User talk:HaeB/Archive 2004-2008

1638:!!! The speculation about Smarandache is ridiculuous - I do PhD in molecular pharmacology, and you can check that publishing or not in physical journal has nothing to do with my career, nor is vital for me. Also the fact I work in physics in my free time, all this is for fun, and I participate in heated discussions with various PhDs in physics, but this is NOT vital neither for me, nor for my research. I am tired to be accused by vandals in false things, and one of their huge curiosity is "why I am editing in physics"?? Obviously they think that I must have PhD in physics in order to edit such topics. My reply is - I edit whatever I like, and for example when I enrich the entries on Japanese culture with info and photos nobody asks me if I have PhD to do that. Mathsci reverts my edits on entry Smarandache, and he is the guy who has problems. I think it is not acceptable for spitting over the others in the main articles, and this is what the anonymous Mathsci does. If he had exposed his name, he wouldn't be so brave to spit over Smarandache. I do NOT question the practise for anonymous editing on all topics EXCEPT BIOGRAPHIES OF LIVING PEOPLE!!!!!!! One cannot spit anonymously over the biography of living person. If you can suggest where i have to post my proposal for changing the Knowledge rules, I will appreciate that. My thesis is very concrete -- biographies of living people should be immunized for malicious editing from anonymous users. Kind regards, 2627:

and in the forward of ther previous book. Dr. Hassnain is author of over 30 books and poublications about Jesus in India and the tomb of Roza Bal. For credentials, he was head of the India Department of Antiquities for 30 years. That is much better validation from the scientific and archaeologic community than many other authors have included here at Knowledge. Further endorsements have come from none other than the Eastern orthadox churches, who also contributed their reviews on the back cover of her book. She was also featured in a film about the tomb that is due to be released shortly (made by producer Paul Davids, this also appears on the back cover of her book) The head of the BJP party in India Governemnt has expressed a desire that books such as hers will lead people to Kashmir to investigate claims about the tomb further. Then there is an entire religion, The Ahmadiyya community that supports her efforts even though she is a Christian. Then we have the fact that she actually obtained permission to retrieve DNA from graves in two countries, and one of the projects was to be led by the famous head of Pakistan Archaeology and antiquities, Dr. Ahmed Dani (now retired).

4722:

various other resistance figures. Through him, Helena become friends with both Axel Freiherr von dem Bussche and Philipp Freiherr von Boeselager. The family of General Olbricht, most especially his widow, Eva Olbricht, and his son-in-law, Dr. Friedrich Georgi, were supportive in every way, providing countless details and documentation. Marion Gräfin Yorck von Wartenburg and Clarita von Trott zu Solz were equally encouraging, providing much insight above all into the motivation and life-style of those courageous opponents of the Nazi regime involved in a conspiracy against a brutal and inhumane police state. Nina Gräfin Stauffenberg, the widow of Claus Graf Stauffenberg, granted Helena an extremely rare interview, and Helena was also able to spend many hours talking with Freya Gräfin Moltke. Last but not least, Helena was also able to interview several of the officers who helped put down the coup on 20 July 1944 as well as the widow of Generaloberst Jodl.

2637:. In this genre about Jesus certain names will appear repeatedly on many Knowledge pages. These inlcude Gene Matlock, Holger Kersten, Kwaja Nazir Ahmad, Fida Hassnain, James Tabor, James Gardner, Laurence Gardner, Margaret Starbird, Karen Armstrong, Nicholas Notovich, and many more. Many of these names have pages here. Why do you consider that they are NOT promoting their books but Olsson is? I fail to see why you disconnect at this point, especially since Olsson's workhas been endorsed by the scientific and religious community. Further, she had been elected Vice President of a website representing this theory and attracting a quarter million hits per day from around the world. I am refering to the 'Tomb of Jesus' website. She certianly has a large enough presence worldwide that promoting her book is not necessary, but protecting her research and including her views certainly is. 3525:

quite a bit - we were both writers at Inpress and then worked at TRM magazine in 2000/01, so we've kept in touch. Andrez sent me a lot of his old stories because I'm writing a history of independent music in Melbourne and I have put some of this information on the entries here for people he interviewed. I'm a big admirer of Melbourne techno (its my hometown, so I am biased I guess!) and i also wrote a listing for Voiteck which was deleted. Anyway I hope this clears things up and if you feel there is a conflict of interest I will stop adding info on him and/or the Melbourne scene. Sorry for any misunderstandings!!!! Nina phunsta 05:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

3150:

argument I can produce is a "better than nothing" approach; no photos exist of them making music, no photos exist of them performing, there are a very limited number of press release photos, of which this is one. The FAC criteria (which theoretically every article should be aspiring to) specifies that an article should have images where appropriate - I assume that you are saying that this image is not appropriate and that no images are appropriate for this article. Without wanting to say "other crap exists" :P, many images are used in articles not showing the person undertaking the activities they are notable for -

3224:- compare the rather boring "official" portrait in the article). You are right that this argument is less important for writers, but on the other hand it also applies well to athletes, astronauts, dancers, etc etc. And the Tecumseh photo that you mention would probably not have become featured if it did not show him in his official uniform (i.e. in the attire of the job that he is encyclopedically notable for). It provides even more historical context, as the image description on the main page noted: "The black ribbon around his left arm is a sign of mourning over Abraham Lincoln's death". 5968:) 03:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC) hi haeb, im just editing that article again, giving more reference to my source, and rewording it as much as i can. for the geodemographic segmentation article, i was wondering whether it would be better to, instead of listing all the segments per system for CAMEO, ACORN< MOSAIC, and GEOSMART, but whether to try to find the list on their website and refer it to there? or would that encourage traffic to their respective websites? By the way, I've also removed the leading terms used to describe the five systems. thanks again haeb! 2891:, ignored by everyone. You cannot force your views on the community. Continuing to try to do so will be self-defeating. It would be far more productive for you to calmly help work toward what level of consensus can actually be arrived at (as someone else noted, we may even have to pare it down to a leaner document if after another long bout of discussions consensus cannot be reached on certain points. My compromise edits clearly and handily identify most of those trouble spots. 3184: 5092: 6242:(which mentions it's Myakka City Lemur Reserve specifically). I'm not sure if I can find any sources that give as many details about their facilities as the organization's own web site. If you want, I can point to individual primate fact sheets on Primate Info Net that state that the Lemur Conservation Foundation is actively involved in a lemur species' conservation. What else do you recommend? 2515:

information. For issues you have no clue about (like this one) please refrain from editing until you have some basic knowledge or see knowledgable users disputing the information. Finland is a page of pride for a lot of Finnish users so if the information is not accurate it will be disputed faster than you know (Finland is among the most IT intensive countries on earth and has lots of them)

4028: 2695:

belong on Knowledge. But since adult eye cancer is so rare - there are only 12 ocular oncologists - perhaps this decision belongs under the Discussion area. Of course, then retinal specialists who particpated in the COMS study would also have a right to be listed. And before you know it, every one-off practice in the U.S. has a link to their website under External Links.

5802:

published in one newspaper, he was also carried on numerous regional newspapers such as the Windsor Times in East Canada, Victoria Columnist in Pacific Canada and in the Calgary Herald. There are many architects but I think only few can boast of being featured in numerous regional and national newspapers. I can send clips from these newspapers if you so desire.

4718:

sold out and a second edition followed the following year. Although now out of print, this biography is still the definitive biography of Olbricht. It incorporated much original research, based on access to archives in what was then East Germany, unpublished personal documents and interviews with family members, colleagues and opponents of Friedrich Olbricht.

5991:

article (same fact date), which you apparently found no reason to delete. So what were your criteria? I checked briefly on the edit history for July-2007 (the fact date), but cant find any deep justification, to say the least, for the fact-tagging, and I know from experience, that some editors spray out fact-tags with a rather loose hand. Thank you.

2549:"""When editors write to promote their own interests, their contributions often show a characteristic lack of connection to anything the general reader might want to consult as a reference. If you do write an article on area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a neutral tone and cite reliable, third-party published sources.""" 2473:

being the sole official language of the province." that you had added. I did not say that this is wrong, but that it needs a reference. There are many good reasons why Knowledge requires references and does not accept arguments lik "but it's true!", "look it up yourself!" or "everybody here knows this!" instead. Please read

2275:

Now, obviously you are not one of them, and sorry if this upset you. However, it takes one about ten seconds to remedy an edit conflict which comes from adding a simple tag, and if one wants to avoid it at all costs, there is still the option of clicking "Show preview" a few more times instead of "Save page". Regards,

3857:) - somebody else could just go there and take a photo, too. In fact that is what I recommend you to do: Ask among Turkish wikipedians if somebody would be willing and able to take an own photo and upload it to Knowledge, or Commons. That would also have the advantage that the resolution can be much higher. 4113:

several 100 readers to one person who edits, and with vandals sharing IPs, changing dynamical IPs and/or ignoring the message link, it is quite likely that the warning reaches the wrong person. (I once answered an OTRS mail from a really upset lady who was quite angry of being wrongly accused.) Regards,

6014:, not with the one who removes it - there isn't any "deep justification" necessary. Granted, there are cases where demanding sources is not appropriate, namely if the information is obvious or can be assumed to be known to the average reader, but that is not the case here, as you have stated yourself ( 4902:

When a cited booked has a url to a site that shows the book, esp. amazon, where the "search inside the book" feature can often be used to verify that cited info, that url is doing a useful service and should not be removed, unless you have a better url to replace it with. This topic was discussed on

3665:

The notification is a standard procedure meant as a courtesy to the uploader. Perhaps it could be left out in clear cases. Anyway I didn't know if you would like to be notified or not - I suggest you put a little notice on the top of your talk page that you don't want to be bothered with this, I have

3653:

I am sorry that this policy makes you feel bad. I can only ask you to take some time (later, once you have put your understandable frustration about your uploaded images behind you) and think about how these fair use images destroy the motivation and enthusiasm of people who would be able and willing

3524:

Hi there High On A Tree, thanks for your message. I didn't quite know how to reply and I hope here is OK! I'm still a little dumb when it comes to the right etiquette on Knowledge!! Anyway, in answer to your Q, no, I'm not related to Andrez Begen, but we have worked together in the media in Melbourne

3235:

is an example of an act which for many years had the reputation that photos of them were absolutely impossible to obtain (almost every article about them stated this as a fact), they were the very symbol of "faceless techno", much more than Klute or 2-Bit Pie today I would think - yet today we have a

3171:

Well, I didn't mean to say that this image is not appropriate at all - if it were a free image, I would not object to having the image in the article (although I would still prefer not to place it in the infobox, since it does not represent the group as a whole, and thus seems of reduced encyclopedic

3149:

The list on the website is to be understood in light of the fact that they are all live performances by Fluke, not 2 Bit Pie, which can be deduced by the dates of the performances in correspondence with the article stating that 2BP formed in 2005. As for the encyclopaedic value of the image, the only

2878:

position you would revert all of the efforts at compromise, just to reinstall your wildest-dreams anti-flag variant, for which no consensus has even come close to developing. You and Garion don't suddenly constitute a consensus to turn the entire proposal on its ear. I'm sorry if I sound pissy, but

2430:

Although the information is common knowledge (at least in Finland) it can also be found on legal databases like www.finlex.fi (I'm not sure it will be in English though). Please also inform me why you doubt the accuracy of any given information, as I don't want to spend my time tracking down a source

2021:

Hmm well I doubt many people are going to be searching the history of this particular article. I guess I should get back to be old habits of writing the article first in my sandbox -this way the articles won't be affected by historical copywright!!! It is difficult often though writing about the same

1096:

In the emoticon article I tried to revert an edit which was made by an anonimous which reads for nearly two pages A4: o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O o.O

771:

and my serious attempts to improve that article, which were rebuffed by an administrator in a way I personally perceive as rather arrogant or nonchalant, I'm not prioritizing work on that very article for the moment - and most probably not for any foreseeable future. But of course I'm happy if others

6351:

My reason was that the "According to a 2007 survey by Rasmussen Reports" paragraph talks about the bias. This doesn't necessarily mean that "The Times has been accused of having either a liberal or a conservative bias." is only based off of the following information; the two paragraphs were together

6204:

Eh, Lexington must be a very notable exception (and it is a very exceptional school) haha. Very well. As soon as I find the time, I will work on re-integrating the page back into the other pages. (But in response to the reliable source table, those are from the official websites of the competitions.

5990:

Hi HaeB, you recently deleted some fact-marked statements in the Gauss article. Could you please explain or otherwise justify your edits? I'm no expert on Gauss, and to me the claims you deleted may or may not be true. I am curious though, because there are many other fact-marked statements in that

4721:

During more than 20 years in residence in Berlin, Germany, Helena Schrader became friends with several members of the German Resistance to Hitler. Ludwig Freiherr von Hammerstein, son of the former Commander-in-Chief of the German Army in the Weimar Republic, was her mentor establishing contact with

4112:

Thanks for the hint. I have been using {{test}} (or {{test2}}) for a long time, and will consider to do so more often, although I believe that perhaps they are not too effective - not for habitual vandals anyway -, but good for "omg I can edit this?" newbies. Another thing is that there are probably

3384:

It seems that my answer did not satisfy you. I hope that the explanations of other were more successful in helping you to finally understand the difference between removing the link to an image from an article and deleting the image itself from the database, and grasping Knowledge's non-free content

2626:

Hello High on a tree....to answer the question that seems to trouble you most, what has been the response to the research of suzanne olsson? Let's start with Professor Fida Hassnain, who has made many public comments about her book and research conclusions, and some of these appear on the back cover

2564:

It's your call High on a tree.... What would you suggest? How would you suggest this be approached? Because now it begins to appear that you have signaled her out in an unfair way by denying information and updates about her research to appear along with the others mentioned again and again at these

2541:

Hello High on a tree...first, I think you should remove those comments on the page of suzanne olsson..please take note that these issues were addressed last year when Gunther brought them up, and there is no further need to discredit her or demand this same information now...as an example, she wrote

2274:

I clearly said in my edit summary that it was just meant as reminder and that you were welcome to remove it later. The article is fine now, but you did not announce specifically you were going to add references, and many authors still forget this, so it is better to remind them as early as possible.

1946:

OK I owe you an apology sorry - its if the article is tagged with an "under construction" and this was asserted when I initially started I thought my intentions were pretty obvious to rewrite it. I am trying to help the encyclopedia after all and haven't had two DYK'S in two days for nothing. I only

1488:

Well, I know what you mean (sometimes legitimate stuff get mistaken for an hoax by undiscerning or overzealous editors), and I am usually quite cautious in proposing speedy deletions, several of my normal afds have been speedied afterwards by others. But in this case.... let me quote from the policy

775:

As a more personal sidenote, I could explain my interest as that Finland's (that is my country of origin, although not of birth) 20th century history may have contributed to making me particularly sensitive for greater powers' interference in what ought to be other countries' internal affairs, which

4541:

Thanks for the reasonable comment to Alanyst. My concern on the arbitration has been that people seem to be very easily carried away with what at first looked like data mining and junk statistics (before Alanyst). I'm sure Alanyst will tell you that a careful investigation benefits from somebody

4152:

Exactly which "proper procedures" demand keeping copyvio images in an article for as long as possible until they are deleted? Please cite the Knowledge policy pages that you have in mind. And wouldn't that just contradict common sense and run contrary to the interest of encyclopedic quality and the

4133:

While you were removing the image although in good meaning you instead caused an edit war with another user. When removing an image you must ad the tag for the image and request it's deletion. When you sent your message I had already done the first and I just finished the second portion. It is wise

3227:

But I am getting onto a tangent here. The point is, as I already noticed above while talking with Wwwhatsup, that there are a so many people out there which are willing and able to provide free photos to articles about musical groups and living people (with the advent of digital cameras, people are

3093:

items 1 (mixmag etc.) and 6. 2 Bit Pie have never performed live and as such it is currently and will remain impossible to obtain a free image of them. Were the band's policy to change this would be subject to review. I have updated the non-free image rationale more fully to cover all the points in

2945:

Adam Bishop, Amarkov, Antandrus, AntiVandalBot, Bdj (Badlydrawnjeff), Conk 9, CanbekEsen, DLand, Downwards, Eagle 101, Ericbronder, Gogo Dodo, High on a tree, Hut 8.5, Interiot, Jayjg, Jrwallac, Kingboyk, Kuru, Noclip, Patrick Berry, PFHLai, PhantomS, Pollinator, Rachack, Ranma9617, Rx StrangeLove,

2514:

I am sorry, but I will not spend several hours looking up information just so some ignorant brit/american will be convinced about a matter of which he has no interest&knowledge. It would seem your primary concern is maintaining links to usefull sources (point taken) and keeping out non-accurate

1935:

I do respect your other contributions to Knowledge (as I wish that you would respect mine and not call me a "freak"), but we have a problem here even if you rewrite the article, because the old versions still contain copyright violations. I don't know how to request version deletions on the English

1795:

Thanks for providing the references. Somebody else just beat me to removing the tag. But anyway tags like this are not "owned" by anybody, so if you sincerely feel that the reason for which the tag has been added has become moot due to later improvements to the article, and expect that the user who

5584:

I don't believe you are understanding the guidelines correctly. For one, we have NOFOLLOW settings that prevent sites from getting better pagerank/search results from links on Knowledge. Promotion plays no part in this at all. Secondly, the part about being more specific is referring to having one

5325:

I am trying to reinstate an improved page at Wiki...as suggested by Gwen Gail, I would like several editors such as yourself to review the page in the sandbox and make suggestions before it returns to Knowledge. The topics of Yuz Asaf and Roza Bal are most central to my life's work. Since you have

4717:

In 1993, Helena P. Schrader (then writing under her maiden name, Helena P. Page) wrote the first, full-length biography of General Friedrich Olbricht. This work was published by a leading academic publisher in Germany and at once harvested recognition and academic honors. The small edition rapidly

4654:

does it say that album covers are specifically NOT to identify the artist. It says album covers can be used to identify the artist's work. Surely what they look like covers identifying the artist's work. Right now non-free pictures of the artist are unavailable therefore using a source direct from

4278:

Thanks, that is interesting information, but even assuming that it would say something about notability, there are numerous other concerns justifying deletion. I think Knowledge can endure the loss of precious encyclopedic information like "Another summer has come to an end, and it is time to head

4159:

was already tagged with the "AutoReplaceable fair use people" tag, which stated that it was up for deletion from today (16 January), so your additional IfD nomination was unnecessary. In any case, I tagged it for speedy deletion as the extra 5 days on IfD seemed not justified. It has been speedily

4005:

into account (the image was uploaded to be used there in a previous, speedily deleted version). And I also think that " is afraid of cameras, and is hiding underneath a swim cap" (quoted from the image description) qualifies as an attack. In any case, I find it hard to believe that I have to argue

3817:

That's alright, my mistake! I misdirected you to oblivion. Some time ago, serious application was put in erasing the Turkish female out of wikipedia and it got worse the more they were good looking and successful. Probably some elephant-legged nanny somewhere! The article on the author in question

3325:

that you got. Trying to provide a better fair use rationale is fine, but leave it to an admin to determine whether the new rationale is valid. Your rewriting did not adress the main concern: That this is an artist who is still alive and active, and thus it can't be assumed that it is impossible to

3219:

I find it rather obvious that images of musicians performing carry added encylopedic value - especially with bands, for example simply because you can see who plays what kind of instrument, how they play it, what kind of geat they use, and also because of things like body language while performing

3043:

That would be great. Especially with articles about musicians, I think there must be so many music fans out there who made good photos decades ago, and would be happy to contribute them since they are just lying in their drawers anyway. But if the article already has an unfree image, the incentive

2694:

It appears that the solution is to create entirely new content that more precisely reflects the subject matter. In other words, the See A Cure Foundation should have its own content that is searchable under "Cancer Foundations." Private care doctor links (which amounts to advertising) may not even

2386:

You are correct that the first reference doesn't back up the statement that "sleep is the deepest state of natural rest", but it doesn't support the original sentence either. I think the wrong page from that site is cited anyway - it should be to the definition of sleep page. Anyway, how would you

644:

Thanks. It did indeed take little time to turn groove into a disambig, which you could have easily done. Assuming I was a new user you should have educated me on my talk page. Assuming I was just too lazy isn't assuming the best. Thanks for the apology. However, I'm a little confused, which "small

6164:

In defense of the page, I had put a merger proposal on both pages and felt that a decent amount of time had passed before completing the merger. No one had bothered to oppose the merger or to question its notability, so I assumed that it was a reasonable course of action. As for citations, I feel

5924:

hi! sorry i have not quite gotten used to how to edit wiki yet so my reply to you will be like so... sorry! the only way i am affiliated with "geosmart" is by the fact that I've been reading up on geodemographics for australia, and have found nothing on wikipedia for geodemographics in australia!

5013:

criteria should not be interpreted the same way in the context of a citation, because the URL there is supposed to be helpful in finding or reading the source. I'd say that if you prefer not to have retailer link, you should find a suitable replacement, not just remove it. If you'd like to bring

3635:

Full disclaimer: I HATE the policy that says that Knowledge cannot use fair-use images of living people. It's idiotic and stinks of copyright paranoia. That out of the way, I know you are doing what you feel is right. However, I must ask that you please stop posting messages on my talk page about

3595:

Thanks for the message on my Talk page regarding the John Hagelin photo. I have almost no experience with photos -- this is the only one I've uploaded. This whole thing is confusing to me. It's not obvious to me that a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created. Where would I find

2686:

Although I am new to this, I had read the Welcome Page and the editing guidelines, but at the time of your edits didn't see conflicts with my External Links. Plus, it seemed like the remaining links under Ocular Oncology and Uveal Melanoma were, under the guidelines, inapproapriate, too, yet they

2682:

Quick follow-up: I noticed that neither prostate nor breast cancer (as well as other cancers), had External Links to respective advocacy groups under their content areas. In fact, they had their own content areas entirely such as the Susan G. Komen Foundation. It looks like this is the acceptable

2630:

Regarding the awards she received in the past, she was writing under her maiden name first, then a previous married name, which would take a lot of explaining if someone looked up awards given to 'Olsson'...further, two awards were given 'in-house' by the US Government when she was employeed with

2510:

Hi! Thanks for the response. It would seem I triggered some kind of automated vandalism notification by breaking the links. Ill try not to break them when I edit the page the next time. As for the sources, you can't source everything in English in foreign countries. No-one in Finland disputes the

2450:

edit. The first reason for my revert was that your had destroyed a number of citations (nos. 18-22) and wikilinks - it appears that you had replaced the wiki source text of this section by a copy+paste of the same text as it appears in the displayed article. If you do that, all the formatting and

2407:

It appears that finding a good definition of sleep is a very hard problem, but that's one more reason not to make one up ourselves. Superlatives like this ("deepest") are always very dangerous - how can one be sure that there is not some exotic bird somewhere with a special rest state deeper than

2121:

Thanks. I have a working knowlege of how approvals can be done, and if I can help you when you are establishing stable versions - I'd be glad to try, though we never got it down to a system, really, we did learn to work together on CZ. No hard feelings about your comments about the complex number

1377: 1343:

No chance to break the quota (75% support required), but I'm not bothered. For one thing, not having to do that job is also fine, and I may invest the time saved to try to get better coordination and quality assurance institued in physics. "Mehr Bürokratie wagen" wasn't the most popular slogan. I

1084:

page. Since he didn't list reasons for deleting your additions, I restored them, though I made one verb into the past tense (currently defending vs. defended) to make it more accurate. I've contact him about the dispute, too, so hopefully this will be resolved with the most accurate information

6080:

Well, the question is what one wants to have growing organically - hearsay by anonymous Internet users or well-referenced information? And by the way the equation "regular editor = logged-in editor" isn't correct, there are many people who have been editing Knowledge for years as an IP, and many

5600:

of Nofollow and the discussions surrounding it. While it has certainly reduced the incentive for linkspamming a bit, it would be naive to assume it eliminated it completely. For example, many Knowledge mirrors (e.g. Answers.com) do not copy the Nofollow tags, which means that linking a site in a

4918:

You are welcome to provide a link to that discussion. I would then also take the time and search for another discussion that I vaguely remember, in the context of the debate about advertising on Knowledge, where it was argued that Knowledge could profit a lot financially from including a link to

3299:

The tag read: "Adminstrators delete this image if explanation's not provided and revert the previous image" which according to tag did qualify as a non-free rationale image. So, if it did (which was an album cover and the one you deleted was a promo image) where is the previous/original image. I

2698:

So, I get it. There needs to be control. I just would have appreciate some additional feedback since the other links didn't seem to qualify either. Eye cancer is my area of expertise, even if Knowledge isn't - yet. Reading your listings, it looks like you've been around the Knowledge block a few

2560:

The book is new and covers many theories (Roza Bal,Jesus and Buddhism, survivng crucifixion, Jesus in India, Mother Mary and Magdalene in India, tomb in India, Yuz Asaf,Jews and Hinduism,archaeologic terrorism, cultural terrorism, et cetera) then certainly you and Knowledge would want to see all

2472:

I thought it was clear for which statement I had requested a reference: The sentences "Education in the other domestic language is compulsory in Junior High School for both Finnish and Swedish speakers. The exception is the autonomous Åland Islands, where Finnish is not compulsory due to Swedish

1633:

Dear User, exactly because MathSci started insulting me with questions "am I ill, or in medication" I have used some of the words quoted by you, but NOT agaisnt Mathsci, I was talking about ME - "I am not idiot" .. etc, etc. Also it seems that user Mathsci himself has complained and continues to

1057:

Thanks for your comments, sorry about the delay in reply. 'Martyr to dissipation' has wonderful overtones in English of both irony and moral outrage which makes it I think almost impossible to translate exactly into another language. Thank you for memorialising Pinto's exact anniversary (which I

6318:

Surveys are just one possible source of such accusations (and not necessarily that for the most substantiated ones). Previously, after the summarizing statement we had the Rasmussen survey, the UCLA study and Okrent about gay marriage and the Iraq war to expand on it. I moved the sentence about

6029:

policy would have to be removed immediately if Gauss were still alive). I'm certainly not saying that there isn't other content in the article which lacks sources, but sometimes it might be better to give editors the chance to name the references that they used while the content is still in the

5801:

Your comment that "Home stories in local newspapers do not carry much" does not apply in this case because; the Edmonton Journal is not just a local newspaper but also a source of research information used by notable universities like the University of Alberta. Moreover, the subject is not only

5444:

In regards to my job, I find this a little unfair and unwarranted. The premise for me placing the article should have no bearing on the article itself. Stephen Arnold earns $ 3 million a year writing jingles for major TV Channels. Most of America listens to Stephen’s music daily without even

4731:

So I honestly believe her books: General Olbricht: Ein Mann des 20. Juli and An Obsolete Honor SHOULD be listed as resources on the pages I had them as should her website which is all about the same subject. Yet everything was deleted, even the German book which had been on the German page for

2845:

No particular problems with it. I think it is marginally notable at best but it is great that it is being edited by you. I couldn't fnd anything solid for sources except insider vanity stuff so I did the prod. I thought you were having the same problem finding legit sources and wondered why you

2655:

I added more comments to our discussion by 'editing' at the bottom of exisiting discussion...I probably did that wong. Hope you found the expanded expanations. Waiting reply for 2-3 days..most anxious to resume updating relevent pages with your understanding and approval.. All the best Kashmir2

1018:

The compromise is nice. I'm in no way againsts lists and orders and so on. They just seem so irrelevant. When you look at the bios of other heads of state/government, "Order" is not there. So, for reasons of consistency, the cell shouldn't be there. I suppose it has been put there to single out

5790:

HaeB, I do not agree with your premise. Knowledge article is not all about "important and influential" but all about knowledge. I have reviewed the references and find no basis for your criticism. The fact that the subject is a President of a reputable institute such as the Royal Architectural

5740:

Your edits on the above mentioned article refers. You did note that the reference should be from published sources. If you read carefully, you will realize that all the references are all from third party published sources. Edmonton Journal or Calgary Herald (both notable newspapers in Western

4688:

Thank you for the reply and clarification. I did make searches on Flickr for alternatives (noticed the Machel one you nabbed was spelt Montana not Montano hence why I missed it), I will try to remember to take a camera with me when next any of these artists will be performing at a fete. I have

1533:

My articles about these men, were taken from the English Parliment records, to name a few. Their birth and death dates, were from their tombs when possible. Also family history, Project Gutenberg Ebooks and A2A. I use many sources and check them carefully, if i make a mistake, i change it. The

6379:

It seems we agree that the text from "The Times has been accused ..." until the end of the section forms a logical unit. The extra paragraph separations were not intended to break that unit, but to have more structure within it - I would still prefer it for readability reasons to separate the

5008:

I've been searching, but can't find that old discussion. I was not aware of the amazon affiliate bits, but certainly agree those should be removed; the consensus at the discussion before was the links to google book search and amazon and to publishers were all OK in the URL field of the book

2556:

Suzanne Olsson lived in Kashmir and did the research there for her book. In fact the irony is that, for example, on the Knowledge page for 'Yuz Asaf' (and several others) someone has directly lifted the latest research data from her book and included it there withour giving her credit for her

1903:

Look I started the article with the summary under construction. I am compiling various sources together. Yes direct copywright is not acceptable but it was only for two minutes while I intergrate sources -remove what is not really needed and polish it. Look I have contributed many articles to

5725:

The article did not assert that he distributed those particular posters. The mere presence of a footnote does not apply that. My edit summary, "link to some posters, typical of the times," also makes clear that they are merely typical, or representative, of the types of posters that leftists

3733:

I uploaded some images last year or earlier when my understanding of how fair use worked was different and when it was sufficient to just pick from the drop down list of choice for use of an image. At that time, there was a statement that if images came from someones "press" section, it was

2552:

I also noticed that on several pages where reference to Suzanne Olsson's book appears there also appear reference to 'The Lost Tomb' of Tialpot, a very recent film and documentary that has come under heavy criticism. Then there is mention of other books related to the topic. Can this also be

3132:

Besides, I doubt the encyclopedic value of this image: It shows just two of the nine members (according to the article), and the image description doesn't even say which two these are! And the photo just shows what these two unknown persons look like, one can't see them doing what they are

3504:, so what I do is right click and go to "view page source". Then it would show the exact URL. But I see that's an easier method, so thanks again. Also, the RIAA database can sometimes be misleading. There are times where they simply don't update the certifications or don't list it at all. 5805:

You also ignored other references such as the RAIC websites where the subject was featured. At no point did the article claim that the subject is important or influential as you insinuated and I do not want to believe that you are trying to suggest that Knowledge is an elitist portal.

3162:(today's featured picture) does not show the general conducting military affairs. Furthermore, if this line is being pursued, what encyclopaedic benefit is gleaned by having an image of a band posing with their instruments as opposed to pictures of the members in a different situation? 2022:

place to avoid any familiarity in content. I understand you tagged in good faith as you saw a problem - sorry to snap at you. I have going to creating many articles on Cambodia as it is very poorly covered. I really want to see more even coverage on wikipedia!!! I began to develop the

2565:

relevent sites.. my email is (oops..deleted due to lack of privacy) if you care to discuss this directly. I really do appreciate your attentativeness, but I would also like to insure that it is fair and accurate, which it does not appear to be at this time.. All the best Kashmir 2

4725:

Combined with over 20 years of secondary and archival research these contacts along with interviews with over a hundred other survivors of Nazi Germany enabled Helena to write a novel, An Obsolete Honor, which helps modern readers to understand what it was really like to live in Nazi

6022:, and enforcing citations has turned out to be the most effective way to prevent or reduce the insertion of fake or unreliable information. It also greatly enhances the utility of Knowledge for readers which need a reliable, quotable source for the information they find on Knowledge. 3300:

don't understand why all of a sudden images began to get rejected by some of the newer so-called adminstrators which provided much similar explanation as the ones uploaded before, especially when images that are subject to copyright, their use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws?.--

3228:

taking more photos on more occasions, you can see this change very clearly at most concerts), but as soon as there is an unfree image in the article, the incentive to do so is greatly reduced. This is how such fair use images are hurting Wikipedias mission to provide free knowledge.

6058:, thanks. That policy seems to be in slight disconcord with the organic growth of Knowledge though. A lot of useful info is added by anon IPs. They are not regular editors, and will not respond to fact tagging, so most of their contributions could be erased, strictly following 2937:

I recently reviewed the contribution logs of all the accounts and IP addresses that I can recall having used. My goal was to identify all of the intentionally harmful edits I caused, and to apologize to the individual users who reverted those edits, or warned me, or blocked me.

2886:

You also seem to be insufficiently aware of how policy processes work here. Guidelines reflect practice, not vice versa. You cannot possibly hope to alter this guideline to be as negatively prescriptivist as you would like, and expect that it will ever become anything but a

2005:

still has a sentence which obviously is coming from the source, but you changed the wording, it should not be a problem. In general it is hard to draw a clear line between copyright violations and text which is sufficiently rewritten not to infringe on the copyright, but with

2557:

research. She covers a 'lost tomb' theory, plus a lot more. The book was just released as a new edition in February 2007. On one hand you worry that this author is being 'overly promoted'. You said it appears (to you) on pages that are not relevent. I beg to differ with you.

4582:

And what's the deal with Debra Lafave image? I think this is all about finding a proper license for this image, and I'd prefer it instead of deletion of image. But it seems there's nothing wrong with the license. The image is free and non-profit educational. For example, in

3903:

or in the page history. A permission which merely allows to use the image on Knowledge is not enough. It would be great if you could get a permission by the photographer/copyright holder to release this image under a free license (which allows reuse outside Knowledge) - see

5419:

I have read over the article posted yesterday, and I genuinely can not see that I have made the same mistakes as Justinsofley. I have included various sources and have stated no opinions at all. The article reads as a list of facts, a historiography of Stephen’s life.

2879:

you can probably expect reactions like this when you wander into a long-standing consensus-building process, months long, and start editwarring in support of drastic changes that do not have consensus behind them. Your first appearance at that document was Sept. 11! Its

2259:

Was it really necessary for you to place a {{references}} tag on this article when I had already stated in my earlier edit summary that I was in the process of adding information to the article? This is the kind of thing which causes edit conflicts. Whatever happened to

4093:. Always use the lowest level warning (in other words, assume good faith), unless they have been recently warned, in which case you can go up to the next warning level. If you see that someone has been vandalising after a recent final warning, you can report them here: 1499:

I would think that these articles are "obviously ridiculous" enough, it takes about 15 seconds to see that they are fakes. But I don't insist on speedy deletion, you are free to hangon, prod or AfD them. I just thought that Knowledge had already been embarassed enough by

2640:

Two Wijipedia reviewers from last year, Squibbix and Grutter, added several links to Olsson's page (I notice some are now removed)that endorsed her book and research. That seems to have settled the issues to the satisfaction of all until yesterday when you first posted.

670:

after, I click "Edit this page". I hadn't even noticed this edit comment: "read before you edit - this information is already in the second paragraph". This led to my confusion in our discussion, as I was responding to your next edit comment: "read before you wikilink -

6293:

Shouldn't the statement that the NYT has been accused of liberal and conservative biases be followed by the surveys where people respond back saying that the newspaper is either liberal or conservative? At the very least, the sentence is now just a stub paragraph.

4394:

Hi. A while ago I added a line to the "arco" page for the band "arco", who appear on the soundtrack to TV's "Californication". (The edit contained approrpiate verification info, ie "where to find the press release and the iTunes album".) But the edit was deleted.

4389: 1369:, you have tagged several articles (15-16?) as copyvios and informed the creator of those articles as to the procedure to be followed. It is great to see someone applying themselves diligently in the way you did, by tracking all the contributions of that editor. 6186:. I don't see significant coverage in independent reliable sources - a results table is not sufficient. Have the math teams from this town of ca. 30,000 inhabitants been the main subject of books, or articles in major (e.g. US nationwide) newspapers? Regards, 5925:

geosmart is something ive research more on the web, and thought i should share! i am trying to be as neutral as possible in terms of describing the system, but if it feels like it is advertisign for them, then will just not write a page! sorry about that haeb

2608:.) You can also use the "E-mail this user" link, however discussions about the contents of Knowledge articles should be held in public, preferably on the talkpages of the articles in question. I will respond later to the other issues that you raised. Regards, 4336:. The result of the deletion discussion was to keep the template, but there are still some questions about whether the current template serves a useful purpose and how to prevent its misapplication. Please contribute to the discussion if you are interested. — 3004:

You did a step in the right direction: The fair use rationale needs to justify the use of the images in the articles about these two persons, not in the article about the documentary (which does not exist). However, the new rationale fails to satisfy no 1 of

3488:. The small link labeled "First" on the bottom left of the results page is the permanent link. I think it helps a lot against the (apparently popular) faking of Gold/Platinum/Diamond certification numbers if one can quote these direct links as a reference. 1218:, as I already remarked in the edit comment when I created this redirect. It is also mentioned, along with a comment about how the current pronunciation of the first consonant (in either spelling of the word) differs from that of governor Gerry's name, in 5726:

organizations prepared. This information is relevant, because a reader will wonder "just what kind of posters were they, anyway?" One does not have to provide a link to the particular poster he got arrested for in order for the link to be informative. --

4983:

13. Links to sites already linked through Knowledge sourcing tools. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, consider the "ISBN" linking format, which gives readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book

3840:- I didn't have anything to do with this, but managed to have a quick look while it was still there. If you are still interested in a comment about the copyright situation: There are two creators involved here whose copyrights have to be respected: Mr. 4858:

Knowledge guidelines note, "A site that requires registration or a subscription should not be linked unless the web site itself is the topic of the article or is being used as an inline reference." Thus, it is OK to use a Facebook page as a reference.

1278:

I'm sorry, but some references do require visiting a library to confirm them if you don't happen to have the book. I find it really strange that you dismiss the authority of the most respected scholarly dictionary of the English language in favor of a

795:

Yet again. Thanks for putting that first sentence in. I just felt funny being the only one modifying the article. Is there any reason not to put in the picture say that's in the German WP page? I love that tie, BTW! It's a new concept in loincloths!

2426:

Hi, You just undid an edit of mine on Finland (language section), while asking me to provide sources. Unfortunately you were very unspecific. As I am not aware of any of the facts beeing disputed, could you please inform me what sources you require.

4937:

Finally, many of those links are actually affiliate links (look for "qid" in the URL, I think "ref" has similar effects), which means that someone else is making money from them - and in many cases, has inserted them into articles precisely for that

2542:

under several pen names and married names. It would be senseless and irrelevent to list them in association with the New York Times, the New Jersey Herald, or other newspapers she contributed to over 30 years ago. Please use a little common sense.

2122:

article, you were right, it was difficult and awkward. You were not right about the hierarchy, the editor-in-chief there had little to nothing to do with the actual work of writing or approving. Anyway, I will write this on your talk page, as well.

4444:

Be that as it may - I think that the FAQ should concentrate on the really frequently asked questions and the central arguments which have led to the current handling of the issue. Of course, I too would like to mention in a prominent position

5657:

Hi Adoniscik, thanks for clarifying that no direct connection to the subject of the article was intended. In that case, the remark must be considered original research, or the information could even be seen as off-topic right away. Regards,

1652:(it is a bit offtopic there and I am not sure if you are still following that page, but I couldn't edit your user talk page which has been locked following your indefinite ban from Knowledge). Sorry for not having replied earlier. Regards, 3462:

Hey Tree, thanks for removing the unsourced figures from the discography. I hate it when people add unreferenced/inflated sales and charts. It's more annoying than actual vandalism. It's good to see someone out there who actually follows

5620:) is about the question whether such a link is appropriate at all. The fact that in each case the templates contain another, more specific and more appropriate link to the same site is an additional argument against these general links. 6375:

I didn't say that is was only based on the following information, but that these are examples supporting that summarizing statement - in this way the Rasmussen part is related to the "has been accused" part, yes, but so are the other

2533:

Hello High on a tree...I have tried for half an hour to find out where to post a reply to you ...no luck...so I am attempting it this way.. I will simply cut and paste here the response i wrote to you about your edits to my edits....

38:

I usually reply here. I am often working on several things at the same time, so if I haven't answered yet even though I am online and editing elsewhere, please have some patience - if it is really urgent, write a follow-up comment.

4545:

I think that I've become something of a lightening rod for criticism in what has become a very nasty RFARB, so to a large extent I'm withdrawing from it. I'd be very appreciative if you took a look in on Alanyst from time to time.

6352:

because they were related. It would probably be better to rewrite "The Times has been accused of having either a liberal or a conservative bias." a bit rather than splitting it into two paragraphs, which makes it flow not as well.

5503: 5189:

Hi. I'm just learning how to use this format-if I did something wrong, let me know. Have you read this book? It is a scholarly work from a historian who is a witchcraft scholar with a Master's degree in American and New England

6150: 5511: 5504: 4089:. Thank you for helping with the revertion of vandals - all appreciated. If you do revert any vandalism, please can you add a warning on their talk page as well? There is a whole list of appropriate warnings on this page: 2545:

second, you make it rather arbitrary and impossible to respond to you when you provide no email or other means of contact. I followed your link to Knowledge Conflicts of Interest (thank you for providing same) and found this:

1241:

This spelling is not official and the page you cited gives an Internal Server Error. The ratio of Google hits for the two spellings is about 900 to 1,000,000, so it's hardly even an alternate. Regardless, I've marked it with

5646:

There is no implied claim that Akcam was arrested for one of those particular posters. If I wanted to single one out I would have named it. The posters are simply ancillary information, and the wording makes this obvious.

2537:

You also said: "Please read Knowledge:Conflict of interest. I have the impression that you are advertising her new book in several articles where it does not belong. Regards, High on a tree"" 16:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

1936:

Knowledge, but if you take care that those versions get deleted, I will consider the problem settled. By the way I see at least 25 different copyright-related complaints on your talk page for July 2007 alone. Regards,

2644:

I hope we have cleared up whatever problems you had...I honestly cannot imagine what further "endorsements" you could possibly require of her, especially since I see that no such issues affect more questionable pages

2561:

these relevent pages updated to include the latest research material available...I am attempting to update all relevent pages to include her book among the many others mentioned..it is not promotion, it is updating..

766:

A side remark: You asked if I "still am interested" - yes, most certainly. I do not consider Knowledge to be a discussion forum, where one have hot topics-of-the-week. However, given what happened with the article on

1597:

neologism, i.e. an entry that doesn't (yet) cite sources to show that its subject is an established notion, should not be speedily deleted. In this case however, the author himself seemed to describe it as a case of

1058:

completely let slip myself). I have added to the Pinto article a link to (my) review of Tom Wakefield's CD which is I think a real collector's item. Did you perhaps see the stuff about Wagner, Semper and Judaism on

2042:

Facts are not copyrighted, of course. Similarities can become a problem when a longer text has the same structure in the way it selects and presents facts, and verbatim copying (like in this case) should always be

6322:

But it should perhaps be made clearer that this part of the section, after the summay sentence, contains examples of such accusations. I have now tried to achieve this by structuring the examples part with bullet

4926:(the link at the ISBN number). Also, "search inside" often requires one to set up an Amazon customer account (which includes turning over personal data to the company), so in this cases it would also run against 1140:

You know, I have no idea why I reverted your edit. I must have meant to revert something in another articule. The only thing that I know is that you did the right thing and that it was a mistake in my behave.

5394:

Hey HaeB, thank you for your speedy reply. I posted on the page advised to me by Stardust8212 but wanted your advice as well, so I apologize if it appears I am ignoring procedure (but this is not the case).

4415: 2010:

it was a clear case of copyright violation - many sentences copied verbatim, others only slightly changed. What are you now going to do about the older versions of this article, which are still online? Regard,

2780:

Hi there: I have removed my personal blog (eyecancerblog.com) under External Links but reposted the See A Cure Foundation, since that is a legit, nonprofit, noncommercial site dedicated to eye cancer issues.

520: 2357:

I am a new contributor, so I started by copying another page and matching it, but then added other things, which I (innocently) thought would be interesting to the readers. Alas, this was not the way to go.

3636:

images I've uploaded in the past. If you want to delete them, fine, but seeing the warnings on my talk page just makes me angrier at the policy. If the images are destined for deletion, so be it. Thanks, —

1606:

This word was created in a random school on the west coast of the U.S.A. It was started by a random kid whose name I cannot disclose. This word is widely used by the students at the school and is spreading.

3844:

as the creator of the sculpture itself and the photographer of TIME magazine who took the picture. It might be possible to use a photo of statue without infringing on Öktem's (or his heirs') rights by a

4578:

image is also "Unknown Police Department photographic records." because in cases like these it's very hard to find out where one was arrested and when. That's why the source information should be valid.

4420: 3596:

such? I'm sure I could get permission from Hagelin's institute to use the photo, but I don't then understand how I can use that. Do I simply add a statement saying that i've received permission? Thanks.

2434:

In fact, personally I think that if you revert the burden of proof should actually be on you. As your user page clearly shows you are not a vandal, I would however be willing to give you a hand. Cheers,

3354:

allows the use of covers "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question,". In other words, one can't say "once this image is uploaded with some kind of fair use rationale, I can use it any way I

2690:

For instance, under the subject Ocular Oncology, the Eye Cancer Network links to a private doctor's practive. Under the subject Uveal Melanoma, the Mike's Page link deals with skin - not eye - cancer.

3725: 2604:

Hi Kashmir2, posting on a user talk page like this is the usual way to communicate with other Wikipedians. (Sorry it took you so long to find out, maybe it should be featured more prominently on the

5039:

The images MVD1.jpg and Malagi 1.jpg were taken in Bangalore, and HSShivaprakash.jpg in New Delhi. These three images are in my possession. They have been published on wikipedia on a GFDL licence. (

3413:

Could you clarify "reasonably" for me? I've practiced law in the UK, including copyrights, designs & patents, but I'm not sure what the term means in US law. Could you cite me a case? Thanks. --

5261:

At various times in Knowledge's history, articles about these online venues have been tenaciously forbidden from existing within Knowledge, which could be argued is itself a criticism of Knowledge.

2836:

are still seeing problems with it? I worked for a while on the article yesterday and now I think it does pretty well, except for one unsourced statement and maybe a few sins of omission. Regards,

5069:

Vijayan has a special place in the heart of the people of Kerala. It is a tradition in Kerala not to copyright photographs of men and women whom they hold in high esteem. The image of Vijayan at

5527: 4650:

stating "unfree image which is used against its fair use rationale here ("solely to illustrate the audio recording in question", not to show how this article's subject looks like". No where in

3069: 6267:

I had explained in my edit summary that while the PIN entry is published by an independent institution, it looked more like self-submitted content in the style of yellow pages entry than like

5545:

in May 2008). Rather than speedy it, I thought I'd let you take a look—it's got slightly different info, but still no real sources. (The provided CNN source is about as trivial as they come.)

4167:

I am a bit confused why you blame me for an "edit war". I never submitted the same version more than once. And as I already remarked, I had taken the time to explain in two different comments

1758:

The reason why the template requires it is technical. Many URLs include equals signs. But an equals sign will not be included as part of a template parameter unless it is a named parameter.

4090: 3543:. Things get very little more verifiable than the BBC Press Office. And i understand your comments about hoaxes and vandalism because i revert several from this page a week in some cases. 4689:

Fay-Ann on the cards, was trying to finish out Machel's Discography first which I'm almost done. Neither Fay-Ann nor Bunji maintain websites so gathering information is a bit of a PITA.

3758:

of the Board of the Wikimedia Foundation there have been some changes in the fair use policy of the English Knowledge, so you probably can't be blamed for the upload back then. Regards,

5132: 4398:

Judging by point #10 in Knowledge:Notability_(music) I thought this appearance on a major TV show and soundtrack compilation album was enough to satisfy musical notability guidelines.

1745:

appear even if one leaves the "url=" out (I tried it out again just a few hours ago). And it is not clear to me why the template should require it anyway. Maybe I will bring this up at

3540:

I won't be reinserting the gay claim, because I know he has a long term girlfriend and have no interest in posting nonsense. However, i will be reinserting the Kerouac note, with this

4256: 4249: 4128: 3805: 2046:"No one will find out" or "No one will care" is seldom good advice in legal matters. The fact is that the copyvio text is still accessible worldwide on Knowledge's site - an URL like 4711:

I am really confused why you chose to remove the texts by Helena Schrader who received her PHD in Germany by writing the works on Olbricht, Stauffenberg, the German Resistance and.

4438: 3216:

does not say that a featured article has to have images at any cost, on the contrary, it specifically demands that non-free images must meet one of the non-free contents exceptions.

2664: 480: 2469:(Reference "" will not appear anymore after that, or it will point to the wrong citation, because the entry in the References list is generated by the "ref" link that you removed.) 1478:

Hello! Just to let you know that hoaxes or suspected hoaxes are not criteria for tagging articles for speedy deletion. They need to be prodded or taken to AfD instead. Regards,

4067: 981:

Hi, thanks for noticing the interwiki mishap. There is a very easy way to prevent bot from making that mistake again (which it will really soon): create a conflict. The link to

6081:

accounts who make a few edits and never come back. I think most people who have contributed significantly to an article will check back from time to time out of curiousity alone.

4903:

the page about the cite book template, or some such place, perhaps a year ago, so unless a more recent discussion has concluded that it's a bad idea, please stop removing them.

3748: 3107: 994: 3884:

I had obtained permission from the DJ in question, and there are few promotional photos of him available. I believe I had sourced the image as coming from his official website.

4172:

why this image should not be used, and I do not find it polite if someone just reverts me without adressing these concerns, at least by briefly explaining their point of view.

3344: 1001:. Remmember that the link must be two way - from fr to en, and from en to fr. This way, bot will show an error next time it sees it, and let the bot master solve it. Thanks! 5791:

Institute of Canada in Alberta makes him notable enough to be featured and be a subject of study... Your comment seem to denigrate this feat or achievement of the subject.

5224: 4146: 3801: 5486: 5478: 5470: 5464: 3822:

for an article on a Turkish sculptor who died 2 days ago. I did my best for the rationale. I would be pleased if you take a look at it and comment if you judge necessary.

1649: 5489:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

5249: 1557:

Thanks (belatedly) for replying and naming these sources. You should still write these into the articles themselves, so readers will have a chance to know, too. Regards,

780:, although I politically have very little in common with him. The way USA treated Germany in the last years reminds me too much of how the Soviet Union treated Finland. / 5798:

is meant to substantiate the fact that the subject is indeed an Associate of the firm. I hope you are not suggesting that the reference in question here has been faked.

5263:

If I understand it correctly, you tried to say that Knowledge has been criticized for not having article about these web sites, so I asked whose criticism this was. And

2027: 1986: 1963: 1948: 1920: 1905: 1528: 508: 4039:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

3009:, since there is no reason to assume that free photos of these persons are impossible to create - both are alive and well. For this reason, I am going to nominate both 1561: 350: 5579: 4864: 4619: 4610: 485: 4606:

There isn't a source, it just makes sense that if a man loves women and guys, that he is bisexual. I also wrote that it is suspected that George Michael is bisexual.

2883:

to start acting like you fully understand what is going on (which your latest rather angry-reading post and its embedded questions clearly indicate is not the case.)

4501:

with the two unreferenced sentences that it referred to - the statement about genealogy -, so no citation needed there anymore.) My edit summary also stated "please

3294: 2138: 1919:

Look do you not have any idea of my contributions to wikipedia?? What do you expect if you are in the middle of writing an encyclopedia article and get interrupted?

1501: 970: 3912:, and mark the image with the correct license. At present it is marked as fair use, but images of living people which merely show how they look like generally fail 2784:

So thanks for the edit. In fact, I am going to follow your lead and move the Mike's Page link to the Melanoma page since that is about skin cancer not eye cancer.

2511:

facts in the paragraph. The only discussion has been on if they are relevant enough to be in the language section of the Finland article (see Finland talk page).

1455: 3990: 3221: 300: 5705:

If on the other hand no such assertion was meant to be implied, then the placement of the footnote is misleading and the information is off-topic in this article.

5589: 2107: 2080: 2015: 1940: 4868: 2905: 2858: 2612: 2492: 2404:

Well, I agree - I didn't add the original citation. (It was probably only meant for the "all mammals and birds, and in many reptiles, amphibians, and fish" bit.)

1627: 1433: 1037: 6326:

Even if you disagree with the placement of the sentences, I would have expected you not to revert my rewriting of one of them without good reason. I assume the

5361:), so that it is clear for each statement which reference supports it. Books and articles which have not been published yet obviously can't be used as a source. 3304: 742: 5449: 4525: 4514: 4369:

which you actually did), I dont disagree with the edit you did and dont really have a problem with that. Hope this clarifies. Good luck with your edits.regards

4363: 4356: 4094: 1656: 5445:

knowing about it. Being a musician myself, I actually find what he does extremely fascinating – no less fascinating than Slash, Eric Clapton or Bob Dylan.

2946:

SlimVirgin, Tfrogner, TommyBoy, Vary, Woohookitty, Zzuuzz, and some anonymous IPs. (I also reverted one edit myself after it went unnoticed for three weeks.)

2175:

actually, i've nominated all the members for speedy, except Calamari, since there seems to be an assertion of notability. Perhaps add him to the AfD? Cheers!

5304: 5241: 4607: 3900: 1008: 5498: 4891: 4631: 4198:

sorry about that. tried to hide them in the text. will use talk page next time. how did you catch it so fast? do you have some kind of wiki watch software?

3400: 1890: 1520: 1511: 1465: 5462: 5267:

doesn't just mean naming somebody who said it, but also to provide a reference to a publication where they said it, so that this can be verified by others.

5070: 5047: 4853: 4477:, your edit summary says external link cleanup, but you also removed several fact tags. Is there a reason you removed the tags without adding citations? - 4122: 3973: 3869: 3831: 3812: 3451: 3115: 3079: 3010: 2528: 2191:

I had already added all four of them. Usually, I would regard being a member of a notable band as an assertion of notability, but in this case... Regards,

1877: 882: 345: 28:

In general, I prefer conversations about specific articles to be held on the corresponding article talk pages, so that other editors can follow them too.

4184: 4015: 3243: 3166: 3140: 2503: 2484: 2317:? I did not "reveal" anybody's real name. I just drew the connection to another article that you had created yourself (and I didn't even say that you are 1856: 5076:. Ideally, it should remain on wikipedia on a GFDL licence. If wikipedia finds this it contravening with its norms, the image may be deleted forthwith. ( 4318: 4205: 4138: 3985: 3014: 2519: 2436: 2126: 1293: 1266: 1236: 1077: 305: 4970:

in addition to the above. Now I would really like to know where that previous discussion took place - it flatly contradicts the following two points at

4458: 1534:

articles about World War II were from Thunder From Heaven. Also from my dad and uncle, who were in the, Headquarters of the 17th and the 82nd Airborne.

1427: 6206: 6168: 6000: 5807: 5748: 5233: 4875: 4822: 4790:

I presume you are sure that is Mr. Lee in the pic. It's hard to recognize him altho I am only familiar with 25 year old images. The descriptive phrase

4272: 4156: 3925: 3570: 3508: 3495: 3280: 3268:

Yes of course. By "exceptions" I did not mean these 10 points, but rather different types of situations which satisfy these, especially with regard to

3263: 3057: 3048: 3038: 3025: 2236: 2220: 2211: 2195: 2186: 2170: 634:: "Assume the best about people whenever possible". I did read, but I don't have unlimited time. I would have much prefered a comment on my talk page. 5432:“Confirmation of Stephen Arnold’s standing in the jingle world was confirmed when he was awarded an Emmy for his compositions for Comcast in 2003.” 5023: 4999: 4950: 4288: 4062:

Thanks for noticing me. I just wanted to say that. And yeah I know how to do most wiki stuff already I'm a frequent user here (with the same name):

3762: 3624: 3362: 2850: 2840: 2805: 2687:

remained untouched. That made your edits confusing and arbritrary to me. Which is why I immediately reposted them because I thought it was a mistake.

2364:

You seem to be quite active and quite helpful. I would really appreciate your guidance on how to make the page on Ronit Baras a good Knowledge page.

1814: 1764: 1753: 5741:

Canada) are published references. Please stop editing the article if you have nothing positive to contribute to it. Thank you for your cooperation.

4774: 4698: 4683: 4588: 3719: 3379: 2279: 1348: 1338: 32: 4596: 4345: 3678: 2415: 2361:

Following your comments and others', I have made significant changes to the page, which I believe (and some others agree) have made it much better.

1619: 6280: 6222: 5191: 4323: 4247: 2297: 1873:". I had assumed that no one would think such a thing and therefore my impression was that your edits had been in some way unintentional. Regards, 1541: 849: 597: 6138: 6093: 6075: 6049: 5312: 5290: 5157: 5538: 5380: 4483: 4294: 4036: 4002: 2788: 2700: 2579: 2318: 2115: 1804: 1782: 1671: 1441: 1434: 210: 4106: 3782: 3386: 3322: 1962:

No - those are copywrights for images not articles - I contribute a lot to films and there is always problems with orhpaned images licenses etc

1662: 1642: 708: 657: 6214: 6195: 5838: 5784: 4742: 4333: 3893: 3853:. But as I understand the statue is still standing in public place in Ankara, therfore the work of the TIME photographer is not irreplacable ( 3086:

I have outlined my reasons as to why a free image is unobtainable of the band on both the image page and its talk page and attach a copy here.

1682: 1311: 596:

Hey High on a tree: Thanks for fixing the mistake on the Nabokov page (acrostic for anagram). As the guy who made the mistake, I'm grateful.

504: 182: 5573: 2634:

Now let's return to authors and books mentioned at various Knowledge sites such as those with the word Jesus as part of their subject matter.

2103:

And don't worry, I'm not worried I know many Wikipedians makes useless redirects without meaning to, yes I will check a dictionary next time.

1833: 6392: 6370: 6342: 5969: 5961: 5926: 5719: 5667: 5632: 5542: 5218: 5148: 2961: 2812: 2395: 1482: 120: 5911: 5897: 4571: 3958: 2455:{{cite web |url=http://www.stat.fi/tup/vaesto/index_en.html |title=Population |work=Statistics Finland |accessdate=2007-05-07}}</ref: --> 2095: 614:

page, but I re-added the other part – which said that, in essence, Sokal attacks postmodernism thought as a legitimate academic discipline.

5601:

Knowledge article will still increase that site's PageRank eventually. And of course the benefits from increased traffic remain untouched.

4260: 3837: 1020: 192: 165: 6432: 5954: 5857:

Collegiate Dictionary, the earliest known use of the term "fanboy" in an English-language publication dates to 1919." Your reference was

5153:

I took from a Turkish Eurovision fan site, but i don't know this site in now... Some sites are had this photo, we can write their links...

5126: 4475: 3995: 2367:

Given your initial objection to the page, I will be happy to follow your advice until you remove your objection and request for deletion.

1129: 5339: 5237: 5107: 4565: 1575: 1568: 3689:

You have removed images after previously stating I had two days to rectify the issue. You have deleted prior to these two days lapsing.

3471: 2522: 2439: 5982: 5326:

done so much editing on those pages, I would like to include you in the process of making my new page as best as possible. Here it is:

5131: 559: 547: 5199: 4384: 4754: 4075: 3905: 3737:

If you feel that this image no longer meets current criteria for fair use, please go ahead and mark it for speedy deletion. Thanks.

1612:

Still, it would perhaps have been wiser to use prod or afd. The article has meanwhile been deleted on the instigation of other users.

5457: 4241: 2036: 1995: 1972: 1957: 1929: 1914: 816:

all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the

6158: 6123: 4612: 3432: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1826: 6312: 3133:

encyclopedically notable for (making music). All in all, it could be replaced very well by several separate photos of the members.

2160: 1729:

use the "url=" parameter, or the source URL is not displayed for the deleting admin to check. Thank you for findign this copyvio.

1417: 1229:

It is not unusual for alternative spellings to become "official" over a period of time, and this word is almost two centuries old.

1111: 467: 395: 3879: 3707:

Above, you said you would "look through the system". What system did you mean by that, the Wikimedia OTRS? And what did you find?

3605: 2142: 497: 390: 4971: 4931: 4927: 3089:"The fact that a band make music does not imply that they make public appearances or perform live. 2 Bit Pie are notable as per 1735: 1401: 1180: 6176: 5870: 2998: 2913: 2343: 2268: 1047: 472: 187: 5558: 4497:, and unless I am severly mistaken, I didn't remove any fact tags from statements. (I removed one {{Fact|date=November 2007}} 3647: 2791: 2703: 6402: 6154: 5815: 5760: 5086: 4878:

isn't a bunch of people gathering on some social networking web site, and postings on such sites are normally not considered

2926:

Between December 14, 2005 and June 7, 2007, I vandalized Knowledge under my previous username (YechielMan) and under various

2431:

just because you are uneducated (you can actually read things yourself without someone else finding it for you you know...).

1789: 1208: 1104:(see the history of the article), I just put the version before the "wipe-out" back, which was a revert made by Tawkerbot2. 70:

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See

4664: 3939:

I noticed that your talk page is getting rather long, so if you would like to archive it, please follow the instructions at

2394:

seems to think it's a form of sleep, but they also say that bears hibernate where this is generally considered inaccurate.

1785:, you could also consider reviving it as a redirect. Otherwise, there'll be no further action nor enquiry from me. Cheers -- 1685: 1314: 260: 5877: 5730: 5677: 5651: 5365: 5062: 4978:

5. Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising.

4860: 4080: 4052: 3768: 1870: 1865:

I will, as soon as you have demonstrated that in the English language the expression "Book 7" is universally regarded as a

1246: 2826: 2374: 1283:. And if it's in such a dictionary, it can be in Knowledge, "alternative British spelling" doesn't mean it's not official. 4912: 4803: 4071: 3428: 3333:

The policy with regard to fair use images might have become a bit stricter than it was in the past, this is because of a

3213: 2070: 1023: 435: 102: 4848: 3585: 3321:, which does not contain the text that you quoted. Instead, it clearly says "Please do not remove this tag", as did the 3017:

for deletion. By the way, if you want to help finding free images for the illustration of Knowledge articles, check out

2973: 6258: 4560: 4213: 3908:

for advice on how to do this properly. You then still need to document this permission, for example by e-mailing it to

1820: 1705: 1275:

and has been there for quite some time. If you question its validity you should bring this up on the article talk page.

763:

at the moment, but times will come when I again have more time for Knowledge. I haven't given up on you yet, guys! :-)

457: 4706: 3773:

High! I responded you in the talk page of Image:Nightspirits.jpg. It seemed lke the appropriate place to do. Regards.

3551: 1587: 1148: 6153:

page. I can understand where you're coming from. Would you be suggesting that the page be reintegrated back into the

5977: 5934: 5756: 4655:

the artist itself (album covers are promotional) do fall in line with my interpretation of the fair usage of images.

4464: 4380: 4355:

High HOAT, My apologies for the Fitzwilliam college problem, I looked at it in a hurry and thought you'd removed the

3698: 985:

exists in every language wiki. To solve it, they all have to be removed. The easiest way is to create either a page

638: 528: 440: 5179: 3053:

I know. Sadly tho, often the free images, particularly recent ones taken with digital cameras, can be far inferior.

2474: 998: 971: 3931: 3457: 3389: 3314: 1625: 1471: 6025:

The content I removed was mainly of the more gossipy personal kind (the sort of unsourced content which under the

5596: 5256: 3659: 2950:

Thank you for maintaining the integrity of Knowledge against everyone who has attacked it, including my old self.

2518:

I don't have an obligation to educate you or your friends! Use common sense for God's sake. Have a nice day! (

2398: 1800: 1066: 5698: 5368:. It would certainly be advantageous to leave the article's creation to an editor without a conflict of interest. 4170: 4168: 3979: 2305: 2231: 2206: 2181: 2155: 1549: 1328: 142: 6418:

Could you tell me please if this song is from Avraham Fried or someone else? And on wich album does it appears?

4446: 2059: 1100:

The second example was a "wipe-out" (in my opinion: a complete delition of the text in an article) of the lemma

6062:. I think I had hoped that your reply would be, that you had read a biography on Gauss or something. But OK, 5184: 4964:

In previous discussions, it was agreed that a URL to where the book can be examined or purchased is a good idea

4809:

You are right about "Studio One", but I did some research before uploading the image, did you read my comments

4584: 2587: 1172: 852:

Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at

577: 3192: 946: 6231: 6223: 5606: 5320: 4958: 4750: 4350: 4329: 4006:

with an admin to get this kind of vandalism removed, where Knowledge is abused for school bullying. Regards,

3850: 3351: 3273: 3176: 3129:

on your web page to be understood? And live performances are not the only possibility to obtain a free image.

2832:

I don't quite understand the question - since it was you who prodded the article, I'd rather ask you back if

2421: 1985:

acceptable? To be honest I'm afraid to write anything more than a stub at the moment as it may face deletion

1215: 1088: 4305: 4043:. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 5477:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 2969: 2086: 573: 516: 61: 5113: 2818:

I am just curious: What seems to be the problem with the above article? {I was watching it because of the

1461:

I wrote something which I hope will help to calm things down in the debate and on his talk page. Regards,

1286:

However, I appreciate your sense for compromise and I have no objection to leaving the redirect like that.

871: 809: 6234:

page, aside from the reference to the organization's own web site: the National Primate Research Center (

1256: 860: 675:

is about something else". I contributed to this confusion by not quoting this on my first message to you.

125: 567:

You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

6286: 4995: 4946: 4887: 4818: 4810: 4770: 4679: 4627: 4510: 4454: 4284: 4237: 4180: 4118: 4011: 3969: 3940: 3921: 3865: 3793: 3789: 3590: 2321:. If you are - well, nobody forced you to create that article, in fact it is strongly discouraged, see 2132: 2069:

I'd be happy to see you improve Knowledge's coverage on Cambodia (I once contributed a very small part

1101: 741:

I've added a bit to the discussion on "registered Republican/Democrat" in the reference section here:

255: 3350:

very much depends on the context (how much the text around the image is referring to it), this is why

2290:

If you want to use someone's real name, rather than their username, reveal your own High on a Tree....

1097:

o and so on. I personnaly don't think that entire sections are lost when you are removing this edit.

877:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "

5453: 5103: 4465: 3630: 3581:

I have sought and obtained permission from within the club. I will look through the system tomorrow.

3318: 2252: 1710: 1153: 1031: 866: 813: 746: 524: 412: 367: 4279:

back to class as another school year begins!" until somebody else starts a proper article. Regards,

3310:

First, I am not an administrator (on this Knowledge) and therefore I also did not delete any images.

6330:

view was a bit confusing though (unfortunately this often happens when chunks of text are moved)...

6119: 6071: 6019: 5996: 5844: 5684: 5308: 5264: 5245: 5106:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 5077: 5040: 5031: 4570:

You said "Unknown Police Department photographic records" is not a valid source. I found the image

3715: 3704:

As you seem to have discovered yourself in the meantime, I was not the one who deleted your images.

3674: 3620: 3566: 3477:

Thanks, and let me return the compliment, I was glad to see you watching some of those pages too...

3447: 3396: 3159: 2447: 2026:

articles earlier which will need a great deal of editing. I am always trying to expand and improve

1746: 1479: 825: 422: 407: 287: 5690:

In 1975 he was arrested for distributing leaflets and placing posters around the city.<ref: -->

4587:

article there is mug shot of him on infobox. Hopefully these images I uploaded won't get deleted.

5335: 4190: 4102: 3964:

I have seen much longer talk pages, but okay, I will archive it at the end of the year. Regards,

3827: 3778: 3439: 3424: 3408: 2986:

Although I am not the uploader I have attempted to provide non-free rationales for the images on

2981: 2674: 2322: 1356: 768: 493: 417: 362: 197: 92: 5564:

Thanks for the notice. I agree, no real improvement on the sources. I have prodded it. Regards,

4919:

Amazon as a standard part of book references - essentially what you want -, and it was rejected.

2047: 856:

those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

753: 745:

because my state's practices are unique among the fifty states. If you need more, let me know.

6254: 6103: 5598: 5523: 5389: 4840: 4637: 4601: 4520: 4478: 4209: 4142: 3984:

Hello, I removed the db-attack as I did not see an attack there. The image is an orphan though.

3541: 3337:

by the Wikimedia foundation from this year which is beginning to take effect on a larger scale.

2954: 2225:

And with all my notes to you, it was probably like an orange strobe at the top of your page ;)

2104: 2092: 1772: 1676: 1639: 1303: 539: 427: 242: 42: 5278:? Shockingly, it even seems that they never had an article called "Criticism of Britannica"... 3755: 3334: 6319:

FAIR/Reagan there because it is such an accusation, too (of conservative bias, in this case).

6210: 6172: 6165:

that the sections have a sufficient amount of reliable citations to prove its verifiability.

6144: 5826: 5811: 5768: 5752: 5532: 5438:

However, I would argue that winning an Emmy award proves a certain level of professionalism.

4314: 4226: 3797: 3183: 1978: 1807:

has never existed (and I would not be the one who deleted it anyway, I am not an admin here).

1280: 1263: 1205: 1013: 551: 78: 72: 6018:). - You may know that one of the biggest problems our project has had to face for years is 5683:

The assertion that he was arrested for distributing material such as that which is shown at

4328:

Hello, High on a tree. Since you recently contributed to the lively deletion discussion for

1219: 6246: 5984: 5744: 5552: 5515: 4738: 4592: 4556: 4434: 4374: 4201: 4021: 3485: 2846:

removed the tag if that was the case. (sometimes I don't understand me.) Happy editing...--

2575: 2293: 2051: 1537: 894:

I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

730: 692:, as you obviously have more knowledge of electronic music as witnessed by your comment on 631: 610: 137: 5960:

thanks haeb!!! i will use the wiki guideline and your advice to write it in the best way!

3313:

Second, I am not sure from which tag you are quoting - I was referring to your removal of

2865:

remove massive chunks of guideline proposal text just because you are not getting your way

2166:

I'm at it. It is interesting that the band article has survived for three weeks. Regards,

1579: 1472: 515:

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks:

8: 6363: 6305: 6115: 6111: 6067: 5992: 5735: 5638: 5494: 5206: 5195: 5175: 5154: 4991: 4942: 4923: 4883: 4814: 4799: 4766: 4675: 4623: 4506: 4450: 4280: 4233: 4221:

No problem. (If you want to hide a remark using HTML comments, it's

4176: 4114: 4007: 3965: 3917: 3889: 3861: 3809: 3759: 3711: 3670: 3616: 3562: 3558: 3492: 3443: 3392: 3359: 3277: 3240: 3137: 3045: 3022: 2921: 2837: 2811: 2802: 2618:

________________________________________________________________________________________

2609: 2500: 2481: 2412: 2349: 2340: 2301: 2276: 2229: 2217: 2204: 2192: 2179: 2167: 2153: 2077: 2012: 1937: 1887: 1874: 1811: 1750: 1719: 1653: 1616: 1558: 1545: 1517: 1508: 1493:"Occasionally these can be deleted as vandalism if the article is obviously ridiculous". 1462: 1449: 1424: 1335: 1290: 1233: 1185: 1159: 1126: 836:

license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Knowledge's license, the

615: 3849:(in an article with a significant amount of text commenting on this work of art) or per 2874:

I find it unfathomable that given actual movement of the proposed guideline more toward

1829:. This is a redirect page, not an "implausible typo." Please remove your speedy tag. 6287: 6239: 5907: 5866: 5331: 5019: 4908: 4897: 4411: 4332:, I thought I'd let you know that I've continued the discussion about this template at 4268: 4098: 4048: 3954: 3823: 3774: 3744: 3612: 3601: 3576: 3500:

Yea pop pages are always filled with fake figures. And about the permanent link, I use

3481: 3415: 2798: 2597: 2583: 2285: 2007: 1853: 1830: 1762: 1733: 1176: 912:

I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:

543: 170: 97: 5885: 4794:

is particularly inappropriate, right? That said, well done for digging up a free pic.

2391: 6250: 5519: 5512:

Knowledge:Errors_in_the_Encyclopædia_Britannica_that_have_been_corrected_in_Wikipedia

5505:

Knowledge:Errors_in_the_Encyclopædia_Britannica_that_have_been_corrected_in_Wikipedia

4834: 4783: 4762: 4746: 4694: 4671: 4660: 4651: 4086: 4040: 3694: 3163: 3104: 2888: 2496: 2253: 1898: 1567: 1145: 1044: 986: 950: 937: 743:

Knowledge:Reference_desk#In_the_U.S..2C_what_is_a_registered_Democrat.2FRepublican.3F

650: 6030:

article; the authors of the removed material had had that opportunity for 14 months.

3818:

will still look OK with the book cover. Joke and my paranoia apart, I just uploaded

1272: 1040:

for more discussion. Can you please add your thoughts again if you want to. -Thanks

6428: 6388: 6338: 6276: 6191: 6134: 6089: 6063: 6059: 6055: 6045: 6007: 5973: 5965: 5950: 5942: 5930: 5919: 5893: 5858: 5834: 5822: 5780: 5772: 5715: 5663: 5628: 5569: 5376: 5286: 5271: 5214: 5122: 5058: 4310: 3641: 2965: 2897: 2123: 1700: 1599: 1445: 1122: 817: 666:

Ah, duplicating groove was a mistake. I always use Ctrl-F before, and (apparently)

591: 580:

page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

452: 337: 272: 107: 5861:, but when I try that link I don't even get an entry. Am I missing something? -- 4519:

Erm, yes ... I appear to have been insane when I looked at that diff. Sorry! :) -

2650: 1690: 752: 5854: 5547: 5074: 5051: 4575: 4552: 4426: 4370: 4341: 4161: 3913: 3854: 3684: 3327: 3090: 2864: 2451:

references contained in the source text will be lost - for example, you replaced

2314: 1448:

and myself, but I would really appreciate a third party to mediate this jackass.

1414: 1398: 726: 317: 232: 215: 152: 6235: 4401:

I'd be very grateful if you could let me know what was wrong with adding this -

3841: 1681:

Hello I see that you have edited my pages could you edit the rest? Thank You. --

6354: 6296: 6104: 5727: 5691:

For a sample of the posters disseminated by Devrimci Gençlik, see </ref: -->

5674: 5648: 5586: 5490: 5358: 5229: 5171: 5144: 4795: 4533: 4390:

Is the band "arco", who appear on the soundtrack to "Californication", notable?

4295: 3909: 3885: 3548: 3535: 3505: 3468: 3464: 3372: 3260: 3252: 3155: 3151: 3095: 3054: 3035: 3006: 2995: 2931: 2226: 2201: 2176: 2150: 2063: 1778: 1696: 1304: 1223: 1201: 990: 982: 975: 964: 919:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "

722: 693: 621: 535: 17: 5585:

link over another, but doesn't comment about having both at the same time. --

3819: 2621: 1947:

lost my temper when I saw you had removed my work again and speedied it again

1741:

Sorry, I will try to remember this. The confusing thing is that often the URL

777: 736: 546:. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in 6268: 6183: 6034: 6026: 5903: 5888:, and it should also be possible to just refer to the print edition. Regard, 5862: 5482: 5474: 5354: 5275: 5015: 4904: 4828: 4494: 4407: 4264: 4057: 4044: 3846: 3740: 3597: 3368: 3301: 3232: 3126: 3018: 2847: 2823: 2605: 2464:

Most of the Finnish people (92 percent) speak Finnish as their mother tongue.

2379: 2371: 2329: 2261: 2058:, and in any case things like this are fodder for critics of Knowledge which 1786: 1759: 1730: 1583: 1271:

The link has worked and is still working for me. It the first reference from

1167: 1052: 829: 705: 689: 654: 635: 585: 372: 322: 247: 112: 5401:

In terms of the advice given to me I could only see the following problems;

5345:

After a brief look at the draft, I still see a lot of concerns, for example

2048:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Prasat_Phum_Prasat&oldid=146568132

885:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: 803: 558:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in

5613: 5350: 5165: 5010: 4879: 4690: 4656: 4643: 4574:. I don't know where it was taken but it appears to be mug shot. Source of 3690: 3582: 3376: 3200: 2868: 2265: 2002: 1982: 1883: 1410: 1345: 1325: 1081: 1041: 942: 572:

If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the

462: 382: 292: 157: 5605:- several editors expressed a different opinion in a recent discussion on 4097:- a lovely feeling when a vandal gets themselves indefinitely blocked :-) 3480:

By the way, here is how to get a permanent link to a search result in the

3030:

Understood. I can myself supply photos I've taken of Clive Chin, and also

6424: 6012:

The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material

5270:

Btw, has Britannica ever been criticized for not having an article about

5118: 5099: 4502: 4306:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/09/13/NSTHS2CKK.DTL

3637: 1668: 1319: 1197: 1193: 1186: 1162:! I would like to discuss your removal of the links to REI.com from the 1135: 1108: 1063: 781: 608:

Thanks for reminding me. Half of my remark probably belonged more to the

377: 327: 277: 202: 3272:. One of them would be the case of articles about albums, the case that 1781:

stub created today. If you were also responsible for speedy deletion of

4337: 3343:- sometimes yes, but Knowledge's rules are stricter than U.S. law (see 2987: 2927: 2333: 2023: 1005: 845: 797: 685: 237: 4066:

I was just in a rush to post my thoughts before another vandal came.--

684:

Thank you for keeping a cool head. Regarding melody, I was going from

6384: 6334: 6272: 6271:. But thanks for expanding the article, it look better now. Regards, 6187: 6130: 6085: 6041: 5946: 5889: 5830: 5795: 5776: 5711: 5659: 5624: 5565: 5372: 5346: 5282: 5210: 5140: 5139:

Hi, could you please explain where you got this image from? Regards,

5054: 4784: 4647: 4091:

Knowledge:Template messages/User talk namespace/Multi-level templates

4032: 3077:

I have placed a dispute tag for your replaceable fair use tag on the

3031: 2991: 5327: 4421:

You deleted somethig from the FAQ that backs up the current position

4259:

is confusing, but the school is operated by the local school board,

1376: 5881: 5426:

The only thing you could argue as ‘biased’ would be the following;

5091: 5014:

this question up again, we could re-sample the prevailing opinion.

3726:

Please go ahead with deletion of Image:Jessecolinyoung live8x10.jpg

3347: 3249:"non-free images must meet one of the non-free contents exceptions" 776:

for instance made me unhappy with the European Union's reaction on

46: 5609:, which was actually what brought these templates to my attention. 5473:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 3519: 2869:

making some consensus building progress, which you are undermining

2216:

Thanks. I'm easily confused by such complicated tasks ;) Regards,

1071: 603: 4063: 3655: 3501: 2631:

them...they would not be generally known to the public at large.

1866: 1214:"Jerrymander" can be found as an alternative British spelling in 941:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- 282: 227: 5612:

I did not quite understand your second argument. The quote from

3529: 881:" template into their user page, but there are other options at 355: 5850: 5686:. This assertion is implicit in the placement of the footnote: 5295:

I see that you have decided that Knowledge is the encyclopedia

3070:

Disputing replaceable fair use image assertion of 2-Bit Pie.jpg

1222:

web page which has been used as a source for the main article,

672: 646: 627: 332: 31:

If you are referring to a particular edit, it is best to use a

5485:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

4027: 1582:. Though I agree with you however I suggest putting it up at 688:. The only olive branch I have to offer is to ask you to read 445: 5170:

Cheers for that..not sure how I missed the other references.

4334:

Knowledge talk:Non-free content#Template:Non-free promotional

4263:. I do not know if the article is worth salvaging, though. -- 2941:

Hence, I apologize to you and to all of the following users:

2380: 2137:

I was just about to nominate it myself! Are you going to add

1695:

Thanks for doing that. Beat me to it. They seem like obvious

1362: 1334:

Thanks, and good luck to you at the arbcom thing ;) Regards,

1310:

I have replied on my talk page in reference to this article.

1059: 400: 147: 85: 5479:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox

3820:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:TimeCoverTankutOktemStatue.jpg

3197:

images of living people that merely show what they look like

3034:

who I see has also received your attention, which I'll GFDL.

2569: 1076:

There seems to be a dispute between your edits and those of

1036:

I reposted the Me & X images you commented on Jan. 9 at

716: 6327: 4192: 3098:. I hope this can be resolved to the satisfaction of all." 2871:

with such extremist editwarring, for no explicable reason.

2146: 2055: 1366: 928: 837: 265: 175: 130: 4129:

Please take note that I follow proper Knowledge procedures

1163: 1019:

Germany in the first place. Thank you and best wishes, --

220: 5330:

I look forward to your helpful suggestions. Thank You.,

3486:

http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH

55: 4930:. And it excludes certain browsers, which runs against 4225:

I happened to see your edit because I was watching the

2454:

Most of the ] (92 percent<ref name="Population": -->

1038:

Knowledge:Images and media for deletion/2006 January 16

760: 310: 6151:

Math Teams in Lexington Public Schools (Massachusetts)

5673:

Which remark, exactly, is OR? I'm trying to follow. --

4095:

Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism

4035:: You may already know about them, but you might find 4001:

As I had remarked in my edit comment, one has to take

2387:

suggest resolving the problems raised about the lede?

1578:

because it is not a criteria for speedy deletion, see

1440:

I don't know if you've been watching the goings-on at

958: 5225:

Notable critics who cite sites as Knowledge criticism

4972:

Knowledge:External links#Links normally to be avoided

4932:

Knowledge:External links#Links normally to be avoided

4928:

Knowledge:External links#Sites requiring registration

3654:

to create free alternatives (there are many of them,

4922:

Amazon, like other webshops, is still reachable via

3175:

Instead, I was thinking of the following quote from

790: 6016:

to me the claims you deleted may or may not be true

5884:, but the Merriam-Webster entry has been quoted by 5303:am entitled to edit. That must be fun for you. -- 5098:An article that you have been involved in editing, 4735:If I reinsert them will you leave them this time? 1529:

Sir John Byron,Sir Allen Apsley, Sir John Byron(Sr)

5580:Re: Knowledge:External links and blanket reverting 5328:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 1196:could be considered anything but a misspelling of 3295:Your deletion of Raffaele Riefoli (AKA Raf) image 1796:added it would agree, you can remove it yourself. 1397:for his role in tracking copyright violations. -- 5364:I think Gwen Gale already gave some good advice 5357:). And you should use footnoted references (see 5009:citation. There was a general feeling that the 4489:I don't understand what you are referring to. I 4425:It's a bit strange when you think about it...- ( 848:, to use our articles. Since you are among the 4037:Knowledge:Template messages/User talk namespace 4031:Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to 3341:their use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws? 2859:Your wholesale deletion edit at a live proposal 1442:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Waters 1435:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Waters 5073:is widely circulated. It is not a property of 4134:to remove the image through proper procedure. 3530:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Nina_phunsta 3375:. He should have left a message here. Cheers, 183:Czech Republic national under-18 football team 5880:. I, too, am a bit surprised at this case of 4449:and other interesting arguments ... Regards, 3754:Thanks for your understanding. Following the 3346:, for more explanations). And sometimes not: 1166:page. Come look at the article talk please. 993:, or, alternativelly, create an english page 5353:(and there is also likely to be doubt about 4854:Removing inline references to Facebook pages 4261:Cape Breton - Victoria Regional School Board 3101:Many thanks, I hope this can be sorted out. 2529:See Added Comments Below-Suzanne Olsson Page 2060:accuse it of habitual copyright infringement 1882:These redirect have already been deleted by 1777:Please review your citation template on the 550:. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 193:North Island (provincial electoral district) 5108:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Erich Feigl 3666:seen such a notice before and respected it. 3236:pretty decent photo of them in the article. 2867:. The active editorship there is actually 2699:times, so your feedback is always welcome. 2328:My only interest in doing so is because of 5618:Sites that are only indirectly related ... 2570:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Kashmir2 2475:Knowledge:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence 1904:wikipedia and have rarwely had complaints. 5541:has been recreated (you had successfully 5413:3) Not enough personal information. 3906:Knowledge:Example requests for permission 1715:When tagging a coipyright violation with 1374: 1262:to avoid warring with you over a trifle. 6380:examples by bullet points or paragraphs. 6159:Lexington Public Schools (Massachusetts) 6033:By the way, thanks for your addition to 4324:Template:Non-free promotional discussion 2953:If you wish to respond, please do so at 653:? And what "content was already there"? 5697:(Or also in your previous edit summary 2116:copy of the reply I put on my talk page 2050:means an unnecessary liability for the 1504:having survived for nearly two days :-o 1413:as a small token of my appreciation. -- 14: 5603:Promotion plays no part in this at all 5050:, which is found in identical form at 3899:Hi Coolgamer, I can't see a source at 2914:Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(flags) 1574:Hi, I've removed your speedy tag from 1116:Copy of this reply to BramvR talk page 473:National Memorial Service for War Dead 188:List of sailors at the Summer Olympics 25: 6155:Lexington High School (Massachusetts) 3950:Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! 3326:obtain or create free photos of him ( 2683:approach to profiling organizations. 468:Asunción Escalada National Highschool 356: 5510:You have been signing your edits in 3484:database: Enter the search terms at 3259:, not just one, of the guidelines. 2200:I added the listing to the AfD log. 1871:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1663:Boy's Surface: Statue at Oberwolfach 1516:The articles are gone now. Regards, 1204:, which is only spelled with a "g". 686:http://www.jahsonic.com/Riddims.html 5046:Thanks for your answer. What about 4566:Darren Mack and Debra Lafave images 3214:Knowledge:Featured article criteria 3123:2 Bit Pie have never performed live 1423:Very kind of you, thanks! Regards, 721:Hi, I have moved the discussion to 626:That was rude. Why didn't you edit 534:If you have any questions, see the 446: 103:List of Scheduled Tribes in Gujarat 23: 5133:Image:Sertab Erener-eurovision.jpg 5090: 3371:decided to take his grievances to 3182: 2313:You are referring to my remark at 931:, I would like to know that too. 401: 86: 24: 6443: 6415:שהחיינו וקיימנו והגיענו לזמן הזה 6240:Association of Zoos and Aquariums 6149:You left a couple of tags on the 5902:Thanks. That's very strange. -- 4833:You should be able to do it now. 3806:Image talk:UstunBilgenReinart.jpg 2994:. I hope these are satisfactory. 2091:I will post my opinions on this. 927:". If you only prefer using the 4257:Glace Bay Adult Education Centre 4250:Glace Bay Adult Education Centre 4026: 3756:2007 Licensing policy resolution 3315:Template:di-replaceable fair use 3044:for this is much less. Regards, 2028: 1987: 1964: 1949: 1921: 1906: 1375: 883:Template messages/User namespace 872:Free the Rambot Articles Project 560:assigning those to your username 548:assigning those to your username 266: 176: 131: 6230:I have 2 references on the new 6006:Hi Power.corrupts, please read 5516:I think this is not appropriate 5299:are entitled to edit more than 4842: 4835: 4302:How's this for a good source? 3880:Anabolic Frolic fair use photo. 2665:User talk:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 1667:Thanks for pointing that out! 1391:This original barnstar goes to 921:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 915:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 897:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 879:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 498:new articles on important women 359: 143:National symbols of North Korea 6393:19:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 6371:18:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 6343:18:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 6313:18:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 6281:11:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 6215:20:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 6196:11:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 6177:00:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 6139:11:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 6124:12:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 6094:11:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 6076:12:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 6050:18:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 6020:concerns about its reliability 6001:12:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5978:04:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5955:03:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5935:02:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 5912:00:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 5898:17:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5871:05:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 4521: 4479: 4447:this Islamic scholar's opinion 4064:http://zeldawiki.org/Main_Page 3416: 3352:Template: Non-free album cover 2906:06:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 2851:20:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2841:16:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2827:15:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2806:16:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2792:16:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2704:13:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 999:fr:Joseph Antoine René Joubert 972:fr:Joseph Antoine René Joubert 963:Oops! Sorry about that one. -- 458:Musaik – Grenzenlos musizieren 221: 13: 1: 6403:Baruch HaBa Melech HaMashiach 6232:Lemur Conservation Foundation 6224:Lemur Conservation Foundation 5853:you wrote, "According to the 5816:12:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 5785:17:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 5761:08:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 5607:Knowledge talk:External links 5087:AfD nomination of Erich Feigl 4561:15:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 4526:18:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 4515:22:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 4484:22:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 4459:07:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 4439:06:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 4416:12:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 4385:10:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 4330:Template:Non-free promotional 4085:Hi! Saw your recent edits on 3974:14:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC) 3959:10:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 3948: 3926:10:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 3894:01:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 3870:04:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 3851:Knowledge:Freedom of panorama 3452:12:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 3433:11:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 3401:03:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 3274:Template:Non-free album cover 3177:Template:Non-free promotional 2613:17:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 2523:11:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2504:11:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2485:11:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2440:10:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2416:08:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2399:08:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 2332:concerns about your edits in 1602:. To quote from the article: 1216:The Concise Oxford Dictionary 1149:04:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1024:16:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 449: 312:Fix original research issues 6184:general notability guideline 5043:) 16:25, 18 June 2008 (IST) 4957:PS: I see that you are also 4642:You removed two images from 4346:17:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 4319:22:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 4289:22:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 4273:21:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 4242:23:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 4185:18:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 4147:21:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 4123:10:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 4107:10:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 4081:Reverting vandalism - thanks 4076:08:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 4053:02:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 4016:02:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 3996:02:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 3832:08:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 3813:17:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 3802:Image:UstunBilgenReinart.jpg 3783:12:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 3769:Image:UstunBilgenReinart.jpg 3763:04:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 3749:03:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 3720:06:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 3699:14:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 3679:06:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 3648:07:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 3625:22:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 3606:21:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 3586:00:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 3571:22:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC) 3552:17:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3509:01:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3496:01:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3472:01:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3380:10:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 3363:03:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 3305:02:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 3281:04:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 3264:04:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 3244:03:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 3167:13:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3141:13:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3108:13:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3058:18:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3049:23:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 3039:19:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 3026:00:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 2999:17:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 2974:19:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 2822:that was on it.). Cheers! -- 1294:00:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 1267:15:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1237:07:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1209:04:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1181:02:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1168: 1048:18:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC) 863:- Lots of questions answered 404: 311: 177:Update with new information 89: 26:Welcome to my talk page :) 7: 6433:08:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 5731:22:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5720:22:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5678:22:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5668:22:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5652:21:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5633:19:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 5590:04:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 5574:00:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 5080:) 18:18, 18 June 2008 (IST) 4153:legal safety of Wikipedian? 3794:Image talk:NightSpirits.jpg 3790:Image talk:NightSpirits.jpg 3195:usually considers fair use 2456:) speak Finnish as their ]. 2375:02:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1324:Nice to see you editing. -- 1247:R from alternative spelling 1177: 1173: 995:Joseph Antoine René Joubert 645:entry" should I have read: 10: 6448: 6110:Left a message for you on 5878:is still in Google's cache 5839:17:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 5559:13:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 5487:User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 5471:User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 5465:User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 5259:" was about your sentence 4665:18:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 4613:17:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 4597:14:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 3941:Help:Archiving_a_talk_page 3319:Image:Raffaele Riefoli.jpg 3276:was created for. Regards, 3255:non-free images must meet 3158:are not shown writing and 2344:00:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 2280:07:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2269:06:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2237:05:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2221:05:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2212:05:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2196:05:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2187:05:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2171:05:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 2161:05:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 1821:Your recent speedy request 1650:Talk:Florentin Smarandache 1067:20:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 967:18:15, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC) 820:Attribution-Share Alike ( 749:16:55, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC) 269: 179: 134: 82:for further information.) 5543:nominated it for deletion 5528:03:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 5499:23:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 5410:2) Biased Language. 5349:pages are not considered 5158:21:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 5149:13:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 5127:16:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 5116:of receiving this notice? 5063:11:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 4714:Here is some of her bio: 4466:six degrees of separation 4068:Guy in a floppy green cap 3788:There are no comments at 2663:(Follow-up discussion at 2590:) 16:41, 7 September 2007 2127:04:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2108:12:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2096:12:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2081:03:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 2037:19:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 2016:18:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1996:18:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1973:18:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1958:18:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1941:18:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1930:17:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1915:17:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1891:02:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1878:02:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1857:02:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1834:02:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1815:14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1790:11:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1765:14:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1754:14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1736:22:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1706:13:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1672:02:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1657:14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1643:10:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1620:14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1562:14:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 1381: 1130:22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1009:23:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC) 784:20:26, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) 733:01:34, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC) 618:05:50, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC) 600:00:44, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC) 588:01:01, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC) 413:Lucknow Christian College 368:Holocene climatic optimum 267:Check and add references 87:Fix spelling and grammar 6129:Replied there. Regards, 5886:numerous other web pages 5458:18:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 5381:19:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 5340:16:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 5313:03:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 5291:02:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 5250:02:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 5219:08:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 5200:19:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 5180:16:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 5024:23:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 5000:04:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 4951:03:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 4913:03:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 4892:17:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4869:16:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 4620:User talk:Dmitrij Volkov 4404:Many thanks in advance. 4298:article notability claim 3932:Archiving your Talk Page 3458:Tupac Shakur discography 3172:value for this article). 3160:William Tecumseh Sherman 2553:construed as promotion? 1747:Template talk:db-copyvio 1686:20:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 1636:SPREAD FALSE INFORMATION 1588:09:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 1521:05:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 1512:05:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 1483:04:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC) 1473:Speedily deleting hoaxes 1466:05:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 1456:03:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 1428:23:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1418:17:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1402:17:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 1349:22:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 1339:21:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 1329:10:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 1112:10:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 997:and link it with french 800:17:43, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 769:anti-American sentiments 709:04:03, 14 May 2004 (UTC) 658:02:18, 14 May 2004 (UTC) 639:01:36, 14 May 2004 (UTC) 538:, add a question to the 423:Long Beach Museum of Art 408:Lake Butig National Park 288:Nathan Ward (missionary) 224: 4849:01:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 4823:12:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 4804:05:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 4775:10:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 4755:06:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 4707:Helena Schrader's works 4699:02:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC) 4684:18:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 4632:03:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3980:Image:Houston boyer.jpg 3440:User talk:Rodhullandemu 2323:Knowledge:Autobiography 2139:Mon Calamari (musician) 1502:Rhapsody Hard Rock Tour 1315:22:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 447:Translate and clean up 418:Lake Echo Power Station 363:Starfire (Star Hunters) 198:Soundset Music Festival 93:History of the Maldives 41:I can often be reached 6269:"significant coverage" 5481:and please be sure to 5185:Disguised as the Devil 5102:, has been listed for 5095: 3798:Image:NightSpirits.jpg 3660:an inspiring blog post 3188: 2354:Hello High on a tree, 1273:Gerrymander#References 576:page. There is also a 527:. You should read our 428:Le Juste Milieu Mosque 357:Improve lead sections 314: 243:Piazzetta dei Leoncini 222:Expand short articles 5827:User talk:Ndiye thabo 5769:User talk:Colsmartcol 5321:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox 5094: 4351:Template: Subhas Bose 3251:- from my reading of 3199:to be replaceable by 3186: 2493:User talk:Drivenapart 2446:We are talking about 2422:Your recent vandalism 1979:Kampuchea Thmei Daily 1628:Florentin Smarandache 1593:Well, I agree that a 1552:) 06:49, 24 May 2007 1385:The Original Barnstar 1093:Dear High on a Tree, 1089:Reverting of articles 935:what you think at my 867:Multi-Licensing Guide 832:if they prefer. The 73:Knowledge:Maintenance 5985:Carl Friedrich Gauss 5407:1) No sources. 5240:, to name a few. -- 4357:Category:Subhas Bose 3901:Image:Frolicbio1.jpg 3836:It has already been 3323:notification message 2651:Suzanne Olsson edits 2596:(also responding at 2390:As for hibernation, 2087:Thanks for the info. 2066:study, for example). 2052:Wikimedia Foundation 1749:some time. Regards, 1489:that you linked to: 754:Herta Däubler-Gmelin 747:PedanticallySpeaking 632:Knowledge:Wikiquette 611:Fashionable Nonsense 578:votes for undeletion 531:at some point too. 509:those of low quality 138:Blade element theory 6410:ברוך הבא מלך המשיח 6205:So...erm, yeah...) 6112:Talk:Gudrun Burwitz 5537:Hi, I noticed that 5257:please cite sources 5207:User talk:Witchmark 5071:Image:Vijayan 1.jpg 5048:Image:Vijayan 1.jpg 4924:Special:BookSources 4874:But the subject of 4792:Studio One Producer 3734:acceptable to use. 3559:User talk:Tefalstar 3116:Image:2-Bit Pie.jpg 3080:Image:2-Bit Pie.jpg 3021:new tool. Regards, 3011:Image:CliveChin.jpg 2679:Hi High on a Tree, 2262:assuming good faith 1409:Please accept this 1200:. It's named after 1102:"Weird Al" Yankovic 989:that's linked with 861:Multi-Licensing FAQ 759:I'm pretty busy in 6288:The New York Times 5483:sign your comments 5463:MfD nomination of 5096: 4542:watching over it. 3847:fair use rationale 3613:User talk:TimidGuy 3591:John Hagelin photo 3482:RIAA certification 3189: 3015:Image:BunnyLee.jpg 2932:alternate accounts 2799:User talk:SeeACure 2622:TOO HIGH ON A TREE 2598:User_talk:Kashmir2 2133:Golden Octopus AFD 2008:Prasat Phum Prasat 1803:, an entry called 1257:R from misspelling 1192:I'm wondering how 933:Please let me know 925:{{MultiLicensePD}} 737:Party registration 592:Nabokov's acrostic 584:Again, welcome! - 574:votes for deletion 521:Naming conventions 517:How to edit a page 98:17th Mixed Brigade 6263: 6249:comment added by 6054:I was unaware of 5794:The reference to 5763: 5747:comment added by 5117: 4763:User talk:Kythera 4757: 4741:comment added by 4672:User talk:Rasadam 4522:Revolving Bugbear 4480:Revolving Bugbear 4217: 4204:comment added by 4162:Knowledge:CSD#G12 4157:Image:Sakurai.jpg 4087:Waiting for Godot 3644: 3425:please reply here 3191:Please note that 3125:- source? How is 3119: 2889:rejected proposal 2668: 2591: 2578:comment added by 2497:User talk:Brianga 2309: 2296:comment added by 2254:John Chipman Gray 2105:TheBlazikenMaster 2093:TheBlazikenMaster 1799:According to the 1711:use of db-copyvio 1640:Danko Georgiev MD 1553: 1540:comment added by 1407: 1406: 1154:Your edits to REI 1078:User:Diegorivera2 1062:? Best regards -- 1032:Me & X images 987:fr:Joseph Joubert 804:Article Licensing 651:Groove (software) 6439: 6369: 6366: 6357: 6311: 6308: 6299: 6262: 6243: 6236:Primate Info Net 6182:Please read the 5943:User talk:Hinjae 5845:fanboy reference 5823:Talk:Samuel Oboh 5773:Talk:Samuel Oboh 5742: 5595:I am well aware 5555: 5550: 5351:reliable sources 5272:Harvey Einbinder 5234:Seth Finkelstein 5111: 5032:Image copyrights 4880:reliable sources 4845: 4844: 4837: 4736: 4523: 4481: 4368: 4362: 4199: 4030: 3993: 3988: 3952: 3642: 3528:Retrieved from " 3420: 3207:for the project. 3113: 2900: 2662: 2573: 2568:Retrieved from " 2291: 2034: 1993: 1970: 1955: 1927: 1912: 1724: 1718: 1535: 1452: 1451:Ten Pound Hammer 1446:User:Handyandy33 1379: 1372: 1371: 1261: 1255: 1251: 1245: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1123:User talk:BramvR 840:, but it allows 824:) v1.0 and v2.0 818:Creative Commons 812:to get users to 453:Mahoroba (train) 338:The Maracot Deep 273:Benjamin Scheuer 108:Portuguese India 6447: 6446: 6442: 6441: 6440: 6438: 6437: 6436: 6416: 6411: 6405: 6364: 6355: 6353: 6306: 6297: 6295: 6291: 6244: 6228: 6147: 6108: 5988: 5922: 5855:Merriam-Webster 5847: 5796:the linked page 5738: 5641: 5582: 5553: 5548: 5535: 5508: 5468: 5450:Timesrunningout 5392: 5323: 5227: 5187: 5168: 5155:*** Эɱ®εč¡κ *** 5136: 5112:Do you want to 5089: 5034: 4900: 4856: 4841: 4831: 4788: 4732:several years. 4709: 4640: 4604: 4568: 4536: 4469: 4423: 4392: 4366: 4360: 4353: 4326: 4300: 4255:The article at 4253: 4196: 4137:All the best.-- 4131: 4083: 4060: 4024: 3991: 3986: 3982: 3955:The Helpful One 3934: 3882: 3771: 3728: 3687: 3633: 3631:Fair use images 3593: 3579: 3538: 3522: 3460: 3411: 3409:Fair Use Images 3297: 3270:8. Significance 3072: 2984: 2982:Non-free Images 2924: 2896: 2861: 2816: 2787:Again, thanks. 2677: 2675:Ocular Oncology 2653: 2624: 2531: 2424: 2384: 2352: 2315:Talk:AGL Energy 2288: 2257: 2234: 2209: 2184: 2158: 2135: 2118: 2089: 2031:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1990:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1967:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1952:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1924:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1909:♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ 1901: 1823: 1775: 1722: 1716: 1713: 1693: 1679: 1665: 1631: 1572: 1531: 1476: 1450: 1438: 1359: 1357:Copyvio tagging 1322: 1308: 1259: 1253: 1249: 1243: 1190: 1156: 1146:Tony the Marine 1138: 1091: 1074: 1055: 1034: 1016: 979: 961: 810:started a drive 806: 793: 757: 739: 719: 630:appropriately? 624: 606: 594: 525:Manual of Style 490: 489: 488: 477: 448: 444: 443: 432: 403: 399: 398: 387: 358: 354: 353: 342: 318:Phan Thong F.C. 313: 309: 308: 297: 268: 264: 263: 252: 233:Monte Millifret 223: 219: 218: 207: 178: 174: 173: 162: 153:Valentino Rossi 133: 129: 128: 117: 88: 58: 50: 45:, too (HaeB on 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6445: 6417: 6414: 6409: 6408: 6404: 6401: 6400: 6399: 6398: 6397: 6396: 6395: 6381: 6377: 6346: 6345: 6331: 6324: 6320: 6290: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6227: 6221: 6220: 6219: 6218: 6217: 6199: 6198: 6146: 6143: 6142: 6141: 6116:Power.corrupts 6107: 6105:Gudrun Burwitz 6102: 6101: 6100: 6099: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6082: 6068:Power.corrupts 6038: 6031: 6023: 5993:Power.corrupts 5987: 5983:Your edits to 5981: 5958: 5957: 5921: 5918: 5917: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5846: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5788: 5787: 5737: 5734: 5723: 5722: 5707: 5706: 5702: 5701: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5671: 5670: 5640: 5637: 5636: 5635: 5621: 5610: 5581: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5534: 5531: 5507: 5502: 5467: 5461: 5441: 5435: 5429: 5423: 5416: 5404: 5398: 5391: 5390:Stephen Arnold 5388: 5386: 5384: 5383: 5369: 5362: 5359:Help:Footnotes 5322: 5319: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5305:Cool as a Cuke 5279: 5268: 5265:citing sources 5242:Cool as a Cuke 5230:Rachel Marsden 5226: 5223: 5222: 5221: 5186: 5183: 5167: 5164: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5160: 5135: 5130: 5110:. Thank you. 5088: 5085: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5033: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5003: 5002: 4992:High on a tree 4988: 4987: 4986: 4980: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4954: 4953: 4943:High on a tree 4939: 4935: 4920: 4899: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4884:High on a tree 4861:129.174.91.122 4855: 4852: 4830: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4815:High on a tree 4787: 4782: 4780: 4778: 4777: 4767:High on a tree 4708: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4676:High on a tree 4639: 4638:Image Removals 4636: 4635: 4634: 4624:High on a tree 4603: 4602:George Michael 4600: 4567: 4564: 4549:Thanks again, 4535: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4507:High on a tree 4468: 4463: 4462: 4461: 4451:High on a tree 4422: 4419: 4391: 4388: 4352: 4349: 4325: 4322: 4299: 4296:Aria C Jalali! 4293: 4292: 4291: 4281:High on a tree 4252: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4234:High on a tree 4230: 4227:recent changes 4223: 4195: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4177:High on a tree 4173: 4165: 4154: 4130: 4127: 4126: 4125: 4115:High on a tree 4082: 4079: 4059: 4056: 4023: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4008:High on a tree 4003:this "article" 3981: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3966:High on a tree 3933: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3918:High on a tree 3881: 3878: 3877: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3862:High on a tree 3858: 3810:High on a tree 3770: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3760:High on a tree 3727: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3712:High on a tree 3708: 3705: 3686: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3671:High on a tree 3667: 3663: 3632: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3617:High on a tree 3592: 3589: 3578: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3563:High on a tree 3537: 3534: 3521: 3518: 3516: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3493:High on a tree 3489: 3478: 3459: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3444:High on a tree 3410: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3393:High on a tree 3382: 3360:High on a tree 3356: 3338: 3331: 3311: 3296: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3278:High on a tree 3241:High on a tree 3237: 3229: 3225: 3217: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3173: 3156:Salman Rushdie 3152:Thomas Pynchon 3144: 3143: 3138:High on a tree 3134: 3130: 3120: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3046:High on a tree 3023:High on a tree 2983: 2980: 2978: 2960:Best regards, 2948: 2947: 2923: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2863:Please do not 2860: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2838:High on a tree 2815: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2803:High on a tree 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2667:and elsewhere) 2652: 2649: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2610:High on a tree 2602: 2530: 2527: 2508: 2507: 2501:High on a tree 2488: 2487: 2482:High on a tree 2478: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2413:High on a tree 2409: 2405: 2383: 2378: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2341:High on a tree 2337: 2326: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2277:High on a tree 2256: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2232: 2218:High on a tree 2207: 2193:High on a tree 2182: 2168:High on a tree 2156: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2117: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2088: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2078:High on a tree 2074: 2067: 2044: 2019: 2018: 2013:High on a tree 1944: 1943: 1938:High on a tree 1900: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1888:High on a tree 1875:High on a tree 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1812:High on a tree 1808: 1797: 1779:Joseph Jenkins 1774: 1773:Joseph Jenkins 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1751:High on a tree 1712: 1709: 1692: 1689: 1678: 1677:High on a tree 1675: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1654:High on a tree 1630: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1617:High on a tree 1613: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1559:High on a tree 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1518:High on a tree 1509:High on a tree 1505: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1480:(aeropagitica) 1475: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1463:High on a tree 1437: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1425:High on a tree 1405: 1404: 1394:High on a tree 1388: 1387: 1382: 1380: 1358: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1336:High on a tree 1321: 1318: 1307: 1305:Simon Reynolds 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1291:High on a tree 1287: 1284: 1276: 1234:High on a tree 1230: 1227: 1224:Gerrymandering 1202:Elbridge Gerry 1189: 1184: 1160:High on a tree 1155: 1152: 1137: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1127:High on a tree 1114: 1090: 1087: 1073: 1070: 1060:my own website 1054: 1051: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1015: 1012: 991:Joseph Joubert 983:Joseph Joubert 978: 976:Joseph Joubert 969: 960: 957: 955: 917: 916: 913: 910: 899: 898: 895: 892: 875: 874: 869: 864: 842:other projects 805: 802: 792: 789: 787: 756: 751: 738: 735: 723:talk:Janjaweed 718: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 700: 699: 698: 697: 694:Talk:Breakbeat 679: 678: 677: 676: 661: 660: 623: 620: 616:David.Monniaux 605: 602: 593: 590: 582: 581: 569: 568: 564: 563: 514: 478: 476: 475: 470: 465: 460: 455: 433: 431: 430: 425: 420: 415: 410: 388: 386: 385: 380: 375: 370: 365: 343: 341: 340: 335: 330: 325: 320: 298: 296: 295: 290: 285: 280: 275: 253: 251: 250: 245: 240: 235: 230: 208: 206: 205: 200: 195: 190: 185: 163: 161: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 132:Fix wikilinks 118: 116: 115: 110: 105: 100: 95: 84: 67: 64:to Knowledge. 57: 54: 52: 18:User talk:HaeB 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6444: 6435: 6434: 6430: 6426: 6422: 6419: 6412: 6394: 6390: 6386: 6382: 6378: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6367: 6361: 6360: 6350: 6349: 6348: 6347: 6344: 6340: 6336: 6332: 6329: 6325: 6321: 6317: 6316: 6315: 6314: 6309: 6303: 6302: 6289: 6282: 6278: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6265: 6264: 6260: 6256: 6252: 6248: 6241: 6237: 6233: 6225: 6216: 6212: 6208: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6200: 6197: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6162: 6160: 6156: 6152: 6145:LHS math team 6140: 6136: 6132: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6125: 6121: 6117: 6113: 6106: 6095: 6091: 6087: 6083: 6079: 6078: 6077: 6073: 6069: 6065: 6061: 6057: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6039: 6036: 6032: 6028: 6024: 6021: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6002: 5998: 5994: 5986: 5980: 5979: 5975: 5971: 5967: 5963: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5944: 5940: 5939: 5938: 5936: 5932: 5928: 5913: 5909: 5905: 5901: 5900: 5899: 5895: 5891: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5868: 5864: 5860: 5856: 5852: 5840: 5836: 5832: 5828: 5824: 5820: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5803: 5799: 5797: 5792: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5774: 5770: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5762: 5758: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5733: 5732: 5729: 5721: 5717: 5713: 5709: 5708: 5704: 5703: 5699: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5687: 5685: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5676: 5669: 5665: 5661: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5653: 5650: 5644: 5634: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5608: 5604: 5599: 5597: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5588: 5575: 5571: 5567: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5557: 5556: 5551: 5544: 5540: 5539:United Planet 5533:United Planet 5530: 5529: 5525: 5521: 5520:Jorge Peixoto 5517: 5513: 5506: 5501: 5500: 5496: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5472: 5466: 5460: 5459: 5455: 5451: 5446: 5442: 5439: 5436: 5433: 5430: 5427: 5424: 5421: 5417: 5414: 5411: 5408: 5405: 5402: 5399: 5396: 5387: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5370: 5367: 5363: 5360: 5356: 5355:Fortean Times 5352: 5348: 5344: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5332:SuzanneOlsson 5329: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5288: 5284: 5280: 5277: 5276:Joseph McCabe 5273: 5269: 5266: 5262: 5258: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5235: 5231: 5220: 5216: 5212: 5208: 5204: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5182: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5159: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5146: 5142: 5138: 5137: 5134: 5129: 5128: 5124: 5120: 5115: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5093: 5079: 5075: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5049: 5045: 5044: 5042: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5025: 5021: 5017: 5012: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5001: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4979: 4976: 4975: 4973: 4969: 4965: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4956: 4955: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4893: 4889: 4885: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4866: 4862: 4851: 4850: 4846: 4838: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4786: 4781: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4733: 4729: 4728: 4723: 4719: 4716: 4712: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4633: 4629: 4625: 4621: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4611: 4609: 4599: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4585:James Nichols 4580: 4577: 4573: 4563: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4527: 4524: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4482: 4476: 4472: 4471:Hi there ... 4467: 4460: 4456: 4452: 4448: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4418: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4402: 4399: 4396: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4379: 4376: 4372: 4365: 4358: 4348: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4321: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4297: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4251: 4243: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4194: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4171: 4169: 4166: 4163: 4158: 4155: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4135: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4099:StephenBuxton 4096: 4092: 4088: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4055: 4054: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4029: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4004: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3994: 3989: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3946: 3943: 3942: 3937: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3902: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3843: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3824:Cretanforever 3821: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3775:Cretanforever 3764: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3735: 3731: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3661: 3657: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3645: 3639: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3588: 3587: 3584: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3533: 3531: 3526: 3517: 3510: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3494: 3490: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3470: 3466: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3421: 3419: 3418:Rodhullandemu 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3387: 3383: 3381: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3369:User:Harout72 3366: 3365: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3342: 3339: 3336: 3332: 3329: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3282: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3233:Basic Channel 3230: 3226: 3223: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3208: 3206: 3202: 3201:free-licensed 3198: 3194: 3185: 3181: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3142: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3084: 3082: 3081: 3075: 3059: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2958: 2956: 2951: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2933: 2929: 2917: 2915: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2892: 2890: 2884: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2870: 2866: 2852: 2849: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2825: 2821: 2814: 2807: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2790: 2785: 2782: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2666: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2648: 2647: 2642: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2619: 2614: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2600: 2599: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2571: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2526: 2524: 2521: 2516: 2512: 2505: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2486: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2460: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2432: 2428: 2417: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2382: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2345: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319:Matthew Horan 2316: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2281: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2255: 2238: 2235: 2230: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2210: 2205: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2185: 2180: 2178: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2154: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2128: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2025: 2017: 2014: 2009: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1984: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1968: 1960: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1953: 1942: 1939: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1928: 1926: 1925: 1917: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1910: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1858: 1855: 1854:Exploding Boy 1851: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1831:Exploding Boy 1828: 1816: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1805:Welsh Swagman 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1783:Welsh Swagman 1780: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1721: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1698: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1629: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1570: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1498: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1481: 1474: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1436: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1416: 1412: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1350: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1306: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1258: 1248: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1165: 1161: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1142: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1105: 1103: 1098: 1094: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1014:Angela Merkel 1011: 1010: 1007: 1002: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 977: 973: 968: 966: 956: 953: 952: 948: 944: 940: 939: 934: 930: 926: 922: 914: 911: 909: 906: 905: 904: 903: 896: 893: 891: 888: 887: 886: 884: 880: 873: 870: 868: 865: 862: 859: 858: 857: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830:public domain 827: 823: 819: 815: 814:multi-license 811: 801: 799: 788: 785: 783: 779: 773: 770: 764: 762: 755: 750: 748: 744: 734: 732: 728: 724: 710: 707: 704: 703: 702: 701: 695: 691: 690:Break (music) 687: 683: 682: 681: 680: 674: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 656: 652: 648: 643: 642: 641: 640: 637: 633: 629: 619: 617: 613: 612: 601: 599: 589: 587: 579: 575: 571: 570: 566: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 553: 549: 545: 542:or ask me on 541: 537: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 512: 510: 507:, especially 506: 505:popular pages 503:Help improve 501: 499: 495: 494:systemic bias 492:Help counter 487: 483: 482: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 451: 450: 442: 438: 437: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 405: 402:Add an image 397: 393: 392: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 373:Richard Brome 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 360: 352: 348: 347: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 323:Arthur Ceppos 321: 319: 316: 315: 307: 303: 302: 294: 291: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 270: 262: 258: 257: 249: 248:Quero, Veneto 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 225: 217: 213: 212: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 180: 172: 168: 167: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 135: 127: 123: 122: 114: 113:Thodi Kodallu 111: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 83: 81: 80: 75: 74: 68: 65: 63: 53: 48: 44: 40: 36: 34: 29: 19: 6423: 6420: 6413: 6406: 6358: 6300: 6292: 6251:Visionholder 6229: 6167: 6163: 6148: 6109: 6015: 6011: 5989: 5959: 5923: 5848: 5804: 5800: 5793: 5789: 5739: 5724: 5689: 5672: 5645: 5642: 5617: 5602: 5583: 5546: 5536: 5509: 5469: 5447: 5443: 5440: 5437: 5434: 5431: 5428: 5425: 5422: 5418: 5415: 5412: 5409: 5406: 5403: 5400: 5397: 5393: 5385: 5324: 5300: 5296: 5260: 5228: 5188: 5169: 5097: 4982: 4977: 4963: 4901: 4876:this article 4857: 4836:silly rabbit 4832: 4791: 4789: 4779: 4734: 4730: 4727: 4724: 4720: 4715: 4713: 4710: 4644:Bunji Garlin 4641: 4605: 4581: 4569: 4551: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4537: 4505:". Regards, 4503:cite sources 4498: 4490: 4473: 4470: 4430: 4424: 4406: 4403: 4400: 4397: 4393: 4377: 4359:(opposed to 4354: 4327: 4309: 4304: 4301: 4254: 4206:71.169.20.16 4197: 4160:deleted per 4139:HeaveTheClay 4136: 4132: 4084: 4061: 4025: 4022:January 2008 3983: 3953: 3949: 3947: 3944: 3938: 3935: 3883: 3842:Tankut Öktem 3808:). Regards, 3772: 3739: 3736: 3732: 3729: 3688: 3662:about this). 3634: 3594: 3580: 3545:Warm Regards 3544: 3539: 3527: 3523: 3520:Nina phunsta 3515: 3461: 3417: 3414: 3412: 3340: 3298: 3269: 3256: 3248: 3231:By the way, 3204: 3196: 3190: 3187:Warning sign 3164:Martin Hinks 3122: 3105:Martin Hinks 3103: 3100: 3088: 3085: 3078: 3076: 3073: 2985: 2977: 2959: 2955:my talk page 2952: 2949: 2940: 2936: 2928:IP addresses 2925: 2911: 2902: 2895: 2893: 2885: 2880: 2875: 2873: 2862: 2833: 2819: 2817: 2786: 2783: 2779: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2678: 2654: 2646: 2643: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2617: 2595: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2520:194.252.5.66 2517: 2513: 2509: 2437:194.252.5.66 2433: 2429: 2425: 2389: 2385: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2360: 2356: 2353: 2289: 2258: 2136: 2090: 2030: 2029: 2020: 2003:Prasat Andat 2001:I think so. 1989: 1988: 1983:Prasat Andat 1976: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1951: 1950: 1945: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1908: 1907: 1902: 1884:User:Stephen 1824: 1801:deletion log 1776: 1742: 1726: 1714: 1701: 1694: 1680: 1666: 1635: 1632: 1605: 1594: 1573: 1532: 1492: 1477: 1444:, regarding 1439: 1408: 1393: 1392: 1384: 1360: 1323: 1309: 1191: 1157: 1143: 1139: 1115: 1106: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1082:BearingPoint 1075: 1072:BearingPoint 1056: 1035: 1027: 1017: 1003: 980: 962: 954: 936: 932: 924: 920: 918: 907: 901: 900: 889: 878: 876: 853: 841: 833: 828:or into the 821: 807: 794: 786: 774: 765: 758: 740: 720: 667: 625: 609: 607: 604:Sokal affair 595: 583: 544:my talk page 540:village pump 533: 513: 502: 496:by creating 491: 479: 463:Susumu Kodai 434: 389: 383:Vamps (film) 344: 299: 293:Jason Greene 254: 209: 164: 158:Hyun Joo-yup 119: 77: 71: 69: 66: 59: 51: 37: 30: 27: 6245:—Preceding 6207:Tklalmighty 6169:Tklalmighty 5945:. Regards, 5829:. Regards, 5808:Ndiye thabo 5775:. Regards, 5749:Colsmartcol 5743:—Preceding 5736:Samuel Oboh 5639:Taner Akcam 5255:My remark " 5209:. Regards, 5100:Erich Feigl 5053:? Regards, 4882:. Regards, 4813:? Regards, 4765:. Regards, 4737:—Preceding 4674:. Regards, 4622:. Regards, 4538:Dear Hoat, 4364:Subhas Bose 4311:Stan weller 4200:—Preceding 4191:Comment in 3916:. Regards, 3615:. Regards, 3561:. Regards, 3442:. Regards, 3391:. Regards, 3367:Hello. FYI 3203:images and 2922:I apologize 2898:SMcCandlish 2813:Nick Philip 2801:. Regards, 2574:—Preceding 2499:. Regards, 2370:Thank you, 2350:Ronit Baras 2292:—Preceding 2124:DrSculerati 1886:. Regards, 1702:SunStar Net 1536:—Preceding 1281:Google test 1264:Mike Dillon 1252:instead of 1206:Mike Dillon 1198:Gerrymander 1194:Jerrymander 1187:Jerrymander 1125:. regards, 1085:available. 778:Jörg Haider 378:An-Nisa, 34 328:Bhoj, India 278:Marcia Kure 203:Mauro Rizzo 79:Task Center 6421:thank you 6238:) and the 6226:notability 5876:The entry 4898:book links 4652:WP:NONFREE 4589:Reverend X 4553:Smallbones 4431:WolfKeeper 4371:rueben_lys 3577:Accusation 3467:. Thanks. 3385:criteria. 3335:resolution 3205:unsuitable 3193:our policy 3074:Hi there, 2988:Clive Chin 2912:(Reply at 2881:a bit late 2606:help pages 2491:(See also 2334:AGL Energy 2286:real names 2054:under the 2024:Phnom Penh 1841:Ditto for 1720:db-copyvio 1586:. Cheers 1580:neologisms 1415:Gurubrahma 1399:Gurubrahma 1344:assume. -- 846:WikiTravel 844:, such as 727:Fuelbottle 552:Wikipedian 536:help pages 238:Monte Ceva 6383:Regards, 6376:examples. 6333:Regards, 6084:Regards, 6064:WP:BURDEN 6060:WP:BURDEN 6056:WP:BURDEN 6040:Regards, 6008:WP:BURDEN 5941:Reply at 5821:Reply at 5767:Reply at 5728:Adoniscik 5710:Regards, 5675:Adoniscik 5649:Adoniscik 5623:Regards, 5587:Ned Scott 5491:Gwen Gale 5448:Regards, 5371:Regards, 5347:GeoCities 5281:Regards, 5238:Cade Metz 5205:Reply at 5192:Witchmark 5172:MrMarmite 4990:Regards, 4941:Regards, 4796:Wwwhatsup 4785:Bunny Lee 4761:Reply at 4670:Reply at 4648:Rikki Jai 4618:Reply at 4495:fact tags 4232:Regards, 4175:Regards, 4033:Paintball 3992:cierekim 3914:WP:NFCC#1 3886:Coolgamer 3860:Regards, 3855:WP:NFCC#1 3710:Regards, 3669:Regards, 3611:Reply at 3557:Reply at 3549:Tefalstar 3506:Spellcast 3491:Regards, 3469:Spellcast 3438:Reply at 3358:Regards, 3328:WP:NFCC#1 3261:Wwwhatsup 3239:Regards, 3136:Regards, 3127:this list 3055:Wwwhatsup 3036:Wwwhatsup 3032:Jah Shaka 2996:Wwwhatsup 2992:Bunny Lee 2797:Reply at 2480:Regards, 2411:Regards, 2372:Gal Baras 2339:Regards, 2298:Lanshaeoc 2227:Flyguy649 2202:Flyguy649 2177:Flyguy649 2151:Flyguy649 2076:Regards, 1899:Rewriting 1810:Regards, 1699:to me! -- 1648:Reply at 1615:Regards, 1600:WP:MADEUP 1595:suspected 1576:Confuzzle 1569:Confuzzle 1542:Randall O 1507:Regards, 1289:Regards, 1232:Regards, 1121:Reply at 1107:Regards, 965:SqueakBox 938:talk page 808:Hi, I've 717:Janjaweed 598:Bds yahoo 486:Learn how 441:Learn how 396:Learn how 351:Learn how 306:Learn how 261:Learn how 216:Learn how 171:Learn how 126:Learn how 33:diff link 6259:contribs 6247:unsigned 5920:geosmart 5882:link rot 5757:contribs 5745:unsigned 5475:deletion 5190:Studies. 5104:deletion 5016:Dicklyon 4984:sources. 4959:claiming 4938:purpose. 4905:Dicklyon 4751:contribs 4739:unsigned 4726:Germany. 4499:together 4408:Craytina 4381:contribs 4265:Eastmain 4248:Prod on 4214:contribs 4202:unsigned 4045:Nn123645 3945:Thanks! 3741:Skumarla 3598:TimidGuy 3429:contribs 3348:fair use 3302:Harout72 3114:Copy at 3091:WP:MUSIC 2848:Stormbay 2824:Stormbay 2789:SeeACure 2701:SeeACure 2588:contribs 2580:Kashmir2 2576:unsigned 2306:contribs 2294:unsigned 2233:contribs 2208:contribs 2183:contribs 2157:contribs 2043:avoided. 1977:Now are 1787:Aeronian 1550:contribs 1538:unsigned 1411:barnstar 1169:Eclectek 1144:Cheers! 923:" with " 908:Option 2 890:Option 1 850:top 2000 834:CC-by-sa 826:Licenses 822:CC-by-sa 706:Hyacinth 655:Hyacinth 636:Hyacinth 586:UtherSRG 529:policies 76:or the 47:Freenode 6407:Hello, 6323:points. 6161:pages? 6157:and/or 6066:holds. 5937:hinjae 5114:opt out 4743:Kythera 4691:rasadam 4657:rasadam 4041:sandbox 3838:deleted 3792:(or at 3691:Londo06 3685:Londo06 3656:Joi Ito 3583:Londo06 3502:Firefox 3465:WP:CITE 3377:Mathsci 3373:WP:AN/I 3253:WP:NFCC 3222:example 3096:WP:NFCC 3007:WP:NFCC 2903:‹(-¿-)› 2392:wordnet 2266:Eastlaw 2149:to it? 1867:synonym 1843:Books 2 1683:Ekicous 1361:Hi, on 1346:Pjacobi 1326:Pjacobi 1312:Adambro 1080:on the 1042:Nv8200p 947:comment 943:Ram-Man 854:minimum 668:usually 481:More... 436:More... 391:More... 346:More... 301:More... 283:Saccade 256:More... 228:Papozze 211:More... 166:More... 121:More... 62:welcome 60:Hello, 56:Welcome 43:via IRC 6425:Djampa 6035:WP:EBE 6027:WP:BLP 5970:Hinjae 5962:Hinjae 5927:Hinjae 5851:fanboy 5643:Haeb, 5119:Namsos 4608:Volkov 4534:Thanks 3730:Hi, 3658:wrote 3638:Amcaja 3536:Morgan 3355:like". 3257:ALL 10 3083:page. 2962:Shalom 2645:here.. 2408:sleep? 2396:Ciotog 2330:WP:COI 1827:Book 7 1697:hoaxes 1669:A13ean 1584:WP:AFD 1158:Hello 1109:BramvR 1064:Smerus 959:Rastas 782:Tuomas 673:groove 647:Riddim 628:groove 622:Groove 333:Domeli 5904:Allen 5863:Allen 5614:WP:EL 5554:shtak 5549:Pagra 5518:. -- 5011:WP:EL 4829:Email 4491:added 4338:Bkell 4058:Brawl 3317:from 2970:Peace 2966:Hello 2381:Sleep 2143:Padoo 2062:(see 1691:AFD's 1363:6 May 1053:Pinto 1021:wpopp 1006:Yurik 951:talk) 798:CSTAR 791:F. S. 772:do. 148:Tanec 16:< 6429:talk 6389:talk 6385:HaeB 6365:talk 6359:King 6356:Gary 6339:talk 6335:HaeB 6328:diff 6307:talk 6301:King 6298:Gary 6277:talk 6273:HaeB 6255:talk 6211:talk 6192:talk 6188:HaeB 6173:talk 6135:talk 6131:HaeB 6120:talk 6090:talk 6086:HaeB 6072:talk 6046:talk 6042:HaeB 5997:talk 5974:talk 5966:talk 5951:talk 5947:HaeB 5931:talk 5908:talk 5894:talk 5890:HaeB 5867:talk 5859:this 5835:talk 5831:HaeB 5825:and 5812:talk 5781:talk 5777:HaeB 5771:and 5753:talk 5716:talk 5712:HaeB 5664:talk 5660:HaeB 5629:talk 5625:HaeB 5570:talk 5566:HaeB 5524:talk 5495:talk 5454:talk 5377:talk 5373:HaeB 5366:here 5336:talk 5309:talk 5287:talk 5283:HaeB 5246:talk 5215:talk 5211:HaeB 5196:talk 5176:talk 5166:Fern 5145:talk 5141:HaeB 5123:talk 5078:talk 5059:talk 5055:HaeB 5041:talk 5020:talk 4996:talk 4947:talk 4909:talk 4888:talk 4865:talk 4843:talk 4819:talk 4811:here 4800:talk 4771:talk 4747:talk 4695:talk 4680:talk 4661:talk 4646:and 4628:talk 4593:talk 4576:this 4572:here 4557:talk 4511:talk 4493:two 4455:talk 4435:Talk 4427:User 4412:talk 4375:talk 4342:talk 4315:talk 4285:talk 4269:talk 4238:talk 4210:talk 4193:1962 4181:talk 4143:talk 4119:talk 4103:talk 4072:talk 4049:talk 4012:talk 3987:Dloh 3970:talk 3936:Hi, 3922:talk 3910:OTRS 3890:talk 3866:talk 3828:talk 3804:and 3779:talk 3745:talk 3716:talk 3695:talk 3675:talk 3643:talk 3621:talk 3602:talk 3567:talk 3448:talk 3397:talk 3154:and 3019:this 3013:and 2990:and 2934:. 2930:and 2876:your 2820:prod 2584:talk 2495:and 2448:this 2302:talk 2264:? -- 2147:Gron 2145:and 2071:here 2064:this 2056:DMCA 1981:and 1869:of " 1848:and 1743:does 1727:must 1725:you 1546:talk 1367:2007 1220:this 1045:talk 974:and 929:GFDL 838:GFDL 731:Talk 35:. 5849:On 5514:. 5297:you 5274:or 4934:#7. 4474:In 2834:you 2461:by 1852:. 1825:On 1760:DES 1731:DES 1626:On 1454:• 1320::-) 1164:REI 1136:404 725:-- 649:or 554:! 6431:) 6391:) 6341:) 6279:) 6261:) 6257:• 6213:) 6194:) 6175:) 6137:) 6122:) 6114:. 6092:) 6074:) 6048:) 6010:: 5999:) 5976:) 5953:) 5933:) 5910:) 5896:) 5869:) 5837:) 5814:) 5783:) 5759:) 5755:• 5718:) 5700:.) 5666:) 5647:-- 5631:) 5572:) 5526:) 5497:) 5456:) 5379:) 5338:) 5311:) 5289:) 5248:) 5236:, 5232:, 5217:) 5198:) 5178:) 5147:) 5125:) 5061:) 5022:) 4998:) 4974:: 4949:) 4911:) 4890:) 4867:) 4847:) 4821:) 4802:) 4773:) 4753:) 4749:• 4697:) 4682:) 4663:) 4630:) 4595:) 4559:) 4513:) 4457:) 4437:) 4429:) 4414:) 4383:) 4367:}} 4361:{{ 4344:) 4317:) 4287:) 4271:) 4240:) 4222:.) 4216:) 4212:• 4183:) 4145:) 4121:) 4105:) 4074:) 4051:) 4014:) 3972:) 3924:) 3892:) 3868:) 3830:) 3800:, 3796:, 3781:) 3747:) 3718:) 3697:) 3677:) 3646:) 3623:) 3604:) 3569:) 3547:-- 3532:" 3450:) 3431:) 3427:- 3399:) 3388:, 3330:). 3179:: 2972:) 2968:• 2957:. 2894:— 2586:• 2572:" 2525:) 2442:) 2325:). 2308:) 2304:• 2141:, 2073:). 1723:}} 1717:{{ 1548:• 1365:, 1260:}} 1254:{{ 1250:}} 1244:{{ 1004:-- 949:| 902:OR 761:RL 729:| 523:, 519:, 511:. 500:. 484:• 439:• 394:• 349:• 304:• 259:• 214:• 169:• 124:• 49:). 6427:( 6387:( 6368:) 6362:( 6337:( 6310:) 6304:( 6275:( 6253:( 6209:( 6190:( 6171:( 6133:( 6118:( 6088:( 6070:( 6044:( 6037:! 5995:( 5972:( 5964:( 5949:( 5929:( 5906:( 5892:( 5865:( 5833:( 5810:( 5779:( 5751:( 5714:( 5662:( 5627:( 5616:( 5568:( 5522:( 5493:( 5452:( 5375:( 5334:( 5307:( 5301:I 5285:( 5244:( 5213:( 5194:( 5174:( 5143:( 5121:( 5057:( 5018:( 4994:( 4945:( 4907:( 4886:( 4863:( 4839:( 4817:( 4798:( 4769:( 4745:( 4693:( 4678:( 4659:( 4626:( 4591:( 4555:( 4509:( 4453:( 4433:( 4410:( 4378:· 4373:( 4340:( 4313:( 4283:( 4267:( 4236:( 4229:. 4208:( 4179:( 4164:. 4141:( 4117:( 4101:( 4070:( 4047:( 4010:( 3968:( 3920:( 3888:( 3864:( 3826:( 3777:( 3743:( 3714:( 3693:( 3673:( 3640:( 3619:( 3600:( 3565:( 3446:( 3423:( 3395:( 3220:( 3118:: 2964:( 2916:) 2601:) 2582:( 2506:) 2477:. 2435:( 2336:. 2300:( 1850:5 1846:3 1544:( 1226:. 945:( 696:. 562:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index