User talk:Jayjg/Archive 18

3268:

turban wearing Hindus) tends to rise after the 9/11 attacks and so forth. It would be a mistake to say that those retaliatory attacks on Arabs are the primary result of a deep seated Islamophobia. Also on that topic I can say this: I do favor viewing the battle against Islamist extremists as a policing matter as is a more common perception in Europe/Britian than as a global "War on Terror" or a conflict of civilizations. Viewing it as a policing matter that is just targeting criminal activity avoids making things more complex than necessary. I don't view a "War on Terror" as particularly effective concept -- for example, it never really made sense how Iraq under Saddam fit considering he wasn't really engaged in what is normally termed terrorism, claims he was aligned with al Queda were fairly flimsy, rather he was a relatively isolated, although brutal dictator of a fairly secular state. I guess I favor viewing things as they actually are rather than trying to fit them into contrived, simplified and potentially misleading conceptual frameworks. --

4309:"(rm edit from user banned by order of the arbitration committee)". He since has explained on that talk page that, despite my protests, I am the sockpuppet of a banned user (Dabljuh). I seriously don't know what to do now, especially since the ban enforcement imposed on me by Nandesuka has taken place in a moment, when I already had apologized for my initial very bad behaviour and went on to partake in civil discussion on article talks and refrained from any further stupid vandalism. Now, it seems, Nandesuka won't reply to anything I say, he just deleted comments on his own talk page and also in all articles and on other users home pages stating that a banned user may not edit. I understand that user:Dabljuh has been banned indefinitely. So my only way out of this seems to be giving valid proof or sufficient assertion that I am not him. Hmmm... out of words... I am not him, have never talked to him in Knowledge or in person. I'm just not Dabljuh. What else could I do? Do you have any suggestions? yours sincerely, Adrian 608:

to respond with the invited IP address. On a positive note, I did indeed register with Knowledge (I had no idea it was so painless, but I suppose I should have suspected as much) and will not be "lost" again. For what it's worth (I suspect not much due to verifiability issues and other matters of protocol, but I'll toss it out there anyhow) I unequivocally and irrevocably claim authorship of and responsibility for every edit and comment made by IP address 201.53.27.33 to the Knowledge site(s) since making my edit to the UN SCR 242 article at 02:26, 17 August 2006 until, and including, my edit to the Talk page of the same article at 23:25, 20 August 2006. I will post an alert to Vjam to let him know so he can decide what he wants to do about his mediation request, although I do still hope we will all be able to forge an agreement without having to further tax the formal dispute resolution resources.

933:(a) I have been accused of "sockpuppetry". This is totally unjust. I am not the same as any ot the Knowledge-editors to whom I have been linked. I seek an arbiter who will listen to reason and logic. Contributors named Bioinformaticist, M&M Peace (i think), Philly Student...they are not I, at all --I do not know who they are, I vow as if in court! (b) Why are articles (bios of living people) on Marion Cohen, Roberta Wenocur, Elaine Zanutto, Linda Zhao, and other female mathematicians being held to standards different from male mathematicians like Herbert Wilf, Dennis DeTurck, &c .? (c) What is the problem with the corp, Daniel H. Wagner Associates? (d) All right, maybe articles need improvement, but deletion? and some with prompt deletion? (e) Knowledge should be fun, not so contentious. 5041:. It would not be right to go changing every article on China to a uniform American Dating or International Dating format because the MoS doesn't mention a preferred format and it would be a clear violation of JGuk and Sortan to go around changing things to a personal preference. Your personal interpretation seems to dictate a ban on any format changes, and that seems unreasonable. I'd prefer it if you contacted Raul to work out a consistency of opinion, please. I'm not trying to be provocative, and I'm sorry if you take it that way. I am trying to find what is and isn't acceptable, and as I say it is difficult and frustrating to be told different things by different people, especially when they are in positions of authority. -- 1217:, ... I realise the poster image being discussed dates from 2003, however, aren't there similar protests over current events? Why is there no discussion about current events and reactions to them. If the answer is because neither I nor any other editor has added it, that's fine - I fully understand the concept of "sofixit". If it is because the current events in Lebanon do not affect semetic and anti-semetic perspectives, I find that surprising. I suspect Lebanon will have something to do with anti-Semetic feeling at present - however, not an area I care particularly to research or comment on. So, why do you think Lebanon has nothing to do with an article on anti-semetism?-- 592:

directly. While engaged in a formal dispute resolution process I obviously would present my own understanding of any substantive issues, I intend to follow your lead wrt issues of policy and procedure and therefore am waiting to see if you accept mediation before responding to the invitation. Hopefully my service provider will not change my IP address during this process, although I am thinking of registering at this point and will continue to give the issue due consideration. If I do register or if my IP address changes (as it has in the past from time to time), is there a way for me to continue with this process if I choose to?

65:

promoted circumscision that predated Kellog; so I am now unsure how much Kellog's book contributed. So I now have to find a proper source that discusses how intsrumental Kellog actually was, so I can re-word my statement to be more accurate. He certainly was influential....but to what extent I can't say right now until I check more sources. This may take me sometime to dig up, as I am pretty busy. I have heard claims that Kellog used a lot of his cornflakes empire money to campaign for circumcision, but I am still looking for a reference for that one....but if true, kinda puts me off eating cornflakes :-) Best regards,

4305:

not especially familiar with Knowledge. Prior to my bad crushing in on the ongoing dispute on articles associated with circumcision, my contributions to Knowledge were confined without exception to minor spelling and grammar corrections, adding Knowledge-internal links to articles and two or three times asking questions on article talk pages. That's where my familiarity with Knowledge comes from. I am not familiar enough with it, though, to effectively search through Arbitration Committee decisions. User:Nandesuka commented a deletion of a comment to user:Lordkazan on

1644: 2186:

stuff presented against me is open for voting. I think you need to add the other stuff that pertains to Coolcaesar that was left out. Plus, I apologize, and have been very productive the past few weeks. Since my ban ended, I have not engaged in edit warring, and have been constructine in my edits. Please reconsider your votes, for I know I did do all that stuff, and I am truely sorry, but know that I have changed from doing that, and I do not get into personal conflicts with others, edit wars, etc. Thank you.

6323: 5626: 4794:

protection to gag the user from using his or her own talk page! Gwenol (or his allies) then took the extraordinary, unethical and unusual step of changing the history page record of the Jodie Foster article to erase even the hisotry of the attempt at improving the page and his revisions. Gwenol then threatened this user/editor, who was acting in good faith, with an lifetime ban! (Which I do not believe that he has the authority to do).

3285:

attacks are not necessarily anti-Semitic it is in the context of his claim that the primary cause is not anti-Semitism, it is a secondary effect based on misunderstanding. That said, outside of the context of the case he is making in his essay, those attacks can obviously be classified as anti-Semitism. Just as firebombing mosques can be classified as Islamophobia (although I would argue its a lot more than just a

2670: 2070: 2736: 1570:

and I amalso assuming Jayjg is a moderator since you are expecting him to intervene on your behalf. That strikes me as rather disturbing due to the fact that your primary complaint is I disagree with you and you disagree with what I have posted on various talk pages. Under those circumstances who is to stop Knowledge editors from conspiring with moderators to control the content on certain articles? --

5764: 4910:, does it? It would have been much nicer and in the spirit of Knowledge if you had paid attention to the “first sentence” discussion point in the talk page. But, for you the subject had not even been discussed and you didn’t even give me time to tell you the subject had been discussed… You do as you wish, but wikipedia is also about assuming good faith and discussing the matters, I guess. 122: 817:, claiming that they were harassment. As far as I can see Deuterium was making an attempt at engaging you in civil dialogue. Removing these kinds of comments serves little purpose other than further enflaming the dialogue. Knowledge is fantastic because it is possible to enter into a dialogue with those with whom you have a disagreement. Please make more of an effort to do so. 4431: 4999:

years-long process of gaining consensus on date formats, concur with your fellows, sort out a consistency of opinion, and let me (and the rest of the community of editors) know what it might be. If you concur with Raul's interpretation, then may I request that you kindly undo your reverts of my careful work (my "mess", as you put it). --

3425:. I am not attempting to disrupt or troll. Far from it-- I have merely been defending the existing guideline concerning self-citation by "experts" from what seems an underhanded and concerted attempt to change it. At the very least, I am trying to get everyone to follow the proper guidelines when they make such a change. 2083:. I will go very carefully at first, trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools, and will begin by re-reading all the high-quality feedback I received during the process, not least from those who opposed me. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! 2554:), who remains banned from editing the article, the principal participants in this dispute shall be granted an amnesty for past actions, but are strongly encouraged to engage in negotiations. All involved administrators are admonished not use their administrative tools without prior discussion and consensus. 5923:

page to explain your latest edit there? There is an ongoing discussion without consensus regarding the sentence you just restored. I also replied to one of your points on this same issue earlier without receiving a reply. It would be good if we could discuss further there before making changes to the

4761:

Hey, Jayjg. Thanks for performing the latest checkuser on Cretanpride. I hope you were aware of his stunt last weekend. Did you look into the possibility of a range block as well? I have some information about Cretanpride's real-world identity that I'd rather not release publicly on the wiki, but

3360:

was not intended as an attack. It was a personal opinion of your collective behaviour. I'm sorry about that choice of words and if it hurt yours or SV's feelings in anyway. It was not my intent, and as I've explained before, my message was meant for BHouston and not you. As I'm certain SV will be

2871:

Hi Jayjg. Why the hysteria and false accusations? I have responded to you on the NAS talk page. The issue is that I used a sentence within the article while you used one in the lead. Besides that I left in both the left-Islamist association and the fact that some criticism of Israel was used as a

1855:

I'm sending this message out to the 6 active admin with CheckUser priveleges. Just wanted to let you all know that there is a lengthy backlog on the CheckUser page and it has not been checked since August 21, 2006. According to the CheckUser site, it says that user records expire within a week or so,

1569:

Nonsense? Why is it you complain to Jayjg everytime other editors don't agree with your POV? You expect him to intervene when people don't agree with you or your "refutation" isn't as successful as intended? I am going to make an assumption that the two of you are friends or aquantances of some kind,

1295:

You mentioned on talk or in edit summaries, that the spurious deletes — using BLP as the reason — bordered on vandalism. I deal with this 24/7 on all the Chavez articles. You can see from the I-V article that I source content well, but it is repeatedly deleted with a BLP claim, and similar claims to

894:

OK I have to eat my words a bit. I read the entire link again, and the first time it confused me. What it quotes Strom Thurmond as saying is a different quote of the same guy. On the Conde McGinley quote, it questions whether he *might* have made it up, it merely states that he could not provide a

6183:

I have already told that what I meant from "people like you". I do not know if I have to find reference for that too? If a same standard not applied uniformly on every article and become strong in Islamic article then it is wrong. For example a law which become strick for blacks people and light for

5714:

Hello jayjg - I am a complete novice in terms of contributing & sending messages here, etc.. Apologies in advance if I've done something wrong by posting here - I cannot figure out how to reply to the message on my page! I have primarily used Wiki as a resource until yesterday when I was looking

4801:

I believe Gwendol has abused his power as administrator to punish editors for content he does not like regardless of its relevance and truthfulness. I ask that Gwendol's SYSOPS and administrative powers be revoked or at the very least be suspended for 6 months. I also belive Mr. Gwendol owes me an

4201:

article. I am not still sure if I should include the Rubinstein's quote issue in the RfC I'm going to file. So, would you please let know if you think there are still problems with adding that quote (either in the intro or in a possibly new section which is specifically dealing with Yellow badge and

3284:

I understand that it can be problematic in the way Brian Klug formulated his response in order to say that those attacks were not anti-Semitic -- that is your issue. I am now being put by you in the position of defending his piece. If you read his piece, I believe that when he is saying that those

3253:

An analogy might make more sense: its like seeing a red car, a red apple and a red pen. While one can try to focus on their red-ness in trying to understand their nature, there is a limit to the depth of understanding possible from that approach. An overfocusing on their red-ness to the neglect of

2511:

However, what it comes down to is this: Most of my links have been in articles for at least two years without any one of the many users who has encountered them feeling they were delete-worthy. Further, as far as I can remember, I've never re-added a link that was deleted --all I've done is update

2185:

Hi. I was wondering why no arbitrators have added the information from the workshop to the proposed decision about Coolcaesar. I know that we are two different people, but you said that you would consider what he has done in making this decision (since he did initiate the whole thing). Yet, only the

1726:

Also, I am not saying that the article describes what the anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists are talking about any more than the linked word to Israel just before it is saying there is truth to that shit about Israel. But those conspiracies are extreme and hateful distortions of a real lobby though,

64:

Hi Jay, it is well-known in the field that Kellog was influential in the "circumcision drive" in the US. I have gone and read various sources, now that you have bought it up, and found that you are right though. Because it seems there was already anti-masturbation hysteria in the US and doctors that

5982:

has reverted twice without any comment or explanation besides "POV". I explicitly asked for comments on the talk page. In the process of his reverts, he has also removed less significant edits in other sections. I can not revert again without violating the 3RR. I believe my changes were helpful and

4817:

on the grounds of the proportion of the number of his contributions to a very narrow range of interrelated articles as compared to the total number of his contributions. Do you not consider this user to be conceiveable as an spa to at least some extent? Or did your revert it because you felt that I

4797:

I hope the Committee will look into this along with the sarcastic, belittling and needling comments Gwendol puts about edits he does not like with the comment (to many good faith edits). "Thank you for experimenting with the page Jodie Foster on Knowledge. Your test worked, and it has been reverted

3974:

If you're going to address me in your talk page as you have done each time you post a response to my comment, you are inviting an additional reponse. Once again you're also complaining about the content on the talk page and your disagreement with it. What gives your opinion more weight over mine on

3237:

In reference to the conversation yesterday, I don't think that Brian Klug is trying to minimize the attacks. His thesis isn't that the evidence for increased hostility as well as attacks is wrong. Rather his main issue with the concept of NAS is that it causes one to believe that anti-Semitism is

1748:

and the talk page? A couple of editors have reduced the page to a list of quotations, and the intro is an attempt to poison the well by hinting that there's no such thing as Islamophobia. The same editors have also insisted that material that does not actually use the word "Islamophobia" should not

607:

Hello Jayjg. This is "IP 201.53.27.33" again. As Murphy would have it my dynamic IP address changed again sometime late last night or early this morning, and I am no longer "201.53.27.33". I do not know how this affects the mediation request, but I suspect it becomes moot because I will be unable

6031:. Or you could have contacted other editors who deal with topics like this to solicit their views. This action of your is extreme and I do not condone it. I urge you to withdraw this nomination. Thank you. (I am cross-posting this message on a couple of relevant places, to get people's attention.) 6011:

and could lead to the nomination for and deletion of similar articles about smaller Hasidic dynasties - by people who are not experts and don't care - with unintended consequences. Votes to delete are open to the world and you are inviting people who have no idea what this topic is about at all to

4399:

up for deletion. I thought you would like to know. It's an unpleasant incident, but the article as it stands is pretty NPOV, thanks it seems in large part to your editing, and there seems to be some doubt among the noms that this particular case was notable at all, and some belief that the article

4304:

Hi there. Well, I'm sorry for all the fuzz I caused, running in a blind rage. There is no good reason for my behaviour, I just went on a rant. This said I just wanted to give you my word on two things: 1. Although I am German, I am not the person that used the banned user account Dabljuh. 2. I am

4247:

Obviously, hate sites have huge reliability problems, so I wouldn't want to trust them on anything controversial. Similarly, before El_C fixed the article, there were 40+ links to the hate site, which seems quite excessive to me, so I'm glad that got cut back. But, is it really against Knowledge

766:

I wrote: "Some academics, researchers and other individuals are working to identify instances of it and are attempting to formulate a precise description of the alledged phenomenon." You wrote: Because it is a new concept, academics and other researchers are working to identify instances of it and

35:

Somebody, who is probably very well meaning, keeps adding a sentence stating that the disease has been cured by new research at Duke University. I looked into the mater, and there is indeed research underway, but the successful treatments reported were for another disease, and the person who makes

6198:

I do not attack people unless I am talking to them directly. Why you want me to attack on other people and mention their names? What is your hidden agenda. Read the moto of Islamonline and how they described themself. Then see the website whose creation is based on hate _(jihadwatch). How can you

5089:

You're the one who is haranguing. Yossarian is wrong, but I'm not going to get worked up about one date change. However, if I find people systematically working their way through articles for the purpose of changing date formats to their preferred version, I certainly will block them, as per many

5021:

However, it is patently not acceptable to change one acceptable style to another unless you are (a) making the article self consistent, or (b) you have a compelling reason, such as expanding the article from a 1 paragraph stub to featured article. (Simply changing the dating style for the sake of

4638:

Oddly enough, my "copyright violation" accusation stemmed from an article I lifted from an ANTI-Holocaust-denial website written in a negative vein regarding Mark Weber, a well known Holocaust denier. I went back to the website and saw no claims of copyrighted material, so I guess the standard is

3267:

I don't quite understand the analogy your making. I do believe that Islamophobia is to be condemned but you are right that it is a secondary issue that is driven by people misunderstanding Islamist-associated terrorism -- it is clear that attacks on Arabs or people suspected to be Arabs (such as

1722:

Can you explain what you mean in this sentence "It's an article about a single article - the rest of its contents are original research on your part" when you are referring to "the rest of its contents are original research on your part." That article is so closely sourced right now that I don't

4152:

Hi Jayjg, I've replied on both my own and on the talk page. I personally could do with the POV issue being resolved because I've been using your Cuba article as the best example I have found of how to address a difficult subject in a neutral fashion! Beardo's POV tag does compromise my arguments

835:

Hmm, apoligies if my comment was a little condescending regarding "what wikipedia is good for" :) Anyway, I still feel that you should restrain yourself from handing out accusations of harassment. I never doubted your credibility on Knowledge, thanks for pointing out those fascinating statistics

591:

Hello Jayjg. As well as being one of the parties involved in the content dispute and invited for mediation, I have also been following the recent discussion regarding OR. I agree entirely with what you have posted on the topic to date and appreciate your patient efforts to try to work this out

5606:

Hey Jayjg. I'm sorry about the conflict of interest bit. I didn't mean to imply that anyone is not working in good faith. To be fair, SlimVirgin brought up the same issue in the FA nomination and it has been discussed several times before on the talk page - namely the fact that everyone who has

2430:

Hi there Jayjg. just saw your ANI post on my watchlist. Was Bastique in the content dispute when he unblocked Netscott last week? I do not follow this sphere at all closely so I don't know about these things. I'm a bit surprised you didn't have anything to say on my talk page about my block of

478:

I have raised concerns with ArbCom members about this, but somehow I feel my concerns are not being addressed. Fred is of the opinion that the ArbCom can make value judgements about the "quality of the relationship" between a dispicle of a certain faith and its teacher and differentiate it from

4991:

My interpretation (and, I think, the Arbcom's interpretation as well) of the Manual of style and Sortan ruling is as follows: for a British or British commonwealth related article, the British style is the preferred style and it's OK to change American to British style; for an American related

4793:

I hope I am doing this right. I would like to request arbitration and report gross abuses by the user/ adminstrator "Gwenol" who conducted a 1 WEEK block for an editor who made a good faith attempt to improve the "Jodie Foster" by adding just 3 words. Furthermore Gwenol proceeded to use page

4998:

Again I make the point that it is difficult and frustrating to be told contrary things by senior editors, and to be threatened with blocks if I follow the opinion of one over the other. If you do not agree with Raul, then I hope you will not take it amiss if I ask you to to look back over the

4667:

Folks, he's a mind-reader as well! Guilty as charged. Actually I figured that bad press is better than no press at all, and for all that it was deleted by NawlinWiki who does not contest its noteworthiness. What do you think, jayjg, should I re-write the "Mark Weber" article without violating

719:

I just replied on unblock-en-l, but have no fear of me unblocking anyone without discussion, A) I'm not an administrator yet, which renders it sort of moot, and B) I wouldn't do anything without making multiple efforts to communicate and find out what the admins story is/was, if I were to be

31:

Jay. Sorry to miss out on the Jewish History discussion. I was away for several weeks. I was wondering, is there some way that you as an admin can protect a page so that only a person with a wikipedia log-in can edit it. I have worked a lot on the page on Tay-Sachs disease. The page keeps

5177:

I'm not sure what should be done, I don't relish monitoring it and I suspect no one else cares to. Maybe it should be unprotected and let the mayhem continue or maybe protect it tighter? The new user should be checked in case its just the same one who was changing it a few months back.

2507:

I know you're just doing your job, so no hard feelings. However, either the wikipedia style manual has changed recently or it's being applied a lot more aggressively. Either way, there's lots of things in it that I simply wasn't aware of when I began my relationship with wikipedia.

518:

Thanks for your response. Please note that I am not arguing that for a disciple of a "guru" it may not be challenging to edit neutrally. It would be a good advice to pay attention to bias. But to make a distinction betwen faiths in this respect may not be appropriate. Also note that

2872:

pretext for anti-Semitism -- the two things you and SlimVirgin claim I removed. My only explanation for SV and your behavior is that you couldn't take the time to actually read through the changes I made but rather preferred to jump to the conclusion that I was whitewashing. --

6022:

template or considered MERGING the material at some point perhaps and WAITED (at least a month!) to do so. You should also have first started a discussion at a number of places where people who know something about this topic could have given their intelligent input, such as at

3331:

It was not an attack, and I don't care whether you think you deserve an apology. Don't leave messages for me on my talk page. I don't like you and any further commentary from you is going to be completely ignored, because I think you are dead wrong, and an incredible bully.

5776: 5104:

for a comment, because you seem to think I'm harassing you. I think your opinion is wrong, but as I've said elsewhere, one does not argue right of way with a speeding semi-trailer, and on that point I note your continued threats to block, placing me in an impossible position.

559: 955:

As a longtime editor on Knowledge and your status as an ArbCom member it surprises me that when an editor like myself makes a good faith effort to edit in accord with neutral point of view you don't respect it. Seriously, what is the problem with adding, "X says Y about Z"?

4978:

Thank you. Put simply, my preferences are that articles on American subjects use month-day-year American Dating, and articles on British subjects use day-month-year International Dating. Without presuming to be rude, may I ask you to please point out precisely where in the

3879:

It doesn't make you exempt from policy, but it does mean that you can treat them civily and give them an actual reasoning why you object to their behaviour rather than an insulting "read teh ruels" template notice. Further, deleting warning notices is only against policy

1606:

reverting my work. That way we can get some back and forth going on the talk page about these important issues and help build a more balanced article. I hope we can begin to bring about more examples of collaborative editing among people with differing viewpoints there.

1372:

Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them on an article's talk page, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is a matter of regret — you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. However, it is not

2489:

Jayjg: I am not Little Miss Cheerleader and 64.233.172.34 is NOT my IP address. I am Weekeejames and I don't want to tell here my IP address. Before you block, please make sure you have investigated and have proven everything to be TRUE. Now, unblock me ASAP. Thanks.

1285:

Yes, SuperFlanker and JRSP do that regularly on all the Chavez articles. They never have a valid reason, other than they refuse to accept negative content about Chavez anywhere. I'm kind of all alone in dealing with that, and there are only so many hours in a day.

4943:

I'm happy to accept guidance, but I'm getting contrary instructions from many senior editors, and it would be great if you all could confer amongst yourselves before coming out with something that flatly and rudely contradicts what the previous person has told me.

4581:". The problem is, I don't see the Libel. Everything I have stated is sourced, and the source is explained. Further, shes quite proud of her work in Israel, I don't see how it can be libelous. As such, your thoughts and opinions on the matter are requested. -- 3432:

is legitimate, at least if the rules and guidelines have any meaning. Sorry if this requires confrontational language, but I do not see any alternative, having tried most of them. As I noted, Duncharris has recently been formally cited for "shenanegans"

3868:

Just because you're an established user does not exempt you from Knowledge policies. Also, I find it highly out of order for you to threaten me with banning without cause and without authority. Deleting warning messages is also against Knowledge policy.

4965:, you should not be going around changing date formats to your own preferences. No "senior editors" have told you any different including Raul654. I've cleaned up some of your mess, and if I see you doing it again, you will quickly find yourself blocked a 4241:

we're having about whether it's ever appropriate to reference a hate site, or whether the reference should be left as a hidden comment so as to avoid inadvertantly promoting the hate site by linking to it. Is it ever appropriate to use a hate site as a

6188:

each line is referenced but it has many tag on it and gone for deletion request twice. And see 100s of other articles without any reference but still no one cares about them. That is why Islamic article have to be very well-referenced all the time. ---

4656::Your edits consist of one or the other; sorry if my first comment wasn't clear enough about that. Your copyright violations almost always come from Holocaust denial sources; you only used the ADL source to test to see if that would be tagged as well. 685:

This user has appealed to unblock-en-l, among other things complaining that sending you copies of their ID is setting them up for identity theft crimes. Though I suspect you are an honorable person, their concern is justified as a matter of policy...

5562:. So, what are you going to do now that I have exposed myself? Indef. block this new account, too? Well, you are the expert and you surely know what to do. But please understand that I can not go on contributing to WP with that block over my head. 1309:

Thanks. I've decided MedCab is somewhat unreliable, as it depends on volunteers and the luck of the draw. I've seen brand new editors to Wiki take a case, significantly worsen the situation, then disappear. I don't hold out much hope there.

4352:

I'm running into trouble with this editor who seems intent to blank out any material he doesn't like even when compltely sourced, reliable and verfiable, simply because he doesn't like it, on false pretexts such as "well poisoning". See here :

5118:. Please don't take this personally. I feel that I have received conflicting advice from senior editors and your statements that there is no conflict merely add to the doubt in my mind. I'd like this clarified so that I know how to proceed. -- 4294:

Thanks - hopefully that'll solve the problem. As for him being Dab, it's really just a gut feeling, though Dab did login from both Switzerland and Germany, as I recall. This new user seems to be remarkably familiar with Knowledge, though...

2480:

You were blocked by Jayjg for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Little Miss Cheerleader". The reason given for Little Miss Cheerleader's block is: "Zephram Stark".

5715:

up the baseball manager "Lou Pinella" and there were a bunch of capital letters inserted in the middle of his name in one entry and I thought I would attempt to edit them out. Thanks for activating my account, I'll try to stay more active.

4181:

Thanks. Tony Sidaway extended the arbitration remedies to Hagiographer based on consensus at WP:AN. Do you think it would be sufficient to take that route again or would you prefer listing at WP:RFAR#Requests for clarifications? Thanks.

836:

though. I remain convinced that no matter what kind of headers you might place on your talk page removing civil comments and accusing users of harassment is not appropriate. So you are a member of the ArbCom, don't let it get to your head.

5607:

offered an opinion on the issue is either Jewish or Lutheran. Regardless, it is not a productive argument to have. I only brought it up due to the shear frustration of no one even being willing to consider ideas for improving the section.

4905:

You said yourself that I’m new here, so the least I would expect from you would have been for you to make me aware of the rule before threatening me with it. Moreover, leading me in a 3RR, besides not being nice, doesn’t account much for

474:

Don't you think that this could be construed as a dangerous precendent of discriminating against followers of Eastern faiths? What do you think Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhist and others will feel about Knowledge when they learn about this..?

6040: 3238:

the core commonality and driver, leading one to believe in a growing global coalition, when in fact the root causes of the various trends are distinct and anti-Semitism is more a secondary effect rather than the driving root cause.

5545:

to the harassed user. If I had known back then that placing the single purpose account can be seen as a harassment or personal attack, I would never have done it (or, I wouldn't have created an account for it - after all, that was

6049:) has been resolved about a week ago through a straw poll which found 71% in opposition to the proposal. It has been marked as 'rejected' by an uninvolved party, and debate has died down and moved to some essays on the matter. 2390:) seem to be sockpuppets/meatpuppets, I don't think the IPs are him, however. If one or more of these users are him, then the articles should probably be semi-protected to prevent further disruption - look what happened on the 2235:

to his personal website. I find most of them to be marginally relevant, generally of little interest, and not "professional" in any way -- no different than a random blog -- see, for example, the very tangential reference to

1511:

Hi. I find Dmcdevit continues to make unfair speculations about my efforts to keep a semblence of reason with Zeq and ME articles, and when I protest this, he continues with further speulations (while denying he is doing so):

3736:

could you please take a look at the CfD nomination for "Mathematicians by religion"? Also - see the talk pages referenced therein, as well as the remark I have just left in SlimVirgin's page. Your advice will be appreciated.

2278:

SOrry the password thing was my mistake i realise now. I hope I didn't waste any of your time. Ive been laid up and have been going thfouhg the Jewish Encyclopedia missing articles. it is very time consuming tedious work.

4677:

As for violating the copyrights of Holocaust denial websites, I suspect you know as well as I do that they want to be violated, I mean yearn for it, because the abuser and the abused are often tough to distinguish between.

4644:

Also, it is impossible to violate strictures against "original research" and to violate copyrights at the same time, if you think about it. Copyright violation would mean using somebody else's original research, at best.

4218:

Greetings, Jay. If you get a chance, could you have a look at the entry above? I provisionally denazified it today after noticing it had tens of stromfront and sympathizers links as refs, and other forms of not-so-subtle

4113:. Consensus to promote was reached, and I am now an administrator. I'll be using the tools cautiously at first, and everyone should feel welcome to peer over my shoulder and make sure I'm not doing anything foolish. -- 2230:

hey Jayjg -- I'm asking you this more or less random question because you're the last admin I've talked to, and you seem to have a level head on your shoulders. I just noticed today a large number of external links by

4600:

because of his "non-noteworthiness". Another administrator deleted an article about another Holocaust denier because of my own witless copyright violation of an ADL website. The following exchange ensued on the Robert

3964:

and again trolling my Talk page. Not expecting an intervention, but again just advice about how this can best be handled: the talk page for the article is now pretty much nothing but denial and counters to it. Thanks.

5173:

page sometime ago, and sadly, it probably still needs it. However a newly created userID is being used to turn it back to a nearly all pro-Arian site just like was happening a few months ago before you protected it.

705:

I can't find anything in the contributions of Jethro that make me suspect he may be Zephram Stark. He sent me an e-mail as well, so I am considering unblocking him and simply monitoring him if you don't mind. Thanks.

341: 1560:. Normally I would just let his rants go, but he's already convinced one editor to make changes to the article based on his nonsense. If you have any advice for this sort of thing I would much appreciate it. Thanks. 4224: 4453:

For your information : I discovered that copyright license for photographs is limited to 50 years after the moment it was developed for the first time ! That is very interesting for the illustration of historical

4415: 5901:

There was an edcon when I responded to you, so when I cut my reponse out of the bottom box to paste it into the top box; I accidentally cut your passage as well and pasted in a second copy. Sorry 'bout that.

238: 5018:

What is actually "frustrating and difficult" is that you have deliberately misquoted Raul again, as has been pointed out to you before. You left off the part immediately after that statement, where he said

739: 4330:

I feel you are treating me unfairly. I had already stopped misbehaving and entered civilized discussion when you imposed that block. But this is really Jayjg's talk page and I'd like to hear his opinion.

155:

It's interesting that, despite having been warned that using newbie templates on experienced users is generally perceived as an insult, he continues to do so. Presumably the insult in intentional then.

3819:

Thank you, Jayjg, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.

54:

Hi Jay, Curious as to why you removed the discussion on Harvey Kellog as the person who spurred the American tradition of circumcision. Do you have sources that say something different? Best regards,

4743:) has been alleged to be ZS, and since you were most involved in checking him, I'm forwarding this request (from someone else) directly to you. Please check this, if possible, and post the result on 6128:

Firstly it is not the right answer to my request. Secondly, it amaze me that when it comes to Islam then standards get so much strick and otherwise even un-reference things are allowed to stay. ---

994:

I've responded to your issues at length on the relevant article Talk: page. It baffles me why people cannot read the top of this page, or feel they need to discuss the exact same article content in

5954: 4802:

apology for the intentionaional infliction of severe emotional distress he has caused me. Please consider my request for the betterment of the Wikicommunity and Knowledge. Thank you very much.

5639:. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. 81: 4034:"article" carefully, and have come to the conclusion that it should mere br a "REDIRECT" "page." What do you think? What should we single this title out? Notice the following (incomplete) list: 523:

of faiths/gurus will have as much as a challenge in this regard, but there is no mention of that conflict in the proposed princple. Look forward to your comments after you revise the evidence.

3752: 3500: 352:. Briefly, such editing is discouraged due to inherent bias. If you do edit, Knowledge:Neutral point of view, Knowledge:Verifiability, and Knowledge:No original research remain in full effect. 6028: 3849:

I believe that the above two template warnings were unwarranted, and should not be considered an accurate reflection of Jayjg's behaviour. Future viewers of the page should disregard them. --

5351:

You indef. blocked me and gave a reason. I disagree with the validity of that reason and would like to go to Mediation Cabal and try to sort things out. What do you say? That is, apart from

6073: 4167:

Jay, I noticed you just blocked Hagiographer as a sockpuppet of MJGR. Does that mean MJGR was also behind the Zapatero/Zapatancas accounts, and should the personal attack probation at

3281:

Jayjg asked "I'm not talking about prejudice against Arabs or Hindus, or the War on Terror, I'm talking about firebombing mosques in response. Would that be an example of Islamophobia?"

2515:

In summary, from this point forward, I will cease adding new links to self-written pages, but I would argue for letting the process take care of the ones that are already in existence.

1954:

Thanks. I'm just cutting it back some (well, more than some). Maybe in a while I'll become more active again. It was just taking over my life... Good sign to take a little wikibreak. --

770:...claiming your revert had to do with "no original research". Quite obviously your revert was grounded in the following: Your POV. .... that is, unless you have a better explanation. 5978:. I made extensive changes to the introduction, but as far as I could tell, removed nothing of substance. The bulk of the changes were re-organizing and removing repeated information. 5983:

legitimate, and would appriciate your assisitance. Obviously I do not expect you to agree with all the changes, but blind reverts without explnation help no one. Thanks in advance. --

32:

attracting vandals. It is sad, but anything that is remotely associated with "Jewish" seems to get vandalized. But that concerns me less than another kind of edit/review problem.

5114:

Lacking any further guidance from you, and having no confidence that you have checked with Raul or found any relevant ArbCom cases beyond Sortan and Jguk, I have asked for guidance

854:

Well anyway if you'd like to have a chat I should be on IRC in the next couple of days in the channels I mention on my talk page. Perhaps that might be enlightening for both of us.

4668:

copyright issues? (It's not clear to me thet WP's policies are strictly law-based so much as cautious. But I'm not a licensed attorney...) Will you or Jpgordon delete and block a

1184: 4672:

article on the basis of non-noteworthiness, despite the fact that he is clearly a major player in the H-denier field? Please see NawlinWiki's talk page under Mark Weber heading.

1300:, they were again told they were wrong. They still do it. There are three of them, and one of me, and they claim BLP on any content not favorable to Chavez. Any suggestions? 494:, the latter that reads " Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views — regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream or extreme." 270:. Could you look into each recent IP used by these accounts and see if they're open proxies? Also, perhaps this would lead you to find more socks? (I'm referring to what you did 4357: 1580:

Clearly Nazrac is barking up a tree or pissing up a rope. Doesn't he know it's not WHAT you know, it's WHO you know in this world, and that includes Knowledge and all its bias.

3464: 5133:

Thank you. In general, I'm leery of leaning on individual admins (less ammo for screams of "cabalism!"), but if necessary in future, I'll contact you directly on this page. --

4980: 4937: 3289:

if it involves firebombings.) If you read his essay you'll understand what I am talking about. I think that we're sort of stuck at the moment of talking past each other. --

5558:(which is what I am currently doing again). And for what it's worth, once again: Nandesuka blocked me in the first place for being a sockpuppet of a banned user. That's why 3469:

I have tried to summarize my content concerns regarding NAS as simply as possible. If we can tackle these, then my concerns over balance will be addressed. Here they are:

2889:

Use your oversight powers to delete my user page history? There is sensitive personal information on there that I would like removed. Everything up to the most recent edit?

1534:. Please speak to him. He might be under the mistaken imperssion that as an arbitrator he is not expected to adhere to civility standrads with these continued insinuations. 40:

page only editable with a log-in. Maybe then I can at least figure out who this editor is and get them to understand the importance of the peer review process in science. --

6001: 2526: 2431:

Netscott last Friday because a few guys did - the topic is still there if you would like to say something - I'm happy for my page to be used as a debating forum. Thanks,

4168: 602:

Hi. What on earth is going on with the un sc res 242 article? I come back a month or so later and it seems entirely re-written in a very biased pov way. How can I help?

4928:, I can see what you are trying to do. The question in my mind is why. My understanding is that the limits on format changing have been set, as per the Manual of Style 2247:. I am inclined to go remove all links to his personal web site, but I want at least one more pair of eyes before doing so. Can you tell me what you think? thanks. 1753:

to accommodate that material. A bad situation, in other words. The page is currently protected and I'm starting to tidy it by rewriting the intro. The current intro is

6355: 3580:

One more thing--a WPdeian put a MERGE notice on that article I'm writing--but didn't give any argument!!! How can I defend if WP does not tell me WHY or HOW to MERGE?

3498: 2690:

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my

2367: 1702:, is very closely sourced to an article written by Mitchell G. Bard, the executive director of a foundation that promotes the US-Israel relationship and also runs the 1275:

Thanks for fixing that: I couldn't understand why you were re-introducing the topic in a second section. Did you have a look at the controversy on the talk page ?

4496: 1229:

It's an article on New anti-Semitism. It quotes reliable sources on the subject. Which reliable sources have discussed New anti-Semitism in the context of Lebanon?"

2353: 1435: 558:

that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at

318: 2564: 727: 5322:, but these kind of categories do not normally have articles attached to them, they just function as "holding pens" for the articles about Jews. This used to be 5314:(it is presently a redirect) which would make it consistent with all the other articles of "History of the Jews in ______" series as you can see for yourself in 5058:

My position is entirely consistent with that of Raul's. Stop pretending that there is a difference of opinion here through which you can slip your date changes.

4474: 4068: 3540: 2802: 2282:

I know nothing about about programming but surely there must be a simple way to have a bot change all the unusual charachters to ch and tz etc.. And to put the

761: 3627:, I thought you might want to know that today, on this same page, he removed the protection, made a series of edits, and reprotected the page. I've filed a new 4400:

was created purely as a POV-fork. It would be interesting if you weighed in briefly on the deletion page. (Full disclosure: I argued in favour of keeping it.)

4280:. The user has also indicated a willingness to evade blocks. Based on location and these characteristics, I'm also wondering if he might be a possible sock of 3434: 3413: 5593: 5584: 5575: 5692:, an account with no contributions indefinitely as a "sleeper account". A sleeper account of who? He's asking to be unblocked, so I'll let you handle it. -- 5115: 3493: 2866: 2377: 2363: 1196: 1657:. I will take to heart your comments and try and work more on collaborating with other editors. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. 5356: 4892: 4803: 4609: 4310: 4273: 4269: 3613: 2908: 2527: 2438: 1465: 1415: 1392: 542: 5992: 5370: 4744: 4582: 4332: 2349: 2339: 2031: 1431: 623: 596: 593: 36:

this modification is not reading the Duke University press releases correctly. Misinformation about a disease is a terrible thing. Could you make the

4470: 3441: 2798: 2575: 2260:

I would have called it that ("linkspamming") myself, but wanted another pair of eyes before editing so many pages. thanks. I'll get on it tomorrow.

712: 3654:

and I undid your last edit, while undoing some vandalism just before you editted. I'm not quite sure what you were up to, but you might want to fix.

2876: 1602:

If you disagree with that edit, I'd really appreciate if you discussed, with me and other editors, the grounds for your disagreement on the talk page

5716: 5663: 2607: 780:

I see now that your reverted something else as well, so maybe it was a mistake. I reinserted my changes. If you want to remove them, please explain.

774: 612: 6240: 6203: 6193: 6166: 6149: 6132: 2540:

with subsidiary dialog on the talk page of affected articles. Based on the difficult and controversial nature of this matter, with the exception of

699: 5373: 5198: 3770: 2857:." Will it become a "duplication" of many things on Knowledge? What should it's goals and functions be? Please add your learned views. Thank you. 178: 5566: 2726: 1351:

I await the mediation process but refuse to jump a spot the Mediation Cabal is the first step in the conflict's resolution and it should be taken.

1323: 1314: 1304: 1290: 1251: 5268: 3526: 3490: 3290: 3269: 3255: 3242: 3220: 2873: 2708: 2656: 2433: 1909: 1728: 1711: 1296:

what you see on the I-V article. I submitted an RfC, and another editor also pointed out to them that they were wrong. I raised the question at

1259: 1218: 1170:

Whenever I sign my name with "~ ~ ~ ~" my password is revealed as part of my name. !!!!!!!!!!!! [[User:Juicifer ]] 00:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

137: 6035: 4836: 4325: 4186: 3214: 4335: 4281: 3594: 44: 3795: 3483: 3478: 1996:

Lol, how do you tell it's him, anyway? Does he only use open proxies when he uses sockpuppets, or does he edit from his homebase in Romania? —

945: 4248:

policy to reference a hate site at all, as in this case, for example, when we want to reference how many registered users they claim to have.

3635: 2836: 2461: 2452: 2309: 2283: 1514:

you are just playing with words because for some reason you have animosity towards either me or the Arbitration Committee as a whole or both.

291: 6301: 5288: 4885: 4313: 3888: 1966: 985: 848: 116: 4870:

Your threat to block him is extremely out of line until you can PROVE he is a sockpuppet, or until he actually has committed harassment of

4596:

Messrs. jayjg, Jpgordon et al have taken to further censorship activities and have deleted and blocked a perfectly legitimate article on a

4203: 3897: 3805:

I see that it's confusing for people - perhaps I suggust repharsing it, so it'll be clear that the 6 million number is not being censored.

3691: 3452: 105: 26: 6086:

It is written in Jerusalem from the Jews who have studied the Halacha (Jewish Religious Law) and its relations to the Gentils (=Non-Jews)

5454: 5436: 5366: 4537: 3946: 3722: 3380: 3351: 3293: 3272: 3258: 3200: 2817: 2650: 2419: 2267: 2050: 2017: 2002: 1837: 1818: 1803: 1731: 1500: 1262: 1157: 1130: 1032:

Article content disputes disguised as "policy discussions" should be discussed on the relevant article Talk: pages. If you want to have a

899: 648: 327: 300: 5979: 5122: 5109: 5076: 5045: 5003: 4973: 4847:

There is a lot of unsourced material here. i trust it, but don't want anyone to fault the article for violating NOR. I commented here,

4257: 3859:

You're welcome. Personally, I'd say you could even remove or strike through those template after the incident in question is finished. --

3227: 2698:(trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for 2677: 2289:

Someone could then go through the stuff and add categories from a set list, change the first lines styling and POP!! Great new article,

1905: 1650: 1584: 1381: 1239:(who in fact gets hs own section on the article - so I assume he is of interest and his web site could be a source). He references this 5152: 4384: 1625:(Sorry to put this out of order on your talk page, but I couldn't get my comment out of the colored template on the RFA thanks below.) 1089: 209: 160: 6329: 5719: 4586: 4437:

that I made after a purely silly request that mackensen wished he had a {{Thrown out}} It'd have been useful for the Tyrenius case. --

3969: 1377:

Whatever my edits are as long as I justify them (and trust me the justification is extremely solid) is not Vandalism. Just a heads up.

1355: 1279: 1058: 1040: 1002: 150: 6340:! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Knowledge a better place. Feel free to send me a 5267:

I know we've had disputes in the past, but I would like to set that aside. I need the services of a checkuser. can you confirm that

4798:

or removed" He should know perfectly well these edits are not "experiments" but the hard work of peopkle trying to improve articles.

4514: 3625: 2893: 88: 69: 5709: 5232: 2932: 2839: 2190: 1877: 866: 829: 75: 4299: 4141: 3677: 3668: 2172: 1924:

Administrator needed to move page back to that title. 'Incident' is quite a strange term for what happened here. I cannot revert to

1791: 1727:

just like conspiracies about Israel are extreme and hateful distortions of a real country. This perspective is why I linked it. --

784: 536: 3809: 3710: 2076: 928: 756: 5340: 5254: 5241: 4948: 4561:

has reverted the information I have added away from the article four times over the past 19 days with such charming summaries as "

4238: 2316: 1629: 1538: 5632: 4818:

tagged a comment by that user in an inappropriate place? I'd understand that but would still appreciate your comment. Thank you.

4062: 3979: 3402: 2537: 1599:

page, an edit that takes into account all of the specific requests for improvement that I've received over the past week or two.

677: 572: 5874: 5656: 4933: 4751: 4689:

So I'm curious if I start an article on Mark Weber, will you delete it, jayjg? Will you support others who delete and block it?

3782: 2254: 1990: 957: 603: 6162:

It means that it is shame that I need to find reference to make a link between a thing that it too obvious. Thanks to you. ---

4110: 3975:

the article talk page? Why would Jayjg intervene simply because you disagree with the content on an article discussion page? --

3873: 3759: 2927: 2826: 733: 5909: 4895: 4631: 3777: 2292:

I think that this is the only way that the 15,000 or so outstanding articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia will ever get done.

1948: 1335:

Jayjg (and Sandy), do you see the tactic of guilt-by-association used in the material Flanker quotes? If guilt-by-association

185: 5359: 5094: 5062: 5027: 4464: 4441: 2630: 2441: 237:

Vote for me! I will be a kid administor! Forfilling duties, watching reverting, and blocking, communicating and cooporating!

5749: 5519: 4157: 2521: 2494: 799: 84:

was filed "against" you and SlimVirgin, which I have deleted and delisted as gross misuse of the RfC process. All the best,

3928: 2750: 2680:, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA 2387: 2373: 1706:. The article is hosted on the JVL as well. Understanding subjects like these demystifies them. I also wrote one on the 1564: 1553: 1178: 1026: 271: 5278: 5159: 4886:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Admin_Jayg_Inappropriate_ban_of_User:Tit_for_tat

4878: 4693: 4682: 4649: 4404: 2791: 2757: 6269: 6122: 5987: 5775:

to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage,

5475: 4719: 4502: 3863: 3853: 3800: 3638: 3422: 3415: 1772: 1475: 1457: 1425: 1079: 804: 58: 5943: 4962: 4175: 3408: 1862: 1297: 1110: 245: 6364: 6118:

Please do not make your reverts in jizya article as "minor edits" as they are not espacially if they are disputed. ---

6024: 5355:, which is true, but also a tautology (you blocked me) and is one of the things I'd like address with Mediation Cabal. 5185: 4983:

to which you refer, the reverse is explained "quite clearly"? I would also like your interpretation on Raul's comments

4777: 4543: 3952: 3746: 3685: 2861: 2400: 2359: 2041: 1441: 1409: 1268: 287: 205: 5891: 5237:

Zoe, on top of the fact that reverts of banned users don't count for 3RR, I only removed the material 3 times, not 4.

4919: 4660: 4459: 3664:

Thanks for your note. I checked when I saw you'd cleaned out some vandalism, but somehow both of our edits stuck. :-)

1611: 1255: 973: 923: 5611: 4914: 4772: 4480: 3764: 2933: 2884: 2808: 2585: 2303: 2096: 1758: 1699: 1574: 1206: 310: 5424: 4117: 1714: 6108: 5671: 5330: 5326:'d work, but he hasn't been around, and I am working on tidying-up some Jews and Judaism categories. Thanks a lot. 5311: 4822: 4814: 3835: 3459: 3455:? It's a concept I've not encountered before, and there doesn't seem to be much if anything on the web about it. -- 3245: 2177: 1880:) saying what you did, and then VoABot will move it automatically to the bottom of the page, and later remove it. — 1667: 1595:

I just wanted to let you know ahead of time that I'm going to be making what I feel to be an important edit on the

1527: 888: 6012:

cast a vote, which is very unfair and lacking insight. It seems that you may have been better off trying to add a

5961: 4858: 2298: 2220: 2087: 1767: 280: 5724: 4056: 3658: 3473: 2778: 2599: 2225: 1972: 1782: 1707: 509: 140: 4288: 4171:

be applied to MJGR? (Should MJGR in fact be blocked under that decision for the Hagiographer attacks?). Thanks.

1343:

Yeah that is funny that not only it is plainly evident but policy even shields me from the 3RRR rule due to the

1221: 810: 5648: 5141: 5084: 5053: 5013: 4984: 4956: 4372: 4231: 4074: 3375: 3346: 3320: 2914: 2898: 2785:

article should definately be semi-protected, as this appears to be a ridiculous amount of disruption. Thanks. —

1977: 1894: 1165: 632: 370: 5551: 5529:

and tell me I am a) harassing anyone and/or that I am a troll or a sockpuppet or whatever. I believe I gave a

5407: 5034: 4929: 4153:

elsewhere somewhat! Perhaps a deadline for counter POV is necessary? Apologies for the splintered messages. --

3325: 1688: 1661: 1488: 5861: 5685: 5503: 5146: 4724: 2499: 2345: 1622: 1616: 1520: 562:, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to 5887:

I liked the disclaimer at the top of your talk page. Do you mind if I steal it, and use it on my talk page?

5101: 4488: 4131: 3741: 3306:

Don't talk to me about unbased and unfounded personal attacks that you don't intend your recipient to see.

2464: 2455: 1912: 1516:

Can you have a word with him? I feel he treating me disrespectfuly and that I am unable to reach him. Best,

672: 227: 6308: 5462: 4698: 4025:

I've noticed your work on it and I note that you only describe it as . That's probably 'cause your so busy.

3908:

Jay, thanks for letting me know, and you're right, I'm not surprised. In a way it's kind of sad as Awbrey

2695: 2569: 2425: 2211: 2168: 1917: 790: 689:

What are your specific suspicions regarding their edit patterns which make you think they're a Stark sock?

5222: 5209: 2762: 5395: 5069: 4206: 4147: 3701: 2613: 4891:

You banned me for no reason at all. I am hereby formally requesting IMMEDIATE unblocking of my account!

4712: 2617: 5675: 4740: 4554: 4544: 3903: 3840: 3619: 2844: 1269: 1008: 752: 584: 465: 455: 49: 4925: 4829: 4575:(it was never an Arb-Com case - as you no doubt know, *I* was an arb-com case and am on Revert patrol) 1710:

based on the same source. They are really stubs for the moment, I need to find additional sources. --

5738: 2551: 2536:

To summarize: Discussion of global issues which concern use of "apartheid" and all polls shall be at

1847: 1232: 1066: 724: 696: 6286: 6282: 6278: 6274: 6046: 5681: 5319: 5262: 5033:

I think a reasonable reading of that is that he is referring to articles on (say) China, where the

4863: 4591: 3788: 2469: 2381: 1608: 168: 4354: 950: 5896: 5590: 5581: 5572: 5563: 5526: 5346: 5315: 4874:- simply putting the SPA tag on an account does not constitute harassment. You are out of line. 4438: 4390: 4379: 2685: 2562: 2245: 1469: 1451: 1419: 1095: 532: 505: 349: 6141:

Obviously most of the Islamic articles are well-sourced because people like you makes standards

5488:

forgive me for not being about to communicate or edit this site they way you do, just learning.

1240: 1190:"Representatives for leading US defense company tour Israel, offer to complete Nautilus project" 992:

Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.

5294: 4855: 4284:. I was wondering if you might have a word with him and/or if you had any suggestions. Thanks. 4104: 3990: 3828: 3792: 3405: 2321: 2035: 1703: 1544: 1403: 936:

Please help. I want to be nice, but it is difficult when being unjustly accused and bulliied.

679: 199: 3590:--- Please find the time to answer me. Thanks. And here's my partial resume so far--thus far: 6313: 6258: 6185: 5955:

Knowledge:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 October 10#Category:Saintly person tombs in Israel

5948: 5930: 5862: 5601: 5535:

account: Any edit I'm going to make anytime in the future is in evasion of an existing block.

5323: 5164: 4992:

article, the American style is the preferred style and it's OK to change British to American.

4768: 4446: 4396: 4183: 4172: 4091: 4086: 3604: 2744: 2579: 1750: 5418: 3550:

I had been printing (hardcopy) versions of WP perhaps even before you became an Administror.

1478:) (Bonaparte) to my userpage? And possbily also semi-protect it? He's also been editing the 912:

Jay, would you S-Protect Lutheranism? We have a spate more of vandalism there. Thanks! Bob--

348:

Editing an article concerning a guru you are a disciple of is governed by the principles in

6105: 6083: 5966: 5872: 5742: 5737:

for deletion, but in fact, the one who has now reproduced it should have first taken it to

5667: 5560:

you banned tit_for_tat indef. at once, you never gave me any warning or any temporary block

4639:

they have to make an active release of copyright status in order to qualify for Knowledge.

4212: 4162: 3893:

I hadn't actually considered removing them until I got your latest post. Now they're gone.

2832: 2691: 2164: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1918: 1765: 1664: 1215: 1213: 1071:

While I agree with most of your recent revert there, I am confused as to why the part with

1013:

Are you open to policy discussions here? I notice your stipulations only mention articles.

983: 921: 274:) Anyways, he's been a bit of a nuisance lately, it would be great if you could help out. — 232: 5246:

You're right, and I apologize. It's the same as the 3RR on vandalism, it doesn't apply.

3428:

Likewise, presenting concrete evidence that an alleged "concensus" is no such thing under

8: 6360: 6341: 6113: 5906: 4756: 4422: 4306: 3961: 3643: 3429: 3388: 3117: 2959: 2772: 2593: 1961: 1943: 1754: 1693: 1557: 1104:

article with socks and open proxies from Saudi Arabia. Can you please put a stop to it? —

905: 861: 843: 824: 692:

Would you be happy with someone at OFFICE reviewing their identity information, perhaps?

563: 335: 100: 6007: 4969:

time for making arbitrary date format changes. I hope that is absolutely crystal clear.

4785: 3673:

Odd that ... I thought I'd noticed that happening recently. Some kind of Wikimagic ...

2312:

and, if so, whether I can re-insert that statement without being in violation of 3RR. -

1258:. Why is the topic ignored? There are plenty of potential reliable sources out there.-- 6290: 6266: 6237: 6200: 6190: 6163: 6146: 6129: 6119: 6050: 5879: 5702: 5468: 5450: 5432: 5403: 4911: 4533: 4521: 4510: 4492: 4409: 4263: 4211: 3446: 3232: 2918: 2558: 2331: 2264: 2251: 2060: 1447: 1048: 1016: 963: 942: 871: 669: 182: 133: 129: 3753:

Knowledge:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 September 10#Category:Israel Defense Forces

1643: 1526:

Now he is becoming outright abusive, removing my comment with an edit summary reading

6095: 6016: 5984: 5844: 5836: 5272: 4851: 4050: 3999: 3966: 3870: 3821: 3632: 3599: 3398: 2890: 2754: 2641: 2621: 2273: 2195: 2187: 2179: 1889: 1626: 1561: 1399: 1378: 1352: 1320: 1311: 1301: 1287: 1276: 1236: 1101: 568:

There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

433: 388: 250: 195: 37: 5754: 1528:"I'm serious. Stop with your baseless accusations. My own talk page isn't the place 5888: 5807: 5644: 5616: 5532: 5513: 5138: 5128: 4864: 4833: 4819: 4763: 4365: 4254: 3993: 2491: 2205: 1506: 998:

three different places, only one of which (the article Talk: page) is appropriate.

939:

I hope you are understanding, and believe me. I am not lying. This is the truth.

451: 263: 242: 223: 174: 110: 5414: 3586:

And do you make any allowence based on the QUALITY of a WP's WORK/PRODUCT/ARTICLE:

3241:

His essay is particularly difficult to read but I still recommend you read it. --

2637: 2533:

This case has closed and the final decision has been published at the link above.

742:

regarding your range blocks vs. Zephram Stark on Charter /24 blocks and others on

6098: 5940: 5869: 5730: 5625: 5389: 5307: 5119: 5106: 5073: 5042: 5000: 4945: 4900: 4808: 4748: 4401: 4347: 3695: 3572:

I just figure it out--I'll do it sloppily--and someone will cleanup after me--OK?

3566: 2714: 2658: 2237: 2159: 1981: 1872:

Hi Jayjg: just letting you know that when you protect/unprotect a page listed at

1867: 1762: 1739: 1658: 1201: 1151:. Would you mind doing a check on those two as well? (Inanna has a dynamic IP). — 980: 913: 528: 501: 314: 259: 41: 17: 1856:

so it would be great if one of you could go through it sometime soon. Thanks, --

1339:

being employed, is this a "valid reason" for a delete? I honestly want to know.

80:

You may not be aware of this, as the author did not bother informing you, but a

6352: 6295: 5777:

Knowledge:Requests for mediation/United Nations Security Council Resolution 242

5734: 5285: 5275: 5190: 5182: 4875: 4734: 4690: 4679: 4646: 4616: 4361: 4322: 4277: 4122: 4031: 3934:

Jeez, most people have fewer pairs of socks than he had sock puppets. Unreal.

3814: 3771:

User talk:ThuranX#Your past nominations to rename (Knowledge:Undeletion policy)

2768: 2589: 2451:

i've not figured out how to send messages but i don't have other wiki accounts

2154:

edition did not pass, the necessity to cite sources follows from NPOV, per 5P.

1955: 1937: 1873: 1778: 1581: 1362: 881: 877: 855: 837: 818: 814: 743: 707: 617: 580: 560:

Knowledge:Requests for mediation/United Nations Security Council Resolution 242

483: 429: 384: 267: 157: 94: 5914: 3397:, but I suspect that it's about time the arbitration committee looked at this 2241: 6262: 6229: 6000:

Meshulam: You should avoid this kind of move (the hasty nomination to delete

5974:

Asking for your help with an article we have been involved with in the past:

5936: 5772: 5695: 5447: 5429: 5400: 5379: 5251: 5229: 5219: 5206: 5191: 5170: 4907: 4842: 4620: 4558: 4530: 4507: 4456: 4154: 3935: 3917: 3738: 3718: 3706: 3628: 3610: 3456: 3438: 3362: 3333: 3307: 3301: 3197: 3038: 2923: 2904: 2831:

take a look at the 3RR report recently filed against me, regarding edits to

2813: 2787: 2782: 2681: 2646: 2626: 2545: 2446: 2415: 2396: 2391: 2313: 2295: 2261: 2248: 2216: 2046: 2013: 1998: 1986: 1833: 1814: 1799: 1787: 1685: 1681: 1675: 1496: 1484: 1386: 1348: 1153: 1148: 1126: 1106: 1051: 1019: 966: 896: 885: 666: 644: 628: 609: 551: 491: 487: 443: 323: 296: 276: 190: 6045:

I wish to point out that the issue specified in this arb case (the proposal

5508:

For observational purposes. Blocking doesn't do much anyway for this sort. —

3998: 3254:

their real distinctions else may lead one to draw incorrect conclusions. --

2781:) please? If it turns out that it's Bonny (which I'm pretty sure he is) the 1072: 5975: 5840: 5608: 4708: 4624: 4484: 4381: 4369: 4198: 4080: 3806: 3690:

I know you're probably busy these days, but could you please do a check on

3168: 2998: 2406: 2335: 2084: 1882: 1745: 1744:

Jay, if you have any time and inclination, would you mind taking a look at

1086: 1076: 796: 555: 6236:

article. Please be careful next time and honor other people opinions. ---

6041:"Harrassment, talk page vandalism, and non-consensus changes to guideline" 2940:

Greetings! From a novice Wikipedian--since August 31, 2006--consider this:

2688:

has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Knowledge.

6322: 6089: 5939:

report. Hopefully, if there is another time, I will get it right myself.

5925: 5920: 5843:

to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please

5800: 5640: 5509: 5134: 5100:

Thanks. Could you cite those many precedents on date style, please? I've

4192: 3976: 3953: 3885: 3860: 3850: 3728: 3651: 3644: 2835:. I believe this is a bad faith report, but would accept your judgement. 2518: 2232: 2201: 2134:

Rule too soon for this young wiki - should follow practice as it develops

1899: 1857: 1634: 1571: 1549: 1144: 1140: 1036:

policy discussion, you should do that on the relevant policy Talk: page.

906: 654: 479:

others. One can call that discrimination. What is your opinion on this?

218: 66: 55: 3210:

Also, your THIRD RULE is incoherent to me--can fix it or explain please?

1227:

As I stated, I fully understand the concept of "sofixit". You replied "

979:

You're not editing in accordance with NPOV. You're trying to add a POV.

795:

FYI, I just sent you what may be a time sensitive email (I'm not sure).

5385: 5367:

User_talk:Centrx#declined_my_unblock_request_.2F_any_specific_reason.3F

5238: 5091: 5059: 5024: 4970: 4871: 4669: 4657: 4628: 4550: 4296: 4285: 4138: 4128: 4114: 4014: 3894: 3674: 3665: 3655: 3437:}. This does not seem to have slowed his activities in the slightest. 3356:

After stepping back, and VoiceofAll's words, I will offer an apology.

3081: 2603: 1590: 1037: 999: 781: 771: 524: 497: 418:

schools could be discouraged from editing articles about their teachers

380: 366: 147: 128:

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain

6029:

Knowledge talk:Orthodox Rabbinical Biography Collaboration of the Week

5733:

article after it was voted for deletion in July '06. I have put it in

4571:

Revert Lies! - Reprobate Sources, as previously decided in arbitration

3021:

Velikoe v malom i antikhrist, kak blizkaia politicheskaia vozmozhnost.

403: 6305: 6032: 5958: 5746: 5472: 5337: 5327: 5156: 4730: 4716: 4602: 4228: 4220: 4044: 3774: 3756: 3562: 3522:

I've learned by trial and error--did not even read any of your rules.

3512: 3224: 3132: 3073: 3010: 2858: 2410: 1535: 1517: 1482:

article. Sorry I ask you for so much help, I hope you don't mind... —

1479: 1243: 1193: 1175: 1117: 747: 576: 213: 85: 4762:

which might help blocking efforts. Email me if you're interested. —

2854: 2850: 639: 6199:

compare two? I have now started losing good faith towards you. ---

5525:

Jayjg, please take a look at my current contribs on the account of

5247: 5215: 5202: 4011: 3175: 3101: 3085: 3077: 3065: 3034: 2994: 2541: 520: 393: 362: 5201:. Please don't revert again or you will be blocked for 24 hours. 4703:

Hi Jay: Could you please take a look at the discussion concerning

4848: 4525: 4018: 3069: 3042: 2735: 2474:

I was just about to save a page I was editing when this came up:

1749:

be used as a source; therefore, other editors have had to create

1596: 1121: 146:

Yikes! Someone's taking themselves just a wee bit too seriously.

5480: 3583:

So I just wiped--out his notice--did I do OK? Or violate a rule?

3149:

This has been translated/transliterate]]d], word for word, into:

2669: 2069: 1395:. She also edited after she was banned under the following IPs: 4358:

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command

3533: 2286:

in the correct places add the {{Jewish encyc,lopeida tag }}.

415: 411: 397: 258:

Bonny has been pretty active lately, the most recent socks are

5554:

for details.) However, if the block on tit_for_tat continues,

4729:

It appears that the Zephram Stark case needs to be revisited.

2327: 876:

As I explained on the talk page, the link does *not* say that

357:

Are you aware of the implications of this proposed principle?

6233: 5072:, who has undone one of your reverts, citing a convention. -- 3624:

Given your concern the last time this admin abused his tools

3544: 3421:

Re: DuncHarris and Slrubenstein. Please seem my comments on

3160: 3136: 3108: 3097: 3030: 3014: 2990: 2977: 2966: 2955: 2946: 1812:

Yeah, I was just thinking about what happened to Katefan... —

1680:

Could you explain what you mean by "keep this clean?" on the

447: 437: 425:

All this when there are no discouragement or limitations for

376: 340:

Jay, can you take a look at Proposed principles ArbCom case:

6002:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Medzhibozh (Hasidic dynasty)

5763: 121: 4553:, you hate me more than most. Can you have a swing over to 4237:

Jay-- in a related matter, would you care to comment on an

4169:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas

3916:

be a good contributer, if he'd stop tripping over his ego.

3769:

Hi Jay: Your learned input would be greatly appreciated at

3519:--and I love it!!! It's a great and incredible phenomena!!! 3516: 3093: 3089: 3002: 2987: 2970: 2478:

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.

1391:

Well, for a list that some of the IPs that Inanna used see

1235:- probably includes the odd reliable source. There is say 486:

may be in contradiction with existing WP policies, such as

461: 407: 132:

and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating

6273:. You are good by one hour hence cannot report this time. 4850:. If you can address any of my concerns I'd be grateful, 4378:

See development on MA issue (not related to Palmiro...) :

3189:

So do you have any objections to my proposed title change?

1876:, don't remove it from the page, just add a comment (like 1653:, which closed successfully this morning with a result of 3055:

The roots of the immediately above four (4) Russian words

655: 6084:

http://www.daatemet.org.il/daathalacha/en_gentiles2.html

3984: 2512:

links when the url changed so a link wouldn't go dead.

1185:

Surplus having been dumped: now time to revive the MTHEL

5868:

A proposal that NOR and V be combined, and RS ditched.

4069:

Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion

3107:

Accordingly, that's one source of the English language

2903:

Hey Jayjg. I was wondering if you could let me know if

1365:

official policy clearly states what vandalism is not:

3435:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-08 Acupuncture

2983:

is a dignified subsequent English language translation

2620:

it looks like Bonaparte. See also the edit history of

2244:. He fixed a couple dozen of these links today, see 1831:

Heh, I actually heard that form someone else too. :p —

1244:

article in the NY Sun by Foxman, writer of the book "

895:

source when asked. I'll modify the page accordingly.

2753:

and would very much appreciate your thoughts. Best,--

5856:

This message delivered: 12:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

4469:

Hi Jayjg, would you mind deleting the edits made by

3989:

Hello Jayjg. I wonder what licence has this image :

2644:. That's why I thought they were all the same guy. — 2624:. Can you do a check on these three? Thanks again. — 2528:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Israeli apartheid

2131:

Unclear when can delete unverified info and when not

1781:

please? BTW, do you think I should take things like

1393:

Category:Suspected Knowledge sockpuppets of -Inanna-

1319:

oh, my, 'ya learn something new every day! Thanks,

884:

said it, months before it appears in Conde's paper.

723:Looking forwards to your followup on unblock-en-l. 4137:

I sent it again. Hopefully, it worked this time. --

2079:, which closed successfully today with a result of 1494:

Ok, thanks. Big tóda on your help as well. Later. —

1464:BTW, can you do me a favor and delete the edits by 767:are attempting to formulate a precise description. 5919:Hi there Jayig. Would you mind coming over to the 5539:I am totally keeping out of all "hazardous" topics 1210:What on earth would Lebanon have to do with this? 640:http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Oruj 5153:Talk:Engage (organization)#"Zionist organization" 3361:reading this page, that apology extends to her. 1906:Why pretending there is no lobby isn't productive 1147:exhibit very similar behavior to the banned user 1075:as a citation constituted OR. What am I missing? 5997:I have written the following to the nominator: 5271:is not a sockpuppet of temporarily blocked user 4936:. More discussion may be found on the talk page 4006:Greetings Jayjg. The above is the briefest title 3992:from the wp:he. Can you help me ? Thank you :-) 2308:I am wondering if I have addressed your concern 2146:Enwiki mentality different from ruwiki mentality 1936:. If that would also happen, I would agree... -- 179:Knowledge:Article Creation and Improvement Drive 5556:you force me to stop all helping with Knowledge 5199:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 4705:Conceptual backround: Hasidic dynastic disputes 2137:Preference for "truth" (OR) vs. "verifiability" 762:What has this got to do with original research? 482:Another concern is that this interpretation of 6082:Here is the answer for anti-semitism polemic: 4627:are always fascinating. Please login. Thanks. 4416:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tyrenius 3221:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jew Year's Eve 2105:53 (59 %) Yea, 33 (37 %) Nay, 4 (4 %) Neutral. 1242:. There are also under current news items: 6328:Hi, Jayjg! Thank you for supporting me in my 6257:::::::: I did not wanted to but after seeing 5661:At 16:04, February 3, 2006 (UTC) you blocked 5427:) as well (the second one is more serious). — 2867:NAS - why the hysteria and false accusations? 990:Please read the top of this page, which says 746:, where you may want to participate. Thanks! 4414:Looking at the hilarity (in the history) of 4276:? Numerous personal attacks, disagrees with 3755:. Your expertise is required. Thanks a lot. 3484:Article is about modern NAS theory, not term 3479:Confusing evidence with NAS's interpretation 2676:Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent 2075:Thank you very much for participating in my 543:Mediation request for Resolution 242 article 5993:Vote to delete Medzhibozh (Hasidic dynasty) 5839:, an automated bot account operated by the 5151:Hi Jay: Could you please look into this at 4451:Hello Jayjg. Thank you for the translation. 1233:43,600 hits for "New anti-Semitism" lebanon 1045:Fair enough, thanks for the clarification. 960:of NPOV is rather clear about such issues. 3751:Hi Jay: Please take a look at the vote at 3465:Ben's "big three issues" with NAS article. 5552:User_talk:Netsnipe#Single_Purpose_Account 5336:Hi Jay, see my response on my talk page. 3532:You comment was very useful. Now I check 3515:(I even know the acronym ) on August 31, 3401:kerfuffle. I've applied for arbitration 3060:translate/transliterate, successively to: 3050:Protocoly sobran??ii S?ionskikh mudretsov 1073:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2977086.stm 5845:contact the Mediation Committee directly 5741:which he did not. See the discussion at 4418:, I wanted to let you know there's also 3773:. See my comments there please. Thanks. 3159:Accordingly, it appears that the longer 2394:article the second it got unprotected. — 5039:Elsewhere, either format is acceptable. 4063:Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 3174:while the shorter title comes from the 2711:for the incredible photo to the right.) 2538:Knowledge:Central discussions/Apartheid 14: 5980:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg 5580:Thank you. I replied on my talk page. 4202:toleration in Muslim lands). Thanks -- 4197:I want to file an RfC request for the 365:could be discouraged from editing the 82:Knowledge:Requests for comment/SlimJay 6300:Hi Jay: Came across this non-article 6184:whites. For example: See the article 5353:blocked users are not allowed to edit 5284:didn't know how to do that.. thanks! 638:Also, Wik is being disruptive again: 5953:Hi Jay: Please provide your view at 5537:Please do not ignore the facts that 5494:htlp:tiraspoltimes.com/aboutus.html 5022:changing the dating style is not OK. 4713:Talk:Barry Gurary#Dispute of content 3650:Looks like we simultaneously edited 3525:The reason is I wanted to become an 3219:Hi Jay: Take a look at this please: 3215:Articles for deletion/Jew Year's Eve 1761:. Would you mind giving an opinion? 1554:Talk:Examination of Holocaust denial 1361:BTW I have been meaning to tell you 317:or another user. See the history of 27:Could you protect Tay-Sachs Disease? 4520:Thanks, he's been pretty active on 4395:Hi. An editor's put the article on 3553:Anyway, I imagine your quite bussy. 3423:Knowledge talk:No original research 3416:Knowledge talk:No original research 23: 6025:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Judaism 5631:Thank you for participating in my 5068:You might like to go and harangue 2143:Translation from English imperfect 446:from editing articles about their 396:could be discouraged from editing 379:could be discouraged from editing 120: 24: 6375: 6304:which should be deleted. Thanks. 5935:Thank you for your help with the 5729:Hi Jay: Someone has repasted the 5228:And he ate the last twinkie too. 3501:History of the "Protocols of Zion 2934:Protocols of the wise men of Zion 2484:Your IP address is 64.233.172.34. 1700:Israel lobby in the United States 880:made up the quote. It says that 6321: 6265:violation on Jizya article. --- 6261:, I am now going to report your 5762: 5624: 5312:History of the Jews in Lithuania 4830:User_talk:Lordkazan#Jake_and_SPA 4429: 4318:Step 1: stop evading your block. 4268:Hi Jay - can you have a look at 3631:report about this behavior here 3561:I'd like to make the hit on the 2734: 2668: 2326:Check the edit histories of the 2068: 1723:know what you are talking about. 1642: 929:Request for arbitration and help 6344:if you need any assistance. :) 5635:, which passed with a tally of 5620: 5531:good reason for unblocking the 5491:You can confrim my identity at 4813:I tagged a user as a suspected 4579:Revert Libel, Reprobate sources 4127:Hi, I've sent you an e-mail. -- 4109:Thank you for participating in 4057:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 3154:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 3144:Protokoly sionskikh mudret?s?ov 2921:(or perhaps neither). Thanks. — 2663: 2030:Oh, did you ever do a check on 1708:Arab lobby in the United States 1256:this editorial from Albuquerque 665:. It almost makes me hungry! 5289:20:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 5279:20:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC) 5255:20:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5242:19:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5233:17:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5223:17:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5210:17:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5186:16:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5160:08:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5142:02:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5123:19:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 5110:21:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5095:21:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5077:21:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5063:21:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5046:21:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5028:20:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 5004:20:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 4974:16:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 4963:explained to you quite clearly 4949:00:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 4915:17:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4896:13:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 4879:15:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4859:15:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4837:15:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4823:14:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4778:03:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 4752:15:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 4720:03:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 4694:02:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 4683:01:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 4661:18:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 4650:17:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 4632:15:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 4623:and copyright violations from 4612:22:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4587:14:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 4559:User with a small edit history 4538:23:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 4515:23:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 4460:17:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4442:15:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4405:09:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 4385:01:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4373:23:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 4336:16:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4326:15:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4314:14:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 4300:09:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 4289:20:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC) 4258:02:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 4232:10:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC) 4207:23:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 4187:20:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 4176:19:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 4158:18:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 4142:15:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 4132:21:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 4118:04:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 4075:Protocols of the Sages of Zion 3980:20:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3970:18:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3947:17:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3929:17:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3898:02:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3889:02:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3874:02:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3864:02:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3854:00:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3836:21:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 3810:17:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 3796:18:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 3778:14:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 3760:12:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 3742:16:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3723:01:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 3711:00:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3678:22:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3669:22:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3659:22:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3639:04:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3614:03:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC) 3539:However, maybe tomorrow I buy 3511:I'm a novice--having become a 3494:21:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC) 2827:Your help would be appreciated 2140:Many articles would have to go 1978:Special:Contributions/Djavakhi 1585:02:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1575:20:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 1085:Thanks for the clarification. 734:Range blocks vs. Zephram Stark 547:Hi Jayjg. Here's the request: 371:Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama 286:Also note his recent activity 13: 1: 5197:You have now violated 3RR on 4465:Yet another Bonaparte comment 3460:23:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 3442:05:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 3409:02:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 3381:19:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3352:19:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3326:18:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3294:21:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3273:20:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3259:19:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3246:18:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3228:17:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3201:01:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2928:23:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 2894:14:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 2877:18:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 2862:09:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2840:03:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2818:21:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2792:20:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2758:20:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2727:01:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2657:Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from 2651:06:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 2631:23:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 2565:20:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 2522:14:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 2495:02:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 2465:19:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2456:19:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2442:03:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2420:05:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2401:03:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2317:01:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2268:05:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC) 2157:So says the Russian 'crat. - 1139:Thanks a lot! BTW, the users 661:I like the way you played up 313:could have also been used by 6365:16:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 6309:12:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 6270:12:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 6241:07:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 6204:16:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6194:15:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6167:15:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6150:15:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6133:15:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6123:15:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6109:13:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 6074:20:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 6036:10:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 5988:04:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 5962:03:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 5944:01:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 5910:16:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 5892:13:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 5875:05:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 5854: 5797:For the Mediation Committee, 5750:05:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 5720:19:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 5657:Jimsurge74's unblock request 5594:20:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 5585:07:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC) 5576:20:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 5550:through that account! - see 3845:(spurious warnings removed) 3783:More Conspiracy Theory Afd's 3393:Perhaps I'm being a bit too 2112:Among the oppose arguments: 1556:, has gotten very active on 1552:, he of the long screeds on 464:from editing articles about 7: 5710:15:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 5649:15:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC) 5612:21:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 5567:11:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC) 5520:15:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 5476:11:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 5455:02:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 5437:22:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 5408:17:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC) 5374:18:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC) 5360:12:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 5341:11:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC) 5331:06:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 5303:. I am requesting that the 4321:There really is no step 2. 3884:, and I say they aren't. -- 3801:over 5 million in holocaust 3536:to see how many hits I get. 3125:which is 64 pages in length 2460:not me, though i know them 2299:10:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2255:01:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2221:00:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2191:00:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2173:20:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2088:14:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2051:23:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2018:23:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 2003:23:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1991:18:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1967:18:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1949:17:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1913:03:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1895:22:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1863:20:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1838:23:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1819:23:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1804:23:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1792:18:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1773:Bonaparte again (and again) 1768:07:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1732:05:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1715:04:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1689:04:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1662:12:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1649:Thank you for voting on my 1630:18:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1612:10:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1565:07:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1539:08:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1521:06:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1501:21:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1489:21:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1382:03:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1356:03:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 1324:22:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1315:22:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1305:22:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1291:20:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1280:17:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1263:20:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1222:09:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1197:08:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1192:... Try to look surprised. 1179:08:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 1158:20:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1131:20:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1111:20:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1090:19:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1080:19:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1059:16:56, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1041:16:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1027:16:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1003:16:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 986:16:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 974:16:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 946:16:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 924:09:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 900:19:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 889:03:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 867:23:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 849:23:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 830:22:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 805:Mistaken case of harassment 800:14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 785:11:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 775:07:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 757:03:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 728:19:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 713:18:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 700:03:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 673:01:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 649:01:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 633:23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 613:20:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 597:22:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 537:15:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 510:15:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 342:Editing your guru's article 328:04:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 301:07:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 281:04:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 246:23:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 228:02:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 186:16:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 173:Please add your support to 161:20:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 151:19:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 141:19:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 106:19:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 89:14:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 70:21:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 59:09:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 45:06:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 6380: 5835:This message delivered by 5413:Also please do a check on 5384:Hi, can you do a check on 4555:Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox 4545:Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox 4223:promotion (see some diffs 3747:IDF and Military of Israel 3686:Guess who (might be) back? 2731: 2116:What is a reliable source? 1270:Israel-Venezuela relations 587:) 15:24, August 20, 2006. 466:Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi 456:Menachem Mendel Schneerson 5957:. Good Mo'ed. Thank you. 5739:Knowledge:Deletion review 5467:Hi Jay: Did this "Rabbi" 5365:Please see my posting on 5181:Your thoughts? Thanks. 4227:). Thanks. All the best, 3765:Jewish vs. Judeo renaming 2885:Wondering if you could... 2304:Concern addressed at J4J? 2128:Against bureaucracy on WP 2097:WP:V not passed on ruwiki 1250:plus this article in the 1237:this one from Finkelstein 663:crisp meaningful sentence 309:Thanks, I might add that 6047:Knowledge:Non-notability 5924:article itself. Thanks. 5320:Category:Lithuanian Jews 5214:Please see your email. 4563:Delete false information 3791:if you are interested. 3789:User:GabrielF/911TMCruft 3167:derives from the longer 2965:It is also the earliest 2200:Could you do a check on 1777:Could you do a check on 1369:Bullying or Stubbornness 1347:of an article violating 622:Could you do a check on 554:has been filed with the 6259:WP:AE#User:Irishpunktom 6145:very tough there. --- 5725:Michael Laitman is back 5527:user:Subversive_element 5316:Category:Jewish history 5169:You semi-protected the 4920:Let's make a date, mate 4786:Request for Arbitration 3128:--apparently a pamphlet 3116:On the other hand, the 2958:is the one used by the 2945:I propose changing the 2686:infinite monkey theorem 2588:) created the accounts 2226:external links question 1973:Another Bonaparte sock? 350:Knowledge:Autobiography 76:RfC filed "against" you 6336:with a final tally of 6287:01:44, 16 October 2006 6283:13:33, 16 October 2006 6279:17:10, 16 October 2006 6275:02:54, 17 October 2006 4625:Holocaust denial sites 3489:What do you think? -- 2899:Is this Bonny? (again) 2767:Can you do a check on 2749:Hi! I've requested an 2150:Despite the fact that 2119:Project will slow down 2102:Results: Passage fails 1980:. Compare this guy to 1704:Jewish Virtual Library 1621:I mentioned your name 1166:Crazy Security Problem 813:some comments made by 680:User:Jethro B Cornhusk 319:ShivLing of Makkeshwar 125: 6186:The Quran and science 5863:Knowledge:Attribution 5773:Request for Mediation 5755:Request for Mediation 5504:User talk:Tit for tat 5324:User:Goodoldpolonius2 5147:Engage (organization) 4828:I added a comment on 4725:Xosa = Zephram Stark? 4397:Iman Darweesh Al Hams 4092:The International Jew 4087:Cause of World Unrest 3882:if they are warranted 3716:Ok, thanks anyways. — 3605:Cesare G. De Michelis 3541:Knowledge for DUMMIES 3120:owns an undated text, 3024:Zapiski pravoslavnago 2855:Jewish Studies School 2500:Kitoba External Links 2108:2/3 threshold not met 1932:was not renamed into 1751:Anti-Muslim sentiment 1617:Courtesy notification 1246:The New Anti-Semetism 575:comment was added by 552:request for mediation 124: 5743:Talk:Michael Laitman 5463:Verifying a meshumad 5318:. There is indeed a 5085:User talk:SuperJumbo 5054:User talk:SuperJumbo 5014:User talk:SuperJumbo 4957:User talk:SuperJumbo 4699:Barry Gurary article 3824:this is messedrocker 2980:currently used by WP 2833:Battle of Bint Jbeil 2636:The edit history of 2574:Today it seems that 2570:This is really weird 2426:My block of Netscott 1934:Deir Yassin incident 1930:Deir Yassin massacre 1926:1929 Palestine riots 1919:1929 Palestine riots 1530:to get your kicks in 791:Time sensitive email 725:Georgewilliamherbert 697:Georgewilliamherbert 5841:Mediation Committee 5090:ArbCom precedents. 4487:'s talk page? Also 4307:user_talk:lordkazan 4148:Allegations in Cuba 3962:Talk:Einsatzgruppen 3430:Knowledge:concensus 3171:version of the text 3118:Library of Congress 2960:Library of Congress 2954:The above proposed 2949:of this WP article. 1558:Talk:Einsatzgruppen 1100:He's attacking the 564:Knowledge:Mediation 556:Mediation Committee 208:) is Zephram. See 6228:You have violated 5915:Request to discuss 5848: 5591:Subversive element 5582:Subversive element 5573:Subversive element 5564:Subversive element 5548:my sole wrongdoing 5469:Isaac Lichtenstein 5083:(copied over from 5052:(copied over from 5012:(copied over from 4955:(copied over from 4522:Economy of Romania 4505:). Thanks again. — 4274:User:87.78.178.102 4270:User:87.78.184.150 3912:rather bright and 3904:Gentle Rottweiller 3841:Maintenance notice 3620:RyanGerbil10 agian 2845:Jewish WIKIVERSITY 2240:which he links to 1928:myself. Note that 1698:That article, the 1009:Policy discussions 311:one of the proxies 126: 50:Talk: Circumcision 6348: 6347: 6096:User:Bayle Shanks 5853: 5852: 5849: 5834: 5812: 5708: 5654: 5653: 5273:User:Supreme_Cmdr 4776: 4621:original research 4051:Protocols of Zion 4000:Protocols of Zion 3793:Morton devonshire 3600:Victor E. Marsden 3474:Neutering critics 3451:You ever hear of 3399:New anti-Semitism 3135:Russian language 3013:English language 2763:...and he's back! 2742: 2741: 2713: 2642:Avram Iancu, Alba 2622:Avram Iancu, Alba 2180:User:Ericsaindon2 2171: 2094: 2093: 1965: 1947: 1886: 1848:CheckUser backlog 1797:Thanks a bunch. — 1673: 1672: 1102:Moldovan language 1067:new anti-semitism 624:User:AdoniCtistai 588: 535: 508: 434:Pope_Benedict_XVI 432:from editing the 389:Guru Gobind Singh 226: 104: 38:Tay-Sachs Disease 6371: 6358: 6325: 6318: 6317: 6070: 6068: 6066: 6064: 6062: 6021: 6015: 5833: 5816: 5814: 5810: 5805: 5766: 5759: 5758: 5707: 5705: 5699: 5693: 5691: 5688: 5678: 5628: 5621: 5571:Please respond. 5533:user:tit_for_tat 5453: 5435: 5406: 5263:Need a checkuser 4865:User:Tit for tat 4766: 4598:Holocaust denier 4592:Robert Faurisson 4536: 4513: 4433: 4432: 4427: 4421: 4366:Ghassan Kanafani 3944: 3941: 3938: 3926: 3923: 3920: 3833: 3832: 3826: 3825: 3721: 3709: 3556:So to the point. 3370: 3341: 3315: 3131:--and bears the 2926: 2853:there is now a " 2849:Hi Jay: NEW: On 2816: 2790: 2738: 2724: 2719: 2705: 2672: 2664: 2649: 2629: 2616:), but based on 2470:Stop Blocking Me 2418: 2399: 2219: 2163: 2072: 2065: 2064: 2049: 2016: 2011:I knew it! :-) — 2001: 1989: 1959: 1941: 1893: 1884: 1860: 1836: 1817: 1802: 1790: 1646: 1639: 1638: 1515: 1499: 1487: 1191: 1156: 1129: 1109: 1054: 1022: 969: 920: 864: 858: 846: 840: 827: 821: 710: 647: 631: 570: 527: 500: 326: 299: 279: 222: 181:. Respectfully, 175:David Ben-Gurion 169:David Ben-Gurion 98: 6379: 6378: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6356: 6316: 6298: 6143:"conspicuously" 6116: 6106:KillerChihuahua 6099:User:Jon Awbrey 6092: 6060: 6058: 6056: 6054: 6052: 6043: 6019: 6013: 5995: 5969: 5951: 5933: 5917: 5899: 5897:Duplicated text 5882: 5866: 5859: 5808: 5801: 5799: 5757: 5731:Michael Laitman 5727: 5703: 5697: 5694: 5686: 5676: 5662: 5659: 5647: 5619: 5604: 5543:I did apologize 5506: 5500:PP.Mark Street 5483: 5465: 5446: 5428: 5399: 5382: 5349: 5347:Mediation Cabal 5308:Lithuanian Jews 5297: 5265: 5195: 5167: 5149: 5131: 5035:Manual of Style 4987:where he says: 4922: 4903: 4868: 4845: 4811: 4788: 4759: 4727: 4701: 4594: 4576: 4548: 4529: 4506: 4467: 4449: 4430: 4425: 4419: 4412: 4393: 4391:AfD of interest 4350: 4266: 4239:on-going debate 4216: 4195: 4165: 4150: 4125: 4107: 4003: 3987: 3958: 3942: 3939: 3936: 3924: 3921: 3918: 3906: 3843: 3830: 3829: 3823: 3822: 3817: 3803: 3785: 3767: 3749: 3731: 3717: 3705: 3688: 3648: 3622: 3505: 3467: 3449: 3419: 3391: 3379: 3368: 3350: 3339: 3324: 3313: 3304: 3235: 3217: 3156: 3146: 3104: 3052: 3026: 2937: 2922: 2901: 2887: 2869: 2847: 2829: 2812: 2786: 2765: 2747: 2720: 2715: 2673: 2662: 2645: 2625: 2572: 2531: 2502: 2472: 2449: 2428: 2414: 2395: 2324: 2306: 2276: 2238:Rushmore (film) 2228: 2215: 2198: 2183: 2125:Rule is obvious 2122:Malicious abuse 2099: 2063: 2045: 2012: 1997: 1985: 1975: 1922: 1902: 1881: 1870: 1858: 1850: 1832: 1813: 1798: 1786: 1775: 1742: 1696: 1678: 1637: 1619: 1593: 1547: 1513: 1509: 1495: 1483: 1389: 1273: 1204: 1189: 1187: 1168: 1152: 1125: 1105: 1098: 1096:Bonaparte again 1069: 1052: 1020: 1011: 967: 953: 931: 918: 910: 874: 862: 856: 844: 838: 825: 819: 807: 793: 764: 755: 736: 708: 683: 659: 643: 627: 620: 571:—The preceding 545: 430:Roman Catholics 338: 322: 315:User:BookwormUK 295: 275: 272:that other time 253: 235: 193: 171: 113: 78: 52: 29: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Jayjg 12: 11: 5: 6377: 6346: 6345: 6326: 6315: 6312: 6297: 6294: 6254: 6253: 6252: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6248: 6247: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6215: 6214: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6174: 6173: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6169: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6136: 6135: 6115: 6112: 6091: 6088: 6081: 6078: 6042: 6039: 6008:slippery slope 5994: 5991: 5968: 5965: 5950: 5947: 5932: 5929: 5916: 5913: 5907:EngineerScotty 5898: 5895: 5881: 5878: 5865: 5860: 5851: 5850: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5820: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5769: 5767: 5756: 5753: 5726: 5723: 5658: 5655: 5652: 5651: 5643: 5629: 5618: 5615: 5603: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5596: 5587: 5578: 5505: 5502: 5482: 5479: 5471:really exist? 5464: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5445:Wow, thanks! — 5440: 5439: 5381: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5348: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5296: 5295:Requested move 5293: 5292: 5291: 5264: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5235: 5194: 5189: 5166: 5163: 5148: 5145: 5130: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5112: 5080: 5079: 5049: 5048: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4921: 4918: 4902: 4899: 4889: 4888: 4867: 4862: 4844: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4810: 4807: 4787: 4784: 4782: 4758: 4755: 4726: 4723: 4700: 4697: 4688: 4617:User:Proskauer 4593: 4590: 4574: 4547: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4466: 4463: 4455: 4452: 4448: 4445: 4411: 4408: 4392: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4362:Rashid Khalidi 4349: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4319: 4265: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4250: 4249: 4244: 4243: 4215: 4210: 4194: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4164: 4161: 4149: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4124: 4121: 4106: 4105:Belated thanks 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4094: 4089: 4083: 4077: 4071: 4065: 4059: 4053: 4047: 4036: 4035: 4032:disambiguation 4027: 4026: 4008: 4007: 4002: 3997: 3986: 3983: 3957: 3956:is at it again 3951: 3950: 3949: 3905: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3891: 3857: 3856: 3842: 3839: 3816: 3813: 3802: 3799: 3784: 3781: 3766: 3763: 3748: 3745: 3730: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3704:)? Thanks... — 3687: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3647: 3642: 3621: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3609:and more. --- 3607: 3602: 3597: 3588: 3587: 3584: 3581: 3574: 3573: 3570: 3558: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3537: 3530: 3523: 3520: 3504: 3497: 3487: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3466: 3463: 3448: 3445: 3418: 3412: 3390: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3373: 3344: 3318: 3303: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3282: 3276: 3275: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3234: 3231: 3216: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3196:Yours truly, 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3180: 3179: 3172: 3164: 3163: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3129: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3113: 3112: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3039:transliterated 3019: 3007: 3006: 2984: 2981: 2974: 2963: 2951: 2950: 2942: 2941: 2936: 2931: 2917:) is Bonny or 2900: 2897: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2868: 2865: 2846: 2843: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2821: 2820: 2764: 2761: 2746: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2732: 2730: 2707:(Thanks go to 2674: 2667: 2661: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2571: 2568: 2530: 2525: 2501: 2498: 2471: 2468: 2448: 2445: 2427: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2378:82.208.233.123 2364:82.208.233.127 2323: 2322:Is this Bonny? 2320: 2305: 2302: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2227: 2224: 2197: 2194: 2182: 2176: 2148: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2098: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2073: 2062: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2006: 2005: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1921: 1916: 1901: 1898: 1869: 1866: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1807: 1806: 1774: 1771: 1757:; my proposal 1741: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1724: 1695: 1692: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1647: 1636: 1633: 1618: 1615: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1546: 1545:Einsatzgruppen 1543: 1542: 1541: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1462: 1461: 1445: 1429: 1413: 1388: 1385: 1359: 1358: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1231:. Google has 1203: 1200: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1134: 1133: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 988: 952: 949: 930: 927: 909: 904: 903: 902: 882:Strom Thurmond 878:Conde McGinley 873: 870: 852: 851: 815:User:Deuterium 806: 803: 792: 789: 788: 787: 763: 760: 751: 735: 732: 731: 730: 721: 716: 715: 682: 676: 658: 653: 652: 651: 619: 616: 601: 544: 541: 540: 539: 514: 472: 471: 468: 459: 441: 423: 422: 419: 400: 391: 385:Guru Nanak Dev 374: 355: 354: 337: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 304: 303: 252: 249: 234: 231: 192: 189: 170: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 112: 109: 77: 74: 73: 72: 51: 48: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6376: 6367: 6366: 6363: 6362: 6359: 6354: 6343: 6339: 6335: 6331: 6327: 6324: 6320: 6319: 6314:My RfA thanks 6311: 6310: 6307: 6303: 6293: 6292: 6288: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6272: 6271: 6268: 6264: 6260: 6242: 6239: 6235: 6231: 6227: 6226: 6225: 6224: 6223: 6222: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6216: 6205: 6202: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6192: 6187: 6182: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6177: 6176: 6175: 6168: 6165: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6151: 6148: 6144: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6134: 6131: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6124: 6121: 6111: 6110: 6107: 6102: 6100: 6097: 6087: 6085: 6079: 6076: 6075: 6072: 6071: 6048: 6038: 6037: 6034: 6030: 6026: 6018: 6010: 6009: 6003: 5998: 5990: 5989: 5986: 5981: 5977: 5972: 5964: 5963: 5960: 5956: 5949:Category vote 5946: 5945: 5942: 5938: 5931:Golan Heights 5928: 5927: 5922: 5912: 5911: 5908: 5903: 5894: 5893: 5890: 5885: 5884:Hello there. 5877: 5876: 5873: 5871: 5864: 5857: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5815: 5806: 5804: 5798: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5778: 5774: 5770: 5768: 5765: 5761: 5760: 5752: 5751: 5748: 5744: 5740: 5736: 5732: 5722: 5721: 5718: 5712: 5711: 5706: 5701: 5700: 5689: 5683: 5679: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5638: 5634: 5630: 5627: 5623: 5622: 5614: 5613: 5610: 5602:Martin Luther 5595: 5592: 5588: 5586: 5583: 5579: 5577: 5574: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5565: 5561: 5557: 5553: 5549: 5544: 5540: 5536: 5534: 5528: 5524: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5517: 5516: 5511: 5501: 5498: 5495: 5492: 5489: 5486: 5478: 5477: 5474: 5470: 5456: 5452: 5449: 5444: 5443: 5442: 5441: 5438: 5434: 5431: 5426: 5423: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5405: 5402: 5397: 5394: 5391: 5387: 5375: 5372: 5368: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5361: 5358: 5357:87.78.147.203 5354: 5342: 5339: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5306: 5302: 5290: 5287: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5277: 5274: 5270: 5269:User:JBKramer 5256: 5253: 5249: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5240: 5236: 5234: 5231: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5224: 5221: 5217: 5212: 5211: 5208: 5204: 5200: 5193: 5188: 5187: 5184: 5179: 5175: 5172: 5171:Sami Al-Arian 5165:Sami Al-Arian 5162: 5161: 5158: 5154: 5144: 5143: 5140: 5136: 5124: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5111: 5108: 5103: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5093: 5088: 5086: 5078: 5075: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5061: 5057: 5055: 5047: 5044: 5040: 5036: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5026: 5023: 5017: 5015: 5005: 5002: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4988: 4986: 4982: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4972: 4968: 4964: 4960: 4958: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4950: 4947: 4941: 4939: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4917: 4916: 4913: 4912:DavidMarciano 4909: 4898: 4897: 4894: 4893:87.78.182.130 4887: 4883: 4882: 4881: 4880: 4877: 4873: 4866: 4861: 4860: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4838: 4835: 4832:. Thank you. 4831: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4824: 4821: 4816: 4806: 4805: 4804:71.111.117.99 4799: 4795: 4791: 4790:Hello Jayjig 4783: 4780: 4779: 4774: 4770: 4765: 4754: 4753: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4739: 4736: 4732: 4722: 4721: 4718: 4714: 4711:article. See 4710: 4706: 4696: 4695: 4692: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4681: 4674: 4673: 4671: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4659: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4648: 4641: 4640: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4630: 4626: 4622: 4618: 4613: 4611: 4610:69.109.166.52 4606: 4604: 4599: 4589: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4572: 4568: 4567:REVERT LIES!! 4564: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4546: 4539: 4535: 4532: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4512: 4509: 4504: 4501: 4498: 4494: 4493:217.144.192.8 4490: 4486: 4482: 4479: 4476: 4472: 4462: 4461: 4458: 4447:Image license 4444: 4443: 4440: 4436: 4424: 4417: 4407: 4406: 4403: 4398: 4386: 4383: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4359: 4355: 4337: 4334: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4324: 4320: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4312: 4311:87.78.158.150 4308: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4298: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4259: 4256: 4252: 4251: 4246: 4245: 4240: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4230: 4226: 4222: 4214: 4209: 4208: 4205: 4200: 4188: 4185: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4174: 4170: 4160: 4159: 4156: 4143: 4140: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4130: 4120: 4119: 4116: 4112: 4095: 4093: 4090: 4088: 4084: 4082: 4078: 4076: 4072: 4070: 4066: 4064: 4060: 4058: 4054: 4052: 4048: 4046: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4033: 4030:I about this 4029: 4028: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4020: 4016: 4013: 4005: 4004: 4001: 3996: 3995: 3991: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3972: 3971: 3968: 3963: 3955: 3948: 3945: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3927: 3915: 3911: 3899: 3896: 3892: 3890: 3887: 3883: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3872: 3866: 3865: 3862: 3855: 3852: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3827: 3812: 3811: 3808: 3798: 3797: 3794: 3790: 3780: 3779: 3776: 3772: 3762: 3761: 3758: 3754: 3744: 3743: 3740: 3734: 3724: 3720: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3708: 3703: 3700: 3697: 3693: 3679: 3676: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3657: 3653: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3633: 3630: 3626: 3615: 3612: 3608: 3606: 3603: 3601: 3598: 3596: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3585: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3571: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3535: 3531: 3528: 3527:ENCYCLOPEDIST 3524: 3521: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3502: 3496: 3495: 3492: 3485: 3482: 3480: 3477: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3462: 3461: 3458: 3454: 3444: 3443: 3440: 3436: 3431: 3426: 3424: 3417: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3403: 3400: 3396: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3372: 3367: 3365: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3349: 3348: 3343: 3338: 3336: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3317: 3312: 3310: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3266: 3265: 3260: 3257: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3244: 3239: 3230: 3229: 3226: 3222: 3209: 3208: 3202: 3199: 3195: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3162: 3158: 3157: 3155: 3148: 3147: 3145: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3105: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3051: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3025: 3022: 3018: 3016: 3012: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2989: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2935: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2920: 2919:Constantzeanu 2916: 2913: 2910: 2906: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2875: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2834: 2824: 2819: 2815: 2810: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2784: 2783:Mircea Eliade 2780: 2777: 2774: 2770: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2751:Editor review 2745:Editor Review 2737: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2718: 2712: 2710: 2703: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2665: 2660: 2652: 2648: 2643: 2639: 2638:Poiana Braşov 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2584: 2581: 2577: 2567: 2566: 2563: 2560: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2524: 2523: 2520: 2516: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2497: 2496: 2493: 2487: 2486: 2482: 2479: 2475: 2467: 2466: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2454: 2444: 2443: 2440: 2436: 2435: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2408: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2392:Slovakization 2389: 2386: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2332:Árpád dynasty 2329: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2280: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2246: 2243: 2239: 2234: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2203: 2193: 2192: 2189: 2181: 2175: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2161: 2155: 2153: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2052: 2048: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1979: 1968: 1964: 1963: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1945: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1907: 1897: 1896: 1891: 1887: 1879: 1875: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1853: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1747: 1733: 1730: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1691: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1624: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1598: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1531: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1467: 1466:82.137.209.13 1459: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1448:81.213.98.179 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416:81.213.96.251 1414: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1394: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1364: 1357: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1271: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1247: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1199: 1198: 1195: 1180: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1116:Also see the 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1018: 1004: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 987: 984: 982: 978: 977: 976: 975: 972: 970: 965: 959: 951:I'm surprised 948: 947: 944: 943:MathStatWoman 940: 937: 934: 926: 925: 922: 917: 916: 908: 901: 898: 893: 892: 891: 890: 887: 883: 879: 869: 868: 865: 859: 850: 847: 841: 834: 833: 832: 831: 828: 822: 816: 812: 802: 801: 798: 786: 783: 779: 778: 777: 776: 773: 768: 759: 758: 754: 749: 745: 741: 729: 726: 722: 718: 717: 714: 711: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 693: 690: 687: 681: 675: 674: 671: 668: 664: 657: 650: 646: 641: 637: 636: 635: 634: 630: 625: 615: 614: 611: 605: 604: 599: 598: 595: 589: 586: 582: 578: 574: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 548: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 517: 516: 515: 512: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 493: 489: 485: 480: 476: 469: 467: 463: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 444:Orthodox Jews 442: 439: 435: 431: 428: 427: 426: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 402:Followers of 401: 399: 395: 392: 390: 386: 382: 378: 375: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 353: 351: 346: 345: 344: 343: 329: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 298: 293: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 278: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 248: 247: 244: 240: 230: 229: 225: 221: 220: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 197: 188: 187: 184: 183:Republitarian 180: 176: 162: 159: 154: 153: 152: 149: 145: 144: 143: 142: 139: 135: 131: 123: 119: 117: 108: 107: 103: 102: 96: 91: 90: 87: 83: 71: 68: 63: 62: 61: 60: 57: 47: 46: 43: 39: 33: 19: 6351: 6349: 6337: 6333: 6299: 6256: 6255: 6142: 6117: 6103: 6093: 6080: 6077: 6051: 6044: 6005: 5999: 5996: 5985:Uncle Bungle 5976:Anti-Zionism 5973: 5970: 5967:Anti-Zionism 5952: 5934: 5918: 5904: 5900: 5886: 5883: 5867: 5855: 5837:MediationBot 5802: 5796: 5728: 5713: 5696: 5660: 5636: 5605: 5559: 5555: 5547: 5542: 5538: 5530: 5514: 5507: 5499: 5496: 5493: 5490: 5487: 5484: 5466: 5421: 5392: 5383: 5371:87.78.158.52 5352: 5350: 5310:be moved to 5304: 5300: 5298: 5266: 5213: 5196: 5180: 5176: 5168: 5150: 5132: 5082: 5081: 5051: 5050: 5038: 5020: 5011: 5010: 4990: 4966: 4961:As has been 4954: 4942: 4923: 4904: 4890: 4869: 4852:Slrubenstein 4846: 4812: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4789: 4781: 4760: 4737: 4728: 4709:Barry Gurary 4704: 4702: 4687: 4676: 4675: 4666: 4665: 4655: 4654: 4643: 4642: 4637: 4636: 4614: 4608: 4607: 4597: 4595: 4583:Irishpunktom 4578: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4549: 4499: 4477: 4468: 4450: 4434: 4413: 4394: 4351: 4333:87.78.186.67 4282:User:Dabljuh 4267: 4217: 4199:Yellow badge 4196: 4166: 4163:Hagiographer 4151: 4126: 4108: 4081:Jewish Peril 4009: 3988: 3973: 3967:Ergative rlt 3959: 3913: 3909: 3907: 3881: 3871:SighSighSigh 3867: 3858: 3844: 3818: 3804: 3786: 3768: 3750: 3735: 3733:Dear Jayjg, 3732: 3698: 3689: 3649: 3623: 3595:Sultan Catto 3589: 3575: 3543:--if such a 3529:immediately. 3506: 3488: 3468: 3450: 3427: 3420: 3406:Tony Sidaway 3394: 3392: 3374: 3371: 3363: 3357: 3345: 3342: 3334: 3319: 3316: 3308: 3305: 3286: 3240: 3236: 3218: 3169:Sergei Nilus 3153: 3143: 3049: 3023: 3020: 3008: 2999:Sergei Nilus 2911: 2902: 2891:Magic Window 2888: 2880: 2870: 2848: 2830: 2822: 2805: 2775: 2766: 2755:Shirahadasha 2748: 2721: 2716: 2706: 2704: 2699: 2689: 2618:this comment 2610: 2596: 2582: 2573: 2556: 2548: 2535: 2532: 2517: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2503: 2488: 2485: 2483: 2477: 2476: 2473: 2459: 2450: 2432: 2429: 2409:may also be 2384: 2370: 2356: 2350:AttilaThe... 2342: 2325: 2307: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2284:link things 2281: 2277: 2229: 2208: 2199: 2188:Ericsaindon2 2184: 2160:CrazyRussian 2158: 2156: 2151: 2149: 2111: 2080: 2038: 2032:AdoniCtistai 1976: 1960: 1942: 1923: 1903: 1871: 1854: 1851: 1785:seriously? — 1776: 1746:Islamophobia 1743: 1697: 1679: 1654: 1620: 1603: 1601: 1594: 1568: 1562:Ergative rlt 1548: 1529: 1510: 1472: 1463: 1454: 1438: 1432:85.100.89.40 1422: 1406: 1400:85.97.21.168 1390: 1376: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1360: 1344: 1336: 1334: 1274: 1252:Jewish press 1245: 1228: 1209: 1205: 1188: 1169: 1099: 1070: 1046: 1033: 1014: 1012: 995: 991: 961: 958:This section 954: 941: 938: 935: 932: 914: 911: 875: 853: 808: 794: 769: 765: 738:I started a 737: 695:Thank you. 694: 691: 688: 684: 662: 660: 621: 606: 600: 594:201.53.27.33 590: 567: 549: 546: 513: 496: 481: 477: 473: 424: 356: 347: 339: 257: 254: 236: 233:Vote for me! 217: 202: 196:Carla Pehlke 194: 172: 127: 114: 99: 92: 79: 53: 34: 30: 6114:Minor edits 5921:Talk:Israel 5889:Bertilvidet 5589:And again. 5481:Mark Street 4981:discussion 4924:Looking at 4884:Read this: 4834:Tit for tat 4820:Tit for tat 4764:Josiah Rowe 4757:Cretanpride 4605:talk page: 4528:lately... — 4471:80.48.192.6 4454:articles... 4368:and more . 4255:Alecmconroy 4184:Thatcher131 4173:Thatcher131 3954:User:Nazrac 3652:Rudolf Vrba 3645:Rudolf Vrba 3491:Ben Houston 3414:Changes to 3389:Arbitration 3291:Ben Houston 3270:Ben Houston 3256:Ben Houston 3243:Ben Houston 3223:. Be well. 2874:Ben Houston 2851:Wikiversity 2799:Moldoveanul 2684:). I guess 2640:, and then 2576:Ianosistvan 2492:Weekeejames 2233:User:Kitoba 2214:) please? — 1910:Ben Houston 1729:Ben Houston 1712:Ben Houston 1694:OR article? 1684:talk page? 1124:articles. — 907:Lutheranism 336:ArbCom case 264:Economistul 255:Hey Jayjg, 243:Lindsay1980 6104:-thanks - 6004:) because 5971:Hi Jayjg, 5941:Viewfinder 5880:disclaimer 5870:SlimVirgin 5745:. Thanks. 5717:Jimsurge74 5682:block user 5677:page moves 5664:Jimsurge74 5485:Dear Sir 5301:Shavua Tov 5155:. Thanks. 5102:asked Raul 4872:User:Jakew 4749:Scobell302 4715:. Thanks. 4670:Mark Weber 4439:Kevin_b_er 4423:Thrown out 4410:Thrown out 4402:Hornplease 4264:Your view? 4242:reference? 4221:hate sites 4213:Stormfront 4015:plagiarism 3507:Dear Jay, 3453:Gesher tov 3447:Gesher tov 3233:Brian Klug 3082:convention 2659:Alphachimp 2504:Hi Jayjg, 2334:articles. 2061:RfA thanks 1982:Georgianis 1852:Hi there, 1763:SlimVirgin 1659:NawlinWiki 1373:vandalism. 981:SlimVirgin 872:Rabinovich 740:discussion 452:Habbadniks 367:Dalai_lama 260:Georgianis 239:Vote here! 216:edits. -- 115:Regarding 42:Metzenberg 6334:succeeded 5698:Netsnipe 5687:block log 5541:and that 5286:Lordkazan 5276:Lordkazan 5183:Jmcnamera 5070:Yossarian 4926:this diff 4876:Lordkazan 4745:this page 4691:Proskauer 4680:Proskauer 4647:Proskauer 4603:Faurisson 4489:this edit 4428:shown as 4323:Nandesuka 4045:Protocols 3563:Protocols 3513:Knowledge 3133:romanized 3074:gathering 3041:from the 3011:romanized 2769:Peter IBM 2692:talk page 2590:Titirenko 2439:rant-line 2274:Hey there 2196:Bonny Boy 2081:(62/18/3) 1956:Daniel575 1938:Daniel575 1779:Zhangshou 1582:Proskauer 1480:Romanians 1207:You asked 1118:Bucharest 709:Cowman109 678:Block of 525:≈ jossi ≈ 521:apostates 498:≈ jossi ≈ 470:and so on 421:and so on 394:Ravidasis 381:Ten Gurus 363:Buddhists 268:Latinitas 251:Bonaparte 214:Terrorism 210:This edit 158:Guettarda 134:edit wars 95:Daniel575 6332:, which 6017:merge to 5672:contribs 5425:contribs 5396:contribs 5299:Hi Jay: 5248:User:Zoe 5230:Wjhonson 5216:User:Zoe 5203:User:Zoe 5129:Sarfatti 4773:contribs 4741:contribs 4503:contribs 4481:contribs 4457:Alithien 4435:Rejected 4155:Zleitzen 4012:infamous 4010:of that 3739:Bellbird 3719:Khoikhoi 3707:Khoikhoi 3702:contribs 3611:Ludvikus 3457:jpgordon 3439:Pproctor 3395:previous 3198:Ludvikus 3178:version. 3176:G. Butmi 3102:wise man 3086:congress 3078:assembly 3066:protocol 3035:appendix 2995:appendix 2969:of this 2924:Khoikhoi 2915:contribs 2905:Jeorjika 2814:Khoikhoi 2809:contribs 2788:Khoikhoi 2779:contribs 2709:Blnguyen 2696:email me 2647:Khoikhoi 2627:Khoikhoi 2614:contribs 2600:contribs 2586:contribs 2552:contribs 2434:Blnguyen 2416:Khoikhoi 2397:Khoikhoi 2388:contribs 2374:contribs 2360:contribs 2346:contribs 2314:Abscissa 2296:juicifer 2262:bikeable 2249:bikeable 2217:Khoikhoi 2212:contribs 2047:Khoikhoi 2042:contribs 2014:Khoikhoi 1999:Khoikhoi 1987:Khoikhoi 1834:Khoikhoi 1815:Khoikhoi 1800:Khoikhoi 1788:Khoikhoi 1686:Wjhonson 1668:contribs 1655:(64/3/3) 1507:Dmcdevit 1497:Khoikhoi 1485:Khoikhoi 1476:contribs 1458:contribs 1442:contribs 1426:contribs 1410:contribs 1345:severity 1298:Talk-BLP 1154:Khoikhoi 1149:-Inanna- 1127:Khoikhoi 1107:Khoikhoi 1053:Netscott 1021:Netscott 968:Netscott 897:Wjhonson 886:Wjhonson 809:Hi, you 667:bikeable 645:Khoikhoi 629:Khoikhoi 610:Dasondas 585:contribs 573:unsigned 454:editing 440:articles 383:, from 373:articles 361:Tibetan 324:Khoikhoi 297:Khoikhoi 277:Khoikhoi 206:contribs 138:Paul Cyr 111:Civility 6342:message 6291:ابراهيم 6267:ابراهيم 6238:ابراهيم 6201:ابراهيم 6191:ابراهيم 6164:ابراهيم 6147:ابراهيم 6130:ابراهيم 6120:ابراهيم 6006:it's a 5735:WP:PROD 5609:Kaldari 5305:article 4901:Threats 4809:SPA tag 4707:in the 4619:, your 4526:Moldova 4485:MariusM 4382:Amoruso 4370:Amoruso 4348:Palmiro 4278:WP:NPOV 4019:forgery 3994:ceedjee 3985:Licence 3807:Amoruso 3547:exists. 3366:astique 3358:Idiotic 3337:astique 3311:astique 3070:meeting 3043:Russian 3033:of the 3017:reads: 2993:of the 2986:of the 2407:123uiop 2376:), and 2336:123uiop 2178:Hello, 2085:Guinnog 1874:WP:RFPP 1868:WP:RFPP 1740:Request 1597:Zionism 1379:Flanker 1363:WP:VAND 1353:Flanker 1202:Lebanon 1122:Romania 1087:JoshuaZ 1077:JoshuaZ 919:Wyneken 811:removed 797:JoshuaZ 744:WP:AN/I 484:WP:AUTO 450:(e.g. 404:Vedānta 177:on the 93:test -- 6338:75/0/1 6296:Delete 6263:WP:3RR 6230:WP:3RR 5937:WP:3RR 5926:Tiamut 5803:Essjay 5641:NCurse 5637:91/1/4 5617:My RfA 5510:Centrx 5252:(talk) 5239:Jayjg 5220:(talk) 5207:(talk) 5192:WP:ANI 5135:Calton 5092:Jayjg 5060:Jayjg 5037:says: 5025:Jayjg 4971:Jayjg 4908:WP:AGF 4658:Jayjg 4629:Jayjg 4123:E-mail 4111:my RfA 3977:Nazrac 3960:...on 3895:Jayjg 3886:tjstrf 3861:tjstrf 3851:tjstrf 3831:(talk) 3815:My RFA 3666:Jayjg 3636:Isarig 3629:WP:ANI 3567:hangon 3534:Google 3287:phobia 3009:whose 2837:Isarig 2682:WP:100 2602:) and 2519:Kitoba 2462:Jebus1 2453:Jebus1 2265:(talk) 2252:(talk) 2202:Aircea 1962:(talk) 1944:(talk) 1859:Palffy 1682:WP:NOR 1604:before 1572:Nazrac 1550:Nazrac 1349:WP:BLP 1260:Arktos 1219:Arktos 1145:Mizrak 1141:Kachik 1038:Jayjg 1000:Jayjg 670:(talk) 626:too? — 618:BTW... 492:WP:NPA 488:WP:AGF 448:rabbis 416:bhakti 412:tantra 398:Raidas 266:, and 224:(Talk) 219:JW1805 212:, and 148:Jayjg 101:(talk) 6234:Jizya 6053:: --> 5386:Henco 5380:Bonny 5120:Jumbo 5107:Jumbo 5074:Jumbo 5043:Jumbo 5001:Jumbo 4985:here, 4946:Jumbo 4843:Yeshu 4483:) to 4297:Jakew 4286:Jakew 4204:Aminz 4139:Telex 4129:Telex 4115:Robth 3914:could 3692:KYMYK 3675:Nfitz 3656:Nfitz 3565:...{{ 3545:title 3302:CIVIL 3161:title 3137:title 3109:title 3098:elder 3031:title 3015:title 2991:title 2978:title 2967:title 2956:title 2947:title 2797:Also 2722:Chimp 2717:alpha 2604:Yancu 2447:reply 2169:email 1904:See: 1676:Clean 1627:Sandy 1623:here. 1387:Stuff 1321:Sandy 1312:Sandy 1302:Sandy 1288:Sandy 1277:Sandy 1174:Wau! 863:plane 845:plane 826:plane 782:pertn 772:pertn 462:Sufis 438:Jesus 377:Sikhs 369:and 191:Stark 130:civil 67:bunix 56:bunix 16:< 6353:Core 6306:IZAK 6289:--- 6069:< 6033:IZAK 6027:and 5959:IZAK 5811:Talk 5747:IZAK 5668:talk 5645:work 5515:talk 5497:Des 5473:IZAK 5451:khoi 5448:Khoi 5433:khoi 5430:Khoi 5419:talk 5404:khoi 5401:Khoi 5398:)? — 5390:talk 5338:IZAK 5328:IZAK 5157:IZAK 5139:Talk 5116:here 4938:here 4934:here 4932:and 4930:here 4856:Talk 4769:talk 4735:talk 4731:Xosa 4717:IZAK 4569:", " 4565:", " 4557:. A 4534:khoi 4531:Khoi 4524:and 4511:khoi 4508:Khoi 4497:talk 4475:talk 4272:aka 4229:El_C 4225:here 4096:etc. 4085:The 4079:The 4073:The 4067:The 4061:The 4055:The 4049:The 4043:The 4017:and 3943:sch 3937:Jim 3925:sch 3919:Jim 3775:IZAK 3757:IZAK 3696:talk 3576:--- 3517:2006 3404:. -- 3376:voir 3347:voir 3321:voir 3225:IZAK 3094:sage 3092:(4) 3090:Zion 3088:(3) 3068:(2) 3064:(1) 3029:The 3003:book 2988:1905 2976:The 2971:text 2909:talk 2859:IZAK 2803:talk 2773:talk 2608:talk 2594:talk 2580:talk 2546:talk 2411:Juro 2382:talk 2368:talk 2354:talk 2340:talk 2330:and 2310:here 2242:here 2206:talk 2165:talk 2152:this 2044:)? — 2036:talk 1890:talk 1883:Mets 1878:this 1783:this 1759:here 1755:here 1665:talk 1536:El_C 1518:El_C 1470:talk 1452:talk 1436:talk 1420:talk 1404:talk 1212:Umm 1194:El_C 1176:El_C 1143:and 1120:and 1034:real 857:jaco 839:jaco 820:jaco 748:Demi 720:one. 581:talk 577:Vjam 490:and 414:and 408:yoga 292:here 290:and 288:here 200:talk 136:. 86:El_C 6357:des 6330:RfA 6302:חסד 6232:on 6094:Is 6090:JA? 5633:RfA 5415:РКП 4967:4th 4854:| 4815:spa 4551:Jay 4491:by 4356:], 4193:RfC 3787:At 3729:CfD 3045:is: 2997:of 2811:) — 2702:. 2700:you 2694:or 2678:RfA 2559:Mgm 2542:Zeq 2413:. — 2362:), 2348:), 2328:Bač 2077:RFA 1984:. — 1900:FYI 1885:501 1651:RFA 1635:RFA 1609:BYT 996:two 915:CTS 656:God 436:or 387:to 321:. — 294:. — 6361:at 6350:-- 6285:, 6281:, 6277:, 6101:? 6020:}} 6014:{{ 5905:-- 5779:. 5771:A 5704:► 5684:• 5680:• 5674:• 5670:• 5518:• 5369:. 5137:| 5105:-- 5087:): 5056:): 5016:): 4959:): 4944:-- 4940:. 4771:• 4747:. 4585:\ 4573:" 4426:}} 4420:{{ 4364:, 4360:, 4253:-- 4021:. 3940:62 3922:62 3910:is 3634:. 3569:}} 3100:, 3096:, 3084:, 3080:, 3076:, 3072:, 3037:, 3001:' 2557:- 2490:-- 2437:| 2090:} 1958:| 1940:| 1908:-- 1591:Hi 1337:is 1254:, 583:• 566:. 550:A 531:• 504:• 410:, 406:, 262:, 241:. 118:: 97:| 6067:t 6065:n 6063:a 6061:i 6059:d 6057:a 6055:R 5858:. 5847:. 5813:) 5809:( 5690:) 5666:( 5512:→ 5422:· 5417:( 5393:· 5388:( 5250:| 5218:| 5205:| 4775:) 4767:( 4738:· 4733:( 4615:: 4577:" 4500:· 4495:( 4478:· 4473:( 3820:— 3699:· 3694:( 3503:" 3499:" 3433:{ 3369:▼ 3364:B 3340:▼ 3335:B 3314:▼ 3309:B 3139:: 3111:. 3005:, 2973:. 2962:. 2912:· 2907:( 2806:· 2801:( 2776:· 2771:( 2611:· 2606:( 2597:· 2592:( 2583:· 2578:( 2561:| 2549:· 2544:( 2385:· 2380:( 2371:· 2366:( 2357:· 2352:( 2343:· 2338:( 2209:· 2204:( 2167:/ 2039:· 2034:( 1892:) 1888:( 1532:" 1473:· 1468:( 1460:) 1455:· 1450:( 1444:) 1439:· 1434:( 1428:) 1423:· 1418:( 1412:) 1407:· 1402:( 1248:" 1056:) 1049:→ 1047:( 1024:) 1017:→ 1015:( 971:) 964:→ 962:( 860:♫ 842:♫ 823:♫ 753:C 750:/ 642:— 579:( 533:@ 529:t 506:@ 502:t 458:) 203:· 198:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index