891:(2011) should not be changed. The main argument for this is that the production notes for Ralph Breaks the Internet happen to declare that there has not been a Disney sequel since Fantasia 2000. I find this to be problematic, essentially suggesting that Winnie the Pooh (2011) does not exist, is not an official Walt Disney Animation Studios theatrical feature film, or breaks the rules of qualifying as a sequel, none of which are things that I feel any person can honestly conclude. It is a well-known informality that Winnie the Pooh (2011) tends to be ignored and forgotten simply because it was not a popular film and made substantially less money than Disney's other in-house animated films (this is also true of the two previous hand-drawn Disney sequels). When sources are used for later Disney films, Winnie the Pooh (2011) regularly goes unmentioned because the people writing these articles are human beings, which means they are selective and fallible. Because the widely published source we are discussing (the production notes) just so happened to mention that Fantasia 2000 was the last official Disney sequel until Ralph Breaks the Internet does not make it accurate in the face of its actual reported status within Walt Disney Animation Studios. There are many articles that do acknowledge its existence, so merely ignoring it no matter how forgettable it is does not change its status as a sequel.
901:." The new sentence would then read "It is Walt Disney Animation Studios' first animated film sequel to be created by the original film's writing and directing team." while still citing the production notes, so the new sentence would both be accurate and still be backed-up by the same source, and it would prevent people like me who disagree with the "Fantasia 2000" statement from wanting to change it. It would allow people on both sides to decide for themselves how they want to classify the other sequels. It would also simply be a more concise statement and would not cause unnecessary drama from persistent editors on this particular article, especially since Ralph Breaks the Internet has almost nothing to do with the other Disney sequels in the first place. The sentence as it currently stands is simply inaccurate for the reasons I already stated in addition to many more (which can be sourced) that I don't have the energy to discuss at this moment. Even if it were true, it would be irrelevant (and arguably childish) to insist on mentioning it since it is not the first of its kind and its status has little impact.
550:. I feel you have made a very wrong admin call. That user is not even replying to my requests to engage, how on earth do you expect me to have a dispute resolution in this case? I cannot report him to AIV as his edits are not technically vandalism, but a disruptive edit. Edit warring noticeboard needs more than 3 reverts to be reported. I have already made 3 reverts. That user has already restored his shitty nonsense in the current article version as of now. You are basically refusing to help and would not allow others to help. Just resign from Adminship or at the very least stop taking shitty calls on Page protection by just pressing buttons, I believe you should find a more productive admin work where you are not meddling with others who are trying to help. --
31:
848:
if such a result was not found. Your statement tries to say that it was proven to not reduce viral load, while it is for sure not the outcome of the study and the study authors also did not make that claim, to the contrary, they said what I recommended as an updated wording. If you insist on reporting on the study in a misleading manner, then please remove the report on the results completely or add the results from all published peer reviewed studies for ivermectin. Instead of cherry picking studies and reporting on them in a misleading manner.
614:, good so you respond to questioning of your shitty admin calls by attacking my edits now. Way to go! Yes, those edits are disruptive. What exactly are you suggesting me to do there once that DISRUPTIVE editor made 4 edits? Ignore the shitty edits and leave the article in its shitty version, because we have a shitty admin who will patrol the admin noticeboard to help the vandals and the disruptive editors? I left the article as I did not wanted to break the 3RR, and waited on the talk page. As expected no response came.
103:
1632:
1697:
990:
18:
1461:
1504:
1337:
1046:
89:
1751:
1591:
520:• Citations do not present evidence of what is being stated, and rather lead to arbitrary websites with no related information. • Websites listed as references lead to websites seemingly hostile to the Catholic Church. • The only seemingly valid reference source seems to be a website that lists a concordat existing between the Church and the state of Poland, which itself seems to be a biased and hostile website
648:
72:
1714:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
1007:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
714:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1311:
Thank you very much indeed. really appreciate your answer. I visited a therapist several hours ago, and, accordingly, my therapist confirmed your words. But, you know, could you give a liable source which proves your statement? Sorry for being rather captious, and meticulous. I'm thought to be rather
1265:
Hello there! My mother asked me whether
Levolet is a trade name of Levofloxacin or not. I'm not well-versed in terms of medicine, so I'm asking you right this minute. I googled "trade names of Levofloxacin", and I opened medinda. com (or org. In a word, I don't remember exactly), so, according to the
791:
Hi, I notice that you were the one to post the information with regards to a study on
Ivermectin use for COVID-19. I don't have a high enough level to edit the article and nobody else seems to want to do so, but the information you have written is incorrect and requires rewording, removal, correction
624:
Grow a thick skin and learn to take criticism on its merits when you are going to make shitty admin calls. Through your reply you have just proved why my suggestions for resigning, not doing RFPP calls is applicable to you. If you take another shitty page protection call on that page, (in addition to
391:
There is still no discussion on the article's talk page regarding the alleged "neutrality" issues and no serious concerns regarding specific facts have ever been raised. I understand that the legal threats call for a prudent approach, but adding the POV and
Dispute tags seems questionable as a matter
478:
Thanks for clearing things up. Since D.Lazard and I were the only non-IP contributors to the page, I thought you meant us and might have overreacted slightly. I apologize for being pushy. I don't want to get into the nuances of the debate - suffice to say that I think other administrators rightfully
319:
For the record: I disagree with your re-inclusion of the dispute/POV tags which I removed in accordance with policy (When to remove: "It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given"). There are no factual elements in dispute, merely unsourced accusations
847:
I guess you don't have a scientific or statistical background, but 18-fold lower with a p = 0·16 is not "no difference" - it is a huge difference which is very close to the standard p=0.05 which is generally chosen to mean statistical significant. It is indeed misleading to claim a negative result
969:
from semi-protect to pending changes protection. SandyGeorgia and I are both watching the page to deal with any pending edits. If it seems quiet for several months, we'll try unprotecting as well. I'm mildly pessimistic about the net effect of IP/new account edits at a page about a fringe-y topic,
279:
Please add a neutrality box (POV) to the page that was reverted by a SPA user (EdgarAllanFrost), and take into account that libellous elements have been "sedimented" in the page as it is now. The simple fact to have asked for an "non EU administrator" in order to protect it seems like wanting to
800:
If you could change it to "no difference in PCR-positive nasal swabs and non-statistically significant reduction of viral load (3 times lower by day 4 and 18 times lower by day 7) between patients who received ivermectin and those given placebo, thus failing the primary outcome of the study but
434:
As I have noted in the Talk page, subjects of articles have immense leeway under our BLP policy to object to how they are presented in the encyclopedia, to the extent where blanking of content by the subject of an article is not considered vandalism, and complaints about potentially libelous or
1169:
When someone edits a
Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
1706:
280:
evade the law: its in general a sign that something is not going on well. Reading the page in diagonal and the lack of encyclopedic respect of basic rules (hierarchy of information) should be sufficient to understand it. Living personalities pages can't become on wikipedia bashing tools
894:
I realize that I'm not the only person making this argument. Since there is this much debate about the subject, and the one source currently being used can be refuted by other sources, I would strongly recommend simply removing the phrase "and is the first sequel from the studio since
1881:
I have been waiting a few months and requested a couple other people, none have responded, i simply wanted "the Royal Cypher of
Emperor Haile Selassie I, the only cypher that exists is for the whole Imperial Family of Ethiopia at Wiki Commons, this is his personal cypher as Emperor,
823:, a nonsignificant difference is no difference. I am happy to add a statement to that effect. "...but warranting further study in larger trials" would be redundant—the following paragraph already states "Additional evidence from RCTs and dose-response studies are needed".
865:
1177:. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on
515:
1451:
939:, where you can discuss the proposed change with other users and have an administrator implement it if there is consensus. Like other admins, I have no authority over any other user; we only have access to an additional set of tools.
399:
Again: I understand that the history of the article is a mess. I have no objection to the continuous protection. But since you chose to get involved, you should have familiarized yourself more with the matter before accusing me and
1235:
786:
1317:
1274:
1150:
this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of
December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the
587:. The user's changes were not disruptive, and there was no indication for protecting the page. The fact that you requested protection so as to circumvent committing a 3RR violation yourself is also quite concerning.
369:
and I are "autoconfirmed users potentially acting on behalf". I understand that the history of the article in question is a mess and you are acting in good faith, but I fear you have misunderstood a few things...
442:. My only involvement has been administrative; I have no intention whatsoever of diving into any content issues which remain. That would be inappropriate. I deliberately did not familiarize myself with the matter—
2110:
1313:
1270:
1135:
796:
To summarize, you state: "no difference in PCR-positive nasal swabs nor in viral load" The study indicates the viral load was 18 times lower: "18-fold lower at day 7 (p = 0·16 for gene E; p = 0·18 for gene N)"
619:
I have read those pages you linked for me to read and it is clear that Page protection is an acceptable response to prevent edit warring. May be you should also read the pages you are asking others to read.
1200:
904:
I hope you or someone with authority will consider at least my minimal request. You can also have my assurance I will not make any changes to the article on my own terms regardless of the outcome. Thanks.
590:
Calling others' edits "shitty nonsense" and complaining about "shitty calls" really doesn't help your case here. If the user is refusing to engage, post a thread at the
Administrators' noticeboard. Best,
1284:
Hi there! I'm not sure where your mother is, but in Russia, Levolet (Леволет) is indeed a trade name of levofloxacin. If she is unsure, check if the package also says "Левофлоксацин" or "levofloxacinum".
707:
1533:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1366:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1266:
afore-mentioned site, Levolet is a trade name of
Levofloxacin. I don't know whether medinda is a liable source. Could you recommend me a good source which deals with the trade names of Levofloxacin?
1073:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
377:
I made the request after the subject started tweeting about the article and it was subsequently (yet again) vandalized and turned into a hagiography by him and/or sockpuppets and/or his followers.
1178:
1472:
1453:
916:
535:
1466:
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
407:
I apologize if I come off as strong, but I have already been threatened and insulted based on my involvement in this article. In the past, the subject of the article went so far as to
1549:
1382:
1089:
813:
1518:
1351:
1059:
697:
1810:
1883:
1152:
1907:
Hi there! Sadly, I'm not familiar with the script, and I'm afraid any attempt might not be accurate... but I can try to make a vector version of the second example you give
1888:, it would greatly be appreciated if you help in its creation." i would greatly appreciate it if you can help out since i am not good at vectors so it can be visible on the
1813:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
1208:
1691:
1491:
999:
1794:
1604:
984:
928:
page because of a long history of silly vandalism from sockpuppets of blocked users, not because of any content disputes—I am not familiar with the issue you describe.
531:
1185:
732:
737:
21:
908:
1116:
1189:
295:
I have restored the dispute/POV tags. Please note that if you or the subject of the article have concerns about potentially libelous material, you should
2048:
564:
P.S. looking at the busy template, if you are too busy to look into an issue you should let others who are willing to spend time in looking into it. --
1804:
970:
but hey, maybe I'll be surprised. Just wanted to let you know since you set the current protection in 2017. Anyway, I hope you're staying well! Best,
1031:
781:
507:
469:
345:
314:
1738:
1231:
954:
385:
2109:
Hey there
Fvasconcellos! It's been a million years. I've given you the autopatrolled userright because you're obviously a trusted user, and it's
1576:
1409:
691:
42:
1252:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
446:
would have muddied the waters. It was a straightforward request for protection, which I obliged, and later discussed with another administrator.
1417:
333:
1584:
857:
838:
634:
625:
that disruptive editor) I would also take your admin calls to Admin
Noticeboard for a review, as it deserves scrutiny. Have a good day. Bye.
606:
1758:
1617:
547:
34:
2099:
1036:
1241:
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
1321:
1306:
655:
395:
In fairness to the subject: The COI-tag has no basis, as the article was specifically rewritten to get rid of the previous hagiography.
1830:
1446:
1126:
658:. I hope the rest of your day is enjoyable (like this kitten) and productive (not like this kitten but then again, nobody's perfect.)
449:
The article is no longer fully protected. You are free to edit it as you see fit, as long as you stick to BLP policies and guidelines.
761:
1962:
Hi! Sorry, but I don't know exactly when I will be able to get to it. I have not been able to contribute recently due to IRL work.
1726:
1019:
329:
1685:
1788:
1496:
1329:
711:
1901:
1876:
757:
296:
801:
warranting further study in larger trials" it would be a more balanced and accurate reflection of the actual study outcome.
669:
1572:
1405:
1112:
573:
559:
527:
113:
2043:
1870:
1972:
1920:
1865:
1743:
1680:
1477:
1301:
949:
833:
686:
601:
464:
320:
of "bulshit" and a "gross tentative to destroy an individual". Other administrators have already been involved (notably
309:
422:
289:
2028:
1991:
1977:
1957:
1939:
1925:
1657:
979:
262:
257:
252:
247:
242:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
1710:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1223:
1003:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
408:
715:
162:
157:
152:
145:
140:
135:
130:
125:
120:
1147:
866:
Concerning the status of Walt Disney Animation Studios sequels on Ralph Breaks the Internet's article introduction.
703:
1278:
2022:
2008:
1568:
1401:
1108:
328:
on the talk page. The article has quite the illustrious history; if you are fluent in French I'd suggest reading
1849:
321:
2117:
936:
1715:
1211:. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
1158:
1008:
362:
62:
46:
1797:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
54:
2080:
1827:
1542:
1375:
1082:
541:
50:
965:
Exciting section title, less exciting topic: just wanted to drop a note to let you know that I've swapped
483:
I am preparing criminal prosecution against you via a lawsuit (...) before the senior investigating judge.
58:
1554:
1387:
1094:
887:
1470:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
2062:
1814:
1800:
1711:
1653:
1775:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1982:
It's fine, just let me know any time when you upload it, to which you do it at your own time frame!
1948:
not to sound impatient but could you give me a date when the Royal Seal would be uploaded to commons
1602:
has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at
960:
924:
875:
742:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
642:
503:
480:
418:
341:
285:
1779:
1770:
1645:
1595:
1467:
912:
819:
Sorry, but the current wording is neither misleading nor incorrect. For all intents and purposes,
1823:
1613:
1139:
665:
374:
I was the one who requested the protection of the article (thanks for obliging this request btw).
431:
I was not referring to you or D.Lazard in the log; not sure what would give you that impression.
2104:
1622:
728:
2069:
Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
1908:
1886:
1835:
1763:
1667:
1649:
1608:
and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
1530:
1363:
1207:
on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can
1070:
1188:. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can
2040:
1845:
1541:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1374:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1081:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
751:
584:
523:
499:
414:
381:
337:
281:
1787:
is the only hospital in Europe specialising in the care and rehabilitation of people with
1215:
8:
2054:
853:
809:
630:
569:
555:
274:
102:
754:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
654:
Thanks for your helpful and informative response to my request for page protection for
1997:
1963:
1945:
1911:
1856:
1671:
1609:
1486:
1473:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
1454:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
1292:
975:
940:
824:
677:
661:
611:
592:
455:
439:
355:
300:
336:). I consider it bad form to be accused of being a "SPA" by an account created today.
2092:
2004:
1987:
1953:
1935:
1897:
1599:
1512:
1442:
1345:
1053:
777:
768:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
719:
358:, there remain issues regarding this article that I feel the need to come back to.
1561:
1526:
1394:
1359:
1101:
1066:
2032:
1841:
1734:
1128:
1027:
793:
516:
Regarding edits to the 'Finance' section on the 'Roman Catholic Church in Poland'
80:
is neck-deep in work and will be away from Knowledge for the foreseeable future.
1889:
1538:
1371:
1245:
Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
1078:
849:
820:
805:
626:
580:
565:
551:
787:
Misleading statement on Ivermectin study information on COVID drug repurposing
2114:
1534:
1481:
1367:
1288:
1143:
1074:
971:
897:
881:
792:
or all of the above. Please have a look at my comment on the Talk page here:
401:
366:
1269:
P. S. Anyway, could you add this trade name in the article on Levofloxacin?
1193:
2087:
2058:
2000:
1983:
1949:
1931:
1893:
1438:
1434:
1004:
932:
773:
769:
1930:
Would greatly appreciate your kind offer! But the script is Ge'ez/Amharic
1631:
384:, whose account was apparently created primarily for this purpose and to [
1784:
325:
1545:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1378:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1085:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1730:
1522:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1355:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1260:
1063:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1023:
743:
2027:
Hi Fvasconcellos :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview
1503:
1423:
1336:
1312:
meticulous. Dunno whether this trait is quite harmful or not, though.
1045:
88:
1750:
747:
324:. As for the substance: I defer to the convincing arguments made by
1166:
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
1590:
1173:
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin
1427:
380:
You then "restored the dispute/POV tags" based on the request of
1558:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1422:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1391:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1098:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
794:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:COVID-19_drug_repurposing_research
1548:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1516:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1381:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1349:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1088:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
966:
1142:
from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with
1057:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
879:
that the statement that it is the first Disney sequel since
710:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
647:
1795:
Template:Did you know nominations/Mildmay Mission Hospital
71:
1692:
Orphaned non-free image File:شعار مؤتمر الحوار الوطني.svg
411:. I remain committed to stop this kind of blatant abuse.
698:
Management of multiple sclerosis Featured article review
428:
Hi there. Let's take this one step at a time, shall we?
1529:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1426:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1362:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1069:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
746:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
435:
defamatory statements are not considered legal threats.
409:
write threatening letters to employers of other editors
1138:
Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove
17:
1793:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1230:The administrator policy has been updated with new
1725:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1018:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
985:Orphaned non-free image File:Stellastarr Jenny.jpg
30:
2073:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
1287:In other countries, "Levolet" is a trade name of
1248:Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
2049:I have sent you a note about a page you started
738:Disambiguation link notification for February 7
33:
20:
2031:. Feel free to pass if you're not interested.
1727:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1721:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1020:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1014:Note that any non-free images not used in any
2053:Hi Fvasconcellos. Thank you for your work on
931:The best way to go about this is to make an
2111:no longer included with the admin userright
1418:Disambiguation link notification for June 2
496:Kind regards (and a belated Happy New Year)
361:I have to say I am somewhat miffed by your
1585:DYK nomination of Mildmay Mission Hospital
656:2021 storming of the United States Capitol
1840:Olá, não edita lá por quê? Cumprimentos,
1767:was updated with a fact from the article
1184:If you have not seen it before, you can
1789:HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder
1224:New administrator activity requirement
873:I've seen it written in the notes for
404:and accidentally muddying the waters.
821:especially for a general encyclopedia
546:Please explain why you have declined
1513:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1346:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
1054:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
66:
41:
1497:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1330:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
1175:will still be able to access the IP
1037:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
13:
1877:Request for RC of Haile Selassie I
1695:
1159:How we will see unregistered users
988:
646:
438:I have not chosen to get involved—
29:
16:
14:
2128:
2083:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
1707:File:شعار مؤتمر الحوار الوطني.svg
1291:, so that might cause confusion.
1205:We would appreciate your feedback
1127:Administrators will no longer be
15:
2065:and left the following comment:
1749:
1744:DYK for Mildmay Mission Hospital
1630:
1589:
1502:
1459:
1335:
1044:
704:Management of multiple sclerosis
297:contact the Wikimedia Foundation
101:
87:
70:
2074:
1809:, and the hook may be added to
1552:and submit your choices on the
1385:and submit your choices on the
1194:the weekly technical newsletter
1155:. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
1092:and submit your choices on the
579:We have very clear policies on
1032:18:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
24:This user is an administrator.
1:
2118:00:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2100:16:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
2061:, has reviewed it as part of
1716:our policy for non-free media
1686:20:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
1658:15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
1618:16:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
1600:Did You Know nominations page
1577:00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1531:Knowledge arbitration process
1410:00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1364:Knowledge arbitration process
1117:00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
1071:Knowledge arbitration process
1009:our policy for non-free media
955:14:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
917:03:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
858:23:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
839:01:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
814:00:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
346:10:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
315:10:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
290:10:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
131:Archive 3: January–March 2007
2023:Editor experience invitation
1322:18:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
1307:23:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1279:10:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
1220:18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
1209:let us know on the talk page
782:06:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
733:02:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
708:featured article review here
692:18:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
670:17:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
126:Archive 2: Nov 2006–Jan 2007
99:
97:
7:
2079:(Message delivered via the
1492:09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
1257:22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
1153:Administrator's Noticeboard
635:12:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
607:12:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
574:13:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
560:13:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
536:06:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
508:11:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
470:11:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
423:08:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
158:Archive 8: July–August 2007
136:Archive 4: March–April 2007
93:Archived every 30 sections.
10:
2133:
1831:00:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
1594:Hello! Your submission of
1569:MediaWiki message delivery
1402:MediaWiki message delivery
1203:this identity could work.
1109:MediaWiki message delivery
1000:File:Stellastarr Jenny.jpg
922:Hi there. I protected the
109:
37:Keepin' it real since 1554
2009:00:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1992:00:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
1978:23:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1958:17:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
1739:19:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
1696:
1629:
1478:categories for discussion
989:
980:23:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
925:Ralph Breaks the Internet
876:Ralph Breaks the Internet
712:featured article criteria
198:Archive 16: May–June 2008
153:Archive 7: June–July 2007
141:Archive 5: April–May 2007
2044:17:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
1940:00:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
1926:23:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
1902:21:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
1871:23:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
1850:00:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
1805:Mildmay Mission Hospital
1780:Mildmay Mission Hospital
1771:Mildmay Mission Hospital
1646:Mildmay Mission Hospital
1596:Mildmay Mission Hospital
1566:to your user talk page.
1447:09:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
1399:to your user talk page.
1106:to your user talk page.
243:Archive 25: Sep–Nov 2009
238:Archive 24: Jul–Sep 2009
228:Archive 22: Mar–Jun 2009
223:Archive 21: Jan–Feb 2009
218:Archive 20: Nov–Dec 2008
213:Archive 19: Sep–Nov 2008
208:Archive 18: Jul–Sep 2008
193:Archive 15: Apr–May 2008
188:Archive 14: Feb–Apr 2008
183:Archive 13: Jan–Feb 2008
178:Archive 12: Nov–Dec 2007
173:Archive 11: Oct–Nov 2007
168:Archive 10: Sep–Oct 2007
146:Archive 6: May–June 2007
1605:your nomination's entry
1314:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров
1271:Роман Сергеевич Сидоров
1234:following a successful
163:Archive 9: Aug–Sep 2007
121:Archive 1: Apr–Nov 2006
2071:
1815:Did you know talk page
1701:
994:
651:
38:
25:
2067:
1704:Thanks for uploading
1699:
1638:The Original Barnstar
1527:Arbitration Committee
1510:Hello! Voting in the
1360:Arbitration Committee
1343:Hello! Voting in the
1232:activity requirements
1067:Arbitration Committee
1051:Hello! Voting in the
997:Thanks for uploading
992:
650:
263:Archive 29: 2017–2020
258:Archive 28: 2012–2016
233:Archive 23: July 2009
203:Archive 17: July 2008
148:(aka "The RfA files")
36:
23:
1855:Preferência, mesmo.
1644:Thanks for creating
1435:Opt-out instructions
870:Hi, Fvasconcellos.
770:opt-out instructions
542:Declining my request
382:User:SarahMonteiro23
2105:Autopatrolled right
2055:Etilefrine pivalate
1811:the statistics page
1623:A barnstar for you!
1236:Request for Comment
1144:Edit Filter Manager
2057:. Another editor,
1836:Wikipédia lusófona
1702:
1543:arbitration policy
1452:CfD nomination at
1376:arbitration policy
1201:two suggested ways
1083:arbitration policy
995:
760:• Join us at the
652:
585:disruptive editing
440:quite the contrary
332:article (archived
47:edit summary usage
39:
26:
2084:
1976:
1924:
1869:
1808:
1712:claim of fair use
1684:
1663:
1662:
1579:
1480:page. Thank you.
1412:
1305:
1186:read more on Meta
1124:
1123:
1119:
1005:claim of fair use
961:Protecting pandas
953:
837:
804:Much appreciated!
765:
752:usually incorrect
750:. Such links are
702:I have nominated
690:
643:A kitten for you!
605:
538:
526:comment added by
468:
313:
272:
271:
84:
83:
2124:
2097:
2096:
2090:
2078:
2076:
2063:new pages patrol
2038:
2035:
1966:
1914:
1859:
1798:
1753:
1698:
1674:
1668:IgnatiusofLondon
1650:IgnatiusofLondon
1634:
1627:
1626:
1593:
1567:
1565:
1506:
1489:
1484:
1463:
1462:
1400:
1398:
1339:
1295:
1107:
1105:
1048:
1041:
1040:
991:
943:
827:
755:
725:
680:
595:
521:
479:considered this
458:
303:
253:Archive 27: 2011
248:Archive 26: 2010
105:
98:
91:
74:
67:
32:
19:
2132:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2107:
2094:
2093:
2088:
2051:
2036:
2033:
2025:
1879:
1838:
1820:
1819:
1754:
1746:
1729:. Thank you. --
1694:
1670:thank you! :-)
1625:
1587:
1582:
1581:
1559:
1507:
1499:
1487:
1482:
1464:
1460:
1457:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1392:
1340:
1332:
1263:
1255:
1254:
1226:
1161:
1136:recently closed
1132:
1099:
1039:
1022:. Thank you. --
987:
963:
888:Winnie the Pooh
868:
789:
762:DPL WikiProject
740:
723:
700:
645:
581:page protection
544:
518:
500:EdgarAllanFrost
487:a legal threat.
415:EdgarAllanFrost
338:EdgarAllanFrost
282:SarahMonteiro23
277:
268:
267:
116:
96:
65:
40:
35:
27:
22:
12:
11:
5:
2130:
2106:
2103:
2075:{{Re|SunDawn}}
2050:
2047:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
1942:
1890:Haile Selassie
1878:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1837:
1834:
1755:
1748:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1661:
1660:
1641:
1640:
1635:
1624:
1621:
1586:
1583:
1550:the candidates
1519:eligible users
1508:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1468:categorization
1458:
1456:
1450:
1419:
1416:
1383:the candidates
1352:eligible users
1341:
1334:
1333:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1285:
1262:
1259:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1160:
1157:
1131:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1090:the candidates
1060:eligible users
1049:
1038:
1035:
986:
983:
962:
959:
958:
957:
929:
909:DESERTSCHo0L20
867:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
842:
841:
788:
785:
739:
736:
699:
696:
695:
694:
676:Thank you! :)
672:
644:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
622:
620:
617:
615:
588:
543:
540:
528:142.127.214.94
517:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
497:
491:
490:
489:
488:
473:
472:
452:
451:
450:
447:
436:
432:
397:
396:
393:
389:
378:
375:
353:
351:
350:
349:
348:
276:
273:
270:
269:
266:
265:
260:
255:
250:
245:
240:
235:
230:
225:
220:
215:
210:
205:
200:
195:
190:
185:
180:
175:
170:
165:
160:
155:
150:
147:
143:
138:
133:
128:
123:
117:
112:
111:
108:
107:
106:
85:
82:
81:
75:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2129:
2120:
2119:
2116:
2112:
2102:
2101:
2098:
2091:
2085:
2082:
2081:Page Curation
2070:
2066:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2046:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2030:
2010:
2006:
2002:
1999:
1998:Fvasconcellos
1995:
1994:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1974:
1970:
1965:
1964:Fvasconcellos
1961:
1960:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1946:Fvasconcellos
1943:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:Fvasconcellos
1909:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1872:
1867:
1863:
1858:
1857:Fvasconcellos
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1833:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1818:
1816:
1812:
1806:
1802:
1796:
1792:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1766:
1765:
1760:
1759:26 March 2024
1752:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1719:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1708:
1687:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1672:Fvasconcellos
1669:
1665:
1664:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1610:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1607:
1606:
1601:
1597:
1592:
1580:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1563:
1557:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1523:
1521:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1505:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1485:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1469:
1455:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1429:
1425:
1413:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1396:
1390:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1354:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1338:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1299:
1294:
1293:Fvasconcellos
1290:
1289:levothyroxine
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1267:
1258:
1253:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1233:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1214:Thank you. /
1212:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1167:
1164:
1156:
1154:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1140:Autopatrolled
1137:
1130:
1129:autopatrolled
1120:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1062:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:
982:
981:
977:
973:
968:
956:
951:
947:
942:
941:Fvasconcellos
938:
937:the Talk page
934:
930:
927:
926:
921:
920:
919:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
900:
899:
898:Fantasia 2000
892:
890:
889:
884:
883:
882:Fantasia 2000
878:
877:
871:
859:
855:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
835:
831:
826:
825:Fvasconcellos
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
802:
798:
795:
784:
783:
779:
775:
771:
766:
763:
759:
753:
749:
745:
735:
734:
730:
726:
722:
717:
713:
709:
705:
693:
688:
684:
679:
678:Fvasconcellos
675:
674:
673:
671:
667:
663:
662:HouseOfChange
659:
657:
649:
636:
632:
628:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
612:Fvasconcellos
610:
609:
608:
603:
599:
594:
593:Fvasconcellos
589:
586:
582:
578:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
539:
537:
533:
529:
525:
509:
505:
501:
498:
495:
494:
493:
492:
486:
484:
477:
476:
475:
474:
471:
466:
462:
457:
456:Fvasconcellos
453:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
429:
427:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
410:
405:
403:
394:
390:
387:
383:
379:
376:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
359:
357:
356:Fvasconcellos
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
317:
316:
311:
307:
302:
301:Fvasconcellos
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
189:
186:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
156:
154:
151:
149:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
122:
119:
118:
115:
110:
104:
100:
95:
94:
90:
79:
76:
73:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
2108:
2086:
2072:
2068:
2052:
2026:
1968:
1916:
1880:
1861:
1839:
1821:
1778:
1776:
1769:
1768:
1764:Did you know
1762:
1756:
1722:
1720:
1705:
1703:
1676:
1637:
1603:
1588:
1553:
1547:
1524:
1517:
1511:
1509:
1471:
1465:
1432:
1421:
1386:
1380:
1357:
1350:
1344:
1342:
1297:
1268:
1264:
1256:
1251:
1240:
1229:
1219:
1213:
1204:
1198:
1183:
1179:better tools
1174:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1146:, choose to
1133:
1093:
1087:
1064:
1058:
1052:
1015:
1013:
998:
996:
964:
945:
933:edit request
923:
907:
903:
896:
893:
886:
880:
874:
872:
869:
829:
803:
799:
790:
767:
741:
720:
701:
682:
660:
653:
597:
563:
548:this request
545:
522:— Preceding
519:
482:
460:
443:
413:
406:
398:
360:
352:
305:
278:
92:
86:
77:
2089:✠ SunDawn ✠
1785:East London
1555:voting page
1388:voting page
1216:Johan (WMF)
1148:self-assign
1095:voting page
885:instead of
363:insinuation
275:Juan Branco
63:protections
2034:Clovermoss
1892:article.
1842:RodRabelo7
1801:here's how
1539:topic bans
1372:topic bans
1079:topic bans
772:. Thanks,
756:(Read the
744:Respirator
392:of policy.
43:edit count
2095:(contact)
1777:... that
1535:site bans
1424:Semaxanib
1368:site bans
1190:subscribe
1181:to help.
1075:site bans
850:Adriaandh
806:Adriaandh
627:Walrus Ji
566:Walrus Ji
552:Walrus Ji
55:deletions
1723:articles
1483:Qwerfjkl
1199:We have
1016:articles
972:Ajpolino
524:unsigned
402:D.Lazard
367:D.Lazard
114:Archives
2059:SunDawn
2001:CtasACT
1984:CtasACT
1950:CtasACT
1932:CtasACT
1894:CtasACT
1598:at the
1562:NoACEMM
1476:on the
1439:DPL bot
1428:Hypoxia
1395:NoACEMM
1261:Levolet
1102:NoACEMM
774:DPL bot
724:Georgia
2041:(talk)
1885:&
1828:(talk)
967:PANDAS
748:Dräger
706:for a
454:Best,
386:harass
326:C.Fred
51:blocks
1731:B-bot
1437:.) --
1024:B-bot
721:Sandy
365:that
354:Dear
322:here)
59:moves
2029:here
2005:talk
1988:talk
1954:talk
1936:talk
1898:talk
1846:talk
1735:talk
1654:talk
1614:talk
1573:talk
1525:The
1488:talk
1443:talk
1406:talk
1358:The
1318:talk
1275:talk
1163:Hi!
1113:talk
1065:The
1028:talk
976:talk
913:talk
854:talk
810:talk
778:talk
729:Talk
716:here
666:talk
631:talk
583:and
570:talk
556:talk
532:talk
504:talk
444:that
419:talk
342:talk
334:here
330:this
286:talk
1824:PMC
1783:in
1757:On
1718:).
1430:.
1192:to
1011:).
935:at
758:FAQ
731:)
2115:Ed
2113:.
2077:.
2037:🍀
2007:)
1990:)
1956:)
1938:)
1910:.
1900:)
1848:)
1826:♠
1817:.
1803:,
1761:,
1737:)
1656:)
1648:!
1616:)
1575:)
1564:}}
1560:{{
1537:,
1445:)
1408:)
1397:}}
1393:{{
1370:,
1320:)
1277:)
1238:.
1196:.
1134:A
1115:)
1104:}}
1100:{{
1077:,
1030:)
978:)
915:)
856:)
812:)
780:)
764:.)
718:.
668:)
633:)
572:)
558:)
534:)
506:)
421:)
344:)
299:.
288:)
78:FV
61:·
57:·
53:·
49:·
45:·
2003:(
1996:@
1986:(
1975:)
1973:c
1971:·
1969:t
1967:(
1952:(
1944:@
1934:(
1923:)
1921:c
1919:·
1917:t
1915:(
1896:(
1868:)
1866:c
1864:·
1862:t
1860:(
1844:(
1822:♠
1807:)
1799:(
1791:?
1733:(
1700:⚠
1683:)
1681:c
1679:·
1677:t
1675:(
1666:@
1652:(
1612:(
1571:(
1441:(
1433:(
1404:(
1316:(
1304:)
1302:c
1300:·
1298:t
1296:(
1273:(
1111:(
1026:(
993:⚠
974:(
952:)
950:c
948:·
946:t
944:(
911:(
852:(
836:)
834:c
832:·
830:t
828:(
808:(
776:(
727:(
689:)
687:c
685:·
683:t
681:(
664:(
629:(
604:)
602:c
600:·
598:t
596:(
568:(
554:(
530:(
502:(
485:"
481:"
467:)
465:c
463:·
461:t
459:(
417:(
388:.
340:(
312:)
310:c
308:·
306:t
304:(
284:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
