User talk:Graemp - Knowledge

3086:

other possible contests. In summary, the party had decided to stand in every constituency it won in 1910 other South Glamorganshire (presumably candidature dependent on MP's continued support for Labour) and possibly Hallamshire (candidate selected but MFGB supportive only if Wadsworth did not wish to remain in post, even as a Lib-Lab). In Chester-le-Street, the MFGB had agreed a new candidate, but the Labour NEC still hoped the current MP might re-stand. The NEC had also sanctioned candidates in Bishop Auckland, Jarrow, Portsmouth, Oldham, Preston, St Helens, Leigh, Wigan, Birmingham East, Coventry, Hull West, Sowerby, Bermondsey, Glasgow Camlachie, Ayr South, Midlothian and Lanarkshire SE. Those with candidates selected but not fully sanctioned were: Darlington, S Shields, Houghton-le-Spring, NW Durham, Eccles, Newton, Nottingham E, Bristol E, Birmingham W, York, Keighley, Barnsley, Rotherham, Osgoldcross, Mid Glamorgan, East Glamorgan, West Monmouthshire, Leith, Montrose and West Lothian. He notes the list isn't totally comprehensive as trade unions had been allocated a certain number of candidatures each, and some - particularly the MFGB - had selected some candidates who don't appear on this list.

441:

would pause uploads and posted my previous message. I then get a further email in which sam person says "We don’t exclude Knowledge, but my understanding was that Knowledge would not except this type of CC licence (I was contacted by someone earlier this week who said that Knowledge administrators were removing images uploaded under this particular licence). If they do, then that is fine, and you can use the images we have available in this way" I responded to this by clarifying the problems that I had encountered. I have heard nothing further as yet. Given your comment, I am less certain that the person I have been in email contact with, knows what they are talking about. As for the problem with re-sizing, I may have assumed from the first quote that this was the identified problem - however I may have assumed wrongly.

456:

would suspect the reason I was told April 2014 was because even if they will talk among themselves and the other galleries they will need to pay lawyers, and web developers to sort any change out. My reading of the situation is they are happy for their CC images to be used on Knowledge (not Commons) even resized, just not change in other ways, or loosing the meta data in re-sizing. For the overzealous image checkers on here it will probably mean having to resize (I've been halving mine to 400px). Also maybe only use on the key articles about the person, not the others about individual elections. Also I would advise linking to the actual image download page as the source and licence links, as that way anyone can track back the claim. I haven't had any challenges on any of mine yet - fingers crossed :)

2184:

admittedly, and I rushed to correct them. I acknowledge that I may have been wrong from time to time and I hope you do the same. I believe thay Gershon Ellenbogen deserves a second chance as an article. I would appreciate it if you could also better Kemp′s article too. A notable scientific accomplishment would be fine. Another suggestion I would like to make, is that you also uploaded images of Conservative and Liberal Unionist politicians of the 1875-1925 era. You have access to more resources than the average Knowledge user does and it is a pity that you only use them for Liberals. I would be delighted if you could also upload images of Conservative MPs of the said era. I have already started doing this with all Conservatives and Liberal Unionists that I could find at

5683:. I noticed that this happened very soon after the subject's death. We only use nonfree media as an absolute last resort. Prior to doing this, did you ensure to contact the copyright holder of every photograph of this individual, ask them to release the photo under a free license, and receive a negative response? We would always try to obtain a free image release before resorting to using a nonfree; an article subject's death is not an automatic license to use a nonfree image unless you've actually exhausted the possibility of getting an existing image released freely. This would apply to any other image you've uploaded as "nonfree historic" as well, we always need to try for a free image first. 2620:

of a man in the image slot (last one ran on April 29) so we have been getting due for one. My personal patterns when building DYK sets also played a part. I try to "share the wealth" when selecting hooks for the image slot and the article's nominator has not received an image slot in a while. This was not true for several other hooks I considered for the slot. Finally, when I promote a hook to the prep areas I also perform a simplified review (a full DYK review usually takes me 30 to 60 minutes per article). My first choice left me uncomfortable with the quality of its sourcing so I left it for another set builder to deal with. This opened the door for Asher. --

7751: 3022:(Houghton-le-Spring), Batey (S Shields), Watts Morgan (Rhondda), J. Williams (Gower), Brace (W Monmouthshire), Adamson (W Fife), Robertson (NE Lanarks), Brown (Midlothian). In addition, the following candidates had been adopted by local MFGB affiliates as Labour candidates and were seeking MFGB funding: Twist (Wigan), Greenall (Leigh), Guest (Barnsley), Potts (Osgoldcross), Cairns (Morpeth), Straker (Wansbeck), Gilliland (Chester-Le-Street), Hartshorn (Mid Glam), Onions (E Glam), Winstone (N Monmouths), Richardson (Whitehaven). This is all from Roy Gregory, 6491:, 6 April 1939: "R. E. L. Bowyer (Tonbridge), Ashley Bramall (Fareham), Thomas W. Gittins (Farnham), A. H. Gordon (Bury St Edmunds), Dennis Gordon (Kingston), Gwendoline Hill (Bristol West), Elizabeth Jacobs (Walsall), Geoffrey W. Manners (Midlothian and Peebles North), Peter Pain (Portsmouth Central), Patricia Strauss (South Kensington), Lyall Wilkes (Newcastle Central), Rodger Wrightson (Edgbaston)". The same article notes the M. H. Wrigglesworth has just been dropped as Labour PPC for Pudsey and Otley. 7533: 6696: 5586: 3491: 115: 3129:

alternative name for Linlithgowshire (indeed, the official name was changed in 1945). It seems Brace was never keen on joining Labour and, while he ultimately stuck with the party, I guess the NEC were unsure whether he would. On Hallamshire, that's essentially right, apparently Wadsworth hadn't decided whether to re-stand, if he did, the YMA would sponsor him even if he stood as a Lib-Lab, but if he didn't then Grundy had been selected and the MFGB would sponsor him.

25: 2289: 6432: 8547: 7287: 7179: 7071: 8489: 8437: 8385: 8081: 8034: 7982: 7581: 7389: 7013: 6961: 6901: 6841: 6620: 6258: 6202: 5696:

instance, prior to his death, I had already researched the possibility of using a free image and had been unsuccessful. Now he is dead, we can use a non-free image. As far as wikipedia policies are concerned, it does not matter how soon after an individual's death an image of them is uploaded. It may well be that a free image subsequently comes to light, in which case, we will have the opportunity of making the replacement. 11:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

7934: 5332: 5276: 5220: 5164: 5108: 5052: 4996: 4940: 4884: 4828: 4772: 4716: 4660: 4604: 4548: 4492: 4436: 4380: 4324: 4268: 4212: 4156: 4100: 4044: 3988: 3932: 3876: 3820: 3764: 3708: 3652: 3596: 3540: 1438: 2358: 1164: 8299: 7842: 7663: 7445: 6513: 5923: 6595:. It failed the third criteria shown on the license you used - ("it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date") as URAA was only 51 years after publication. Therefore copyright was renewed at URAA and it now becomes PD (in US) 95 years after publication = 1st Jan 2041. As for PD in home country (here in UK), tricky, some might argue that some of the text should be attributed to the subject and she died in 2004 - 245:), I was wondering if you had considered asking NPG if they are willing to put a public statement on their website to clearly state under what licence/conditions they grant to use images on Knowledge? You could point out that they could benefit as the url would be linked on each picture and they could use the same page to encourage support, donation, sales etc. Also they could ask that each picture has a caption including 'from the 8673: 2317: 5865:

candidates you are assuming that they were better known by their first name which is often not the case, even if this information is known. Therefore we need to list all forenames of some candidates. Knowledge is an on-going collaborative project. An un-linked candidate whose name is listed in full is more likely to be found and linked by another editor as and when their article page is found or created.

418:. The CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 does not explicitly stop resizing (after reading the full legal text) - but it is a legal grey area, but from their email I guess they don't like it - not really sure why. It would be nice if the Knowledge actually had some ways to deal with these issues, the Foundation itself should talk more to these organisations. Need to get Knowledge to accept CC-BY-NC-ND @ 800px for 8257: 8217: 8185: 8133: 7798: 6377: 6335: 6072: 5545: 5420: 265:

something that they actually include as a condition in their license. When I first started including their portraits I included their recommended caption. However another Knowledge editor came along and removed this aspect from the caption as it was apparently in breach of Knowledge's captioning policy. Ho hum. This is a morale draining experience but your encouragement is uplifting. Thanks.

2234: 3114:

re-take the Liberal whip. I assume from what you read that the YMA had agreed to sponsor either one or the other depending on which one stood. John Wilkinson Taylor announced in 1914 he would retire. South Shields, Jarrow and Hull West candidates withdrew in 1914. Lanarkshire South East and West Lothian don't appear to be constituencies at the time.

8506:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 8454:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 8402:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 8098:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 8051:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7999:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7598:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7406:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 7030:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6978:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6918:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6858:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6637:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6277:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6221:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 5845:

showed him with six names in total - made the page look ridiculous. All we need to record for an election result is the first and last name of each candidate; if they are notable and have their own WP entry then that page can be linked so that the reader can access additional biographical information if they are interested.

1339:

copy to be retained. Knowledge obviously recognise that there are reasons why an uploader might want to select these options and thus make them available without stipulating what these reasons might be. For anyone who is interested, I'm sure there is a way of finding out what they think these various reasons will be. Cheers.

6131:

Hi. You and I were part of a UK politics discussion about this matter. I remember the discussion well and I do not remember it coming to any sort of consensus. I do remember other editors making various comments about a number of issues we had raised. I have taken on board some of those comments, the

2996:

Manchester Evening News, 4 Apr 1939 ran a story on the expulsions which included DLP President Walter Dale. The story also mentions that Casasola withdrew as Labour candidate in November 1938 and that by the time of the article he had been replaced as candidate by William Harvey Moore. I know nothing

1338:

Hi, Although you raised the question with regard to a specific file, I see you are more interested with the general practice. When using the wikipedia upload wizard, uploaders are given the choice of where they wish to upload files. They are also given the choice to stipulate if they wish for a local

982:

Firstly, "No, I have made no interpretation at all" ignores "If a politician is a man resolutely anti-Fascist, and he can be shown to have voted for a right-wing measure, that might be significant". By sending me a message you have clearly made an interpretation regarding the notability of this vote,

925:

Thank you for your interest. There are indeed thousands of votes and you illustrate how some votes can be more informative/notable than others. The matter then comes down to interpretation of the degree and any clutter point is in itself irrelevant. I feel able to make an interpretation based upon my

649:

I don't profess to be any authority on reference style but it looks right to me. I am glad you appreciate my use of wikipedia graphics. Regarding your text edit and references, I think it may be difficult for the casual reader such as myself, to work out what his position was on any of the issues you

6800:

Thanks, Johnson is a new name for me. I obviously hadn't carried out any ILP research for 1939 as I didn't have any of them running. I have a query about Kate Spurrell in Camborne who may have withdrawn. The ILP were nominally part of the Popular Front which may explain the low number of candidates.

5398:

Thanks for your understanding approach. You will come across other differences to UK constituency articles; some give results of most recent first and some put the most recent last. The consensus seems to be to put the most recent first for all current constituencies. For historical constituencies I

3412:

Sorry on these - Kneeshaw is me mistyping, it is J. W. Kneeshaw in the original - Tanner (p.186) confirms that James Kneeshaw is the candidate in question, though from the sources I've found, I'm not 100% sure the two are not the same person. And on Gilliland, the original is just "J. Gilliland" of

3200:

I've managed to see the 1916 Year Book. The snippets were misleading, as it moves straight on from a list of approved candidates (Robertson in Lanark NE) to one of agents (Duncan Graham for Lanark NE). Anyway, in case there are any names you are missing, the approved candidates with constituencies

1242:

The final text said "from Scotland" and linked the parliament to the UK one. If you want to talk more about the issues you raised then do try my talk page. However you imply that you want to talk to the right person .... not sure we have that person. Womens History do also have a discussion page and

944:

No, I have made no interpretation at all, merely stated why interpretation is dangerous and NOT OUR JOB. We are to find reliable secondary sources, and while we are not totally forbidden from using primary sources like Hansard (going there to prove the exact wording of a quote from a speech might be

558:

I've just spent too long thinking about your options without reaching a conclusion. I'll leave the decision and the resulting work to you. Either option would reduce the need to keep the information on the lists pages which I think is good. Just adding at the bottom to start with would be easiest. A

455:

I think the guys that work there are probably as much if not more confused by the exact legal positions as we are. I think mostly they are there to basically deal with sales of the images, they may not even have a single member of staff willing to comment outside the guidelines they probably have. I

264:

Thanks KylieT for your suggestions. (Stefan2 was not particularly helpful.) The NPG have a Creative Commons statement on their website that does not specifically mention Knowledge. I don't think they would want to go down the road of mentioning any particular website. Your 'credit in the caption' is

5767:? I uploaded files of the same name at Commons without realising that the files here had the same name. I tried requesting a name change at Commons, but that was declined as the preference is for local files to be renamed. Though having said that, I am asking for this to be reconsidered over there. 2619:

This article was selected for the image slot based upon a number of factors. First and foremost was simple luck of the draw. The nomination was in the right place at the right time to be selected. Beyond that, DYK tries to run a variety of images. It has been a while since DYK used the portrait

2203:

From time to time I make mistakes and don't mind if these are corrected. I also do not mind if other users contact me if they have a query about a file I have uploaded or an article to which I have contributed, either on my talk page or the talkpage of the file/article. My file upload list contains

1075:

edit. I thought I might be able to easily do this in a satisfactory way but quickly worked out that this was not possible. I am undecided as to how and when I will return to this issue. There are plenty of articles on wikipedia (not just stubs) that are under-developed. Given that the information I

1040:

I do not know what you were trying to achieve with your edits. If you would care to explain what they are intended to achieve, it would be appreciated. If that purpose is to advocate a point of view, based on primary sources, then I believe the edits should be reverted. If you are in the process of

440:

It is confusing KT, I received a reply by email from a/the Rights & Images Manager who said; "At present, we cannot license any images for use on Knowledge due to the terms they wish to impose on uploaded content (and because they don’t adhere to UK copyright law)." I responded by saying that I

328:

Hmm, interesting. Good work KylieT. I have drafted an email to them asking them to change the licence status of their Walter Stoneman portraits where I believe there is a particularly strong moral case for them being free to use on wikipedia. Can you tell me who at the NPG you contacted/got back to

3113:

Didn't know about SPGB. Glamorgan South is surprising, Brace was SWMF sponsored and continued to take the Labour Party whip, so I don't understand the hesitancy. Hallamshire is interesting; both Wadsworth and Grundy were Liberals, Grundy had agreed to run as a Labour candidate and Wadsworth was to

2702:

example, I could create a page for one of the candidates Cecil Binney a minor notability on your site, which could be linked in the wikipedia article. While I think this would be useful for wikipedia readers looking for more, would you be happy for your site to be used in such a patchwork fashion?

5382:

Hi, thanks for your comment about the compact election boxes. As you can probably see, I'm a new editor and thought the compact were new versions of the election boxes that hadn't made their way across Knowledge yet. I've taken on board your comment and will revert them soon, with the new results

3128:

Interesting. I guess Lanarkshire SE is a misprint for either Lanarkshire NE or Lanarkshire S, but no way of telling which one without further information. He also lists the non-existent Lanarkshire W in the uncertain list, so there's something odd going on there. Apparently West Lothian was an

2582:

was deleted from the article as the file had been deleted because of a licence issue. Given the image was dated 1917, this seems odd as a 1917 image would be free to use. Even if the 1917 date is questionable, which I don't think it is, the image could have been retained under fair use. You could

1496:

You appear to be a seasoned editor. I need assistance in restoring a crucial descriptive paragraph that is the basis for the Wiki page. The paragraph concerns information from almost 30 years ago concerning the cold war, nuclear arms race and nuclear disarmament. The word activist, which was used

313:

I've got a reply back already! They are going to discuss the idea internally and with other UK museums and Galleries. They said they are aware the current licence is the most restrictive CC licence and as it's been over a year since launch they are going to review the impact. However due to other

5844:

We do not need lists of middle names for election candidates in WP; no other encyclopedia would do this. My edit to the Ilford North page was 'thanked' by another editor yesterday for the reason I made the edit - inserting four middle names into one of the regular candidates, such that the page

3085:

I've looked through the book, and although there is no more to that table, there's a really useful summary on pages 326-327. From internal Labour Party documents, he places constituencies in four columns: those won in 1910, those with sanctioned candidatures, those with candidates selected, and

2927:

Hi, I had provided no information for the death of the photographer, this information was provided by another user. I have often added the 'don't copy to commons' tag to files that I think may be deleted if they are transferred to Commons. From my experience I have discovered that a file that is

283:

that have been 'cleared'. It does still seam ridiculous that the NPG give a license to use and it's still such a problem... I resized mine (keeping the meta data) so hopefully they wont be removed. I also contacted the NPG to point out the problems and asked if they would consider releasing even

5868:

Away from Ilford North and South, across UK Constituency articles, there are many candidates listed with all their forenames. If it is your intention to arbitrarily delete middles names from those articles, you have much work ahead of you, even ignoring problems you will encounter with other UK

897:

There are thousands of votes by politicians around the world on issues every day; very few of these are notable, so a mere record that X voted for Y, as proven by Hansard (a primary source) is not in itself proof that anything notable has happened. Further, it clutters up the encyclopedia. If a

5864:

You correctly point out that the reader can click on the link to find out the full name of any linked candidate, however they can not do this with an un-linked candidate, therefore removing middle names from candidates limits the information for the reader. By removing the middle name from all

5611:

We met the other day at the NLC editathon. Hello again. I've done a quick search for "lewin sharp architect" and "lewen sharp architect", and both spellings seem to be in use. I see Lewen was also a councillor. As Lewen is the more unusual, I suspect it is the correct one. But, I remember that

2701:

You have previously mentioned using your London site to host articles that fail wikipedia notability, such as individual election candidates. I would be interested to know how you visualise this working. For instance, there is little point with duplicating the Uxbridge page on your site. As an

5695:

Thank you for the lesson in use of non-free images. While it is not our task to contact image copyright holders and ask them to alter their licensing arrangements, I have had experience of doing this, resulting in hundreds of images being made eligible for use on wikipedia. In this particular

2928:

regarded as free on wikipedia may not be treated as such on commons. That is probably why I restored the tag. If an editor was to decide to remove this tag from a file and copy the file to commons and then delete the file from wikipedia, I would hope that they would know what they are doing.

2655:

No problem. No57 took the trouble to ask UK politics project members to comment, which was good. I am pleased to see that you have addressed No57's concerns about the articles referencing. Might I suggest that you refrain from addressing the nature of the referencing in the Afd as it is not a

2146:

Hi. This image was moved over to Commons as being PD, but since you (apparently, from what was stated) don't have an actual copy of the postcard itself, it's lacking 'evidence' that it's actually PD. It would (obviously) be perfectly fine as on enwiki under fair use, but do you have any other

5860:

Your point of view that any candidate with five forenames looks ridiculous is a stylistic point that I can not address other than to say that stylistic points are not really a consideration for an encyclopedia. If there are worthy stylistic considerations then I would say that consistency of

2183:

It crossed my mind that you may believe that I consider you some sort of a ″wikienemy″ of mine. Whether or not you do, I have to tell you that such an assumption would not by any means be true. What is true is that I noticed some flaws (as I perceive them) in your actions, one after another,

519:

by W Eric Jackson, published in 1965 at the end of the council. I have been trying to flesh out the names and biographies a bit as much as I can. It turned out that we had some individuals listed under different names who turned out to be the same person (often they had terms as aldermen and

1323:

have some kind of licensing issues or there is some other clear reason. I ask here for two reasons: first, since this applies to many files, and the thing they have in common is that you uploaded them; and second, File talk pages are very underutilized, and a question there is likely to go

872:

It seems logical to me to have them in this order. Unlike External links sections, often Reference sections are very long, and when the name of the section is not visible on the screen, it could cause problems. Which is the point made in WP:ORDER, though it concludes by making the opposite

6525:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5900:

I agree this is not about a volume of information - no one is adding the names of candidates who did not contest elections. The purpose is to provide readers with full and accurate information and not arbitrarily delete potentially key information, just because one thinks it looks nice.

6115:

to reinstate full names of candidates with links. The consensus we arrived at last year was that those candidates would be displayed with their commonly used names. Has the consensus changed - if so, could you point me in the direction of the discussion as I can't see anything. Thanks.

3429:

I am reasonably convinced that it is John William Kneeshaw (Debrett's and author references) that is the J.W. Kneeshaw and that Tanner mistakenly referred to him as James Kneeshaw. On checking, I can only find J. Gilliland and therefore think you were right in assuming James Gilliland.

3390:

F. W. Kneeshaw (Birmingham West): According to Political Change and the Labour Party 1900-1918 in 1914 it was James Kneeshaw. In 1918 John W. Kneeshaw fought Birmingham Ladywood. It is possible that there were 3 different people and all this info is correct - or there could be an error

1700:

Hi Graemp. The article as it existed when I deleted it was just obvious vandalism/hoax material, nothing of value what so ever. I'd be happy if you want another admin the verify this. Nice to see some proper content take it's place, thanks for the work you've done on the article -

3021:

Hi - I've found a list of Labour Party candidates the MFGB had agreed to sponsor by the outbreak of World War I: Walsh (Ince), Sutton (Manchester E), Roebuck (Doncaster), Lunn (Holmfirth), Grundy (Hallamshire), Hall (Normanton), Stanley (NW Staffs), Martin (NE Derbys), Richardson

902:

to use a primary source to show that -- you would have to find a secondary source which pointed out that he had been hypocritical to vote like that, for it to be acceptable here at Knowledge. If the additions were being made to further a cause, then they would constitute

2911:

Hi there, if you're sure the date of death of the photographer was 1941, I believe this photograph is now in the public domain under the life + 70 years rule. Any particular reason you added the "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons" tag ? regards, Rod in Sydney.

2719:

Anyone in 'what is #now# loosely Greater London' can be included': and from the LW point of view at least crosslinking to and from WP pages to avoid duplication on LW and 'discussions over notability on WP' is reasonable. To use an example of someone already on LW - is

6150:

The compromise to use common names for linked candidates and full names - where known - for unlinked candidates was broadly accepted. There was definitely a very clear preference by members that linked candidates should be shown using their common names for ease of

992:

Finally, I regard wikipedia as a collaborative project in which editors can work together and would expect any editor who took the trouble to post a message on my talkpage to seek to be helpful. Leaving aside the general tone of your messages, (you may want to read

7954:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

3147:

of 1916, p.317, confirms it was Lanarkshire NE, where Duncan Graham was the candidate. It seems that year book has a complete list of selected candidates and their constituencies and sponsors, but unfortunately I only have access to snippets on Google Books.

1307:

Files on Commons are just as easily accessible to Knowledge, and using exactly the same syntax, as files kept locally here. In addition, and unlike files kept locally, files on Commons are available to other projects (other languages' Wikipedias, Wikibooks,

804:

I am happy to concentrate on pre-1931 results, though I reserve my right to meddle in post-1931 results where I feel the urge. When I do, it is usually because I have identified additional data such as electorates and forenames. I assume you have been using

2037:

Okay. I will tackle all the pre-1950 stuff. I notice that sometimes you seem to use The Times House of Commons sources I showed you and sometimes not. If you used The Times ... it would save me the trouble of going over your good work adding the forenames.

2458:

Good point. Okay, I will. I used to make a point of adding electorates to the table title bar until it was pointed out to me that this was an improper use of the project's template. So now, if I happen to be making an edit, I delete the electorate.

5358:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5302:

5246:

5190:

5134:

5078:

5022:

4966:

4910:

4854:

4798:

4742:

4686:

4630:

4574:

4518:

4462:

4406:

4350:

4294:

4238:

4182:

4126:

4070:

4014:

3958:

3902:

3846:

3790:

3734:

3678:

3622:

3566:

1464:

2279: 1796:

Mr. L. Fior is a solicitor and formerly a barrister Born in 1896; educated at King's College, London University, and Gray's Inn. Former member of London County Council and Middlesex county council. Served with The Middlesex Regiment,

540: 1881:

I believe he was Lucien Fior, born 2Q 1896 in St George in the East Registration District and married Olga Samuel in 3Q 1928 in Paddington Registration District according to FreeBMD. He is mentioned here in a letter about his son:

7648:

It was my pleasure to add to all the work you had done with the constituency pages. It was the least I could do since I had the data sitting on my PC from when I was planning doing the 1925-1937 elections. 16:17, 12 May 2020

346:(or if you like to call people +44 (0)207 312 2473/4). I'm thinking about contacting other sources of images as well for CC-BY access to 'low' quality resources, I really want more astronomy and taxonomic free image sources. 2219: 893:

Hi, I'm a little bemused to discover you are adding a mass of similar statements to politician's articles stating they voted on an issue on a certain date; and further that you are supporting these by a bare URL reference.

3056:? Unfortunately, I can't see the pages before or after, but it lists the constituencies with Labour Party candidates approved centrally by January 1915. I think I can get access to a hard copy next week, if it's useful. 520:

councillors at different times or represented different divisions), while there were some members who had namesakes (sometimes father and son) who appeared to be a single person. I think we are getting of top of this now.

514:

shared his data on LCC election results with me, which is mostly extracted from the official poll books, and these are also covered in the newspapers of the time which are available online. The names of members come from

314:

projects and resources they are unlikely to make any changes till after April next year. Lastly, they said "It is also extremely useful for us to have the views from Knowledge contributors." - So at least it's positive

8739:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

7632:

Thanks for your work on the London County Council candidates, I only did quick searches when I originally pulled the constituency articles together, and you've found loads more full names and candidates with links!

5399:

think it is better to list them in chronological order. As I go along adding historical data I will often flip the results if they are in reverse chronological order. I'm not aware of this upsetting other editors.

506:

In the 1889 election party labels were somewhat flexible, some candidates were nominated by local Liberal/Radical associations and some by Unionists and some by both. By 1892 the two parties were well established.

7958:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

5362:

5306:

5250:

5194:

5138:

5082:

5026:

4970:

4914:

4858:

4802:

4746:

4690:

4634:

4578:

4522:

4466:

4410:

4354:

4298:

4242:

4186:

4130:

4074:

4018:

3962:

3906:

3850:

3794:

3738:

3682:

3626:

3570:

1468:

1960:

of Friday 27 March 1925, he was being considered as a potential Liberal candidate to contest South East Essex. "Mr. Fior is a practising barrister, a Jew by race and religion, of Rumanian descent, but of British

413:

Hmmmm. Shows how out of touch they are. When the orginal problem between NPG(UK) and the Knowledge Foundation happened in 2009 that may have been true, but now the policy is to uphold local copyright law, as per

221:

Just a quick note to say thanks for your excellent work on by-elections. Having started a few of these articles, I am pleased to see them so well expanded. Maps and pictures especially make a big contribution.

8648: 5707:

Thanks for the thank. You're welcome. He happens to be the bro of someone I'm researching, and I found the pic in passing. There is probably more online about W.R. Elliston's WWI military career, if you're

967:

So, let me ask directly (in lieu of reverting a substantial number of your edits), why are you adding mentions of who voted for women's right to vote, and how are you selecting which articles to add this to?

5883:

The purpose of WP is to provide readers with an accessible readable encyclopedia of information; not to fill every page with as much information as you can find, regardless of its use or interest to people.

1519:

Just to confirm for the next few weeks I will be concentrating on the following constituencies in terms of completing their post-1930 election results: Hertfordshire East Ogmore Swansea East Wrexham Harwich

3070:

I had accessed that book preview before. There may be some run on data not picked up by the preview. If you decide to track down hard copy and happen to find anything of interest to me, that would be nice.

748:

Hi, Could you please check the references for James Bryce, 1st Viscount - is my layout OK? The information is all fine - (fron the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography) Cheers and Happy new Year! Mike

720:

A warning about that site - some of their electorates and turnouts differ from Craig and The Times House of Commons who tend to agree. TTHoC (which also give first names) for 1945-1970 can be accessed here

8446: 814: 5782:

Thanks for asking. I don't think I have a problem with that, assuming they are different images. Commons response to your request seems odd, though I generally find Commons odd and avoid uploading there.

2981:

The DLB article didn't mention that, but stated that in 1945 he stood on a conventional Labour Party platform; it seems his move towards the CPGB happened later, after he became more active in the union.

6170:

I have again reverted your edit to this article. Your edit de-linked Sir John Francis Roskell Reynolds. I also note another of your edits where you de-linked 3 other notabilities. I have referred you to

836:

Hi, Yes Scotland. I may jump back to Wales and England when my interest takes me but for now am trying to complete as many 'interesting' seats as possible - ones that are not very 'safe' for any party.

298:

I'd be interested in hearing any feedback you get from the NPG. I have been uploading the portraits in batches, partly so that I could see what additional problems occurred, and adapt the upload method

360:

I am pausing my upload of NPG images until further notice following an email from the NPG in which they state that they are currently not prepared to licence their images to wikipedia for two reasons;

8636: 8328:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7869:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7690:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 7472:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 6537:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1942:. As to him being a member of the London County Council this seems wrong and I can't find any reference him to being a member of Middlesex County Council. Perhaps he did legal work for the councils? 8589: 7219: 7111: 6761:

Next up are the Independent Labour Party PPCs as of 1939 - according to the Annual Report of the National Administrative Committee of the ILP, in addition to all their MPs at the time, they were

6450: 5861:

presentation both within an article and across articles has merit. You would seem to agree with this as you went through both of those articles deleting middle names that had previously existed.

1110:

Ok, I'll think what to do. Reversion is clearly an option but it may be we can find a less drastic route. More generally, I feel we shouldn't add similar phrases and refs to a mass of articles.

8697:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 8431: 6194: 3162:

I have Lanarkshire North-East as J. Robertson, MFGB sponsored in 1914. I also have Linlithgow rumoured in 1914 that George Dallas would run. Do you have a link for Labour Year Book of 1916?

5723:

My interest is in his political rather than military career. I had not seen a picture of him other than a 1918 election postcard I have that pictures him marching at the head of his troops.

4593: 4403: 2637: 1558: 1041:

adding secondary sources and other materials for some other purpose, to which the edits so far made will contribute in some way, I will happily await those developments. With best wishes,

8205:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука

7951: 7186: 7172: 7078: 7064: 7022: 7007: 6910: 6818:

isn't mentioned in the 1939 Report, which lists all the official candidates at that date. In a few days I should be able to check whether she's mentioned in the previous years' reports.

6312: 794:

Just to keep you informed that I am continuing to work on Welsh UK constituency results since 1931 for the forseeable, followed by Scotland (if you want to look in and give me a hand...)

2903: 1715: 8344: 7885: 7706: 7488: 6895: 6553: 5454: 4627: 2148: 7818:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --

8394: 7327: 6970: 6955: 6850: 3177: 3394:

James Gilliland (Chester-le-Street): I had John Gilliland, not sure where from and thought it might have been John Edward "Jack" Gilliland (1877 -1951), who is a different person.

627:

Hi Graemp could you please check that I have done a new reference the right way on the Professor Sir Arnold Lupton page? Great diagrams by the way! Well Done. Thanks so much Mike

8746:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the 8313: 8277:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

8237:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

7855: 7676: 7458: 6355:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

5440:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

2069:

I don't know how it's going to be changed but it's just going to be completely impossible for Mr. Harper to call an election for this year now. I don't know how to fix all this.--

1554: 8153:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

8264: 8140: 7167: 7059: 6835: 5427: 5097: 3753: 926:

knowledge of the subject area. I note that you have made a different one, which is not something I can do anything about other than encouraging you to read around your subject.

1919:

Digital Library search, you can follow his legal career. He wrote a letter published in the paper on 2 February 1953 as Joint Honrary Secretary, Liberal Candidates Association.

1692:

Hello Graemp! Wondered if you would oblige me and help complete this constituency's election results in the 1920s? Free cake will be served in gratitude. The Literal Democrat.

3505:" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on 2305: 2824: 1617:

Hi Graemp. Wondering if you could add the full names to the Tynemouth Constituency election history? Ta for all your work and suggestions, by the way. - The Literal Democrat

677:

is devoid of all results. I'll do 1945 onwards for you now, I know how you like the dust covered older results ;) (And tbf, I only have easy access to post-1945 results....)

8192: 6087: 8272: 7398: 7294: 7280: 6614: 6092:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. --

5565:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. --

5321: 5131: 4985: 4705: 4425: 4257: 3787: 2017: 1794:

A bit of a long shot, but given your interest in historical London government, can you tell me anything about this individual (biography from The Times House of Commons);

1530:

Okay. I will check those pages in due course and improve their pre-1945 results. You will find that this link provides all the information including candidate fore names.

809:

which often use 'different' (perhaps unreliable) electorate data to other major sources such as Craig and TTHoC. TTHoC results/biographies for 1950-70 can be located here

1410: 8090: 6066: 5435: 5414: 1716: 815:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Tb8bAQAAMAAJ&q=Etholiadau'r+ganrif&dq=Etholiadau'r+ganrif&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5k3MUuODEM6S7AaHr4H4Dg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA

6397:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

8667: 8535: 8379: 8148: 8043: 7383: 6315:

for UK elections on the type of election box template we use. I know we've discussed this previously so thought I'd flag it for you, in case you wish to participate.--

4481: 3921: 2255: 6132:

deletion of forenames not being one of them as there was no consensus on this matter. Your second Exchange edit de-linked one candidate, which I found a bit strange.

1825:. Can't see any very similar possibly misspelled names either. Any chance you could say which election and constituency he stood in. I might be able to cahse him up. 8483: 8200: 5539: 5355: 5019: 4739: 4459: 4291: 1502: 1497:

twice has also been removed, in addition an image of a map and numerous key descriptive words. I was wondering if you would be interested in assisting me? Thank you

1243:

there is systemic bias. I was pleased to see your article made a number 2 slot on the main page when there was a surplus of articles trying to get there. Well done.

1198: 8232: 7922: 5560: 4873: 3529: 1392: 202:

Thanks for the update. Perhaps you might add a note to these various 1906 and 1910 maps that they are the work of Stepney from the US Election Atlas or Votetalk.

169:

Hey Graemp. Thanks for the extra results on this article. My sources only go back to 1931 so it's always good to see someone finding and supplying older results.

8224: 7275: 5680: 4929: 4515: 4369: 3977: 3955: 2850:? I'm sure there must be others, but I can't find them. I'm pulling together a list by party and year of the oldest, youngest and last surviving candidates at 6392: 6350: 2819:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1405:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

945:

a justifiable example), it is not acceptable to take a set of primary sources and to weave them into an argument not stated by any of the sources, that is pure

8251: 8127: 7976: 7590: 6368: 5468: 4649: 3809: 3585: 1023:

I am sorry you find me unclear and uncivil, I should strive to avoid both those sins. I am very glad to hear you are making no more of them. Let me try again.

7940: 7924: 7813: 7805: 7774: 5209: 5041: 4907: 4667: 4651: 3563: 2756:

Aha! Brilliant, thank you. So he was spelt wrongly (a bee in my bonnet!) and now you have corrected and clarified. that's great, many thanks and best wishes

1461: 8662: 6013:

was selected for Colchester in 1913. No word on how long he remained a candidate; as an anti-war ILPer, he might have been dropped on the outbreak of war?

8179: 8075: 7575: 6329: 4963: 4537: 4313: 4201: 4089: 4011: 2921: 2806: 2724: 2031: 1735: 6245: 6032:

Graemp, when have we just added estimates such as the given reference without giving the bigger picture. I have to say I am very disappointed. Regards -

5657:

If three experienced editors concur, that is enough for me. Rather than doing a redirect, I have been bold and moved it to Lewen Sharp. On my head be it!

4644: 3445: 2415:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1221:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

8028: 6702: 6695: 6250: 5153: 4761: 4683: 4033: 3843: 3641: 3619: 7270: 7162: 7054: 2869:

I have carried out extensive research on this very subject, but only for the Liberal candidates. According to my research the following are still alive;

2441: 989:

Thirdly, you would do well to note that I stopped doing this at 08:38 this morning, over an hour before you contacted me and I have not continued since.

7741: 6950: 5265: 5243: 5075: 3865: 603:

I tend to take the key dates/details and refer back to the WP page - but some people are 'too marginal' for here (and there are only two of us there).

33: 8478: 7792: 7002: 4817: 4571: 4347: 4235: 4123: 2798: 2780: 1427: 1258: 7912: 7732: 6890: 5737:

In response to your comment I looked for an early image associated with his political career but didn't find one, sorry. Good luck with your search.

5148: 3804: 2967:

Thanks. In 1939, 11 Bury Labour members were expelled for Popular Front sympathies. I'd be interested to know where Casasola stood on this subject.

2099: 2022:

Hello Graemp! Wondered if you would oblige me and help complete these constituencies election results in the 1920s and 1910s? Free cake on its way.

898:

politician is a man resolutely anti-Fascist, and he can be shown to have voted for a right-wing measure, that might be significant, but it would be

7971: 7514: 6571: 6101: 5187: 4795: 4067: 2140: 3180:, although I can't even see snippets today. I should be able to see a hard copy next week, if we can't get the useful information out of Google. 8070: 6112: 5574: 5449: 5372: 5299: 5036: 4756: 4476: 4308: 3899: 3697: 2392: 2330: 7378: 6661: 1208: 8647:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

8631: 8211: 6766: 6420: 4851: 4532: 4145: 3972: 3675: 2433: 1511: 1486: 888: 8790: 7430: 2473:

Strange. I wonder who pointed out that and why they don't like it. Can we move the electorate elsewhere in the article instead of deletion? --

1687: 1422: 8708: 6802: 6180: 6133: 6052: 5902: 5870: 5784: 5724: 5644: 5523: 5400: 4924: 3580: 3431: 3395: 3163: 3115: 3072: 3040: 2998: 2968: 2929: 2889: 2772: 2703: 2671: 2657: 2584: 2522: 2488: 2460: 2205: 2164: 2085: 2039: 1980: 1844: 1800: 1767: 1651: 1645: 1642: 1622: 1598: 1534: 1340: 1292: 1077: 998: 927: 874: 817: 772: 725: 693: 651: 590: 560: 442: 385: 330: 300: 266: 4980: 4420: 4028: 4700: 3860: 3731: 3636: 1813:

Butting (User:Jackiespeel tipped me off). Nobody of that name was a member of LCC (there's a complete alphabetical list in the appendix of

1648: 958:

Secondly, the clutter is serious, because it appears to be POV, modifying how readers may think about the human subjects of these articles.

8371: 8174: 8023: 7767: 5260: 5092: 2836: 919: 344: 8775: 8426: 8159: 7832: 7827: 7653: 6578: 4588: 4364: 4252: 4179: 4140: 2487:

I don't think adding electorates outside of the table is a good idea. I'm also not minded to propose a new table design for the project.

8530: 8286: 7622: 6363: 5204: 4812: 4084: 3692: 2438:

Please use edit summaries more frequently, as I have no idea why you deleted electorate data from Devizes and Westbury election results.

7435: 6774: 6505: 6301: 5316: 3916: 2691: 4868: 2402: 2047: 1285: 8733: 8644: 8638: 8206: 7945: 5344: 5288: 5232: 5176: 5120: 5064: 5008: 4952: 4896: 4840: 4784: 4728: 4672: 4616: 4560: 4504: 4448: 4392: 4336: 4280: 4224: 4168: 4112: 4056: 4000: 3944: 3888: 3832: 3776: 3720: 3664: 3608: 3552: 2794: 2761: 2656:

relevant consideration. Perhaps the two of you would consider discussing this subject either privately or on the article's talkpage.

2606: 2592: 2213: 2197: 1450: 1313:. I'm trying to understand the logic of keeping the local copy (or indeed uploading it here instead of there?). Usually files tagged 780: 659: 3748: 2846:

From your work on past election candidates, are you aware of any surviving candidates from the 1950 UK general election, other than

2452: 1951: 188:

Regarding . It is not entirely your own work, is it? The outline map was prepared by me and comes from the US Election Atlas forum.

8122: 6609: 4196: 2851: 2841: 2139: 1542: 1119: 1085: 1050: 1006: 997:

when you have a moment), I find it difficult to interpret what you are saying because of the contradictory nature of your comments.

977: 935: 8518: 8466: 8414: 8110: 8063: 8011: 7786: 7610: 7418: 7042: 6990: 6930: 6870: 6649: 6289: 6233: 5408: 2863: 2711: 2343: 1970: 6827: 6810: 5746: 5732: 3422: 3189: 3171: 3157: 3138: 3102: 3080: 3065: 3006: 2991: 2976: 2897: 2743: 2310: 2178: 2064: 2005: 1808: 1789: 1775: 1548: 1252: 1154: 840: 612: 598: 539:

Hi again, just wondering how to deal with by-elections/co-options? Add to bottom of election article or give them something like

465: 450: 435: 355: 338: 323: 308: 293: 274: 66: 8246: 6188: 6163: 6141: 6060: 5806: 5792: 5513: 5501: 2439: 1387: 8610: 8291: 7348: 7240: 7132: 6213: 2937: 2665: 1988: 1852: 1834: 1670: 1606: 1570: 733: 715: 701: 674: 568: 5531: 2093: 2078: 8732:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

5666: 5652: 2765: 2731: 2544: 2530: 2516: 2496: 2482: 2468: 2157: 1840: 1481: 882: 866: 756: 686: 665: 634: 3439: 3403: 3123: 2172: 1348: 1333: 1300: 69:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

8367: 7908: 7728: 7510: 6782: 6567: 5910: 5893: 5878: 5592: 5585: 2790: 2757: 846: 280: 258: 6751: 8751: 8747: 8725: 8690: 6579: 5717: 5392: 1498: 3498: 159: 8766: 8554: 8540: 4611: 4595: 3524: 8502:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8450:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8398:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8094:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 8047:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7995:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7594:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7402:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 7026:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6974:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6914:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6854:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6633:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6324: 6273:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6217:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 5479: 1591: 393: 231: 139: 8627: 6713: 5869:

politics project editors like myself who have contributed much time into researching this information and adding it.

3212: 2904: 2412: 2364: 1523:

If you have the time, I would welcome a helping hand or even a second pair of eyes to clean up anything I've missed.

1218: 284:

lower resolution pictures with a fully free (CC-BY) license - it's a long shot but you don't get if you don't ask ;)

246: 236: 216: 211: 197: 5995: 3048: 1170: 8651:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 6733: 6485:

Thought you might be interested in some more Labour PPCs from 1939, listed in "Parliamentary candidates' protest",

6125: 5854: 5636: 3347: 3090: 1406: 1398: 1358: 642: 178: 6794: 5976: 5689: 2572: 1710: 583: 8742: 8363: 7904: 7724: 7506: 6563: 6022: 5836: 5700: 3465:

Looks good. I'll add an infobox to it, and see if I can find more references or info on his parliamentary career.

3016: 2961: 2816: 2428: 2269: 2221: 1402: 1382: 850: 764: 534: 423: 7642: 6475: 2626: 1976: 1682: 552: 241:

Hi. After just seeing that your still having issues with people not accepting you have permission from the NPG (

147:

Hey, you recently passed your 1,000th edit to Knowledge articles. Thanks for sticking around for so many years!

8702: 8681: 8614: 8268: 8228: 8196: 8144: 7809: 7352: 7244: 7136: 6388: 6346: 6083: 6010: 5629: 5556: 5431: 5377: 2727: 1575: 1291:

I wanted the file to be kept on wikipedia. Just wondering why you asked here rather than on the file talkpage?

8507: 8455: 8403: 8099: 8052: 8000: 7599: 7407: 7031: 6979: 6919: 6859: 6684: 6638: 6500: 6278: 6222: 5831: 5776: 1913:

The identity cards case seems to have been quite notable from a quick Google search. If you put his name into

503:. It's perfectly permissible to copy this into Knowledge but we should try and get the formatting consistent. 6728: 6079: 5971: 3485: 3478: 2348: 2328:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2265: 2132: 1875: 1757: 1506: 1260: 1071:

This division is sufficiently notable enough to warrant informing how some MPs voted in it, hence my initial

529: 415: 279:

I see you've already noticed I have started to upload some of the missing images from NPG on the sections of

96: 5494: 1630: 8498: 8337: 7878: 7699: 7568: 7481: 6945: 6885: 6709: 6629: 6546: 5981: 5916: 5115: 5099: 3771: 3755: 3293: 2820: 2812: 589:

I shall concentrate on adding stuff on here, but I have no problem with you copying the LCC articles across

49: 37: 7545:

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.

6461: 6444: 6045: 8602: 8558: 8536: 8349: 7890: 7711: 7493: 7340: 7298: 7276: 7232: 7190: 7168: 7124: 7082: 7060: 6558: 6306: 5552: 2676:

The decades are slightly out of order (and I don't wish to 'scramble the tables' by moving them around).

2614: 1994: 1641:

Can't seem to find the Sutton constituency anywhere old man... Can you direct me? - The Literal Democrat

1149: 164: 105: 8686: 8606: 8503: 8451: 8399: 8095: 8048: 7344: 7236: 7128: 6589: 6106: 5819: 2416: 2398: 2057: 2027: 1695: 1222: 1204: 6675:. I only knew him through his poetry, it is fascinating to find out about the rest of his life story. 1763:

If you come across material I have uploaded relating to London-based politicians feel free to copy to

8761: 8067: 6471: 5941: 5841:

Your edits just made to the Ilford North and Ilford South Constituencies put you in breach of WP:3RR

5797:

Thank-you. I'll do that. Commons can be strange at times, but is not that bad if you are used to it.

5606: 5459:

Can you check number of votes for the 1922 election - they are showing the same as the 1923 election.

5348: 5339: 5323: 5292: 5236: 5180: 5124: 5068: 5012: 5003: 4987: 4956: 4900: 4844: 4788: 4732: 4723: 4707: 4676: 4620: 4564: 4508: 4452: 4443: 4427: 4396: 4340: 4284: 4275: 4259: 4228: 4172: 4116: 4060: 4004: 3948: 3892: 3836: 3780: 3724: 3668: 3612: 3556: 2602: 2568: 2193: 1723: 1477: 1454: 760: 638: 183: 44: 706:

Grand stuff. And lo and behold, politicsresources goes back to 1931, so that's saved you a bit.....

559:

subsequent creation of a specific page could then be easily done if it seems the right thing to do.

6756: 5931:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

5815: 5764: 5464: 3320: 3206: 2649: 1664: 1659: 1369: 1359: 2389:

stood as a candidate for the UK Parliament, even though he was too young to vote in that election?

825: 813:

and are far more reliable IMHO. A good additional source for Welsh results is Etholiadau'r ganrif

8736:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 7755: 7743: 6000: 5701: 4499: 4483: 3939: 3923: 3510: 2943: 2251: 2124: 1780:

Thanks - and if you come across 'relevant persons too obscure for WP' they can have a good home.

1612: 1378: 1191: 1182: 1115: 1046: 973: 915: 207: 193: 90: 74: 3054: 40:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 7991: 7967: 7627: 6384: 6369: 6342: 6320: 5760: 5674: 5643:) Lozleader thinks it is probably Lewen so we all agree. I thought I would hold off on a move. 5388: 2339: 1231: 384:

If I knew someone (preferably not a lawyer) at wikipedia to speak to about this, then I would.

153: 133: 2997:

of a Liberal being in the field so it seems unlikely that he withdrew in favour of a Liberal.

2357: 1531: 1163: 501: 498: 8325: 7866: 7687: 7638: 7565: 7551: 7469: 6823: 6790: 6747: 6666: 6534: 6496: 6407:-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the 6018: 5754: 5742: 5713: 5473: 4891: 4875: 3547: 3531: 3418: 3385:

Some useful additional info, thanks. I have two queries which hopefully you can easily check;

3341: 3185: 3153: 3134: 3098: 3061: 3031: 2987: 2957: 2859: 2739: 2697:

Thanks for flagging this incomplete flipping with me, I had forgotten I had not completed it.

2687: 2369: 2053: 2023: 2001: 1871: 1785: 1753: 1248: 1175: 620: 608: 579: 489: 461: 431: 351: 319: 289: 254: 6435:

There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you have been involved.

5612:

politicians' names is your specialist subject, so you should decide. You might want to move

2563:

Hello. Do you have or can you find and upload an image of Max Muspratt? Thanks in advance.--

1745:

If you come across material relating to London-based politicians feel free to contribute to

1195:

was the first woman to be adopted as an official party candidate for parliament in Scotland?

8786: 8336:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8170: 7877:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7698:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7480:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 7374: 7266: 7158: 6724: 6680: 6545:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 6480: 6467: 6416: 6159: 6121: 5827: 5802: 5772: 4947: 4931: 4387: 4371: 3995: 3979: 3305: 3093:

had selected Clifford Groves for East Ham North in 1939/40 and were heavily promoting him.

2598: 2564: 2556: 2303: 2189: 1470: 752: 630: 54: 5933: 5599: 2540: 2512: 2503:

Better idea. Before we delete the electorate figure, we use it to calculate the turnout. (

2478: 2448: 8: 8734:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

8618: 7823: 7782: 7763: 7356: 7248: 7140: 6457: 6440: 6269: 6097: 5991: 5570: 5460: 3827: 3811: 3603: 3587: 3470: 3269: 2917: 2645: 1966: 1947: 1908: 1830: 1740: 1731: 1706: 1678: 1587: 1566: 1317: 1270: 1212: 1145: 743: 711: 682: 548: 525: 174: 70: 1076:

added is not misleading or poorly sourced, I did not think I needed to revert my edits.

8657: 8282: 8242: 6689: 6425: 5684: 5509: 5490: 5227: 5211: 5059: 5043: 2240: 2225: 2112: 2074: 2052:

I find those files are not in alphabetical order and put simply - can't be bothered...

1895: 1111: 1042: 994: 969: 911: 511: 203: 189: 84: 18: 8774:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

8158:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

2395:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1201:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 806: 692:

okay Dok, as StH is abolished, I'll do them with the older results higher up the page.

8585: 8307: 7963: 7849: 7670: 7526: 7452: 7364: 7323: 7256: 7215: 7148: 7107: 6521: 6408: 6316: 6027: 5966: 5662: 5625: 5445: 5384: 4555: 4539: 4331: 4315: 4219: 4203: 4107: 4091: 3371: 2874: 2832: 2335: 2325: 1937: 1491: 1418: 1135: 862: 242: 149: 129: 127:

In recognition of your hard work on history articles, especially about UK elections!

8572: 7310: 7202: 7094: 6466:

BLP applies everywhere on Knowledge not just biographical articles, stop reverting.

2726:

notable enough to be given his own page on WP, or should there be merely links from

2334:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

810: 722: 8622: 8356: 8321: 7897: 7862: 7718: 7683: 7634: 7562: 7548: 7500: 7465: 6939: 6879: 6819: 6786: 6743: 6530: 6492: 6172: 6014: 5738: 5709: 5368: 5312: 5256: 5200: 5171: 5155: 5144: 5088: 5032: 4976: 4920: 4864: 4808: 4779: 4763: 4752: 4696: 4640: 4584: 4528: 4472: 4416: 4360: 4304: 4248: 4192: 4136: 4080: 4051: 4035: 4024: 3968: 3912: 3856: 3800: 3744: 3688: 3632: 3576: 3517: 3451: 3414: 3287: 3181: 3149: 3130: 3094: 3057: 3027: 2983: 2953: 2855: 2735: 2683: 2535:

There are no turnout figures in the Devizes and Westbury elections linked above. --

1997: 1979:

is clearly an error as I had feared. I had also assumed that this was Lucien Fior.

1867: 1781: 1749: 1329: 1281: 1244: 604: 575: 457: 427: 347: 315: 285: 250: 227: 1935:. If this family history site is to be believed, he died in Cannes on 4 July 1987 8782: 8566:

On Commons with the same name but tagged with "keep local" for no apparent reason

8526: 8474: 8422: 8166: 8118: 8019: 7618: 7426: 7370: 7262: 7154: 7050: 6998: 6778: 6739: 6720: 6676: 6657: 6412: 6297: 6241: 6155: 6117: 6033: 5889: 5850: 5823: 5798: 5768: 5283: 5267: 3883: 3867: 3299: 3245: 2949: 2751: 2300: 2288: 2268:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 854: 8571:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7309:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7201:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

7093:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

2536: 2508: 2474: 2444: 2188:

and I am not finished yet. Such help from you, would be very much appreciated.--

8333: 7874: 7819: 7778: 7759: 7695: 7477: 6600: 6542: 6453: 6436: 6404: 6093: 5987: 5566: 4835: 4819: 3659: 3643: 3458: 3332: 3311: 3257: 3251: 2913: 2641: 2579: 2406: 1962: 1943: 1931: 1826: 1727: 1702: 1674: 1636: 1583: 1562: 1445: 1429: 1141: 707: 678: 544: 521: 343:

Hi, I just contacted them on the email they gave for "Licensing and copyright"

170: 8693:. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have 8652: 8329: 8278: 8238: 7870: 7691: 7532: 7473: 6815: 6672: 6538: 6176: 5505: 5486: 3506: 3377: 3275: 3218: 2888:

There are about 200 others for whom I have not been able to confirm a death.

2385: 2376: 2321: 2105: 2070: 1977:

http://tools.assembla.com/svn/grodt/uk/thc/files/marked_up/1951_marked_up.txt

1072: 986:

Secondly, something that could be described as clutter may or may not be POV.

904: 786: 621: 419: 59: 3513:. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! 7996: 7595: 7403: 7027: 6975: 6915: 6855: 6634: 6274: 6218: 6154:

I removed a red link from Liverpool Exchange, which has now been re-added.

5961: 5951: 5658: 5621: 5441: 3715: 3699: 3353: 3326: 3281: 3263: 3236: 2847: 2828: 2557: 1886: 1414: 946: 899: 858: 8728:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 3490: 114: 6934: 6874: 6770: 5617: 5613: 5364: 5308: 5252: 5196: 5140: 5084: 5028: 4972: 4916: 4860: 4804: 4748: 4692: 4636: 4580: 4524: 4468: 4412: 4356: 4300: 4244: 4188: 4163: 4147: 4132: 4076: 4020: 3964: 3908: 3852: 3796: 3740: 3684: 3628: 3572: 3365: 3359: 2631: 2622: 2521:

Just about all the on-line sources used have already calculated turnout.

2152: 1325: 1277: 223: 24: 8340:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7881:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7702:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7484:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

7363:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

7255:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

7147:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

6801:

I have candidates for 5 different political parties running in Norwich.

6549:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

16: 8522: 8470: 8418: 8317:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

8114: 8015: 7859:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7680:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7614: 7462:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

7422: 7046: 6994: 6762: 6653: 6356: 6293: 6237: 5885: 5846: 5602:

at any time by removing the {{Interwiki talkback}} or {{Itb}} template.

2425: 1975:

Thanks for your confirmation and additional research. The Times source

6175:

which allows for the linking of those who meet notability criteria in

4404:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/William Herbert Kemp (2nd nomination)

2680: 2260:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

2163:

This is clearly PD as I point out in the deletion request discussion.

1764: 1746: 8298: 7952:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Reginald Logan Rait (2nd nomination)

7841: 7662: 7444: 6512: 6487: 6051:

Why not try improving the other editors work rather than deleting it?

3230: 2721: 2638:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Salisbury City Council election, 2009

2381:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2261: 1923: 1915: 1187:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1526:

I would say 'goodbye' but I can't spell it, The Illiterate Democrat

831: 8672: 8432:

Orphaned non-free image File:1929 Robert Young (trade unionist).jpg

5635:

Hi Edx, Yes I remember you from NLC editathon. I was in touch with

2287:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1820: 249:' etc. Keep up the good work - impressed with your efforts. Cheers 4628:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/David Murray (Scottish politician)

2771:

My pleasure; parliamentary candidate forenames are my speciality.

2316: 2149:

commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1906 Eustace Fiennes MP.jpg

2243:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 497:

I have been doing a bit of work on LCC elections over here: 1889

8353:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7894:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7715:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 7497:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 853:

as External links sections come after Reference sections as per

8343:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

8311:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

7884:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

7705:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

7487:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

6552:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1235: 873:

determination which is odd. Perhaps there is a miss-print here.

8256: 8216: 8184: 8132: 7853:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

7797: 7674:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

6376: 6334: 6195:

Orphaned non-free image File:1928 George Balfour, Unionist.jpg

6071: 5544: 5419: 6179:. All these four notabilities have biographies in Who's Who. 2147:

information that indicates the actual age? Please comment at

8721:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

6716:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

5132:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Constantine Scaramanga-Ralli

3788:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/William Mitchell (barrister)

1673:. You can follow the metadata links to the name and colour. 797:

Keep up the good work and thanks for your support this far.

8689:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 5478:

Hello Graemp. I'm getting a "page not found" message from

2233: 1799:- He does not appear in any of the LCC lists on wikipedia. 1717:

Template:Did you know nominations/Betty Morgan (politician)

1555:

deletion discussion on the Aberdeen North by-election, 1928

1532:

http://tools.assembla.com/svn/grodt/uk/thc/files/marked_up/

8717:

the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing

8685:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 7773:

Hi Graeme. Perhaps you can help clarify the licensing for

7008:

Orphaned non-free image File:1931 John George Burnett .jpg

6896:

Orphaned non-free image File:1931 John George Burnett .jpg

5640: 5579: 5455:

Glasgow Pollok (UK Parliament constituency) - 1922 results

3039:

Thanks very much. You've given me 4 names I did not have.

1817:

Achievement : a short history of the London County Council

7938:

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article

5928:

Hello, Graemp. Please check your email; you've got mail!

5356:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Frances Henrietta Stewart

5020:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Betty Morgan (politician)

4740:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Norman Clarke (physicist)

4460:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Maurice Alfred Gerothwohl

4292:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/John Beeching Frankenburg

2827:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

2276:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

1843:

1951. I can confirm that the surname is correctly spelt.

1413:

if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

1199:

Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Fraser (feminist)

541:

London County Council by-elections and co-options 1919-22

81:

on this page and ask your question here. Again, welcome!

7456:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

3446:

A page you started (Dugald Macfadyen) has been reviewed!

2204:

images of Socialists and Unionists as well as Liberals.

8668:

Replaceable non-free use File:Norman Easedale Crump.jpg

8613:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

8595:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

8380:

Orphaned non-free image File:1924 Henry Haydn Jones.jpg

8324:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7865:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7686:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7468:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

7351:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

7333:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

7243:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

7225:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

7135:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

7117:

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing

6956:

Orphaned non-free image File:1923 Maurice Alexander.jpg

6836:

Orphaned non-free image File:1923 Maurice Alexander.jpg

6533:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

5337:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5281:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5225:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5169:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5113:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5057:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5001:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4945:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4889:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4833:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4777:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4721:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4665:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4609:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4553:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4516:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/William Rowley Elliston

4497:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4441:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4385:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4329:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4273:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4217:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4161:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4105:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4049:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3993:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3956:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/James Rankin Rutherford

3937:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3881:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3825:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3769:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3713:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3657:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3601:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3545:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2854:

in the thought this might prove of some use in future.

1443:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

8578:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

7316:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

7208:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

7100:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

6449:

Your further breach of 3RR is reported for discussion

3461:

just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

2264:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 2115:

just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

1956:

Yes, I think Lucien Fior is our man. According to the

1462:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Walter Leslie Dingley

8750:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 4908:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Margaret Jane Joachim

3564:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ian Stevenson Webster

3497:

Hi Graemp, I just wanted to let you know that I have

3143:

I've got the answer to the Lanarkshire question: the

2100:

A page you started (Peter Grafton) has been reviewed!

380:

Knowledge operates a quality/sizing alteration policy

8484:

Orphaned non-free image File:Hastings Lees-Smith.jpg

7944: