User talk:Jake Wartenberg/Archive 1

7601: 7057: 6521: 4669: 3726: 1783: 31: 6915: 158: 7972: 8381: 7778: 7362: 4911: 2818: 374: 5309: 7731: 7830: 7943: 5867:, you may wish to double check WP:TRIVIA, Whilst i am aware that this is contentious policy (I am editing logged out from my user account, as I mainly work on technical articles), lists of trivia such as references to indiana jones, a comedian's stand up routine and a probably fictional japanese dish, are not adding to the article in any way, and are trivia that cannot be integrated into the article in a meaningful manner. 1761: 7413: 2981: 6225: 5365: 4180: 2719: 2345: 7281: 5283: 4581: 5839: 3615: 3217: 5163: 2079: 1974: 1913: 1714: 1535: 5258: 4404: 1820: 8406: 2161: 4544: 3659: 3279: 5619:"The suppression of economic freedom must lead to the disappearance of political freedom. We oppose such suppression, whether brought about by State ownership or control or by private monopolies, cartels and trusts. We admit State ownership only for those undertakings which are beyond the scope of private enterprise or in which competition no longer plays its part" 3245: 5078: 4953: 5936:

My post regarding Malphas constitutes vandalism you say? Your words constitute discrimination. In what way is the truth "vandalism"? Nothing i said was in discrimination of anything, or in any way offensive to anyone. I am simply putting out the truth for people to see. Is this what you are afraid of

5783:

I always go back and check my edits, but this time I guess the "bot" caught it before I did. Not a newbie but by no means a Wiki expert, I get a little annoyed when I get the "dummy" treatment: use the sandbox, etc. But certainly not your fault! (And yes I do use "preview" before "save", but everyone

3591:

I wasn't vandalizing the Skiing page. There is a great deal of duplicated information in the "types of skiing" section that should be moved to the appropriate pages, then linked back. That's what I was doing. I also removed some ridiculous inaccuracies, like the bit about backcountry skiers primarily

3306:

My deletion of the redirect for AM Radio (band) is because the redirect does not have anything to do with the music group AM Radio. I also deleted the link from the main AM radio article. I think the optimal thing would be to make a disambiguation page with the main meaning, the Everclear song, and

2054:

Thank you; reading the original Defence mechanism (biology) article has satisfied me that there is nothing more there which deserves rescuing. I think the plan of producing an over-arching article on defence mechanisms (which is needed) will have to wait untill someone has time to do it. The old talk

5122:

I object to the reference of WJLA-TV as a "Gotcha" journalism group. WJLA has no association with the referred to defamation lawsuit referred that was filed, and then withdrawn, in 1994. That is a slanderous allegation against WJLA-TV which is a respected news organization in Washington DC. Where

5018:

Thank you for speaking up. I am involved in an editing war. I am a former professional colleague of Roberta Baskin and someone is out to trash her. This is particularly serious as she is job searching and the wikipedia entry that is being posted is inflammatory. This other person does not listen

322:

Dear Jake, Are you reverting the 2 paragraphs in question (Re: Save Mart Supermarkets), because you are trying to retain the integrity of the Knowledge content? This content is incorrect and goes so far as to be slanderous. It has been continually added/reverted by someone that is not identifying

5779:

Hiya! Just wanted to let you know that the "Blanked the page" edit I recently made was an unintentional error on my part. I only meant to delete my comments which had become irrelevant after I made a minor edit to the article; I didn't mean to delete the headers/tags. (Of course that's what you get

3489:

It is highly recommended that you do not edit articles in which you have conflict of interest. But if you see material of a promotional nature, please let me or someone else know, so that it can be removed. The correct response is not to try to "balance out" with more promotional material. Thank

958:

Sorry about the YouTube - I plead ignorance. However, if you view "The Money or the Gun Open Titles" on YouTube and check me out on IMD, you will see that I am the accredited film editor on this series, so I know what I'm talking about. Please reinstate my accurate revisions to The Money or the Gun

3542:

Sure - in the Carbon Footprint definition there is a section covering Carbon Labelling. Currently there are two major not-for-profits working on carbon labelling globally, The Carbon Trust and CarbonCounted. We are not competitors and are both working to enable carbon labelling. However, if you

7671: 5900:

I believe that essay is about articles that are about popular culture, and not articles that are about physical phenomena, and as such does not apply directly in this situation. An article entitled "Bird strikes in popular culture" would surely fail notability. I still hold with my first comment.

4879:

Mozart Bass Arias Conal Coad, Gary Karr, Tasmanian Symphony conductor Dobbs Franks ABC Classics (PolyGram Classics)432697-2 Rita Hunter Ritorna Vincitor, Tasmanian Symphony conductor Dobbs Franks ABC Classics (PolyGram) 426804-2 La Boheme the Ballet, West Australian Symphony Orchestra conductor

4369:

I did not by any means intend to add any unconstructive editing on the NFD page, I know the NFD band members personally and just noticed that it says "for live gigs we bring in Steve Carey" yet Steve who is a friend of mine still, left the band last year so i thought to just update it to the new

2895:

Dude: I am not vandalizing the article. The FURTHER READING list has NOTHING to do with the enzyme, save the last three book references. My name is Steve Presnell and I have written a good section of the vit K article and I wrote the Vit K carboxylase article years ago. Please delete the URTHER

2450:

Such as? I would like you and me to agree upon this conflict between Greater and Metro Vancouver Personally , I would go with both because the district still uses Greater Vancouver in the water and plumage systems ; Environment Canada still uses Greater Vancouver in Watches and Warnings, etc. I

5652:

Hi Jake. I disagree that my edit to the polygamy article was unconstructive. I deleted that section, because if you read it, it is basically a section listing several polygamists who have been arrested for sex with a minor. It has zero to do with polygamy in the US, which is the subject of the

1423:

These links are for the public to gain knowledge into the most recent findings regarding the Jimmy Hoffa case. I believe it is unfair for Stephen J. Anderson to delete information that serves the public's quest for the truth about this case. Any help you can provide in this matter would be

6431: 4125:

Hi. You have changed my correction stating the reason that it was not neutral. However, the PKK is recognized as a terrorist organisation by the USA and the EU. It still kills civilians with bombs in city centres. This is not a matter of neutrality but referring to the truth. sincerely

5529:

hello you have taken away my comments on social liberalism as you deem them unconstructive I think I have raised some very valid points that are clearly articulated, I will post them below and unless you can explain what you think is wrong with them I think its unfair you delete them

2007:

may have been responsible. I don't think we have a consensus on this action, and in any event the Defence mechanism article (& its talk page) had some valuable content which should not be discarded. Therefore, I'm hoping you will look at the situation and take appropriate action.

1649:

I did not commit vandalism. Vandalism is more akin to say deleting the whole page entirely or inserting random nonsense. Secondly, forums are not a source and so the section I've deleted is eligible for expunging since its backing is grounded in a forum but not any reputable sources.

6313:

article is full of junk. For example I do not believe that their national anthem mentions David Hasselhoff. Also Masal Bugduv is a hoax / fictional footballer. My guess is that everything after the first sentence can be deleted. What would be an appropriate warning to place at the

2446:

I am very sorry to this result. However, I have just made an account on Knowledge-- and are not that familiar with these sort of guidelines (Yes, I have read the beginners section) I am shocked by your warnings towards me; even though I have presented thus, evidence of the truth.

6429:

I think that we should run your story on mobile browsing (it's awesome, by the way). We can use this week's BRION report draft as the starting point for next week. I am not a great copy editor, so I hope that X! can put the final touches on it. Also, any feedback or help

6888:. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. 5604:

There is absolutely no mention here of how this movement fits in with the Liberal International or the Oxford Manifesto. Certainly the opposition of social liberals to free trade would be add odds with both the liberal manifesto of 1948 and the liberal international.

2845:

I made an edit on the PA page while not logged on, you reverted the edit claiming it was vandalism, that took time for me to right and I logged on and was about to start adding references. Please read and evaluate whether or not is vandalism. Best KermitCrack

6493:

for the strong work on the Flagged Revisions story. One thing that helps make writing, and reading, major stories easier (and makes collaboration a lot easier) is to break the story into well-defined sections. Just something to keep in mind for next time.

5973:

Am I missing some long term harassment or something? I'm not sure why you're reverting this user's comments and leaving templated vandalism warnings. I don't think the Malphas edits were all that useful, but they don't appear to have been vandalism either.

1702:; indeed it doesn't even fit our afd requirements. One reason not to template regulars is that we do know the policies, and I would not create a stub if I did not feel it fitted with what is wanted in terms of new stubs, so thanks for your reverts. Thanks, 1697:

is always a good idea. I see you do good work speedying, and thanks for recognising that my sneeze-sex syndrome article unquestionably does not fit our speedy policy, having an impeccable secondary source that refs a primary source from the prestigious

3329:

Yep. It is necessary that you leave an edit summary, so people know what it going on. Once you did, I saw my mistake, and nominated the page for deletion (not the same thing as a blank page). I have removed the warning from your talk page. Cheers,

8348:

Ha! I had just looked, and was thinking "Aw crap, we already covered that!" I have no problem canning those entries. If you want, you can list some discussions you think we should cover, and I will read them and write the entries. Thanks, —

2401:

The song "Hush" was not "written" by Deep Purple. In fact, they are the second artist to record a cover of that song! (The first one was Billy Joe Royal) The song was written by Joe South. Check out the article under his name and you'll see.

3460:

Yes, but Carbon Trust likely posted their own promotional details as well. Perhaps theirs should be deleted? Neither company is making any money from their efforts, so I think they should both be there in the definition of a carbon label.

4880:

Dobbs Franks ABC Classics 476 199-9 David Joseph selected works volume 1 Adelaide Symphony Orchestra, conductor Dobbs Franks MOVE MD3301 Bruce Cale orchestral works, Tasmanian Symphony Orchestra, conductor Dobbs Franks Tall Poppies TP188

5595:

His "Principles of Political Economy" is the definitive text on classical economics. This is a man who considered progressive taxation slightly immoral. Even Adam Smith the exalted high guru of capitalism supported progressive taxation.

1362:

I feel angry about your intervention. If you had waited a couple of minutes you would have seen that I was constructively creating an archive 3 which you have now disrupted. So I'll try again. Please desist from disrupting my editing.

2741:

The statements I have added to the criticism section on the Robert Beckford page are to balance fair and reasonable. No academic criticism hads been cited and no vandalism has been commited. Please stop harrassing fellow wikipedians

6450:

I made a few minor edits to your story, but I think it covers the Flagged Revisions issue nicely. For the BRION report, if X! has anything to add, then it might run this week. Otherwise, it can wait and have more material next week.

2802:

I think that you were emphasizing far too much. But I have noticed that you have voluntarily toned down your language, and appreciate it. Do you think that you can accept the current revision I have made as a compromise? Cheers,

3410: 2625:

but although, I need some help. Personally, about the Metro and Greater Vancouver thing I really want to do something about it; (i have been changing some sentence structure but) however I keep on getting the vandalized message.

5725:

May you please delete the Gjokaj article. This person who keeps adding his own history is presenting with faulty information. His clan doesnt even come from the "TRIESHI" headline, which is where the Gjokaj headline is under.

4208:, and ask Aude about how her plans for it and what help you might provide. Beyond the next edition I'm not sure what the plans are, so if you want to handle the Technology report on your own, you may have that opportunity.-- 2176:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)

2497:

Comments are not the best place for extended discussion. Please discuss controversial changes you intent to make on the article's talk page. In the meantime, I have restored the article to it's original version. Thanks,

6403:

As an alternative to the weekly tech report, I'm thinking we could run occasional tech stories. I had previously drafted something about mobile Knowledge browsing and have that mostly complete now (except copyediting) at

2279:, as I see you have already done. An alternative would be to write about your idea elsewhere on the web (you might consider creating a web page for it). I really like your idea, by the way. Good luck. PS: Remember to 153:. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Knowledge and you are encouraged to revert, warn and report inappropriate conduct. I have however declined to act on this report for the following reason: 8363: 6136:

True. Things are going to be picking up in the immediate future, though, now that the fund-raiser is over. Feel free to ping me earlier in the week in the future if you want to share some of the work. Cheers,

5586:

There are key differences between classical liberals and libertarians a classical liberal would support government ownership of roads paid for by taxes a libertarian would support private roads paid for by tolls

3415:

I think the re-addition of details about CarbonCounted's carbon labelling initiative is as valid as the Carbon Trust details in this definition. We are both not-for-profits and we are both doing similar work.

5019:

to reason and judging by his history (he's been out to trash her for several months) he's been warned and sanctioned by wikipedia before. I am all for third party mediation. Please tell me how to proceed.

3057:

posted two more times. It was kind of funny to see my own talk page on huggle. AND to not be the one to revert and warn. Nice userboxes, too.. I might use a couple. (Especially the Vandalism Information one)

2424:

I bet you're right, as I know absolutely nothing on the topic. But you need to cite a source, and probably say who wrote the song in the same place that you make that assertion. Cheers, and happy editing!

3190:

seems to indicate you can have even more fun by naming all the other Voyager episodes as not notable enough for WP. In other words, since WP carries all Voyager episodes as articles, either you should mark

2223:

I came up with an idea for an educational game using Knowledge to teach kids (and adults) about how different encyclopedia entries may be linked and how to navigate around Knowledge by using the wikilinks.

2039:. In any event, I am not one of the super involved parties; I only reverted that IP's exit because it failed to leave a proper edit summary. I am happy to answer any questions you have, however. Thanks, 4203:

has offered to put together the technology report for the coming edition, but she might appreciate some help since there has been so much development since the last report. You should leave a note at the

1676:

considered vandalism. In the future, you need to discuss changes you plan to make on the article's talk page, and leave an informative edit summary so that people can understand your intentions. Thanks,

5547:

It states that "social liberalism"'s economic foundations were laid by John Maynard Keynes But that social liberals are opposed to free trade an globalisation. How can those two statements be reconciled?

3563: 3522: 3481: 3436: 746:

no, no, no! I am sorry. You were NOT being a vandal, carsoncolts is! I was asking you to revert HIS changes on Millikan High School. Sorry about that, and please put the warning back on his page! Thanks

5330:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

546:

page. As you can imagine, the page is a magnet for vandals. I've had it semi-protected twice in the past few months, but the anonymous IPs immediately jump on it once the protection period ends. Cheers!

4968: 5613:

The article states that social liberals are against the neoliberal policies of Margaret Thatcher. Margret Thatcher's policies involved the privatisation of utilities, transport and communications.

5110: 3199:. Please note that I indicated the purpose of my deletion clearly in the history, as -notability. Please also verify the WP stub line before deleting edits next time, to see the context. Thanks. 4429: 2451:

would also go with Metro Vancouver 50% because it is metropolitan , but who doesn't know that Vancouver's a populous city? Everyone knows Toronto is a metropolitan city, and it still uses GTA

1897:

I know of Jews who do, and I can't find an online source so I won't include it, but the House of Shammai's teachings should be mentioned in the article, because sources can be found for that.

824:

I'm pretty new here, so I was just wondering how you have your user page set up to look as good as it does. Are you using a script or something, or do you just enter in all the code yourself?

8165: 3695: 2110:

was reverted by yourself, as it appears to be unconstructive. I believe that the article is extremely inaccurate and the sources are disputable. How do I delte or nominate it for deletion?

3126:

Your source does check out. Sorry about that. I have added back that information in a more acceptable manner (one sentence does not deserve two sections) under "Demographics". Cheers,

7455: 4222: 354:

Fantastic! I misunderstood your intentions. I and serveral friends have been watching this page and trying to keep this erroneous, if not libelous, content out. Thanks very much!

411:. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — 5599: 2780:

It is not "point of view" to emphasise the lack of cited academic criticism in the criticism section of an article about an academic, rather balancing out the truth more fairly.

7952:. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Knowledge. 3286: 4242: 8028: 5622: 177: 8107: 7315:

A few of the entires had been seemingly removed. Was that intentional? Also did the info on the WP pages have a source? I have no reason to doubt it but sourcing can't hurt. --

4083: 5403: 3555: 3514: 3473: 3428: 8077: 5423: 7818: 5468: 4269:

As it stands, that fragment is clearly missing, do you have reasons to object to its restoration?? I have personal experience with the machine that the fragment is accurate.

5989:

The edits I reverted sure seemed like vandalism to me. In any case, I think that I will drop the issue before it escalates and let someone else take care of it. Cheers,

5822:

I don't know exactly why I stumbled across your userpage, but I feel compelled to tell you that it's pretty fantastic. I love the "Do something useful" part. Very cool.

5787:

Thanks for your dedication Knowledge! I doubt I'll ever become an administrator — too many obstinate knuckleheads out there which I simply do not have the patience for. :)

2764:

Please read this talk page's header. The manner in witch your posted your comment is very disruptive (I have repaired the damage). Regarding your criticism, please see

8205: 7521: 7141: 6610: 4746: 4003: 3890: 3819: 3110: 2417: 8217: 8194: 7543: 7499: 7146: 7134: 6622: 4758: 4284:

My mistake. I was moving too fast, and I did not realize that was code. I rolled back my edits and removed the warning from your talk page. Happy editing! Cheers,

4008: 3996: 3897: 3885: 3824: 3646: 3137:

It's a false complaint. The "source" is a copy of a vandalised Knowledge article. Robmuntzawesome has been doing a lot of vandalism, you can see this in his contribs.

8331: 8211: 8199: 7532: 7510: 6617: 6581: 5843: 4753: 3551: 3510: 3469: 3424: 1033:

Just try to avoid inserting your personal opinions into the article. You could say "poorly received" if there is a source that you can cite (ie a negative review)

598: 7864: 3577: 3536: 3496: 3454: 624: 8301: 5889:. While I agree that it would be nice if there were sources, I don't think that is reason to remove the section, only to improve it. What do you think? Cheers, 4889:

I am trying my best to do the right thing in creating this page for Knowledge. Please let me know what I need to do to meet the criteria, which I feel sure I do.

3955: 3873: 3795: 2396: 4639:

meetup, currently scheduled for January 24, as the previous meetup was lightly attended due to a snowstorm. You are being notified because your name is listed on

8424: 7589: 7443: 6973:

The next Connecticut Knowledge meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on

5378: 3972: 3947: 3787: 3132: 2368:

Ok, sorry. I didn't think it would change it, and that was my source that was better, because I still can't verify the source and that is a personal experience.

1492: 1223: 1207: 1195: 1178: 1148: 1127: 906: 6763: 5921: 5910: 5895: 5590: 5079:

Re: Cindy Lineau, who had worked at the Civic Arena since 1974, practiced day in and day out to become . . . the first female Zamboni driver in Olympic history.

4954:

Re: Cindy Lineau, who had worked at the Civic Arena since 1974, practiced day in and day out to become . . . the first female Zamboni driver in Olympic history.

3668: 3295: 3226: 2431: 2148: 2091: 2064: 2045: 1986: 1770: 1309: 813: 774: 762: 8176: 8170: 8123: 7466: 7117: 6593: 6586: 6381: 6057: 5710: 5688: 5214: 5007: 4729: 4624: 4417: 4255: 4154: 3979: 3800: 3624: 3336: 3106: 2809: 2774: 2357: 1683: 724: 712: 7635: 6272:

Well, it was my block, so I don't think it would be kosher to deny the unblock request as well. I was just providing some feedback for the reviewing admin. --

5852: 5193:, in which you apparently thought you were reverting the addition of dubious material, you were actually putting that (false) material back into the article. 4290: 3035: 2940: 1481: 1270: 1009:

Well, he performed the song in an ironic manner in order to lambast the advertising industry, but i'm willing to tone down the text if needs be. what say you?

531: 308: 7819: 5677: 5524: 5486: 3967: 3960: 2884: 2118: 1586: 1445: 1238:

I didnt mean to vandalize Yoga. My friend did that to try to kick me off Knowledge since i usee it all the time. He was just being stupid. Really sorry =(

1160: 8137: 4507: 2728: 2660: 2615: 2504: 2309: 2209: 1547: 346: 7623: 4590: 4553: 4381: 3087: 2390: 1925: 1906: 1892: 1881: 1867: 1726: 845: 576: 363: 332: 8398: 8318: 8295: 8282: 7299: 6865: 6849: 6832: 5768: 5292: 5276: 5250: 5178: 1399: 1385: 1076: 1065: 1039: 1000: 869:

Can you link to a diff? I am more than willing to accept the fact that I may have made a mistake, but I am not sure what you are talking about. Cheers,

208: 8182: 7477: 7122: 6598: 6341: 6298: 5811: 5641: 4734: 4463:. I am inquiring about Toolserver status, so may have that to add. Feel free to make any changes, additions, or whatever you think is needed. Cheers. -- 3991: 3878: 3807: 3208: 3175: 3157: 3146: 3009: 2990: 8342: 7715: 6396:. (sorry for not getting to this until Friday!) Anyway, I feel like it's been a slow tech news week and there's not so much to report. If you and/or 5995: 3404: 2569: 2544: 2533: 1706: 1116: 895: 884: 875: 674: 660: 458: 438: 8251: 8188: 7884: 7655: 7583: 7488: 7129: 6605: 6045: 5953: 4741: 4102: 3984: 3812: 2231: 610: 492: 7927: 7221: 6962: 6697: 6478: 6462: 6445: 6258: 6143: 6131: 6115: 4853: 4494: 4189: 4114: 1638: 944: 7248: 7176: 7030: 6991: 6652: 6213: 5221: 5051:

By the way, I have been trying for days to figure out how to contact wikipedia to enlist some third-person intervention. I am glad you stepped in.

4788: 4089: 4038: 2700: 2678: 2636: 2589: 2477: 1513: 355: 324: 5984: 8374: 5098: 2017: 8266: 4227:

I changed this because I have paper documents and an installation CD-ROM from this company, all with the name in print thusly: Blue Sky Software

1689: 833: 7590: 5734: 5147: 317: 7933: 7310: 6179:

How common is the name Wartenberg? I had a teacher at school, Winfred (Fred) Klaus Adolf Watenberg. I wondered if there is any relationship.

6003: 1260:

Your IP is on its last warning, so as long as it does not happen again you should be fine. For purposes of legitimate editing, you may wish to

191: 8147: 7402: 7037: 6400:

can fill it in more so that there is enough for this week, that would be excellent. Otherwise, my suggestion is for BRION to take a week off.

4895: 4357: 4535: 1095:

Someone, probably you, has requested access to the toolserver account creation tool under this username. Please confirm here that it was you.

5975: 5539: 4350: 3367: 3268: 2004: 5831: 4141: 2581:

Sorry I have vandalized the page, "even though I didn't know about it until I read the Vandalizehelppage" but saying sorry doesnt hurt :)

7890: 7427: 7044: 6778:, though think there is more to add. I will take another look tomorrow, but if you have anything to add, that would be helpful. Cheers. -- 6508: 6100: 4656: 2708: 2690: 2644: 2601: 2489: 1372: 1351: 1135: 648: 380:

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

6742: 2031:. If you do not feel that all of the content that should have been kept was moved over, you can move content to the new article from the 1070:

No Problem. I have removed both warnings from your talk page, as it is now clear to me that your edits were made in good faith. Cheers,

6997: 6968: 5202: 4479: 2130: 426: 181:

might be a helpful read if you wish to improve your future reports. If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my

4651: 2911: 2834: 6885: 3379: 3214:

I was responding not to the removal of the template, but to the addition of a second "Plot" section (I don't think we need two of those

2866: 801: 7813: 3650: 3001:

sorry for all the vandalism. my little brother put all of that stuff when i wasnt on the computer. i hope that there was no trouble

2795: 2757: 7738: 6945: 6364: 5662: 5627:

Surely the deciding factor here must be state control of industry? Anyone who believes in state control of industry is not a liberal

5569: 4926: 3689: 3181: 1851: 1104: 407:

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view

230: 6789: 5631:

There were a few issues with all the horizontal lines, but I probably should not have reverted your edit. Sorry. Things have been

4947: 4449: 3543:

believe that a post of details about CarbonCounted is a COI, then the post that The Carbon Trust put in should be removed as well.

1296: 741: 4217: 3559: 3518: 3477: 3432: 3118: 2538:

Holy Crap! I did not realize that Huggle had done that, and have withdrawn my report. I need to pay closer attention ;) Thanks,

1665: 1433: 606: 6423: 6352:

The edit I have made was constructive and by my opinion, right. The reason why I have removed the Grateful Dead songs is because.

5575: 5132: 5071: 3571:

Due to your conflict of interest, it is difficult to ascertain if that information is appropriate. I will look into it. Thanks,

2289: 2035:. If you are opposed to the merge itself, I would advise you to state your opposition on the aforementioned talk page. Also see 7397: 7272: 5965: 5879: 5799: 5746: 5356: 5238: 4474: 4393: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3606: 1620: 819: 7336: 6281: 5039: 4612: 7949: 7551: 7206: 6682: 6324: 4818: 4068: 3322: 2455:

Hopefully you can agree upon with me ; I am just fixing up some sentence flaws, I am unclear of how this is called Vandalism

1965: 1832: 1694: 1570: 1203: 1156: 635:

looks quite mis-tagged. Decently written, rational explanations, several cited sources that are on-topic (though maybe not the

518: 291: 87: 6907: 5398: 3098:

I have provided credible evidence of the Incest rate of Bushmills, Ireland and you continue to disrupt my post. Why is this?

2335: 7923: 7857: 7840: 7628: 7611: 7172: 7168: 6648: 6644: 4979:

why would you think me putting Obama's name is vandalizing? the youtube link i put is a video of him saying he is a member.

4903: 4784: 4780: 4640: 4278: 4205: 4034: 4030: 3114: 3021: 1561:

Hi You deleted my information on Brightling This is true imformation as my name is Brightling Why do you keep deleting it? --

700: 7760: 7311:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_suspects_in_the_Ergenekon_investigation&diff=269432053&oldid=269323357

6930:

I can't do the tech report this week, due to a wikibreak that has come up for the next several days/weekend. If you and/or

4994: 1793: 1525: 1505:

hi, m new to wiki espacially to this editing, i don know how to edit n use, i hav been trying, so if u could help me... <

564: 5902: 5871: 5554:

Keynesian and classical economics are essentially the same when it comes to macro-economics but differ on micro-economics

4939: 4601: 3642: 3200: 2409: 2197: 2126: 1957: 1800: 1744: 1288: 1253: 754: 117: 5608: 3075: 2378: 1752: 1023: 982: 8115: 8069: 7180: 7010: 7006: 6656: 6241: 6169: 5702: 5669: 5654: 5561: 5155: 4986: 4792: 4604: 4573: 4513: 4389: 4334: 4325: 4234: 4133: 4042: 3681: 3598: 3314: 2787: 2749: 2327: 1992: 1657: 1465: 630: 582: 408: 79: 71: 66: 7691: 6503: 6192: 2971: 731:

Sorry about that. I have removed the warning from the user's talk page. But please remember to sign your comments and

7100: 6564: 5517: 4712: 4649: 4316: 4270: 3929: 3856: 3769: 3017: 2903: 1245: 863: 510: 287: 7341:

My guess is that the edit came to an older version. That happens to me too... Really annoying and embarrassing. :). --

7325:

I have no idea how or why that happened. I rolled back those edits; I will do some more work on the article soon. —

6925: 6287:

OK, thanks for that clarification. I added a note regarding threats of violence made by the user as well. Cheers, —

6083: 7856:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at 7627:, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at 6815: 5961: 5265:. Congratulations by the way, having your own attack page is something to be proud of, shows you're getting to them-- 4308: 3053:

edit to my talkpage. Man, it's amazing how persistant some of these vandals are. After you intercepted that message,

2862: 1842:

Yes, some Jews do light all candles the first night, seven the second, six the third... Sources: Being a Jew myself.

1357: 368: 8083: 5446: 5442: 5438: 4886:

There is much more I can dig up if required, but I thought I would get this information to you as soon as possible.

4501:

Erm... I am not much of a photographer, and I live in Massachusetts. I think that I am missing something. Cheers,

1303:

No, it was not. Remember that this is an encyclopedia. Also, please add your comments to the bottom of the page.

932: 5434: 2686: 2651: 2597: 2485: 2028: 1521: 480: 172:

this is discouraged but not forbidden. You could contact him and explain to him how to contribute more effectively

6370:

Fixed. I don't know what that was about—I either missed the edit summary, or read the diff backwards. Sorry. —

6895: 6408:. This could run instead of or in addition to the usual tech report. Let me know what you think, and if you or 5513: 5430: 5427: 5106: 4172: 3342: 3187: 2437: 2375: 2262: 3050: 588: 6934:

can write it, that would be appreciated. Though, I saw your note on the Signpost page saying you were busy. --

6769: 5817: 5742: 5067: 5035: 978: 163: 3347:

Jake, Silly question, but how does one upload text onto wikipedia, or at least submit text for consideration?

7794: 7378: 5632: 4338: 4120: 3232: 2967: 2650:

I am not quite sure what you mean when you say "the controversial page site". In any event, you should read

1090: 216: 111: 7777: 3237:

So now wet yourself! Lol! Anyway, I was really here to give you this (I just stumbled into your userboxes).

182: 8157: 7948:

Hello, Jake Wartenberg. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the

7908: 7896: 7769: 7412: 7163: 6975: 6639: 6387: 5978: 4775: 4025: 3375: 1336: 602: 8054: 2896:

READING, save the THREE book ones. The three references to the review articles are fine (1-3) Thank you.

7847: 7783: 7618: 7018: 6775: 6393: 6069: 4460: 4454: 2032: 1993: 1595: 1379:

In the future, please leave an edit summary so that we vandal fighters know what you are doing. Cheers,

768:

Done. Please write in clear, coherent sentences in the future. Thanks for fighting vandalism! Cheers,

304: 204: 5208:

Oops! I thought I was removing that material. Things are so chaotic around here right now... Cheers,

8271:

I think I got it. I will let you know when I get most of it done, so you can look it over. Cheers, —

7361: 7056: 6726: 6520: 6405: 5497:

sorry about all the problems with my page. i'm new to this and it is more complicated than i thought

5184: 4668: 4630: 3725: 2890: 2840: 1837: 1616: 1315: 1199: 1152: 1121:

I seem to have access to the tool now, but don't I also need the "accountcreator" permission? Thanks,

147: 38: 6979:

whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!

5870:

Not all IP edits are vandalism :) (I believe its about 7%, see the straw poll page on your watchlist)

5339:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 1886:

Can you find a source for that information? If not, I think it is better to not include it. Thanks,

503:

Excuse me, I am new to this Knowledge editing. Why do you keep sending me messages about reversions?

8419: 8393: 8355: 8313: 8277: 8102: 8009:

s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

7879: 7852: 7710: 7650: 7331: 7292: 7002: 6957: 6860: 6827: 6758: 6473: 6440: 6376: 6336: 6293: 6253: 6208: 6202:. I don't think that there is any recognizably close relationship, but I could be wrong. Cheers, — 5454: 5352: 5319: 5190: 4423: 4331: 4195: 3612:

I reverted to your last version (I was not the one who reverted your edits). Don't get so worked up

2101: 1699: 135: 47: 17: 7999:

and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more

7367: 6804: 1999:

I'm a bit taken back by finding this former article eliminated entirely, and the title re-routed to

859:), so someone changing this word in an article about a British subject is not vandalising (sic). -- 6738: 6160:

I got my new user name. Maybe you can help me spiff up my user page? Yours looks a lot more legit.

5906: 5875: 5774: 5117: 5046: 4943: 4873:

Australian Opera: The Gondoliers ABC VIDEO ARTS Australian Opera: Die Fledermaus ABC VIDEO ARTS

3264: 3204: 2413: 2122: 2060: 2013: 1961: 1748: 1417: 1292: 797: 758: 4883:

There are two CDs which are to be released any time now music of Richard Meale and Gerard Brophy.

923:

Hi Jake, you left a message on my page re vandalism but methinks you mix me up with someone else.

8133: 8119: 8073: 7353: 7254: 6264: 6041: 5720: 5706: 5673: 5658: 5565: 5482: 5464: 5220: 5198: 4990: 4608: 4385: 4238: 4137: 3685: 3602: 3318: 2791: 2753: 2736: 2331: 2000: 1661: 1100: 784: 696: 7014: 6951:

X! has already started the report. I will help him out as much as RealLife permits. Thanks, —

6120:

It's fine to save things for next time. I'm sure some weeks will be slow with any tech news. --

7260: 6838: 6347: 6304: 5827: 5647: 5013: 4647: 4274: 3630: 3259:

For your great Vandal work and for reverting vandals on my pages. Cheers and Happy Editing. :)

3013: 2907: 2459:

PS. The Picture about Arbutus Ridge is looking upon Downtown Vancouver ; to be more specific.

1629: 1461: 1407: 1249: 514: 283: 7685:

Congratulations on your first featured picture credit. May it be the first of many. Cheers!

7600: 7904: 5957: 4312: 2930:

be blocked from editing for a period of at least 24 hours. Please discuss your changes with

2858: 1632:, and then recreate the article when you are satisfied that it will not be deleted. Cheers, 1566: 1429: 141: 7965: 589:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Backstreet_Boys&diff=242489895&oldid=242485992

8414: 8388: 8350: 8308: 8272: 8097: 7874: 7721: 7705: 7645: 7326: 7285: 6952: 6855: 6822: 6753: 6468: 6435: 6371: 6331: 6288: 6248: 6203: 6138: 6110: 6052: 5990: 5949: 5931: 5916: 5890: 5847: 5806: 5763: 5730: 5683: 5636: 5557: 5501: 5373: 5348: 5315: 5287: 5245: 5209: 5173: 5094: 5055: 5023: 5002: 4982: 4963: 4935: 4921: 4859: 4619: 4585: 4548: 4523: 4502: 4412: 4377: 4304: 4285: 4250: 4249:

Google seems to agree with you. I have moved the article to "Blue Sky Software". Cheers,

4230: 4184: 4149: 4129: 4109: 3677: 3663: 3638: 3619: 3572: 3547: 3531: 3506: 3491: 3465: 3449: 3420: 3399: 3363: 3331: 3310: 3290: 3221: 3152: 3127: 3102: 3082: 3030: 3005: 2985: 2955: 2935: 2899: 2879: 2850: 2829: 2822: 2804: 2783: 2769: 2745: 2723: 2704: 2682: 2674: 2655: 2640: 2610: 2593: 2585: 2539: 2510: 2499: 2481: 2473: 2426: 2405: 2385: 2352: 2323: 2305: 2284: 2250: 2204: 2143: 2114: 2086: 2040: 1981: 1953: 1920: 1887: 1862: 1827: 1807: 1765: 1740: 1721: 1678: 1653: 1644: 1633: 1604: 1581: 1542: 1517: 1509: 1487: 1476: 1440: 1395: 1380: 1346: 1324: 1304: 1284: 1281:

Seriously guy, why'd you delete my addition to the song's article? It was clearly needed!

1276: 1265: 1241: 1218: 1191: 1173: 1144: 1122: 1111: 1071: 1034: 995: 966: 939: 901: 890: 870: 840: 808: 769: 750: 736: 707: 655: 619: 594: 571: 526: 506: 487: 433: 359: 341: 328: 300: 275: 200: 123: 6355:

1. It's unconfirmed, and shouldn't be in the confirmed songs section, or wikipedia alone.

6106: 5635:. The version you reverted to is much better. I hope there are no worries now. Cheers, 3029:

It's OK, but please try to keep this kind of thing from happening in the future. Cheers,

857: 8: 7212:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 6901: 6875: 6734: 6688:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 6219: 6174: 5509: 5415:

Hi Jake, I'm doing RC patrolling (too) and watching this. Not quite sure what to do. :)

5394: 5384: 5102: 4824:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 4636: 4569: 4490: 4442: 4341:

and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes and even subscribe to the RSS feed at

4074:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- 3260: 3073: 2372: 2297: 2258: 2191:

Thank you for helping me with my enquiry at the Help desk about creating a wikiproject.--

2056: 2009: 1902: 1877: 1847: 829: 793: 792:

P.S: Btw I am a Muslim, but I won't mind getting those Santa Clause candies and goodies.

718: 556: 167: 129: 7040:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 4602:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/11/sources-voinovich-to-retire-from-senate/

4360:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 8372: 8340: 8293: 8264: 8129: 7996: 7983: 7919: 7811: 7395: 7217: 7186: 6987: 6845: 6811: 6727: 6693: 6662: 6499: 6359: 6037: 5937:

perhaps? If you think i am wrong, do you have proof that what you are saying is right?

5738: 5478: 5460: 5327: 5274: 5236: 5194: 5151: 5128: 5063: 5031: 4829: 4798: 4432:. Nothing to be concerned about, just someone who did not know about the ACC process. – 4364: 4213: 4079: 4048: 3583: 3093: 2173: 1556: 1368: 1061: 1019: 974: 692: 7021:) and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes and subscribe to the RSS feed at 5146:) was legitimate. The page had repeating sections, as I detailed in the edit summary. 839:

Thanks for the complement. I didn't use any tools, but I am glad you like the page.

8242: 8089: 7574: 7343: 7317: 7239: 6715: 6320: 6277: 6199: 6155: 5858: 5823: 5795: 4915: 4899: 4845: 4644: 4596: 3171: 3142: 2963: 2215: 2107: 2036: 1457: 1261: 537: 498: 279: 236: 221:

That wasn't a mistake. This photo is of poor quality, and don't even have a license.

105: 7954:

Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists.

7559:

If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

7259:

Hi Jake! As you contribute to the Signpost, I'd really appreciate your thoughts on

6330:

I have tagged the article as a possible hoax, and proposed its deletion. Cheers, —

6198:

Not too common. I am always surprised to hear about people with my last name, like

5754:

Please cease your vandalism. If you have a dispute with another editor, please see

3411:

Addition of CarbonCounted details to Carbon Labelling in Carbon Footprint definition

8093: 8046: 8041: 7661: 6165: 6063: 5981: 5759: 5302: 3595:

It needs to be cleaned up. You do it if you can't stand seeing me take care of it.

3502:

Fair enough. Can you point me in the right direction? Thanks for your guidance.

3371: 3301: 2854: 2564: 2528: 2272: 1562: 1500: 1425: 1332: 953: 670: 644: 618:

I am glad you like the site. I added the diff you linked to, thanks for the tip!

450: 418: 226: 8063: 4098:. I wasn't quite sure what to do with multiple edits by a registered user + IPs.— 3530:

Can you tell me, specifically, what content you think should be removed? Cheers,

8334:

issue? Or is this segment going to cover a discussion until it's closed? Thanks,

8014: 8003: 7989: 7305: 5336: 5137: 4261: 3041: 2996: 2946: 2363: 2315: 2301: 2192: 2167: 2154: 2024: 1939: 1169: 851: 476: 6224: 2980: 340:

Ok, that's cool. I just saw a paragraph removed with no edit summary. Cheers,

323:

themselves (IP only). Can you let me know what your intentions are? Thanks.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

8033: 8018: 7190: 6940: 6889: 6784: 6666: 6488: 6457: 6418: 6237: 6126: 6095: 6078: 6068:

I finished the draft of this week's BRION technology report for the Signpost. (

5616:

This is entirely in keeping with article II section 1 of the liberal manifesto

5583:

Surely these people are considered libertarians, more than classical liberals?

5505: 5419: 5406: 5390: 5340: 4802: 4565: 4559: 4527: 4519: 4486: 4469: 4434: 4169: 4095: 4052: 3395: 3186:

Your reversal of my deletion of the notability question of the Voyager episode

3069: 2765: 2465:

Thank you in regards; Please talk to me if you have any concerns or questions.

2369: 2276: 2254: 2182: 1898: 1873: 1843: 1776: 1703: 1612: 1472: 1215: 991: 928: 918: 825: 691:

violate wikipedia image rules ?If not, could you add the "keep" tag for it ? --

682: 549: 392: 6232:

Thank you so much for your help on the technical page, have a wonderful week.

5580:"Classical liberals such as Robert Nozick, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek" 4266:

The ru, f77 code fragment is restored from an earlier version of the article.

8367: 8335: 8288: 8259: 7978: 7915: 7806: 7787: 7390: 7371: 7264: 7213: 7026: 6983: 6841: 6807: 6689: 6495: 6187: 6181: 5886: 5266: 5228: 5124: 5059: 5027: 4974: 4825: 4346: 4209: 4075: 3445: 2931: 2923: 2280: 2139: 1858: 1391: 1364: 1233: 1057: 1015: 970: 732: 543: 186: 89: 5682:

Should be fixed now. I don't know why I missed your edit summary. Cheers,

4867:

I hope I meet the notability requirements. Here are some of my recordings:

4730:

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones

1782: 8232: 7971: 7564: 7229: 6914: 6705: 6316: 6273: 5791: 5755: 5492: 4835: 3167: 3138: 2959: 2919: 2875: 636: 466: 8017:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ 7824: 7595: 7123:

Knowledge in the news: Knowledge's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"

3166:

I found it deceptive, the site was legitmate. Thank you for the barnstar!

2768:

and stop trying to insert your own point of view into this encyclopedia.--

1140:

it is perfectly useful imformation there are no grounds for deleteing it

7942: 7751: 7686: 6794: 6161: 5864: 5084: 4160: 3759: 3244: 2553: 2517: 1577: 1451: 1390:

I got the same message, but the user did not have a proper edit summary.

1328: 1096: 881: 860: 666: 640: 444: 412: 222: 8380: 7900: 7861: 7632: 7278:

All I can say is that it looks great! Sorry I can't be more helpful.

7090: 6821:

Mkay. Should I put it back, or do you want to word it differently? —

6554: 4702: 4296: 3846: 1732: 472: 1471:

If you want to withdraw the RFA, it is better to do so as outlined in

6935: 6779: 6452: 6413: 6233: 6121: 6090: 6073: 4464: 4200: 4166: 4099: 3919: 1608: 1456:

It was my page that I deleted what do you meen it was un contructive?

924: 373: 260: 7730: 7670: 5915:

I believe that you are mistaken. Could you read the page? Thanks,

5449:. AND they are repeatedly erasing all warnings from their talk page 5308: 2878:, so people like me know what is going on. Happy editing! Cheers, 7829: 6412:

want to take the lead for next week, that would be okay with me. --

254: 7550: