1028:
early stereo effects that liked to put the instrumentation on one speaker and the vocals on the other, which many fans hated and preferred the mono mixes as a result. For instance, the original version of "Taxman" had the drums, bass and guitar all on the left channel, and the right just for Starr's percussion, which sounded totally unbalanced. Now the main instruments are more centred, but the guitar is separated from the rhythm section, which to my ears makes the whole thing crisper and with a bit more punch to it. On "Eleanor Rigby" you had the strings in the centre and McCartney's vocal off the the right, only moving to the left for the double-tracked chorus, which made the vocals in the chorus seem much louder than in the verse. Now the vocals are in the centre, and the two string quartets have been split, one each on the left and right speaker, which makes much more sense, and makes it easier to hear each individual string instrument in the quartet. My favourite is the new mix of "For No One" – I always thought the keyboards were far too low in the original mix and almost drowned out by Starr's tambourine, while McCartney's vocal almost sounded a cappella and disassociated from the rest of the song. The new mix splits the piano and clavichord into different channels and balances everything out better, in my opinion... you can hear this in the instrumental version of the song in the extras, where everything just seems to swing. I do understand the complaints about "She Said She Said"... in general, the McCartney songs seem to have benefitted far more than the Lennon songs, where Lennon's vocals appear to have been mixed higher up and had a bit more processing. The stereo mixes of "Paperback Writer" and "Rain" were a waste of time, though – they add nothing to the originals and given the obvious garage rock influences of both songs, they were fine in scuzzy mono.
424:, often tying in with Apple campaigns; and from that point of view, I think Doggett shows what is so often lacking in Beatles literature: respect for the reader's intelligence. At least: for anyone who read these interviews at the time and wondered why many music journalists, Beatles historians and biographers appeared to take a latter-day McCartney statement at face value, even if some of them do recognise a self-serving aspect in his general demeanour. This is what I meant by ETW taking what she wants from Doggett – holding him up as an authority (which he undoubtedly is), on one hand, yet then appearing to ignore things he writes that don't sit quite as snuggly with the narrative she presents. That's the way it felt to me, and there I was, looking for something eureka-ish from
1095:
should suffice. A user has continually removed sourced information on reissues from the Oingo Boingo album pages, stating it's best to just list the bonus tracks in the track listing, when that seems to be the exact opposite of what is stated in the MOS. (Personally, I think he wants this info removed because of a personal beef he had with the head of the label on a prominent music forum.) So I guess my question is should I reinstate the reissue info and remove bonus tracks from the track listing? Or is any of this information even necessary to add to those pages? Look forward to hearing your thoughts. —
1344:
484:
1226:
1451:
1117:
21:
1577:
1537:
1243:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
347:
of their discussion, mostly covering the band's early years, was posted a year ago. I asked Diana in
September when the second half would drop and she said in the next month, but it unfortunately still hasn't materialized. I'm excited for that one because, as you mentioned at the "Eleanor Rigby" talk
1047:
stereo mix was, like you said. One thing I can't grasp is why Giles made a quicker fadeout on "Got to Get You into My Life". Both the stereo and mono mixes had different fadeouts but the 2022 mix seems to remove those entirely for some reason. I wonder if the new book mentions why he did that... and
1288:
English rock band the
Beatles". I have seen articles where editors simply drop it though and write: "English rock band the Beatles". I have looked around in style guides but I am not sure exactly where to find this sort of distinction. I'm guessing it may be an American versus British thing. Little
847:
JG66, when you deleted the changes I made, you indicated I had not explained why I was removing "sourced material". I already explained why I removed it in previous posts. I removed it because the "sourced material" was inaccurate. The information you referenced is based on incorrect information
318:
when I was studying some history, both of which Weber refers to, but I think her book serves as a much clearer introduction to the methods of source analysis. From the statements I've heard Robert
Rodriguez make on his podcast, he seems to be fully onboard after reading it, but I have no idea if he
299:
One point she makes is that
Lewisohn's influence has pushed recent authors to include footnotes or endnotes to source their statements, whereas previous authors would include only a bibliography or nothing at all. The thing I'm hopeful for is that her book will prove influential on the Beatle books
291:
Beyond any of her individual conclusions, the book mostly works around the larger picture of how the literature has evolved over time. With that in mind, I think you should give it a read from front-to-back – it was actually pretty enjoyable too. Now is a great chance, since its price has come down
918:
Tag in! You're kidding! I enjoyed the remix, I think some tracks have some a lot better but others not so much. Like the White Album deluxe I think this reissue really benefits from the bonus tracks. Hearing the initial versions of "LYT" and "GTGYIML" were definitely eye opening. Check it out when
783:
plays congas and Mal plays maracas (heard at 17:50 in the episode). On "My Sweet Lord", he says Bobby
Whitlock was the one playing harmonium and that it wasn't Mike Gibbins playing tambourine but instead Alan White. Those are the ones they mention in the episode. I presume there's more info in the
570:
If you wanna say it looks bad, fine, completely up to you. But we need factual evidence that it's bad. If you know anything about the
Beatles discography order, you would know that the US version always gets chosen because of it feeling more like a studio album with singles like Strawberry Fields,
461:
Your action is wrong. If you want to complain about non-existent chart at that time, then the Kent Report didn't exist then, as were many if not most of the charts given there, and you could reasonably delete them, particularly if they are not sourced. You should take this up at the template talk
440:
really chimed with my reading of too many
Beatles books – about how "fact" became determined by "which side spoke loudest and gave the most interviews". But does she then apply what you'd image would be due scrutiny to the influence of the ex-Beatle giving the most interviews through the 1990s and
1027:
My favourite
Beatles album as well. I thought this might get opinions from other editors, and it's from the ones I expected! In general I really like the new mix – I don't think Giles Martin has taken too many liberties, it's more about getting a better balance of the EQs and getting rid of those
411:
for me. So gratifying at the time to read a text that explores McCartney's psyche, and not idly (through, say, weighing up his various statements on one particular issue from many interviews, over decades), because of McCartney's continuing popularity and extremely high profile, and the resulting
395:
It's not about whether she's read and discussed every possible book on the
Beatles, not at all. More about the ones that don't seem to receive a mention, and particularly ones that, from what I see, are generally viewed as almost go-to texts on the area being discussed, or at least are far better
1094:
Hey there. I know we have talked before about the issue of bonus tracks and alternate track listings. I read the long discussion about it from a while back and the consensus achieved here seems to suggest that bonus track listings are generally unnecessary, and that mentioning them in the prose
1003:
Just wanna insert myself to see I completely agree about the She Said remix. I think it's dreadful and defanged, remixed as though the intention was to turn it into Good Day
Sunshine, but we already have Good Day Sunshine! I'm not really keen on those sort of liberties being taken (cf. numerous
391:
I hear you on ETW's historiographical approach and remember reading her references to those others books (mentions them both in the YouTube clip at "Eleanor Rigby", as I recall). I just also remember reading statements she makes in her book and thinking at the time, "Hang on, Erin, aren't you
546:
didn’t even work at the July 9-11 sessions for “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer”, so he wouldn’t have known what went on that day. The balance engineer was Phil McDonald and the tape operator was John Kurlander, so Geoff didn’t work on those three days and that was why I deleted his recollections.
322:
As for her not having read and discussed every possible book, I think that was inevitable given how many have been written about the band, which I know you've alluded to before. Instead, she focused on some of the most influential, comparing the differences between three editions of
1378:
Hello, Hope you are doing great! You've known me as Garagepunk66, but I just got a name change. I'll now be going by the name GloryRoad66 (GR66 for short). I tried to get GP66, but they wouldn't let me--they said it sounds too much like another editor's name. Good luck!
812:, nice to hear from you. Yes, I'm sure that book will be useful, and in fact there's no end of info to continue adding to the album and song articles from the ATMP 50 scrapbook and liner notes. Bit stuck for time right now – will try to write more in the next day or so.
338:
One point Weber makes about Doggett is that, through no fault of his own, he is the only one to have written such an in-depth look into the breakup period, which means he looms large in all discussions of it. I sent her a request that she review Ken McNabb's book,
550:
Norman Smith didn’t know what he was talking about when he said that there was an artistic clash between John and Paul and Paul criticised George’s guitar playing - as I said before, none of the band have ever confirmed his claims or mentioned any discord.
754:
Hey JG66, hope all is well. I'm sorry I didn't respond to that post above some six months ago – I still have thoughts to share but things seemed to get away from me. Anyway, I was wondering if you were aware of Jason Kruppa and Kenneth Womack's new book
1584:
848:
that has been superseded by liner notes from the Beatles album in question. The liner notes indicate that McCartney played bass on "She Said She Said". If that isn't sufficient for you, I suggest purchasing the record and seeing for yourself.
690:. I ahve been working full-time for over a year on filling bare URLs using a variety of tools, and the total number of articles with bare URls has fallen by over 80%. That is why I am now tagging some of the remainder, after first running @
462:
page, and get it fixed. Why did you undo, for example, the Norwegian one if you want to keep the one in Beatles? Why don't you fix the Dutch one, which wasn't named such? So on and so on. Your action is just inconsistent and unreasonable.
1571:
343:, and she told me she had it on request at her library, but it sounds like she's put things on hold for the moment because of her young kids. I know that she and Diana Erickson discussed Doggett in a yet unreleased podcast interview. The
431:
I don't mean to zoom in on McCartney when discussing the Doggett book, btw, but he was always the PR Beatle, right? (Equally, I could be wrong about Doggett being in some way pioneering on this issue – influential, definitely. I hear
1531:
761:(2021)? While I've mostly found Womack's earlier books rehash previously discovered material, it seems he's been moving towards doing research of his own. I thought some of this new stuff sounded like it would be helpful to you.
266:
Ha, nice! Thanks for adding your two cents over there. I think we're pretty much on the same page with these issues. Although, given some of the responses there, I think I'm more confused about what to do than I was before! —
1235:
1004:
things throughout the White Album remix, like the removal of 'pleh' or the smothering of the Long, Long, Long acoustic guitar). Anyway, that's enough moaning from me. The complete set is very nice. As you were. --
1552:
832:
If you think that the simple track listing format should be used, check out Pablo Honey, The Bends, and the Kid A articles. They all use the same track listing template I was trying to revert to on OK Computer.
412:
influence his version of events has on our understanding of the Beatles story, certainly in the 21st century. The epiphany I'm alluding to is after I'd read years and years of interviews with McCartney, in
1592:
1220:
1480:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1146:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
300:
that haven't been written yet. She began it as a way to introduce her history students to historiography and historical method with a fresher topic than WWI or the French Revolution; I read both
1279:
1496:
1162:
1043:
I acquired the mono CD boxset probably 5 years ago at this point so I haven't heard the stereo mixed of PPM to Pepper probably since that time, although I still recall how shitty the
591:
1606:
764:
Womack is currently writing a biography on Mal Evans and has been reading personal journals for the book. Apparently Mal was the one in charge of paying all the session players on
1597:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
1557:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
1465:
1131:
1566:
957:", you can hear a bit more guitar noodling – by making it so you can hear each constituent part, I think that one unfortunately feels a little less cohesive than the original. "
949:". I think it shows what most of the remix was all about: boosting the low end and giving a nice stereo picture. Sometimes they go a bit far with boosting the bass and drums ("
1544:
1351:
491:
441:
into the 21st century, and how his readiness to engage with a nostalgia-primed media might inform writers and shape the story? Obviously, I need to read the book in full.
1071:
Hi all (if anyone's still watching). Sorry, didn't mean to ignore comments here, just had some time away from Knowledge ... But no, I still haven't anything from the new
556:
779:
I noticed that some of the listings Womack provided from the journals diverged from the sources used in some of your GAs. For example, he mentions that on "Wah-Wah",
1322:
855:
900:
is probably my favourite album of all time. Didn't bother with any of the other 50th anniversary Beatles reissues either. (I only made an exception for Harrison's
1598:
1558:
202:
348:
page, Weber has mostly been positive in her mentions of Doggett, whereas Erickson, as one of Paul's biggest advocates (in case you aren't familiar, she loves
1625:
896:, always nice to hear from you. I confess I've not yet heard anything from the new release – not the remix nor the outtakes. Which is odd, I guess, because
745:
1620:
1274:
396:
known than some of the ones she selects. I can't give examples, I'm afraid – I'm just recalling the overall impression I had, years ago, from when I read
863:
380:
in full. I'm lucky enough to have been given so many Beatles books for free over the last few years. I think the last Beatles book I actually bought was
344:
981:
One thing I think we can all agree on is Paul really was a masterful bass player, the new mixes of "Taxman" and "I'm Only Sleeping" showcasing that. –
400:
a decent portion of the book. But like you, I do hope her work informs the approach other writers take in the future; in fact, I think it already has.
1304:
919:
you can, I think it's worth it. Sidebar: What it has brought for us here on WP however is the slew of people coming here saying Paul played bass on "
392:
presenting that – that assumption as fact, saying what's 'correct' – in the very same way as those bad historians you've highlighted at the start ?"
1203:
859:
538:
827:
352:, something even I can't do), has regularly critiqued Doggett's conclusions. Anyway, before this post spirals too far, I'll end things here.
1089:
296:
37.85 on Amazon, CA$ 17.99 for the Kindle version (unfortunately for me, I got it from my local bookstore when it was still CA$ 66.99...).
219:
560:
1523:
1189:
950:
436:
wrote a very insightful biography on McCartney in 1986, so perhaps there's much of the same there.) Erin's comment about the legacy of
35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
958:
954:
946:
384:, late last year, having previously milked all I could from Amazon or Google previews. But if there's one more I'd get, it would be
1255:
1104:
802:
904:, but that was as much about timing as anything else – severe lockdown/lifestyle blues in Sydney.) Have you heard it? Any good?
842:
1443:
1109:
769:
284:
276:
257:
580:
532:
735:
664:
1519:
1185:
565:
552:
207:
367:
1318:
571:
Penny Lane, etc. So I made that template with that info in mind and I suggest we keep it. I'm not changing history here.
450:
1284:
Hey JG. I noticed in all the articles you have written, you introduce the Beatles with a definite article, like this: "
1239:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
51:
If it's more big-picture stuff (rather than specific edits), or if you want to be funny, or rude, then come on in ...
513:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
1013:
625:
1515:
1215:
1181:
610:
1409:
1588:
1548:
235:
1438:
1244:
1417:
1368:
1009:
585:
135:
27:
1489:
1326:
1197:
1155:
590:
There are already several primary sources and third-party sources that list entire personnel sections. Per
499:
140:
1065:
649:
594:, a personnel section should only be included if an external link doesn't already provide one. Similar to
1501:
1167:
1060:
993:
935:
913:
740:
1240:
715:
670:
471:
193:
114:
998:
976:
1602:
1562:
1331:
1314:
1037:
886:
821:
731:
150:
877:
Hi JG66 - just curious to know as a Beatles fan, what do you think of the new version of the album?
1005:
940:
780:
701:
144:
1211:
1100:
633:
576:
456:
272:
231:
117:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1388:
1364:
1309:
621:
606:
509:
172:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
121:
110:
1084:
1477:
1405:
1384:
1143:
1033:
882:
694:
over them at least 7 times, to draw the attention of other editors to some of the remainder.
213:
189:
177:
165:
157:
1488:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1154:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
851:
838:
722:
637:
161:
8:
1434:
683:
595:
173:
757:
1207:
1096:
869:
708:
572:
268:
241:
227:
126:
1459:
1360:
1298:
1125:
970:
920:
796:
691:
687:
655:
617:
602:
520:
505:
361:
310:
305:
1508:
1473:
1401:
1380:
1174:
1139:
1029:
893:
878:
185:
640:
to make sure as many editors as possible get to weigh in if they wish to. Thanks,
1572:
File:Cover of Maclen sheet music for "Back in the USSR".jpg listed for discussion
1425:
1270:
1056:
1048:
I do miss the extra guitar thrash heard on the "I'm Only Sleeping" mono mix... –
989:
931:
834:
293:
223:
101:
1343:
1317:
is back into shape, I think. You might want to take a look, see what you think.
483:
1485:
1430:
1151:
433:
768:
and so his journals have detailed personnel listings. I learned about it in a
707:
tag, so I apply it only to URLs which I know from testing cannot be filled by
1614:
1532:
File:The Beatles "Helter Skelter" US picture sleeve.jpg listed for discussion
1481:
1147:
543:
467:
408:
1373:
1291:
963:
809:
789:
758:
All Things Must Pass Away: Harrison, Clapton, and Other Assorted Love Songs
373:
354:
131:
1221:
Orphaned non-free image File:Material World Charitable Foundation logo.jpg
679:
1492:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1158:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1469:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1397:
1259:
1135:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1050:
983:
925:
315:
1450:
1116:
1076:
905:
813:
676:
banner, why not take a moment to fix the problem by filling the ref?
641:
524:
442:
263:
249:
463:
335:. She's covered others on her blog and in her more recent podcast.
42:
Hey kids. If you want to discuss a change I've made to an article,
961:" sounds nice though by not having everything panned to one side.
20:
592:
Knowledge:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources
1505:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1426:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Bob_Dylan#Listing_legal_name_first
1171:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1495:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1463:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1161:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1129:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
697:
Unfortunately, some of the ref-filing tools do not support the
636:
and gain consensus for the addition. Also post notification at
46:, not this one, so that other editors get a chance to weigh in.
1576:
1536:
169:
1585:
File:Cover of Maclen sheet music for "Back in the USSR".jpg
632:
I'm not sure I do agree. But you should raise the issue at
58:
For all previous messages, please see talk archives for
1545:
File:The Beatles "Helter Skelter" US picture sleeve.jpg
1476:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1142:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
180:, or ask your question on this page and then place
1254:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1236:File:Material World Charitable Foundation logo.jpg
428:; I thought I'd be right on the same page as her.
1612:
523:. Thanks so much, and I hope you're well. Best,
1280:"The English rock band" or "English rock band"?
686:are unhelpful to readers and are vulnerable to
1256:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1250:Note that any non-free images not used in any
953:"), but I think it mostly sounds alright. On "
1626:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages
1422:Hi JG66, A discussion is taking place here:
407:, have to say that reading it was akin to a
341:And in the End: The Last Days of the Beatles
1621:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
828:Check out Pablo Honey, The Bends, and Kid A
616:That honestly goes for track listings too.
244:, blimey, that's bizarre – I was literally
1342:
482:
156:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1090:Need advice on reissues with bonus tracks
226:. Please chime in, if you can. Thanks! —
376:: Hey, I'd very much like to read ETW's
539:Maxwell’s Silver Hammer and Rubber Soul
319:has any plans to write any more books.
184:before the question. Again, welcome!
1613:
1583:A file that you uploaded or altered,
1543:A file that you uploaded or altered,
1206:concerning track numbering for LPs! —
333:The Beatles: The Authorised Biography
53:(Did you bring your guitar with you?)
1460:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1126:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
15:
1444:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1110:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
856:2601:C2:B00:730:A145:D07F:68DF:FB68
13:
1575:
1535:
1224:
218:Hi! Would love your thoughts on a
44:please use the article's talk page
14:
1637:
28:This user may have left Knowledge
1449:
1115:
329:Lennon: The Definitive Biography
141:How to create your first article
31:. JG66 has not edited Knowledge
19:
1499:and submit your choices on the
1165:and submit your choices on the
198:Thank you! Other useful pages:
1589:Knowledge:Files for discussion
1549:Knowledge:Files for discussion
426:The Beatles and the Historians
386:The Beatles and the Historians
382:The Cambridge Companion to ...
378:The Beatles and the Historians
286:The Beatles and the Historians
1:
1567:06:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
1524:00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1478:Knowledge arbitration process
1245:our policy for non-free media
1190:01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1144:Knowledge arbitration process
1085:02:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1066:00:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
1038:20:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
1014:20:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
999:19:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
977:18:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
941:18:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
914:03:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
822:16:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
803:12:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
277:23:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
258:10:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
236:10:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
122:The five pillars of Knowledge
1275:23:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
1202:Would love your thoughts on
1105:07:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
887:15:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
864:04:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
566:Magical Mystery Tour Infobox
113:to Knowledge! Thank you for
7:
1439:11:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
1216:07:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
945:If you want a sample, try "
843:20:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
741:08:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
650:22:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
626:20:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
611:20:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
194:07:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
10:
1642:
1516:MediaWiki message delivery
1418:Robert Dylan or Bob Dylan?
1396:By the way, check out the
1327:03:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
1182:MediaWiki message delivery
772:of Jason Kruppa's podcast
586:Album article style advice
472:07:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
451:13:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
368:13:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
1410:07:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
1389:07:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
1350:
1341:
1315:Helter Skelter (scenario)
1305:12:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
1225:
1198:Trying to reach consensus
561:14:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
533:01:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
490:
481:
1607:21:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
1513:to your user talk page.
1369:05:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
1179:to your user talk page.
1080:
909:
817:
645:
581:16:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
528:
514:08:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
446:
302:The Landscape of History
253:
136:How to develop articles
1580:
1540:
1230:
746:Kruppa & Womack's
711:. The others get the
682:is a core policy, and
248:when you posted here!
1587:, has been listed at
1579:
1547:, has been listed at
1539:
1474:Arbitration Committee
1457:Hello! Voting in the
1233:Thanks for uploading
1228:
1140:Arbitration Committee
1123:Hello! Voting in the
774:Producing the Beatles
1332:Precious anniversary
902:All Things Must Pass
766:All Things Must Pass
748:All Things Must Pass
500:Precious anniversary
1338:
1310:Helter re-Skeltered
1006:TangoTizerWolfstone
663:Instead of removing
478:
220:thread I've started
174:Knowledge:Questions
1581:
1541:
1490:arbitration policy
1336:
1231:
1156:arbitration policy
476:
246:just posting there
132:How to edit a page
115:your contributions
33:since January 2023
1591:. Please see the
1551:. Please see the
1526:
1357:
1356:
1241:claim of fair use
1192:
955:She Said She Said
947:I'm Only Sleeping
921:She Said She Said
866:
854:comment added by
739:
716:Cleanup Bare URLs
671:Cleanup Bare URLs
601:Do you disagree?
497:
496:
399:
398:(and screenshot )
306:John Lewis Gaddis
203:Album style guide
164:your messages on
109:Hello, JG66, and
54:
39:
38:
1633:
1514:
1512:
1453:
1346:
1339:
1335:
1303:
1301:
1295:
1267:
1264:
1227:
1180:
1178:
1119:
975:
973:
967:
951:Paperback Writer
849:
801:
799:
793:
730:
728:
726:
720:
714:
706:
700:
675:
669:
486:
479:
475:
438:Lennon Remembers
397:
366:
364:
358:
311:What Is History?
183:
166:discussion pages
52:
23:
16:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1611:
1610:
1599:JohnCWiesenthal
1574:
1559:JohnCWiesenthal
1534:
1529:
1528:
1506:
1454:
1446:
1420:
1376:
1334:
1312:
1299:
1293:
1290:
1282:
1265:
1260:
1223:
1200:
1195:
1194:
1172:
1120:
1112:
1092:
1064:
997:
971:
965:
962:
939:
875:
830:
797:
791:
788:
752:
724:
723:
718:
712:
704:
702:Bare URL inline
698:
673:
667:
658:
588:
568:
541:
502:
459:
457:Michelle (song)
403:With Doggett's
362:
356:
353:
289:
216:
181:
151:Manual of Style
104:
12:
11:
5:
1639:
1629:
1628:
1623:
1573:
1570:
1533:
1530:
1497:the candidates
1466:eligible users
1455:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1375:
1372:
1355:
1354:
1348:
1347:
1333:
1330:
1311:
1308:
1289:help? Cheers.
1281:
1278:
1222:
1219:
1199:
1196:
1163:the candidates
1132:eligible users
1121:
1114:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1091:
1088:
1069:
1068:
1054:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
987:
929:
874:
868:
829:
826:
825:
824:
751:
744:
657:
656:Cleanup banner
654:
653:
652:
629:
628:
587:
584:
567:
564:
553:60.241.226.102
540:
537:
536:
535:
501:
498:
495:
494:
488:
487:
458:
455:
454:
453:
434:Chris Salewicz
429:
401:
393:
389:
288:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
215:
212:
211:
210:
205:
154:
153:
148:
145:Article Wizard
138:
129:
124:
103:
100:
37:
36:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1638:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1616:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1590:
1586:
1578:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1550:
1546:
1538:
1527:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1510:
1504:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1452:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1423:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:98.114.190.60
1316:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1287:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1263:
1258:. Thank you.
1257:
1253:
1248:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1208:The Keymaster
1205:
1193:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1176:
1170:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1134:
1133:
1128:
1127:
1118:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1097:The Keymaster
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1062:
1058:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1002:
1001:
1000:
995:
991:
986:
985:
980:
979:
978:
974:
969:
968:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
943:
942:
937:
933:
928:
927:
922:
917:
916:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
872:
867:
865:
861:
857:
853:
845:
844:
840:
836:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:
805:
804:
800:
795:
794:
785:
782:
777:
775:
771:
767:
762:
760:
759:
749:
743:
742:
737:
733:
729:
717:
710:
703:
695:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
672:
665:
661:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
599:
597:
593:
583:
582:
578:
574:
573:ChallengeCick
563:
562:
558:
554:
548:
545:
544:Geoff Emerick
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
493:
489:
485:
480:
474:
473:
469:
465:
452:
448:
444:
439:
435:
430:
427:
423:
422:Rolling Stone
419:
415:
410:
409:eureka moment
406:
402:
394:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
360:
359:
351:
346:
342:
336:
334:
330:
326:
320:
317:
313:
312:
307:
303:
297:
295:
287:
278:
274:
270:
269:The Keymaster
265:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:The Keymaster
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
228:The Keymaster
225:
221:
214:Seeking input
209:
208:Album sources
206:
204:
201:
200:
199:
196:
195:
191:
187:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
137:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
119:
118:
116:
112:
108:
99:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
56:
55:
48:
47:
45:
34:
30:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1593:
1582:
1553:
1542:
1500:
1494:
1471:
1464:
1458:
1456:
1429:
1424:
1421:
1377:
1361:Gerda Arendt
1358:
1352:Three years!
1313:
1292:
1285:
1283:
1261:
1251:
1249:
1234:
1232:
1201:
1166:
1160:
1137:
1130:
1124:
1122:
1093:
1072:
1070:
1049:
1044:
1026:
982:
964:
924:
901:
897:
876:
870:
850:— Preceding
846:
831:
790:
786:
778:
773:
765:
763:
756:
753:
747:
696:
692:Citation bot
678:
662:
659:
618:Tree Critter
603:Tree Critter
600:
596:WP:NOTLYRICS
589:
569:
549:
542:
506:Gerda Arendt
503:
460:
437:
425:
421:
417:
413:
404:
385:
381:
377:
355:
349:
340:
337:
332:
331:and four of
328:
324:
321:
309:
301:
298:
290:
285:
245:
217:
197:
178:my talk page
176:, ask me on
155:
147:if you wish)
106:
105:
57:
50:
49:
43:
41:
40:
32:
26:
1502:voting page
1402:GloryRoad66
1381:GloryRoad66
1204:this thread
1168:voting page
1030:Richard3120
879:Richard3120
770:new episode
709:WP:Reflinks
634:WT:MOSALBUM
327:, three of
186:Aboutmovies
182:{{help me}}
168:using four
143:(using the
1615:Categories
1594:discussion
1554:discussion
1486:topic bans
1398:Glyn Johns
1152:topic bans
923:". Ugh. –
835:DENBRO1995
781:Alan White
727:HairedGirl
688:WP:LINKROT
492:Two years!
420:, perhaps
345:first part
316:E. H. Carr
158:Wikipedian
1482:site bans
1431:Mick gold
1400:article!
1374:New name!
1148:site bans
684:Bare URLs
350:Wild Life
160:! Please
1337:Precious
1252:articles
1073:Revolver
1045:Revolver
898:Revolver
871:Revolver
852:unsigned
787:Cheers.
736:contribs
721:banner.
660:Hi JG66
638:WT:ALBUM
477:Precious
224:WP:SONGS
222:over at
127:Tutorial
107:Welcome!
1509:NoACEMM
1294:Tkbrett
1175:NoACEMM
966:Tkbrett
894:Richard
810:Tkbrett
792:Tkbrett
374:Tkbrett
357:Tkbrett
111:welcome
102:Welcome
959:Taxman
873:Deluxe
784:book.
732:(talk)
325:Shout!
292:to to
170:tildes
1075:(!).
1051:zmbro
984:zmbro
926:zmbro
725:Brown
521:Gerda
418:Uncut
405:Money
1603:talk
1563:talk
1520:talk
1472:The
1435:talk
1406:talk
1385:talk
1365:talk
1323:talk
1271:talk
1212:talk
1186:talk
1138:The
1101:talk
1081:talk
1077:JG66
1061:cont
1057:talk
1034:talk
1010:talk
994:cont
990:talk
936:cont
932:talk
910:talk
906:JG66
883:talk
860:talk
839:talk
818:talk
814:JG66
750:book
680:WP:V
666:the
646:talk
642:JG66
622:talk
607:talk
577:talk
557:talk
529:talk
525:JG66
519:Hey
510:talk
468:talk
447:talk
443:JG66
414:Mojo
308:and
294:CA$
273:talk
264:JG66
254:talk
250:JG66
232:talk
190:talk
162:sign
134:and
96:2021
94:and
92:2020
88:2019
84:2018
80:2017
76:2016
72:2015
68:2014
64:2013
60:2012
1300:(✉)
1286:The
1262:Yee
1247:).
1059:) (
992:) (
972:(✉)
934:) (
892:Hi
808:Hi
798:(✉)
734:• (
464:Hzh
363:(✉)
314:by
304:by
1617::
1605:)
1565:)
1522:)
1511:}}
1507:{{
1484:,
1437:)
1408:)
1387:)
1367:)
1359:--
1325:)
1273:)
1266:no
1214:)
1188:)
1177:}}
1173:{{
1150:,
1103:)
1083:)
1036:)
1012:)
912:)
885:)
862:)
841:)
820:)
776:.
719:}}
713:{{
705:}}
699:{{
674:}}
668:{{
648:)
624:)
609:)
598:.
579:)
559:)
531:)
512:)
504:--
470:)
449:)
416:,
275:)
256:)
234:)
192:)
98:.
90:,
86:,
82:,
78:,
74:,
70:,
66:,
62:,
1601:(
1561:(
1518:(
1433:(
1404:(
1383:(
1363:(
1321:(
1269:(
1229:âš
1210:(
1184:(
1099:(
1079:(
1063:)
1055:(
1032:(
1008:(
996:)
988:(
938:)
930:(
908:(
881:(
858:(
837:(
816:(
738:)
644:(
620:(
605:(
575:(
555:(
527:(
508:(
466:(
445:(
388:.
271:(
262:@
252:(
230:(
188:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
