User talk:Hydnjo/Archive07

3900:

to a minimum, but since I am still addicted to this place, I can't help it. Also, starting Saturday there will be no way for me to edit anymore because I will no longer have internet at home (I'm moving, so it's being cut off). On top of moving, I have school exams coming up, and three other huge problems all tied together which involves a legal procedure (court case) in which I am a witness and all that has been stressing me out lately (exams, plus moving, plus problems and court case). I decided to leave Wiki for a while because I found myself stressed out over edit wars, and vandalism when I didn't need that stress right now (normally i wouldn't mind, it's part of editing), and since the court dates and exams all coincide with the first week of December, I decided to put December 10 (which should be a date when everything has returned back to normal) as my return date. Since I still have internet, I do come around Wiki sometimes just to watch, or as i mentioned, to read an article but that won't be occuring anymore as of Saturday because it'll be nearly impossible to come on at all. Wiki used to take up about 85% of my internet time, now it's down to 5% and that's just cause my addiction to this place has me coming back for more! LOL. As you can see, I've kept my edits to a minimum for the past two days and after this, I'll be stopping completely because tomorrow I have errands to run for my moving, saturday I'm moving, and I won't have any internet until December 1 at the least. Then, i'll have exams and the court proceedings, and once all that's past, I'll be able to come back. I apologize again for sounding like I was watching over you, and I trust your judgement in editing and dealing with vandals since you are a more experienced user than I, but I just thought you had a question for me and didn't realize it was a list you were making for once I returned. I hope you aren't upset with me, and I am glad you are willing to help. Thanks. --

1780:

either delete this from the template or change the category), but this shouldn't be one of them. You can reference a template in a manner that causes the template to be expanded ("compiled") into the page when you save it (and further changes to the template don't affect that page). How you'd do this is by entering (for example) {{subst:Mainpage date|July 24|2005}}. It will look the same when you preview, but after saving it if you edit the article again you'll see the expanded code (not the template reference). At some point, somebody may suggest you do it this way. The tradeoff is future changes to the template don't affect articles already using it (and you can't find references via "what links here") but it's less work for the software to regenerate the page (it doesn't have to look up the definition of the template). Changing a template used on thousands of pages is also an issue - it causes the software to do a bunch of database work to indicate that the pages using it need to be regenerated the next time they're viewed.

3933:

the same pages I do, so they probably jumped on any bad edits ASAP. I think only the miami-dade school pages are not watched by anyone else except me. I actually managed to stay away from here for three days, and that's because I had no internet while I moved, but trying to stay away from here is impossible (i discovered the internet is boring without wikipedia). I still have my finals coming up next week, and then the court date, which is what was causing most of my stress (i'm a witness, not a defendant or plaintiff, but I'm testifying against an old friend and that has torn apart my friendship with several people). Now, before I leave another legacy... I just want to say thanks again, and if you need any help from me, I'll gladly do it without question. --

1554:

milestones an article reaches that you thought worth recording. The ones I personally regard are important are the Main Page date and Featured Article date, though I would say that more important than the date at which either event/status occurred/was achieved is the simple acknowledgement of this. The Featured template does a good job and has become institutionalised, though I remain surprised that more isn't made within an article's space if it makes it all the way to the front page - I regard MP articles as being 'first among equals' and deserve recognition for this. Now that some of us have begun to ensure that such articles are noted on their talk pages, adding the date has come naturally.

1776:(which doesn't exist). The fix is to change the reference on Hey Jude's talk to {{Mainpage date|July 24|2005}}. Why the link changes from blue to red is because the template expansion changed. It used to use the date only to display the date (wikified, so that user prefs for date format display will take effect). With Brain0918's (or ALoan's) version the date arg is also used as part of the link to the summary article. When it's only used as a date, it doesn't matter whether it's "Month day" or "day Month" (and either displays the same way assuming you've picked a date format in your user prefs). When it's used in the link to the FA summary article it HAS to be "Month day". 375:

if that date had been easily available (think right there on the talk page) then I may well have gone on to a better understanding of an article's evolution (some articles age better than others) and been amazed or prompted to fix some deterioration. At first I didn't think that I was asking for a great deal within a Featured article's CV but I was wrong. It seems to some to be a big deal and an unreasonable request. I'm not in any way demeanimg your work, in fact, it will be quite helpful to anyone's searching an article's history. My comments are directed towards finding a way (going forward) to memorialize the Main page date within the article itself. Thanks for listening,

99:. My own interest came about while reading some FA or another and wondering how the article had evolved (or devolved) since it became a FA and of equal or even more relevance since being published on the Main Page. I've been tagging the Main Page articles for a few weeks now (on their talk page) as a temporary measure after finding little enthusiasm from others to memorialize this date somehow within the FA template (to indicate the date of promotion) and then to have perhaps a different template after MP publication to record both dates. I think my concern is legitimate in that the current FA template gives no clue as to its vintage and as we can see at 59:. It's currently auto-generated from the FAC logs, which I'm finding to be not really regular enough to make it work smoothly. As an intermediate step, I've created (not posted yet) a list of all the featured articles with their nominator(s). It seems like it might be worthwhile adding the original featured date, and (this is really why I think you might be interested) the main page appearance date and keep this updated as a page. Eventually we might have to break it down by year or something, but for now I think a single list would do. I assume if such a thing existed, you'd be interested (right?). Please let me know what you think about this. -- 2140:. I think we can remove the red words though. I'd really love to protect that page once everything has settled down. I'm not too keen on putting moving the "Ask Knowledge a Question" into a more prominent place quite yet, but I have proposed that the bottom links be placed in alphabetical order as a compromise. I think that link has caused the reference desk to swell to well over 700 questions at the moment! Putting it into an even more prominent place would make it even harder to maintain, although I'm not sure if shifting it over would really make much of a difference. I'm actually thinking of writing a bot to maintain the RD pages at the moment. -- 603:(replacing MONTHDAY with {{{1}}} and YEAR with {{{2}}}) then you'd invoke it with {{whatever|September 5|2005}}. If you want to try this I'll help if necessary. And, BTW, no apologies necessary. Templates and meta-templates and programming and mathematical logic are what I DO and have done for a very long time (so, are very second nature to me). I'm sure it's just a familiarity thing. If you're interested, and you do one or two (or ten or twenty every year for thirty years :) ) I'm sure you'll get the hang of it. And, further BTW, thanks for the compliment (hearing your side). I actually do try to listen. -- 2426:

Ummmm, this is dumb. It would be FAR more efficient for the smaller (42x42) version of the image to be stored on the server. Given that this is a copyrighted image of the Wikimedia Foundation, there might be some sensitivity to uploading a pre-condensed 42x42 version of the 600x600 original. I'm not sure if there's a way to force the rescaling to be done by the user's browser (rather than by the Apache server), but I'm trying to figure out a way to do this. Please stay tuned. --

2323:

1947:

names. The wikipedia "template language" is pretty primitive - something as simple sounding as recognizing a date is in "day Month" form and transforming it to "Month day" form is actually quite difficult. What it's really set up for is creating a shorthand notation for a chunk of text, with arguments simply substituted in (like a form letter). Doing any computation or making the output vary based on parameters is extremely difficult. I can't think of any way (well, no

669:) and put the table in it, using {{{1}}} for the first argument, {{{2}}} for the second argument (you can also do the arguments by name, but I suspect by number is easier in this case). Then, you reference it in an article with {{featured day|September 7|2005}}. If you want to do the arguments by name, you'd use something like {{{day}}} instead of {{{1}}} (and {{{year}}} instead of {{{2}}}) and (in the article) something like {{featured day|day=September 7|year=2005}}-- 3263:

anymore - I had said before that I'm not a techy type and looking back I'm quite surprised I even got involved with this project in the first place. It's not good, hardworking editors like yourself that have pissed me off, it's the 'clan' that dominate this whole thing... it just all seems so pointless! WP is a great idea, but I don't think it works in practice. Keep it up - you do a good job round here. --

3003:. You may not have been aware of that user's background. He was a recovering methadone addict, had a rather stormy history on Knowledge, is often suicidal, and has very recently started using methadone again. He's also mentally ill. He has just left Knowledge. I don't want to play on your emotions or conscience by hinting that your comments led to his relapse or his departure. I am sure they did 1808:? I'm confused. Would it help if I explained this issue on the template talk page? I suspect ALoan and/or Brian0918 simply don't realize the change has broken some (I don't know how many) references. Please don't give up on this. Other people editing what you start is the wiki-way. With templates, sometimes folks come along and make changes that require updating some (sometimes 1812:) references to the template (and they should generally realize this and make the necessary updates themselves). This is just like somebody coming after you and editing an article, although with slightly (sometimes dramatically) more impact. The real beauty of the wiki is that rather than any individuals owning certain pieces everyone owns everything. Is this helpful? -- 413:

page, which I think is Raul654) to do it as part of making a page today's featured page. I really can't think of any automatic way to do this, and I think any way (period) would require an edit to the page (or its talk). You've talked to Raul654 about this, and he seems to be somewhat resistant. I can't find a description of the maintenance procedures for

3274:

that they seem to think WP is here to be written rather than read, and surely that's wrong. Seeing that you're from NH - a part of the United States that has always struck me as being particularly agreeable (Kerry won there for starters!) - I doubt there isn't much danger around should you wander on to the streets at night, but do keep up the good work. --

2059: 3504:

put them in a list on my talk page otherwise I'll assume that they are the articles listed on your user page. Please take a break without worrying about the the Wikitasks that you have been tending. I'm sure I'll know when you're back so best wishes resolving your personal stuff and thanks for asking. ;-) Heidi and Joe, --

3975:

at the moment, and had been reducing my Knowledge activity, so delayed thanking people, but I'm finding the new rollback button so easy to use that I'm just keeping Knowledge open on my browser while working on other things, and I thought I'd like to thank at least a few of those who supported me while I'm here. Cheers.

2251:

adminship - I don't contribute anywhere near enough or often enough (like I said, this week off sick was an exception). And I'm really not sure about having contributions recognised - I think you need to mix with the 'elite' to get noticed! Not that I'm bothered by that sort of thing - it's not the reason I'm here.

3974:

Hi, I want to say a big thank you to you for supporting my RfA. I hope I'll make a good job of it. It's quite flattering to get support from people who disagree with me on article content, and to know that they still trust me not to "misbehave" as an admin. I'm supposed to be working on an assignment

3503:

Hey, I just took a peek at your stress-meters, no problem - go away - and don't worry, I'll look after the featured articles. Even if I miss "...to come" I'll not miss "FA date", I promise. My own watchlist has about 200 entries so adding your's will be no big deal. Just to make sure I have them all,

2868:

Thanks for the notice. You know, I am surprised at people being so worked up about asking people to vote for an RfA. I had seen people do this a number of times (and I'm sure others do it behind the scenes with e-mail). However, if I had known there was such strong feelings about this I wouldn't have

2525:

I've been so astonished and flattered by all the support for my RfA that my head is about to burst! (And when it does I'll be sure to write a Knowledge article about it. :) Thank you for all your support and your encouragement in the past, and also for your note on my Talk page - without that I might

1946:

and any order would do. The arg names could be more concise, for example m=, d=, and y=. Using named arguments you can put the arguments in any order, but you have to remember what the names are. Using positional arguments you have to put them in the right order, but you don't have to remember any

1553:

Back again! Purely by chance, I stumbled across your earlier correspondence with Rick Block regarding this matter. I started adding the template for reasons I stated earlier, so we've obviously arrived at the same point independently - fools seldom differ and all that! I noted your comments about the

1512:

First, thanks for your second message of thanks - and in light of going back through all the old ones, I certainly don't expect this everytime! I wasn't expecting any help with this, but the idea of working from both ends is a good one and is much appreciated. I'll keep a record of where I'm up to on

374:

version? Did it get better or worse since then? I'm not a student of article evolution, I'm just curious. If I were a student of article evolution I could track down the version in question with some effort and time. But just being curious, eh, there's plenty more to read around here so I go on. But,

258:

Thanks for the heads-up. The information will be be quite helpful in tagging prior talk pages with their Main page date. I'd still like to see the Main page date (going forward) just be part of the selection process rather than what I'm doing now. I feel as though I'm going against the grain somehow.

3899:

Hi. I'm sorry if I made it seem as if I am watching over your shoulder, but I'm not. I came here to research a topic for a school essay and I had a new message and thought it was you asking a question, but was unaware it was a list you were making, so I answered it. I tried to keep my edits down

1901:

Thanks for the further message, and sorry for any confusion. I think Rick has identified the problem: the template will need to be invoked as {{mainpage date|Month day|Year}} for the version that links to the subpage to work (if that is the one that we stick with). But as I say above , I am rather

1066:

Ah yes - it's quite interesting to reflect how modern society has evolved in the Western world. It seems as if we have progressed from an agricultural, to an industrial, to a service oriented, to an information based society, in this order. What would be interesting to observe is the next generation

763:

If you move the template, I believe the old name stays as a redirect and it's then usable under either name. It's probably good form to edit the references to the new name, but I don't think this is particularly necessary (on the other hand, they're only like 2 of them or something, right?). BTW -

425:

indicating the date, but I really doubt you'll be able to get Raul654 to edit the articles to add it. You feel strongly enough about this to be doing it yourself, so you might propose an addendum to the "featured on main page" process along the lines of "Raul654 does his stuff, and then Hydnjo adds

211:

is brand new - I'm still working on it. Second, the intermediate list I'm creating can have whatever we'd like. To make it relatively easy to update (I think it will have to be updated manually), I think the primary sort will have to be by FAC promotion date. I'm going through the MP archives and

3913:

Yes, I'm gone now for good until December (I was just waiting for your reply, but now I'm definately gone since my internet will be disconnected soon) You'll see why I was around a bit, and why I'm taking a wikibreak when you read the book I left ya. Sorry for the misunderstanding, and thanks for

3262:

Hi, thought I should quickly register myself to acknowledge the emails I received whilst I was away from WP - I have both studio versions of High Hopes, although I must say that the live version from P*U*L*S*E is the best. You'll note from my user page that I really can't be bothered with Knowledge

2806:

I double checked my block log. Wonderfool will be back, 31 December 2005. I also told him that if at any time he wanted to be unbanned, I would gladly do it for him. I haven't received anything in my mailbox yet. I think I'm going to revert those pagelinkings. If that is really Wonderfool, he would

412:

Just to echo back what I'm hearing, you want the "featured on main page" date to be prominently indicated on the page (or it's talk). This is what you've been doing page by page (after the fact) and you'd like Raul654 (or whoever does the work behind the scenes related to geting a page on the main

346:

Defeature and renominations are rare, but we could also describe how to find these. I guess my bottom line is I'm not sure it's worth adding the main page date to the talk page, given an adquate alternative exists. So, I guess this becomes a question for you - do you think the alternative (search

3932:

No, I didn't have anyone else looking for me. I actually only asked because I was hoping you would place the mainpage date templates on newly chosen mainpage articles while I was gone. I do appreciate that you went all the way and helped watch everything, thanks! There are a few people who watch

3273:

Joe (I presume), thanks for your message. I'll let you know if I do return, but it would certainly be under a different username. What I said on my page is no word of a lie - there are types round here that make my skin crawl and I have no desire be part of their project - one way of putting it is

3036:

No problem, I had no clue. Just thought he was being a "wise-guy," thrust and parry kind of fooling around. Also, I didn't notice any followup to my comment at Redwolf24 so I assumed all was cool with everyone. I will definitely comment on his talk page as best I can. Thanks for keeping me in the

2425:

The logo that's included at this point is a .4M version of the image rescaled on the server (!) to a 42x42 version for inclusion with the template. The rescaling is done by an Apache server (not cached by the numerous squid cache servers) every time any user views a page including the template.

2347:

I can't believe that I asked a question requiring such a convoluted (to my mind) answer! Now I'm feeling bad that I put you through all of this for such a minor annoyance. Thanks of course Brian for looking into this, I was just wondering if adding the logo could have been done in a more efficient

2322:

1714:

Sorry for butting in on the template: I must admit to not looking at the history before I edited it. My main concern was to ensure that the date was properly wikified, so the user preferences would format it appropriately. The version that was there when I first edited it had the date inside the

812:

before realizing that acronyms were not the best form for template names and I'm assuming that the reason is that the name should be indicative of its function. Also assuming that this template is going to be around for a while and will be seen in lots of future edit windows I would like to change

462:

in that it clearly articulates what I've been trying to say. At this point, I think that providing a foothold for the feature-master to dig-in on this point would not be constructive. I'm going to let it slide for a while as I quietly do my additive thing going forward (and backwards with your new

4035:

Well, no. I do have some words of my own. I'm enjoying myself tremendously here. I do a lot of reading about subjects with which I am familiar which leads me to an astounding number of places with which I am totally unfamiliar. I sometimes stumble into areas in which I wish to express opinion and

2450:

I can't believe that I asked a question requiring such a convoluted (to my mind) answer! Now I'm feeling bad that I put you through all of this for such a minor annoyance. Thanks of course Rick for looking into this, I was just wondering if adding the logo could have been done in a more efficient

1563:

As for recording the date FA status was achieved, the template could be amended, but a big backlog would have to be cleared to ensure the red links don't lurk for too long. And it might be hard to get this institutionalised (which is surprising, given how steeped in red tape WP is!). I'm going to

624:

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this, not by any means for lack of interest. I would very much like to invoke a template as you have suggested. I really don't how to set it up though. How does something like {{Template:FAD}} (Featured Article Date) seem to you? Thanks again for your

516:

where MONTHDAY and YEAR are passed in as parameters. If this template existed, your edit to the talk page would consist of adding the template specifying the date (not particularly different than what you're already doing). If you're template averse for any reason, let me know and we can create

3991:

You're not an admin? Hell, can I put you up for adminship? I know its annoying and time-consuming answering the questions (I had to do that twice, but of course failed both votes), but I wanna get my "percentage of users I've nominated for adminship who have been granted as thus (for more than 1

3535:

places the next article on there, I add the template and go to the archive, then do the same for every article chosen and when he's done adding, I unwatch the now filled in date and watch the next empty date. Thanks again for helping me, I just have too many things going on to have to watch for

2393:

with the WP Mainpage logo (nice touch). The weird part is that when I call a talk page that calls that template there is a hang-time of (sometimes) several seconds between the template expansion without the logo until the logo shows up. Also, my browser (Safari) progress bar indicates incomplete

2290:

2102:

hmm... dunno if i'm ready to be a sysop; I don't even know how to add that little arrow thing (that redirects) to the edit summary people add when editing pages. Of course, If I were nominated I'd accepted, but I doubt I'd get much support. Maybe i'm just being overly cynical. Thanks for your

1937:

Hi - Can we make a version that isn't sensitive to the date ordering? Well, yes, but my guess is you might not like it very much. One way would be to use three named arguments rather than two positional arguments. Ignoring what the template code would look like, the reference on the talk page

1410:

Thanks for the congratulations — I was amazed at how much support it received. Re the TfD: I think that, seeing as there is still dissent from another admin on whether this is a speedy, I won't speedy it myself; I don't want to run into trouble on my second day! If you like, you can tag it again

970:

that indicates the date an article achieves featured status - which I'm guessing is where you'd really like to go with this). Re credit - I'm perfectly willing to share, but I don't see how it matters (it's not like we're filing a patent or anything, right?). I promise I won't begrudge you any

2069:

Blimey! You might well have more time than me, but you've almost certainly got more tenacity too. I was working on doing a month per day if I'm lucky with time, but thanks for chugging along much quicker. Let's keep this up and hope that it'll soon become standard practice. Have a Working Man's

1779:

BTW - the way you're using it causes it to be NOT "compiled" into the page, so when the template changes if you redisplay a page using it the page should show the change. There are some weird cases where this doesn't happen (like if the template adds the page including it to a category and you

1666:

Thanks for your message, though when I started using MPD I did notice the error straight away - it didn't result in a link to the Today's Featured Article/(date). I was going to notify you but saw the discussion on your page and so carried on with the old one. I just find it easier to type the

2250:

As for the user page - at the time I had nothing to say on my page, hence the links. I'm not usually a techy/Webby type, so I'm surprised that I've got into WP - suppose it's the encyclopedic bit that I like. That said, I shouldn't hold your breath waiting for me to turn up on nominations for

2242:

I've had some time off recently and thought I may as well get going with the Portal, so thank you for your encouraging remarks. It seemed like a gap worth filling (am surprised there wasn't a portal before), and hopefully I'll get time to keep it going. Most of the formatting is based on the

764:

I just assumed you preferred FAD (which would be OK with me). If you want to move it to a new name, I'm OK with that, too. If you move it to a new name and fix the references and want to get rid of the redirect, let me know and I can delete the redirect (with my awesome admin powers!). --

2533:), after following that link you gave me. I personally think that a condition of his further participation in Knowledge should be that he stops trying to prove his point, whatever it is, in the voting. He's creating WAY too much drama and pointless discussion. But that's just my two cents. 2960:

Thanks for your comment on the formatting of my question, but I didn't understand what you said. I did a diff on the histories and saw no difference. I signed my name with the 4 tildes, so I don't know why you suggested that I didn't. I am not being defensive, I simply don't

1363:

I really like the FA date template you made. In fact, I liked it so much I made a clone of it for articles which are scheduled to soon appear on the front page (Of course, people will have to update the template once this date is passed). I also promoted the templates on

2394:

until the logo is in place. The other templates on the same page (Featured, etc) appear all at once, logo and all. I'm concerned that the way the logo was added may be incorrect. Please take a look and let me know what you think so I can sleep soundly tonight. Thanks, --

2291:

1803:

Did I miss something? What's the problem? To fix the articles where the link is red, the first argument needs to be changed to "Month day" format (rather than "day Month" format). Or do you object to linking to the day-specific summary article rather than

3296:

I'm sorry that I mislead you on this. It appears that any HTML errors were being silently tended to with Tidy and so folks weren't aware of any markup problems in their sig. When Tidy went down all hell broke loose as every markup error did its thing. :-(

2117:

It's not so much that they'll find it with the new name, but that experienced users will refer to the page by that title, and it will show up at the top of the page. I reverted some, but not all of Barrett's changes. Hopefully, he'll accept the compromise.

1072:

I had no idea my user account was listed on the Signpost - heh, sometimes I think there's too much information to keep track of on Knowledge! Usually I just focus on what's important at the moment and trust that the Wiki will help solve everything else! :D

945:

still disagrees on the speedy part. I don't really want to do battle over this so I'm not going to retag, I'll keep an eye out in case someone tries to use it (someone already has) and edit it out. On another note, I think you should receive credit here

1955:

summary article. An unreasonable way is to have two sets of 366 templates, one for each day in either form, and use these templates inside the main template to expand the argument to what's needed for the link to the TFA summary for the given date.

3481:

Hey, I'm going to be taking a wikibreak since there are a lot of stressful things going on in my life, and wanted to know if you could take care of adding the {{mainpage date to come|Date}} templates on new chosen articles while I'm gone. Thanks! --

1976:

No, I think that may make the situation worse. Heck after HighHopes and I are done it's only going to be used once a day anyway. I'm sure we all can keep track and catch any trip-ups (mainly from EU I would guess). Thank you for taking a look. :-)

192:

So, I think that these dates should be readily available for the article's starter, contributors, readers, curious, students of wiki culture or anything else. Sorry to dump this on your talk page but it came to mind and I was already here. ;-)

3551:. We all need a break now and again, you know, stuff happens. I'll look after things so don't worry. Of course the way WP has been behaving lately it's a wonder that anyone can get anything done around here (kidding ... just kidding) ;-) -- 994:

I doubt that this will gather any resistance to delete but just in case you have an excellent Plan B worked out. Also, my response line is: "As much as I would love full credit, this template is actually the result of a collaboration between

2203:

This edit should not have an arrow because I clicked on the plus sign at the top of your user page. But, if you were to click the edit link to the right of this post and reply here, you should see a little arrow in your edit contributions.

660:

To avoid the pun (and, I generally prefer not to use acronyms), how about {{template:featured day}}? Renaming is certainly possible later, so it's probably not worth agonizing too much about the name. To set it up, you create a page like

1518:

As I said in my message on the template talk page, I was surprised that a MP appearance by an article wasn't logged on the article's talk page - and it wasn't so long ago (I'm still fairly new) that I thought that a featured article

1883:

I assume you've seen the template talk. The newly required syntax is {{Mainpage date|MONTH DAY|YEAR}}. I left a suggestion that the folks that broke it should fix it :) (although, sigh, we all own it so we should all fix it). --

1771:

with the date as part of the page name in "Month day, year" format. The template on the talk page for Hey Jude puts the date in "day Month, year" format, so when the link to "Today's featured article" is generated the link goes to

2937:

Thank you both again for all your kindness and support! And please don't take down the big yellow banner from my talk page - I like it, I'm going to archive it with the rest of my stuff there! :) Actually I haven't had occasion to

1411:

yourself although don't remove the TfD notice of course. You can always just check the "What links here" for the template once a day or something over the next week and replace any usages with the new one you have/will made/make. -

212:

adding the date of MP appearance. These dates won't be on the article's talk page, but in this separate list. I'll post the list fairly soon (still working on it). I'll let you know when I post it and ask you what you think. --

3103:

I am archiving the RD pages less frequently partially because I have become increasingly busy with other activities on Knowledge. I am so happy to see that the number of active questions has finally decreased below 100 per page!

434:

and have effectively been doing this anyway. If you'd like to institutionalize it as "standard practice" you'll have to get consensus behind it. I think it's a reasonable idea (I also think it's reasonable to add a date to the

3403:

there - some user just decided to blank the entire page one day, and I didn't bother adding it back in. Also, click on "edit this page", and scroll to the very bottom of the page, where there's a secret conversation going on...

1195:

As its author I take no position as to memorializing my rant. I feel awkward that it has taken the notice that it has taken already. Scrap it if you want, I can always recreate it later if it seems relevant. Thanks for asking,

3523:, since there are too many to place on there. All I need is someone to watch and make sure the articles aren't vandalized, many of them are watched by several users so those are covered, but there are some (like most of the 1667:

command ( {{mainpage date.... etc}} ) and copy it, and then just paste it for each talk page, updating the day of the month each time. Works alright for me! Did April 04 today - will have May done by end of tomorrow. --

1773: 3891:

The IP explained his removal in the article's talk page, and a google search reveals no mention of the Miami Federals except on Knowledge mirror sites, so it looks good; back to my hiatus. Happy Thanksgiving! --

3947:

That's awesome, and shows how confusing it really can be. I had had had had as being stupid, but now I have had had had had as an example, I had better have had had hads removed, as I realise how dangerous they

540:. Try as I might they always came out wrong so I quit trying. You make it seem so simple that I feel embarrassed at my lack of effort. Thanks for pulling me along, that's the same thing I did with my kids. ;-() 3322:

Thanks for the note. It really seemed like all hell broke loose when that 'Tidy' thing went down— It even spoiled me user page. Hopefully, everything is back to normal and will stay that way. Thnaks again.

1832:

Wow. I'm honored. Thank you. BTW - would you like me to explain the issue at the template talk page? Your last note there sounds a little angry (alright, it sounds a lot angry). Please let me know. --

1048:

Ah yes, my adminship. Thanks for the congrats! That was quite recent actually. I think I come across differently on that RfA than in my normal activities on Knowledge. Have you read the thread about the

2238:

Obviously, first and foremost for the barnstar - not sure I've deserved it, but thanks all the same. It has pride of place on my userpage and I hope you don't mind me appending it with what it was for.

1932: 4040:). So. I guess it's "no thanks" at this time. I'm fully enjoying my own self-inflicted challenges and have no desire to assume any other implied duties. This is not to say that I'm unwilling to help 2763:

Hello Hydnjo, glad to help with the stub. sorry it took so long but its a very busy wikiproject even with 100 of us working on it! It was the first stub template ive made so hopefully it works ok :)

3923:

I have returned. I've come to realize I can't stay away from this place (I tried). Thank you for helping me out, even with the whole misunderstanding; sorry about all that. Thank You again. --

3007:. I think he went back on methadone before you made that comment, and there were many other Wikipedias who wrote things that upset him. As regards his departure, he has left before and come back. 2491:

You are far more experienced than I in these matters so go right ahead. Im sure you'll design a fine disambig page. My concern was about preserving the usage of the term within so many contexts.

1594:

Good point - while I had appreciated your interest in the evolution of an article after being given such status, being there on the MP does tend to give rise to a flurry of editing activity. --

1564:

drop a note to Rick Block and alert him to this thread. For now though, I maintain that acknowledging MP or FA status is more important than the detail, and I'm glad we've got going on that. --

1263:

request. I'm in your debt. I read the article to Heidi this morning and although she saw some merit and some insights she agreed that it wasn't suitable for an encyclopedia article. "Geesh, is

3017:

And yes, I realize that I have absolutely no right to make such a request – but, well, I feel sorry for him. Check the recent history of his user page, if you're interested. Regards.

1299:

And, if someone else had edited it I would have gladly given up ownership. That's the part I didn't understand. Perhaps the Admin thought that the article had some merit! Oh well,

1870:

I've always invoked it as follows:{{Mainpage date|DAY MONTH|YEAR}}. But now it seems that that is not correct. So, I'm at a loss. Thanks to all who have tried to help me here. --

3766:

would be the only other one; unless you already have it on your list? Thanks again! I'll be removing Wiki from my homepage now to discourage myself. Talk to you again around

2994: 1463:

Hey, thanks, that worked. I don't know what happened, I just logged on and all the dates were coming out this way! I don't remember changing it. Thanks again, for your help.

2689: 1628:

Just seen that you left a message with Rick Block around the same time - fools still seldom differ! Just out of interest, who was giving you all the trouble over this matter?--

1493: 366:

Obviously I'm not making my point with any degree of clarity. Allow me one more try. I happen to read an article that has been prominently tagged on its talk page as being a

2659:{{van-stub}} was the most specific stub I could find! Apologies to all the van and truck purists. Hopefully a van expert will be able to assist with this truck page anyway. 802:

Geesh, we may have to archive soon just because of this section! Please feel free to clear out your talk page, as you can see I've been duplicating here. Anyway, I started

208: 84: 56: 3855:

start writing a bot for the RD instead, but realistically I don't have the time to manage such a thing. Would you be willing to put in a bot request on behalf of the RD? --

1255:. Anyway, thanks for your mercy. Some things that seem perfectly rational late at night make my face turn red the next morning and I can't imagine that an admin was saying 1090:

you one day! It's well worth the consideration. I know you've been here for a while, and those extra buttons might complement your work here. Let me know what you think! --

3831: 395:

Also, as time and enthusiasm permit, I will definitely use your new WP reference pages to help tag prior FA pages with their Main page date. I am grateful for your help.

2019:

Hi, and thanks for adding the MainpageDate template to featured articles. You also added the "featured" tag to Pufferfish, but unfortunately I had to remove this again.

1086:

Would you like to become a "sir" someday too? :-) Let me know when you feel ready; I'd be honoured to nominate you when the time comes. Or, alternatively, I just might

2942:

any of the "superpowers" yet, aside from using the shortcut-revert once... but it does make me feel a little more affirmed. :) I'm helping in a situation right now in

4044:

out as you see fit to ask my assistance but I perceive being an Admin to be a level of commitment with which I feel uncomfortable. Thanks for your confidence, :-)

3447: 1756:

You changed it so the link goes to today's featured article summary (not the summary article for the date the article was on the main page), but with a wikified date

3122:. It was an honor to be both nominated and approved as an admin. If there is ever any adminish (is that a word :-) things you need help with, please let me know. -- 3250: 3086: 3021: 2946:, and if things continue to go poorly and people violate 3RR again, I'm going to start imposing temporary bans and protecting the page... *cackles gleefully* ;) - 2382: 2279: 1970: 1702: 1384: 880: 831: 726: 966:'s agreeing with the delete now, so I think all will be good at tfd (I'll watch I guess, and if the tide seems to be turning I'll suggest FAD become a version of 1041:

Those racoons seemed to have disappeared now...not sure what the mothballs did, but they're still on the ground! I think removing the food really helped though.

662: 1432:

on this list and let me know what you think. It looks like BS to me but I wanted to get another opinion before rv. Thanks, hydnjo 00:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

3228:

They're barnstars for minor edits. I personally think they are more special than the bigger normal barnstar, because the smaller one isn't awarded so often. --

1333: 695:

I jumped the gun before hearing back from you. Sorry about that. Should I tag it for speedy and start over or move it to a new name? Now I'm embarrassed. :-(

3638: 3528: 2816:-You think I'd've done this differently?!? What are you, some kinda psychologist or mind reader? Remember I always had a penchant for sockpuppets. Remember 1358: 421:

would be as good a place as any to bring this up (again). Rather than add the text like you've been doing, you might create a template similar in style to

370:

article. So, I casually ask a question in my mind: was it a featured article last week, last month, last year or when? How does this version compare to the

3789:

Ok got it. BTW, I'm one person and Heidi is another so I guess that makes us two people. Whereas Heidi is blind we try to make do with one account. ;-) --

3162:

Oh, I did it up, but to demonstrate by example I've only just realised this minute that my code has had two syntax errors for the past several months... --

1024: 2682: 3247: 3083: 3018: 1523:

an article profiled on the MP. It is nice to know that this exercise is being considered worthwhile - to be honest, I've never known quite how I can add

920: 600: 569:

despite all of the attacks, thanks for hearing my side of things in (I think) a fair way. I feel encouraged by your comments. I was beginning to wonder.

3023: 1747:

Brian0918 changed it so instead of just having a date, it linked to the featured article summary article as of the date the article was on the main page

1018: 335: 309: 3859: 3123: 2870: 2860: 2850: 1768: 1506: 1373: 2722: 3275: 3264: 3014:? I don't mean a grovelling apology, just a nice note to say that you didn't mean any offence and that you hope his problems sort themselves out. 2390: 2287: 2258: 2071: 2063: 2040:

Hi, just for clarification: I removed the "Featured" tag, but kept the "Mainpage" tag, since I think it is a great idea! Keep up the good work! --

1668: 1629: 1595: 1565: 1528: 1499: 3467: 3450: 1145:

After further reflection and under more sober circumstances I have tagged this article for speedy deletion as I believe it meets the criterion of

3602: 2821: 2750: 2746: 103:, some articles do not age very well. Please let me know if your plans address memorializing these dates within the article's talk page somehow. 3408: 3386: 3360: 2795: 2154: 1726:

and not the subpage. I thought it made sense to link to the subpage, but, so long as the date works, I'm not all that concerned about that. --

1420: 1115: 1094: 1077: 971:

glories that come your way as a result of this. You've been fighting for it for months, so I think you deserve at least most of the credit. --

2512: 2498: 2085: 912: 806: 3907:

P.S.- I might make one or two edits if they're necessary tonight, but after that I', definately gone (since I have no choice). Thanks again!

3113: 2904: 2873: 2863: 1844: 1823: 565:

the template. Thank you for helping me along in this matter (damn, that sounds so stiff and formal) lets try again: Hey Rick, champion of the

2834: 2731: 2165:

I appreciate your praise of the "vandal-blocker" I put in, but it's really a simple HTML comment. I tried to explain it in the talk page of

1853:

You're invoking the template wrong. You need to supply a date and year to get it to work right, just as it says on the template talk page. —

1487: 1452: 1429: 1376: 328: 324: 320: 236: 232: 228: 3278: 3088: 3044: 2458: 2192: 1684: 1645: 1611: 1581: 1544: 1031: 3379: 2924: 2589:

Its there, but it strangely does not appear. If you use the sectional edit, you'll see the username. I have no clue why this is happening.

2227: 1306: 1274: 1225: 1203: 1181: 1163: 4051: 2355: 2160: 2047: 1984: 1398: 3119: 2846: 1926: 1441: 1365: 418: 3819: 3796: 3774: 3750: 3558: 3511: 3157: 2642: 2616: 2600: 2417: 1351:

It was my mistake, I think my browser wasn't refreshing properly, I have since changed the image, and reverted it back to your version.

3126: 2830:

Um...not really...it's just really confusing that's all. Anyway, if you need to perform some page merges and stuff, let me know. :-) --

2526:

never have noticed that I was nominated, since RN put the announcement on my User page, and I rarely go there to read about myself! ;)

1369: 503: 3068: 2749:. And shall pretty much behave in a similar manner to Wonderfool. Apart from the whole being a wikipest for 2 hours every 9 months. -- 2314: 2005: 1763:

The red vs. blue FA date link is an issue with the format of the link to the summary article. The summary article is at a subpage of

1006: 956: 848: 738: 702: 649: 632: 576: 547: 474: 402: 382: 290: 200: 2717: 2706: 1344: 1750:

ALoan changed it to keep the link to the article's summary article but also display the date according to user prefs (wikified date)

1738: 4027:

I'm very honored and thankful if someone says something nice about my activity here, but in general I'm very critical of what I do.

3981: 2530: 2178: 1036: 3631: 3581: 1895: 1797: 1060: 4077:- unnecessary in this case - so reverted. If you think it warrents the template, feel free to discuss it on the talk page. :) -- 2970: 2696:!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my 1138: 1125: 3000: 2989: 2853: 506: 3232: 2840: 2776: 2736: 2437: 341:

Peer review and FA nomination are generally linked from the talk page, which makes these dates fairly discoverable by article.

2753: 2144: 1877: 305: 3695: 3527:

articles) that are probably watched only by me. My process for adding the templates to the new chosen articles is to go to

3252: 2536:

The whole RfA process is fascinating and mesmerizing. I may write about it after I'm done being put through the wringer. :)

2369: 2334: 91:

Hello Rick, well, that's one I never came across before. I'm assuming that you know about the listing of FAs by category at

3645: 2677: 2092: 39: 3969: 3223: 2758: 2476:

should be split up... it's hard to wikilink directly to a computer security type certificate (that's the issue I had with

2401: 2266: 2131: 1698: 50: 3446:

Hmmm... ;) In Belarus, his song "Why Does My Heart" is used in advertisement of Coca-Cola's product - BonAqua :-) --WBR,

2693: 2074: 1764: 1345: 592: 499: 414: 316: 4089: 2859:

Thanks for the vote. I was just trying to let people I'd interacted with over the months know about the vote. My bad. --

2845:

I have been nominated for an adminship and I was wondering if I could get your vote. If you feel inclined, please go to

2298: 266: 110: 3937: 3927: 3918: 3904: 3881: 3617: 3439: 3309:

It seems that this edit caused a re-rendering of this page and all looks fine. Again, sorry for the confusion. :-) --

3108: 1733: 3418: 3202: 2915:

Lemmings look like fat furry hamsters. They have strong legs and claws for digging. Thick fur helps to keep them warm.

2079: 2053: 1339: 1067:- the ones that grew up with the internet, took it for granted, and know all the nooks and crannies of the technology. 3218: 2950: 300:

How about adding a description of how to find the relevant dates for a featured article someplace prominent (like on

3495: 3491:

Oh and, not to be a bother, but can you keep an eye on my watchlist, too... it's listed on my userpage. Thanks! --

3237: 2811: 2663: 2484: 2261: 1467: 3877:, but I don't think that's what we need. I'll leave it to you to write something for the RD at your leisure! :-) -- 3688: 3666: 3334: 2894: 2034: 1336: 933: 3886: 3540: 3486: 3350: 3147: 2965: 2668: 2211: 1490:

is a page that you may be interested in. I'm after the 5 extra sysop buttons on here. At least, i think they're 5

1221:

Deleted as requested, no archival. Had anyone else edited it, it would have had to stay on for the entire week. --

4008: 2824: 2562: 2548: 2543: 2107: 3316: 3304: 3243: 2126: 1951:

way) to accept either "Month day" or "day Month" as a positional argument and preserve the link to the specific

1719:

subpage where the article has its main page write-up, which meant that the user preferences didn't reformat it.

1329:

who popped up on Wiktionary. His ancestory is unbeknownst to him currently, AFAIK. Family tree to be updated! --

3267: 2150:

I find the question mark distracting being on the right side. It sort of draws attention away from the text. --

3214:

Hey, I see you're doing great work on there. Just figured I'd drop a line to say thanks for the hard work :-)

3171: 1477: 1458: 1321: 3964: 3732: 3725: 3058: 2976: 2583: 1676: 1637: 1603: 1573: 1536: 911: 587:

So, um, does this mean you want to create a template? What would you like to call it? Something related to

3864: 3098: 2508:

Oh, not necessarily :-) I think you make a good point. I'll think about it and see what I can work out... -

2451:

way. As always, your research has helped me understand the underlying mechanics and I thank you for that. --

2348:

way. As always, your research has helped me understand the underlying mechanics and I thank you for that. --

2233: 2014: 3681: 1421: 1027:. I'm thinking of shrinking the size of the question mark by changing the number 48 to a smaller number. -- 45: 3131: 2955: 2652: 1415: 3960: 3702: 3674: 2088:. Hmm...didn't that term first enter Knowledge a while back ago? :-) And congrats on the new barnstar! -- 4057: 3476: 3284: 2881: 2097: 1448:

Agreed. It appears he was a gold digger and I can find no evidence of him being an electrical engineer.

3979: 3082:

Many thanks. I appreciate that! I know his outbursts are startling, but I'm sure he's a decent person.

2364: 723:

Thanks for wikifying the date, I forgot to follow your instructions. If I move {{Template:FAD}} to say

2932: 2801: 467:

right now but I thank you for suggesting the avenues to approach this in the future. Warmest regards,

3011: 2529:

As for Boothy443: what a ...(whatever)! I went looking and found lots more info about him (including

1919:

serving a useful function. We just need to hit upon a consensus version that works for everyone. --

599:

already exists and seems to be related. If you yank and put the table from above into a page called

3942: 2673:

for all your support and warm fuzzies. I really appreciate you, and I'm glad you're out there! :) -

2198: 2112: 3294:

is working again you may want to rv to the last before your fixes to get back to a "clean" version.

3986: 3341: 3815:

No, I just can't quit cold Turkey, ya know. LOL.... I NEED HELP! I promise, no more edits. --

280: 3257: 3207: 2567: 3870: 3609: 31:

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 1 September 2005 and 31 October 2005.

3346:

I can't say I know what happened. I've been noticing this happen quite often lately though. --

3061:

to get his attention, not to be disrespectful. Let me know if I can be helpful in any way. --

2520: 2467: 2023:

was a featured article, but is no longer featured, since most of the information was moved to

1405: 1326: 124:

These dates in my estimation are usually the the most volatile events in an article's history:

3976: 3574: 2788: 2769: 1722:

As far as I can see, the only difference between my version and yours is that yours links to

947: 837:

before I do anything else out of sorts. And yes I agree that going back and editing the now

3997: 3328: 3215: 2509: 2481: 2432: 2329: 1965: 1890: 1839: 1818: 1792: 977: 892: 770: 675: 609: 523: 445: 353: 245: 218: 65: 1910:

and more so that the date should be wikified so it displays according to user preferences.

239:. These lists are annotated with the main page appearance for each featured article. -- 8: 4086: 4078: 3519:

That's all of them, the only ones that aren't listed are the school articles attached to

2891: 2189: 2175: 2123: 1860: 1673: 1634: 1600: 1570: 1533: 1504: 458:

You have no idea how much your considerate response means to me. I'm delighted with your

430:

template to the talk page". I think (aside from the fancy shmancy template) you've been

156:

Date that an article was promoted to FA. Findable by looking through the history for the

3153:

Ah. You can see I'm not fluent in Geek Code - or in most other computing languages... --

2728: 2044: 2031: 924: 566: 4071: 3652: 3188: 3175: 2947: 2674: 2637: 2611: 2595: 2578: 2540: 1438: 967: 817: 666: 588: 422: 4067:

to do what you like, it's nothing to do with me, I just have it watchlisted and saw

3456:

Ah ... my apologies for removing it. It's too late for me to put it back as it wont

4058: 4048: 3878: 3856: 3793: 3747: 3555: 3508: 3464: 3436: 3405: 3383: 3357: 3347: 3313: 3301: 3229: 3105: 3065: 3041: 2921: 2901: 2831: 2808: 2783: 2764: 2495: 2455: 2414: 2398: 2352: 2311: 2295: 2224: 2208: 2151: 2141: 2089: 2002: 1981: 1874: 1395: 1303: 1271: 1222: 1200: 1178: 1160: 1135: 1112: 1091: 1074: 1057: 1028: 1003: 953: 930: 845: 735: 699: 646: 629: 573: 544: 471: 399: 379: 287: 263: 197: 130: 107: 35: 17: 2062:

For tirelessly ensuring that Main Page articles are recorded and recognised, from

2058: 4005: 3957: 3624: 3324: 2742: 2557: 2427: 2324: 2184:

You can get rid of the question mark. I really don't care. I didn't put it in.

2027:. Anyway, thanks for updating many featured article talk pages. Happy editing -- 1960: 1923: 1885: 1834: 1813: 1787: 1730: 1388: 1352: 1330: 996: 972: 887: 765: 670: 604: 518: 440: 348: 240: 213: 75: 60: 3037:

know in your usual kind and considerate way. Are you an Angel or something? --

2572:

Thanks for informing me. I had no idea that such a thing had happened. Regards,

1527:

to WP, so it's good to have something I can contribute. Thanks for your help! --

484:

If you'd like to use a template, I'd suggest something that does something like:

4036:

sometimes vigorously defend my opinion. And sometimes I just like to have fun (

3743:

OK, that should do it. Let me know if I've missed any. Go take a nap. ;-)) --

3659: 3199: 2984: 2887: 2660: 2244: 2185: 2171: 2119: 1855: 431: 227:

I've posted the source lists I used to create the list by nominator. They are

4081: 3934: 3924: 3915: 3901: 3893: 3874: 3841: 3816: 3771: 3537: 3492: 3483: 3425: 3133: 2625: 2137: 2104: 2041: 2028: 1952: 1907: 1903: 1805: 1723: 1716: 1464: 1248: 1153: 175: 148: 100: 96: 2553:

Thank you for your support on my RfA. Your trust in me is well appreciated.

1437:

I agree with you; that entry looks like nonsense and it should be deleted.

4064: 4037: 3532: 3208: 3163: 3154: 3144: 2962: 2817: 2697: 2632: 2606: 2590: 2573: 2166: 1449: 1174: 963: 942: 596: 301: 139: 92: 2869:

done it. Perhaps a notice in the About RfA section would be appropriate?--

2207:

And if it still doesn't work...then try the sandbox and experiment! :-) --

1173:

Wondering if you would like the article to be enshrined in BJAODN heaven?

4045: 3993: 3790: 3767: 3744: 3552: 3505: 3461: 3433: 3310: 3298: 3062: 3038: 2943: 2918: 2492: 2473: 2452: 2411: 2395: 2349: 2308: 2292: 2247:- go and check it out, you lot should be playing it instead of baseball! 2221: 1999: 1978: 1871: 1412: 1392: 1300: 1268: 1197: 1157: 1000: 950: 927: 842: 732: 696: 643: 626: 570: 541: 468: 396: 376: 284: 260: 194: 104: 2406:

Oh, I forgot to mention that it seems to happen (I think) only with the

2303:

Oh, I forgot to mention that it seems to happen (I think) only with the

4001: 3953: 2653: 2554: 2020: 1920: 1727: 3242:

Hi, thanks for your support. Your talk page is messed up again. Would

174:

Sometimes: Date that an article was demoted and noted as a former FA:

3291: 3195: 3139:

Thanks for the note on my talk page. However, what exactly does the '

2621:

I don't think that's necessary. I believe he had added it before the

1472: 1131: 1056:

Just wondering, what makes editing on Knowledge enjoyable for you? --

495: 3709: 3588: 3118:

I know I've been slow in saying this, but thanks for supporting my

2727:

It certainly brightened my evening. And encourages me to continue.

2631:

template came into use on that page, so it is currently redundant.

2169:, but in essence it's simple. Anything between  919:

Hi again. I tried to speedy this but have met some resistance, see

2979:. Any comments you may have are appreciated. Have a great day! 27:

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

3763: 3595: 2975:

As you requested, please find the statistics I generated for you

2713: 2702: 3524: 3520: 2849:

and cast your "yes" or "not in a million years." Many thanks.--

1959:

Would you be interested in a version with named arguments? --

2254:

The name - simply, after the last song recorded by the Floyd.

1130:

Well, we'll see how things unfold. I think it's too much of a

949:

and on its links. Let me know if you object to co-authorship.

841:

articles is no big deal. I shall await your guidance (again).

38:, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See 2688: 1767:

that has the date in the name. Hey Jude, for example, is at

1247:

Thanks. I have no clue as to why some Admin was insisting on

338:

and by article by searching the by year indices I've created.

315:

Main page appearance by date can be found in the archives at

209:

Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations

85:

Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations

57:

Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations

2711:

I see you supported not one but TWICE - well thanks again!!

2539:

Anything else you'd like me to photograph for you at WDW? -

3429: 2477: 2024: 4020:

He that loves to be flattered is worthy o' the flatterer.

1428:

Hi. would you take a look at the most recent addition of

1053:

on my talk page? Knowledge is so interesting at times...

813:(move) it at this time. In order to avoid confusion with 1933:

date order insensitive version of mainpage date template

1743:

Hi - Going through the recent versions of the template:

731:

what happens to the articles withe original template?

147:

Date that an article was presented as a potential FA:

3639:

List of victims of the Columbine High School massacre

3369:

Thank you :-) - you make this place a good place too!

334:

Promotion to featured status by date can be found at

3529:

Knowledge:Today's featured article/November 24, 2005

283:

with its Main page date. I hope I got it right. ;-)

138:

Date that an article was presented for peer review:

4014:

Gasp... I have no words of my own so let me borrow:

3246:eplain it, or is it an unrelated problem? Cheers! 1387:is actually the result of a collaboration between 336:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Featured log 310:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Featured log 1476: 3382:? It is quite the creative spot on Knowledge! -- 1774:Knowledge:Today's featured article/24 July, 2005 1769:Knowledge:Today's featured article/July 24, 2005 178:. Very seldom and usually without great fanfare. 4004:declined the nom. You're a dead-cert surely. -- 3603:Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport 1513:my Pending Tasks box at the top of my userpage. 2086:Knowledge:Improve this article about Knowledge 1711:Oh, you get used to the blue after a while... 3567:OK, I've added the following to my watchlist: 3460:with the word that replaced it. Sorry :-( -- 1942:{{mainpage date|month=July|day=12|year=2005}} 1488:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Wonderfool 2 321:Knowledge:Featured articles nominated in 2003 237:Knowledge:Featured articles nominated in 2003 233:Knowledge:Featured articles nominated in 2004 229:Knowledge:Featured articles nominated in 2005 169:. Is findable with knowhow but not prominent. 3010:Could I request that you send him a note on 2741:Good day, Hydnjo. Just to let you know that 1902:less concerned about whether the link is to 183:Sometimes: Date of re-presentation .... etc. 2995:Request - hope you won't find it offensive. 2847:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Alabamaboy 1753:Brian0918 basically reverted ALoan's change 1494:James I of England + Mainpage Date template 1383:Note: As much as I would love full credit, 3832:Oh where, oh where has my question gone... 3536:vandalism and get into edit wars, LOL. -- 1483:A snowflake of appreciation for you Hydnjo 1370:Knowledge:Template messages/Talk namespace 1366:Knowledge talk:Tomorrow's featured article 419:Knowledge talk:Tomorrow's featured article 3996:was on the cusp, and didn't make it, but 3184:It's better not to sign the insertion of 2886:Maybe i dont like talking to lemmings, -- 1783:Probably more than you wanted to know :) 1267:all you do all night?" or something. ;-) 165:Date that an article was featured on the 3531:, and add it to my watchlist, then when 3194:- at a glace I thought the template (on 3030:Response to Ann: ==Regarding sensitivity 2531:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Boothy443 2220:OK, Lets see if an arrow appears now. -- 2057: 926:as I have named you as a coconspirator. 823:, I'd prefer to stay away from the word 3632:Leonardo Da Vinci International Airport 3582:Ernesto Cortissoz International Airport 1498:No problems - glad to be of service. -- 14: 3847:Because there is too much text there!! 2807:have done this differently I think. -- 463:pages). I'm not sure that I'm up to a 827:altogether. I'd like your opinion on 561:In case you missed it in my reply, I 306:Knowledge:Featured_article_statistics 129:Date that an an article was started: 3646:Madrid Barajas International Airport 2782:woot! my first barnstar! thank you! 1915:Please don't give up - the template 347:the index pages) is reasonable? -- 279:BTW, with your help I've tagged the 40:Knowledge:How to archive a talk page 3777:P.S (You're two people right? LOL.) 1346:Space opera in Scientology doctrine 23: 3696:Rafael Nuñez International Airport 3618:Jacksonville International Airport 2683:Thanks for your support on my RfA! 2410:call after adding the template. -- 2307:call after adding the template. -- 1765:Knowledge:Today's featured article 1359:Excellent work on FA date template 1023:Oh, check out the edits I made to 593:wikipedia:today's featured article 415:Knowledge:Today's featured article 317:Knowledge:Today's featured article 119:An article's historical benchmarks 24: 4100: 3378:May I introduce you to a game of 2605:Mystery solved, my doing infact! 3689:Palm Beach International Airport 3669:- and several daughter articles. 3667:Miami-Dade County Public Schools 2745:has moved. (S)he now resides at 2687: 1355:03:08, September 10, 2005 (UTC) 1045:some peace and quiet at night!! 1019:Templates and the Reference Desk 2723:Thank you for the encouragement 1478: 982:22:16, September 10, 2005 (UTC) 614:04:33, September 6, 2005 (UTC) 223:00:46, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 3498:23:57, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 2999:Hello, Hydnjo. I've just seen 2692:Thanks for your support of my 2262:02:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 2228:03:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 2212:02:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 2193:02:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 2179:01:26, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 2155:03:26, 28 September 2005 (UTC) 2145:20:37, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 2127:18:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 2108:15:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 2093:13:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 2075:08:30, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 2048:08:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 2035:08:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 2006:19:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 1985:19:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1971:18:50, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1927:09:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1896:04:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1878:04:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1845:03:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1824:03:01, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1798:00:16, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1734:00:11, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1685:17:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1646:16:57, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1612:00:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1582:23:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 1545:20:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 1507:23:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC) 1468:09:43, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 1453:08:05, 12 September 2005 (UTC) 1442:04:56, 12 September 2005 (UTC) 1416:20:11, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 1399:00:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC) 1377:19:08, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 1007:23:02, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 957:20:41, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 934:12:30, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 897:14:05, September 9, 2005 (UTC) 775:01:50, September 9, 2005 (UTC) 680:03:35, September 8, 2005 (UTC) 528:01:28, September 6, 2005 (UTC) 450:00:21, September 6, 2005 (UTC) 358:22:38, September 5, 2005 (UTC) 250:17:26, September 5, 2005 (UTC) 13: 1: 4090:15:42, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 4052:23:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 4009:22:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 3982:22:36, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3965:12:25, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3938:23:56, 02 December 2005 (UTC) 3928:22:34, 02 December 2005 (UTC) 3919:02:40, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3905:02:03, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 3882:03:20, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 3860:01:34, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 3837:oh where, oh where can it be? 3820:02:41, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 3797:04:41, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3775:04:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3751:02:39, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3733:Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold 3726:Columbine conspiracy theories 3559:01:56, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3541:01:47, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3512:01:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 3496:23:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 3487:23:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 3468:14:14, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 3451:11:03, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 3440:20:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 3409:03:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 3387:03:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 3361:03:13, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 3351:03:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 3317:05:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 3305:05:13, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 3279:20:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 3268:19:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 3253:23:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 3233:08:21, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 3219:06:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 3203:15:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC) 1759:ALoan reverted to his version 1340:11:04, 7 September 2005 (UTC) 1307:00:29, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 1275:00:22, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 1226:23:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1204:23:41, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1182:23:35, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1164:19:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1139:03:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1116:02:16, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1095:02:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1078:01:12, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1061:23:48, 3 September 2005 (UTC) 1032:03:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 923:. You may want to comment at 849:04:01, 9 September 2005 (UTC) 739:15:50, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 703:03:44, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 650:02:31, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 633:02:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 577:02:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 548:01:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 475:00:42, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 403:00:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC) 383:23:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 291:22:16, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 267:18:40, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 70:19:55, August 30, 2005 (UTC) 3682:Nassau International Airport 3158:21:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 3148:20:25, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 3127:16:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 3114:Thanks for supporting my RfA 3109:04:54, 5 November 2005 (UTC) 3089:02:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC) 3069:02:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 3045:01:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 3024:00:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 2990:17:54, 31 October 2005 (UTC) 2966:21:40, 30 October 2005 (UTC) 2951:02:55, 27 October 2005 (UTC) 2925:23:53, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 2905:03:59, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 2895:23:51, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 2874:12:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 2864:12:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 2854:02:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 2835:15:23, 30 October 2005 (UTC) 2825:09:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC) 2812:21:30, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 2796:09:36, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 2777:04:33, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 2754:16:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 2732:13:07, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 2718:04:22, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 2707:04:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 2257:Anyway thanks once again, -- 1422:List of electrical engineers 319:and by article by searching 7: 3703:Tampa International Airport 3675:Miami International Airport 2678:23:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2664:23:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2643:18:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2617:18:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2601:18:06, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2584:17:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC) 2563:22:29, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 2544:02:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 2513:02:35, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 2499:15:09, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 2485:08:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 2459:04:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2438:04:37, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2418:00:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2402:00:44, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2356:04:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2335:04:37, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2315:00:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2299:00:44, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 2070:barnstar in recognition! -- 1906:or the relevant subpage of 638:Oops, I just noticed - pun 201:22:59, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 111:20:01, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 10: 4105: 2381:Hi again template genius. 2278:Hi again template genius. 1327:There is a new progeniture 151:. Difficult to determine. 142:. Difficult to determine. 95:and the index by date at 3896:22:00, 24 November 2005 3869:You can place it here... 3424:I'm confused. What does 500:Today's featured article 494:appeared on Knowledge's 3198:was referring to you. 2472:I really do think that 3992:day)" up to over 50%. 3871:Knowledge:Bot requests 3610:Gallatin Field Airport 2383:Template:Mainpage date 2280:Template:Mainpage date 2066: 1739:mainpage date template 1484: 1385:Template:Mainpage date 4000:did get through, and 3575:Columbine High School 3120:request for adminship 2971:Statistics for Hydnjo 2913:Our thought exactly. 2061: 1482: 1051:Mysterious Wikipedian 1037:Racoons and Adminship 663:template:featured day 536:I am without a doubt 3998:User:Commander Keane 2841:Can I get your vote? 2737:Wonderfool has moved 1126:Gone without a trace 941:Thanks for vote but 591:and also related to 133:. Usually available. 55:Hi - I'm working on 46:Start added sections 34:Post replies to the 3718:a few more to go... 1479:File:Snowflake5.JPG 1109:figuratively poetic 1107:Not draconian, but 517:this togethter. -- 259:What do you think? 3970:Thank you from Ann 3844:is a lost cause... 3612:- Bozeman, Montana 3448:Andrew O. Shadoura 3224:Minor barnstars... 2759:Re:Tank truck stub 2365:End added sections 2084:Take a look here: 2067: 1865:• 2005-09-22 04:01 1485: 1025:Template:RD header 538:template chalenged 281:Monty Hall problem 3963: 3653:Macarthur Airport 2792: 2773: 2716: 2705: 2436: 2370:Template weirdnes 2333: 2267:Template weirdnes 2132:Templates and ASK 1969: 1894: 1866: 1843: 1822: 1796: 981: 968:template:featured 921:Template talk:FAD 896: 886:is perfect. --- 774: 679: 667:template:featured 613: 601:template:whatever 589:template:featured 527: 513: 512: 449: 423:template:featured 357: 249: 222: 79: 69: 51:featured articles 4096: 4084: 4076: 4070: 3956: 3428:have to do with 3419:Word Association 3380:word association 3193: 3187: 3180: 3174: 2793: 2790: 2786: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2712: 2701: 2700:! Thanks again! 2691: 2640: 2635: 2630: 2624: 2614: 2609: 2598: 2593: 2581: 2576: 2430: 2327: 2170:doesn't appear. 1963: 1888: 1863: 1854: 1837: 1816: 1790: 1707: 1701: 1683: 1681: 1671: 1644: 1642: 1632: 1610: 1608: 1598: 1580: 1578: 1568: 1543: 1541: 1531: 1502: 1480: 975: 890: 885: 879: 836: 830: 822: 816: 811: 805: 768: 730: 673: 607: 521: 492:Hydnjo/Archive07 488: 487: 443: 417:, but I suppose 351: 243: 216: 131:Special:Newpages 73: 63: 18:User talk:Hydnjo 4104: 4103: 4099: 4098: 4097: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4082: 4074: 4068: 4062: 4006:User:Wonderfool 3989: 3972: 3945: 3914:helping me! -- 3889: 3873:. There's also 3867: 3851:Maybe I should 3834: 3625:Kahului Airport 3479: 3421: 3344: 3287: 3260: 3240: 3238:Messed up pages 3226: 3216:Ta bu shi da yu 3212: 3191: 3185: 3182: 3178: 3172: 3137: 3116: 3101: 2997: 2973: 2958: 2935: 2884: 2843: 2804: 2791:kiss the lizard 2789: 2784: 2772:kiss the lizard 2770: 2765: 2761: 2743:User:Wonderfool 2739: 2725: 2685: 2671: 2657: 2638: 2633: 2628: 2622: 2612: 2607: 2596: 2591: 2579: 2574: 2570: 2560: 2551: 2523: 2510:Ta bu shi da yu 2482:Ta bu shi da yu 2470: 2444:And I responded 2372: 2367: 2341:And I responded 2269: 2236: 2201: 2163: 2161:"Vandal Shield" 2136:I like the new 2134: 2115: 2100: 2082: 2080:Knowledge Widow 2056: 2054:Progress Report 2017: 1935: 1861: 1741: 1709: 1705: 1699: 1677: 1675: 1669: 1638: 1636: 1630: 1604: 1602: 1596: 1574: 1572: 1566: 1537: 1535: 1529: 1500: 1496: 1475: 1461: 1425: 1408: 1361: 1349: 1324: 1128: 1039: 1021: 916: 883: 877: 834: 828: 820: 814: 809: 803: 724: 439:template). -- 53: 48: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4102: 4061: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4023: 4015: 3988: 3985: 3971: 3968: 3944: 3941: 3911:Short version: 3888: 3887:Miami Federals 3885: 3866: 3863: 3849: 3848: 3845: 3838: 3833: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3737: 3736: 3729: 3721: 3720: 3714: 3713: 3706: 3699: 3692: 3685: 3678: 3671: 3663: 3660:Miami, Florida 3656: 3649: 3642: 3635: 3628: 3621: 3614: 3606: 3599: 3592: 3585: 3578: 3570: 3569: 3563: 3562: 3547:Like I said - 3518: 3516: 3515: 3478: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3420: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3364: 3363: 3343: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3259: 3256: 3239: 3236: 3225: 3222: 3211: 3206: 3181: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3136: 3130: 3115: 3112: 3100: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 2996: 2993: 2972: 2969: 2957: 2954: 2934: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2908: 2907: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2842: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2760: 2757: 2738: 2735: 2724: 2721: 2684: 2681: 2670: 2669:Thank you both 2667: 2656: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2569: 2566: 2558: 2550: 2547: 2522: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2503: 2502: 2469: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2268: 2265: 2245:Cricket portal 2235: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2216: 2200: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2133: 2130: 2114: 2111: 2099: 2096: 2081: 2078: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 1988: 1987: 1944: 1943: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1912: 1911: 1881: 1880: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1827: 1826: 1761: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1748: 1740: 1737: 1708: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1548: 1547: 1515: 1514: 1495: 1492: 1474: 1471: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1445: 1444: 1424: 1419: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1360: 1357: 1348: 1343: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1168: 1167: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1081: 1080: 1069: 1068: 1038: 1035: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 986: 985: 984: 983: 915: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 642:intended. ;-) 636: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 554: 553: 552: 551: 530: 529: 511: 510: 486: 485: 481: 480: 479: 478: 452: 451: 409: 408: 407: 406: 389: 388: 387: 386: 360: 359: 344: 343: 342: 339: 332: 297: 296: 295: 294: 273: 272: 271: 270: 252: 251: 205: 204: 188: 187: 186: 185: 180: 171: 162: 153: 144: 135: 121: 115: 114: 88: 52: 49: 47: 44: 36:main talk page 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4101: 4092: 4091: 4088: 4085: 4080: 4073: 4066: 4060: 4053: 4050: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4034: 4028: 4024: 4021: 4017: 4016: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3984: 3983: 3980: 3978: 3967: 3966: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3940: 3939: 3936: 3930: 3929: 3926: 3921: 3920: 3917: 3912: 3908: 3906: 3903: 3897: 3895: 3884: 3883: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3862: 3861: 3858: 3854: 3846: 3843: 3839: 3836: 3835: 3821: 3818: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3800: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3776: 3773: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3754: 3752: 3749: 3746: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3728: 3727: 3723: 3722: 3719: 3716: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3707: 3705: 3704: 3700: 3698: 3697: 3693: 3691: 3690: 3686: 3684: 3683: 3679: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3670: 3668: 3664: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3655: 3654: 3650: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3641: 3640: 3636: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3627: 3626: 3622: 3620: 3619: 3615: 3613: 3611: 3607: 3605: 3604: 3600: 3598: 3597: 3593: 3591: 3590: 3586: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3577: 3576: 3572: 3571: 3568: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3557: 3554: 3550: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3539: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3514: 3513: 3510: 3507: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3497: 3494: 3489: 3488: 3485: 3470: 3469: 3466: 3463: 3457: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3438: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3426:advertisement 3410: 3407: 3402: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3388: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3362: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3349: 3336: 3333: 3330: 3326: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3315: 3312: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3300: 3295: 3293: 3280: 3277: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3266: 3255: 3254: 3251: 3249: 3245: 3235: 3234: 3231: 3221: 3220: 3217: 3210: 3205: 3204: 3201: 3197: 3190: 3177: 3165: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3146: 3142: 3135: 3129: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3111: 3110: 3107: 3090: 3087: 3085: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3071: 3070: 3067: 3064: 3060: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3047: 3046: 3043: 3040: 3034: 3033: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3022: 3020: 3015: 3013: 3012:his talk page 3008: 3006: 3002: 2992: 2991: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2978: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2961:understand.-- 2953: 2952: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2926: 2923: 2920: 2916: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2906: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2893: 2889: 2875: 2872: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2848: 2836: 2833: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2810: 2797: 2794: 2787: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2775: 2768: 2756: 2755: 2752: 2748: 2747:User:Newnoise 2744: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2729:Open2universe 2720: 2719: 2715: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2680: 2679: 2676: 2666: 2665: 2662: 2655: 2644: 2641: 2636: 2627: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2615: 2610: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2594: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2577: 2565: 2564: 2561: 2556: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2537: 2534: 2532: 2527: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2461: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2448: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2376: 2358: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2345: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2316: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2273: 2264: 2263: 2260: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2246: 2240: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2210: 2205: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2173: 2168: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2143: 2139: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2095: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2065: 2060: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1983: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1928: 1925: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1892: 1887: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1864: 1859: 1858: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1775: 1770: 1766: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1718: 1712: 1704: 1703:mainpage date 1686: 1682: 1680: 1674: 1672: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1647: 1643: 1641: 1635: 1633: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1613: 1609: 1607: 1601: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1583: 1579: 1577: 1571: 1569: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1540: 1534: 1532: 1526: 1522: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1491: 1489: 1481: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1454: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1431: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1414: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1356: 1354: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1328: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1264: 1260: 1258: 1252: 1250: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1149: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1052: 1046: 1044: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1002: 998: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 979: 974: 969: 965: 961: 960: 959: 958: 955: 952: 948: 944: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 932: 929: 925: 922: 914: 894: 889: 882: 881:Mainpage date 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 850: 847: 844: 840: 833: 832:Mainpage date 826: 819: 808: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 772: 767: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 740: 737: 734: 728: 727:mainpage date 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 704: 701: 698: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 677: 672: 668: 664: 659: 653: 651: 648: 645: 641: 637: 635: 634: 631: 628: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 585: 578: 575: 572: 568: 564: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 550: 549: 546: 543: 537: 534: 533: 532: 531: 525: 520: 515: 514: 508: 505: 501: 497: 493: 490: 489: 483: 482: 477: 476: 473: 470: 464: 459: 456: 455: 454: 453: 447: 442: 438: 433: 429: 424: 420: 416: 411: 410: 405: 404: 401: 398: 393: 392: 391: 390: 385: 384: 381: 378: 373: 369: 364: 363: 362: 361: 355: 350: 345: 340: 337: 333: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 312:)? I think: 311: 307: 303: 299: 298: 293: 292: 289: 286: 282: 277: 276: 275: 274: 269: 268: 265: 262: 256: 255: 254: 253: 247: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 220: 215: 210: 203: 202: 199: 196: 190: 189: 184: 181: 179: 177: 172: 170: 168: 163: 161: 157: 154: 152: 150: 145: 143: 141: 136: 134: 132: 127: 126: 125: 122: 120: 117: 116: 113: 112: 109: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 87: 86: 82: 81: 80: 77: 71: 67: 62: 58: 43: 41: 37: 32: 29: 28: 19: 4063: 4041: 4026: 4019: 3990: 3973: 3949: 3946: 3931: 3922: 3910: 3909: 3898: 3890: 3868: 3852: 3850: 3788: 3742: 3731: 3724: 3717: 3708: 3701: 3694: 3687: 3680: 3673: 3665: 3658: 3651: 3644: 3637: 3630: 3623: 3616: 3608: 3601: 3594: 3587: 3580: 3573: 3566: 3548: 3546: 3517: 3502: 3490: 3480: 3459: 3455: 3423: 3422: 3400: 3345: 3331: 3308: 3289: 3288: 3261: 3248:Ann Heneghan 3241: 3227: 3213: 3183: 3140: 3138: 3117: 3102: 3084:Ann Heneghan 3056: 3035: 3029: 3019:Ann Heneghan 3016: 3009: 3004: 2998: 2985: 2980: 2974: 2959: 2948:Brian Kendig 2939: 2936: 2914: 2885: 2844: 2818:User:Onefool 2815: 2805: 2762: 2740: 2726: 2710: 2686: 2675:Brian Kendig 2672: 2658: 2571: 2552: 2541:Brian Kendig 2538: 2535: 2528: 2524: 2490: 2471: 2449: 2443: 2424: 2407: 2389:recently by 2386: 2374: 2373: 2346: 2340: 2321: 2304: 2286:recently by 2283: 2271: 2270: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2241: 2237: 2215: 2206: 2202: 2164: 2135: 2116: 2101: 2083: 2068: 2018: 1995: 1993: 1958: 1948: 1945: 1936: 1916: 1882: 1856: 1851: 1809: 1785: 1782: 1778: 1762: 1742: 1721: 1715:link to the 1713: 1710: 1678: 1639: 1605: 1575: 1538: 1524: 1520: 1497: 1486: 1462: 1439:Engineer Bob 1427: 1426: 1409: 1391:and myself. 1382: 1362: 1350: 1325: 1298: 1266: 1262: 1256: 1254: 1246: 1194: 1151: 1146: 1144: 1129: 1108: 1087: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1042: 1040: 1022: 999:and myself. 993: 940: 918: 917: 913:Template:FAD 838: 824: 652: 639: 623: 597:template:TFA 562: 539: 535: 491: 466: 461: 457: 436: 427: 394: 371: 367: 365: 278: 257: 206: 191: 182: 173: 166: 164: 159: 155: 146: 137: 128: 123: 118: 90: 83: 74:Response to 72: 54: 33: 30: 26: 25: 4038:Onefool ;-) 3994:User:Shanel 3879:HappyCamper 3865:Bot request 3857:HappyCamper 3768:December 10 3406:HappyCamper 3384:HappyCamper 3358:HappyCamper 3348:HappyCamper 3230:HappyCamper 3143:mean? :) -- 3106:HappyCamper 3099:RD archival 2944:Kim Jong-il 2902:Ëvilphoenix 2832:HappyCamper 2809:HappyCamper 2714:Ryan Norton 2703:Ryan Norton 2549:OwenX's RfA 2474:Certificate 2209:HappyCamper 2152:HappyCamper 2142:HappyCamper 2090:HappyCamper 1994:FYI, we're 1525:effectively 1459:Date format 1430:Kyle McGhee 1322:Fool family 1251:instead of 1223:HappyCamper 1179:HappyCamper 1152:(1.2.7) at 1136:HappyCamper 1113:HappyCamper 1092:HappyCamper 1075:HappyCamper 1058:HappyCamper 1029:HappyCamper 962:Looks like 665:(just like 567:Monty logic 4087:stianpower 4002:User:BillC 3356:Yeah... -- 3325:Journalist 3124:Alabamaboy 2986:Roby Wayne 2956:formatting 2871:Alabamaboy 2861:Alabamaboy 2851:Alabamaboy 2654:Tank truck 2428:Rick Block 2325:Rick Block 2234:Thank you! 2103:comments! 2021:Pufferfish 2015:Pufferfish 1961:Rick Block 1949:reasonable 1938:might be: 1886:Rick Block 1835:Rick Block 1814:Rick Block 1788:Rick Block 1389:Rick Block 1374:Alabamaboy 1353:Autopilots 1331:Wonderfool 997:Rick Block 973:Rick Block 888:Rick Block 825:featur(ed) 766:Rick Block 671:Rick Block 605:Rick Block 595:. I note 519:Rick Block 441:Rick Block 428:mpfeatured 349:Rick Block 241:Rick Block 214:Rick Block 61:Rick Block 4065:Feel free 4059:WP:PORTAL 3842:W-P A-S-K 3840:The page 3477:Wikibreak 3292:HTML Tidy 3290:Now that 3285:HTML Tidy 3276:HighHopes 3265:HighHopes 3200:Guettarda 3196:evolution 2892:trácht ar 2888:Boothy443 2882:Happy now 2698:talk page 2694:adminship 2661:Scottkeir 2391:HighHopes 2375:You wrote 2288:HighHopes 2272:You wrote 2259:HighHopes 2186:Superm401 2172:Superm401 2120:Superm401 2072:HighHopes 2064:HighHopes 1998:. ;-) -- 1150:article 7 1132:neologism 625:support. 496:Main Page 465:challenge 167:Main Page 160:template. 4072:confused 3935:PRueda29 3925:PRueda29 3916:PRueda29 3902:PRueda29 3894:PRueda29 3817:PRueda29 3772:PRueda29 3710:Tri-Rail 3589:Fine Air 3538:PRueda29 3493:PRueda29 3484:PRueda29 3335:contribs 3189:unsigned 3176:unsigned 2963:Ben Best 2933:*cheers* 2822:Newnoise 2802:Very odd 2751:Newnoise 2634:=Nichalp 2608:=Nichalp 2592:=Nichalp 2575:=Nichalp 2387:enhanced 2284:enhanced 2105:PRueda29 2098:PRueda29 2042:Chris 73 2029:Chris 73 1465:PRueda29 1088:surprise 818:Featured 504:MONTHDAY 437:featured 372:Featured 368:Featured 158:featured 3952:are ;) 3943:Had had 3764:Aviacsa 3596:Florida 3549:go away 3533:Raul654 3458:connect 3164:Kwekubo 3155:Kwekubo 3145:Kwekubo 3059:hey you 3057:I said 2917:;-) -- 2639:«Talk»= 2613:«Talk»= 2597:«Talk»= 2580:«Talk»= 1450:Spliced 1147:General 1043:Finally 964:Zzyzx11 943:Zzyzx11 432:WP:BOLD 207:First, 4046:hydnjo 3987:admin? 3875:WP:BOT 3853:really 3791:hydnjo 3745:hydnjo 3553:hydnjo 3525:M-DCPS 3521:M-DCPS 3506:hydnjo 3462:hydnjo 3434:hydnjo 3342:Hmm... 3311:hydnjo 3299:hydnjo 3134:WP:ASK 3063:hydnjo 3039:hydnjo 2919:hydnjo 2900:What? 2493:hydnjo 2453:hydnjo 2412:hydnjo 2396:hydnjo 2350:hydnjo 2309:hydnjo 2293:hydnjo 2222:hydnjo 2199:Arrows 2138:WP:ASK 2113:WP:ASK 2000:hydnjo 1979:hydnjo 1953:WP:TFA 1924:(Talk) 1908:WP:TFA 1904:WP:TFA 1872:hydnjo 1806:WP:TFA 1731:(Talk) 1724:WP:TFA 1717:WP:TFA 1413:Splash 1393:hydnjo 1301:hydnjo 1269:hydnjo 1261:speedy 1259:to my 1253:speedy 1249:WP:AfD 1198:hydnjo 1158:hydnjo 1154:WP:CSD 1134::-) -- 1111::-) -- 1001:hydnjo 951:hydnjo 928:hydnjo 843:hydnjo 733:hydnjo 697:hydnjo 644:hydnjo 627:hydnjo 571:hydnjo 542:hydnjo 469:hydnjo 397:hydnjo 377:hydnjo 285:hydnjo 261:hydnjo 235:, and 195:hydnjo 176:WP:FFA 149:WP:FAC 105:hydnjo 101:WP:FFA 97:WP:TFA 3954:Proto 3770:. -- 3432:? -- 3258:Stuff 3209:WP:RD 3141:a---' 2981:: --> 2568:Brian 2555:Owen× 2408:first 2305:first 2167:WP:AQ 1921:ALoan 1857:BRIAN 1728:ALoan 1175:WP:-) 839:three 323:(and 304:, or 302:WP:FA 140:WP:PR 93:WP:FA 16:< 4049:talk 3977:AnnH 3794:talk 3748:talk 3556:talk 3509:talk 3465:talk 3437:talk 3430:Moby 3329:talk 3314:talk 3302:talk 3244:this 3132:Re: 3066:talk 3042:talk 3001:this 2977:here 2922:talk 2820:? -- 2626:user 2521:Wow! 2496:talk 2480:) - 2478:MDAC 2468:Heya 2456:talk 2433:talk 2415:talk 2399:talk 2385:was 2353:talk 2330:talk 2312:talk 2296:talk 2282:was 2225:talk 2190:Talk 2176:Talk 2124:Talk 2045:Talk 2032:Talk 2025:Fugu 2003:talk 1996:done 1982:talk 1966:talk 1891:talk 1875:talk 1862:0918 1840:talk 1819:talk 1793:talk 1670:High 1631:High 1597:High 1567:High 1530:High 1501:High 1396:talk 1372:. -- 1368:and 1304:talk 1272:talk 1265:that 1201:talk 1177:? -- 1161:talk 1004:talk 978:talk 954:talk 931:talk 893:talk 846:talk 771:talk 736:talk 700:talk 676:talk 647:talk 630:talk 610:talk 574:talk 563:love 545:talk 524:talk 507:YEAR 472:talk 460:echo 446:talk 426:the 400:talk 380:talk 354:talk 329:2005 327:and 325:2004 288:talk 264:talk 246:talk 219:talk 198:talk 108:talk 76:Rick 66:talk 4079:Cel 4042:you 3950:had 3401:was 3032:== 3005:not 2940:use 1810:all 1786:-- 1679:(+) 1640:(+) 1606:(+) 1576:(+) 1539:(+) 1521:was 1473:rfa 1406:TfD 1337:(c) 807:FAD 640:not 502:on 498:as 308:or 42:.) 4075:}} 4069:{{ 3799:"" 3404:-- 3399:I 3297:-- 3192:}} 3186:{{ 3179:}} 3173:{{ 3104:-- 2890:| 2785:BL 2766:BL 2629:}} 2623:{{ 2446:: 2377:: 2343:: 2274:: 2188:| 2174:| 2122:| 1977:-- 1917:is 1706:}} 1700:{{ 1257:No 1156:. 1073:-- 1009:" 884:}} 878:{{ 835:}} 829:{{ 821:}} 815:{{ 810:}} 804:{{ 729:}} 725:{{ 509:. 331:). 231:, 4083:e 4029:" 4025:" 4022:" 4018:" 3961:c 3958:t 3753:' 3337:) 3332:· 3327:( 2982:: 2559:☎ 2435:) 2431:( 2332:) 2328:( 1968:) 1964:( 1893:) 1889:( 1842:) 1838:( 1821:) 1817:( 1795:) 1791:( 1334:t 980:) 976:( 895:) 891:( 773:) 769:( 678:) 674:( 612:) 608:( 526:) 522:( 448:) 444:( 356:) 352:( 248:) 244:( 221:) 217:( 78:: 68:) 64:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index