:I note that you have been putting articles in both 491:). You are invited to comment on the discussion at 860:http://www.declarationalliance.us/then_and_now.php 1434:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1158:Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas! 1696: 1642:17th St. Louis Knowledge and WikiProject Meetup 1626:17th St. Louis Knowledge and WikiProject Meetup 1571:16th St. Louis Knowledge and WikiProject Meetup 1555:16th St. Louis Knowledge and WikiProject Meetup 41:. If you decide that you need help, check out 1141:Knowledge:WikiProject St. Louis/Education/SLU 864:http://www.mesora.org/_private/alankeyes.html 1381:Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15! 1343:You're invited to Knowledge Takes St. Louis! 1176: 1091:about your edits - I used a software tool, 1263:Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — 1384: 1243:Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — 869:I did not remove any other information. 1670:Good article reassessment of Alan Keyes 544:I don't think it is fair to write that 350:Tireless Contributor - Featured Artcile 1697: 1495:You are invited to participate in the 1227: 989:Hello, I noticed you've made edits to 585:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Shamir1 493:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Shamir1 1398:Knowledge:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day 1192:Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. 541:I kindly ask that you take this back. 398:WP:Citing sources#Adding new content 1406:Knowledge:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list 1005:status. Hope you can participate! 740:Good Article nomination: Alan Keyes 45:, ask me on my talk page, or place 13: 1613: 1542: 1346: 1277: 1217: 980: 269: 14: 1716: 1460:review the candidates' statements 847:I removed one unreliable source: 587:, I am committing to two things: 43:Knowledge:Where to ask a question 1488: 1354: 1309: 1196:National Archives in Kansas City 749: 431:Another peer review this time a 1034:category:Indian Roman Catholics 1705:WikiProject St. Louis Invitees 1660:add your name as a participant 1624:You are invited to attend the 1589:add your name as a participant 1553:You are invited to attend the 1466:. For the Election committee, 1436:Arbitration Committee election 1427:ArbCom elections are now open! 1229:And two local editions of the 657:. Good luck in the future. -- 473:has been filed concerning the 465:RFC discussion of User:Shamir1 412:Talk:Israel#Freedom House text 320:20:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 1607:Knowledge Meetup St. Louis 17 1536:Knowledge Meetup St. Louis 16 1476:16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1421:20:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 1376:12:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC) 1024:Categories and sub-categories 967:19:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 951:19:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 924:08:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 909:15:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 888:08:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 838:19:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 101:The five pillars of Knowledge 73: 20: 1691:10:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC) 1523:02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC) 1265:Forest Park Visitors' Center 1125:14:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1103:14:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 1078:16:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1062:07:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 979: 858:I removed two broken links: 819:19:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 792:18:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 781:21:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 732:18:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 723:15:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 712:13:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 697:01:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 662:16:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 556:01:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 533:23:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 507:03:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 419:05:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 168:Getting more Knowledge rules 116:How to write a great article 37:to Knowledge! Thank you for 7: 1638:Cortex Innovation Community 1636:Thursday Gatherings at the 1567:Cortex Innovation Community 1565:Thursday Gatherings at the 1462:and submit your choices on 1019:01:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 456:18:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 446:02:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 405:21:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 376:18:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 366:17:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 344:18:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 334:06:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 201:New contributors' help page 130:Getting your info out there 10: 1721: 1656:WikiProject St. Louis Page 1647:We hope to see you there! 1585:WikiProject St. Louis Page 1576:We hope to see you there! 1515:MediaWiki message delivery 1468:MediaWiki message delivery 1183: 1030:category:Indian Christians 433:Semi Automatic Peer Review 426:Semi Automatic Peer Review 216:Frequently Asked Questions 1605: 1534: 1362:Knowledge Takes St. Louis 1338:18:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 1179: 1139:You may be interested in 1088:List of Indian Christians 1621:Dear fellow Wikipedian, 1550:Dear fellow Wikipedian, 1299:19:53, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 1153:10:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 1120: 1073: 962: 904: 599:been unfairly blamed on 279:Pages needing attention 206:Where to ask a question 17:Welcome to Knowledge!!! 1650:St. Louis Wikipedians 1618: 1579:St. Louis Wikipedians 1547: 1411:Hope to see you there 1389: 1351: 1282: 1245:Central Riverside Park 1222: 1204:Dominic McDevitt-Parks 985: 274: 1617: 1546: 1440:Arbitration Committee 1388: 1350: 1290:Message delivered by 1281: 1231:Great American Wiknic 1221: 996:St. Louis WikiProject 984: 973:WikiProject St. Louis 273: 139:Neutral Point of View 1038:policy on categories 851:, which I explained 471:request for comments 1444:arbitration process 1320:our Facebook group. 254:Conflict resolution 1628:. Please join the 1619: 1557:. Please join the 1548: 1456:arbitration policy 1390: 1352: 1283: 1223: 986: 932:Wikignat's editing 275: 111:Be bold in editing 96:How to edit a page 91:Knowledge Tutorial 39:your contributions 1679:reassessment page 1667: 1666: 1662: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1511: 1510: 1301: 1287: 1286: 1166:, and Wiknics in 1009: 1008: 949: 828:History of Israel 702:Selective Awards? 443: 318: 309: 308: 305: 304: 301: 300: 263:Getting technical 184: 183: 149:Cite your sources 72: 71: 67: 1712: 1653: 1603: 1602: 1582: 1532: 1531: 1497:50,000 Challenge 1492: 1485: 1484: 1358: 1335: 1328: 1313: 1312: 1305:Meetup St. Louis 1289: 1177: 1002:featured article 977: 976: 942: 808: 805: 802: 770: 767: 764: 753: 503: 500: 441: 362: 359: 314: 188: 159:Image use policy 154:Uploading images 78: 74: 59: 49: 32: 25: 21: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1695: 1694: 1672: 1601: 1530: 1483: 1464:the voting page 1430: 1383: 1368:Marcus Qwertyus 1345: 1331: 1324: 1310: 1307: 1160: 1137: 1026: 975: 934: 845: 831: 815: 806: 803: 800: 777: 768: 765: 762: 742: 704: 501: 498: 467: 429: 384: 360: 357: 352: 327: 264: 244:Sign your posts 226: 193: 169: 131: 106:Manual of Style 83: 82:Getting Started 68: 47: 30: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1718: 1708: 1707: 1683:Kavyansh.Singh 1671: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1634:Venture Cafe's 1610: 1609: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1563:Venture Cafe's 1539: 1538: 1529: 1526: 1509: 1508: 1493: 1482: 1479: 1433: 1429: 1424: 1382: 1379: 1344: 1341: 1306: 1303: 1285: 1284: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1248: 1240: 1225: 1224: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1207: 1199: 1198: 1189: 1181: 1180: 1159: 1156: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1081: 1080: 1048: 1047: 1025: 1022: 1007: 1006: 987: 974: 971: 970: 969: 933: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 844: 841: 830: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 810: 772: 744:I've reviewed 741: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 703: 700: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 596: 595: 594: 591: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 561:you regarding 536: 535: 521: 513: 466: 463: 461: 459: 458: 428: 423: 422: 421: 383: 380: 379: 378: 351: 348: 347: 346: 326: 323: 307: 306: 303: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 291: 286: 281: 266: 265: 262: 259: 258: 257: 256: 251: 246: 241: 236: 228: 227: 224: 221: 220: 219: 218: 213: 208: 203: 195: 194: 191: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 177:Policy Library 171: 170: 167: 164: 163: 162: 161: 156: 151: 146: 141: 133: 132: 129: 126: 125: 124: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 85: 84: 81: 70: 69: 53:sign your name 28: 18: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1717: 1706: 1703: 1702: 1700: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1622: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1604: 1592: 1590: 1586: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1545: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1506: 1502: 1501:United States 1498: 1494: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1407: 1401: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1363: 1357: 1349: 1340: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1329: 1327: 1321: 1317: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1232: 1226: 1220: 1216: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1021: 1020: 1017: 1013: 1012:Grey Wanderer 1004: 1003: 998: 997: 992: 988: 983: 978: 968: 964: 960: 955: 954: 953: 952: 948: 945: 941: 938: 925: 921: 917: 912: 911: 910: 906: 902: 897: 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 881: 876: 873: 870: 867: 865: 861: 856: 854: 850: 840: 839: 836: 829: 820: 817: 816: 813: 812:Editor review 809: 795: 794: 793: 790: 785: 784: 783: 782: 779: 778: 775: 774:Editor review 771: 756: 752: 747: 733: 730: 726: 725: 724: 721: 716: 715: 714: 713: 710: 699: 698: 695: 689: 685: 683: 677: 674: 663: 660: 656: 651: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 633: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 602: 597: 592: 589: 588: 586: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 568: 564: 559: 558: 557: 554: 550: 547: 543: 540: 539: 538: 537: 534: 531: 527: 522: 518: 514: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 504: 494: 490: 487: 484: 480: 476: 472: 462: 457: 454: 450: 449: 448: 447: 444: 438: 434: 427: 420: 417: 413: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 399: 394: 389: 377: 374: 370: 369: 368: 367: 364: 363: 345: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 332: 322: 321: 317: 313: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 282: 280: 277: 276: 272: 268: 267: 261: 260: 255: 252: 250: 247: 245: 242: 240: 237: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225:Getting along 223: 222: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 202: 199: 198: 197: 196: 190: 189: 186: 178: 175: 174: 173: 172: 166: 165: 160: 157: 155: 152: 150: 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 128: 127: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 86: 80: 79: 76: 75: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 44: 40: 36: 27: 26: 23: 22: 1673: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1623: 1620: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1552: 1549: 1512: 1431: 1410: 1402: 1391: 1360: 1353: 1332: 1325: 1308: 1288: 1262: 1242: 1228: 1191: 1161: 1145:DaronDierkes 1138: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1027: 1010: 1000: 994: 935: 877: 874: 871: 868: 857: 846: 832: 798: 797: 760: 759: 754: 743: 705: 690: 686: 678: 671: 670: 631: 545: 525: 496: 485: 474: 468: 460: 430: 385: 355: 353: 328: 310: 294:Village pump 192:Getting Help 121:WikiProjects 46: 1187:Kansas City 1040:says that: 601:Talk:Israel 567:Tariqabjotu 388:Talk:Israel 382:Talk:Israel 284:Peer review 249:Wikipedians 144:Attribution 1675:Alan Keyes 1630:discussion 1559:discussion 1452:topic bans 1322:Thank you. 940:JamesMLane 843:Alan Keyes 746:Alan Keyes 234:Wikiquette 57:≈ jossi ≈ 48:{{helpme}} 1654:Join our 1583:Join our 1448:site bans 1258:St. Louis 1172:St. Louis 1135:SLU stuff 1097:Fayenatic 1093:WP:POPUPS 1056:Fayenatic 991:St. Louis 916:DrKiernan 880:DrKiernan 526:answering 331:Gilabrand 325:thank you 312:≈ jossi ≈ 289:Utilities 211:Help Desk 1699:Category 1333:Qwertyus 835:Telaviv1 495:. -- -- 489:contribs 239:Civility 1599:WMSTL17 1528:wmstl16 1292:Dominic 1238:Wichita 1168:Wichita 1117:Jdcaust 1070:Jdcaust 959:Jdcaust 914:Keyes? 901:Jdcaust 789:Jdcaust 755:on hold 729:Jdcaust 720:Jdcaust 709:Randyqs 694:Shamir1 659:Jdcaust 655:be bold 553:Shamir1 530:Shamir1 479:Shamir1 475:conduct 453:Jdcaust 437:SriMesh 416:Shamir1 402:Shamir1 373:Jdcaust 341:Jdcaust 35:Welcome 31:Jdcaust 1438:. The 1413:Sadads 1326:Marcus 1100:(talk) 1059:(talk) 1036:. The 682:WP:REF 650:Israel 563:WP:SYN 517:WP:SYN 502:abjotu 393:WP:REF 361:abjotu 316:(talk) 29:Hello 635:time. 546:after 499:tariq 358:tariq 1687:talk 1658:and 1587:and 1519:talk 1505:here 1472:talk 1417:talk 1372:talk 1316:here 1170:and 1149:talk 1121:talk 1074:talk 1032:and 1016:Talk 963:talk 920:talk 905:talk 896:here 884:talk 853:here 483:talk 442:talk 414:? -- 1432:Hi, 1400:. 477:of 1701:: 1689:) 1521:) 1513:-- 1507:! 1474:) 1450:, 1419:) 1408:. 1374:) 1194:— 1174:: 1151:) 1123:) 1076:) 1014:| 965:) 957:-- 922:) 907:) 886:) 855:. 807:24 769:24 692:-- 632:is 469:A 439:| 63:• 33:! 1685:( 1517:( 1470:( 1415:( 1370:( 1296:t 1294:· 1147:( 1119:( 1072:( 961:( 947:c 944:t 918:( 903:( 882:( 814:) 804:F 801:N 776:) 766:F 763:N 486:· 481:( 65:@ 61:t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index